VANCOUVER, BC,
Oct. 1,
2024 /PRNewswire/ - New Pacific
Metals Corp.
(TSX: NUAG) (NYSE-A: NEWP) ("New Pacific"
or the "Company") is pleased to report
the results of its Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for the
Carangas project (the "Project") in Oruro Department, Bolivia. The PEA is based on the Mineral
Resource Estimate (the "MRE") for the Project, which was reported
on September 5, 2023, and prepared in
accordance with National Instrument 43‐101- Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43‐101").
Highlights from the PEA are as follows (all figures in US
Dollars):
- Post-tax net present value ("NPV") (5%) of $501 million and internal rate of return ("IRR")
of 26% at a base case price of $24.00/oz silver, $1.25/lb zinc, and $0.95/lb lead;
- NPV and IRR of $748 million and
34%, respectively, at $30/oz
silver;
- 16-year life of mine ("LOM"), excluding 2-years of
pre-production, producing approximately 106 million oz ("Moz") of
payable silver, 620 million pounds ("Mlbs") of payable zinc and 382
Mlbs of payable lead;
- Payable silver production of approximately 8.5 Moz per year in
years one through six; with LOM average silver production exceeding
6.5 Moz per year;
- Initial capital costs of $324
million and a post-tax payback of 3.2 years;
- Average LOM all-in sustaining cost ("AISC") of $7.60/oz silver, net of by-products; and
- Approximately 500 direct permanent jobs to be created from the
Project.
"The PEA for the Carangas project marks a significant
milestone for our company, outlining a robust, high-margin project
with strong economics. By focusing our efforts on a discrete, near
surface, subset of silver rich material we were able to define a
project with a post-tax NPV of $501 million, an
IRR of 26% and an initial capital expenditure of $324 million," stated Andrew Williams, CEO and President.
"This study not only underscores the quality of this asset
but also highlights the exceptional work of our team who discovered
this greenfield project only three years ago. While Silver
Sand remains our flagship asset, Carangas has become a significant
standalone project for our Company. Carangas provides balance and
scale to our portfolio of quality silver projects in Bolivia. We are grateful for the collaboration
with the local community and government that has brought us to this
point and look forward to continuing this partnership as we advance
the Project and unlock value for all stakeholders."
Economic Results and Sensitivities
Table 1 shows key assumptions and summarizes the projected
production and economic results of the PEA. Tables 2 and 3 show
sensitivities to silver prices and operating and capital costs.
Table 1: Carangas Open Pit Mining – Key
Economic Assumptions and Results
Item
|
Unit
|
Value
|
Silver Price
|
$/oz
|
24
|
Zinc Price
|
$/lb
|
1.25
|
Lead Price
|
$/lb
|
0.95
|
Total Mill
Feed
|
Mt
|
64.4
|
Open Pit Strip
Ratio1
|
t:t
|
1.7
|
Annual Processing
Rate
|
Mtpa
|
4.0
|
Average Silver
Grade2
|
g/t
|
63
|
Average Silver Grade in
first 6 years
|
g/t
|
83
|
Silver
Recovery
|
%
|
87.3
|
Total Payable
Silver
|
Moz
|
106
|
Total Payable
Zinc
|
Mlbs
|
620
|
Total Payable
Lead
|
Mlbs
|
382
|
Mine
Life3
|
Yrs
|
16.2
|
Average Annual
Payable Silver Metal over LOM
|
Moz
|
6.6
|
Annual Payable Silver
Metal in first 6 years
|
Moz
|
8.5
|
Total
Revenue
|
$M
|
3,296
|
Total Revenue
Contribution from Silver
|
%
|
76
|
Total Operating Costs
(net of by-products)4
|
$/oz
|
4.25
|
Government
Royalties
|
$/oz
|
1.79
|
AISC (net of
by-products)5
|
$/oz
|
7.60
|
Initial Capital
Costs
|
$M
|
324
|
Sustaining Capital
Costs6
|
$M
|
128
|
Payback Period
(post-tax)7
|
Yrs
|
3.2
|
Cumulative Net Cash
Flow (pre-tax)
|
$M
|
1,447
|
Cumulative Net Cash
Flow (post-tax)
|
$M
|
867
|
Post-tax NPV
(5%)
|
$M
|
501
|
Post-tax
IRR
|
%
|
26
|
NPV (5%) to Initial
Capex Ratio
|
$:$
|
1.5
|
Notes
|
1.
|
LOM average strip
ratio.
|
2.
|
LOM average.
|
3.
|
Excludes 2 years
pre-production period.
|
4.
|
Includes mining costs,
processing costs, tailing costs, G&A costs, and selling
costs.
|
5.
|
Includes total
operating costs, royalties, sustaining capital costs, and closure
costs.
|
6.
|
Excludes mine closure
costs of $39 M.
|
7.
|
The payback period is
measured from the beginning of production after construction is
completed.
|
Table 2: Carangas Project Economic Sensitivity
Analysis for Silver Prices – Post-Tax
|
Silver Price
Sensitivity
|
Silver
Price (US$/oz)
|
$18.00
|
$21.00
|
$24.00 (Base
Case)
|
$27.00
|
$30.00
|
Results (post-tax NPV
$M / IRR)
|
254/17%
|
378/22%
|
501/26%
|
625/30%
|
748/34%
|
Note: Inputs for the base case (100%) are
listed in Table 1. Table 2 presents how the Project's post-tax NPV
and IRR are affected by varying the selling price of silver. For
example, if the silver price increases by $3/oz (from $24.00 to
$27.00/oz) while other Inputs remain as the "Base Case", then the
NPV becomes $625 M and the IRR is 30%. NPV values are
discounted at a rate of 5%. Zinc and lead prices are kept constant
at $1.25/lb and $0.95/lb respectively.
|
Table 3: Carangas Project Economic Sensitivity Analysis for
Costs – Post-Tax
|
Cost
Sensitivity
|
Sensitivity
Items
|
-20 %
|
-10 %
|
100%
(Base Case)
|
+10 %
|
+20 %
|
Mining Cost
(post-tax NPV $M /
IRR)
|
534/27%
|
518/26%
|
501/26%
|
485/25%
|
468/25%
|
Process Cost
(post-tax NPV $M
/ IRR)
|
563/28%
|
532/27%
|
501/26%
|
470/25%
|
439/24%
|
Life-of-Mine
Capex
(post-tax NPV $M /
IRR)
|
558/32%
|
530/29%
|
501/26%
|
473/23%
|
444/21%
|
Note: Inputs for
the base case (100%) are listed in Table 1. Table 3 lists
sensitivity analysis for three "Input" variables. For
example, if LOM Capex increases by 20% (+20%), while silver price,
mine operating cost, and process operating cost remain the same as
the "Base Case" input, the NPV becomes $444M and IRR is 21%. NPV
values are discounted at a rate of 5%.
|
Capital and Operating Costs
The Project, as outlined in the PEA, is anticipated to include
an open-pit operation, with mining to be carried out by a contract
mining company, supplying mill feed to a flotation plant, producing
silver-lead and zinc concentrates. The PEA anticipates the Project
will have several capital and operating cost advantages:
- Mineralized material is flat-lying and near-surface, which is
anticipated to result in a shallow pit with a final depth of
approximately 230 meters below surface and a low LOM average strip
ratio of 1.7:1;
- It is proposed that the mine will be operated by a contractor
with current operations in Bolivia, eliminating the need for the Company
to procure a mining fleet and sustain capital for fleet
replacement;
- Bond ball mill work index (BWi) averaging 12 and a Bond
abrasion index (Ai) averaging 0.06, therefore it is anticipated
that processing mineralized material will require modest power
consumption and low grinding media consumption;
- Test work shows that total silver recoveries are favorable at
87.3%, with the Pb concentrate containing a high silver content
expected to exceed 3,500 g/t, along with an absence of deleterious
elements to enhance smelter terms;
- It is expected that the mine will be connected to the national
electricity grid, providing low-cost power at $0.05/kWh to the processing plant and other
on-site infrastructure;
- The site can be accessed via national highways and all-season
local roads; and
- The Project could be a major supplier for a proposed
government-operated zinc smelter in Oruro.
Table 4: Total Operating Cost Estimate
Item
|
Cost ($/t
milled)
|
Mining1
|
6.00
|
Processing
|
9.00
|
General and
Administration
|
3.60
|
Total operating
cost
|
18.60
|
Note
|
1.
|
Mining cost is $2.48/t
mined.
|
A summary of capital costs is shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Total Capital Cost Estimate
Item1
|
Cost
($M)
|
Mine
development
|
43
|
Processing
plant
|
188
|
Site
infrastructure2
|
68
|
Tailings Storage
Facility ("TSF")3
|
14
|
Owner's cost
|
11
|
Initial
capital
|
324
|
Life of mine sustaining
capital4
|
167
|
Note
|
1.
|
Includes direct,
indirect, and contingency costs. Contingency costs total
approximately $43 M.
|
2.
|
Includes $37 M for a
200km 115 kV power line.
|
3.
|
Tailings capital
includes initial earthworks, liners/membranes, and a water
management facility.
|
4.
|
Sustaining capital
costs include expansion of the TSF, refurbishment and replacement
of processing equipment, and mine closure of $39 M.
|
Mining
It is anticipated that the deposit will be mined using a
conventional open pit approach. This entails drilling and
blasting, with loading by hydraulic excavators and haulage by
off-highway rear dump haul trucks. The PEA pit is designed to be
relatively shallow, resulting in comparatively short hauls for both
mill feed and waste. A SW-NE cross section showing the resource
model grades and pit is illustrated in Figure 1. The mine
production schedule is illustrated in Figure 2.
Mill feed tonnes and grade are a subset of the Mineral Resource
Estimate, accounting for planned mining dilution and recovery. A
mining net smelter return ("NSR") cutoff grade of $28/t was applied and all mined material below
this cutoff grade is treated as waste. The mining cutoff
grade was chosen to cover all operating costs as well as a built-in
economic margin for the Project.
The PEA assumes that mill feed will be hauled to the primary
crusher or a run-of-mine ("ROM") stockpile near the crusher. A
portion of the oxides and lower grade resources mined in the early
years are planned to be stockpiled and processed over the life of
mine. Waste rock will be hauled to waste storage facilities. It is
anticipated that mine operations will be conducted by a contractor
with current operations in Bolivia.
It is anticipated that open-pit mining will commence in the
first year of construction. The mine plan anticipates that
19 Mt of waste and oxide material will be mined, with the
oxides stockpiled, over a two-year pre-production period. Peak
open-pit production is expected to be 15 Mt per year. The planned
open pit contains a total of 176 Mt of material (mineralized
material and waste) which is scheduled to be mined out by Year
13 of milling operations. 24 Mt of oxide and lower grade material
is planned to be processed throughout the mine, with years 14-17
processing stockpiles exclusively.
Notes: Net
Smelter Prices ("NSP") and metallurgical recoveries are used to
define the NSR cutoff grade. NSPs include market price assumptions
of $23.0/oz Ag, $0.95/lb Pb, $1.25/lb Zn. Various smelter and
refining terms, offsite costs, and a 6% royalty derive NSPs of
$20.5/oz Ag, $0.64/lb Pb, and $0.74/lb Zn. Metallurgical
recoveries of 90% Ag, 83% Pb, and 58% Zn are applied. The metal
prices, smelter terms, and recoveries for the economic analysis are
slightly different from the values described here. Checks have been
made by the qualified person to ensure that the PEA mine plan would
not be materially altered by revising these inputs to the final PEA
values.
|
Mineral Processing
The Project is designed to
process 4.0 Mt of mineralized material per year. The
overall production schedule is illustrated in Figure 3. The
processing facility will use conventional comminution
circuits followed by selective sequential flotation to
produce a lead/silver concentrate and a zinc/silver concentrate.
This is planned to include primary crushing, followed by a SAG-Ball
milling circuit ("SABC") and sequential sulfide
flotation to separate silver/lead and zinc while rejecting pyrite
and non-sulfidic gangue minerals. Tailings would
then be thickened and pumped to a conventional storage
facility.
Mineral Resource Estimate
The MRE, which used
conceptual open pit mining constraints for reporting purposes, was
previously reported by the Company in a news release dated
September 5, 2023. The MRE, stated at
a 40 g/t AgEq cut‐off, is shown in Table 6.
To minimize upfront capital while maximizing the Project's
return, the Company based the PEA on a 64 Mt subset of the
near-surface, higher-grade material within the Upper Silver Zone of
the MRE, as illustrated in Figure 1. This is anticipated to
preserve the optionality to mine and process the remainder of the
MRE at a later date.
Table 6: Mineral Resource as of August
25, 2023
Domain
|
Category
|
Tonnage
|
Ag
|
Au
|
Pb
|
Zn
|
AgEq
|
Mt
|
g/t
|
Mozs
|
g/t
|
Kozs
|
%
|
Mlbs
|
%
|
Mlbs
|
g/t
|
Mozs
|
Upper Silver
Zone
|
Indicated
|
119.2
|
45
|
171.2
|
0.1
|
216.4
|
0.3
|
916.6
|
0.7
|
1,729.6
|
85
|
326.8
|
Inferred
|
31.3
|
43
|
43.3
|
0.1
|
104.6
|
0.3
|
202.4
|
0.5
|
350.0
|
80
|
80.8
|
Middle Zinc
Zone
|
Indicated
|
43.4
|
11
|
15.0
|
0.1
|
77.4
|
0.4
|
343.6
|
0.8
|
739.4
|
56
|
78.1
|
Inferred
|
9.3
|
9
|
2.6
|
0.1
|
15.6
|
0.4
|
74.1
|
0.8
|
162.3
|
54
|
16.2
|
Lower Gold
Zone
|
Indicated
|
52.3
|
11
|
19.1
|
0.8
|
1,294.4
|
0.2
|
184.7
|
0.2
|
184.7
|
92
|
154.9
|
Inferred
|
4.4
|
13
|
1.8
|
0.7
|
97.5
|
0.2
|
21.4
|
0.2
|
21.4
|
91
|
12.8
|
Source: compiled by
RPMGlobal, 2023
|
Notes:
|
1.
|
CIM Definition
Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral
Resources.
|
2.
|
The qualified person
(as defined in NI 43-101) for the purposes of the MRE is Anderson
Candido, FAusIMM, Principal Geologist with
RPMGlobal.
|
3.
|
Mineral Resources
are constrained by an optimized pit shell at a metal price of
US$23.00/oz Ag, US$1,900.00/oz Au, US$0.95/lb Pb, US$1.25/lb Zn,
recovery of 90% Ag, 98% Au, 83% Pb, 58% Zn and Cut-off grade of 40
g/t AgEq.
|
4.
|
Drilling results up
to June 1, 2023.
|
5.
|
The numbers may not
compute exactly due to rounding.
|
6.
|
Mineral Resources
are reported on a dry in-situ basis.
|
7.
|
Mineral resources
are not Mineral Reserves and have not demonstrated economic
viability.
|
Next Steps
With the completion of the PEA, New Pacific
intends to continue its efforts to secure the necessary permits for
the Project. The Company will only proceed with a feasibility
study, expected to take 12-18 months, once it has confidence in a
favorable and timely permitting outcome. This is anticipated to
include securing a comprehensive mine development agreement with
the local community, converting the Company's exploration license
into a mining license, substantially progressing an
Environmental Impact Assessment Study ("EIA") and obtaining legal
certainty for the Project's location within 50 kilometers of the
Bolivian border with Chile. The
Company anticipates being in such a position no earlier than the
second half of 2025.
Significant progress has been made towards these milestones over
the past year. For the EIA, the Company has completed baseline
environmental data collection for both the dry and wet seasons and
has recently secured community consent to begin the primary
socioeconomic baseline data collection, which is expected to take
several months to complete. This baseline data will help refine the
Project's design, assess potential environmental and social impacts
and will help inform agreements with the local community.
The Company is encouraged by the strong support from both the
Oruro Department and the federal government in advancing the
Project. Through its recently formed Oruro Mining Task Force, the
Government of Bolivia has
established a pathway for transitioning from an exploration license
to a mining license, with Carangas set to become the first project
to do so under Bolivia's 2014
mining code. The Company believes that continued collaboration and
support from governmental authorities are crucial for the Project's
success and its potential to become a key source of raw material
for a zinc plant under construction by the Bolivian government in
Oruro.
Qualified Persons
The qualified persons for the
PEA are Mr. Marcelo del Giudice,
FAusIMM, Principal Metallurgist with RPMGlobal, Mr. Pedro Repetto, SME, P.E., Principal
Civil/Geotechnical Engineer with RPMGlobal, Mr. Gonzalo Rios, FAusIMM, Executive Consultant -
ESG with RPMGlobal, Mr. Jinxing Ji,
P.Eng., Metallurgist with JJ Metallurgical Services, and Mr.
Marc Schulte, P.Eng., Mining
Engineer with Moose Mountain Technical Services. The specific
sections for which each qualified person is responsible will be
outlined in the NI 43-101 PEA Technical Report. This is in addition
to Mr. Anderson Candido, FAusIMM,
Principal Geologist with RPMGlobal who estimated the Mineral
Resource. All such qualified persons have reviewed the technical
content relevant to the sections of the PEA for which they are
responsible included in this news release for the deposit at the
Project and have approved its dissemination.
Further details supporting the PEA will be available in an NI
43‐101 Technical Report which will be posted under the Company's
profile at sedarplus.com within 45 days of this news release.
This news release has been reviewed and approved by Alex Zhang, P.Geo., Vice President of
Exploration of New Pacific Metals Corp. who is the designated
qualified person for the Company.
Conference Call and Webcast Details
The Company
will host a conference call and presentation webcast at
8:00 am Pacific Time / 11:00 am Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 2nd,
2024, to provide further information. Participants are advised to
dial in five minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the call.
A presentation will be made available on the Company's website
prior to the webcast. Webcast details:
Date: Wednesday, October
2nd, 2024, 8:00 am Pacific
Time / 11:00 am Eastern
Time
Toll-free Canada/USA:
1-844-763-8274
International: 1-647-484-8814
Webcast:
https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=plP25uTi
About New Pacific Metals
New Pacific is a
Canadian exploration and development company with three precious
metal projects in Bolivia. The
Company's flagship Silver Sand project has the potential to be
developed into one of the world's largest silver mines. The Company
is also advancing its robust, high-margin silver-lead-zinc
Carangas project. Additionally a discovery drill program was
completed at Silverstrike in 2022.
On behalf of New Pacific Metals Corp.
Andrew Williams
Director and CEO
For Further Information
New Pacific Metals Corp.
Phone: (604) 633‐1368 Ext. 223
U.S. & Canada toll-free:
1-877-631-0593
E-mail: invest@newpacificmetals.com
For additional information and to receive company news by
e-mail, please register using New Pacific's website at
www.newpacificmetals.com.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC
ASSESSMENT
The results of the PEA prepared in accordance
with NI 43-101 titled "Carangas Deposit - Preliminary
Economic Assessment" with an anticipated effective date of
October 1, 2024 and prepared by
certain qualified persons associated with RPMGlobal are preliminary
in nature and are intended to provide an initial assessment of the
Project's economic potential and development options of the
Project. The PEA mine schedule and economic assessment includes
numerous assumptions and is based on both indicated and Inferred
Mineral Resources. Inferred resources are considered too
speculative geologically to have the economic considerations
applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral
Reserves, and there is no certainty that the preliminary economic
assessments described herein will be achieved or that the PEA
results will be realized. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be
materially affected by geology, environmental, permitting, legal,
title, socio-political, marketing or other relevant issues. Mineral
resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated
economic viability. Additional exploration will be required to
potentially upgrade the classification of the Inferred Mineral
Resources to be considered in future advanced studies. RPMGlobal
(mineral resource, infrastructure, tailings, water management,
environmental and financial analysis) was contracted to conduct the
PEA in cooperation with Moose Mountain Technical Services (mining),
and JJ Metallurgical Services (Metallurgy). The qualified persons
for the PEA for the purposes of NI 43-101 are Mr. Marcelo del Giudice, FAusIMM, Principal
Metallurgist with RPMGlobal, Mr. Pedro Repetto, SME, P.E., Principal
Civil/Geotechnical Engineer with RPMGlobal, Mr. Gonzalo Rios, FAusIMM, Executive Consultant -
ESG with RPMGlobal, Mr. Jinxing Ji,
P.Eng., Metallurgist with JJ Metallurgical Services, and Mr.
Marc Schulte, P.Eng., Mining
Engineer with Moose Mountain Technical Services., in addition to
Mr. Anderson Candido, FAusIMM,
Principal Geologist with RPMGlobal who estimated the Mineral
Resources. All qualified persons for the PEA have reviewed the
disclosure of the PEA herein. The PEA is based on the MRE, which
was reported on September 5, 2023.
The effective date of the MRE is August 25,
2023. Mineral Resources are constrained by an optimized pit
shell at a metal price of US$23.00/oz
Ag, US$1,900.00/oz Au, US$0.95/lb Pb, US$1.25/lb Zn, recovery of 90% Ag, 98% Au, 83%
Pb, 58% Zn and Cut-off grade of 40 g/t AgEq. Assumptions made to
derive a cut-off grade included mining costs, processing costs, and
recoveries were obtained from comparable industry situations.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD‐LOOKING
INFORMATION
Certain of the statements and information in
this news release constitute "forward-looking statements" within
the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" within the
meaning of applicable Canadian provincial securities laws. Any
statements or information that express or involve discussions with
respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections,
objectives, assumptions, or future events or performance (often,
but not always, using words or phrases such as "expects", "is
expected", "anticipates", "believes", "plans", "projects",
"estimates", "assumes", "intends", "strategies", "targets",
"goals", "forecasts", "objectives", "budgets", "schedules",
"potential" or variations thereof or stating that certain actions,
events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be
taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms
and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and
may be forward-looking statements or information. Such statements
include, but are not limited to statements regarding: the results
of the PEA and the timing of the filing of the PEA; expectations
regarding the Project; estimates regarding Mineral Reserves and
Mineral Resources; anticipated exploration, drilling, development,
construction, and other activities or achievements of the Company;
timing of receipt of permits and regulatory approvals; and
estimates of the Company's revenues and capital expenditures; and
other future plans, objectives or expectations of the Company.
Forward-looking statements or information are subject to a
variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that could cause actual events or results to differ from those
reflected in the forward-looking statements or information,
including, without limitation, risks relating to: global economic
and social impact of public health crisis; fluctuating equity
prices, bond prices, commodity prices; calculation of resources,
reserves and mineralization, general economic conditions, foreign
exchange risks, interest rate risk, foreign investment risk; loss
of key personnel; conflicts of interest; dependence on management,
uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing
needed in the future, environmental risks, operations and political
conditions, the regulatory environment in Bolivia and Canada, risks associated with community
relations and corporate social responsibility, and other factors
described under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual
information form for the year ended June 30,
2024 and its other public filings. This list is not
exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company's
forward-looking statements or information.
The forward-looking statements are necessarily based on a number
of estimates, assumptions, beliefs, expectations and opinions of
management as of the date of this news release that, while
considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to
significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and
contingencies. These estimates, assumptions, beliefs, expectations
and options include, but are not limited to, those related to the
Company's ability to carry on current and future operations,
including: public health crisis on our operations and workforce;
development and exploration activities; the timing, extent,
duration and economic viability of such operations; the accuracy
and reliability of estimates, projections, forecasts, studies and
assessments; the Company's ability to meet or achieve estimates,
projections and forecasts; the stabilization of the political
climate in Bolivia; the Company's
ability to obtain and maintain social license at its mineral
properties; the availability and cost of inputs; the price and
market for outputs; foreign exchange rates; taxation levels; the
timely receipt of necessary approvals or permits, including the
ratification and approval of the Mining Production Contract with
Corporación Minera de Bolivia, the
Bolivian state mining corporation, by the Plurinational Legislative
Assembly of Bolivia; the ability
of the Company's Bolivian partner to convert the exploration
licenses at the Company's Carangas project to Administrative
Mining Contract; the ability to meet current and future
obligations; the ability to obtain timely financing on reasonable
terms when required; the current and future social, economic and
political conditions; and other assumptions and factors generally
associated with the mining industry.
Although the forward-looking statements contained in this news
release are based upon what management believes are reasonable
assumptions, there can be no assurance that actual results will be
consistent with these forward-looking statements. All
forward-looking statements in this news release are qualified by
these cautionary statements. Accordingly, readers should not place
undue reliance on such statements. Other than specifically required
by applicable laws, the Company is under no obligation and
expressly disclaims any such obligation to update or alter the
forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise except as may be required by law. These
forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this news
release.
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO US INVESTORS
This news release has
been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities
laws in effect in Canada which
differ from the requirements of United
States securities laws. The technical and scientific
information contained herein has been prepared in accordance with
NI 43-101, which differs from the standards adopted by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Accordingly, the
technical and scientific information contained herein, including
any estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, may not be
comparable to similar information disclosed by United States companies subject to the
disclosure requirements of the SEC.
Additional information relating to the Company, including the
AIF, can be obtained under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ at
www.sedarplus.ca, on EDGAR at www.sec.gov, and on the Company's
website at www.newpacificmetals.com.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-pacific-metals-delivers-strong-economics-for-carangas-in-preliminary-economic-assessment-302264776.html
SOURCE New Pacific Metals Corp.