Guilford Pharmaceuticals Announces Positive Phase II Clinical Trial Results of AQUAVAN(R) Injection
06 Noviembre 2003 - 8:48AM
PR Newswire (US)
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Announces Positive Phase II Clinical Trial
Results of AQUAVAN(R) Injection BALTIMORE, Nov. 6
/PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. announced
today that it has completed a preliminary analysis of results from
two Phase II clinical trials of AQUAVAN(R) Injection, a novel
sedative/hypnotic. The results from the Phase II studies suggest
that AQUAVAN(R) Injection provides rapid onset and rapid recovery
from sedation/anesthesia in a convenient dosing regimen and without
serious adverse effects. The first Phase II clinical trial was an
open label, multi-center, adaptive dose ranging study of AQUAVAN(R)
Injection, used in combination with fentanyl citrate, to provide
mild sedation in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. The
study enrolled healthy adults aged 18-60 undergoing elective
colonoscopy. A second dose-range finding study is ongoing in
patients aged 61-85. During the study, patients were pre-treated
with fentanyl citrate, an analgesic commonly used for pain relief
during brief diagnostic procedures. Five minutes after receiving
fentanyl, patients were given a bolus dose of AQUAVAN(R) Injection.
Three dose groups of AQUAVAN(R) Injection (7.5, 10, and 12.5 mg/kg)
and three dose groups of fentanyl (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 ug/kg) were
studied, resulting in a total of nine AQUAVAN(R) Injection/fentanyl
dose- combinations. Measurements of sedation were collected using
the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S)
scale. The desired sedative effect was defined as one that
consistently provided mild to moderate sedation, or an OAA/S score
of between 2 and 4. Patients were continuously monitored for
adverse events and vital signs throughout the study. Measurements
of safety, tolerability and patient and physician satisfaction were
also assessed. A total of 77 patients were enrolled and randomly
allocated to one of the nine AQUAVAN(R) Injection/fentanyl dose
groups. Following bolus administration of AQUAVAN(R) Injection, the
median time to achieve sedation was 2 minutes. The median time to
full alertness after removal of the colonoscope was 12 minutes, and
the median time to full recovery, defined as the ability to stand
and walk without instability or assistance, was 20 minutes.
Gastroenterologists rated 94% of patients as adequately sedated by
AQUAVAN(R) Injection for the duration of the procedure. The most
common adverse event experienced in the study was a transitory
itching or tingling sensation, often called paresthesias, reported
by 57% of patients. Of the patients reporting paresthesias, 76%
rated them as mild to moderate in severity. The paresthesias were
not considered a serious adverse event, and did not affect the
patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with the drug. Brief
episodes of apnea were reported in 4% of patients and successfully
treated with short-term supplemental oxygen. No patients required
respiratory support or endotracheal intubation. There was no pain
at the injection site reported, and no episodes of hypotension
requiring medical treatment were observed. Following the procedure,
the majority of patients and physicians reported a high level of
satisfaction with AQUAVAN(R) Injection. In the study, 98% of
patients responding indicated they would use the drug again. On a
scale of 0 to 100 (100 representing highly satisfied and 0
representing dissatisfied), 82% of patients rated their experience
higher than 90 and 52% rated their experience at 99.
Gastroenterologists rated 98% of the patients' experiences as good
to excellent and 100% of the ratings by gastroenterologists
indicated they would use AQUAVAN(R) Injection again for these
patients. In summary, the results of this study suggest that
AQUAVAN has an ideal profile for use in patients receiving
conscious sedation. During the study, the desired level of sedation
was quickly achieved with a simple single bolus injection and was
optimal for the duration of a colonoscopy procedure. In most
patients given doses in the range of 800 mg, a single bolus
injection was adequate for the entire procedure. Importantly,
patients woke up quickly after the procedure, had a feeling of mild
euphoria and left the endoscopy suite quickly, alert and able to
follow post-operative instructions. This result is in stark
contrast to patients receiving midazolam who often take an hour or
more to recover after the procedure, have post-procedure amnesia
and leave the endoscopy suite feeling lethargic. Dr. Ron Pruitt,
President and Medical Director, Nashville Medical Research
Institute, Chairman of Gastroenterology, Saint Thomas Hospital,
Nashville, Tennessee and an investigator in the study, commented,
"Our experience with AQUAVAN(R) Injection suggests that it has an
ideal profile for use in providing mild to moderate sedation in
patients undergoing elective procedures such as colonoscopy. With
AQUAVAN(R) Injection, the desired level of sedation was more
rapidly achieved and was optimal for the duration of the procedure.
As well, unlike patients treated with midazolam or other
medications typically used in this setting, patients receiving
AQUAVAN(R) Injection leave the endoscopy suite clear-headed and
able to follow post-operative instructions. I am very impressed by
the emerging pharmacological profile of AQUAVAN(R) Injection and
look forward to continued clinical development of this product."
Guilford is also reporting results from a second Phase II clinical
trial of AQUAVAN(R) Injection. The goal of the second Phase II
clinical study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and
efficacy of AQUAVAN(R) Injection, compared to DISOPRIVAN(R)
Injectable Emulsion, for use in pre-operative sedation, anesthesia
induction and maintenance, and post-operative ICU sedation in
patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A total of
sixteen patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were
randomized to receive either AQUAVAN(R) Injection or DISOPRIVAN(R)
Injectable Emulsion as the sedative/hypnotic component of a
balanced anesthetic regimen. Both sedatives were delivered by
target-controlled infusion to provide total intravenous anesthesia
for the duration of the patient's sedation. Efficacy measures in
the study included the overall quality of sedation and quality of
anesthesia induction and maintenance as assessed by the
anesthesiologist, and the ease of control of anesthesia before and
during surgery. In addition, various hemodynamic measures,
including blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate were
continuously assessed throughout the study. While the number of
patients enrolled in the study was small, AQUAVAN(R) Injection
compared very favorably to DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion. All
patients enrolled in the study completed the procedure without
requiring the use of other anesthetic agents. No serious adverse
events were attributed to AQUAVAN(R) Injection during the study.
The average procedure times for AQUAVAN(R) Injection were
comparable to DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion, and time to loss
of consciousness was similar. For DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion
the average time to loss of consciousness was 2.6 minutes, while
for AQUAVAN(R) Injection it was 3.1 minutes. The average time
required for intubation was the same, approximately 9.9 minutes for
DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion compared to 9.5 minutes for
AQUAVAN(R) Injection, as was the duration of the surgical procedure
(3.75 hours for DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion compared to 3.73
hours for AQUAVAN(R) Injection). Post-operative sedation time was 2
hours for both DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion and AQUAVAN(R)
Injection. Patients received a mean AQUAVAN(R) Injection dose of
5.3 grams during the complete sedation which lasted a mean time of
6.9 hours. The number of interventions (concomitant medication,
decrease or increase in anesthesia) was similar for both
DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion and AQUAVAN(R) Injection. There
were no drug-related serious adverse events in either the
AQUAVAN(R) Injection or the DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable Emulsion
treatment group. Adverse events considered to be drug related were
mild paresthesias in the AQUAVAN(R) Injection group and mild to
moderate injection site pain in the DISOPRIVAN(R) Injectable
Emulsion group. The results of this study demonstrated that
AQUAVAN(R) Injection could be used to provide total intravenous
anesthesia for complex medical and surgical procedures in high-risk
patients. "After using AQUAVAN(R) Injection for cardiovascular
surgery, I was pleased with the lack of pain on injection and lipid
free formulation, characteristics that are markedly different from
propofol. In addition, I was pleasantly surprised to see AQUAVAN(R)
Injection's speed of onset, potency and fast recovery, which were
comparable with propofol. These properties favor AQUAVAN(R)
Injection as a useful drug for anesthesia induction and maintenance
and sedation in general. These characteristics are clear
advantages. In view of the hemodynamic profile of AQUAVAN(R)
Injection and based on our experience with a small number of
patients in a surgical setting, we anticipate that this product may
be also used safely for mild to moderate sedation in brief medical
procedures," commented Jurgen Schuttler, M.D., Professor and
Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology, University of
Erlanger-Nuremberg, Germany. Craig Smith, M.D., Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Guilford, remarked, "Our clinical
results with AQUAVAN(R) Injection continue to be very promising and
suggest important utility for AQUAVAN(R) Injection in potentially
diverse medical settings. Guilford's objective is to develop
AQUAVAN(R) Injection initially for use in conscious sedation. Our
next step is to conduct an open label study of the optimal dose
combination of AQUAVAN(R) Injection and fentanyl identified in the
current Phase II setting. In this confirmatory study, AQUAVAN(R)
Injection will be administered by nurses without the presence of an
anesthesiologist." About AQUAVAN(R) Injection AQUAVAN(R) Injection
is a proprietary water-soluble prodrug of propofol exclusively
licensed by Guilford from ProQuest Pharmaceuticals. Unlike
propofol, which is formulated in an oil or lipid-based emulsion,
AQUAVAN(R) Injection is formulated in a clear aqueous solution and
is rapidly converted by an enzyme in the body called alkaline
phosphatase into propofol after intravenous injection. Because of
its water-soluble formulation and unique properties, Guilford
anticipates that AQUAVAN(R) Injection may minimize or obviate many
of the side effects associated with current sedatives and
anesthetics. Contact: Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. Stacey
Jurchison 410.631.5022 This press release contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including those
described in the section entitled "Risk Factors" contained in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 11,
2003, that could cause the Company's actual results and experience
to differ materially from anticipated results and expectations
expressed in these forward-looking statements. Among other things,
there can be no assurance that AQUAVAN(R) Injection will continue
to advance through clinical development or receive regulatory
approval for commercialization either in the United States or in
international markets. DATASOURCE: Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.
CONTACT: Stacey Jurchison, Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
+1-410-631-5022 Web site: http://www.guilfordpharm.com/ Company
News On-Call: http://www.prnewswire.com/comp/112882.html
Copyright
Guilford (NASDAQ:GLFD)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
Guilford (NASDAQ:GLFD)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024