UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011
Commission file number 1-11700
HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware 04-2869857
(State or Other Jurisdiction (I.R.S. employer
of Incorporation or Organization) identification No.)
9033 Red Branch Rd., Columbia, MD 21045
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(443) 367-5500
(Issuer's telephone number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
o
Yes
x
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 of Section 15(d) of the Act.
o
Yes
x
No
Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (
§
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x
Yes
o
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (
§
229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K
.
o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o
|
Smaller reporting company
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
o
Yes
x
No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on March 31, 2011, was $816,361 based on a closing price of $0.06 per share of Common Stock. As of December 5, 2011, 15,490,281 shares of Common Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts constitute forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by that Act. Forward looking statements may be identified by words such as “estimates”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “believes”, “should” and similar expressions or the negative versions thereof and by the context in which they are used. Such statements, whether express or implied, are based on current expectations of the company and speak only as of the date made. Reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied. Hemagen undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which they are made.
Statements concerning the establishments of reserves and adjustments for dated and obsolete products, expected financial performance, on-going business strategies and possible future action which Hemagen intends to pursue to achieve strategic objectives constitute forward-looking information. All forward-looking statements, including those relating to the sufficiency of such charges, implementation of strategies and the achievement of financial performance are each subject to numerous conditions, uncertainties, risks and other factors. Factors which could cause actual performance to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, include, without limitation, management’s analysis of Hemagen’s assets, liabilities and operations, the failure to sell date–sensitive inventory prior to its expiration, competition, new product development by competitors which could render particular products obsolete, the inability to develop or acquire and successfully introduce new products or improvements of existing products, recessionary pressures on the economy and the markets in which our customers operate, costs and difficulties in complying with the laws and regulations administered by the United States Food and Drug Administration, changes in the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar and Brazilian Reals, unfavorable political or economic developments in Brazilian operations, and the ability to assimilate successfully product acquisitions and other factors disclosed in our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with the SEC.
PART I
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. is a biotechnology company that develops, manufactures, and markets approximately 68 Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") cleared proprietary medical diagnostic test kits and components. There are two different product lines, the Virgo® line and the Analyst® line. The Virgo® product line consist of various diagnostic test kits that are used to aid in the diagnosis of certain autoimmune and infectious diseases, using ELISA, Immunoflourescence, and hemagglutination technology. The Analyst® product line is an FDA-cleared Benchtop Clinical
C
hemistry Analyzer System, including consumables that are used to measure important constituents in human and animal blood. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1985 and became a public company in 1993. Hemagen’s principal offices are located at 9033 Red Branch Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045 and the telephone number is (443) 367-5500. Hemagen maintains a website at www.hemagen.com. Investors can obtain copies of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission from our web site free of charge as well as from the Securities and Exchange Commission website at www.sec.gov.
In September 1998, the Company acquired the Analyst
â
Benchtop Clinical Chemistry System, which was originally designed by Dupont, from Dade Behring, Inc. The Analyst® is a proprietary bench top clinical chemistry instrument and reagent system. The Analyst® instrument is used to test general chemistry profiles for both the human and veterinary markets using a proprietary consumable rotor that is manufactured by Hemagen at its Columbia, Maryland facility. The Analyst® is cleared by the FDA for marketing in the United States to physician office laboratories. In December 2002, Hemagen also acquired another veterinary chemistry analyzer system, the Endocheck. Today, Hemagen estimates that its customer base for the Analyst® is approximately 90% veterinary practices and 10% physician office laboratory practices.
In 1995, Hemagen completed the acquisition of a comprehensive line of diagnostic test kits utilizing immunofluorescence technology (“IFA products”) from Schiaparelli Biosystems, Inc. The IFA products and Hemagen’s comprehensive line of proprietary diagnostic test kits based on enzyme-linked immunosorbence assay technologies (“ELISA” or “EIA”) and hemagglutination technology (“HA”) form the Virgo
â
product line. These products are used to test for autoimmune and infectious diseases and are manufactured for manual use or for use on automated instrument platforms.
The Virgo® product-line is marketed directly to reference laboratories, hospitals, and universities in the United States, among others and internationally. There are over 30 distributors that market the Virgo
â
product line. Hemagen also markets the Virgo
â
product line in South America through its wholly-owned subsidiary Hemagen Diagnosticos Comercio, Importacao Exportacao, Ltd. (HDC), a Brazilian limited liability company.
Recent Developments
During fiscal 2011 management continued to work toward achieving its goal of increasing shareholder value and achieving sustained profitability. Some of the important steps taken toward achieving those goals were as follows:
·
|
Hemagen has engaged four PhD level personnel to improve and bolster its manufacturing and product development capabilities.
|
·
|
The Company looked for opportunities to consolidate operations into more efficient space, and continues to seek out and implement cost reductions.
|
·
|
Hemagen completed the improvements to its autoimmune Elisa line and product offering.
|
·
|
The Company is working on bringing various processes in house that were previously outsourced.
|
·
|
Hemagen is evaluating several new technology renovations that it believes will be implemented in 2012.
|
Technology
Analyst Instrument System
The Analyst® is a bench-top centrifugal clinical chemistry analyzer. The Analyst® utilizes a consumable rotor that contains dry prepackaged reagents. The Analyst® spins the rotor, mixing the patient sample with the dry reagents, producing a result in approximately ten minutes. Hemagen currently markets four types of rotors providing a variety of clinical chemistry tests, which are 510(k) cleared by the FDA for the human medical market and two types of rotors that are exclusively sold for the veterinary market. The Analyst® instrument has been designated by the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments (CLIA) as a moderately complex system, and is therefore suitable for both the physician and veterinary office laboratories. Hemagen’s blood chemistry and Analyst® system assays are used to aid in the monitoring and measurement of health profiles, such as cholesterol, blood urea nitrogen, triglycerides, glucose and uric acid.
In addition, Hemagen has entered into agreements to distribute a hematology analyzer and an electrolyte and blood gas analyzer to complement the Analyst®.
Autoimmune and Infectious Disease Assays
Detection of the presence and concentration of certain antibodies in human blood can assist physicians in the diagnosis of certain diseases. Hemagen's assays are
in vitro
(outside of a patient's body) diagnostic tests that are used to measure specific substances, antibodies, in blood or other body fluids. Our assays recognize specific antibodies that bind to our assay platforms in the proper environment, making it detectable either by the naked eye, or with the aid of a laboratory technique, which amplifies the reaction so that it is rendered visible. Hemagen's hemagglutination, ELISA and immunofluorescence assays are three examples of such techniques.
Immunofluorescence
Hemagen's immunofluorescence tests are manufactured using several procedures with the most common being mammalian cells grown on microscope slides treated with disease-producing organisms (viral or bacterial). Serum from a patient is placed in contact with the infected cells on the slides. If a patient has antibodies to the organism causing the disease, the antibodies will bind to the organism. A chemical reagent is added to the slide that binds to the organism and the antibody, if present and detectable. When the slide is illuminated with light at a specific wavelength in a fluorescent microscope, the chemically-treated cells will appear with a specific fluorescent pattern, indicating a positive test result. If the patient does not have detectable quantities of the appropriate antibody, no fluorescence will appear producing a negative test result.
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assays
ELISA or EIA tests employ small plastic wells coated with particular antigens. The test process involves introducing the patient's serum into the well to allow a reaction to occur. If the antibody being tested for is present, it will bind to the antigens on the inner surface of the well. After the wells are rinsed, the specifically bound antibody will remain while any non-specific antibodies will be washed away. To detect the quantity of the specific antibody, other compounds (conjugate, substrate) are added which will cause a color change in the liquid, the intensity of which is proportionate to the quantity of the specific antibody found. If no color is noted, this indicates that the patient's serum did not contain detectable quantities of the specific antibody.
Hemagen has developed an application for its ELISA technology to detect cardiovascular and inflammatory risk factors (apolipoproteins) and inflammatory signals (acute phase reactants), the latter of which are present in a patient's blood prior to the clinical manifestation of infection or inflammation. If successful, these technologies could lead to earlier detection and prevention of cardiovascular disease, the imminent rejection of transplanted organs or the onset of infections. Such earlier detection could enable physicians to better plan appropriate treatment of patients with these conditions. Hemagen currently markets two test kits to detect inflammatory signals.
Hemagglutination
Hemagglutination is the agglutination or "clumping" of red blood cells (RBCs). Many substances, including certain antibodies, when placed in contact with RBCs, will cause agglutination. Under the appropriate conditions, human RBCs may be modified or sensitized by binding specific foreign antigens to their surface.
These sensitized RBCs will bind to the specific antibody and this will cause agglutination of these cells. The presence of certain antibodies in an individual’s serum (blood from which clotted RBCs have been removed) can indicate certain diseases. By sensitizing RBCs with an antigen that specifically reacts with a particular antibody, the simple visible observation of the agglutination reaction will indicate the presence of the disease-produced antibody. The use of RBCs instead of other particles can allow for simple visual observation of the agglutination reaction in the proper environment, and reduces the non-specific reactions seen in artificial systems such as those that utilize latex particles.
To perform Hemagen's hemagglutination test, a technician combines Hemagen's sensitized RBCs with a patient's serum in a small well with a V-shaped bottom according to directions included with Hemagen's test kits. If no agglutination takes place, the RBCs will settle to the bottom of the well, resulting in a clearly visible red dot which indicates that the test is negative. In contrast, if the particular antibody is present in the patient's blood, the RBCs will agglutinate, which prevents the RBCs from settling to the bottom of the well. Instead of the small red dot, the substance will appear a diffuse red, which indicates a positive reaction.
Current Products
Analyst
â
System Products
Hemagen currently markets four FDA 510(k) cleared rotor types for use on the Analyst® clinical chemistry analyzer, two general chemistry rotors, a glucose test and a lipid screen test. In addition, Hemagen sells four rotors specifically designed for the veterinary marketplace: VET-16, VetFlex7, VetFlex and T4 rotors.
Immunofluorescence or “IFA” Products
Hemagen's immunofluorescence products consist primarily of diagnostic assays for infectious diseases and several products for autoimmune diseases. Immunofluorescence kits are used as primary or confirmatory tests in many large clinical laboratories worldwide. Hemagen currently sells 15 kits in the immunofluorescence format.
Hemagen's immunofluorescence products are used to aid in the diagnosis of the following diseases:
Cytomegalovirus
|
Herpes simplex
|
SLE (Lupus)
|
German Measles
|
Connective Tissue Diseases
|
Chicken Pox
|
Primary Bilary Cirrhosis
|
Epstein-Barr virus (Mononucleosis)
|
Toxoplasmosis
|
Chlamydia
|
Syphilis
|
Measles
|
RSV
|
Mumps
|
|
Autoimmune Diseases
|
ELISA Assays
Hemagen develops, manufactures and markets ELISA test kits for the detection of disease. Along with the immunofluorescence and hemagglutination assays, Hemagen’s ELISA kits test for specific antibodies. The quantitative or semi-quantitative test results give useful information about the stage and prevalence of a particular disease. ELISA tests are widely used by large laboratories, due to their ready adaptability to automation and high volume testing. Hemagen’s autoimmune and infectious disease ELISA kits are used in the diagnosis of the following diseases:
Systemic Lupus Erythematous (Lupus)
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
Scleroderma
|
Sjögren's Syndrome
|
Glomerulonephritis
|
Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
|
Polymyositis
|
Dermatomyositis
|
Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
|
Wegener’s Granulomatosis
|
Systemic Vasculitides
|
Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome
|
Venous and Arterial Thromboses
|
Thrombocytopenia
|
Recurrent Abortion
|
Toxoplasmosis
|
Rubella (German Measles)
|
Cytomegalovirus Infections
|
Herpes simplex
1 & 2 Infections
|
Chagas Disease
|
Varicella Zoster Infections (Chicken Pox & Shingles)
|
Hemagen has also developed specialized assays for quantitative analysis of the acute phase markers, specifically, C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A. These are believed to be important in the detection and prediction of inflammatory events associated with several diseases, including Systemic Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Myocardial Infarction.
Hemagen also offers ELISA & Hemagglutination screening assays, capable of verifying the presence of as many as six analytes in a single test. This is a useful tool in a patient’s initial assessment. For example, if an individual’s autoimmune screen 6 test is positive, individual marker kits are then used to differentially diagnose the particular rheumatoid disease. To better serve customers’ needs, most of the reagents for these kits are offered in both lyophilized and liquid-stable formats.
Hemagglutination Assays
Hemagen's hemagglutination assays are based on Hemagen's proprietary technique to lyophilize, or "freeze dry," the RBCs which form the central component of a hemagglutination assay. Hemagen's proprietary lyophilization technique for the preservation of RBCs permits the production of standardized, easy-to-use and accurate hemagglutination tests with an extended shelf-life, most of which were previously unavailable using hemagglutination assays. The shelf-life of the lyophilized RBCs before reconstitution may be up to 48 months. A technician reconstitutes the powdered cells in a water-based solution prior to introducing to the patient's serum.
Each hemagglutination test also requires a specific formula to sensitize the RBCs prior to lyophilization such that they will react to a specific antibody. For each of its tests, Hemagen uses a proprietary formula to combine antigens and other reagents with RBCs in a manner that allows for standard, sensitive and specific agglutination reactions. Results from Hemagen's test kits are generally available within two hours. Hemagen's hemagglutination test kits aid in the diagnosis of the following diseases:
SLE (Lupus)
|
Dermatomyositis
|
Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
|
Polymyositis
|
Sjögren's Syndrome
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis)
|
Chagas' Disease
|
Distribution and Marketing
General
In the United States, Hemagen sells its products directly and through distributors to clinical laboratories, hospitals, veterinary offices and research organizations, among other places. Internationally, Hemagen sells its products primarily through distributors and its wholly-owned subsidiary in Brazil. Hemagen grants both exclusive and non-exclusive distributorships, which generally cover limited geographic areas and specific test kits. Hemagen has relationships with over 30 distributors in various countries worldwide.
Hemagen markets its Virgo® product line in South America through its wholly owned subsidiary, Hemagen Diagnosticos Comerico, Importacao e Exportacao, Ltd. (“HDC”) in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hemagen also engages numerous distributors throughout South America. HDC maintains a fully staffed sales, marketing and distribution force, warehouse and administrative office. In fiscal years 2011 and 2010, Hemagen derived product sales through HDC of approximately $2,390,000 and $2,593,000 respectively, which represents 46% and 50% of Hemagen’s total sales, respectively.
Products Under Development
Hemagen spent approximately $5,000 and $25,000 on research and development for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
The Company’s research and development efforts are currently focused on:
·
|
Activities related to upgrades to the Analyst® instrument and product offering such as evaluating and
developing complimentary products for Hemagen’s Analyst® product line to distribute to the veterinary market and alternative tests utilizing the Analysts’® rotor technology;
|
·
|
Developing and enhancing IFA kits.
|
Manufacturing and Sources of Supply
Hemagen manufactures its ELISA test kits, hemagglutination test kits, immunofluorescence test kits and Analyst® and Endochek consumables at its Columbia, Maryland facility. The Analyst® and the Endochek instruments are manufactured by third parties for Hemagen. Hemagen purchases many of the antigens and other reagents used in its kits from outside vendors. Certain of these antigens and reagents are from single suppliers. The Company attempts to mitigate such risk from these single suppliers by maintaining an adequate supply of inventory and/or backup suppliers. If the products purchased from these single sources become unavailable there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to substitute a new supplier in a timely manner and thus this could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations. Certain reagents used in Hemagen's test kits are manufactured at Hemagen's facilities. Hemagen uses lyophilization equipment to preserve sensitized red blood cells for its hemagglutination test kits. All of Hemagen's products are manufactured under the Quality System Regulation as defined by the FDA.
Most components used in Hemagen’s products are available from multiple sources. Certain raw materials that are used in the Analyst® rotors are manufactured for the Company pursuant to manufacturing agreements with other manufacturing companies that have been vendors for the Company for many years. The Company continues to consider other potential vendors, including itself, or alternative vendors for manufacturing although there can be no assurances that we will be able to develop any new suppliers for these raw materials used in the Analyst® product line.
Government Regulation
Hemagen's manufacturing, distribution and marketing of diagnostic test kits is subject to a number of both domestic and international regulatory controls. In the United States, Hemagen’s production and marketing activities are subject to regulation by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), under the authority of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended.
These regulations require that Hemagen must formally notify the FDA of its intentions to market
in vitro
diagnostic devices through a regulatory submission process, either the 510(k) process or the Pre-market Approval (PMA) process. When a 510(k) process is used, Hemagen is required to demonstrate that the product is “substantially equivalent” to another product in commercial distribution. Under the 510(k) process, Hemagen cannot proceed with sales of its diagnostic products in the United States until it receives clearance from the FDA in the form of a substantial equivalency letter. Currently, the majority of products that are reviewed by the 510(k) process are cleared within 90 days. In certain cases, specifically for Class III devices, Hemagen must follow the PMA process which is lengthier and more burdensome.
Hemagen is registered with the FDA as a device manufacturer and to disclose its devices. Accordingly, Hemagen is subject to inspection on a routine basis for compliance with the FDA's Quality System Regulations. These regulations require that Hemagen manufacture its products and maintain its documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing, process control and distribution activities. In addition, Hemagen is required to comply with various FDA requirements for labeling, pursuant to the applicable regulations. The most recent inspections by the FDA were in October 2010 for the Columbia, MD facility. The results of those inspections can be reviewed at
www.fda.gov
., the content of which is not incorporated herein. Finally, the FDA prohibits an approved device from being marketed for unapproved applications. Hemagen believes it is in compliance with all such regulations.
In January 2004, the Company received CE certification thereby allowing the Company to sell certain of its registered products in the European Community.
In October 2009, the Company received ISO 13485 certification in order to market additional products in the European Community and Canada. In October 2010 Hemagen was re-audited for the ISO and was recertified for 2011.
Competition
The clinical diagnostic industry is highly competitive. There are many companies, both public and private, engaged in diagnostics-related sales, including a number of well-known pharmaceutical and chemical companies. Competition is based primarily on product reliability, customer service and price. Many of these companies have substantially greater capital resources and marketing and business organizations that are substantially greater in size than Hemagen. Many of these companies have also been working on immunodiagnostic reagents and products, including some products believed to be similar to those currently marketed or under development by Hemagen. Hemagen believes that its primary competitors in the market include Abaxis Inc., Bion, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Corgenix Medical Corporation, Diamedix Corporation, Heska Corporation, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Immco Diagnostics, INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., and Trinity Biotech PLC, among others. Hemagen expects competition within this industry to intensify.
Product Liability
The testing, marketing and sale of clinical diagnostic products entail an inherent risk of allegations of product liability, and there can be no assurance that product liability claims will not be asserted against Hemagen. Hemagen may incur product liability due to product failure or improper use of products by the user. Inaccurate detection may result in the failure to administer necessary therapeutic drugs or administration of unnecessary and potentially toxic drugs. Even with proper use of a product, there may be specific instances in which the results obtained from Hemagen's test kits could lead a physician to predict the inappropriate therapy for a particular patient. Hemagen maintains product liability insurance in the amount of up to $2,000,000 per incident and in the aggregate which, based on Hemagen's experience and industry practice, Hemagen believes to be adequate for its present operations. No assurance can be given that Hemagen's insurance coverage is sufficient to fully insure against claims which may be made against Hemagen.
Patents and Proprietary Rights
Hemagen protects its technology primarily as trade secrets rather than relying on patents, either because patent protection is not possible or, in management's opinion, would be less effective than maintaining secrecy. In addition, Hemagen relies upon confidentiality agreements with its employees. To the extent that it relies on confidentiality agreements and trade secret protection, there can be no assurance that Hemagen's efforts to maintain secrecy will be successful or that third parties will not be able to develop the technology independently. In the future, Hemagen may apply for patent protection for certain of its technologies if management believes such protection would be beneficial to Hemagen. The protection afforded by patents depends upon a variety of factors which may severely limit the value of the patent protection, particularly in foreign countries, and no assurance can be given that patents, if granted, will provide meaningful protection for Hemagen's technology.
Employees
As of September 30, 2011, Hemagen had twenty-eight full-time employees and three employees working on a contractual basis. Thirteen employees are in sales, marketing, general and administrative activities and eighteen (including contractual personnel) are involved in production activities.
None of Hemagen’s employees are represented by a labor organization and Hemagen is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement. Hemagen has never experienced any strike or work stoppage and considers its relationship with its employees to be good. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that the Company will not experience such strikes or work stoppages in the future, either of which could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Not applicable.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Hemagen maintains its principal administrative office, laboratory and production operations in a 22,610 square foot leased facility in Columbia, Maryland. The Company plans to slightly reduce the space it utilizes in the Columbia, MD facility to 20,000 square feet by June 30,, 2012. Under the Columbia lease, which runs through June 30, 2012, Hemagen expects to pay approximately $207,538 (assuming 22,610 square feet leased through December 2011 and a subsequent reduction to 20,000 square feet) per year in rent for the upcoming fiscal year.
Hemagen's subsidiary, Hemagen Diagnosticos Comercio, Importacao e Exportacao, Ltd, leases approximately 6,000 square feet of flexible office space in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The lease, which expired on June 30, 2006, has been extended without a definitive stated term. Either party can terminate with 60 days notice. This subsidiary paid approximately $101,000 during fiscal 2011 in rent for this space. Management is currently seeking to relocate to a less expensive, and more efficient and effective space.
Management believes that all of the properties are adequately insured.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
Not applicable.
Item 4.
[Removed and Reserved]
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Hemagen's Common Stock has been traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board (OTC-BB) market since March 3, 2003 under the symbol “HMGN.OB.” On December 5, 2011, the closing bid and ask price for the Common Stock as reported by the OTC-BB were $0.031 and $0.045 per share, respectively.
For the periods indicated, the following table sets for the range of high and low bid prices for the Common Stock as reported by the OTC-BB during fiscal 2011 and 2010. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
Fiscal 2011
|
High
|
Low
|
First Quarter
|
$0.07
|
$0.04
|
Second Quarter
|
$0.08
|
$0.06
|
Third Quarter
|
$0.08
|
$0.04
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$0.04
|
$0.03
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
$0.11
|
$0.07
|
Second Quarter
|
$0.11
|
$0.05
|
Third Quarter
|
$0.10
|
$0.06
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$0.10
|
$0.06
|
As of October 31, 2011, there were 158 holders of record of Hemagen's Common Stock, which Hemagen believes represents approximately 1,233 beneficial owners.
Dividends
Hemagen has never paid cash dividends. Hemagen currently intends to retain all future earnings, if any, for use in its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Period
|
(
a
)
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
(b)
Average
Price Paid per Share
|
|
(c)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)
|
|
(d)
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
|
July 1-31, 2011
|
27,056
|
|
$0.030
|
|
27,056
|
|
-
|
August 1-30, 2011
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
September 1-30, 2011
|
450
|
|
$0.030
|
|
450
|
|
-
|
Total
|
27,506
|
|
$0.030
|
|
27,506
|
|
-
|
(1)
|
Represents shares of the Company’s Common Stock purchased pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) that was established October 1, 2003 with no expiration. The purpose of the plan is not to repurchase, but rather it is an employee benefit plan.
|
(2)
|
There is no maximum number of shares that may be purchases under the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
Not applicable
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
Refer to “Forward Looking Statements” following the Index in the front of this Form 10-K.
Overview
Revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 were $5,141,227 compared to revenues for fiscal 2010 of $5,220,170; gross margin for fiscal 2011 was $1,960,797 compared to gross margin for fiscal 2010 of $2,356,205; and the net loss for fiscal 2011 was $880,476 compared to the net loss for fiscal 2010 of $156,314. The comprehensive loss for fiscal 2011 was $918,977 compared to comprehensive loss of $107,428 for fiscal 2010.
Historically, Hemagen has concentrated its efforts on developing, manufacturing and marketing medical diagnostic test kits used to aid in the diagnosis of certain diseases and for assessing general health conditions. Hemagen has approximately 60 different test kits available that are 510(K) cleared for sale in the United States by the FDA, and also sells other products that are not required to be FDA cleared.
Management has been working to take the appropriate actions to improve the management and operations of the Company while striving to achieve sustained profitability. There can be no assurance that any of the previously discussed actions management is taking will achieve the desired results. However, management believes that as a direct result of these actions, cash flow from operations, cash on hand at September 30, 2011 and its line of credit availability will be sufficient to finance its operations for fiscal 2012. See the “Recent Developments” section on page 3.
At September 30, 2011, Hemagen had $213,611 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $923,610 and a current ratio of 1.61 to 1.0.
Hemagen currently has a revolving senior secured line of credit with TiFunding, a related party, for the purpose of financing working capital needs as required. The line of credit currently provides for borrowings up to $1,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 9%. As of December 5, 2011, the outstanding balance on the line was $719,426. The Company’s ability to borrow on the line is based on a borrowing base calculation dependent on certain receivables and inventory. The line of credit’s maturity has been extended until October 1, 2012 and is renewable annually. The Company intends to renew the line when it expires. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that it will have sufficient cash to repay the line of credit if it is not renewed or to finance its operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Hemagen has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010
For fiscal 2011, revenues decreased by approximately $79,000 (2%) to approximately $5,141,000 from approximately $5,220,000 for fiscal 2010. Approximately $38,000 of this decrease was attributed to lower sales in the Analyst® division during fiscal 2011 and a decrease in sales in the Virgo line of approximately $54,000.
Sales of the Analyst® Clinical Chemistry Analyzer product line were approximately $38,000 lower in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010. Consumable sales increased by approximately $36,000 during the current fiscal year but this increase was offset by a decrease in equipment sales of approximately $74,000 during the current year.
Revenues from the autoimmune and infectious disease line decreased overall by approximately $54,000 during the current year to $3,497,000 in fiscal 2011 from $3,551,000 in fiscal 2010. This overall decrease was due to lower sales overall in the autoimmune and infections disease line. Sales in the local Brazilian currency were approximately R$160,000 less than that of the prior year but the stabilization of the Brazilian Real during the year resulted in only a decrease of approximately $29,000 dollars. The average exchange rates for the 12 month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were 1.65 and 1.78, respectively. Non-Brazil sales decreased by approximately $25,000 over the prior year.
Cost of product sales increased approximately $316,000 (11%) to approximately $3,180,000 in fiscal 2011 from approximately $2,864,000 in fiscal 2010. Gross margin decreased to 38% in fiscal 2011 as compared to a 45% gross margin in fiscal 2010. This decrease in gross margin is predominately attributable to an increase in raw material costs from one supplier who increased its prices for certain orders during the current year, as well as increases in outside consulting and payroll related expenses. The Company recently increased its prices on certain items to cover the increase in raw material costs and expects its margins to improve going forward.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $334,000 during fiscal 2011 to approximately $2,429,000 from approximately $2,095,000 in fiscal 2010. The Brazil operational expenses accounted for approximately $239,000 of this overall increase which included increases in travel, facility, audit and outside consulting service expenses as compared to the prior year expenses. The Columbia Maryland operations contributed to the remaining $79,000 of increased expense, which consisted mainly of increased expenses related to travel, facility and legal expenses.
Research and development expenses for fiscal 2011 decreased approximately $20,000 (80%) to approximately $5,000 from $25,000, in the previous year. The decrease is the result of the reduction in headcount.
For fiscal 2011, Hemagen had a net operating loss of approximately $473,000 as compared to $236,000 of operating income in the previous fiscal year. This decrease of approximately $709,000 in operating income is the result of the combination of the decline in gross margins and the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses that occurred during fiscal 2011.
Net interest expense for fiscal year 2011 increased by approximately $74,000 to $406,000 in 2011 from $332,000 in the prior year. During the current fiscal year there was approximately $32,000 of increased interest expense related to the issuance of warrants that occurred when the line of credit was transferred in February 2011. There was also an increase of approximately $22,000 of interest expense related to the line of credit which was the result of carrying a higher outstanding balance during the year in conjunction with an increase in the annual rate. The annual rate changed from 5.5% to 9% in February of 2011 when the line was transferred. A decrease in interest income of approximately $17,000 was the result of the declining balance on the note receivable that also contributed to the overall change.
In fiscal year 2011, the Company had approximately $4,000 of income tax expense as compared to $90,000 in fiscal year 2010. All of the income tax expense is related to the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary and represents the net tax expense after adjusting the benefit of loss carry-forwards utilized according to Brazilian tax law.
Net loss for fiscal year 2011 increased by approximately $725,000 to $881,000 as compared to a net loss of approximately $156,000 in the previous fiscal year. This increase in net loss is attributable to lower gross margins, increases in overall administrative expenses, and an overall increase in interest expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2011, Hemagen had $213,611 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $923,610 and a current ratio of 1.61 to 1.0. At September 30, 2010, Hemagen had $151,743 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $1,601,979 and a current ratio of 2.37 to 1.0.
Hemagen currently has a revolving senior secured line of credit with TiFunding for the purpose of financing working capital needs as required. The line of credit provides for borrowings up to $1,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 9%. As of September 30, 2011 and December 5, 2011, the outstanding balance on the line was $669,413 and $719,426, respectively. The Company’s ability to borrow on the line is based on a borrowing base calculation dependent on certain receivables and inventory. The line of credit’s maturity has been extended to October 1, 2012, and is renewable annually. The Company intends to renew the line when it expires.
During fiscal 2011, Hemagen had capital expenditures of approximately $56,000, which included some leasehold improvements and upgrades to office furniture and equipment.
Cash used by operating activities was approximately $337,000; cash provided by investing activities was approximately $156,000 and cash provided by financing activities was approximately $271,000. The effect of exchange rates on cash in fiscal year 2011 resulted in a negative cash adjustment of approximately $29,000.
Hemagen believes that cash flow from operations and cash on hand at September 30, 2011 will be sufficient to finance its operations for fiscal 2012. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that it will have sufficient cash to repay the line of credit if it is not renewed or finance its operations.
Fiscal 2011 compared to Fiscal 2010
Hemagen used approximately $337,000 of cash in its operating activities during fiscal 2011 compared to $183,000 of cash provided from its operating activities in fiscal 2010. The cash provided from the change in operating assets and liabilities was approximately $270,000 during fiscal 2011 compared to $197,000 of cash used during fiscal 2010. The largest portion of the change in operating assets and liabilities came from the decrease in prepaid expenses as compared to the prior year along with decreased accounts receivable and increased payables all which provided net cash for operating activities during the current year
Cash provided by investing activities totaled approximately $156,000 in fiscal 2011, as compared to approximately $177,000 provided in fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2011 there was a reduction in the outlay of cash for purchases of property and equipment of approximately $18,000, offset by less cash provided by the sale of Company assets of approximately $38,000.
Cash provided by financing activities totaled approximately $271,000 in fiscal 2011 as compared to $31,000 used in financing activities in fiscal 2010. The cash utilized during the current year went toward funding the operations of the Company as compared to the cash used during fiscal 2010 which went toward paying down the Company’s line of credit and paying on the notes with Itau bank.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and judgments with respect to the selection and application of accounting policies that affect the reporting of amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies and estimates have the greatest impact on the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
The Company manufactures and markets a broad offering of
in vitro
diagnostic products and services which currently include: (1) reagents and consumables for general chemistry analyzers; (2) medical diagnostic test kits; (3) medical diagnostic instruments; and (4) maintenance services. Reagents and consumables, in addition to medical test kits, represent the largest portion of our sales. Revenues from reagents and consumables and test kits are recognized when the product is shipped, all contractual obligations have been satisfied and it is reasonably assured that the resulting receivable is collectible.
Instruments are usually sold either directly to the customer or to a third party financing entity that in turn leases it to the end customer. Instrument revenue is recognized upon shipment, when all contractual obligations have been satisfied and it is reasonably assured that the resulting receivable is collectible.
Revenues under product service contracts, which are generally for one year or less, are recognized ratably over the term of the contract, based on the relative fair value of the contracts.
Accounts Receivable
The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from distributors (domestic and international), hospitals, universities, and physician and veterinary offices and other entities in the medical field. Credit is extended based on evaluation of customers’ financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are most often due within 30 days and are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Any accounts outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts based on a number of factors, including the length of time the accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual amounts collectible could vary from our estimates and affect our operating results.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost as determined by the first-in, first-out method (“FIFO”) or market. Market for raw materials is based on replacement costs and, for other inventory classifications, on net realizable value. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for deterioration, excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements for the next 12 to 18 months, depending on the product. Several factors may influence the realizability of our inventories, including technological change and new product development. These factors could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory on hand. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory was overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in cost of goods sold at the time of such determination. Although we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and our reported operating results.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This accounting standard sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. This standard also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This accounting standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 which amended ASC 855. This amendment, which was effective upon issuance, removed the requirement for SEC registrants to disclose the date through which such registrants have evaluated subsequent events.
ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance which changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This new guidance also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This new guidance is to be applied prospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2012 will not materially expand its consolidated footnote disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. This new guidance requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This new guidance is to be applied retrospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2012 will not materially change the presentation of its consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Not applicable.
Item 8.
Financial Statements.
See Item 15 below and the Index therein for a listing of the financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this report.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, William P. Hales, and the Company’s Principal Financial Officer, Catherine M. Davidson, have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2011. Based upon this evaluation, these officers believe that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011.
Management is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties due to the small number of employees within the financial and administrative functions of the Company. As a result of the limitations of the resources and segregation of duties, Stegman and Company, the Company’s current auditor has informed the Company that these limitations represent a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. Management will continue to evaluate this segregation of duties issue. The Company has worked over the past years and has documented these internal controls. This material weakness has not been remediated.
The internal control report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed herewith, under the caption “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of internal controls that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, Hemagen’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
Not applicable.
PART III
Executive Officers and Directors
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The following table presents information regarding the Directors of the registrant.
Dr. Alan S. Cohen
Director Since 1993
Term Expires 2012
Age: 85
|
Dr. Cohen has served as a Director of Hemagen since its inception. Dr. Cohen has been a Professor of Medicine at Boston University School of Medicine since 1968 and a Professor of Pharmacology since 1974. He is currently Distinguished Professor of Medicine (E). Dr. Cohen is Editor-in-Chief of AMYLOID. The Journal of Protein Folding Disorders. Dr. Cohen served as the Director of the Arthritis Center of Boston University from 1976 to 1994. From 1973 to 1992, Dr. Cohen served as Chief of Medicine of Boston City Hospital. Dr. Cohen is a past president of the American College of Rheumatology. Dr. Cohen received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Harvard College and his M.D. degree from the Boston University School of Medicine. Dr. Cohen’s extensive experience in the medical field, both as a practicing rheumatologist and in academic medicine and pharmacology, make him extremely knowledgeable about how the Company’s operations and products relate to the views of, and recent developments in the medical community, and render him a valuable member of the Company’s Board.
|
William P. Hales
Director since 1999
Term Expires 2014
Age: 49
|
William P. Hales has been a Director of Hemagen and its President since October 1, 1999, and has served as Hemagen’s CEO since 2002. Mr. Hales has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors since February 2004. From 1991 to 1999 Mr. Hales was employed by several brokerage and investment banking firms. Prior to that, Mr. Hales spent six years in public accounting with Ernst & Whinney and Coopers & Lybrand advising clients on both audit and management consulting. Mr. Hales’ long-time service as the principal executive officer of the Company provides him with a unique perspective as the Company’s overall business strategy given its operating history and its future goals and objectives, which, through his position on the Board, he is able to communicate with the other Directors.
|
Edward T. Lutz
Director since 2004
Term Expires 2013
Age: 65
|
Mr. Lutz has been the President and CEO of Lutz Advisors, Inc. since 2001. Prior to that Mr. Lutz served Tucker Anthony Sutro Capital Markets within the Investment Banking Group focusing on the bank and thrift industry. He has over thirty-five years experience in bank regulation, mergers and acquisitions of troubled financial institutions, strategic planning and structuring financial transactions. Over the last 13 years he has specialized in investment banking and consulting to bank and thrift institutions. Mr. Lutz was a member of the board of directors of Union State Bank (NYSE) and U.S.B Holding Bank which as sold to KeyBank in 2008. Mr. Lutz earned his B.A. in Economics from Hofsta University and his M.B.A in Finance from American University. As a result of Mr. Lutz’s prior experience serving on the boards of directors of multiple U.S. public companies and his financial expertise, he provides the Board with important guidance with respect to the complex financial and governance issues facing the Company as a result of being a public-traded company. Since October 2008, Mr. Lutz has been Vice Chairman and Director of Greater Hudson Bank, NA, a community bank located in Middletown, New York. He also serves as Chairman of that bank’s Audit Committee.
|
The executive officers as of the date of this report:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
William P. Hales
|
49
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Catherine M. Davidson (a)
|
46
|
Controller, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|
(a) On July 11, 2007 Catherine Davidson was appointed as the Company’s Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. For the five years prior to joining Hemagen, Ms. Davidson served as the Chief Financial Officer of Pepco Building Services, Inc., overseeing the finance and accounting functions of that company and its subsidiaries.
Our Directors will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is comprised of, Edward T. Lutz, (Chairman) and William P. Hales. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Lutz meets the standards for independence provided under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. All members meet standards of financial literacy. The Board has also determined that Mr. Lutz qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Hemagen’s executive officers, Directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Hemagen’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on a review of reports received by it, and upon written representations from the reporting persons, Hemagen believes that during the last fiscal year, all of its executive officers, Directors and 10% shareholders complied with Section 16 reporting except that each of Messrs. Cohen and Lutz filed one late ownership report with respect to options granted for service as a director.
Code of Ethics
The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our Directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics was filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, a copy of which is available to any person without charge upon request to the Secretary.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following sets forth compensation paid, earned or awarded to the CEO and Principal Executive officer and the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer during the last two fiscal years ended September 30:
Name and
Principal
Position
|
|
Year
(b)
|
|
Salary
($)
(c)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
(d)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(e)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(f)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(g)
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(h)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(i)
|
|
|
Total
($)
(j)
|
William P. Hales
|
|
2011
2010
|
|
172,500
172,500
|
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
--
128,832
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
43,775
42,704
|
(1)
(2)
|
|
216,275
344,036
|
Catherine M. Davidson
|
|
2011
2010
|
|
115,000
115,000
|
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
|
|
1,183
1,692
|
(3)
(4)
|
|
116,183
116,962
|
(1)
|
Represents $31,800 in provision for housing, $10,200 for a car allowance and an estimated $1,775 for the Company’s contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the plan year ending September 2011.
|
(2)
|
Represents $29,820 in provision for housing, $10,200 for a car allowance and $2,684 for the Company’s contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the plan year ending September 2010.
|
(3)
|
Represents Company’s estimated contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership plan for plan year ending September 2011.
|
(4)
|
Represents Company’s contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership plan for plan year ending September 2010.
|
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
(b)
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(c)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
(d)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
(f)
|
|
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
(g)
|
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(h)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(i)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(j)
|
William P. Hales
|
|
250,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
.20
|
|
10/25/2015
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
406,208
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
.19
|
|
03/04/2019
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
616,667
|
|
1,233,333(1)
|
|
—
|
|
.11
|
|
05/27/2020
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
.07
|
|
05/27/2020
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catherine M. Davidson
|
|
28,000
10,000
|
|
7,000 (2)
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
.22
.19
|
|
04/23/2012
01/10/2013
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
|
—
—
|
(1) These unexercisable options will vest as follows:
# OPTIONS
|
VESTING DATE
|
616,667
|
05/27/2012
|
616,666
|
05/27/2013
|
(2) These unexercisable options will vest as follows:
# OPTIONS
|
VESTING DATE
|
7,000
|
04/23/2012
|
Director Compensation
Non-employee Directors receive a $2,500 cash payment per quarter and receive 2,500 shares each quarter of the Company’s common stock as compensation. Non-employee Directors of the Company are granted an option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the election of their three-year term. In addition, Non-employee Directors that serve on a committee or committees of the Board of Directors are granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the annual appointment of their position. The following chart shows director compensation for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
Name
(a)
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
(b)
|
|
|
Stock Awards
($)
(c)
|
|
|
Option Awards ($)
(d)
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
(e)
|
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
(f)
|
|
|
All Other Compensation
($)
(g)
|
|
|
Total
($)
(h)
|
|
Alan S.Cohen
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward T. Lutz
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
The following table shows the aggregate number of shares of stock and options held as of September 30, 2011 for each director.
NAME
|
# SHARES COMMON STOCK
|
# OPTIONS
|
ALAN S. COHEN
|
346,165
|
90,000
|
EDWARD T. LUTZ
|
186,526
|
80,000
|
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters.
Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock
The following table reports information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 15, 2011, by each person or entity known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, each of our Directors and named executive officers, and all of our Directors and executive officers as a group.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Percent of Class
|
William P. Hales
President & CEO, Director
9033 Red Branch Rd.
Columbia, MD 21045
|
10,184,959
|
(1)
|
41.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan E. Rothschild
1061-B Shary Circle
Concord, CA 94518
|
1,133,021
|
(2)
|
7.3%
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Alan Cohen
Director
99 Florence Street
Bldg 60, Unit4A
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
|
438,665
|
(3)
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Edward T. Lutz
Director
6 West Sanders St.
Greenlawn, NY 11740
|
269,026
|
(4)
|
1.7%
|
|
|
|
|
Catherine M. Davidson
Controller, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
9033 Red Branch Road
Columbia, MD 21045
|
119,481
|
(5)
|
0.8%
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (4 persons)
|
11,012,131
|
|
44.8%
|
(1)
|
Share ownership includes 1,357,875 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days, senior subordinated secured notes convertible into 2,527,000 shares of common stock within 60 days, warrants for 5,000,000 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days and 161,334 shares in the employee ESOP plan as of the plan year ending September 30, 2010.
|
(2)
|
Information based upon Schedule 13G filed by Mr. Rothschild on January 20, 2005.
|
(3)
|
Includes 90,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days.
|
(4)
|
Includes 80,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days.
|
(5)
|
Share ownership includes 38,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days and 81,481 shares in the employee ESOP plan as of the plan year ending September 30, 2010.
|
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth our Securities authorized for issuance under our currently effective Equity Compensation Plans.
Plan category
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
3,142,208
(1)
|
$0.14
|
398,792
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
-----
|
-----
|
-----
|
Total
|
3,142,208
(1)
|
$0.14
|
398,792
(2)
|
1.
|
Amount includes 461,000 options for the purchase of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on February 27, 2001, 80,000 options for the purchase of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on April 25, 2000, and 2,601,208 options for purchases of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on April 24, 2007 that have been issued as of September 30, 2011.
|
2.
|
Amount represents options for the purchase of common stock approved by the shareholders pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Stock Option plan that have not been issued as of September 30, 2011.
|
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Related Transactions
William P. Hales, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company owns $884,450 face value of the senior subordinated secured convertible notes due September 30, 2014. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the senior notes.
On December 31, 2010, the Company had a loan outstanding in the amount of $398,000 with Bay Bank, FSB. On February 7, 2011, TiFunding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by William P. Hales, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, and his father, purchased the loan from Bay Bank, FSB for approximately $360,000 and agreed to provide a $1 million line of credit facility to the Company for the purpose of financing working capital needs. In connection with this credit facility, the Company issued to TiFunding warrants to purchase $1,000,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20. Refer to Note 8 for a description of this line of credit.
Director Independence
The Board of Directors affirmatively determines the independence of each director and nominee for election as a director based on the definition of independence contained in the NASDAQ rules and the applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on these standards, Edward T. Lutz and Dr. Alan S. Cohen, who comprise a majority of the Board of Directors, both qualify as “independent” directors.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Hemagen’s independent public accountants are Stegman and Company. Stegman and Company has served in that capacity since fiscal year 2007. Aggregate fees billed to Hemagen in fiscal 2011 and 2010 by its principal accountants, Stegman and Company were:
|
2011
|
2010
|
Audit fees and SAS 100 quarterly review fees
|
$52,493
|
$60,081
|
Audit – related fees
|
--
|
--
|
Tax fees
|
$ 6,500 (a)
|
$5,000 (a)
|
All other fees
|
--
|
--
|
|
$58,993
|
$65,081
|
(a)
|
The Audit Committee believes the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
|
Audit Fee
s. Audit services of Stegman and Company for fiscal 2011 and 2010 consisted of examination of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, quarterly reviews of the financial statements and services related to the filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Tax Fees.
Tax fees included charges primarily related to the preparation of federal and state tax returns.
All Other Fees
. Fees paid to Stegman and Company for services other than as described under “Audit Fees” and “Tax Fees” for the 2011 and 2010 fiscal years.
All of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has not adopted formal pre-approval policies, but has the sole authority to engage the Company’s outside auditing and tax preparation firms and must approve all tax consulting and auditing arrangements with the independent accounting firm prior to the performance of any services. Approval for such services is evaluated during the Audit Committee meetings and must be documented by signature of an Audit Committee member on the engagement letter of the independent accounting firm.
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)(1) and (2)
Financial Statements and Schedules
|
Page
|
|
|
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
F-2
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-3
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
F-4
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2011, and 2010
|
F-6
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
|
|
September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
F-7
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
F-8
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-9
|
(a)(3) Exhibit List.
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 28, 2010.)
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 29, 2010.)
|
4.1
|
Specimen Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on February 10, 1999)
|
10.1
|
Description of the Lease for office space of HDC in Sao Paulo, Brazil (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005)
|
10.2
|
Form of 8% Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Note due September 30, 2014 (Hemagen’s Schedule T-O filed with the Commission on September 1, 2009)
|
10.3
|
Second Amendment to the Lease between the Company and 9033 Red Branch Road, L.L.C. dated June 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000)
|
10.4
|
Second Restructuring Agreement between the Company and Dade Behring, Inc. dated November 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001)
|
10.5*
|
2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008)
|
10.6*
|
2001 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on January 29, 2001)
|
10.7
|
Line of Credit Financing Agreement between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Reagents Applications, Inc. and Bay National Bank dated September 26, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002)
|
10.8*
|
Directors Rule 10b5-1 Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003)
|
10.9*
|
Hemagen Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
|
10.10*
|
Trust Agreement for the Hemagen Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
|
10.11
|
Quota Purchase and Sale Agreement and Non-Competition Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
|
10.12*
|
2007 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on March 21, 2007)
|
10.13
|
Third Amendment to the Lease between the Company and 9033 Red Branch Road, L.L.C. dated June 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 12, 2007)
|
10.14
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between Reagents Applications, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
|
10.15
|
Promissory Note between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
|
10.16
|
Inventory Purchase Agreement between Reagents Applications, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
|
10.17*
|
Executive Employment Agreement between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and William P. Hales effective as of May 27, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 28, 2010.)
|
10.18
|
Ninth Modification to Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and TiFunding LLC (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.)
|
10.19
|
Sixth Allonge to Promissory Note executed by the Company in favor of TiFunding LLC (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.)
|
10.20
|
Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock issued to TiFunding LLC (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.)
|
10.21
|
Seventh Allonge to Promissory Note executed by the Company in favor of TiFunding LLC dated December 23, 2011 (Filed herewith)
|
14
|
Code of Ethics Policy (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003)
|
23.1
|
Consent of Stegman and Company (Filed herewith)
|
31.1
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
|
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
|
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Filed herewith)
|
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Filed herewith)
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance
|
101.XSD
|
XBRL Schema
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Calculation
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Definition
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Label
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Presentation
|
*Management compensatory contracts.
Hemagen will provide shareholders with any exhibit upon the payment of a specified reasonable fee, which fee shall be limited to Hemagen’s reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: December 23, 2011
|
HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
By:
/s/ William P. Hales
William P. Hales, Chairman of the Board,
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Name
|
Capacity
|
Date
|
/s/ William P. Hales
William P. Hales
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
December 23, 2011
|
/s/ Alan S. Cohen
Alan S. Cohen
|
Director
|
December 23, 2011
|
/s/ Edward T. Lutz
Edward T. Lutz
|
Director
|
December 23, 2011
|
/s/ Catherine M. Davidson
Catherine M. Davidson
|
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|
December 23, 2011
|
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of management and the Directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011. Management’s assessment is based on the criteria established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In assessing the internal controls, management is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties due to the small number of employees within the financial and administrative functions of the Company. As a result of the limitations of the resources and segregation of duties, management acknowledges a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. As a result, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2011, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were ineffective. This material weakness has not been remediated.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report.
/s/ William P. Hales
|
William P. Hales
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
December 23, 2011
|
|
/s/ Catherine M. Davidson
|
Catherine M. Davidson
|
Principal Financial Officer
|
December 23, 2011
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ Stegman and Company
Baltimore, Maryland
December 20, 2011
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2011 and 2010
ASSETS
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
213,611
|
|
|
$
|
151,743
|
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $67,286 and $60,016 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
580,240
|
|
|
|
669,892
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,460,780
|
|
|
|
1,386,317
|
|
Current Portion of Note Receivable
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
159,493
|
|
|
|
352,534
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,449,124
|
|
|
|
2,770,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT;
net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization of $6,431,680 and
$6,297,906 at September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively
|
|
|
386,520
|
|
|
|
525,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term portion of Note Receivable
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
52,658
|
|
|
|
40,250
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
52,658
|
|
|
|
75,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
2,888,302
|
|
|
$
|
3,371,394
|
|
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2011 and 2010
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
818,875
|
|
|
$
|
743,170
|
|
Revolving line of credit
|
|
|
669,413
|
|
|
|
398,000
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
37,226
|
|
|
|
27,337
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,525,514
|
|
|
|
1,168,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior subordinated secured convertible notes
|
|
|
4,049,858
|
|
|
|
4,049,858
|
|
Total Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
4,049,858
|
|
|
|
4,049,858
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,575,372
|
|
|
|
5,218,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value - 1,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value – 45,000,000 shares authorized; 15,585,281 and 15,565,281 shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
155,852
|
|
|
|
155,652
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
23,038,217
|
|
|
|
22,959,539
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(25,770,916
|
)
|
|
|
(24,890,440
|
)
|
Less treasury stock at cost; 100,000 shares at
September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
(89,636
|
)
|
|
|
(89,636
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income -
currency translation (loss) income
|
|
|
(20,587
|
)
|
|
|
17,914
|
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(2,687,070
|
)
|
|
|
(1,846,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
|
$
|
2,888,302
|
|
|
$
|
3,371,394
|
|
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For The Years Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
5,141,226
|
|
|
$
|
5,220,170
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
3,180,429
|
|
|
|
2,863,965
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
1,960,797
|
|
|
|
2,356,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
2,428,511
|
|
|
|
2,095,035
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
25,224
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,433,514
|
|
|
|
2,120,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(472,717
|
)
|
|
|
235,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, (net)
|
|
|
(406,563
|
)
|
|
|
(332,262
|
)
|
Gain on Sale of Assets
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
26,290
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(403,628
|
)
|
|
|
(302,681
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss, before income taxes
|
|
|
(876,345
|
)
|
|
|
(66,735
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(4,131
|
)
|
|
|
(89,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(880,476
|
)
|
|
|
(156,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(38,501
|
)
|
|
|
48,886
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(38,501
|
)
|
|
|
48,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(918,977
|
)
|
|
$
|
(107,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share – Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Net (loss) income per share – Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation
of net (loss) income per share – Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
15,476,486
|
|
|
|
15,454,103
|
|
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
For the
Years Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
Common Stock
Shares Par Value
|
|
|
Additional Paid in Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
Shares Cost
|
|
|
Total Stockholders’
Deficit
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2009
|
|
|
15,345,281
|
|
|
$
|
153,452
|
|
|
$
|
22,919,932
|
|
|
$
|
(24,734,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,972
|
)
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,781,350
|
)
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(156,314
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(156,314
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
48,886
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
48,886
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based Compensation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
25,957
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
25,957
|
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
13,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,850
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
5,565,281
|
|
|
$
|
155,652
|
|
|
$
|
22,959,539
|
|
|
$
|
(24,890,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,914
|
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,846,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(880,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(880,476
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,501
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(918,977
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,999
|
|
Amortization of interest expense - warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,879
|
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
15,585,281
|
|
|
$
|
155,852
|
|
|
$
|
23,038,217
|
|
|
$
|
(25,770,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,587
|
)
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,687,070
|
)
|
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
For The Years Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(880,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
(156,314
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
185,814
|
|
|
|
163,943
|
|
Non-cash interest expense - warrants
|
|
|
31,879
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
45,999
|
|
|
|
25,957
|
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
15,850
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
(9,724
|
)
|
Gain on the sale of assets
|
|
|
(2,800
|
)
|
|
|
(26,290
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
78,540
|
|
|
|
(30,148
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(74,463
|
)
|
|
|
302,026
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
180,633
|
|
|
|
(218,021
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
75,705
|
|
|
|
(225,965
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
9,889
|
|
|
|
(24,493
|
)
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
|
(337,168
|
)
|
|
|
(183,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(56,414
|
)
|
|
|
(74,142
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
40,911
|
|
Payments received on Note Receivable
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
156,386
|
|
|
|
176,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (payments) on revolving line of credit
|
|
|
271,413
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
Payments made on Itau Bank Note
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(28,859
|
)
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
271,413
|
|
|
|
(30,859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(28,763
|
)
|
|
|
32,698
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
61,868
|
|
|
|
(4,571
|
)
|
Cash, beginning of year
|
|
|
151,743
|
|
|
|
156,314
|
|
Cash, end of year
|
|
$
|
213,611
|
|
|
$
|
151,743
|
|
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For The Years Ending September 30, 2011 and 2010
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware company, is a biotechnology company that develops, manufactures, and markets more than 68 FDA-cleared proprietary medical diagnostic test kits. Hemagen has two different product lines. The
Virgo®
product line consists of diagnostic test kits that are used to aid in the diagnosis of certain autoimmune and infectious diseases, using ELISA, Immunofluorescence, and hemagglutination technology. The
Analyst
â
product line is an FDA-cleared benchtop clinical
chemistry analyzer system, including consumables, that is used to measure important constituents in human and animal blood. In the United States, the Company sells its products through distributors and directly to physicians, veterinarians, clinical laboratories and blood banks and on a private-label basis through multinational distributors. Internationally, the Company sells its products primarily through distributors. The Company was incorporated in 1985 and became a public company in 1993.
NOTE 2 – FINANCIAL CONDITION
At September 30, 2011, Hemagen had $213,611 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $923,610 and a current ratio of 1.61 to 1.0. Hemagen currently has a revolving senior secured line of credit with TiFunding, a related party, for the purpose of financing working capital needs as required. The line of credit currently provides for borrowings up to $1,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 9%. As of December 5, 2011, the outstanding balance on the line was $719,426. Hemagen believes that cash flow from operations and cash on hand at September 30, 2011 will be sufficient to finance its operations for fiscal 2012. The Company’s ability to borrow on the line is based on a borrowing base calculation dependent on certain receivables and inventory. The line of credit’s maturity has been extended and currently expires October 1, 2012. The line is renewable annually. The Company intends to renew the line when it expires. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that it will have sufficient cash to repay the line of credit if it is not renewed or to finance its operations. Hemagen has no off-balance sheet transactions.
NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Hemagen Diagnostics Commercio, Importaco & Exporataco, Ltd. ("HDC"). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The financial position and results of operations of HDC are measured using HDC's local currency, the Brazilian Real, as the functional currency. Revenues and expenses of HDC have been translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Assets and liabilities have been translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded directly as a separate component of stockholders' equity.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company may have amounts in cash accounts in excess of federally insured limits throughout the year.
Accounts Receivable
A majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from distributors (domestic and international), hospitals, universities, and physician and veterinary offices and other entities in the medical field. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts with outstanding balances for longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are posted against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts was $67,286 and $60,016 on September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company does not accrue interest on accounts receivable past due.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, determined on the first-in, first-out basis, or market. Inventory reserves are established for obsolescence based on expiration dating of perishable products and excess levels of inventory on hand. The Company had $541,158 and $738,972 of inventory reserves as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Long-lived Assets
The Company reviews the carrying values of its long-lived assets for possible impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the review indicates that long-lived assets are not recoverable (i.e., the carrying amount is less than the future projected undiscounted cash flows), the carrying amount would be reduced to fair value and a charge to income would be recorded. Hemagen did not have any long-lived assets whose balances needed to be reduced.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at net book value. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 3 to 10 years. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Other Assets
Other assets, net at September 30, 2011 and 2010 consists of product registration certificates that are being amortized over their 5 year life, security deposits relating to the facilities that are being leased, and the long term portion of the Note Receivable.
Income Taxes
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The provision for or benefit from income taxes is allocated based upon each subsidiary’s individual operations.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the sale of products are recognized when 1) product is shipped, 2) all contractual obligations have been satisfied, and 3) the collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Revenues from product service contracts, which are based on their relative fair value, are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Losses are provided for at the time that management determines that contract costs will exceed related revenues. The portion of product service contracts not complete at the balance sheet date is included in deferred revenue.
Stock- Based Compensation
The Company applies FASB ASC 718-10,
Share-Based Payment
, which requires companies to measure the cost of share-based awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award using an option pricing model and to recognize that cost over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted and recognizes the compensation cost of share-based awards in its statement of operations using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.
The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of share-based awards requires that the Company make certain assumptions and estimates for required inputs to the model, including (i) the fair value of the Company’s common stock at each grant date, (ii) the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock value, (iii) the expected life of the share-based award, (iv) the risk-free interest rate, and (v) the dividend yield. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Research and Development Costs
All costs incurred to research, design and develop products are considered research and development costs and are charged to expense as incurred.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, customer receivables, accounts payable, certain other accrued liabilities and long-term debt. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates its fair value based on the current rate offered to the Company for debt of similar remaining maturities. The carrying values of all other financial instruments also approximate their fair values.
Advertising Expenses
Costs of advertising, which also include promotional expenses, are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were approximately $12,201 and $7,404, respectively.
Shipping and Handling
The cost of shipping products to customers is included in cost of goods sold. Amounts billed to a customer in a sale transaction related to shipping and handling are classified as revenue.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This accounting standard sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. This standard also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This accounting standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 which amended ASC 855. This amendment, which was effective upon issuance, removed the requirement for SEC registrants to disclose the date through which such registrants have evaluated subsequent events.
ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance which changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This new guidance also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This new guidance is to be applied prospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2012 will not materially expand its consolidated footnote disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. This new guidance requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This new guidance is to be applied retrospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2012 will not materially change the presentation of its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
William P. Hales, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company owns $884,450 face value of the senior subordinated secured convertible notes due September 30, 2014. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the senior notes.
TiFunding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by William P. Hales, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, and his father, provides a senior secured line of credit facility to the Company for the purpose of financing working capital needs. TiFunding acquired this facility on February 7, 2011 from Bay Bank, FSB for approximately $360,000. Refer to Note 8 for a description of this line of credit.
NOTE 5 - INVENTORIES
Inventories at September 30, consist of the following:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
1,039,604
|
|
|
$
|
1,171,982
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
48,049
|
|
|
|
137,035
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
914,285
|
|
|
|
816,272
|
|
|
|
|
2,001,938
|
|
|
|
2,125,289
|
|
Less reserves (obsolesce and dating),
|
|
|
(541,158
|
)
|
|
|
(738,972
|
)
|
Inventories, net
|
|
$
|
1,460,780
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,317
|
|
NOTE 6 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment at September 30, consists of the following:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
$
|
6,723,107
|
|
|
$
|
6,730,072
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
95,093
|
|
|
|
93,492
|
|
|
|
|
6,818,200
|
|
|
|
6,823,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(6,431,680
|
)
|
|
|
(6,297,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
386,520
|
|
|
$
|
525,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense relating to property and equipment was $185,814 and $163,943 for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Of these amounts $153,643 and $137,051 were included in the SG&A for fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively and $32,171 and $26,892 were included in costs of sales for fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively.
NOTE 7 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities include the following at September 30:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Accounts payable – trade
|
|
$
|
415,221
|
|
|
$
|
308,601
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
20,150
|
|
|
|
21,050
|
|
Accrued vacation
Accrued taxes
Accrued interest
|
|
|
81,883
64,636
36,511
|
|
|
|
86,758
142,638
38,335
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
200,474
|
|
|
|
145,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
818,875
|
|
|
$
|
743,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8 - LINE OF CREDIT
TiFunding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by William P. Hales, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, and his father, provides a senior secured line of credit facility to the Company for the purpose of financing working capital needs. TiFunding acquired this facility on February 7, 2011 from Bay Bank, FSB for approximately $360,000, and increased the line of credit to $1,000,000 dollars.
The facility’s term maturity has been extended to October 1, 2012, is renewable annually and provides for borrowings at an annual interest rate of 9%. Maximum borrowings under the facility not to exceed $1,000,000 are based on certain receivables and inventory of the Company. The facility is secured by a first lien on all assets of the Company. In connection with the facility, the Company issued to TiFunding warrants to purchase $1,000,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time until February 7, 2016 and have certain demand registration rights. The expense related to the warrants is being amortized over the life of the warrants and is included as interest expense in the accompanying financial statements. As of September 30, 2011, the outstanding balance on the facility was $669,413. The Company is in compliance with all of the covenants in the facility as of the date of this report.
NOTE 9 – NOTE PAYABLE
Hemagen Diagnostics Commercio, Importaco & Exporataco, Ltd. ("HDC") had obtained notes used to finance the purchase of automated equipment that was placed into key customer accounts. As of September 30, 2010 these notes were paid in full. The notes bore interest at 1.45% per month or 17.4% annual interest, and were to be repaid in 24 equal monthly installments. These capital notes were secured by HDC receivables at the ratio of 50% receivable to loan value.
NOTE 10 – SENIOR SUBORDINATED SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES
During September 2009, the Company completed an Exchange Offer of its senior subordinated secured convertible notes due on September 30, 2009. The Company offered to exchange new, modified 8% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes due 2014 for the outstanding 8% Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes due 2009. The principal features of the Exchange Offer included $4,049,858 principal amount of Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes, due September 30, 2014, which bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum, paid quarterly, convertible by holders into Common Stock at $.35 per share. The Company can require the conversion of these Modified Notes to Common Stock at any time after the Common Stock trades at or above $0.70 for fifteen consecutive trading days.
The Company has accounted for the Exchange Offer as though the exchange of the entire amount of $4,049,858 of the outstanding notes was effective as of September 30, 2009, because at September 30, 2009 all of the terms and conditions for the consummation of the exchange offer had been satisfied.
The Modified Notes are secured by a first lien on all real, tangible and intangible property except that the terms of the Modified Notes provide that they are subordinated to the following (i) a senior secured credit facility that is equal to or less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000), (ii) any secured financing that is greater than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000), provided that (A) the Company provides the Holder twenty (20) business days’ written notice of such secured financing, and (B) all of the funds raised in connection with such secured financing shall be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the Principal Amount and accrued and unpaid interest owed on the Notes, (iii) real estate financing that the Company may incur for the purchase of a corporate facility provided that the annual mortgage payments are less than the rent expense that the Company pays in the year of such purchase for its leased facilities, and (iv) secured financing not to exceed Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) at any one time for the purpose of financing an acquisition by the Company of the business of another person or entity.
NOTE 11 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of issuance by the Board of Directors and may include voting rights, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion and redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. No shares of preferred stock are issued or outstanding at September 30, 2011 or 2010.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists solely of foreign currency translation adjustments totaling $20,587 of loss and $17,914 of income at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Stock Options
On February 27, 2001, the shareholders voted to approve the 2001 Stock Option Plan. The 2001 Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options for the purchase of an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock by employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The 2001 Stock Option Plan expired in February of 2011. No additional options will be issued under this plan.
On April 25, 2007, the shareholders voted to approve the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this plan, the Board has reserved a maximum of 1,500,000 shares for issuance pursuant to stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock awards.
On April 30, 2009, the shareholders voted to amend the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized to be issued under the plan from 1,500,000 to 3,000,000.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the administration of both Plans. The Compensation Committee determines the term of each option, the number of shares for which each option is granted and the rate at which each option is exercisable.
The Company recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, $45,999 and 25,957 of stock compensation expense for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The following are the assumptions made in computing the fair value of the share-based awards:
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
Dividend yield
|
--
|
|
--
|
Expected volatility
|
129.73% - 137.95%
|
|
125.86%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.47% - 3.48%
|
|
3.34%
|
Expected life in years
|
5 - 10
|
|
10
|
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the evaluation model. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
A summary of the stock option activity for the year ended September 30, 2011 and related information is shown below:
|
|
SHARES
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE
LIFE IN YEARS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, OCTOBER 1, 2009
|
|
|
1,007,208
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
7.21
|
|
GRANTED
|
|
|
1,955,000
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
9.66
|
|
EXERCISED
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CANCELLED OR EXPIRED
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,932,208
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
GRANTED
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
5.26
|
|
EXERCISED
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CANCELLED OR EXPIRED
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
|
|
|
3,142,208
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXERCISABLE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
|
|
|
1,709,375
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of September 30, 2011 ranged from $0.04 to $0.97 as follows:
|
Options Outstanding
|
Range of
Exercise Prices
|
Number Outstanding at September 30, 2011
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 – 0.14
|
2,255,000
|
8.3
|
0.11
|
0.15 – 0.24
|
737,208
|
5.6
|
0.19
|
0.25 – 0.34
|
55,000
|
3.3
|
0.28
|
0.35 – 0.59
|
50,000
|
6.6
|
0.35
|
0.60 – 0.70
|
25,000
|
2.4
|
0.70
|
0.71 – 0.97
|
20,000
|
0.4
|
0.97
|
0.04 – 0.97
|
3,142,208
|
7.3
|
0.14
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during 2011 and 2010 was $10,158 and $130,177, respectively.
Assuming that no additional share-based payments are granted after September 30, 2011, $79,823 of compensation expense will be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations over a weighted-average period of five years. The options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2011 have no intrinsic value.
Warrants
On February 7, 2011 TiFunding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by William P. Hales , the Company’s Chief Executive Office and President, and his father purchased the senior secured credit line facility from Bay Bank, FSB for approximately $360,000. In connection with the facility, the Company issued to TiFunding warrants to purchase $1,000,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time until February 7, 2016 and have certain demand registration rights. The expense related to these warrants is being amortized over the life of the warrants and is included as interest expense in the accompanying financial statements.
The following table summarizes the Company’s warrant activity for the twelve months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Average Weighted Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average Life (in years)
|
|
Warrants Outstanding – October 1, 2010
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Forfeited, cancelled or expired
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Warrants outstanding – September 30, 2011
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants exercisable – September 30, 2011
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of the warrants issued during 2011 was $239,091. As of September 30, 2011 there was $207,212 of unamortized interest expense associated with these warrants. This expense will be fully amortized within five years.
Stockholder Rights Agreement
In April 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved a Stockholder Rights Agreement (the "Agreement"). Under the Agreement the Company declared a dividend of one common stock purchase right (a "Right") for each share of the Company's outstanding common stock as of April 29, 2010. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one share of Common Stock of the Company at a cash exercise price of $0.15 per share (the "Exercise Price"), subject to adjustment, under certain conditions provided in the Agreement.
The Rights become exercisable only if a person or group, as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, acquires beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the Company's outstanding common stock or announces a tender offer that would result in beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the Company's outstanding common stock.
William P. Hales, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, who is a stockholder and a debt holder of the Company, is exempt under the Agreement. The Rights, which are scheduled to Expire on April 29, 2020, are redeemable in whole at the Company's option at $0.0000001 per Right at the times and under the circumstances set forth in the Agreement. No Rights have yet been exercised or have redeemed under the Agreement.
For the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, domestic and foreign (losses) or income before income taxes from continuing operations are as follows:
Years ended September 30
,
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(667,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
(393,896
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(209,414
|
)
|
|
|
327,161
|
|
Net income (loss), before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(876,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66,735
|
)
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had current income tax expense of approximately $4,131 and $89,579 respectively which related to foreign income tax expenses from its Brazilian subsidiary. The difference between income taxes on provided at the Company's effective tax rate and the Federal statutory rate is as follows:
Years ended September 30
,
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Federal tax at statutory rate
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Current tax expense on international
operations
|
|
|
--
24.0
|
|
|
|
--
31.3
|
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following at September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
7,717,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,389,000
|
|
Inventory reserve
|
|
|
216,000
|
|
|
|
295,000
|
|
Accounts receivable reserve
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
8,023.000
|
|
|
|
7,777,000
|
|
Basis difference in fixed assets
|
|
|
(43,000
|
)
|
|
|
(32,000
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
7,980,000
|
|
|
|
7,745,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(7,980,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,745,000
|
)
|
Total reported deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has provided a valuation allowance equal to 100% of the net deferred tax asset in recognition of the uncertainty regarding the ultimate amount of the net deferred tax asset that will be realized.
At September 30, 2011 the Company had approximately $22,698,000 of federal operating loss carry-forwards available to offset future taxable income, which expires on various dates through 2031. Ownership changes as defined in the Internal Revenue Code may limit the amount of net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards that may be utilized annually. The Company also had Brazilian net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $1,102,000 which is available to offset future Brazilian taxable income.
NOTE 13 - SIGNIFICANT SALES AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Revenues derived from export sales, excluding sales to the company’s subsidiary in Brazil, amounted to approximately $1,543,973 or 30% of total sales in 2011 and $1,157,000, or 22% of total sales in 2010. Export sales to Europe were approximately $1,028,917 or 20% of total sales in 2011 and $759,000 or 14% of total sales in 2010.
At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had approximately $37,458 and $107,723 of cash in foreign bank accounts.
NOTE 14 - GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
The Company considers its manufactured kits, tests and instruments as one operating segment.
The following table sets forth revenue for the periods reported and assets by geographic location for the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
|
United States*
|
Brazil
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$2,750,948
|
$2,390,278
|
$5,141,226
|
Long-lived assets
|
175,697
|
263,481
|
439,178
|
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$2,626,939
|
$2,593,231
|
$5,220,170
|
Long-lived assets
|
239,607
|
361,301
|
600,908
|
* Includes export sales to countries other than Brazil of approximately $1,543,973 and $1,157,000 in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The long-lived assets include property and equipment, intangibles, and long-term notes receivable, net of any depreciation and amortization.
NOTE 15- COMMITMENTS
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases lasting through 2014. Future minimum lease commitments under the non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
Years ending September 30
,
2012
|
|
$
|
182,939
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
2,536
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
Rent expense was approximately $394,000 and $389,000 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. Rent expense is included in the selling, general and administrative expense category on the income statement.
Employee Benefit Plans
The Company maintains a defined contribution retirement plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, covering substantially all employees. Participant contributions and employer matching contributions are made as defined in the 401(k) Plan agreement. The Company’s policy is to contribute to the ESOP plan rather than to match 401K contributions. As such, effective October 1, 2003, the Company created an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for the benefit of its employees, which has been determined by the Internal Revenue Service to be a qualified retirement plan subject to section 4975(E)7 of the Code. The Employer has no obligations to contribute any amount under this plan except as so determined at its sole discretion. Employees are eligible to participate in the ESOP after 90 days of active employment and fully vest in the benefits after five years of service. The Company’s contributions to the ESOP were $10,000 in cash during each of the fiscal years 2011 and 2010. The compensation committee of the Board of Directors approves all contributions to the ESOP plan. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the ESOP owned approximately 881,281 and 792,880 shares of Hemagen common stock, respectively, that were either purchased in the open market by the ESOP, or contributed by the company to the ESOP. As of September 30, 2011 the ESOP plan had approximately $3,519 of cash available to purchase additional shares in the open market. The 881,281 shares owned by the ESOP represent approximately 6% of the shares outstanding as of September 30, 2011.
Directors Plan
The Company maintains a Rule 10b5-1 Stock Purchase Plan (the 10b5-1 Plan) for its Non-employee Directors for which the company deposited cash as part of the directors’ compensation plan. Effective October 1, 2008, the director compensation plan changed and the non-employee Directors now receive a $2,500 cash payment and 2,500 shares of the Company’s common stock each quarter. The 10b5-1 Plan will continue to purchase shares in the open market until the cash balance is depleted.
NOTE 16 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
Basic earnings (loss) per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Diluted earnings per common share is computed based on common shares outstanding plus the effect of dilutive stock options and other potentially dilutive common stock equivalents consisting of stock options and convertible debentures. The dilutive effect of stock options and other potentially dilutive common stock equivalents is determined using the treasury stock and if-converted method based on the Company’s average stock price for the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the twelve month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
|
|
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMERATOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$
|
(880,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
(156,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DE DENOMINATOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
15,476,486
|
|
|
|
15,454,103
|
|
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SHARES
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
DENOMINATOR FOR DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
|
15,476,486
|
|
|
|
15,454,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Diluted net income per share does not include the effect of the following common stock equivalents related to outstanding convertible debentures and stock purchase options as their effect would be antidilutive:
|
|
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONVERTIBLE NOTES
|
|
|
11,571,022
|
|
|
|
11,571,000
|
|
WARRANTS
|
|
|
3,232,877
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
OPTIONS TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
3,060,564
|
|
|
|
1,678,564
|
|
TOTAL ANTIDILUTIVE INSTRUMENTS
|
|
|
17,864,463
|
|
|
|
13,249,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 17 - SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH
September 30,
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
388,914
|
|
|
$
|
365,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes (Brazil)
|
|
$
|
4,132
|
|
|
$
|
89,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for property and equipment purchases
|
|
$
|
56,414
|
|
|
$
|
74,142
|
|
Hemagen Diagnostics (CE) (USOTC:HMGN)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
Hemagen Diagnostics (CE) (USOTC:HMGN)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024