GTT GT Gold Corp

GT Gold Corp. (TSX-V:GTT) (the “Company” or “GT Gold”) is pleased to provide notice that a National Instrument 43-101 technical report (“NI 43-101” or “Technical Report”) has been filed with Canadian securities regulators to support the maiden mineral resource estimate (“Mineral Resource”) for the Saddle North project (“Saddle North”) on the Company’s 100%-owned Tatogga property, located in northwestern British Columbia, Canada.

Paul Harbidge, President and CEO stated, “We are delighted to file the technical report in support of the previously disclosed maiden mineral resources for Saddle North, which marks another significant step for the company. An updated sensitivity analysis supports the presence of the continuous higher-grade core of mineralization, which has the potential to drive the value for our next key milestone, the Preliminary Economic Study”.

Highlights:

• The large mineral resource comprises an Indicated resource containing 1.81 Blb copper and 3.47 Moz gold and an Inferred resource containing 2.98 Blb copper and 5.46 Moz gold.

• Continuous higher-grade central core of mineralization within the deposit offers optionality and flexibility to be studied as part of the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) to drive value.

• Good metallurgical results point to a simple process, with conventional flowsheet and clean concentrate.  
• Excellent local infrastructure with a main highway crossing the property, a hydro powerline within easy access and a nearby deep-water port at Stewart, British Columbia. 
• The topography of the property is highly favorable for the potential future development of the project both in terms of open pit and underground operations. 
• Highly prospective exploration with the Saddle North deposit remaining open along strike and at depth. Saddle South provides additional project potential, it is only three kilometres from Saddle North and consists of a precious metal rich sheeted vein system. There are additional untested targets in proximity to Saddle North and South. At the new Quash Pass target, where there are two multi-kilometre anomalous trends, phase 1 diamond drilling is underway.

The Preliminary Economic Assessment is underway and will examine mining options, which are made possible by the size, grade and mineral distribution in the deposit. These will include:

• A starter pit that accesses the easily mineable surface ±150m which is situated at the top of a gently-sloping valley
• An underground operation, accessing the higher-grade core through a decline and which uses lower cost bulk mining methods

The Technical Report, dated effective August 20, 2020, is titled " NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Saddle North Copper-Gold Project" and is available under the Company's profile on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).The Technical Report was authored by Richard Flynn, P.Geo., Principal, Next Mine Consulting Ltd., who is a qualified person within the meaning of NI 43-101, is independent of the Company and has reviewed and approved the disclosure regarding the resource estimate for GT Gold disclosed herein.

The Mineral Resource and Technical Report for the Saddle North gold-rich copper porphyry system is founded on the geological model completed in Q1 2020 (see press release dated April 28, 2020).

Saddle North Mineral Resource Estimate

The open pit and underground mine shape constrained Mineral Resources are summarized below in Table 1.

Table 1: Saddle North Mineral Resource

Tatogga Project Saddle North Mineral Resources Amenable to Open Pit Mining Methods
NSR cut-off $9.00/t (0.13 % CuEq)
			Average Grade					Contained Metal
Material Type	Category	Tonnes	Cu	Au	Ag	NSR	CuEq	Cu	Au	Ag	NSR	CuEq
		(Mt)	(%)	(g/t)	(g/t)	($/t)	(%)	(M lb)	(koz)	(koz)	$M	(M lb)
Transition	Indicated	21	0.15	0.16	0.5	17.09	0.24	72	108	340	364	112
	Inferred	13	0.20	0.12	0.6	19.23	0.27	58	49	260	250	76
Fresh	Indicated	196	0.26	0.30	0.7	30.15	0.42	1,105	1,906	4,210	5,903	1,808
	Inferred	241	0.22	0.25	0.5	25.48	0.35	1,174	1,907	4,090	6,129	1,877
Total	Indicated	217	0.25	0.29	0.7	28.87	0.40	1,177	2,014	4,550	6,267	1,920
	Inferred	254	0.22	0.24	0.5	25.16	0.35	1,232	1,956	4,350	6,379	1,953
Tatogga Project Saddle North Mineral Resources Amenable to Underground Mining Methods
Within NSR $16/t cut-off (0.22% CuEq) Bulk Tonnage Underground Mining Shape
			Average Grade					Contained Metal
Material Type	Category	Tonnes	Cu	Au	Ag	NSR	CuEq	Cu	Au	Ag	NSR	CuEq
		(Mt)	(%)	(g/t)	(g/t)	($/t)	(%)	(M lb)	(koz)	(koz)	$M	(M lb)
Fresh	Indicated	81	0.35	0.56	1.2	47.14	0.65	632	1,457	3,030	3,814	1,168
	Inferred	289	0.27	0.38	0.8	34.30	0.48	1,750	3,499	7,290	9,922	3,039
Tatogga Project Saddle North for Combined Mining Methods
			Average Grade					Contained Metal
Material Type	Category	Tonnes	Cu	Au	Ag	NSR	CuEq	Cu	Au	Ag	NSR	CuEq
		(Mt)	(%)	(g/t)	(g/t)	($/t)	(%)	(M lb)	(koz)	(koz)	$M	(M lb)
Total	Indicated	298	0.28	0.36	0.8	33.83	0.47	1,809	3,471	7,580	10,081	3,088
	Inferred	543	0.25	0.31	0.7	30.03	0.42	2,982	5,455	11,640	16,301	4,992

Notes to Table 1: ‎

• Results are reported in-situ and diluted (underground resource) and are considered to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, but not unplanned dilution. Dilution in the underground estimate is approx. 5 Mt Indicated and 27 Mt Inferred avg. $12/t NSR.

• As Independence is defined under NI 43-101, the Qualified Person is Mr. Richard Flynn, P.Geo. of Next Mine Consulting Ltd. (NMC), who is independent of GT Mining and has reviewed, validated, and takes responsibility for the Mineral Resource Estimates.

• The block model was regularized to 15 m x 15 m x 15 m whole blocks using mineralization.

• The effective date of the Mineral Resource estimate is July 6, 2020.

• The number of metric tonnes are rounded to the nearest million, gold ounces are rounded to the nearest thousand and silver ounces were rounded to the nearest ten thousand. Any discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding.

• Pit constrained Mineral Resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell above an NSR cut-off of $9.00/t.

• Underground Mineral Resources assume block-cave mining method that does not allow selectivity. A bulk mining shape based on an NSR cut-off of $16.00/t was used to constrain the estimate and all blocks within the cave shape were tabulated irrespective of grade.

• Block tonnage was estimated from volumes using an average density per lithological unit. Specific gravity had a range of 2.75 to 2.86.

• All copper, gold and silver assays have been capped prior to being composited at 15m, breaking at lithology and alteration contacts.

• NSR calculation is based on a price of USD 3.25 per pound of copper, USD 1,500 per ounce of gold, USD 18 per ounce silver, and copper recoveries of 88%, gold recoveries of 67% and silver recoveries of 58%. Foreign Exchange assumption was $0.76 C$/US$.

• Net Smelter Return (“NSR”) ($/t) = (Cu% x 2204.62 lb/t x Cu Recovery x payable% x Cu CAD Price) + (Au g/t ÷ 31.1035 g/ounce x Au Recovery x Au CAD Price x payable%) + (Ag g/t ÷ 31.1035 g/ounce x Ag Recovery x Ag CAD Price x payable%).

• Copper Equivalent in % (CuEq) = Cu% + Au g/t * 0.53 + Ag g/t * 0.005.

• All values in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

• Differences may occur in totals due to rounding.

• Transition-Sulphide boundary determined from visual logging (weak oxidation in transition material limited to fracture plane surfaces).

• The CIM Definition Standards (May 10, 2014) were followed for classification of Mineral Resource.

Figure 1: Grade-Tonnage Curve for Open Pit Resource at NSR Cut-Offshttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/a5bc64c2-eac8-49fa-a52b-4f978d39fa2e

Figure 2: Grade-Tonnage Curve for Underground Resource at NSR Cut-Offshttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7859905e-4f06-4c55-9f04-d4eec53a62e8

Table 2: Open Pit Mineral Resource Sensitivity to changes in NSR Cut-Off.

Saddle North Open Pit Mineral Resource Sensitivity to NSR Cut-Off Changes
Category	NSR		Average Grade		Contained
	Cut-Off	Tonnes	Cu	Au	Cu	Au
	($/t)	(Mt)	(%)	(g/t)	(M lb)	(koz)
Indicated	7.50	222	0.24	0.28	1,183	2,027
	9.00	217	0.25	0.29	1,177	2,014
	10.50	210	0.25	0.30	1,164	1,992
	12.00	201	0.26	0.30	1,144	1,959
	13.50	187	0.27	0.32	1,109	1,908
	15.00	171	0.28	0.34	1,064	1,845
	20.00	131	0.32	0.39	923	1,645
	25.00	97	0.36	0.46	773	1,423
	30.00	70	0.41	0.53	628	1,202
	35.00	55	0.44	0.60	531	1,054
	40.00	44	0.47	0.66	452	927
	50.00	24	0.55	0.84	291	650
	60.00	15	0.59	1.01	195	487
Inferred	7.50	261	0.22	0.24	1,243	1,979
	9.00	254	0.22	0.24	1,232	1,957
	10.50	244	0.23	0.25	1,215	1,927
	12.00	229	0.23	0.26	1,181	1,878
	13.50	216	0.24	0.26	1,146	1,829
	15.00	200	0.25	0.27	1,099	1,765
	20.00	129	0.30	0.34	851	1,417
	25.00	83	0.35	0.42	646	1,126
	30.00	59	0.39	0.50	511	945
	35.00	43	0.43	0.59	407	809
	40.00	33	0.45	0.65	327	692
	50.00	18	0.51	0.82	202	475
	60.00	11	0.55	0.97	134	344

Notes to Table 2: See above notes for Table 1

Silver has been ignored in the sensitivity analysis below, in tables 2 and 3 for simplicity of reporting

Table 3: Underground Mineral Resource Sensitivity to changes in NSR Cut-Off.

Saddle North Underground Mineral Resource Sensitivity to NSR Cut-Off Changes
Category	UG Shape		Average Grade		Contained
	NSR	Tonnes	Cu	Au	Cu	Au
	($/t)	(Mt)	(%)	(g/t)	(M lb)	(koz)
Indicated	16.00	81	0.35	0.56	632	1,457
	20.00	71	0.38	0.62	598	1,406
	25.00	65	0.40	0.65	574	1,368
	40.00	46	0.45	0.78	462	1,161
	50.00	34	0.48	0.89	362	973
	60.00	23	0.51	1.01	258	747
Inferred	16.00	289	0.27	0.38	1,750	3,499
	20.00	228	0.31	0.44	1,563	3,212
	25.00	188	0.34	0.48	1,397	2,930
	40.00	93	0.40	0.64	824	1,911
	50.00	46	0.45	0.80	457	1,177
	60.00	23	0.49	0.95	249	702

Notes to Table 3: See above notes for Table 1

Data Verification

The data described above is supported by using industry standard QA/QC procedures consisting of the insertion of certified standards and blanks into the sample stream and utilizing certified independent analytical laboratories for all assays. Historical QA/QC data and methodology on the project were reviewed and are summarized in the NI 43-101 Technical Report‎. The qualified person detected minor but no significant QA/QC issues during review of the data.

All geological data used in the mineral resource estimate was reviewed and verified by Richard Flynn, P.Geo, of Next Mine Consulting Ltd. who made two site visits in June of 2020. Site visits included:

• review of GT Gold’s logging and sampling techniques
• viewing of core from seven Saddle North boreholes
• confirmation of borehole collar field locations

Qualified Person

In accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, Michael Skead, FAusIMM, Vice President Projects, is the Qualified Person for the Company and has validated and approved the technical and scientific content of this news release.

Risk Factors

GT Gold is aware this project is subject to the same types of risks that large base metal projects experience at an early stage of development in northern British Columbia. The Company has engaged experienced management and specialized consultants to identify, manage and mitigate those risks. However, the types of risks will change as the project evolves and more information becomes available.

About GT Gold

GT Gold is focused on exploring for base and precious metals in the geologically prolific terrain of British Columbia’s renowned Golden Triangle. The Company’s flagship asset is the wholly-owned, 46,827 hectare Tatogga property, located near Iskut, British Columbia, upon which it made two significant discoveries in 2017 and 2018 at its Saddle prospect: a precious metal rich vein system at Saddle South and a gold-rich copper porphyry system at Saddle North.

For further information, please contact:

GT Gold Corp.Paul HarbidgePresident and Chief Executive OfficerTel: (236) 427 5744Website: www.gtgoldcorp.ca

GT Gold Corp.Shawn CampbellChief Financial OfficerTel: (236) 427 5744

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (together, "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements. Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as "plans", "expects”, "estimates", "intends", "anticipates", "believes" or variations of such words, or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might", "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". Forward looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators, that could cause actual results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing these forward-looking statements are reasonable based upon the information currently available to management as of the date hereof, actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by these statements. Readers are therefore cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements, which only apply as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed times frames or at all. Except where required by applicable law, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.