PART I
Certain matters discussed or incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report of Form 10-KSB including, but not limited
to, those described in Item 6 - Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking statements
that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such
risks and uncertainties include, among others, (1) competitive pressure in
the banking industry increasing significantly; (2) changes in the interest
rate environment reduces margins; (3) general economic conditions, either
nationally or regionally, are less favorable than expected, resulting in, among
other things, a deterioration in credit quality; (4) changes in the
regulatory environment; (5) changes in business conditions and inflation;
and (6) changes in securities markets. Therefore, the information set
forth therein should be carefully considered when evaluating the business
prospects of the Corporation.
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
GENERAL
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. (the Corporation) was
incorporated on August 29, 1995, as a for-profit corporation under the
California Corporate laws for the principal purpose of engaging in banking and
non-banking activities as allowed for a bank holding company. The Corporation owns 100% of Monterey County Bank (the Bank). The Corporations sources of revenues at
this time are dividends on investments, gains on securities transactions and
potential dividends, management fees and tax equalization payments, if any,
from the Bank.
Compliance with environmental laws has not
had a material impact on the operations of the Bank or the Corporation,
although the Bank faces potential
liability or losses if its
borrowers fail to comply with such laws and the Bank acquires contaminated
properties in foreclosure.
BANK SUBSIDIARY
Monterey County Bank, an independent, California chartered commercial
banking corporation was chartered by the State of California on July 30,
1976. The Banks customer base includes
individuals, small and medium sized businesses and a variety of government
agencies with residences, offices or
other relationships located in or about the city and county of Monterey, California,
including the cities of Carmel, Pacific Grove and Salinas. The Bank offers its customers a wide variety
of the normal personal, consumer and commercial services expected of a locally
owned, independently operated bank. The
Banks deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC,
and, as such, the Bank is subject to regulations by that federal agency and to
periodic audits of its operations and documentary compliance by FDIC
personnel. As a state chartered bank,
which is not a member of the Federal Reserve System, it is also regulated and
periodically examined by the California State Department of Financial
Institutions.
The Banks activities are conducted at its
principal offices, 601 Munras Ave., Monterey, California and at its three
branch offices in Carmel-By-The-Sea, Carmel Valley and Pacific Grove,
California and a loan production office in Monterey, California.
At December 31, 2007 the Bank had
total assets,
deposits and shareholders equity of approximately $252,215,000, $167,818,000
and $20,781,000, respectively.
Northern California Bancorp, Inc.
Trust I
On March 27, 2003, Northern California Bancorp, Inc.
Trust I, a newly formed Delaware statutory business trust and a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company (Trust I), issued an aggregate of $3.0 million of
principal amount of Floating Rate TRUPS
â
(Capital Trust Pass-through Securities
of the Trust) (the Trust Preferred Securities).
Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. acted as placement agent in
connection with the offering of the Trust Preferred Securities. The securities issued by Trust I are fully
guaranteed by the Company with respect to distributions and amounts payable
upon liquidation, redemption or repayment.
The entire proceeds to Trust I from the sale of the Trust Preferred
Securities were used by Trust I in order to purchase $3.0 million in principal
amount of the Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures
due 2033 issued by the Company (the Subordinated Debt Securities).
Pursuant to Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) (FIN 46), this trust is not reflected on a
consolidated basis in our financial statements.
The Subordinated Debt Securities bear a variable
interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. The effective rate at December 31, 2007
was 8.49%. Total broker and legal costs
associated with the issuance of $115,000 are being amortized over a 30 year
period.
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II
On November 13,
2003, Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II, a newly formed
Delaware statutory business trust and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
(Trust II), issued an aggregate of $5.0 million of principal amount of Floating
Rate TRUPS
â
(Capital Trust Pass-through Securities
of the Trust) (the Trust Preferred Securities).
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. acted as placement agent in
connection with the offering of the Trust Preferred Securities. The securities issued by Trust II are fully
guaranteed by the Company with respect to distributions and amounts payable
upon liquidation, redemption or repayment.
The entire proceeds to Trust II from the sale of the Trust Preferred
Securities were used by Trust II in order to purchase $5.0 million in principal
amount of the Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures
due 2033 issued by the Company (the Subordinated Debt Securities).
Pursuant to Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) (FIN 46), this trust is not reflected on a
consolidated basis in our financial statements.
The Subordinated Debt Securities bear a variable
interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.85%. The effective rate at December 31, 2007
was 7.76%. Total broker and legal costs associated with the issuance of $54,000
are being amortized over a 30 year period.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2007 the Northern California Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary Monterey County
Bank employed a total of 52 full time equivalent persons.
4
COMPETITION
All phases of the Banks business have been, since inception, and will
continue to be subject to significant competitive forces. Although the Bank has increasing recognition
in its primary service area and Monterey County, it nevertheless has to compete
with other independent local banking institutions, including commercial banks
and savings and loan associations, as well as branch offices of regional
commercial banks, some of which have assets, capital and lending limits
substantially larger than the Bank, as well as wider geographic markets, more
support services and larger media advertising capabilities. The Bank will also compete with respect to
its lending activities, as well as in
attracting demand deposits, with savings banks, savings and loan associations,
insurance companies, regulated small loan companies and credit unions, as well
as securities brokerage offices which can issue commercial paper and other
securities (such as shares in money market funds).
Among the advantages such institutions have
over the Bank are their ability to finance wide ranging advertising campaigns
and to allocate their investment assets to regions of highest yields and
demand. Many institutions offer certain
services, such as trust services and international banking, which the Bank does
not currently offer or plan to offer. By
virtue of their greater total capital, such institutions have substantially
higher lending limits than the Bank (legal lending limits to an individual
customer being limited to a percentage of a banks total capital
accounts). These competitors may
intensify their advertising and marketing activities to counter any efforts by
the Bank to further attract new business as a commercial bank. In addition, as a result of legislation
enacted earlier in the decade, there is increased competition between banks,
savings and loan associations and credit unions for the deposit and loan
business of individuals. These
activities may hinder the Banks ability to capture a significant market share.
To compete with the financial institutions
in its primary service area, the Bank intends to use the flexibility, which its
independent status will permit. Its
activities in this regard include an ability and intention to respond quickly
to changes in the interest rates paid on time and savings deposits and charged
on loans, and to charges imposed on depository accounts, so as to remain competitive
in the market place. It also will
continue to emphasize specialized services for the small business person and
professional and personal contacts by the Banks officers, directors and
employees. If there are customers whose
loan demands exceed the Banks lending limits, the Bank has the ability to
arrange for such loans on a participation basis with other financial
institutions. No assurance can be given,
however, that the Banks efforts to compete with other financial institutions
in its primary service area will be successful.
The Bank provides a range of competitive
retail and commercial banking services.
The deposit services offered include various types of personal and
business checking accounts, savings accounts, money market investment accounts,
certificates of deposit, and retirement accounts. Lending services include consumer loans,
various type of mortgage loans for residential and commercial real estate,
personal lines of credit, home equity loans, real estate construction, accounts
receivable financing, commercial loans to small and medium size businesses and
professionals. The Bank also provides
drive-through facilities, at its Monterey and Carmel offices, and night
depository facilities for customer convenience.
The Bank offers safe deposit box facilities, cashiers checks, travelers
checks, U.S. Savings Bonds, and wire transfers.
The Bank does not provide trust services.
5
While the Bank has the authority to engage
in a wide range of banking activities, and offers most of the types of banking
services of a commercial bank, over the
past three years it has
derived much of its profitability and differentiated itself from its
competitors through (i) commercial and real estate loans guaranteed by the
Small Business Administration (SBA); and (ii) credit card depository
services for merchants.
The
Bank entered into an agreement with Genesis Financial Solutions, a purchaser of
charged-off consumer credit card balances, to market a MasterCard credit card
program. The Bank issued the cards, but
the credit card balances are 100 percent owned by Genesis Financial
Solutions. The program was implemented
in the first quarter of 2005 with the initial card solicitations being mailed
in February 2005 resulting in 14,741 active cards on file at December 31,
2005. The Banks fee revenue from the
program in 2007, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $106,000, $71,000 and
$95,000, respectively. Genesis Financial
Solutions maintains deposits with the Bank equal to the sum of the total
available credit of the portfolio plus the total of five days average
settlement activity for the prior month.
The average deposits maintained during 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $645,000,
$648,000 and $276,000, respectively. It
is anticipated the number of accounts in the portfolio will continue to decline
as no new accounts are being added.
Program revenues in 2008 will approximate $8,000 per month until the
expiration of the agreement in September 2008.
The
Bank entered into an agreement in February 2006 with GC Acquisitions, LLC (GCA), the owner of a portfolio of consumer
credit card contracts and receivables, under which the Bank offered MasterCard®
credit cards to qualifying GCA credit card contract holders. GCA,
through its affiliates, agents and vendors, established new credit card
accounts with the Bank for certain of its existing credit card contract
holders. GCA services the credit card accounts and owns the receivables
generated from the accounts. A total of
approximately 252,000 cards were issued during March and April 2006,
as a result of GCAs purchase of a credit card portfolio. GCA requested and the Bank granted permission
for GCA to transfer a total of approximately 87,000 accounts from the portfolio
to another card issuer. In consideration
for the Bank granting permission to transfer the accounts GCA paid a one time
transfer fee totaling approximately $382,000.
The Banks fee revenue from the program in 2007 and 2006 was
approximately $473,000 and $1,209,000, respectively. Included in both 2007 and 2006 revenues were
one time transfer fees of $204,000 and $382,000, respectively. GCA maintained
average reserve deposits with the Bank of $2,050,000 $7,488,000 at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. The Banks
2008 revenues from the program will be based on monthly minimum fee payments of
approximately $10,000.
The
Bank has entered into agreements with two additional companies, who are
purchasers of charged off debt, to market credit cards to their customer
bases. The Bank anticipates its 2008
revenues from these programs will be derived from the minimum monthly fee
payments due under the agreements.
The
Bank has implemented a pre-paid debit card program. The program is marketed by third parties through
employer payroll programs and check cashing facilities, through Internet
websites for purchasers of the websites products and services. Holders of the pre-paid cards will be able to
have additional funds added to the card balance, make point of sale purchases
and withdraw cash through automated teller machines. The Bank will be issuing the pre-paid cards
and maintaining the funds held on the cards.
The Banks revenues from the program will be in the form of transaction
fees and earnings from investing the funds held on the cards. The fee revenues from the program were
$293,000, $75,000 and $14,000 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
6
The
Bank depends largely on rate differentials.
In general, the difference between the interest rate paid by the Bank on
its deposits and its other borrowings, and the interest rate received by the
Bank on loans extended to its customers and securities held in the Banks
portfolio, comprise the major portion of the Banks earnings. These rates are highly sensitive to many
factors that are beyond the control of the Bank. Accordingly, the earnings and growth of the
Bank are subject to the influence of domestic and foreign economic conditions,
including inflation, recession and unemployment.
Monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and the policies
of regulatory agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board, also impact the Banks business. The Federal Reserve Board implements national
monetary policies (with objectives such as curbing inflation and combating
recession) by its open-market operations in U.S. Government securities, by
adjusting the required level of reserves for financial intermediaries subject
to its reserve requirements and by varying the discount rates applicable to
borrowings by depository institutions.
The actions of the Federal Reserve Board in these areas influence the
growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and also affect interest rates
charged on loans and paid on deposits.
The nature and impact of any future changes in monetary policies cannot
be predicted.
SUPERVISION
AND REGULATION
The
Corporation
Future offers or sales of the stock of the Corporation will be subject
to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, and
qualification under the California Corporate Securities Act of 1968, and
possibly other state Blue Sky laws, (unless an exemption is available), although the Banks common stock is exempt from
such requirements.
On December 29, 1995, after receipt of
appropriate approvals, and/or passage of notice periods without objection, from
the California Superintendent of Banks, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the
shareholders of the Bank, the Corporation acquired the Bank through a reverse
triangular merger (the Merger). As a
result, by operation of law, each outstanding share of common stock of the Bank
prior to the Merger was converted into a share of common stock of the Corporation,
while the Corporation became the sole owner of the newly issued shares of
common stock of the Bank.
The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended, places the Corporation under the supervision of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System (the FRB). The Corporation must generally
obtain the approval of the FRB before acquiring all or substantially all of the
assets of any bank, or ownership or control of any voting securities of any
bank if, after giving effect to such acquisition, the Corporation would own or
control more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank.
A bank holding company is generally
prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect control of more
than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities
unless the FRB, by order or regulation, has found such activities to be so
closely related to banking, managing or controlling banks as to be a proper
incident thereto. In making such determinations, the FRB considers whether the
performance of such activities by a bank holding company would offer advantages
to the public, which outweigh possible adverse effects.
7
The FRBs Regulation Y sets out the
non-banking activities that are permissible for bank holding companies under
the law, subject to the FRBs approval in individual cases. Most of these activities are now permitted
for California banks that are well-capitalized. The Corporation and its subsidiaries will
also be subject to certain restrictions with respect to engaging in the
underwriting, public sale and distribution of securities. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the Act) was
signed by the President and enacted into law on November 12, 1999. The Act does three fundamental things: 1) it
repeals key provisions of the Glass Steagal Act to permit commercial banks to
affiliate with investment banks, 2) it substantially modifies the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956 to permit companies that own commercial banks to engage in
any type of financial activity and 3) it allows subsidiaries of banks to engage
in a broad range of financial activities that are not permitted by banks. Management cannot predict what effect these
changes will have on the Bank or the Corporation.
The Corporation will be required to file
reports with the FRB and provide such additional information as the FRB may
require. The FRB will also have the authority to examine the Corporation and
each of its subsidiaries with the cost thereof to be borne by the Corporation. Under California banking law, the Corporation
and its subsidiaries are also subject to examination by, and may be required to
file reports with, the Superintendent Department of Financial Institutions.
The Corporation and any subsidiari
es which it may
acquire or organize after the reorganization will be deemed affiliates of the
Bank within the meaning of the Federal Reserve Act. Pursuant thereto, loans by the Bank to
affiliates, investments by the Bank in affiliates stock, and taking affiliates
stock by the Bank as collateral for loans to any borrower will be limited to
10% of the Banks capital, in the case of any one affiliate, and will be
limited to 20% of the Banks capital, in the case of all affiliates. Federal and State law place other limitations
on transactions between the Bank and its affiliates designed to ensure that the
Bank receives treatment in such transactions comparable to that available from
unaffiliated third parties.
The
Corporation and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in
arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, sale or lease of
property or furnishing of services. For
example, with certain exceptions, the Bank may not condition an extension of credit
on a customers obtaining other services provided by it, the Corporation or any
other subsidiary, or on a promise from its customer not to obtain other
services from a competitor.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act) was enacted into law on July 30,
2002. The Act was in response to recent
issues in corporate governance and accountability. Key provisions of the Act provide for:
·
Expanded oversight of the accounting
profession by creating a new independent public company oversight board to be
monitored by the SEC.
·
Revised rules on auditor independence to
restrict the nature of non-audit services provided to audit clients and to
require such services to be pre-approved by the audit committee.
·
Improved corporate responsibility through
mandatory listing standards relating to audit committees, certifications of
periodic reports by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
and making issuer interference with an audit a crime.
·
Enhanced financial disclosures, including
periodic reviews for the largest issuers and real time disclosure of material
company information.
·
Enhanced criminal penalties for a broad array
of white-collar crimes and increases in the statute of limitations for
securities fraud lawsuits.
·
Provides for mandated internal control report
and assessment with the annual report and an attestation and a report on such
report by the companys auditor.
8
The
effect of the Act upon corporations is uncertain; however, it is likely that
compliance costs may increase as corporations modify procedures if required to
conform to the provisions of the Act.
The Company does not currently anticipate that compliance with the Act
will have a material effect upon its financial position or results or its operations
or its cash flows.
Subsidiary
Bank
Both federal and state laws provide extensive regulation of the banking
business. State and federal statutes and
regulations apply to many aspects of
the Banks operations, including minimum capital requirements, reserves against
deposits, interest rates payable on deposits, loans, investments, mergers and
acquisitions, borrowings, dividends and locations of branch offices. The
California Superintendent of Banks and the FDIC provide primary supervision,
periodic examination and regulation of the Bank.
The FDIC, through its Bank Insurance Fund
(the BIF) insures the Banks deposits, currently up to a maximum of $100,000
per depositor, except that individual retirement accounts are insured up to a
maximum of $250,000 per depositor. For
this protection, the Bank, like all insured banks, pays a semi-annual statutory
assessment and is subject to the rules and regulations of the FDIC. Although the Bank is not a member of the
Federal Reserve System, certain regulations of the Federal Reserve Board also
apply to its operations.
California law restricts the amount
available for cash dividends by state-chartered banks to the lesser of retained
earnings or the banks net income for its last three fiscal years (less any
distributions to stockholders made during such period). Cash dividends may also be paid in an amount
not exceeding the net income for such banks last preceding fiscal year after
obtaining the prior approval of the Superintendent. The FDIC also has authority to prohibit the
Bank from engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. The FDIC can use this power, under certain
circumstances, to restrict or prohibit a bank from paying dividends.
Federal law imposes restrictions on banks
with regard to transactions with affiliates, including any extensions of credit
to, or the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of, its
affiliates, as well as the purchase of or investments in stock or other
securities thereof, or the taking of such securities as collateral for loans,
and the purchase of assets from affiliates.
These restrictions have the effect of preventing affiliates (such as the
Corporation) from borrowing from the Bank unless the loans are secured by marketable
obligations of designated amounts.
Secured loans and investments by the Bank are limited to 10% of the Banks
capital and surplus (as defined by federal regulations) in the case of any one
affiliate, and 20% thereof in the case of all affiliates. California law also imposes certain restrictions
with respect to transactions involving other controlling persons of the Bank.
From time to tim
e, legislation is enacted
which has the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or
expanding permissible activities or affecting the competitive balance between
banks and other financial intermediaries.
Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations
and taxation of banks, bank holding companies and other financial intermediaries
are frequently made in Congress, in the California legislature and before
various bank regulatory and other professional agencies. The Bank cannot
predict what, if any legislation or regulations will be enacted, or the impact
thereof on its business and profitability.
9
Capital Adequacy Standards
Government agencies have traditionally regulated bank capital through
explicit and implicit guidelines and rules.
State law requires adequate
capital, without objective definition.
Federal law and regulations require minimum levels of risk-based and
so-called Leverage capital.
FDIC guidelines implement the risk-based
capital requirements. The guidelines establish a systematic analytical
framework that makes regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to
differences in risk profiles (using the rough measures set forth therein) among
banking organizations, take certain off-balance sheet items into account in
assessing capital adequacy and minimize disincentives to holding liquid,
low-risk assets. Under these guidelines, assets and credit equivalent amounts
of off-balance sheet items, such as letters of credit and outstanding loan
commitments, are assigned to one of several risk categories, which range from
0% for risk-free assets, such as cash and certain U.S. government securities,
to 100% for relatively high-risk assets, such as loans and investments in fixed
assets, premises and other real estate owned. The aggregate dollar amount of
each category is then multiplied by the risk-weight associated with that
category. The resulting weighted values from each of the risk categories are
then added together to determine the total risk-weighted assets.
A banking organizations risk-based capital
ratios are obtained by dividing its qualifying capital by its total risk
adjusted assets, including dollar equivalents for certain off-balance sheet
assets.
The guidelines require a minimum ratio of
qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%, of which at least 4%
must consist of Tier I capital. Higher
risk-based ratios are required to be considered well capitalized under prompt
corrective action provisions.
A banking organizations qualifying total
capital consists of two components: Tier 1 capital (core capital) and Tier 2
capital (supplementary capital). Tier 1
capital consists primarily of common stock, related surplus and retained
earnings, qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority
interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Trust preferred
securities qualify as Tier 1 capital up to a maximum of 25% of capital. Any additional portion will qualify as Tier 2
capital. Intangibles, such as goodwill,
are generally deducted from Tier 1 capital; however, purchased mortgage
servicing rights and purchased credit card relationships may be included,
subject to certain limitations. At least 50% of the banking organizations
total regulatory capital must consist of Tier 1 capital.
Tier 2 capital may consist of (i) the
allowance for loan and lease losses in an amount up to 1.25% of risk-weighted
assets; (ii) cumulative perpetual preferred stock and long-term preferred
stock and related surplus; (iii) hybrid capital instruments (instruments
with characteristics of both debt and equity), perpetual debt and mandatory
convertible debt securities; and (iv) eligible term subordinated debt and
intermediate-term preferred stock with an original maturity of five years or
more, including related surplus, in an amount up to 50% of Tier 1 capital. The
inclusion of the foregoing elements of Tier 2 capital is subject to certain
requirements and limitations of the federal banking agencies.
10
The FDIC imposes a minimum leverage ratio of
Tier I capital to average total assets of 3% for the highest rated banks, and
4% for all other banks. Institutions
experiencing or anticipating significant growth or those with other than
minimum risk profiles are expected to maintain capital at least 100-200 basis
points above the minimum level.
In addition, the Federal Reserve Board and
the FDIC have issued or proposed rules to take account of interest rate
risk, concentration of credit risk and the risks of nontraditional activities
in calculating risk-based capital.
For capital adequacy purposes, deferred tax
assets that can be realized from taxes paid in prior carry-back years, and from
the future reversal of temporary differences,
are generally
unlimited. However, deferred tax assets
that can only be realized through future taxable earnings, including the
implementation of a tax planning strategy, count toward regulatory capital
purposes only up to the lesser of (i) the amount that can be realized
within one year of the quarter-end report date or (ii) 10% of Tier I
capital. The amount of deferred taxes in
excess of this limit, if any, would be deducted from Tier I capital and total
assets in regulatory capital calculations.
Effective January 17,
1995, the federal banking agencies issued a final rule relating to capital
standards and the risks arising from the concentration of credit and
nontraditional activities. Institutions
which have significant amounts of their assets concentrated in high risk loans
or nontraditional banking activities and who fail to adequately manage these
risks, will be required to set aside capital in excess of the regulatory
minimums. The federal banking agencies
have not imposed any quantitative assessment for determining when these risks
are significant, but have identified these issues as important factors they will
review in assessing an individual banks capital adequacy. Management of the Company does not believe
that the Banks assets and activities, as currently structured, would lead the
FDIC to require additional capital under this rule.
Future changes in regulations or practices
could further reduce the amount of capital recognized for purposes of capital
adequacy. Su
ch a change could affect the
ability of the Bank to grow and could restrict the amount of profits, if any,
available for the payment of dividends.
Prompt Corrective Action and Other
Enforcement Mechanisms
Under Section 38 of the FDIA, as added by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), each federal banking
agency is required to implement a system of prompt corrective action for
institutions which it regulates. The
federal banking agencies have promulgated substantially similar regulations to
implement this system of prompt corrective action. Under
the regulations, an institution shall generally be deemed to be: (i) well
capitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or more, has a
Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or more, has a Tier I
leverage capital ratio of 5.0% or more and is not subject to specified
requirements to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital
measure; (ii) adequately capitalized if it has a total risk-based
capital ratio of 8.0% or more, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 4.0%
or more and a Tier I leverage capital ratio of 4.0% or more (3.0% under
certain circumstances) and does not meet the definition of well capitalized; (iii) undercapitalized
if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier I
risk-based capital ratio that is less than 4.0% or a Tier I leverage
capital ratio that is less than 4.0% (3.0% under certain circumstances); (iv) significantly
undercapitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than
6.0%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio that is less than 3.0% or a
Tier I leverage capital ratio that is less than 3.0%; and (v) critically
undercapitalized if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is
equal to or less than 2.0%.
11
Section 38 of the FDIA and the implementing
regulations also provide that a federal banking agency may, after notice and an
opportunity for a hearing, reclassify a well capitalized institution as
adequately capitalized and may require an adequately capitalized institution or
an undercapitalized institution to comply with supervisory actions as if it
were in the next lower category if the institution is in an unsafe or unsound
condition or engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice. (The FDIC may not, however, reclassify a
significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized.)
An institution generally must file a written
capital restoration plan which meets specified requirements, as well as a
performance guaranty by each company that controls the institution, with the
appropriate federal banking agency within 45 days of the date that the
institution receives notice or is deemed to have notice that it is
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically
undercapitalized. Immediately upon
becoming undercapitalized, an institution shall become subject to the
provisions of Section 38 of the FDIA, which sets forth various mandatory
and discretionary restrictions on its operations.
At December 31, 2007, the Bank met the
te
sts to be categorized as well capitalized under the prompt corrective
action regulations of the FDIC.
Safety and Soundness Standards
Federal law requires the federal banking regulatory agencies to
prescribe, by regulation, standards for all insured depository institutions
relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems and internal audit
systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv) interest
rate risk exposure; (v) asset growth; and (vi) compensation, fees and
benefits. The federal banking agencies
recently adopted final regulations and Interagency Guidelines Prescribing
Standards for Safety and Soundness (Guidelines) to implement safety and
soundness standards required by
the FDIA. The Guidelines set forth the
safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to
identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital
becomes impaired. The agencies also
proposed asset quality and earnings standards which, if adopted in final, would
be added to the Guidelines. Under the
final regulations, if the FDIC determines that the Bank fails to meet any
standard prescribed by the Guidelines, the agency may require the Bank to
submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the
standard, as required by the FDIA. The final
regulations establish deadlines for the submission and review of such safety
and soundness compliance plans.
Premiums for Deposit Insurance
The FDIC adopted regulations implementing a risk-based premium system
required by federal law. Under the regulations
which cover the assessment periods commencing on and after January 1,
1994, insured depository institutions are required to pay insurance premiums
within a range of $.23 cents per $100 of deposits to $.31 cents per $100 of
deposits depending on their risk classification. The FDIC, effective September 30, 1995,
lowered assessments from their rates of $.23 to $.31 per $100 of insured
deposits to rates of $.04 to $.31, depending on the health of the bank, as a
result of the re-capitalization of the BIF.
The FDIC may alter the existing assessment rate structure for deposit insurance and may change
the base assessment rate (currently, 4 to 31 basis points per year) by
rulemaking with notice and comment.
Without notice or comment, the FDIC may increase or decrease the current
rate schedule uniformly by as much as 5 basis points, as deemed necessary to
maintain the target designated reserve ratio 1.25 percent (fund balance to
estimated insured deposits). The insured
deposit rates for 2007 were $.05 to $.43 per $100 of deposits.
12
On
February 8, 2006, the President signed The Federal Deposit Insurance
Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform Act) into law. The Federal Deposit Insurance
Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005, which the President signed into law
on February 15, 2006, contains necessary technical and conforming changes
to implement deposit insurance reform, as well as a number of study and survey
requirements.
The
Reform Act provides for the following changes:
·
Merging the
Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF)
into a new fund, the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). This change was made
effective March 31, 2006.
·
Increasing the
coverage limit for retirement accounts to $250,000 and indexing the coverage
limit for retirement accounts to inflation as with the general deposit
insurance coverage limit. This change was made effective April 1, 2006.
·
Establishing a range of 1.15
percent to 1.50 percent within which the FDIC Board of Directors may set the
Designated Reserve Ratio (DRR).
·
Allowing the
FDIC to manage the pace at which the reserve ratio varies within this range.
1.
If the reserve
ratio falls below 1.15 percentor is expected to within 6 monthsthe FDIC must
adopt a restoration plan that provides that the DIF will return to 1.15 percent
generally within 5 years.
2.
If the reserve
ratio exceeds 1.35 percent, the FDIC must generally dividend to DIF members
half of the amount above the amount necessary to maintain the DIF at 1.35
percent, unless the FDIC Board, considering statutory factors, suspends the
dividends.
3.
If the reserve
ratio exceeds 1.5 percent, the FDIC must generally dividend to DIF members all
amounts above the amount necessary to maintain the DIF at 1.5 percent.
·
Eliminating the
restrictions on premium rates based on the DRR and granting the FDIC Board the
discretion to price deposit insurance according to risk for all insured
institutions regardless of the level of the reserve ratio.
·
Granting a
one-time initial assessment credit (of approximately $4.7 billion) to recognize
institutions past contributions to the fund.
·
The Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005 requires the FDIC to
conduct studies of three issues: (1) further potential changes to the
deposit insurance system, (2) the appropriate deposit base in designating
the reserve ratio, and (3) the Corporations contingent loss reserving
methodology and accounting for losses.
·
The 2005 act
requires the Comptroller General to conduct studies of (1) federal bank
regulators administration of the prompt corrective action program and recent
changes to the FDIC deposit insurance system, and (2) the organizational
structure of the FDIC.
13
The final rule consolidates the existing nine risk categories into
four and names them Risk Categories I, II, III and IV. Risk Category
I replaces the 1A risk category.
Within Risk Category I, the final rule combines supervisory
ratings with other risk measures to differentiate risk. For most institutions,
the final rule combines CAMELS component ratings with financial ratios to
determine an institutions assessment rate. For large institutions that have
long-term debt issuer ratings, the final rule differentiates risk by
combining CAMELS component ratings with these ratings. For large institutions
within Risk Category I, initial assessment rate determinations may be modified
within limits upon review of additional relevant information.
The final rule defines a large institution as an institution that
has $10 billion or more in assets. With certain exceptions, beginning in 2010,
the final rule treats new institutions (those established for less than
five years) in Risk Category I the same, regardless of size, and assesses them
at the maximum rate applicable to Risk Category I institutions.
The final rule sets
actual rates beginning January 1, 2007, as follows:
|
|
Risk Category
|
|
|
|
I*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Maximum
|
|
II
|
|
III
|
|
IV
|
|
Annual Rates (in basis points)
|
|
5
|
|
7
|
|
10
|
|
28
|
|
43
|
|
*
Rates for institutions that do not pay the minimum or maximum rate vary between
these rates.
These rates are three basis
points above the base rate schedule adopted in the final rule:
|
|
Risk Category
|
|
|
|
I*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Maximum
|
|
II
|
|
III
|
|
IV
|
|
Annual Rates (in basis points)
|
|
2
|
|
4
|
|
7
|
|
25
|
|
40
|
|
*
Rates for institutions that do not pay the minimum or maximum rate vary between
these rates.
The final rule continues to allow the FDIC Board to adjust rates
uniformly from one quarter to the next, except that no single adjustment can
exceed three basis points. In addition, cumulative adjustments cannot exceed a
maximum of three basis points higher or lower than the base rates without further
notice-and-comment rulemaking.
The billing for deposit insurance is now quarterly and in the
arrears. Payment for the first quarter
2007 deposit insurance premiums will be collected in June 2007.
The Banks portion of the one-time initial assessment credit is
estimated to be approximately $49,000, which will be used to offset deposit
insurance premiums; the assessment credit cannot be used to offset FICO
premiums.
14
The Financing Corporation
(FICO), established by the Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987, is a
mixed-ownership government corporation whose sole purpose was to function as
the financing vehicle for the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC). Effective December 12, 1991, as provided
by the Resolution Trust Corporation Refinancing, Restructuring and Improvement
Act of 1991, the FICOs ability to issue new debt was terminated. Outstanding FICO bonds, which are 30-year
non-callable bonds with a principal amount of approximately $8.1 billion,
mature in 2017 through 2019.
The
FICO has assessment authority, separate from the FDICs authority to assess
risk-based premiums for deposit insurance, to collect funds from FDIC-insured
institutions sufficient to pay interest on FICO bonds. The FDIC acts as collection agent for the
FICO. The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of
1996 (DIFA) authorized the FICO to asses both Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and
Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) insured deposits, and required the
BIF rate to equal one-fifth the SAIF rate through the year 1999, or until the
insurance funds are merged, whichever occurs first. Thereafter, BIF and SAIF insured deposits
will be assessed at the same rate by FICO.
The
FICO assessment rate is adjusted quarterly to reflect changes in the assessment
basis of the respective funds based on the quarterly Call Report and the Thrift
Financial Report submissions. The FICO
quarterly rates for 2007 were 1.22, 1.22, 1.14 and 1.14. The FICO quarterly rate for the first quarter
of 2008 is 1.14.
Interstate Banking and Branching
On September 29,
1994, the President signed into law the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and
Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the Interstate Act). Under the Interstate Act, beginning one year
after the date of enactment, a bank holding company that is adequately
capitalized and managed may obtain regulatory approval to acquire an existing
bank located in another state without regard to state law. A bank holding company would not be permitted
to make such an acquisition if, upon consummation, it would control (a) more
than 10% of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions in
the United States or (b) 30% or more of the deposits in the state in which
the bank is located. A state may limit
the percentage of total deposits that may be held in that state by any one bank
or bank holding company if application of such limitation does not discriminate
against out-of-state banks. An
out-of-state bank holding company may not acquire a state bank in existence for
less than a minimum length of time that may be prescribed by state law except
that a state may not impose more than a five year existence requirement.
The Interstate Act also
permitted affective June 1, 1997, mergers of insured banks located in
different states and conversion of the branches of the acquired bank into
branches of the resulting bank. Each
state may permit such combinations earlier than June 1, 1997, and may
adopt legislation to prohibit interstate mergers after that date in that state
or in other states by that states banks.
The same concentration limits discussed in the preceding paragraph
apply. The Interstate Act also permits a
national or state bank to establish branches in a state other than its home
state if permitted by the laws of that state, subject to the same requirement
and conditions as for a merger transaction.
The Interstate Act is
likely to increase competition in the Banks market areas especially from
larger financial institutions and their holding companies. It is difficult to asses the impact such
likely increased competition will have on the Bank operations.
15
On October 2, 1995,
the California Interstate Banking and Branching Act of 1995 (the 1995 Act)
became effective. The 1995 Act generally
allows out-of-state banks to enter California by merging with, or purchasing, a
California bank or industrial loan company which is at least five years old. Also, the 1995 Act repeals the California
Interstate (National) Banking Act of 1986, which previously regulated the
acquisition of California banks by out-of-state bank holding companies. In addition, the 1995 Act permits California
state banks, with the approval of the Superintendent of Banks, to establish
agency relationships with FDIC-insured banks and savings associations. Finally, the 1995 Act provides for regulatory
relief, including (i) authorization for the Superintendent to exempt banks
from the requirement of obtaining approval before establishing or relocating a
branch office or place of business, (ii) repeal of the requirement of
directors oaths (Financial Code Section 682), and (iii) repeal of
the aggregate limit on real estate loans (Financial Code Section 1230).
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending
Developments
The Bank is subject to
certain fair lending requirements, reporting obligations involving home
mortgage lending operations and Community Reinvestment Act (the CRA). The CRA generally requires the federal
banking agencies to evaluate the record of financial institutions in meeting
the credit needs of their local community, including low and moderate income
neighborhoods. In addition to substantial
penalties and corrective measures that may be required for a violation of
certain fair lending laws, the federal banking agencies may take compliance
with such laws and CRA into account when regulating and supervising other
activities.
In May, 1995, the federal
banking agencies issued final regulations which change the manner in which they
measure a banks compliance with its CRA obligations. The final regulations adopt a
performance-based evaluation system which bases CRA ratings on an institutions
actual lending service and investment performance rather than the extent to
which the institution conducts needs assessments, documents community outreach
or complies with other procedural requirements.
In March 1994, the Federal Interagency Task Force on Fair Lending
issued a policy statement on discrimination in lending. The policy statement describes the three
methods that federal agencies will use to prove discrimination: overt evidence
of discrimination, evidence of disparate treatment and evidence of disparate
impact. Management of the Bank believes
that the Bank is in substantial compliance with all requirements under these
provisions. Following the Banks most
recent CRA examination, the Banks rating was satisfactory.
Other Regulations and Policies
The federal regulatory agencies
have adopted regulations that implement Section 304 of FDICIA which
requires federal banking agencies to adopt uniform regulations prescribing
standards for real estate lending. Each
insured depository institution must adopt and maintain a comprehensive written
real estate lending policy, developed in conformance with prescribed
guidelines, and each agency has specified loan-to-value limits in guidelines
concerning various categories of real estate loans.
Section 24 of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the FDIA), as amended by the FDICIA, generally
limits the activities and equity investments of FDIC-insured, state-chartered
banks to those that are permissible for national banks. Under regulations dealing with equity investments,
an insured state bank generally may not directly or indirectly acquire or
retain any equity investment of a type, or in an amount, that is not
permissible for a national bank. An
insured state bank is not prohibited from, among other things, (i) acquiring
or retaining a majority interest in a subsidiary, (ii) investing as a
limited partner in a partnership the sole purpose of which is direct or
indirect investment in the acquisition, rehabilitation or new construction of a
qualified housing project, provided that such limited partnership investments
may not exceed 2% of the banks total assets, (iii) acquiring up to 10% of
the voting stock of a company that solely provides or reinsures directors,
trustees and officers liability insurance coverage or bankers blanket bond
group insurance coverage for insured depository institutions, and (iv) acquiring
or retaining the voting shares of a depository institution if certain
requirements are met.
16
FDIC regulations
implementing Section 24 of the FDIA provide that an insured
state-chartered bank may not, directly, or indirectly through a subsidiary,
engage as principal in any activity that is not permissible for a national
bank unless the FDIC has determined that such activities would pose no risk to
the insurance fund of which it is a member and the bank is in compliance with
applicable regulatory capital requirements.
Any insured state-chartered bank directly or indirectly engaged in any
activity that is not permitted for a national bank must cease the impermissible
activity.
Financial Modernization
Act
Effective March 11, 2000, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act eliminated most barriers to affiliations among banks and securities firms,
insurance companies, and other financial service providers, and enabled full
affiliations to occur between such entities.
This new legislation permits bank holding companies to become financial
holding companies and thereby acquire securities firms and insurance companies
and engage in other activities that are financial in nature. A bank holding company may become a financial
holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized under the
prompt corrective action provisions discussed above, is well managed, and has
at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act by filing a
declaration that the bank holding company wishes to become a financial holding
company. No regulatory approval will be
required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a
bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature
or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the
Federal Reserve Board. The Bank has no
current intention of becoming a financial holding company, but may do so at
some point in the future if deemed appropriate in view of opportunities or
circumstances at the time.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act defines financial in
nature to include securities underwriting, dealing and market making;
sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; insurance underwriting and
agencies; merchant banking activities; and activities that the Federal Reserve
Board has determined to be closely related to banking. A national bank (and therefore, a state bank
as well) may also engage, subject to limitations on investment, in activities
that are financial in nature, other than insurance underwriting, insurance
company portfolio investment, real estate development and real estate
investment, through a financial subsidiary of the bank, if the bank is well
capitalized, well managed and has at least a satisfactory Community
Reinvestment Act rating. Subsidiary
banks of a financial holding company or national banks with financial subsidiaries
must continue to be well capitalized and well managed in order to continue to
engage in activities that are financial in nature without regulatory actions or
restrictions, which could include divestiture of the financial in nature
subsidiary or subsidiaries. In addition,
a financial holding company or a bank may not acquire a company that is engaged
in activities that are financial in nature unless each of the subsidiary banks
of the financial holding company or the bank has a Community Reinvestment Act
rating of satisfactory or better.
17
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act also imposes significant
new requirements on financial institutions with respect to the privacy of
customer information, and modifies other existing laws, including those related
to community reinvestment.
USA Patriot Act of 2001
On October 26, 2001, President Bush signed the
USA Patriot Act of 2001. Enacted in
response to the terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington,
D.C. on September 11, 2001, the USA Patriot Act is intended to strengthen
U.S. law enforcements and the intelligence communities ability to work
cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The potential impact of the USA Patriot Act
on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. The USA Patriot Act contains sweeping
anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires various
regulations applicable to financial institutions, including:
·
due diligence requirements for financial institutions
that administer, maintain, or manage private bank accounts or correspondent
accounts for non-U.S. persons;
·
standards for verifying customer identification at
account opening; and
·
rules to promote cooperation among financial
institutions, regulators, and law enforcement entities in identifying parties
that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering.
The Bank implemented the requirements under the USA
Patriot Act during 2001 and 2002. Compliance
with such requirements has all been accomplished with existing staff, so the
financial impact on the Bank has been negligible.
Regulatory Enforcement Powers
Commercial banking
organizations, such as the Bank, may be subject to enforcement actions by the
FDIC and the Superintendent for engaging in unsafe or unsound practices in the
conduct of their businesses or for violations of any law, rule, regulation or
any condition imposed in writing by the agency or any written agreement with
the agency. Enforcement actions may
include the imposition of a conservator or receiver, the issuance of a
cease-and-desist order that can be judicially enforced, the termination of
insurance of deposits, the imposition of civil money penalties, the issuance of
directives to increase capital, the issuance of formal and informal agreements,
the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated
parties and the imposition of restrictions and sanctions under the prompt
corrective action provisions of the FDICIA.
California and Federal Banking Law
The Federal Change in
Bank Control Act of 1978 prohibits a person or group of persons acting in
concert from acquiring control of a bank or holding company unless the
appropriate federal regulatory agency has been given 60 days prior written
notice of such proposed acquisition and, within that time period, has not
issued a notice disapproving the proposed acquisition or extending for up to
another 30 days the period during which such a disapproval may be issued. An
acquisition may be made prior to the expiration of the disapproval period if
the agency issues written notice of its intent not to disapprove the
action. The acquisition of more than 10%
of a class of voting stock of a bank (or holding company) with a class of
securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (such as the Common stock), is generally presumed, subject to
rebuttal to constitute the acquisition of control.
18
Under the California
Financial Code, no person shall, directly or indirectly, acquire control of a
California licensed bank or a bank holding company unless the Superintendent
has approved such acquisition of control.
A person would be deemed to have acquired control of the Corporation
under this state law if such person, directly or indirectly, has the power (i) to
vote 25% or more of the voting power of the Corporation or (ii) to direct
or cause the direction of the management and policies of the Corporation. For purposes of this law, a person who
directly or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more of the Common stock would
be presumed to control the Corporation, subject to rebuttal.
In
addition, any company would be required to obtain the approval of the Federal
Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the BHC Act),
before acquiring 25% (5% in the case of an acquirer that is, or is deemed to
be, a bank holding company) or more of the outstanding Common stock of, or such
lesser number of shares as constitute control over, the Bank or the
Corporation.
The Community
Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA) and the related Regulations of the Comptroller
of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are intended to encourage regulated
financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of their local community
or communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent
with the safe and sound operation of such financial institutions. The CRA and such regulations provide that the
appropriate regulatory authority will assess the records of regulated financial
institutions in satisfying their continuing and affirmative obligations to help
meet the credit needs of their local communities as part of their regulatory
examination of the institution. The
results of such examinations are made public and are taken into account upon
the filing of any application to establish a domestic branch, to merge or to
acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of a bank. In the case of a bank holding company, the
CRA performance record of the subsidiary bank(s) involved in the
transaction is reviewed in connection with the filing of an application to acquire
ownership or control of shares or assets of a bank or to merge with any other
bank holding company. An unsatisfactory
record can substantially delay or block the transaction.
RESEARCH
Neither the Corporation
nor the Bank makes any material expenditures for research and development.
DEPENDENCE
UPON A SINGLE CUSTOMER
Neither the Corporation
nor the Bank is dependent upon a single customer or very few customers. The Banks business is concentrated in, and
largely dependent upon the strength of the local economy in, the Monterey
Peninsula area of Northern California.
The local economy is affected by both national trends and by local
factors. Tourism and the activities at the
former Fort Ord military base are among the major contributors to the local
economy.
19
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The main office of the
Bank, which also serves as the principal office of the Corporation, is located
at 601 Munras Ave., Monterey, California 93940.
This facility contains a lobby, executive and customer service offices,
teller stations, safe deposit boxes and related non-vault area, vault,
operations area, lounge and miscellaneous areas. A drive-through facility and adequate paved parking
are also on the premises. Both the land
and all improvements thereto are owned by the Bank
.
The Bank also owns a building located at 556
Abrego St., Monterey, CA which houses a loan production office and additional
office space. The Bank currently
operates three branch offices in Carmel-By-The-Sea, Carmel Valley and Pacific
Grove, California, all within approximately 10 miles from the Banks main
office. The Bank has received regulatory
approval to establish a full service branch office in Salinas, California. The land and improvements dedicated to the
Carmel-By-The-Sea, Carmel Valley, Pacific Grove and Salinas branch offices are
leased. See Footnote 12 to the
Corporations financial statements included herewith.
Generally, neither the
Bank nor the Corporation may invest in equity interests in real estate, except
for the direct use of the Bank or the Corporation in their business. The Bank makes and/or purchases loans secured
by real estate, subject to normal banking practices, its own policies and the
restrictions described above under Item 1.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There
are no known pending legal proceedings to which the Corporation or its
subsidiary is a party, or to which any of their properties is subject, other
than ordinary litigation arising in the normal course of business activities.
Although the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to such proceedings
cannot be determined, in the opinion of management, any such liability will not
have a material effect on the consolidated financial position of the Corporation
and its subsidiary.
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted
to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE CORPORATIONS COMMON STOCK
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The
Corporations stock, symbol NRLB is traded on the OTCBB (over-the-counter
bulletin board)
a
quotation service for securities not listed or traded on NASDAQ or a national
securities exchange.
The
Corporation also has knowledge of a limited number of transactions conducted
between individual shareholders.
The
Corporation currently has one company which makes a market for its common stock
,
Howe Barnes Hoeffer &
Arnett.
At
December 31, 2007 there were 530
record holders of common stock of the Company. This
does not reflect the number of persons or entities who hold their stock in
nominee or street name through various brokerage firms.
20
The Corporation repurchased 3,795 shares of common stock at $4.00 per
share in 2005; no shares were repurchased in 2007 or 2006.
The
following table sets forth, according to information known to the Corporation,
the price paid per share in, and volume of, transactions in the Corporations
stock during the quarters ended March 31, 2005 to December 31, 2007.
|
Quarter/Year
|
|
Price
|
|
Volume
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st quarter of 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd quarter of 2005
|
|
3.00-6.75
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
3rd quarter of 2005
|
|
4.00-5.35
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
4th quarter of 2005
|
|
4.00-8.15
|
|
8,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st quarter of 2006
|
|
7.70-10.70
|
|
13,941
|
|
|
2nd quarter of 2006
|
|
8.00-12.15
|
|
902
|
|
|
3rd quarter of 2006
|
|
8.00-13.05
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
4th quarter of 2006
|
|
8.00-13.25
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st quarter of 2007
|
|
12.00-17.00
|
|
42,225
|
|
|
2nd quarter of 2007
|
|
17.00-18.50
|
|
25,738
|
|
|
3rd quarter of 2007
|
|
16.00-18.35
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
4th quarter of 2007
|
|
11.00-16.05
|
|
92,520
|
|
(1)
For the period
presented, the information indicated might not include information on shares
which may have been traded directly by shareholders or through dealers.
The
principal source of cash flow of the Corporation, including cash flow to pay
dividends on its stock or principal and interest on debt, is interest and
dividends on investments and tax benefit payments and dividends from the Bank. There are statutory and regulatory
limitations on the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Corporation, as well
as by the Corporation to its shareholders.
If
in the opinion of the applicable federal and/or state regulatory authority, a
depository institution or holding company is engaged in or is about to engage
in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition
of the depository institution or holding company, could include the payment of
dividends), such authority may require, after notice and hearing (except in the
case of an emergency proceeding where there is in no notice or hearing), that
such institution or holding company cease and desist from such practice. Moreover, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC
have issued policy statements which provide that bank holding companies and
insured depository institutions generally should only pay dividends out of
current operating earnings.
Under
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA),
an FDIC insured depository institution may not pay any dividend once it is
undercapitalized or if payment would cause it to become undercapitalized.
21
The
Banks payment of dividends, as a California chartered commercial banking
corporation, is regulated by the California Financial Code. Under the California Financial Code, funds
available for cash dividend payments by the Bank are restricted to the lessor
of: (i) retained earnings; or (ii) the Banks net income for its last
three fiscal years (less any distributions to the stockholders made during such
period). As of December 31, 2007
the Bank had $13,050,000 in retained earnings.
The Banks net income for the last three fiscal years less distributions
to stockholders was $8,160,000.
In
December 2007, 2006 and 2005 the Corporation paid cash dividends to
shareholders of $0.25, $0.35 and $0.20 per share, respectively. The Bank paid cash dividends totaling
$800,000 and $625,000 to the Corporation during 2007 and 2006, respectively; no
dividends were paid in 2005.
ITEM 6.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Statements Regarding
Forward-Looking Information
Except
for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed or
incorporated by reference in this report contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. When used in this report, or in the documents incorporated
by reference herein, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, may, intend,
expect, and similar expressions identify certain of such forward-looking statements.
Actual results of Monterey County Bank could differ materially from such
forward-looking statements contained herein. Factors that could cause
future results to vary from current expectations include, but are not limited
to, the following: changes in economic conditions (both generally and more
specifically in the markets in which the Bank operates); changes in interest
rates, deposit flows, loan demand, real estate values and competition; changes
in accounting principles, policies or guidelines and in government legislation
and regulation (which change from time to time and over which the Bank has no
control); other factors affecting the Banks operations, markets, products and
services; and other risks detailed in this Form 10-KSB and in the Banks
other reports filed with the Comptroller of the Currency pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which reflect managements analysis only as of the date hereof. The Bank
undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date thereof.
OVERVIEW
The
following discussion reviews and analyzes the operating results and financial
condition of the Corporation, focusing on the Bank. It should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the other financial data presented elsewhere herein.
Net
income for each of the last three years was $1,929,000 in 2007, $3,837,000 in
2006, and $1,929,000 in 2005. The
primary net income per share for each of the last three years was $1.08, $2.31,
and $1.20 respectively. The diluted net
income per share for the same time periods was $1.03, $2.09 and $1.00,
respectively. Return on average
shareholders equity was 14.09%, 34.94% and 24.15% in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Return on average assets
was 0.91%, 2.24%, and 1.24% in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The
decrease in earnings in 2007 was due to decreases of $79,000 in net interest
income after provision for loan losses, $2,841,000 in non-interest income and
$1,390,000 in income tax expense; while non-interest expense increased
$378,000.
The
increase in earnings in 2006 was due to increases of $1,284,000 in net interest
income after provision for loan losses, $2,815,000 in non-interest income,
$814,000 in non-interest expense and $1,377,000 in income tax expense.
The
increase in earnings in 2005 was due to increases of $2,135,000 in net interest
income after provision for loan losses, $135,000 in non-interest income,
$697,000 in non-interest expense and $709,000 in income tax expense.
22
The following table provides a summary of the consolidated income
statement, balance sheet, and selected ratios for the last five years. A more detailed analysis of each component of
net income is included under the appropriate captions, which follows.
|
|
As of and for the years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
Summary of Operating Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
16,941
|
|
$
|
13,760
|
|
$
|
10,691
|
|
$
|
7,355
|
|
$
|
5,569
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
8,002
|
|
5,197
|
|
3,672
|
|
2,435
|
|
1,920
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
8,938
|
|
8,563
|
|
7,019
|
|
4,920
|
|
3,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for possible loan losses
|
|
865
|
|
410
|
|
150
|
|
185
|
|
155
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
8,074
|
|
8,153
|
|
6,869
|
|
4,735
|
|
3,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
4,336
|
|
7,177
|
|
4,362
|
|
4,227
|
|
2,403
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
9,005
|
|
8,627
|
|
7,813
|
|
7,116
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
3,405
|
|
6,703
|
|
3,418
|
|
1,846
|
|
1,498
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
1,476
|
|
2,866
|
|
1,489
|
|
781
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
$
|
3,837
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
$
|
840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income - Primary (1)
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
Net income - Diluted (2)
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Book value, end of period
|
|
7.82
|
|
7.20
|
|
5.55
|
|
4.55
|
|
4.09
|
|
Avg shares outstanding (3)
|
|
1,785,812
|
|
1,658,675
|
|
1,614,196
|
|
1,576,589
|
|
1,528,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income (4)
|
|
$
|
168,748
|
|
$
|
130,050
|
|
$
|
107,300
|
|
$
|
95,036
|
|
$
|
76,908
|
|
Total assets
|
|
253,865
|
|
190,570
|
|
162,645
|
|
134,039
|
|
107,872
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
167,333
|
|
131,628
|
|
118,120
|
|
97,263
|
|
78,132
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
14,434
|
|
12,402
|
|
8,931
|
|
7,321
|
|
6,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios (4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (5)
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
2.24
|
%
|
1.24
|
%
|
0.88
|
%
|
0.88
|
%
|
Return on average stockholders equity (5)
|
|
14.09
|
%
|
34.94
|
%
|
24.15
|
%
|
15.35
|
%
|
13.84
|
%
|
Net interest spread
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
4.82
|
%
|
4.63
|
%
|
4.02
|
%
|
3.92
|
%
|
Net yield on interest earning assets (5)
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
5.58
|
%
|
5.09
|
%
|
4.47
|
%
|
4.30
|
%
|
Avg. shareholders equity to average assets (5)
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
6.40
|
%
|
5.15
|
%
|
5.75
|
%
|
6.35
|
%
|
Risked-Based capital ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1
|
|
9.23
|
%
|
9.50
|
%
|
9.50
|
%
|
8.22
|
%
|
9.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
12.63
|
%
|
14.90
|
%
|
14.90
|
%
|
14.83
|
%
|
17.30
|
%
|
Total loans to total deposits at end of period (4)
|
|
100.85
|
%
|
98.80
|
%
|
90.84
|
%
|
97.71
|
%
|
98.43
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of
period (4)
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
1.07
|
%
|
1.02
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans at end of period
(4)
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
0.12
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.04
|
%
|
0.04
|
%
|
Net charge-offs to average loans (4)
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
0.09
|
%
|
0.01
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.03
|
%
|
23
(1)
Basic
earnings per share amounts were computed on the basis of the weighted average
number of shares of common stock during the year. The weighted average number of shares used
for this computation was 1,785,812 for 2007, 1,658,675 for 2006, 1,614,196 for
2005, 1,576,589 for 2004 and 1,528,268 for 2003.
(2)
Fully
diluted earnings per share amounts were computed on the basis of the weighted
average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents
outstanding during the year. Common
stock equivalents include employee stock options. The weighted average number of shares used
for this computation was 1,881,004, 1,831,892, 1,923,532, 1,919,512 and
1,796,859 in 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
(3) Weighted average common shares.
(4) Includes loans being held for sale.
(5)
Averages are of daily balances.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make a number of judgments,
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, income and expenses in the Banks financial statements and
accompanying notes. Management believes that the judgments, estimates and
assumptions used in preparation of the Banks financial statements are
appropriate given the factual circumstances as of December 31, 2007.
Various
elements of the Banks accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently
subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective
assessments. Critical accounting policies are those that involve the most
complex and subjective decisions and assessments and have the greatest
potential impact of the Banks results of operation. In particular,
management has identified one accounting policy that, due to judgments,
estimates and assumptions inherent in this policy, and the sensitivity of the
Banks financial statements to those judgments, estimates and assumptions, are
critical to an understanding of the Banks financial statements. This
policy relates to the methodology that determines the allowance for loan and
lease losses.
24
Management has discussed the
development and selection of this critical accounting policy with the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors. Although Management believes the
level of the allowance at December 31, 2007 is adequate to absorb losses
inherent in the loan portfolio, a decline in the regional economy may result in
increasing losses that cannot reasonably be predicted at this time.
For further information regarding the allowance for loan losses see Provision
and Allowance for Loan Losses, and Note 6 to the Banks audited financial
statements included elsewhere herein.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 1 to the Financial Statements Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies for discussion of the recently issued
accounting standards.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income, the difference between (a) interest
and fees earned on interest-earning assets and (b) interest paid on
interest-bearing liabilities, is the most significant component of the Banks
earnings. Changes in net interest income
from period to period result from increases or decreases in the average
balances of interest earning assets portfolio, the availability of particular
sources of funds and changes in prevailing interest rates.
The
following table summarizes the Corporations net interest income.
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
From Prior Year
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2007/2006
|
|
2006/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amt
|
|
%
|
|
Amt
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
16,941
|
|
$
|
13,760
|
|
$
|
10,691
|
|
$
|
3,181
|
|
23.1
|
|
$
|
3,069
|
|
28.7
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
8,002
|
|
5,197
|
|
3,672
|
|
2,805
|
|
54.0
|
|
1,525
|
|
41.6
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
$
|
8,939
|
|
$
|
8,563
|
|
$
|
7,019
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
4.4
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
22.0
|
|
Net
interest income increased $376,000 or 4.4% from 2006 to 2007. Average interest bearing assets increased
23.71%, while the average rate earned decreased 8 basis points, resulting in an
increase of $3,181,000 in total interest income. Interest expense increased $2,805,000 the
result of a 32.02% increase in average interest bearing liabilities, while the
average rate paid increased 68 basis points.
Net
interest income increased $1,544,000 or 22.0% from 2005 to 2006. Average interest bearing assets increased
11.30%, while the average rate earned increased 120 basis points, resulting in
an increase of $3,069,000 in total interest income. Interest expense increased $1,525,000 the
result of a 6.56% increase in average interest bearing liabilities, while the
average rate paid increased 100 basis points.
The following table shows the components of net
interest income, setting forth, for each of the three years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 (i) average assets, liabilities and investments, (ii) interest
income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on
interest-bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on
interest-earning assets and average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities,
(iv) the net interest spread (i.e., the average yield earned on
interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities) and (v) the net interest yield on average interest-earning
assets (i.e., net interest income divided by average interest-earning
assets). Yields are computed on a
tax-equivalent basis, resulting in adjustments to interest earned on
non-taxable securities of $330,000, $149,000 and $138,000 in 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. Non-accrual loans
and overdrafts are included in average loan balances. Average loans are presented net of unearned
income.
25
DISTRIBUTION, RATE AND YIELD
ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME:
The following table shows
the consolidated average balances of earning assets, and interest-bearing
liabilities; the amount of interest income and interest expense; the average
yield or rate for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities; and the net interest income and the net interest spread for the
periods indicated:
|
|
As of
and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Int
|
|
Avg
|
|
|
|
Int
|
|
Avg
|
|
|
|
Int
|
|
Avg
|
|
|
|
Avg
|
|
Earn
|
|
%
|
|
Avg
|
|
Earn
|
|
%
|
|
Avg
|
|
Earn
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Bal
|
|
Paid
|
|
Rate
|
|
Bal
|
|
Paid
|
|
Rate
|
|
Bal
|
|
Paid
|
|
Rate
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
146,944
|
|
$
|
14,442
|
|
9.83
|
%
|
$
|
118,699
|
|
$
|
11,954
|
|
10.07
|
%
|
$
|
108,963
|
|
$
|
9,561
|
|
8.77
|
%
|
Time deposits -
in other banks
|
|
1,359
|
|
66
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
1,000
|
|
50
|
|
4.97
|
%
|
1,000
|
|
29
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
Invest securities
- taxable
|
|
28,777
|
|
1,627
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
15,145
|
|
730
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
13,237
|
|
441
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
Invest securities
- nontaxable
|
|
7,260
|
|
477
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
7,019
|
|
480
|
|
6.83
|
%
|
7,026
|
|
445
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
9,401
|
|
476
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
14,745
|
|
721
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
10,481
|
|
352
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
Total
interest-earning assets
|
|
193,741
|
|
17,088
|
|
8.82
|
%
|
156,607
|
|
13,933
|
|
8.90
|
%
|
140,707
|
|
10,828
|
|
7.70
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
credit losses
|
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(1,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from
banks
|
|
6,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and
equipment
|
|
4,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
receivable
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
7,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average
assets
|
|
$
|
212,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
171,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
156,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
demand
|
|
$
|
14,564
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
$
|
13,243
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
$
|
12,584
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
Money market
savings
|
|
1,732
|
|
13
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
3,589
|
|
27
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
4,818
|
|
32
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
4,759
|
|
49
|
|
1.03
|
%
|
7,355
|
|
74
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
7,476
|
|
80
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
Time deposits
>$100M
|
|
46,609
|
|
2,405
|
|
5.16
|
%
|
32,372
|
|
1,479
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
29,908
|
|
990
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
Time deposits
<$100M
|
|
50,814
|
|
2,590
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
33,174
|
|
1,370
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
31,981
|
|
971
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
Other Borrowing
|
|
50,017
|
|
2,911
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
37,894
|
|
2,207
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
32,998
|
|
1,567
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
168,495
|
|
8,005
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
127,626
|
|
5,198
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
119,765
|
|
3,672
|
|
3.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
checking
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
payable
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
3,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
198,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
shareholders equity
|
|
13,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average
liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
212,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
171,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
156,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
as a percentage of average earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
Net yield on
interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
5.09
|
%
|
Net interest
spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
26
The
following table shows a rate and volume analysis for changes in interest
income, interest expense, and net interest income for the periods indicated.
|
|
Increase (decrease) in the twelve months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 compared with December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
2,844
|
|
$
|
(356
|
)
|
$
|
2,488
|
|
Time deposits - in other banks
|
|
18
|
|
(1
|
)
|
17
|
|
Invest securities - taxable
|
|
657
|
|
241
|
|
898
|
|
Invest securities - nontaxable
|
|
16
|
|
(19
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
(261
|
)
|
16
|
|
(245
|
)
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
3,274
|
|
(119
|
)
|
3,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
4
|
|
(9
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
Money market savings
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Savings deposits
|
|
(26
|
)
|
1
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Time deposits >$100M
|
|
650
|
|
276
|
|
926
|
|
Time deposits <$100M
|
|
729
|
|
492
|
|
1,221
|
|
Other borrowing
|
|
707
|
|
(3
|
)
|
704
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
2,050
|
|
757
|
|
2,807
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net interest income
|
|
$
|
1,224
|
|
$
|
(876
|
)
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in the twelve months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006 compared with December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
|
Increase in interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
$
|
2,392
|
|
Time deposits - in other banks
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
20
|
|
Invest securities - taxable
|
|
63
|
|
225
|
|
288
|
|
Invest securities - nontaxable
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
35
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
145
|
|
225
|
|
370
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
1,062
|
|
2,043
|
|
3,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
2
|
|
7
|
|
9
|
|
Money market savings
|
|
(8
|
)
|
3
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Savings deposits
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
Time deposits >$100M
|
|
82
|
|
407
|
|
489
|
|
Time deposits <$100M
|
|
36
|
|
363
|
|
399
|
|
Other borrowing
|
|
232
|
|
408
|
|
640
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
343
|
|
1,183
|
|
1,526
|
|
Increase in net interest income
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
$
|
860
|
|
$
|
1,579
|
|
27
Provision and Allowance for Loan
Losses
The provision for loan losses is an expense charged
against operating income and added to the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses represents
amounts which have been set aside for the specific purpose of absorbing losses
which may occur in the Banks loan portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses reflects managements
ongoing evaluation of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio both generally
and with respect to specific loans, the state of the economy, and the level of
net loan losses experienced in the past.
Management and the Board of Directors review the results of the State
Banking Department and FDIC examinations, independent accountants
observations, and the Banks internal review as additional indicators to
determine if the amount in the allowance for loan losses is adequate to protect
against estimated future losses. It is
the Banks current practice, which could change in accordance with the factors
mentioned above, to maintain an allowance which is at least equal to the sum of
the following percentage of loan balances by loan category. Additionally, specific loss allocations are
made for classified loans.
Loan Category
|
|
Reserve %
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified Loans:
|
|
|
|
Loans classified loss
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Loans classified doubtful
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
Loans classified substandard
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
Secured
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Non Real Estate
Secured
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Unclassified Loans:
|
|
|
|
Real Estate - Loan to value 80% or less
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
Real Estate - Loan to value over 80%
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
Real Estate - Construction
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
Loans to Individuals
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
Commercial
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
SBA Loans Unguaranteed portion
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
Unfunded Loan Commitments
|
|
.10
|
%
|
Concentration Risk Factor Real Estate
|
|
.50
|
%
|
Economic Risk Factor
|
|
.25
|
%
|
SBA Loans - Guaranteed portion
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Cash Secured Loans
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Although no assurance can be given that actual losses
will not exceed the amount provided for in the allowance, Management believes
that the allowance is adequate to provide for all estimated credit losses in light
of all known relevant factors. At the
end of 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Banks allowance stood at 1.19%, 1.07%, and
1.02% of gross loans, respectively.
Provisions were made to the allowance for loan losses in 2007, 2006 and
2005 of $865,000, $410,000, and $150,000, respectively. Loans charged off in 2007, 2006 and 2005
totaled $250,000, $109,000 and $14,000, respectively. Recoveries for these same periods were
$4,000, $7,000, and $2,000, respectively.
28
The Banks non-performing (delinquent 90 days or more
and on non-accrual) loans as a percentage of total loans were 2.01 percent,
0.12 percent, and 0.00 percent as of the end of 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The significant increase
in non-accrual loans consisted of a single $3,200,000 real estate loan
participation purchased. The foreclosure
process has been initiated with a foreclosure sale anticipated in April. We do not at this time anticipate any
material loss due to expressions of interest by two entities in purchasing the
property.
Non-Interest Income
The following table presents a summary of the Banks
non-interest income:
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
Gain on sale of Pacific Coast Bankers Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
Other service charges, commissions and fees
|
|
3,222
|
|
4,627
|
|
2,807
|
|
Income from sales and servicing of SBA loans
|
|
480
|
|
690
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-interest income
|
|
$
|
4,336
|
|
$
|
7,177
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
Total non-interest income decreased $2,841,000 or
39.58% in 2007 when compared with 2006.
The decrease resulted from the gain on sale of the Banks investment in
Pacific Coast Bankers Bank of $1,313,000 reported in 2006, decreases in other
service charges, commissions and fees of $1,405,000, and $210,000 in income
from sales and servicing of Small Business Administration Loans; partially
offset by an increase in service charges on deposit accounts of $87,000. The decrease in other service charges,
commissions and fees was due primarily to a $686,000 in losses on trading
assets compared with a gain of $283,000 in 2006, and decreases of $624,000 in
fee income from credit card programs, $191,000 in merchant discount fees and
commercial banking origination fees decreased $104,000, while stored value card
programs increased $218,000.
Total non-interest income increased $2,815,000 or
64.84% in 2006 when compared with 2005.
The increase resulted from the gain on sale of the Banks investment in
Pacific Coast Bankers Bank of $1,313,000, an increase in income from other
service charges, commissions and fees of $1,820,000, and decreases of $302,000
in income from sales and servicing of Small Business Administration Loans and $16,000
in service charges on deposit accounts.
The increase in other service charges, commissions and fees was due
primarily to a $50,000 mark to market gain on trading assets compared with a
$427,000 mark to market loss in 2005, and increases of $1,100,000 in fee income
from credit card programs, $272,000 in merchant discount fees and $29,800 from
stored value card programs, while commercial banking origination fees decreased
$287,000.
Total non-interest income increased $135,000 or 3.20%
in 2005 when compared with 2004. Income
from sales and servicing of SBA loans increased $275,000 and service charges on
deposit accounts increased $47,000; while other income decreased $187,000. The decrease in other income was due
primarily to a mark to market loss of $427,000 in trading asset activities;
partially offset by increases of $102,000 in credit card program fees and
$138,000 in commercial banking origination fees.
29
The sale of Small Business Administration (SBA)
guaranteed loans is a significant contributor to the Banks income. SBA guaranteed loans yield up to 3 3/4% over
the New York prime rate, and the guaranteed portions can be sold at premiums
which vary with market conditions. SBA
loans are guaranteed by the full faith of the United States Government up to 85
percent of the principal amount. The
guaranteed portion has risks comparable for an investor to a U. S. Government
security and can usually be sold in the secondary financial market, either at a
premium or at a yield which allows the Bank to maintain a significant spread
for itself.
There can be no assurance that the gains on sale will
continue at, or above, the levels realized in the past three years. The Small Business Administration has
recently increased the guarantee fees borrowers must pay. Increasing competition among lenders for
qualified SBA borrowers makes it difficult for the Bank to continually expand
its program in this area, and may limit the level of premium that can be earned
with regard thereto.
The following table presents a summary of the
activity in SBA loans for the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA loans authorized
|
|
$
|
3,065
|
|
$
|
3,645
|
|
$
|
6,274
|
|
SBA loans sold
|
|
$
|
1,933
|
|
$
|
4,428
|
|
$
|
7,945
|
|
Summary of Income from sales and Servicing of SBA
Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from premium
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
$
|
665
|
|
Income from servicing
|
|
333
|
|
340
|
|
326
|
|
Total income from sales and servicing of SBA loans
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents a summary of the Banks
other non-interest expense:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
$
|
4,049
|
|
$
|
3,854
|
|
$
|
3,282
|
|
Occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
866
|
|
790
|
|
665
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
165
|
|
149
|
|
141
|
|
Data processing
|
|
361
|
|
322
|
|
356
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
3,564
|
|
3,512
|
|
3,369
|
|
Total other
expenses
|
|
$
|
9,005
|
|
$
|
8,627
|
|
$
|
7,813
|
|
30
Salary and benefits expense
increased $195,000 in 2007 as a result the addition of a Loan Processor, a full
years salary for a Marketing Officer hired in November 2006 and merit
increases. Salary and benefits expense
increased $572,000 in 2006 as a result the addition of a Marketing Officer,
Business Development Officer and a Credit Analyst, increased commission paid
due to increased credit card and stored value card program revenues, and merit
increases and bonus payments. Salary and
benefits expense increased $278,000 in 2005 as a result merit increases and
bonus payments.
Occupancy and equipment expenses
increased $76,000 in 2007, primarily due to increases of $17,000 in
depreciation expense, $11,000 in premises rent, $12,000 merchant terminal
expense, repairs and maintenance $11,000 and $12,000 in storage facilities
rent; while sublease rental income decreased $5,000. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased
$125,000 in 2006, primarily due to increases of net merchant terminal expense
$40,000, $16,000 in depreciation expense, $11,000 in premises rent and $6,000
in property taxes; while sublease rental income decreased $45,000. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased
$68,000 in 2005, primarily due to increases of $48,000 in depreciation expense,
$18,000 in property taxes, $11,000 in premises rent, $10,000 in premises other
expense and $9,000 in janitorial expense; while net merchant terminal decreased
$31,000.
Data processing expense
increased $39,000 in 2007, the result of offering new services to customers and
growth in the numbers of customer accounts.
Data processing expense decreased $34,000 in 2006, the result of
continued efforts to implement more cost effective programs. Data processing expense decreased $8,000 in
2005, the result of renegotiation of the data services contract during the
fourth quarter of 2004.
In 2007, professional fees
increased $16,000 due to increased legal fees.
In 2006, professional fees increased $8,000 due to increased legal
fees. In 2005, professional fees
increased $27,000 due to accounting/audit fees increasing $22,000 while legal
fees increased $5,000.
Other general and administrative
expense for 2007 totaled $3,564,000 compared with $3,512,000 for 2006, an
increase of $52,000. The Bank
established a reserve of $110,000 for its liability associated with the
settlement by VISA of litigation brought by American Express and Discover. Significant changes occurred in the following
categories with increases in director fees of $72,000, business development of
$47,000, stationary/supplies of $25,000 and entertainment and meals of $16,000;
while decreases occurred in merchant processing expense of $126,000,
advertising of $60,000, donations $52,000, operational losses of $51,000 and
travel $15,000. Additionally no
provision for debt securities losses was made in 2007 compared with a credit of
$110,000 in 2006.
Other general and administrative
expense 2006 totaled $3,512,000 compared with $3,369,000 for 2005, an increase
of $143,000. Significant changes
occurred in the following categories with increases in merchant processing
expense of $104,000, advertising of $83,000, operational losses of $62,000,
business development of $61,000, stationary/supplies of $42,000, loan expense
of $36,000, travel expense of $23,000, bank fees of $21,000, dues and
memberships of $13,000, and collection expense of $10,000; while decreases
occurred in provision for debt securities losses of $229,000, provision for
loss unfunded loan commitments of $71,000, director fees of $13,000, and meals
of $10,000.
31
Income Taxes
In 2007, the Banks provision
for federal and state income taxes was $1,476,000, while the provision was
$2,866,000 and $1,489,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively. This represents 43.35% of income before taxes
in 2007, 42.76% in 2006 and 43.57% in 2005.
The decrease in the tax provision from 2006 to 2007 was due to a $591,000
provision related to the gain on sale of the Banks investment in Pacific Coast
Bankers Bank in 2006 and other decreased income. The increase in the tax provision from 2005
to 2006 was due to a $591,000 provision related to the gain on sale of the Banks
investment in Pacific Coast Bankers Bank and increased income.
The amount of the tax provision is determined by
applying the Banks statutory income tax rates to pre-tax book income, adjusted
for permanent differences between pre-tax book income and actual taxable
income. Such permanent differences
include but are not limited to tax-exempt interest income, increases in the
cash surrender value of life insurance, and certain other expenses that are not
allowed as tax deductions.
LOANS
Loans, the largest component of
earning assets, represented 75.85% of average earning assets, and 69.11% of
average total assets during 2007, compared with 75.79% and 69.17%, respectively
during 2006. In 2007, average loans
increased 23.80% from $118,699,000 in 2006 to $146,944,000. Average real estate loans increased
$16,590,000 or 20.69%, average construction loans increased $9,117,000 or
75.89%, average commercial loans increased $2,687,000 or 10.48%; while average
installment loans decreased $149,000 or 17.68%.
Loans represented 75.79% of
average earning assets, and 69.17% of average total assets during 2006,
compared with 77.44% and 69.81%, respectively during 2005. In 2006, average loans increased 8.94% from
$108,963,000 in 2005 to $118,699,000.
Average real estate loans increased $10,893,000 or 15.72%, average
construction loans increased $2,063,000 or 20.73% while average commercial
loans decreased $3,210,100 or 11.12%, and average installment loans decreased
$9,000 or 1.06%.
Loan policies and procedures
provide the overall direction to the administration of the loan portfolio. The Banks loan underwriting process is
intended to encourage sound and consistent credit decisions are made. Emphasis is placed upon credit quality, the
borrowers ability to repay through cash flow, secondary and (occasionally
tertiary) repayment sources, and the value of collateral.
The Banks commercial and
industrial loans are generally made for the purpose of providing working
capital, financing the purchase of equipment or inventory, and other business
purposes. Such loans generally have maturities ranging from one year to several
years. Short-term business loans are
generally intended to finance current transactions and typically provide for
monthly interest payments with principal being payable at maturity or at 90-day
intervals. Term loans (usually for a term of two to five years) normally
provide for monthly installments of principal and interest. The Bank from time to time utilizes accounts
receivable and inventory as security for loans.
32
The Bank is the recognized leader for Small Business
Administration lending in Monterey County, and holds SBAs coveted Preferred
Lender Status. Generally, SBA loans are
guaranteed by the SBA for up to 85 percent of their principal amount, which can
be retained in portfolio or sold to investors.
Such loans are made at floating interest rates, but generally for longer
terms (up to 25 years) than are available on a conventional basis to small
businesses. The unguaranteed portion of the loans, although generally
supported by collateral, is considered to be more risky than conventional
commercial loans because they may be based upon credit standards the Bank would
not otherwise apply, such as lower cash flow coverage, or longer repayment
terms.
The Banks real estate loan portfolio consists both
of real estate construction loans and real estate mortgage loans. The Bank has initiated a program to generate
more commercial and industrial real estate loans, which generally yield higher
returns than normal commercial loans.
The Bank has also developed a broker program for generating residential
real estate loans. The Bank does not
make real estate development loans. Real estate construction loans are
made for a much shorter term, and often at higher interest rates, than
conventional single-family residential real estate loans. The cost of administering such loans is often
higher than for other real estate loans, as principal is drawn on periodically
as construction progresses.
The Bank also makes real estate loans secured by a
first deed of trust on single family residential properties and commercial and
industrial real estate. None of the
loans are sub-prime loans. California commercial
banks are permitted, depending on the type and maturity of the loan, to lend up
to 90 percent of the fair market value of real property (or more if the loan is
insured either by private mortgage insurers or governmental agencies). In certain instances, the appraised value may
exceed the actual amount which could be realized on foreclosure, or declines in
market value subsequent to making the loan can impair the Banks security.
Consumer loans are made for the purpose of financing
the purchase of various types of consumer goods, home improvement loans, auto
loans and other personal loans. Consumer
installment loans generally provide for monthly payments of principal and
interest, at a fixed rate. Most of the
Banks consumer installment loans are generally secured by the personal
property being purchased. The Bank generally
makes consumer loans to those customers with a prior banking relationship with
the Bank.
The following table presents the composition of the
loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, at December 31 for the last
five years.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
30,197
|
|
$
|
27,543
|
|
$
|
26,236
|
|
$
|
23,854
|
|
$
|
18,607
|
|
Construction
|
|
23,396
|
|
17,326
|
|
10,456
|
|
7,373
|
|
5,934
|
|
Real estate, mortgage
|
|
116,625
|
|
86,207
|
|
71,006
|
|
64,339
|
|
52,698
|
|
Installment
|
|
876
|
|
694
|
|
942
|
|
622
|
|
580
|
|
Government guaranteed loans purchased
|
|
32
|
|
39
|
|
45
|
|
51
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
171,126
|
|
131,809
|
|
108,685
|
|
96,239
|
|
77,876
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
(2,028
|
)
|
(1,409
|
)
|
(1,101
|
)
|
(963
|
)
|
(775
|
)
|
Deferred origination fees, net
|
|
(350
|
)
|
(350
|
)
|
(284
|
)
|
(240
|
)
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
168,748
|
|
$
|
130,050
|
|
$
|
107,300
|
|
$
|
95,036
|
|
$
|
76,908
|
|
33
The following table shows
the maturity distribution and repricing intervals of the Banks outstanding
loans at December 31, 2007.
Balances of fixed rate loans are displayed in the column representative
of the loans stated maturity date.
Balances for variable rate loans are displayed in the column
representative of the loans next interest rate change.
|
|
Loan
Maturities and Repricing Schedule
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
After One But Within Five Years
|
|
After Five Years
|
|
Total
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
23,396
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
23,396
|
|
Commercial, industrial and guaranteed loans
purchased
|
|
23,845
|
|
3,033
|
|
3,351
|
|
30,229
|
|
Real estate
|
|
55,773
|
|
30,311
|
|
30,541
|
|
116,625
|
|
Installment
|
|
645
|
|
108
|
|
123
|
|
876
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
$
|
103,659
|
|
$
|
33,454
|
|
$
|
34,015
|
|
$
|
171,126
|
|
Loans with variable (floating) interest rates
|
|
$
|
89,123
|
|
$
|
5,976
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
95,099
|
|
Loans with predetermined (fixed) interest rates
|
|
$
|
14,536
|
|
$
|
27,476
|
|
$
|
34,015
|
|
$
|
76,027
|
|
Non-performing and Non-accrual
Loans
The Banks present policy is to cease accruing
interest on loans which are past due as to principal or interest 90 days or more,
except for loans which are well secured or when collection of interest and
principal is deemed likely. When a loan
is placed on non-accrual, previously accrued and unpaid interest is generally
reversed out of income unless adequate collateral from which to collect the
principal of and interest on, the loan appears to be available.
34
The following table
presents information with respect to loans which, as of the dates indicated,
were past due 90 days or more or were placed on non-accrual status (referred to
collectively as non-performing loans):
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Accruing,
past due 90 days
or more:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
28
|
|
Installment
|
|
155
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual
|
|
3,396
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming
|
|
3,396
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans end of period
|
|
171,126
|
|
131,809
|
|
108,685
|
|
96,239
|
|
77,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of
nonperforming loans to total loans at end of period
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
0.12
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.04
|
%
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If interest on
non-accrual loans had been accrued, such income would have approximated
$133,000, $11,000, $0, $8,000 and $3,000 for 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. There were no non-accrual
loans at December 31, 2005.
The Bank does not have
any foreign loans or loans for highly leveraged transactions.
35
Summary
of Loan Loss Experience
|
|
For the Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Average loans
outstanding
|
|
$
|
146,944
|
|
$
|
118,699
|
|
$
|
108,963
|
|
$
|
86,870
|
|
$
|
67,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance,
beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
$
|
1,101
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
$
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off during period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
1
|
|
109
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge
offs
|
|
250
|
|
109
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries during period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
4
|
|
7
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
charged off during the period
|
|
246
|
|
102
|
|
12
|
|
(3
|
)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to
allowance for possible loan losses
|
|
865
|
|
410
|
|
150
|
|
185
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance, end
of period
|
|
$
|
2,028
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
$
|
1,101
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of net
loans charged off to average loans outstanding during the period
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
0.09
|
%
|
0.01
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of
allowance to total loans at end of period
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
1.07
|
%
|
1.02
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
36
Funding Sources
Average deposits
increased 20.32% to $144,252,000 in 2007 from $119,887,000 in 2006. In 2007 average certificates of deposit
increased 48.63% while average demand deposits decreased 14.53% and average
interest checking, money market and savings accounts as a group decreased
12.95%. Average certificates of deposit
represented 67.54% of average deposits in 2007 compared with 54.67% in 2006. Average interest checking, money market and
savings accounts as a group were 14.60% of average deposits in 2007 compared
with 20.17% in 2006. Average demand
deposits represented 17.87% of average deposits in 2007 compared with 25.15% in
2006.
The following
table summarizes the distribution of average daily deposits and the average
daily rates paid for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005,
respectively.
|
|
Average deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Non-interest-bearing checking
|
|
$
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,155
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
14,564
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
13,243
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
12,584
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
Money market savings
|
|
1,732
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
3,589
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
4,818
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
4,759
|
|
1.03
|
%
|
7,355
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
7,476
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
Time deposits >$100M
|
|
46,609
|
|
5.16
|
%
|
32,372
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
29,908
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
Time deposits <$100M
|
|
50,814
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
33,174
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
31,981
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
118,478
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
89,733
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
86,767
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
144,252
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
$
|
119,888
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
$
|
111,624
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
The following table sets
forth the scheduled maturities of the Companys time deposits in denominations
of $100,000 or greater which amounted to $62,620,000 at December 31, 2007:
Maturities of Time Deposits of $100,000 or
more
At December 31, 2007
($ in thousands)
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
11,236
|
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
12,334
|
|
Over six months through twelve months
|
|
16,770
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
22,280
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,620
|
|
The Bank has lines of
credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of San Francisco, Bank of the
West, Pacific Coast Bankers Bank and The Independent Bank with remaining available
borrowing capacity on December 31, 2007 of $4,236,000 (based on pledged
collateral), $4,500,000, $6,000,000 and $5,000,000, respectively. The Federal Home Loan Bank line of credit has
a maximum borrowing capacity of 25% of the Banks total assets, adjusted
quarterly. The Federal Home Loan Bank
line of credit is secured by a portion of the Banks real estate secured loans
and securities at December 31, 2007.
The total principal balance of pledged loans was $41,309,000 and
securities of $31,576,000. The following
table provides information on seventeen FHLB advances totaling $52,500,000 and
outstanding at December 31, 2007.
37
Advance
|
|
Fixed Interest
|
|
Funding
|
|
Maturity
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
6/17/05
|
|
6/17/10
|
2,500,000
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
8/20/07
|
|
8/20/10
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
11/14/05
|
|
11/15/10
|
2,250,000
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
1/26/06
|
|
1/26/11
|
1,750,000
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
1/26/06
|
|
1/26/11
|
1,500,000
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
7/17/06
|
|
7/18/11
|
3,500,000
|
|
5.49
|
%
|
7/17/06
|
|
7/18/11
|
1,000,000
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
8/25/06
|
|
8/25/11
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
7/30/07
|
|
7/30/12
|
3,000,000
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
10/1/07
|
|
10/1/12
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
9/18/07
|
|
9/18/14
|
1,000,000
|
|
7.72
|
%
|
8/21/01
|
|
6/3/30
|
4,000,000
|
|
5.96
|
%
|
8/2/04
|
|
7/28/34
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
12/24/04
|
|
12/22/34
|
2,000,000
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
5/4/05
|
|
5/1/35
|
2,000,000
|
|
5.31
|
%
|
11/17/06
|
|
11/17/36
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
6/29/07
|
|
6/29/37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Bank of the West,
Pacific Coast Bankers Bank and The Independent Bank lines of credit are unsecured.
The Bank did not utilize any overnight borrowings in 2007, 2006 or 2005.
The Bank has a
$330,000 letter of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
to secure the uninsured portion of local agency deposits maintained with the
Bank. The letter of credit matures April 17,
2011.
Capital
Resources
The Corporation
maintains capital to comply with legal requirements, to provide a margin of
safety for its depositors and stockholders, and to provide for future growth
and the ability to pay dividends. At December 31,
2007, stockholders equity was $14,434,000 versus $12,402,000 at December 31,
2006. The Corporation paid cash
dividends to shareholders of $0.25, $0.35 and $0.20 per share in 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The Bank paid cash
dividends totaling $800,000 and $625,000 to the Corporation in 2007 and 2006,
respectively; no cash dividends were paid in 2005.
The FDIC and
Federal Reserve Board have adopted capital adequacy guidelines for use in their
examination and regulation of banks and bank holding companies. If the capital of a bank or bank holding
company falls below the minimum levels established by these guidelines, it may
be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or non-bank
businesses, or the FDIC or Federal Reserve Board may take other administrative
actions. The guidelines employ two
measures of capital: (1) risk-based
capital and (2) leverage capital.
38
In general, the
risk-based capital guidelines provide detailed definitions of which obligations
will be treated as capital, and assign different weights to various assets and
off-balance sheet items, depending upon the perceived degree of credit risk
associated with each asset. Each asset
is assigned to one of four risk-weighted categories. For example, 0 percent for cash and
unconditionally guaranteed government securities; 20 percent for deposits with
other banks and fed funds; 50 percent for state bonds and certain residential
real estate loans; and 100 percent for commercial loans and other assets. Capital is categorized as either Tier 1
capital, consisting of common stock and retained earnings (or deficit), or Tier
2 capital, which includes limited-life preferred stock and allowance for loan
losses (subject to certain limitations).
The guidelines also define and set minimum capital requirements
(risk-based capital ratios), which increased over a transition period, ended December 31,
1992. Under the final 1992 rules, all
banks were required to maintain Tier 1 capital of at least 4 percent and total
capital of 8.0% of risk-adjusted assets. The Bank had a Tier 1 capital to total
risk-adjusted assets capital ratio of 10.77% and 12.40% at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. The Banks
Tier 1 capital exceeds the minimum regulatory requirement by $12,681,000. The Bank had a Total Risk-Based capital to
risk-adjusted assets ratio of 11.86% and 13.40% at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The Banks Total
Risk-Based capital exceeds the minimum regulatory requirement by $7,220,000.
The Tier 1 leverage
capital ratio guidelines require a minimum leverage capital ratio of 4% of Tier
1 capital to total assets less goodwill.
The Bank had a leverage capital ratio of 8.59% and 10.20% at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. The Banks
Tier 1 leverage capital exceeds the minimum regulatory requirement by
$10,776,000.
As
of the end of 2007, the Bank was considered to be well capitalized by
regulatory standards. We do not foresee
any circumstances that would cause either the Corporation or the Bank to be
less than well capitalized, although no assurance can be given that this will
not occur.
On
March 27, 2003, the Corporations wholly owned special-purpose trust
subsidiary, Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust I (Trust I) issued
$3 million in cumulative Trust Prefe
rred
Securities. The securities bear a floating rate of
interest of 3.25% over the three month LIBOR rate, payable quarterly. The effective rate at December 31, 2007
and 2006 was 8.49% and 8.62%, respectively. Concurrent with the issuance of the
Trust Preferred Securities, Trust I used the proceeds from the Trust Preferred
Securities offering to purchase a like amount of Junior Subordinated Debentures
of the Corporation.
The Corporation will pay interest on the
Junior Subordinated Debentures to Trust I, which represents the sole revenue
and sole source of dividend distributions to the holders of the Trust Preferred
Securities. The Corporation has the right,
assuming no default has occurred, to defer payments of interest on the Junior
Subordinated Debentures at any time for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive
quarters. The Trust Preferred Securities
will mature on April 7, 2033, but can be redeemed under certain
circumstances at a premium prior to April 7, 2008, and can be redeemed, in
whole or in part, on any January 7, April 7, July 7 or October 7
on or after April 7, 2008 at par.
The Corporation fully and unconditionally guarantees the obligations
Trust I, on a subordinated basis.
The Corporation received $2.91 million from Trust I upon issuance of the
Junior Subordinated Debentures, of which $1 million was contributed by the
Corporation to the Bank to increase its capital, $1.14 million was used to
retire existing Corporation debt and the remainder held as working capital.
39
On November 13, 2003, the Corporations wholly owned special-purpose
trust subsidiary, Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II (Trust II)
issued $5 million in cumulative Trust Preferred Securities. The securities bear a floating rate of
interest of 2.85% over the three month LIBOR rate, payable quarterly.
The
effective rate at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 7.76% and 8.22%,
respectively. Concurrent with the issuance of the Trust
Preferred Securities, Trust II used the proceeds from the Trust Preferred
Securities offering to purchase a like amount of Junior Subordinated Debentures
of the Corporation. The Corporation will
pay interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures to Trust II, which
represents the sole revenue and sole source of dividend distributions to the
holders of the Trust Preferred Securities.
The Corporation has the right, assuming no default has occurred, to
defer payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures at any time
for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The Trust Preferred Securities will mature on
August 8, 2033, but can be redeemed under certain circumstances at a
premium prior to August 8, 2008, and can be redeemed, in whole or in part,
on any February 8, May 8, August 8 or November 8 on or
after August 8, 2008 at par. The
Corporation fully and unconditionally guarantees the obligations of Trust II,
on a subordinated basis.
The Corporation received $4.96 million from Trust II upon issuance of the
Junior Subordinated Debentures, of which $2.5 million was contributed by the
Corporation to the Bank to increase its capital and the remainder held as
working capital.
Under applicable regulatory guidelines, a portion of the Trust Preferred
Securities will qualify as Tier I Capital, and the remainder as Tier II
Capital.
Liquidity
Liquidity
represents a banks ability to provide sufficient cash flows or cash resources
in a manner that enables it to meet obligations in a timely fashion and
adequately provides for anticipated future cash needs. For the Bank, liquidity considerations
involve the capacity to meet expected and potential requirements of depositors
seeking access to balances and to provide for the credit demands of borrowing
customers. In the ordinary course of the
Banks business, funds are generated from the repayment of loans, maturities
within the investment securities portfolio and the acquisition of deposit
balances and short-term borrowings. In
addition, the Bank has a line of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco of approximately $57,066,000, based on twenty five per cent of the
Banks total assets as reported in the most recent quarterly Consolidated
Reports of Condition and Income for a bank with Domestic Offices Only. The line of credit is subject to pledging of
acceptable collateral. Additionally the
Bank has unsecured federal funds lines of credit with
Bank of the
West $4,500,000, Pacific Coast Bankers Bank $6,000,000 and The Independent
Bank $5,000,000
to
meet temporary liquidity requirements.
Available
borrowing capacities on December 31, 2007 were $4,500,000, $6,000,000 and
$5,000,000, respectively.
As a matter of
policy, the Bank seeks to maintain a level of liquid assets, including
marketable investment securities, equal to a least 15 percent of total assets (primary
liquidity), while maintaining sources of secondary liquidity (borrowing lines
from other institutions) equal to at least an additional 10 percent of assets. In addition, it seeks to generally limit
loans to not more than 110 percent of deposits. Within these ratios, the
Bank generally has excess funds available to sell as federal funds on a daily
basis, and is able to fund its own liquidity needs without the need of
short-term borrowing. The Banks total
liquidity at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was 27.09%, 24.31%, and
27.09%, respectively, while its loan to deposit ratio for such years was
100.85%, 98.80% and 90.84%, respectively.
40
Brokered deposits are
deposit instruments, such as certificates of deposit, deposit notes, bank
investment contracts and certain municipal investment contracts that are issued
through brokers and dealers who then offer and/or sell these deposit
instruments to one or more investors.
Additionally, deposits on which a financial institution pays an interest
rate significantly higher than prevailing rates are considered to be brokered
deposits. Federal law and regulation
restricts banks from soliciting or accepting brokered deposits, unless the bank
is well capitalized under Federal guidelines.
The Bank had no brokered deposits at December 31, 2007; brokered
deposits totaled approximately $5,046,000 or 3.83% at December 31, 2006
and $12,849,300 or 10.82% at December 31, 2005. None of the Banks
brokered deposits paid an interest rate significantly higher than prevailing
rates.
Management of interest rate sensitivity
(asset/liability management) involves matching and repricing rates of
interest-earning assets with interest-bearing liabilities in a manner designed
to optimize net interest income within the constraints imposed by regulatory
authorities, liquidity determinations and capital considerations. The Bank instituted formal asset/liability
policies at the end of 1989.
The purpose for
asset/liability management is to provide stable net interest income growth by
protecting the Banks earnings from undue interest rate risk. The Bank expects to generate earnings from
increasing loan volume, appropriate loan pricing and expense control and not
from trying to accurately forecast interest rates. Another important function of asset/liability
management is managing the risk/return relationships between interest rate
risk, liquidity, market risk and capital adequacy. The Bank gives priority to liquidity concerns
followed by capital adequacy, then interest rate risk and market risk in the
investment portfolio. The policy of the
Bank will be to control the exposure of the Banks earnings to changing
interest rates by generally maintaining a position within a narrow range around
an earnings neutral position. An earnings neutral position is defined as the
mix of assets and liabilities that generate a net interest margin that is not
affected by interest rate changes.
However, Management does not believe that the Bank can maintain a
totally earnings neutral position.
Further, the actual timing of repricing of assets and liabilities does
not always correspond to the timing assumed by the Bank for analytical
purposes. Therefore, changes in market
rates of interest will generally impact on the Banks net interest income and
net interest margin for long or short periods of time.
The Bank monitors its
interest rate risk on a quarterly basis through the use of a model which
calculates the effect on earnings of changes in the fed funds rate. The model converts a fed funds rate change
into rate changes for each major class of asset and liability, then simulates
the banks net interest margin based on the banks actual repricing over a one
year period, assuming that maturities are reinvested in instruments identical
to those maturing during the period. The
following table shows the affect on net interest income of a 100 and a 200
basis point rate shock at December 31, 2007.
Rate Shock Increase(Decrease)
in Basis Points
|
|
Percent Increase(Decrease)
in Net Interest Income
|
100
|
|
5.8%
|
(100)
|
|
(6.7)%
|
200
|
|
11.6%
|
(200)
|
|
(13.5)%
|
41
The Corporations sources
of revenues and liquidity are the dividends, tax equalization payments or
management fees from the Bank and gains on securities held in a trading account
and other investments. The ability of
the Bank to pay such items to the Corporation is subject to limitations under
state and Federal law.
Investment
Securities
The
Corporation maintains a trading account, at fair value, consisting of
marketable securities. At December 31,
2007 and 2006 the account value was $1,224,000 and $1,762,000, respectively. The Corporation has investments of $20,000 in
AT Service LLC, which provides title insurance services for commercial,
industrial and residential properties, as well as other real estate related
financial and informational services, including escrow, real estate
information, trustee sale guarantees and real estate tax exchanges, and $10,000
in Metrocities Mortgage, LLC. In
addition the Corporation has investments in Northern California Bancorp Trust I
of $93,000 and Northern California Bancorp Trust II of $155,000, these are
special-purpose trust subsidiaries which were formed to facilitate the issuance
of trust preferred securities.
The following table sets
forth the book and market value of the consolidated investment securities as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
INVESTMENT
PORTFOLIO MIX
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
Market
|
|
Book
|
|
Market
|
|
Book
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
value
|
|
value
|
|
value
|
|
value
|
|
value
|
|
Available for
sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
National Mortgage Association
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
$
|
857
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
State/Local
Agency Securities
|
|
225
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
Agencies
|
|
36,027
|
|
36,191
|
|
14,724
|
|
14,660
|
|
9,714
|
|
9,597
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
36,638
|
|
$
|
36,801
|
|
$
|
15,365
|
|
$
|
15,286
|
|
11,202
|
|
11,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to
maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State/Local
Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
7,869
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
$
|
7,012
|
|
$
|
7,280
|
|
7,025
|
|
7,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home
Loan Bank Stock
|
|
$
|
2,495
|
|
$
|
2,495
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
$
|
1,183
|
|
$
|
1,183
|
|
AT Services, LLC
|
|
20
|
|
20
|
|
20
|
|
20
|
|
40
|
|
40
|
|
Metrocities
Mortgage, LLC
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
The Independent
Bankers Financial Corp.
|
|
51
|
|
51
|
|
50
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
MasterCard Inc
Class B Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern
California Bancorp, Inc. Trust I
|
|
93
|
|
93
|
|
93
|
|
93
|
|
93
|
|
93
|
|
Northern
California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II
|
|
155
|
|
155
|
|
155
|
|
155
|
|
155
|
|
155
|
|
Pacific Coast
Bankers Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
1,757
|
|
Pan Pacific Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
100
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,824
|
|
$
|
2,824
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
$
|
2,021
|
|
$
|
3,338
|
|
42
The following
tables summarize the maturity of the consolidated investment securities at December 31,
2007:
|
|
INVESTMENT
PORTFOLIO MATURITIES
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
Due between five and ten years
|
|
11,250
|
|
11,311
|
|
Due in over ten years
|
|
24,002
|
|
24,106
|
|
GNMA - Mortgage Backed Securities
|
|
386
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,638
|
|
$
|
36,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
Due in over ten years
|
|
$
|
7,869
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following
consolidated financial statements included in the Consolidated Financial Report
issued by Hutchinson and Bloodgood LLP, Certified Public Accountants at the pages indicated
are incorporated herein by reference:
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
The Company had no
disagreements with its independent accountants on any matter of accounting
principles, practices or financial statement disclosure during 2007, 2006 or
2005.
43
ITEM
8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act), that are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the Evaluation), under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure Controls) as
of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) of
the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our
Disclosure Controls were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
Changes in Internal Controls
We have also evaluated our internal controls for financial reporting,
and there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date
of their last evaluation.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure
Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative
to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making
can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of
some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management or board
override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.
CEO and CFO Certifications
Appearing immediately following the Signatures section of this report
there are Certifications of the CEO and the CFO. The Certifications are
required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(the Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this report, which you are
currently reading is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in
the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in
conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding
of the topics presented.
44
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
The management of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The
Companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management and board of directors
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition
of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control
systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this
assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework
. Based on our
assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2007, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those
criteria.
This annual report does not include an attestation
report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by our
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only managements
report in this annual report.
ITEM
8B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable
45
PART III
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Code of Ethics
The Bank has adopted a code of ethics applicable to all of its
officers, directors and employees, including its principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons
performing similar functions.
The name, age,
title and five-year business background of each director, executive officers
and significant employees of the Corporation (including the Bank) as of December 31,
2007, are as follows:
Name &
Position with Bank
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal Occupation During Past Five Years
|
Charles
T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
Director since 1985, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
66
|
|
Chairman of the
Board & Chief Executive Officer Monterey County Bank since 3/87
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra
G. Chrietzberg
Director, 1988 to 1994 and since 1995
|
|
64
|
|
Formerly President and
CEO Queen of Chardonnay, Inc., dba La Reina Winery 8/84-12/93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie
G. Chrietzberg
Director since 2007
|
|
40
|
|
Vice President,
Business Development Officer of Monterey County Bank since 5/06, Accounting
Manager/Assistant Controller, Portola Plaza Hotel 9/94-4/06, Reservation
Agent, Accounts Receivable Clerk, Payroll, Doubletree Hotel 12/91-9/94.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter
J. Coniglio, Esq.
Director since 1976
|
|
78
|
|
Partner - Hudson, Martin,
Ferrante & Street, Monterey, CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carla
S. Hudson, CPA
Director since 1994
|
|
54
|
|
Partner Bianchi, Kasavan & Pope, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
M. Lotz
Director since 1991
|
|
66
|
|
Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer & President Del Monte Aviation, Inc. dba.
Monterey Bay Aviation, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Couroc of
Monterey 1996-2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark
A. Briant
Director since 2006
|
|
60
|
|
Owner Fashion Streaks
Screenprinting, Embroidery, Signs and Banners, Sand City, CA
Owner, Sandy Creek Olive Ranch, Carmel Valley, CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
A. Bernahl
Director since 2006
|
|
29
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer & President, Pacific Tweed, Inc. Carmel, CA
|
46
Timothy
M. Leveque
Executive Vice President
Chief Lending Officer
|
|
64
|
|
Executive Vice
President, Chief Lending Officer of Monterey County Bank since 11/03, Senior
Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer, Pacific Coast Bankers Bank
1997-2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce
N. Warner
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
60
|
|
Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Monterey
County Bank since 2002; Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer of Monterey County Bank since 1993-2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary
Ellen Stanton
Senior Vice President
|
|
69
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Loan Administration, Monterey County Bank Since 10/98.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andre
G. Herrera
Senior Vice President
|
|
42
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Chief Information Officer, Manager BankCard Service 12/04, Vice President,
Chief Information Officer 11/01.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia
D. Weber
Senior Vice President
Senior Operations Manager
|
|
47
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Senior Operations Manager 12/04, Vice President, Operations Manager 6/97.
|
Directors of the
Corporation serve in similar capacities with the Bank. The Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation serve in similar capacities with the Bank, although the limited
operations of the Corporation do not require significant amounts of their
time. There is no family relationships
among the persons listed above, except that Mr. and Mrs. Chrietzberg
are spouses and Stephanie g. Chrietzberg is their daughter.
Director Bernahl
resigned from
his position as a member of the Board of Directors of Northern California
Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Monterey County Bank on January 17,
2008. Director Bernahl cited time
demands from his involvement in a start-up venture and the planned expansion of
his existing business which would impact his ability to attend to Board
matters.
Based solely upon
a review of the relevant forms furnished to the Bank and the Corporation,
except as disclosed below, the Corporation believes that all officers,
directors and principal shareholders filed appropriate forms as required by Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act, and related regulations, during 2007.
47
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following
table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation, in thousands,
paid to the Chief Executive Officer, Executive Officers and the next two
highest compensated officer of the Corporation/Bank whose total compensation
exceeded $100,000 for 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonquailified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Incentive
Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
Name & Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
2007
|
|
311
|
|
300
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
27
|
(1)
|
639
|
|
Chairman,
President & CEO
|
|
2006
|
|
308
|
|
300
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
56
|
(1)
|
664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Leveque
|
|
2007
|
|
182
|
|
65
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
25
|
(2)
|
272
|
|
Executive Vice
President,
|
|
2006
|
|
173
|
|
75
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
28
|
(2)
|
276
|
|
Chief Lending
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce N. Warner
|
|
2007
|
|
164
|
|
65
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
16
|
(3)
|
246
|
|
Executive Vice
President,
|
|
2006
|
|
153
|
|
75
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
14
|
(3)
|
241
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Operating
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andre G. Herrera
|
|
2007
|
|
196
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
13
|
(4)
|
210
|
|
Senior Vice
President,
|
|
2006
|
|
219
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
14
|
(4)
|
232
|
|
Chief Information
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager BankCard
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia D. Weber
|
|
2007
|
|
100
|
|
33
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
9
|
(5)
|
143
|
|
Senior Vice
President,
|
|
2006
|
|
98
|
|
30
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
8
|
(5)
|
136
|
|
Senior Operations
Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
2007 includes $13,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions, health insurance premiums of $7,000,
personal use of a Bank owned automobile of $4,000 and life/disability
insurance premiums of $3,000.
|
|
2006 includes $29,000 in
expense accrued in the Salary Continuation Plan net of earnings on life
insurance policies as more fully described in the Long Term Incentive Plan
Table, $15,000 in matching 401K plan contributions, health insurance premiums
of $6,000, $4,000 in personal use of a Bank owned automobile and $2,000 in
life/disability insurance premiums.
|
(2)
|
2007 includes $12,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions, health insurance premiums of $4,000,
automobile allowance of $6,000 and life/disability insurance premiums of
$3,000.
|
|
2006 includes $11,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions, health insurance premiums of $9,000, $6,000
in automobile allowance and $2,000 in life/disability insurance premiums.
|
(3)
|
2007 includes $13,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions and $3,000 in life/disability insurance
premiums.
|
|
2006 includes $12,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions and $2,000 in life/disability insurance
premiums.
|
(4)
|
2007 includes $11,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions and $2,000 in life/disability insurance
premiums.
|
|
2006 includes $13,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions and $1,000 in life/disability insurance
premiums.
|
(5)
|
2007 includes $7,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions and $2,000 in life/disability insurance
premiums.
|
|
2006 includes $7,000 in
matching 401K plan contributions and $1,000 in life/disability insurance
premiums.
|
The Bank
furnishes, on a non-discriminatory basis, to the employees: (i) insurance
benefits; and (ii) other benefits.
The value of these benefits for the respective persons is included in
the table if the aggregate of value of the benefits exceeded $10,000.
48
The Board of
Directors authorized the Bank to enter into a three year employment contract
with Mr. Chrietzberg, effective January 1, 2005. It provides for a base salary of $240,000 per
year, a Bank furnished automobile or automobile allowance, and a bonus based on
profits. The bonus, not to exceed
$250,000 annually, will equal $10,000 for each 0.1 percent that the Banks
profits exceed 1 percent return on average assets plus $10,000 for each 1
percent that the Banks return on equity exceeds 10 percent. Under the terms of the contract, if Mr. Chrietzberg
is terminated other than for cause (as defined in the contract), he is entitled
to severance compensation for his monthly salary plus a pro rated incentive
bonus for the greater of 24 months or the remaining term of his contract (which
ends in December, 2008); however, if the termination follows within 12 months
after a change in control transaction (as defined in the contract), he is
entitled to such severance compensation for the greater of 24 months or the
remainder of the term of the contract.
The Board of
Directors authorized the Bank to execute Addendum 1 to the three year
employment contract with Mr. Chrietzberg effective January 1,
2006. Addendum 1 provides for a base
salary of $300,000 and a bonus not to exceed $300,000. All other terms of the employment contract
remain the same.
The following
table sets forth certain information regarding the long term incentive plan
provided for Mr. Chrietzberg.
|
|
|
|
Performance or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Other Period
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts under
|
|
|
|
Shares, Units
|
|
Until
|
|
Non-Stock Price-Based Plans
|
|
|
|
or Other Rights
|
|
Maturation or
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
Payment
|
|
($ or #)
|
|
($ or #)
|
|
($ or #)
|
|
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr
|
|
Salary Continuation Agreement
|
|
Retirement at age 65, subject to provisions for
earlier payout described below
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
$90,000/yr. lifetime
|
|
In December 1993, the Board of Directors approved a Salary
Continuation Agreement for the benefit of Mr. Chrietzberg that provided
for payments of $75,000 per year, for 15 years, if he remains with the Bank
until normal retirement, commencing age 65. After consideration of the impact of such an
agreement on the Banks income, the Bank amended the Agreement to provide for
one half the original benefit amounts, but adopted Surviving Income Agreements
which provide benefits upon the death of the executive to his beneficiary in a
single payment, in an amount equal to the retirement benefit. The Salary Continuation Agreement provides
for lesser payments in the event of early retirement, generally designated to
coincide with increases in the anticipated surrender value for the life
insurance policies described below.
In August, 2001,
the Board of Directors amended the Salary Continuation Agreement for the
benefit of Mr. Chrietzberg which was approved in December, 1993 and
amended in August 1999. The amended
Salary Continuation Agreement provides for payments of $90,000 per year, for Mr. Chrietzbergs
lifetime. The amended Salary
Continuation Agreement provides the following with regard to the division of
death proceeds should Mr. Chrietzberg die before his 65
th
birthday; his
beneficiary(ies) shall be entitled to an amount equal to $2,940,000 or the net
at risk insurance portion of the proceeds, whichever amount is less. The net at risk insurance portion is the
total proceeds less the cash value of the policy. Should Mr. Chrietzberg die on or
subsequent to his 65
th
birthday, his beneficiary(ies) shall be
entitled to an amount equal to $1,000,000 plus the present value of the
remaining retirement benefits due to Mr. Chrietzberg or the net at risk
insurance portion of the proceeds, whichever is less, and the Bank shall be
entitled to the remainder of such proceeds.
49
The Banks
obligations under the Salary Continuation Agreement are not secured by any
segregated amounts, but are informally funded by the purchase of single-premium
life insurance policies. The Bank did
not incur any salary continuation expense in 2007, net earnings on the life
insurance policies totaled $124,000 for the year. The salary continuation expense accrued net
of earnings on life insurance policies in 2006 and 2005 was $28,900, $28,900,
respectively. Based upon the current
projected earnings of the insurance used to informally fund the Banks obligations
under the Agreement, and the anticipated salary continuation expense to be
booked, net of tax benefits, the Bank anticipates (based upon current tax laws
and assumptions regarding the yield on alternative investment(s)) that the cost
of the benefits to be provided under the agreement will not have a material
adverse impact on the Banks net income after taxes in the future, although no
assurance can be given in this regard.
The Surviving Income Agreement was terminated upon adoption of the
amended Salary Continuation Agreement.
The Corporation
did not grant any stock options under the Corporations 1998 Amended Stock
Option Plan or the Northern California Bancorp 2007 Stock Option Plan during
the year ended December 31, 2007.
The following
table sets forth the number of shares of Common stock represented by
outstanding stock options and stock awards held by each of the named executive
officers as of December 31, 2007 under the Coporations 1998 Amended Stock
Option Plan.
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable
|
|
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unerercised Unearned Options (#)
|
|
Option Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Option Expiration
Date
|
|
Number of
Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
|
|
Market Value
of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
|
|
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
|
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights
That Have Not Vested ($)
|
|
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
25,000
|
(1)
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
110,000
|
|
2/2/09
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
Timothy Leveque
|
|
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
Bruce N. Warner
|
|
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
Andre G. Herrera
|
|
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
Patricia D. Weber
|
|
1,500
|
(2)
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
4,500
|
|
3/20/08
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
(2)
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
10,000
|
|
2/2/09
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
NONE
|
|
(1) The vesting date
for Mr. Chrietzbergs options was February 2, 2004.
(2) The vesting
dates for Ms. Webers options were March 20, 2003 and
February 2, 2004.
50
The following table sets forth certain
information regarding the compensation, in thousands, paid to each director
during 2007.
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned
or Paid
in
Cash
($)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
David A. Berhnal
|
|
20
|
(1)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
Mark A. Briant
|
|
21
|
(2)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
20
|
(3)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
Sandra G. Chrietzberg
|
|
20
|
(4)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
Stephanie G. Chrietzberg
|
|
20
|
(5)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
Peter J. Coniglio
|
|
20
|
(6)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
Carla S. Hudson
|
|
22
|
(7)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
John M. Lotz
|
|
21
|
(8)
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
1. Includes a retainer of $11,000 and $9,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings.
2. Includes a retainer of $11,000, $9,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings and $1,000 in meeting fees for
attendance as a member of the Audit Committee.
3. Includes a retainer of $11,000 and $9,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings.
4. Includes a retainer of $11,000 and $9,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings.
5. Includes a retainer of $11,000 and $9,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings.
6. Includes a retainer of $11,000, $8,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings and $1,000 in meeting fees for
attendance as a member of the Audit Committee.
7. Includes a retainer of $11,000, $9,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings and $2,000 in meeting fees for
attendance as chair member of the Audit Committee.
8. Includes a retainer of $11,000, $9,000 in
fees for monthly Board of Director meetings and $1,000 in meeting fees for
attendance as a member of the Audit Committee.
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
To the knowledge of the
management of the Company, the following shareholders own more than five
percent (5%) of the outstanding common stock of the Company, its only class of
voting securities.
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Class
|
|
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
748,874
|
(1)
|
40.03
|
%
|
P.O. Box 1344
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carmel, CA 93921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David S. Lewis Trust
|
|
153,863
|
|
8.34
|
%
|
13500 N. Rancho Vistoso #3560
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson, AZ 85755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce N. Warner
|
|
114,530
|
|
6.20
|
%
|
601 Munras Ave.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monterey, CA 93940
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Includes 25,000 shares subject to employee stock
options and 18,414 shares held beneficially for Mr. Chrietzberg and Mrs. Chrietzberg
in Individual Retirement Accounts where voting power is shared with the
custodian of the account. 400,000 shares
of the Common stock owned by Mr. Chrietzberg are pledged to secure a loan
from an unaffiliated bank.
51
The following table sets forth
similar information regarding the beneficial ownership, both by numerical
holding and percentage interest of each of the Companys directors and all of
its directors and executive officers as a group. All addresses are in care of the Corporation
at 601 Munras Ave. Monterey, CA 93940.
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Purchase
|
|
Class without
|
|
Name
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Class
|
|
Options
|
|
Option Shares
|
|
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
748,874
|
(1)(2)(3)
|
40.03
|
%
|
25,000
|
|
39.21
|
%
|
Sandra G. Chrietzberg
|
|
748,874
|
(2)(3)
|
40.03
|
%
|
25,000
|
|
39.21
|
%
|
Stephanie G. Chrietzberg
|
|
26,640
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
Peter J. Coniglio
|
|
76,355
|
(4)(5)
|
4.11
|
%
|
13,161
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
Carla S. Hudson
|
|
39,899
|
(6)
|
2.16
|
%
|
2,500
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
John M. Lotz
|
|
11,395
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
10,500
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
Mark A. Briant
|
|
2,534
|
(7)
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
All Directors and Executive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers as a
group
|
|
1,082,238
|
(8)
|
57.05
|
%
|
51,161
|
|
55.86
|
%
|
(1)
|
Includes
25,000 shares subject to his employee stock options. 400,000 shares of the
Common stock owned by Mr. Chrietzberg are pledged to secure a loan from
an unaffiliated bank. Should he default under such credit, the shares could
be acquired by the lender, or sold pursuant to applicable terms of the
Uniform Commercial Code, in a transaction that could result in a change of
control of the Corporation. Such transaction may require approval under
provisions of Federal and California change in bank control laws.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The shares include an
aggregate of 18,414 shares held beneficially by Mr. Chrietzberg and
Mrs. Chrietzberg in Individual Retirement Accounts, where voting power
is also shared with the custodian of the account.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes shares of
spouse pursuant to Californias community property laws.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Sole voting power.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 13,161 shares
subject to the respective directors stock options. Of the remaining shares,
28,211 are held by Mr. Coniglio, 26,530 are held in a family trust
controlled by Mr. Coniglio, as to which he has sole voting and
investment power, while 8,453 shares are held by Hudson, Martin,
Ferrante & Street, a partnership of which Mr. Coniglio is the
managing partner, with voting and investment power.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 2,500 shares
subject to the respective directors stock options. The remaining shares are
held jointly with family members, other than 1,610 shares held in a corporate
pension, as to which Ms. Hudson has voting and investment power.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Shares are held in a
profit sharing plan, as to which Mr. Briant has voting and investment
power.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Includes 176,541 shares
held by executive officers who are not also directors.
|
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS
AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The Bank has had, and expects to
have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of its business
with directors, officers, principal shareholders and their associates. Management of the Bank believes that these
transactions have been (and those in the future are intended to be) on
substantially the same terms, including interest rates, collateral and
repayment terms on extensions of credit, as those prevailing at the same time
for comparable transactions with others and did not involve more than the
normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. Management does not believe that any such
loans are outside the ordinary course of business. The following table sets forth information on
extensions of credit to directors, principal shareholders, officers and their
related parties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Name
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Peter J. Coniglio
|
|
$
|
3,339
|
|
16.10
|
%
|
$
|
3,196
|
|
22.14
|
%
|
Carla S. Hudson
|
|
300
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
300
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
John M. Lotz
|
|
5
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
5
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
David A. Bernhal
|
|
286
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
278
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
Mark A. Briant
|
|
420
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
354
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
Directors, Principal Shareholder, and Officers as a
Group (10 in number)
|
|
$
|
4,350
|
|
30.14
|
%
|
$
|
4,132
|
|
28.63
|
%
|
52
Item 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS
A. EXHIBITS
Item
|
|
Description
|
2
|
|
Plan of Merger and
Merger Agreement, Monterey County Bank with Monterey
|
|
|
County Merger
Corporation un the Charter of Monterey County Bank under
|
|
|
the Title of Monterey
County Bank, joined in by Northern California Bancorp,
|
|
|
Inc. dated
November 1, 1995.
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1995.
|
3 (i)
|
|
Articles of
Incorporation
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1995.
|
3 (ii)
|
|
Bylaws
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1995.
|
10 (i) D
|
|
(1) Lease
agreement Carmel Branch Office
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1995.
|
|
|
(2) Lease
agreement Carmel By The Sea Office
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2002.
|
|
|
(3) Lease
agreement 301 Webster Street, Monterey, CA 93924
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2004.
|
10 (ii) A
|
|
(1)
First Addendum to
Employment Contract of Charles T.
Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
(2) Employment
Contract of Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr., dated January 1, 2005
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
(3) Deferred
Compensation Agreement, dated December 31, 1993
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1995.
|
|
|
(4) Northern
California Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Agreements
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1998.
|
|
|
(5) Amendment to
the Salary Continuation Agreement Dated December 31, 1993
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1999.
|
|
|
(6) Life Insurance
Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 1999.
|
|
|
(7) Amendment to
the Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement
|
|
|
Dated January 5,
2000
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2001
|
|
|
(8) Amendment to
the Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2001
|
|
|
(9) Amendment to
the Salary Continuation Agreement Dated December 31, 1993
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2001
|
|
|
(10) Monterey
County Bank Supplemental Life Insurance Agreement Dated October 26, 2006
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(11) First Amendment to
the Monterey County Bank Supplemental Life Insurance Agreement
|
|
|
Dated October 31,
2006
|
|
|
Filed as exhibit to
Form 10KSB dated December 31, 2006
|
11
|
|
Statement Reference
Computation of Per Share Earnings
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
23.1
|
|
Consent
of Hutchinson and Bloodgood, LLP
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.
pursuant to
Section 302
of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
53
B. REPORTS
None
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Fees
Audit Fees.
Aggregate fees billed by Hutchinson and Bloodgood for professional
services rendered in connection with the audit of the Banks annual financial
statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and for the
required review of the Banks financial statements included in its Form 10-QSBs
for that same year totaled $75,325.
Financial
Information System Design and Implementation Fees.
No fees were
paid to Hutchinson and Bloodgood for financial information system design and
implementation services rendered for the 2007 fiscal year.
All Other
Fees.
$2,900 was paid to Hutchinson & Bloodgood for all tax services
rendered for the 2007 fiscal year.
54
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
March 26,
2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Charles T.
Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
and President
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
March 26,
2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Bruce N. Warner
|
|
|
|
Bruce N. Warner
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
and Principal
Accounting Officer
|
In accordance with the
Exchange Act, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
|
|
March 26,
2008
|
Charles
T. Chrietzberg, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sandra G.
Chrietzberg
|
|
|
|
March 26,
2008
|
Sandra G. Chrietzberg
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter J. Coniglio
|
|
|
|
March 26,
2008
|
Peter J. Coniglio
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Carla S. Hudson
|
|
|
|
March 26,
2008
|
Carla S. Hudson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John M. Lotz
|
|
|
|
March 26,
2008
|
John M. Lotz
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Briant
|
|
|
|
March 26,
2008
|
Mark A. Briant
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephanie G.
Chrietzberg
|
|
|
|
March 26,
2008
|
Stephanie G.
Chrietzberg
|
|
Director
|
|
|
55
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Independent Auditors Report
To
the Board of Directors
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Monterey, California
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Northern
California Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Monterey County
Bank, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporations
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Northern California
Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
Watsonville,
California
March 21,
2008
1
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2007 and 2006
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
8,063
|
|
$
|
4,979
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
12,090
|
|
17,455
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
20,153
|
|
22,434
|
|
Time deposits with other
financial institutions
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
1,224
|
|
1,762
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale
|
|
36,801
|
|
15,286
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at cost (fair value
approximates $8,105,000 in 2007; $7,280,000 in 2006)
|
|
7,869
|
|
7,012
|
|
Other investments
|
|
2,824
|
|
1,967
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
1,887
|
|
1,182
|
|
Loans, net of allowance
for loan losses of $2,028,000 in 2007; $1,409,000 in 2006
|
|
166,861
|
|
128,868
|
|
Premises and equipment,
net
|
|
4,874
|
|
4,613
|
|
Cash surrender value of
life insurance
|
|
3,845
|
|
3,671
|
|
Interest receivable and
other assets
|
|
7,527
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
253,865
|
|
$
|
190,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing demand
|
|
$
|
24,814
|
|
$
|
30,079
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
15,600
|
|
17,262
|
|
Savings
|
|
5,487
|
|
5,326
|
|
Time less than $100,000
|
|
58,812
|
|
43,135
|
|
Time in denominations of $100,000 or more
|
|
62,620
|
|
35,826
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
167,333
|
|
131,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
borrowed funds
|
|
52,500
|
|
34,750
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
securities
|
|
8,248
|
|
8,248
|
|
Payable for investment
securities purchased
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
Interest payable and other
liabilities
|
|
6,125
|
|
3,542
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
239,431
|
|
178,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no stated par value, authorized: 2,500,000 shares, issued
and outstanding: 1,845,918 and 1,721,715 shares at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively
|
|
5,502
|
|
5,060
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
8,831
|
|
7,363
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
101
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
14,434
|
|
12,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
253,865
|
|
$
|
190,570
|
|
The notes to consolidated financial statements are an
integral part of these statements.
2
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years
Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and fee income on loans
|
|
$
|
14,442
|
|
$
|
11,953
|
|
$
|
9,562
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
66
|
|
50
|
|
29
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
1,957
|
|
1,036
|
|
748
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
476
|
|
721
|
|
352
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
16,941
|
|
13,760
|
|
10,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
|
|
49
|
|
68
|
|
64
|
|
Savings and time deposit accounts
|
|
2,638
|
|
1,443
|
|
1,051
|
|
Time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more
|
|
2,405
|
|
1,479
|
|
990
|
|
Notes payable and other borrowings
|
|
2,910
|
|
2,207
|
|
1,567
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
8,002
|
|
5,197
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
8,939
|
|
8,563
|
|
7,019
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
865
|
|
410
|
|
150
|
|
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses
|
|
8,074
|
|
8,153
|
|
6,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
634
|
|
547
|
|
564
|
|
Income from sales and servicing of Small Business Administration
loans
|
|
480
|
|
690
|
|
991
|
|
Gain on sale of Pacific Coast Bankers Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
3,222
|
|
4,627
|
|
2,807
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
4,336
|
|
7,177
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
4,049
|
|
3,854
|
|
3,282
|
|
Occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
866
|
|
790
|
|
665
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
165
|
|
149
|
|
141
|
|
Data processing
|
|
361
|
|
322
|
|
356
|
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
3,564
|
|
3,512
|
|
3,369
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
9,005
|
|
8,627
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax
provision
|
|
3,405
|
|
6,703
|
|
3,418
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
1,476
|
|
2,866
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
$
|
3,837
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
The notes to consolidated
financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
3
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Years
Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Common
|
|
Retained
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Stock
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2004
|
|
1,608,019
|
|
$
|
4,720
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
$
|
7,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain on securities and other assets, net of reclassification
adjustment and tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
(45
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$.20 per share cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
Repurchase of stock options
|
|
(3,795
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit
|
|
27,215
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2005
|
|
1,631,439
|
|
4,772
|
|
4,129
|
|
30
|
|
8,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain on securities and other assets, net of reclassification
adjustment and tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
(51
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$.35 per share cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense, net of tax benefit
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit
|
|
90,276
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2006
|
|
1,721,715
|
|
5,060
|
|
7,363
|
|
(21
|
)
|
12,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
Change in net unrealized gain on securities and other assets, net of reclassification
adjustment and tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
122
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$.25 per share cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit
|
|
124,203
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2007
|
|
1,845,918
|
|
$
|
5,502
|
|
$
|
8,831
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
$
|
14,434
|
|
The notes to consolidated
financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years
Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
$
|
3,837
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
293
|
|
277
|
|
241
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
865
|
|
410
|
|
150
|
|
Realized (gain) loss on sales of available for sale securities and
other investments, net
|
|
(216
|
)
|
(1,308
|
)
|
92
|
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs
|
|
372
|
|
334
|
|
224
|
|
Net amortization (accretion) of securities
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
7
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
(91
|
)
|
(32
|
)
|
(179
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on sale of equipment
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
(124
|
)
|
(104
|
)
|
(85
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
538
|
|
(735
|
)
|
(224
|
)
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
(705
|
)
|
4,133
|
|
(776
|
)
|
Interest receivable
|
|
(392
|
)
|
(187
|
)
|
(210
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
(4,361
|
)
|
(465
|
)
|
94
|
|
Increase in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
904
|
|
589
|
|
376
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
1,748
|
|
357
|
|
665
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
756
|
|
7,133
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities
|
|
24,217
|
|
5,831
|
|
597
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
(41,863
|
)
|
(8,575
|
)
|
(6,020
|
)
|
Net increase in loans
|
|
(70,019
|
)
|
(43,118
|
)
|
(60,467
|
)
|
Loan purchases
|
|
(11,001
|
)
|
(19,150
|
)
|
(13,448
|
)
|
Proceeds from loan sales
|
|
41,790
|
|
34,642
|
|
62,052
|
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
1
|
|
Purchase of life insurance policies
|
|
(50
|
)
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|
|
Additions to bank premises and equipment
|
|
(547
|
)
|
(584
|
)
|
(2,379
|
)
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
(56,473
|
)
|
(32,005
|
)
|
(20,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes to consolidated
financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years
Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
35,705
|
|
13,508
|
|
20,857
|
|
Proceeds from FHLB borrowings
|
|
20,500
|
|
12,000
|
|
10,000
|
|
Repayments of FHLB borrowings
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(4,900
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
442
|
|
270
|
|
67
|
|
Repurchase of common stock and stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid on common stock
|
|
(461
|
)
|
(603
|
)
|
(326
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
53,436
|
|
23,175
|
|
25,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(2,281
|
)
|
(1,697
|
)
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING
|
|
22,434
|
|
24,131
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
ENDING
|
|
$
|
20,153
|
|
$
|
22,434
|
|
$
|
24,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
7,100
|
|
$
|
3,296
|
|
$
|
2,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
1,262
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
The notes to consolidated
financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
6
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business
The Bank provides a variety
of financial services to individuals and small businesses through its four
offices on the Monterey Peninsula. Its
primary deposit products are demand and term certificate accounts. Its primary lending products are residential,
commercial, and Small Business Administration (SBA) loans.
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. (the Corporation)
and its wholly owned subsidiary, Monterey County Bank (the Bank). All
significant
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Corporation determines
whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first
evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable
interest entity under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Voting interest entities are entities in which the total
equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself
independently and provides the equity holders with the obligation to absorb
losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions
about the entitys activities. The Corporation consolidates voting interest
entities in which it has all, or at least a majority of, the voting
interest. As defined in applicable
accounting standards, variable interest entities (VIEs) are entities that lack
one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in an entity
is present when an enterprise has a variable interest, or a combination of
variable interests, that will absorb a majority of the entitys expected
losses, receive a majority of the entitys expected residual returns, or
both. The enterprise with a controlling
financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the
VIE. The Corporations wholly owned
subsidiaries, Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust I and Northern
California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II, are VIEs for which the Corporation is
not the primary beneficiary.
Accordingly, the accounts of these entities are not included in the
Corporations consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2007 and
2006.
7
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Use of Estimates
In preparing consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Material estimates that are
particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the
determination of the allowance for loan losses, and the valuation of deferred
tax assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting
cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash, amounts due from banks and
Federal funds sold on a daily basis, all of which mature within ninety days.
Time Deposits with Other Financial Institutions
Interest-bearing deposits in
banks mature within one year and are carried at cost.
Trading Activities
The Corporation engages in
trading activities consisting of securities that are held principally for
resale in the near term. The securities
are recorded in the trading assets account at fair value with changes in fair
value recorded in earnings. Interest and
dividends are included in net interest income.
Quoted market prices, when
available, are used to determine the fair value of trading instruments. If quoted market prices are not available,
then the fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of
instruments with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows.
8
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Investment Securities
Investments in debt
securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to
maturity are classified as held to maturity and reflected at cost, adjusted
for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, which are recognized
as adjustments to interest income. Other
marketable securities are classified as available for sale and are reflected
at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and
reported in other comprehensive income.
Purchase premiums and
discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the
terms of the securities. Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and
available for sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than
temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment
losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of
the Bank to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient
to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Gains and losses on disposition are generally
recognized on the trade date, based on the net proceeds and the adjusted
carrying amount of the securities sold using the specific identification
method.
Sales and Servicing of SBA Loans
The Bank originates loans to
customers under the Small Business Administration (SBA) program that generally
provides for SBA guarantees of 70% to 85% of each loan. The Bank generally sells the guaranteed
portion of each loan to a third party and retains only the non-guaranteed
portion in its own portfolio. A gain is
recognized on these loans through collection on sale of a premium over the
adjusted carrying value, or through retention of an ongoing rate differential,
less a normal service fee between the rate paid by the borrower to the Bank and
the rate paid by the Bank to the purchaser (excess servicing fee). In calculating the gain, the Bank assumes
that the loans sold will be outstanding for one-half of their contractual
lives.
9
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Sales and Servicing of SBA Loans (Continued)
The Banks investment in an
SBA loan is allocated among the retained portion of the loan, excess servicing
retained, and the sold portion of the loan, based on the relative fair market
value of each portion at the time of loan origination, adjusted for payments
and other activities. Since the portion
retained does not carry an SBA guarantee, part of the gain recognized on the
sold portion of the loan is deferred and amortized as a yield enhancement on
the retained portion of the loan. Excess
servicing fees are reflected as an asset which is amortized over an expected
half life; in the event future prepayments are significant and future expected
cash flows are inadequate to cover the unamortized excess servicing asset,
additional amortization is recognized.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consist
of the portion of loans that are guaranteed by the SBA and are carried at the
lower of cost or market. Market value
for loans guaranteed by the SBA is generally determined based on the price at
which the loans were committed to be sold on the trade date. Direct loan origination costs are recorded at
settlement as an adjustment to gain or loss on sale.
Loans and Loan Fees
The Bank grants mortgage,
commercial, construction, and consumer loans to customers. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio
is represented by
mortgage loans
on the Monterey Peninsula. The ability
of the Banks debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real
estate and general economic conditions in the area.
Loans, as reported, have
been reduced by
undisbursed loan
funds, net deferred loan fees, and the allowance for loan losses.
Loans that management has
the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or
pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances
adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees
or cost on originated loans. Interest
income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct
origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related
loan yield using the interest method.
10
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Loans and Loan Fees (Continued)
The accrual of interest on
mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days
past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Credit card loans and other personal loans
are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms
of the loan. In all cases, loans are
placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of
principal or interest is considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not
collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off is reversed
against interest income. The interest on
these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until
qualifying for return to accrual. Loans
are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts
contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably
assured.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan
losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings
and is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for reasonably
foreseeable loan losses.
The provision and the level
of the allowance are evaluated on a regular basis by management and are based
upon managements periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light
of historical experience, known and inherent risks in the nature and volume of
the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability
to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic
conditions. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to
significant change. In addition, various
regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review the Banks allowance for losses on loans and other real
estate owned. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the
allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time
of their examination. Ultimately, losses
may vary from current estimates and future additions to the allowance may be
necessary.
Loan losses are charged
against the allowance when management believes the collectibility of the loan
balance is unlikely. Subsequent
recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
11
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
The allowance consists of
specific, general and unallocated components.
The specific component relates to loans that are classified as either
doubtful, substandard or special mention.
For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is
established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable
market price) of the impaired loan is lower than that of the carrying value of
that loan. The general component covers
non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for
qualitative factors. An unallocated
component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect managements
estimate of probable losses. The
unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision
inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating
specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a
creditor will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or
interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in
determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the
probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when
due. Loans that experience insignificant
payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as
impaired. Management determines the
significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis,
taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the
borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the
borrowers prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to
the principal and interest owed.
Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest
rate, the loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral
if the loan is collateral dependent.
Substantially, all of the Banks loans that have been identified as
impaired have been measured by the fair value of existing collateral.
Large groups of smaller
balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately
identify individual consumer loans for impairment disclosures.
Loan Servicing
Rights to service loans for
others are capitalized as separate assets, whether acquired through purchase or
origination, if such loans are sold or securitized with servicing rights
retained. Accordingly, the total cost of
the loan is allocated to the related servicing right and to the loan based on
the relative fair values if it is practicable to estimate those fair values.
12
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Loan Servicing (Continued)
The Bank estimates fair
value based on the present value of estimated expected future cash flows using
prepayment speeds and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved, and
servicing costs determined on an incremental cost basis.
Capitalized mortgage
servicing rights are reported in other assets and amortized to servicing
revenue in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated future net
servicing revenues of the underlying assets.
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights is assessed based on the fair
value of those rights. For purposes of
measuring impairment, the rights are stratified based on the following
predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans: loan type, size, note
rate, date of origination, term, and geographic location. Impairment is recognized through a valuation
allowance for an individual stratum, to the extent that fair value is less than
the capitalized amount for the stratum.
Premises and Equipment
The Banks premises and
equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is provided
for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to
operations over their estimated service lives.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease or the
service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. The straight-line method of depreciation is
followed for financial reporting purposes, while both accelerated and
straight-line methods are followed for income tax purposes.
It is general practice to
charge the cost of
maintenance and
repairs to earnings when incurred; major expenditures for betterments are capitalized
and depreciated.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are
recognized for estimated future tax effects attributable to income tax carry
forwards as well as temporary differences between income tax and financial
reporting purposes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to
reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount expected to be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in
which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or
settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted accordingly through the provision for income taxes.
13
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial
assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been
surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when
1) the assets have been isolated from the Bank, 2) the transferee (buyer)
obtains the right to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, free of
conditions that would constrain it from taking advantage of that right, and 3)
the Bank does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets
through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Stock Option Plans
Under the Corporations 1998
Stock Option Plan, the Corporation may grant incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options to directors, officers, and employees of the
Corporation and its subsidiary, so long as the Corporation owns a majority of
the equity interest of such subsidiary.
Incentive stock options are granted at fair value of the common stock on
the date of grant. However, an incentive
stock option granted to an individual owning 10% or more of the Corporations
stock after such grant must have an exercise price of at least 110%
of such fair market value and an exercise
period of not more than five years.
Non-qualified stock options may be granted at prices not lower than 85%
of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The Board of Directors is authorized to
determine when options become exercisable within a period not exceeding 10
years from the date of grant. Under the
Plan, 211,081 shares of common stock have been reserved for the granting of
these options. At December 31,
2007, 76,534 options were outstanding.
During 2007, no options were granted, and 124,203 options were exercised
by officers, employees, and board members.
As of December 31, 2007, all options have been vested.
Under the Corporations 2007
Stock Option Plan, the Corporation may grant incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options to directors, officers, and employees of the
Corporation and its subsidiary, so long as the Corporation owns a majority of
the equity interest of such subsidiary.
Incentive stock options are granted at fair value of the common stock on
the date of grant. However, an incentive
stock option granted to an individual owning 10% or more of the Corporations
stock after such grant must have an exercise price of at least 110%
of such fair market value and an exercise
period of not more than five years. The
Board of Directors is authorized to determine when options become exercisable
within a period not exceeding 10 years from the date of grant. Under the Plan, 300,000 shares of common
stock have been reserved for the granting of these options. At December 31, 2007, no options were
issued or outstanding.
14
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Stock Option Plan (Continued)
The Corporation adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R, effective January 1, 2006, using the
modified prospective method and began recording compensation expense associated
with stock-based awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized as compensation expense through the income statement based on their
fair values at issue date. SFAS No. 123R also requires the benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a
financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow required under
current guidelines. Pre-tax stock-based
compensation expense was $0 and $18,000 for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006. There were no options
granted during both of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Future levels of
compensation cost recognized related to stock-based compensation awards
(including the aforementioned expected costs during the period of adoption) may
be impacted by new awards and/or modifications, repurchases and cancellations
of existing awards before and after the adoption of this standard.
The Corporation had applied
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations, in
accounting for the stock option plan prior to January 1, 2006. Under APB
Opinion No. 25, stock options issued under the Corporations stock option
plan have no intrinsic value at the grant date, and therefore, no compensation
cost is recognized for them.
The following table
illustrates the effect on the Corporations reported net income and earnings
per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provision of
SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation for the year ended December 31,
2005:
15
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Stock Option Plan (Continued)
Reported net earnings
|
|
$
|
1,929,300
|
|
Additional expense had the Corporation adopted SFAS No. 123
|
|
(52,400
|
)
|
Related income tax benefit
|
|
22,000
|
|
Pro forma net earnings
|
|
$
|
1,898,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share as reported:
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
The fair value of these
options was estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2005: risk-free
interest rate of 4.6%; dividend yield of 1.3%; expected option life of 4 years;
and volatility of 20%.
The expected volatility is
based on historical volatility. The risk-free interest rates for periods within
the contractual life of the awards are based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve
in effect at the time of the grant. The expected life is based on historical
exercise experience. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Companys
history and expectation of dividend payouts.
16
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
represent income available to common shareholders divided by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common
shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result
from the assumed issuance. Potential
common shares that may be issued by the Corporation relate solely to
outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock
method. The weighted average number of
shares outstanding for basic earnings per share amounted to 1,785,812
for 2007, 1,658,675 for
2006, and 1,614,196 for 2005. The
weighted average number of shares outstanding for dilutive earnings per share
amounted to 1,881,004 for 2007, 1,831,892 for 2006, and 1,923,532 for
2005. The Corporation paid cash
dividends of $.25, $.35, and $.20 per share in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(an interpretation of SFAS Statement No. 109)
. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006 with earlier adoption encouraged. FIN 48 was issued to clarify the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the consolidated financial
statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return.
The adoption of FIN 48 did not have an impact on the Corporations
consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
In March of 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 156,
Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assets
, which amends SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
, with respect to the
accounting for servicing of financial assets. SFAS No. 156 requires that
all separately recognized servicing rights be initially measured at fair value,
if practicable. For each class of separately recognized servicing assets and
liabilities, SFAS No. 156 permits an entity to choose either of the
following subsequent measurement methods: (1) the amortization of
servicing assets or liabilities in proportion to and over the period of
estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss or (2) the reporting
of servicing assets or liabilities at fair value at each reporting date and
reporting changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes
occur. SFAS No. 156 also requires additional disclosures for all
separately recognized servicing rights. Early adoption is permitted as of the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued
consolidated financial statements, including interim consolidated financial
statements, for any period of that fiscal year.
17
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)
SFAS No. 156 is
effective the earlier of the date an entity adopts the requirements of SFAS No. 156,
or as of the beginning of its first fiscal year beginning after September 15,
2006. An entity should apply the requirements for recognition and initial
measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities prospectively to all
transactions after the effective date of SFAS No. 156. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 did not
have an impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements and
results of operations.
In September 2006, the
FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS 157),
Fair Value Measurements
,
effective for the Corporation beginning on January 1, 2008, with earlier
adoption permitted. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements.
This statement establishes a
fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between valuations obtained from
sources independent of the entity and those from the entitys own unobservable
inputs that are not corroborated by observable market data. SFAS 157 expands
disclosures about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in
interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. The disclosures focus on the inputs used to
measure fair value and for recurring fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs, the effect of the measurements on earnings or changes in
net assets for the period. This statement encourages an entity to combine the
fair value information disclosed under this statement with the fair value
information disclosed under other accounting pronouncements, including SFAS
107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, where
practicable. The Corporation is currently assessing the impact of this guidance
on its financial statements.
On September 7, 2006,
the Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-4, Accounting for
Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar
Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF 06-4) and on March 15, 2007, the Task
Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-10, Accounting for
Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements(EITF 06-10).
The scope of these two issues relates to the recognition of a liability and
related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar life insurance
arrangements and for collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance
arrangements, respectively. EITF 06-4
and EITF 06-10 are both effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2007, although early adoption is permitted.
The financial impact of adoption of EITF 06-04 and EITF 06-10 is
estimated at $361,000.
18
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)
In February 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
which is effective for the Corporation as of the beginning of the first fiscal
year that begins after November 15, 2007.
Early adoption is permitted as of the fiscal year that begins on or
after November 15, 2006, provided that the Corporation also elects to
apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. The Corporation is currently evaluating the
impact of adopting this Statement on the Banks financial statements.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accounting principles
generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains, and losses be
included in net income. Although certain
changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the
equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are
components of comprehensive income.
The components of other
comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects for the years ended December 31,
are as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities
and other assets, net
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) realized in income
|
|
(216
|
)
|
5
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
222
|
|
(93
|
)
|
(82
|
)
|
Tax effect
|
|
(100
|
)
|
42
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-tax amount
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
19
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Continued)
The components of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Unrealized holding gains
(losses) on available for sale securities
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gains
on available for sale asset strip receivable
|
|
21
|
|
41
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
(83
|
)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-tax amount
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are
charged to operations when incurred. The
amount expensed for advertising as of December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
was $164,000, $224,000, and $141,000, respectively.
Reclassification
Certain amounts have been
reclassified in the 2006 and 2005 financial statements to conform to the 2007
presentation.
Note 2.
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Corporation is required
to maintain aggregate reserves (in the form of cash and deposits with the
Federal Reserve Bank) to satisfy federal regulatory requirements. At December 2007 and 2006, these reserve
balances amounted to $790,000 and $1,184,000, respectively.
20
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 3.
TRADING ASSETS
At December 31, 2007
and 2006, the Corporations trading assets consisted of marketable equity
securities in the amount of $1,224,000 and $1,762,000, respectively.
Note 4.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS
The following is a
comparison of amortized cost and approximate fair value of investment
securities at December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA - Mortgage Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
385
|
|
State/Local Agency Securities
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Government Agency Securities
|
|
36,027
|
|
179
|
|
(15
|
)
|
36,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
36,638
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
36,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State/Local Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
7,869
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
21
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 4.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Other Investments, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT Services LLC
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, restricted
|
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
Metrocities Mortgage, LLC
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust I
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
The Independent Bankers Financial Corporation
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments
|
|
$
|
2,824
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA - Mortgage Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
$
|
626
|
|
Government Agency Securities
|
|
14,724
|
|
2
|
|
(66
|
)
|
14,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
15,365
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
(81
|
)
|
$
|
15,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State/Local Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
7,012
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
7,280
|
|
22
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 4.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Other Investments, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT Services LLC
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, restricted
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
Metrocities Mortgage, LLC
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust I
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
The Independent Bankers Financial Corporation
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
MasterCard Inc. Class B Stock
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
The amortized cost and fair
value of debt securities by contractual maturity date at December 31, 2007
follows:
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
Due after five years
through ten years
|
|
11,250
|
|
11,311
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
24,002
|
|
24,106
|
|
GNMA - Mortgage Backed
Securities
|
|
386
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,638
|
|
$
|
36,801
|
|
23
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 4.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
$
|
7,869
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturity and
sales of investment securities for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005 were $24,217,000, $5,831,000, and $597,000, respectively. Realized gains (losses) for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005 were $216,000, $1,312,000, and $(92,000), respectively.
On January 31, 2006,
Monterey County Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.,
sold its shares of common stock in Pacific Coast Bankers Bancshares (PCBB). The gross sales proceeds were $1,757,000.
After subtracting the book value of $440,000, the resulting pretax gain was
$1,313,000. The after tax gain will approximate $790,000. Monterey County Bank
owned 3,699 shares of PCBB that sold for $475.00 per share less a $4,000 sales
charge.
As a member of the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system, the Bank is required to maintain an investment in
FHLB stock in an amount equal to the greater of 1% of its outstanding mortgage
loans or 5% of advances from the FHLB. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
the Bank had advances from the FHLB totaling $52,500,000 and $34,750,000,
respectively. No ready market exists for FHLB stock, and it has no quoted
market value. FHLB stock is evaluated for impairment based on an estimate of
the ultimate recoverability of par value.
At December 31, 2007
and 2006, U.S. Government obligations with a carrying value of $31,576,000 and
$15,286,000, respectively, were pledged to secure advances from the FHLB.
In December 2007, the
bank purchased two debt securities totaling $5,225,000 that have settlement
dates in January 2008. The bank
records their investment purchases as of the trade date and has recorded the
corresponding payable for investment securities purchased of $5,225,000 at December 31,
2007.
24
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 4.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Information pertaining to
securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2007, aggregated
by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been
in a continuous loss position follows:
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA - Mortgage Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Government Agencies
|
|
2,147
|
|
(14
|
)
|
1,000
|
|
(1
|
)
|
3,147
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,532
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
3,532
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State/Local Agency Securities
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
25
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 4.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND OTHER INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Information pertaining to
securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2006, aggregated
by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been
in a continuous loss position follows:
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA - Mortgage Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
Government Agencies
|
|
5,983
|
|
(6
|
)
|
5,675
|
|
(60
|
)
|
11,658
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,609
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
$
|
5,675
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
$
|
12,284
|
|
$
|
(81
|
)
|
There were no unrealized
losses at December 31, 2006 pertaining to securities held to maturity.
Management evaluates
securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis,
and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation.
Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which
the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the
Bank to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to
allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
On December 31, 2007,
four securities had an unrealized loss with aggregate depreciation of 0.05%
from the Banks amortized cost basis. On December 31, 2006, seven
securities had an unrealized loss with aggregate depreciation of 0.65% from the
Banks amortized cost basis. The unrealized losses relate to a mortgage backed
security issued by federally sponsored agencies, which are fully secured by
conforming residential loans, securities issued by agencies of the United
States and securities issued by local government agencies. Since the Bank has the ability to hold these
securities until estimated maturity, no decline is deemed to be other than
temporary.
26
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 5.
SALES AND SERVICING OF SBA LOANS
A summary of the activity of
SBA loans follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
SBA loans originated
|
|
$
|
3,065
|
|
$
|
3,645
|
|
$
|
6,274
|
|
SBA loans sold
|
|
$
|
1,933
|
|
$
|
4,428
|
|
$
|
7,945
|
|
A summary of income from SBA
loans sold is as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Income from premiums
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
$
|
665
|
|
Income from servicing
|
|
333
|
|
340
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SBA sales and
servicing income
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 6.
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
A summary of loan balances
follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
28,310
|
|
$
|
26,361
|
|
Construction
|
|
23,396
|
|
17,326
|
|
Real estate, mortgage
|
|
116,625
|
|
86,207
|
|
Installment
|
|
876
|
|
694
|
|
Government guaranteed
loans purchased
|
|
32
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
169,239
|
|
130,627
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
(2,028
|
)
|
(1,409
|
)
|
Deferred origination fees,
net
|
|
(350
|
)
|
(350
|
)
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
166,861
|
|
$
|
128,868
|
|
An analysis of the allowance
for loan losses follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
$
|
1,101
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
4
|
|
7
|
|
2
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
(250
|
)
|
(109
|
)
|
(14
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
865
|
|
410
|
|
150
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,028
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
$
|
1,101
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
and 2006, there were $3,396,000 and $155,000 in impaired loans,
respectively. No additional amounts are
committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.
During the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006, the average recorded investment in impaired loans amounted to
approximately $702,000 and $142,000, respectively. At December 31, 2007 and 2006 there were
$3,396,000 and $155,000 in impaired loans with an allowance of $212,000 and
$31,000, respectively. If interest on non-accrual loans had been accrued, such
income would have approximated $133,000 and $11,000 for 2007 and 2006,
respectively. There were no non-accrual
loans at December 31, 2005.
28
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 6.
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
As of December 31, 2007
and 2006, there were no loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing
interest.
Loans serviced for others
are not included in the accompanying balance sheets. The unpaid principal balance of loans
serviced for others was $109,294,000 and $101,138,000 at December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
Note 7.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of the cost and
accumulated depreciation of banking premises and equipment and their estimated
useful lives follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
Building
|
|
1,808
|
|
1,808
|
|
40
years
|
|
Building improvements
|
|
1,114
|
|
897
|
|
40
years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
835
|
|
833
|
|
Lease
term
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
2,243
|
|
1,932
|
|
3-8
years
|
|
|
|
7,174
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
(2,300
|
)
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,874
|
|
$
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005 amounted to $293,000, $277,000, and $241,000, respectively.
29
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 8.
DEPOSITS
At
December 31, 2007, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as
follows:
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
67,675
|
|
2009
|
|
31,006
|
|
2010
|
|
18,965
|
|
2011
|
|
1,748
|
|
2012
|
|
1,964
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
121,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9.
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT SECURITIES
On March 27, 2003, the
Corporations wholly owned special-purpose trust subsidiary, Northern
California Bancorp, Inc. Trust I (Trust I) issued $3 million in
cumulative Trust Preferred Securities.
The securities bear a floating rate of interest of 3.25% over the three
month LIBOR rate, payable quarterly. The
effective rate at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 8.49% and 8.62%,
respectively. Concurrent with the
issuance of the Trust Preferred Securities, Trust I used the proceeds from the
Trust Preferred Securities offering to purchase a like amount of Junior
Subordinated Debentures of the Corporation. The Corporation will pay interest
on the Junior Subordinated Debentures to Trust I, which represents the sole
revenue and sole source of dividend distributions to the holders of the Trust
Preferred Securities. The Corporation
has the right, assuming no default has occurred, to defer payments of interest
on the Junior Subordinated Debentures at any time for a period not to exceed 20
consecutive quarters.
The Trust Preferred
Securities will mature on April 7, 2033, but can be redeemed under certain
circumstances at a premium prior to April 7, 2008, and can be redeemed, in
whole or in part, on any January 7, April 7, July 7 or October 7
occurring after April 7, 2008 at par.
The Corporation fully and unconditionally guarantees the obligations of
Trust I, on a subordinated basis.
The Corporation received
$2.91 million from Trust I upon issuance of the Junior Subordinated Debentures,
of which $1 million was contributed by the Corporation to the Bank to increase
its capital, $1.14 million was used to retire existing Corporation debt and the
remainder was held as working capital.
Under applicable regulatory guidelines, a portion of the Trust Preferred
Securities will qualify as Tier I Capital and the remainder as Tier II Capital.
30
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 9.
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT SECURITIES (Continued)
On November 13, 2003,
the Corporations wholly owned special-purpose trust subsidiary, Northern
California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II (Trust II) issued $5 million in
cumulative Trust Preferred Securities.
The securities bear a floating rate of interest of 2.85% over the three
month LIBOR rate, payable quarterly. The
effective rate at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 7.76% and 8.22%,
respectively. Concurrent with the issuance of the Trust Preferred Securities,
Trust II used the proceeds from the Trust Preferred Securities offering to
purchase a like amount of Junior Subordinated Debentures of the Corporation.
The Corporation will pay interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures to
Trust II, which represents the sole revenue and sole source of dividend
distributions to the holders of the Trust Preferred Securities. The Corporation has the right, assuming no
default has occurred, to defer payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated
Debentures at any time for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The Trust Preferred Securities will mature on
November 8, 2033, but can be redeemed under certain circumstances at a
premium prior to November 8, 2008, and can be redeemed, in whole or in
part, on any February 8, May 8, August 8 or November 8
occurring after November 8, 2008 at par.
The Corporation fully and unconditionally guarantees the obligations of
Trust II on a subordinated basis.
The Corporation received
$4.96 million from Trust II upon issuance of the Junior Subordinated
Debentures, of which $2.5 million was contributed by the Corporation to the
Bank to increase its capital and the remainder was held as working capital.
Issuance costs of $116,000
and $54,000 related to Trust I and Trust II, respectively have been capitalized
and are being amortized over the 30-year life of the securities.
During the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 interest expense on Junior Subordinated Debentures totaled
$696,000, $676,000, and $526,000, respectively.
The amortization of the issuance cost totaled $6,000 for each year ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Note 10.
FUNDING SOURCES
The Bank has lines of credit
from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of San Francisco, Bank of the West,
Pacific Coast Bankers Bank and The Independent Bank with remaining available
borrowing capacity on December 31, 2007 of $4,236,000, $4,500,000,
$6,000,000 and $5,000,000, respectively.
The Federal Home Loan Bank line of credit has a maximum borrowing
capacity of 25% of the Banks total assets, adjusted quarterly. The Federal Home Loan Bank line of credit is
secured by a portion of the Banks real estate secured loans and securities at December 31,
2007. At December 31, 2007, the
total principal balance of pledged loans and securities was $41,309,000 and
$31,576,000, respectively.
31
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 10.
FUNDING SOURCES (Continued)
At December 31, 2006,
the total principal balance of pledged loans and securities was $33,464,000 and
$15,286,000, respectively.
The following table provides
information on seventeen FHLB advances outstanding at December 31, 2007.
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Funding
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
06/17/05
|
|
06/17/10
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
08/20/07
|
|
08/20/10
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
11/14/05
|
|
11/15/10
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
01/26/06
|
|
01/26/11
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
01/26/06
|
|
01/26/11
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
07/17/06
|
|
07/18/11
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
5.49
|
%
|
07/17/06
|
|
07/18/11
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
08/25/06
|
|
08/25/11
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
07/30/07
|
|
07/30/12
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
10/01/07
|
|
10/01/12
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
09/18/07
|
|
09/18/14
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
7.72
|
%
|
08/21/01
|
|
06/03/30
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
5.96
|
%
|
08/02/04
|
|
07/28/34
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
12/24/04
|
|
12/22/34
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
05/04/05
|
|
05/01/35
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
5.31
|
%
|
11/17/06
|
|
11/17/36
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
06/29/07
|
|
06/29/37
|
|
$
|
52,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank of the West,
Pacific Coast Bankers Bank and The Independent Bank lines of credit are
unsecured. The Bank did not utilize any
overnight borrowings in 2007 or 2006.
The Bank has a $330,000
letter of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco to
secure the uninsured portion of local agency deposits maintained with the
Bank. The letter of credit matures April 17,
2011.
32
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 11.
INCOME TAXES
Allocation of federal and
California income taxes between current and deferred portions is as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Current tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,099
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
California
|
|
468
|
|
768
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
2,898
|
|
1,668
|
|
Deferred tax provision
(benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
(259
|
)
|
(117
|
)
|
(213
|
)
|
California
|
|
(110
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
(41
|
)
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
278
|
|
135
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
(32
|
)
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
$
|
2,866
|
|
$
|
1,489
|
|
The differences between the
statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rates are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Statutory federal tax rate
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
34.00
|
%
|
34.00
|
%
|
California taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
7.20
|
|
7.20
|
|
7.20
|
|
Other, net
|
|
2.15
|
|
1.56
|
|
2.37
|
|
Effective tax rates
|
|
43.35
|
%
|
42.76
|
%
|
43.57
|
%
|
33
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 11.
INCOME TAXES (Continued)
The components of the net
deferred tax asset, included in other assets, are as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
California
|
|
371
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
1,565
|
|
1,074
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
(823
|
)
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of each
type of income and expense items that give rise to deferred taxes are as
follows
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets
(liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on securities
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
California franchise tax
|
|
100
|
|
182
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
860
|
|
601
|
|
Accrued salary continuation liability
|
|
383
|
|
383
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
(88
|
)
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
1,565
|
|
1,074
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
(823
|
)
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
The Bank establishes a
valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence, it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
34
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 12.
COMMITMENTS
In the normal course of
business, there are outstanding commitments that are not reflected in the
consolidated financial statements.
Operating lease commitments
The Bank leases its branch
offices in Carmel By-The-Sea, Carmel Valley, Pacific Grove and a Salinas branch
office which is scheduled to open during the second quarter of 2008. The Carmel By-The-Sea office has a five and
one half year lease with four, five year options and commenced in April 2002. The Carmel Valley building has a twenty-five
year lease which commenced in March 1981 and an addendum to the lease
executed in 2005 provides for two options to renew the lease for an additional
10 years each, and may be adjusted annually for changes in the Consumer Price
Index. The Pacific Grove building has a
five-year lease with five, five-year options and commenced in April 1997. The Salinas building has a five-year lease
with four, five-year options and commenced in November 2007. The Bank leases approximately 1,000 square
feet at 321 Webster Street, Monterey, CA.
The 321 Webster Street lease has a term of three years commencing September 2000,
with a three-year option. An addendum to
the lease was executed in 2004 and provided for two, five year options to
extend the lease, which commenced in September 2006. The Bank also leases certain equipment used
in the normal course of business.
Rent expense for operating
leases is included in occupancy and equipment expense and amounted to
approximately $286,000, $275,000, and $286,000 in 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively.
Effective April 1,
2000, the Bank entered into a five year sublease agreement to rent one of the
units in the Carmel Valley branch, upon expiration of the sublease in 2005 the
Bank elected to retain the space for its own use. Sublease rental income for the year ending
2005 was approximately $27,000.
Effective July 1, 2002,
the Bank entered into a five year and three months sublease agreement to rent
one of the units in the Carmel-By-The-Sea branch. The sublease was terminated in 2006 due to
default for non-payment of rent.
Sublease rental income for the years ending 2006 and 2005 was
approximately $24,000 and $40,000, respectively. In 2007 approximately $18,000 in delinquent
2006 rent was collected. The Bank has
decided to retain the subleased portion of the facility for its own use.
35
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 12.
COMMITMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum lease
commitments for all non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
Year Ending
|
|
Minimum Lease
|
|
December 31
|
|
Commitments
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
363,500
|
|
2009
|
|
363,500
|
|
2010
|
|
363,500
|
|
2011
|
|
267,000
|
|
2012
|
|
168,700
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,526,200
|
|
Loan commitments
The Bank is a party to
financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit. Such
commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate
risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Banks exposure to
credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in
making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
At December 31, 2007
and 2006, such commitments to extend credit were $20,794,000 and $35,434,000,
respectively, of undisbursed lines of credit, undisbursed loans in process, and
commitment letters.
36
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 13.
CONCENTRATION OF RISK
The Bank grants commercial,
construction, real estate and installment loans to businesses and individuals
primarily in the Monterey Peninsula area of Northern California. Most loans are secured by business assets, and
commercial and residential real estate. Real estate and construction loans held
for investment represented 83% and 79% of total loans held for investment at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. The Bank
has no concentration of loans with any one customer.
The Bank does have
concentrations of loans in the real estate and accommodation and food services
industries. Loans held for investment in
the real estate industry represented 28.49% and 35.65% of total loans held for
investment at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Loans held for investment in the
accommodation and food services industry represented 17.85% and 16.58% of total
loans held for investment at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note 14.
OTHER INCOME AND OTHER GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Other income for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 totaled $3,222,000, $4,627,000,
and $2,807,000, respectively.
Significant categories comprising other income were as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Merchant discount fees
|
|
$
|
2,423
|
|
$
|
2,614
|
|
$
|
2,343
|
|
Commercial banking broker
fees
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
Life insurance cash
surrender value earnings
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
Credit card marketing
program income
|
|
$
|
684
|
|
$
|
1,308
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
Stored value card
marketing program income
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Trading asset activities
|
|
$
|
(686
|
)
|
$
|
283
|
|
$
|
(392
|
)
|
Net gain (loss) realized
on available for sale securities
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
$
|
|
|
37
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 14.
OTHER INCOME AND OTHER GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (Continued)
Other general and
administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005 totaled $3,564,000, $3,512,000, and $3,369,000, respectively. Significant categories comprising other
general and administrative expenses were as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Merchant credit processing
expense
|
|
$
|
2,028
|
|
$
|
2,154
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
Advertising
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
Business development
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
Insurance
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
Stationary and supplies
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
Note 15.
MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Corporation (on a
consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements
can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the
Corporations and Banks financial statements.
Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are
also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings, and other factors. Under applicable regulatory guidelines, a
portion of the Trust Preferred Securities qualify as Tier I Capital, and the
remainder as Tier II Capital. Prompt
corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures
established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation
and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following
table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to
risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average
assets (as defined). Management believes,
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, that the Corporation and the Bank met
all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
38
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 15.
MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31,
2007, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action.
To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain
minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set
forth in the following tables. There are
no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have
changed the Banks category. The
Corporations and the Banks actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31,
2007 and 2006 are also presented in the tables.
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum To Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Corrective
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
Action
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Requirement
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Total Capital to Risk
Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
23,849
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
$
|
15,108
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
Monterey County Bank
|
|
$
|
22,197
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
$
|
14,977
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
$
|
18,721
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital to Risk
Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
17,429
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
$
|
7,554
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
Monterey County Bank
|
|
$
|
20,169
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
$
|
7,488
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
$
|
11,232
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital to Average
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
17,429
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
$
|
9,410
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
Monterey County Bank
|
|
$
|
20,169
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
$
|
9,393
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
$
|
11,742
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
39
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 15.
MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum To Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Corrective
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
Action
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Requirement
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Total Capital to Risk
Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
21,439
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
$
|
11,812
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
Monterey County Bank
|
|
$
|
19,559
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
$
|
11,652
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
$
|
14,565
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital to Risk
Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
15,097
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
$
|
5,906
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
Monterey County Bank
|
|
$
|
18,117
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
$
|
5,826
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
$
|
8,739
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital to Average
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
15,097
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
$
|
6,882
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
Monterey County Bank
|
|
$
|
18,117
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
$
|
7,137
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
$
|
8,921
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Note 16.
OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS
The Corporation is subject
to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under the
Bank Holding Corporation Act. The Bank
is subject to regulation, supervision, and regular examination by the
California Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation. The regulations
of these agencies affect most aspects of the Corporations business and
prescribe permissible types of loans and investments, the amount of required
reserves, requirements for branch offices, the permissible scope of the
Corporations activities, and various other requirements. The Corporation is also subject to certain
regulations of the Federal Reserve Bank dealing primarily with check clearing
activities, establishment of banking reserves, Truth-in-Lending (Regulation Z),
and Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B).
40
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 17.
STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK DIVIDENDS
At December 31, 2007,
options for the purchase of 76,534 shares of the Corporations common stock
were outstanding and exercisable at prices ranging from $2.25 - $ 4.40. The status of all stock options is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price Range
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2005
|
|
293,140
|
|
$
|
1.71
- $4.40
|
|
4
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(90,276
|
)
|
$
|
1.71
- $4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2006
|
|
202,864
|
|
$
|
1.86
- $4.40
|
|
2.3
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(124,203
|
)
|
$
|
1.86
- $3.30
|
|
|
|
Expired unexercised
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2007
|
|
76,534
|
|
$
|
2.25
- $4.40
|
|
2.2
Years
|
|
The weighted average
exercise price was $3.56, $3.19, and $2.47 for the years ending December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. No
options were granted in both 2007 and 2006, the weighted average fair value of
options granted during the year ending December 31, 2005 was $4.00. All of the options are exercisable as of December 31,
2007.
There were no non-vested
options at both December 2007 and 2006.
The intrinsic value of
options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2007 was $912,000.
The aggregate intrinsic values of stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31,
2007 were $556,000. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax
intrinsic value based on stock options with an exercise price less than the
Corporations closing stock price of $11 as of December 31, 2007, which
would have been received by the option holders had those option holders
exercised those options as of that date.
41
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 18.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Corporation has and
expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of
its business with directors, officers, principal shareholders, and their
associates. These transactions,
including loans and deposits, are granted on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and collateral on loans, as those prevailing at the
same time for comparable transactions with others and do not involve more than
the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.
Aggregate loan transactions
with related parties are approximately as follows:
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
New loans
|
|
497
|
|
Advances on lines of credit
|
|
71
|
|
Repayments
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2006
|
|
1,629
|
|
New loans
|
|
3,761
|
|
Advances on lines of credit
|
|
19
|
|
Repayments
|
|
(1,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
4,132
|
|
Related party deposits
totaled $1,103,000 and $259,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Note 19.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
During 1995, the Corporation
established an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) to invest in the
Corporations common stock for the benefit of eligible employees. The Board of Directors determines the
Corporations contribution to the plan.
Shares in the plan generally vest after seven years. The Corporation did not contribute to the
ESOP trust in 2007, 2006, or 2005. There
were no shares in the plan as of December 31, 2007.
42
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 19.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
The Bank has a salary
reduction plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code. The plan covers substantially all
full-time employees who have completed one year of service with the Bank. Employees are allowed to defer up to 15% of
their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. Under the provisions of the plan, the Banks
contribution policy is discretionary.
The Bank initiated a matching contribution in 2001 of 100% of each
employees contribution up to 6% of the employees compensation. The Banks matching contributions in 2007,
2006, and 2005 totaled $114,000, $129,000, and $107,000, respectively.
Note 20.
RESTRICTION ON DIVIDENDS, LOANS AND ADVANCES
Federal and state banking
regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans or advances
made by the Bank to the Corporation. The
total amount of dividends which may be paid by the Bank to the Corporation at
any date is generally limited to the lesser of: (i) retained earnings; or (ii) the
Banks net income for its last three fiscal years (less any distributions to
the stockholders made during such period), and loans or advances are limited to
25% of the Banks primary capital plus the allowance for loan losses on a
secured basis and 15% on an unsecured basis.
Note 21.
SALARY CONTINUATION PLANS
The Corporation has
established salary continuation plans, which provide for payments to a certain
officer at retirement. Included in other
liabilities is $855,000 of deferred compensation related to the continuation
plans at both December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The plans are funded through life insurance policies that generate value to fund the
future benefits.
Note 22.
NON-CASH TRANSACTION
The Bank had non-cash
transactions relating to the purchase of two debt securities totaling
$5,225,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The Bank had a non-cash transaction
relating to the trade in of a vehicle of $13,000 for the year ended December 31,
2006.
43
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 23.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments requires disclosure of estimated
fair values of all financial instruments where it is practicable to estimate
such values. In cases where quoted
market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using
present value or other valuation techniques.
Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used,
including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the derived fair value estimates
cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many
cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Statement No. 107 excludes certain
financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure
requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate
fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the
Corporation.
The Corporation in
estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments used the following
methods and assumptions:
Cash and cash equivalents:
The carrying amounts of
cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values.
Investment securities:
Fair values for investment
securities, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Pacific Coast Bankers
Bank stock, are based on quoted market prices.
The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair
value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Loans:
For
variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in
credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of performing fixed-rate loans
is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the Corporations current
offering rate for loans with similar characteristics. The fair value of performing adjustable-rate
loans is considered the same as book value.
The fair value of non-performing loans is estimated at the fair value of
the related collateral or, when in managements opinion foreclosure upon the
collateral is unlikely, by discounting future cash flows using rates which take
into account managements estimate of credit risk.
44
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 23.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit:
The Corporation does not generally enter into long-term fixed rate
commitments or letters of credit. These
commitments are generally priced at current prevailing rates. These rates are generally variable and,
therefore, there is no interest rate exposure.
Accordingly, the fair market value of these instruments is equal to the
carrying value amount of their net deferred fees. The net deferred fees associated with these
instruments are not material. The
Corporation has no unusual credit risk associated with these instruments.
Deposit liabilities:
The fair values disclosed
for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, savings, and
certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount
payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of
deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies
interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of
aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Accrued interest:
The carrying amounts of
accrued interest approximate fair value.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance:
The carrying amount of life insurance approximate fair value.
Short-term borrowing:
The carrying amounts of
federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other
short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair
values. Fair values of other borrowings
are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporations
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Long-term borrowing:
The fair values of the Corporations
long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on
the Corporations current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of
borrowing arrangements
45
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 23.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
The estimated fair values,
and related carrying amounts, of the Corporations financial instruments as of December 31,
2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
20,153
|
|
$
|
20,153
|
|
$
|
22,434
|
|
$
|
22,434
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
1,000
|
|
Trading assets
|
|
1,224
|
|
1,224
|
|
1,762
|
|
1,762
|
|
Debt and Other Securities
|
|
47,108
|
|
47,345
|
|
23,639
|
|
23,789
|
|
GNMA - Mortgage Backed Security
|
|
385
|
|
385
|
|
626
|
|
626
|
|
Loans, held for sale
|
|
1,887
|
|
1,887
|
|
1,182
|
|
1,182
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
166,861
|
|
177,199
|
|
128,868
|
|
122,346
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
1,352
|
|
1,352
|
|
964
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
167,333
|
|
167,017
|
|
131,628
|
|
131,437
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
60,748
|
|
63,640
|
|
42,998
|
|
43,464
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
2,250
|
|
2,250
|
|
1,346
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 24.
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. (PARENT CORPORATION ONLY)
The following are the
financial statements of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. (Parent
Corporation only) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:
Balance Sheets
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Investment in common stock of Monterey County Bank
|
|
20,781
|
|
18,522
|
|
Investment securities - trading account
|
|
1,224
|
|
1,762
|
|
Investment in Metrocities Mortgage, LLC Stock
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
Investment in AT Services LLC Acquisition Corp.
|
|
20
|
|
20
|
|
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust I
|
|
93
|
|
93
|
|
Northern California Bancorp, Inc. Trust II
|
|
155
|
|
155
|
|
Debt issue costs, net
|
|
144
|
|
150
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,916
|
|
$
|
20,859
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Dividend payable
|
|
41
|
|
75
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
69
|
|
10
|
|
Junior subordinated debt securities
|
|
8,248
|
|
8,248
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
8,482
|
|
8,457
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
14,434
|
|
12,402
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,916
|
|
$
|
20,859
|
|
47
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 24.
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. (PARENT CORPORATION ONLY) (Continued)
Statements of Income
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
108
|
|
233
|
|
35
|
|
Gain (loss) on trading asset
|
|
(794
|
)
|
50
|
|
(427
|
)
|
Other
|
|
64
|
|
58
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
341
|
|
(283
|
)
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
713
|
|
685
|
|
527
|
|
Other
|
|
72
|
|
54
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
739
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary
|
|
(1,407
|
)
|
(398
|
)
|
(864
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
(399
|
)
|
(175
|
)
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
(223
|
)
|
(659
|
)
|
Equity in undistributed
net income of subsidiary
|
|
2,937
|
|
4,060
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
$
|
3,837
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
48
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 24.
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BANCORP, INC. (PARENT CORPORATION ONLY) (Continued)
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
$
|
3,837
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed income of Monterey County Bank
|
|
(2,937
|
)
|
(4,060
|
)
|
(2,588
|
)
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in trading securities
|
|
538
|
|
(735
|
)
|
(224
|
)
|
Decrease in other assets
|
|
6
|
|
8
|
|
3
|
|
Increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
31
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
26
|
|
65
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
(438
|
)
|
(849
|
)
|
(856
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends received from subsidiary
|
|
800
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
Decrease in investments
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
52
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
800
|
|
745
|
|
52
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid on common stock
|
|
(462
|
)
|
(603
|
)
|
(326
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
442
|
|
270
|
|
67
|
|
Stock repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
(20
|
)
|
(333
|
)
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
342
|
|
(437
|
)
|
(1,078
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
143
|
|
580
|
|
1,658
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
49
Northern California Banc... (CE) (USOTC:NRLB)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De May 2024 a Jun 2024
Northern California Banc... (CE) (USOTC:NRLB)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Jun 2023 a Jun 2024