MYL Mylan NV

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 12, 2020

Building 4, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, England

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +44 (0) 1707-853-000

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.12b-2).

Emerging growth company  ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

In connection with the planned combination of Pfizer Inc.’s (“Pfizer”) global, primarily off-patent branded and generic established medicines business (the “Upjohn Business”) and Mylan N.V. (“Mylan”), Mylan is filing this current report on Form 8-K (this “Current Report”) to provide the following information: (i) the unaudited condensed combined financial statements and related notes of the Upjohn Business as of March 29, 2020 and for the three months ended March 29, 2020 and March 31, 2019, which is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report, (ii) management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Upjohn Business, which is filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report and (iii) the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information of Mylan and the Upjohn Business as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is filed as Exhibit 99.3 to this Current Report. Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 to this Current Report are excerpted from the Registration Statement on Form 10, which includes an information statement (the “Form 10”), filed by Upjohn Inc. (“Newco”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 12, 2020, and are incorporated by reference into this Item 8.01.

2

Forward-Looking Statements

This communication contains “forward-looking statements”. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements about the proposed combination of Newco and Mylan, which will immediately follow the proposed separation of the Upjohn Business from Pfizer (the “proposed transaction”), the expected timetable for completing the proposed transaction, the benefits and synergies of the proposed transaction, future opportunities for the combined company and products and any other statements regarding Pfizer’s, Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s or the combined company’s future operations, financial or operating results, capital allocation, dividend policy, debt ratio, anticipated business levels, future earnings, planned activities, anticipated growth, market opportunities, strategies, competitions, and other expectations and targets for future periods. Forward-looking statements may often be identified by the use of words such as “will”, “may”, “could”, “should”, “would”, “project”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “plan”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “potential”, “pipeline”, “intend”, “continue”, “target”, “seek” and variations of these words or comparable words. Because forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties, actual future results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to: ongoing challenges and uncertainties posed by the COVID-19 pandemic for businesses and governments around the world; the parties’ ability to meet expectations regarding the timing, completion and accounting and tax treatments of the proposed transaction; changes in relevant tax and other laws; the parties’ ability to consummate the proposed transaction; the conditions to the completion of the proposed transaction, including receipt of approval of Mylan’s shareholders, not being satisfied or waived on the anticipated timeframe or at all; the regulatory approvals required for the proposed transaction not being obtained on the terms expected or on the anticipated schedule or at all; inherent uncertainties involved in the estimates and judgments used in the preparation of financial statements and the providing of estimates of financial measures, in accordance with U.S. GAAP and related standards or on an adjusted basis; the integration of Mylan and the Upjohn Business being more difficult, time consuming or costly than expected; Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s and the combined company’s failure to achieve expected or targeted future financial and operating performance and results; the possibility that the combined company may be unable to achieve expected benefits, synergies and operating efficiencies in connection with the proposed transaction within the expected time frames or at all or to successfully integrate Mylan and the Upjohn Business; customer loss and business disruption being greater than expected following the proposed transaction; the retention of key employees being more difficult following the proposed transaction; Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s or the combined company’s liquidity, capital resources and ability to obtain financing; any regulatory, legal or other impediments to Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s or the combined company’s ability to bring new products to market, including but not limited to where Mylan, the Upjohn Business or the combined company uses its business judgment and decides to manufacture, market and/or sell products, directly or through third parties, notwithstanding the fact that allegations of patent infringement(s) have not been finally resolved by the courts (i.e., an “at-risk launch”); success of clinical trials and Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s or the combined company’s ability to execute on new product opportunities; any changes in or difficulties with Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s or the combined company’s manufacturing facilities, including with respect to remediation and restructuring activities, supply chain or inventory or the ability to meet anticipated demand; the scope, timing and outcome of any ongoing legal proceedings, including government investigations, and the impact of any such proceedings on Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s or the combined company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows; Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s and the combined company’s ability to protect their respective intellectual property and preserve their respective intellectual property rights; the effect of any changes in customer and supplier relationships and customer purchasing patterns; the ability to attract and retain key personnel; changes in third-party relationships; actions and decisions of healthcare and pharmaceutical regulators; the impacts of competition; changes in the economic and financial conditions of the Upjohn Business or the business of Mylan or the combined company; the impact of outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic; uncertainties regarding future demand, pricing and reimbursement for Mylan’s, the Upjohn Business’s or the combined company’s products; and uncertainties and matters beyond the control of management and other factors described under “Risk Factors” in each of Pfizer’s, Newco’s and Mylan’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the SEC. These risks, as well as other risks associated with Mylan, the Upjohn Business, the combined

3

company and the proposed transaction are also more fully discussed in the Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, which includes a proxy statement/prospectus (as amended, the “Form S-4”), which was filed by Newco with the SEC on October 25, 2019 and declared effective by the SEC on February 13, 2020, the Form 10, which has been filed by Newco with the SEC on June 12, 2020 and has not yet been declared effective, a definitive proxy statement, which was filed by Mylan with the SEC on February 13, 2020 (the “Proxy Statement”), and a prospectus, which was filed by Newco with the SEC on February 13, 2020 (the “Prospectus”). You can access Pfizer’s, Mylan’s and Newco’s filings with the SEC through the SEC website at www.sec.gov or through Pfizer’s or Mylan’s website, as applicable, and Pfizer and Mylan strongly encourage you to do so. Except as required by applicable law, Pfizer, Mylan and Newco undertake no obligation to update any statements herein for revisions or changes after this communication is made.

Additional Information and Where to Find It

This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offer of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection with the proposed transaction, Newco and Mylan have filed certain materials with the SEC, including, among other materials, the Form S-4, Form 10 and Prospectus filed by Newco and the Proxy Statement filed by Mylan. The Form S-4 was declared effective on February 13, 2020 and the Proxy Statement and the Prospectus were first mailed to shareholders of Mylan on or about February 14, 2020 to seek approval of the proposed transaction. The Form 10 has not yet become effective. After the Form 10 is effective, a definitive information statement will be made available to the Pfizer stockholders relating to the proposed transaction. Newco and Mylan intend to file additional relevant materials with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT MYLAN, NEWCO AND THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION. The documents relating to the proposed transaction (when they are available) can be obtained free of charge from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. These documents (when they are available) can also be obtained free of charge from Mylan, upon written request to Mylan or by contacting Mylan at (724) 514-1813 or investor.relations@mylan.com or from Pfizer on Pfizer’s internet website at https://investors.Pfizer.com/financials/sec-filings/default.aspx or by contacting Pfizer’s Investor Relations Department at (212) 733-2323, as applicable.

Participants in the Solicitation

This communication is not a solicitation of a proxy from any investor or security holder. However, Pfizer, Mylan, Newco and certain of their respective directors and executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed transaction under the rules of the SEC. Information about the directors and executive officers of Newco following the completion of the proposed transaction may be found in the Form S-4, the Proxy Statement and the Prospectus, and Pfizer’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2020. Information about the directors and executive officers of Pfizer may be found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2020 and its definitive proxy statement relating to its 2020 Annual Meeting filed with the SEC on March 13, 2020, as supplemented by its supplement to the proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 7, 2020. Information about the directors and executive officers of Mylan may be found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2020, as amended on April 29, 2020, and its definitive proxy statement relating to its 2020 Annual General Meeting filed with the SEC on June 8, 2020. Additional information regarding the interests of these participants can also be found in the Form S-4, the Proxy Statement and the Prospectus. These documents can be obtained free of charge from the sources indicated above.

4

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit 15.1

June 12, 2020

Pfizer Inc.

New York, New York

Re: Registration Statement No. 333-234337

With respect to the subject registration statement and the proxy statement/prospectus that forms a part thereof, we acknowledge our awareness of the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated June 12, 2020 related to our review of interim financial information, which report appears in the Form 8-K of Mylan N.V. dated June 12, 2020.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York

Exhibit 99.1

INDEX – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements

F-1

Independent Auditors’ Review Report

The Board of Directors of Pfizer Inc.:

Report on the Financial Statements

We have reviewed the condensed combined financial statements of Upjohn (a business unit of Pfizer Inc.), which comprise the condensed combined balance sheet as of March 29, 2020, and the related condensed combined statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 29, 2020 and March 31, 2019.

Management’s Responsibility

The Company’s management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the condensed financial information in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this responsibility includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control sufficient to provide a reasonable basis for the preparation and fair presentation of interim financial information in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to conduct our reviews in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to reviews of interim financial information and in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and in accordance with the auditing standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial information. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Conclusion

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed combined financial information referred to above for it to be in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Report on Condensed Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and in accordance with the auditing standards of the PCAOB, the combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2019, and the related combined statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (presented elsewhere in this document); and we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those audited combined financial statements in our report dated March 20, 2020. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed combined balance sheet of Upjohn as of December 31, 2019 is consistent, in all material respects, with the audited combined financial statements from which it has been derived.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York

June 12, 2020

F-2

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

F-3

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

F-4

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

F-5

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

F-6

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

F-7

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Business Description and Basis of Presentation

A. Business Description

Upjohn (collectively, Upjohn, the Upjohn Business, the business, the company, we, us and our) is a business unit of Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer). We are a China-based global pharmaceutical company with a portfolio of well-established, primarily off-patent branded and generic medicines, including Lyrica, Lipitor, Norvasc, Celebrex and Viagra, as well as a U.S.-based generics platform, Greenstone. Our pharmaceutical products are used to treat non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We commercialize, manufacture and develop pharmaceutical products across a broad range of therapeutic areas, including cardiovascular, pain and neurology, psychiatry, urology and ophthalmology. The accompanying condensed combined financial statements include the accounts of all operations that comprise the Upjohn operations of Pfizer.

On January 23, 2020, Upjohn China entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Shanghai Minghui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Minghui) from Shanghai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which is a state-owned enterprise in China. After the completion of a listing and bidding process, Upjohn agreed to acquire Minghui for 40 million renminbi (RMB) (approximately $5 million, net of cash acquired of approximately $1 million). In February 2020, Upjohn remitted the total purchase price to SUAEE, the institution managing the listing and bidding process. The closing conditions provided in the transaction documents have been met. Minghui obtained a new business license in April 2020 under which Upjohn Hong Kong is registered as the sole shareholder of Minghui. Minghui’s drug distribution license and good supply practices certification in China have also been updated to reflect such change in ownership. The acquisition of Minghui was accounted for by Upjohn as the acquisition of a group of assets rather than the acquisition of a business. In connection with this asset acquisition, we recorded $5 million in Identifiable intangible assets, consisting of a licensing agreement—see Note 9A.

On July 29, 2019, Pfizer announced it had entered into a definitive agreement to combine Upjohn with Mylan N.V. (Mylan), creating a new global pharmaceutical company. The name of the new company to be formed by the planned combination of the Upjohn Business and Mylan will be “Viatris.” Under the terms of the agreement, which is structured as an all-stock, Reverse Morris Trust transaction, Pfizer will contribute the Upjohn Business to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Upjohn Inc. (Newco) and distribute its ownership interest in Newco to Pfizer shareholders via either a spin-off or a split-off (the Distribution). Pfizer intends to effect the Distribution by way of a spin-off. Newco will issue $12 billion of debt in connection with its separation from Pfizer, and, at or prior to the Distribution, Newco will make a cash payment to Pfizer equal to $12 billion as partial consideration for the contribution of the Upjohn Business from Pfizer to Newco. Immediately after the Distribution, Newco will be combined with Mylan. Pfizer shareholders would own 57% of the combined new company and former Mylan shareholders would own 43% on a fully diluted basis. The transaction is generally expected to be tax free to Pfizer and Pfizer shareholders and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2020, subject to Mylan shareholder approval and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals.

Pfizer, the Upjohn Business and Mylan are in the process of negotiating the terms on which Pfizer would transfer its Meridian Medical Technologies business (Meridian), the manufacturer of EpiPen^® and other auto-injector products, and/or certain Pfizer assets that currently form part of a pre-existing strategic collaboration between Pfizer and Mylan for generic drugs in Japan (Mylan-Japan collaboration) to Viatris following the completion of the proposed combination of the Upjohn Business and Mylan. There can be no assurance that any agreement or transaction will result from these negotiations and if the parties are unsuccessful in their efforts to negotiate the terms of such potential transactions, Meridian and/or the Pfizer assets that currently form part of the Mylan-Japan collaboration will remain with Pfizer. The Upjohn Business’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows presented in these condensed combined financial statements and notes thereto do not include the results of operations, assets and liabilities or cash flows of Meridian and the Mylan-Japan collaboration.

F-8

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

B. Basis of Presentation

We prepared the accompanying condensed combined financial statements following the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) can be condensed or omitted.

The financial information included in our condensed combined financial statements for subsidiaries operating outside the U.S. is as of and for the three months ended February 23, 2020 and February 24, 2019. The financial information included in our condensed combined financial statements for U.S. subsidiaries is as of and for the three months ended March 29, 2020 and March 31, 2019. All significant intercompany balances and transactions among the legal entities that comprise Upjohn have been eliminated. Balances due from or due to Pfizer that are expected to be cash-settled, if any, are included, depending on the nature of the balance, in Other current assets, Other noncurrent assets, Other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities on the condensed combined balance sheets. All balances and transactions among Upjohn and Pfizer that are not cash-settled are shown as part of Business unit equity on the condensed combined balance sheets and represent the net of amounts settled without payment (to)/from Pfizer. For additional information about balances and transactions among Upjohn and Pfizer, see Note 15.

Revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities can vary during each quarter of the year. Therefore, the results and trends in these interim financial statements may not be representative of those for the full year.

We are responsible for the unaudited condensed combined financial statements included in this document. The interim financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments that are considered necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position and operating results. The information included in these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the combined financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2019 included elsewhere in this document.

Certain amounts in the condensed combined financial statements and associated notes may not add due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts.

As of January 1, 2020, we adopted four new accounting standards. See Note 2A for further information.

The condensed combined financial statements have been derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of Pfizer and include allocations for direct costs and indirect costs attributable to the operations of the Upjohn Business of Pfizer. As part of a Pfizer reorganization beginning in 2019, Upjohn was positioned as a standalone division within Pfizer with distinct and dedicated manufacturing, marketing and other commercial activities, research, development, medical, regulatory and limited enabling functions. As a result, many of the costs for certain support functions that, prior to 2019, were provided to Upjohn on a centralized basis within Pfizer are, beginning in 2019, incurred directly by Upjohn.

These condensed combined financial statements do not purport to reflect what the results of operations, comprehensive income, financial position, equity or cash flows would have been had we operated as an independent standalone company during the periods presented.

F-9

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-10

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management believes that the allocations are a reasonable reflection of the services received or the costs incurred on behalf of Upjohn and its operations and that the condensed combined statements of income reflect all costs of the Upjohn Business of Pfizer.

The allocated expenses from Pfizer primarily include:

F-11

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The income tax provision/(benefit) in the condensed combined statements of income for the three months ended March 29, 2020 and March 31, 2019 has been calculated as if Upjohn filed a tax return separate from Pfizer in the various jurisdictions where it does business.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

A. Adoption of New Accounting Standards

On January 1, 2020, we adopted four new accounting standards.

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments—We adopted a new accounting standard for credit losses on financial instruments, which replaces the probable initial recognition threshold for incurred loss estimates under prior guidance with a methodology that reflects expected credit loss estimates. The standard generally impacts financial assets that have a contractual right to receive cash and are not accounted for at fair value through net income, such as accounts receivable and held-to-maturity debt securities. The new guidance requires us to identify, analyze, document and support new methodologies for quantifying expected credit loss estimates for certain financial instruments, using information such as historical experience, current economic conditions and information, and the use of reasonable and supportable forecasted information. The standard also amends existing impairment guidance for available-for-sale debt securities to incorporate a credit loss allowance and allows for reversals of credit impairments in the event the issuer’s credit improves.

We adopted the new accounting standard utilizing the modified retrospective method, and therefore, no adjustments were made to amounts in our prior period financial statements. The cumulative effect of adopting the standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of Business unit equity was not material. The impact of adoption did not have a material impact on our condensed combined statement of income or condensed combined statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 29, 2020, nor on our condensed combined balance sheet as of March 29, 2020. For additional information, see Note 2B.

F-12

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Goodwill Impairment Testing—We prospectively adopted the new accounting standard, which eliminates the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. Under the new guidance, the goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. There was no impact to our condensed combined financial statements from the adoption of this new standard.

Implementation Costs in a Cloud Computing Arrangement—We prospectively adopted the new accounting standard related to customers’ accounting for implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is considered a service contract. The new guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. There was no material impact to our condensed combined financial statements from the adoption of this new standard.

Collaboration Agreements—We prospectively adopted the new accounting standard, which provides new guidance clarifying the interaction between the accounting for collaborative arrangements and revenue from contracts with customers. There was no impact to our condensed combined financial statements from the adoption of this new standard.

On January 1, 2019, we adopted a new accounting standard for lease accounting. For additional information, see Notes to Combined Financial Statements—Note 3A. Significant Accounting Policies: Adoption of New Accounting Standard included in our combined financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2019 included elsewhere in this document.

B. Revenues and Trade Accounts Receivable

Our accruals for Medicare rebates, Medicaid and related state program rebates, performance-based contract rebates, chargebacks, sales allowances and sales returns and cash discounts totaled $1.4 billion as of March 29, 2020 and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2019.

The following table provides information about the balance sheet classification of these accruals:

Trade Accounts Receivable—Trade accounts receivable are stated at their net realizable value. The allowance for credit losses against gross trade accounts receivable reflects the best estimate of expected credit losses of the receivables portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, current information, and forecasts of future economic conditions. In developing the estimate for expected credit losses, trade accounts receivables are segmented into pools of assets depending on market (U.S. versus international), delinquency status, and customer type (high risk versus low risk and government versus non-government), and fixed reserve percentages are established for each pool of trade accounts receivables.

In determining the reserve percentages for each pool of trade accounts receivables, we considered our historical experience with certain customers and customer types, regulatory and legal environments, country and

F-13

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

political risk, and other relevant current and future forecasted macroeconomic factors. These credit risk indicators are monitored on a quarterly basis to determine whether there have been any changes in the economic environment that would indicate the established reserve percentages should be adjusted and are considered on a regional basis to reflect more geographic-specific metrics. Additionally, write-offs and recoveries of customer receivables are tracked against collections on a quarterly basis to determine whether the reserve percentages remain appropriate. When management becomes aware of certain customer-specific factors that impact credit risk, specific allowances for these known troubled accounts are recorded. Trade accounts receivable are written off after all reasonable means to collect the full amount (including litigation, where appropriate) have been exhausted.

During the first quarter of 2020, additions to the allowance for credit losses, write-offs and recoveries of customer receivables were not material to our condensed combined financial statements.

Amounts recorded for revenue deductions can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions.

Note 3. Restructuring Charges/(Credits) and Other Costs Associated with Cost-Reduction/Productivity Initiatives

The condensed combined statements of income include costs associated with Pfizer’s cost-reduction/productivity initiatives. The expenses include direct costs and charges as well as an allocation of indirect costs and charges that have been deemed attributable to Upjohn. The condensed combined balance sheets reflect the accrued restructuring charges directly attributable to the Upjohn operations. In connection with our cost-reduction/productivity initiatives, we typically incur costs and charges associated with site closings and other facility rationalization actions, workforce reductions and the expansion of shared services, including the development of global systems. All operating functions may be impacted by these actions, including sales and marketing, manufacturing and research and development, as well as groups such as worldwide technology, shared services and corporate operations.

2017-2019 Initiatives and Organizing for Growth

During 2018, Pfizer reviewed its business operations and determined that, at the start of its 2019 fiscal year, Pfizer would begin operating under a new commercial structure, which reorganized Pfizer operations into three businesses – Biopharma, a science-based innovative medicines business; Upjohn; and a Consumer Healthcare business. As part of a Pfizer reorganization beginning in 2019, Upjohn was positioned as a standalone division within Pfizer with distinct and dedicated manufacturing, marketing and other commercial activities, research, development, medical, regulatory and limited enabling functions, which better enables us to optimize our growth potential. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, Pfizer reviewed previously planned initiatives and new initiatives and combined the 2017-2019 initiatives with its Organizing for Growth initiatives to form one cohesive plan. Initiatives for the combined program include activities related to the optimization of the Pfizer manufacturing plant network, the centralization of Pfizer corporate and platform functions, and the simplification and optimization of the operating business structure and functions that support them.

Through March 29, 2020, we have incurred cumulative direct restructuring charges (primarily related to employee termination costs) and implementation costs associated with the combined program of 2017-2019 initiatives and Organizing for Growth initiatives of approximately $159 million. In the first three months of 2020, we incurred total direct restructuring charges and implementation costs of $18 million. We expect to incur approximately $8 million of additional direct, mostly cash, restructuring charges and implementation costs primarily over the remainder of 2020 and into 2021 to complete activities associated with the combined program of cost-reduction initiatives.

F-14

F-15

F-16

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5. Tax Matters

A. Taxes on Income

During the periods presented in the condensed combined financial statements, Upjohn did not generally file separate tax returns, as Upjohn was generally included in the tax grouping of other Pfizer entities within the respective entity’s tax jurisdiction. The income tax provision included in these condensed combined financial statements has been calculated using the separate return basis, as if Upjohn filed a separate tax return.

Our effective tax rate for income was 11.7% for the first three months of 2020, compared to 12.8% for the first three months of 2019.

The lower effective tax rate for the first three months of 2020 in comparison with the same period in 2019 was primarily due to:

partially offset by

Our estimated $4.3 billion repatriation liability on accumulated post-1986 foreign earnings as of December 31, 2019, for which we elected, with the filing of our 2018 U.S. Federal Consolidated Income Tax Return, payment over eight years through 2026, is reported in Income taxes payable ($320 million) and the remaining liability is reported in Other taxes payable in our condensed combined balance sheet as of March 29, 2020. We expect to pay the second installment of $320 million in July 2020, which was originally due to be paid in April 2020 but was recently extended to July 2020 by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in response to the pandemic resulting from a novel disease caused by a strain of coronavirus (COVID-19). Our obligations may vary as a result of changes in our uncertain tax positions and/or availability of attributes such as foreign tax and other credit carryforwards.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was signed into law in the U.S. to provide certain relief as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, governments around the world have enacted or implemented various forms of tax relief measures in response to the economic conditions in the wake of COVID-19. As of March 29, 2020, neither the CARES Act nor changes to income tax laws or regulations in other jurisdictions had a significant impact on our effective tax rate.

B. Tax Contingencies

We are subject to income tax in many jurisdictions, and a certain degree of estimation is required in recording the assets and liabilities related to income taxes. All our tax positions are subject to audit by the local

F-17

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

taxing authorities in each tax jurisdiction. These tax audits can involve complex issues, interpretations and judgments, and the resolution of matters may span multiple years, particularly if subject to negotiation or litigation. Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but our estimates of unrecognized tax benefits and potential tax benefits may not be representative of actual outcomes, and variation from such estimates could materially affect our financial statements in the period of settlement or when the statutes of limitations expire, as we treat these events as discrete items in the period of resolution.

The U.S. is one of our major tax jurisdictions, and we are regularly audited by the IRS. Tax years 2011-2015 are currently under audit. Tax years 2016-2020 are open but not under audit. All other tax years are closed.

In addition to the open audit years in the U.S., we have open audit years in other major tax jurisdictions, such as Asia (2009-2020, primarily reflecting Japan, China and Singapore), Canada (2013-2020), Europe (2011-2020, primarily reflecting Ireland, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain and Germany), Latin America (1998-2020, primarily reflecting Brazil) and Puerto Rico (2015-2020).

F-18

Note 7. Financial Instruments

The condensed combined balance sheets include the financial assets and liabilities that are directly attributable to Upjohn—see Note 1B.

Financial Assets and Liabilities

As of March 29, 2020 and December 31, 2019, financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable.

The recorded amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Note 9. Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The condensed combined balance sheets include all of the goodwill and identifiable intangible assets directly attributable to Upjohn. The condensed combined statements of income include all of the amortization expense associated with finite-lived identifiable intangible assets.

F-19

Amortization

Total amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets was $36 million in the first three months of 2020 and $39 million in the first three months of 2019.

F-20

F-21

F-22

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 12. Benefit Plans

The condensed combined statements of income include benefit plan expenses attributable to Upjohn, including expenses associated with defined benefit and defined contribution plans, as well as other postretirement plans, consisting primarily of retiree medical benefits. The expenses include allocations of direct expenses as well as expenses that have been deemed attributable to the Upjohn operations.

The condensed combined statements of income include the net periodic pension and postretirement costs associated with plans sponsored by Upjohn (service cost component is for the Upjohn participants only). Net periodic pension and postretirement costs other than service costs are recognized, as required, in Other (income)/deductions—net. Net periodic pension and postretirement service costs for the Upjohn participants only are recognized, as required, in Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses and Research and development expenses, as appropriate.

The condensed combined balance sheets include the pension and postretirement benefit plan assets and liabilities of only those plans or arrangements sponsored by Upjohn. Pension benefit obligations, net at March 29, 2020 include an actuarial loss of $85 million in the three months ended March 29, 2020, resulting from a remeasurement of the Upjohn sponsored pension plan in Puerto Rico, which is recorded in Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax. There was no change in the plan’s expected rate of return on assets for full year 2020 as a result of the remeasurement. As of March 29, 2020, Upjohn is the sponsor of pension plans, primarily in Puerto Rico, Japan, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, Italy, South Korea, Mexico, the Philippines, Greece, Thailand, China, Germany, France and Kuwait, among other countries. In 2020, there are newly formed pension plans in Mexico for participants who previously participated in plans sponsored by Pfizer. The newly formed pension plans are partially funded and have aggregate net pension liabilities of approximately $1.8 million included in Pension benefit obligations, net ($1.7 million) and Accrued compensation and related items ($0.2 million) in the condensed combined balance sheet at March 29, 2020. Upjohn is the sponsor of one postretirement plan in Puerto Rico. Included in certain of the Upjohn sponsored plans are both Upjohn and non-Upjohn Pfizer participants. The condensed combined balance sheets at March 29, 2020 and December 31, 2019 reflect the pension plan assets and pension and postretirement plan obligations associated with the non-Upjohn Pfizer active plan participants and inactive members as follows:

F-23

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Many of our employees participate in benefit plans sponsored by Pfizer. The condensed combined statements of income include the service cost associated with direct Upjohn employees participating in plans sponsored by Pfizer as well as an allocation of service cost that has been deemed attributable to Upjohn operations. The condensed combined balance sheets do not include benefit plan assets and liabilities associated with Upjohn employees participating in plans that are not sponsored by Upjohn. Service costs are recognized, as required, in Cost of sales, Selling, informational and administrative expenses and Research and development expenses, as appropriate. The projected benefit obligation associated with direct Upjohn employees participating in plans sponsored by Pfizer that is not included in the condensed combined balance sheets but may be required by law in certain jurisdictions to transfer upon a separation of Upjohn from Pfizer was approximately $112 million at March 29, 2020. There are approximately $67 million of assets associated with these obligations at March 29, 2020.

A. Pension and Postretirement Plans

Pension expense/(income) associated with the U.S. and international locations is included in the condensed combined statements of income as follows:

Postretirement expense/(income) associated with the U.S. and international locations is included in the condensed combined statements of income as follows:

F-24

The following table provides the amounts contributed, and the amounts expected to be contributed during 2020, to the Upjohn sponsored pension and postretirement plans from general assets for the periods indicated:

Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies

Upjohn is subject to numerous contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business, including but not limited to those discussed below. For a discussion of our tax contingencies, see Note 5B.

A. Legal Proceedings

Our non-tax contingencies can include, but are not limited to, the following:

F-25

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Certain of these contingencies could result in losses, including damages, fines and/or civil penalties, which could be substantial, and/or criminal charges.

We believe that our claims and defenses in these matters are substantial, but litigation is inherently unpredictable and excessive verdicts do occur. We could incur judgments, enter into settlements or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of certain matters, and such developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the amounts are accrued and/or our cash flows in the period in which the amounts are paid.

We have accrued for losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable. Substantially all of our contingencies are subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining the likelihood of a loss and/or the measurement of any loss can be complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts accrued. Our assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on estimates and assumptions that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change those estimates and assumptions.

Amounts recorded for legal and environmental contingencies can result from a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions.

The principal pending matters to which we are a party are discussed below. In determining whether a pending matter is a principal matter, we consider both quantitative and qualitative factors in order to assess materiality, such as, among other things, the amount of damages and the nature of any other relief sought in the proceeding, if such damages and other relief are specified; our view of the merits of the claims and of the strength of our defenses; whether the action purports to be, or is, a class action and, if not certified, our view of the likelihood that a class will be certified by the court; the jurisdiction in which the proceeding is pending; whether related actions have been transferred to a multi-district litigation; any experience that we or, to our knowledge, other companies have had in similar proceedings; whether disclosure of the action would be important to a reader of our financial statements, including whether disclosure might change a reader’s judgment about our financial statements in light of all of the information that is available to the reader; the potential impact of the proceeding on our reputation; and the extent of public interest in the matter. In addition, with respect to patent matters in which we are the plaintiff, we consider, among other things, the financial significance of the product protected by the patent. As a result of considering qualitative factors in our determination of principal matters, there are some matters discussed below with respect to which management believes that the likelihood of possible loss in excess of amounts accrued is remote.

A1. Legal Proceedings––Patent Litigation

Like other pharmaceutical companies, we are involved in numerous suits relating to our patents, including but not limited to those discussed below. Most of the suits involve claims by generic drug manufacturers that patents covering our products, processes or dosage forms are invalid and/or do not cover the product of the generic drug manufacturer. Also, counterclaims, as well as various independent actions, have been filed alleging that our assertions of, or attempts to enforce, patent rights with respect to certain products constitute unfair competition and/or violations of antitrust laws. Patent rights to certain of our products are being challenged in various jurisdictions throughout the world. We are also party to patent damages suits in various jurisdictions pursuant to which generic drug manufacturers, payers, governments or other parties are seeking damages from us for allegedly causing delay of generic entry. We also may be involved in other proceedings, such as inter partes review, post-grant review, re-examination or opposition proceedings, before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the European Patent Office, or other foreign counterparts relating to our intellectual property or the intellectual property rights of others. Also, if one of our patents is found to be invalid by such proceedings, generic or competitive products could be introduced into the market resulting in the erosion of sales of our

F-26

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

existing products. We are also subject to patent litigation pursuant to which one or more third parties seeks damages and/or injunctive relief to compensate for alleged infringement of its patents by our commercial or other activities. If one of our marketed products is found to infringe valid patent rights of a third party, such third party may be awarded significant damages, or we may be prevented from further sales of that product. Such damages may be enhanced as much as three-fold in the event that we or one of our subsidiaries is found to have willfully infringed valid patent rights of a third party.

Lyrica

In June 2014, Pharmascience Inc. commenced an action against Pfizer Canada Inc., Warner-Lambert Company and Warner-Lambert Company LLC (the Pfizer Canada Defendants) seeking damages in connection with an earlier unsuccessful patent litigation brought by the Pfizer Canada Defendants involving pregabalin. The case is in the discovery phase and a trial date has been set for the first quarter of 2021.

Sawai Pharmaceutical Company Limited (a Japanese generic company) (Sawai) filed an invalidation action against the Lyrica pain use patent in the Japanese Patent Office (JPO) in January 2017. Nissin Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Nissin) and Sandoz intervened and their arguments were considered with those of Sawai. Hexal AG has filed a separate invalidation action that has been stayed pending the result of the Sawai/Nissin case. Nippon Chemiphar and Teva have also subsequently been allowed to intervene in the case. In February 2019, the JPO issued an interim decision indicating the granted claims were potentially invalid. In July 2019, we submitted proposed claim amendments to the JPO to overcome the issues raised by the interim decision, as well as additional arguments supporting the validity of the patent. In November 2019, we received the third-party challengers’ rebuttal briefs and on February 13, 2020 we submitted our final reply brief to the JPO.

In June 2014, Mylan N.V. (Mylan) filed an invalidity action against the Lyrica pain use patent in the High Court. In September 2014, Actavis UK Ltd (Actavis) also filed an invalidity action in the same court. In December 2014, we filed in the High Court an infringement action against Actavis requesting preliminary relief. Our request for preliminary relief was denied in a January 2015 hearing and the denial subsequently was confirmed on appeal.

In February 2015, the National Health Service (NHS) England was ordered by the High Court, as an intermediary, to issue guidance for prescribers and pharmacists directing the prescription and dispensing of Lyrica by brand when pregabalin was prescribed for the treatment of neuropathic pain. NHS Wales and NHS Northern Ireland also issued prescribing guidance. The guidance to prescribe and dispense Lyrica for neuropathic pain was withdrawn upon patent expiration in July 2017. The Mylan and Actavis invalidity actions were heard in the High Court at the same time as the Actavis infringement action. In September 2015, the High Court ruled that (i) Actavis had not infringed the pregabalin pain patent; (ii) certain patent claims directed generally to pain and neuropathic pain were not valid; and (iii) other patent claims for other types of neuropathic pain were valid. All parties appealed.

In October 2016, the Court of Appeal dismissed all appeals and affirmed the High Court’s decision. In March 2017, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom granted Pfizer leave to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision, and subsequently granted the generic companies leave to appeal as well. In November 2018, the Supreme Court issued its decision finding all claims relevant to the neuropathic pain indications were invalid.

We also filed infringement actions against Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. (Teva) and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (Dr. Reddy’s) in February 2015, seeking the same relief as in the action against Actavis. Dr. Reddy’s filed invalidity counterclaims. These actions were stayed pending the outcome of the Actavis and Mylan cases.

F-27

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In October 2015, after Sandoz launched a full label generic pregabalin product, we obtained from the High Court a preliminary injunction enjoining Sandoz from further sales of the product and ordering them to provide the identity of the parties holding the Sandoz product. After Sandoz advised that the parties were wholesaler AAH Pharmaceuticals Ltd and pharmacy chain Lloyds Pharmacy (supplied by AAH), we noticed these parties, requesting the cessation of further sales and the withdrawal of the Sandoz generic pregabalin product. In October 2015, after Lloyds was added to the Sandoz action as a respondent, we obtained a preliminary order from the High Court pursuant to which Lloyds was required to advise its pharmacists that the Sandoz generic pregabalin product should not be dispensed. In November 2015, the High Court confirmed the preliminary injunction against Sandoz and Lloyds. Upon agreement of the parties, in December 2015, the proceedings against Lloyds were terminated, and the proceedings against Sandoz were stayed pending outcome in the Actavis and Mylan cases. In December 2016, Sandoz sought to withdraw the preliminary injunction, however, in December 2016, the London High Court denied Sandoz’s request and the preliminary injunction remained in place until patent expiration in July 2017.

A2. Legal Proceedings—Product Litigation

Like other pharmaceutical companies, we are defendants in numerous cases, including but not limited to those discussed below, related to our products. Plaintiffs in these cases seek damages and other relief on various grounds for alleged personal injury and economic loss.

Effexor

Beginning in May 2011, actions, including purported class actions, were filed in various federal courts against Wyeth (a subsidiary of Pfizer) and, in certain of the actions, affiliates of Wyeth and certain other defendants relating to Effexor XR, which is the extended-release formulation of Effexor. The plaintiffs in each of the class actions seek to represent a class consisting of all persons in the U.S. and its territories who directly purchased, indirectly purchased or reimbursed patients for the purchase of Effexor XR or generic Effexor XR from any of the defendants from June 14, 2008 until the time the defendants’ allegedly unlawful conduct ceased. The plaintiffs in all of the actions allege delay in the launch of generic Effexor XR in the U.S. and its territories, in violation of federal antitrust laws and, in certain of the actions, the antitrust, consumer protection and various other laws of certain states, as the result of Wyeth fraudulently obtaining and improperly listing certain patents for Effexor XR in the Orange Book, enforcing certain patents for Effexor XR and entering into a litigation settlement agreement with a generic drug manufacturer with respect to Effexor XR. Each of the plaintiffs seeks treble damages (for itself in the individual actions or on behalf of the putative class in the purported class actions) for alleged price overcharges for Effexor XR or generic Effexor XR in the U.S. and its territories since June 14, 2008. All of these actions have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

In October 2014, the District Court dismissed the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ claims based on the litigation settlement agreement, but declined to dismiss the other direct purchaser plaintiff claims. In January 2015, the District Court entered partial final judgments as to all settlement agreement claims, including those asserted by direct purchasers and end-payer plaintiffs, which plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In August 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the District Court’s decisions and remanded the claims to the District Court.

Lipitor

Beginning in November 2011, purported class actions relating to Lipitor were filed in various federal courts against, among others, Pfizer, certain affiliates of Pfizer, and, in most of the actions, Ranbaxy, Inc. (Ranbaxy) and certain affiliates of Ranbaxy. The plaintiffs in these various actions seek to represent nationwide, multi-state or statewide classes consisting of persons or entities who directly purchased, indirectly purchased or reimbursed patients for the purchase of Lipitor (or, in certain of the actions, generic Lipitor) from any of the defendants from

F-28

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 2010 until the cessation of the defendants’ allegedly unlawful conduct (the Class Period). The plaintiffs allege delay in the launch of generic Lipitor, in violation of federal antitrust laws and/or state antitrust, consumer protection and various other laws, resulting from (i) the 2008 agreement pursuant to which Pfizer and Ranbaxy settled certain patent litigation involving Lipitor, and Pfizer granted Ranbaxy a license to sell a generic version of Lipitor in various markets beginning on varying dates, and (ii) in certain of the actions, the procurement and/or enforcement of certain patents for Lipitor. Each of the actions seeks, among other things, treble damages on behalf of the putative class for alleged price overcharges for Lipitor (or, in certain of the actions, generic Lipitor) during the Class Period. In addition, individual actions have been filed against Pfizer, Ranbaxy and certain of their affiliates, among others, that assert claims and seek relief for the plaintiffs that are substantially similar to the claims asserted and the relief sought in the purported class actions described above. These various actions have been consolidated for pre-trial proceedings in a Multi-District Litigation (In re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation MDL-2332) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

In September 2013 and 2014, the District Court dismissed with prejudice the claims by direct purchasers. In October and November 2014, the District Court dismissed with prejudice the claims of all other Multi-District Litigation plaintiffs. All plaintiffs have appealed the District Court’s orders dismissing their claims with prejudice to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In addition, the direct purchaser class plaintiffs appealed the order denying their motion to amend the judgment and for leave to amend their complaint to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In August 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the District Court’s decisions and remanded the claims to the District Court.

Also, in January 2013, the State of West Virginia filed an action in West Virginia state court against Pfizer and Ranbaxy, among others, that asserts claims and seeks relief on behalf of the State of West Virginia and residents of that state that are substantially similar to the claims asserted and the relief sought in the purported class actions described above.

A number of individual and multi-plaintiff lawsuits have been filed against us in various federal and state courts alleging that the plaintiffs developed type 2 diabetes purportedly as a result of the ingestion of Lipitor. Plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages.

In February 2014, the federal actions were transferred for consolidated pre-trial proceedings to a Multi-District Litigation (In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation (No. II) MDL-2502) in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. Since 2016, certain cases in the Multi-District Litigation were remanded to certain state courts. In January 2017, the District Court granted our motion for summary judgment, dismissing substantially all of the remaining cases pending in the Multi-District Litigation. In January 2017, the plaintiffs appealed the District Court’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. In June 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision.

Viagra

Since April 2016, a Multi-District Litigation has been pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (In Re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2691), in which plaintiffs allege that they developed melanoma and/or the exacerbation of melanoma purportedly as a result of the ingestion of Viagra. Additional cases filed against Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) with respect to Cialis have also been consolidated in the Multi-District Litigation (In re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) and Cialis (Tadalafil) Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2691). In January 2020, the District Court granted our and Lilly’s motion to exclude all of plaintiffs’ general causation opinions. As a result, in April 2020, the District Court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants and dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims.

F-29

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A3. Legal Proceedings—Commercial and Other Matters

Contracts with Iraqi Ministry of Health

In October 2017, a number of United States service members, civilians, and their families brought a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against a number of pharmaceutical and medical devices companies, including Pfizer and certain of its subsidiaries, alleging that the defendants violated the United States Anti-Terrorism Act. The complaint alleges that the defendants provided funding for terrorist organizations through their sales practices pursuant to pharmaceutical and medical device contracts with the Iraqi Ministry of Health, and seeks monetary relief. In July 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice requested documents related to this matter, which have been provided.

A4. Legal Proceedings—Government Investigations

Like other pharmaceutical companies, we are subject to extensive regulation by government agencies in the U.S., other developed markets and multiple emerging markets in which we operate. Criminal charges, substantial fines and/or civil penalties, limitations on our ability to conduct business in applicable jurisdictions, corporate integrity or deferred prosecution agreements, as well as reputational harm and increased public interest in the matter could result from government investigations. In addition, in a qui tam lawsuit in which the government declines to intervene, the relator may still pursue a suit for the recovery of civil damages and penalties on behalf of the government. Among the investigations by government agencies are the matters discussed below.

Phenytoin Sodium Capsules

In 2012, Pfizer sold the U.K. Marketing Authorisation for phenytoin sodium capsules to a third party, but retained the right to supply the finished product to that third party. In May 2013, the U.K. Competition & Markets Authority (CMA) informed us that it had launched an investigation into the supply of phenytoin sodium capsules in the U.K. market. In August 2015, the CMA issued a Statement of Objections alleging that Pfizer and Pfizer Limited, a U.K. subsidiary, engaged in conduct that violates U.K. and EU antitrust laws. In December 2016, the CMA imposed a £84.2 million fine on Pfizer and Pfizer Limited. Pfizer appealed the CMA decision to The Competition Appeal Tribunal (the Tribunal) in February 2017. On June 7, 2018, the Tribunal overturned the CMA decision as well as the associated fine. The CMA appealed the judgment to the Court of Appeal. In March 2020, the Court of Appeal affirmed the Tribunal’s decision.

Greenstone Investigations

Since July 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division has been investigating our Greenstone generics business. We believe this is related to an ongoing broader antitrust investigation of the generic pharmaceutical industry. The government has been obtaining information from Greenstone.

In April 2018, Greenstone received requests for information from the Antitrust Department of the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General. In May 2019, Attorneys General of more than 40 states plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico filed a complaint against a number of pharmaceutical companies, including Greenstone and Pfizer. The matter has been consolidated with a Multi-District Litigation (In re: Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation MDL No. 2724) in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As to Greenstone and Pfizer, the complaint alleges anticompetitive conduct in violation of federal and state antitrust laws and state consumer protection laws. In June 2020, the State Attorneys General filed a new complaint against a large number of companies, including Greenstone and Pfizer, making similar allegations, but concerning a new set of drugs. This complaint will be transferred to the Multi-District Litigation.

Contracts with Iraqi Ministry of Health

For information regarding U.S. government investigations related to contracts with the Iraqi Ministry of Health, see Note 13A3.

F-30

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

B. Guarantees and Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of business and in connection with the sale of assets and businesses, we often indemnify our counterparties against certain liabilities that may arise in connection with the transaction or related to activities prior to or following the transaction. These indemnifications typically pertain to environmental, tax, employee and/or product-related matters and patent-infringement claims. If the indemnified party were to make a successful claim pursuant to the terms of the indemnification, we may be required to reimburse the loss. These indemnifications are generally subject to various restrictions and limitations. Historically, we have not paid significant amounts under these provisions and, as of March 29, 2020, recorded amounts for the estimated fair value of these indemnifications are not significant.

Note 14. Segment, Geographic and Revenue Information

A. Segment Information

We manage our commercial operations through three distinct business segments: Developed Markets; Greater China; and Emerging Markets. The operating segments are each led by a single manager. Each operating segment has responsibility for its commercial activities.

We regularly review our segments and the approach used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources.

Operating Segments

Our chief operating decision maker uses the revenues and earnings of the three operating segments, among other factors, for performance evaluation and resource allocation.

Other Costs and Business Activities

Certain costs are not allocated to our operating segment results, such as costs, if any, associated with the following:

F-31

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Segment Assets

We manage our assets on a total company basis, not by operating segment. Therefore, our chief operating decision maker does not regularly review any asset information by operating segment and, accordingly, we do not report asset information by operating segment. Total assets were approximately $16.2 billion as of March 29, 2020 and $16.4 billion as of December 31, 2019.

For Earnings in the first three months of 2020, certain significant items include: (i) restructuring charges and implementation costs associated with our cost-reduction/productivity initiatives that are not associated with an acquisition of $19 million (of which $18 million is direct)–see Note 3; and (ii) other charges of $2 million, which primarily includes unrealized losses on investments allocated from Pfizer of $1 million and net charges for certain legal matters of $1 million–see Note 4.

For Earnings in the first three months of 2019, certain significant items include: (i) restructuring charges and implementation costs associated with our cost-reduction/productivity initiatives that are not associated with an acquisition of $15 million (of which $6 million is direct)–see Note 3; and (ii) other income of $9 million, which primarily includes in Other (income)/deductions–net income of $6 million for a reversal of a legal accrual where a loss was no longer deemed probable net of charges for certain legal matters; net gains on investments allocated from Pfizer of $7 million; and costs associated with certain initiatives in international jurisdictions of $4 million–see Note 4.

F-32