U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________
FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015
[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File No. 000-33053
_____________________________________
MIND SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
|
Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
01-0719410
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
3525 Del Mar Heights Road, Suite 802
San Diego, California
(Address of principal executive offices) |
92130
(Zip Code) |
(888) 461-3932
(registrant’s telephone number,
including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One):
Large accelerated filer [ ] |
Accelerated filer [ ] |
Non-accelerated filer [ ] |
Smaller reporting company [X] |
Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding
of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. At May 20, 2015, the registrant had
outstanding 2,322,489,859 shares of common stock.
Table of Contents
|
|
PAGE |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
3 |
Item 2. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
20 |
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
33 |
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
33 |
Item
4 (T) |
Controls
and Procedures |
33 |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
36 |
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
36 |
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
36 |
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
36 |
Item 4. |
Mining Safety Disclosures |
36 |
Item 5. |
Other Information |
36 |
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
36 |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MIND SOLUTIONS, INC. |
BALANCE SHEETS |
(Development Stage Registrant) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| March 31, | | |
| December 31, | |
Assets: | |
| 2015 (UNAUDITED) | | |
| 2014 (AUDITED) | |
Current Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | |
$ | 56,322 | | |
$ | 113,199 | |
Prepaids | |
| 89,812 | | |
| 46,020 | |
Total Current Assets | |
| 146,134 | | |
| 159,219 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Fixed Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Property Plant & Equipment | |
| 89,653 | | |
| 89,653 | |
Accumulated Depreciation | |
| (87,581 | ) | |
| (86,876 | ) |
Total Fixed Assets | |
| 2,072 | | |
| 2,777 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Marketable Securities: Available-for-Sale | |
| 257 | | |
| 3,958 | |
Total Other Assets | |
| 257 | | |
| 3,958 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Assets | |
$ | 148,463 | | |
$ | 165,954 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses | |
$ | 403,334 | | |
$ | 389,165 | |
Accounts Payable to Related Parties | |
| 3,500 | | |
| 3,500 | |
Accrued Interest | |
| 351,413 | | |
| 342,647 | |
Notes Payable | |
| 145,000 | | |
| 145,000 | |
Convertible Notes Payable | |
| 286,861 | | |
| 451,728 | |
Derivative Liability | |
| 573,290 | | |
| 1,767,223 | |
Total Liabilities | |
| 1,763,398 | | |
| 3,099,263 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders' Equity: | |
| | | |
| | |
Series A Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value 10,000,000 | |
| | | |
| | |
shares authorized, 9,109,110 shares issued and outstanding | |
| 9,110 | | |
| 10,000 | |
Common Stock, $0.001 par value 5,000,000,000 | |
| | | |
| | |
shares authorized, 2,147,741,683 and 1,388,783,762 shares | |
| | | |
| | |
issued and outstanding | |
| 2,147,741 | | |
| 1,388,784 | |
Stock Payable | |
| — | | |
| 36,605 | |
Additional Paid-In Capital | |
| 17,777,243 | | |
| 16,949,368 | |
Accumulated Comprehensive Loss | |
| (429,743 | ) | |
| (426,042 | ) |
Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage | |
| (21,119,286 | ) | |
| (20,892,024 | ) |
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | |
| (1,614,935 | ) | |
| (2,933,309 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |
$ | 148,463 | | |
$ | 165,954 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
financial statements.
| |
MIND SOLUTIONS, INC. |
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Development Stage Registrant) |
(UNAUDITED) |
| |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
| |
2015 | |
2014 |
| |
| |
|
Product Revenues | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
Service Revenues | |
| — | | |
| 31,111 | |
Total Revenues | |
| — | | |
| 31,111 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of Sales | |
| — | | |
| — | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Profit | |
| — | | |
| 31,111 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Operating expenses: | |
| | | |
| | |
Consulting | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 363,234 | |
Officer compensation | |
| 40,130 | | |
| 35,000 | |
Professional Fees | |
| 24,411 | | |
| 28,827 | |
Research and Development | |
| 50,140 | | |
| — | |
General and Administration | |
| 16,278 | | |
| 23,472 | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 230,959 | | |
| 450,533 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from operations | |
| (230,959 | ) | |
| (419,422 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other Income and (Expenses): | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest Expense | |
| (36,583 | ) | |
| (17,637 | ) |
Gain/(Loss) on Derivative adjustment | |
| 40,280 | | |
| — | |
Forgiveness of Debt | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Total Other Income and (Expenses) | |
| 3,697 | | |
| (17,637 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net Gain (Loss) before taxes | |
| (227,262 | ) | |
| (437,059 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Tax provisions | |
| — | | |
| — | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net Gain (Loss) After Taxes | |
$ | (227,262 | ) | |
$ | (437,059 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other Comprehensive Income: | |
| | | |
| | |
Gain (Loss) on Available-for-Sale Securities | |
| (3,701 | ) | |
| (28,333 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | |
$ | (230,963 | ) | |
$ | (465,392 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Basic & diluted loss per share | |
$ | (0.00 | ) | |
$ | (0.00 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | |
| 1,674,158,410 | | |
| 312,808,041 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
MIND SOLUTIONS, INC. |
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(Development Stage Registrant)
(UNAUDITED) |
| |
For the Three Months Ended |
| |
March 31, |
| |
2015 | |
2014 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Gain (Loss) for the period | |
$ | (227,262 | ) | |
$ | (437,059 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash | |
| | | |
| | |
provided by operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Stock for services | |
| 25,500 | | |
| 247,992 | |
Derivative (gain)/loss adjustment | |
| (40,280 | ) | |
| — | |
Available-for-sale securities transferred as compensation | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Available-for-sale securities received for service revenues | |
| — | | |
| 31,111 | |
Original issue discount | |
| 15,000 | | |
| — | |
Depreciation | |
| 705 | | |
| 461 | |
Changes in Operated Assets and Liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Prepaids | |
| (69,292 | ) | |
| — | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| 35,752 | | |
| 13,000 | |
Net cash used in operating activities | |
| (259,877 | ) | |
| (144,495 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase Equipment | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Net cash used by investing activities | |
| — | | |
| — | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from convertible notes | |
| 203,000 | | |
| 155,000 | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | |
| 203,000 | | |
| 155,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash | |
| (56,877 | ) | |
| 10,505 | |
Cash at Beginning of Period | |
| 113,199 | | |
| 47,428 | |
Cash at End of Period | |
$ | 56,322 | | |
$ | 57,933 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental Disclosures: | |
| | | |
| | |
Income Taxes Paid | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
Interest Paid | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Issuance of common stock in payment of non related | |
| | | |
| | |
party convertible debt | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 226,787 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
MIND SOLUTIONS, INC.
(A Development Stage registrant)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1-ORGANIZATION
AND DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
Mind Solutions, Inc. (the “registrant”)
was initially incorporated in the state of Delaware on May 19, 2000 as Medical Records by Net, Inc. On October 17, 2000, the
registrant changed its name to Lifelink Online, Inc. In January 2001, its name was changed to MedStrong Corporation, and on March
9, 2001, the registrant name was changed to MedStrong International Corporation. On March 30, 2007, the registrant’s name
was changed to VOIS, Inc. and the domicile was changed to the State of Florida. On October 19, 2012, the registrant executed a
merger agreement with Mind Solutions, Inc. whereas Mind Solutions, Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of the registrant. Mind
Solutions, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of Nevada on May 24, 2002, under the name Red Meteor Media, Inc. The registrant
changed its name to Prize Entertainment, Inc. in November 2003, and then again to Mind Solutions, Inc. in January 2011. On October
28, 2013, the registrant changed its name from VOIS, Inc. to Mind Solutions, Inc. as well as changing its domicile from Florida
to Nevada.
On October 28, 2013, the registrant closed an
Agreement and Plan of Merger with Mind Solutions, Inc. For accounting purposes this agreement was treated as a reverse merger.
The operations of the registrant became those solely of Mind Solutions, Inc. In connection with the merger agreement, the registrant
changed its fiscal year end to coincide with that of Mind Solutions, Inc., which is December 31. Pursuant to the Plan of Merger
with Mind Solutions, Inc., the holders of stock in VOIS, Inc. received one share of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, in
Mind Solutions, Inc. for every 2,000 shares of common stock in VOIS, Inc. (in effect, a one for 2,000 reverse split). As a result,
the then current common stockholders of VOIS, Inc. held all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock in the surviving
corporation Mind Solutions, Inc.
The registrant has developed
software
applications which are compatible with
EEG headsets on the market. The registrant is working with the most advanced electronics manufacturing
companies to develop the most advanced EEG headset on the market. This BCI headset will allow users to operate thought-controlled
applications on their mobile phone devices as well as on traditional PC computers. The registrant has completed a working
prototype which has been successfully tested on several Android devices. EEG headset can read
brainwaves and allow
for interaction with
a computer.
The registrant develops software for thought
controlled technologies, allowing the user to interact with the computer and other machines through the power of the mind. The
technology involves the use of a wireless headset, which detects brainwaves on both the conscious and non-conscious level. This
revolutionary neural processing technology makes it possible for computers to interact directly with the human brain. The registrant
has created three applications currently available through the registrant’s website and is developing a micro EEG headset
that is compatible with mobile smart phones and other devices.
NOTE 2 - PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited
interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with the audited
financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s most recent Annual Financial Statements filed with the
SEC on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim period presented have been reflected herein. The
results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes
to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial statements for
the most recent fiscal period, as reported in the Form 10-K, have been omitted.
Development Stage registrant
The registrant is currently a development stage
enterprise reporting under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 915, Development Stage Entity. The accompanying financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Restated Financial Statements
Certain amounts in the prior period financial
statements have been adjusted to conform to the one (1) for two thousand (2,000) reverse stock split on October 15, 2013.
Prior Year Financial Statement Presentation
The prior year financial statements were prepared
to show the effect of the reverse merger and to show the mark to market adjustment as other comprehensive income for comparative
purposes in the prior year financial statements.
NOTE 3 -
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The
registrant considers
all cash on hand
and in banks,
including
accounts in book overdraft
positions, certificates of
deposit and
other highly-liquid
investments with maturities
of three months
or less, when
purchased,
to be cash and equivalents.
Fixed assets are recorded at cost.
Major renewals and improvements
are capitalized, while maintenance
and repairs are expensed
when incurred.
Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized in amounts greater or equal to $1,000. Depreciation of equipment
is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets
estimated useful life of three(3), five (5), or seven (7) years. Upon sale or retirement of equipment, the related cost and accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.
C. Advertising
expenses
Advertising
and marketing expenses
are charged
to operations
as incurred.
For the three months ended
March 31, 2015 and 2014, advertising
and marketing
expense
were $1,650 and $2,240, respectively.
D. Revenue recognition
The registrant follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1
of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The registrant will recognize revenue when it is realized
or realizable and earned. The registrant considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria
are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered
to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
E. Stock-based
compensation
The Company accounts for
equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).
Pursuant to ASC
Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity
instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity
instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity
instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that
performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of
share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or
monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could
be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the
market.
The fair value of share
options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges
of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
|
● |
Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments. |
Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses
a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share
options and similar instruments.
Pursuant to ASC paragraph
505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement
for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of
the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached.
A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether
the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity
under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1,
a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable
equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific
performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity
by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the
balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other
than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date
for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.
Pursuant to Paragraphs
505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee
only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves
specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same
manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with,
or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar
instrument that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
Pursuant to ASC paragraph
505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments,
those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments
are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should
be recorded.
F. Income
Taxes
The registrant adopted FASB ASC Topic 740, Income
Taxes, at its inception. Under FASB ASC Topic 740, the deferred tax provision is determined under the liability method. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts
and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using presently enacted tax rates.
G. Earnings
(loss) per share
The registrant adopted FASB ASC Topic 260, Earnings
Per Share. Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of all common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated
by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common shares, if any, that would be issued assuming
conversion of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding. For all periods diluted earnings per share is not presented, as
potentially issuable securities are anti-dilutive.
There are approximately 257,973,149 potentially
dilutive shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2015, which are derived from the outstanding convertible promissory
notes. The registrant also has 9,109,110 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, each share of which can be
converted into 100 shares of our common stock, therefor there are an additional 910,911,000 potentially dilutive shares of common
stock.
H. Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Significant estimates for the periods reported include certain assumptions
used in deriving the fair value of share-based compensation recognized, the useful life of tangible assets and the future value
of our website development costs. Assumptions and estimates used in these areas are material to our reported financial condition
and results of our operations. Actual results will differ from those estimates.
I. Business Segments
The Company operates in
one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
J. Fair value of financial instruments measured on a recurring
basis
The registrant follows paragraph
825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and
paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the
fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph
820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair
value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value
hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level 1 |
|
Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. |
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. |
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when
their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one
significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization
is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
The carrying amount of the registrant’s
financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the
short maturity of those instruments. The registrant’s line of credit and notes payable approximate the fair value of such
instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the registrant for similar
financial arrangements at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Transactions involving related parties cannot
be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings
may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions
were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be
substantiated.
It is not, however, practical to determine the
fair value of advances from stockholders due to their related party nature.
K. Commitments and contingencies
The registrant follows subtopic 450-20 of the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the
consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the registrant but which will only be resolved when
one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The registrant assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently
involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the registrant
or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the registrant evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings
or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates
that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated
liability would be accrued in the registrant’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential
material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of
the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally
not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based
upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the registrant’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and
adversely affect the registrant’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
L. Related parties
The registrant follows subtopic 850-10 of the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties
include (a) affiliates of the registrant; (b) Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent
the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted
for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts
that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d) principal owners of the registrant; (e) management of the registrant;
(f) other parties with which the registrant may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating
policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate
interests; and (g) Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties
or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that
one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures
of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the
ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined
financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: (a) the nature of the relationship(s)
involved; (b) description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for
each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding
of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; (c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods
for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used
in the preceding period; and (d) ammounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if
not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
M. Embedded Conversion Features
The Company evaluates embedded
conversion features within convertible debt under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” to determine whether the embedded
conversion feature(s) should be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a derivative at fair value with changes
in fair value recorded in earnings. If the conversion feature does not require derivative treatment under ASC 815, the instrument
is evaluated under ASC 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” for consideration of any beneficial conversion
features.
N. Derivative Financial Instruments
Fair value accounting requires
bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement
of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional
convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered
conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.
Once determined, derivative liabilities are
adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in
results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments
such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
O. Beneficial Conversion Feature
For conventional convertible
debt where the rate of conversion is below market value, the Company records a "beneficial conversion feature" ("BCF")
and related debt discount.
When the Company records
a BCF, the relative fair value of the BCF is recorded as a debt discount against the face amount of the respective debt instrument
(offset to additional paid in capital) and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.
P. Debt Issue Costs and Debt Discount
The Company may record
debt issue costs and/or debt discounts in connection with raising funds through the issuance of debt. These costs may be paid in
the form of cash, or equity (such as warrants). These costs are amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt. If a conversion
of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed.
Q. Cash flows reporting
The registrant adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24
of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according
to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the
indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating
activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected
future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash
receipts and payments. The registrant reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current
exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported
as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides
information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph
830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
R. Subsequent events
The registrant follows the guidance in Section
855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The registrant will evaluate
subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification, the registrant as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed
to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
S. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2014, FASB issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain
Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation”.
The update removes all incremental financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the removal
of Topic 915 from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. In addition, the update adds an example disclosure in Risks and Uncertainties
(Topic 275) to illustrate one way that an entity that has not begun planned principal operations could provide information about
the risks and uncertainties related to the company’s current activities. Furthermore, the update removes an exception provided
to development stage entities in Consolidations (Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity-which
may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a company that has an interest in
a company in the development stage. The update is effective for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014,
including interim periods therein. Early application with the first annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s
financial statements have not yet been issued (Public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). The Company
adopted this pronouncement for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
In June 2014, FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation ( Topic
718 ); Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved
after the Requisite Service Period”. The amendments in this ASU apply to all reporting entities that grant their
employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could
be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and
that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should
apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for
such awards. For all entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this
ASU either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards
with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial
statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of
applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be
recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective
transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This updated guidance
is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. We are
currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash
flows or financial condition.
In August 2014, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic
205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there
is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance.
In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments
require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain
principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial
doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating
effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration
of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and
(6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be
issued). We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations,
cash flows or financial condition.
All other newly issued
accounting pronouncements but not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.
NOTE 4 –GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been
prepared assuming that the registrant will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization
of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
As of March 31, 2015, the registrant had an
accumulated deficit during development stage of $21,119,286. Also, during the three months ended March 31, 2015, the registrant
used net cash of $259,877 for operating activities. These factors raise substantial doubt about the registrant’s ability
to continue as a going concern.
While the registrant is attempting to commence
operations and generate revenues, the registrant’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the registrant’s
daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that
the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the
registrant to continue as a going concern. While the registrant believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues
and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the registrant to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon the registrant’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.
The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might be necessary if the registrant is unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 5– PREPAIDS
The prepaid assets recorded at March 31, 2015
and December 31, 2014, were the result of:
| a.) | In the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company made prepayments totaling $69,292 in cash which consisted of $54,792
to a manufacturer overseas and $14,500 for consulting and legal services. |
| b.) | The registrant executing a six month consulting agreement on September 2, 2014, whereby the registrant issued 30,000,000
free trading S-8 shares to Noah Fouch to provide weekly marketing services through social media platforms. The 30,000,000
shares were valued at the closing price of $0.0016 on the date of the agreement which will result in the registrant recording
consulting expense of $48,000 over the life of the contract. |
| c.) | The registrant executing a one year service agreement on September 12, 2014, whereby the registrant issued 5,000,000 shares
of Series A Preferred Stock to its CEO, Kerry Driscoll. The 5,000,000 shares were valued at par $0.001 which will result in the
registrant recording officer compensation expense of $5,000 over the life of the contract. |
| d.) | The registrant executing a (1) year service agreement on September 12, 2014, whereby the registrant issued 5,000,000 shares
of Series A Preferred Stock to a former officer of the registrant. The 5,000,000 shares were valued at par $0.001 which will result
in the registrant recording officer compensation expense of $5,000 over the life of the contract. |
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014,
the registrant had a prepaid balance of $89,812 and $46,020 which is derived from the uncompleted portion of the consulting agreements
as well as prepayments for manufacturing costs and legal services.
NOTE 6– PROPERTY PLANT &
EQUIPMENT
Furniture and Equipment
consisted of the
following:
| |
March 31,
2015 | |
December 31,
2014 |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Equipment | |
$ | 85,467 | | |
$ | 85,467 | |
Furniture | |
| 4,186 | | |
| 4,186 | |
Total | |
| 89,653 | | |
| 89,653 | |
Less accumulated Depreciation | |
| (87,581 | ) | |
| (86,876 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | |
$ | 2,072 | | |
$ | 2,777 | |
On April 30, 2013, the registrant acquired all
the assets of Mind Technologies, Inc. through an executed Asset Purchase Agreement (Described in Note 9).
Depreciation expense
for the three months ended March 31, 2015
and 2014 was $705 and $461.
NOTE 7 – RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Convertible note payable to related party
On January 2, 2014, the registrant entered into
a convertible promissory note with Brent Fouch, in the amount of $61,096, bearing no interest, convertible at the closing market
price on the date of conversion. On January 5, 2014, Brent Fouch entered into an assignment agreement with Magna Group, LLC, whereby
Brent Fouch assigned his convertible promissory note dated January 2, 2014, in the amount of $61,096.
Consulting agreement(s) with CEO
The registrant executed a consulting agreement
on December 25, 2013, with its current Chief Executive Officer whereby the registrant issued 120,000,000 shares of common stock
for one year of executive services. The 120,000,000 shares were valued at the closing price of $0.0022 on the date of the agreement
which will result in the registrant recording officer compensation of $264,000 over the life of the contract.
The registrant executed a service
agreement on September 12, 2014, with its current Chief Executive Officer, Kerry Driscoll, whereby the registrant issued
5,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for one year of services such as compliance, guidance, infrastructure and
business strategy. The 5,000,000 shares were valued at par $0.001 which resulted in the registrant recording officer
compensation of $5,000 over the life of the contract.
Service Agreement with Former Officer
The registrant executed a service
agreement on September 12, 2014, with a former officer of the Company, whereby the registrant issued 5,000,000 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock for one year services to facilitate the development of BCI software compatibility with the
registrant’s micro BCI headset. The 5,000,000 preferred shares were valued at par $0.001 which resulted in the
registrant recording a consulting expense of $5,000 over the life of the contract.
Asset Purchase Agreement
On April
30, 2013, the registrant executed an asset purchase agreement with Mind Technologies, Inc., (MTEK), whereby the registrant purchased
all the assets of MTEK for 15,000 common shares. The assets purchased include those previously licensed from MTEK, described in
Note 9.
Free office space provided by chief executive officer
The registrant has been provided office space
by its chief executive officer Kerry Driscoll at no cost. Management has determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize
the rent expense in its financial statements.
NOTE 8– AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
SECURITIES
Other Comprehensive Income/Loss
On February 12, 2014, the registrant entered
into a consulting agreement with Monster Arts, Inc. (“Monster”), whereby the registrant will provide Monster with thought
controlled software development services over a one year term. The registrant will be paid four quarterly payments of $50,000 in
restricted common stock of Monster. As March 31, 2015, the registrant has received two certificates of Monster’s stock totally
39,583,333 common shares worth approximately $100,000, based on the closing stock price at the date of receipt. The registrant
revalued the 39,583,333 shares on March 31, 2015. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded an unrealized
loss on available-for-sale securities of $3,701 and $28,333.
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014,
the registrant had available for sale securities balance of $257 and $3,958.
NOTE 9 – LICENSED
PRODUCTS & ASSET PURCHASE
On December
18, 2012, the registrant signed a licensing agreement with Mind Technologies, Inc., (MTEK), for the right to use, develop, improve,
manufacture, and sale the licensed software application which uses wireless headsets
to read brainwaves
and allow interaction
with a computer.
The registrant issued 3,500 common shares to MTEK as consideration for the licensing
agreement. The shares were valued at the amortized holding cost of the related party. The amortized holding cost was $-0- at March
31, 2015, and March 31, 2014 respectively.
On
April 30, 2013, the registrant executed an asset purchase agreement with MTEK, whereby the registrant purchased all the
assets of MTEK for 15,000 common shares. The assets purchased were previously licensed from MTEK as described previously. The
cost basis of the assets acquired is $86,033, with accumulated depreciation of $81,638, which resulted in a net asset balance
of $4,395. The registrant recorded the excess consideration as additional paid in capital inasmuch as it was a related party
transaction. The former CEO of Mind Solutions, Inc. is also the former CEO of Mind Technologies, Inc. The registrant acquired
all the assets involved with the former operations of MTEK which include three thought-controlled software
applications named Mind Mouse, Master Mind and Think-Tac-Toe. These purchased assets constitute neural processing software
for thought-controlled technologies, allowing the user to interact with computers, gaming devices, and other machines through
the power of the mind. Included in the purchase are all Mind Technologies’ inventory, fixed assets, intellectual
property, and an assignment of rights and assumption of obligations under Mind Technologies’ existing contracts.
NOTE 10 –
CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
In the three months ended March 31, 2015, the
registrant entered into two convertible note agreements. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the registrant has $286,861
and $451,728 in outstanding convertible notes payable with eight non-related entities.
Iconic Holdings, LLC
On February 4, 2015, the registrant entered
into an amendment to the convertible promissory note dated February 18, 2014 with Iconic Holdings, LLC, (“Iconic”),
whereby Iconic additionally funded the convertible promissory note. The Company received $55,000 cash with $5,000 of original issue
discount pursuant to this additional funding of said convertible promissory note. The convertible promissory note has terms with
interest of 10% per annum, unsecured, and due February 4, 2016. The note is convertible into common shares of the registrant at
a conversion rate of 55% of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 10 days leading up to the
date of conversion. As of March 31, 2015, Iconic Holdings, LLC has not converted any principle on this note.
On March 30, 2015, the registrant entered into
an amendment to the convertible promissory note dated February 18, 2014 with Iconic Holdings, LLC, (“Iconic”), whereby
Iconic additionally funded the convertible promissory note. The Company received $74,250 cash with $8,250 of original issue discount
pursuant to this additional funding of said convertible promissory note. The convertible promissory note has terms with interest
of 10% per annum, unsecured, and due March 30, 2016. The note is convertible into common shares of the registrant at a conversion
rate of 55% of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 10 days leading up to the date of conversion.
As of March 31, 2015, Iconic Holdings, LLC has not converted any principle on this note.
On March 30, 2015, the registrant entered into
a convertible promissory note agreement, (“Note”), with Iconic Holdings, LLC, (“Iconic”) in the principle
amount of $220,000 with interest of 10% and due March 30, 2016. As of March 31, 2015, the Registrant received $15,750 cash with
$1,750 of original issue discount pursuant to this Note. The Note is convertible into common shares of the registrant at a conversion
rate of 50% of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 20 days leading up to the date of conversion.
As of March 31, 2015, Iconic Holdings, LLC has not converted any principle on this note.
LG Capital, LLC
On February 10, 2015, the registrant issued
a convertible promissory note to LG Capital Funding LLC with a front end and back end portion with the same terms. The front end
and back end portion of the convertible promissory note are in the principle amount of $31,500. The convertible promissory note
has interest of 10% per annum, is unsecured, and due February 10, 2016. The note is convertible into common shares of the registrant
at a conversion rate of 55% of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 10 days leading up to the
date of conversion. As of March 31, 2015, the registrant received $60,000 cash with $3,000 of legal fees pursuant to the front
end and back end of said convertible promissory note. As of March 31, 2015, LG Capital Funding LLC converted $31,500 of principle
into 35,397,411 shares of our common stock on this note.
JMJ Financial
On May 15, 2013, the registrant executed
a convertible promissory note with JMJ Financial, (“JMJ”) in an amount up to $250,000 bearing interest on the
unpaid balance at the rate of 12 percent. While the note was in the original principal amount up to $250,000, it was only
partially funded. On May 15, 2013, the registrant received $30,000 pursuant to this convertible promissory note with JMJ
Financial. On August 14, 2013, the registrant received $20,000 pursuant to this convertible promissory note with JMJ
Financial. On December 4, 2013, the registrant received $25,000 pursuant to this convertible promissory note with JMJ
Financial. On April 16, 2014, the registrant received $40,000 pursuant to this convertible promissory note with JMJ
Financial. On June 23, 2014, the registrant received $60,000 pursuant to this convertible promissory note with JMJ Financial.
On December 16, 2014, the registrant received $25,000 pursuant to this convertible promissory note with JMJ Financial. The
notes are interest free for the first 180 days after which it accrues interest of 12% per annum. The note is convertible
after 180 days into common shares of the registrant at a conversion rate of 60% of the market price, calculated as the lowest
trade price in the 25 trading days previous to conversion. As of March 31, 2015, the Company recorded $48,889 in original
debt discount pertaining to the accumulation from all the notes issued to JMJ. As of March 31, 2015, JMJ Financial converted
$217,778 in principle into 357,948,896 shares of common stock leaving a note payable balance of $31,111 due to JMJ.
Conversion of convertible debt.
As of March 31, 2015, JMJ Financial converted
$217,778 in principle into 357,948,896 shares of commons stock, JSJ Investments Inc. converted $100,000 of convertible debt into
158,079,053 shares of common stock, LG Capital Funding LLC converted $63,000 of convertible debt into 69,087,250 shares of common
stock, Iconic Holdings, LLC converted $27,500 of convertible debt into 33,333,333 shares of common stock, WHC Capital, LLC converted
$10,000 of convertible debt into 31,829,910 shares of common stock, KBM Worldwide Inc. converted $27,500 of convertible debt into
71,500,000 shares of common stock and Cicero Consulting Group converted $100,000 of convertible debt into 100,000,000 shares of
common stock.
The following table summarizes the total outstanding
principle on convertible notes payable:
| |
March 31,
2015 | |
December 31,
2014 |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Convertible Notes Payable - JMJ Financial, LLC | |
| 31,111 | | |
| 85,978 | |
Convertible Notes Payable - LG Capital Funding LLC | |
| 32,500 | | |
| 32,500 | |
Convertible Notes Payable - Iconic Holdings | |
| 190,750 | | |
| 63,250 | |
Convertible Notes Payable - KBM Worldwide, Inc. | |
| 32,500 | | |
| 60,000 | |
Convertible Notes Payable - WHC Capital, LLC | |
| — | | |
| 10,000 | |
Convertible Notes Payable - Cicero Consulting Group, LLC | |
| — | | |
| 100,000 | |
Convertible Notes Payable - JSJ Investments Inc. | |
| — | | |
| 100,000 | |
Total | |
$ | 286,861 | | |
$ | 451,728 | |
In the three months ended March 31, 2015 and
2014, the registrant recorded interest expense relating to the outstanding convertible notes payable in the amounts of $12,738
and $8,792.
Derivative liability.
At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the
Company had $573,290 and $1,767,223 in derivative liability. In the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company reduced its
derivative liability by $1,193,933 of which $40,280 was credited as an Other Income Item- Gain on Derivative Adjustment due to
the change in derivative liability calculated by the Black Scholes Model pertaining to the outstanding convertible notes payable.
We calculate the derivative liability using
the Black Scholes Model which factors in the Company’s stock price volatility as well as the convertible terms applicable
to the outstanding convertible notes. The following is the range of variables used in revaluing the derivative liabilities at March
31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
| |
March 31,
2015 | |
December 31,
2014 |
Annual dividend yield | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Expected life (years) of | |
| 0.01 – .90 | | |
| 0.01 – .90 | |
Risk-free interest rate | |
| 10 | % | |
| 10 | % |
Expected volatility | |
| 509.4 | % | |
| 508.1 | % |
NOTE 11– NOTES
PAYABLE
The total amount due on notes payable and related
interest and penalty is as follows:
| |
March 31, 2015 | |
December 31, 2014 |
| |
| |
|
Notes Payable | |
$ | 145,000 | | |
$ | 145,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total | |
$ | 145,000 | | |
$ | 145,000 | |
The registrant has outstanding notes due to
a former director in the aggregate amount of $145,000. The notes are unsecured and accrue interest and penalty of 15% inasmuch
as they are past due. The former director elected not to participate with the holders of other promissory notes, including our
then executive officers, in the exchange of those notes for equity which occurred during January 2009. At March 31, 2015, and December
31, 2014, total accrued interest and penalty pertaining to the outstanding $145,000 in notes payable is $287,274 and $280,024.
NOTE 12– STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Authorized Common Stock
On May 17, 2013, the registrant’s board
voted to authorize an amendment to the registrant’s articles of incorporation to increase its authorized shares of common
stock from 1,000,000,000 to 3,000,000,000. On August 23, 2013, the registrant’s board authorized an amendment to the registrant’s
articles of incorporation to increase its authorized shares of common stock from 3,000,000,000 to 5,000,000,000.
Authorized Preferred Stock
The registrant is authorized to issue 10,000,000
shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
The board of directors passed a resolution designating
certain preferential liquidity, dividend, voting and other relative rights to Shares of Series A Preferred Stock. Each share of
Series A Preferred Stock may at the option of the holder be converted into 100 fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock.
Issued Preferred Stock
On September 12, 2014, the registrant issued
5,000,000 Preferred A Shares to its chief executive officer, Kerry Driscoll, for one year of services to be rendered to the registrant.
The 5,000,000 shares were valued at par $0.001which resulted in the registrant recording officer compensation of $5,000 over the
life of the contract.
The registrant executed a service agreement
on September 12, 2014, with a unrelated third party whereby the registrant issued 5,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
for one year services to facilitate the development of BCI software compatibility with the registrant’s micro BCI headset.
The 5,000,000 preferred shares were valued at par $0.001which resulted in the registrant recording a consulting expense of $5,000
over the life of the contract.
In the three months ended March 31, 2015,
an unrelated third party converted 890,000 preferred shares into 89,000,000 shares of common stock.
Issued Common Stock
In the year ended December 31, 2013, the
registrant issued 35,894,503 shares of common stock. Of the 35,894,503 shares issued, 22,088,000 shares were to consultants
for services, 15,000 shares were issued in an asset purchase agreement, 10,625 shares were issued to a related party for the
reduction of $51,000 in related party convertible debt, and 13,777,673 shares were issued to non-related convertible note
holders for the reduction of $469,346 in convertible debt. Of the 22,088,000 shares to consultants, 20,000,000 were issued to
our chief executive officer pursuant to a one year consulting agreement dated December 25, 2013. We recorded the portion of
the contract not yet completed as prepaid expense. The 22,088,000 shares issued for services rendered were valued at the
closing price on the dates of their respective agreements which resulted in the registrant recording a consideration of
$1,467,703. Of the other 2,088,000 shares for services, 238,000 were to the Secretary of the registrant for consulting
services provided over the past two years. The other 1,850,000 were to unrelated third party consultants for investor related
services completed by December 31, 2013.
In the year ended December 31, 2014, the registrant
issued 1,352,758,793 shares of common stock, of which 252,895,776 shares were issued for services and 1,099,863,017 shares were
issued for the reduction of $861,629 in convertible notes payable debt and $18,487 of accrued interest. The 252,897,776 shares
issued for services rendered were valued at the closing price on the dates of their respective agreements which resulted in the
registrant recording a consulting expense of $562,361.
In the three months ended March 31, 2015, the
registrant issued 758,957,921 shares of common stock of which 669,957,921 shares were for the conversion of $382,867 in principle
convertible debt and $12,817 of accrued interest and 89,000,000 shares were for the conversion of 890,000 shares of preferred stock.
Stock Payable
In the three months ended March 31, 2015, the registrant issued
55,149,902 shares of common stock pursuant to two conversion notices executed in December of 2014 totaling $36,605 leaving a stock
payable balance of $0.
NOTE 13– COMMITMENTS
We were a defendant in two actions, each entitled
951 Yamato Acquisition registrant, LLC vs. VOIS, Inc., both as filed in December 2009 in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial
Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida under case numbers 502010CA040121XXXXMB and 502010CC19027XXXXBBRS, which are related
to the lease agreements for our former office space. A combined summary judgment was entered in April, 2010 against VOIS, Inc.
in the amount of $106,231. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our liabilities as reported in our financial statements contained
elsewhere in this report reflect the principal amount of the judgment together with $31,869 and $30,278 in accrued interest, respectively.
NOTE 14 -
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated subsequent events pursuant
to the requirements of ASC Topic 855 and has determined that other than listed below, there were no other material subsequent events
exist.
| 1. | In April and May of 2015, convertible note holders converted $52,500 of principle and $1,300
of accrued interest into 74,748,176 shares of common stock. The Company also issued 100,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant
to the conversion of 1,000,000 preferred shares. |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ
TOGETHER WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT ON FORM
10-Q.
The following discussion reflects our
plan of operation. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements which are included in this Report.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our expected financial position, business and
financing plans. These statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results
described in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and
elsewhere in this Report.
Unless the context otherwise suggests,
“we,” “our,” “us,” and similar terms, as well as references to “VOIS” and “Mind
Solutions,” all refer to Mind Solutions as of the date of this report.
Mind Solutions has successfully developed
software applications described below that run on Emotive EEG headsets. We have experienced minimal sales of our software applications.
It was decided by management that to better position Mind Solutions in the market, we should develop our own unique EEG headset
that would allow us to have more market strength. We have invested a significant amount of money and time into developing a prototype
EEG headset. We have completed a prototype which has been successfully tested on several Android devices and tablets.
On August 1, 2012, Dr. Gordon Chiu,
our chief scientific adviser, filed an International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/049135. Generally, the proprietary
technology we are using consists of a “Portable Brain Activity Monitor.” On February 12, 2011, Mind Technology,
Inc., one of our predecessors, and Dr. Gordon Chiu, our chief science advisor, granted us a license to use the technology
covered by his patent application. Through the series of mergers described in this report, Mind Solutions acquired the
license granted to Mind Technology, Inc. For the period, that Mind Technology, Inc. (now Mind Solutions) exists and funds the
development and progress of the covered invention, Dr. Chiu agreed to license the use of the technology to Mind Solutions. If
Mind Solutions fails to support the launch, progress and/or funding of the production of the invention, then the license may
be terminated. The agreement provided that Dr. Chiu will receive a non-refundable, non-dilatable cash royalty payment equal
to 20% of the gross proceeds received by Mind Solutions from the use of the covered technology. In addition, an unrelated
third party, will receive a
non-refundable, non-dilatable cash royalty payment equal to 5% of the gross proceeds received by Mind Solutions from the use
of the covered technology. See “Business – Patents and Intellectual Property.”
We believe a minimum of $100,000
is still needed to complete the EEG device, which will cover costs associated with the SDK (operating system), the design
work to create a sleek, consumer-friendly final product and updates on the hardware including Bluetooth wireless updates. We
have announced our desire to partner with a larger technology firm to invest in the completion of the EEG headset in return
for a negotiated interest in the product. If successful, we will not need to raise this capital to complete the project. If
we are not successful in attracting a financial partner to assist in the completion of the EEG headset, we plans to raise
funds by means of an equity offering to raise the necessary capital to complete the project.
Mind Solutions currently has a need of
approximately $45,000 per month to sustain operations until sales of the software and anticipated sales of the EEG headset increase.
Going Concern
As of March 31, 2015, the registrant
had an accumulated deficit during development stage of $21,119,286. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the registrant
used net cash of $259,877 for operating activities. These factors raise substantial doubt about the registrant’s ability
to continue as a going concern.
While the registrant is attempting to
commence operations and generate revenues, the registrant’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the registrant’s
daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that
the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the
registrant to continue as a going concern. While the registrant believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues
and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the registrant to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon the registrant’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015, Compared to Three
Months Ended March 31, 2014.
Revenues. During the three months
ended March 31, 2015, and 2014, the registrant recognized $0 and $31,111 of revenues. The $31,111 of service revenues recognized
were from the registrant’s services provided to a third party which it received stock in the third party as compensation.
The registrant is aggressively looking for ways to leverage our technology to develop revenue streams.
General and Administrative Expenses.
Consulting Fees. During the three
months ended March 31, 2015, consulting expense increased to $100,000 as compared to $363,234 from the prior three months ended
March 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily the result of less stock and convertible notes being issued to consultants for services
rendered to the registrant.
Officer Compensation. During the
three months ended March 31, 2015, officer compensation increased to $40,130 as compared to $35,000 from the prior three months
ended March 31, 2014. Officer compensation increased due to additional payments made to our chief executive office for services
rendered.
Professional Fees. During the
three months ended March 31, 2015, professional fees decreased to $24,411 as compared to $28,827 from the prior three months ended
March 31, 2014. Professional fees decreased slightly but for the most part stayed fairly constant as the registrants legal and
accounting services have not changed.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expense. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $16,278 as
compared to $23,472 from the prior three months ended March 31, 2014. The decrease was due primarily to less travel expenses.
Research and Development. During
the three months ended March 31, 2015, research and development expenses increased to $50,140 as compared to $0 from the prior
three months ended March 31, 2014. Research and development costs increased as the Company is testing, modifying and updating its
hardware and software with its prototype headset.
Interest Expense. During the three
months ended March 31, 2015, interest expense increased to $36,583 as compared to $17,637 from the prior three months ended March
31, 2014. The increase was primarily due to original issue discount on issued convertible promissory notes. Interest expense accrued
pursuant to the outstanding convertible notes stayed fairly constant.
Derivative Adjustment.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, gain on derivative adjustment was $40,280 as compared to $0 for the prior three
months ended March 31, 2014. The change was due to the derivative liability calculated using the Black Scholes Model
pursuant to the outstanding convertible notes payable.
Net Loss from Operations. Our
net loss from operations decreased to $230,959 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $419,422 for the three months
ended March 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to less stock issued for consulting services.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability of a company
to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash. The following table provides certain selected balance sheet comparisons
between March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
$ |
|
% |
2015 |
2014 |
Change |
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working Capital |
|
$ (1,593,594) |
|
$ (2,940,044) |
|
$ 1,346,450 |
|
45.8% |
Cash |
|
56,322 |
|
113,199 |
|
(56,877) |
|
(50.2)% |
Total current assets |
|
146,134 |
|
159,219 |
|
(13,085) |
|
(8.2)% |
Total assets |
|
148,463 |
|
165,954 |
|
(17,491) |
|
(10.5)% |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
403,334 |
|
389,165 |
|
14,169 |
|
3.6% |
Notes payable and accrued interest |
|
783,274 |
|
939,375 |
|
(156,101) |
|
(16.6) % |
Total current liabilities |
|
1,763,398 |
|
3,099,263 |
|
(1,335,865) |
|
(43.1) % |
Total liabilities |
|
1,763,398 |
|
3,099,263 |
|
(1,335,865) |
|
(43.1)% |
In the three months ended March 31, 2015,
our working capital deficit decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in derivative liability of $1,193,933 and a decrease
in convertible notes payable of $164,867 both due from the conversion of convertible debt into shares of common stock in the registrant.
Operating activities
Net cash used for continuing operating
activities during the three months ended March 31, 2015, was $259,877 as compared to $144,495 for the three months ended March
31, 2014. Non-cash items totaling approximately $56,285 contributing to the net cash used in continuing operating activities for
the three months ended March 31, 2015, include:
$25,500 representing the value of shares issued to consultants,
$40,280 gain on derivative liability adjustment,
$15,000 of original issue discount on convertible debentures issued
$69,292 in prepaids to a manufacturer and a lawyer for future legal
services, |
$705 of depreciation,
$35,752 decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
Net cash used for continuing operating
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014, was $144,495. Non-cash items totaling approximately $295,564 contributing
to the net cash used in continuing operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014, include:
$247,992 representing the value of shares issued for consulting
services,
$31,111 in service revenues paid in the form of available
for sale securities, |
$461 of depreciation,
$13,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities
was $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and 2014.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
was $203,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. This included $203,000 from proceeds from convertible notes.
Net cash provided by financing activities
was $155,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 which was entirely from proceeds from convertible notes.
IBC Funds, LLC. Financing
On November 21, 2013,
IBC Funds, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, acquired by assignment, debts owed by Mind Solutions to four creditors in the
amount of $82,845.63. Likewise, on November 21, 2013, IBC Funds and Mind Solutions executed that certain Settlement Agreement and
Stipulation, whereby Mind Solutions agreed to settle the debt of $82,845.63, and to pay the debt by the issuance of shares pursuant
to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act, which provides that the issuance of shares are exempt from the registration requirement
of Section 5 of the Securities Act. In relevant part, Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act provides an exemption from the registration
requirement for securities: (i) which are issued in exchange for a bona fide claim, (ii) where the terms of the issuance and exchange
are found by a court to be fair to those receiving shares, (iii) notice of the hearing is provided to those to receive shares and
they are afforded the opportunity to be heard, (iv) the issuer must advise the court prior to its hearing that it intends to rely
on the exemption provided in Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act, and (v) there cannot be any impediments to the appearance
of interested parties at the hearing.
On November 22, 2013,
in a court proceeding styled IBC Funds, LLC, a Nevada limited Liability registrant, Plaintiff vs. Mind Solutions, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, Defendant, bearing Civil Action No. 2013 CA 008370 NC, in the Circuit Court in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in and
for Sarasota County, Florida, after due notice, the court entered an order approving the Settlement Agreement and Stipulation.
In satisfaction of the debt, we agreed to issue shares of our common stock in one or more tranches to IBC Funds in the manner contemplated
in the Settlement Agreement and Stipulation at a conversion price of $0.0045 per share. In accordance with the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and Stipulation, the court was advised of our intention to rely upon the exception to registration set forth in Section
3(a)(l0) of the Securities Act to support the issuance of the shares.
As set forth in the
order, the court found that the terms and conditions of the exchange were fair to Mind Solutions and IBC Funds within the meaning
of Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act, and that the exchange of the debt for our securities was not made under Title 11 of
the United States Code.
As permitted by the court order and the
Settlement Agreement and Stipulation, we issued 77,298,674 shares of our common stock to IBC Funds, LLC. The shares were issued
free of any restrictions as permitted by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act.
Hanover Holdings I, LLC Financing
In 2013, we executed various Securities
Purchase Agreements with Hanover Holdings I, LLC, whereby we issued convertible promissory notes to Hanover Holdings I, LLC bearing
interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 10 percent, as follows:
| · | Convertible promissory note dated February 4, 2013, in the original principal amount of $16,500. As a result of a conversion
of the note, we issued 159,659 shares of our common stock to Hanover Holdings I, LLC. As of the date hereof, the note is paid in
full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated March 7, 2013, in the original principal amount of $16,500. As a result of a conversion of
the note, we issued 304,379 shares of our common stock to Hanover Holdings I, LLC. As of the date hereof, the note is paid in full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated September 5, 2013, in the original principal amount of $41,500. As a result of a conversion
of the note, we issued 58,085,830 shares of our common stock to Hanover Holdings I, LLC. As of the date hereof, the note is paid
in full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated August 7, 2013, in the original principal amount of $26,500. As a result of a conversion
of the note, we issued 17,084,482 shares of our common stock to Hanover Holdings I, LLC. As of the date hereof, the note is paid
in full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated November 23, 2013, in the original principal amount of $26,500. As of the date hereof, the
note is paid in full. |
Each of the notes was convertible
into shares of our common stock by dividing the Conversion Amount (as defined below) by the applicable Conversion Price then in
effect on the date specified in the notice of conversion. The term “Conversion Amount” means, with respect to any
conversion of a note, the sum of (1) the principal amount of the note to be converted in such conversion plus (2) at Hanover Holdings
I, LLC’s option, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on such principal amount at the interest rates provided in the note
to the Conversion Date; provided, however, that Mind Solutions shall have the right to pay any or all interest in cash plus (3)
at our option, Default Interest, if any, on the amounts referred to in the immediately preceding clauses (1) and/or (2) plus (4)
at Hanover Holdings I, LLC’s option, any amounts owed to Hanover Holdings I, LLC under the note.
The conversion price (the “Conversion
Price”) shall be the Variable Conversion Price (subject to equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights
offerings by Mind Solutions relating to our securities or the securities of any subsidiary of Mind Solutions, combinations, recapitalization,
reclassifications, extraordinary distributions and similar events). The “Variable Conversion Price” shall mean 55%
multiplied by the Market Price (as defined in the note) but in no event shall the Conversion Price be less than $0.00004. “Market
Price” means the lowest Trading Price (as defined below) for our common stock during the ten (10) Trading Day period ending
on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. “Trading Price” means, for any security as of any
date, the lowest trading price on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, or applicable trading market (the “OTCBB”) as
reported by a reliable reporting service (“Reporting Service”) mutually acceptable to Mind Solutions and Hanover Holdings
I, LLC (i.e., Bloomberg). If the Trading Price cannot be calculated for such security on such date in the manner provided
above, the Trading Price shall be the fair market value as mutually determined by Mind Solutions and the holders of a majority
in interest of the notes being converted for which the calculation of the Trading Price is required in order to determine the Conversion
Price of such notes.
“Trading Day” shall mean
any day on which our common stock is traded for any period on the OTCBB, or on the principal securities exchange or other securities
market on which our common stock is then being traded. If our common stock is chilled for deposit at DTC and/or becomes chilled
at any point while the note remains outstanding, an additional 8% discount will be attributed to the Conversion Price defined in
the note. If Mind Solutions is unable to issue any shares under this provision due to the fact that there is an insufficient number
of authorized and unissued shares available, Hanover Holdings I, LLC promises not to force Mind Solutions to issue these shares
or trigger an Event of Default, provided that Mind Solutions takes immediate steps required to get the appropriate level of approval
from stockholders or the board of directors, where applicable to raise the number of authorized shares to satisfy the Notice of
Conversion.
All shares of our common stock issued
to Hanover Holdings I, LLC were restricted in their transfer, pursuant to the Securities Act. In addition, all shares of our common
stock which were issued to Hanover Holdings I, LLC have been adjusted to take into account the one for 2,000 reverse split of the
shares of our common stock which occurred on October 31, 2013.
The note further provides for anti-dilution
adjustments in favor of Hanover Holdings I, LLC, in the event we offer additional shares of our common stock.
Copies of the Securities
Purchase Agreements and convertible notes in favor of Hanover Holdings I, LLC were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
Asher Enterprises, Inc. Financing
In 2012, 2013, and 2014, we executed
various Securities Purchase Agreements with Asher Enterprises, Inc., whereby we issued convertible promissory notes to Asher Enterprises,
Inc. bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of eight percent, as follows:
| · | Convertible promissory note dated December 26, 2012, in the original principal amount of $32,500. As a result of a conversion
of the note, we issued 44,402 shares of our common stock to Asher Enterprises, Inc. As of the date hereof, the note is paid in
full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated March 1, 2013, in the original principal amount of $32,500. As a result of a conversion of
the note, we issued 583,992 shares of our common stock to Asher Enterprises, Inc. As of the date hereof, the note is paid in full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated April 18, 2013, in the original principal amount of $32,500. As a result of a conversion
of the note, we issued 10,836,925 shares of our common stock to Asher Enterprises, Inc. As of the date hereof, the note is paid
in full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated November 7, 2013, in the original principal amount of $42,500. As of the date hereof, the
note is paid in full. |
| · | Convertible promissory note dated February 6, 2014, in the original principal amount of $37,500. As of the date hereof, the
note is paid in full. |
Each of the notes was convertible into
shares of our common stock by dividing the Conversion Amount (as defined below) by the applicable Conversion Price then in effect
on the date specified in the notice of conversion. The term “Conversion Amount” means, with respect to any conversion
of a note, the sum of (1) the principal amount of the note to be converted in such conversion plus (2) at Asher Enterprises, Inc.’s
option, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on such principal amount at the interest rates provided in the note to the Conversion
Date; provided, however, that Mind Solutions shall have the right to pay any or all interest in cash plus (3) at our option, Default
Interest, if any, on the amounts referred to in the immediately preceding clauses (1) and/or (2) plus (4) at Asher Enterprises,
Inc.’s option, any amounts owed to Asher Enterprises, Inc. under the note.
The conversion price (the “Conversion
Price”) shall be the Variable Conversion Price (subject to equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights
offerings by Mind Solutions relating to our securities or the securities of any subsidiary of Mind Solutions, combinations, recapitalization,
reclassifications, extraordinary distributions and similar events). The “Variable Conversion Price” shall mean 55%
multiplied by the Market Price (as defined in the note) but in no event shall the Conversion Price be less than $0.00004. “Market
Price” means the lowest Trading Price (as defined below) for our common stock during the ten (10) Trading Day period ending
on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. “Trading Price” means, for any security as of any
date, the lowest trading price on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, or applicable trading market (the “OTCBB”) as
reported by a reliable reporting service (“Reporting Service”) mutually acceptable to Mind Solutions and Asher Enterprises,
Inc. (i.e., Bloomberg). If the Trading Price cannot be calculated for such security on such date in the manner provided
above, the Trading Price shall be the fair market value as mutually determined by Mind Solutions and the holders of a majority
in interest of the notes being converted for which the calculation of the Trading Price is required in order to determine the Conversion
Price of such notes.
“Trading Day” shall mean
any day on which our common stock is traded for any period on the OTCBB, or on the principal securities exchange or other securities
market on which our common stock is then being traded. If our common stock is chilled for deposit at DTC and/or becomes chilled
at any point while the note remains outstanding, an additional 8% discount will be attributed to the Conversion Price defined in
the note. If Mind Solutions is unable to issue any shares under this provision due to the fact that there is an insufficient number
of authorized and unissued shares available, Asher Enterprises, Inc. promises not to force Mind Solutions to issue these shares
or trigger an Event of Default, provided that Mind Solutions takes immediate steps required to get the appropriate level of approval
from stockholders or the board of directors, where applicable to raise the number of authorized shares to satisfy the Notice of
Conversion.
All shares of our common stock issued
to Asher Enterprises, Inc. were restricted in their transfer, pursuant to the Securities Act. In addition, all shares of our common
stock which were issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc. have been adjusted to take into account the one for 2,000 reverse split of the
shares of our common stock which occurred on October 31, 2013.
The note further provides for anti-dilution
adjustments in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc., in the event we offer additional shares of our common stock.
Copies of the Securities
Purchase Agreements and convertible notes in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc. were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
JMJ Financial Financing
On May 15, 2013, we issued
to JMJ Financial our convertible promissory in the amount up to $250,000. As a result of partial conversions of the note, we issued
75,022,674 shares of our common stock to JMJ Financial. On May 15, 2013, we executed a convertible promissory note in favor of
JMJ Financial in the amount up to $250,000 bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 12 percent. While the note was
in the original principal amount of $250,000, it was only partially funded on May 15, 2013 in the amount of $30,000.00, plus pro-rated
original issue discount and pro-rated interest in the amount of $7,333.33, on August 14, 2013 in the amount of $20,000.00, on December
9, 2013 in the amount of $25,000.00, on April 16, 2014 in the amount of $40,000 and on September 23, 2014, in the amount of $60,000.
After allowing for conversions, approximately $31,111 of the principle on the convertible notes is outstanding on the date of this
report.
The Conversion Price of
the note is 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion (In the case that conversion shares
are not deliverable by DWAC an additional 10% discount will apply; and if the shares are ineligible for deposit into the DTC system
and only eligible for)(clearing deposit an additional 5% discount shall apply; in the case of both an additional cumulative 15%
discount shall apply). Unless otherwise agreed in writing by both parties, at no time will JMJ Financial convert any amount of
the note into common stock that would result in JMJ Financial owning more than 4.99% of the common stock outstanding of the registrant.
JMJ Financial has the
right, at any time after 180 days from the effective date of the note, at its election, to convert all or part of the outstanding
and unpaid principal sum and accrued interest (and any other fees) into shares of fully paid and non-assessable shares of common
stock of the registrant as per this conversion formula: Number of shares receivable upon conversion equals the dollar conversion
amount divided by the Conversion Price.
As of the date hereof,
$31,111 of the JMJ Financial note remains unpaid.
All shares of our common stock issued
to JMJ Financial were restricted in their transfer, pursuant to the Securities Act. In addition, all shares of our common stock
which were issued to JMJ Financial have been adjusted to take into account the one for 2,000 reverse split of the shares of our
common stock which occurred on October 31, 2013.
The note further provides for anti-dilution
adjustments in favor of JMJ Financial, in the event we offer additional shares of our common stock.
LG Capital Funding, LLC Financing
On February 4, 2014, we executed a Securities
Purchase Agreement with LG Capital Funding, LLC, whereby we issued convertible promissory notes in an aggregate amount of $25,000
to LG Capital Funding, LLC bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 10 percent, as follows:
| · | On February 4, 2014, the registrant entered into a Convertible Note Agreement with LG Capital
Funding LLC whereby there is a front end and a back end note with the same terms. On February 4, 2014, the registrant issued a
$25,000 front end convertible note with interest of 10% per annum, unsecured, and due February 4, 2015. The note is convertible
into common shares of the registrant at any time from the date of issuance at a conversion rate of 55% of the market price, calculated
as the lowest trading price in the previous 10 days leading up to the date of conversion. On August 7, 2014, the registrant issued
a back end note of $25,000 with the same terms. As of March 31, 2015, LG Capital Funding LLC converted the entire principle balance
of the front end note, $25,000, and $1,312 of accrued interest into 47,864,258 shares of our common stock. As of March 31, 2015,
the registrant has an outstanding convertible note balance to LG Capital Funding LLC which pertains to the back end note dated
February 4, 2014. |
| | |
| · | On March 25, 2014, we executed a Securities Purchase Agreement
with LG Capital Funding, LLC, whereby we issued a convertible promissory note in the amount of $40,000
to LG Capital Funding, LLC bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 10 percent. On
March 25, 2014, we issued a $40,000 convertible note unsecured and due February 25, 2015. The note
is convertible into shares of our common stock at any time from the date of issuance at a conversion
rate of 55 percent of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 10
days leading up to the date of conversion. |
On September 4, 2014, we executed a Securities
Purchase Agreement with LG Capital Funding, LLC whereby LG Capital agreed to purchase two of our 10% convertible notes in the forms
attached to the Securities Purchase Agreement as Exhibits A and B in the aggregate principal amount of $63,000 (with the first
note being in the amount of $31,500 and the second note being in the amount of $31,500 (together with any note(s) issued in replacement
thereof or as a dividend thereon or otherwise with respect thereto in accordance with the terms thereof, the “Note”),
convertible into shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share, upon the terms and subject to the limitations and conditions
set forth in such Note. The first of the two notes (the “First Note”) shall be paid for by LG Capital as set forth
the Securities Purchase Agreement. The second note (the “Second Note”) shall initially be paid for by the issuance
of an offsetting $31,500 secured note issued to the registrant by LG Capital (“Buyer Note”), provided that prior to
conversion of the Second Note, LG Capital must have paid off the First Note in cash such that the Second Note may not be converted
until it has been paid for in cash. Subject to the terms of the Note, LG Capital shall have the right, at LG Capital’s option,
to convert the outstanding principal amount and interest under the Note in whole or in part.
On February 10, 2015, we executed a Securities
Purchase Agreement with LG Capital Funding, LLC whereby LG Capital agreed to purchase two of our 10% convertible notes in the forms
attached to the Securities Purchase Agreement as Exhibits A and B in the aggregate principal amount of $63,000 (with the first
note being in the amount of $31,500 and the second note being in the amount of $31,500 (together with any note(s) issued in replacement
thereof or as a dividend thereon or otherwise with respect thereto in accordance with the terms thereof, the “Note”),
convertible into shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share, upon the terms and subject to the limitations and conditions
set forth in such Note. The first of the two notes (the “First Note”) shall be paid for by LG Capital as set forth
the Securities Purchase Agreement. The second note (the “Second Note”) shall initially be paid for by the issuance
of an offsetting $31,500 secured note issued to the registrant by LG Capital (“Buyer Note”), provided that prior to
conversion of the Second Note, LG Capital must have paid off the First Note in cash such that the Second Note may not be converted
until it has been paid for in cash. Subject to the terms of the Note, LG Capital shall have the right, at LG Capital’s option,
to convert the outstanding principal amount and interest under the Note in whole or in part.
As of the date hereof, $32,500 of the
LG Capital LLC notes remains unpaid.
Copies of the Securities Purchase Agreements
and the convertible promissory notes in favor of LG Capital Funding, LLC were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
GEL Properties, LLC Financing
On February 4, 2014, we issued a convertible
promissory note to GEL Properties, LLC bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 10 percent, in the original principal
amount of $25,000. The note is unsecured, and due February 4, 2015, and is convertible into shares of our common stock at any time
from the date of issuance at a conversion rate of 55 percent of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the
previous 10 days leading up to the date of conversion. As of the date hereof, the note is paid in full.
On August 28, 2014, we issued a convertible
promissory note to GEL Properties, LLC bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 10 percent, in the original principal
amount of $25,000. The note is unsecured, and due August 28, 2015, and is convertible into shares of our common stock at any time
from the date of issuance at a conversion rate of 55 percent of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the
previous 10 days leading up to the date of conversion. As of the date hereof, the note is paid in full.
Copies of the convertible promissory
notes in favor of GEL Properties, LLC were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
Premier Venture Partners, LLC Financing
On March 11, 2013, Mind Solutions and
Premier Venture Partners, LLC, a California Limited Partnership executed that certain Equity Purchase Agreement with respect to
the resale of up to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock by Premier pursuant to a “put right.” The Equity Purchase
Agreement permitted us to “put” up to $1,000,000 in shares of our common stock to Premier. Moreover, we also agreed
to register the resale by Premier of an additional 12,765,957 shares of our common stock issued as Initial Commitment Shares in
connection with the Equity Purchase Agreement. We were not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock
offered by Premier. However, we were to receive proceeds from the sale of securities pursuant to our exercise of the put right
described in the Equity Purchase Agreement. We agreed to bear all costs associated with the registration.
We filed with the SEC a current report
on Form 8-K with respect to the Premier Equity Purchase Agreement on March 26, 2014.
On June 27, 2014, we filed a registration
statement on Form S-1 in connection with the Premier Equity Purchase Agreement. However, on July 17, 2014, pursuant to Rule 477
of Regulation C promulgated under the Securities Act, we withdrew our registration statement, inasmuch as we received notice from
the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2014, that the Commission’s preliminary review of the registration statement
indicated that we were not entitled to file the registration statement for our equity line financing, inasmuch as the shares of
our common stock are quoted for sale on the OTCPK operated by OTC Market Group, Inc. No securities were sold in connection with
the registration statement. On September 10, 2014, we filed a Form 8-K/A announcing that we had terminated the Premier Equity Purchase
Agreement.
Caesar Capital Group LLC Financing
On April 15, 2014, the registrant entered
into a securities purchase agreement and convertible promissory note in the amount of $50,000 with Caesar Capital Group LLC with
8% interest per annum, due April 15, 2015. The note holder has the right to convert the note into common shares of the registrant
after 6 months from the date of the executed note at a discount to market of 45% based on the lowest trading price ten days prior
to conversion.
In the year ended December 31, 2014,
Caesar Capital Group LLC converted $50,000 of principle into 37,166,878 shares of common stock. As of the date of this filing,
the note is paid in full.
A copy of the Securities Purchase Agreement
and the convertible promissory note in favor of Caesar Capital Group LLC was filed as an exhibit with the SEC.
AARG Corp. Financing
On April 30, 2014, the registrant entered
into a securities purchase agreement and convertible promissory note in the amount of $50,000 with ARRG Corp. with 8% interest
per annum, due April 30, 2015. The note holder has the right to convert the note into common shares of the registrant after 6 months
from the date of the executed note at a discount to market of 45% based on the lowest trading price ten days prior to conversion.
As of the date hereof, $0 of the ARRG
Corp. note remains unpaid.
A copy of the Securities Purchase Agreement
and the convertible promissory note in favor of ARRG Corp. was filed as an exhibit with the SEC.
Cicero Consulting Group, LLC Financing
On May 12, 2014, we executed a Consulting
Agreement with Cicero Consulting Group, LLC and convertible promissory note in the amount of $200,000 whereby Cicero Consulting
Group, LLC will provide management consulting and business advisory services to Mind Solutions over a one year term. We have compensated
Cicero Consulting Group, LLC with a $200,000 convertible promissory note which is considered earned in full as of May 12, 2014.
The convertible note issued pursuant to the Consulting Agreement may be converted into shares of our common stock after six months
from the date of the executed note at a 10 percent discount to market based on the lowest trading price during the 10 trading days
prior to the conversion date.
As of the date hereof, $0 of the Cicero
Consulting Group, LLC note remains unpaid.
A copy of the Consulting Agreement and
the convertible promissory note in favor of Cicero Consulting Group, LLC was filed as an exhibit with the SEC.
KBM Worldwide, Inc. Financing
On May 8, 2014, we executed a Securities
Purchase Agreement with KBM Worldwide, Inc., whereby we issued a convertible promissory note dated May 8, 2014, to KBM Worldwide,
Inc. bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of eight percent, in the original principal amount of $42,500.
The note is convertible into shares of
our common stock by dividing the Conversion Amount (as defined below) by the applicable Conversion Price then in effect on the
date specified in the notice of conversion. The term “Conversion Amount” means, with respect to any conversion of a
note, the sum of (1) the principal amount of the note to be converted in such conversion plus (2) at KBM Worldwide, Inc.’s
option, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on such principal amount at the interest rates provided in the note to the Conversion
Date; provided, however, that Mind Solutions shall have the right to pay any or all interest in cash plus (3) at our option, Default
Interest, if any, on the amounts referred to in the immediately preceding clauses (1) and/or (2) plus (4) at KBM Worldwide, Inc.’s
option, any amounts owed to KBM Worldwide, Inc. under the note.
The conversion price (the “Conversion
Price”) shall be the Variable Conversion Price (subject to equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights
offerings by Mind Solutions relating to our securities or the securities of any subsidiary of Mind Solutions, combinations, recapitalization,
reclassifications, extraordinary distributions and similar events). The “Variable Conversion Price” shall mean 51 percent
multiplied by the Market Price (as defined in the note). “Market Price" means the average of the lowest three Trading
Prices (as defined below) for our common stock during the 30 Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior
to the Conversion Date. “Trading Price” means, for any security as of any date, the lowest trading price on the Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board, or applicable trading market (the “OTCBB”) as reported by a reliable reporting service (“Reporting
Service”) mutually acceptable to Mind Solutions and KBM Worldwide, Inc. (i.e., Bloomberg). If the Trading Price cannot
be calculated for such security on such date in the manner provided above, the Trading Price shall be the fair market value as
mutually determined by Mind Solutions and the holders of a majority in interest of the note being converted for which the calculation
of the Trading Price is required in order to determine the Conversion Price of such note.
“Trading Day” shall mean
any day on which shares of our common stock are tradable for any period on the OTC, or on the principal securities exchange or
other securities market on which shares of our common stock are then being traded.
All shares of our common stock to be
issued to KBM Worldwide, Inc. are to be issued free of any restrictions pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The note further provides for anti-dilution
adjustments in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc., in the event we offer additional shares of our common stock.
Copies of the Securities Purchase Agreement
and convertible note in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc. were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
Additional KBM Worldwide, Inc. Financing
On July 22, 2014, we executed a Securities
Purchase Agreement with KBM Worldwide, Inc., whereby we issued a convertible promissory note dated July 22, 2014, to KBM Worldwide,
Inc. bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of eight percent, in the original principal amount of $27,500.
The note is convertible into
shares of our common stock by dividing the Conversion Amount (as defined below) by the applicable Conversion Price then in
effect on the date specified in the notice of conversion. The term “Conversion Amount” means, with respect to any
conversion of a note, the sum of (1) the principal amount of the note to be converted in such conversion plus (2) at KBM
Worldwide, Inc.’s option, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on such principal amount at the interest rates provided
in the note to the Conversion Date; provided, however, that Mind Solutions shall have the right to pay any or all interest in
cash plus (3) at our option, Default Interest, if any, on the amounts referred to in the immediately preceding clauses (1)
and/or (2) plus (4) at KBM Worldwide, Inc.’s option, any amounts owed to KBM Worldwide, Inc. under the note.
The conversion price (the “Conversion
Price”) shall be the Variable Conversion Price (subject to equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights
offerings by Mind Solutions relating to our securities or the securities of any subsidiary of Mind Solutions, combinations, recapitalization,
reclassifications, extraordinary distributions and similar events). The “Variable Conversion Price” shall mean 51 percent
multiplied by the Market Price (as defined in the note). “Market Price" means the average of the lowest three Trading
Prices (as defined below) for our common stock during the 30 Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior
to the Conversion Date. “Trading Price” means, for any security as of any date, the closing bid price on the Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board, Pink Sheets electronic quotation system or applicable trading market (the “OTC”) as reported by a reliable
reporting service (“Reporting Service”) designated by the Holder (i.e. Bloomberg) or, if the OTC is not the
principal trading market for such security, the closing bid price of such security on the principal securities exchange or trading
market where such security is listed or traded or, if no closing bid price of such security is available in any of the foregoing
manners, the average of the closing bid prices of any market makers for such security that are listed in the “pink sheets.”
If the Trading Price cannot be calculated for such security on such date in the manner provided above, the Trading Price shall
be the fair market value as mutually determined by Mind Solutions and the holders of a majority in interest of the note being converted
for which the calculation of the Trading Price is required in order to determine the Conversion Price of such note.
“Trading Day” shall mean
any day on which shares of our common stock are tradable for any period on the OTC, or on the principal securities exchange or
other securities market on which shares of our common stock are then being traded.
All shares of our common stock to be
issued to KBM Worldwide, Inc. are to be issued free of any restrictions pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The note further provides for anti-dilution
adjustments in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc., in the event we offer additional shares of our common stock.
As of the date of this report, $7,500
of the notes to KBM Worldwide, Inc. remain unpaid. There have been no conversions of the note.
Copies of the Securities Purchase Agreement
and convertible note in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc. were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
WHC Capital, LLC Financing
On May 30, 2014, we executed a Securities
Purchase Agreement and convertible promissory note in the amount of $60,000 with WHC Capital, LLC with 12 percent interest per
annum, due May 30, 2015. The note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of our common stock after six months from
the date of the executed note at a discount to market of 50 percent based on the lowest trading price 10 days prior to conversion.
All shares of our common stock to be
issued to WHC Capital, LLC upon conversion of the note will be free of any restrictions pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities
Act.
As of the date of this report, the note
has been paid in full.
Copies of the Securities Purchase Agreement
and convertible note in favor of WHC Capital, LLC are filed as exhibits to this report.
Iconic Holdings, LLC Financing
On February 18, 2014, we executed a Note
Purchase Agreement with Iconic Holdings, LLC, whereby we issued a convertible promissory note dated February 18, 2014, to Iconic
Holdings, LLC bearing interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 10 percent, in the original principal amount of $220,000.
The initial Purchase Price was $27,500
of consideration upon execution of the Note Purchase Agreement and all supporting documentation. On September 25, 2014, the registrant
received another $27,500 pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement. The sum of $50,000 was delivered to Mind Solutions in the nine
months ended March 31, 2015, and $5,000 was retained by Iconic Holdings through an original issue discount for due diligence and
legal bills related to this note.
On February 4, 2015, the registrant entered
into an amendment to the convertible promissory note dated February 18, 2014 with Iconic Holdings, LLC, (“Iconic”),
whereby Iconic additionally funded the convertible promissory note. The Company received $55,000 cash with $5,000 of original issue
discount pursuant to this additional funding of said convertible promissory note. The convertible promissory note has terms with
interest of 10% per annum, unsecured, and due February 4, 2016. The note is convertible into common shares of the registrant at
a conversion rate of 55% of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 10 days leading up to the
date of conversion. As of March 31, 2015, Iconic Holdings, LLC has not converted any principle on this note.
On March 30, 2015, the registrant entered into
an amendment to the convertible promissory note dated February 18, 2014 with Iconic Holdings, LLC, (“Iconic”), whereby
Iconic additionally funded the convertible promissory note. The Company received $74,250 cash with $8,250 of original issue discount
pursuant to this additional funding of said convertible promissory note. The convertible promissory note has terms with interest
of 10% per annum, unsecured, and due March 30, 2016. The note is convertible into common shares of the registrant at a conversion
rate of 55% of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 10 days leading up to the date of conversion.
As of March 31, 2015, Iconic Holdings, LLC has converted $55,000 of principle into 102,083,333 shares of common stock.
On March 30, 2015, the registrant entered into
a convertible promissory note agreement, (“Note”), with Iconic Holdings, LLC, (“Iconic”) in the principle
amount of $220,000 with interest of 10% and due March 30, 2016. As of March 31, 2015, the Registrant received $15,750 cash with
$1,750 of original issue discount pursuant to this Note. The Note is convertible into common shares of the registrant at a conversion
rate of 50% of the market price, calculated as the lowest trading price in the previous 20 days leading up to the date of conversion.
As of March 31, 2015, Iconic Holdings, LLC has not converted any principle on this note.
Iconic reserves the right to pay additional
consideration on the note at any time and in any amount it desires, at its sole discretion. Mind Solutions is not responsible to
repay any unfunded portion of the note. The note may not be prepaid in whole or in part except as otherwise provided therein.
Conversion Right. Subject to the
terms of the note, Iconic shall have the right, at Iconic’s option, at any time to convert the outstanding principal amount
and interest under the note in whole or in part.
Stock Certificates or DWAC. Mind
Solutions will deliver to Iconic, or Iconic’s authorized designee, no later than two Trading Days after the Conversion Date,
a certificate or certificates (which certificate(s) shall be free of restrictive legends and trading restrictions) representing
the number of shares of common stock being acquired upon the conversion of the note. In lieu of delivering physical certificates
representing the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the note, provided Mind Solutions’ transfer agent is
participating in the DTC Fast Automated Securities Transfer (“FAST”) program, upon request of Iconic, Mind Solutions
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its transfer agent to electronically transmit such shares issuable upon conversion
to Iconic (or its designee), by crediting the account of Iconic’s (or such designee’s) prime broker with DTC through
its Deposits and Withdrawal at Custodian (DWAC) program (provided that the same time periods herein as for stock certificates shall
apply).
Reservation and Issuance of
Underlying Securities. Mind Solutions covenants that it will at all times reserve and keep available out of its
authorized and unissued common stock solely for the purpose of issuance upon conversion of the note (including repayments in
stock), free from preemptive rights or any other actual contingent purchase rights of persons other than Iconic, not less
than three times (3x) the number of shares of common stock as shall be issuable (taking into account the adjustments under
the note but without regard to any ownership limitations contained therein) upon the conversion of the note into common
stock. These shares shall be reserved in proportion with the Consideration actually received by Mind Solutions and the total
reserve will be increased with future payments of consideration by Iconic. Mind Solutions covenants that all shares of common
stock that shall be issuable will, upon issue, be duly authorized, validly issued, fully-paid, non-assessable and
freely-tradable. Mind Solutions agrees that this is a material term of the note.
Conversion Limitation. Iconic
will not submit a conversion to Mind Solutions that would result in Iconic owning more than 9.99% of the total outstanding shares
of Mind Solutions.
As of the date of this report, $163,250
of the note remains unpaid.
Copies of the Note Purchase Agreement
and convertible note in favor of Iconic were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
JSJ Investments, Inc. Financing
On September 22, 2014, the registrant
entered into a Convertible Note Agreement with JSJ Investments Inc. The registrant issued a $100,000 convertible note with interest
of 12% per annum, unsecured, and due March 22, 2015. The note is convertible into common shares of the registrant at any time from
the date of issuance at a conversion rate of 48% discount to the market price, calculated as the average of the three lowest trading
prices in the previous 20 trading days leading up to the date of conversion. As of March 31, 2015, JSJ Investments Inc. has not
converted any principle on this note.
All shares of our common stock to be
issued to JSJ Investments Inc. upon conversion of the note will be free of any restrictions pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities
Act.
As of the date of this report, $0 of
the JSJ Investments Inc. note remains unpaid.
Copies of the Securities Purchase Agreement
and convertible note in favor of JSJ Investments Inc. were filed as exhibits with the SEC.
Seasonality
We do not anticipate that our business
will be affected by seasonal factors. The only expected impact would be increased retail sales of our software applications during
the Christmas season.
Impact of Inflation
General inflation in the economy has
driven the operating expenses of many businesses higher. We will continuously seek methods of reducing costs and streamlining operations
while maximizing efficiency through improved internal operating procedures and controls. While we are subject to inflation as described
above, our management believes that inflation currently does not have a material effect on our operating results. However, inflation
may become a factor in the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements and accompanying
notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses.
These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Critical accounting policies
include revenue recognition and impairment of long-lived assets.
We recognize revenue in accordance with
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” Sales are recorded when products
are shipped to customers. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances and other adjustments
are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
We evaluate our long-lived assets
for financial impairment on a regular basis in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” which evaluates the recoverability of long-lived
assets not held for sale by measuring the carrying amount of the assets against the estimated discounted future cash flows
associated with them. At the time such evaluations indicate that the future discounted cash flows of certain long-lived
assets are not sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets, the assets are adjusted to their fair values.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk
We conduct all of our transactions, including
those with foreign suppliers and customers, in U.S. dollars. We are therefore not directly subject to the risks of foreign currency
fluctuations and do not hedge or otherwise deal in currency instruments in an attempt to minimize such risks. Demand from foreign
customers and the ability or willingness of foreign suppliers to perform their obligations to us may be affected by the relative
change in value of such customer or supplier’s domestic currency to the value of the U.S. dollar. Furthermore, changes in
the relative value of the U.S. dollar may change the price of our products relative to the prices of our foreign competitors.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize compensation cost for stock-based
awards based on the estimated fair value of the award on date of grant. We measure compensation cost at the grant date based on
the fair value of the award and recognize compensation cost upon the probable attainment of a specified performance condition or
over a service period.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2014, FASB issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain
Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation”.
The update removes all incremental financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the removal
of Topic 915 from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. In addition, the update adds an example disclosure in Risks and
Uncertainties (Topic 275) to illustrate one way that an entity that has not begun planned principal operations could provide information
about the risks and uncertainties related to the company’s current activities. Furthermore, the update removes an exception
provided to development stage entities in Consolidations (Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest
entity-which may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a company that has
an interest in a company in the development stage. The update is effective for the annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2014, including interim periods therein. Early application with the first annual reporting period or interim period for which
the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (Public business entities) or made available for issuance (other
entities). The Company adopted this pronouncement for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk.
There has been no material change in
our market risks since the end of the fiscal year 2014.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
See Item 4(T) below.
Item 4(T). Controls and Procedures.
The term disclosure controls and procedures
means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a, et seq. ) is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
The term internal control over financial
reporting is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the issuer’s board of directors, management
and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures
that:
| · | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; |
| · | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and |
| · | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Our management, including our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls
over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to
their costs. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the registrant have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Evaluation of Disclosure and Controls
and Procedures. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. We carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report. The evaluation was undertaken in consultation with our accounting personnel. Based on that evaluation, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at March
31, 2015, due to the lack of accounting personnel. We intend to hire additional employees when we obtain sufficient capital.
Changes in Internal Controls over
Financial Reporting. There were no changes in the internal controls over our financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On April 30, 2008, we filed a complaint
against two former members of our board of directors alleging breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment.
The complaint, styled VOIS Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Edward Spindel and Michael Spindel, Defendants, Case No. CA012201XXXXMB,
in the Circuit Court for the 15th Judicial District in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, alleges that during 2002 and 2003 while
Mind Solutions, which at that time was known as Medstrong International, was under significant financial distress the defendants
caused us to issue demand promissory notes charging excessive and/or usurious interest rates with the knowledge that we would be
unable to repay the notes upon any demand. The defendants, who are brothers, were members of the Medstrong International board
of directors until their resignations in April 2006.
The complaint further alleges that the
defendants engaged in a repeated systematic scheme to defraud our company by continuing to restructure the promissory notes while
they were members of the prior board of directors at such excessive and usurious interest rates that the defendants violated their
fiduciary duties and responsibilities and approved debt obligations that benefited them and not Mind Solutions and that their wrongful
actions and omissions resulted in their unjust enrichment. We sought damages in excess of $968,000.
On June 18, 2009, the defendants removed
the lawsuit from Palm Beach Circuit Court (State) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Federal).
Thereafter, the defendants sought to have the case transferred to the United States District Court in New York. On October 27,
2009, the judge denied the defendant’s Motion to Transfer. On October 28, 2009 the defendants filed their Answer and Defenses
to the Complaint. The defendants did not file a counterclaim at that time. On November 12, 2009, the Court entered a Scheduling
Order and a Notice of Trial for December 2009. On December 4, 2009, the Court selected a mediator. In February 2010, the defendants
changed law firms and sought leave from the Court to file a counterclaim. At that time, the defendants also served discovery in
the form of interrogatories, request for production and request for admission. The defendant’s counterclaim was filed on
February 17, 2010, and we filed our Answer on March 13, 2010. Over the course of the next several months we responded to the discovery
requests.
On November 13, 2009, the parties attended
a pretrial hearing to address legal issues related to our complaint and the defendants’ counterclaim. Based upon questions
posed by the Court and the argument of counsel, the Court struck the defense of usury and additionally dismissed our complaint
without prejudice, providing us 10 days to file an amended complaint. The defendants were also provided 10 days to file an Amended
counterclaim. Based upon the rulings, the matter was then removed from the Court’s December 2009 trial docket. We have decided
that it is not cost effective or beneficial to pursue our affirmative claims in this matter and have, accordingly, elected not
to file an amended complaint.
On July 19, 2010, the counter–plaintiffs,
Edward and Michael Spindel filed a motion for summary judgment. We filed a response in opposition on August 5, 2010. The Spindels
filed a reply on September 9, 2010. The court held a hearing on September 16, 2010, and at the hearing granted summary judgment
in favor of the Spindels. Final judgment was ordered on November 16, 2010, in the amount of $287,266 plus post judgment interest.
Attorney’s fees of $172,304 were also awarded.
On December 6, 2010, we filed an appeal
to the judgment.
On July 13, 2011, the United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion in favor of VOIS, Inc. This Opinion was made final when the Court issued
the mandate on August15th, 2011. This ruling effectively reversed the Summary Judgment previously granted to the Spindels by the
District Court on November 4, 2010, in the amount of $287,266. At the present time, this lawsuit is still pending in the State
Circuit Court of Florida. Mind Solutions intends to mount a vigorous defense.
Mind Solutions had two outstanding notes
due to Edward Spindel and Michael Spindel in the aggregate amount of $145,000. The notes were unsecured and accrue interest and
penalty of 15% inasmuch as they are past due. Spindels filed a lawsuit styled Edward Spindel and Michael Spindel,
Counter-Plaintiffs, vs. VOIS, Inc. F/K/A Medstrong International Corp., Counter-Defendant, in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division, Case No. 08-80689-CIV-Ryskamp/Hopkins. On November 16, 2012, judgment
was entered against VOIS in favor of Edward Spindel against VOIS in the amount of $188,942.47 and in favor of Michael Spindel against
VOIS in the amount of $99,527.41, together with post-judgment interest as provided by law. Messrs. Spindels have sought to garnish
the bank accounts of Mind Solutions to recover on the judgment and as of the date of this report, the two garnishments have netted
$30,771 in favor of Messrs. Spindels. At March 31, 2015, total principal, accrued interest and penalty pertaining to the outstanding
$145,000 in notes payable is $432,274.
We were a defendant in two actions,
each entitled 951 Yamato Acquisition Company, LLC vs. VOIS, Inc. both as filed in December 2009 the Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida under case numbers 502010CA040121XXXXMB and 502010CC19027XXXXBBRS,
which are related to the lease agreements for our former office space. A combined summary judgment was entered in April 2010 against
VOIS in the amount of $106,231. At March 31, 2015, our liabilities as reported in our financial statements contained elsewhere
in this report reflect the principal amount of the judgment together with $138,103 in accrued interest.
Mind Solutions is not engaged in
any other litigation at the present time, and management is unaware of any claims or complaints that could result in future
litigation. Management will seek to minimize disputes with its customers but recognizes the inevitability of legal action in
today’s business environment as an unfortunate price of conducting business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and
Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit No. |
Identification of Exhibit |
2.1** |
Plan and Agreement of Merger Between VOIS, Inc. (a Florida Corporation) and Mind Solutions, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) dated October 15, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Definitive Schedule 14C on October 23, 2013, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
2.2** |
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 19, 2012, by and among VOIS, Inc., Mind Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Mind Solutions, Inc., an Ontario corporation and Mind Solutions Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on October 23, 2012, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.1** |
Delaware Certificate of Incorporation of Medical Records by Net, Inc., dated May 19, 2000, filed as Exhibit 2(a) to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-1 on March 22, 2001, Commission File Number 333-57468 |
|
Delaware Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Medical Records by Net, Inc. changing the its corporate name to Lifelink Online, Inc., dated October 17, 2000, filed as Exhibit 2(a) to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-1 on March 22, 2001, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
|
Delaware Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Lifelink Online, Inc. changing the its corporate name to MedStrong Corporation, dated January 17, 2001, filed as Exhibit 2(a) to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-1 on March 22, 2001, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
|
Delaware Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of MedStrong Corporation changing the its corporate name to MedStrong International Corporation, dated March 9, 2001, filed as Exhibit 2(a) to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-1 on March 22, 2001, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
3.2** |
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of MedStrong International Corporation dated August 2006, filed as Exhibit 3.1(a) to the registrant’s Report on Form 10-QSB on August 21, 2006, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
|
Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MedStrong International Corporation dated May 19, 2000, filed as Exhibit 3.1(b) to the registrant’s Report on Form 10-QSB on August 21, 2006, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
3.3** |
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of MedStrong International Corporation dated October 24, 2006, filed as Exhibit 3.1(c) to the registrant’s Report on Form 10-KSB on March 30, 2007, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
3.4** |
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of MedStrong International Corporation changing its name to VOIS, Inc. dated March 26, 2007, filed as Exhibit 3.1(e) to the registrant’s Report on Form 10-QSB on May 15, 2007, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
3.5** |
Bylaws of Lifelink Online, Inc. filed as Exhibit 2(b) to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-1 on March 23, 2001, Commission File Number 333-57468. |
3.6** |
Certificate of Domestication and Articles of Incorporation of VOIS, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of Florida on March 18, 2009, filed as Exhibit 3.10 to the registrant’s Report on Form 8-K on March 24, 2009, Commission File Number 000-33035. |
3.7** |
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of VOIS, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of Florida on November 4, 2010, filed as Exhibit 3.13 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on November 22, 2010, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.8** |
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of VOIS Inc. filed with the Florida Secretary of State on December 2, 2011, filed as Exhibit 3.8 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.9** |
Articles of Merger between Mind Solutions, Inc. and Mind Solutions Acquisition Corp. filed with the State of Nevada on October 23, 2012, filed as Exhibit 3.9 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.10** |
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of VOIS Inc. filed with the Florida Secretary of State on May 17, 2013, filed as Exhibit 3.10 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.11** |
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of VOIS Inc. filed with the Florida Secretary of State on August 28, 2013, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on August 30, 2013, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.12** |
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mind Solutions, Inc. on October 28, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Definitive Schedule 14C on October 23, 2013, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.13** |
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mind Solutions, Inc. on October 28, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Definitive Schedule 14C on October 23, 2013, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.14** |
Articles of Merger between Mind Solutions, Inc. and VOIS, Inc. filed with the State of Florida on October 28, 2013, filed as Exhibit 3.14 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.15** |
Articles of Merger between Mind Solutions, Inc. and VOIS, Inc. filed with the State of Nevada on October 28, 2013, filed as Exhibit 3.15 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.16** |
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of VOIS, Inc. filed with the State of Florida on August 28, 2013, filed as Exhibit 3.16 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.17** |
Articles of Incorporation of Red Meteor, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on May 24, 2002, filed as Exhibit 3.17 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.18** |
Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Red Meteor, Inc. changing its name to Prize Entertainment, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on November 13, 2003, filed as Exhibit 3.18 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.19** |
Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Prize Entertainment, Inc. changing its name to Mind Solutions, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on November 20, 2009, filed as Exhibit 3.19 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
3.20** |
Bylaws of Red Meteor, Inc. filed as Exhibit 3.20 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
4.1** |
Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on September 10, 2014, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Report on Form 8-K on September 10, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33035. |
|
10.1** |
Asset Purchase Agreement dated April 30, 2013, by and between Mind Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and VOIS, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on May 7, 2013, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.2** |
Equity Purchase Agreement, dated March 11, 2014, between Mind Solutions, Inc. and Premier Venture Partners, LLC filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 26, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.3** |
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 11, 2014, between Mind Solutions, Inc. and Premier Venture Partners, LLC filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 26, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.4** |
Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $10,000 executed by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Premier Venture Partners, LLC filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 26, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.5** |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 11, 2014, between Mind Solutions, Inc. and Premier Venture Partners, LLC filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 26, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.6** |
Charter of the Audit Committee of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.7** |
Code of Business Conduct of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.8** |
Amended Code of Ethics for Senior Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.9** |
Charter of the Compensation Committee of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.10** |
Corporate Governance Principles of the Board of Directors of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.11** |
Charter of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.12** |
Charter of the Finance Committee of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.13** |
Charter of the Governance and Nominating Committee of Mind Solutions, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.14** |
Royalty, Ownership and Inventor’s Agreement, dated February 12, 2011, by and between Dr. Gordon Chiu, Brent Fouch, and Mind Technologies, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.15** |
Consulting Agreement dated December 25, 2013, by and between Kerry Driscoll and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.16** |
Officer Agreement dated August 20, 2013, by and between Jeff Dashefsky and VOIS, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.17** |
Settlement Agreement and Stipulation dated November 21, 2013, by and between IBC Funds, LLC and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.18** |
Order Granting Approval of Settlement Agreement and Stipulation between IBC Funds, LLC and the registrant dated November 22, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on April 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.19** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 5, 2013, between Hanover Holdings I, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $16,500 filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.20** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated February 5, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Hanover Holdings I, LLC, in the amount of $16,500 filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.21** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 7, 2013, between Hanover Holdings I, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $16,500 filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.22** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated March 7, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Hanover Holdings I, LLC, in the amount of $16,500 filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.23** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 5, 2013, between Hanover Holdings I, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $41,500 filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.24** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated June 5, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Hanover Holdings I, LLC, in the amount of $41,500 filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.25** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 7, 2013, between Hanover Holdings I, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $26,500 filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.26** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated August 7, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Hanover Holdings I, LLC, in the amount of $26,500 filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.27** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 23, 2013, between Hanover Holdings I, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $26,500 filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.28** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated November 23, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Hanover Holdings I, LLC, in the amount of $26,500 filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.29** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 26, 2012, between Asher Enterprises, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $32,500 filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.30** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated December 26, 2012, issued by the registrant in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $32,500 filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.31** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 1, 2013, between Asher Enterprises, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $32,500 filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.32** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated March 1, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $32,500 filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.33** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 18, 2013, between Asher Enterprises, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $32,500 filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.34** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated April 18, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $32,500 filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.35** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 7, 2013, between Asher Enterprises, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $42,500 filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.36** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated November 7, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $42,500 filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.37** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 6, 2014, between Asher Enterprises, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $37,500 filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.38** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated February 6, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $37,500 filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.39** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated December 31, 2010, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $157,324.06 filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.40** |
Assignment Agreement dated June 5, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch, as assignor, Magna Group, LLC, as assignee, and VOIS, Inc. assigning $106,324 of the Convertible Promissory Note dated December 31, 2010, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $157,324.06 filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.41** |
Debt Conversion Agreement dated April 4, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch and VOIS, Inc. converting $51,000 of the Convertible Promissory Note dated December 31, 2010, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $157,324.06 into 21,250,000 shares of the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.42** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated December 31, 2011, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $33,674.05 filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.43** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated June 30, 2012, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $50,435 filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.44** |
Assignment Agreement dated February 5, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch, as assignor, Magna Group, LLC, as assignee, and VOIS, Inc. assigning $40,000 of the Convertible Promissory Note dated June 30, 2012, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $50,435 filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.45** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated January 3, 2014, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $61,096 filed as Exhibit 10.45 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 on June 27, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.46** |
Assignment Agreement dated June 5, 2014, by and between Brent Fouch, as assignor, Magna Group, LLC, as assignee, and VOIS, Inc. assigning the Convertible Promissory Note dated January 3, 2014, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $61,096 filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 on June 27, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.47** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated April 3, 2013, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $48,872 filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.48** |
Assignment Agreement dated November 11, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch, as assignor, Magna Group, LLC, as assignee, and VOIS, Inc. assigning the Convertible Promissory Note dated April 3, 2013, issued by Mind Solutions, Inc. in favor of Brent Fouch, in the amount of $48,872 filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.49** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated May 15, 2013, issued by the registrant in favor of JMJ Financial, in the amount of $250,000 filed as Exhibit 10.49 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.50** |
Consulting Agreement dated January 2, 2014, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.51** |
Consulting Agreement dated February 12, 2014, by and between Monster Arts, Inc. and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.51 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.52** |
Consulting Agreement dated March 18, 2014, by and between Bret Cusick and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.52 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.53** |
Consulting Agreement dated March 19, 2014, by and between Noah Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.54** |
Consulting Agreement dated May 11, 2014, by and between IN2NE Corp. and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.54 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.55** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 8, 2014, between KBM Worldwide, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $42,500 filed as Exhibit 10.54 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.56** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated May 8, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc., in the amount of $42,500 filed as Exhibit 10.56 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.57** |
License Agreement as of December 18, 2012, by and among VOIS Inc., a Florida corporation (“Licensee”), and Mind Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Licensor”) filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on December 20, 2012, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.58** |
Consulting Agreement dated May 2, 2014, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.58 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.59** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 8, 2014, between Asher Enterprises, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $42,500 filed as Exhibit 10.59 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.60** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated May 8, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of Asher Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $42,500 filed as Exhibit 10.60 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A on May 14, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.61** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated February 4, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of GEL Properties, LLC in the amount of $25,000 filed as Exhibit 10.61 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.62** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 4, 2014, between LG Capital Funding, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of two Convertible Promissory Notes in the aggregate amount of $50,000 filed as Exhibit 10.62 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.63** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated February 4, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital Funding, LLC in the amount of $25,000 filed as Exhibit 10.63 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.64** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated February 4, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital Funding, LLC in the amount of $25,000 filed as Exhibit 10.64 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.65** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 25, 2014, between LG Capital Funding, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $40,000 filed as Exhibit 10.65 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.66** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated March 25, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital Funding, LLC in the amount of $40,000 filed as Exhibit 10.66 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.67** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 15, 2014, between Caesar Capital Group, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $50,000 filed as Exhibit 10.67 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.68** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated April 15, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of Caesar Capital Group, LLC in the amount of $50,000 filed as Exhibit 10.68 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.69** |
Consulting Agreement dated May 12, 2014, by and between Cicero Consulting Group, LLC and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.69 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.70** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated May 12, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of Cicero Consulting Group, LLC in the amount of $200,000 filed as Exhibit 10.70 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.71** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 30, 2014, between AARG Corp. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $50,000 filed as Exhibit 10.71 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.72** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated April 30, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of AARG Corp. in the amount of $50,000 filed as Exhibit 10.72 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 15, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
|
10.73** |
Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.73 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.74** |
Consulting Agreement dated December 18, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.74 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.75** |
Consulting Agreement dated January 30, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.75 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.76** |
Consulting Agreement dated February 20, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.76 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.77** |
Consulting Agreement dated September 2, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.77 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.78** |
Consulting Agreement dated September 26, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.78 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.79** |
Consulting Agreement dated May 1, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.79 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.80** |
Consulting Agreement dated July 19, 2013, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.80 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.81** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 30, 2014, between WHC Capital, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $60,000 Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.81 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.82** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated May 30, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of WHC Capital, LLC in the amount of $60,000 Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.82 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.83** |
Consulting Agreement dated March 18, 2013, by and between Christian Hansen and the registrant Consulting Agreement dated October 24, 2012, by and between Brent Fouch and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.83 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.84** |
Consulting Agreement dated March 20, 2013, by and between Larry Simon and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.84 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.85** |
Consulting Agreement dated March 20, 2013, by and between Relaunch Consulting Group and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.85 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.86** |
Consulting Agreement dated November 11, 2013, by and between Mirador Consulting LLC and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.86 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.87** |
Consulting Agreement dated November 11, 2013, by and between First Swiss Capital, Inc. and the registrant filed as Exhibit 10.87 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.88** |
Amendment to Equity Purchase Agreement, dated June 19, 2014, between Mind Solutions, Inc. and Premier Venture Partners, LLC date March 11, 2014, filed as Exhibit 10.88 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Amendment No. 2 on August 1, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.89** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 22, 2014, between KBM Worldwide, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $27,500 filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 31, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.90** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated July 22, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc., in the amount of $27,500 filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 31, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.91** |
Note Purchase Agreement dated February 18, 2014, between Iconic Holdings, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $220,000 filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 31, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.92** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated February 18, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of Iconic Holdings, LLC, in the amount of $220,000 filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 31, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.93** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 4, 2014, between LG Capital Funding, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of convertible promissory note in the aggregate amount of $63,000, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K/A on September 10, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.94** |
10% Convertible Redeemable Note dated September 4, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital, in the amount of $31,500, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Form 8-K/A on September 10, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.95** |
Collateralized Secured Promissory Note dated September 4, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital, in the amount of $31,500, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Form 8-K/A on September 10, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.96** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated September 22, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of JSJ Investments, Inc., in the amount of $100,000, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on October 8, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.97** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 29, 2014, between KBM Worldwide, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $32,500, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on November 3, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.98** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated October 29, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc., in the amount of $32,500, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on November 3, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.99** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 4, 2014, between LG Capital Funding, LLC and the registrant with respect to the issuance of convertible promissory note in the aggregate amount of $63,000, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on September 10, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.100** |
10% Convertible Redeemable Note dated September 4, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital, in the amount of $31,500, filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on September 10, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.101** |
Collateralized Secured Promissory Note dated September 4, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital, in the amount of $31,500, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on September 10, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.102** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated September 22, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of JSJ Investments, Inc., in the amount of $100,000, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on October 8, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.103** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 29, 2014, between KBM Worldwide, Inc. and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $32,500, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on November 3, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.104** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated October 29, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of KBM Worldwide, Inc., in the amount of $32,500, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on November 3, 2014, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.105** |
Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 10, 2015, between LG Capital Funding, LLC, and the registrant with respect to the issuance of a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $31,500, filed as Exhibit 10.105 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on March 10, 2015, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.106** |
Convertible Promissory Note dated February 10, 2015, issued by the registrant in favor of LG Capital Funding, LLC in the amount of $31,500, filed as Exhibit 10.106 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on March 10, 2015, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.107** |
Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note dated February 18, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of Iconic Holdings, LLC in the amount of $220,000, with respect to a payment due on or before October 30, 2014, filed as Exhibit 10.107 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on March 10, 2015, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
10.108** |
Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note dated February 18, 2014, issued by the registrant in favor of Iconic Holdings, LLC in the amount of $220,000, with respect to a payment due on or before February 4, 2015, filed as Exhibit 10.108 to the registrant’s Form 8-K on March 10, 2015, Commission File Number 000-33053. |
31.1* |
Certification of Kerry Driscoll, Chief Executive Officer of Mind Solutions, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2* |
Certification of Kerry Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Mind Solutions, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1* |
Certification of Kerry Driscoll, Chief Executive Officer of Mind Solutions, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2* |
Certification of Kerry Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Mind Solutions, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
____________
* Filed herewith.
** Previously filed.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MIND SOLUTIONS, INC.
Date: May 20, 2015.
By /s/ Kerry Driscoll
Kerry Driscoll, Chief
Executive Officer
By /s/ Kerry Driscoll
Kerry Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer and
Principal
Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Kerry Driscoll, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q
of Mind Solutions, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods present in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13-a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control
over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involved management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date: May 20, 2015.
/s/ Kerry Driscoll
Kerry Driscoll, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Kerry Driscoll, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q
of Mind Solutions, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods present in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13-a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control
over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d ) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involved management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date: May 20, 2015.
/s/ Kerry Driscoll
Kerry Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mind Solutions, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2015, I, Kerry Driscoll, Chief Executive
Officer of Mind Solutions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
1. Such Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Mind Solutions, Inc.
Date May 20, 2015.
/s/ Kerry Driscoll
Kerry Driscoll, Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mind Solutions, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2015, I, Kerry Driscoll, Chief Financial
Officer of Mind Solutions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
1. Such Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Mind Solutions, Inc.
Date: May 20, 2015.
/s/ Kerry Driscoll
Kerry Driscoll, Chief Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Mind Solutions (CE) (USOTC:VOIS)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
Mind Solutions (CE) (USOTC:VOIS)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024