VINP Vinci Partners Investments Ltd

PART I

Certain of our funding costs and the returns on certain of our investment funds are tied to certain interest rate indices or other benchmark indices, such as the Brazilian long-term interest rates (taxa de juros de longo prazo or taxa de longo prazo), or the TJLP/TLP rates, the Brazilian interbank deposit rate (taxa de depósito interbancário), or the CDI Rate, the Brazilian basic interest rate (taxa SELIC), or the SELIC Rate, certain inflation indices and certain B3 indices. In addition, carrying costs and the returns on certain of our investment funds based in the United States are tied to or denominated in U.S. dollars, exposing us to risks associated with fluctuations in rate of exchange of U.S. dollars for Brazilian reais. We may not be able to adequately manage our exposure to these benchmarks, which could lead to increased funding costs, carrying costs or decreased returns for our funds, with a consequent adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The financial services market is highly competitive. Many of our competitors may have substantially greater resources than we do. These competitors may be able to offer more attractive fees to our current and prospective clients, especially our competitors that are affiliated with financial institutions. Competition could cause us to reduce the performance and management fees and financial services advisory fees we charge for our services and could also result in a loss of existing clients, and greater difficulty in attracting new clients.

The financial services market is characterized by rapid technological change, new product and service introductions, evolving industry standards, changing client needs and the entrance of non-traditional competitors. There can be no assurance that we will have the funds available to maintain the levels of investment required to support our projects, and if we are unable to develop, adapt to or take advantage of technological changes or evolving industry standards, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we identified a number of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The material weaknesses identified refer to our insufficient accounting processes necessary to comply with the reporting and compliance requirements of IFRS and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. We have a remediation plan to improve our internal control over financial reporting, but there is no assurance that our efforts will be effective or prevent any future material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian federal government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. We have no control over and cannot predict what measures or policies the Brazilian government may take in the future. We and the market price of our Class A common shares may be harmed by changes in Brazilian government policies, as well as general economic factors.

Brazil’s political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political crises have affected and continue to affect the confidence of investors and the general public, which have historically resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil. Ongoing political uncertainty could harm the Brazilian economy and, consequently, our business and the value of our investments, and could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our Class A common shares.

10

Our portfolio investments and our business could be materially and adversely affected by the risks related to health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The ultimate extent of the impact of such health crises on our business, financial condition and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are uncertain and out of our control. Higher interest rates globally may also lead to sudden changes in global liquidity conditions causing increased volatility in asset prices around the world.

Risks Relating to Our Class A Common Shares

Gilberto Sayão da Silva controls our company through his beneficial ownership of all of our outstanding Class B common shares, representing 78.1% of the combined voting power of our issued share capital. So long as Mr. Sayão da Silva beneficially owns a sufficient number of Class B common shares, even if he beneficially owns significantly less than 50% of our outstanding share capital, he will be able to effectively control our decisions.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association and by the laws of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders and the responsibilities of members of our board of directors may be different from the rights of shareholders and responsibilities of directors in companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions. In particular directors of a Cayman Islands company owe fiduciary duties to the company and separately a duty of care, diligence and skill to the company, whereas under Delaware corporate law, a director has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its stockholders. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law.”

Certain Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

Difficult market and economic conditions can adversely affect our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments that we manage or by reducing the ability of our funds to raise or deploy capital, each of which could negatively impact our net income and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.

Our business and the businesses of the companies in which our funds invest are materially affected by financial markets and economic conditions or events throughout the world, such as interest rates, availability of credit, inflation rates, economic and political uncertainty, such as those deriving from the new Brazilian government that took office on January 1, 2023, changes in laws (including laws relating to taxation), trade barriers and trade tension (including between the United States and China), commodity prices, currency exchange rates and controls and national and international political circumstances (including wars, such as the ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia, terrorist acts or security operations). Future market conditions may be less favorable compared to current and historical market conditions. Adverse conditions in financial markets and the economy can adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition by decreasing our AUM (both directly through a decline in market value or through clients withdrawing investments) and thereby decrease our performance and management fees, as well as by decreasing the investment income we earn from our proprietary investments.

Fluctuations in financial markets and economic conditions are outside our control and may affect the level and volatility of securities prices and liquidity and as a result, the value of our investments and our financial results. In addition, we may not be able to or may choose not to manage our exposure to these conditions and/or events. If not otherwise offset, declines in the equity, commodity and debt in the markets would likely cause us to write down our investments and the investments of our funds. Our profitability may also be materially and adversely affected by our fixed costs and the possibility that we would be unable to scale back other costs within a time frame sufficient to match any decreases in net income relating to a downturn in market and economic conditions.

11

Unfavorable market and economic conditions may reduce opportunities for our funds to make, exit and realize value from their investments. Challenging market and economic conditions, including those caused by changes in tax laws and other regulatory restrictions, may make it difficult for us to find suitable investments for our funds or secure financing for investments on attractive terms. Such conditions may also result in reduced opportunities for our funds to exit and realize value from their existing investments and lower-than-expected returns on existing investments. Throughout our history, we have exited our portfolio companies through a combination of routes, including selling to strategic buyers, carrying out sponsor to sponsor transactions and through public market exits, including through initial public offerings, or IPOs, and reverse mergers into listed companies. In challenging equity markets, our funds may experience greater difficulty in realizing value from investments. In addition, when financing is not available or becomes too costly, it is difficult for potential buyers to raise sufficient capital to purchase our funds’ investments. Consequently, we may earn lower-than-expected returns on investments, which could cause us to realize diminished or no performance fees, which are typically determined by reference to performance in excess of one or more specified benchmarks.

We generally raise capital for a successor fund following the substantial and successful deployment of capital from the existing fund. In the event of poor performance by existing funds, our ability to raise new funds is impaired. Our fundraising may also be negatively impacted by any change in or rebalancing of fund investors’ asset allocation policies. During periods of unfavorable fundraising conditions, fund investors may negotiate for lower fees, different fee sharing arrangements for transaction or other fees, and other concessions. The outcome of such negotiations could result in our agreement to terms that are materially less favorable to us than for prior funds we have managed. Our current funds, including all our recent private equity funds, have performance hurdles, which require us to generate a specified return on investment prior to our right to receive performance fees. This requirement will likely be in all our future funds, and the hurdle rate could increase for our future funds. In addition, successor funds raised by us when such unfavorable circumstances exist would also likely result in smaller funds than our comparable predecessor funds. Fund investors may also seek to redeploy capital away from certain of our credit or other non-private equity investment vehicles, which permit redemptions on relatively short notice, in order to meet liquidity needs or invest in other asset classes or with other managers. Any of these developments could materially and adversely affect our future revenues, net income, cash flow, financial condition or ability to retain our employees.

In addition, our ability to raise capital could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets, including as a result of the turmoil caused in the banking sector by current macroeconomic conditions. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed receiver of Silicon Valley Bank. On March 11, 2023, Signature Bank was similarly closed and placed into receivership. Although we did not hold deposits at these financial institutions, our banking relationships and cash deposits could be adversely affected by the volatility in the U.S. banking system and our capital raising ability may be impacted by any downturn caused in the availability of liquidity caused by disruptions to the U.S. banking system or the banking system globally.

During periods of difficult market or economic conditions or slowdowns (which may occur across one or more industries, sectors or geographies), companies or assets in which we have invested may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. These companies may also have difficulty in expanding their businesses and operations or be unable to meet their debt service obligations or pay other expenses as they become due, including amounts payable to us. Negative financial results in our funds’ portfolio companies may result in lower investment returns for our investment funds, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flow. To the extent the operating performance of such portfolio companies (as well as valuation multiples) deteriorate or do not improve, our funds may sell those assets at values that are less than we projected or even at a loss, thereby significantly affecting those funds’ performance and consequently our operating results and cash flow and resulting in lower or no performance fees being paid to us. Adverse conditions may also increase the risk of default with respect to private equity, credit and other investments that we manage or the abandonment or foreclosure of our real asset investments. Even if economic and market conditions do improve broadly, adverse conditions in particular sectors may also cause our performance to suffer. In addition, low interest rates related to monetary stimulus, economic

12

stagnation or deflation may negatively impact expected returns on all types of investments as the demand for relatively higher return assets increases and the supply decreases. As a result, adverse conditions in financial markets as described above, as well as lower level of transaction activities involving our funds’ investments, which can be unpredictable and outside our control, may negatively impact both the frequency and size of fees generated by our business.

Our performance is subject to the risks of the industries and businesses in which the portfolio companies of our investment funds operate.

Our performance directly ties-in to the payment of fund management and performance fees by our investment funds, which, in turn, are subject to a number of risks inherent to their operations and also to the risk of the businesses and industries in which the portfolio companies of such investment funds operate, as well as advisory fees for financial advisory services, which are subject to transaction closings and realization of IPOs advised by Vinci Partners. Some of these industries are particularly noteworthy for the inherent risks therewith associated, such as infrastructure and real estate. These risks include but are not limited to, those associated with the burdens of ownership of real property, general and local economic conditions, changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for instance, of overbuilding), operating income, the financial resources of tenants, changes in building, environmental, zoning and other laws, casualty or condemnation losses, energy and supply shortages, various uninsured or uninsurable risks, natural disasters, changes in government regulations (such as rent control or operational licenses), changes in real property tax rates, changes in income tax rates, changes in interest rates, the reduced availability of mortgage funds which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, increased mortgage defaults, increases in borrowing rates, changes to the taxation of business entities and the deductibility of corporate interest expense or other applicable tax exemptions or benefits, negative developments in the economy that depress travel activity, environmental liabilities, contingent liabilities on disposition of assets, acts of god, terrorist attacks, war and other factors that are beyond our control. In addition, the acquisition of direct or indirect interests in undeveloped land or underdeveloped real property, which may often be non-income producing, is subject to the risks normally associated with such assets and development activities, including risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory or environmental approvals and licenses, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks beyond the control of our fund, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages) and the availability of both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. Additionally, the investment in energy, manufacturing, transportation, water and sanitation, and other infrastructure capital-intensive projects, as well as the development and operation of assets associated with real estate and certain other assets, may expose our investment funds, and, consequently, us, to increased environmental liabilities that are inherent in the ownership of such assets, which under the applicable laws may be imposed regardless of fault.

Changes in the debt financing markets may negatively impact the ability of our investment funds’ portfolio companies and strategies pursued with our balance sheet assets to obtain attractive financing for their investments or to refinance existing debt and may increase the cost of such financing or refinancing if it is obtained, which could lead to lower-yielding investments and potentially decrease our net income.

In the event that our portfolio companies regularly utilize the corporate debt markets in order to obtain financing for their operations, to the extent that credit markets render such financing difficult to obtain or more expensive, this may negatively impact the operating performance of those portfolio companies and, therefore, the investment returns on our funds. In addition, to the extent that conditions in the credit markets impair the ability of our portfolio companies to refinance or extend maturities on their outstanding debt, either on favorable terms or at all, the operating performance of those portfolio companies may be negatively impacted, which could impair the value of our investment in those portfolio companies and lead to a decrease in the investment income earned by us. In some cases, the inability of our portfolio companies to refinance or extend maturities may result in the inability of those companies to repay debt at maturity or pay interests when due, and may cause the companies to sell assets, undergo a recapitalization or seek bankruptcy protection, any of which would also likely impair the value of our investment and lead to a decrease in investment income earned by us.

13

Our failure to comply with investment guidelines set by our clients could result in damage awards against us or a reduction in AUM, either of which would cause our earnings to decline and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

When clients retain us to manage assets on their behalf, they specify certain guidelines regarding investment allocation and strategy that we are required to observe in the management of their portfolios. Our failure to comply with these guidelines and other limitations could result in clients terminating their investment management agreement with us and forcing an early redemption of their investments in our funds, as these investment agreements generally are terminable without cause on 30 days’ notice, and/or permit our clients to force an early redemption of their investment without prior notice or on relatively short notice. Clients could also sue us for breach of contract and seek to recover damages from us. In addition, such guidelines may restrict our ability to pursue certain allocations and strategies on behalf of our clients that we believe are economically desirable, which could similarly result in losses to a client, early redemption of a client’s quota, or termination of the asset management agreement and a corresponding reduction in AUM. Even if we comply with all applicable investment guidelines, a client may be dissatisfied with its investment performance or our services or fees, and may terminate their asset management agreements, redeem their quotas or be unwilling to commit new capital to our specialized funds or separate management accounts. Any of these events could cause our earnings to decline and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and certain benchmark indices could impact our funding costs and the value of our funds, and fluctuations in these rates and benchmarks could adversely affect our funding costs and the returns on certain of our funds, which could have a material adverse effect on our funds’ liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

Certain of our funding costs and the returns on certain of our investment funds are tied to certain interest rate indices or other benchmark indices, such as the TJLP/TLP rates, the CDI Rate, the SELIC Rate, certain inflation indices and certain B3 indices. In addition, carrying costs and the returns on certain of our investment funds based in the United States are tied to or denominated in U.S. dollars, exposing us to risks associated with fluctuations in rate of exchange of U.S. dollars for reais. We have no control over fluctuations in interest rates, market indices or exchange rates and we may not be able to adequately manage our exposure to these benchmarks, which could lead to increased funding costs, carrying costs or decreased returns for our funds, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “—Certain Risks Relating to Brazil—Inflation and certain measures by the Brazilian government to curb inflation have historically harmed the Brazilian economy and Brazilian capital markets, and high levels of inflation in the future would harm our business and the price of our Class A common shares” and “—We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and may enter into derivatives transactions to manage our exposure to exchange rate risk.”

We have significant liquidity requirements, and adverse market and economic conditions may adversely affect our sources of liquidity, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We expect that our primary liquidity needs will consist of cash required to:

These liquidity requirements are significant and, in some cases, may require cash outlays over time or involve capital that will remain invested for extended periods of time. In the event that our liquidity requirements were to exceed available liquid assets for the reasons specified above or for any other reasons, there can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flows from realizations of investments to fund them, which could force us to sell assets or seek to raise debt or equity capital on unfavorable terms. For further discussion of our liquidity needs, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

14

Our earnings and cash flow are highly variable due to the nature of our business and we do not intend to provide earnings guidance, each of which may cause the value of interests in our business to be volatile.

Our earnings are highly variable from quarter to quarter due to the volatility of investment returns of most of our funds, other investment vehicles and our balance sheet assets and the transaction and other fees earned from our businesses. We recognize earnings on investments in our funds based on our allocable share of realized and unrealized gains (or losses) reported by such funds and for certain of our recent funds, when a performance hurdle is achieved. During times of market volatility, the fair value of our funds and our balance sheet assets are more variable, and as publicly traded equity securities currently represent a proportion of the assets of many of our funds and balance sheet assets, volatility in the equity markets may have a significant impact on our reported results. A decline in realized or unrealized gains, a failure to achieve a performance hurdle or an increase in realized or unrealized losses, would adversely affect our profit for the period.

Net revenue from fund management, net revenue from performance fees and net revenue from advisory, which we recognize when contractually earned, can vary due to fluctuations in AUM, the number of investment transactions made by our funds, the number of portfolio companies we manage, the fee provisions contained in our funds and other investment products and transactions by our financial advisory services. In any particular quarter, fee income may vary significantly due to the variances in size and frequency of management and performance fees, or fees received for our financial advisory services. We may create new funds or investment products or vary the terms of our funds or investment products (for example our funds now include performance hurdles), which may alter the composition or mix of our income from time to time.

We may also experience fluctuations in our results from quarter to quarter, including our net revenue from services rendered and profit for the period, due to a number of other factors, including changes in the values of our funds’ investments, changes in the amount of distributions or interest earned in respect of investments, changes in the number of completed transactions (such as merger and acquisition, or M&A, transactions and/or initial public offerings, or IPOs) for our financial advisory clients, changes in our operating expenses, the degree to which we encounter competition and general market and economic conditions. Such fluctuations may lead to variability in the value of interests in our business and cause our results for a particular period not to be indicative of our performance in future periods. It may be difficult for us to achieve steady growth in net income and cash flow on a quarterly basis, which could in turn lead to large adverse movements in the value of interests in our business.

We are entitled to receive performance fees when the return on assets under management, over a given period established in each fund’s private memorandum, exceeds certain return benchmarks or other performance benchmarks. The timing and receipt of performance fees from our investment funds are unpredictable and will contribute to the volatility of our cash flows. Performance fee payments from investments depend on our funds’ performance and opportunities for realizing gains, which may be limited. It takes a substantial period of time to identify attractive investment opportunities, to raise all the funds needed to make an investment and then to realize the cash value (or other proceeds) of an investment through a sale, public offering or other exit. To the extent an investment is not profitable, no performance fees will be received from our funds with respect to that investment and, to the extent such investment remains unprofitable, we will only be entitled to a management fee on that investment. Furthermore, certain vehicles and separately managed accounts may not provide for the payment of any performance fees at all. Even if an investment proves to be profitable, it may be several years before any profits can be realized in cash. We cannot predict when, or if, any realization of investments will occur. In addition, if finance providers, such as commercial and investment banks, make it difficult for potential purchasers to secure financing to purchase companies in our investment funds’ portfolio, it may decrease potential realization events and the potential to earn performance fees. A downturn in the equity markets would also make it more difficult to exit investments by selling equity securities. If we were to have a realization event in a particular quarter, the event may have a significant impact on our cash flows during the quarter that may not be replicated in subsequent quarters. A decline in realized or unrealized gains, or an increase in realized or unrealized losses, would adversely affect our investment income, which could further increase the volatility of our quarterly results.

The timing and receipt of performance fees also vary with the life cycle of certain of our funds. Our performance-paying funds that have completed their investment periods and are able to realize mature investments, sometimes referred to as being in a “harvesting period,” are more likely to make larger distributions than our

15

performance-paying funds that are in their fundraising or investment periods that precede the harvesting period. During times when a significant portion of our AUM is attributable to performance-paying funds that are not in their harvesting periods, we may receive substantially lower performance fee distributions.

Our investment management activities may involve investments in relatively high-risk, illiquid assets, and we and our clients may lose some or all of the amounts invested in these activities or fail to realize any profits from these activities for a considerable period of time.

The investments made by our funds may include high-risk, illiquid assets. We have made and expect to continue to make investments alongside our investors, as the general partner, in our existing funds and certain customized separate accounts and in any new private markets funds we may establish in the future. The private markets funds in which we invest capital generally invest in securities that are not publicly traded. Even if such securities are publicly traded, many of these funds may be prohibited by contract or applicable securities laws from selling such securities for a period of time. Such funds will generally not be able to sell these securities publicly unless their sale is registered under applicable securities laws, or unless an exemption from such registration requirements is available. Accordingly, the private markets funds in which we invest our clients’ capital may not be able to sell securities when they desire and therefore may not be able to realize the full value of such securities. The ability of private markets funds to dispose of investments is dependent in part on the public equity and debt markets, to the extent that the ability to dispose of an investment may depend upon the ability to complete an IPO of the portfolio company in which such investment is held or the ability of a prospective buyer of the portfolio company to raise debt financing to fund its purchase. Furthermore, large holdings of publicly traded equity securities can often be disposed of only over a substantial period of time, exposing the investment returns to risks of downward movement in market prices during the disposition period. Contributing capital to these funds is risky, and we may lose some or the entire amount of our specialized funds’ and our clients’ investments.

The portfolio companies in which private markets funds have invested or may invest will sometimes involve a high degree of business and financial risk. These companies may be in an early stage of development, may not have a proven operating history, may be operating at a loss or have significant variations in operating results, may be engaged in a rapidly changing business with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, may be subject to extensive regulatory oversight, may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, to finance expansion or to maintain their competitive position, may have a high level of leverage, or may otherwise have a weak financial condition.

In addition, these portfolio companies may face intense competition, including competition from companies with greater financial resources, more extensive development, manufacturing, marketing, and other capabilities, and a larger number of qualified managerial and technical personnel. Our portfolio companies may be subject to additional risks, including changes in currency exchange rates, exchange control regulations, risks associated with different types (and lower quality) of available information, expropriation or confiscatory taxation and adverse political developments, which risks may be exacerbated for any portfolio companies that may be organized in jurisdictions outside of Brazil. In addition, during periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns in a particular investment category, industry or region, portfolio companies may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased costs. During these periods, these companies may also have difficulty in expanding their businesses and operations and may be unable to pay their expenses as they become due. A general market downturn or a specific market dislocation may result in lower investment returns for the private markets funds or portfolio companies in which our specialized funds and customized separate accounts invest, which consequently would materially and adversely affect investment returns for our specialized funds and customized separate accounts. Furthermore, if the portfolio companies default on their indebtedness, or otherwise seek or are forced to restructure their obligations or declare bankruptcy, we could lose some or all of our investment and also suffer reputational harm.

We may pursue investment opportunities that involve business, regulatory, legal or other complexities.

We may pursue investment opportunities that have unusually complex business, regulatory and/or legal aspects to them. This complexity presents risks, as such transactions can be more difficult, expensive and time-consuming to finance and execute, it can be more difficult to manage or realize value from the assets acquired in such transactions and such transactions sometimes involve a higher level of regulatory scrutiny or a greater risk of contingent liabilities. Any of these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

16

Our funds may face risks relating to undiversified investments.

While we have a policy of maintaining diversification in accordance with fund objectives and, where applicable, mandatory fund allocation rules, there can be no assurance as to the degree of diversification, if any, that will be achieved in any fund investments. Difficult market conditions or slowdowns affecting a particular asset class, geographic region or other category of investment could have a significant adverse impact on a given fund if its investments are concentrated in that area, which would result in lower investment returns. Accordingly, a lack of diversification on the part of a fund could adversely affect its investment performance and, as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Investments by our funds may in many cases rank junior to investments made by other investors.

In many cases, the companies in which our funds invest have indebtedness or equity securities, or may be permitted to incur indebtedness or to issue equity securities, that rank senior to our clients’ investments in our specialized funds, customized separate accounts or advisory accounts. By their terms, these instruments may provide that their holders are entitled to receive payments of dividends, interest or principal on or before the dates on which payments are to be made in respect of our clients’ investments. Also, in the event of bankruptcy or liquidation of a company in which one or more of our funds hold an investment, holders of securities ranking senior to our clients’ investments would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before distributions could be made in respect of our clients’ investments. After repaying senior security holders, the company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying amounts owed in respect of our clients’ investments. To the extent that any assets remain, holders of claims that rank equally with our clients’ investments would be entitled to share on an equal and ratable basis in distributions that are made out of those assets. Also, during periods of financial distress or following an insolvency, our ability to influence a company’s affairs and to take actions to protect investments by our funds may be substantially less than that of those holding senior interests, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our funds may be forced to dispose of investments at a disadvantageous time.

Our funds may make investments of which they do not advantageously dispose of prior to the date the applicable fund is dissolved, either by expiration of such fund’s term or otherwise. Although we generally expect that our funds will dispose of investments prior to dissolution or that investments will be suitable for in-kind distribution at dissolution, we may not be able to do so. We have only a limited ability to extend the term of the fund with the consent of fund investors or the advisory board of the fund, as applicable, and therefore, we may be required to sell, distribute or otherwise dispose of investments at a disadvantageous time prior to dissolution. This would result in a lower than expected return on the investments and, perhaps, on the fund itself.

A decline in the pace or size of investment by our funds would reduce the revenues we receive from fees.

The performance fees (including realized and unrealized performance fees) and management fees that we earn are driven in part by the pace at which our funds make investments and the size of those investments. Any decline in that pace or the size of investments would reduce our revenue from transaction and management fees. Likewise, during an attractive selling environment, our funds may capitalize on increased opportunities to exit investments. Any increase in the pace at which our funds exit investments, if not offset by new commitments and investments, would reduce future management fees. Additionally, in certain of our funds that derive management fees only on the basis of invested capital, the pace at which we make investments, the length of time we hold such investment and the timing of disposition will directly impact our revenues. Many factors could cause such a decline in the pace of investment or the transaction and management fees we receive, including:

17

Given our focus on achieving investment performance that exceeds the performance of our main competitors, and on maintaining and strengthening investor relations, we may reduce our AUM, restrain its growth, reduce our fees or otherwise alter the terms under which we do business when we deem it in the best interests of our investors—even in circumstances where such actions might be contrary to the near-term interests of holders of our Class A common shares.

From time to time if we decide it is in the best interests of all stakeholders, we may take actions that could reduce the profits we could otherwise realize in the short term. While we believe that our commitment to treating our investors fairly is in the long-term interest of us and our shareholders, we may take actions that could adversely impact our short-term profitability, and there is no guarantee that such actions will benefit us in the long term. The means by which we seek to achieve investment performance that exceeds the performance of our main competitors in each of our strategies could include limiting the AUM in our strategies to an amount that we believe can be invested appropriately in accordance with our investment philosophy and current or anticipated economic and market conditions. Additionally, we may voluntarily reduce management fee rates and terms for certain of our funds or strategies when we deem it appropriate, even when doing so may reduce our short-term revenue. For instance, in order to enhance our relationship with certain fund investors, we have reduced management fees or ceased charging management fees on certain funds in specific instances. In certain investment funds, we have agreed to charge management fees based on invested capital or net asset value as opposed to charging management fees based on committed capital.

We have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and type of investment products we offer to retail investors, which could expose us to new and greater levels of risk.

Although retail investors have been part of our historic distribution efforts, we have increasingly undertaken business initiatives to increase the number and type of investment products we offer to high net worth individuals, family offices and other mass affluent investors. In some cases we seek to distribute our funds to such retail investors indirectly through feeder funds sponsored by brokerage firms, private banks or third party feeder providers, and in other cases directly to the qualified clients of private banks, independent investment advisors and brokers. In other cases we create investment funds specifically designed for direct investment by retail investors. Our initiatives to access retail investors entail the investment of resources and our objectives may not be fully realized.

Accessing retail investors and selling retail directed products exposes us to new and greater levels of risk, including heightened litigation and regulatory enforcement risks. To the extent we distribute retail products through new channels, including through unaffiliated firms such as digital distribution platforms, we may not be able to effectively monitor or control the manner of their distribution, which could result in litigation against us, including with respect to, among other things, claims that products distributed through such channels are distributed to customers for whom they are unsuitable or distributed in any other inappropriate manner. Although we seek to ensure through due diligence and onboarding procedures that the channels through which retail investors access our investment products conduct themselves responsibly, to the extent that our investment products are being distributed through third parties, we are exposed to reputation damage and possible legal liability to the extent such third parties improperly sell our products to investors. Similarly, the hiring of employees to oversee independent advisors and

18

brokers presents risks if they fail to follow training, review and supervisory procedures. In addition, the distribution of retail products through new channels whether directly or through market intermediaries could expose us to additional regulatory risk in the form of allegations of improper conduct and/or actions by regulators against us with respect to, among other things, product suitability, conflicts of interest and the adequacy of disclosure to customers to whom our products are distributed through those channels.

Our inability to raise additional or successor funds (or raise successor funds of a size comparable to our predecessor funds) could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Our current private equity funds and certain other funds and investment vehicles have a finite life and a finite amount of commitments from fund investors. Once a fund nears the end of its investment period, our success depends on our ability to raise additional or successor funds in order to keep making investments and, over the long term, earning management fees (although our funds and investment vehicles continue to earn management fees after the expiration of their investment periods, they are generally at a reduced rate). Even if we are successful in raising successor funds, to the extent we are unable to raise successor funds of a size comparable to our predecessor funds or the extent that we are delayed in raising such successor funds, our revenues may decrease as the investment periods of our predecessor funds expire and associated fees decrease. The performance of our funds also impacts our ability to raise capital, and deterioration in the performance of our funds would result in challenges with regard to future fundraising. The evolving preferences of our fund investors may necessitate that alternatives to the traditional investment fund structure, such as separately managed accounts, smaller funds and co-investment vehicles, become a larger part of our business going forward. This could increase our cost of raising capital at the scale we have historically achieved. Furthermore, in order to raise capital for new strategies and products without drawing capital away from our existing products, we will need to seek new sources of capital such as individual investors.

Our ability to raise new funds could also be hampered if the general appeal of private equity and alternative investments were to decline. An investment in a limited partner interest in a private equity fund is less liquid than an exchange-traded instrument and the returns on such investment may be more volatile than returns on an investment in securities for which there is a more active and transparent market. Private equity and alternative investments could fall into disfavor as a result of concerns about liquidity and short-term performance. Institutional investors in private equity funds that have suffered from decreasing returns, liquidity pressure, increased volatility or difficulty maintaining target asset allocations may materially decrease or temporarily suspend making new investments in private equity funds. Such concerns could be exhibited, in particular, by public pension funds, which have historically been among the largest investors in alternative assets. Many public pension funds are significantly underfunded and their funding problems have been, and may in the future be, exacerbated by economic downturns. Concerns with liquidity could cause such public pension funds to reevaluate the appropriateness of alternative investments, and other institutional investors may reduce their overall portfolio allocations to alternative investments. This could result in a smaller overall pool of available capital in our industry. There is no assurance that the amount of commitments investors are making to alternative investment funds will continue at recent levels or that our ability to raise capital from investors will not be hampered.

In addition, the asset allocation rules or regulations or investment policies to which such third-party investors are subject could inhibit or restrict the ability of third-party investors to make investments in our investment funds. Coupled with a lack of distributions from their existing investment portfolios, many of these investors may have been left with disproportionately outsized remaining commitments to, and invested capital in, a number of investment funds, which may significantly limit their ability to make new commitments to third-party managed investment funds such as those advised by us.

Fund investors may also seek to redeploy capital away from certain of our credit or other non-private equity investment vehicles, which permit redemptions on relatively short notice in order for investors to meet liquidity needs or invest in other asset classes. We believe that our ability to avoid excessive redemption levels primarily depends on our funds’ continued satisfactory performance, although redemptions may also be driven by other factors important to our fund investors, including their need for liquidity and compliance with investment mandates, even if our performance is superior. Investors’ liquidity needs tend to be more pronounced during periods of market volatility. Any such redemptions would decrease our AUM and revenues.

The number of funds raising capital varies from year to year, and in years where relatively few funds are raising capital, the growth of our AUM and associated fees may be significantly lower. There is no assurance that the raising of funds for new strategies or successor funds will experience success similar to our existing or predecessor funds in the future.

19

If we cannot make the necessary investments to keep pace with rapid developments and change in our industry, the use of our services could decline, reducing our revenues.

The financial services market in which we compete is subject to rapid and significant changes. This market is characterized by rapid technological change, new product and service introductions, evolving industry standards, changing client needs and the entrance of non-traditional competitors. In order to remain competitive and maintain and enhance customer experience and the quality of our services, we must continuously invest in projects to develop new products and features. These projects carry risks, such as cost overruns, delays in delivery, performance problems and lack of client adoption. There can be no assurance that we will have the funds available to maintain the levels of investment required to support our projects, and any delay in the delivery of new services or the failure to differentiate our services or to accurately predict and address market demand could render our services less desirable, or even obsolete, to our clients.

In addition, the services we deliver are designed to process highly complex transactions and provide reports and other information concerning those transactions, all at high volumes and processing speeds. Any failure to deliver an effective and secure service, or any performance issue that arises with a new service, could result in significant processing or reporting errors or other losses. As a result of these factors, our development efforts could result in increased costs and/or we could experience a loss in business that could reduce our earnings or could cause a loss of revenue if promised new services are not timely delivered to our clients or do not perform as anticipated. We also rely in part, and may in the future rely in part, on third parties for the development of, and access to, new technologies. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to develop or adapt to technological changes and evolving industry standards. We cannot predict the effects of technological changes on our business. If we are unable to develop, adapt to or take advantage of technological changes or evolving industry standards on a timely and cost-effective basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Furthermore, our competitors may have the ability to devote more financial and operational resources than we can to the development of new technologies and services that provide improved functionality and features to such competitors’ existing service offerings. If successful, their development efforts could render our services less desirable to clients, resulting in the loss of clients or a reduction in the performance and management fees and financial services advisory fees we could generate from our service offerings, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Actual or potential epidemics, pandemics, outbreaks, or other public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may have an adverse impact on our investment portfolio and consequently our business and financial condition.

Our portfolio investments and our business could be materially and adversely affected by the risks (or the public perception of the risks) related to an epidemic, pandemic, outbreak, or other public health crisis, such as the recent outbreak of COVID-19. The global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, which originated in late 2019 and was later declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020, negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted supply chains, and created significant volatility in global financial markets. Reflecting this, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused the levels of equity and other financial markets to decline sharply and to become volatile since the onset of the impacts of COVID-19, and the market volatility resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic caused a number of planned public stock offerings and merger and acquisition transactions in Brazil to be postponed or cancelled.

The COVID-19 pandemic and government measures taken in response thereto led to significant disruptions in our funds’ portfolio companies’ businesses and to long-term disruptions or closures. In addition, significant market fluctuations or macroeconomic conditions driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and related developments have resulted in fluctuations in the fair value component of our assets under management, or AUM, and could result in additional fluctuations in our AUM depending on the severity and extent of the ongoing pandemic. For example, one lasting macroeconomic effect of the COVID-19 pandemic was the increase in government expenditures and a sharp reduction in interest rates to minimize the negative economic impact at the time of the crisis. These stimuli

20

led to a global surge in inflation and, as a result, a sharp rise in interest rates in the post-pandemic period. Increased real interest rates have led and may continue to lead to sudden changes in global liquidity conditions causing increased volatility in asset prices around the world and, therefore, adversely affect financial markets in the future.

The ultimate extent of the impact of COVID-19 and other potential impacts of an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis on our business, financial condition and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with any certainty. Such developments could therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.

The success of our business depends on the identification and availability of suitable investment opportunities for our clients.

Our success largely depends on the identification and availability of suitable investment opportunities for our clients. The availability of investment opportunities will be subject to market conditions and other factors outside of our control and the control of the fund managers with which we invest. Past returns of our funds have benefited from investment opportunities and general market conditions that may not continue or reoccur, including favorable borrowing conditions in the debt markets, and there can be no assurance that our funds, or the underlying funds in which we invest, will be able to avail themselves of comparable opportunities and conditions. There can also be no assurance that the private markets funds we manage will be able to identify sufficient attractive investment opportunities to meet their investment objectives. Further, the due diligence investigations we conduct before investments are made by our funds may not uncover all facts relevant to the suitability of such opportunities. See “—Our due diligence processes for investments may not reveal all relevant facts, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.”

Substantial and increasingly intense competition within our industry may harm our business.

The financial services market is highly competitive. Our growth will depend on a combination of the continued expansion of the financial services we offer and our ability to increase our market share. Our primary competitors include other alternative investment advisors as well as traditional financial services providers such as affiliates of financial institutions and well-established financial services companies in Brazil. In addition, although we do not compete directly for international capital with U.S. and European alternative asset managers in fundraising, our ability to raise international institutional capital for certain Private Markets strategies could be adversely affected by globally challenging market conditions. We also face competition from non-traditional financial services providers that have significant financial resources and develop different kinds of services.

Many of our competitors may have substantially greater financial, technological, operational and marketing resources than we do. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to offer more attractive fees to our current and prospective clients, especially our competitors that are affiliated with financial institutions. If competition causes us to reduce the performance and management fees and financial services advisory fees we charge for our services, we will need to aggressively control our costs in order to maintain our profit margins and our revenues may be adversely affected. Moreover, we may not be successful in reducing or controlling costs and our margins may be adversely affected. In particular, we may need to reduce the performance and management fees and financial services advisory fees we charge in order to maintain market share, as clients may demand more customized and favorable pricing from us. We may also decide to terminate client relationships which may no longer be profitable to us due to such pricing pressure. Competition could also result in a loss of existing clients, and greater difficulty in attracting new clients. One or more of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For further information regarding our competition, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Competition.”

Client attrition could cause our revenues to decline and the degradation of the quality of the products and services we offer, including support services, could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain clients and partners.

We experience client attrition resulting from several factors, including, among others, closures of businesses of our clients, transfers of investments to our competitors and lack of client satisfaction with investment returns and overall customer relationship and investor experience. We cannot predict the level of attrition in the future and our revenues could decline as a result of higher-than-expected attrition, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, should we not be successful in selling additional solutions or investment opportunities to our clients, we may fail to achieve our desired rate of growth.

21

Moreover, our clients expect a consistent level of quality on our investment platform. If the reliability, performance or functionality of our products and services is compromised or the quality of those products or services is otherwise degraded, we could lose existing clients and find it harder to attract new clients and partners, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Poor performance by our funds may adversely affect our brand and reputation, the performance fees and investment income received by us, and our growth and ability to raise capital for future funds.

In the event that our funds were to perform unsatisfactorily, in particular if this were the case for a larger fund, this may lead to difficulties for Vinci Partners in attracting fund investors and raising capital for new funds in the future. Poor performance by our funds could also result in a reduction in the performance fees expected to be received by us and the amount of performance fees ultimately received by us or could even result in us receiving no performance fees at all. Fund investors in future Vinci Partners funds may negotiate a lower management fee or a lower allocation of performance fees and investment income to us and the economic terms of our future funds may be less favorable to us than those of existing Vinci Partners funds.

The performance of our funds is always measured against the performance of competitors’ funds and public markets performance, and there is subsequently a risk that, even if our funds perform in line with expectations, where our competitors’ funds or public markets perform better by comparison, this may have an adverse effect on Vinci Partners’ ability to retain or attract fund investors and further adversely affect our ability to negotiate management fee rates or other economic terms of our future funds.

The performance of our funds could be adversely affected by a number of factors, for instance if competition for investment opportunities, on which a particular Vinci Partners fund is focused, increases. Competition for investment opportunities is based primarily on the ability to source such investment opportunities, the pricing, terms and structure of a proposed investment and the certainty of execution. Competition for investment opportunities is also influenced by our funds’ historical returns. For example, a Vinci Partners fund may be chosen as the preferred acquirer because of our history even where competitors are on equal or better footing in terms of pricing at the time of investment; conversely, a Vinci Partners fund may lose out on a potential investment if Vinci Partners was damaged by poor performance, even where a Vinci Partners fund offered better pricing terms than its competitors. Our funds may have been created under different organizational structures with the result that applicable laws and investment limitations might differ from current or future funds. Further, there is a risk that current and future Vinci Partners funds will not benefit from investment opportunities and general market conditions from historical periods. In addition, Vinci Partners funds could also generate lower returns on investments or experience increased risks of investment losses in situations where Vinci Partners offers more aggressive terms for certain investment opportunities when participating in competitive sales processes.

We are subject to risks relating to the dilution of our corporate culture and Brazilian heritage.

We have a strong corporate culture and continuously work to uphold this corporate culture within our organization. Our growth across new product offerings, investment opportunities, asset classes and markets may lead to organizational and cultural challenges. Without the existence of thoughtful strategies aimed at maintaining corporate culture despite rapid growth, there is a risk that our corporate culture will be diluted, and our values will change over time. Our focus on our personnel has further been decisive in retaining employees and maintaining good organizational health.

Dilution of our corporate culture and of our Brazilian heritage may lead to key employees leaving us, a change in our leadership style or additional strain on our ability to successfully integrate new employees, new systems or other resources. If we do not uphold our corporate culture, this may also adversely affect our ability to retain and recruit investment advisory professionals and other key personnel. Our personnel is our most important asset, and a dilution of our corporate culture could have a material adverse effect on our continued development, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

22

Changed trends in the Brazilian and in the global savings markets or in the private markets industry may adversely affect us.

We are affected by trends in the market for management of savings assets, which market has grown significantly in recent years. Growth has been primarily driven by investment returns, most notably rising equity market values. However, net inflows have made an increasing contribution towards overall growth in industry-wide AUM in recent years.

In the last five years, the Brazilian basic interest rate, known as the SELIC Rate, fell from a nominal 14.25% per year to as low as 2.0% until March 2021. This rapid and significant drop in the SELIC Rate initiated a never-before-seen migration of capital flows to alternative asset management products, accelerating the migration of retail and institutional investors in Brazil from fixed-income products to alternative investments, such as ours. However, with global economic recovery currently underway, and as a result of disruptions in global supply chains, commodity prices (and prices generally) increased significantly in 2021 and 2022, leading to a global increase in inflation, and in Brazil in particular. This led the Brazilian Central Bank to repeatedly raise the SELIC Rate throughout 2021 and 2022 to 13.75% as of December 31, 2022, in an attempt to curb rising inflation, which, as measured by the National Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo), or IPCA, which is published by the Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), or IBGE, came in at 5.8% for the year ended December 31, 2022. Although additional increases are not expected in 2023, rates may eventually be increased if inflation rates turn out to be more persistent than currently expected. The market estimates the SELIC Rate at 12.75% as of December 31, 2023 according to the Brazilian Central Bank’s February 24, 2023 Focus report, an estimate which has been consistently revised upwards in recent weeks.

In the year ended December 31, 2022, we posted a positive performance despite this hike in interest rates. The aforementioned nominal rates translate into real rates at around 8% (one-year nominal rate deflated by market expectations for inflation in the next 12 months). The neutral real interest rate in Brazil is estimated to be approximately 4%, which means that the current 8% rate is already at a level poised to reduce inflation in due course. Market expectations compiled by the Brazilian Central Bank’s Focus survey point to interest rates and inflation dropping in the coming years. As the environment of lower SELIC Rates resumes in the future, we expect to continue drawing retail investors to alternative asset classes; we also believe the share of investment from Brazilian institutional investors in listed funds, which is currently low, may increase significantly in the coming years, which could continue to support the potential growth in this asset class.

If, contrary to current market expectations based on the Focus survey, basic interest rates are further increased, this could result in a significant slowdown in our AUM growth and could necessitate a shift by us to investments in other asset classes or change our mix of investments, and we may not be able to generate the same investment returns that we have generated historically, or could experience a loss on in investments in real terms. In addition, if the positive trends in the asset management industry do not continue or if the industry were to be subject to negative trends, this may impede our ability to raise capital for new funds. Furthermore, fund investors’ investment returns can be impacted by overall public share prices and a decrease in share prices may affect our funds’ returns to fund investors.

Despite the recent hike in interest rates to mitigate the impact of commodity price shock on Brazilian inflation, we believe that the overall macroeconomic environment remains favorable for our business, driving migration toward alternative investments, such as those that we offer. There is a risk, however, that, in the future, fund investors may, for instance due to an overall downturn in the public markets, end up over-allocated to private markets, which in turn could have a negative impact on our ability to raise capital for new funds. This may also lead to increased competition from new entrants and established players, making it more difficult for us to source suitable investment opportunities for our funds. For example, within the private equity sector, competitors include Advent International Ltd., Patria Investments Ltd., Kinea Investimentos Ltda. and Kinea Private Equity Investimentos S.A. (which we refer to together as Kinea). Within the infrastructure sector, competitors include Patria and Perfin Administração de Recursos Ltda. Within the real estate sector, competitors include Kinea, XP Inc., Banco BTG Pactual S.A. and Credit Suisse Hedging-Griffo (through Credit Suisse Hedging-Griffo Wealth Management S.A. and Credit Suisse Hedging-Griffo Corretora de Valores S.A.). Within the credit sector our main competitors are the large Brazilian banks, including Itau Unibanco S.A., Banco Bradesco S.A., Banco do Brasil and Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A., and investment platforms tied to other financial institutions, including Kinea, XP Inc. and Banco BTG Pactual S.A. Our financial advisory services compete against those of local and international boutique mergers and

23

acquisitions advisory firms. Alternatively, for a variety of reasons, fund investor sentiment may turn against private markets investing. For example, the returns generated by private markets may decline, and other asset classes or investment opportunities may be perceived to offer superior returns. Certain institutional fund investors are also demonstrating a preference to “in-source” their own investment advisory professionals. Such institutional investors may cease to invest in, or reduce their allocations to, our funds, as well as potentially become competitors of Vinci Partners and our funds, all of which could adversely affect our earning potential.

To meet the demands of fund investors, we have a multi-strategy Private Markets platform including private equity, real estate, infrastructure, credit and special situations, enabling fund investors to simplify their investment manager relationships by investing across multiple investment strategies with the same manager. If fund investor requirements and preferences change, this could adversely affect the level of interest for investing in specific asset classes or investing in our funds. Such changes may impede our ability to raise capital for new funds, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may face damage to our professional reputation and legal liability if our services are not regarded as satisfactory or for other reasons.

As an asset management firm, we depend to a large extent on our relationships with our clients and our reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain clients. As a result, if a client is not satisfied with our services, such dissatisfaction may be more damaging to our business than to other types of businesses.

In recent years, the volume of claims and amount of damages claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial advisors has been increasing. Our asset management and advisory activities may subject us to the risk of significant legal liabilities to our clients and third parties, including our clients’ stockholders or beneficiaries, under securities or other laws and regulations for materially false or misleading statements made in connection with securities and other transactions. In our investment management business, we make investment decisions on behalf of our clients that could result in substantial losses. Any such losses also may subject us to the risk of legal and regulatory liabilities or actions alleging negligent misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract. Moreover, litigation risk may also arise from a perception from investors that any investment opportunity identified by us that is appropriate for two or more investment funds in a manner that excludes one or more funds or results in a disproportionate allocation based on factors or criteria that we determine is inconsistent with the fiduciary obligations of our subsidiaries under applicable law, governing fund agreements or Vinci Partners’ own policies. These risks often may be difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of time. We may incur significant legal expenses in defending litigation. In addition, negative publicity and press speculation about us, our investment activities or the private markets in general, whether or not based in truth, or litigation or regulatory action against us or any third-party managers with whom we invest directly or indirectly involving us may tarnish our reputation and harm our ability to attract and retain clients. Substantial legal or regulatory liability could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations or cause significant reputational harm to us, which could seriously harm our business.

Climate change and climate change-related regulation could adversely affect our business.

We and our portfolio companies face risks associated with climate change, including risks related to the impact of climate change and environmental, social and governance matters, or ESG matters, including climate change and ESG legislation and regulation (both domestically and internationally), risks related to climate-related business trends, and risks stemming from the physical impacts of climate change. New climate change-related regulations or interpretations of existing laws may result in enhanced disclosure obligations, which could negatively affect us or our portfolio companies and materially increase our regulatory burden. Increased regulations generally increase our costs, and we could continue to experience higher costs if new laws require us to spend more time, hire additional personnel or buy new technology to comply effectively. At the portfolio company level, there are still individual portfolio companies in these and other sectors that could face transition risk if carbon-related regulations or taxes are implemented. Further, advances in climate science may change society’s understanding of sources and magnitudes of negative effects on climate, which could negatively impact portfolio company financial performance and regulatory jeopardy.

24

In addition, we face business trend-related climate risks including the increased attention to climate-related legislation and regulation by our fund investors. Certain fund investors have considered ESG factors, including climate risks, in determining whether to invest in our funds. See “—We are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors with respect to the ESG impact of investments made by our funds, which may constrain capital deployment opportunities for our funds and adversely impact our ability to raise capital from such investors.” For our portfolio companies, business trends related to climate change may require capital expenditures, product or service redesigns, and changes to operations and supply chains to meet changing customer expectations. While this can create opportunities, not addressing these changed expectations could create business risks for portfolio companies, which could negatively impact the returns in our funds.

Further, significant physical effects of climate change, including extreme weather events such as hurricanes, floods or droughts, can also have an adverse impact on certain of our portfolio companies and investments, especially our real asset investments and portfolio companies that rely on physical factories, plants or stores located in the affected areas. As the effects of climate change increase, we expect the frequency and impact of weather and climate-related events and conditions to increase as well. For example, unseasonal or violent weather events can have a material impact to businesses or properties that focus on tourism or recreational travel. While the geographic distribution of our portfolio inherently limits our physical climate risk, some physical risk is inherent in the companies in our portfolio given the unknown potential for extreme weather that could occur related to climate change.

Moreover, Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation came into force on March 10, 2021 and was further supplemented by Level 2 Regulatory Technical Standards that came into force on 1 January 2023 (together, the “SFDR”). The SFDR imposes disclosure requirements on “financial market participants,” which include alternative investment fund managers, or “AIFMs,” authorized under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, in respect of “financial products”, which include alternative investment funds, or “AIFs.” In particular, the disclosures obligations under the SFDR consist of entity (e.g., AIFM)-level disclosures and product (e.g., AIF or portfolio)-level disclosures. Such disclosure must be made variously in pre-contractual information to investors, in periodic investor reports and publicly on firms’ websites. Furthermore, the SFDR imposes additional disclosure obligations for: (i) Article 8 products (products that promote environmental or social characteristics, colloquially known as “light green funds”); and (ii) Article 9 products (products that have sustainable investment as their objective, colloquially known as “dark green funds”). Vinci Impact Climate Change fund, or VICC, is a non-EU AIFM, and, as a result, pursuant to the SFDR, we are required to, among other things, prepare entity-level disclosures, and product-level disclosures and periodic reports in respect of its AIFs. Accordingly, the provisions of the SFDR may affect the fundraising process for VICC and for Vinci Impact and Return V fund with European limited partners, and may impose additional operating costs on us, which may be borne by the AIFs.

As of the date of this annual report, we believe that VICC’s AIFs promote environmental and/or social characteristics and, therefore, we intend to comply with the disclosure requirements that are applicable to Article 8 funds under the SFDR. In the future, we may seek to effect the requisite changes at entity-level and at product-level for VICC’s AIFs to comply with the disclosure requirements that are applicable to Article 9 funds. Nonetheless, we may be subject to regulatory action or financial penalties if VICC fails to comply with applicable requirements under the SFDR, and failure to adequately or accurately disclose information in relation to the environmental or social characteristics, or any sustainable investment objective, of its AIFs could expose us to litigation or other legal or regulatory actions.

We are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors with respect to the ESG impact of investments made by our funds, which may constrain capital deployment opportunities for our funds and adversely impact our ability to raise capital from such investors.

In recent years, certain investors, especially pension funds, have placed increasing importance on the negative impacts of investments made by the private equity and other funds to which they commit capital, including with respect to ESG matters. Certain investors have also demonstrated increased activism with respect to existing investments, including by urging asset managers to take certain actions that could adversely impact the value of an investment, or refrain from taking certain actions that could improve the value of an investment. At times, investors have conditioned future capital commitments on the taking or refraining from taking of such actions. Increased focus and activism related to ESG and similar matters may constrain our capital deployment opportunities, and the

25

demands of certain investors may further limit the types of investments that are available to our funds. In addition, investors may decide to withdraw previously committed capital from our funds (where such withdrawal is permitted) or to not commit capital to future fundraises as a result of their assessment of our approach to and consideration of the social cost of investments made by our funds. To the extent our access to capital from investors, including pension funds, is impaired, we may not be able to maintain or increase the size of our funds or raise enough capital for new funds, which may adversely impact our revenues.

Unauthorized disclosure, destruction or modification of data, through cybersecurity breaches, computer viruses or otherwise, or disruption of our services could expose us to liability and protracted and costly litigation and damage our reputation.

Our business involves the collection, storage, processing and transmission of customers’ personal data, including names, addresses, identification numbers, bank account numbers and trading and investment portfolio data. An increasing number of organizations, including large clients and businesses, other large technology companies, financial institutions and government institutions, have disclosed breaches of their information technology systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks, including on portions of their websites, networks or infrastructure, or those of third parties who provide services to them. We could also be subject to breaches of security by hackers. Threats may derive from human error, fraud or malice on the part of employees or third-party service providers, or may result from accidental technological failure. Concerns about security are increased when we transmit information. Electronic transmissions can be subject to attack, interception or loss. Also, computer viruses and malware can be distributed and spread rapidly over the internet and could infiltrate our systems or those of our associated participants, which can impact the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information, and the integrity and availability of our products, services and systems, among other effects. Denial of service or other attacks could be launched against us for a variety of purposes, including interfering with our services or creating a diversion for other malicious activities. These types of actions and attacks could disrupt our delivery of products and services or make them unavailable, which could damage our reputation, force us to incur significant expenses in remediating the resulting impacts, expose us to uninsured liability, subject us to lawsuits, fines or sanctions, distract our management or increase our costs of doing business.

In the scope of our activities, we share information with third parties, commercial partners, third-party service providers and other agents, who collect, process, store and transmit sensitive data, and we may be held responsible for any failure or cybersecurity breaches attributed to these third parties insofar as they relate to the information we share with them. The loss, destruction or unauthorized modification of data by us or such third parties or through systems we provide could result in significant fines, sanctions and proceedings or actions against us by governmental bodies or third parties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any such proceeding or action, and any related indemnification obligation, could damage our reputation, force us to incur significant expenses in defense of these proceedings, distract our management, increase our costs of doing business or result in the imposition of financial liability.

Our encryption of data and other protective measures may not prevent unauthorized access to or use of sensitive data. A breach of our system or of the system of one of our commercial partners or third-party service providers may subject us to material losses or liability, including fines. A misuse of such data or a cybersecurity breach could harm our reputation and deter clients from using our products and services, thus reducing our revenues. In addition, any such misuse or breach could cause us to incur costs to correct the breaches or failures, expose us to uninsured liability, increase our risk of regulatory scrutiny, subject us to lawsuits, and result in the imposition of material penalties and fines under state and federal laws or regulations.

We cannot assure you that there are written agreements in place with every third party or that such written agreements will prevent the unauthorized use, modification, destruction or disclosure of data or enable us to obtain reimbursement from such third parties in the event we should suffer incidents resulting in unauthorized use, modification, destruction or disclosure of data. Any unauthorized use, modification, destruction or disclosure of data could result in protracted and costly litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Cybersecurity incidents are increasing in frequency and evolving in nature and include, but are not limited to, installation of malicious software, unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and the corruption

26

of data. Given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information technology disruptions, there can be no assurance that the procedures and controls we employ will be sufficient to prevent security breaches from occurring and we could be subject to the manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to risks related to noncompliance with data protection laws and the new Brazilian General Data Protection Law, which provides for application of sanctions, including financial penalties, in case of noncompliance.

In 2018, the President of Brazil approved Brazilian Law No. 13,709/2018, named the General Personal Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados), or the LGPD, which came into force on September 18, 2020, a comprehensive data protection law establishing the general principles and obligations that apply across multiple economic sectors and contractual relationships. The LGPD establishes detailed rules for the collection, use, processing and storage of personal data in all economic sectors, regardless of whether data is collected in a digital or physical environment. Certain aspects of the LGPD will be subject to further regulation to be enacted by the National Data Protection Authority and should result in changes to the LGPD’s approach that are not yet defined as of the date of this annual report.

Moreover, the administrative sanctions provisions of LGPD became enforceable as of August 1, 2021, pursuant to Law No. 14,010/2020. In the event of a violation of the LGPD, we may be subject to (1) legal notices and the required adoption of corrective measures, (2) fines of up to 2% of the our or our economic group’s revenues up to a limit of R$50.0 million per infraction, (3) publication of the infraction following confirmation of its occurrence, (4) the blocking and erasing of personal data involved in the infraction, (5) partial or complete suspension of the infringing processing activities for up to one year and (6) partial or complete prohibition to engage in processing activities. Moreover, we may be liable for property, moral, individual or collective damages caused by us, including by third party providers that process personal data for us, and jointly liable for property, moral, individual or collective damages caused by our subsidiaries, due to non-compliance with the obligations established by the LGPD and certain other sector-specific laws and regulations on data protection still in force. If we are unable to use sufficient measures to protect the personal data we manage and store or to maintain compliance with the LGPD, we may incur material costs which could have an adverse effect in our reputation and results of operations. Moreover, we may be held liable for material, punitive, individual or collective damages to the data subjects due to its processing and treatment and could be held individually or severally responsible for material, punitive, individual or collective damages caused by us, our subsidiaries, service providers that process personal data on our behalf or our affiliates due to non-compliance with the obligations set forth by the LGPD, which may adversely affect our reputation and results and, consequently, the value of our Class A common shares.

In the event of failure or insufficiency in the adoption of measures to protect the personal data that is processed or to maintain compliance with the LGPD, we may incur relevant costs, such as the payment of fines and indemnities, implementation of adjustment measures, and loss of business, as well as such failure or insufficiency having an adverse effect on our reputation and results of operations. As a result, we may be held liable regardless of LGPD sanctions since consumer protection authorities and the Public Prosecutor’s Office have already been active in pursuing data privacy violations even before the LGPD became effective. Accordingly, failures in the protection of the personal data processed by us, or any failure to implement adequate data protection measures in response to applicable legislation, may subject us to high fines, the disclosure of the incident to the market, the payment of indemnities, the elimination of personal data from the database in question and the suspension of access to our databases, prohibition of our activities related to the processing of infringed data in addition to civil sanctions, which may adversely affect our reputation and results.

In addition, the application of administrative sanctions under other laws that deal with privacy and data protection issues may still apply, such as the Consumer Protection Code and the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet. These administrative sanctions may be imposed by other public authorities, such as the Public Prosecutors’ Offices, the National Consumer Secretariat and consumer protection agencies. We may also be subject to liability in the civil sphere for violation of these laws. Sanctions imposed against us by these authorities may also adversely affect our reputation and results and, consequently, the value of our Class A common shares.

27

Our business depends on our well-regarded, reliable brand, and any failure to maintain, protect, and enhance our brand and related brands, including through effective marketing and communications strategies, would harm our business.

We have developed a well-regarded and reliable brand, “Vinci Partners,” that has contributed significantly to the success of our business. Maintaining, protecting, and enhancing our brands is critical to expanding our client base, and our relationships with other third-party partners, as well as increasing engagement with our products and services. This will depend largely on our ability to remain widely known, maintain trust, and continue to provide high-quality and secure products and services. Any negative publicity about our industry or our company, the quality, reliability and performance of our products and services, our risk management processes, changes to our products and services, our ability to effectively manage and resolve client complaints, our privacy and security practices, litigation, regulatory activity, and the experience of clients with our products or services could adversely affect our reputation and the confidence in and use of our products and services. Harm to our brands can arise from many sources, including failure by us or our partners to satisfy expectations of service and quality, inadequate protection of personal information, compliance failures and claims, litigation and other claims, third-party trademark infringement claims, administrative proceedings at the applicable national trademark offices, employee misconduct, and misconduct by our partners, service providers, or other counterparties. If we do not successfully maintain well-regarded and widely known brands, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We may in the future be the target of incomplete, inaccurate, and misleading or false statements about our company, our business, and our products and services that could damage our brands and materially deter people from adopting our services. Negative publicity about our company or our management, including about our product quality, reliability and performance, changes to our products and services, privacy and security practices, litigation, regulatory enforcement, and other actions, as well as the actions of our clients and other users of our services, even if inaccurate, could cause a loss of confidence in us. Our ability to respond to negative statements about us may be limited by legal prohibitions on permissible public communications by us during our initial public offering process or during future periods.

In addition, we believe that promoting our brands in a cost-effective manner is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our products and services and to expanding our base of clients. Our brand promotion activities may not generate customer awareness or increase revenue, and even if they do, any increase in revenue may not offset the expenses we incur in building our brands. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brands or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

The introduction and promotion of new services, as well as the promotion of existing services, may be partly dependent on our visibility on third-party advertising platforms, such as LinkedIn and Google. Changes in the way these platforms operate or changes in their advertising prices or other terms could make the maintenance and promotion of our products and services and our brands more expensive or more difficult. If we are unable to market and promote our brands on third-party platforms effectively, our ability to acquire new clients would be materially harmed, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Large investments made by certain of our funds may involve certain complexities and risks that may not be encountered in the context of small- and medium-sized investments and concentrated positions in any of our funds may expose us to losses.

Where our funds make large investments, these may involve certain complexities and risks that may not be encountered in small- and medium-sized investments. For example, larger transactions may be more difficult to finance or may entail greater challenges in implementing changes in the relevant portfolio company’s management, culture, finances or operations, and may face greater scrutiny by regulators, interest groups and other third parties. Further, in larger transactions, the amount of equity capital required to complete an investment has increased significantly. This has resulted in some larger private equity deals being structured as consortium transactions. Consortium transactions generally entail a reduced level of control over the investment because governance rights must be shared with the other consortium investors. Accordingly, in such deals, our funds may not be able to separately control decisions relating to a consortium investment and the timing and nature of any exit. In addition, large investments could result in concentrated positions in certain of our funds, or certain of our funds may have concentrated positions in the securities of certain issuers or of issuers of a particular industry, country or region, which could expose us to losses in respect of such issuer, industry, country or region. Any of these factors could

28

increase the risk that our funds’ larger investments could be less successful than investments over which the relevant Vinci Partners fund has full control or has a more diversified position. The consequences of an unsuccessful larger investment by a Vinci Partners fund could be more severe given the size of the investment and any such adverse consequences could, in turn, have a material adverse impact on our brand and reputation as well as adversely affect the performance fees and investment income received by us from the relevant fund, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a number of external service providers for certain key market information and data, technology, processing and supporting functions.

We rely on a number of external service providers for certain key market information and data, technology, processing and supporting functions, such as Microsoft, SS&C Eze, and Cirion Technologies, among others. The functions these service providers provide include portfolio management and asset allocation services, compliance management, communication systems, registration systems, data control systems, information security systems, and others which are of critical importance for us in order to provide our services to our clients in a satisfactory manner. These service providers may face technical, operational and security risks of their own, including risks similar to those that we face as described herein. Any significant failures by them, including improper use or disclosure of our confidential customer, employee or company information, could interrupt our business, cause us to incur losses and harm our reputation. Particularly, we rely on certain systems and institutions to allow our portfolio managers to access real-time market information data, such as Bloomberg, Reuters, Broadcast, Quantum and Economática, which are essential for our managers to make their investment decisions and take certain actions (such as making trades). Any failure of such information providers to update or deliver such data in a timely manner could lead to potential losses of our funds, which may in turn affect our business operations and reputation and may cause us to incur losses.

We cannot assure you that the external service providers will be able to continue to provide these services to meet our current needs in an efficient and cost-effective manner, or that they will be able to adequately expand their services to meet our needs in the future. Some external service providers may have assets and infrastructure that are important to the services they provide us that are located in or outside Brazil, and their ability to provide these services is subject to risks from unfavorable political, economic, legal or other developments, such as social or political instability, changes in governmental policies or changes in the applicable laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which their assets and operations are located.

An interruption in or the cessation of service by any external service provider as a result of system failures, capacity constraints, financial constraints or problems, unanticipated trading market closures or for any other reason and our inability to make alternative arrangements in a smooth and timely manner, if at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Further, disputes might arise in relation to the agreements that we enter into with our service providers or the performance of the service providers thereunder. To the extent that any service provider disagrees with us on the quality of the products or services to be provided under the terms and conditions of the payment under or other provisions of any such agreement, we may face claims, disputes, litigations or other proceedings initiated by such service provider against us. We may incur substantial expenses and require significant attention of management in defending against these claims, regardless of their merit. We could also face damage to our reputation as a result of such claims, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be able to ensure the accuracy of the information for third-party funds that we invest in for our clients, and we have no control over the performance of these third-party funds.

We invest our clients’ funds in certain third-party funds. While the information related to these third-party funds has been generally reliable, there can be no assurance that the reliability can be maintained in the future. If these third-party funds or their service providers or agents provide incomplete, misleading, inaccurate or fraudulent information in relation to their funds, we may lose the trust of existing and prospective investors.

Furthermore, as clients invest in these third-party funds through funds managed by us, they may have the impression that we are at least partially responsible for the quality and performance of these funds. Although we have established standards to screen fund providers before we invest in these funds, we have limited control over the

29

performance of these third-party funds. In the event that an investor is dissatisfied with a third-party fund invested in by us, we do not have any means to directly make improvements in response to client complaints. If investors become dissatisfied with these third-party funds, our business, reputation, financial performance and prospects could be adversely affected.

We rely upon our systems and upon third-party data center service providers to host certain aspects of our platform and content, and any systems failure due to factors beyond our control or any disruption to, or interference with, our use of third-party data center services could interrupt our service, increase our costs and impair our ability to deliver our platform, resulting in customer dissatisfaction, damaging our reputation and harming our business.

We utilize data center hosting facilities from a third-party service provider to make certain content available on our platform. Our primary data centers are located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Our operations depend, in part, on our providers’ ability to protect their facilities against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, criminal acts and similar events. The occurrence of natural disasters, acts of terrorism, vandalism or sabotage, a decision to close a facility without adequate notice, or other unanticipated problems at our providers’ facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in the availability of our platform, which would adversely affect our business.

In addition, we depend on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of numerous systems, including our computer systems, software, data centers and telecommunications networks, as well as the systems of third parties. Our systems and operations or those of our third-party providers could be exposed to damage or interruption from, among other things, fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, unauthorized entry and computer viruses. Defects in our systems or those of third parties, errors or delays in the processing of transactions, telecommunications failures or other difficulties could result in:

Valuation methodologies for certain assets in Vinci Partners funds involve subjective judgments and assumptions and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies could, therefore, be incorrect, which could have an adverse effect on fund performance, accrued performance fees and investment income.

Valuation methodologies for investments held by our funds can involve subjective judgments, and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may therefore be incorrect, which could have an adverse effect on fund performance and accrued performance fees.

There are often no readily ascertainable market prices for a portion of the investments of funds that we manage. As of December 31, 2022, investments in non-listed companies comprise 91.3% of investments in portfolio companies for the private equity funds that we manage. Valuations of the investments held by our funds are

30

generally prepared in line with applicable and recognized valuation processes and procedures (including, in respect of private equity investments in accordance with the international private equity and venture capital valuation guidelines) prepared by either our management team or third-party specialist firms. There is a risk that investments held by our funds will not be realized for amounts equal to, or greater than, the amounts at which they are valued, or that the past valuations based on such performance information will not accurately reflect the realization value of such investments. An investment’s actual realization value will depend on, among other factors, future operating results of the relevant investment, the value of the assets and market conditions at the time of disposal, any related transaction costs and the timing and manner of sale, all of which may differ from the assumptions on which previous valuations were determined.

Valuations of unrealized investments held by our funds can affect the amount of performance fees generated by our funds in circumstances where unrealized investments are written off or written down in value. To the extent that a valuation is incorrect, this may result in a recognition of revenue from performance fees, a subsequent reduction of which could ultimately reduce our profitability. Valuation of unrealized investments held by our funds could also affect management fees in the case of a bankruptcy of a portfolio company of a Vinci Partners fund, whereby the investment is considered realized and the invested capital is deducted from the base on which management fee is calculated, which could have an effect on the income from management fees received by Vinci Partners from existing funds.

Changes in values attributed to investments from time to time may result in volatility in the results of operations that our funds and we report from period to period. Also, a situation where asset values turn out to be materially different to those values previously realized could cause fund investors to lose confidence in us, which could in turn result in difficulty in raising capital for additional funds, and as a consequence, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The historical performance of our investments should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our investments or our operations or any returns expected on an investment in our Class A common shares.

Past performance of our funds is not necessarily indicative of future results or of the performance of our Class A common shares. An investment in our Class A common shares is not an investment in any of our funds. In addition, the historical and potential future returns of funds that we manage are not directly linked to returns on our Class A common shares. Therefore, you should not conclude that continued positive performance of funds will necessarily result in positive returns on an investment in our Class A common shares. However, poor performance of our specialized funds could cause a decline in our revenue, and could therefore have a negative effect on our performance and on returns on an investment in our Class A common shares.

The historical performance of our funds should not be considered indicative of the future performance of these funds or of any future funds we may raise, in part because:

31

If we lose key personnel, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We are dependent upon the ability and experience of a number of key personnel, including our partners and other members of senior management, who have substantial experience with our operations, the financial services industry and the markets in which we offer our products and services. Many of our key personnel have worked for us for a significant amount of time or were recruited by us specifically due to their industry experience. It is possible that the loss of the services of one or a combination of our senior executives or key managers, including our chief executive officer, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The ability to attract, recruit, develop and retain qualified employees and continue to strengthen our business is critical to our success and growth. If we are not able to do so, our business and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business functions at the intersection of rapidly changing technological, social, economic and regulatory developments that require a wide-ranging set of expertise and intellectual capital. In order for us to successfully compete and grow, we must attract, recruit, develop and retain the necessary personnel who can provide the needed expertise across the entire spectrum of our intellectual capital needs. While we have a number of our key personnel who have substantial experience with our operations, we must also develop our personnel to provide succession plans capable of maintaining continuity in the midst of the inevitable unpredictability of human capital. However, the market for qualified personnel is competitive, and we may not succeed in recruiting additional personnel or may fail to effectively replace current personnel who depart with qualified or effective successors. We must continue to hire additional personnel to execute our strategic plans. Our effort to retain and develop personnel may also result in significant additional expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability. We cannot assure you that our qualified employees will continue to be employed by us or that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Failure to retain or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, in order to manage our growth effectively, we must continue to strengthen our existing infrastructure, develop and improve our internal controls, create and improve our reporting systems, and timely address issues as they arise. These efforts may require substantial financial expenditures, commitments of resources, developments of our processes, and other investments and innovations. Furthermore, we encourage employees to quickly develop and launch new features for our products and services. As we grow, we may not be able to execute our strategies as quickly as smaller, more efficient organizations. If we do not successfully manage our growth, our business will suffer.

Implementing our growth strategy, including new investment products and business initiatives, may be unsuccessful.

We may be subject to a number of risks and uncertainties associated with our growth strategy, including the risk that new business initiatives will not contribute towards achieving our objectives or that we will not execute such new initiatives successfully. New initiatives may also be difficult to launch, for instance where we do not have a proven track record within the area of the new initiative, or may not reach the set goals and expectations following launch. Any new products we offer may have different economic structures than our traditional investment funds and may require a different marketing approach. Given our diverse offering of products and services, these initiatives could create conflicts of interests with existing products, increase our costs and expose us to new market risks and legal and regulatory requirements and could expose us to greater reputation and litigation risk. Implementing our growth strategy may also entail significant difficulties and costs, including the logistical and overhead costs of opening and expanding offices, the cost of recruiting, training and retaining a higher number of investment advisory professionals and higher costs arising from exposure to additional jurisdictions (including the laws, rules and regulations thereof) and activities. New initiatives and expanding our business, including to open new offices or develop new product offerings, could also divert significant time and attention of our senior management in the development of such new initiatives to the detriment of our existing business. Furthermore, we may be directly exposed to new business risks or be subjected to enhanced exposure to existing risks if business initiatives are financed with our own capital.

32

We may be exposed to asset-specific risks, including those relating to the holding of publicly traded securities, such as fluctuating stock prices and additional media scrutiny, which by extension may have an adverse effect on our brand and reputation. In addition, when our funds acquire minority stakes in public companies, or our portfolio companies are listed, these public companies may make decisions with which the relevant Vinci Partners fund disagrees, and the majority stakeholders or the management of the company may take risks or otherwise act in a manner that does not serve our funds’ interests.

Any failure of our new initiatives to meet or exceed expectations could lead to us not reaching profitability within the initiative, not growing in accordance with our growth strategy and not being able to enjoy the benefits that this is expected to lead to, as well preventing us from reaching our growth targets. In order for us to successfully compete and grow, we must attract, recruit, develop and retain the necessary personnel who can provide the needed expertise across the entire spectrum of our intellectual capital needs.

We are subject to various risks associated with the securities industry, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business, cash flows and results of operations.

We are subject to uncertainties that are common across the securities industry. These uncertainties include:

As a result, our revenues and earnings may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year. Sudden sharp declines in market values of securities and the failure of issuers and counterparties to perform their obligations can result in illiquid markets which, in turn, may result in our having difficulty selling securities. In the event of a market downturn, or in the event of increased market volatility, our business could be adversely affected in many ways, potentially for a prolonged period of time.

Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries.

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. As a holding company, our corporate purpose is to invest, as a partner, quotaholder or shareholder, in other companies, consortia or joint ventures in Brazil, where most of our operations are located, and outside Brazil. Accordingly, our material assets are our direct and indirect equity interests in our subsidiaries, and we are therefore dependent upon the results of operations and, in turn, the payments, dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries for funds to pay our holding company’s operating and other expenses and to pay future cash dividends or distributions, if any, to holders of our Class A common shares, and we may have tax costs in connection with any dividend or distribution. In addition, the payments, dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries to us for funds to pay future cash dividends or distributions, if any, to holders of our Class A common shares, could be restricted under financing arrangements that we or our subsidiaries may enter into in the future and we and such subsidiaries may be required to obtain the approval of lenders to make such payments to us in the event they are in default of their repayment obligations. Furthermore, exchange rate fluctuation will affect the U.S. dollar value of any distributions our subsidiaries make

33

with respect to our equity interests in those subsidiaries. See “—Certain Risks Relating to Brazil—Exchange rate instability may have adverse effects on the Brazilian economy, us and the price of our Class A common shares,” “—Certain Risks Relating to Brazil—Economic uncertainty and political instability in Brazil may harm us and the price of our Class A common shares” and “Item 8.—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

We may be subject to credit risks and could be subject to losses that would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be subject to the risk that our counterparties’ credit worthiness will deteriorate and that they no longer will be able to fulfil their financial obligations towards us. Our credit risks relate primarily to receivables and contract assets, cash held in bank accounts, any derivative instruments outstanding with a positive fair value, and any financial guarantees. If measures taken by us to minimize credit risks are not sufficient, or if one or more counterparties run into financial difficulties, we could be subject to losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The performance of our funds may also be affected by credit risks, which subsequently could adversely affect us. In our funds’ activities, defaults on commitments may have adverse consequences on the investment process. For instance, fund investors may not satisfy their contractual obligation to fund capital calls when requested by the general partner or fund manager of the relevant fund. This may result in shortfalls in capital and may affect the relevant fund’s ability to consummate investments and adversely affect our ability to receive management fees and other income.

Risk management activities may adversely affect the return on our funds’ investments.

When managing our exposure to market risks, we may (on our own behalf or on behalf of our funds) from time to time decide to use forward contracts, options, swaps, caps, collars and floors or pursue other strategies or use other forms of derivative instruments to limit our exposure to changes in the relative values of investments that may result from market developments, including changes in prevailing interest rates, currency exchange rates (as described below in “—We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and may enter into derivatives transactions to manage our exposure to exchange rate risk”) and commodity prices. The success of any hedging or other derivative transactions generally will depend on our ability to correctly predict market changes, the degree of correlation between price movements of a derivative instrument, the position being hedged, the creditworthiness of the counterparty and other factors. As a result, while we may enter into a transaction in order to reduce our exposure to market risks, the transaction may result in poorer overall investment performance than if it had not been executed. Such transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the value of a hedged position increases.

While such hedging arrangements may reduce certain risks, such arrangements themselves may entail certain other risks. These arrangements may require the posting of cash collateral at a time when a fund has insufficient cash or illiquid assets such that the posting of the cash is either impossible or requires the sale of assets at prices that do not reflect their underlying value. Moreover, these hedging arrangements may generate significant transaction costs, including potential tax costs, which reduce the returns generated by a fund. Finally, regulatory agencies may in the future require certain foreign exchange products to be subject to mandatory clearing, which could increase the cost of entering into currency hedges.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and may enter into derivatives transactions to manage our exposure to exchange rate risk.

We hold certain funds in non-Brazilian real currencies, and will continue to do so in the future, and our offshore operating subsidiaries generate revenue in non-Brazilian real currencies. Accordingly, our financial results are affected by the translation of these non-real currencies into reais. In addition, to the extent that we need to convert future financing proceeds into Brazilian reais for our operations, any appreciation of the Brazilian real against the relevant foreign currencies would materially reduce the Brazilian real amounts we would receive from the conversion, and any depreciation of the Brazilian real against the relevant foreign currencies could increase the amounts in Brazilian reais that we are require to convert into the relevant foreign currencies in order to service such relevant foreign currency financings. No assurance can be given that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates will not have a significant impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We may also have

34

foreign exchange risk on any of our other assets and liabilities denominated in currencies, or with pricing linked to currencies, other than our functional currency, including certain contract assets. Fluctuations in the Brazilian real versus any of these foreign currencies may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations including, for example as a result of overall market declines and increased volatility due to the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in the prices of commodities exported by Brazil and sudden changes in the global liquidity conditions caused by interest rate hikes in the main global financial centers, such as the United States and the European Union.

In addition, we may in the future enter into derivatives transactions to manage our exposure to exchange rate risk. Such derivatives transactions would be designed to protect us against increases or decreases in exchange rates, but not both. If we enter into derivatives transactions to protect against, for example, decreases in the value of the Brazilian real and the real instead increases in value, we may incur financial losses. Such losses could materially and adversely affect us.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and, if we fail to remediate such deficiencies (and any other ones) and to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations and/or prevent fraud.

Prior to our IPO, we were a private company with limited accounting personnel and other resources to address our internal control over financial reporting and procedures. As a result of our IPO, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires, among other things, that we establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Under current SEC rules, we are required to perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls.

In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we identified a number of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses identified relate to the processes necessary to comply with the reporting and compliance requirements of IFRS and the SEC and managing access to our systems, data and end-user computing, or EUC, controls, and computer operations controls, which were not designed or operating effectively. To address these material weaknesses, in 2021, we hired an external consultant with the experience we deemed necessary to assist us with designing the required processes and controls, addressing any systems and EUC deficiencies. In 2022, the consultant along with the Company, mapped out the processes and designed a risk and control framework relating to internal controls over financial reporting, and suggested action plans for some of our internal controls to be validated by the applicable staff. We expect that the consultant’s work will be completed in 2023, which will enable us to focus on controls gaps and related action plans. Notwithstanding, as the risk and control framework requires continuous updating, new risks and controls or control gaps that are not mapped in the current assessment may arise.

Additionally, we identified material weaknesses related to training, specifically, training to address financial reporting topics for a public company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. Beginning in the year ended December 31, 2022 and continuing into 2023, we sought to address these material weaknesses by appointing a firm to train our employees on financial reporting topics for a public company, and the material weakness has since been remedied. Continuous staff training is part of our culture and, consequently, we plan to continue to provide training in the year ended December 31, 2023 to relevant staff members related to this matter to mitigate the risk of uncovering material weaknesses in the future.

In addition, we identified material weaknesses as of December 31, 2020 related to the supervision of financial reporting for a public company, including lack of an audit committee. In 2021, we created our audit committee in connection with our IPO (see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—Audit Committee”) and further created an internal controls department, which is leading the remediation process along with the external consultant and is responsible for completing our action plans, monitoring, reviewing and testing controls, and ensuring that new controls are in place for new processes or changes in existing processes. We further created an internal audit department, which reports directly to the audit committee.

35

Moreover, we identified control deficiencies as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, related to controls around the financial reporting closing process, the procedures in existence to maintain formal accounting policies, processes and controls to analyze, account for and disclose complex transactions. Such deficiencies, when considered in the aggregate, would be considered a material weakness. Beginning in the year ended December 31, 2022 and continuing into 2023, we have sought to remedy our control deficiencies through procedures such as updated accounting policies and procedures, and controls regarding the reviewing process and the accuracy of the information required to produce the financial statements.

These material weaknesses did not result in a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements. However, additional testing may reveal other deficiencies in our internal controls that are deemed to be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and render our internal controls over financial reporting ineffective. We incur additional accounting and auditing expenses and spend significant management time in complying with these requirements. If we are not able to comply with these requirements in a timely manner, or if we or our management identifies material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our Class A common shares may decline and we may be subject to investigations or sanctions by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, or other regulatory authorities. Moreover, we cannot assure you that our efforts will be effective or prevent any future material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

In addition, these obligations also require substantial attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business. These cost increases and the diversion of management’s attention could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operation results.

Requirements associated with being a public company in the United States require significant company resources and management attention.

We are subject to certain reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and other SEC and Nasdaq rules and regulations. We are also subject to various other regulatory requirements, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These rules and regulations increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. New rules and regulations relating to information disclosure, financial reporting and controls and corporate governance, which could be adopted by the SEC, the Nasdaq or other regulatory bodies or exchange entities from time to time, could result in a significant increase in legal, accounting and other compliance costs and make certain corporate activities more time-consuming and costly, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These rules and regulations may also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers.

These obligations also require substantial attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business. Given that most of the individuals who constitute our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies, initially, these obligations could demand even greater attention. These cost increases and the diversion of management’s attention could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to complex and evolving regulations and oversight related to our provision of financial products and services and to costs and risks associated with other increased or changing laws and regulations affecting our business, including developments in data protection and privacy laws, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a firm mainly focused on asset management in Brazil, our business is subject to Brazilian laws and regulations relating to asset management in Brazil, comprising Federal Law No. 6,385/1976 and related rules and regulations issued by the CVM and ANBIMA, among others. Since the launching of our Vinci Retirement Services segment, or VRS, we have been subjected to the rules and regulations of the Brazilian Superintendency for Private Insurance (Superintendência de Seguros Privados), or the SUSEP. If we are unable to comply with these private insurance regulations in a timely manner, we may be subject to fines or other penalties.

36

In addition, by engaging in the insurance business, we are subject to a number of regulatory risks, such as (1) changes in solvency and minimum capital regulation, which could result in the need for increased capital to cover new solvency requirements and/or in the divestment of certain classes of assets; (2) changes in product regulation, which could materially alter the way in which our products are created, sold or operated in general; (3) intervention and/or liquidation proceedings by SUSEP in the event of solvency-sensitive scenarios, which could lead to material deviations or interruptions to our ordinary course of business and/or regulatory sanctions upon the Company and its management; and (4) incurrence of fines and other penalties (such as temporary suspension of activities or license cancellation) imposed by SUSEP for perceived breaches of applicable regulation, among others.

The laws, rules, and regulations that govern our business include or may in the future include those relating to consumer financial protection, tax, anti-money laundering and terrorist financing and escheatment (rules relating to unclaimed property). These laws, rules, and regulations are enforced by multiple authorities and governing bodies in Brazil, including the CVM and the SUSEP. In addition, as our business continues to develop and expand, we may become subject to additional rules and regulations, which may limit or change how we conduct our business. In addition, during periods of heightened political and economic uncertainty, the Brazilian federal government could implement additional rules and regulations that could adversely impact our business. See “—Certain Risks Relating to Brazil—The Brazilian federal government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement as well as Brazil’s political and economic conditions could harm us and the price of our Class A common shares.”

We are subject to anti-money laundering and terrorist financing laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions that prohibit, among other things, involvement in transferring the proceeds of criminal or terrorist activities. We could be subject to liability and forced to change our business practices if we were found to be subject to, or in violation of, any laws or regulations impacting our ability to maintain a bank account in the countries where we operate, including the United States, or if existing or new legislation or regulations applicable to banks in the countries where we maintain a bank account, including the United States, were to result in banks in those countries being unwilling or unable to establish and maintain bank accounts for us.

If any person in the Cayman Islands knows or suspects or has reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting that another person is engaged in criminal conduct or money laundering or is involved with terrorism or terrorist financing and property and the information for that knowledge or suspicion came to their attention in the course of business in the regulated sector, or other trade, profession, business or employment, the person will be required to report such knowledge or suspicion to (i) the Financial Reporting Authority (“FRA”) of the Cayman Islands, pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Act (Revised) of the Cayman Islands if the disclosure relates to criminal conduct or money laundering, or (ii) a police officer of the rank of constable or higher, or the FRA, pursuant to the Terrorism Act (Revised) of the Cayman Islands, if the disclosure relates to involvement with terrorism or terrorist financing and property. Such a report shall not be treated as a breach of confidence or of any restriction upon the disclosure of information imposed by any enactment or otherwise.

Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the United States. If we or any of our subsidiaries obtain additional licenses or registrations in the United States, we could be subject to compliance with additional applicable laws and regulations, including anti-money laundering and terrorist financing laws and regulations, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Although we have a compliance program focused on applicable laws, rules, and regulations (which currently is principally focused on Brazilian law) and are continually investing in this program, we may nonetheless be subject to fines or other penalties in one or more jurisdictions levied by federal, state or local regulators, as well as those levied by foreign regulators. In addition to fines, penalties for failing to comply with applicable rules and regulations could include significant criminal and civil lawsuits, forfeiture of significant assets, or other enforcement actions, including loss of required licenses or approvals in a given jurisdiction. We could also be required to make changes to our business practices or compliance programs as a result of regulatory scrutiny. In addition, any perceived or actual failure to comply with applicable laws, rules, and regulations could have a significant impact on our reputation as a trusted brand and could cause us to lose existing clients, prevent us from obtaining new clients, require us to expend significant funds to remedy problems caused by breaches and to avert further breaches, and

37

expose us to legal risk and potential liability, and we could be (1) required to pay substantial fines and disgorgement of our profits or (2) required to change our business practices. Any disciplinary or punitive action by our regulators or failure to obtain required operating authorizations could seriously harm our business and results of operations.

In addition, the Brazilian regulatory and legal environment exposes us to other compliance and litigation risks that could materially affect our results of operations. These laws and regulations may change, sometimes significantly, as a result of political, economic or social events. Some of the federal, state or local laws and regulations in Brazil that affect us include: those relating to consumer products, product liability or consumer protection; those relating to the manner in which we advertise, market or sell products; labor and employment laws, including wage and hour laws; tax laws or interpretations thereof; bank secrecy laws, data protection and privacy laws and regulations; and securities and exchange laws and regulations. For instance, data protection and privacy laws are developing to take into account the changes in cultural and consumer attitudes towards the protection of personal data (including as a result of the LGPD). There can be no guarantee that we will have sufficient financial and personnel resources to comply with any new regulations or successfully compete in the context of a changing regulatory environment.

We are subject to regulatory activity and antitrust litigation under competition laws.

We are subject to scrutiny from governmental agencies under competition laws in Brazil. Other companies or governmental agencies may allege that our actions violate antitrust or competition laws, or otherwise constitute unfair competition. Contractual agreements with clients or companies, as well as our unilateral business practices, could give rise to regulatory action or antitrust investigations or litigation. Some regulators may perceive our business to have such significant market power that otherwise uncontroversial business practices could be deemed anticompetitive. Any such claims and investigations, even if they are unfounded, may be expensive to defend, involve negative publicity and substantial diversion of management time and effort, and could result in significant judgments against us.

We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations and failure to comply with such laws and regulations could result in criminal liability, administrative and civil lawsuits, significant fines and penalties, forfeiture of significant assets, as well as reputational harm.

We operate in jurisdictions that have a high risk of corruption and we are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations, including the Brazilian Federal Law No. 12,846/2013, or the Clean Company Act, the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or the FCPA, and the Bribery Act 2010 of the United Kingdom, or the Bribery Act. Each of the Clean Company Act, the FCPA and the Bribery Act impose liability against companies who engage in bribery of government officials, either directly or through intermediaries. We have a compliance program that is designed to manage the risks of doing business in light of these new and existing legal and regulatory requirements. Violations of the anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations could result in criminal liability, administrative and civil lawsuits, significant fines and penalties, forfeiture of significant assets, as well as reputational harm.

Regulators regularly reexamine their rules and regulatory measures, requirements and procedures, which may lead us to adjust our compliance and anti-money laundering programs, including the procedures we use to verify the identity of our clients and to monitor their transactions and transactions made by our funds. Costs associated with fines or enforcement actions, changes in compliance requirements, or limitations on our ability to grow could harm our business, and any new requirements or changes to existing requirements could impose significant costs, result in delays to planned product improvements, make it more difficult for new customers to join our network and reduce the attractiveness of our products and services. As a result, allegations of improper conduct as well as negative publicity and press speculation about us or our portfolio companies, or the private equity industry in general, whether or not valid, may harm our reputation, which may be more damaging to our business than to other types of businesses.

38

Misconduct of our employees, consultants or subcontractors could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain clients and subjecting us to significant legal liability and reputational harm. Fraud and other deceptive practices or other misconduct at our funds’ portfolio companies could similarly subject us to liability and reputational damage and also harm performance.

Our employees, consultants and subcontractors could engage in misconduct that adversely affects our business. We are subject to a number of obligations and standards arising from our asset management business and our authority over the assets managed by our asset management business. The violation of these obligations and standards by any of our employees, consultants and subcontractors would adversely affect our clients and us. If our employees, consultants and subcontractors were to improperly use or disclose confidential information, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position and current and future business relationships. Detecting or deterring employee misconduct is not always possible, and the extensive precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. If one of our employees, consultants and subcontractors were to engage in misconduct or were to be accused of such misconduct, our business and our reputation could be adversely affected.

As just mentioned above, regulatory authorities across various jurisdictions, such as Brazil the United States and the United Kingdom, among others, have increasingly focused on enhancing and enforcing anti-bribery laws, such as the Clean Company Act, FCPA and the Bribery Act. While we have developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure strict compliance by us and our personnel with such laws, such policies and procedures may not be effective in all instances to prevent violations. Any determination that we have violated the Clean Company Act, the FCPA, the U.K. anti-bribery laws or other applicable anti-corruption laws could subject us to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties or material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business prospects, financial position or the market value of our Class A common shares.

In addition, we may also be adversely affected if there is misconduct by personnel of portfolio companies in which our funds invest. For example, financial fraud or other deceptive practices at our funds’ portfolio companies, or failures by personnel at our funds’ portfolio companies to comply with anti-bribery, trade sanctions, anti-harassment or other legal and regulatory requirements, could subject us to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties or material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct and securities litigation, and could also cause significant reputational and business harm to us. Such misconduct may undermine our due diligence efforts with respect to such portfolio companies and could negatively affect the valuations of the investments by our funds in such portfolio companies.

Changes in tax laws, tax incentives, benefits or differing interpretations of tax laws may adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes in tax laws, regulations, related interpretations and tax accounting standards in Brazil, the United States or the Cayman Islands may result in a higher tax rate on our earnings, which may significantly reduce our profits and cash flows from operations. If the taxes applicable to our business increase or any tax benefits are revoked and we cannot alter our cost structure to pass our tax increases on to clients, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. Our activities are also subject to a Municipal Tax on Services (Imposto sobre Serviços), or ISS. Any increases in ISS rates could also harm our profitability.

There are a number of proposed drafts of legislation currently before the Brazilian Congress that aim to implement overall tax reform, and the Brazilian federal government has made strong indications that it intends to effect tax reform and progress certain of these drafts in the near future. Among the drafts under discussion, there are proposals that aim to completely change the consumption taxation system, which would extinguish three federal taxes—excise tax, PIS and COFINS, as well as state value-added taxes, and municipal taxes—and would impose in their place a system of consumption-based, value-added taxes, which could lead to a higher tax burden on us as compared to ISS and PIS/COFINS. In addition, one such proposal is an income tax reform bill presented by the Brazilian federal government in June 2021 (Bill of Law No. 2,337/2021), which would subject dividends to tax withholding at a rate of 15% and establish an annual withholding tax on the gains of certain investment funds. This bill was approved by the Brazilian House of Representatives and is pending approval from the Brazilian Federal Senate and subsequent signature into law by the Brazilian President. If any tax reform is approved, or if there is any change in the laws and regulations that affects the taxes or tax incentives applicable to us and our subsidiaries or portfolio companies, such change or changes could, directly or indirectly, adversely affect our business and results of operations.

39

Moreover, tax rules in Brazil, particularly at the local level, can change without notice. We may not always be aware of all such changes that affect our business and we may therefore fail to pay the applicable taxes or otherwise comply with tax regulations, which may result in additional tax assessments and penalties for our company.

At the municipal level, the Brazilian government enacted Supplementary Law No. 157/16, which imposed changes regarding the ISS collection applied to the rendering of part of our services. These changes created new obligations, as ISS will now be due in the municipality in which the client contracting our services is located rather than in the municipality in which the service provider’s facilities are located. This obligation was enacted in December of 2016, but its force has been delayed by Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 5835, or ADI 5835, filed by taxpayers. ADI 5835 challenges the constitutionality of Supplementary Law No. 157/16 before the Supreme Court, arguing that the new legislation would adversely affect companies’ activities due to the increase of costs and bureaucracy related to the ISS payment to several municipalities and the compliance with tax reporting obligations connected therewith. As a result, the Supreme Court granted an injunction to partially suspend the enforcement of article one of Supplementary Law No. 157/16. As of the date of this annual report, a final decision on this matter is currently pending.

On September 23, 2020, the Brazilian federal government enacted Supplementary Law No. 175/2020, which aims to establish a standard for determining the location where ISS must be collected in connection with the rendering of specific services, including investment fund management. ISS is a municipal tax payable by the service provider. Under Supplementary Law No. 175/2020 the ISS collection location for fund management services changes from the municipality where the services originate to the municipality where the services are destined to, which means, in our case, the municipality of incorporation or residence of the quotaholders of the investment funds managed by us. Although ISS for our services is currently taxed in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Recife (the municipalities where we have offices) at rates that range from 2% to 5%, the applicable rate may be defined by each municipality at up to 5%. Therefore, the new rules of Supplementary Law 175/2020 could cause an increase in ISS tax payable by us in connection with the services we provide, if we are required to pay ISS in municipalities that charge a ISS rate higher than the 2% rate charged in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo.

Moreover, tax laws, regulations and treaties are complex and the manner in which they apply to us or to our funds is sometimes open to interpretation and, in some cases, they may be interpreted differently between us and the relevant tax authorities. The application of indirect taxes, such as value-added tax, services tax, business tax and gross receipt tax, to businesses such as ours is complex and continues to evolve. We are required to use significant judgment in order to evaluate applicable tax obligations. In many cases, the ultimate tax determination is uncertain because it is not clear how existing statutes apply to our business. One or more states or municipalities, the federal government or other countries may seek to challenge the taxation or procedures applied to our transactions, which could impose additional reporting, record-keeping or indirect tax collection obligations on businesses like ours or the charge of taxes due, plus charges and penalties. New taxes, social security and labor charges could also require us to incur substantial costs to capture data and collect and remit taxes. If such obligations were imposed, the additional costs associated with tax collection, remittance and audit requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.

In addition, to support its fiscal policies, the Brazilian government regularly enacts reforms to tax and other assessment regimes that may affect our funds (including offshore funds) and the investors in such funds. Such reforms include changes in the rate of assessments and, occasionally, enactment of temporary taxes, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated governmental purposes. The effects of these changes and any other changes that result from enactment of additional tax reforms have not been, and cannot be, quantified. There can be no assurance that any such reforms will not, once implemented, increase the overall tax burden on, and have an adverse effect upon, the operations and business of our private equity funds and their portfolio companies. Furthermore, such changes have in the past produced uncertainty in the financial system and may increase the cost of borrowing. The Brazilian tax authorities’ interpretations with respect to tax events and tax rates, as well as the computation of certain taxes, may change from time to time, including in ways that could materially adversely affect our funds, investors, and our financial condition and results of operations.

Transfer pricing may result in increased tax costs.

The jurisdictions in which we operate have rules on transfer pricing that require intra-group transactions to be conducted on arm’s-length terms. Brazil did not comprehensively adopted the arm’s length terms until December 28, 2022,

40

when Provisional Measure No. 1,152/2022 was enacted to adapt the Brazilian transfer pricing rules to fully adopt the arm’s length standard. The provisional measure must still be converted into law by the Brazilian Congress within 120 days of its enactment (excluding the parliamentary recess) signed into law by the Brazilian President. The Brazilian Congress can either convert, amend, or repeal the provisional measure, and the Brazilian President can sign it into law or veto it, in part or in full. According to the provisional measure, the new rules will be effective in 2024, but taxpayers may choose to apply the new rules in 2023.

We regularly obtain advice regarding, inter alia, transfer pricing from external tax advisors. Transactions conducted between and among us and our subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, provision of investment advisory and investor relations services and business support services, and management services are made on a commercial basis by application of international guidelines and national regulations. As a consequence of globalization and growing world trade, tax authorities worldwide have increased their focus on transfer pricing with respect to cross border intra group transactions, as part of protecting their respective country’s tax base. In the event the tax authorities in the jurisdictions where we operate consider the pricing not to be on arm’s-length terms and were to succeed with such claims, this could result in an increased tax cost, including tax surcharges and interest.

The costs and effects of pending and future litigation, investigations or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto, could materially affect our business, financial position and results of operations.

We are, and may be in the future, party to legal, arbitration and administrative investigations, inspections and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business or from extraordinary corporate, tax or regulatory events, involving our clients, suppliers, customers, as well as competition, government agencies, tax and environmental authorities, particularly with respect to civil, tax and labor claims, including, but not limited to, aspects of our business, corporate structure, executive compensation and dividend policies in our operational subsidiaries. Indemnity rights that we seek to negotiate in certain transactions may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that we will be successful in defending ourselves in pending or future litigation or similar matters under various laws. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any pending or future litigation or investigation significantly exceed any amounts we are able to recover under any indemnity arrangements, such judgments or settlements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the price of our Class A common shares. Further, even if we adequately address issues raised by an inspection conducted by an agency or successfully defend our case in an administrative proceeding or court action, we may have to set aside significant financial and management resources to settle issues raised by such proceedings or to those lawsuits or claims, which could adversely affect our business. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated statements and other financial information—Legal Proceedings.”

We may not be able to successfully manage our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.

We rely on a combination of contractual rights, trademarks and trade secrets to establish and protect our proprietary technology. Third parties may challenge, file actions to nullify, invalidate, circumvent, infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property, including at the administrative or judicial level, or such intellectual property may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current market trends or otherwise to provide competitive advantages, which could result in costly redesign efforts, the discontinuance of certain service offerings or other competitive harm. If the ownership of any of our trademarks or domain names is legally challenged and such challenges result in adverse judicial decisions rendered against us, we may be prohibited from further using our trademarks and domain names. In addition, others, including our competitors, may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our services or design around our intellectual property, and in such cases, we could not assert our intellectual property rights against such parties. Further, our contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our confidential information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of our confidential information. We may have to litigate to enforce or determine the scope and enforceability of our intellectual property rights, trade secrets and know-how, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not prove successful. Also, because of the rapid pace of technological change in our industry, aspects of our business and our services rely on technologies developed or licensed by third parties, and we may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from these third parties on reasonable terms or at all. The loss of intellectual property protection, the inability to obtain third-party intellectual property or delay or refusal by relevant regulatory authorities to approve pending intellectual property registration applications

41

could harm our business and ability to compete. With respect to trademarks, loss of rights may result from term expirations, owner abandonment and forfeiture or cancellation proceedings before the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial, or the INPI/BPTO). In addition, if we lose rights over registered trademarks, we would not be entitled to use such trademarks on an exclusive basis and, therefore, third parties would be able to use similar or identical trademarks to identify their products or services, which could adversely affect our business.

We may also be subject to costly litigation in the event our services and technology infringe upon or otherwise violate a third party’s proprietary rights. Third parties may have, or may eventually be issued, patents that could be infringed by our services or technology. Any of these third parties could make a claim of infringement against us with respect to our services or technology. We may also be subject to claims by third parties for breach of copyright, trademark, license usage or other intellectual property rights. Any claim from third parties may result in a limitation on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims or could prevent us from registering our brands as trademarks. Additionally, in recent years, individuals and groups have been purchasing intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making infringement claims and attempting to extract settlements. Even if we became party to intellectual property related claims that we believe to be without merit, defending against such claims is time-consuming and expensive and could result in the diversion of the time and attention of our management and employees. Claims of intellectual property infringement also might require us to redesign affected services, enter into costly settlement or license agreements, pay costly damage awards, adjust our business practices or operations, change our brands, or face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting us from marketing or selling certain services or using certain brands. Even if we have an agreement for indemnification against such costs, the party providing such indemnification may be unwilling or unable to comply with its indemnification obligations. If we cannot or do not license the infringed technology on reasonable terms or substitute similar technology from another source, our revenues and earnings could be adversely impacted.

Any acquisitions, partnerships or joint ventures that we make or enter into could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.

We evaluate, and expect in the future to evaluate, potential strategic acquisitions of, and partnerships or joint ventures with, complementary businesses, services or technologies. We may not be successful in identifying acquisition, partnership and joint venture targets. In addition, we may not be able to successfully finance or integrate any businesses, services or technologies that we acquire or with which we form a partnership or joint venture—including, but not limited to, our acquisition of SPS Capital in 2022 (see “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Our History—Acquisition of SPS Capital”)—, and we may lose clients as a result of any acquisition, partnership or joint venture. In addition, we may be unable to realize the expected benefits, synergies or developments that we may initially anticipate. Furthermore, the integration of any acquisition, partnership or joint venture may divert management’s time and resources from our core business and disrupt our operations.

Certain acquisitions, partnerships and joint ventures we make may prevent us from competing for certain clients or in certain lines of business and may lead to a loss of clients. In addition, we may spend time and money on projects that do not increase our revenue or profitability. To the extent we finance any acquisition or investment in cash, it would reduce our cash reserves, and to the extent the purchase price is paid with our common shares, it could be dilutive to our shareholders. To the extent we finance any acquisition or investment with the proceeds from the incurrence of debt, this would increase our level of indebtedness and could negatively affect our liquidity, credit rating and restrict our operations. Our competitors may be willing to pay more than us for acquisitions or investments, which may cause us to lose certain opportunities that we would otherwise desire to complete. Moreover, we may face contingent liabilities in connection with our acquisitions and joint ventures, including, among others, (1) judicial and/or administrative proceeding or contingencies relating to the company, asset or business acquired, including civil, regulatory, tax, labor, social security, environmental and intellectual property proceedings or contingencies; and (2) financial, reputational and technical issues, including with respect to accounting practices, financial statement disclosures and internal controls, as well as other regulatory or compliance matters, all of which we may not have identified as part of our due diligence process and that may not be sufficiently indemnifiable under the relevant acquisition or joint venture agreement. We cannot assure you that any acquisition, partnership, investment or joint venture we make will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

42

Our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risks, which could expose us to losses and liability and otherwise harm our business.

We operate in a dynamic industry, and we have experienced significant change in recent years, and the emergence of new risks within the industries in which we operate or may operate in the future. Accordingly, our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in identifying, monitoring and managing our risks. Some of our risk evaluation methods depend upon information provided by others and public information regarding markets, clients or other matters that are otherwise inaccessible by us. In some cases, however, that information may not be accurate, complete or up to date. If our policies and procedures are not fully effective or we are not always successful in capturing all risks to which we and our funds are or may be exposed, we and our funds may suffer harm to our reputation or be subject to litigation or regulatory actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

When our products and services are used in connection with illegitimate transactions we may be exposed to governmental and regulatory sanctions, including outside of Brazil (for example, U.S. anti-money laundering and economic sanctions violations). Our risk management policies, procedures, techniques, and processes may not be sufficient to identify all of the risks to which we and our funds are exposed, to enable us to mitigate the risks we have identified, or to identify additional risks to which we and our funds may become subject in the future. Furthermore, if our risk management policies and processes contain errors or are otherwise ineffective, we and our funds may suffer large financial losses, may be subject to civil and criminal liability, and our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be able to maintain adequate insurance coverage on acceptable terms, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We have insurance coverage for, among other things, damages and crimes against property, business trips, and directors’ and officers’ liability. However, we may experience claims in excess of or not covered by our current insurance policies. For example, given the size of certain of our funds and their investments, the relevant member of Vinci Partners (such as the fund managers or advisors to such funds) could be subject to material legal or regulatory actions, including from dissatisfied fund investors, regulators or other third parties, which may not be covered by our current insurance coverage. Further, damage caused to us could, even if covered by our insurance coverage, result in increased insurance premiums. We may not be able to obtain or maintain liability insurance in the future on acceptable terms, or at all, which could in turn create a need or desire for us to build up an internal contingency reserve to cover risks, thus affecting our financial position, which would adversely affect our business and the trading price of our Class A common shares.

Our due diligence processes for investments may not reveal all relevant facts and potential liabilities, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We continuously evaluate and carry out due diligence on a broad range of investment opportunities, some of which lead to investment while some do not. When conducting due diligence review of an investment, reliance may be placed on available resources which often include information provided by the target of the investment and, in some cases, third-party investigations and due diligence reports. Information provided or obtained from third-party sources may be limited and could, in some cases, be inaccurate or misleading. Thus, we cannot be certain that the due diligence investigations carried out with respect to an investment opportunity will reveal or highlight all relevant facts, opportunities or risks, including any ongoing fraud, which might be necessary or helpful in evaluating such an investment opportunity. Accordingly, there is a risk that the success or future performance of an investment might fall short compared to the financial projections used when evaluating such investment, which may affect our fund’s results.

Contingent liabilities could harm fund performance.

We may acquire or cause our funds to acquire companies or effect an investment that is subject to contingent liabilities, which includes our recent acquisition of SPS Capital. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Our History—Acquisition of SPS Capital.” Such contingent liabilities could be unknown to us at the time of acquisition or, if they are known to us, we may not accurately assess or protect against the risks that they present. Acquired contingent liabilities could thus result in unforeseen losses for our funds.

43

In addition, in connection with the disposition of an investment in a portfolio company, a fund may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of such portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. A fund may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations are inaccurate. These arrangements may result in the incurrence of contingent liabilities by a fund, even after the disposition of an investment. Accordingly, the inaccuracy of representations and warranties made by a fund could harm such fund’s performance.

We may not be able to obtain and maintain requisite regulatory approvals and permits, including licenses for our fund operations.

We are required to maintain regulatory approvals and authorizations. There is a risk that we will not have the ability to obtain and retain requisite approvals and permits from relevant governmental authorities and other organizations, and to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or be able to do so without incurring undue costs and delays, which may result in a financial loss for us. A loss of the requisite approvals and/or permits, or the loss of relevant approvals and/or permits for us to operate or market funds within a certain area or generally, may result in the wind-down or liquidation of existing Vinci Partners funds, and could accordingly have a material adverse effect on the size of our AUM and thus also affect management fees that we receive, as well as the ability to receive performance fees and investment income.

We are subject to risks related to conflicts of interest.

Various conflicts of interest may arise with regard to our operations, our funds, our shareholders and our fund investors. Failure to appropriately deal with conflicts of interest as they arise, or the appearance of conflicts of interest, could harm our brand and reputation or result in potential liability for us, and could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position and earnings.

Our funds invest in a broad range of asset classes, including in the equity of portfolio companies, debt securities and corporate loans. In certain cases, certain of our funds may invest in different parts of the same company’s capital structure. In those cases, the interests of the different funds may not always be aligned, which could create actual or potential conflicts of interest or give the appearance of such conflicts. For example, one of our private equity funds could have an interest in pursuing an acquisition, divestiture or other transaction that, in that fund’s judgment, could enhance the value of the private equity investment, even though the proposed transaction could subject a Vinci Partners credit fund’s debt investment to additional or increased risks.

To the extent that any potential investment opportunities have been identified by us, including opportunities to co-invest with other investment managers; which fall within the investment mandate of several of our funds, conflicts of interest may arise in relation to the allocation of the investment opportunity and which fund will pursue the potential investment, in particular when such funds are both managed by the same independent fund manager appointed to act as alternative investment fund manager, and their fund management team. Moreover, we may be subject to conflicts of interest arising from co-investment opportunities where investment advisors to our funds or to investment vehicles with which we co-invest may have an incentive to provide potential co-investment opportunities to certain investors in lieu of others and/or in lieu of an allocation to our funds (including, for example, as part of an investor’s overall strategic relationship with us) if such allocations are expected to generate relatively greater fees or performance allocations to us than would arise if such co-investment opportunities were allocated otherwise.

We have in the past invested alongside our investors, and while we have not targeted any specific investments as of the date of this annual report, we expect to make investments alongside our investors in the future. While we follow certain internal guidelines and CVM rules in respect of making such investments, these investments could lead to potential conflicts of interest with our clients. When we invest alongside our investors, we make such investments under the same conditions and according to the same fee structures, paying the same management and performance fees. In respect of public offerings, CVM rules prohibit investments by related persons if there is excess demand greater than one third of the amount of securities being offered, and we must adhere to these rules in connection with public offerings of any of our funds. For open-ended funds distributed by us or by third parties, any investor, including us, can invest or divest at any time, though such investor (including us) must comply with the provisions of the respective funds’ bylaws. In the case of our listed funds, any trade made by us can only be

44

executed after first obtaining written pre-clearance from our compliance department. While we believe these conditions, measures, and internal protocols adequately address potential conflicts of interests that may arise from investing alongside our clients, there can be no assurance that we will adequately address all potential conflicts of interest, which could have an adverse effect on our customer relationships, thereby adversely affecting our reputation and our business.

Our funds may acquire investments from, or sell investments to, other Vinci Partners funds, and members of the board of the general partner or the fund manager of our funds may be officers or directors of entities which are not part of Vinci Partners and which provide advice or services to, or engage in other transactions with, a Vinci Partners fund or to one or more portfolio companies of a Vinci Partners fund. Such conflicts of interest may not always be properly disclosed. According to our internal policies, our officers, directors, members, managers, and employees are prohibited from holding an interest in a portfolio company of our private funds, unless otherwise authorized by the compliance department and in certain cases where required by law to maintain plurality of partners. However, if our officers, directors, members, managers, employees, or other legal entities or entities of Vinci Partners hold or acquire a direct or indirect interest in a portfolio company of a Vinci Partners fund, this may create a conflict of interest. Such conflicts may result in litigation arising from investor dissatisfaction and may cause fund investors to explore withdrawing or cancelling their commitments to a Vinci Partners fund, or not to invest in new Vinci Partners funds, which could affect the size of the AUM being managed in existing Vinci Partners funds.

Certain policies and procedures implemented to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and address certain regulatory requirements may reduce the synergies across our various businesses.

Because we act in portfolio management, in distribution of our funds, and in advisory services, we may be subject to a number of actual and potential conflicts of interest and subject to greater regulatory oversight and more legal and contractual restrictions than that to which we would otherwise be subject if we had just one line of business. To mitigate these conflicts and address regulatory, legal and contractual requirements across our various businesses, we have implemented certain policies and procedures (for example, information walls) that may reduce the positive synergies that we cultivate across these businesses for purposes of identifying and managing attractive investments. For example, we may come into possession of material non-public information with respect to issuers in which we may be considering making an investment or issuers in which our affiliates may hold an interest. As a consequence of such policies and procedures, we may be precluded from providing such information or other ideas to our other businesses that might be of benefit to them.

Changes to applicable accounting standards, or changes to the interpretations thereof, could have a material adverse effect on Vinci Partners.

Vinci Partners applies IFRS in the preparation of its financial statements. In preparing our financial statements, we make judgments and accounting estimates that affect the application of our accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income, including the recognition of performance fees, and expenses. Valuation methodologies for certain assets in our funds can be subject to significant subjectivity and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may never be realized, and valuation methodologies for historical Vinci Partners funds may differ to the valuation methodologies used for current or future Vinci Partners funds. Amendments to, and changes to interpretations of, existing accounting standards could have a significant effect on Vinci Partners’ financial condition, and also result in extensive adoption costs.

The ability to comply with applicable accounting standards depends in some instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions for which no clear precedent or authority may be available, or where only limited guidance may be available. If we are unable to accurately apply the relevant accounting standards, our financial reporting could be incorrect, and could require a restatement of our financial statements and result in a material adverse effect on our reputation, our business, our financial condition and results of operations, thereby adversely affecting the market price of our Class A common shares.

Potential changes in the insurance brokerage regulatory environment could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects for expansion.

The activities of our subsidiary Vinci Vida e Previdência S/A, or VVP, is subject to specific Brazilian laws and regulation enacted by the SUSEP and is licensed to operate life insurance and open-ended pension plans in Brazil. Changes in the laws and regulations applicable to the insurance and reinsurance market, and insurance brokers,

45

could have a material adverse effect on the business of insurance companies. There is no guarantee that the Brazilian government, whether through SUSEP or any other instrumentality/government agency, will not change these laws and regulations, which may prevent or restrict the operations of VVP, adversely affecting our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

Certain Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian federal government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement as well as Brazil’s political and economic conditions could harm us and the price of our Class A common shares.

The Brazilian federal government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases or decreases in interest rates, changes in fiscal policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange rate controls, blocking access to bank accounts, currency devaluations, capital controls and import and export restrictions. We have no control over and cannot predict what measures or policies the Brazilian government may take in the future. We and the market price of our Class A common shares may be harmed by changes in Brazilian government policies, as well as general economic factors, including, without limitation:

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian federal government will implement reforms or changes in policy or regulation affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil, which may have an adverse effect on our activities and consequently our results of operations, and may also adversely affect the trading price of our Class A common shares. Recent economic and political instability has led to a negative perception of the Brazilian economy and higher volatility in the Brazilian securities markets, which also may adversely affect us and our Class A common shares. See “—Economic uncertainty and political instability in Brazil may harm us and the price of our Class A common shares” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Significant Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Brazilian Macroeconomic Environment.”

46

Economic uncertainty and political instability in Brazil may harm us and the price of our Class A common shares.

Brazil’s political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political crises have affected and continue to affect the confidence of investors and the general public, which have historically resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil.

The recent economic instability in Brazil has contributed to a decline in market confidence in the Brazilian economy as well as to a deteriorating political environment. In addition, various past and ongoing investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, including the largest such investigation, known as “Operação Lava Jato,” have negatively impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. The potential outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of the Brazilian economy.

In addition, 2022 was a presidential election year in Brazil. Historically, in election years, especially presidential elections, foreign investments in Brazil tend to decrease and political uncertainty may generate greater instability and volatility in the domestic markets. Additional uncertainty may arise from the market’s perception of the new Brazilian government that took office on January 1, 2023. In either case, these factors may negatively affect the trading price of our Class A common shares.

A failure by the Brazilian government to implement necessary reforms may result in diminished confidence in the Brazilian government’s budgetary condition and fiscal stance, which could result in downgrades of Brazil’s sovereign foreign credit rating by credit rating agencies, negatively impact Brazil’s economy, lead to further depreciation of the real and an increase in inflation and interest rates, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any of the above factors may create additional political uncertainty, which could harm the Brazilian economy and, consequently, our business and the value of our investments, and could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our Class A common shares.

Inflation and certain measures by the Brazilian government to curb inflation have historically harmed the Brazilian economy and Brazilian capital markets, and high levels of inflation in the future would harm our business and the price of our Class A common shares.

In the past, Brazil has experienced extremely high rates of inflation. Inflation and some of the measures taken by the Brazilian government in an attempt to curb inflation have had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy generally. Inflation, policies adopted to curb inflationary pressures and uncertainties regarding possible future governmental intervention have contributed to economic uncertainty and heightened volatility in the Brazilian capital markets.

According to the IPCA, Brazilian inflation rates were 5.8%, 10.1%, 4.5% and 4.3% as of December 31, 2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Brazil may continue to experience high levels of inflation in the future and inflationary pressures may lead to the Brazilian government intervening in the economy and introducing policies that could harm our business and the trading price of our Class A common shares. In the past, the Brazilian government’s interventions included the maintenance of a restrictive monetary policy with high interest rates that restricted credit availability and reduced economic growth, causing volatility in interest rates. For example, the official interest rate in Brazil decreased from 14.25% as of December 31, 2015, to 6.50% as of March 28, 2018 and maintained at that level until December 31, 2018. The COPOM reconfirmed the SELIC Rate of 6.50% in the first half of 2019, but reduced the SELIC Rate to 6.00% on August 1, 2019, and further reduced the rate to 4.50% on December 12, 2019. On February 5, 2020, the COPOM reduced the SELIC Rate to 4.25% and further reduced the rate to 3.75% on March 18, 2020, to 3.00% on June 5, 2020, to 2.25% on June 17, 2020, to 2.00% on August 5, 2020. Then, after the rates were kept stable for four rounds of meetings, the COPOM repeatedly raised the SELIC Rate to 9.25% and 13.75% as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively. As of the date of this annual report, the

47

SELIC Rate was set at 13.75%. Conversely, more lenient government and Brazilian Central Bank policies and interest rate decreases have triggered and may continue to trigger increases in inflation, and, consequently, growth volatility and the need for sudden and significant interest rate increases, which could negatively affect us and increase our indebtedness.

Exchange rate instability may have adverse effects on the Brazilian economy, us and the price of our Class A common shares.

The Brazilian currency has been historically volatile and has been devalued frequently over the past three decades. Throughout this period, the Brazilian government has implemented various economic plans and used various exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations (during which the frequency of adjustments has ranged from daily to monthly), exchange controls, dual exchange rate markets and a floating exchange rate system. Although long-term depreciation of the Brazilian real is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of the real occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate between the real, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The real depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 32.0% at year-end 2015 as compared to year-end 2014, and by 11.8% at year-end 2014 as compared to year-end 2013. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$3.9048 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2015, and R$3.2591 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2016, which reflected a 16.5% appreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during 2016. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$3.308 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2017, which reflected a 1.5% depreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during 2017. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$3.8742 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2018, which reflected a 17.1% depreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during 2018. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$4.0307 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2019, which reflected a 4.0% depreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during 2019. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$5.1967 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2020, which reflected a 28.9% depreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during the year. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$5.5805 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2021, which reflected a 7.4% depreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during the year. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$5.2177 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2022, which reflected a 6.5% appreciation in the real against the U.S. dollar during the year. As of March 31, 2023, the exchange rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars as reported by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$5.0789 per US$1.00. There can be no assurance that the real will not appreciate or depreciate against the U.S. dollar or other currencies in the future.

Further devaluation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar could create inflationary pressures in Brazil and cause the Brazilian government to, among other measures, further increase interest rates. Any depreciation of the real may generally restrict access to the international capital markets. It would also reduce the U.S. dollar value of our results of operations. Restrictive macroeconomic policies could reduce the stability of the Brazilian economy and harm our results of operations and profitability. In addition, domestic and international reactions to restrictive economic policies could have a negative impact on the Brazilian economy. These policies and any reactions to them may harm us by curtailing access to foreign financial markets and prompting further government intervention. A devaluation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar may also, as in the context of the current economic slowdown, decrease consumer spending, increase deflationary pressures and reduce economic growth.

On the other hand, an appreciation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies may worsen the Brazilian current accounts. We and certain of our suppliers purchase services from countries outside Brazil, and thus changes in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to other currencies may affect the costs of services that we purchase. Depending on the circumstances, either devaluation or appreciation of the real relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies could restrict the growth of the Brazilian economy, as well as our business, results of operations and profitability.

Infrastructure and workforce deficiency in Brazil may impact economic growth and have a material adverse effect on us.

Our performance depends on the overall health and growth of the Brazilian economy. Brazilian GDP growth has fluctuated over the past few years, with growth of 3.0% in 2013 but decreasing to 0.5% in 2014, a contraction of 3.5% in 2015, a contraction of 3.3% in 2016, a growth of 1.3% in 2017, a growth of 1.8% in 2018, a growth of 1.4%

48

in 2019, a contraction of 4.1% in 2020, a growth of 4.6% in 2021, while, in 2022, the Brazilian GDP with a growth of 2.9%. Growth is limited by inadequate infrastructure, including potential energy shortages and deficient transportation, logistics and telecommunication sectors, general strikes, the lack of a qualified labor force, and the lack of private and public investments in these areas, which limit productivity and efficiency. Any of these factors could lead to labor market volatility and generally impact income, purchasing power and consumption levels, which could limit growth and ultimately have a material adverse effect on us.

Developments and the perceptions of risks in other countries, including other emerging markets, the United States and Europe, may harm the Brazilian economy and the price of our Class A common shares.

The market for securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil is influenced by economic and market conditions in Brazil and, to varying degrees, market conditions in other Latin American and emerging markets, as well as the United States, Europe and other countries. To the extent the conditions of the global markets or economy deteriorate, the business of companies with significant operations in Brazil may be harmed. The weakness in the global economy has been marked by, among other adverse factors, lower levels of consumer and corporate confidence, decreased business investment and consumer spending, increased unemployment, reduced income and asset values in many areas, reduction of China’s growth rate, currency volatility and limited availability of credit and access to capital. Developments or economic conditions in other emerging market countries have at times significantly affected the availability of credit to companies with significant operations in Brazil and resulted in considerable outflows of funds from Brazil, decreasing the amount of foreign investments in Brazil.

Crises and political instability in other emerging market countries, the United States, Europe or other countries, including increased international trade tensions and protectionist policies, could decrease investor demand for securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil, such as our Class A common shares. In June 2016, the United Kingdom had a referendum in which the majority voted to leave the European Union (so-called “Brexit”). The announcement of Brexit caused significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations. The United Kingdom formally withdrew from the European Union on January 31, 2020. On December 24, 2020, the United Kingdom and the European Commission reached an agreement on the terms of its future cooperation with the European Union. On December 31, 2020, the European Union (Future Relationship) Act was enacted in the United Kingdom and the agreement reached with the European Commission came into full force on May 1, 2021, after relevant E.U. institutions ratified the agreement. We have no control over and cannot predict the effect of United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union nor over whether and to which effect any other member state will decide to exit the European Union in the future. These developments, as well as potential crises and forms of political instability arising therefrom or any other as of yet unforeseen development, may harm our business and the price of our Class A common shares.

In addition, it is unclear the degree to which current political divisions in the United States will continue to influence policy action. Fighting inflation, orientation towards fiscal policy, energy and geopolitical strategies are divisive issues that may lead to sudden policy changes. We are also unable to predict the policies that will be adopted by eventual new presidential administrations and the effects of any such policies, if implemented. These political divisions and policies may materially adversely affect the United States and global economies and capital markets, including the Brazilian economy and capital markets, which may, in turn, materially adversely affect the trading price of our Class A common shares.

An escalation of the war in Ukraine may increase global risk aversion and adversely affect us and the price of our Class A common shares.

The ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine has provoked strong reactions from the United States, the United Kingdom, the EU and various other countries around the world, including from the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine beginning on February 24, 2022, the United States, the United Kingdom, the EU and other countries announced broad economic sanctions against Russia, including financial measures such as freezing Russia’s central bank assets, limiting its ability to access its dollar reserves, the United States, the EU and the United Kingdom have also banned people and businesses from dealings with the Russian central bank, its finance ministry and its wealth funds, selected Russian banks will also be removed from Swift messaging system, which enables the smooth transfer of money across borders. Other sanctions by the United Kingdom include major Russian banks from the United Kingdom financial system, stopping them from accessing sterling and clearing payments, preventing major Russian companies and the

49

country from raising finances or borrowing money on the United Kingdom markets, and establishing limits on deposits Russians can make at United Kingdom banks. The United States, the EU and the United Kingdom adopted personal measures, such as sanctions on individuals with close ties to Mr. Putin, and placed visa restrictions on several oligarchs, as well as their family members and close associates, and froze their assets.

While the precise effect of the ongoing armed conflict and these sanctions on the Russian and global economies remains uncertain, should tensions remain at current heightened levels or continue to increase, markets may face continued volatility as well as economic and security consequences including, but not limited to, supply shortages of different kinds, increases in prices of commodities, including piped gas, oil and agricultural goods, among others. Given that Russia and Ukraine are among the largest grain exporters in the world, impacts on financial markets, inflation, interest rates, unemployment and other matters could affect the global economy that is currently recovering from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Particularly, these effects have resulted and could continue to result in increased inflation in Brazil and in measures by the Brazilian government to contain inflation, such as raising the interest rates, which could materially impact the cost of debt and third-party capital for financing and investing activities across industries. Other potential consequences include, but are not limited to, growth in the number of popular uprisings in the region, increased political discontent, especially in the regions most affected by the conflict or economic sanctions, an increase in cyberterrorism activities and attacks, exodus to regions close to the areas of conflict and an increase in the number of refugees fleeing across Europe, among other unforeseen social and humanitarian effects.

As a company that operates globally, the adverse effects—global or localized—of the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and/or economic sanctions and import and/or export controls to be imposed on the Russian government by the United States, the United Kingdom, the EU or others, could have a material adverse effect on our or our portfolio companies’ business, results of operations or financial condition.

Any further downgrading of Brazil’s credit rating could reduce the trading price of our Class A common shares.

We may be harmed by investors’ perceptions of risks related to Brazil’s sovereign debt credit rating. Rating agencies regularly evaluate Brazil and its sovereign credit ratings, which are based on a number of factors including macroeconomic trends, fiscal and budgetary conditions, indebtedness metrics and the perspective of changes in any of these factors.

The rating agencies began to review Brazil’s sovereign credit rating in September 2015. Subsequently, the three major rating agencies downgraded Brazil’s investment-grade status:

50

Brazil’s sovereign credit rating is currently rated below investment grade by the three main credit rating agencies. Consequently, the prices of securities offered by companies with significant operations in Brazil have been negatively affected. A prolongation or worsening of the current slow growth rates of the Brazilian economy and continued political uncertainty, among other factors, could lead to further ratings downgrades. Any further downgrade of Brazil’s sovereign credit ratings could heighten investors’ perception of risk and, as a result, cause the trading price of our Class A common shares to decline.

Certain Risks Relating to Our Class A Common Shares

Gilberto Sayão da Silva owns 100% of our outstanding Class B common shares, which represent approximately 78.1% of the voting power of our issued share capital, and controls all matters requiring shareholder approval. This concentration of ownership and voting power limits your ability to influence corporate matters.

Gilberto Sayão da Silva controls our company and does not hold any of our Class A common shares, though he beneficially owns 26.3% of our issued share capital through his beneficial ownership of all of our outstanding Class B common shares, and consequently, 78.1% of the combined voting power of our issued share capital. Our Class B common shares are entitled to 10 votes per share and our Class A common shares are entitled to one vote per share. Our Class B common shares are convertible into an equivalent number of Class A common shares and generally convert into Class A common shares upon transfer, subject to limited exceptions. As a result, Mr. Sayão da Silva controls the outcome of all decisions at our shareholders’ meetings, and is able to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors. He is also able to direct our actions in areas such as business strategy, financing, distributions, acquisitions and dispositions of assets or businesses. For example, Mr. Sayão da Silva may cause us to make acquisitions that increase the amount of our indebtedness or outstanding Class A common shares, sell revenue-generating assets or inhibit change of control transactions that may benefit other shareholders. The decisions of Mr. Sayão da Silva on these matters may be contrary to your expectations or preferences, and they may take actions that could be contrary to your interests. He is able to prevent any other shareholders from blocking these actions. For further information regarding shareholdings in our company, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.” In addition, for so long as Mr. Sayão da Silva beneficially owns more than two-thirds of our issued share capital, he will also have the ability to unilaterally amend our Articles of Association, which may be amended only by special resolution of shareholders (requiring a two-thirds majority vote of those shareholders attending and voting at a quorate meeting).

So long as Mr. Sayão da Silva beneficially owns a sufficient number of Class B common shares, even if he beneficially owns significantly less than 50% of our outstanding share capital, he will be able to effectively control our decisions. However, if our Class B common shares at any time represent less than 10% of the total aggregate number of common shares in the capital of the company outstanding, each Class B common share then outstanding will automatically convert into one Class A common share. For a description of the dual class structure, see “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Share Capital”

We have granted holders of our Class B common shares preemptive rights to acquire shares that we may sell in the future, which may impair our ability to raise funds.

Under our Articles of Association, each holder of our Class B common shares is entitled to preemptive rights to purchase additional common shares in the event that additional Class A common shares are issued, upon the same economic terms and at the same price, in order to maintain their proportional ownership interests, which represent approximately 26.3% of our outstanding shares. The exercise by holders of our Class B common shares of preemptive rights may impair our ability to raise funds, or adversely affect the terms on which we are able to raise funds, as we may not be able to offer to new investors the quantity of our shares that they may desire to purchase.

51

Our Articles of Association contain anti-takeover provisions that may discourage a third-party from acquiring us and adversely affect the rights of holders of our Class A common shares.

Our Articles of Association contain certain provisions that could limit the ability of others to acquire our control, including a provision that grants authority to our board of directors to establish and issue from time to time one or more series of preferred shares without action by our shareholders and to determine, with respect to any series of preferred shares, the terms and rights of that series. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of the opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over the prevailing market price by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain our control in a tender offer or similar transactions.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, about our business, the price of our Class A common shares and our trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our Class A common shares depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our Class A common shares or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our Class A common shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our Class A common shares could decrease, which might cause the price of our Class A common shares and trading volume to decline.

Our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders is restricted by applicable laws and regulations and by the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to pay dividends to holders of our Class A common shares. Holders of our Class A common shares are only entitled to receive cash dividends to the extent our board of directors declares and pays out of funds of the Company that are legally available for such payments. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors as our board of directors considers relevant. In addition, our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries. See “—Certain Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries.” There is no assurance that future dividends will be paid, and if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

Our dual class capital structure means our shares will not be included in certain indices. We cannot predict the impact this may have on the trading price of our Class A common shares.

In 2017, FTSE Russell, S&P Dow Jones and MSCI announced changes to their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain indices to exclude companies with multiple classes of shares of common stock from being added to such indices. FTSE Russell announced plans to require new constituents of its indices to have at least five percent of their voting rights in the hands of public stockholders, whereas S&P Dow Jones announced that companies with multiple share classes, such as ours, will not be eligible for inclusion in the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600, which together make up the S&P Composite 1500. MSCI also opened public consultations on their treatment of no-vote and multi-class structures and temporarily barred new multi-class listings from its ACWI Investable Market Index and U.S. Investable Market 2500 Index; however, in October 2018, MSCI announced its decision to include equity securities “with unequal voting structures” in its indices and to launch a new index that specifically includes voting rights in its eligibility criteria. We cannot assure you that other stock indices will not take a similar approach to FTSE Russell, S&P Dow Jones and MSCI in the future. Under the announced policies, our dual class capital structure would make us ineligible for inclusion in any of these indices and, as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and other investment vehicles that attempt to passively track these indices will not invest in our stock. It continues to be somewhat unclear what effect, if any, these policies will have on the valuations of publicly traded companies excluded from the indices, but in certain situations they may depress these valuations compared to those of other similar companies that are included. Exclusion from indices could make our Class A common shares less attractive to investors and, as a result, the market price of our Class A common shares could be adversely affected.

52

The dual class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with Gilberto Sayão da Silva as the beneficial owner of the entirety of our Class B common shares; this will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters.

Each Class A common share entitles its holder to one vote per share and each Class B common share entitles its holder to ten votes per share, so long as the total number of the issued and outstanding Class B common shares is at least 10% of the total number of shares outstanding. The beneficial owner of all of our Class B common shares is Gilberto Sayão da Silva. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.” Due to the ten-to-one voting ratio between our Class B and Class A common shares, Mr. Sayão da Silva controls a majority of the combined voting power of our common shares and therefore be able to control all matters submitted to our shareholders so long as the total number of the issued and outstanding Class B common shares is at least 10% of the total number of shares outstanding and the total number of the issued.

In addition, our Articles of Association provide that at any time when there are Class A common shares in issue, additional Class B common shares may only be issued pursuant to (1) a share split, subdivision of shares or similar transaction or where a dividend or other distribution is paid by the issue of shares or rights to acquire shares or following capitalization of profits; (2) a merger, consolidation, or other business combination involving the issuance of Class B common shares as full or partial consideration; or (3) an issuance of Class A common shares, whereby a holder of the Class B common shares is entitled to purchase a number of Class B common shares that would allow such holder to maintain its proportional ownership interests in us (following an offer by us to each holder of Class B common shares to issue to such holder, upon the same economic terms and at the same price, such number of Class B common shares as would ensure such holder may maintain a proportional ownership interest in us pursuant to our Articles of Association).

In light of the above provisions relating to the issuance of additional Class B common shares, as well as the ten-to-one voting ratio of our Class B common shares and Class A common shares, the holder of our Class B common shares controls all matters requiring shareholder approval. This concentrated control limits or precludes our shareholders’ ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future. For a description of our dual class structure, see “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Voting Rights.”

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. The rights of our shareholders, including with respect to fiduciary duties and corporate opportunities, may be different from the rights of shareholders governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions.

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association and by the laws of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders and the responsibilities of members of our board of directors may be different from the rights of shareholders and responsibilities of directors in companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions. In particular, as a matter of Cayman Islands law, directors of a Cayman Islands company owe fiduciary duties to the company and separately a duty of care, diligence and skill to the company. Under Cayman Islands law, directors and officers owe the following fiduciary duties: (1) duty to act in good faith in what the director or officer believes to be in the best interests of the company as a whole; (2) duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which those powers were conferred and not for a collateral purpose; (3) directors should not properly fetter the exercise of future discretion; (4) duty to exercise powers fairly as between different sections of shareholders; (5) duty to exercise independent judgment; and (6) duty not to put themselves in a position in which there is a conflict between their duty to the company and their personal interests. Our Articles of Association have varied this last obligation by providing that a director must disclose the nature and extent of his or her interest in any contract or arrangement, and following such disclosure and subject to any separate requirement under applicable law or the listing rules of the Nasdaq, and unless disqualified by the chairman of the relevant meeting, such director may vote in respect of any transaction or arrangement in which he or she is interested and may be counted in the quorum at the meeting. Conversely, under Delaware corporate law, a director has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its stockholders (made up of two components) and the director’s duties prohibits self-dealing by a director and mandates that the best interests of the company and its shareholders take precedence over any interest possessed by a director, officer or controlling shareholder and not shared by the shareholders generally. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law.”

53

We may need to raise additional capital in the future by issuing securities or may enter into corporate transactions with an effect similar to a merger, which may dilute your interest in our share capital and affect the trading price of our Class A common shares.

We may need to raise additional funds to grow our business and implement our growth strategy through public or private issuances of common shares or securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common shares, which may dilute your interest in our share capital or result in a decrease in the market price of our common shares. In addition, we may also enter into mergers or other similar transactions in the future, which may dilute your interest in our share capital or result in a decrease in the market price of our Class A common shares. Any fundraising through the issuance of shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares, or the participation in corporate transactions with an effect similar to a merger, may dilute your interest in our capital stock or result in a decrease in the market price of our Class A common shares.

As a foreign private issuer and an “emerging growth company” (as defined in the JOBS Act), we have different disclosure and other requirements than U.S. domestic registrants and non-emerging growth companies.

As a foreign private issuer and emerging growth company, we are subject to different disclosure and other requirements than domestic U.S. registrants and non-emerging growth companies. For example, as a foreign private issuer, in the United States, we are not subject to the same disclosure requirements as a domestic U.S. registrant under the Exchange Act, including the requirements to prepare and issue quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or to file current reports on Form 8-K upon the occurrence of specified significant events, the proxy rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 14 of the Exchange Act or the insider reporting and short-swing profit rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we rely on exemptions from certain U.S. rules which permit us to follow Cayman Islands legal requirements rather than certain of the requirements that are applicable to U.S. domestic registrants.

We follow Cayman Islands laws and regulations that are applicable to Cayman Islands companies. However, Cayman Islands laws and regulations applicable to Cayman Islands companies do not contain any provisions comparable to the U.S. proxy rules, the U.S. rules relating to the filing of reports on Form 10-Q or 8-K or the U.S. rules relating to liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time, as referred to above.

Furthermore, foreign private issuers are required to file their annual report on Form 20-F within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 75 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from Regulation Fair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information, although we are be subject to Cayman Islands laws and regulations having, in some respects, a similar effect as Regulation Fair Disclosure. As a result of the above, even though we are required to file reports on Form 6-K disclosing the limited information which we have made or are required to make public pursuant to Cayman Islands law, or are required to distribute to shareholders generally, and that is material to us, you may not receive information of the same type or amount that is required to be disclosed to shareholders of a U.S. company.

The Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for emerging growth companies. Under this act, as an emerging growth company, we will not be subject to the same disclosure and financial reporting requirements as non-emerging growth companies. For example, as an emerging growth company we are permitted to, and intend to continue to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Also, we will not have to comply with future audit rules promulgated by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, (unless the SEC determines otherwise) and our auditors will not need to attest to our internal controls under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may follow these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information that they deem important. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our IPO, (b) in which we have total annual revenues of at least US$1.235 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Class A common shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700.0 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than US$1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. Accordingly, the information about us available to you will

54

not be the same as, and may be more limited than, the information available to shareholders of a non-emerging growth company. We could be an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our Class A common shares held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700.0 million as of any June 30 (the end of our second fiscal quarter) before that time, in which case we would no longer be an “emerging growth company” as of the following December 31 (our fiscal year end). We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Class A common shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common shares and the price of our Class A common shares may be more volatile.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the rules of the Nasdaq corporate governance rules and, as a result, qualify for, and rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. Our shareholders do not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

Gilberto Sayão da Silva beneficially owns 100% of our Class B common shares, representing 78.1% of the voting power of our outstanding share capital. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq corporate governance rules. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power in the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements. For example, controlled companies, within one year of the date of the listing of their common shares:

As a “controlled company,” we rely on such exemptions and, as a result, we do not expect a majority of the directors on our board to be independent. In addition, we do not expect that any of the committees of the board to consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, our shareholders do not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq.

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to and we rely on exemptions from certain Nasdaq corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. issuers, including the requirement that a majority of an issuer’s directors consist of independent directors. This may afford less protection to holders of our Class A common shares.

Subject to certain requirements, as a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of certain Nasdaq corporate governance rules, which include rules relating to board independence, independent director oversight of executive compensation, nomination of directors and other corporate governance matters, such as the requirement that we obtain shareholder approval prior to an issuance of securities (in certain circumstances) in connection with certain events. To the extent Cayman Islands law does not require us to adopt these corporate governance standards, we are permitted, intend to and follow home country practice in lieu of the above requirements. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law—Corporate Governance.”

We may lose our foreign private issuer status which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and cause us to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses.

In order to maintain our current status as a foreign private issuer, either (a) more than 50% of our Class A common shares must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the United States or (b)(i) a majority of our executive officers or directors may not be U.S. citizens or residents; (2) more than 50% of our assets cannot be located in the United States; and (3) our business must be administered principally outside the United States. If we lose this status, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We may also be required to make changes in our corporate governance practices in

55

accordance with various SEC and the Nasdaq rules. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher than the costs we will incur as a foreign private issuer.

Our shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests because we are a Cayman Islands exempted company.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association, by the Companies Act (as amended) of the Cayman Islands, or the Companies Act, and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as that from English common law, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less exhaustive body of securities laws than the United States. In addition, some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fulsome and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands.

While Cayman Islands law allows a dissenting shareholder to express the shareholder’s view that a court sanctioned reorganization of a Cayman Islands company would not provide fair value for the shareholder’s shares, Cayman Islands statutory law does not specifically provide for shareholder appraisal rights in connection with a court sanctioned reorganization (by way of a scheme of arrangement). This may make it more difficult for you to assess the value of any consideration you may receive in a merger or consolidation (by way of a scheme of arrangement) or to require that the acquirer gives you additional consideration if you believe the consideration offered is insufficient. However, Cayman Islands statutory law provides a mechanism for a dissenting shareholder in a merger or consolidation to apply to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands for a determination of the fair value of the dissenter’s shares if it is not possible for the company and the dissenter to agree on a fair price within the time limits prescribed.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies (such as us) have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records and accounts or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders. Our directors have discretion under our Articles of Association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

Subject to limited exceptions, under Cayman Islands law, a minority shareholder may not bring a derivative action against the board of directors. Class actions are not recognized in the Cayman Islands, but groups of shareholders with identical interests may bring representative proceedings, which are similar.

United States civil liabilities and certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, the majority of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of these persons is located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It may also be difficult to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors who are not resident in the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets are located outside of the United States.

Further, it is unclear if original actions predicated on civil liabilities based solely upon U.S. federal securities laws are enforceable in courts outside the United States, including in the Cayman Islands and Brazil. Courts of the Cayman Islands may not, in an original action in the Cayman Islands, recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state of the United States on the grounds that such provisions are penal in nature. Although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce

56

a foreign judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction if such judgment is final, for a liquidated sum, provided it is not in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, is not inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matters, and was not obtained in a manner which is contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands. In addition, a Cayman Islands court may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.

Judgments of Brazilian courts to enforce our obligations with respect to our Class A common shares may be payable only in reais.

Most of our assets are located in Brazil. If proceedings are brought in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations in respect of our Class A common shares, we may not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than the real. Under Brazilian exchange control laws, an obligation in Brazil to pay amounts denominated in a currency other than the real may only be satisfied in Brazilian currency at the exchange rate, typically as determined by the Brazilian Central Bank, in effect on the date the judgment is obtained, and such amounts are then typically adjusted to reflect exchange rate variations and monetary restatements through the effective payment date. The then-prevailing exchange rate may not afford non-Brazilian investors with full compensation for any claim arising out of or related to our obligations under the Class A common shares.

Our Class A common shares may not be a suitable investment for all investors, as investment in our Class A common shares presents risks and the possibility of financial losses.

The investment in our Class A common shares is subject to risks. Investors who wish to invest in our Class A common shares are thus subject to asset losses, including loss of the entire value of their investment, as well as other risks, including those related to our Class A common shares, us, the sector in which we operate, our shareholders and the general macroeconomic environment in Brazil, among other risks.

Each potential investor in our Class A common shares must therefore determine the suitability of that investment in light of its own circumstances. In particular, each potential investor should:

There can be no assurance that we were not a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for our 2022 taxable year or that we will not be a PFIC for any future taxable year, which could subject U.S. investors in our Class A common shares to significant adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, we will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for any taxable year in which, after the application of certain look-through rules with respect to subsidiaries, either (1) 75% or more of our gross income consists of “passive income;” or (2) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of our assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, “passive income.” Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, certain non-active rents and royalties, and capital gains. Based on our operations, income, assets and certain estimates and projections, including as to the relative values of our assets, including goodwill, which is based on the market price of our Class A common shares, we believe we were likely not a PFIC for our 2022 taxable year. Whether we were a PFIC in 2022, and whether we will be a PFIC in any future year is uncertain because, among other things, (i) we hold a substantial amount of

57

investments that generate passive income; (ii) our PFIC status for any taxable year depends on the composition of our income and assets and the value of our assets from time to time (which is determined, in part, by reference to the market price of our Class A common shares, which could be volatile); and (iii) the law applicable to determining whether our goodwill is categorized as an asset that produces active or passive income is subject to varying interpretation. To the extent that any growth in our passive income outpaces our active business, our PFIC status could change. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we were not a PFIC in 2022 or that we will not be a PFIC for any future taxable year. In addition, there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with our conclusion.

If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. investor holds Class A common shares, we generally would continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to that U.S. investor for all succeeding years during which the U.S. investor holds Class A common shares, even if we ceased to meet the threshold requirements for PFIC status. Such a U.S. investor may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences, including (i) the treatment of all or a portion of any gain on disposition as ordinary income; (ii) the application of a deferred interest charge on such gain and the receipt of certain dividends; and (iii) compliance with certain reporting requirements. A “mark-to-market” election may be available that will alter the consequences of PFIC status if our Class A common shares are regularly traded on a qualified exchange. For further discussion, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders.”

If we were deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We intend to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, an entity generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if: (a) it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading securities or (b) absent an applicable exemption, it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities (other than U.S. government securities, securities issued by employees’ securities companies and securities issued by qualifying majority owned subsidiaries of such entity) having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.

We believe that we are engaged primarily in the business of providing asset management services and not in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We also believe that the primary source of income from each of our businesses is properly characterized as income earned in exchange for the provision of services. We hold ourselves out as an asset management firm and do not propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that the Company is what is frequently referred to as an “orthodox” investment company as defined in the Investment Company Act and described in clause (a) in the preceding paragraph. Furthermore, on an unconsolidated basis, at least 60% of the value of the Company’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) consists of our interest in Vinci Investments Brazil, our majority owned subsidiary which we believe is a qualifying majority owned subsidiary for purposes of the 40% test described in clause (b) in the preceding paragraph, because Vinci Investments Brazil, on a consolidated basis, is primarily engaged in providing asset management services and is not an investment company by virtue of Rule 3a-1 under the Investment Company Act. Under Rule 3a-1, an entity is generally deemed to be an “investment company” if, absent an applicable exemption, more than 45% of the value of its assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) consists of, and more than 45% of its net income after taxes (for the past four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, securities other than U.S. government securities, securities issued by employees’ securities companies, securities issued by qualifying majority owned subsidiaries of such entity and securities issued by qualifying companies that are controlled primarily by such entity. Vinci Investments Brazil’s assets, consolidated with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (within the meaning of the Investment Company Act), consist primarily of fee receivables for the provision of services, property and equipment, right-of-use leases deferred tax assets, and other assets that we believe would not be considered securities for purposes of the Investment Company Act. Therefore, we believe that, consolidating Vinci Investments Brazil’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (within the meaning of the Investment Company Act), no more than 45% of the value of its assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) consists of, and no more than 45% of its net income after taxes (for the past four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, securities other than U.S. government securities, securities issued by employees’ securities companies, securities issued by qualifying majority owned subsidiaries of Vinci Investments Brazil and securities issued by qualifying companies that are controlled primarily by Vinci Investments Brazil. Accordingly,

58

we believe that Vinci Investments Brazil is not an investment company by virtue of Rule 3a-1 under the Investment Company Act, and therefore is a qualifying majority-owned subsidiary of the Company for purposes of applying the 40% test described in clause (b) in the preceding paragraph to the Company.

In addition, we believe the Company is not an investment company under section 3(b)(1) of the Investment Company Act because it is primarily engaged in a non-investment company business.

However, our subsidiaries have a significant number of investment securities, and we expect to make investments in other investment securities from time to time. We monitor these holdings regularly to confirm our continued compliance with the assets and income test described above. The need to comply with this test may cause us to restrict our business and subsidiaries with respect to the assets in which we can invest and/or the types of securities we may issue, sell investment securities, including on unfavorable terms, acquire assets or businesses that could change the nature of our business or potentially take other actions that may be viewed as adverse to the holders of our Class A common stock, in order to conduct our business in a manner that does not subject us to the registration and other requirements of the Investment Company Act.

If anything were to happen which would cause the Company to be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may lose our ability to raise money in the U.S. capital markets and from U.S. lenders, and additional restrictions under the Investment Company Act could apply to us, all of which could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently conducted. This would materially and adversely affect the value of your Class A common shares and our ability to pay dividends in respect of our Class A common shares.

The following chart summarizes key milestones in our operational history:

60

Our Corporate Reorganization

Prior to our IPO we undertook a corporate reorganization as described under “Presentation of Financial and Certain Other Information—Corporate Events.”

Acquisition of SPS Capital

On August 16, 2022, we completed our previously announced acquisition of SPS Capital Gestão de Recursos Ltda., or SPS Capital, a leading special situations independent asset manager with over R$2.0 billion in assets under management at the time of the acquisition and led by a highly experienced and best-in-class team with extensive experience in the sector.

The acquisition of SPS Capital resulted in a new business strategy, Vinci SPS, under the Private Markets segment, which broadens our product offering and we believe enhances the strength of our platform. The transaction strengthens Vinci Partners’ FRE quality, stability and visibility as a result of recurring and high visibility management fee revenues with long-term lockups. We believe that the new strategy, Vinci SPS, operates in an underpenetrated market, creating substantial future growth opportunities to the platform. We believe the acquisition solidified Vinci Partners’ position as the player of choice for alternative investments in Brazil, with a full suite of sophisticated and complementary business segments.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at Av. Bartolomeu Mitre, 336, Leblon, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22431-002. Our telephone number at this address is +55 (21) 2159-6240.

Investors should contact us for any inquiries through the address and telephone number of our principal executive office. Our principal website is https://www.vincipartners.com. The information contained in, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into this annual report.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

As a company with less than US$1.235 billion in revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other burdens that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

We may take advantage of these provisions for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than US$1.235 billion in annual revenue, have more than US$700 million in market value of our Class A common shares held by non-affiliates or issue more than US$1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period. We may choose to take advantage of some but not all of these reduced burdens. Accordingly, the information about us available to you will not be the same as, and may be more limited than, the information available to shareholders of a non-emerging growth company.

In addition, under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. Given that we currently report and expect to

61

continue to report under IFRS as issued by the IASB, we will not be able to avail ourselves of this extended transition period and, as a result, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required by the IASB.

Introduction to Vinci Partners

Vinci Partners is a leading alternative investment platform in Brazil, established in 2009. Our 283 full-time employees as of December 31, 2022 draw from a wide-ranging network of personal and professional relationships with industry-leading executives, business owners, corporate managers, financial and operational advisors, consultants and attorneys to source, fund, and manage investments. Vinci Partners’ business segments include Private Markets, Liquid Strategies, Investment Products and Solutions, Financial Advisory and Retirement Services, each managed by dedicated investment teams with an independent investment committee and decision-making process.

Since inception, our AUM has grown from R$1.9 billion in 2009 to R$63.1 billion as of December 31, 2022, representing a 31% compound annual growth rate, or CAGR. Our notable AUM growth has been driven by strong performance, consistent launches of new investment vehicles, and selective strategic transactions, such as our association with Gas Investimentos in 2010, Mosaico Capital in 2017 and SPS Capital in 2022.

Since 2018, powered by a sharp decrease in interest rates and the fundraising of our third vintage in our private equity flagship strategy, our total AUM grew from R$25.5 billion to R$63.1 billion as of December 31, 2022. This 25% CAGR is greater than the growth rate for all other funds in the Brazilian alternative investments market, as defined to include funds classified by ANBIMA in classes similar to our alternative investment verticals (public equities, hedge funds, pension funds, credit rights investment funds (Fundo de Investimentos em Direitos Creditórios—FIDC), private equity investment funds (Fundos de Investimento em Participações—FIP), and REITs (Fundos de Investimento Imobiliário—FII)).

Our business strategy is comprised of five segments: Private Markets, Liquid Strategies, Investment Products and Solutions, or IP&S, Financial Advisory and Retirement Services. As of December 31, 2022, Private Markets accounted for 45% of our AUM, followed by IP&S with 38% and Liquid Strategies with 17%. Long-term products, with formal lock-ups of five years or more, accounted for 51% of our total AUM, and perpetual capital vehicles represented 22% of our long-term AUM.

Our revenue base is broadly diversified within our strategies. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Private Markets accounted for 52% of our net revenues, followed by IP&S with 21%, Liquid Strategies with 22%, and Financial Advisory with 5%.

62

The following table sets forth our AUM on a per-segment basis as of the dates indicated.

The following table sets forth our total net revenues on a per-segment basis for the years indicated.

Competitive Strengths

We have established a premier independent franchise with market leadership across our high value-added strategies. We believe that our business model, focused on high-performance and executed by talented multi-disciplinary teams with a focus on value creation, has enabled us to build one of the most complete portfolios of alternative investment strategies and solutions, which combined with the adoption of innovative technologies and increasing integration across our business segments, strongly position us to capitalize on the future expansion and shifts in asset allocation in the Brazilian investment market.

63

We are a leading independent alternative asset manager in Brazil, with an extensive product offering across several business strategies.

Since our inception, we have worked tirelessly to become a leading independent investment platform in Brazil, in terms of AUM and product offering, that is well positioned to benefit from long-term trends in the Brazilian asset management industry. Starting with only proprietary capital from our partners, we have been able to grow our AUM base at a CAGR of 30.9% since our founding by expanding our product offering within liquid and illiquid strategies.

Vinci Partners is a leading independent asset manager in Brazil in terms of AUM and is ranked among the 22 largest asset managers in Brazil (including banks, independent players and non-independent players) among over 898 asset managers, based on data published by ANBIMA as of December 31, 2022.

Our extensive product offering with ten business strategies presents a strong competitive advantage as limited partners are seeking to consolidate their investments by general partner. With our broad and well-developed platform, we set ourselves apart from competition, being the partner of choice with our one-stop shop model. Aligned with this phenomenon, investors are still extremely under allocated to alternatives in Brazil, allowing Vinci Partners to leverage its competitive platform to capture a substantial share from this growth opportunity.

We have an established and recognized track record of achieving returns above benchmarks across our asset classes, putting us in a position of strength to benefit from shifts in asset allocation in Brazil

We believe we offer our clients best-in-class products in terms of investment performance across asset classes. We have been able to establish an impressive track record, achieving returns in the top quartile across products within both liquid and illiquid strategies.

We have developed expertise and credibility across strategies, with our products having a track record of surpassing the respective benchmarks. We believe that our past success enhances our reputation and market credibility and will be an asset in sourcing future investment opportunities.

Our AUM focused on long-term capital creates a resilient, management fee-centric and asset-light business model

In the year ended December 31, 2022, our assets under management posted a 10% year-over-year growth, despite facing a challenging market environment, backed by long-term commitments that provided stability in our earnings. As of December 31, 2022, Vinci had R$63 billion in AUM, with 51% being long-term capital, where commitments are locked up for five years or more. In addition, Vinci Partners had over R$7 billion in perpetual or quasi-perpetual capital, mostly coming from our listed REITs business in our Real Estate strategy, a business that we continued to expand and that we believe should continue to be an important driver for growth over the next years.

64

These factors facilitate a predictable earnings stream, with a significant portion coming from management fees. In the year ended December 31, 2022, 91% of total net revenues from services rendered came from management fees. We expect management fees to continue to be a tailwind for earnings security in the coming years as we continue to add long-term capital into our platform. We are currently undergoing a strong fundraising cycle for our Private Markets products that should have commitments locked up for five years or more.

Our AUM funding base is mostly built upon our proprietary distribution channels, resulting in a sticky investor base.

Vinci Partners has five different distribution channels across its fundraising base, each one with a fully dedicated team. Roughly 90% of Vinci Partners’ AUM is built upon proprietary distribution or perpetual listed vehicles. Our close relationship with our clients is a strong foundation to our business model, enhancing our AUM resilience when facing more challenging environments, and representing a strong driver for growth in favorable environments.

Our proprietary relationships are a competitive strength for Vinci Partners as they secure our AUM, resulting in stability into our earnings, as our proximity with investors mitigates outflows risks. As of December 31, 2022, 51% of our AUM had formal lockups for five or more years. However, our IP&S AUM, in its majority, has no formal lockups and is comprised by institutional and HNWI investors with low churn over the years, due to the long-term oriented business strategy and our close relationship with clients.

In sum, our AUM is secured by our well-developed funding base, mostly based on proprietary capital, which we believe sets us apart from our competitors.

We are one of the pioneers in the adoption of responsible investment and ESG integration in our investment decision process in Brazil and of a strong focus on internal ESG practices companywide.

We have been a PRI signatory since 2012, and according to the PRI data portal, in 2014 there were only 10 active investment manager signatories in Brazil.

We have been consistently developing our ESG approach year over year, with important improvements on a regular basis. For instance, in 2014 we implemented our responsible investment policy for private equity; in 2017, we engaged a specialized consulting company to develop our ESG management system for private markets; and in 2019, we engaged a different ESG consulting company to develop our ESG model for public markets. In both cases, we leveraged international and local best practices to develop our policies and approach, such as IFC Performance Standards, and the principles for responsible investments from the PRI, among others. We are one of the only alternative asset managers in Brazil with an active private market dedicated strategy through our VIR (Vinci Impact and Return) platform within our private equity strategy. In addition, Vinci Partners’ headquarters in Rio de Janeiro is self-sufficient from an energy standpoint through a build-to-suit solar power plant.

Given the different characteristics and ESG risk profile, our approach is distinct for private markets and public markets. However, in both cases, our ESG approach is integrated in most of our investment processes, which means that we incorporate ESG aspects in our main investment analyses. In addition, we also apply other ESG approaches in some of the funds. For instance, our private equity funds use negative filters and exclusion lists. Our credit fund VES (Vinci Energia Sustentável), is focused on sustainable energy projects (e.g., solar, wind, etc.), and as such, uses an additional filter of sustainability.

As discussed in “—Environment, Social and Governance – ESG,” we believe that our organization and governance towards ESG are developed and evolve every year. We have multiple programs that cover inclusion, diversity, equality, and best environment practices. With our IPO, we enhanced our consciousness towards ESG practices and adopted an ESG committee—chaired by Sonia Consiglio, a member of our board of directors—which is responsible for Vinci Partners’ ongoing development in this matter. In 2022, we published our first ever ESG report, which we expect to update on a yearly basis with new developments and initiatives.

65

We believe that our strong investment approach towards ESG over the years in most of our business strategies, as pioneers in the field in Brazil, alongside our focus on internal practices, with an ESG committee chaired by Sonia Consiglio, gives us a strong competitive advantage as investors increasingly become stricter on this subject.

Our strong cash balance is a valuable asset to leverage new products and pursue inorganic operations to enhance growth.

As a result of our IPO in the beginning of 2021, Vinci Partners received net proceeds of U$252.2 million, which became a valuable asset to the company as a means to enhance AUM growth and boost our future FRE earning power.

Since our IPO we leveraged our cash balance to raise new products across Private Markets via seed investments, which played an important role on fundraising, and we will continue to enhance growth through this avenue. In addition to boosting our future FRE, our seed investments in Private Markets funds presents an important upside as these funds divest from its assets. This could play an important role to our earnings as the capital gain will impact our general partner investment income when they are realized. While the capital is not called from closed-end products, our cash balance is invested in Vinci Partners’ open-ended vehicles, which are mostly exposed to fixed income bonds.

Nonetheless, we are closely monitoring opportunistic M&A transactions to accelerate FRE growth, adding value to our shareholders, as we did with the acquisition of SPS Capital, which closed in the third quarter of 2022.

We are seeing a number of high-quality firms facing headwinds raising capital in a challenging environment, and we believe that this should make way for conversations around partnerships that would allow value generation for all parties involved. We believe that our strong cash balance also adds flexibility around deal structuring, as was the case with our acquisition of SPS in 2022. We have been active in sourcing on the corporate M&A front and are looking into several different opportunities for potential acquisitions, focusing on recurring FRE growth and client-base expansion, which we believe can be an interesting complement to our cash deployment on top of our seed allocation to proprietary private market funds. We believe there is significant room to grow FRE by acquiring smaller private market-oriented managers that are under-scale in this tougher macro environment, especially in perpetual capital products, which can be highly synergistic to our current product offering.

Our strong free cash flow played an important role delivering substantial value to our shareholders through share repurchases. Since the announcement of the first buyback plan in the second quarter of 2021, we repurchased 1.8 million shares. Although these operations were financed by our free cash flow generation, our strong cash balance creates flexibility for the management of our quarterly earnings, allowing us to put this capital to work and add value to our shareholders.

Segment Reporting

Until December 31, 2020, our strategic decisions comprised eight distinct business segments: (i) hedge funds; (ii) public equities; (iii) private equity; (iv) financial advisory services; (v) investment products and solutions; (vi) real estate; (vii) infrastructure; and (viii) credit. Beginning in the year ended December 31, 2021, our eight segments were grouped into four new segments: (i) Private Markets (including private equity, real estate, infrastructure and credit), (ii) Liquid Strategies (including public equities and hedge funds), (iii) IP&S, and (iv) Financial Advisory. This change was motivated by how our chief executive officer monitors and manages our business, as well as the way shareholders and investors evaluate our investment vehicles, to present financial and strategic information in a more cohesive manner. Strategies were sorted within business segments following technical and strategic similarities among the attributes of the respective funds, such as management and performance fee structures, liquidity constraints, targeted returns, and investor profile. In the year ended December 31, 2022, we created a fifth segment, Retirement Services, following the launch of our retirement services strategy.

Our five segments consolidate our ten distinct business strategies: (i) hedge funds; (ii) public equities; (iii) private equity; (iv) financial advisory services; (v) investment products and solutions; (vi) real estate; (vii) infrastructure; (viii) credit; (ix) special situations; and (x) retirement services.

For more information, see note 21 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

66

Private Markets

Our Private Markets segment is comprised of five business lines: (1) private equity, (2) real estate, (3) infrastructure (4) credit and (5) special situations. This segment is mostly made up of closed-end funds with long-term lock-ups and higher targeted returns. Depending on the strategy, these products can range from private equity-style funds, with formal lock-ups ranging from eight to 15 years, to vehicles listed on the B3 with perpetual capital. Our credit strategy also has short- to medium-term funds depending on the sub-strategy.

As of December 31, 2022, Private Markets accounted for R$28.7 billion in AUM. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the average management fee in this segment was 0.89%, and the management team was composed of 65 full-time employees across our Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Recife offices.

Private Markets AUM Breakdown

Private Markets AUM in the fourth quarter 2022 was R$28.7 billion, with R$13.8 billion (48%) coming from private equity, followed by real estate with R$5.6 billion (20%), credit with R$5.1 billion (18%), infrastructure and special situations both with R$2.1 billion (7%).

Our investor base is highly diversified within the segment. Institutional offshore investors remain the segment’s biggest contributor, accounting for 37% of Private Markets AUM as of December 31, 2022, followed by local institutional investors accounting for 21%, public markets vehicles with 18%, high net worth individuals, or HNWI, with 17%, and allocators and distributors with 6%.

The following table sets forth our Private Markets AUM on a per-strategy basis as of the dates indicated.

67

The following table sets forth our Private Markets AUM by type of investor as of the dates indicated.

Private equity

Our private equity strategy has a sector-agnostic approach focused on growth equity investments in Brazil. Opportunistically, we will also analyze turnaround and greenfield investment opportunities. The main strategic focus of our private equity strategy is value creation by promoting the growth of revenue, productivity and profitability through significant operating and management changes in portfolio companies through our proprietary “Value from the Core” process. We also take into account non-measurable aspects, such as alignment of the potential investment with ESG goals.

The private equity strategy invests through two sub-strategies: Vinci Capital Partners and Vinci Impact and Return.

Private Equity Investment Process

Vinci Partners targets assets or companies with proven cash flow stability and inflation protected revenues with strong organic growth and/or M&A potential. We may also seek to partner with strategic players to develop operating platforms.

Vinci Partners’ team brings together a wide-ranging network of personal and professional relationships across leading industry executives, business owners, corporate managers, financial and operational advisors and consultants, attorneys, and regulatory agencies. This robust network, combined with our proactive, top-down identification of target industries and companies, provides a highly differentiated deal sourcing platform for each of our private markets investment strategies. The team follows a highly disciplined and systematic investment review and decision-making process comprised of multi-staged reviews by our investment committee, which is comprised of several partners, most of whom have worked together since 2001.

The key objectives of our investment review and decision-making process are to: (i) effectively manage the pipeline of investments, (ii) identify key issues early in the investment process and before executing the transaction, (iii) efficiently allocate the deal team, (iv) determine a tailored deal execution and due diligence plan, and (v) provide a forum to solicit the input and views of the entire infrastructure team.

68

For instance, the graphic below depicts the key steps in the investment review and decision-making process in our private equity practice:

Both of our sub-strategies have a historical long-term performance, with seven vehicles managed by their partners since the early 2000s. Our Vinci Capital Partners strategy has raised over R$8.6 billion in capital commitments throughout to date, including our ongoing fundraising for VCP IV, with a gross IRR of 64.7% in reais and 70.2% in U.S. Dollars through September 30, 2022, and a gross multiple of invested capital, or MOIC, of 2.5x in reais and 2.2x in U.S. dollars. Our VIR strategy has raised close to R$1.3 billion to date, with its latest vintage, VIR IV, being the largest vehicle. The strategy is marked at a 20.6% gross IRR in reais and 27.3% in U.S. dollars through September 30, 2022, and a gross MOIC of 1.3x in reais and 1.3x in U.S. dollars.

69

Real estate

Our real estate strategy invests through two sub-strategies:

70

Our Real Estate team also manages exclusive mandates, which includes an exclusive mandate REIT for an international institutional investor that co-invests in four shopping malls with VISC, and a fund of funds strategy that invests in listed REITs.

Real Estate Investment Process

The real estate investment process is made up of five key steps:

Credit

Our credit investment strategy is focused on customized credit instruments, structures, and solutions to meet the financing needs of both established and growing businesses, while generating interesting credit investment opportunities for our investors. The credit strategy invests across five core sub-strategies/asset classes:

71

We have an emphasis on self-originating investment opportunities in credit for our investors, generally in the private credit space, with a collateral package providing the downside protection against credit-related events.

Credit Investment Process

Our credit investment process is made up of four key steps:

72

The following chart sets out the total gross return of our main non-listed credit funds since inception.

Infrastructure

Our infrastructure strategy has exposure to tangible assets related to economic infrastructure, through investments in equity, equity-like and/or debt instruments across several sectors, including power generation and transmission, transportation and logistics and water and sewage. Our infrastructure strategy seeks control or control-oriented positions and employs active hands-on management of assets and operations.

Our infrastructure strategy invests across two sub-strategies:

Infrastructure Investment Process

Our infrastructure investment process is primarily based on proprietary origination, without relying solely on financial advisors. The proprietary origination starts with a top-down and bottom-up analysis, which enables us to be productive in the process and leverage our experience and know-how. In this first step, we take a closer look as to whether the asset is aligned with our strategy. We also look for potential ESG and climate impacts, potential synergies with our portfolio and the profile of the sellers and partners of the business. After this step, we develop our financial models, projections and prepare the investment thesis for investment committee approval.

After the approval of our investment committee, the team executes a thorough investigation of the asset’s governance and investment structure. In this step, the team also prepares a more detailed investment thesis and due diligence budget. With the go-ahead from the investment committee, a non-binding offer is made. Lastly, our team adjusts the financial models with the results from the due diligence and presents it to the investment committee. Once approved by the investment committee, a binding offer is presented. If accepted, our team executes the transaction.

The funds’ investments are periodically monitored by our investment team, with key topics including the evolution of ESG metrics, financial and operational metrics, and the evolution of previous targets. Depending on the vehicle, the climate impact is also periodically monitored.

73

FIP Infra Transmissão was marked at 61.7% gross IRR in reais and 45.7% gross IRR in U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2022, and a 3.6x gross MOIC in reais and 2.7x gross MOIC in U.S. dollars, which is evidence of the strong track record of our investment team in infrastructure assets.

Our water and sewage strategy, VIAS, was marked at 19.2% gross IRR in reais and 18.8% gross IRR in U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2022, and a 1.2x gross MOIC in reais and 1.2x gross MOIC in U.S. dollars. In 2022, VIAS, in a partnership with Brazilian operator Águas do Brasil, invested in the public concession of CEDAE Block III, which investment has already delivered a meaningful impact as a result of operational improvements in the losses index, water coverage, and commercial efforts. With this transaction, the fund reached 90% capital deployment considering commitments raised since its first close in 2021.

Vinci Climate Change, or VICC, is our new fund that aims to actively contribute to the climate agenda. VICC invests in climate infrastructure assets that range from renewable power generation, to water assets and to the efficient use of natural resources and reduced emissions from other sources (e.g., energy efficiency solutions in industries and commercial, public and residential sectors). VICC’s goal is to contribute to mitigating (or adapting) the effects of climate change and generate financial returns, with a targeted yearly gross return of 18 to 22% in Brazilian reais. We plan to create, in partnership with key operators and developers, a leading portfolio of scalable climate solutions that we believe may positively impact the climate without foregoing compelling, risk-adjusted financial returns. VICC will focus on the acquisition of control or co-control structures. In addition, to meet financial and environmental impact objectives, all investments made by VICC will also seek to increase diversity and inclusion across portfolio companies, especially from a gender perspective, in their leadership and workforce, with the intention of positively impacting the communities in which these companies are actively promoting the adoption of good environmental, social and governance, or ESG, practices. VICC was anchored by BNDES and is currently within its fundraising process aiming at a first close in the first semester of 2023.

Vinci Transportation and Logistics’ strategy focuses on public concessions of transportation and logistics assets, such as ports and highways. In 2022, we announced our first investment, the acquisition of the project of a container terminal called Maralto, in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Our team believes that in the future this could be an important strategy due to a significant pipeline of investment opportunities in the sector.

Vinci SPS

In 2022, Vinci Partners concluded its first M&A transaction since the IPO with the acquisition of SPS Capital. This acquisition filled a strategic gap within our Private Markets segment and thereby created our new Vinci SPS strategy. Our Vinci SPS investment strategy has a broad investment mandate within the special situations spectrum, which improves the diversification of our portfolio among asset classes associated with different industries and value drivers. The resulting Vinci SPS strategy invests across five core sub-strategies:

74

Vinci SPS Investment Process

What we believe sets Vinci SPS apart is its robust and well-developed investment process, which ultimately is a direct driver to value creation. The graphic below depicts the six key steps in the investment review and decision-making process in Vinci SPS:

Our Vinci SPS strategy raised over R$1.8 billion in capital commitments as of the date of this report across three vintages, with its latest vintage, SPS III, being the largest vehicle with over R$1.1 billion in total commitments. The strategy is marked at a gross IRR of 29.8% in reais and 27.6% in U.S. dollars through December 31, 2022, and a gross multiple of invested capital, or MOIC, of 1.4x in reais and 1.5x in U.S. dollars.

Liquid Strategies

Our Liquid Strategies segment has two business strategies: public equities and hedge funds. This segment is focused on generating value through operations in public markets, such as by trading bonds, public stocks and derivatives, among other assets. Liquid Strategies is composed by open-end funds with short- to medium-term redemption periods. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the segment reported an average management fee rate of 0.79%, and management teams were composed by 23 full-time employees across our Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo offices.

Liquid Strategies AUM Breakdown

Liquid Strategies accounted for R$10.2 billion in assets under management as of December 31, 2022, with R$7.4 billion (72%) coming from public equities and R$2.8 billion (28%) coming from hedge funds.

75

Our investor base is heavily weighted towards institutional clients, which represent 86% of total AUM for the segment. Local institutional investors are our main investor class, accounting for 47% of Liquid Strategies AUM. Institutional offshore investors account for 39% of Liquid Strategies AUM, with most coming from our sovereign wealth exclusive mandate in our public equities strategy. HNWIs and Allocators and distributors accounted for 8% and 6%, respectively, of Liquid Strategies AUM as of December 31, 2022.

The following table sets forth our Liquid Strategies AUM on a per-strategy basis as of the dates indicated.

The following table sets forth our Liquid Strategies AUM by type of investor as of the dates indicated.

Public equities

Vinci Partners has a long track record and deep experience investing in public equities in Brazil. We focus on holding positions in companies for three to five years following deep analysis and review by our various investment committees, taking into consideration our internal controls.

Our public equities strategy invests according to two key sub-strategies:

76

Public Equities Investment Process

Our public equities investment process is robust and consists of four key steps:

The following chart sets out the total gross return of our public equities funds since inception.

77

Hedge funds

Our hedge funds team operates under a multi-manager strategy with several portfolio managers, each pursuing independent strategies. This strategy invests through two key sub-strategies:

Hedge Funds Investment Process

The hedge funds strategy is composed of independent portfolio managers with access to both our macro and equities dedicated research teams, which support these managers in creating a robust analysis of the markets. Each portfolio manager has their own book and uses this support information as a basis to invest.

We have strong overarching risk monitoring practices in order to generate superior Sharpe ratio and alpha for our investors. Our risk team analyzes each portfolio using risk metrics such as stress tests, value at risk, or VaR, stop loss and a deep inspection of fund liquidity. Each strategy has its own VaR and stop loss, with limits set by our CIO and CRO, taking into account the volatility of each strategy. Our CIO also has a book that could be used to reduce or leverage risk.

The following chart sets out the total gross return of our main hedge funds since inception.

IP&S

The IP&S segment seeks to offer tailor-made solutions to investors with a focus on exclusive mandates for institutional investors and HNWIs. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the segment reported an average management fee rate of 0.37%, and the management team was composed of 15 full-time employees across our Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and New York offices.

Our IP&S segment offers clients access to tailored financial products through an open architecture platform, in addition to in-house asset allocation and risk management. The strategy aims to provide a sophisticated investment strategy with alpha generation according to our clients’ targets. In the execution of these strategies, we take into account risk profile assessment, preparation of investment policies and product selection, among other factors. The strategy is divided in four sub-strategies: (1) separate exclusive mandates, (2) commingled funds, (3) international allocation, and (4) pension plans.

78

IP&S Investment Process

We have a very robust investment process within our IP&S segment, which begins with a thorough analysis of funds and assets to identify the products that best suit our investors. When we select a manager for a client’s portfolio, we conduct a thorough investigation of the manager’s track record, investment team, risk management and differentiators. We also have weekly macro committees with our economic department to better understand the global and local scenarios and identify potential investments and monthly calls with our risk department, in which our investment solutions teams present investment opportunities that will be analyzed by the team. In this case, the risk department has veto power over those investments. In addition to this internal process, our team discusses with each client their tolerance to risk, investment horizon, cash flow expectations and preferences to better meet our clients’ needs and expectations.

IP&S AUM Breakdown

IP&S accounted for R$24.2 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2022, with R$15.8 billion (66%) coming from separate exclusive mandates, R$3.4 billion (14%) from pension plans, R$2.7 billion (11%) from international allocation, and R$2.2 billion (9%) from commingled funds. Our investor base is heavily weighted towards institutional clients. Local institutional investors are our biggest contributors, accounting for 44% of IP&S’ AUM, followed by HNWI with 38% and allocators and distributors with 18%.

79

The following table sets forth our IP&S AUM on a per-strategy basis as of the dates indicated.

The following table sets forth our IP&S AUM by type of investor as of the dates indicated.

The following chart sets out the total gross return of our main IP&S commingled and pension funds since inception.

Financial Advisory

Our financial advisory services team provides financial and strategic services to business owners, senior corporate management teams and boards of directors, focusing mostly on pre-IPO and M&A advisory services for Brazilian middle-market companies. We believe our financial advisory services team serves as trusted advisors to clients seeking local and/or product expertise in the Brazilian marketplace.

As an independent boutique, Vinci Partners has the flexibility to engage in transactions that often require complex solutions, long-term relationships, and alignment of interests with clients. The Financial Advisory platform provides conflict-free advice with senior focus for value creation and long-term support. The platform focuses on two main sub-strategies:

80

Retirement Services

Our Retirement Services strategy was launched early in 2022, and investments were made during the year ended December 31, 2022 to develop the product and structure its dedicated team. This resulted in the creation of a fifth reporting segment to enable shareholders to track the evolution of our retirement services strategy AUM, revenues and costs separately from our other already mature asset management segments. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Segment Reporting.”

VRS will supplement the services provided by our current pension plan funds strategy in IP&S, thereby increasing our interactions with our clients and our ability to fundraise from this pool of capital. The open-ended pension plan industry has a sizable addressable market, with more than R$1 trillion in AUM and double-digit growth over the last years, according to FenaPrevi. While liquid markets have struggled with outflows, the open-ended pension plans industry posted another year of inflows in 2022, according to ANBIMA. We also believe there is a great opportunity to gain share within this market with VRS. Currently, close to 90% of the industry is controlled by traditional Brazilian banks, and recent pension portability numbers indicate a significant flow from traditional banks to independent insurers, according to FenaPrevi and SUSEP. The decentralization of capital from incumbent banks is one of Vinci Partners’ main growth opportunities. We believe there is a lack of independent alternative players offering open-ended pension plans in Brazil given that the market has several barriers of entries caused by expertise and structuring requirements. In particular, SUSEP, the Brazilian regulator, has a number of requirements that only sizeable and consolidated players can address, which we believe places Vinci Partners in a unique position to capture a relevant portion of the industry.

In the latter part of the 2022, Vinci Partners was approved by SUSEP to operate life insurance and open-ended pension plans in Brazil, which officially enabled us to launch our strategy. In VRS, we have developed a tailor-made asset allocation algorithm based on many inputs that include an individual’s retirement goals, risk appetite and objectives. The solution is personalized for the individual’s life cycle and is backed by solid risk tolerance metrics. We have created a user-friendly digital product, supported by the combination of a technological platform and a tech advisor mechanism. Through this innovative initiative, we aim to offer a leading industry service, which we believe will ultimately simplify the most complex processes for pension beneficiaries. As a result of the product’s suitability, which will combine the asset allocation approach with a tailor-made investment portfolio, we believe that individuals will benefit from long-term returns, thereby diminishing the impact of short-term volatility, and increased efficiency, as we will allocate capital through different type of funds depending on market conditions and investor preferences.

We plan to begin fundraising efforts leveraging on our proprietary HNWI investor base, followed by select corporate pension plans, a segment with over R$100 billion in addressable market, which we believe has, in addition to the large capital pool, a significant growth opportunity.

Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance – ESG

Vinci Partners is committed to ESG practices throughout the company, ranging from sustainability in our offices and inclusion policies to our investment process through our investment vehicles.

Alignment with our limited partners is our first step for a successful relationship. Our partners are clients, and our clients are partners. We have a strong culture to seed capital in our funds, where partners invest alongside investors in the same conditions and fees. This culture, when complemented by targeted long-term returns, creates a stickier investor base, with limited partners investing with us for a long horizon. Our broadly diversified platform enables us to have knowledge exchange between portfolio managers from different strategies, generating an important competitive advantage, always respecting our compliance rules and Chinese wall policies.

We have a long-term goal of democratizing the alternative market space by focusing on our limited partners’ needs and providing tailored solutions and investment opportunities.

81

Corporate Governance

We have sought to consistently improve our governance structure, especially after our IPO in 2021. We believe that we follow well-established and recognized practices in the Brazilian and international corporate markets by operating in a partnership model. Moreover, in keeping with our values, we encourage entrepreneurship and ownership without leaving administrative discipline aside. Even before our IPO, when Rogério Werneck was already our independent director, Vinci Partners was focused on its ethics and good corporate governance practices. In 2021, our independent director group was bolstered by the arrival of Ana Marta Veloso, Guilherme Stocco and Sonia Consiglio.

We select our independent directors based on their expertise in topics that we consider strategic for Vinci Partners, on their ability to contribute to internal discussions, on their external reputation and recognition, and on their alignment with our values and culture. To staff our committees, we chose members with the ability to significantly contribute to the relevant matters under discussion and balancing strategic vision and execution capacity, in particular among leaders of these respective areas.

Due to the additional controls that are necessary for a listed company, the responsibilities of our compliance, legal, financial, risk and investor relations departments were also expanded.

Board of Directors

The role of our board of directors is to provide strategic direction and support to Vinci Partners by monitoring business opportunities, innovation, sustainability, and the development of our professionals. As of the date of this report, it is composed of eight directors, four of which are independent, and is chaired by Gilberto Sayão. In 2021, we were granted the Women on Board (WOB) seal, an independent initiative that recognizes and promotes organizations with at least two women on their boards of directors or advisory boards.

Audit Committee

In alignment with the best market practices and meeting regulatory requirements, the Audit Committee is composed of four independent directors and chaired by Ana Marta Veloso. The Audit Committee oversees internal controls and the company’s financial statements, ensuring compliance with corporate governance principles. It is also responsible for receiving and analyzing complaints submitted through the external whistleblower channel implemented in 2021, in line with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), a U.S. statute on foreign corruption practices.

ESG Committee

Established in May 2021, the ESG Committee recommends, discusses, proposes, and evaluates Vinci Partners sustainability actions. It is composed of eight members and chaired by an independent director, Sonia Consiglio, since August 2021.

We believe that investments that incorporate best ESG practices can bring superior returns to investors, society and to Brazil, and we believe that we have the potential to transform the market and lead by example, based on constructive engagement with investee companies. With an initial focus on risk mitigation, our approach was expanded to consider value generation from integrating best practices to the investment processes, always considering pre-established policies, solid methodologies, and objective criteria. We therefore believe that the ESG Committee can be a catalyst for the ESG agenda and help it permeate all business fronts and middle areas, from the board of directors to every other level inside the Company.

Vinci Partners’ ESG agenda is structured in three pillars:

82

Innovation Committee

We believe that innovation has great transformational potential and, through process automation and optimization, can promote important gains to governance, transparency, and compliance. The Innovation Committee goal is to promote creativity and the development of the Company by evaluating what measures will be implemented to expand digital skills, what are the related risks and how can they be minimized. It discusses topics such as big data, artificial intelligence and blockchain by examining how they can be incorporated into the business. The committee is composed of thirteen members and is chaired by an independent director Guilherme Stocco.

Executive Committee

The executive committee is comprised of a group of senior partners that lead the main areas of the company. Its goal is to think of Vinci Partners as a business, learning form global references and identifying opportunities for improvement. It also supports themes related to innovation, communication, people and culture.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

We have several programs focused on diversity and inclusion at Vinci Partners, and we constantly seek to improve our performance on that front. Between 2017 to 2022, the number of women in our back-office and front-office areas grew by 62% and 126%, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, 34% of our workforce is comprised of women. In addition, there is no gender pay gap at Vinci Partners.

Vinci for Them (“Vinci por Elas”) Program

Launched on the International Women’s Day in 2021, our Vinci for Them program congregates all of the following gender equity initiatives in the Company. Since its inception, 22 women were hired under the program:

83

Internal Environmental Practices

The main impact of our operations on the environment derives from the allocation of resources, which has led us to develop products related to environmental issues, such as Vinci Energia (VIGT), Vinci Energia Sustentável (VES), Vinci Infraestrutura Água e Saneamento (VIAS) and Vinci Climate Change (VICC). Nonetheless we seek to align all our internal activities with best environmental practices, as consistency between speech and practice gives us even more power to demand the best standards from the companies in which we invest. Among the practices, we highlight the following:

Investment Process in ESG

Private equity

Our private equity Impact and Return strategy was developed to tend to a growing market demand for ESG products combined with our view of the potential positive influence our capital allocation could have over entrepreneurs and their markets’ environment. In our impact strategy, we target minority equity investments, focusing on the positive impact we can bring to their businesses. The market for impact funds in Brazil is still in development and faces challenges. This investment thesis is better received by entrepreneurs with prior contact with the strategy. Reaching out to smaller entrepreneurs is an important goal for the long-term success of the strategy.

Our fourth vintage of our Impact strategy, VIR IV, raised R$1 billion in capital commitments through a diversified investor base, with the presence of institutional investors. VIR IV’s goal is to invest capital in underdeveloped regions, generating a positive impact to business in these regions. Our investment process comprises several criteria, such as impact metrics, regions with less capital availability, and minority-owned businesses. The investment strategy is completed with a strong analysis of the business, a detailed report highlighting the impact on the business, and quarterly follow-ups. VIR IV received the award for “Impact Fund of the Year” from Environmental Finance in 2021.

Our Vinci Capital Partners strategy, or VCP strategy, has also developed a robust ESG framework. The VCP team created, with the support of a global reference ESG consultancy firm, a general ESG risk assessment framework to support ESG due diligence in new target companies. This framework contains the main environmental and social issues addressed by most sustainability initiatives, inspired by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards, and a preliminary assessment of the material issues per sector that Vinci Partners invests or plans to invest. During the due diligence phase, we partner with specialized firms to confirm the initial materiality map and to investigate if additional material risks are present in the target company.

84

The team also developed an Environmental and Social Management System, or ESMS, to integrate ESG matters in its internal procedures and when monitoring portfolio companies. This approach enables our funds to mitigate ESG-related risks to companies and seek opportunities of value creation through ESG initiatives. Since 2020, the team publishes an ESG annual report for VCP III to provide updated information on ESMS performance and ESG issues of investee companies during the previous year.

Infrastructure

Our infrastructure strategy is also investing heavily in the ESG agenda. We are developing our VICC fund, focusing on investments that actively contribute to the climate agenda ranging from renewable energy generation and water supply to the efficient use of natural resources and reduced emissions from other sources. Our goal is to help to mitigate climate change globally. All investments made by VICC should also seek to increase diversity and inclusion across portfolio companies.

The complexity of infrastructure investments demands a robust due diligence regarding operational, financial and ESG aspects. Our funds have a strong governance policy, especially those related to government-controlled assets. Vinci Partners’ Water and Sewage strategy closed its first investment in 2021, the public concession of CEDAE Block III. The water and sewage sector is a key sector for ESG investments in Brazil. The fund also has alignment with ESG guidelines through sustainability metrics.

Real estate

Our listed REITs faced a challenging environment in 2022 and showed resilience due to our strong competitive position in the market and the team’s extensive track record. Robust governance in the funds’ investment and monitoring process was a key factor to navigate a difficult market environment.

Several of our invested real estate properties have LEED certifications, which reflect our commitment to green practices in our portfolio. In 2022, our Real Estate strategy, in partnership with our Credit group, raised funds our first agribusiness fund, VICA, which is advised by Chrimata. The agribusiness sector provides significant investment opportunities, which strengthens the ESG agenda with investment profile and materiality of the assets. Transparency and a robust due diligence are key for this investment process.

Credit

Our credit segment also has a group of funds dedicated to finance infrastructure projects and companies, such as Vinci Energia Sustentável, or VES, and Vinci Credit Infra. These funds have a series of ESG guidelines, such as a veto on investments in fossil fuels and compliance with social, labor and environmental rules and regulations. VES was funded by the BNDES and other relevant Brazilian institutional investors and was the first Brazilian fund to receive the ESG “European Standard” label. VES closed its investment period ahead of schedule, which reflects our team’s ability to manage this kind of asset.

Liquid Strategies

Our Liquid Strategies segment also has an important role regarding ESG practices. Our investment team developed an ESG-focused questionnaire, which is used for the evaluation of potential impact. This is taken in consideration for investment purposes and could lead to divestment from assets that do not fit the targeted profile. The team also focuses on investments that could lead to significant governance impacts, and partners with other groups in voting at shareholder meetings.

IP&S

When our IP&S team analyzes external managers in which to invest, they may also take into consideration ESG practices. A relevant portion of the business is funded by institutional investors, which require a complete asset monitoring process and a thorough due diligence process.

85

Fundraising

Vinci Partners’ distribution efforts are organized through four client divisions and one additional distribution channel: (1) local institutional clients, (2) institutional offshore clients, (3) HNWIs, (4) allocators and distributors, and (5) public markets vehicles. We have dedicated teams to reach out, advise and follow-up with each investor profile. Our public market vehicles are listed on the B3, and investors are able to trade quotas of the funds directly therein; for these products, we have an exclusive dedicated investor relations team.

Currently, our AUM is weighted toward long-term capital, with 51% committed for five years or more. Our platform offers a wide range of products across different strategies, and we are supported by a diverse investor base, with 34% of our AUM coming from local institutional clients as of December 31, 2022, followed by HNWIs with 24%, institutional offshore clients with 23%, and the remainder from retail clients and public market vehicles;

We believe we have a very loyal client base. Over 80% of our client base comes from proprietary relationships from our client division teams. Our proximity to our clients is a strong advantage, creating an open and transparent channel in order to understand their needs and propose solutions in every scenario.

86

The following table sets forth our AUM by type of investor as of the dates indicated.