TIDMSOLG
RNS Number : 4393P
SolGold PLC
19 October 2021
19 October 2021
SolGold plc
("SolGold" or the "Company")
SolGold Announces Tandayama-Ameríca Maiden Mineral Resource
The Board of Directors of SolGold (LSE & TSX: SOLG) is
pleased to provide an independently verified update regarding a
Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") for its Tandayama-Ameríca ("TAM")
porphyry copper-gold deposit at the Cascabel project in northern
Ecuador.
The TAM deposit lies approximately 3km north of the Alpala
deposit.
The Alpala deposit comprises 2,663 Mt at 0.53% CuEq ([1]) in the
Measured plus Indicated categories and contained metal content of
9.9 Mt Cu, 21.7 Moz Au and 92.2 Moz Ag ([2]) at the Company's
Cascabel project, held by Exploraciones Novomining S.A. ("ENSA"),
an 85% owned subsidiary of SolGold.
SUMMARY OF TANDAYAMA-AMERICA MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Total Mineral Resource of 233.0Mt @ 0.33% CuEq([3]) containing
0.53Mt Cu and 1.20Moz Au in the Indicated category, plus 197.0Mt @
0.39% CuEq containing 0.52Mt Cu and 1.24Moz Au in the Inferred
category.
Mineral Resource Statement: Effective date 26 August 2021
Mining Method Cut-off Grade Resource Tonnage Grade Contained Metal
(CuEq %) Category (Mt)
-------------- ------------- -------- --------------------------- -------------------------------
Cu Au (g/t) CuEq (%) Cu (Mt) Au (Moz) CuEq (Mt)
(%)
-------------- ------------- -------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----------
Open Pit 0.16 Indicated 201.0 0.22 0.16 0.33 0.45 1.06 0.66
-------------- ------------- -------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----------
Inferred 61.8 0.25 0.30 0.44 0.16 0.59 0.27
-------------- ------------- -------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----------
Underground 0.28 Indicated 32.0 0.26 0.14 0.35 0.08 0.14 0.11
-------------- ------------- -------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----------
Inferred 135.2 0.27 0.15 0.37 0.37 0.65 0.50
-------------- ------------- -------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----------
Total Indicated 233.0 0.23 0.16 0.33 0.53 1.20 0.77
-------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----------
Total Inferred 197.0 0.27 0.20 0.39 0.52 1.24 0.77
-------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----------
Notes:
1. Dr Andrew Fowler , MAusIMM CP(Geo), Principal Geology
Consultant of Mining Plus , is responsible for this Mineral
Resource statement and is an "independent Qualified Person" as such
term is defined in NI 43-101.
2. The Mineral Resource is reported using cut-off grades that
are applied according to the mining method where 0.16 % CuEq
applies to potentially open-pittable material and 0.28 % CuEq
applies to material potentially mineable by underground bulk mining
methods.
3. The Mineral Resource is considered to have reasonable
prospects for eventual economic extraction by open pit or
underground bulk mining such as block caving as described
below.
4. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
5. The statement uses the terminology, definitions and
guidelines given in the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and
Mineral Reserves (May 2014) as required by NI 43-101.
6. The underground portion of the Mineral Resource is reported
on 100 percent basis within an optimized shape as described
below.
7. Figures may not compute due to rounding.
-- Potentially open pittable Mineral Resources comprise 201.0Mt
@ 0.33% CuEq in the Indicated category, plus 61.8Mt @ 0.44% CuEq in
the Inferred category, at a cut-off grade of 0.16% CuEq.
-- Potentially open pittable Mineral Resources include a
higher-grade near-surface zone containing 10.6Mt @ 0.41% CuEq and
5.2Mt @ 0.45% CuEq.
-- Mineral Resources potentially mineable by underground bulk
mining methods comprise 32.0Mt @ 0.35% CuEq in the Indicated
category, plus 135.2Mt @ 0.37% CuEq in the Inferred category, at a
cut-off grade of 0.28% CuEq.
-- Drilling continues and an update to the TAM resource base is planned.
SolGold's Interim CEO Keith Marshall commented on the work being
advanced at Cascabel:
"The TAM deposit adds further copper and gold mineralisation to
Alpala's large metal inventory at the Cascabel project. The
resource offers optionality and the potential to generate economic
ore earlier which will complement the high-grade Alpala underground
ore.
The maiden MRE is based on assays from the first 18 holes.
Drilling has continued at the TAM deposit during the estimation
process and visual mineralisation from Holes 19-30 suggest
potential for future resource growth in the southeast quarter of
the open pit optimised shape and particularly in the east and
southeast depth extensions of the underground optimised shape where
the highest grade mineralisation encountered thus far remains
open".
([1]) Alpala Copper Equivalency (CuEq) was calculated (assuming
100% recovery of copper and gold) using a Gold Conversion Factor of
0 613 (CuEq = Cu + Au x 0.613), calculated from a nominal copper
price of US$3.40/lb and a gold price of US$1,400/oz.
([2]) See "Cascabel Property NI 43-101 Technical Report, Alpala
Porphyry Copper-Gold-Silver Deposit - Mineral Resource Estimation,
January 2021" with an Effective date: 18 March 2020 and Amended
Date: 15 January 2021 (the "Amended Technical Report"), filed at
www.Sedar.com on January 29, 2021.
([3]) TAM Copper Equivalency (CuEq) was calculated (assuming
100% recovery of copper and gold) using a Gold Conversion Factor of
0 751 (CuEq = Cu + Au x 0.751), calculated from an updated nominal
copper price of US$3.30/lb and a gold price of US$1,700/oz.
References to figures relate to the version visible in PDF
format by clicking the link below:
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/4393P_1-2021-10-18.pdf
FURTHER INFORMATION
The TAM deposit lies approximately 3km north of the Alpala
deposit, at the Cascabel project, held by ENSA, an 85% owned
subsidiary of SolGold . The project area lies within the Imbabura
province of northern Ecuador approximately 100 km north of the
capital city of Quito and approximately 50 km north-northwest of
the provincial capital, Ibarra (Figure 1).
On the 26 August 2021, a data cut-off was applied to the TAM
dataset for the purposes of Mineral Resource Estimation. The TAM
maiden MRE dataset comprised 17,535m of diamond drilling from holes
1-23, 458m of surface rock-saw channel sampling from 72 outcrops,
and 14,566m of final assay results from holes 1-18 ( Figure 2
).
To date a total of 22,216m has been completed at the TAM
deposit, with drill holes 26-30 currently underway utilising four
diamond drilling rigs. Assay results from Holes 19-25, and 27 are
pending.
The TAM MRE is constrained within a three-dimensional ("3D")
Open Pit Optimised Shape ("OP") and an Underground Optimised Shape
("UOS"), whereby the UOS "daylights" into the floor of the OP (
Figure 3 ).
The estimation of Cu and Au was confined within 3D estimation
domains which were based on the combination of two 3D wireframe
interpretations:
-- Grade Shell Interpretation : Low-, Medium- and High-Grade
shells equating to CuEq cut-off grades of 0.15%, 0.30% and 0.45%
respectively.
-- Lithological Interpretation : Modelling of seven rock groups,
comprising "D10" (Pre-Mineral Diorite Host Rock), "EM"
(Early-Mineral Quartz Diorite and Diorite), "IBX" (Intra-Mineral
Intrusive Breccia), "IM" (Intra-mineral Quartz Diorite and
Diorite), "LM" (Late-mineral Diorite), "PM" (Post-mineral Quartz
Diorite and Diorite), "V" (Pre-Mineral Volcanic Host Rocks), and
"SOI" (soil and oxidised rock).
The TAM deposit shares the same geological and structural
setting as the Alpala deposit. Mineralisation is hosted within a
complex of middle to late-Eocene (Bartonian) hornblende-bearing
diorites, quartz diorites and intrusive breccias that intrude
volcanic host rocks to form a complex of stocks, dykes, and breccia
pipes.
The trend of mineralisation throughout the TAM deposit is
defined by a northwest (315(--) ) trending intrusive complex
inclined steeply (78(--) ) towards the northeast. Surface mapping
data was supported by structural measurements taken from orientated
drill core provided data from 127 intrusive contacts and 3062
B-type quartz veins.
Copper and gold mineralisation is intimately associated with
porphyry style B-type quartz-chalcopyrite veins and stockworks,
centred upon an early-mineral causal quartz-diorite intrusion
(QD10), and cut by a series of intra-mineral, late-mineral and
post-mineral stocks dykes and breccias of diorite, hornblende
diorite, and quartz diorite.
Intrusions have emplaced episodically such that each subsequent
intrusion has introduced mineralising fluids (and subsequent arrays
of mineralised veins) into the TAM system, and/or remobilising and
enriching existing mineralisation or contributed to localised
overprinting of pre-existing mineralisation.
The geological character of the porphyry stocks / dykes
encountered through drilling to date indicate a well-preserved
porphyry system with significant potential for greater depth
extent. Individual mineralised porphyry dykes are observed to have
emplaced within a vertical column of over 1,000m.
The full size and tenor of the TAM system has not yet been
tested. Mineralisation remains open to the south and east and at
depth. Further surface geochemical anomalies to the east of the
current drilling area require drill testing.
Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction
The cut-off grades used for reporting have been based on up to
date third party metal price research, forecasting of Cu and Au
prices, and a cost structure from mining studies currently being
reviewed. Costs include mining, processing and general and
administration ("G&A"). Net Smelter Return ("NSR") includes
metallurgical recoveries and off-site realisation (TC/RC) including
royalties and utilising metal prices of Cu at US$3.30/lb and Au at
US$1,700/oz.
Cut-off grades have been developed independently for open pit
mining methods and underground bulk mining methods. The cut-off
grade for potentially open pittable material has been calculated at
0.16% CuEq using a copper equivalency factor of 0.632, while the
cut-off grade for material potentially mineable by a bulk
underground mining method such as block caving has been calculated
at 0.28% CuEq using a copper equivalency factor of 0.654.
Optimisation was completed in two stages, with the open pit
optimisation initially applied to the block model, and the
remaining material was then considered for underground
optimisation.
The open pit optimisation was completed using the conventional
Lerchs-Grossman optimisation routine implemented in Whittle
software, and the revenue factor one pit was selected for reporting
the Mineral Resource. The QP considers that the open pit portion of
the reported Mineral Resource has reasonable prospects for eventual
economic extraction at the specified cut-off grade.
Subsequently, a three-dimensional Underground Optimised Shape
was generated using Datamine(TM) software at a cut-off grade of
0.28% CuEq. Block Cave and Sub-Level Cave mining methods were
considered during the optimisation. The final UOS maximises the
tonnes above the cut-off while ensuring that all material was part
of a minimum mining unit with geometry appropriate for a block cave
of 120 m length by 120 m width by 200 m height. These minimum
mining dimensions for a block cave are consistent with mining
studies and the resulting shape contains planned internal and edge
dilution that the QP considers appropriate.
It is noteworthy that the UOS is not described as a "mineable
shape". Mining factors excluded from this analysis include, but are
not limited to, capital costs (non-mining, access and footprint
establishment), regional pillars, footprint geometries, unplanned
dilution and the time value of money. However, the shape does
enclose a contiguous and appropriately diluted Mineral Resource
that, by virtue of its grade and geometry, should be considered for
inclusion within a mineable shape. As such, the QP considers that
the underground portion of the reported Mineral Resource has
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction by the block
cave underground mining method at the specified cut-off grade.
An assessment of whether the project as a whole is economically
viable has not been made under this analysis.
Figure 1 : Location of TAM, Alpala and Aguinaga deposits at the
Cascabel project.
Figure 2 : Drill plan at the TAM deposit, looking down, showing
TAM maiden MRE dataset of diamond drill holes 1-23, and surface
rock-saw channel samples from 72 outcrops. A total of 14,566m of
final assay results from holes 1-18 were utilised. Holes 1-18
display downhole CuEq assay grades, whilst holes 19-23 (black) were
utilised for geological data.
Figure 3 : Section view, looking northwest, with unlimited
window thickness, showing the "OP" and "UOS" optimisation shapes
(top left), with Inferred and Indicated wireframe overlay (top
right), with high- and medium-grade wireframe overlays (bottom
left) and with high- and medium- and low-grade wireframe overlays
(bottom right). The Low-, Medium- and High-Grade shells are
modelled utilising CuEq cut-off grades of 0.15%, 0.30% and 0.45%
respectively.
Figure 4 : Example drill section, looking northwest through the
centre of the drilling area, with a window thickness of 150m
showing surface CuZn geochemistry anomalism and limits of drilling
data indicated by black outline. Sections show modelled geology
(left) and modelled grade (right) at the TAM deposit. Low-, Medium-
and High-Grade shells equate to CuEq cut-off grades of 0.15%, 0.30%
and 0.45% respectively. Geological units modelled are abbreviated
as follows: D10 (Pre-Mineral Diorite Host Rock), EM (Early-Mineral
Quartz Diorite and Diorite), IBX (Intra-Mineral Intrusive Breccia),
IM (Intra-mineral Quartz Diorite and Diorite), LM (Late-mineral
Diorite), PM (Post-mineral Quartz Diorite and Diorite), V
(Pre-Mineral Volcanic Host Rocks).
Qualified Person:
Information in this report relating to the exploration results
is based on data reviewed by Mr Jason Ward ((CP) B.Sc. Geol.), the
Chief Geologist of the Company. Mr Ward is a Fellow of the
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, holds the
designation FAusIMM (CP), and has in excess of 20 years' experience
in mineral exploration and is a Qualified Person for the purposes
of the relevant LSE and TSX Rules. Mr Ward consents to the
inclusion of the information in the form and context in which it
appears.
Information in this report relating to the Mineral Resource
Estimate was reviewed by Dr Andrew Fowler. Dr Fowler is a Chartered
Professional Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy and has in excess of 20 years' experience in Mineral
Resource Estimation, open pit mining, underground mining and
mineral exploration. He is an independent Qualified Person for the
purposes of the relevant LSE and TSX Rules. Dr Fowler consents to
the inclusion of the information in the form and context in which
it appears.
By order of the Board
Dennis Wilkins
Company Secretary
CONTACTS
Dennis Wilkins
SolGold Plc (Company Secretary) Tel: +61 (0) 417 945 049
dwilkins@solgold.com.au
Ingo Hofmaier
SolGold Plc (GM - Project & Corporate Tel: +44 (0) 20 3823 2130
Finance) ihofmaier@solgold.com.au
Fawzi Hanano
SolGold Plc (Investors / Communication) Tel: +44 (0) 20 3823 2130
fhanano@solgold.com.au
Tavistock (Media)
Jos Simson/Gareth Tredway Tel: +44 (0) 20 7920 3150
Follow us on twitter @SolGold_plc
Certain information contained in this announcement would have
been deemed inside information.
ABOUT SOLGOLD
SolGold is a leading resources company focussed on the
discovery, definition and development of world-class copper and
gold deposits. In 2018, SolGold's management team was recognised by
the "Mines and Money" Forum as an example of excellence in the
industry and continues to strive to deliver objectives efficiently
and in the interests of shareholders. SolGold is aggressively
exploring the length and breadth of this highly prospective and
gold-rich section of the Andean Copper Belt which is currently
responsible for c40% of global mined copper production.
The Company operates with transparency and in accordance with
international best practices. SolGold is committed to delivering
value to its shareholders, while simultaneously providing economic
and social benefits to impacted communities, fostering a healthy
and safe workplace and minimizing the environmental impact.
Dedicated stakeholders
SolGold employs a staff of over 800 employees of whom 98% are
Ecuadorean. This is expected to grow as the operations expand at
Alpala, and in Ecuador generally. SolGold focusses its operations
to be safe, reliable and environmentally responsible and maintains
close relationships with its local communities. SolGold has engaged
an increasingly skilled, refined and experienced team of
geoscientists using state of the art geophysical and geochemical
modelling applied to an extensive database to enable the delivery
of ore grade intersections from nearly every drill hole at Alpala.
SolGold has over 80 geologists on the ground in Ecuador exploring
for economic copper and gold deposits.
About Cascabel and Alpala
The Alpala deposit is the main target in the Cascabel
concession, located on the northern section of the heavily endowed
Andean Copper Belt, the entirety of which is renowned as the base
for nearly half of the world's copper production. The project area
hosts mineralisation of Eocene age, the same age as numerous Tier 1
deposits along the Andean Copper Belt in Chile and Peru to the
south. The project base is located at Rocafuerte within the
Cascabel concession in northern Ecuador, an approximately
three-hour drive on sealed highway north of the capital Quito,
close to water, power supply and Pacific ports.
Having fulfilled its earn-in requirements, SolGold is a
registered shareholder with an unencumbered legal and beneficial
85% interest in ENSA (Exploraciones Novomining S.A.) which holds
100% of the Cascabel concession covering approximately 50km(2) .
The junior equity owner in ENSA is required to repay 15% of costs
since SolGold's earn in was completed, from 90% of its share of
distribution of earnings or dividends from ENSA or the Cascabel
concession. It is also required to contribute to development or be
diluted, and if its interest falls below 10%, it shall reduce to a
0.5% NSR royalty which SolGold may acquire for US$3.5million.
SolGold's Regional Exploration Drive
SolGold is using its successful and cost-efficient blueprint
established at Alpala, and Cascabel generally, to explore for
additional world class copper and gold projects across Ecuador.
SolGold is the largest and most active concessionaire in
Ecuador.
The Company wholly owns four other subsidiaries active
throughout the country that are now focussed on thirteen high
priority gold and copper resource targets, several of which the
Company believes have the potential, subject to resource definition
and feasibility, to be developed in close succession or even on a
more accelerated basis compared to Alpala.
SolGold is listed on the London Stock Exchange and Toronto Stock
Exchange (LSE/TSX: SOLG). The Company has on issue a total of
2,293,816,433 fully paid ordinary shares and 105,125,000 share
options.
Quality Assurance / Quality Control on Sample Collection,
Security and Assaying
SolGold operates according to its rigorous Quality Assurance and
Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol, which is consistent with industry
best practices.
Primary sample collection involves secure transport from
SolGold's concessions in Ecuador, to the ALS certified sample
preparation facility in Quito, Ecuador. Samples are then air
freighted from Quito to the ALS certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
where the assaying of drill core, channel samples, rock chips and
soil samples is undertaken. SolGold utilises ALS certified
laboratories in Canada and Australia for the analysis of
metallurgical samples.
Samples are prepared and analysed using 100g 4-Acid digest ICP
with MS finish for 48 elements on a 0.25g aliquot (ME-MS61).
Laboratory performance is routinely monitored using umpire assays,
check batches and inter-laboratory comparisons between ALS
certified laboratory in Lima and the ACME certified laboratory in
Cuenca, Ecuador.
In order to monitor the ongoing quality of its analytical
database, SolGold's QA/QC protocol encompasses standard sampling
methodologies, including the insertion of certified powder blanks,
coarse chip blanks, standards, pulp duplicates and field
duplicates. The blanks and standards are Certified Reference
Materials supplied by Ore Research and Exploration, Australia.
SolGold's QA/QC protocol also monitors the ongoing quality of
its analytical database. The Company's protocol involves
Independent data validation of the digital analytical database
including search for sample overlaps, duplicate or absent samples
as well as anomalous assay and survey results. These are routinely
performed ahead of Mineral Resource Estimates and Feasibility
Studies. No material QA/QC issues have been identified with respect
to sample collection, security and assaying.
Reviews of the sample preparation, chain of custody, data
security procedures and assaying methods used by SolGold confirm
that they are consistent with industry best practices and all
results stated in this announcement have passed SolGold's QA/QC
protocol.
The data aggregation method for calculating Copper Equivalent
(CuEq) for down-hole drilling intercepts and rock-saw channel
sampling intervals are reported using copper equivalent (CuEq)
cut-off grades with up to 10m internal dilution, excluding bridging
to a single sample and with minimum intersection length of 50m.
Alpala Copper Equivalency (CuEq) was calculated (assuming 100%
recovery of copper and gold) using a Gold Conversion Factor of
0.613 (CuEq = Cu + Au x 0.613), calculated from a nominal copper
price of US$3.40/lb and a gold price of US$1,400/oz.
TAM Copper Equivalency (CuEq) was calculated (assuming 100%
recovery of copper and gold) using a Gold Conversion Factor of
0.751 (CuEq = Cu + Au x 0.751), calculated from an updated nominal
copper price of US$3.30/lb and a gold price of US$1,700/oz.
TAM underground resources were estimated using a Copper
Equivalency (CuEq) calculated from estimated costs, including
mining, processing and general and administration (G&A),
whereby Net Smelter Return (NSR) includes metallurgical recoveries
and off-site realisation (TCRC) including royalties, and utilising
the updated nominal copper price of US$3.30/lb and a gold price of
US$1,700/oz to produce a Gold Conversion Factor of 0.654 (CuEq = Cu
+ Au x 0.654).
See www.solgold.com.au for more information. Follow us on
twitter @SolGold plc
CAUTIONARY NOTICE
News releases, presentations and public commentary made by
SolGold plc (the "Company") and its Officers may contain certain
statements and expressions of belief, expectation or opinion which
are forward looking statements, and which relate, inter alia, to
interpretations of exploration results to date and the Company's
proposed strategy, plans and objectives or to the expectations or
intentions of the Company's Directors, including the plan for
developing the Project currently being studied as well as the
expectations of the Company as to the forward price of copper. Such
forward-looking and interpretative statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors beyond the
control of the Company that could cause the actual performance or
achievements of the Company to be materially different from such
interpretations and forward-looking statements.
Accordingly, the reader should not rely on any interpretations
or forward-looking statements; and save as required by the exchange
rules of the TSX and LSE or by applicable laws, the Company does
not accept any obligation to disseminate any updates or revisions
to such interpretations or forward-looking statements. The Company
may reinterpret results to date as the status of its assets and
projects changes with time expenditure, metals prices and other
affecting circumstances.
This release may contain "forward--looking information" within
the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation.
Forward--looking information includes, but is not limited to,
statements regarding the Company's plans for developing its
properties. Generally, forward--looking information can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
"plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget",
"scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or
"does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words
and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may",
"could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be
achieved".
Forward--looking information is subject to known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual
results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the
Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied
by such forward--looking information, including but not limited to:
transaction risks; general business, economic, competitive,
political and social uncertainties; future prices of mineral
prices; accidents, labour disputes and shortages and other risks of
the mining industry. Although the Company has attempted to identify
important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in forward-looking information,
there may be other factors that cause results not to be as
anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that
such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and
future events could differ materially from those anticipated in
such statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from such forward-looking information include, but are
not limited to, risks relating to the ability of exploration
activities (including assay results) to accurately predict
mineralization; errors in management's geological modelling and/or
mine development plan; capital and operating costs varying
significantly from estimates; the preliminary nature of visual
assessments; delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required
governmental, environmental or other required approvals;
uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing
needed in the future; changes in equity markets; inflation; the
global economic climate; fluctuations in commodity prices; the
ability of the Company to complete further exploration activities,
including drilling; delays in the development of projects;
environmental risks; community and non-governmental actions; other
risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry;
the ability of the Company to retain its key management employees
and skilled and experienced personnel; and those risks set out in
the Company's public documents filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com .
Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on
forward--looking information. The Company does not undertake to
update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with
applicable securities laws.
The Company and its officers do not endorse, or reject or
otherwise comment on the conclusions, interpretations or views
expressed in press articles or third-party analysis, and where
possible aims to circulate all available material on its
website.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms
and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information
contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an
anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services.
For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange
use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy
Policy.
END
MSCUWANRASURAAA
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
October 19, 2021 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
Solgold (LSE:SOLG)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Mar 2024 a Abr 2024
Solgold (LSE:SOLG)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Abr 2023 a Abr 2024