TIDMCCZ
RNS Number : 8253N
Castillo Copper Limited
04 October 2021
THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONTAINS INSIDE INFORMATION AS STIPULATED
UNDER THE UK VERSION OF THE MARKET ABUSE REGULATION NO 596/2014
WHICH IS PART OF ENGLISH LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUROPEAN (WITHDRAWAL)
ACT 2018, AS AMED. ON PUBLICATION OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT VIA A
REGULATORY INFORMATION SERVICE, THIS INFORMATION IS CONSIDERED TO
BE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
4 October 2021
CASTILLO COPPER LIMITED
("Castillo", "CCZ" or the "Company")
Due diligence verifies significant lithium surface occurrences
across Picasso Project
Castillo Copper Limited (LSE and ASX: CCZ), a base metal
explorer primarily focused on copper across Australia and Zambia,
is pleased to announce that preliminary due diligence on the
Picasso Lithium Project, near Norseman in Western Australia, has
verified multiple lithium surface occurrences across the tenure
that align with pegmatite outcropping. In addition, a site visit by
a geological consultant (arranged by the Vendor Group) took
numerous photographs of pegmatite outcropping that has the
potential to host lithium mineralisation.
Highlights
-- Preliminary due diligence by CCZ's geology team has verified
assay results from historical geochemical sampling, undertaken
Anglo Gold(1) , across the Picasso Lithium Project and adjacent
tenure, detected multiple elevated lithium surface readings:
o The surface occurrences aligned with pegmatite outcropping
mapped by the Geological Society of Western Australia (GSWA)
confirmed 69 mapped pegmatites(2) .
-- A preliminary site visit by a geological consultant,
organised by the Vendor Group, took numerous photographs of
pegmatite outcropping and collected over 30 samples from within the
tenure (east quadrant) which have been sent to the laboratory for
analysis
-- The geologically consultant noted there was multiple
occurrences of pegmatite outcropping within the tenure, with the
potential to host lithium mineralisation, providing numerous
targets for integrated exploration
-- The Picasso Lithium Project is accessible via the Evre
Highway and proximal to Liontown Resources' (ASX: LTR) Buldania
Project (Appendix A) which has a JORC compliant resource at 14.9Mt
@ 0.97% Li(2) O(3)
Simon Paull, Managing Director of Castillo Copper, commented:
"Straight out of the gates, the preliminary due diligence has hit a
high note at the Picasso Project, with multiple historical surface
occurrences being confirmed and photographic evidence there is
significant pegmatite outcropping with the potential to host
lithium mineralisation. The Board is delighted with these initial
findings and looks forward to receiving the assays results back
from the laboratory."
PRELIMINARY DUE DILIGENCE
Historical reports
A review of historical exploration reports prepared by Anglo
Gold(1) in 2010, verified there were significant elevated lithium
occurrences across the tenure which aligned with GSWA(2) 69 mapped
pegmatites. At the time, the focus of Anglo Gold's exploration
efforts were on gold mineralisation.
Site visit
The Vendor Group organised a geological consultant to visit the
Picasso Lithium Project, focusing mostly on the eastern part of the
tenure, to assess the potential for lithium mineralisation. The
geological consultant verified the presence of numerous outcropping
pegmatites, noted the potential for these to host lithium
mineralisation and highlighted there were numerous targets for
integrated exploration.
Further, the geological consultant collected 33 samples from
within the Picasso tenure comprising two soils, one stream sediment
and 30 rock-chips - these have been sent to the laboratory for
follow up analysis. The sampling predominantly targeted areas where
granite and pegmatite outcrops were exposed.
Next steps
For the lithium projects, the initial focus will be on the
following areas:
o Ongoing due diligence on the Picasso and Litchfield Lithium
Projects, including return of assay results for surface sampling
campaigns.
In Queensland, the following is set to take place over the
coming weeks:
o Big One Deposit assay results; and
o Commencement of drilling at the Arya Prospect.
There are several ongoing steps for the Zambia operations,
including:
o Complete the IP survey at the Luanshya & Mkushi Projects
then analyse the results for incremental targets for test-drilling;
and
o Commence work on the inaugural drilling campaign for the
Luanshya Project.
In addition to this release, a PDF version with supplementary
information and images can be found on the
Company's website: https://castillocopper.com/investors/announcements/
For further information, please contact:
Castillo Copper Limited +61 8 6558 0886
Simon Paull (Australia), Managing Director
Gerrard Hall (UK), Director
SI Capital Limited (Financial Adviser and
Corporate Broker) +44 (0)1483 413500
Nick Emerson
Luther Pendragon (Financial PR) +44 (0)20 7618 9100
Harry Chathli, Alexis Gore
About Castillo Copper
Castillo Copper Limited is an Australian-based explorer
primarily focused on copper across Australia and Zambia. The group
is embarking on a strategic transformation to morph into a mid-tier
copper group underpinned by its core projects:
-- A large footprint in the Mt Isa copper-belt district,
north-west Queensland, which delivers significant exploration
upside through having several high-grade targets and a sizeable
untested anomaly within its boundaries in a copper-rich region.
-- Four high-quality prospective assets across Zambia's
copper-belt which is the second largest copper producer in
Africa.
-- A large tenure footprint proximal to Broken Hill's
world-class deposit that is prospective for
zinc-silver-lead-copper-gold.
-- Cangai Copper Mine in northern New South Wales, which is one
of Australia's highest grading historic copper mines.
The group is listed on the LSE and ASX under the ticker
"CCZ."
References
1) Anglo Gold Ashanti Australia. (2011). Government of Western
Australia. Retrieved from Department of Mines, Industry, Regulation
and Safety:
http://geodocs.dmp.wa.gov.au/search.jsp?Report_Ref=A92239&cabinetId=2301
2) Satellite imagery from Geological Survey of Western Australia. Available at: https://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/Geological-Survey/Geological-Survey-262.aspx
3) LTR ASX Release - 2 August 2021 and CCZ ASX Release - 29 September 2021
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration
Results for "Litchfield" and "Picasso" is based on information
compiled or reviewed by Mr Geoffrey Reed, a Non- Executive Director
of CCZ. Mr Reed is both a shareholder and director of Bluespoint
Mining Services, a company which is a shareholder of Castillo
Copper Limited. Bluespoint Mining Services provides ad hoc
geological consultancy services to Castillo Copper Limited. Mr Reed
is a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
(CP) (member #250422) and has sufficient experience of relevance to
the styles of mineralisation and types of deposits under
consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a
Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore
Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, and Mineral Resources. Mr Reed is a member of
the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Further, Mr Reed
consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on
information in the form and context in which it appears.
Mr Reed has not verified any of the information regarding any of
the properties or projects referred to herein other than the
"Litchfield" and "Picasso" Properties.
The London Stock Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept
responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this release.
Disclaimer Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This ASX announcement (Announcement) contains various
forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of
historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are inherently subject to uncertainties in that they may
be affected by a variety of known and unknown risks, variables and
factors which could cause actual values or results, performance, or
achievements to differ materially from the expectations described
in such forward-looking statements.
Castillo Copper Limited does not give any assurance that the
anticipated results, performance, or achievements expressed or
implied in those forward-looking statements will be achieved.
APPIX: JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION - TABLE 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
============================================================
Sampling
techniques * Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, * Picasso
random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma Regional aircore drilling was undertaken
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These within
examples should not be taken as limiting the broad tenements E15/946 and E63/1083-1084 (Now part
meaning of sampling. of Picasso) in late 2010. Bostech Drilling
was contracted to complete this work
utilising
* Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample their light truck mounted Bostech Drillboss
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any 200 (Atlas Copco XRV9, Compressor - capacity
measurement tools or systems used. 350psi & 600cfm). Holes were drilled to blade
refusal along existing tracks in a program
of regional traverses. These traverses were
* Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that completed to better understand the depth of
are Material to the Public Report. cover and the regolith environment and to
gain
an understanding of the basement geology.
* In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done All air core samples were submitted to
this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse Genalysis
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples Intertek Laboratory Services for analysis.
from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g At the laboratory, samples were dried in an
charge for fire assay'). In other cases more oven at 120 degrees and then pulverised in
explanation may be required, such as where there is an LMS mill to a nominal size of -75 microns.
coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. The milled pulps were weighed out (to 25g)
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg and underwent stepwise aqua regia digestion
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed in a temperature-controlled laboratory. The
information. analyte was then presented to a
graphite-furnace
AAS (method AR25/GF) for gold analysis, with
the detection limit for this method being 1
ppb Au.
1,743 unique surface geochemistry samples -
historical company samples (Anglo Gold(11)
). The majority of the geochemical sampling
had been completed by Anglo Gold Ashanti
Australia
focussed solely on gold mineralisation. This
program was not specifically targeting
lithium,
though results show elevated lithium,
including
over 40ppm (Figure 1). It is apparent that
outcropping granite and/or pegmatites may
have
been a hindrance to soil sampling in areas
and in fact contributed to less sampling near
known pegmatites. Rock chip sampling was not
conducted in the area as granites/pegmatites
were historically not considered a target.
Low-impact surface sampling by LV-mounted
mechanical
auger was completed by Prodrill Pty Ltd.
Auger
holes were drilled to a maximum depth of
2.5m,
with single samples taken from the zone of
greatest carbonate reactivity down-hole.
Samples
were not sieved and averaged approximately
300-500g. Sample hole locations were acquired
using a GPS device attached to a Trimble
Nomad
rugged PDA. Standards and blanks were
routinely
submitted approximately every 50 samples as
part of quality control.
Auger Samples were sent to Genalysis in Perth
for preparation and analysis. Samples were
dried in an oven at 100 degrees and then
pulverised
in an LM2-sized robotic mill to a nominal
size
of -75 microns. The milled pulps were weighed
out at 25g and underwent stepwise aqua regia
digestion in a temperature-controlled
laboratory.
The analyte was then presented to a
graphite-furnace
and AAS for gold analysis (method code
B25/EETA
or B/ETA), followed by ICP mass spectrometry
(B25/MS) and optical emission spectrometry
(method code B25/OES) for multi-element
analysis.
============================================================ =========================================================
Drilling
techniques * Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-h * Picasso
ole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,
etc) Regional aircore drilling and auger soil sampling
and details (eg core diameter, triple or standar was undertaken within tenements E15/946 and
d E63/1083-1084 (Now part of Picasso) in late
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit 2010.
or
other type, whether core is oriented and if so,
by
what method, etc).
============================================================ =========================================================
Drill sample
recovery * Method of recording and assessing core and chip * Picasso
sample recoveries and results assessed.
Drilling to blade refusal was utilised to identify
* Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure the distribution of anomalous gold. Collar
representative nature of the samples. locations were surveyed using a hand-held GPS
with a nominal accuracy of +10 m. Drill holes
were pegged in the field using GPS and then
* Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery the actual location of the hole was picked
and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred up after drilling .
due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
============================================================ =========================================================
Logging
* Whether core and chip samples have been geologically * Picasso
and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to
support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies. Aircore drilling was geology, Alteration and
weathering logged
* Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.
* The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
============================================================ =========================================================
Sub-sampling
techniques * If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, * Picasso
and sample half or all core taken.
preparation
Aircore Samples were collected from the cyclone
* If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary in single meter intervals and laid on the ground
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. in rows of ten for geological logging. Four-meter
composite samples weighing approximately 3kg
in total were collected from the sample piles
* For all sample types, the nature, quality and using a scoop and submitted for gold analysis.
appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. The magnetic susceptibility of these samples
was measured, in the bag, with a KT9 magnetic
susceptibility meter
* Quality control procedures adopted for all Auger Samples were sent to Genalysis in Perth
sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of for preparation and analysis. Samples were
samples. dried in an oven at 100 degrees and then pulverised
in an LM2-sized robotic mill to a nominal size
of -75 microns. The milled pulps were weighed
* Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is out at 25g and underwent stepwise aqua regia
representative of the in situ material collected, digestion in a temperature-controlled laboratory.
including for instance results for field The analyte was then presented to a
duplicate/second-half sampling. graphite-furnace
and AAS for gold analysis (method code B25/EETA
or B/ETA), followed by ICP mass spectrometry
* Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain (B25/MS) and optical emission spectrometry
size of the material being sampled. (method code B25/OES) for multi-element analysis
============================================================ =========================================================
Quality
of assay * The nature, quality and appropriateness of the * Picasso
data and assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether
laboratory the technique is considered partial or total.
tests . A 750g composite sample of the last meter
(or two meters, if bottom of hole sample recovery
* For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF is inadequate) in each hole was collected using
instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining a scoop and submitted for multi-element analysis.
the analysis including instrument make and model, Blanks and standards were routinely submitted
reading times, calibrations factors applied and their for quality control purposes, at a nominal
derivation, etc. ratio of 1 in 40 samples.
All aircore samples were submitted to Genalysis
Intertek Laboratory Services for analysis.
* Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg At the laboratory, samples were dried in an
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory oven at 120 degrees and then pulverised in
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie an LMS mill to a nominal size of -75 microns.
lack of bias) and precision have been established. The milled pulps were weighed out (to 25g)
and underwent stepwise aqua regia digestion
in a temperature-controlled laboratory. The
analyte was then presented to a graphite-furnace
AAS (method AR25/GF) for gold analysis, with
the detection limit for this method being 1
ppb Au.
All Auger Samples were sent to Genalysis in
Perth for preparation and analysis. Samples
were dried in an oven at 100 degrees and then
pulverised in an LM2-sized robotic mill to
a nominal size of -75 microns. The milled pulps
were weighed out at 25g and underwent stepwise
aqua regia digestion in a temperature-controlled
laboratory. The analyte was then presented
to a graphite-furnace and AAS for gold analysis
(method code B25/EETA or B/ETA), followed by
ICP mass spectrometry (B25/MS) and optical
emission spectrometry (method code B25/OES)
for multi-element analysis
============================================================ =========================================================
Verification
of sampling * The verification of significant intersections by * Picasso
and assaying either independent or alternative company personnel.
No adjustment is made to any historical assay
* The use of twinned holes. data.
* Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,
data verification, data storage (physical and
electronic) protocols.
* Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
============================================================ =========================================================
Location Picasso (refer to ASX announcement for image)
of data * Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill
points holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine
workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
* Specification of the grid system used.
* Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
============================================================ =========================================================
Data spacing
and * Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. * Picasso (refer to ASX announcement for image)
distribution
* Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource
and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
* Whether sample compositing has been applied.
============================================================ =========================================================
Orientation
of data * Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased * Picasso
in relation sampling of possible structures and the extent to
to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
geological It is apparent that outcropping granite and/or
structure pegmatites may have been a hindrance to soil
* If the relationship between the drilling orientation sampling in areas and in fact contributed to
and the orientation of key mineralised structures is less sampling near known pegmatites. Rock chip
considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this sampling was not conducted in the area as
should be assessed and reported if material. granites/pegmatites
were historically not considered a target.
============================================================ =========================================================
Sample
security * The measures taken to ensure sample security. * Picasso
Chain of Custody procedure by Anglo Gold(11)
============================================================ =========================================================
Audits or No formal audit or review of sampling techniques
reviews * The results of any audits or reviews of sampling has been
techniques and data. undertaken
============================================================ =========================================================
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this
section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral Picasso (refer to ASX
tenement * Type, reference name/number, location and ownership announcement for image)
and land including agreements or material issues with third The area has been
tenure status parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, classified entirely as
overriding royalties, native title interests, 'minimal
historical sites, wilderness or national park and use' by the Australian
environmental settings. Government's Department
of Agriculture and Water
Resources, which are
* The security of the tenure held at the time of areas of land that are
reporting along with any known impediments to largely unused.
obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Synergy Prospecting Pty
Ltd ("Synergy
Prospecting")
holds one (1) Western
Australia ("WA")
Exploration
Licence ("E") 63/1888,
the Picasso project
================================================================= ====================================
Exploration
done by * Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other * Picasso
other parties parties.
Historic exploration data was
compiled from
DMP open file (WAMEX) reports
and other sources.
Exploration has occurred
within the project
area for at least 40 years
with many companies
exploring for a number of
different commodities
during that time. Goldfields,
Newmont, Sipa,
Avoca and WMC amongst others,
explored for
lode style gold mineralization
whereas Epsilon
and CRA explored for
uranium/lignite in
palaeo-channels.
Asarco, as one of the earlier
explorers in
the area explored for
palaeo-placer deposits
of both gold and uranium.
================================================================= ====================================
Geology
* Deposit type, geological setting and style of * Picasso
mineralisation.
Pegmatites occur in the
greenstones at the
Mt Belches-Bald Hill pegmatite
belt. Further,
pegmatites have also been
mapped in the Archaean
granite in the Picasso
Project. There are a
large number of pegmatite
occurrences, with
69 government mapped
pegmatites throughout
the Picasso Project area. The
majority of the
pegmatites occur in the east
of the project
area, though pegmatites are
also recorded in
the south and west of the
project.
================================================================= ====================================
Drill hole
Information * A summary of all information material to the * Picasso
understanding of the exploration results including a
tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes: Reported in attached Table B1
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
* If the exclusion of this information is justified on
the basis that the information is not Material and
this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person
should clearly explain why this is the case.
================================================================= ====================================
Data Picasso (refer to ASX
aggregation * In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging announcement for image)
methods techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations
(eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are
usually Material and should be stated.
* Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths
of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade
results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail.
* The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
================================================================= ====================================
Relationship
between * These relationships are particularly important in the * Picasso
mineralisation reporting of Exploration Results.
widths and
intercept Down-hole lengths reported in
lengths * If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to attached Table
the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be B1
reported.
* If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear statement to this
effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').
================================================================= ====================================
Diagrams Maps for Picasso Lithium Project
* Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and are included
tabulations of intercepts should be included for any in the announcement
significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill
hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
================================================================= ====================================
Balanced Not applicable.
reporting * Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration
Results is not practicable, representative reporting
of both low and high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
================================================================= ====================================
Other Commencement of due diligence on
substantive * Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, the Picasso
exploration should be reported including (but not limited to): Lithium Project
data geological observations; geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
================================================================= ====================================
Further Commencement
work * The nature and scale of planned further work (eg of due
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or diligence on
large-scale step-out drilling). the Picasso
Lithium
Project.
* Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible For the
extensions, including the main geological Picasso
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided Lithium
this information is not commercially sensitive. Project,
return of
assays for
circa 30
surface
samples.
================================================================= ====================================
TABLE B1: PICASSO DRILLING DETAILS
Hole_ID MGA_North MGA_East AHD_RL Total Dip Azimuth Grid_ID DrillDate Hole_Type
(m) (m) Depth
(m)
NAC087 6454217.53 432545.8 347 33 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC088 6454499.12 433188.06 345 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC089 6454964.3 434047.27 336 23 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC090 6455624.62 434645.26 329 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC091 6456451.31 435179.29 319 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC092 6457241.91 435793.71 315 48 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC093 6458064.62 436321.52 317 26 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC094 6458947.88 436697.52 319 20 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC095 6459777.13 437250.49 327 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC096 6460677.14 437633.9 329 16 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC097 6461649.86 437873.71 322 31 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC098 6462594.06 438145.5 330 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC099 6463530.86 438497.13 337 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC100 6464357.73 438985.3 337 31 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC101 6465223.1 439392.89 338 15 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC102 6466036.42 440055.5 334 43 -90 360 MGA51_94 12/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC103 6466702.1 440423.38 340 49 -90 360 MGA51_94 11/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC114 6461438.7 443489.47 321 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 13/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC115 6462329.98 443763 334 31 -90 360 MGA51_94 13/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC116 6463296.98 443875.8 335 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 13/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
NAC117 6464132.15 444309.43 330 13 -90 360 MGA51_94 13/12/2010 AC
=========== ========== ======= ======= ==== ======== ========= =========== ==========
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms
and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information
contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an
anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services.
For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange
use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy
Policy.
END
UPDFLFIDIELVIIL
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
October 04, 2021 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
Castillo Copper (LSE:CCZ)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Mar 2024 a Abr 2024
Castillo Copper (LSE:CCZ)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Abr 2023 a Abr 2024
