Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note
1 — Basis of Presentation, Business and Organization
Uni-Pixel,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc., its wholly-owned operating subsidiary. As used
herein, “Uni-Pixel,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to
Uni-Pixel, Inc. and Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc. Our common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), is quoted
on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the ticker symbol “UNXL.”
On
April 16, 2015 we acquired certain assets and licenses related to the manufacture of XTouch touch sensors from Atmel Corporation
and CIT Technology Ltd.
Our
decision to focus our business on manufacturing and selling XTouch touch sensors was based on, among other things, the pressure
of declining prices and margin compression in the touch sensor market. We believe that our acquisition of the XTouch technology
provided us with a stand-alone, go-to-market strategy that will lead us to a scalable business.
In
addition to the flexible electronic films that are XTouch touch sensors, we are developing a hard coat resin that can be applied
using film, spray or inkjet coating methods for applications as protective cover films, a cover lens replacement or a conformal
hard coat for plastic components. We plan to sell our hard coat resin and optical films under the Diamond Guard® brand.
Our
strategy is to further develop our proprietary Performance Engineered Film™ technology around the vertical markets that
we have identified as high growth profitable market opportunities. These markets include touch sensors, antennas, automotive and
lighting.
As
of June 30, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2.3 million and had accumulated a total deficit of $199.6 million from
operations in pursuit of these objectives. Our long-term viability is dependent upon our ability to successfully operate our business,
develop our manufacturing process, develop our products, and establish the business relationships we need to manufacture and market
our products. We have historically financed our operations primarily through the issuance of equity and debt securities and by
relying on other commercial financing. Until revenue begins to increase on our products to support our operations we will continue
to be highly dependent on financing from third parties.
The
Company is subject to a number of risks, including, but not limited to, whether it can successfully integrate the XTouch operations;
whether the manufacture and sale of the XTouch touch sensors will ultimately prove to be profitable; whether the Company will
be able to raise capital when it needs to do so; whether the Company can successfully compete in the industry, particularly against
larger organizations with greater financial and other resources; whether the Company will continue to receive the services of
its key personnel; whether its intellectual property is adequately protected; and other risks related to the electronics market
industry.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization
of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has accumulated significant losses
as it has been developing its service and product offerings. The Company has had recurring losses and expects to report losses
for fiscal 2017. The Company believes that current available cash combined with the receipts from anticipated future sales bookings,
and the proceeds of a contemplated capital raise pursuant to its S-3 registration statement noted above will be sufficient to
meet its cash needs for the near future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable
to the Company, if at all. There can be no assurances that the source of additional contracts will be achieved.
Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this quarterly report include Uni-Pixel, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Note
2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim
financial information
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein, which have not been audited pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods on a basis consistent with the
annual audited statements. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for a full year. Certain information,
accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in condensed consolidated financial statements prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations,
although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K,
for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2017 (the “2016 Form
10-K”).
The
accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and to the practices
within the technology industry. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies
during the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to what was previously disclosed in the 2016 Form 10-K. The consolidated financial
information as of December 31, 2016 included herein has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements
as of, and for the fiscal year ended, December 31, 2016.
Significant
Accounting Policies
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Examples include provisions for bad debts, useful lives of property and equipment and intangible assets, the valuation
of derivative liability, the potential impairment of property and equipment and intangible assets, deferred taxes, the valuation
of non-cash equity awards, and the provision for and disclosure of litigation. Actual results may differ materially from those
estimates.
Statement
of cash flows
For
purposes of the statements of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments (i.e., investments which, when purchased,
have original maturities of three months or less) to be cash equivalents.
Concentration
of credit risk
We
maintain our cash with major U.S. domestic banks. The amounts held in interest bearing accounts periodically exceed the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured limit of $250,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. We have not
incurred losses related to these deposits.
Accounts
Receivable
The
carrying value of our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value.
We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts based on type of customer, age of outstanding receivable, historical collection
trends, and existing economic conditions. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that a specific receivable balance may
be unrealizable, further consideration is given to the collectability of those balances, and the allowance is adjusted accordingly.
Receivable balances deemed uncollectible are written off against the allowance. We had $1.0 million and $1.1 million accounts
receivable at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. We had $0 reserved as uncollectible at June 30, 2017 and approximately
$5,000 at December 31, 2016.
Property
and equipment
Property
and equipment, consisting primarily of production equipment, lab equipment, computer equipment, software, leasehold improvements,
and office furniture and fixtures is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization
for financial reporting purposes is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of six to five years.
Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining lease term or the life of the asset, whichever
is shorter. The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged as an expense as incurred. Gains or losses related to retirements or
dispositions of fixed assets are recognized in the period incurred.
Convertible
debt
The
Company accounts for its convertible debt as equal to its proceeds, less unamortized discounts. The Company records discounts
on its convertible debt for the fair value of freestanding and embedded derivatives as well as beneficial conversion features
associated with the issuance of the debt. Discounts are amortized over the life of the convertible debt.
Inventory
Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using standard cost, which approximates the first-in, first-out method.
Adjustments to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value are made for estimated excess, obsolete or impaired
balances. These adjustments are measured as the excess of the cost of the inventory over its market value based upon assumptions
about future demand and charged to cost of revenue. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory
is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration of the original cost basis
or increases in the newly established cost basis.
Series
A-1 preferred stock
The
Series A-1 Preferred Stock contain a substantive conversion option, are redeemable and may convert into a variable number of shares
of Common Stock. As a result, we have classified the Series A-1 Preferred Stock as temporary equity in our consolidated balance
sheet.
Warrant
exchange
The Company accounts
for warrant exchanges by recording the incremental fair value of issuing the new instruments in relation to the fair value of
the extinguished instruments prior to the transaction in accordance with ASC 470-50. The incremental cost is calculated using
the difference in fair value of the new and extinguished instruments on the date of the exchange. In the event that the Company
extinguishes warrants that are accounted for as a liability in exchange for warrants that are accounted for as equity, the Company
reports the net effect of the incremental cost of warrant exchange on the consolidated statement of operations and the gain or
loss on the change in fair value of the liability through the exchange date is reported within gain (loss) on change in warrant
liability on the consolidated statement of operations.
Warranty
expense
Warranty
on the products is for one year. The Company can repair, replace the product or refund the cost of the product to the customer.
Warranty is primarily recorded within the first month from shipment. The Company re-evaluates its estimates at the end of each
quarter to assess the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts that amount if necessary. The warranty liability
is recorded in the accrued liabilities of the consolidated balance sheet. We have approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million
warranty liability balances at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Derivative
liabilities
In
accordance with ASC 815-40-25 and ASC 815-10-15 Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480-10-25 Liabilities-Distinguishing from Equity,
the Company’s convertible notes are accounted for net, outside of shareholders’ equity and warrants are accounted
for as liabilities at their fair value during periods where the full ratchet anti-dilution provision is in effect.
The
warrants are accounted for a liability at their fair value at each reporting period. The value of the derivative warrant liability
will be re-measured at each reporting period with changes in fair value recorded as earnings or losses. To derive an estimate
of the fair value of these warrants, a binomial model is utilized that computes the impact of share dilution upon the exercise
of the warrant shares. This process relies upon inputs such as shares outstanding, estimated stock prices, strike price and volatility
assumptions to dynamically adjust the payoff of the warrants in the presence of the dilution effect.
Revenue
recognition
We
recognize revenue over the period the service is performed. In general, this requires that four basic criteria must be met before
revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, (3) the fee is fixed and determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Advance
payments are deferred until shipment of product has occurred or the service has been rendered.
Revenue
from licenses and other up-front fees are recognized on a ratable basis over the term of the respective agreement.
Revenue
on certain fixed price contracts where we provide research and development services are recognized over the contract term based
on achievement of milestones. When the contracts provide for milestone or other interim payments, the Company will recognize revenue
under the milestone method. The milestone method requires the Company to deem all milestone payments within each contract as either
substantive or non-substantive. That conclusion is determined based upon a thorough review of each contract and the Company’s
deliverables committed to in each contract. For substantive milestones, the Company concludes that upon achievement of each milestone,
the amount of the corresponding defined payments is commensurate with the effort required to achieve such milestone or the value
of the delivered item. The payment associated with each milestone relates solely to past performance and is deemed reasonable
upon consideration of the deliverables and the payment terms within the contract. For non-substantive milestones, including advance
payments, the recognition of such payments are pro-rated to the substantive milestones.
Loss
per share data
Basic
loss per share is calculated based on the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
also gives effect to the dilutive effect of stock options, warrants (calculated based on the treasury stock method), convertible
notes and convertible preferred stock.
At June 30, 2017, 2,635,837
restricted stock units and options and warrants to purchase 54,698,224 shares of Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from
$0.35 to $38.70 per share were outstanding, and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their
effect would be anti-dilutive.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
ASC
Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures
, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for
an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability
in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This topic also establishes a fair value hierarchy,
which requires classification based on observable and unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy
distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable
inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
Level
1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level
2 – Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect
those assumptions that a market participant would use.
Our
financial instruments consist of accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, a derivative liability and accounts payable. We believe
the fair values of our accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and accounts payable reflect their respective carrying amounts given
the short term nature of these instruments. The derivative liability is measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements
In
April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation
of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). The amendments in ASU 2015-03 require that debt issuance costs related to
a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability,
consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments
in ASU 2015-03. ASU 2015-03 is effective for us on January 1, 2016. We have adopted ASU 2015-03.
In
February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02 Leases (Topic). This ASU requires a lessee to recognize
a right-of-use asset and a lease liability under most operating leases in its balance sheet. For public companies, the ASU is
effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the effects that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting
Guidance Not Yet Effective
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue
to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, the guidance provides that an
entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations
in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the
contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company expects to adopt ASU
2014-09 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 and will continue to assess the impact on its financial statements.
Other
accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have
a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Note
3 — Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
In
conjunction with the acquisition of the XTouch technology, the Company entered into a lease for office and production facilities
for approximately 28,918 square feet at 1150 E. Cheyenne Mountain Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906 under a third party
non-cancelable operating lease through October 16, 2018. In July 2015, the company entered into a lease for office space for 4,478
square feet at 4699 Old Ironsides Drive, Ste. 300, Santa Clara, CA 95054 through July 14, 2018. In addition, the company leases
approximately 7,186 square feet at 3400 Research Forest Drive, Suite B2, The Woodlands, TX that expires on May 31, 2018. In December
2016, the Company entered into an operating equipment lease that began in March 2017 and continues through February 2020. Future
minimum operating lease commitments as of June 30, 2017, are as follows:
Year
Ending December 31 (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Six
months ending December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
2018
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
2019
|
|
|
292
|
|
2020
|
|
|
73
|
|
2021
|
|
|
—
|
|
2022
|
|
|
—
|
|
Operating
lease total
|
|
$
|
2,145
|
|
Future
minimum capital lease commitments as of June 30, 2017, are as follows:
Year
Ending December 31 (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Six
months ending December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
2018
|
|
|
42
|
|
2019
|
|
|
42
|
|
2020
|
|
|
3
|
|
2021
|
|
|
—
|
|
2022
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gross
capital lease total
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
Less:
interest
|
|
|
30
|
|
Capital
lease total
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Securities
and Exchange Commission Complaint and Settlement
The
Company entered into an agreement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 16, 2016
signed a final judgment on a complaint filed by the SEC pursuant to our consent (the “Final Judgment”). Without admitting
or denying the allegations of the SEC’s complaint, we consented to the Final Judgment. As of June 30, 2017, the remaining
settlement accrual is reflected in current liabilities of $325,000 and $180,000 in long-term liabilities.
Complaint
by former Officers of the Company for Advancement of Expenses
The
Company, or its insurance company, has advanced as agreed all invoices for all years through the end of 2015 for the defense of
Messrs. Killion and Tomz in the investigation by the SEC that resulted in the filing of the complaint against them by the SEC.
A portion of advancements for 2016 invoices have also been made, but the Company disputed other 2016 invoices as containing expenses
that have not been reasonably incurred by Messrs. Killion and Tomz in defense of the SEC’s complaint, with the total amount
incurred in 2016 initially disputed by the Company at $147,750. Through the course of 2016, the Company was in discussions with
counsel to Messrs. Killion and Tomz of resolving counsels’ charges on these invoices. Notwithstanding those discussions,
on August 22, 2016, Messrs. Killion and Tomz filed an action against the Company for advancement of expenses in the Delaware Chancery
Court. The Company contested the claims made by Messrs. Killion and Tomz that it has not advanced expenses reasonably incurred
by them in the underlying action brought by the SEC. In October 2016, the Chancery Court appointed a former Vice Chancellor of
the Delaware Chancery Court to act as a Special Master to determine whether expenses are reasonably incurred to the extent that
the Company and Messrs. Killion and Tomz are not capable of resolving the dispute concerning whether expenses have been reasonably
incurred without the assistance of the judicial process. In November 2016, unresolved and disputed invoices totaling approximately
$129,698 in fees incurred in 2016 prior to November 2016 were submitted to the Special Master for a determination whether such
expenses were reasonably incurred. The Special Master has determined that it was reasonable for the Company to advance $95,749
of the disputed fees from 2016. As of the filing of this Report on Form 10-Q, the Company has not disputed the advancement of
other expenses, including expenses incurred in 2017. However, only a portion of expenses incurred in 2017 have been advanced as
of such filing. The Company and Messrs. Killion and Tomz have been in discussions regarding timing of payment of advancement of
expenses. These are the only current invoices submitted for advancement currently disputed without resolution. There can be no
assurance that these are the only invoices that will be disputed as this matter proceeds, and therefore the total amount of disputed
invoices remains undeterminable at the present time.
Note
4 —Equity, Stock Plan and Warrants
Common
Stock
During
the six months ended June 30, 2017, we issued 144,095 shares of Common Stock to employees and directors. We also issued 10,530,000
shares of Common Stock for net proceeds of $9.1 million, 7,609,941 shares of common stock related to the conversion of Series
A-1 Preferred Stock (Note 6), 6,576,247 of common stock for the 2017 warrant exercises at $0.35 per share and 1,125,000 shares
of common stock for 2015 warrant exercises.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2016, we issued 57,203 shares of Common Stock for six employees.
In
May 2017, the shareholders of the Company passed a proposal to increase the number of authorized shares from 100,000,000 to 150,000,000.
Restricted
Stock
Total
compensation expense recognized for restricted stock was approximately $0.6 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively. The Company has recorded approximately $0.6 million, $40,000 and $12,000 of restricted
stock expense in selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expense and cost of revenue, respectively,
for the six months ended June 30, 2017, and approximately $0.6 million of restricted stock expense in selling, general and administrative
expenses, approximately $4,000 in research and development expense and approximately $4,000 in cost of revenue for the six months
ended June 30, 2016.
At
June 30, 2017, there was $2.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested shares of restricted stock
which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.17 years. There were 252,765 shares of restricted stock,
net that became vested during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Stock
Incentive Plans
The
Company has adopted four stock incentive plans: the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2010 Stock Incentive
Plan and the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Stock Incentive Plans”). The Stock Incentive Plans allow
for an aggregate of up to 8,366,667 shares of our Common Stock to be awarded through incentive and non-qualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares and other types of awards.
Our
Stock Incentive Plans are administered by our Board of Directors, which has the sole discretion to select participants who will
receive the awards and to determine the type, size and terms of each award granted. As of June 30, 2017, there were 996,857 shares
available for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plans.
The
following disclosures provide information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation awards, all of which are classified
as equity awards:
Total
compensation expense recognized for options was approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively. The Company has recorded approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $37,000 of stock compensation
expense in selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expense and cost of revenue for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 and approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $40,000 of stock compensation expense in selling, general
and administrative expenses, research and development expense and cost of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
A
summary of the changes in the total stock options outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2017 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Outstanding
and expected to vest, at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
2,181,142
|
|
|
$
|
5.41
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
821,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
|
|
(108,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
and expected to vest, at June 30, 2017
|
|
|
2,893,920
|
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
Vested
and exercisable at June 30, 2017
|
|
|
1,701,096
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
The
fair value of the Company’s options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
Three Months
ended
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
Three Months
ended
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
Six Months
ended
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
Six Months
ended
June 30, 2016
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
1.77
|
%
|
|
|
1.10 to 1.23%
|
|
|
|
1.77 to 1.95
|
%
|
|
|
1.10 to 1.23
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
103.32
|
%
|
|
|
98.50
|
%
|
|
|
99.63 to 103.32
|
%
|
|
|
94.31 to 98.50
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
At
June 30, 2017, there was $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards which
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.21 years. There was an approximate 0.2 million, net, increase
in the vested options during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Common
Stock Warrants
As
of June 30, 2017, the Company has 51,804,304 Common Stock warrants outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.37
per share. Information regarding outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2017 is as follows:
Grant date
|
|
Warrants
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Remaining
Life
(Years)
|
|
June 10, 2009
|
|
|
15,796
|
|
|
|
15,796
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
August 31, 2009
|
|
|
24,934
|
|
|
|
24,934
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
October 2, 2009
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
|
March 15, 2010
|
|
|
8,337
|
|
|
|
8,337
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
April 5, 2010
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
November 30, 2015 (1)
|
|
|
38,199,569
|
|
|
|
38,199,569
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
February 21, 2017
|
|
|
4,738,500
|
|
|
|
4,738,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
|
June 13, 2017
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
June 13, 2017
|
|
|
6,111,238
|
|
|
|
6,111,238
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
51,804,304
|
|
|
|
51,804,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
exercise price of the warrants and the number of shares for which the warrants are exercisable are subject to certain adjustments
if the Company issues or sells additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents at a price per share less than
the exercise price then in effect, or without consideration.
|
In
January 2017, we issued warrants covering 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock that had an initial exercise price of $1.50 per share,
were exercisable six months after issuance (the “Initial Exercisability Date”) and had a term of five years from the
Initial Exercisability Date. The exercise price of such warrants were subject to a one-time adjustment on the Initial Exercisability
Date to an amount no less than $1.26 per share. In June 2017 (the “Issuance Date”), the Company entered into certain
warrant exchange agreements (the “Warrant Exchange”), each with holders of certain warrants originally issued in January
2017 pursuant to which each holder separately agreed to exchange its warrant issued in January 2017 for (1) a new warrant exercisable
for 100% of the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock underlying the respective January 2017 warrant at an exercise
price of $1.30 per share, which became exercisable beginning on July 20, 2017 and remain exercisable for 5 years from such date
and (2) a new warrant exercisable for approximately 507.5% of the number of shares of Common Stock which totaled 12,687,485 shares
underlying the respective January 2017 warrant at an exercise price of $0.351633 per share, of which 100% of the warrant shares
shall initially be exercisable from the Issuance Date until 20 business days thereafter, then such amount of exercisable warrant
shares shall be decreased to 60% for the period that is 21 business days after the Issuance Date until 45 business days after
the Issuance Date, followed by a further decrease such that only 40% of the warrant shares shall be exercisable for a period that
is 46 business days after the Issuance Date until 60 business days after the Issuance Date and after such time that is 60 business
days after the Issuance Date no warrant shares shall be exercisable (collectively, the “June 2017 Warrants”). The
combined fair value of the June 2017 Warrants at the execution of the Warrant Exchange was $2,831,270 which has been recorded
in additional paid-in capital on the accompanying balance sheet. As of June 30, 2017, the holders have exercised 6,576,247 warrants
for net proceeds of $2.3 million into 6,576,247 shares of Common Stock.
In
February 2017, we issued warrants covering 4,738,500 shares of Common Stock that are exercisable, have an exercise price of $1.00
per share and have a term of five (5) years from the date of issuance. A holder may not exercise such warrant and we may not issue
shares of Common Stock under such warrant if, after giving effect to the exercise or issuance, the holder together with its affiliates
would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.
Note
5 — Property and Equipment and Inventory
A
summary of the components of property and equipment at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands) are as follows:
|
|
Estimated
Useful
Lives
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
Production
equipment
|
|
3
to 5 years
|
|
$
|
2,399
|
|
|
$
|
2,120
|
|
Research
and development equipment
|
|
3
to 5 years
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
3,583
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
5
years
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Computer
equipment
|
|
5
years
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Office
equipment
|
|
3
to 5 years
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(5,108
|
)
|
|
|
(5,032
|
)
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense of property and equipment for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 was approximately
$0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
A
summary of the components of inventory at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
Work-in-progress
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Finish
Goods
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
Note
6 – Senior Secured Convertible Notes and Warrants
$15
million Convertible Note
Concurrent
with the consummation of the XTouch acquisition, on April 16, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), and pursuant to a Securities
Purchase Agreement, we sold $15 million in Senior Secured Convertible Notes, together with warrants for the purchase of 1,151,121
shares of our Common Stock (the “April 2015 Warrants”), to two accredited investors (the “Investors”).
In addition, we sold an additional $0.5 million Convertible Note to one of these Investors in November 2015, and the April 2015
Warrant issued to that Investor was adjusted for an additional 38,371 shares of Common Stock for a total of 1,189,492 shares of
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the April 2015 Warrants. Investors in the offering have the right to participate for no
less than 35% of any future offering of our equity or equity equivalent securities until the second anniversary of when the last
Convertible Notes issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement were purchased.
As per the terms of the
November 2015 equity transaction, the 1,189,492 April 2015 Warrants were exchanged for new warrants to purchase an equivalent
number of shares of Common Stock in the same form and same terms as the warrants issued in such equity transaction, including
a repricing to $1.50 per share exercise price and a term of five years from the date of issuance in the exchange. In February
2017, the warrants issued in the November 2015 exchange were repriced at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. The exercise
price of the warrants and the number of shares of Common Stock for which these warrants are exercisable are subject to certain
adjustments if we issue or sell additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents at a price per share less than the
exercise price then in effect (which is now $0.35 per share), or without consideration.
As
of June 30, 2017, both Investors had been issued an aggregate of 13,984,411 shares of
Common Stock when the Investor had converted as of such date $11.6 million of principal
and $0.3 million of interest into shares of Common Stock. There was no outstanding balance
on these notes at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
The
following table summarizes the charges to interest, amortization and other expense, net:
|
|
June
30,2017
|
|
|
June
30,2016
|
|
Interest
expense on convertible notes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Accretion
of convertible note discount
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,291
|
|
$3
million Redeemable and Convertible Preferred Stock
On January 20, 2017, the
Company completed the sale of 3,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock for $3 million. The shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock
are convertible into one share of Common Stock at a conversion price of $1.50 per share, subject to adjustment for stock splits,
stock dividends, stock combinations, recapitalizations or similar events. Each holder also has the additional right after ninety
days after issuance of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock to convert the Series A-1 Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock at
that price which is the lower of (i) the conversion price then in effect and (ii) the greater of (A) $0.35 and (B) 93% of the
volume weighted average price of the Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the time of the delivery or deemed
delivery of the applicable conversion notice. As of June 30, 2017, 100 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock were outstanding.
As of June 30, 2017, 2,900 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock were converted for 7,609,940 shares of Common Stock. We
also issued warrants (the “January 2017 Warrants”) covering 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock that had an exercise
price of $1.50 per share, were exercisable six months after issuance (the “Initial Exercisability Date”) and had a
term of five years from the Initial Exercisability Date. The exercise price of such warrants were subject to a one-time adjustment
on the Initial Exercisability Date to an amount no less than $1.26 per share. These warrants have since been exchanged as further
described in Note 4. The remaining Preferred Stock shares must be fully converted or redeemed within twelve months from closing.
The
Series A-1 Certificate of Designations provides that at any time on or after January 20, 2018, if the Series A-1 Preferred Stock
has not yet been converted into shares of our Common Stock, we may be required, at the option of each holder, to redeem the Series
A-1 Preferred Stock, in cash, at a redemption price equal to the greater of 125% of the stated value of the shares of Series A-1
Preferred Stock being redeemed and the intrinsic value of the shares of the Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of the
shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock being redeemed. Alternatively, if a triggering event occurs, each holder may require us (in
lieu of requiring us to convert as described above) to redeem all or any number of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, in cash, at
a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 125% of the $1,000 stated value of each such share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock
being redeemed and (ii) the intrinsic value of the shares of the Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of such shares of
Series A-1 Preferred Stock being redeemed (without regard to any limitations on conversion in the Series A-1 Certificate of Designations).
If we did not have the cash necessary to redeem the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, the holder of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock may
cancel the redemption and instead have dividends, which are also convertible, on the Series A-1 Preferred Stock increase, and
the conversion price of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock adjust.
The
Company has the option to redeem the Series A-1 Preferred Stock at any time, in cash, at a redemption price equal to the greater
of 125% of the stated value of the shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock being redeemed and the intrinsic value of the shares of
the Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of the shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock being redeemed.
The
Series A-1 Certificate of Designations contain certain triggering events including but not limited to: (i) the suspension from
trading or failure of our Common Stock to be trading or listed (as applicable) on The Nasdaq Capital Market, or one of the New
York Stock Exchange, the NYSE MKT, the Nasdaq Global Select Market, or the Nasdaq Global Market, for a period of five consecutive
trading days, (ii) our failure to timely deliver shares of Common Stock upon conversion of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock; (iii)
our failure to make payments when due under the Series A-1 Certificate of Designations; and (iv) our bankruptcy or insolvency.
If
a triggering event occurs, each Holder may require us to redeem all or any number of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, in cash,
at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 125% of the $1,000 stated value of each such share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock
being redeemed and (ii) the intrinsic value of the shares of our Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of such shares of
Series A-1 Preferred Stock being redeemed (without regard to any limitations on conversion in the Series A-1 Certificate of Designations).
At
any time a triggering event has occurred through the earlier of (x) the date of the cure of such triggering event and (y) the
20
th
trading day after we have delivered written notice to such Holder of such triggering event, each Holder may also
alternatively convert Series A-1 Preferred Stock into shares of our Common Stock at the Triggering Event Conversion Price (as
defined below) instead of the Conversion Price, subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations described below. The “
Triggering
Event Conversion Price
” is defined as that price which is defined as that price which is the lower of (i) the Conversion
Price then in effect and (ii) the greater of (A) $0.35 and (B) the higher of (I) 85% of the lowest VWAP of our Common Stock on
any trading day during the five consecutive trading day period ending and including the trading day immediately preceding the
delivery of the applicable conversion notice and (II) $0.35.
The
Series A-1 Preferred Stock and the Warrants may not be converted or exercised, as applicable, if, after giving effect to such
conversion or exercise, as applicable, the holder of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock or Warrant, as applicable, together with its
affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. At each holder’s option,
such conversion or exercise blocker may be raised or lowered to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%.
The
Company also determined there was a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) as a result of the intrinsic value between
the effective exercise price and the market price at the time of conversion of $0.8 million. The BCF was included in additional
paid in capital. The Company utilized a binomial model in determining the fair market value of the Warrants.
At
inception, the preferred stock balance and unamortized discount were as follows:
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock Series A-1
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
Discount
attributable to warrants
|
|
|
(2,238
|
)
|
Discount
attributable to deferred issuance costs
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
Discount
attributable to BCF
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
Carrying
amount of Series A-1 Preferred Stock
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
At
June 30, 2017, the preferred stock debt balance (in thousands) and unamortized discount in millions were as follows:
Discount
attributable to deferred issuance costs
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Discount
attributable to deferred issuance costs
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Carrying
amount of Series A-1
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
The Company recognized
$2.7 million of discount as a deemed dividend for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as a result of the conversion of $2.9
million in Series A-1 Preferred Stock into Common Stock. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, 7,609,940 shares of Common Stock
were issued for the conversion of 2,900 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock into $2.9 million with an average conversion price
of $0.381 per share.
Line
of Credit
On
October 24, 2016, Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) along with its subsidiary Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc. (together with
the Company referred to as the “Borrowers”), entered into a Loan and Security Agreement dated October 18, 2016 (the
“Loan Agreement”) with Western Alliance Bank (the “Bank”) through its Bridge Bank division, with credit
support provided by the Export-Import Bank of the United States pursuant to the terms of a Borrower Agreement of the Company and
a Borrower Agreement of Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc., each dated as of October 24, 2016 (each a “Borrower Agreement” and
collectively, the “Borrower Agreements”). The Borrower Agreements are substantially similar in form.
Under
the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Borrowers may borrow up to $2.5 million on a revolving basis based on a percentage of eligible
export-related accounts. This Loan Agreement is for a two-year period ending October 18, 2018. Total borrowings under the line
may not exceed 90% of eligible-export related accounts. Borrowings under the line will bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.25
percent. The line is secured by all of the assets of the Borrowers, including intellectual property. We have $0.9 million and
$0.8 million line of credit balances at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Note
7 – Agreements with Atmel Corporation and CIT Technology LTD.
Atmel
Corporation Asset Acquisition and License Agreements
On
April 16, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc. (“Displays”) acquired from Atmel Corporation
(“Atmel”), pursuant to the terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement, a Patent License Agreement, an IP License Agreement,
a Bill of Sale and Assignment and Assumption Agreement and two leases for real property, XSense, a business formerly within Atmel
Corporation and which consists of certain assets used for the production of capacitive touch sensors comprised of fine lines of
copper metal photo lithographically patterned and plated on flexible plastic film (the “Touch Sensors”). $450,000
was paid for the machinery, parts and equipment needed to manufacture the Touch Sensors and the existing inventory on hand. The
fair value of the acquired machinery, parts and equipment was $1.4 million. Displays paid this amount with a secured promissory
note due on or before the earlier of (i) the second anniversary of the Effective Date or (ii) the sale of equity and/or debt securities
after the Effective Date pursuant to which Displays or any affiliate of our receives gross proceeds of no less than $5 million.
Interest accrues on the unpaid principal amount at a rate equal to 2% per annum compounded
semi-annually and is to be paid in arrears semi-annually, commencing with the six-month anniversary of the Effective Date.
Displays has granted to Atmel a security interest in the purchased assets and all accounts receivable subsequently arising from
Display’s manufacture and sale of Touch Sensors and all proceeds therefrom. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement,
Displays assumed certain liabilities of Atmel, including open purchase and supply orders, related to the Touch Sensor business.
Through
the Patent License Agreement, Atmel licensed to Displays a non-sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-bearing license under its Touch
Sensors patents to make or have made, use, offer for sale, sell, and import the Touch Sensors. In consideration for this license,
Displays agreed to pay an annual royalty fee during the initial five year term of the license (the “Initial Term”)
of the greater of $3.25 million or 3.33% of the total net sales (as defined in the Patent License Agreement) of the Touch Sensors
during the Initial Term. Displays has the right to renew the license for a term of 10 years. If Displays exercises this right,
the annual royalty fee will consist of 2.5% of the total net sales of the Touch Sensors until it reaches a total of $16.75 million,
at which time no further annual royalty fees will be due. Upon execution of the Patent License Agreement, Displays paid a non-refundable,
non-returnable prepayment of minimum annual royalty fees of $9.33 million (the “Royalty Prepayment”). The Royalty
Prepayment will be applied to the annual royalty fees Displays owes under the Patent License Agreement. If, during the Initial
Term, Displays’ cash balances as of the quarter end immediately prior to the date of the royalty period to which an unpaid
annual royalty relates is less than $30 million, it may pay the annual royalty fee with a secured promissory note. Atmel has agreed
that it will not enter into a license agreement for the licensed patents that is effective prior to the second anniversary of
the Effective Date.
Through
the IP License Agreement, Atmel licensed to Displays a non-sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to the intellectual
property necessary to make or have made, use, offer for sale, sell, and import the Touch Sensors. The term of the IP License Agreement
is co-extensive with the term of the Patent License Agreement. Atmel has agreed that it will not enter into a license agreement
for the licensed intellectual property that is effective prior to the second anniversary of the Effective Date.
As
part of the business combination, Displays also entered into leases with Atmel Corporation for Building 2 and Building 4, both
of which are located at 1150 E. Cheyenne Mountain Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado. The term of each lease is 18 months (the
“Primary Lease Term”). The term of each lease may be extended for two additional six month periods. During the Primary
Lease Term, the initial base rent for each of Building 2 and Building 4 will be $100 per month a net value of $810,000 which has
been included within prepaid and other current assets on the accompanying balance sheet. During the first renewal term, the monthly
base rent for Building 2 will be $5,625 and during the second renewal term the monthly base rent will be $8,438. During the first
renewal term, the monthly base rent for Building 4 will be $39,375 and during the second renewal term the monthly base rent will
be $59,063. Aside from the base rent, Displays is responsible for the payment of its share of operating expenses attributable
to the buildings, real estate taxes attributable to the buildings, sales and personal property taxes, utilities and additional
services provided by Atmel (as defined in the leases).
On
February 15, 2017, Displays and Atmel and Atmel’s successor, Microchip Technology (Barbados) II Inc., entered into a Letter
Agreement Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Patent License Agreement and the IP License Agreement (collectively with
the Patent License Agreement, the “License Agreements”). The Amendment adds an affiliate of Atmel, Microchip Technology
(Barbados) II Inc., as a party to the License Agreements. The Amendment also revises the respective License Agreements to provide
that the licenses granted under the License Agreements allow for Displays to enter into a non-transferable, non-assignable, non-exclusive,
royalty-bearing sublicense solely to General Interface Solution Limited, a Samoa corporation (“GIS”), to make, use
offer for sale, sell and import Licensed XSense Products (as defined in the License Agreements), subject to certain terms provided
for in the Amendment. Furthermore, the Amendment provides that if a sublicense agreement is in effect at the time that the License
Agreements are terminated for any reason, then such sublicense will survive and remain in full force and effect with Atmel having
assumed such sublicense agreement.
The
Amendment increases the annual royalty rate for all sales of Licensed XSense Products by the Company under the Patent License
Agreement, not including any sublicense arrangement, to 4%. The Amendment also provides that the definition of Sales Price (which
is used to calculate the royalty rate) in the Patent License Agreement means the gross revenue recognized by the Company from
the sale, use or other disposition of a TouchScreen by the Company. In addition, the Amendment adds that the Company shall pay
Atmel a separate royalty rate of 5.7% for any GIS sublicenses, based on the manufacturing costs used by the Company to calculate
the royalty payable under its sublicense agreement with GIS (the “Sublicense Price”), provided always that the Sublicense
Price shall be reflect an arm’s length transaction between a willing licensor and a willing licensee and be no less than
the manufacturing cost incurred by other manufacturers involving the most similar products sold in the same volume in an arms-length
transaction, as reasonably determined by Displays and auditable by Atmel. A minimum of 4% of the 5.7% royalty rate owed to Atmel
for a sublicense agreement with GIS must be paid in cash, in which case the remaining 1.7% will be paid to Atmel in the Company’s
stock or other consideration as mutually agreed upon by the parties. Furthermore, the maximum cumulative annual royalties payable
for the GIS sublicense is $13,250,000. Royalties from the GIS sublicense are separate from and do not count toward the minimum
annual royalty amount paid for Display’s license under the Patent License Agreement during the Initial Term, the maximum
cumulative annual royalties during the Renewal Period (as such term is defined in the Patent License Agreement), nor the calculation
of when the Royalty Prepayment has been fully used and credited.
CIT
Technology Ltd. License Agreements and Manufacturing and Technology Transfer Agreement
On
the Effective Date Displays entered into an FLT (Fine Line Technology) Patent License Agreement (the “CIT Patent License
Agreement”), an FLT (Fine Line Technology) Intellectual Property License Agreement (the “CIT IP License Agreement”)
and a Manufacturing and Technology Transfer Agreement (the “Manufacturing Agreement”) with CIT Technology Ltd. (“CIT”).
Through
the CIT Patent License Agreement, CIT licensed to Displays a non-sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-bearing license under its fine
line technology (“FLT”) patents to make or have made, use, offer for sale, sell, and import licensed FLT products
(the “Licensed Products”), which are defined as capacitive touch sensors comprising fine lines of copper metal printed
on flexible plastic film. In consideration for this license, Displays agreed to pay an annual royalty fee during the initial five
year term of the license (the “Initial License Term”) of the greater of $1.65 million or 1.67% of the total net sales
(as defined in the CIT Patent License Agreement) of the Licensed Products during the Initial License Term. Displays has the right
to renew the license for a term of ten years. If Displays exercises this right, the annual royalty fee will consist of 1.67% of
the total net sales of the Licensed Products until it reaches a total of $8.25 million, at which time no further annual royalty
fees will be due. Further, the total royalty fees payable for the initial five year term and the subsequent ten year term is capped
at $30 million. Upon execution of the CIT Patent License Agreement, Displays paid a non-refundable, non-returnable prepayment
of minimum annual royalty fees of $4.67 million (the “CIT Royalty Prepayment”). The CIT Royalty Prepayment will be
applied to the annual royalty fees Displays owes under the CIT Patent License Agreement. If, during the Initial License Term,
Displays’ cash balances as of the quarter end immediately prior to the date of the royalty period to which an unpaid annual
royalty relates is less than $30 million, Displays may pay the annual royalty fee with a secured promissory note. CIT has agreed
that it will not enter into a license agreement for the licensed patents as they relate to the Licensed Products that is effective
prior to the second anniversary of the Effective Date.
Through
the CIT IP License Agreement, CIT licensed to Displays a non-sublicensable, worldwide, royalty-free license to the intellectual
property necessary to make or have made, use, offer for sale, sell, and import the Licensed Products. The term of the CIT IP License
Agreement is co-extensive with the term of the CIT Patent License Agreement. CIT has agreed that it will not enter into a license
agreement for the licensed intellectual property as it relates to the Licensed Products that is effective prior to the second
anniversary of the Effective Date.
On
December 21, 2016, Displays entered into the First Amendment (the “Patent Amendment”) to the FLT Patent License Agreement
(the “Patent License Agreement”) and the First Amendment (the “IP Amendment”, and collectively with the
Patent Amendment, the “Amendments”) to the FLT (Fine Line Technology) Intellectual Property License Agreement (the
“IP License Agreement”, and collectively with the Patent License Agreement, the “License Agreements”)
with CIT. Displays originally entered into the License Agreements with CIT, as previously disclosed by the Company, on April 16,
2015.
The
Amendments revise the respective License Agreements to provide that the licenses granted by CIT to Displays for the Licensed FLT
Patents (as defined in the Patent License Agreement) and the Licensed FLT IP (as defined in the IP License Agreement) are provided
on an exclusive and sublicenseable basis. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such exclusivity to the Licensed FLT Patents and License
FLT IP is subject to a license by CIT to CPI Innovation Services Limited for use with non-touchscreens. Furthermore, the Amendments
to the License Agreements provide that if a sublicense agreement is in effect at the time that the License Agreements are terminated
for any reason then such sublicense will survive and remain in full force and effect, and from and after the effective date of
such termination with respect to Displays, the sublicensee party will be deemed to have the rights of Displays under the respective
License Agreement on a non-exclusive, non-sublicenseable basis, and will become responsible for complying with the terms and conditions
of the respective License Agreement, as amended, pertaining to confidentiality, recordkeeping and auditing.
The
Patent Amendment also revises the definition of sales price (which is used to calculate
the royalty to be paid to CIT) in the Patent License Agreement to provide a calculation
of the sales price in a sublicense transaction situation. Specifically, sales price is
defined in the Patent Amendment to mean (a) gross revenues of Displays recognized from
the sale, use or other disposition, but not to sublicensees, of a Licensed FLT Product
(as defined in the Patent License Agreement) by Displays (including affiliates of Displays)
or (b) the amount used by Displays under its agreement with the relevant sublicensee
to calculate the royalty payable to Displays by the relevant sublicensee in respect of
Licensed FLT Products manufactured by the sublicensee (the “Sublicense Price”),
provided always that the Sublicense Price shall be a bona fides amount reflecting an
arm’s length transaction between a willing licensor and a willing licensee.
The
Manufacturing Agreement had a term of six months, where Displays agreed that for a period of 16 consecutive weeks it will order,
on a weekly basis, 11,500 linear meters of coated film manufactured by CIT at a cost of $7.90 per linear meter. The agreement
has been completed and the process has been transferred to the Colorado Springs facility fiscal 2015.
Note
8 — Fair Value Measurements
Liabilities
measured at fair value (in thousands) on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs
|
|
|
Amount at
|
|
Financial Instruments
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using Inputs
|
|
|
Amount
at
|
|
Financial
Instruments
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
note derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
The derivative liability
is related to warrants issued by the Company in connection with our $15 million Convertible Note and the November 2015
equity transaction, which included a down-round protection on the warrants. These warrants were not issued with the intent
of effectively hedging any future cash flow, fair value of any asset, liability or any net investment in a foreign operation.
The Company recognized approximately $1.2 million of other income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations, resulting from the decrease in the fair value of the derivative liability at June 30, 2017 as compared
to December 31, 2016. The derivative liability will continue to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized
in earnings, until the warrants are exercised, expire or are otherwise extinguished.
Note
9 — Revenue and Credit Concentrations
The
Company operates in one business segment and uses one measurement of profitability for its business.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, revenues by customers (in thousands) with more than 10% of revenue were as follows:
|
|
Six
months ended
June
30, 2017
|
|
|
Six
months ended
June
30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
Company
A
|
|
$
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Company
B
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Company
C
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
As
of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 customers with more than 10% of accounts receivables balances (in thousands) were as follows:
|
|
As
of June 30, 2017
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
Company
A
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Company
B
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Company
C
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Company
D
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
812
|
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
Note
10 — Subsequent Events
In
July 2017, the Company made a decision to restructure its operations that resulted in one-time termination benefits of approximately
$0.1 million and lease termination costs of approximately $0.1 million.
In July and August
2017, the Company issued 2,973,594 shares of common stock related to its warrant exchange and received proceeds of
approximately $1.0 million.
On August 10, 2017,
the Company entered into an equity purchase agreement with L2 Capital, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company, relating to an
offering of an aggregate of up to 14,146,649 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which
13,085,650 of such shares are being offered in an indirect primary offering consisting of an equity line of credit. The remaining
1,060,999 shares were issued as an inducement to enter the agreement.