29
February 2024
Thor Energy
PLC
("Thor"
or the "Company")
High Grade Uranium and
Vanadium Assays
Wedding
Bell and Radium Mountain Projects, USA
The directors of Thor Energy Plc
("Thor") (AIM, ASX: THR, OTCQB: THORF) are pleased to provide an
update on the uranium and vanadium assay results from the recently
completed reverse circulation ("RC") drilling program on the
Company's 100% owned Wedding Bell and Radium Mountain Projects,
located in the uranium-vanadium mining district of the Uravan
Mineral Belt, southwest Colorado, USA (Figure 1).
Highlights:
§ Assays
return up to 3,0348 ppm
(3.0%) V2O5 vanadium pentoxide, with
uranium assay grades up to 6,250ppm (0.63%)
U3O8, consistent with the high-grade
downhole gamma uranium results (ASX/AIM: 4 December 2023)
(Figure 5).
§ Significant uranium and vanadium assay results
include:
23WBR020:
4.9m @ 1199ppm
(0.12%) U3O8 and 6306ppm (0.63%)
V2O5 from 82m,
Including,
0.6m @
6250ppm (0.63%) U3O8 and 30348ppm (3.0%)
V2O5 from 82.6m
Including,
1.8m @ 2999ppm (0.3%) U3O8 and 14912ppm
(1.5%) V2O5 from 82m.
23WBR011:
6.1m @ 563ppm
(0.06%) U3O8 and 9100ppm (0.9%)
V2O5 from 74.7m
Including,
1.5m @
1624ppm (0.16%) U3O8 and 19637ppm (2.0%)
V2O5 from 76.2m.
23WBR016:
3m @ 636ppm
(0.06%) U3O8 and 4677ppm (0.5%)
V2O5 from 67.0m
Including,
1.5m @ 1044ppm (0.1%) U3O8 and 4677ppm (0.5%)
V2O5 from 67.0m.
23WBR019:
1.2m @ 1112ppm
(0.11%) U3O8 and 3744ppm (0.4%)
V2O5 from 90.8m,
§ Vanadium
mineralisation forms broad zones adjacent to the uranium
mineralisation, with an average vanadium-to-uranium ratio of 10:1,
which is typical of the Uravan Mineral Belt.
§ Preparations have commenced for 2024 resource drilling (infill
and extension) at Rim Rock and Groundhog mine areas, with
additional prospects also to be assessed for drilling including
Edna May and Babe Ruth/Diana Mine areas (Figure 2).
Nicole Galloway Warland, Managing Director of Thor Energy,
commented:
"The high-grade uranium (up to 0.6%) and vanadium (1.8%) assay
results confirm the high-grade nature of the Saltwash style
sandstone uranium systems, within the prolific Uravan Mineral Belt.
The assay results also confirm the presence of wide intervals of
high-grade uranium mineralisation within a halo of vanadium
mineralisation.
"Whilst these 100% owned projects are uranium assets, the 10:1
vanadium-to-uranium confirms the rich vanadium
endowment.
"This drilling program stepped out from the 2022 drill
program, with drilling around the Groundhog and Rim Rock mines
confirming mineralisation remains open along strike from historic
workings.
"Preparations are now underway for a larger RC program and
diamond drilling at Groundhog and Rim Rock prospects, chasing
high-grade mineralisation along strike, as well as infill drilling
for Resource definition."
Figure 1:
USA Uranium and Vanadium Project Location Map
within the Uravan Mineral Belt
Figure 2:
Drillhole location plan, Wedding Bell and Radium
Mountain Projects, Colorado
Upcoming News Flow:
§ Detailed
mineralisation and geological interpretations combining the 2022
and 2023 drilling results
§ 2024 RC
and diamond resource drilling (infill and extension) at Rim Rock
and Groundhog mine areas
§ RC
Prospect drilling
§ Maiden
drilling at Vanadium King, Utah
Wedding Bell and Radium Mountain Project,
Colorado:
The chemical assay results relate to
the recently completed RC drill program at the Wedding Bell
Project, comprised 23 shallow drillholes, totalling 2,737m
(ASX/AIM: 4 December 2023) (Figure
2).
The program successfully identified
shallow (maximum depth is 125m at Section 23 and above 100m at Rim
Rock and Groundhog), uranium and vanadium mineralisation in all
holes; drilled at Section 23, Rim Rock Mine and Groundhog Mine
(Figure 2, Table A and
B). Uranium mineralisation
is hosted within reduced sandstones close to the
oxidation/reduction contact (redox front) within the Salt Wash
Sandstone (Figure 3 and
Photo 2) of the Jurassic
Morrison Formation (Figure
1 and Figure 5). The
Salt Wash Sandstone comprises four distinct massive, laterally
continuous, ledge-forming sandstone layers (locally called "rims"),
interbedded by thin siltstone and clay layers. This is the primary
lithology for historic uranium and vanadium production in the
Uravan Mineral Belt.
The vanadium mineralisation forms
extensive broader zones or haloes, adjacent to the uranium
mineralisation. The vanadium-to-uranium ratio averages roughly
10:1, which is typical of the Uravan Mineral Belt. The exploration
focus is on defining uranium mineralisation, with vanadium as a
secondary endowment.
Copper (Cu), base metals (Pb, Zn),
Molybdenum (Mo) and Selenium (Se) are path-finder elements
associated with the uranium and vanadium mineralisation and can be
used to determine the direction of the roll front of the uranium
mineralising system (Figure 3,
Figure 4, and Photo
2). Copper values are up to
0.82% Cu and silver reported up to 55ppm Ag.
Chemical assays reported:
23WBRA015: 0.61m @ 190ppm
U3O8, 3963ppm V2O5,
55.2g/t Ag and 8260ppm Cu from 58.83m
Groundhog Mine area drilling, comprising seven
drillholes was designed to test areas along strike of historic mine
workings predominately in the second and third sandstone rim (above
100m depth). 23WBRA020 returned the highest uranium and vanadium
intercepts of 0.91m @
0.69% eU3O8
uranium (downhole gamma) and 0.6m @ 0.62%
U3O8 uranium (assay) and 1.8%
V2O5 vanadium within a grey reduced
sandstone (Figure 2 and
6). Further work is
required to correlate these results with historic mine working
levels and the 2022 drilling.
Chemical assays reported:
23WBR020:
4.9m @ 1199ppm
(0.12%) U3O8 and 6306ppm (0.63%)
V2O5 from 82m,
Including,
0.6m @
6250ppm (0.63%) U3O8 and 30348ppm (3.0%)
V2O5 from 82.6m
Including,
1.8m @ 2999ppm (0.3%) U3O8 and 14912ppm
(1.5%) V2O5 from 82m
Drilling at Rim Rock Mine area (seven drillholes)
has identified high-grade zones of up to 0.32% eU3O8
uranium and up to 1.8% V2O5 vanadium
adjacent to, as well as along strike from the historic workings
(Figure 3 and 7). Uranium and vanadium mineralisation
appears to be concentrated in the third sandstone rim of the Salt
Wash Sandstone, approximately 60m below surface. Further work is
required to correlate these results with historic mine workings and
the 2022 drilling, to delineate mineral resources.
Chemical assays reported:
23WBR011:
6.1m @ 563ppm
(0.06%) U3O8 and 9100ppm (0.9%)
V2O5 from 74.7m,
Including,
1.5m @
1624ppm (0.16%) U3O8 and 19637ppm (2.0%)
V2O5 from 76.2m
Section 23 is an underexplored
area with no historic workings. The drilling (nine drillholes) was
designed to test stratigraphic extensions to mineralisation in the
Salt Wash Sandstone, targeting the uranium mineralisation
identified from the first pass drilling program in 2022, as well as
testing a portion of the airborne radiometric anomalies
(Figure 8). The initial
data review of the drilling has identified uranium mineralisation
in all four sandstone rims within the Salt Wash Sandstone Member,
increasing the potential for multiple mineralised zones in this
area. Pathfinder geochemistry in 23WBRA009 and 23WBRA005 indicates
roll front fluid pathway, which identifies the uranium
mineralisation potential in the southwest.
Photo 1:
Uranium-Vanadium roll front in Salt Wash Sandstone
at Sunday Complex Mine, Uravan Mineral Belt Photo taken by Nicole Galloway Warland, with
permission to use from Western Uranium and Vanadium
LLC
Figure 5: 23WBRA020 showing
consistency of downhole gamma uranium readings next to assay
results for uranium and vanadium with geology.
Uranium
Outlook
Favourable long-term fundamentals
continue to drive the uranium spot price up (Figure
2). Key drivers include:
§ Nuclear
Energy: Sentiment around reliable baseload clean nuclear energy has
increased, with 24 countries pledging to
triple nuclear capacity by 2050.
§ Geopolitical instability and national supply security: Russian
invasion of Ukraine, Niger Coup d'état and Kazakhstan production
uncertainty reiterate the significance of national supply
security.
§ Supply-demand deficit: Utilities are expected to self-sanction
and refrain from signing contracts, with Russian entities
accompanied by government legislation, current supply below reactor
demands, with uncertainty around production forecasts (Figure 3).
Figure 9:
Uranium Spot Price. Source:
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/uranium
Figure 10:
Supply-Demand Deficit. Source:
https://www.cameco.com/invest/markets/supply-demand
Table A: Uranium and vanadium
Intercepts above 100ppm U3O8
Prospect
|
Drill Hole
|
Depth from
|
Depth To m
|
Interval m
|
U3O8 ppm
|
V205 ppm
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA001
|
No Significant
intercepts
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA002
|
101
|
102.11
|
1.52
|
118
|
712
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA003
|
99
|
99.67
|
0.61
|
60
|
666
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA004
|
101
|
102.41
|
1.22
|
176
|
1550
|
Section 23
|
including
|
101.19
|
101.80
|
0.61
|
248
|
2169
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA005
|
101.19
|
101.80
|
0.61
|
565
|
1350
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA006
|
121.92
|
125.27
|
3.35
|
79
|
1513
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA007
|
121.92
|
123.44
|
1.52
|
69
|
843
|
Section 23
|
and
|
124.05
|
124.66
|
0.61
|
94
|
766
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA008
|
No significant
intercepts
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA009
|
123.44
|
126.49
|
3
|
303
|
2371
|
Rim
Rock
|
23WBRA0010
|
51.82
|
54.86
|
3
|
163
|
1148
|
Rim
Rock
|
including
|
53.34
|
54.86
|
1.5
|
212
|
1316
|
Rim
Rock
|
23WBRA0011
|
73.15
|
80.77
|
7.6
|
463
|
7404
|
Rim
Rock
|
including
|
74.68
|
80.77
|
6.1
|
563
|
9100
|
Rim
Rock
|
including
|
76.20
|
77.72
|
1.5
|
1621
|
19637
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA0012
|
62.48
|
65.84
|
3.4
|
514
|
454
|
Rim Rock
|
including
|
62.48
|
64.01
|
1.5
|
952
|
98
|
Rim
Rock
|
and
|
65.23
|
65.84
|
0.6
|
100
|
2392
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA0013
|
60.96
|
62.48
|
1.5
|
745
|
1392
|
Rim Rock
|
and
|
65.23
|
66.45
|
1.2
|
241
|
1861
|
Rim
Rock
|
23WBRA0014
|
56.39
|
59.74
|
3.4
|
250
|
1801
|
Rim
Rock
|
including
|
58.52
|
59.13
|
0.6
|
522
|
5124
|
Rim
Rock
|
23WBRA0015
|
57.61
|
59.44
|
1.8
|
218
|
3371
|
Rim
Rock
|
23WBRA0016
|
67.06
|
70.1
|
3.0
|
636
|
4677
|
Rim
Rock
|
including
|
67.06
|
68.58
|
1.5
|
1044
|
7141
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA0017
|
88.39
|
91.44
|
3.0
|
154
|
586
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA0018
|
89.61
|
90.22
|
0.6
|
1179
|
8426
|
Groundhog
|
and
|
90.83
|
91.44
|
0.6
|
38
|
3071
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA0019
|
90.83
|
92.05
|
1.2
|
1112
|
3744
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA0020
|
81.99
|
86.87
|
4.9
|
1199
|
6306
|
Groundhog
|
including
|
81.99
|
83.82
|
1.8
|
2999
|
1,4912
|
Groundhog
|
including
|
82.60
|
83.21
|
0.6
|
6250
|
3,0348
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA0021
|
80.77
|
82.60
|
1.2
|
90
|
503
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA0022
|
82.30
|
88.39
|
6.1
|
280
|
3866
|
Groundhog
|
including
|
83.82
|
86.87
|
3.0
|
466
|
5945
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA0023
|
Not
sampled
|
*Minor rounding errors from feet to metre
conversion
Table B: Drill Collar Details
(WGS84 Zone 12)
Prospect
|
Hole ID
|
Easting
|
Northing
|
Elevation
(m)
|
Azimuth
|
Dip
|
Hole Depth
(m)
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA001
|
690892
|
4222825
|
2043
|
360
|
-90
|
148
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA002
|
690924
|
4222795
|
2044
|
360
|
-90
|
142
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA003
|
690862
|
4222796
|
2043
|
360
|
-90
|
142
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA004
|
690893
|
4222765
|
2046
|
360
|
-90
|
145
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA005
|
690883
|
4222717
|
2048
|
360
|
-90
|
142
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA006
|
690759
|
4222867
|
2039
|
360
|
-90
|
142
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA007
|
690728
|
4222837
|
2042
|
360
|
-90
|
142
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA008
|
690751
|
4222815
|
2042
|
360
|
-90
|
142
|
Section 23
|
23WBRA009
|
690826
|
4222762
|
2043
|
360
|
-90
|
142
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA010
|
687970
|
4225686
|
2022
|
360
|
-90
|
57
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA011
|
688010
|
4225566
|
2038
|
360
|
-90
|
99
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA012
|
687957
|
4225545
|
2030
|
360
|
-90
|
94
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA013
|
687976
|
4225613
|
2030
|
360
|
-90
|
99
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA014
|
688000
|
4225656
|
2026
|
360
|
-90
|
99
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA015
|
687939
|
4225656
|
2022
|
360
|
-90
|
99
|
Rim Rock
|
23WBRA016
|
687937
|
4225413
|
2040
|
360
|
-90
|
148
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA017
|
688089
|
4224022
|
2098
|
360
|
-90
|
104
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA018
|
688051
|
4224007
|
2100
|
360
|
-90
|
104
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA019
|
688047
|
4224017
|
2102
|
360
|
-90
|
105
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA020
|
688093
|
4223969
|
2092
|
360
|
-90
|
105
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA021
|
688123
|
4223999
|
2092
|
360
|
-90
|
99
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA022
|
688218
|
4224064
|
2089
|
360
|
-90
|
105
|
Groundhog
|
23WBRA023
|
688435
|
4224036
|
2091
|
360
|
-90
|
136
|
The Board of Thor Energy Plc has
approved this announcement and authorised its release.
For further information, please
contact:
Thor Energy PLC
|
|
Nicole Galloway Warland, Managing
Director
Ray Ridge, CFO & Company
Secretary
|
Tel: +61 (8) 7324 1935
Tel: +61 (8) 7324 1935
|
WH Ireland Limited (Nominated
Adviser and Joint Broker)
|
Tel: +44 (0) 207 220
1666
|
Antonio Bossi / Darshan Patel /
Isaac Hooper
|
|
SI Capital Limited (Joint
Broker)
|
Tel: +44 (0) 1483 413 500
|
Nick Emerson
|
|
Yellow Jersey (Financial
PR)
|
thor@yellowjerseypr.com
|
Sarah Hollins / Shivantha
Thambirajah / Bessie Elliot
|
Tel: +44 (0) 20 3004 9512
|
Competent Person
Statement
The information in this report that relates to Geological
interpretation and Exploration Results is based on information
compiled by Nicole Galloway Warland, who holds a BSc Applied
geology (HONS) and who is a Member of The Australian Institute of
Geoscientists. Ms Galloway Warland is an employee of Thor Energy
PLC. She has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style
of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to
the activity which she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent
Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves'. Nicole Galloway Warland consents to the inclusion in the
report of the matters based on her information in the form and
context in which it appears.
Updates on the Company's activities
are regularly posted on Thor's website https://thorenergyplc.com
which includes a facility to register to receive
these updates by email, and on the Company's X page @thorenergyplc
About Thor Energy Plc
The Company is focused on uranium
and energy metals that are crucial in the shift to a 'green' energy
economy. Thor has a number of highly prospective projects that give
shareholders exposure to uranium, nickel, copper, lithium and gold.
Our projects are located in Australia and the USA.
Thor holds 100% interest in three
uranium and vanadium projects (Wedding Bell, Radium Mountain and
Vanadium King) in the Uravan Belt in Colorado and Utah, USA with
historical high-grade uranium and vanadium drilling and production
results.
At Alford East in South Australia,
Thor has earnt an 80% interest in oxide copper deposits considered
amenable to extraction via In Situ Recovery techniques (ISR). In
January 2021, Thor announced an Inferred Mineral Resource
Estimate¹.
Thor also holds a 26.3% interest in
Australian copper development company EnviroCopper Limited (ECL),
which in turn holds rights to earn up to a 75% interest in the
mineral rights and claims over the resource on the portion of the
historic Kapunda copper mine and the Alford West copper project,
both situated in South Australia, and both considered amenable to
recovery by way of ISR.²³
Alligator Energy recently invested A$0.9M for a 7.8% interest in
ECL with the rights to gain a 50.1% interest by investing a further
A$10.1m over four years.
Thor holds 100% of the advanced
Molyhil tungsten project, including measured, indicated and
inferred resources⁴, in the
Northern Territory of Australia, which was awarded Major Project
Status by the Northern Territory government in July 2020. Thor
executed a A$8m Farm-in and Funding Agreement with Investigator
Resources Limited (ASX: IVR) to accelerate exploration at the
Molyhil Project on 24 November 2022.6
Adjacent to Molyhil, at Bonya, Thor
holds a 40% interest in deposits of tungsten, copper, and vanadium,
including Inferred resource estimates for the Bonya copper deposit,
and the White Violet and Samarkand tungsten deposits. ⁵ Thor's
interest in the Bonya tenement EL29701 is planned to be divested as
part of the Farm-in and Funding agreement with Investigator
Resources Limited.6
Thor owns 100% of the Ragged Range
Project, comprising 92 km2 of exploration licences with
highly encouraging early-stage gold and nickel results in the
Pilbara region of Western Australia.
Notes
1 https://thorenergyplc.com/investor-updates/maiden-copper-gold-mineral-resource-estimate-alford-east-copper-gold-isr-project/
2
www.thorenergyplc.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20172018/20180222-clarification-kapunda-copper-resource-estimate.pdf
³
www.thorenergyplc.com/sites/thormining/media/aim-report/20190815-initial-copper-resource-estimate---moonta-project---rns---london-stock-exchange.pdf
4 https://thorenergyplc.com/investor-updates/molyhil-project-mineral-resource-estimate-updated/
5
www.thorenergyplc.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20200129-mineral-resource-estimates---bonya-tungsten--copper.pdf
6
https://thorenergyplc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221124-8M-Farm-in-Funding-Agreement.pdf
1 JORC Code, 2012 Edition -
Table 1
1.1
Section 1
Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
|
JORC Code explanation
|
Commentary
|
Sampling techniques
|
·
Nature and
quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
·
Include
reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
·
Aspects of the
determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report.
·
In cases where
'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively
simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for
fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such
as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules)
may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
|
Reverse circulation drill samples
were collected off the cyclone at 5ft (1.5m) intervals and split to
3kg (with 2ft samples collected through mineralised
zones.
An pXRF (Olympus Vanta Series C) and
spectrometer (Mt. Sopris SC-132 ) reading was taken for each
sample.
All the holes were electric-logged
(e-logged), on a call-out basis, by Jet West of Farmington, New
Mexico. Jet West followed industry standards for probing holes on
uranium properties. They calibrate their gamma probes at the
Department of Energy test pits located in Grants, New Mexico.
Logs run were natural gamma, single point resistivity (SPR),
self-potential (SP), deep and medium induction resistivity
(DIR and MIR), and selected holes had directional surveys
done. First-pass logging speeds were 35 ft (10.7m)/minute and
for gamma reruns, logging rates were 10 ft (3.05m)/minute. On
first-pass runs gamma readings were taken every 0.3 ft (10cm), and
for reruns, every 0.1 ft (3.0cm).
Anomalous samples were sent to ALS
Canada for analysis -4 acid multi element ICP-MS +Uranium
(ME-MS61U)
|
Drilling techniques
|
·
Drill type (eg
core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method,
etc).
|
Track mounted reverse circulation
rig (5.5inches).
All vertical holes
|
Drill sample recovery
|
·
Method of
recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
·
Measures taken
to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
·
Whether a
relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
|
Sample recovery was good with no
variation within mineralised zones. Each drill cutting pile size is
logged and any deviation from expected was raised with the driller,
and if undersize, to check for blockages.
No sample biases expected, and no
relationship is known to exist between sample recovery and
grade.
|
Logging
|
·
Whether core and
chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
·
Whether logging
is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
·
The total length
and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
|
All chip samples are qualitatively
geologically logged (lithology, structure, alteration,
mineralisation (based on scintillometer cps for each interval),
weathering, colour and other features).
No mineral resource estimation,
mining studies or metallurgical studies have been conducted at this
stage, but samples have been logged in sufficient detail to use for
this function.
During the logging process
representative samples are stored in chip trays for future
reference. The RC chip trays are photographed and electronically
stored.
|
Sub- sampling techniques and sample
preparation
|
·
If core, whether
cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
·
If non-core,
whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
·
For all sample
types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
·
Quality control
procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
·
Measures taken
to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
·
Whether sample
sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
|
Samples were collected as described
in the above sampling technique section.
All holes e-logged by Jet
West.
Based on elogging gamma results a
selection of samples were sent to ALS Canada for
analysis
Samples were collected as described
in the above sampling technique section.
Sampling is carried out using
standard protocols and QAQC procedures as per industry
practice.
Field QAQC procedures for drilling
involved the use of a certified standard, blank and field duplicate
sample submitted These are routinely checked against
originals.
X samples (including QAQC samples)
were sent to ALS Laboratories, Vancouver. Sample preparation
includes sorting, drying, followed by pulverising
(PUL32).
Sample preparation included sorting,
drying, followed by pulverising.
Analysis was 4 acid multi element
ICP-MS +Uranium (ME-MS61U)
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests
|
·
The nature,
quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
·
For geophysical
tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters
used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
·
Nature of
quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
|
All the holes were electric-logged
(e-logged), probes are calibrated at the Department of Energy
test pits located in Grants, New Mexico. Logs run were
natural gamma, single point resistivity (SPR), self-potential (SP),
deep and medium induction resistivity (DIR and MIR), and selected
holes had directional surveys done. First-pass logging speeds
were 35 ft (10.7m)/minute and for gamma reruns, logging rates were
15 ft (4.6m)/minute. On first-pass runs gamma readings were
taken every 0.3 ft (10cm), and for reruns, every 0.1 ft
(3.0cm).
Handheld pXRF readings
readings are taken on -2mm sieved
samples on every drill sample interval, using an Olympus Vanta
Series C with a 40 second reading time.
Instrument is calibrated at start of
each day, along with QAQC of 1 standard and 1 blank. External
instrument calibration completed annually.
64 samples (plus QAQC samples) were
sent to ALS Laboratory Vancouver, Canada for 48 element four
acid digest ICP-MS (ME-MS61U).
|
Verification of sampling and assaying
|
·
The verification
of significant intersections by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
·
The use of
twinned holes.
·
Documentation of
primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
·
Discuss any
adjustment to assay data.
|
All significant intersections have
been verified by an onsite geologist.
There are no twinned
drillholes.
All drilling data is collected in a
series of templates in excel including geological logging, sample
information, collar and survey information.
All data is digitally recorded in
the company's electronic database, managed by external database
company utilising Datashed5 software.
|
Location of data points
|
·
Accuracy and
quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in
Mineral Resource estimation.
·
Specification of
the grid system used.
·
Quality and
adequacy of topographic control.
|
Drill collars were surveyed using a
handheld Garmin 64 GPS with an accuracy of +/-3m. Grid system is
WGS84 UTM zone 12. All holes were vertical
Topographic control using the GPS is
suitable for early- stage exploration.
|
Data spacing and distribution
|
·
Data spacing for
reporting of Exploration Results.
·
Whether the data
spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
·
Whether sample
compositing has been applied.
|
Data spacing for preliminary
exploration work is deemed sufficient on a first-pass basis to
assess areas of potential. Such areas of potential may be
further assessed by more detailed work.
|
Orientation of data in relation to geological
structure
|
·
Whether the
orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
·
If the
relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if
material.
|
Orientational bias is not applicable
to the drilling at this stage but samples and drill lines were
orientated approximately perpendicular to the assumed strike of
mineralisation. The vertical holes were oriented approximately
perpendicular to the very gently (-4degree) NE dipping stratabound
mineralization.
|
Sample security
|
·
The measures
taken to ensure sample security.
|
Samples are kept in a secure
facility.
Sample Security levels are
considered appropriate for RC Drilling.
|
Audits or reviews
|
·
The results of
any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and
data.
|
None undertaken. Thor's sampling
procedure conforms to industry standard practice and each assay
program is reviewed internally for any discrepancies.
|
1.1Section 2: Reporting of
Exploration Results
Criteria
|
JORC Code explanation
|
Commentary
|
Mineral tenement and land tenure status
|
·
Type, reference
name/number, location and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
·
The security of
the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the
area.
|
Mineral rights are held by the U.S.
Government, who transfers those rights to holders of valid mining
claims located on open ground through the General Mining Law of
1872, as amended by other Federal, State and County
regulations. Claim holders, with a few exceptions that
don't apply to this project, must make annual payments to the
government to maintain their rights. Holder of valid claims
can transfer their rights to others. Surface ownership is
also by the U.S. and managed by the Bureau of Land
Management.
Thor's property position consists of
199 unpatented mining claims (approx. 1,663Ha), leased from
underlying owners.
If Thor meets its' contractual
obligations and keeps the claims in good standing with the US, then
the security of tenure should be good.
Depending on the location of the
drill holes, the license to operate in the area is a function of
permitting at differing levels of government (Local, State and
Federal). The holes were in two contiguous Counties (San
Miguel and Montrose). In addition to the normally
required State and Federal permitting, San Miguel County imposes
its' own set of regulations. Montrose County, on the other
hand, is content to defer to the State and Federal
governments. To date, Thor has met those permitting
requirements.
|
Exploration done by other
parties
|
·
Acknowledgment
and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
|
There are no systems of consistent
data archiving for mineral exploration or exploitation done under
the Mining Law on Federal or on other lands within the State of
Colorado. Furthermore, with some exceptions, there was not, nor is
not, a requirement that explorers provide copies of their data to
governmental agencies. That data was retained by private
entities. It now exists in a piecemeal manner, with the data
having been discarded, abandoned or available by vendors that
managed to acquire and store some of it over the years.
Thor's properties have bountiful
surface evidence of historic drill exploration, and in some cases,
mining exploitation, which appears to be mostly from the 1950's
through the early 1970's. There are several mines located in
the western portion of the property. Unpublished
reports list these mines as producing, in aggregate, over 700,000
lbs (318,181 kg) of uranium. To the author's knowledge, very
little of the historic drilling or mining data is available to
Thor, and certainly not enough to help guide an exploration
program. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some of the work on
the property was done by Union Carbide (now defunct), the largest
company that worked in the Uravan Mineral Belt.
|
Geology
|
·
Deposit type,
geological setting and style of mineralisation.
|
According to the USGS Bulletin 1693
(Cox, D.P., and Singer, D. A., eds., 1986), the Deposit Model for
the project is Sandstone Uranium - Tabular subtype.
|
Drill hole Information
|
·
A summary of all
information material to the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the
drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced
Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
o dip and azimuth of the
hole
o down hole length and
interception depth
o hole
length.
·
If the exclusion
of this information is justified on the basis that the information
is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
|
Tables, plans and sections
summarising significant drill results are included in the
report
|
Data aggregation methods
|
·
In reporting
Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off
grades are usually Material and should be stated.
·
Where aggregate
intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and
longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail.
·
assumptions used
for any reporting of metal equivalent
·
The values
should be clearly stated.
|
Gamma data was aggregated to
determine equivalent uranium oxide grades (% eU3O8), thicknesses
and base of mineralization. Uranium grades and thicknesses were
based on the "Uravan Method", originally devised by the AEC, which
is a manual graphic method based on the shape of the gamma curve on
an e-log. It consists of, for a single peak, determining the
cps for the peak, and using one-half that value to determine the
upper mineralization boundary. Successive cps picks on 0.5 ft
(15.2cm) intervals are taken until the last interval drops below
the one-half peak value. This is the lower mineralization
boundary. These boundary values, plus the intervening 0.5 ft
(15.2cm) interval values, are used, in conjunction with parameters
such as hole diameter, whether or not the hole is dry or
water-filled, if the hole is probed in an open or cased or through
drill steel, gamma detector dead time and tool specific K factors,
to arrive at a grade in %eU3O8, thickness and the base of
mineralization, of each peak. Slight modifications to the
method are made if more than one peak occurs close
together.
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept
lengths
|
·
These
relationships are particularly important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
·
If the geometry
of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is
known, its nature should be reported.
·
If it is not
known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be
a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width
not known').
|
All results are assumed to be true
width but is not definitively known at this stage.
|
Diagrams
|
·
Appropriate maps
and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
|
Appropriate maps and sections are
included in the report.
|
Balanced reporting
|
·
Where
comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
|
All results have been
reported
|
Other substantive exploration data
|
·
Other
exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported
including (but not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
|
No meaningful or material
information has been omitted from this release.
|
Further work
|
·
The nature and
scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large-scale step- out
drilling).
·
Diagrams clearly
highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this
information is not commercially sensitive.
|
The drill results suggest that
several areas of potentially economic mineralization could be
investigated in greater detail. A couple of these areas have had
historic mining in the vicinity. Maps of where they mined are
scarce, so any delineation work needs to be cognisant of that
mining
|