FOXXW Foxx Development Holdings Inc

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Cost is determined using the “First in, First out” method. Inventories mainly include electronic products and accessories which are purchased from the Company’s suppliers as merchandized goods and freight-in. On an annual basis, inventories are reviewed for potential write-downs for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventories which equals the difference between the costs of inventories and the estimated net realizable value, the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation, based upon forecasts for future demand and market conditions. When inventories are written down to net realizable value, it is not marked up subsequently based on changes in underlying facts and circumstances. As of September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024, the Company had inventories of $4,540,549 and $1,768,072, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, no inventory write-down was recorded.

Contract assets consisted of cash deposited or advanced to suppliers for future inventory purchases. This amount is refundable and bears no interest. For any advances to suppliers determined by management that such advances will not be in receipts of inventories or refundable, the Company will recognize an allowance account to reserve such balances. Management reviews its advances to suppliers on a regular basis to determine if the allowance is adequate and adjusts the allowance when necessary. Delinquent account balances are written-off against allowance for credit losses after management has determined that the likelihood of collection is not probable. The Company’s management continues to evaluate the reasonableness of the valuation allowance policy and update it if necessary. As of September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024, no allowance for credit losses on contract assets was recorded.

The Company complies with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 340-10-S99-1, “Other Assets and Deferred Costs — SEC Materials” (“ASC 340-10-S99”) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5A, “Expenses of Offering”. Deferred transaction costs consist of underwriting, legal, accounting, and other professional expenses incurred through the balance sheet date that are directly related to the Business Combination and that will be charged to shareholders’ equity (deficit) upon the completion of the Business Combination. The Company completed the Business Combination on September 26, 2024. As of September 26, 2024, and the Company had deferred transaction costs of $893,577 and charged against shareholders’ deficit. As of September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024, the Company had deferred transaction costs of $0 and $462,177, respectively.

Payables on shares redemption consisted of payables to the ACAC shareholders who exercised their redemption rights in connection with the Business Combination (See Note 4).

Contract liabilities mainly consisted of deposits received from customers before all the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are met and are recorded as customer deposits.

At the Closing of the Business Combination, pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the stockholders of Old Foxx were entitled to receive up to a total of 4,200,000 contingent earnout shares (“Earnout Shares”) in the form of common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”). The Earnout Shares would be issued upon certain vesting schedules based on the Company’s financial performance for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and 2025. The Earnout Shares are classified as a liability and measured at fair value, with changes in fair value included in the consolidated statements of operations (See Note 17).

The Company accounts for its convertible instrument in accordance with ASC 470-20 Debt with Conversion and Other Options, whereby the convertible instrument is initially accounted for as a single unit of account, unless it contains a derivative that must be bifurcated from the host contract in accordance with ASC 815-15 Derivatives and Hedging — Embedded Derivatives or the substantial premium model in ASC 470-20 Debt — Debt with Conversion and Other Options applies. If the equity securities underlying the embedded conversion option are readily convertible to cash, such as publicly traded common shares, the embedded conversion option is likely to meet the net settlement criterion to be considered a derivative. If the equity securities underlying the conversion option are not readily convertible to cash, the embedded conversion option may not meet the net settlement criterion, and therefore would not meet the definition of a derivative. Because the convertible instrument has a fixed conversion price and therefore, it lacks an underlying and does not meet the requirement of a derivative. As a result, the Company determined its embedded conversion option does not meet the definition of a derivative for bifurcation.

The Company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services (that is, an asset) to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. An asset is transferred when the customer obtains control of that asset. It also requires the Company to identify contractual performance obligations and determine whether revenue should be recognized at a point in time or over time, based on when control of goods and services transfers to a customer.

To achieve that core principle, the Company applies the five steps defined under Topic 606: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

The Company’s main business is selling electronic products to 1) wholesale customers and 2) individual E-commerce customers.

Wholesale Customers

The Company recognizes a contract with a customer when the contract is committed in writing, the rights of parties, including payment terms, are identified, the contract has commercial substance, and collectability is probable.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of accounting in FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”). A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation identified in the arrangement based on the relative standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. For all the Company’s contracts, the Company has identified one performance obligation, which is primarily satisfied at a point in time upon delivery of products based on terms stated in the contracts, either on Free on Board (“FOB”) shipping point or destination, depending on the specified contract. The Company’s customers generally either pay the order in full balance prior to shipment or in partial payments with credit terms of 30 to 90 days after shipment depends on the specified contract. No sales returns are being given to its wholesale customers as they were being given additional 2-3% of products on top of each customer’s order (see Note 3 - “Warranty” below). There are no transaction prices allocated to future periods or future obligations and no revenue was recognized for performance obligations satisfied in previous periods.

Gross versus Net Revenue Reporting

The determination of whether revenues should be reported on a gross or net basis is based on the Company’s assessment of whether it is the principal or an agent in the transaction in accordance with ASC 606-10-55 and depends on whether the promise to the customer is to provide the products or to facilitate a sale by a third party. The nature of the promise depends on whether the Company controls the products prior to transferring them. When the Company controls the products, the promise is to provide and deliver the products and revenue is presented gross. When the Company does not control the products, the promise is to facilitate the sale and revenue is presented net.

To distinguish a promise to provide products from a promise to facilitate the sale from a third party, the Company considers the guidance of control in ASC 606-10-55-37A and the indicators in ASC 606-10-55-39. The Company considers this guidance in conjunction with the terms in its arrangements with both suppliers and customers.

The Company orders the products and pays in advance from its supplier. When the supplier has completed production, the Company inspects and accepts the products in its suppliers’ warehouse or at the designated logistic warehouse of the supplier. This enables the Company to direct the use of these products but to also bear inventory risk as legal owners. The Company has the responsibility of fulfilling the promise to provide the products to its customers, and also includes an additional 2-3% of products on top of each customer’s order , which covers any damage incurred in shipping and no refund and no return will be granted to customers; or provided a one-year warranty period with no additional 2-3% of products on top of each customer’s order, depending on the specified contract. In addition, when establishing the selling prices for delivery of the products, the Company has control to set its selling price. All these factors indicate that the Company is acting as the principal in this transaction. As a result, revenue from the wholesale customer is presented on a gross basis.

The Company generally provides 1-year warranties for its product sold to its wholesale customer if an additional 2-3% of products on top of each customer’s order was not provided. For the sale transactions that were provided with 2-3% of products on top of each customer’s order, these additional 2-3% products were recognized as cost of goods sold at the same time the respective sale is recognized. For the sales transactions that the Company provided limited warranties to both wholesale customers and e-commerce customers, the Company records estimated future warranty costs under ASC 460. Such estimated costs for warranties are estimated at the time of delivery, and these warranties are not service warranties separately sold by the Company. Generally, the estimated claim rates of warranties are based on actual warranty experience or the Company’s best estimate. As of September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024, the Company accrued warranty reserves of $133,279 and $48,361, respectively recorded under accrued liabilities and other current liabilities, and these reserves were recognized based on estimation and judgment from the Company’s management.

E-Commerce Customers

The Company recognizes a contract with a customer when the contract is committed in writing and signed electronically on an E-Commerce platform, the rights of parties, including payment terms, are identified, the contract has commercial substance, and collectability is probable.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of accounting in Topic 606. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation identified in the arrangement based on the relative standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. For all the Company’s contracts, the Company has identified one performance obligation, which is primarily satisfied at a point in time upon delivery of products based on terms stated in the contracts on shipping destination at its individual customer shipping address, which is the Company’s obligation to deliver the product to the end user/individual customer, depends on the specified contract. The Company’s E-Commerce customers pay the order in full balance prior to shipment to the E-Commerce Platform and the E-Commerce Platform withheld the payment for 30 days before remitting payments to the Company. The Company offered one month of free exchange or return. As a result, the Company recognized its revenues from the E-Commerce customers, in the third-party E-commerce platform, net of estimated sales returns, discount, and rebate, as a consideration reducing the transaction price. Historically, sales returns were insignificant to the Company’s operations. For the three months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized estimated sales returns of $1,557 and $0, respectively, and such reserves are based on estimation and required judgment from the Company’s management. There are no transaction prices allocated to future periods or future obligations and no revenue was recognized for performance obligations satisfied in previous periods.

Gross versus Net Revenue Reporting

The determination of whether revenues should be reported on a gross or net basis is based on the Company’s assessment of whether it is the principal or an agent in the transaction in accordance with ASC 606-10-55 and depends on whether the promise to the customer is to provide the products or to facilitate a sale by a third party. The nature of the promise depends on whether the Company controls the products prior to transferring them. When the Company controls the products, the promise is to provide and deliver the products and revenue is presented gross. When the Company does not control the products, the promise is to facilitate the sale and revenue is presented net.

To distinguish a promise to provide products from a promise to facilitate the sale from a third party, the Company considers the guidance of control in ASC 606-10-55-37A and the indicators in ASC 606-10-55-39. The Company considers this guidance in conjunction with the terms in its arrangements with both suppliers and customers.

The Company orders the products, and the suppliers ship the products to the Company’s warehouse where the Company inspects and accepts the products. This enables the Company to direct the use of these products but to also bear inventory risk as legal owners. The Company has the responsibility of fulfilling the promise to provide the products to its customers, and to provide a one-year warranty period for each customer’s order. In addition, when establishing the selling prices for delivery of the products, the Company has control to set its selling price at the E-commerce platform. All these factors indicate that the Company is acting as the principal in this transaction. As a result, revenue from the E-Commerce customer is presented on a gross basis.

The Company applies the practical expedient in ASC 606 to expense costs as incurred for costs to obtain a contract with a customer when the amortization period is one year or less. The Company has no material incremental costs of obtaining contracts with customers that the Company expects the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year which need to be recognized as assets for the three months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023.

The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842. The Company categorizes leases with contractual terms longer than 12 months as either operating or finance. Finance leases are generally those leases that substantially utilize or pay for the entire asset over its estimated life. All other leases are categorized as operating leases. Costs associated with operating lease assets are recognized on a straight-line basis within operating expenses over the term of the lease. As of September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024, the Company does not have finance leases.

The Company determines if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at inception. Operating lease assets represent the Company’s right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time, or term, in exchange for consideration, and operating lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the aforementioned right.

Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and liabilities are initially recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term, which includes the minimum unconditional term of the lease, and may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain at the commencement date that such options will be exercised. As the rate implicit for each of the Company’s leases is not readily determinable, the Company uses incremental borrowing rate as effective interest rate, based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of its expected lease payments. Operating lease assets also include any initial direct costs and any lease payments made prior to the lease commencement date and are reduced by any lease incentives received. According to ASC 842-10-15-37, a lessee may, as an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset, choose not to separate non-lease components from lease components and instead to account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with that lease component as a single lease component. The Company has identified the common area maintenance (CAM) fee as a non-lease component and elected to not separate it from the lease component.

Operating lease assets are amortized on a straight-line basis in operating lease expense over the lease term on the consolidated statements of operations. The related amortization of ROU assets along with the change in the operating lease liabilities are separately presented within the cash flows from operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company records lease expenses for operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company reviews the impairment of its right-of-use assets consistent with the approach applied for its other long-lived assets on an annual basis. The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on its ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected undiscounted future pre-tax cash flows of the related operations. The Company has elected to include the carrying amount of operating lease right-of-use assets in any tested asset group and include the associated lease payments in the undiscounted future pre-tax cash flows. For the three months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not recognize impairment loss against its right-of-use assets.

For a lease with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liability. For the lease that with lease term of one year or shorter, the Company has elected to not recognize right-of-use asset and lease liability.

The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own Common Stock and whether the warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding.

For issued or modified warrants that meet all of the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as a component of equity at the time of issuance. The Company determined that upon further review of the warrant agreements, the Company concluded that its warrants qualify for equity accounting treatment.

Upon completion of the Business Combination, all of ACAC’s outstanding public and private warrants (See Note 16) were replaced by the Company’s public and private warrants. The Company treated such warrants replacement as a warrant modification and no incremental fair value was recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2024.

The Company considers the applicability and impact of all accounting standards updates (“ASUs”). Management periodically reviews new accounting standards that are issued. Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended (the “JOBS Act”), the Company meets the definition of an emerging growth company and has elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, which delays the adoption of these accounting standards until they would apply to private companies.

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326), which eliminates the accounting guidance on troubled debt restructurings for creditors in ASC 310 and amends the guidance on vintage disclosures to require disclosure of current-period gross write-offs by year of origination. The ASU also updates the requirements related to the accounting for credit losses under ASC 326 and adds enhanced disclosures for creditors with respect to loan refinancing and restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. The Company adopted this guidance on July 1, 2023, which did not have an impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Except as mentioned above, the Company does not believe other recently issued but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash flows.

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280)” (“ASU 2023-07” or “Topic 280). The amendments in ASU 2023-07 improve financial reporting by requiring disclosure of incremental segment information on an annual and interim basis for all public entities to enable investors to develop more decision useful financial analyses. Topic 280 requires a public entity to report a measure of segment profit or loss that the chief operating decision maker (CODM) uses to assess segment performance and make decisions about allocating resources. Topic 280 also requires other specified segment items and amounts, such as depreciation, amortization, and depletion expense, to be disclosed under certain circumstances. The amendments in ASU 2023-07 do not change or remove those disclosure requirements. The amendments in ASU 2023-07 also do not change how a public entity identifies its operating segments, aggregates those operating segments, or applies the quantitative thresholds to determine its reportable segments. The amendments in ASU 2023-07 are effective for years beginning after December 15, 2023 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, adopted retrospectively. Management considers that the guidance will not have a significant impact on the disclosures set out in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures” (“ASU 2023-09”), which modifies the rules on income tax disclosures to require entities to disclose (1) specific categories in the rate reconciliation, (2) the income or loss from continuing operations before income tax expense or benefit (separated between domestic and foreign) and (3) income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations (separated by federal, state and foreign). ASU 2023-09 also requires entities to disclose their income tax payments to international, federal, state and local jurisdictions, among other changes. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted for annual consolidated financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. ASU 2023-09 should be applied on a prospective basis, but retrospective application is permitted. The Company continuously evaluates the potential impact of adopting this new guidance on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and does not believe it will have a material impact on the presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.