UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number:
0-22945
HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
13-3169913
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
200 Park Avenue South
|
|
|
New York, New York 10003
|
|
(212) 979-8228
|
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Registrants Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)
|
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act) Yes
o
No
þ
As of August 8, 2008, there were 2,396,707 shares of common stock, with $.01 par value per share,
outstanding.
HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
INDEX
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,640,803
|
|
|
$
|
3,077,655
|
|
Accounts receivable- less allowance for doubtful accounts of $199,489 at
June 30, 2008, and $221,970 at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,360,846
|
|
|
|
3,479,561
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
79,960
|
|
|
|
32,754
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
313,783
|
|
|
|
279,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
5,395,392
|
|
|
|
6,869,595
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
295,709
|
|
|
|
342,937
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,140,964
|
|
|
|
1,140,964
|
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
149,218
|
|
|
|
151,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,981,283
|
|
|
$
|
8,504,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,624,121
|
|
|
$
|
1,807,033
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
177,502
|
|
|
|
178,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,801,623
|
|
|
|
1,985,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,396,707
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2008; 2,396,707 issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
23,967
|
|
|
|
23,967
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
34,795,696
|
|
|
|
34,758,266
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(29,639,449
|
)
|
|
|
(28,264,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,179,660
|
|
|
|
6,519,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
6,981,283
|
|
|
$
|
8,504,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
9,607,982
|
|
|
$
|
10,609,764
|
|
|
$
|
4,835,953
|
|
|
$
|
4,733,370
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
7,759,236
|
|
|
|
7,480,251
|
|
|
|
3,971,752
|
|
|
|
3,574,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,848,746
|
|
|
|
3,129,513
|
|
|
|
864,201
|
|
|
|
1,158,762
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative
|
|
|
3,154,739
|
|
|
|
3,472,664
|
|
|
|
1,369,137
|
|
|
|
1,706,205
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
88,953
|
|
|
|
94,157
|
|
|
|
44,827
|
|
|
|
49,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,243,692
|
|
|
|
3,566,821
|
|
|
|
1,413,964
|
|
|
|
1,755,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(1,394,946
|
)
|
|
|
(437,308
|
)
|
|
|
(549,763
|
)
|
|
|
(596,689
|
)
|
Other income(expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income-net
|
|
|
28,590
|
|
|
|
92,911
|
|
|
|
9,128
|
|
|
|
37,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,590
|
|
|
|
92,911
|
|
|
|
9,128
|
|
|
|
37,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,366,356
|
)
|
|
|
(344,397
|
)
|
|
|
(540,635
|
)
|
|
|
(558,697
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
11,832
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,375,356
|
)
|
|
|
(356,229
|
)
|
|
|
(545,135
|
)
|
|
|
(567,697
|
)
|
Other
comprehensive (loss)/income
foreign currency adjustment
|
|
|
(2,209
|
)
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
(1,353
|
)
|
|
|
6,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(1,377,565
|
)
|
|
$
|
(351,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
(546,488
|
)
|
|
$
|
(561,483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,375,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
(356,229
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities, net of acquired assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
88,953
|
|
|
|
94,157
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
37,430
|
|
|
|
60,738
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing cost
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Write down of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,059
|
|
Reduction of capital lease obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,758
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
88,715
|
|
|
|
272,269
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
(47,206
|
)
|
|
|
223,768
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(34,158
|
)
|
|
|
(47,168
|
)
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
|
(44,441
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(182,912
|
)
|
|
|
(389,211
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
(247,967
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(1,392,918
|
)
|
|
|
(447,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(41,725
|
)
|
|
|
(53,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(41,725
|
)
|
|
|
(53,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,931
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,209
|
)
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,436,852
|
)
|
|
|
(485,267
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
3,077,655
|
|
|
|
3,849,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,640,803
|
|
|
$
|
3,363,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes net of refunds
|
|
$
|
4,932
|
|
|
$
|
152,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1) GENERAL:
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
contained in Helios & Matheson North America Inc.s (Helios & Matheson or the Company) Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
and the accompanying financial statements and related notes thereto. The accounting policies used
in preparing these financial statements are the same as those described in the Companys Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
2) CONTROLLED COMPANY:
The Board of Directors has determined that Helios & Matheson is a Controlled Company for
purposes of the NASDAQ listing requirements. A Controlled Company is a company of which more
than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company. Certain NASDAQ
requirements do not apply to a Controlled Company, including requirements that: (i) a majority of
its Board of Directors must be comprised of independent directors as defined in NASDAQs rules;
and (ii) the compensation of officers and the nomination of directors be determined in accordance
with specific rules, generally requiring determinations by committees comprised solely of
independent directors or in meetings at which only the independent directors are present. The
Board of Directors has determined that Helios & Matheson is a Controlled Company based on the
fact that Helios & Matheson Information Technology, Ltd. (Helios & Matheson Parent) holds more
than 50% of the voting power of the Company.
3) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
contain all the adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present
fairly the consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2008, the consolidated results of
operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and cash flows for the
six month period ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial
statements. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Form 10-K filed by the Company for the year ended December 31,
2007.
The consolidated results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the full
year.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2008, the Company reported operating losses of approximately ($1.1) million, ($550,000) and
($1.4) million, respectively. While the Company continues to focus on revenue growth and cost
reductions, including but not limited to outsourcing and off-shoring solutions, to improve its
financial condition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be profitable in future
periods.
In managements opinion, cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity combined with cash
on hand will provide adequate flexibility for funding the Companys working capital obligations for
the next twelve months.
4) STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company has a stock based compensation plan, which is described as follows:
The Companys Stock Option Plan (the Plan) provides for the grant of stock options that are
either incentive or
non-qualified
for federal income tax purposes. The Plan provides for the
issuance of a maximum of 460,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment pursuant to
customary anti-dilution provisions). Stock options vest over a period between one to four years.
The exercise price per share of a stock option is established by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors in its discretion but may not be less than the fair market value of a share
of common stock as of the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares of common
stock with respect to which incentive stock options first become exercisable by an individual to
whom an incentive stock option is granted during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.
6
Stock options, subject to certain restrictions, may be exercisable any time after full vesting
for a period not to exceed ten years from the date of grant. Such period is to be established by
the Company in its discretion on the date of grant. Stock options terminate in connection with the
termination of employment.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the modified prospective application method as
specified by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment
(Statement 123 (R)), whereby compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite
service has not yet been rendered that are outstanding as of the adoption date will be recognized
over the remaining service period. The compensation cost for that portion of awards is based on
the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated using pro forma disclosures under Statement
123, as originally issued. All new awards and awards that are modified, repurchased, or cancelled
after the adoption date will be accounted for under the provisions of Statement 123 (R). For the
three month period ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded stock based compensation
expense under the provisions of Statement 123 (R) of $16,339 and $30,327, respectively.
Information with respect to options under the Companys Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
Granted during 1st Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 1st Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during 1st Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2008
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
Granted during 2nd Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 2nd Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during 2nd Qtr 2008
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2008
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
The following table summarizes the status of the stock options outstanding and exercisable at June
30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Range
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
$0.00 $4.80
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.760
|
|
|
|
61,000
|
|
|
2.5 years
|
|
|
57,250
|
|
$4.80 $9.60
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.873
|
|
|
|
55,500
|
|
|
3.7 years
|
|
|
36,625
|
|
$14.40 $19.20
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.504
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
1.4 years
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, 101,375 stock options were exercisable with a weighted average exercise
price of $4.77.
7
5) NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER SHARE
:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for
the six months and the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Numerator for basic net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,375,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
(356,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(545,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(567,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(1,375,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
(356,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(545,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(567,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common
stockholders & assumed conversion
|
|
$
|
(1,375,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
(356,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(545,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(567,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic loss
per share
weighted-average shares
|
|
|
2,396,707
|
|
|
|
2,386,538
|
|
|
|
2,396,707
|
|
|
|
2,388,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted loss per
share adjusted weighted-average shares
|
|
|
2,396,707
|
|
|
|
2,386,538
|
|
|
|
2,396,707
|
|
|
|
2,388,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, all options and
warrants outstanding were excluded from the computation of net loss per share because the effect
would have been anti-dilutive.
6) CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK:
The revenues of three customers represented approximately 17%, 15% and 11% of the revenues for
the six month period ended June 30, 2008. The revenues of three customers represented
approximately 25%, 18% and 10% of revenues for the same period in 2007. No other customer
represented greater than 10% of the Companys revenues for such periods.
8
7) CREDIT ARRANGEMENT:
The Company has entered into a Restated and Amended Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan
Agreement) with Keltic Financial Partners, LP, (Keltic) which is effective as of June 27, 2007
and expires June 27, 2009. Under the Loan Agreement, the Company has a line of credit up to $1.0
million based on the Companys eligible accounts receivable balances at an interest rate that
varies based on the extent of usage in any given calendar year from a minimum of prime to a maximum
of prime plus 0.75% assuming no event of default under the Loan Agreement. Net availability at
June 30, 2008 was approximately $1.0 million. The Loan Agreement has certain financial covenants
that shall apply only if the Company has any outstanding obligations to Keltic including borrowing
under the facility. The Company had no outstanding balance at June 30, 2008, or at December 31,
2007, under the Loan Agreement.
8) CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS:
The Company has the following commitments as of June 30, 2008: long term obligations of
certain employment contracts and operating lease obligations. The Company has two operating
leases: one for its corporate headquarters located in New York and the other for its branch office
in New Jersey.
The Companys commitments at June 30, 2008, are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
1 3 Years
|
|
|
3 5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
Long Term Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Contracts
(1)
|
|
|
437,000
|
|
|
|
218,500
|
|
|
|
218,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent
(2)
|
|
|
1,447,842
|
|
|
|
208,399
|
|
|
|
789,406
|
|
|
|
450,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,884,842
|
|
|
$
|
426,899
|
|
|
$
|
1,007,906
|
|
|
$
|
450,037
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had employment agreements with its two named executive officers
(Salvatore M. Quadrino,
the
Companys Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Michael Prude, the Companys Chief Operating Officer). The employment
agreement with Mr. Quadrino expired on April 30, 2008 and was subsequently amended on May 9, 2008 effective May 1, 2008. Under the amended
agreement, Mr. Quadrino will serve in a dual capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Interim Chief Executive Officer while the Board of Directors
continues its on going search for a Chief Executive Officer. When the Board of Directors hires a Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Quadrino will revert
back to his original role as Chief Financial Officer. Under the
amended agreement, Mr. Quadrino will receive, on
a
month-to-month basis,
an
additional $5,000 per month for his role as Interim Chief Executive Officer. This amount is not reflected in the table above.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The Company has a New York facility with a lease term expiring July 31, 2012 and a New Jersey facility with a lease term expiring
August 31, 2010.
|
As of June 30, 2008, the Company does not have any Off Balance Sheet Arrangements.
9) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations
varies from the expected statutory rate primarily due to a provision for minimum state taxes and
the recording of additional valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. Internal Revenue Code
Section 382 (Code) places a limitation on the utilization of Federal net operating loss and other
credit carry-forwards when an ownership change, as defined by the tax law, occurs. Generally, this
occurs when a greater than 50 percentage point change in ownership occurs. On September 5, 2006,
Helios & Matheson Parent acquired a greater than 50 percent ownership of the Company. Accordingly,
the actual utilization of the net operating loss carry-forwards for tax purposes are limited
annually under Code to a percentage (currently about four and a half percent) of the fair market
value of the Company at the date of this ownership change. The Company did not generate taxable
income during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company maintains a valuation allowance
against additional deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss carry-forwards since, in the
opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized.
9
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of significant factors affecting the Companys operating
results, liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
financial statements and related notes.
Statements included in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and elsewhere in this document that do not relate to present or historical
conditions are forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Additional oral or written forward-looking statements may be made by the Company from
time to time, and such statements may be included in documents that are filed with the SEC. Such
forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainties that could cause results or outcomes to
differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements may include, without limitation, statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as believes, forecasts,
intends, possible, expects, estimates, anticipates, or plans and similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers that results
predicted by forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to the
Companys future business prospects, revenues, working capital, liquidity, capital needs, interest
costs, and income are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. The important factors on
which such statements are based, include but are not limited to, assumptions concerning the
anticipated growth of the information technology industry, the continued needs of current and
prospective customers for the Companys services, the availability of qualified professional staff,
and price and wage inflation.
Overview
Since 1983, Helios & Matheson has provided IT services and solutions to Fortune 1000 companies
and other large organizations. In 1997, Helios & Matheson became a public company headquartered in
New York, New York. In addition, the Company has offices in Clark, New Jersey and Bangalore,
India. The Companys common stock is currently listed on NASDAQ Capital Market
CM
under
the symbol HMNA. Prior to January 30, 2007, the Companys name was The A Consulting Team, Inc.
Helios & Matheson provides a wide range of high quality, software and consulting solutions,
through an integrated suite of market driven Service Lines in the areas of Application Value
Management, Application Development and Integration, Independent Validation, Infrastructure,
Information Management and IT Advisory Services for Fortune 1000 companies and other large
organizations. These services account for over 90% of the Companys revenues. The Companys
solutions are based on an understanding of each clients enterprise model. The Companys
accumulated knowledge is applied to new projects such as planning, designing and implementing
enterprise-wide information systems, database management services, performance optimization,
migrations and conversions, strategic sourcing, outsourcing and systems integration.
Helios & Matheson delivers its IT solutions through Solution Teams composed of Client
Partners, Solution Partners, Project Managers, and Technical Specialists. These professionals
possess the industry experience, project management skills and technical expertise to identify and
effectively address a particular clients needs in relation to its business objectives. Helios &
Mathesons focus on providing highly qualified IT professionals allows the Company to identify
additional areas of the clients business which could benefit from the Companys IT solutions,
thereby facilitating the cross-marketing of multiple Company services. The Company keeps its
Solution Teams at the forefront of emerging technologies and business trends through close
interaction with Helios & Matheson research personnel who identify innovative IT trends, tools and
technologies and market driven solutions. As a result, management believes that Helios & Matheson
Solution Teams are prepared to anticipate client needs, develop appropriate strategies and deliver
comprehensive IT services, thereby allowing the Company to deliver the highest quality IT services
in a timely fashion.
Helios & Matheson markets and distributes a number of software products developed by
independent software developers. The Company believes its relationships with over 60 software
clients throughout the country provide opportunities for the delivery of additional Company
consulting and training services. The software products offered by Helios & Matheson are marketed
primarily through trade shows, direct mail, telemarketing, client presentations and referrals.
Revenue from the sale of software is ancillary to the Companys total revenues, but in the future
the Company hopes to use such sales as a means of introducing itself to potential clients.
The Company is dedicated to providing cost efficient competitive services to its clients
through its Flexible Delivery Model which allows for dynamically configurable Onsite, Onshore or
Offshore service delivery based on the needs of the clients. This capability is made possible
through Helios and Matheson Global Services Private Limited (HMGS), the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiary operating in Bangalore, India. The Companys ability to blend more offshore work into
its pricing should allow it to be more price competitive.
10
On April 7, 2008, the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors established the
Transformation Committee, the purpose of which is to work with management and effect the
transformation of the Company to one that is capable of delivering a higher percentage of its
services through outsourcing and offshoring solutions. In this regard, the Company will explore
the appropriateness of moving functions such as recruiting, solutions delivery and finance and
administration offshore in an effort to become more price competitive while maintaining high
quality services for our clients.
Rapid technological advances and the widespread acceptance and use of the Internet as a
driving force in commerce, accelerated the growth of the IT industry. These advances, including
more powerful and less expensive computer technology, fueled the transition from predominantly
centralized mainframe computer systems to open and distributed computing environments and the
advent of capabilities such as relational databases, imaging, software development productivity
tools, and web-enabled software. These advances expanded the benefits that users can derive from
computer-based information systems and improved the price-to-performance ratios of such systems.
As a result, an increasing number of companies are employing IT in new ways, often to gain
competitive advantages in the marketplace, and IT services have become an essential component of
many companys long-term growth strategies. The same advances that have enhanced the benefits of
computer systems rendered the development and implementation of such systems increasingly complex,
popularizing the outsourcing of IT development and services to third party IT service providers
like the Company. Many companies outsource such work because their internal personnel lack the
qualifications for certain projects or they have an insufficient number of internal staff to
address all of the projects being undertaken. Outsourcing also enables companies to realize cost
efficiencies through reduced personnel costs. Accordingly, organizations turn to external IT
services organizations such as Helios & Matheson to develop, support and enhance their internal IT
systems.
The Company believes that its business, operating results and financial condition have been
harmed by the recent economic downturn. A significant portion of the Companys major customers are
in the financial services industry and have come under considerable pressure as a result of the
recent developments in the financial markets. Spending on IT consulting services is largely
discretionary, and the Company has experienced a delay in the start of projects from existing
customers and extended lead times in closing new projects, both of which have impacted revenue
growth through the second quarter of 2008.
Beginning in 2006 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company expanded its
sales and recruiting resources in an effort to increase its revenues in both the short and
long-term. This effort, however, has been unsuccessful through the second quarter of 2008 as
indicated by the general decline in the Companys consulting revenue.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2008, the Company reported operating losses of approximately ($1.1) million, ($550,000) and
($1.4) million, respectively. While the Company continues to focus on revenue growth and cost
reductions, including but not limited to outsourcing and off-shoring solutions, to improve its
financial condition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be profitable in future
periods.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, approximately 68% of the Companys consulting services
revenues were generated from the hourly billing of its consultants services to its clients under
time and materials engagements, as compared to approximately 65% for the six months ended June 30,
2007, with the remainder generated under fixed-price engagements. The Company has established
standard-billing guidelines for consulting services based on the types of services offered. Actual
billing rates are established on a project-by-project basis and may vary from the standard
guidelines. The Company typically bills its clients for time and materials services on a
semi-monthly basis. Arrangements for fixed-price engagements are made on a
case-by-case basis.
Consulting services revenues generated under time and materials engagements are recognized as those
services are provided. Revenues from fixed fee contracts are recorded when work is performed on
the basis of the proportionate performance method, which is based on costs incurred to date
relative to total estimated costs.
The Company has also generated revenues by selling software licenses. In addition to initial
software license fees, the Company also derives revenues from the annual renewal of software
licenses. Because future obligations associated with such revenue are insignificant, revenues from
the sale of software licenses are recognized upon delivery of the software to a customer. The
Company views software sales as ancillary to its core consulting services business. Revenue
generated from software sales will vary from period to period.
The Companys most significant operating cost is its personnel cost, which is included in cost
of revenues. As a result, the Companys operating performance is primarily based upon billing
margins (billable hourly rate less the consultants hourly cost) and consultant utilization rates
(number of days worked by a consultant during a semi-monthly billing cycle divided by the number of
billing days in that cycle). Due to a continued decline in consulting revenue and consultant
utilization, the Companys gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 19.2% as
compared to 29.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 which included a significantly higher
margin project. Large portions of the Companys engagements are on a time and materials basis.
While most of the Companys engagements allow for periodic price adjustments to address, among
other things, increases in consultant costs, to date clients have been averse to accepting cost
increases. In addition, an increasing number of the Companys clients are outsourcing the
management of their time and material engagements to external Vendor Management Organizations
(VMOs) who are responsible
for monitoring the costs of external service providers. The Company has been challenged by
the price compression created by the VMOs, as well as, absorbing the costs associated with the
VMOs, both of which have squeezed gross margin.
11
Helios & Matheson actively manages its personnel utilization rates by monitoring project
requirements and timetables. Helios & Mathesons utilization rate for the three and six month
period ended June 30, 2008, was approximately 76% and 74%, respectively, as compared to 70% and 69%
for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2007. As projects are completed, consultants
either are re-deployed to new projects at the current client site, to new projects at another
client site or are encouraged to participate in Helios & Mathesons training programs in order to
expand their technical skill sets. The Company carefully monitors consultants that are not
utilized. While the Company has established guidelines for the amount of non-billing time that it
allows before a consultant is terminated, actual terminations vary as circumstances warrant.
On July 19, 2002, the Company acquired all of the common stock of International Object
Technology, Inc. (IOT). The purchase price of the acquisition exceeded the fair market value of
the net assets acquired, resulting in the recording of goodwill currently stated at $1,140,964 on
the balance sheet. IOT provided data management and business intelligence solutions, technology
consulting and project management services. During the first quarter of 2006, IOTs operations
were fully integrated into Helios & Matheson.
The Company had a minority investment in Methoda Computer Ltd. (Methoda), a methodology
provider and knowledgebase for IT management and software engineering based in Israel. Repeated
attempts by the Company to obtain current financial and operational information relating to this
investment were unsuccessful. During the first quarter of 2007, the Company wrote off, to Selling,
General and Administrative expenses, its investment in Methoda of $87,000.
The Company acquired a 51% ownership interest in T3 Media as a result of several investments
in 1998 and 1999. Due to deterioration in performance and market conditions for T3 Medias
services, the operations of T3 Media ceased in the second quarter of 2001. T3 Media had entered
into a series of capital lease obligations, which the Company had guaranteed, to finance its
expansion plans, covering leasehold improvements, furniture and computer-related equipment. The
balance outstanding under such leases was $291,000 and was included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. In 2007, the Company reduced this liability
ratably over the year, consistent with the decrease in exposure that diminished over time. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the write down was $47,000 and $120,000, respectively,
and is reflected in Selling, General and Administrative expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies
The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses in applying its most critical accounting
polices have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its consolidated financial
statements. The Company evaluates its estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. Estimates are
based on historical experience and on assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under
the circumstances. The Companys experience and assumptions form the basis for its judgments about
the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may vary from what is anticipated and different assumptions or estimates about the
future could change reported results. The Company believes the following accounting policies are
the most critical to it, in that they are important to the portrayal of its financial statements
and they require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments in the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill acquired in a purchase and determined to have an indefinite useful life is not
amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142. If it is determined by the Company that goodwill has been impaired it will be
written down at that time.
Revenue Recognition
Consulting revenues are recognized as services are provided. The Company primarily provides
consulting services under time and material contracts, whereby revenue is recognized as hours and
costs are incurred. Customers for consulting revenues are billed on a weekly, semi-monthly or
monthly basis. Revenues from fixed fee contracts are recorded when work is performed on the basis
of the proportionate performance method, which is based on costs incurred to date relative to total
estimated costs. Any anticipated contract losses are estimated and accrued at the time they become
known and estimable. Unbilled accounts receivables represent amounts recognized as revenue based
on services performed in advance of customer billings. Revenue from sales of software licenses is
recognized upon delivery of the software to a customer because future obligations associated with
such revenue are insignificant.
12
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company monitors its accounts receivable balances on a monthly basis to ensure that they
are collectible. On a quarterly basis, the Company uses its historical experience to accurately
determine its accounts receivable reserve. The Companys allowance for doubtful accounts is an
estimate based on specifically identified accounts as well as general reserves. The Company
evaluates specific accounts where it has information that the customer may have an inability to
meet its financial obligations. In these cases, management uses its judgment, based on the best
available facts and circumstances, and records a specific reserve for that customer, against
amounts due, to reduce the receivable to the amount that is expected to be collected. These
specific reserves are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received that impacts
the amount reserved. The Company also establishes a general reserve for all customers based on a
range of percentages applied to aging categories. These percentages are based on historical
collection and write-off experience. If circumstances change, the Companys estimate of the
recoverability of amounts due the Company could be reduced or increased by a material amount. Such
a change in estimated recoverability would be accounted for in the period in which the facts that
give rise to the change become known.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of the Company,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The Company assesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets at least annually based
upon the Companys ability to generate sufficient future taxable income and the availability of
effective tax planning strategies.
Stock Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the modified prospective application method
whereby compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not yet
been rendered that are outstanding as of the adoption date of Statement 123 (R) will be recognized
over the remaining service period. The compensation cost for that portion of awards is based on
the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under Statement
123, as originally issued. All new awards and awards that are modified, repurchased, or cancelled
after the adoption date will be accounted for under the provisions of Statement 123 (R) and
recognized as compensation cost over the applicable service period of each award.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage of revenues of certain items included in the
Companys Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
80.8
|
%
|
|
|
70.5
|
%
|
|
|
82.1
|
%
|
|
|
75.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
33.8
|
%
|
|
|
33.6
|
%
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Comparison of The Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 to The Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues.
Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $4.8 million compared to $4.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Consulting revenue has declined due to extended
lead times in replacing completed projects as well as a decline in new business from existing
customers, many of whom have been adversely affected by the current slow-down of the economy. For
the three months ended June 30, 2008, the decline in consulting revenue was offset by an increase
in revenue from the sale of software.
Gross Profit.
The gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $864,000, a
decrease of $295,000 from the prior year comparable period. As a percentage of total revenues,
gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 17.9% compared to 24.5% for the three
months ended June 30, 2007. Gross margin has declined primarily as a result of a decrease in
higher margin project revenue, increases in costs associated with VMOs and price compression on
staffing assignments.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses are comprised of Selling, General and Administrative
(SG&A) expenses, and depreciation and amortization. SG&A expenses for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 were $1.4 million compared to the 2007 comparable period level of $1.7 million. This
decrease is attributed to cost reduction initiatives associated with various selling, general and
administrative expenses including, but not limited to, employee compensation resulting from a
reduction in sales and administrative resources, sales commission expenses, health insurance, legal
fees and other professional fees. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $4,000.
Taxes.
Taxes decreased approximately $4,000 from $9,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2007 to $5,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The amount recorded during the second
quarter of 2008 was comprised solely of a tax provision for minimum State taxes.
Net Loss.
As a result of the above, the Company had a net loss of ($545,000) or ($0.23) per
basic and diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to a net loss of
($568,000) or ($0.24) per basic and diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Comparison of The Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 to The Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues.
Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $9.6 million, a $1.0 million
decrease from the comparable 2007 period. Consulting revenue has declined due to extended lead
times in replacing completed projects as well as a decline in new business from existing customers,
many of whom have been adversely affected by the current slow-down of the economy.
Gross Profit.
The gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $1.8
million, a decrease of $1.3 million from the comparable 2007 period. As a percentage of total
revenues, gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 19.2% compared to 29.5% for the
six months ended June 30, 2007. Gross margin has declined primarily as a result of a decrease in
higher margin project revenue, increases in costs associated with VMOs and price compression on
staffing assignments.
Operating Expenses.
SG&A expenses were $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared to $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease is attributed to
cost reduction initiatives associated with various selling, general and administrative expenses
including, but not limited to, employee compensation resulting from a reduction in sales and
administrative resources, sales commission expenses, health insurance, legal fees and other
professional fees. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $5,000.
Taxes.
Taxes decreased $3,000 from $12,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to $9,000
in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The amount recorded during the six months ended June 30,
2008 was comprised solely of a tax provision for minimum State taxes.
Net Loss.
As a result of the above, the Company had a net loss of ($1.4) million or ($0.57)
per basic and diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to a net loss of
($356,000) or ($0.15) per basic and diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
14
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys cash balances were approximately $1.6 million at June 30, 2008 and $3.1 million
at December 31, 2007. Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008
was approximately $1.4 million compared to net cash used in operating activities of $448,000 for
the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in net cash used is primarily a result of
operating losses incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The Company had an operating and net loss of approximately ($1.4) million during the six
months ended June 30, 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company had an
operating loss of ($437,000) and a net loss of ($356,000). While the Company continues to focus on
revenue growth and cost reductions, including but not limited to outsourcing and off-shoring
solutions, to improve its financial condition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be
profitable in future periods.
The Companys accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts, at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 were $3.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively, representing 58 and 60 days of
sales outstanding, respectively. The accounts receivable at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
included $80,000 and $33,000 of unbilled revenue, respectively. The Company has provided an
allowance for doubtful accounts at the end of each of the periods presented. After giving effect
to this allowance, the Company does not anticipate any difficulty in collecting amounts due.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $42,000 and $54,000 for the six month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, comprised solely of additions to property and
equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $0 and $11,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company has entered into a Restated and Amended Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan
Agreement) with Keltic Financial Partners, LP, (Keltic) which is effective as of June 27, 2007
and expires June 27, 2009. Under the Loan Agreement, the Company has a line of credit up to $1.0
million based on the Companys eligible accounts receivable balances at an interest rate that
varies based on the extent of usage in any given calendar year from a minimum of prime to a maximum
of prime plus 0.75% assuming no event of default under the Loan Agreement. Net availability at
June 30, 2008, was approximately $1.0 million. The Loan Agreement has certain financial covenants
that shall apply only if the Company has any outstanding obligations to Keltic including borrowing
under the facility. The Company had no outstanding balance at June 30, 2008, or at December 31,
2007, under the Loan Agreement.
In managements opinion, cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity combined with cash
on hand will provide adequate flexibility for funding the Companys working capital obligations for
the next twelve months.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, no shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the
exercise of options issued under the Companys stock option plan. No other shares of common stock
were issued pursuant to the exercise of options issued under the Companys stock option plan.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2008, the Company does not have any Off Balance Sheet Arrangements.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The Company has the following commitments as of June 30, 2008: long term obligations of
certain employment contracts and operating lease obligations. The Company has two operating
leases: one for its corporate headquarters located in New York and the other for its branch office
in New Jersey. The Companys commitments at June 30, 2008 are reflected and further detailed in
the Contractual Obligation table located in Part I, Item 1, Note 8 of this Form 10-Q.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
None.
15
Inflation
The Company has not suffered material adverse affects from inflation in the past. However, a
substantial increase in the inflation rate in the future may adversely affect customers purchasing
decisions, may increase the costs of borrowing or may have an adverse impact on the Companys
margins and overall cost structure.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company has not entered into market risk sensitive transactions required to be disclosed
under this item.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Sal Quadrino, the Companys
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report, has
concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures are effective and designed to ensure that
material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known
to it by others within these entities.
Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Our management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statement for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, the
end of our last fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in the
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Managements assessment included evaluation of the design and operating
effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and
our overall control environment. This assessment is supported by testing and monitoring performed
by both an external independent third party serving as our internal audit organization and our
internal finance department.
Based on our assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of the end of our last fiscal year to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We
reviewed the results of managements assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
In addition, on a quarterly basis we evaluate any changes to our internal control over financial
reporting to determine if material changes occurred.
The Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K did not include an attestation report of
Mercadien P.C., Certified Public Accountants, the Companys registered public accounting firm,
regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to
attestation by the Companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only managements report in
the Companys Annual Report.
Managements Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting shall not be deemed filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Changes in internal controls.
There were no significant changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation that occurred during
its second fiscal quarter of 2008 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.
16
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a detailed discussion of risk factors.
Additional risks or uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company deems to
be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Companys business, financial condition
and/or operating results. The information presented below updates and should be read in
conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
Capital Requirements
The Company may be unable to meet its future capital requirements. The Companys cash
balances were approximately $1.6 million at June 30, 2008 as compared to approximately $3.4 million
at June 30, 2007. Cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was
approximately $1.4 million as a result of continued operating losses since the second quarter of
2007. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2008, the Company reported operating losses of approximately ($1.1) million, ($550,000) and
($1.4) million, respectively. While the Company continues to focus on revenue growth and cost
reductions, including but not limited to outsourcing and off-shoring solutions, to improve its
financial condition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be profitable in future
periods. Additionally, while the Company believes that its current allowance for doubtful
accounts is adequate, there can be no guarantee that all amounts due will ultimately be collected.
The Company has a line of credit up to $1.0 million with Keltic Financial Partners, LP
(Keltic) based on the Companys eligible accounts receivable balances with net availability at
June 30, 2008 of approximately $1.0 million. The line of credit, however, may be inadequate to
satisfy the Companys liquidity demands if the downturn in the Companys business continues, and
the Company may require additional financing in the future in order to continue to implement its
product and services development, marketing and other corporate programs. The Company, however,
may not be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms or at all. Without additional
financing, the Company may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of its product
and services development, marketing and other corporate programs. Even if the Company is able to
obtain additional financing, the terms may contain restrictive covenants that might negatively
affect the Companys shares of common stock, such as limitations on payments of dividends or, in
the case of a debt financing, reduced earnings due to interest expenses. Any further issuance of
equity securities would likely have a dilutive effect on the holders of the Companys shares of
common stock. The Companys business, operating results and financial condition may be materially
harmed if the Company cannot obtain additional financing.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
17
Item 6. Exhibits
(a)
Exhibits
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001, as previously filed with
the SEC on August 10, 2001.
|
|
3.2.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated
August 8, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2001, as previously filed with the SEC on August 14, 2002.
|
|
3.2.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated
November 12, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.2 to the Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on November 14, 2002.
|
|
3.2.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated
January 5, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.3 to the Form 8-K dated January 8,
2004, as previously filed with the SEC on January 8, 2004.
|
|
3.2.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated
January 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.4 to the Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as previously filed with the SEC on March 29, 2007.
|
|
3.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant, dated June 20, 2007, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.3 on Form 8-K, as previously filed with the SEC on June 22, 2007.
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended Quadrino Employment Agreement.
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Salvatore M. Quadrino
|
|
Date: August 14, 2008
|
|
Salvatore M. Quadrino
|
|
|
|
Interim Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
19
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1
|
|
Amended Quadrino Employment Agreement.
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
20
Helios & Matheson North America Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:HMNA)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De May 2024 a Jun 2024
Helios & Matheson North America Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:HMNA)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Jun 2023 a Jun 2024