Baxalta Selected Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data
The following table sets forth summary historical financial information for the periods indicated. The Baxalta selected combined income statement data for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the selected combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 have been derived from Baxaltas audited consolidated and combined financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
The Baxalta selected condensed consolidated and combined income statement data for the three months ended March 31, 2016
and March 31, 2015, and the selected condensed consolidated and combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2016 have been derived from Baxaltas unaudited condensed consolidated and combined interim financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited condensed consolidated and combined interim financial statement data has been prepared on a basis consistent
with which Baxaltas audited consolidated and combined financial statements have been prepared, except income taxes for the interim period which are based on the estimated effective tax for the full year, and in the opinion of management,
includes all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of such data. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
The consolidated and combined financial statements for periods prior to the separation were prepared on a carve-out basis for purposes of
presenting Baxaltas financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Baxalta did not operate as a standalone entity prior to the spin-off, and accordingly the summary financial data presented herein is not necessarily indicative of
Baxaltas future performance and does not reflect what Baxaltas financial performance would have been had the company operated as an independent publicly traded company during the periods presented.
The Baxalta consolidated and combined statement of income data disclosed below has been updated to retrospectively present earnings per share (EPS) for
periods prior to the completion of the separation and related transactions. The computation of basic EPS for all periods prior to the separation disclosed herein was calculated using the shares distributed and retained by Baxter on July 1, 2015
totaling 676 million. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS for the periods prior to separation also include 5 million of diluted common share equivalents for stock options, RSUs and PSUs as these share-based awards
were previously issued by Baxter and outstanding at the time of separation and were assumed by Baxalta following the separation.
The unaudited pro forma
combined statement of income data for the year ended December 31, 2015 assumes that the separation occurred as of January 1, 2015. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that Baxalta believes are
reasonable. The summary unaudited pro forma condensed financial information is for illustrative and informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what the financial position or results of operations would have been if Baxalta had
operated as an independent company during the periods presented or if the transactions described therein had actually occurred as of the date indicated, nor does it project the financial position at any future date or the results of operations for
any future period. Please see the notes to the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a discussion of adjustments reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements.
24
The summary financial information should be read in conjunction with the discussion in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Baxalta, Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements of Baxalta, including the corresponding notes thereto, and the audited
consolidated and combined financial statements and corresponding notes thereto and unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements and corresponding notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three
months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Pro Forma
2015
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
6,230
|
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,555
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
12,824
|
|
|
$
|
12,329
|
|
|
$
|
8,583
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5,317
|
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended March 31,
|
|
|
For the years ended
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income from continuing
operations
1
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
1,460
|
|
|
$
|
1,585
|
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
1
|
Adjusted net income from continuing operations is calculated as net income from continuing operations excluding
special items and is not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This non-GAAP financial measure excludes the impact of certain special items, which are excluded because they are highly variable, difficult to
predict, and of a size that may substantially impact the companys operations and can facilitate an additional analysis of the companys results of operations, particularly in evaluating performance from one period to another. Upfront and
milestone payments related to collaborative arrangements that have been expensed as research and development (R&D) are uncertain and often result in a different payment and expense recognition pattern than internal R&D activities and
therefore are typically excluded as special items. Intangible asset amortization is excluded to facilitate an evaluation of current and past operating performance, particularly in terms of cash returns, and is similar to how management internally
assesses performance. The companys management uses non-GAAP financial
|
25
|
measures to evaluate the companys performance and provides them to investors as a supplement to the companys reported results, as management believes this information provides
additional insight into the companys operating performance. This non-GAAP financial measure used by the company may be calculated differently from, and therefore may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other companies. In
addition, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation, as a substitute for, or as superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, and the companys financial results calculated in accordance with
GAAP and the following reconciliation to those financial statements should be carefully evaluated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three
months
ended
March 31,
|
|
|
For the years ended
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
Adjustments for special items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Business optimization items
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent payment liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Prescription Drug Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation- and integration-related costs
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset amortization expense
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Plasma-related litigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
84
|
|
Turkey VAT charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Business development items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process R&D and other impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency-related items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of special items on income taxes
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total special items, net of tax
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
1,460
|
|
|
$
|
1,585
|
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price and Dividend Information
The market prices of Baxter and Baxalta common stock are subject to fluctuation. The exchange ratio will be set based on the respective market prices of Baxter
and Baxalta common stock during the Averaging Period. As a result, you should, among other things, obtain current market quotations before deciding to tender your shares of Baxter common stock. There can be no assurance what the market price of
shares will be before, on, or after the date on which the exchange offer is completed. Baxter common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol BAX. Baxalta common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol BXLT.
26
Baxter
The following table describes the per share range of high and low sales prices, as reported by the NYSE, for shares of Baxter common stock and dividends
declared per share of Baxter common stock for the quarterly periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price for Baxter
Common Stock
|
|
|
Dividends
Declared
|
|
|
|
High
1
|
|
|
Low
1
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.29
|
|
|
$
|
34.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
39.27
|
|
|
$
|
37.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
40.36
|
|
|
$
|
37.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
39.71
|
|
|
$
|
35.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.97
|
|
|
$
|
35.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
39.05
|
|
|
$
|
34.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
43.44
|
|
|
$
|
33.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.115
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.79
|
|
|
$
|
32.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.115
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
41.50
|
|
|
$
|
34.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.115
|
|
Second Quarter (from April 1, 2016 through May 11, 2016)
|
|
$
|
46.51
|
|
|
$
|
40.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
(1)
|
All stock prices for periods preceding the July 1, 2015 separation of Baxalta are adjusted to reflect the high or low adjusted closing price for the period.
|
The declaration and payment of dividends to holders of Baxter common stock is at the discretion of Baxters board of directors in accordance with
applicable law after taking into account various factors.
As of April 30, 2016, there were 552,108,998 shares of Baxter common stock
outstanding, and 30,691 stockholders of record of shares of Baxter common stock.
On April 20, 2016, the NYSE trading day immediately preceding the
commencement of the exchange offer, the closing sales price per share of Baxter common stock as reported by the NYSE was $43.26.
Baxalta
The following table describes the per share range of high and low sales prices, as reported by the NYSE, for shares of Baxalta common stock and
dividends declared per share of Baxalta common stock for the quarterly periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price for
Baxalta
Common Stock
|
|
|
Dividends
Declared
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
40.90
|
|
|
$
|
29.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
40.24
|
|
|
$
|
30.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
42.38
|
|
|
$
|
36.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Second Quarter (from April 1, 2016 through May 11, 2016)
|
|
$
|
43.35
|
|
|
$
|
38.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
27
The declaration and payment of dividends to holders of common stock of Baxalta is at the discretion of
Baxaltas Board of Directors in accordance with applicable law after taking into account various factors. The merger agreement provides that Baxalta may not pay dividends on Baxalta common stock other than the regular quarterly cash dividends
not to exceed $0.07 per quarter.
On February 23, 2016, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share,
which was paid on April 1, 2016, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 10, 2016. On May 10, 2016, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share, which will be paid on July
1, 2016, to stockholders of record as of the close of trading on the NYSE on June 10, 2016. If the merger with Shire is completed on or prior to June 10, 2016, you will not receive the dividend declared on May 10, 2016. See Dividend
Policy. Holders of shares distributed in the exchange offer will have the right to participate in dividends, if any, distributed after completion of the exchange offer to the extent they hold the shares on the relevant record date. If Baxalta
determines to pay any dividend in the future, there can be no assurance that it will continue to pay such dividends or the amount of such dividends.
As
of April 30, 2016, there were 683,539,950 shares of Baxalta common stock outstanding. As of April 30, 2016, there were 30,892 registered holders of record of shares of Baxalta common stock. Immediately before the commencement of the exchange offer,
Baxter beneficially owned 30,506,097 shares of Baxalta common stock representing approximately 4.5% of Baxaltas outstanding common stock.
On
April 20, 2016, the last NYSE trading day immediately preceding the commencement of the exchange offer, the closing sales price per share of Baxalta common stock as reported by the NYSE was $40.66.
The Merger Agreement with Shire
The Merger
Agreement
On January 11, 2016, Shire, BearTracks, Inc. (Merger Sub), a wholly owned subsidiary of Shire, and Baxalta entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the merger agreement), pursuant to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into Baxalta, with Baxalta being the surviving corporation, and Baxalta will become a
wholly owned subsidiary of Shire (the merger).
On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, at the effective time of the
merger, each share of Baxalta common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (other than treasury shares of Baxalta and any shares of Baxalta common stock owned by Shire or any subsidiary of Shire
(including Merger Sub) or Baxalta, and other than shares of Baxalta common stock as to which dissenters rights have been properly exercised) will be canceled and converted into the right to receive both (i) $18.00 in cash, without
interest and (ii) 0.1482 of an American Depositary Share of Shire (the Shire ADS) duly and validly issued against Shires ordinary shares (the Shire ordinary shares), par value £0.05 per share (the per share stock
consideration), except that cash will be paid in lieu of fractional Shire ADSs. Although Shire has agreed to permit holders of Baxalta common stock to elect to receive 0.4446 of a Shire ordinary share for each outstanding share of Baxalta common
stock in lieu of the per share stock consideration, the deadline for making such election is expected to have passed before the exchange offer is complete.
Under the merger agreement, Shire agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to appoint Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D., chairman of the Baxalta Board of Directors,
and two additional members of the Baxalta Board, jointly selected by the chairman of the Baxalta Board and chairman of the Shire board of directors following consultation with the Nomination Committee of the Shire board, to the Shire board of
directors, effective upon the closing of the merger. Following the appointment of such directors, Shire agreed to nominate the same individuals as directors, to the extent such individuals are willing to serve and have complied in a satisfactory
manner, in the good faith reasonable judgment of the Shire board, with the attendance and performance
28
expectations of the Shire board, at the 2017 Shire stockholder meeting. Since the date of the merger agreement, Dr. Hockmeyer has decided to withdraw himself from consideration for such an
appointment due to personal reasons and therefore only two members of the Baxalta Board will be considered for nomination.
Because the record date for
the special meeting of the stockholders of Baxalta to approve the merger has already occurred, you will not be entitled to vote on the merger with Shire with respect to shares of Baxalta common stock you receive in the exchange offer.
The merger is expected to close in early June 2016, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions described in this prospectus. See The
TransactionsThe Proposed MergerMerger Agreement and BusinessThe Proposed Merger.
Information About Shire
According to publicly available information, Shire (LSE: SHP, NASDAQ: SHPG), a company incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands and based in
Dublin, Ireland, is a biopharmaceutical company that focuses on developing and marketing innovative medicines for patients with rare diseases and other specialty conditions.
Shire is required to file reports and other information with the SEC. On April 18, 2016, Shire filed a proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC with respect to
the merger. The proxy statement/prospectus has been declared effective by the SEC. Copies of these reports and other information regarding Shire, including information regarding Shires dividend policy and history and the market price
performance of Shire ADSs (listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market) and Shire ordinary shares (listed on the London Stock Exchange), may be inspected and copied at the SECs public reference room or website as specified under
Incorporation by ReferenceWhere You Can Find More Information About Baxter and Baxalta. However, such reports and other information are not incorporated by reference in this prospectus. This prospectus relates only to the common
stock of Baxalta being offered by Baxter in this offering and does not relate to the Shire ADSs, Shire ordinary shares or other securities of Shire. All disclosures contained in this prospectus regarding Shire are derived from the publicly available
reports and other information on file with the SEC, referred to above. We have not participated in the preparation of Shires reports and other information on file with the SEC, and none of Baxalta, Baxter or the dealer manager represent that
any such Shire reports or other information, or any other publicly available information regarding Shire, is accurate or complete.
None of Baxalta,
Baxter, the dealer manager, the information agent or the exchange agent can provide you with any assurance that all events occurring prior to the date of this prospectus, including events that would affect the accuracy or completeness of the
publicly available documents described in the preceding paragraph that would affect the trading price of the Shire ADSs or Shire ordinary shares, and therefore the trading price of Baxalta common stock, have been publicly disclosed. Subsequent
disclosure of any such event or the disclosure of or failure to disclose material future events concerning Shire could affect the trading price of Baxalta common stock. We, our affiliates, Baxter, the dealer manager, the information agent and the
exchange agent do not make any representation to you as to the performance of Shire, the Shire ADSs, the Shire ordinary shares or any other securities of Shire.
29
RISK FACTORS
In determining whether or not to tender your shares of Baxter common stock in the exchange offer, you should consider carefully all of the information about
Baxalta and Baxter included or incorporated by reference into this prospectus, as well as the information about the terms and conditions of the exchange offer. None of Baxter, Baxalta or any of their respective directors or officers, the dealer
manager, the information agent, the exchange agent or any other person makes any recommendation as to whether you should tender all, some or none of your shares of Baxter common stock. You must make your own decision after reading this prospectus
and consulting with your advisors.
The risk factors described below are separated into five groups:
|
1.
|
Risks Related to the Exchange Offer;
|
|
2.
|
Risks Related to Baxaltas Business;
|
|
3.
|
Risks Related to the Separation and Distribution;
|
|
4.
|
Risks Related to Baxaltas Common Stock; and
|
|
5.
|
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger with Shire.
|
Risks Related to Baxaltas Business,
Risks Related to the Separation and Distribution and Risks Related to Baxaltas Common Stock describe the material risks relating to Baxaltas business and ownership of Baxalta common stock. For a description of the
material risks relating to Baxter, please read Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information in Baxters Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and Forward-Looking Information in
Baxters Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2016, which reports are incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
The occurrence of the events described below under Risks Related to Baxaltas Business and Risks Related to Baxaltas Common
Stock could have a material adverse effect on Baxaltas businesses, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. If the merger is consummated, the occurrence of certain of the events described below under
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger with Shire could have a material adverse effect on the combined companys business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. In such a case, the price of shares of
Baxalta common stock, or the combined companys common stock if the merger is consummated, may decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. In addition, other unknown or unpredictable economic, business, competitive, regulatory,
geopolitical or other factors could have material adverse effects on Baxaltas, Baxters or the combined companys businesses, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. Please read Cautionary
Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.
Risks Related to the Exchange Offer
Your investment will be subject to different risks after the completion of the exchange offer regardless of whether you elect to participate in the
exchange offer.
Your investment will be subject to different risks as a result of the completion of the exchange offer, regardless of whether you
tender all, some or none of your shares of Baxter common stock.
|
|
|
If you exchange all of your shares of Baxter common stock and the exchange offer is not oversubscribed, then you will no longer have an ownership interest in Baxter, but instead will directly own only an interest in
Baxalta. As a result, your investment will be subject exclusively to risks associated with Baxalta and not risks associated solely with Baxter.
|
|
|
|
If you exchange all of your shares of Baxter common stock and the exchange offer is oversubscribed, then the offer will be subject to the proration procedures described in this prospectus and, unless your odd-lot tender
is not subject to proration, you will own a direct interest in both Baxter and Baxalta. As a result, your investment will continue to be subject to risks associated with both Baxter and Baxalta.
|
30
|
|
|
If you exchange some, but not all, of your shares of Baxter common stock, then regardless of whether the exchange offer is fully subscribed, the number of shares of Baxter common stock you own will decrease (unless you
otherwise acquire shares of Baxter common stock), while the number of shares of Baxalta common stock you own will increase. As a result, your investment will continue to be subject to risks associated with both Baxter and Baxalta.
|
|
|
|
If you do not exchange any of your shares of Baxter common stock and if Baxter disposes of all of the remaining shares of Baxalta common stock held by it in the exchange offer, then your ownership interest in Baxter
will increase on a percentage basis, while your indirect ownership in Baxalta will be eliminated (unless you otherwise own shares of Baxalta common stock). As a result, your investment would be subject exclusively to risks associated with Baxter and
not risks associated with Baxalta because Baxter would no longer have an ownership interest in Baxalta.
|
Regardless of whether you tender
your shares of Baxter common stock, the shares you hold after the completion of the exchange offer will reflect a different investment from the investment you previously held.
The exchange offer and related transactions will result in Baxalta common stock entering the market, which may adversely affect the market price of
Baxalta common stock.
Before the exchange offer, Baxter owned 30,506,097 shares of Baxalta common stock (or approximately 4.5% of the total
number of outstanding Baxalta shares as of April 30, 2016). Assuming the exchange offer is fully subscribed and completed, Baxter will distribute 13,360,527 shares of Baxalta common stock. If Baxter does not dispose of all of the remaining
shares of Baxalta common stock held by it in the exchange offer, Baxalta has been advised by Baxter that Baxter will continue to hold shares of Baxalta common stock. Baxter intends to, prior to or following the completion of the exchange offer,
complete a distribution via a special dividend or make a contribution to Baxters U.S. pension fund prior to any Shire or Baxalta shareholder vote with respect to the merger, which are expected to be taken at meetings held on May 27, 2016, and,
in any event, during the
18-month
period following the distribution on July 1, 2015. Baxter is currently in the process of finalizing a contribution of 17,145,570 shares of Baxalta common stock to its U.S.
pension fund. To the extent Baxter holds any Baxalta common stock or Shire Securities received in exchange for such common stock pursuant to the merger at the end of the 18-month period, as the case may be, Baxter has advised us that it will dispose
of such stock in one or more transactions (including potentially through underwritten equity offerings) as soon as practicable thereafter, taking into account market conditions and its business judgment, but in no event later than five years after
the distribution. The distribution of such number of shares of Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer and/or via a dividend could adversely affect the market price of Baxalta common stock as could sales of Baxalta common stock by the U.S.
pension fund.
Following the completion of the exchange offer, shares of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock will fluctuate and the
final per-share values used in determining the exchange ratio may not be indicative of future trading prices.
The common stock price history for
shares of Baxter and Baxalta may not provide investors with a meaningful basis for evaluating an investment in either companys common stock. Baxalta has been a publicly traded company only since July 1, 2015. As a result, the prior
performance of Baxter and Baxalta common stock may not be indicative of the performance of their common stock after the exchange offer. In addition, the indicative and final per-share values used in determining the exchange ratio may not be
indicative of the prices at which Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock (or, if the merger is consummated, Shire Securities issued in exchange for Baxalta common stock) will trade after the exchange offer is completed. See The
TransactionsThe Proposed MergerMerger Agreement.
Tendering Baxter stockholders may receive a reduced discount or may not receive
any discount in the exchange offer.
The exchange offer is designed to permit you to exchange your shares of Baxter common stock for shares of
Baxalta common stock at a 7% discount. Stated another way, subject to the limitations described below, for
31
each $100 of your shares of Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer, you will receive approximately $107.52 of Baxalta common stock based on the Average Baxter Price and the Average
Baxalta Price. The $100 value of Baxter common stock and approximate $107.52 value of Baxalta common stock will be determined as of the last day of the Averaging Period.
The number of shares you can receive is, however, subject to an upper limit of 1.4026 shares of Baxalta common stock for each share of Baxter common stock
accepted in the exchange offer. The upper limit ensures that any unusual or unexpected decrease in the trading price of Baxalta common stock, relative to the trading price of Baxter common stock, would not result in an unduly high number of shares
of Baxalta common stock being exchanged for each share of Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer. As a result, you may receive less than $107.52 of Baxalta common stock for each $100 of Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer,
depending on the Average Baxter Price and the Average Baxalta Price. Because of the upper limit, if there is a decrease of sufficient magnitude in the trading price for shares of Baxalta common stock relative to the trading price of shares of Baxter
common stock, or if there is an increase of sufficient magnitude in the trading price for shares of Baxter common stock relative to the trading price for shares of Baxalta common stock, you may not receive $107.52 of Baxalta common stock for each
$100 of Baxter common stock accepted, and could receive much less.
In addition, there is no assurance that shares of Baxalta common stock received in the
exchange offer will be able to be sold at prices comparable to the Average Baxalta Price.
There may also be circumstances under which you would receive
fewer shares of Baxalta common stock than you would have received if the exchange ratio were determined using the closing prices for shares of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock on the expiration date of the exchange offer. For example, if
the trading price of shares of Baxter common stock were to increase during the last two trading days of the exchange offer period, the Average Baxter Price would likely be lower than the closing price of shares of Baxter common stock on the
expiration date of the exchange offer. As a result, you may receive fewer shares of Baxalta common stock for each $100 of Baxter common stock than you would have if the Average Baxter Price were calculated on the basis of the closing price of shares
of Baxter common stock on the expiration date or on the basis of an Averaging Period that includes the last two trading days of the exchange offer. Similarly, if the trading price of Baxalta common stock were to decrease during the last two trading
days of the exchange offer, the Average Baxalta Price would likely be higher than the closing price of shares of Baxalta common stock on the expiration date of the exchange offer. This could also result in your receiving fewer shares of Baxalta
common stock for each $100 of Baxter common stock than you would otherwise receive if the Average Baxalta Price were calculated on the basis of the closing price of shares of Baxalta common stock on the expiration date or on the basis of an
Averaging Period that includes the last two trading days of the exchange offer.
Participating Baxter stockholders will experience some delay in
receiving shares of Baxalta common stock (and cash in lieu of fractional shares of Baxalta common stock, if any) for shares of Baxter common stock that are accepted in the exchange offer.
Tendering Baxter stockholders whose shares of Baxter common stock have been accepted for exchange may not be able to sell the shares of Baxalta common stock to
be received until the distribution of shares of Baxalta common stock to individual stockholders has been completed. Consequently, if the market price for shares of Baxalta common stock should decrease or increase during that period, the relevant
stockholder may not be able to stop any losses or recognize any gain by selling the shares of Baxalta common stock. Similarly, you will not be able to invest cash in lieu of fractional shares of Baxalta common stock, if any, until the distribution
of such cash has been completed, and you will not receive interest payments for this time period.
32
Market prices for shares of Baxter common stock may be impacted by the exchange offer.
Investors may purchase shares of Baxter common stock in order to participate in the exchange offer, which may have the effect of raising market prices for
shares of Baxter common stock during the pendency of the exchange offer. Following the completion of the exchange offer, the market prices for shares of Baxter common stock may decline because any exchange offer-related demand for shares of Baxter
common stock will cease.
In addition, following the completion of the exchange offer, the market prices for shares of Baxter common stock may decline
because Baxter may no longer have any ownership interest in Baxalta.
The exchange offer could result in significant tax liability.
Baxter received a ruling from the IRS and a tax opinion from KPMG that collectively provided that the distribution on July 1, 2015 qualified as a tax-free
transaction under Sections 355, 361 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. Such ruling and tax opinion also collectively provided for a tax-free exchange of shares of Baxter common stock for shares of Baxalta common stock within 18 months of the
distribution. Baxter also received an opinion from KPMG on specific issues relating to the exchange offer. Based on the foregoing and Baxters belief of the continuing applicability of the IRS ruling, Baxter believes that it will not recognize
gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the exchange offer and holders of Baxter common stock who participate in the exchange offer will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the receipt of shares of
Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer. A U.S. holder of Baxter stock generally will recognize capital gain or loss with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Baxalta common stock. Completion by Baxter of the exchange offer
will be conditioned on, among other things, the continuing application of Baxters private letter ruling from the IRS.
Although the IRS private
letter ruling is generally binding on the IRS, the continuing validity of such ruling is subject to the completeness of facts and accuracy of factual representations and assumptions made in the ruling. The opinions of KPMG are based upon various
factual representations and assumptions, as well as certain undertakings made by Baxter and Baxalta. If any of the factual representations or assumptions in the IRS private letter ruling or tax opinions are untrue or incomplete in any material
respect, an undertaking is not complied with, or the facts upon which the IRS private letter ruling or tax opinions are based are materially different from the actual facts relating to the exchange offer, the IRS private letter ruling or tax
opinions may not be valid and Baxter and its stockholders could be subject to significant tax liabilities. The opinions of KPMG also are solely limited to the U.S. federal income tax consequences set forth therein and do not address any other tax
consequences. Neither the IRS private letter ruling nor the tax opinions took into account the merger. Moreover, opinions of a tax advisor are not binding on the IRS. As a result, the conclusions expressed in the opinion of a tax advisor could be
successfully challenged by the IRS, and if the IRS prevails in such challenge, the tax consequences to you of the exchange offer could be materially less favorable.
If the exchange offer were determined not to qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and 361 of the Code,
each Baxter stockholder who receives shares of Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer would generally be treated as recognizing gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares
of Baxalta common stock received by the stockholder and its tax basis in the shares of Baxter common stock exchanged therefor, or, in certain circumstances, as receiving a taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of the shares of Baxalta
common stock received by the stockholder.
In addition, Baxter would recognize gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between
the fair market value and the tax basis of Baxters investment in Baxalta common stock disposed of in the exchange offer and possibly with respect to certain related transactions.
If the exchange offer and/or certain related transactions are determined to be taxable, Baxter and its stockholders could incur significant tax liabilities,
and under the tax matters agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, between Baxter and Baxalta, and the letter agreement, dated as of January 11, 2016, among Baxter, Baxalta and Shire.
33
Baxalta may be required to indemnify Baxter for any liabilities incurred by Baxter if the liabilities are caused by any action or inaction undertaken by Baxalta following the distribution on July
1, 2015 (including as a result of the merger).
For a description of the potential effect of the merger on the tax treatment of the Baxter Transactions,
including this exchange offer, refer to the section of this prospectus entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Proposed Merger with ShireThe merger could result in significant liability to Baxalta and Shire if it causes the
Baxter Transactions to be taxable.
Because the record date for the special meeting of stockholders of Baxalta to approve the merger has
already occurred, you will not be entitled to vote on the merger with Shire with respect to shares of Baxalta common stock you receive in the exchange offer.
Baxalta set April 11, 2016 as the record date for stockholders of Baxalta entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting of stockholders at which the
merger will be submitted for approval. Because the record date for the special meeting of stockholders has already occurred, you will not become the owner of Baxalta common stock as of the record date as a result of participating in the exchange
offer and, unless you otherwise own shares of Baxalta common stock, you will not be entitled to vote on the merger, nor to receive notice of any appraisal rights in connection with the merger. In addition, you will not be entitled to receive the
proxy statement/prospectus distributed to Baxalta stockholders in connection with the special meeting.
Risks Related to Baxaltas Business
If Baxalta is unable to successfully introduce new products, encounters negative developments with respect to its existing products or fails to
keep pace with advances in technology, Baxaltas business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Baxalta
currently relies on the revenues generated from its principal products, including ADVATE, FEIBA and GAMMAGARD LIQUID. Although Baxalta has developed and continues to develop additional products for commercial introduction, the company may be
substantially dependent on sales from these products for many years. Any negative developments relating to any of these products, such as safety or efficacy issues, the introduction or greater acceptance of competing products, constraints on product
pricing or price increases, changes in reimbursement policies of third parties or adverse regulatory or legislative developments, may reduce Baxaltas revenues and adversely affect the companys results of operations.
Baxalta needs to successfully introduce new products to achieve its strategic business objectives. Product development requires substantial investment, and
there is inherent risk in the research and development process. A successful product development process depends on many factors, including Baxaltas ability to properly anticipate and satisfy customer needs, adapt to new technologies, obtain
regulatory approvals on a timely basis, demonstrate satisfactory clinical results, manufacture products in an economical and timely manner and differentiate Baxaltas products from those of its competitors. If Baxalta cannot successfully
introduce new products or adapt to changing technologies, the companys products may become obsolete and its revenue and profitability could suffer.
In November 2015, Baxalta received regulatory approval for ADYNOVATE in the United States. ADYNOVATE is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII)
treatment for hemophilia A based on ADVATE. While ADVATE is expected to continue to be an important revenue-driver for the company, ADYNOVATE is an alternative for patients preferring an extended half-life treatment, which allows for fewer doses and
may be preferable in terms of convenience to some patients. If the company does not receive regulatory approvals for the commercialization of ADYNOVATE outside of the United States, or if the company is unable to successfully execute on its plans to
commercialize ADYNOVATE, Baxaltas future revenue growth and results of operations may be adversely affected to the extent that extended half-life and similar products otherwise adversely affect ADVATE results. Along with the risk that
additional regulatory approvals may not be received, factors that may prevent the company from successfully meeting its plans for the launch and commercialization of ADYNOVATE include the availability of competitive products; any reputational damage
34
that may result from adverse experiences or events that may occur with patients treated with ADYNOVATE; any successful challenge with respect to rights in the companys exclusive ownership
of the PEGylation technology utilized in ADYNOVATE; and other risks described in these Risk Factors related to the operation of the companys business and the sales of products of the business.
Baxaltas pipeline also includes additional extended half-life therapies for hemophilia A and other potential new treatments for hemophilia A and B
(including gene therapy) and a recombinant treatment for patients with inhibitors, as well as treatments in other areas of unmet medical need (including oncology), each of which remains subject to additional clinical development risks in addition to
the factors listed above. For a discussion of Baxaltas R&D activities and product pipeline, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of BaxaltaExecutive
SummaryResearch and Development and External Innovation and BusinessBuilding a Diversified Biopharmaceutical Pipeline, respectively.
Issues with product quality could have a material adverse effect upon Baxaltas business, subject Baxalta to regulatory actions and cause a loss of
customer confidence in Baxalta or its products.
Baxaltas success depends upon the quality of its products. Quality management plays an
essential role in meeting customer requirements, preventing defects, improving the companys products and services and assuring the safety and efficacy of Baxaltas products. Baxaltas future success depends on its ability to maintain
and continuously improve its quality management program. While Baxalta has one quality system deployed globally that covers the lifecycle of its products, quality and safety issues may occur with respect to any of these products at any stage. A
quality or safety issue may result in adverse inspection reports, warning letters, product recalls or seizures, monetary sanctions, injunctions to halt manufacture and distribution of products, civil or criminal sanctions, costly litigation, refusal
of a government to grant approvals and licenses, restrictions on operations or withdrawal of existing approvals and licenses. An inability to address a quality or safety issue in an effective and timely manner may also cause negative publicity, a
loss of customer confidence in Baxalta or its current or future products, which may result in the loss of sales and difficulty in successfully launching new products. Additionally, Baxalta has made and continues to make significant investments in
assets, including inventory and property, plant and equipment, which relate to potential new products or modifications to existing products. Product quality or safety issues may restrict the company from being able to realize the expected returns
from these investments, potentially resulting in asset impairments in the future.
Unaffiliated third party suppliers provide a number of goods and
services to Baxaltas R&D, clinical and manufacturing organizations. Third party suppliers are required to comply with Baxaltas quality standards. Failure of a third party supplier to provide compliant raw materials or supplies could
result in delays, service interruptions or other quality related issues that may negatively impact Baxaltas business results. In addition, some of the raw materials employed in Baxaltas production processes are derived from human and
animal origins, requiring robust controls to eliminate the potential for introduction of pathogenic agents or other contaminants.
Baxalta is
subject to a number of existing laws and regulations, non-compliance with which could adversely affect Baxaltas business, financial condition and results of operations, and Baxalta is susceptible to a changing regulatory environment.
As a biopharmaceutical company, Baxaltas operations and products, and those of its customers, are regulated by numerous government agencies,
both inside and outside the United States. The impact of this on Baxalta is direct to the extent the company is subject to these laws and regulations, and indirect in that in a number of situations, even though the company may not be directly
regulated by specific biopharmaceutical laws and regulations, Baxaltas products must be capable of being used by its customers in a manner that complies with those laws and regulations.
The manufacture, distribution, marketing and use of Baxaltas products are subject to extensive regulation and scrutiny by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and other regulatory authorities globally. In particular, regulation of the development, manufacture and sale of biologics (including biosimilars) may be more complex
35
and require greater expenditures than the regulations applicable to other pharmaceutical products. Any new product must undergo lengthy and rigorous testing and other extensive, costly and
time-consuming procedures mandated by FDA and foreign regulatory authorities. Changes to current products may be subject to vigorous review, including multiple regulatory submissions, and approvals are not certain. Baxaltas facilities must be
licensed prior to production and remain subject to inspection from time to time thereafter. Failure to comply with the requirements of FDA or other regulatory authorities, including a failed inspection or a failure in Baxaltas adverse event
reporting system, could result in adverse inspection reports, warning letters, product recalls or seizures, monetary sanctions, injunctions to halt the manufacture and distribution of products, civil or criminal sanctions, refusal of a government to
grant approvals or licenses, restrictions on operations or withdrawal of existing approvals and licenses. Any of these actions could cause a loss of customer confidence in Baxalta and its products, which could adversely affect the companys
sales. The requirements of regulatory authorities, including interpretative guidance, are subject to change and compliance with additional or changing requirements or interpretative guidance may subject the company to further review, result in
product launch delays or otherwise increase Baxaltas costs. For information on current regulatory issues affecting Baxalta, see BusinessRegulation. In connection with these issues, there can be no assurance that additional
costs or civil and criminal penalties will not be incurred, that additional regulatory actions with respect to the company will not occur, that the company will not face civil claims for damages from purchasers or users, that substantial additional
charges or significant asset impairments may not be required, that sales of other products may not be adversely affected, or that additional regulation will not be introduced that may adversely affect the companys operations and consolidated
and combined financial statements.
The sales, marketing and pricing of products and relationships that biopharmaceutical companies have with healthcare
providers are under increased scrutiny by federal, state and foreign government agencies. Compliance with the Anti-Kickback Statute, False Claims Act, Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (including the parts that relate to off-label promotion of
products) and other healthcare related laws, as well as competition, data and patient privacy and export and import laws, is under increased focus by the agencies charged with overseeing such activities, including FDA, the Office of the Inspector
General within the Department of Health and Human Services (OIG), the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission. The DOJ and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have also increased their focus on the enforcement of
the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), particularly as it relates to the conduct of biopharmaceutical companies. The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their employees, contractors or agents from making
improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Healthcare professionals in many countries are employed by the government and consequently may be considered government officials. Foreign governments have
also increased their scrutiny of biopharmaceutical companies sales and marketing activities and relationships with healthcare providers and competitive practices generally. The laws and standards governing the promotion, sale and reimbursement
of Baxaltas products and those governing Baxaltas relationships with healthcare providers and governments, including the Sunshine Act enacted under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), can be complicated, are subject
to frequent change and may be violated unknowingly. Baxalta has compliance programs in place, including policies, training and various forms of monitoring, designed to address these risks. Nonetheless, these programs and policies may not always
protect the company from conduct by individual employees that violate these laws. Violations, or allegations of violations, of these laws may result in large civil and criminal penalties, debarment from participating in government programs,
diversion of management time, attention and resources and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on Baxaltas business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information related to Baxaltas ethics and compliance
programs, see BusinessEthics and Compliance. For more information related to Baxaltas legal proceedings, refer to Note 16 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus.
The laws and regulations discussed above are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could require Baxalta to incur substantial cost
associated with compliance or to alter one or more of the companys sales and marketing practices and may subject the company to enforcement actions which could adversely affect Baxaltas business, financial condition and results of
operations.
36
Baxaltas products face substantial competition in the product markets in which it operates.
Baxalta faces substantial competition throughout its business from international and domestic biopharmaceutical companies of all sizes.
Competition is primarily focused on cost-effectiveness, price, service, product effectiveness and quality, patient convenience and technological innovation.
Competition may increase further as existing competitors enhance their offerings or additional companies enter Baxaltas markets or modify their existing
products to compete directly with Baxaltas products. If Baxaltas competitors respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, the companys products may be rendered obsolete or
non-competitive. If Baxaltas competitors develop more effective or affordable products, or achieve earlier patent protection or product commercialization than the company does, its operations will likely be negatively affected. If Baxalta is
forced to reduce its prices due to increased competition, Baxaltas business could become less profitable. The companys sales could be adversely affected if any of its contracts with customers (including with hospitals, treatment centers
and other health care providers, distributors, group purchasing organizations and integrated delivery networks) are terminated due to increased competition or otherwise.
If Baxaltas business development activities are unsuccessful, Baxaltas business could suffer and Baxaltas financial performance could
be adversely affected.
As part of Baxaltas long-term strategy, Baxalta is engaged in business development activities including evaluating
and consummating acquisitions, joint research and development opportunities, technology licensing arrangements and other opportunities. These activities may result in substantial investment of the companys resources. Baxaltas success
developing products or expanding into new markets from such activities will depend on a number of factors, including Baxaltas ability to find suitable opportunities for acquisition, investment or alliance; whether Baxalta is able to complete
an acquisition, investment or alliance on terms that are satisfactory to the company; the strength of the other companys underlying technology, products and ability to execute its business strategies; any intellectual property and litigation
related to these products or technology; and Baxaltas ability to successfully integrate the acquired company, business, product, technology or research into Baxaltas existing operations, including the ability to adequately fund acquired
in-process research and development projects and to maintain adequate controls over the combined operations. Certain of these activities are subject to antitrust and competition laws, which laws could impact Baxaltas ability to pursue
strategic transactions and could result in mandated divestitures in the context of proposed acquisitions. If Baxalta is unsuccessful in its business development activities, the company may be unable to meet its financial targets and Baxaltas
financial performance could be adversely affected.
For more information on recent business development activities, see Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of BaxaltaExecutive SummaryResearch and Development and External Innovation, BusinessResearch and Development Activities and
BusinessCollaborations.
Baxaltas growth strategy depends upon its ability to expand its product portfolio through external
collaborations, which, if unsuccessful, may adversely affect the development and sale of its products.
Baxalta intends to continue to explore
opportunities to enter into collaboration agreements and external alliances with other parties, focusing on hematology, oncology and immunology. These third party collaborators may include other biopharmaceutical companies, academic and research
institutions, governments and government agencies and other public and private research organizations.
These third party collaborators are often directly
responsible for clinical development under these types of arrangements, and Baxalta does not have the same level of decision-making capabilities for the prioritization and management of development-related activities as it does for its internal
research and development activities. Failures by these partners to meet their contractual, regulatory, or other obligations to Baxalta, or any disruption in the relationships between Baxalta and these partners, could have a material adverse effect
on Baxaltas pipeline and business. In addition, Baxaltas collaborative relationships for research and development extend for
37
many years and may give rise to disputes regarding the relative rights, obligations and revenues of Baxalta and its partners, including the ownership of intellectual property and associated
rights and obligations. These could result in the loss of intellectual property rights or other intellectual property protections, delay the development and sale of potential pharmaceutical products, and lead to lengthy and expensive litigation or
arbitration.
Long-term public-private partnerships with governments and government agencies, including in certain emerging markets, may include
technology transfers to support local manufacturing capacity and technical expertise. Baxalta cannot predict whether these types of transfers and arrangements will become more common in the future. These types of technology transfers and similar
arrangements could have a material adverse effect on the companys results of operations as a result of lost exclusivity with respect to certain manufacturing and technical capabilities, particularly if this model becomes widely used.
Public-private partnerships are also subject to risks of doing business with governments and government agencies, including risks related to sovereign immunity, shifts in the political environment, changing economic and legal conditions and social
dynamics.
For more information on Baxaltas current pipeline, see BusinessBuilding a Diversified Biopharmaceutical Pipeline.
If reimbursement or other payment for Baxaltas current or future products is reduced or modified in the United States or abroad, including through
the implementation of government-sponsored healthcare reform or other similar actions, cost containment measures, or changes to policies with respect to pricing, taxation or rebates, then Baxaltas business could suffer.
Sales of Baxaltas products depend, in part, on the extent to which the costs of its products are paid by both public and private payors. These payors
include Medicare, Medicaid and private health care insurers in the United States and foreign governments and third-party payors outside the United States. Public and private payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for pharmaceutical
products and services. Baxalta may continue to experience continued downward pricing pressures from any or all of these payors which could result in a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and operational results.
Global efforts toward healthcare cost containment continue to exert pressure on product pricing. Governments around the world use various mechanisms to
control healthcare expenditures such as price controls, the formation of public contracting authorities, product formularies (lists of recommended or approved products), and competitive tenders which require the submission of a bid to sell products.
Sales of Baxaltas products are dependent, in part, on the availability of reimbursement by government agencies and healthcare programs, as well as insurance companies and other private payors. In much of Europe, Latin America, Asia and
Australia, for example, the government provides healthcare at low cost to patients, and controls its expenditures by purchasing products through public tenders, collective purchasing, regulating prices, setting reference prices in public tenders or
limiting reimbursement or patient access to certain products. Additionally, austerity measures or other reforms by foreign governments may limit, reduce or eliminate payments for Baxaltas products and adversely affect both pricing flexibility
and demand for its products.
For example, in the United States, the PPACA, which was signed into law in March 2010, includes several provisions that
impact Baxaltas businesses in the United States, including increased Medicaid rebates and an expansion of the 340B Drug Pricing Program, which provides certain qualified entities, such as hospitals serving disadvantaged populations, with
discounts on the purchase of drugs for outpatient use and an excise tax on the sale of certain drugs. Baxalta may also experience downward pricing pressure as the PPACA reduces Medicare and Medicaid payments to hospitals and other providers. While
it is intended to expand health insurance coverage and increase access to medical care generally, the long-term impact of the PPACA on Baxaltas business and the demand for the companys products is uncertain.
As a result of these and other measures, including future measures or reforms that cannot be predicted, reimbursement may not be available or sufficient to
allow Baxalta to sell its products on a competitive basis. Legislation and regulations affecting reimbursement for Baxaltas products may change at any time and in ways
38
that may be adverse to Baxalta. Baxalta cannot predict the impact of these pressures and initiatives, or any negative effects of any additional regulations that may affect the companys
business.
The nature of producing plasma-based therapies may prevent Baxalta from timely responding to market forces and effectively managing its
production capacity.
The production of plasma-based therapies is a lengthy and complex process, and Baxalta sources its plasma both externally and
internally through BioLife Plasma Services L.P. (BioLife), its wholly owned subsidiary. Efforts to increase the collection of plasma or the production of plasma-based therapies may include the construction and regulatory approval of additional
plasma collection facilities and plasma fractionation facilities. Baxalta is in the process of building a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility near Covington, Georgia to support growth of its plasma-based treatments, with commercial production
scheduled to begin in 2018. The development of such facilities involves a lengthy regulatory process and is highly capital intensive. In addition, access to and transport and use of plasma may be subject to restrictions by governmental agencies both
inside and outside the United States. As a result, Baxaltas ability to match its collection and production of plasma-based therapies to market demand is imprecise and may result in a failure to meet market demand for its plasma-based therapies
or, alternatively, an oversupply of inventory. Failure to meet market demand for Baxaltas plasma-based therapies may result in customers transitioning to available competitive products resulting in a loss of market share or customer
confidence. In the event of an oversupply, Baxalta may be forced to lower the prices it charges for some of its plasma-based therapies, close collection and processing facilities, record asset impairment charges or take other action which may
adversely affect Baxaltas business, financial condition and results of operations.
If Baxalta is unable to obtain sufficient components or
raw materials on a timely basis or if it experiences other manufacturing or supply difficulties, its business may be adversely affected.
The
manufacture of Baxaltas products requires the timely delivery of sufficient amounts of quality materials. Baxalta manufactures its products in more than ten manufacturing facilities around the world. Baxalta acquires its materials from many
suppliers in various countries and works closely with its suppliers to ensure the continuity of supply, but cannot guarantee these efforts will always be successful. Further, while efforts are made to diversify its sources of components and
materials, in certain instances Baxalta acquires components and materials from a sole supplier. For most of its components and materials for which a sole supplier is used, Baxalta believes that alternative sources of supply exist and has made a
strategic determination to use a sole supplier. In very limited instances, however, including with respect to a single material used in ADVATE, ADYNOVATE and HYQVIA, Baxalta relies on sole supplier relationships for which no alternatives have
currently been identified. Although Baxalta does carry strategic inventory and maintains insurance to mitigate the potential risk related to any related supply disruption, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective. Due to the
regulatory environment in which it operates, Baxalta may be unable to quickly establish additional or replacement sources for some materials. A reduction or interruption in supply, and an inability to develop alternative sources for such supply,
could adversely affect Baxaltas ability to manufacture its products in a timely or cost-effective manner or to make product sales.
Many of
Baxaltas products are difficult to manufacture. This is due to the complex nature of manufacturing pharmaceuticals, particularly biologics, as well as the strict regulatory regimes governing the companys manufacturing operations.
Variations in the manufacturing process may result in production failures which could lead to launch delays, product shortages, unanticipated costs, lost revenues and damage to the companys reputation. A failure to identify and address
manufacturing problems prior to the release of products to the companys customers may also result in quality or safety issues, which could result in significant recalls, remediations or other costs.
Several of Baxaltas products are manufactured at a single manufacturing facility or stored at a single storage site. Loss or damage to a manufacturing
facility or storage site due to a natural disaster or otherwise could adversely affect the companys ability to manufacture sufficient quantities of key products or otherwise deliver
39
products to meet customer demand or contractual requirements which may result in a loss of revenue and other adverse business consequences. Because of the time required to obtain regulatory
approval and licensing of a manufacturing facility, a third party manufacturer may not be available on a timely basis to replace production capacity in the event the company loses manufacturing capacity or products are otherwise not available due to
natural disaster, regulatory action or otherwise.
If Baxalta is unable to protect its patents or other proprietary rights, or if Baxalta infringes
the patents or other proprietary rights of others, its competitiveness and business prospects may be materially damaged.
Patent and other
proprietary rights are essential to Baxaltas business. Baxaltas success depends to a significant degree on its ability to obtain and enforce patents and licenses to patent rights, both in the United States and in other countries. Baxalta
cannot guarantee that pending patent applications will result in issued patents, that patents issued or licensed will not be challenged or circumvented by competitors, that the patents and other intellectual property rights of Baxalta and its
business partners will not be found to be invalid or that the intellectual property rights of others will not prevent the company from selling its products or from executing on its strategies.
The patent position of a biopharmaceutical company is often uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions. Significant litigation concerning
patents and products is pervasive in Baxaltas industry. Patent claims include challenges to the coverage and validity of Baxaltas patents on products or processes as well as allegations that Baxaltas products infringe patents held
by competitors or other third parties. A loss in any of these types of cases could result in a loss of patent protection or the ability to market products, which could lead to a significant loss of sales, or otherwise materially affect future
results of operations. Baxalta also relies on trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how to develop, maintain and strengthen Baxaltas competitive positions. Third parties may know, discover or independently develop equivalent
proprietary information or techniques, or they may gain access to Baxaltas trade secrets or disclose Baxaltas trade secrets to the public.
Although Baxalta employees, consultants, parties to collaboration agreements and other business partners are generally subject to confidentiality or similar
agreements to protect the companys confidential and proprietary information, these agreements may be breached, and the company may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, Baxaltas trade secrets may otherwise become known
or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that Baxaltas employees, consultants, parties to collaboration agreements and other business partners use intellectual property owned by others in their work for the company,
disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
Furthermore, Baxaltas intellectual property, other proprietary
technology and other sensitive company data is potentially vulnerable to loss, damage or misappropriation from system malfunction, computer viruses, unauthorized access to data or misappropriation or misuse thereof by those with permitted access and
other events. While the company has invested to protect its intellectual property and other data, and continues to work diligently in this area, there can be no assurance that its precautionary measures will prevent breakdowns, breaches, cyber
incidents or other events. Such events could have a material adverse effect on the companys reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.
Misappropriation or other loss of Baxaltas intellectual property from any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the companys
competitive position and may cause it to incur substantial litigation costs.
Baxalta faces competition in the development of relationships with
research, academic and governmental institutions.
Baxalta faces competition for marketing, distribution and collaborative development agreements,
for establishing relationships with academic and research institutions, and for licenses to intellectual property. In addition, academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations may also conduct
40
research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for discovery, research, clinical development and marketing of products similar to Baxaltas products. These
companies and institutions compete with Baxalta in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to Baxaltas programs. If Baxalta is unable to successfully compete
with these companies and institutions, its business may suffer.
Baxalta is subject to risks associated with doing business globally.
Baxaltas operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business globally and under the laws, regulations and customs of various jurisdictions
and geographies. These risks include changes in exchange controls and other governmental actions, loss of business in government and public tenders that are held annually in many cases, increasingly complex labor environments, availability of raw
materials, changes in taxation, export control restrictions, changes in or violations of U.S. or local laws (including the FCPA and the United Kingdom Bribery Act), dependence on a few government entities as customers, pricing restrictions, economic
and political instability (including instability as it relates to the Euro and currencies in certain emerging market countries), disputes between countries, diminished or insufficient protection of intellectual property, and disruption or
destruction of operations in a significant geographic region regardless of cause, including war, terrorism, riot, civil insurrection, shifts in the political environment or social unrest. Failure to comply with, or material changes to, the laws and
regulations that affect Baxaltas global operations could have a material adverse effect on Baxaltas business, financial condition or results of operations.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates could have a material adverse effect on Baxaltas operating results and liquidity.
Baxalta generates a substantial portion of its revenue (approximately 45% of its total revenue in 2015) outside the United States. As a result,
Baxaltas financial results may be adversely affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Baxalta cannot predict with any certainty changes in foreign currency exchange rates or the ability of the company to mitigate these
risks. Baxalta may experience additional volatility as a result of inflationary pressures and other macroeconomic factors in certain emerging market countries. Baxalta is also exposed to changes in interest rates, and the companys ability to
access the money markets and capital markets could be impeded if adverse liquidity market conditions occur. For discussion of the financial impact of foreign exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, and the ways and extent to which Baxalta
attempts to mitigate such impact, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of BaxaltaQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities may have a negative impact on Baxaltas operating results.
Tax policy reform continues to be a topic of discussion in the United States. A significant change to the tax system in the United States, including changes to
the taxation of international income, could have a material adverse effect upon Baxaltas results of operations. Because Baxalta operates in multiple income tax jurisdictions both inside and outside the United States, it is subject to tax
audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions the company has taken and assess additional taxes and related penalties. The company regularly assesses the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine
the appropriateness of its tax provision. However, the company may not accurately predict the outcome of these audits, and as a result the actual outcome of these audits may have a material adverse impact on the companys financial results. For
more information on the companys income taxes, refer to Note 14 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus.
Baxalta is increasingly dependent on information technology systems, and the companys systems and infrastructure face certain risks, including
from cyber security breaches and data leakage.
Baxalta relies upon its technology systems and infrastructure. Baxaltas technology systems
are potentially vulnerable to breakdown or other interruption by fire, power loss, system malfunction, unauthorized access and
41
other events. Likewise, data privacy breaches by employees and others with both permitted and unauthorized access to Baxaltas systems may pose a risk that sensitive data may be exposed to
unauthorized persons or to the public, or may be permanently lost. The increasing use and evolution of technology, including cloud-based computing, creates additional opportunities for the unintentional dissemination of information or intentional
destruction of confidential information stored in the companys systems or in non-encrypted portable media or storage devices. The company could also experience a business interruption, information theft of confidential information, or
reputational damage from industrial espionage attacks, malware or other cyber incidents, which may compromise the companys system infrastructure or lead to data leakage, either internally or at the companys third-party providers or other
business partners. While Baxalta has invested heavily in the protection of data and information technology and in related training, there can be no assurance that these efforts will prevent significant breakdowns, data leakages, breaches in the
companys systems or other cyber incidents that could have a material adverse effect upon the reputation, business, operations or financial condition of the company. In addition, significant implementation issues may arise as Baxalta seeks to
consolidate and outsource certain computer operations and application support activities.
If Baxalta fails to attract and retain key employees
Baxaltas business may suffer.
Baxaltas ability to compete effectively depends on its ability to attract and retain key employees,
including people in senior management, research and sales and marketing. Competition for top talent in the biopharmaceuticals business can be intense. Baxaltas ability to recruit and retain such talent will depend on a number of factors,
including hiring practices of Baxaltas competitors, compensation and benefits, work location, work environment and industry economic conditions. The announcement of the merger may also adversely affect Baxaltas ability to attract and
retain employees. If Baxalta cannot effectively hire and retain qualified employees, its business could suffer.
Baxalta is subject to pending
lawsuits.
Baxalta is a defendant in certain pending lawsuits and may be named as a defendant in future patent, product liability or other
lawsuits, including lawsuits that may relate to its business prior to the separation. These current and future matters may result in a loss of patent protection, reduced revenue, significant liabilities and diversion of Baxaltas
managements time, attention and resources. Given the uncertain nature of litigation generally, Baxalta is not able in all cases to estimate the amount or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome in these current matters. In
view of these uncertainties, the outcome of these matters may result in charges in excess of any established reserves. Protracted litigation, including any adverse outcomes, may have a material adverse impact on the business, operations or financial
condition of the company. Even claims without merit could subject Baxalta to adverse publicity and require Baxalta to incur significant legal fees. For more information regarding legal proceedings involving Baxalta, refer to Note 16 to the audited
consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus.
Current or worsening economic conditions may adversely affect
Baxaltas business and financial condition.
Baxaltas ability to generate cash flows from operations could be affected if there is a
material decline in the demand for the companys products, in the solvency of its customers or suppliers, or deterioration in the companys key financial ratios or credit ratings. Current or worsening economic conditions may adversely
affect the ability of Baxaltas customers (including governments) to pay for its products and services, and the amount spent on healthcare generally. This could result in a decrease in the demand for Baxaltas products and services,
declining cash flows, longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. These conditions may also adversely affect certain of Baxaltas suppliers, which could cause a disruption in Baxaltas ability
to produce its products. In addition, global economic conditions and liquidity issues in certain countries have resulted, and may continue to result, in delays in the collection of receivables and credit losses. In particular, Baxalta has
significant accounts receivable related to its Hemobrás partnership in Brazil ($207 million at December 31, 2015). These conditions may also impact the stability of the Euro or other currencies in which Baxalta does business.
42
Although biosimilars represent a developing opportunity for Baxalta, the market has an uncertain regulatory
framework, and Baxalta and its partners may not be able to successfully develop and introduce biosimilar products.
Baxalta is actively working to
develop and commercialize biosimilar products, including with its partners. Uncertainty remains concerning both the regulatory pathway in the United States and in other countries to obtain approval of biosimilar products and the commercial pathway
to successfully market and sell such products. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) authorizes FDA to approve biosimilars through a more abbreviated pathway as compared to new biologics. Although in March 2015 FDA approved the
first biosimilar drug in the United States, and recently approved a second biosimilar drug, the approval pathway for biosimilar applications remains relatively untested and is subject to ongoing guidance from FDA. Delays and uncertainties in these
approval pathways may result in delays or difficulties in the approval of Baxaltas biosimilar products by regulatory authorities, subject Baxalta to unanticipated development costs or otherwise reduce the value of the investments Baxalta has
made in biosimilars. Any such delays, difficulties or unanticipated costs could impact the profitability of the companys biosimilars products.
Even
if Baxalta and its partners are able to obtain approvals from FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities, the companys biosimilar products and partnerships may not be commercially successful and may not generate profits in amounts that are
sufficient to offset the amount invested to develop such biosimilars and obtain such approvals. Biosimilar products could be subject to extensive patent clearances and patent infringement litigation, which could delay or prevent the commercial
launch of a product for many years. Market success of biosimilar products will depend on demonstrating to patients, physicians and payors (such as insurance companies) that such products are safe and effective compared to other existing products and
offer a more competitive price or other benefit over existing therapies. If Baxaltas competitors develop biosimilar products more quickly or more efficiently than Baxalta does, Baxalta may not be able to effectively execute on its biosimilar
strategy. Depending on the outcome of these risks, Baxaltas sales of biosimilar products and related profitability may not meet the companys expectations, and the companys results of operations or financial condition could be
adversely affected.
For more information on biosimilars, see BusinessIntellectual Property and BusinessRegulation.
Risks Related to the Separation and Distribution
Baxalta has only operated as an independent company since July 1, 2015, and Baxaltas historical and pro forma financial information is not
necessarily representative of the results that it would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of its future results.
The historical information about Baxalta prior to July 1, 2015 included in this prospectus refers to Baxaltas business as operated by and integrated
with Baxter. Baxaltas historical and pro forma financial information for such periods was derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of Baxter. Accordingly, such historical and pro forma financial information
does not necessarily reflect the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows that Baxalta would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company during the periods presented or those that Baxalta will achieve in the future primarily
as a result of the following factors:
|
|
|
Prior to the separation, Baxaltas business was operated by Baxter as part of its broader corporate
organization, rather than as an independent company. Baxter or one of its affiliates performed various corporate functions for Baxalta, such as tax, treasury, finance, audit, risk management, legal, information technology, human resources,
stockholder relations, compliance, shared services, insurance, employee benefits and compensation. Following the separation, Baxter has continued to provide some of these functions to Baxalta, as described in the section of this prospectus entitled
Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with Baxter. Baxaltas historical and pro forma financial results reflect allocations of corporate expenses from Baxter for such functions.
These allocations may not be indicative of the actual expenses Baxalta would have incurred had it operated as an independent, publicly traded company in the periods
|
43
|
presented. Baxalta will make significant investments to replicate or outsource from other providers certain facilities, systems, infrastructure and personnel to which Baxalta no longer has access
as a result of the separation. These initiatives to develop Baxaltas independent ability to operate without access to Baxters existing operational and administrative infrastructure will be costly to implement. Baxalta may not be able to
operate its business efficiently or at comparable costs, and its profitability may decline.
|
|
|
|
Prior to the separation, Baxaltas business was integrated with the other businesses of Baxter. Baxalta was able to utilize Baxters size and purchasing power in procuring various goods and services and shared
economies of scope and scale in costs, employees, vendor relationships and customer relationships. Although Baxalta has entered into transition agreements with Baxter, these arrangements may not fully capture the benefits Baxalta enjoyed as a result
of being integrated with Baxter and may result in Baxalta paying higher charges than in the past for these services. As a separate, independent company, Baxalta may be unable to obtain goods and services at the prices and terms obtained prior to the
separation, which could decrease Baxaltas overall profitability. As a separate, independent company, Baxalta may also not be as successful in negotiating favorable tax treatments and credits with governmental entities. This could have a
material adverse effect on Baxaltas results of operations and financial condition for periods following the separation.
|
|
|
|
Generally, prior to the separation, Baxaltas working capital requirements and capital for its general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, R&D and capital expenditures, were satisfied as part of the
corporate-wide cash management policies of Baxter. Following the separation, Baxalta may need to obtain additional financing from banks, through public offerings or private placements of debt or equity securities, strategic relationships or other
arrangements.
|
|
|
|
After the separation, the cost of capital for Baxaltas business may be higher than Baxters cost of capital prior to the distribution.
|
|
|
|
Baxaltas historical financial information does not reflect its obligations to purchase from Baxter certain operations and assets, and assume the corresponding liabilities, of Baxaltas business after the
separation date.
|
Other significant changes may occur in Baxaltas cost structure, management, financing and business operations as a
result of operating as a company separate from Baxter. For additional information about the past financial performance of Baxaltas business and the basis of presentation of the historical and pro forma combined financial statements of
Baxaltas business, see Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements of Baxalta, Selected Historical Consolidated and Combined Financial Data of Baxalta, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Baxalta and the audited consolidated and combined financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
As Baxalta builds its information technology infrastructure and transitions its data to its own systems, Baxalta could incur substantial additional
costs and experience temporary business interruptions.
Since the separation, Baxalta has begun installing and implementing information technology
infrastructure to support its critical business functions, including accounting and reporting, manufacturing process control, quality and compliance systems, customer service, inventory control and distribution. Baxalta may incur temporary
interruptions in business operations if it cannot transition effectively from Baxters existing transactional and operational systems, data centers and the transition services that support these functions as Baxalta replaces these systems.
Baxalta may not be successful in implementing its new systems and transitioning its data, and it may incur substantially higher costs for implementation than currently anticipated. Baxaltas failure to avoid operational interruptions as it
implements the new systems and replaces Baxters information technology services, or its failure to implement the new systems and replace Baxters services successfully, could disrupt its business and have a material adverse effect on its
profitability. In addition, if Baxalta is unable to replicate or transition certain systems, its ability to comply with regulatory requirements could be impaired.
44
Baxter may not satisfy its obligations under various transaction agreements that have been executed as part
of the separation or Baxalta may not have necessary systems and services in place when certain of the transition agreements expire.
In connection
with the separation, Baxalta and Baxter entered into a separation and distribution agreement and entered into various other agreements, including a transition services agreement, a tax matters agreement, a long term services agreement, a
manufacturing and supply agreement, an employee matters agreement, a trademark license agreement, a Galaxy license agreement, an international commercial operations agreement, a shareholders and registration rights agreement with respect to
Baxters continuing ownership of Baxalta common stock and certain other commercial agreements. These agreements are discussed in greater detail in the section in this prospectus entitled Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other
Related Party TransactionsAgreements with Baxter. Certain of these agreements provide for the performance of services by each company for the benefit of the other for a period of time after the separation. Baxalta will rely on Baxter to
satisfy its performance and payment obligations under these agreements. If Baxter is unable to satisfy its obligations under these agreements, including its indemnification obligations, Baxalta could incur operational difficulties or losses.
If Baxalta does not have its own systems and services in place, or if Baxalta does not have agreements with other providers of these services when the
transition agreements terminate, Baxalta may not be able to operate its business effectively and its profitability may decline. Baxalta is in the process of creating its own, or engaging third parties to provide, systems and services to replace many
of the systems and services Baxter currently provides to it. Baxalta may not be successful in effectively or efficiently implementing these systems and services or in transitioning data from Baxters systems to Baxaltas, which could
disrupt Baxaltas business and have a material adverse effect on its profitability. These systems and services may also be more expensive or less efficient than the systems and services Baxter is providing and is expected to provide during the
transition period.
Potential indemnification liabilities to Baxter pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement could materially adversely
affect Baxalta.
The separation and distribution agreement with Baxter provides for, among other things, provisions governing the relationship
between Baxter and Baxalta with respect to and resulting from the separation. For a description of the separation and distribution agreement, see Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with
BaxterThe Separation and Distribution Agreement, which includes additional details regarding the scope of Baxaltas indemnification obligations. Among other things, the separation and distribution agreement provides for
indemnification obligations designed to make Baxalta financially responsible for many liabilities that may exist relating to its business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the separation pursuant to the separation and distribution
agreement, including any pending or future litigation. These indemnification liabilities are intended to ensure that, as between Baxter and Baxalta, Baxalta is responsible for all liabilities assumed by it in connection with the separation, and that
any liability incurred by Baxter (including directors, officers, employees and agents) related to Baxaltas failure to satisfy such obligations or otherwise in respect of Baxaltas operation of its business or any breach by Baxalta of the
separation and distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement is paid by Baxalta, provided that such indemnification obligations shall not extend to individuals who were or become directors, officers, employees or agents of Baxalta if such
persons would not be eligible for indemnification under Baxter organizational documents for the underlying matter or if the Baxter directors and officers insurance policy would not cover such persons in connection with the applicable
matter. Baxaltas indemnification liabilities are subject to certain limitations under certain ancillary agreements that require Baxalta to act as a service provider for the benefit of Baxter (with Baxter having similar limitations with respect
to corresponding services provided to Baxalta) following the separation, but its other indemnification obligations pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement and under other ancillary agreements are not generally subject to such
limitations. If Baxalta is required to indemnify Baxter under the circumstances set forth in the separation and distribution agreement, Baxalta may be subject to substantial liabilities.
45
The spin-off and the Later Distributions (as defined below) could result in significant liability to
Baxalta.
The spin-off and the Later Distributions (collectively, the Baxter Transactions) are intended to qualify for tax-free treatment to Baxter
and its stockholders under Sections 355, 361 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. Completion of the spin-off was conditioned upon, among other things, the receipt of a private letter ruling from the IRS regarding certain issues relating to the tax-free
treatment of the Baxter Transactions. Although the IRS private letter ruling is generally binding on the IRS, the continuing validity of such ruling is subject to the completeness of facts and accuracy of factual representations and assumptions made
in the ruling. Completion of the distribution on July 1, 2015 was also conditioned upon Baxters receipt of a tax opinion from KPMG regarding certain aspects of the spin-off not covered by the IRS private letter ruling. The opinion was based
upon various factual representations and assumptions, as well as certain undertakings made by Baxter and Baxalta. If any of the factual representations or assumptions in the IRS private letter ruling or tax opinion are untrue or incomplete in any
material respect, an undertaking is not complied with, or the facts upon which the IRS private letter ruling or tax opinion are based are materially different from the actual facts relating to the Baxter Transactions, the opinion or IRS private
letter ruling may not be valid. Neither the IRS private letter ruling nor the tax opinion took into account the merger, which was not contemplated at the time of their issuances. Moreover, opinions of a tax advisor are not binding on the IRS. As a
result, the conclusions expressed in the opinion of a tax advisor could be successfully challenged by the IRS.
If the Baxter Transactions are determined
to be taxable, Baxter and its stockholders could incur significant tax liabilities, and under the tax matters agreement and the letter agreement, Baxalta may be required to indemnify Baxter for any liabilities incurred by Baxter if the liabilities
are caused by any action or inaction undertaken by Baxalta following the spin-off (including as a result of the merger). For additional detail, see Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with
BaxterTax Matters Agreement, and Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Proposed Merger with ShireThe merger could result in significant liability to Baxalta and Shire if it causes the Baxter Transactions to be taxable,
and the immediately following risk factor.
In this prospectus, references to the Later Distributions refer to the following transactions
that have been or may be undertaken by Baxter: (i) any debt-for-equity exchange (and related underwritten offering) with respect to Baxalta shares, (ii) any offer to exchange Baxter shares for Baxalta shares, including this exchange offer,
(iii) a contribution of Baxalta shares to Baxters U.S. pension fund, and/or (iv) a special dividend of Baxalta shares to Baxters stockholders, in each case, that are undertaken prior to any Shire or Baxalta stockholder vote
with respect to the merger, which are expected to be taken at meetings held on May 27, 2016 (and, in any event, during the 18-month period following the distribution on July 1, 2015), and that are intended to be part of a plan that includes the
spin-off.
Baxalta may not be able to engage in certain corporate transactions after the separation.
In order to preserve the tax-free treatment of the Baxter Transactions to Baxter and its stockholders, the tax matters agreement generally restricts Baxalta
from taking or failing to take any action that would cause the Baxter Transactions to become taxable. Under the tax matters agreement, for the two-year period following the separation, Baxalta is prohibited, except in certain circumstances, from:
|
|
|
entering into any transaction resulting in the acquisition of more than a certain percentage of its stock or substantially all of its assets, whether by merger or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
merging, consolidating, or liquidating;
|
|
|
|
issuing equity securities beyond certain thresholds;
|
|
|
|
repurchasing its capital stock;
|
|
|
|
ceasing to actively conduct its business; and
|
|
|
|
taking or failing to take any action that prevents the Baxter Transactions or certain related transactions from being tax-free.
|
46
The tax matters agreement permits Baxalta to take any of the actions described above if Baxalta provides Baxter
with a tax opinion or Baxter receives an IRS private letter ruling that, in each case, is reasonably satisfactory to Baxter to the effect that such action will not affect the tax-free status of the Baxter Transactions (or Baxter waives the
requirement to obtain such an opinion or ruling). If Baxalta intends to take any such restricted action, Baxter will generally be required to cooperate and use reasonable best efforts with a reasonable request to obtain the tax opinion or IRS ruling
as expeditiously as possible. The receipt of any such ruling or opinion in respect of an action Baxalta proposes to take will not relieve Baxalta of its obligation to indemnify Baxter if that action causes the Baxter Transactions to be taxable.
These restrictions may limit Baxaltas ability to pursue certain strategic transactions or other transactions that it may believe to be in the best interests of its stockholders or that might increase the value of its business. In addition,
under the tax matters agreement, Baxalta is required to indemnify Baxter against any tax liabilities as a result of the acquisition of Baxaltas stock or assets, even if Baxalta did not participate in or otherwise facilitate the acquisition.
In connection with the signing of the merger agreement, Baxter agreed in the letter agreement to waive the provisions under the tax matters agreement as
they relate to the signing of the merger agreement and will waive such prohibitions in connection with the consummation of the merger, provided that each of Shires and Baxters tax advisors furnish the tax opinions referenced in the
letter agreement. Such waiver and opinions will not relieve Baxalta or Shire, following the merger, of its obligation to indemnify Baxter if the merger causes the Baxter Transactions or certain related transactions to be taxable. For additional
detail, see Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with BaxterTax Matters Agreement and Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Proposed Merger with ShireThe merger
could result in significant liability to Baxalta and Shire if it causes the Baxter Transactions to be taxable.
Certain of Baxaltas
executive officers and directors may have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of their previous or continuing positions at Baxter.
Because of their current or former positions with Baxter, certain of Baxaltas executive officers and directors own shares of Baxter common stock, options
to purchase shares of Baxter common stock or other equity awards. Even though Baxaltas Board of Directors consists of a majority of directors who are independent, and Baxaltas executive officers who were employees of Baxter ceased to be
employees of Baxter, some Baxalta executive officers and directors continue to have a financial interest in shares of Baxter common stock. In addition, three of Baxaltas directors continue to serve on the Baxter Board of Directors. Continuing
ownership of Baxter common stock and equity awards, or service as a director at both companies, could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest if Baxalta and Baxter pursue the same corporate opportunities or face decisions that
could have different implications for Baxalta and Baxter.
Baxalta may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of the separation, and the
separation may adversely affect Baxaltas business.
Baxalta may not be able to achieve the full strategic and financial benefits expected to
result from the separation, or such benefits may be delayed or not occur at all. The separation is expected to provide the following benefits, among others:
|
|
|
greater management focus on the distinct business of biopharmaceuticals;
|
|
|
|
the ability to commercialize new and existing product offerings more effectively on a global basis;
|
|
|
|
the ability to drive innovation and allocate necessary resources to areas presenting the highest growth potential; and
|
|
|
|
the flexibility to pursue aligned growth and investment strategies resulting in revenue acceleration, improved profitability and enhanced returns.
|
47
Baxalta may not achieve these and other anticipated benefits for a variety of reasons, including, among others:
|
|
|
following the separation, Baxalta may be more susceptible to market fluctuations and other adverse events than if it were still a part of Baxter;
|
|
|
|
following the separation, Baxaltas business is less diversified than Baxters business prior to the separation; and
|
|
|
|
the other actions required to separate Baxters and Baxaltas respective businesses could disrupt Baxaltas operations.
|
If Baxalta fails to achieve some or all of the benefits expected to result from the separation, or if such benefits are delayed, the business, financial
condition and results of operations of Baxalta could be adversely affected.
Baxalta may have received better terms from unaffiliated third parties
than the terms it received in its agreements with Baxter.
The agreements Baxalta entered into with Baxter in connection with the separation,
including a transition services agreement, a long term services agreement, a tax matters agreement, a manufacturing and supply agreement, an employee matters agreement, a trademark license agreement, a Galaxy license agreement, an international
commercial operations agreement, a shareholders and registration rights agreement with respect to Baxters continuing ownership of Baxalta common stock and certain other commercial agreements, were prepared in the context of the
separation while Baxalta was still a wholly owned subsidiary of Baxter. Accordingly, during the period in which the terms of those agreements were prepared, Baxalta did not have an independent board of directors or a management team that was
independent of Baxter. As a result, the terms of those agreements may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arms-length negotiations between unaffiliated third parties. Arms-length negotiations between Baxter and an
unaffiliated third party in another form of transaction, such as a buyer in a sale of a business transaction, may have resulted in more favorable terms to the unaffiliated third party. For additional detail, see Agreements Between Baxter and
Baxalta and Other Related Party Transactions.
Baxalta has significant indebtedness which could restrict the companys ability to pay
dividends and have a negative impact on the companys financing options and liquidity position.
Shortly before the separation, Baxalta
incurred approximately $5 billion of indebtedness through the issuance of senior notes. Baxalta used the net proceeds to make a cash distribution of $4 billion to Baxter as partial consideration for the contribution of assets to Baxalta in
connection with the separation, with the remaining net proceeds intended to be used for general corporate purposes, including to fund acquisitions. In addition, Baxalta also has a senior revolving credit facility with availability of up to $1.2
billion and a Euro-denominated senior revolving credit facility with availability of up to 200 million. The company may also incur additional indebtedness in the future, subject to restrictions set forth in the merger agreement. The
companys indebtedness may impose restrictions on Baxalta that could have material adverse consequences by:
|
|
|
limiting the companys ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
limiting the companys ability to refinance its indebtedness on terms acceptable to the company or at all;
|
|
|
|
imposing restrictive covenants on the companys operations;
|
|
|
|
requiring the company to dedicate a significant portion of its cash flows from operations to paying the principal of and interest on its indebtedness, thereby reducing funds available for other corporate purposes; and
|
|
|
|
making the company more vulnerable to economic downturns and limiting its ability to withstand competitive pressures.
|
48
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
BaxaltaLiquidity and Capital ResourcesFinancial ConditionDebt and Capital Lease ObligationsSenior Notes.
Challenges
in the commercial and credit environment may adversely affect Baxaltas future access to capital.
Baxaltas ability to issue debt or
enter into other financing arrangements on acceptable terms could be adversely affected if there is a material decline in the demand for Baxaltas products or in the solvency of its customers or suppliers or other significantly unfavorable
changes in economic conditions. Volatility in the world financial markets could increase borrowing costs or affect Baxaltas ability to access the capital markets. These conditions may adversely affect Baxaltas ability to maintain
investment grade credit ratings following the separation.
Risks Related to Baxaltas Common Stock
Baxaltas stock price may fluctuate significantly.
The market price of Baxaltas common stock may fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, some of which may be beyond Baxaltas control,
including:
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in Baxaltas operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimated by securities analysts or Baxaltas ability to meet those estimates;
|
|
|
|
the operating and stock price performance of Shire;
|
|
|
|
the operating and stock price performance of comparable companies;
|
|
|
|
announcements or speculation regarding proposed business combinations involving Baxalta or comparable companies in our industry;
|
|
|
|
changes to the regulatory and legal environment under which Baxalta operates; and
|
|
|
|
domestic and worldwide economic conditions.
|
In addition, when the market price of a companys common
stock drops significantly, stockholders often institute securities class action lawsuits against the company. This type of lawsuit against Baxalta could cause it to incur substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of its management
and other resources.
Future sales or distributions of Baxalta common stock may cause the market price for shares of Baxalta common stock to
decline.
As a result of the separation, Baxter distributed approximately 544 million shares of Baxaltas common stock to its
stockholders, all of which are freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), unless the shares are owned by one of Baxaltas affiliates (including
Baxter), as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act.
After completion of the distribution, Baxter retained approximately 19.5% of
Baxaltas total shares outstanding. In January 2016 and March 2016, Baxter exchanged a portion of its retained stake in Baxalta common stock for indebtedness of Baxter held by third parties. The shares of Baxalta common stock exchanged were
then sold by such third parties in secondary public offerings pursuant to registration statements filed by Baxalta under the Securities Act. Immediately following the exchanges, Baxter held approximately 4.5% of Baxaltas total shares
outstanding. Baxter is currently in the process of finalizing a contribution of 17,145,570 shares of Baxalta common stock to its U.S. pension fund. Baxter has advised Baxalta that it otherwise intends to dispose of its remaining ownership interest
in Baxalta common stock (i) to Baxters creditors in satisfaction of outstanding obligations of Baxter, (ii) in exchange for Baxter stock in this exchange offer and (iii) possibly to Baxters stockholders as a special
dividend, on a pro rata basis, in each case, prior to any Shire or Baxalta shareholder vote with respect to the merger, which are expected to be taken at meetings held on May 27, 2016, and, in any event,
49
during the 18-month period following the distribution. If any shares of Baxalta common stock, or Shire Securities received in exchange for such common stock pursuant to the merger, are not
disposed of by Baxter either prior to the merger or during such 18-month period, as the case may be, Baxter has advised Baxalta that it intends to otherwise dispose of such shares as soon as practicable thereafter, taking into account market
conditions and its business judgment, including potentially through secondary offerings of Baxalta common stock, but in no event later than five years after the distribution. Baxter and Baxalta entered into a shareholders and registration
rights agreement wherein Baxalta agreed, upon the request of Baxter, to use reasonable best efforts to effect a registration under applicable federal and state securities laws of any shares of Baxaltas common stock retained by Baxter. Baxter
exercised a portion of its demand registration rights pursuant to such agreement to cause Baxalta to register the offer and sale of the shares of Baxalta common stock in this exchange offer.
Dispositions of significant amounts of Baxaltas common stock or the perception in the market that this will occur may result in the lowering of the
market price of Baxaltas common stock.
Baxalta cannot guarantee the timing, amount, or payment of any dividends on its common stock.
The Board of Directors of Baxalta has adopted a dividend policy with respect to the payment of dividends on Baxalta common stock. However, the
timing, declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends to stockholders will be within the discretion of Baxaltas Board of Directors. The Boards decisions regarding the payment of dividends will depend on many factors, such as
Baxaltas financial condition, earnings, corporate strategy, capital requirements of its operating subsidiaries, debt service obligations, industry practice, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, ability to access capital markets and
other factors that the Board deems relevant. For more information, see Dividend Policy. Baxaltas ability to pay any dividends will depend on its ongoing ability to generate cash from operations and access capital markets. Baxalta
cannot guarantee that it will continue to pay dividends in the future. The merger agreement provides that Baxalta may not pay dividends on Baxalta common stock other than regular quarterly cash dividends not to exceed $0.07 per quarter.
The current percentage of ownership a stockholder has in Baxalta may be diluted in the future.
In the future, the percentage ownership of a given stockholder in Baxalta may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market
transactions or otherwise, including equity awards that Baxalta has granted and will grant to its directors, officers and employees. Baxaltas and Baxters employees have stock options, stock-settled performance share units and
stock-settled restricted stock units for Baxaltas common stock as a result of an adjustment to their corresponding Baxter awards as described in the section of this prospectus entitled Executive CompensationExecutive Compensation
Discussion and AnalysisElements of CompensationEquity-Based Incentive Awards. Baxaltas compensation committee granted approximately 2.9 million RSUs to participating employees through its 2016 annual equity grant process, and
it may grant additional PSUs, RSUs, stock options or other stock-based awards to its employees in the future. Such awards will have a dilutive effect on Baxaltas earnings per share, which could adversely affect the market price of
Baxaltas common stock.
In addition, Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes Baxalta to issue, without the
approval of Baxaltas stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designation, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, including preferences over Baxaltas common
stock respecting dividends and distributions, as Baxaltas Board of Directors generally may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of Baxaltas common
stock. For example, Baxalta could grant the holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of Baxaltas directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the
repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences Baxalta could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock. See Description of Capital Stock of Baxalta.
50
The merger agreement provides that Baxalta may not issue any capital stock (including any preferred stock, as
described above) except pursuant to its existing equity incentive plans. However, Shire may waive this restriction on issuances without prior notice and such restriction shall continue only so long as the merger agreement is in effect.
The public announcement of data from clinical studies or news of any developments related to Baxaltas product pipeline may cause significant
volatility in its stock price. If the development of any of Baxaltas key pipeline products is delayed or discontinued, the companys stock price could decline significantly.
As Baxalta evolves as a standalone company, it will be focusing efforts and resources in building a diversified pipeline of products in existing core disease
areas and into new areas of unmet medical need, such as oncology. The company expects that investors may place heightened scrutiny on some of the companys products in development when making investment decisions in Baxalta compared to historic
Baxter. The announcement of data from clinical studies by the company or its collaborators or news of any developments related to the companys key pipeline products may cause significant volatility in the companys stock price.
Furthermore, the announcement of any negative or unexpected data or the discontinuation of development of any of Baxaltas key pipeline products, or any delay in anticipated timelines for filing for regulatory approval, could cause the
companys stock price to decline significantly. There can be no assurance that data from clinical studies will support a filing for regulatory approval or even if approved, that any of Baxaltas key pipeline products will become
commercially successful.
Certain provisions in Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws,
and of Delaware law, may prevent or delay an acquisition of Baxalta by a party other than Shire, which could decrease the trading price of Baxaltas common stock.
Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain, and Delaware law contains, provisions that are
intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and to encourage prospective acquirors to negotiate with Baxaltas Board of Directors rather than
to attempt a hostile takeover. See Description of Capital Stock of BaxaltaAnti-Takeover Effects of Various Provisions of Delaware Law and Baxaltas Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated
Bylaws for a further description of these provisions.
In addition, because Baxalta has not chosen to be exempt from Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, this provision could also delay or prevent a change of control that stockholders may favor. Section 203 provides that, subject to limited exceptions, persons that acquire, or are affiliated with a person that
acquires, more than 15 percent of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation shall not engage in any business combination with that corporation, including by merger, consolidation or acquisitions of additional shares, for a three-year
period following the date on which that person or its affiliates becomes the holder of more than 15 percent of the corporations outstanding voting stock. Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law does not apply to the merger
because the merger agreement has been approved by the Baxalta Board of Directors.
Baxalta believes these provisions will protect its stockholders from
coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with Baxaltas Board of Directors and by providing Baxaltas Board of Directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions
are not intended to make the company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that Baxaltas Board of Directors
determines is not in the best interests of Baxalta and Baxaltas stockholders. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.
51
Certain of the agreements that Baxalta entered into with Baxter require Baxters consent to any assignment
by Baxalta of its rights and obligations under the agreements. The consent and termination rights set forth in these agreements might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that stockholders may consider favorable. For more information on
these agreements, refer to the section of this prospectus entitled Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with Baxter.
In addition, an acquisition or further issuance of Baxaltas stock could trigger the application of Section 355(e) of the Code. Under the tax
matters agreement, Baxalta is required to indemnify Baxter for the resulting taxes, and this indemnity obligation might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that stockholders may consider favorable. For a description of such
indemnification by Baxalta, refer to the section contained in this prospectus entitled Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with BaxterTax Matters Agreement.
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger with Shire
Failure to consummate the merger could negatively impact the price of Baxalta common stock and our future business and financial results.
The consummation of the merger may be delayed, the merger may be consummated on terms different than those contemplated by the merger agreement, or the merger
may not be consummated at all. Failure to consummate the merger would prevent Baxalta stockholders from realizing the anticipated benefits of the merger. In addition, the consideration offered by Shire reflects a valuation of Baxalta significantly
in excess of the price at which Baxaltas common stock was trading prior to the public announcement of Shires interest in the potential combination. The current market price of Baxalta common stock may reflect a market assumption that the
merger will occur, and a failure to consummate the merger could result in a significant decline in the market price of Baxalta common stock and a negative perception of Baxalta generally. Any delay in the consummation of the merger or any
uncertainty about the consummation of the merger could also negatively impact the share price and future business and financial results of Baxalta.
The market price of the Shire Securities will fluctuate prior to the merger, so Baxalta stockholders cannot be sure of the value of the Shire Securities
they will receive if the merger is consummated.
If the merger is consummated, each outstanding share of Baxalta common stock will be exchanged for
both (i) $18.00 in cash and (ii) 0.1482 of a Shire ADS (or, if a Baxalta stockholder timely elects accordingly and Shire so permits, 0.4446 of a Shire ordinary share in lieu of such fraction of a Shire ADS, although the deadline for making
such election is expected to have passed before the exchange offer is complete) as further described in the sections of this prospectus entitled The TransactionsThe Proposed MergerThe Merger Agreement and
BusinessThe Proposed Merger. Because the number of Shire Securities being offered as consideration is fixed, the market value of the per share stock consideration will be based on the value of Shire Securities at the time the
consideration in the merger is paid. If the market price of Shire Securities declines, Baxalta stockholders could receive less value for their shares of Baxalta common stock upon the consummation of the merger than the implied value of such shares
as of the date the merger was announced, the date of the Baxalta stockholders meeting or as of the date of this prospectus. The market price of the Shire Securities may fluctuate due to a variety of factors that are beyond Baxaltas
control, including general market and economic conditions, changes in business prospects, catastrophic events, both natural and man-made, and regulatory considerations. In addition, the market price of the Shire Securities may significantly
fluctuate during the period of time between the date of the merger agreement and the consummation of the merger, as a result of uncertainty regarding the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, market perception of the synergies and cost
savings expected to be achieved related to the merger, changes to the ongoing business of Baxalta or Shire, including any actions taken by Baxaltas or Shires customers, suppliers, distributors, partners, employees, investors and
governmental authorities as a result of the merger announcement, or actions taken by Baxalta or Shire in connection with the merger.
52
Shire and Baxalta must obtain governmental and regulatory approvals to consummate the merger, which, if
delayed or not granted, may delay or jeopardize the merger.
The merger is conditioned on the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting
period (or extension thereof) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the HSR Act), merger control approval under the relevant merger control laws of the European Union and the consent of certain other merger
control authorities and other governmental entities. The closing condition related to anti-trust approval in the United States was satisfied on February 29, 2016, when the waiting period under the HSR Act expired.
The governmental and regulatory agencies from which Shire and Baxalta are seeking these approvals have broad discretion in administering the applicable
governing regulations. As a condition to their approval of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, those agencies may impose requirements, limitations or costs or require divestitures or place restrictions on the conduct of the
combined companys business. The required approvals may not be obtained or the required conditions to the merger may not be satisfied, or, even if the required approvals are obtained and the conditions to the consummation of the merger are
satisfied, the terms, conditions and timing of such approvals are uncertain.
Any delay in consummating the merger could cause the combined company not to
realize some or all of the synergies that Shire expects to achieve if the merger is successfully consummated within the expected time frame.
The
merger remains subject to additional conditions
,
some of which Shire and Baxalta cannot control, which could result in the merger not being consummated or being delayed, either of which could negatively impact the share price
and future business and operating results of Baxalta.
The merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of other conditions in addition to the
approval of governmental authorities described above, including, but not limited to, the approval of the issuance of the Shire Securities by the stockholders of Shire; the adoption of the merger agreement by the stockholders of Baxalta; the
continued effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 registering the Shire Securities to be issued to Baxalta stockholders in the merger; the absence of any orders, injunctions or rulings that would have the effect of enjoining or
preventing the consummation of the merger; the approval of the UK Listing Authority (UKLA) of a prospectus relating to the Shire Securities and a circular convening the Shire stockholder meeting; approval from The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC to list the
Shire ADS; approval of the UKLA and London Stock Exchange (LSE) to list the Shire ordinary shares; and receipt by each of Baxter and Shire of a tax opinion from its respective tax advisor, in each case, substantially in the same form and substance
as the tax opinion delivered by such advisor in connection with the signing of the merger agreement such that a restriction under the tax matters agreement is waived. Certain conditions to the merger may not be satisfied or, if they are, the timing
of such satisfaction is uncertain. If any conditions to the merger are not satisfied or, where waiver is permitted by applicable law, not waived, the merger will not be consummated.
The merger is not subject to a financing condition. While Shire has secured an $18 billion fully underwritten bank facility, of which $13 billion is available
to finance the cash component of the merger consideration and the payment of related acquisition costs and transaction costs, certain customary conditions precedent to funding must be satisfied in order for Shire to utilize its bank facility, and if
such conditions are not satisfied or waived and if Shires lenders do not satisfy their funding commitment, Shire may be unable to obtain the funds necessary to consummate the merger.
If for any reason the merger is not completed, or the closing of the merger is significantly delayed, the Baxalta share price and business and results of
operations of Baxalta may be adversely affected. In addition, failure to consummate the merger would prevent Baxalta stockholders from realizing the anticipated benefits of the merger. Baxalta has incurred, and expects to continue to incur,
significant transaction fees, professional service fees, taxes and other costs related to the merger. Further, if the merger agreement is terminated, under certain
53
circumstances, Baxalta may be required to disburse to Shire a termination fee of $369 million and/or reimburse Shires expenses in an amount not to exceed $110 million, which expense
reimbursement would be offset against any termination fee subsequently disbursed.
The directors and executive officers of Baxalta have interests in
the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, those of other Baxalta stockholders, which could have influenced their decisions to support or approve the merger.
Baxalta stockholders should recognize that the directors and executive officers of Baxalta have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in
addition to, their interests as stockholders of Baxalta generally. For Baxalta directors, these interests may include the accelerated vesting and payment for certain Baxalta stock-based incentive awards as a result of the merger. For Baxalta
executive officers, these interests may include the potential acceleration of stock-based incentive awards as a result of the merger, as well as cash severance payments and benefits that may become payable in connection with the merger.
Additionally, Baxalta has agreed to provide gross-up payments to individuals for excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (by amending the severance agreements with its executive officers to provide for such payments).
Baxaltas directors and executive officers are also covered by certain indemnification and insurance arrangements. Two members of the Baxalta Board, who will be jointly selected by the chairman of the Baxalta Board and chairman of the Shire
board following consultation with the Nomination Committee of the Shire board, are expected to be appointed to the Shire board, effective upon the closing of the merger. Such interests and benefits could have influenced the decisions of
Baxaltas directors and executive officers to support or approve the merger.
The merger agreement contains provisions that restrict
Baxaltas ability to pursue alternatives to the merger and, in specified circumstances, could require Baxalta to pay Shire a termination fee and/or expense reimbursement.
Under the merger agreement, Baxalta has agreed not to (1) take certain actions to solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination
transactions or (2) subject to certain exceptions, including the receipt of a company superior proposal (as such term is defined in the merger agreement), enter into discussions or an agreement concerning, or provide confidential
information in connection with, any proposals for alternative business combination transactions. In certain circumstances, upon termination of the merger agreement, Baxalta would be required to disburse to Shire a termination fee of $369 million
and/or reimburse Shire for its merger-related expenses in an amount not to exceed $110 million, which reimbursement would be offset against any termination fee subsequently disbursed. These provisions could discourage a third party that may have an
interest in acquiring all or a significant part of Baxalta from considering or proposing that acquisition, even if such third party were prepared to enter into a transaction that is more favorable to Baxalta or its stockholders than the merger.
If the proposed merger is not completed, Baxalta will have incurred substantial costs that may adversely affect Baxaltas financial results.
Baxalta has incurred and will continue to incur substantial costs in connection with the proposed merger. These costs are primarily associated
with the fees of consultants, attorneys, accountants and financial advisors. In addition, Baxalta diverted significant management resources in an effort to complete the merger and Baxalta is subject to restrictions contained in the merger agreement
on the conduct of Baxaltas business during the pendency of the merger. If the merger is not completed, such costs may adversely affect Baxaltas financial results.
In specified circumstances, Shire could terminate the merger agreement to accept an alternative proposal.
Under the merger agreement, Shire may terminate the merger agreement to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a parent superior
proposal (as such term is defined in the merger agreement) prior to obtaining
54
approval of the merger from its stockholders. In such event, Shire would be obligated to pay Baxalta a termination fee equal to $369 million, but would have no further obligation or liabilities
to Baxalta. Such termination would deny Baxalta and Baxaltas stockholders any benefits from the merger and could negatively impact Baxaltas share price.
Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause a loss of employees and may otherwise affect the future business and operations of Baxalta, Shire and
the combined company.
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on Shire or Baxalta and, if
the proposed combination with Shire is consummated, on the combined company following the merger. These consequent uncertainties may impair Baxaltas, and following the closing of the merger, the combined companys, ability to retain and
motivate key personnel and could also cause customers, suppliers, licensees, partners and others that deal with Shire or Baxalta to defer entering into contracts with, making other decisions concerning, or seeking to change existing business
relationships with Baxalta, and following the closing of the merger, the combined company. Because Baxalta and Shire depend on the experience and industry knowledge of their executives and other key personnel to execute their business plans, the
combined company may be unable to meet its strategic objectives.
While the merger is pending, Baxalta and Shire may not be able to hire qualified
personnel to replace any key employees that may depart to the same extent that they have been able to in the past. In addition, if the merger is not completed, Baxalta may also encounter challenges in hiring qualified personnel to replace key
employees that may depart Baxalta subsequent to the merger announcement.
Shire and Baxalta may not successfully integrate.
If the merger is consummated, which will represent Shires largest transaction to date, achieving the anticipated benefits of the proposed combination of
Shire and Baxalta will depend in part upon whether the two companies integrate their businesses in an effective and efficient manner. The companies may not be able to accomplish this integration process successfully. The integration of businesses is
complex and time-consuming. The difficulties that could be encountered include the following:
|
|
|
integrating personnel, operations and systems, while maintaining focus on selling and promoting existing and newly acquired or produced products;
|
|
|
|
coordinating geographically dispersed organizations;
|
|
|
|
distraction of management and employees from operations;
|
|
|
|
changes or conflicts in corporate culture;
|
|
|
|
managements inability to manage a substantial increase in the number of employees;
|
|
|
|
managements inability to train and integrate personnel, who may have limited experience with the respective companies business lines and products, and to deliver a consistent message regarding diseases
treated by the combined company;
|
|
|
|
retaining existing customers and attracting new customers;
|
|
|
|
retaining existing employees and attracting new employees;
|
|
|
|
maintaining business relationships; and
|
|
|
|
inefficiencies associated with the integration and management of the operations of the combined company.
|
In
addition, there will be integration costs and non-recurring transaction costs (such as fees paid to legal, financial, accounting and other advisors and other fees paid in connection with the merger) associated with the proposed merger, including
costs associated with combining operations and achieving the synergies Shire expects to obtain, and such costs may be significant.
55
An inability to realize the full extent of the anticipated benefits of the proposed combination of Shire and
Baxalta, including estimated cost synergies, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process and realizing such benefits, could have an adverse effect upon the revenues, level of expenses and operating results of the combined company,
which may materially adversely affect the value of Shire Securities after the consummation of the merger.
Shire will incur significant additional
indebtedness in connection with the merger, which will decrease Shires business flexibility and increase its interest expense. All of Shires debt obligations, and any future indebtedness Shire may incur, will have priority over the Shire
Securities with respect to payment in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Shire has secured an $18 billion fully underwritten
bank facility, of which $13 billion is available to finance the cash component of the merger consideration. Shire has announced that it intends to maintain an investment grade credit rating for the combined company, but one or more credit rating
agencies may determine that the combined companys credit rating is below investment grade, which could increase the combined companys borrowing costs. The combined companys indebtedness following consummation of the merger could
have the effect, among other things, of reducing the combined companys flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions as well as reducing funds available for capital expenditures and acquisitions and creating competitive
disadvantages for the combined company relative to other companies with lower indebtedness levels. Shire has incurred various costs and expenses associated with the debt financing.
Shire has indicated that it intends to refinance the bank facility through capital market debt issuances in due course. Its ability to refinance the
indebtedness will depend on the condition of the capital markets and the combined companys financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require the combined company to comply with
more onerous covenants, which could further restrict business operations and such refinancing may not be available at all. Shire may also incur additional costs and expenses associated with any such refinancing.
Moreover, the combined company may be required to raise substantial additional financing to fund capital expenditures and acquisitions. The combined
companys ability to arrange additional financing and the costs of that financing will depend on, among other factors, the combined companys financial position and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions and other factors
beyond its control.
In any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Shire, Shire Securities would rank below all debt claims against Shire or any of its
subsidiaries. In addition, any convertible or exchangeable securities or other equity securities that Shire may issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of Shire Securities. As a result, holders of
Shire Securities will not be entitled to receive any payment or other distribution of assets upon any liquidation or dissolution until after Shires obligations to its debt holders and holders of equity securities which rank senior to the Shire
Securities have been satisfied.
The merger could result in significant liability to Baxalta and Shire if it causes the Baxter Transactions to be
taxable.
Under the letter agreement, from and after the closing of the merger, Baxalta agreed to indemnify, and, effective as of the closing of
the merger, Shire agreed to guarantee such indemnity to, Baxter and each of its affiliates and each of their respective officers, directors and employees against certain tax-related losses attributable to, or resulting from (in whole or in part) the
merger (as described in more detail in the letter agreement). If the Baxter Transactions, including this exchange offer, are determined to be taxable as a result (in whole or in part) of the merger (for example, if the merger is deemed to be part of
a plan (or series of related transactions) that includes the Baxter Transactions), Baxter and its stockholders could incur significant tax liabilities, and under the tax matters agreement and the letter agreement, Baxalta and Shire may be required
to indemnify Baxter for any such tax liabilities incurred by Baxter. Baxters waiver of the provisions under the tax matters agreement restricting Baxaltas ability to enter into and consummate the merger will not relieve Baxalta (or
Shire) of its obligation to indemnify Baxter if the merger causes any of the Baxter Transactions to be taxable.
56
In connection with the signing of the merger agreement, Shire received an opinion from Cravath, Swaine &
Moore LLP (Cravath), tax counsel to Shire, to the effect that the merger will not cause Baxters contribution of assets to Baxalta, Baxters distribution of Baxalta shares on July 1, 2015, Baxters distribution of cash received
from Baxalta to its creditors or the Later Distributions to fail to qualify as tax-free to Baxter and its stockholders under Sections 355, 361 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. The merger is conditioned on the receipt by Shire at the time of the
consummation of the merger of a tax opinion to the same effect.
The opinion referred to in the immediately preceding paragraph is based upon various
factual representations and assumptions, as well as certain undertakings made by Baxter and Baxalta. If any of the factual representations or the assumptions in the tax opinion is untrue or incomplete in any material respect, an undertaking is not
complied with or the facts upon which the tax opinion is based are materially different from the facts at the time of the merger, the opinion may not be valid. Moreover, opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS. As a result, the conclusions
expressed in the Cravath opinion could be challenged by the IRS. None of Baxalta, Baxter or Shire has requested a ruling from the IRS regarding the impact of the merger on the tax treatment of the Baxter Transactions. Further, the Cravath opinion
does not address all tax aspects of the separation, Later Distributions and other related transactions and it is possible that Baxalta and Shire may be obligated to indemnify Baxter despite the continuing validity of the Cravath tax opinion.
Baxaltas (and Shires) indemnification obligations to Baxter and its subsidiaries, officers, directors and employees under the tax matters
agreement and letter agreement are not limited in amount or subject to any cap. If Baxalta or Shire is required to indemnify Baxter and its subsidiaries and their respective officers, directors and employees under the circumstances set forth in the
tax matters agreement (as supplemented by the letter agreement), it could have a material adverse effect on Baxalta and Shire.
For a description of the
sharing of certain tax liabilities between Baxter and Baxalta, see Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with BaxterTax Matters Agreement and Agreements Between Baxter and
Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with BaxterLetter Agreement.
New regulations issued by the U.S. Department
of Treasury may impact the combined company following the merger.
On April 4, 2016, the U.S. Department of Treasury issued new regulations
applicable to acquisitions of U.S. companies by non-U.S. companies. These regulations, among other things, change the manner in which thresholds contained within the so-called anti-inversion rules that govern how the combined company
will be taxed are calculated. These calculations are affected both by the merger and by any future acquisitions funded in whole or in part by Shire Securities. These calculations are complicated and depend on several factors. Moreover, the U.S.
Department of Treasury also introduced proposed earning stripping regulations that may, among other things, cause certain related-party debt instruments issued by a U.S. corporation to be treated as equity, resulting in the loss of
deductible interest payments for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
These regulations are newly issued and complex, and as such their application to any
particular set of facts is uncertain. Shire believes that the regulations are not likely to affect the expected tax position of the combined company, which belief is based on, among other things, facts that may change or judgments that may prove to
be incorrect and, if incorrect, could have an adverse impact on the expected tax position of the combined company.
Furthermore, the U.S. tax authorities
could issue additional guidance as to the application of these regulations or issue new regulations that could have an adverse effect on the expected tax position of the combined company.
57
Sales of Baxalta common stock in anticipation of the merger, and resales of Shire Securities following the
completion of the merger, may adversely affect the market price of Baxalta common stock prior to the merger, and, after the merger, the market price of Shire Securities.
Certain Baxalta stockholders, such as index funds or funds with concentration, geographic or other limitations on their permitted investments, may be required
to sell the Shire Securities that they receive in the transaction. Other Baxalta stockholders may already hold Shire Securities and those stockholders may decide not to hold the additional Shire Securities they receive in the merger, or to sell
their Baxalta shares prior to the merger. Such sales of Baxalta common stock or Shire Securities could have the effect of depressing the market price of Shire Securities and Baxalta common stock.
If the merger is consummated, Shire will issue new Shire Securities to Baxalta stockholders. The issuance of these new shares and the sale of additional
shares that may become eligible for sale in the public market from time to time upon exercise of options or the vesting of restricted securities could have the effect of depressing the market price for Shire Securities. Moreover, the increase in the
number of Shire Securities, or an increase in the number of Shire Securities outstanding following a future issuance, sale or transfer of Shire Securities by Shire or the possibility of such an issue, sale or transfer may lead to sales of such
shares or the perception that such sales may occur, either of which may adversely affect the market for, and the market price of, Shire Securities.
The market price of Shire Securities may be adversely affected by reports of third-party analysts published in connection with the consummation of the
merger.
The trading market for Shire Securities depends in part on the research and reports that third-party securities analysts publish about
Shire and its industry. In connection with the consummation of the merger, one or more of these analysts could downgrade Shire Securities or issue other negative commentary about Shire or its industry, which could cause the market price of Shire
Securities to decline.
The market price of Shire Securities may be affected by factors different from those affecting the market price of Baxalta
common stock.
If the merger is consummated, Baxalta stockholders will become holders of Shire Securities. Shires business differs from that
of Baxalta, and Shires results of operations, as well as the market price of Shire Securities, may be affected by factors different from those affecting Baxaltas results of operations and the market price of Baxalta common stock.
Exchange rate fluctuations may adversely affect the foreign currency value of Shire Securities and any dividends.
If the merger is consummated, Baxalta common stock will be exchanged for Shire Securities. Unlike Baxalta, as a consequence of Shires dual listing on
both the NASDAQ and LSE, Shire ordinary shares are quoted in pounds sterling on the LSE and Shire ADS are quoted in U.S. dollars on the NASDAQ. Dividends in respect of Shire ordinary shares, if any, will be declared in U.S. dollars. Shires
financial statements are prepared in U.S. dollars. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and pounds sterling will affect, among other matters, the pounds sterling value of Shire ordinary shares and of any dividends in respect of
such shares.
The Shire Securities have different rights from the shares of Baxalta common stock.
Certain of the rights associated with Baxalta common stock are different from the rights associated with Shire Securities. In particular, the law of Jersey, in
which Shire is organized, significantly limits the circumstances under which stockholders of companies may bring derivative actions and, in most cases, only the corporation may be the claimant or plaintiff for the purposes of maintaining proceedings
in respect of any wrongful act committed against it. Neither an individual nor any group of stockholders has any right of action in such circumstances. In addition, Jersey law does not afford appraisal rights to dissenting stockholders in the form
typically available to stockholders of a U.S. corporation.
58
Only registered holders of Shire Securities are afforded the rights of stockholders under Jersey law, the Shire
Memorandum of Association and the Shire Articles of Association. Because the depositarys nominee will be the registered owner of the shares, holders of Shire ADS must rely on the nominee to exercise the rights of a stockholder on their behalf.
If the merger is consummated, Baxalta stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest and will exercise less influence over the
management and policies of Shire than they do over Baxalta.
Baxalta stockholders currently have the right to vote in the election of the Baxalta
Board of Directors and on other matters affecting Baxalta. If the merger is consummated, each Baxalta stockholder will become a holder of Shire Securities with a percentage ownership of the combined company that is smaller than the
stockholders percentage ownership of Baxalta. Shire estimates that, upon the consummation of the merger, former Baxalta stockholders would own, in the aggregate, approximately 34% of all outstanding Shire ordinary shares on a diluted basis.
Accordingly, Baxalta stockholders would have less influence over the management and policies of Shire than they now have over the management and policies of Baxalta.
Holders of Shire Securities in the United States may not be able to enforce civil liabilities against Shire.
A number of Shires directors and executive officers are not residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of the assets of such
persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to affect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to enforce against them judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon the
civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.
There is also a doubt as to the enforceability in England, Wales and
Jersey, whether by original actions or by seeking to enforce judgments of U.S. courts, of claims based on the federal securities laws of the United States. In addition, punitive damages in actions brought in the United States or elsewhere may be
unenforceable in England, Wales and Jersey.
Lawsuits have been filed and additional lawsuits may be filed against Baxalta, Shire and the Baxalta
Board of Directors challenging the merger. An adverse ruling in any such lawsuit may delay or prevent the completion of the merger or result in an award of damages against Baxalta.
Following announcement of the merger, putative class action complaints were filed by purported Baxalta stockholders on behalf of all Baxalta stockholders in
the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Illinois. The complaints generally allege that the members of the Baxalta board breached their fiduciary duties to Baxalta stockholders by entering into the
merger agreement and approving the merger, and that Baxalta, Shire and Merger Sub aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaints further allege that, among other things, the per share merger consideration undervalues Baxalta and
certain provisions of the merger agreement inappropriately inhibit competing bids. In addition, a complaint for violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act was filed by a purported Baxalta stockholder in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaints seek, among other things, to enjoin the merger. The complaints filed in the State of Delaware have since been dismissed and Baxalta has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint filed in the
Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Illinois, but additional lawsuits arising out of or relating to the merger agreement or the merger may be filed in the future. The results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict and could delay or
prevent the completion of the merger. The existence of litigation relating to the merger could adversely impact the likelihood of obtaining the stockholder approvals from either Baxalta or Shire. Moreover, the pending litigation is, and any future
additional litigation could be, time consuming and expensive and could divert Baxaltas and Shires respective managements attention away from their regular business.
One of the conditions to completion of the merger is the absence of any law or judgment issued by any court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction that
prevents, makes illegal or prohibits the closing of the merger. Accordingly, if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining a judgment prohibiting completion of the merger, then such judgment may prevent the merger from being completed, or from being
completed within the expected time frame.
59
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus and certain documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus include forward-looking statements. Use of the words may,
will, would, could, should, believes, estimates, projects, potential, expects, plans, seeks, intends,
evaluates, pursues, anticipates, continues, designs, impacts, affects, forecasts, target, outlook, initiative,
objective, designed, priorities, goal, or the negative of those words or other similar expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements that represent our current judgment about possible
future events. All statements in this prospectus and documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus, other than statements of historical facts, including statements about future events or financial performance, are forward-looking
statements that involve certain risks and uncertainties.
These forward-looking statements may include statements with respect to the exchange offer
and/or one or more subsequent additional distributions, the tax-free status of the exchange offer, accounting estimates and assumptions, the companys expectations regarding the separation, including separation costs, litigation-related matters
including outcomes, future regulatory filings and the companys R&D pipeline, strategic objectives, credit exposure to foreign governments, potential developments with respect to credit ratings, investment of foreign earnings, estimates of
liabilities including those related to uncertain tax positions, contingent payments, future pension plan contributions, costs, discount rates and rates of return, the companys exposure to financial market volatility and foreign currency and
interest rate risks, geographic expansion, the impact of competition, future sales growth, business development activities, business optimization initiatives, future capital and R&D expenditures, future transactions in the companys
securities and debt issuances, the impact of healthcare reform, manufacturing expansion, the sufficiency of the companys facilities, financial flexibility, future cash flows, the adequacy of credit facilities, derivative instruments and
capitalization, tax provisions and reserves, Baxaltas effective tax rate, the impact on the company of recent tax legislation, the expected impact of the separation and all other statements that do not relate to historical facts.
These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current
conditions, and expected future developments as well as other factors that Baxalta believes are appropriate in the circumstances. While these statements represent Baxaltas current judgment on what the future may hold, and Baxalta believes
these judgments are reasonable, these statements are not guarantees of any events or financial results.
Whether actual future results and developments
will conform to expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the following factors, many of which are beyond Baxaltas control:
|
|
|
demand for and market acceptance of risks for and competitive pressures related to new and existing products;
|
|
|
|
product development risks, including satisfactory clinical performance, the ability to manufacture at appropriate scale, and the general unpredictability associated with the product development cycle;
|
|
|
|
product quality or patient safety issues, leading to product recalls, withdrawals, launch delays, sanctions, seizures, litigation, loss of confidence or declining sales;
|
|
|
|
future actions of FDA, EMA or any other regulatory body or government authority that could delay, limit or suspend product development, manufacturing or sale or result in seizures, recalls, injunctions, loss of customer
confidence, monetary sanctions or criminal or civil liabilities;
|
|
|
|
failures with respect to the companys compliance programs;
|
|
|
|
global regulatory, trade and tax policies;
|
|
|
|
the impact of competitive products and pricing, including generic competition, drug re-importation and disruptive technologies;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to identify business development and growth opportunities and to successfully execute on its business development strategy;
|
60
|
|
|
the companys ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its joint product development and commercialization arrangements, governmental collaborations and other business development activities or to identify
and enter into additional such opportunities in the future;
|
|
|
|
future actions of third parties, including third-party payors, as healthcare reform and other similar measures are implemented in the United States and globally;
|
|
|
|
the impact of U.S. healthcare reform and other similar actions undertaken by foreign governments with respect to pricing, reimbursement, taxation and rebate policies;
|
|
|
|
additional legislation, regulation and other governmental pressures in the United States or globally, which may affect pricing, reimbursement, taxation and rebate policies of government agencies and private payors or
other elements of the companys business;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in supply and demand and the pricing of plasma-based therapies;
|
|
|
|
the availability and pricing of acceptable raw materials and component supply;
|
|
|
|
inability to create additional production capacity in a timely manner or the occurrence of other manufacturing or supply difficulties;
|
|
|
|
the ability to protect or enforce the companys owned or in-licensed patent or other proprietary rights (including trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how) or patents of third parties preventing or
restricting the companys manufacture, sale or use of affected products or technology;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to develop and sustain relationships with institutional partners;
|
|
|
|
the impact of global economic conditions on the company and its customers and suppliers, including foreign governments in certain countries in which the company operates;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign exchange and interest rates;
|
|
|
|
any changes in law concerning the taxation of income, including income earned outside of the United States;
|
|
|
|
breaches or failures of the companys information technology systems;
|
|
|
|
loss of key employees or inability to identify and recruit new employees;
|
|
|
|
the outcome of pending or future litigation;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of the companys cash flows from operations to meet its ongoing cash obligations and fund its investment program;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to successfully develop and introduce biosimilar products;
|
|
|
|
the companys operations as an independent company;
|
|
|
|
the costs and temporary business interruptions related to the separation;
|
|
|
|
Baxters performance under various transaction agreements that were executed as part of the separation;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to transition away from the services to be provided by Baxter pursuant to the transition services agreement, manufacturing and supply agreement and other agreements with Baxter in a timely
manner;
|
|
|
|
potential indemnification liabilities owed to Baxter after the separation (including with regard to the Baxter Transactions);
|
|
|
|
the tax treatment of the distribution and the limitations imposed on the company under the tax matters agreement (and as further addressed in the letter agreement) that the company entered into with Baxter;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on post-separation activities in order to preserve the tax-free treatment of the separation;
|
61
|
|
|
potential conflicts of interest for certain of the companys executive officers and directors because of their previous or continuing positions at Baxter;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to achieve benefits from the separation in a timely manner;
|
|
|
|
the companys ability to access the capital markets following the separation from Baxter;
|
|
|
|
changes to the timing of the subsequent disposal of the equity retained by Baxter;
|
|
|
|
the inability to complete the merger due to the failure to obtain the approval of Baxaltas or Shires stockholders, or the failure to satisfy other conditions to completion of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the failure to obtain regulatory approvals required for the merger, or required regulatory approvals delaying the merger or causing the parties to abandon the merger;
|
|
|
|
the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the outcome of any legal proceeding instituted against Baxalta and others following the announcement of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the merger;
|
|
|
|
the effect of the announcement of the merger on Baxaltas client relationships, operating results and business generally, including without limitation the ability to retain key employees;
|
|
|
|
the failure of Shire to obtain the necessary financing for the merger;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the benefits of the merger, including synergies, may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;
|
|
|
|
the failure of relevant tax opinions that are a condition to the merger to be obtained on acceptable conditions or at all;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the merger may not advance the combined companys business strategy;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the combined company may experience difficulty integrating Baxaltas employees or operations;
|
|
|
|
the potential diversion of Baxaltas managements attention resulting from the proposed merger and of the combined companys managements attention resulting from integration issues after the merger;
|
|
|
|
the factors identified in the documents filed by Baxter and incorporated by reference herein; and
|
|
|
|
other factors identified elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
Factors that could cause actual results or events
to differ materially from those anticipated include the matters described in this prospectus under the sections entitled Summary, Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations of Baxalta, and Business, and the matters described in the sections entitled Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information in Baxters Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015 and Forward-Looking Information in Baxters Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2016, which reports are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. All of the forward-looking
statements made in this prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated will be realized
or, even if realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on Baxter or Baxalta or their respective subsidiaries or businesses or operations. Baxter and Baxalta undertake no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or other such factors that affect the subject of these statements, except where we are expressly required to do so by law.
62
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Board of Directors of Baxalta has adopted a policy with respect to the payment of dividends on Baxalta common stock. Baxalta currently
expects that it will continue to pay quarterly cash dividends until the completion of the merger, with the annual amount initially determined based on 15% of the estimate of annual adjusted net income for the applicable period. Notwithstanding the
current expectations for Baxaltas dividend policy, the timing, declaration, amount and payment of any dividends by Baxalta is within the discretion of its Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including Baxaltas financial
condition, earnings, corporate strategy, capital requirements of its operating subsidiaries, covenants associated with certain of Baxaltas debt service obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, industry practice, ability to
access capital markets and other factors deemed relevant by Baxaltas Board of Directors.
The merger agreement provides that Baxalta
may not pay dividends on Baxalta common stock other than the regular quarterly cash dividends not to exceed $0.07 per quarter. If the merger is consummated, Baxalta stockholders will no longer receive any dividends on Baxalta common stock. The
merger is expected to close in early June 2016, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions described in this prospectus. For more information, see The TransactionsThe Proposed MergerMerger Agreement and
BusinessThe Proposed Merger.
On May 10, 2016, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend
of $0.07 per share of common stock. The quarterly dividend will be paid on July 1, 2016, to stockholders of record as of the close of trading on the NYSE on June 10, 2016. In accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, if the merger is
consummated prior to the close of trading on the NYSE on June 10, 2016, Shire is not obligated to pay this dividend to the applicable stockholders of record. However, if the merger is consummated after such time but prior to July 1, 2016, Shire is
obligated under the merger agreement to pay such dividend to the applicable stockholders of record. If the merger is not consummated by July 1, 2016, Baxalta will pay the dividend to the applicable stockholders of record in the ordinary course.
63
THE TRANSACTIONS
Separation and Distribution
On July 1, 2015, Baxter
completed the distribution of approximately 80.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Baxalta to Baxter stockholders. The distribution was made to Baxters stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 17,
2015, who received one share of Baxalta common stock for each Baxter common share held as of such date.
Baxters transfer of less than all of the
Baxalta common stock to its stockholders in the distribution was motivated by its desire to establish, in an efficient and nontaxable, cost effective manner, an appropriate capital structure for each of Baxter and Baxalta, including by reducing,
directly or indirectly, Baxter indebtedness during the 18-month period following the distribution. The debt-for-equity exchanges discussed below and this exchange offer form part of Baxters liquidity management plans.
The Proposed Merger
Merger
Agreement
On January 11, 2016, Shire, Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Shire, and Baxalta entered into the merger agreement, pursuant
to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into Baxalta, with Baxalta being the surviving corporation, and Baxalta will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Shire.
On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each share of Baxalta common stock issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (other than treasury shares of Baxalta and any shares of Baxalta common stock owned by Shire or any subsidiary of Shire (including Merger Sub) or Baxalta, and other than shares of
Baxalta common stock as to which dissenters rights have been properly exercised) will be canceled and converted into the right to receive both (i) $18.00 in cash, without interest, and (ii) 0.1482 of an American Depositary Share of
Shire (the Shire ADS) duly and validly issued against Shires ordinary shares, par value £0.05 per share (the per share stock consideration), except that cash will be paid in lieu of fractional Shire ADSs. Although Shire will permit
holders of Baxalta common stock to elect to receive 0.4446 of a Shire ordinary share for each outstanding share of Baxalta common stock in lieu of the per share stock consideration, the deadline for making such election is expected to have passed
before the exchange offer is complete.
Under the merger agreement, Shire agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to appoint Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.,
chairman of the Baxalta Board of Directors, and two additional members of the Baxalta Board, jointly selected by the chairman of the Baxalta Board and chairman of the Shire board of directors following consultation with the Nomination Committee of
the Shire board, to the Shire board of directors, effective upon the closing of the merger. Following the appointment of such directors, Shire agreed to nominate the same individuals as directors, to the extent such individuals are willing to serve
and have complied in a satisfactory manner, in the good faith reasonable judgment of the Shire board, with the attendance and performance expectations of the Shire board, at the 2017 Shire stockholder meeting. Since the date of the merger agreement,
Dr. Hockmeyer has decided to withdraw himself from consideration for such an appointment due to personal reasons and therefore only two members of the Baxalta Board will be considered for nomination.
The consummation of the merger is subject to certain closing conditions, including the approval of holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding Baxalta
common stock and the approval of holders of a majority of Shire ordinary shares present and voting in person or by proxy, the receipt of certain regulatory approvals, the absence of a material adverse effect with respect to Shire and
Baxalta, the receipt by Shire and Baxter of certain tax opinions set forth in the letter agreement described below, and other conditions specified in the merger agreement.
64
Because the record date for the special meeting of the stockholders of Baxalta to approve the merger has already
occurred, you will not be entitled to vote on the merger with Shire with respect to shares of Baxalta common stock you receive in the exchange offer.
The
merger agreement provides that, during the period from the date of the merger agreement until the effective time of the merger, Baxalta will be subject to certain restrictions on its ability to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third
parties, to provide non-public information to third parties and engage in discussions with third parties regarding alternative acquisition proposals except that Baxalta may, in response to an unsolicited acquisition proposal, engage in discussions
with, and provide non-public information to, a third party if Baxaltas Board of Directors determines in good faith that the acquisition proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute or lead to a superior proposal.
Baxaltas Board of Directors may make an adverse recommendation and terminate the merger agreement after receiving a superior proposal, subject to Shires right to match the superior proposal during a negotiation period of 5
days (with subsequent negotiation periods of 4 days if the superior proposal is amended). A superior proposal is a written acquisition proposal providing for a transfer of control of at least 50% of the stock or assets of Baxalta, which
Baxaltas Board of Directors determines in good faith (i) to be reasonably likely to be consummated if accepted and (ii) to be more favorable to Baxaltas stockholders from a financial point of view than the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Shire is subject to generally reciprocal non-solicitation obligations except that Baxalta does not have similar rights to match a superior proposal received by Shire.
The merger agreement provides for certain termination rights for both Shire and Baxalta. Upon termination of the merger agreement under certain specified
circumstances, Baxalta may be required to disburse to Shire a termination fee of $369 million and Shire may be required to pay the company a termination fee of $369 million.
In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Baxalta, Baxalta
may be required to reimburse Shire for transaction expenses up to $110 million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently payable by Baxalta), and if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified
circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Shire, Shire may be required to reimburse Baxalta for transaction expenses up to $65 million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently payable by
Shire).
Shire and Baxalta each made certain representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement, including, among other things, covenants
by Shire and Baxalta to conduct their businesses in the ordinary course during the period between the execution of the merger agreement and consummation of the merger.
Letter Agreement
On
January 11, 2016, Baxter, Shire and Baxalta entered into a letter agreement (the letter agreement) in connection with the entry by Shire and Baxalta into the merger agreement, which, among other things, addresses certain aspects of a tax
matters agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, between Baxter and Baxalta, and modifies certain aspects of a shareholders and registration rights agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, between Baxter and Baxalta.
Under the letter agreement, Baxter agreed under certain circumstances to express its support for the merger and waived its appraisal rights under Delaware law
in connection with the merger. Under the letter agreement, Baxter represented to Shire and Baxalta that it had received an opinion from its tax advisor and, in connection with the execution of the merger agreement, Shire received an opinion from its
tax advisor, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (Cravath). In addition, under the letter agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the merger, Baxter, Shire and Baxalta agreed to deliver certain representation letters to each of Cravath and
Baxters tax advisor. The letter agreement provides that Baxter will use its reasonable best efforts to cause its tax advisor to deliver a tax opinion immediately prior to the closing of the merger as required by the letter agreement, and Shire
will use its reasonable best efforts to cause Cravath to deliver immediately prior to the closing of the merger a tax opinion required by the letter agreement.
65
Under the letter agreement, from and after the closing of the merger, Baxalta agreed to indemnify, and Shire
agreed to guarantee such indemnity to, Baxter and each of its affiliates and each of their respective officers, directors and employees against certain tax-related losses resulting from the merger (other than losses resulting from any disposition of
Baxalta common stock by Baxter (i) that are not attributable to the merger and (ii) other than in the distribution on July 1, 2015 and certain debt-for-equity exchanges (including the debt-for-equity exchanges described below),
exchange offers (including this exchange offer), contribution of Baxalta shares to Baxters U.S. pension fund or a special dividend distribution to Baxters stockholders (in each case as contemplated by the letter agreement)).
Under the letter agreement, Shire agreed to cooperate with Baxalta and Baxter to enable Baxalta to comply with its obligations under the shareholders
and registration rights agreement and to use its reasonable best efforts to facilitate Baxters disposition of Baxalta common stock in certain SEC registered offerings, including this exchange offer. Each of Shire and Baxalta agreed in the
letter agreement not to hold their respective stockholder meetings to approve, and not to consummate, the merger before the earliest of (a) the date that Baxter has completed marketing periods for two debt-for-equity exchanges and one equity
exchange offer with respect to its Baxalta common stock, (b) the date on which Baxter has disposed of all its Baxalta common stock, and (c) May 26, 2016 (subject to tolling or extension (generally to no later than June 25, 2016)
under certain circumstances).
The letter agreement may be terminated (a) by mutual written consent of Shire, Baxalta and Baxter, (b) by Shire
or Baxalta upon termination of the merger agreement or (c) upon the closing of the merger, in each case, subject to the terms of the letter agreement.
Initial Debt-for-Equity Exchange
Effective
January 27, 2016, Baxter completed a debt-for-equity exchange with Chase Lincoln First Commercial Corporation (Chase Lincoln), an affiliate of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, the underwriter in the subsequent underwritten public offering described
below, and terminated Baxters existing 364-Day Credit Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2014, among Baxter, as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lender(s) party thereto from time to
time (as amended, the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement provided for a revolving credit commitment of up to $1.8 billion, of which an aggregate principal amount of $1.45 billion was drawn and outstanding immediately prior to the termination of
the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement was terminated in connection with the transfer of 37,573,040 shares of Baxalta common stock (the Exchanged Shares) held by Baxter to Chase Lincoln, the sole lender under the Credit Agreement prior to its
termination, in exchange for the extinguishment of all the outstanding indebtedness thereunder. Chase Lincoln sold the Exchanged Shares in an underwritten public offering managed by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC that was completed on February 2,
2016.
Immediately after giving effect to this initial debt-for-equity exchange, Baxter continued to own 94,329,679 shares of Baxalta common stock,
representing approximately 13.9% of Baxaltas total issued and outstanding shares as of December 31, 2015.
Subsequent Debt-for-Equity
Exchange and Third Party Tender Offer
On February 16, 2016, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and UBS Securities LLC (collectively, the Third Party Purchasers) commenced an offer to purchase for cash, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the offer to purchase, dated February 16,
2016 and the related letter of transmittal as amended by means of a press release dated March 1, 2016, up to $2.2 billion aggregate principal amount of certain notes issued by Baxter. The Third Party Purchasers purchased $2.2 billion aggregate
principal amount of such notes on March 2, 2016, on the early settlement date of the tender offer.
On March 16, 2016, the Third Party Purchasers
entered into an agreement with Baxter whereby the Third Party Purchasers exchanged the notes purchased by them pursuant to the tender offer for certain of the shares of
66
Baxalta common stock held by Baxter in a debt-for-equity exchange. The Third Party Purchasers sold the 63,823,582 shares of Baxalta common stock received by them pursuant to the debt-for-equity
exchange in a registered public offering, which was completed on March 21, 2016. Immediately after giving effect to this debt-for-equity exchange, Baxter continued to own 30,506,097 shares of Baxalta common stock, representing approximately
4.5% of Baxaltas total issued and outstanding shares as of April 30, 2016.
The Exchange Offer
Baxter is offering to exchange up to 13,360,527 shares of Baxalta common stock in the aggregate for outstanding shares of Baxter common stock that are validly
tendered and not validly withdrawn. You may tender all, some or none of your shares of Baxter common stock. Shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered and not validly withdrawn will be accepted for exchange at the final exchange ratio, on the
terms and conditions of the exchange offer and subject to the limits described below, including the proration provisions. Shares not accepted for exchange will be returned to the tendering stockholder promptly following the expiration or termination
of the exchange offer, as applicable. See The Exchange Offer for more information.
Reasons for the Exchange Offer
As part of Baxters liquidity management plans, Baxter has decided to pursue the exchange offer to dispose of all or a portion of its remaining interest
in Baxalta in a tax-efficient manner, thereby enhancing stockholder value.
The following factors, among others, were considered by Baxter in making the
determination to dispose of all or a portion of its remaining interest in Baxalta by means of the exchange offer:
|
|
|
The exchange offer is a tax-efficient way for Baxter to divest its interest in Baxalta.
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer presents an opportunity for Baxter to quickly repurchase a significant number of outstanding shares of Baxter common stock without reducing overall cash and financial flexibility.
|
|
|
|
The prevailing market price of Baxalta common stock reflects a substantial increase in value since the distribution on July 1, 2015.
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer is an efficient means of placing Baxalta common stock with only those Baxter stockholders who wish to directly own an interest in Baxalta.
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer will likely present stockholders tendering shares of Baxter common stock an opportunity to acquire shares of Baxalta common stock at a discount to the then prevailing market price.
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer presents more execution risk than a pro rata distribution of all or a portion of Baxters remaining interest in Baxalta, and may require an extension of the exchange offer period and/or one or
more subsequent additional distributions if Baxter does not dispose of all of the remaining shares of Baxalta common stock held by it in the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer cannot be completed prior to the effectiveness of a registration statement under the Securities Act, while a pro rata distribution of all or a portion of Baxters remaining interest in Baxalta
could be completed without such a registration statement under the Securities Act.
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer will cause Baxter to incur certain incremental expenses relating to the exchange offer that it would not otherwise incur in connection with a pro rata distribution of all or a portion of Baxters
remaining interest in Baxalta.
|
|
|
|
If Baxter holds Baxalta common stock as of the date of the consummation of the merger, such common stock will be converted into the right to receive certain cash consideration and Shire Securities as further described
above under The Proposed MergerMerger Agreement.
|
67
Effects of the Exchange Offer
Holders of Baxter common stock will be affected by the exchange offer as follows:
|
|
|
Holders who exchange all of their shares of Baxter common stock will, if the exchange offer is not oversubscribed, no longer have any ownership interest in Baxter but will instead directly own only an interest in
Baxalta. As a result, their investment will be subject exclusively to risks associated with Baxalta and not risks associated solely with Baxter.
|
|
|
|
Holders who exchange all of their shares of Baxter common stock will, if the exchange offer is oversubscribed, be subject to proration and, unless their odd-lot tender is not subject to proration, will own an interest
in both Baxter and Baxalta. As a result, their investment will continue to be subject to risks associated with both Baxter and Baxalta, though such holders may be subject to these risks to a different degree than prior to the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
Holders who exchange some, but not all, of their shares of Baxter common stock, regardless of whether the exchange offer is fully subscribed, will own fewer shares of Baxter common stock and more shares of Baxalta
common stock than prior to the exchange offer, unless they otherwise acquire Baxter common stock. As a result, their investment will continue to be subject to risks associated with both Baxter and Baxalta, though such holders may be subject to these
risks to a different degree than prior to the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
Holders who do not exchange any of their shares of Baxter common stock in the exchange offer will have an increased ownership interest in Baxter, on a percentage basis, and if Baxter disposes of all of the remaining
shares of Baxalta common stock held by it in the exchange offer, have no indirect ownership interest in Baxalta (unless they otherwise own shares of Baxalta common stock). As a result, their investment will be subject exclusively to risks associated
with Baxter and not risks associated with Baxalta because Baxter would no longer have an investment in Baxalta.
|
Baxaltas Equity
Capitalization
Baxalta had 683,539,950 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2016. Baxter owned approximately 4.5% of the
outstanding shares of Baxaltas common stock as of April 30, 2016.
No Appraisal Rights
Appraisal is a statutory remedy under state law available to corporate stockholders who object to extraordinary actions taken by their corporation. This remedy
allows dissenting stockholders to require the corporation to repurchase their stock at a price equivalent to its value immediately prior to the extraordinary corporate action. No appraisal rights are available to Baxter stockholders or Baxalta
stockholders in connection with the exchange offer.
Regulatory Approval
Certain acquisitions of Baxalta common stock under the exchange offer may require a premerger notification filing under the HSR Act. If a holder of Baxter
common stock decides to participate in the exchange offer and consequently acquires enough shares of Baxalta common stock to exceed the $78.2 million threshold provided for in the HSR Act and associated regulations, and if an exemption under the HSR
Act or regulations does not apply, Baxter and the holder will be required to make filings under the HSR Act and the holder will be required to pay the applicable filing fee. A filing requirement could delay the exchange of shares with any
stockholder or stockholders required to make such a filing until the waiting periods in the HSR Act have expired or been terminated.
Apart from the
registration of shares of Baxalta common stock offered in the exchange offer under applicable securities laws and Baxter filing a Schedule TO with the SEC, Baxter does not believe that any other material U.S. federal or state regulatory filings or
approvals will be necessary to consummate the exchange offer.
68
Accounting Treatment
The shares of Baxter common stock acquired by Baxter in the exchange offer will be recorded as an acquisition of treasury stock at a cost equal to the market
value of the Baxalta shares exchanged in the offer. Any difference between the carrying value of Baxters investment in Baxalta common stock and the market value of the shares of Baxalta common stock will be recognized by Baxter as a gain on
disposal of investment net of any direct and incremental expenses of the exchange offer on the disposal of its Baxalta common stock.
The aggregate market
value of Baxters investment in 13,360,527 shares of Baxalta common stock, based on the closing price of shares of Baxalta common stock on April 20, 2016 of $40.66 per share, was approximately $543.2 million. Baxter expects to
recognize a gain upon consummation of the exchange offer. The amount of the gain will be dependent upon the final exchange ratio and the value of Baxalta common stock at the time the exchange offer is consummated. For example, if at the time Baxter
completes the exchange offer, (i) the exchange offer is fully subscribed, (ii) the upper limit of 1.4026 shares of Baxalta stock exchanged for each share of Baxter common stock is in effect, and (iii) the market value of Baxalta
common stock is $40.66 per share (the last reported sales price on the NYSE on April 20, 2016), Baxter would recognize a gain of approximately $470.4 million in connection with the transaction, prior to estimated fees and expenses. A
$1 increase in the per share market value of Baxalta common stock in this example would increase the gain recognized by Baxter by approximately $13.4 million.
The exchange of shares of Baxalta common stock for shares of Baxter common stock in the exchange offer, in and of itself, will not affect the financial
condition or results of operations of Baxalta.
Tax Treatment
See U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences for a discussion of the tax treatment of the exchange offer.
69
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Terms of the Exchange Offer
General
Baxter is offering to exchange up to 13,360,527 shares of Baxalta common stock which are owned by Baxter for shares of Baxter common stock, at an exchange
ratio to be calculated in the manner described below, on the terms and conditions and subject to the limitations described below and in the related letter of transmittal (including the instructions thereto), which are validly tendered and not
validly withdrawn by 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date, which is currently expected to be May 18, 2016, unless the exchange offer is extended or terminated. The last day on which tenders will be accepted, whether on
May 18, 2016 or any later date to which the exchange offer is extended, is referred to in this prospectus as the expiration date. You may tender all, some or none of your shares of Baxter common stock.
The number of shares of Baxter common stock that will be accepted if the exchange offer is completed will depend on the final exchange ratio and the number of
shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered and not validly withdrawn. The maximum number of shares of Baxter common stock that will be accepted if the exchange offer is completed will be equal to 13,360,527 shares of Baxalta common stock held by
Baxter divided by the final exchange ratio (which will be subject to the upper limit described below under Upper Limit) and could be up to all of the outstanding shares of Baxter common stock. Baxters obligation to complete
the exchange offer is subject to important conditions that are described in the section entitled Conditions to Completion of the Exchange Offer.
For each share of Baxter common stock that you validly tender in the exchange offer and do not validly withdraw, and that is accepted by Baxter, you will
receive a number of shares of Baxalta common stock at a discount of approximately 7%, subject to an upper limit of 1.4026 shares of Baxalta common stock per share of Baxter common stock. Stated another way, subject to the upper limit described
below, for each $100 of Baxter common stock tendered by you and accepted in the exchange offer, you will receive approximately $107.52 of shares of Baxalta common stock based on the Average Baxter Price and the Average Baxalta Price, as determined
by Baxter.
The Average Baxter Price will be equal to the simple arithmetic average of the daily volume-weighted average prices (VWAPs) of shares of
Baxter common stock on the NYSE during the Averaging Period, as determined by Baxter, and the Average Baxalta Price will be equal to the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs of shares of Baxalta common stock on the NYSE during the Averaging
Period, as determined by Baxter, as more fully described below under Pricing Mechanism.
The daily VWAP for shares of Baxter common
stock or Baxalta common stock, as the case may be, will be the VWAP per share of that stock on the NYSE during the period beginning at 9:30 a.m., New York City time (or such other time as is the official open of trading on the NYSE), and ending at
4:00 p.m., New York City time (or such other time as is the official close of trading on the NYSE), except that such data will only take into account adjustments made to reported trades included by 4:10 p.m., New York City time. The daily VWAP will
be as reported by Bloomberg L.P. as displayed under the heading Bloomberg VWAP on the Bloomberg pages BAX UN<Equity>AQR with respect to Baxter common stock and BXLT UN<Equity>AQR with respect to Baxalta common
stock (or any other recognized quotation source selected by Baxter in its sole discretion if such pages are not available or are manifestly erroneous). The daily VWAPs obtained from Bloomberg L.P. may be different from other sources or
investors or other security holders own calculations. Baxter will determine the simple arithmetic average of the VWAPs of each stock, and such determination will be final.
For purposes of the exchange offer, a business day means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or U.S. federal holiday and consists of the time
period from 12:01 a.m., New York City time, through 11:59 p.m., New York City time.
70
Upper Limit
The number of shares of Baxalta common stock that you can receive is subject to an upper limit of 1.4026 shares of Baxalta common stock for each share of
Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer.
If the upper limit is in effect, you may receive less than $107.52 of Baxalta common stock for each $100 of Baxter common stock that you tender, based on the Average Baxter Price and Average
Baxalta Price, and you could receive much less.
This upper limit represents a 25% discount for shares of Baxalta common stock based on the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs of shares of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock on
April 18, 19 and 20, 2016 (the three trading days immediately preceding the date of the commencement of the exchange offer). Baxter set this upper limit to ensure that there would not be an unduly high number of shares of Baxalta common stock
being exchanged for each share of Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer.
Pricing Mechanism
The terms of the exchange offer are designed to result in you receiving approximately $107.52 of shares of Baxalta common stock for each $100 of Baxter
common stock tendered and accepted in the exchange offer based on the Average Baxter Price and the Average Baxalta Price determined as described above at the end of the Averaging Period and subject to the upper limit. Regardless of the final
exchange ratio, the terms of the exchange offer would always result in you receiving approximately $107.52 of Baxalta common stock for each $100 of Baxter common stock, based on the Average Baxter Price and the Average Baxalta Price at the end of
the Averaging Period, so long as the upper limit described above is not in effect.
To illustrate, the number of shares of Baxalta common stock you will
receive for shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered and accepted in the exchange offer, and assuming no proration occurs, will be calculated as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of Baxalta common stock
|
|
=
|
|
(a) number of shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered by you and accepted by Baxter
|
|
multiplied by
|
|
(b) the final exchange ratio
|
The following formula will be used to calculate the final exchange ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final exchange ratio
|
|
=
|
|
the lesser
of:
|
|
(a) the Average Baxter Price divided by 93% of the Average Baxalta Price
|
|
and
|
|
(b) 1.4026 (the upper limit)
|
The Average Baxter Price for purposes of the exchange offer will equal the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs of
shares of Baxter common stock on the NYSE during the Averaging Period of the three consecutive trading days (currently expected to be May 12, 13, and 16, 2016) ending on and including the second trading day preceding the expiration date of the
exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016). The Average Baxalta Price for purposes of the exchange offer will equal the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs of shares of Baxalta common stock on the NYSE during the Averaging
Period of the three consecutive trading days (currently expected to be May 12, 13, and 16, 2016) including the second trading day preceding the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016),
The final exchange ratio, the daily VWAPs used to calculate the final exchange ratio, the Average Baxter Price and the Average Baxalta Price will each be
rounded to four decimals.
71
To help illustrate the way these calculations work, below are two examples:
|
|
|
Example 1: Assuming that the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs during the Averaging Period is $43.2256 per share of Baxter common stock and $41.0903 per share of Baxalta common stock, you would receive 1.1311
shares ($43.2256 divided by 93% of $41.0903) of Baxalta common stock for each share of Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer. In this example, the upper limit of 1.4026 shares of Baxalta common stock for each share of Baxter common
stock would not apply.
|
|
|
|
Example 2: Assuming that the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs during the Averaging Period is $49.7094 per share of Baxter common stock and $34.9268 per share of Baxalta common stock, the upper limit of
1.4026 would be in effect and you would only receive 1.4026 shares of Baxalta common stock for each share of Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer because the upper limit is less than 1.5304 shares ($49.7094 divided by 93% of $34.9268)
of Baxalta common stock for each share of Baxter common stock.
|
A website will be maintained at
www.dfking.com/bax
that provides the
indicative exchange ratio on each day commencing on the third trading day of the exchange offer period prior to the announcement of the final exchange ratio. You may also contact the information agent at its toll-free number provided on the back
cover of this prospectus to obtain this information.
Prior to the Averaging Period, commencing on the third trading day of the exchange offer, the
website will also provide indicative exchange ratios for each day that will be calculated based on the indicative calculated per-share values of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock on each day, calculated as though that day were the last
day of the Averaging Period, by 4:30 p.m., New York City time. In other words, assuming that a given day is a trading day, the indicative exchange ratio will be calculated based on the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs of Baxter common
stock and Baxalta common stock for that day and the immediately preceding two trading days. The indicative exchange ratio will also reflect whether the upper limit would have been in effect had such day been the last day of the Averaging Period.
During the first two days of the Averaging Period, the website will provide indicative exchange ratios that will be calculated based on the Average
Baxter Price and Average Baxalta Price, as calculated by Baxter based on data as reported by Bloomberg L.P. (or any other recognized quotation source selected by Baxter in its sole discretion if such pages are not available or are manifestly
erroneous). The website will not provide an indicative exchange ratio on the third day of the Averaging Period. The indicative exchange ratios will be calculated as follows: (i) on the first day of the Averaging Period, the indicative exchange ratio
will be calculated based on the daily VWAPs of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock for that first day of the Averaging Period and (ii) on the second day of the Averaging Period, the indicative exchange ratio will be calculated based on the
simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock for the first and second day of the Averaging Period. During the first two days of the Averaging Period, the indicative exchange ratios will be updated on
the website each day by 4:30 p.m., New York City time. The final exchange ratio will be announced by press release and be available on the website by 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the trading day (currently expected to be May 17, 2016)
preceding the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016).
Prior to and during the Averaging Period, the data based on
which the VWAP is determined will only take into account adjustments made to reported trades included by 4:10 p.m., New York City time. In addition, the data used to derive the actual daily volume-weighted average prices during the elapsed portion
of the day will reflect a 30-minute reporting and upload delay. The daily VWAPs, and the actual daily volume-weighted average prices during the elapsed portion of the day on each of the Averaging Dates as reported by Bloomberg L.P., may be different
from other sources or investors or other security holders own calculations. Baxter will determine the simple arithmetic average of the daily VWAPs of each stock, and such determination will be final.
Final Exchange Ratio
The final exchange ratio
that shows the number of shares of Baxalta common stock that you will receive for each share of Baxter common stock that you tendered and which is accepted in the exchange offer will be announced
72
by press release and available at
www.
dfking.com/bax
by 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the trading day (currently expected to be May 17, 2016) preceding the expiration date
of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016). After that time, you may also contact the information agent to obtain the final exchange ratio at its toll-free number provided on the back cover of this prospectus.
If a market disruption event occurs with respect to shares of Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock on any day during the Averaging Period, the simple
arithmetic average stock price of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock will be determined using the daily VWAPs of shares of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock on the preceding trading day or days, as the case may be, on which no
market disruption event occurred. If, however, Baxter decides to extend the exchange offer period following a market disruption event, the Averaging Period will be reset. If a market disruption event occurs as specified above, Baxter may terminate
the exchange offer if, in its reasonable judgment, the market disruption event has impaired the benefits of the exchange offer. See Conditions to Completion of the Exchange Offer.
A market disruption event with respect to either Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock means a suspension, absence or material limitation of
trading of such stock on the NYSE for more than two hours of trading or a breakdown or failure in the price and trade reporting systems of the NYSE as a result of which the reported trading prices for Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock, as
the case may be, during any half-hour trading period during the principal trading session in the NYSE are materially inaccurate, as determined by Baxter in its sole discretion, on the day with respect to which such determination is being made. For
purposes of such determination: (i) a limitation on the hours or number of days of trading will not constitute a market disruption event if it results from an announced change in the regular business hours of the NYSE; and (ii) limitations
pursuant to NYSE Rule 80A (or any applicable rule or regulation enacted or promulgated by the NYSE, any other self-regulatory organization or the SEC of similar scope as determined by Baxter or the exchange agent) on trading during significant
market fluctuations will constitute a suspension, absence or material limitation of trading.
Since the exchange offer is scheduled to expire at 11:59
p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date (currently expected to be May 18, 2016) and the final exchange ratio will be announced by 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the trading day (currently expected to be May 17, 2016)
preceding the expiration date of the exchange offer, you will be able to tender or withdraw your shares of Baxter common stock after the final exchange ratio is determined until the exchange offer has expired. For more information on tendering and
withdrawing your shares, see Procedures for Tendering and Withdrawal Rights.
73
For the purposes of illustration, the table below indicates the number of shares of Baxalta common stock that you
would receive per one share of Baxter common stock accepted in the exchange offer and the maximum number of shares of Baxter common stock that would be accepted in the aggregate if the exchange offer is completed, calculated on the basis described
under Pricing Mechanism and taking into account the upper limit, assuming a range of simple arithmetic averages of the daily VWAPs of shares of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock during the assumed Averaging Period. The
first line of the table below shows the indicative Average Baxter Price and the indicative Average Baxalta Price and indicative exchange ratio that would have been in effect following the official close of trading on the NYSE on April 20, 2016,
based on the daily VWAPs of shares of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock on April 18, 19 and 20, 2016. The table also shows the effects of a 15% increase or decrease in either or both of the indicative Average Baxter Price and
indicative Average Baxalta Price based on changes relative to the values as of April 20, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxter
common stock
|
|
Baxalta
common stock
|
|
Average
Baxter Price
|
|
|
Average
Baxalta Price
|
|
|
Shares of Baxalta
common stock per
Baxter common
stock tendered
|
|
|
Value
Ratio
(1)
|
|
|
Maximum
number of
shares of
Baxter
common stock
accepted in
exchange
offer
|
|
As of April 20, 2016
|
|
As of April 20, 2016
|
|
$
|
43.2256
|
|
|
$
|
41.0903
|
|
|
|
1.1311
|
|
|
|
1.0752
|
|
|
|
11,811,976
|
|
Down 15%
|
|
Up 15%
|
|
$
|
36.7418
|
|
|
$
|
47.2538
|
|
|
|
0.8361
|
|
|
|
1.0752
|
|
|
|
15,979,580
|
|
Down 15%
|
|
Unchanged
|
|
$
|
36.7418
|
|
|
$
|
41.0903
|
|
|
|
0.9615
|
|
|
|
1.0752
|
|
|
|
13,895,503
|
|
Down 15%
|
|
Down 15%
|
|
$
|
36.7418
|
|
|
$
|
34.9268
|
|
|
|
1.1311
|
|
|
|
1.0752
|
|
|
|
11,811,976
|
|
Unchanged
|
|
Up 15%
|
|
$
|
43.2256
|
|
|
$
|
47.2538
|
|
|
|
0.9836
|
|
|
|
1.0753
|
|
|
|
13,583,293
|
|
Unchanged
|
|
Down 15%
|
|
$
|
43.2256
|
|
|
$
|
34.9268
|
|
|
|
1.3308
|
|
|
|
1.0752
|
|
|
|
10,039,470
|
|
Up 15%
|
|
Up 15%
|
|
$
|
49.7094
|
|
|
$
|
47.2538
|
|
|
|
1.1311
|
|
|
|
1.0752
|
|
|
|
11,811,976
|
|
Up 15%
|
|
Unchanged
|
|
$
|
49.7094
|
|
|
$
|
41.0903
|
|
|
|
1.3008
|
|
|
|
1.0752
|
|
|
|
10,271,007
|
|
Up 15%
|
|
Down 15%
|
|
$
|
49.7094
|
|
|
$
|
34.9268
|
|
|
|
1.4026
|
|
|
|
0.9855
|
(2)
|
|
|
9,525,543
|
|
(1)
|
The Value Ratio equals (i) the Average Baxalta Price multiplied by the exchange ratio, divided by (ii) the Average Baxter Price.
|
(2)
|
In this scenario, the upper limit of 1.4026 is in effect. Absent the upper limit, the exchange ratio would have been 1.5304 shares of Baxalta common stock per share of Baxter common stock tendered. In this scenario,
Baxter would announce that the upper limit on the number of shares of Baxalta common stock that can be received for each share of Baxter common stock tendered is in effect no later than 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the trading day (currently
expected to be May 17, 2016) preceding the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016).
|
If the
trading price of shares of Baxter common stock were to increase during the last two trading days of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 17 and May 18, 2016), the Average Baxter Price would likely be lower than the closing
price of shares of Baxter common stock on the expiration date or on the basis of an Averaging Period that includes the last two trading days of the exchange offer. As a result, you may receive fewer shares of Baxalta common stock for each $100 of
Baxter common stock that are validly tendered and accepted for exchange than you would have received if the Average Baxter Price were calculated on the basis of the closing price of shares of Baxter common stock on the expiration date or on the
basis of an Averaging Period that includes the last two trading days of the exchange offer. Similarly, if the trading price of shares of Baxalta common stock were to decrease during the last two trading days of the exchange offer, the Average
Baxalta Price would likely be higher than the closing price of shares of Baxalta common stock on the expiration date of the exchange offer. This could also result in your receiving fewer shares of Baxalta common stock for each $100 of Baxter common
stock than you would otherwise receive if the Average Baxalta Price were calculated on the basis of the closing price of shares of Baxalta common stock on the expiration date or on the basis of an Averaging Period that includes the last two trading
days of the exchange offer.
74
The number of shares of Baxter common stock accepted by Baxter in the exchange offer may be subject to proration.
Depending on the number of shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered, and not validly withdrawn, and the final exchange ratio, determined as described above, Baxter may have to limit the number of shares of Baxter common stock that it accepts
in the exchange offer through a proration process. Any proration of the number of shares accepted in the exchange offer will be determined on the basis of the proration mechanics described below under Proration; Odd-Lots.
This prospectus and related documents are being sent to:
|
|
|
persons who directly held shares of Baxter common stock on April 19, 2016;
|
|
|
|
participants in the Savings Plans; and
|
|
|
|
brokers, banks and similar persons whose names or the names of whose nominees appear on Baxters stockholder list or, if applicable, who are listed as participants in a clearing agencys security position
listing for subsequent transmittal to beneficial owners of shares of Baxter common stock.
|
Proration; Odd-Lots
If, upon the expiration of the exchange offer, Baxter stockholders have validly tendered and not validly withdrawn more shares of Baxter common stock than
Baxter is able to accept for exchange, Baxter will accept for exchange the shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered and not validly withdrawn by each tendering stockholder on a pro rata basis, based on the proportion that the total number of
shares of Baxter common stock to be accepted for exchange bears to the total number of shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered and not validly withdrawn (rounded to the nearest whole number of shares of Baxter common stock, and subject to any
adjustment necessary to ensure the exchange of all shares of Baxalta common stock owned by Baxter), except for tenders of odd-lots, as described below.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, beneficial holders of less than 100 shares of Baxter common stock who validly tender all of their shares may
elect not to be subject to proration if the exchange offer is oversubscribed. Beneficial holders of at least 100 shares of Baxter common stock, even those holders with separate stock certificates representing less than 100 shares, and those who own
less than 100 shares but do not tender all of their shares, are not eligible for this preference. In addition, shares held on behalf of participants in the Savings Plans (each of which plans holds more than 100 shares of Baxter common stock) are not
eligible for this preference.
Any beneficial holder of less than 100 shares of Baxter common stock who wishes to tender all of the shares and not be
subject to proration must check the box under Proration/Odd Lot on the letter of transmittal. If your odd-lot shares are held by a broker for your account, you can contact your broker and request the preferential treatment.
Baxter will announce the preliminary proration factor, if any, by press release by 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the business day (currently expected to
be May 19, 2016) following the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016). Upon determining the number of shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered for exchange, Baxter will announce the final
results, including the final proration factor, if any.
Any shares of Baxter common stock not accepted for exchange in the exchange offer as a result of
proration will be returned to the tendering stockholder promptly after the expiration of the exchange offer in book-entry form to a direct registration account in the name of the registered holder maintained by Baxters transfer agent even if
tendered in certificated form.
Fractional Shares
Fractional shares of Baxalta common stock will not be distributed in the exchange offer. The exchange agent, acting as agent for the Baxter stockholders
otherwise entitled to receive fractional shares of Baxalta common stock, will aggregate all fractional shares that would otherwise have been required to be distributed and cause
75
them to be sold in the open market for the accounts of the stockholders. Any proceeds that the exchange agent realizes from that sale will be distributed, less any brokerage commissions or other
fees, to each stockholder entitled thereto in accordance with the stockholders fractional interest in the aggregate number of shares sold. The distribution of fractional share proceeds will take longer than the distribution of shares of
Baxalta common stock. As a result, stockholders will not receive fractional share proceeds at the same time they receive shares of Baxalta common stock.
None of Baxter, Baxalta, the exchange agent, the information agent or the dealer manager or any other person will guarantee any minimum proceeds from the sale
of fractional shares of Baxalta common stock.
You will not receive any interest on any cash paid to you, even if there is a delay in making the payment.
In addition, a U.S. holder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of Baxalta
common stock will generally recognize capital gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes on the receipt of the cash to the extent that the cash received exceeds the tax basis allocated to the fractional share. You are urged to read carefully
the discussion in U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences and to consult your own tax advisor regarding the consequences to you of the exchange offer and the merger.
Holders who are tendering shares allocable to their applicable Savings Plans accounts should note that their accounts do not hold shares (including any
fractional shares), given the unitized nature of the Savings Plans stock funds, and such holders should refer to the special instructions provided to them by their applicable plan administrator for more information.
Exchange of Shares of Baxter Common Stock
Upon
the terms and subject to the conditions of the exchange offer (including, if the exchange offer is extended or amended, the terms and conditions of the extension or amendment), Baxter will accept for exchange, and will exchange, for shares of
Baxalta common stock owned by Baxter, the shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered, and not validly withdrawn, prior to the expiration of the exchange offer, promptly after the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be
May 18, 2016).
The exchange of shares of Baxter common stock tendered and accepted for exchange pursuant to the exchange offer will be made only
after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:
|
(a)
|
(i) share certificates representing all tendered shares of Baxter common stock (other than Direct Registration Shares), in proper form for transfer or (ii) with respect to shares delivered by book-entry transfer
through DTC, confirmation of a book-entry transfer of those shares of Baxter common stock in the exchange agents account at DTC, in each case pursuant to the procedures set forth in the section below entitled Procedures for
Tendering;
|
|
(b)
|
the letter of transmittal for shares of Baxter common stock, properly completed and duly executed (including any signature guarantees that may be required), or, in the case of shares delivered by book-entry transfer
through DTC, an agents message; and
|
|
(c)
|
any other required documents.
|
For purposes of the exchange offer, Baxter will be deemed to have accepted for
exchange, and thereby exchanged, shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered and not validly withdrawn if and when Baxter notifies the exchange agent of its acceptance of the tenders of those shares of Baxter common stock pursuant to the exchange
offer.
On or prior to the time of consummation of the exchange offer, Baxter will deliver to the exchange agent irrevocable instructions to hold the
shares of Baxalta common stock in trust for Baxter stockholders whose shares of Baxter common stock are being accepted for exchange in the exchange offer. Baxalta common stock and/or cash in lieu of fractional shares will be transferred to Baxter
stockholders whose shares of Baxter common stock are accepted in the exchange offer promptly after the expiration of the exchange offer.
You will not receive any interest on any cash paid to you, even if there is a delay in making the
payment.
76
Return of Shares of Baxter Common Stock
If shares of Baxter common stock are delivered and not accepted due to proration or a partial tender, (i) certificated shares of Baxter common stock that
were delivered will be returned in uncertificated book-entry form to be credited in book-entry form in a direct registration account in the name of the applicable holder maintained by Baxters transfer agent, (ii) direct registration
account shares of Baxter common stock that were delivered will be credited back to the applicable account in book-entry form and (iii) shares of Baxter common stock held through DTC will be credited back through DTC in book-entry form.
If you validly withdraw your shares of Baxter common stock or the exchange offer is not completed, (i) certificated shares of Baxter common stock that
were delivered will be returned, (ii) direct registration account shares of Baxter common stock that were delivered will be credited back to the applicable account in book-entry form and (iii) shares of Baxter common stock held through DTC
will be credited back through DTC in book-entry form.
Procedures for Tendering
Shares Held in Certificated Form.
If you hold certificates representing shares of Baxter common stock you must deliver to the exchange agent at
an address listed on the letter of transmittal a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal, along with any required signature guarantees and any other required documents, and the certificates representing the shares of Baxter common
stock tendered.
Shares Held in Book-Entry Direct Registration System.
If you hold Direct Registration Shares of Baxter common stock, you
must deliver to the exchange agent at an address listed on the letter of transmittal a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal, along with any required signature guarantees and any other required documents. Because certificates
are not issued for Direct Registration Shares, you do not need to deliver any certificates representing those shares to the exchange agent.
Shares
Held Through a Broker, Dealer, Commercial Bank, Trust Company, Custodian or Similar Institution.
If you hold shares of Baxter common stock through a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, custodian or similar institution, you should
follow the instructions sent to you separately by that institution. In this case, you should not use a letter of transmittal to direct the tender of your shares of Baxter common stock. If that institution holds shares of Baxter common stock through
DTC, it must notify DTC and cause it to transfer the shares into the exchange agents account in accordance with DTCs procedures. The institution must also ensure that the exchange agent receives an agents message from DTC
confirming the book-entry transfer of your shares of Baxter common stock. A tender by book-entry transfer will be completed upon receipt by the exchange agent of an agents message, confirmation of a book-entry transfer into the exchange
agents account at DTC and any other required documents.
The term agents message means a message, transmitted by DTC to, and
received by, the exchange agent and forming a part of a book-entry confirmation, which states that DTC has received an express acknowledgment from the participant in DTC tendering the shares of Baxter common stock which are the subject of the
book-entry confirmation that the participant has received and agrees to be bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal (including the instructions thereto) and that Baxter may enforce that agreement against the participant.
The exchange agent will establish an account at DTC with respect to the shares of Baxter common stock for purposes of the exchange offer, and any eligible
institution that is a participant in DTC may make book-entry delivery of shares of Baxter common stock by causing DTC to transfer such shares into the exchange agents account at DTC in accordance with DTCs procedure for the transfer.
Delivery of documents to DTC does not constitute delivery to the exchange agent.
Participants in the Savings Plans should follow the special
instructions that are being sent to them by their applicable plan administrator. Such participants should not use the letter of transmittal to direct the tender of shares of Baxter common stock held in these plans. Such participants may direct the
applicable plan
77
administrator through the designated website to tender all, some or none of the shares of Baxter common stock allocable to their Savings Plans accounts, subject to the limitations set forth in
any instructions provided by their applicable plan administrator. Baxter and Baxalta have been informed that instructions to tender or withdraw by participants in the Savings Plans must be made by 4:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 17, 2016,
unless the exchange offer is extended. If the exchange offer is extended, and if administratively feasible, the deadline for receipt of your direction may also be extended.
General Instructions.
Do not send letters of transmittal or certificates representing shares of Baxter common stock to Baxter, Baxalta, the
dealer manager or the information agent.
Letters of transmittal for shares of Baxter common stock and certificates representing shares of Baxter common stock should be sent to the exchange agent at an address listed on the letter of transmittal.
Trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers of corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity who sign a letter of transmittal or any certificates or stock powers must indicate the capacity in
which they are signing and must submit evidence of their power to act in that capacity unless waived by Baxter.
Whether you tender certificated shares of
Baxter common stock by delivery of certificates or uncertificated Direct Registration Shares, the exchange agent must receive the letter of transmittal and any certificates representing your shares of Baxter common stock at the appropriate address
set forth in the letter of transmittal prior to the expiration of the exchange offer. Note that for Direct Registration Shares, you do not need to deliver any certificates representing those shares because certificates are not issued for such
shares. In the case of a book-entry transfer of shares of Baxter common stock through DTC, the exchange agent must receive the agents message and confirmation of a book-entry transfer into the exchange agents account at DTC prior to the
expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016).
Letters of transmittal for shares of Baxter common stock and
certificates representing shares of Baxter common stock, if any, must be received by the exchange agent. Please read carefully the instructions to the letter of transmittal you have been sent. You should contact the information agent if you have any
questions regarding tendering your shares of Baxter common stock.
Signature Guarantees.
Signatures on all letters of transmittal for
shares of Baxter common stock must be guaranteed by a firm that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program, or by any other eligible guarantor institution, as such term is defined in Rule 17Ad-15 under the Exchange
Act (each of the foregoing being a U.S. eligible institution), except in cases in which shares of Baxter common stock are tendered either (1) by a registered stockholder (which term, for purposes of this document, shall include any participant
in DTC whose name appears on a security position listing as the owner of shares of Baxter common stock) who has not completed the Special Transfer Instructions enclosed with the letter of transmittal or (2) for the account of a U.S.
eligible institution.
If the certificates representing shares of Baxter common stock or Direct Registration Shares are registered in the name of a person
other than the person who signs the letter of transmittal, the certificates must be endorsed or accompanied by appropriate stock powers, in either case signed exactly as the name or names of the registered owner or owners appear on the certificates
or as reflected on the letter of transmittal accompanying the tender of Direct Registration Shares without any change whatsoever, with the signature(s) on the certificates or stock powers guaranteed by an eligible institution.
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures.
If you wish to tender shares of Baxter common stock pursuant to the exchange offer but (1) your
certificates are not immediately available, (2) the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed on a timely basis or (3) time will not permit all required documents to reach the exchange agent on or before the expiration date of
the exchange offer, you may still tender your shares of Baxter common stock, so long as all of the following conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
you must make your tender by or through a U.S. eligible institution;
|
78
|
|
|
on or before the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016), the exchange agent must receive a properly completed and duly executed notice of guaranteed delivery, substantially in
the form made available by Baxter, in the manner provided below; and
|
|
|
|
within three NYSE trading days after the date of execution of such notice of guaranteed delivery, the exchange agent must receive (1)(A) share certificates representing all tendered shares of Baxter common stock
(other than Direct Registration Shares), in proper form for transfer or (B) with respect to shares delivered by book-entry transfer through DTC, confirmation of a book-entry transfer of those shares of Baxter common stock in the exchange
agents account at DTC, (2) a letter of transmittal for shares of Baxter common stock, properly completed and duly executed (including any signature guarantees that may be required) or, in the case of shares delivered by book-entry
transfer through DTC, an agents message and (3) any other required documents.
|
Registered stockholders (including any participant
in DTC whose name appears on a security position listing of DTC as the owner of shares of Baxter common stock) may transmit the notice of guaranteed delivery by facsimile transmission or mail to the exchange agent. If you hold shares of Baxter
common stock through a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, custodian or similar institution, that institution must submit any notice of guaranteed delivery on your behalf. You must, in all cases, obtain a Medallion guarantee, in the form
set forth in the notice of guaranteed delivery.
Tendering Your Shares After the Final Exchange Ratio Has Been Determined.
Subject to any
voluntary extension by Baxter of the exchange offer period or any extension mandated by applicable law, the final exchange ratio will be available by 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the trading day (currently expected to be May 17, 2016) preceding
the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016). If you hold Baxter common stock through a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, custodian or similar institution, that institution must tender your shares
on your behalf. DTC is expected to remain open until 5:00 p.m., and institutions may be able to process tenders through DTC during that time (although there is no assurance that will be the case). Once DTC has closed, participants in DTC whose name
appears on a DTC security position listing as the owner of shares of Baxter common stock will still be able to tender shares by delivering a notice of guaranteed delivery to the exchange agent via facsimile. If you hold Baxter common stock through a
broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, custodian or similar institution, that institution must submit any notice of guaranteed delivery on your behalf. It will generally not be possible to direct such an institution to submit a notice of
guaranteed delivery once that institution has closed for the day. In addition, any such institution, if it is not an eligible institution, will need to obtain a Medallion guarantee from an eligible institution in the form set forth in the notice of
guaranteed delivery in connection with the delivery of those shares.
Effect of Tenders.
A tender of shares of Baxter common stock pursuant
to any of the procedures described above will constitute your acceptance of the terms and conditions of the exchange offer as well as your representation and warranty to Baxter that (1) you have the full power and authority to tender, sell,
assign and transfer the tendered shares (and any and all other shares of Baxter common stock or other securities issued or issuable in respect of such shares); (2) when the same are accepted for exchange, Baxter will acquire good, marketable
and unencumbered title to such shares, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, charges and encumbrances and not subject to any adverse claims; (3) you have a net long position in the shares being tendered within the meaning of Rule 14e-4
promulgated under the Exchange Act as further explained below; (4) your participation in the exchange offer and tender of such shares complied with Rule 14e-4 and the applicable laws of both the jurisdiction where you received the materials
relating to the exchange offer and the jurisdiction from which the tender is being made; and (5) for non-U.S. persons: you acknowledge that Baxter has advised you that it has not taken any action under the laws of any country outside the United
States to facilitate a public offer to exchange Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock in that country; that there may be restrictions that apply in other countries, including with respect to transactions in Baxter common stock or Baxalta
common stock in your home country; that, if you are located outside the United States, your ability to tender Baxter common stock in the exchange offer will depend on whether there is an exemption available under the laws of your home country that
79
would permit you to participate in the exchange offer without the need for Baxter or Baxalta to take any action to facilitate a public offering in that country or otherwise; that Baxter will rely
on your representation that your participation in the exchange offer is made pursuant to and in compliance with the applicable laws in the jurisdiction in which you are resident or from which you are tendering your shares and in a manner that will
not require Baxter or Baxalta to take any action to facilitate a public offering in that country or otherwise; and that Baxter will rely on your representations concerning the legality of your participation in the exchange offer in determining to
accept any shares that you are tendering for exchange.
It is a violation of Rule 14e-4 under the Exchange Act for a person, directly or indirectly, to
tender shares of Baxter common stock for such persons own account unless, at the time of tender, the person so tendering (1) has a net long position equal to or greater than the amount of (a) shares of Baxter common stock tendered or
(b) other securities immediately convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for the shares of Baxter common stock tendered and such person will acquire such shares for tender by conversion, exchange or exercise; and (2) will cause
such shares to be delivered in accordance with the terms of this prospectus. Rule 14e-4 provides a similar restriction applicable to the tender or guarantee of a tender on behalf of another person.
The exchange of shares of Baxter common stock tendered and accepted for exchange pursuant to the exchange offer will be made only after timely receipt by the
exchange agent of (a)(i) share certificates representing all tendered shares of Baxter common stock (other than Direct Registration Shares), in proper form for transfer or (ii) with respect to shares delivered by book-entry transfer through
DTC, confirmation of a book-entry transfer of those shares of Baxter common stock in the exchange agents account at DTC; (b) a letter of transmittal for shares of Baxter common stock, properly completed and duly executed (including any
signature guarantees that may be required), or, in the case of shares delivered by book-entry transfer through DTC, an agents message; and (c) any other required documents.
Appointment of Attorneys-in-Fact and Proxies.
By executing a letter of transmittal as set forth above, you irrevocably appoint Baxters
designees as your attorneys-in-fact and proxies, each with full power of substitution, to the full extent of your rights with respect to your shares of Baxter common stock tendered and accepted for exchange by Baxter and with respect to any and all
other shares of Baxter common stock and other securities issued or issuable in respect of the shares of Baxter common stock on or after the expiration of the exchange offer. That appointment is effective when and only to the extent that Baxter
deposits the shares of Baxalta common stock for the shares of Baxter common stock that you have tendered with the exchange agent. All such proxies shall be considered coupled with an interest in the tendered shares of Baxter common stock and
therefore shall not be revocable. Upon the effectiveness of such appointment, all prior proxies that you have given will be revoked and you may not give any subsequent proxies (and, if given, they will not be deemed effective). Baxters
designees will, with respect to the shares of Baxter common stock for which the appointment is effective, be empowered, among other things, to exercise all of your voting and other rights as they, in their sole discretion, deem proper. Baxter
reserves the right to require that, in order for shares of Baxter common stock to be deemed validly tendered, immediately upon Baxters acceptance for exchange of those shares of Baxter common stock, Baxter must be able to exercise full voting
rights with respect to such shares.
Determination of Validity.
Baxter will determine questions as to the form of documents (including
notices of withdrawal) and the validity, form, eligibility (including time of receipt) and acceptance for exchange of any tender of shares of Baxter common stock, in Baxters sole discretion, provided that Baxter may delegate such power in
whole or in part to the exchange agent. Baxter reserves the absolute right to reject any and all tenders of shares of Baxter common stock that it determines are not in proper form or the acceptance of or exchange for which may, in the opinion of its
counsel, be unlawful. Baxter also reserves the absolute right to waive any of the conditions of the exchange offer (other than the conditions relating to the absence of an injunction and the effectiveness of the registration statement for Baxalta
common stock to be distributed in the exchange offer), or any defect or irregularity in the tender of any shares of Baxter common stock. No tender of shares of Baxter common stock is valid until all defects and irregularities in tenders of shares of
Baxter common stock have been cured or waived. None of Baxter, Baxalta, the dealer manager, the exchange agent, the information agent or any
80
other person, nor any of their directors or officers, is under any duty to give notification of any defects or irregularities in the tender of any shares of Baxter common stock or will incur any
liability for failure to give any such notification. Baxters determinations and interpretations of the terms and conditions of the exchange offer (including the letter of transmittal and instructions thereto) may be challenged in a court of
competent jurisdiction.
Binding Agreement.
The tender of shares of Baxter common stock pursuant to any of the procedures described above,
together with Baxters acceptance for exchange of such shares pursuant to the procedures described above, will constitute a binding agreement between Baxter and you upon the terms of and subject to the conditions to the exchange offer.
The method of delivery of share certificates of shares of Baxter common stock and all other required documents, including delivery through DTC, is at your
option and risk, and the delivery will be deemed made only when actually received by the exchange agent. If delivery is by mail, it is recommended that you use registered mail with return receipt requested, properly insured. In all cases, you should
allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery.
Partial Tenders.
If you tender fewer than all the shares of Baxter common stock evidenced
by any share certificate you deliver to the exchange agent, then you must check the box labeled Partial Tender and fill in the number of shares that you are tendering in the space provided on the first page of the letter of transmittal
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. In those cases, promptly after the expiration of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016), the exchange agent will credit the remainder of the
shares of Baxter common stock that were evidenced by the certificate(s) but not tendered to a Direct Registration Share account in the name of the registered holder maintained by Baxters transfer agent, unless otherwise provided in
Special Transfer Instructions or Special Delivery Instructions enclosed with the letter of transmittal filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Unless you indicate otherwise in
your letter of transmittal, all Baxter common stock represented by share certificates you deliver to the exchange agent will be deemed to have been tendered. No share certificates are expected to be delivered to you, including in respect of any
shares delivered to the exchange agent that were previously in certificated form.
Lost or Destroyed Certificates
If your certificate(s) representing shares of Baxter common stock have been mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen and you wish to tender your shares, you will
need to take the steps described under the section entitled Lost or Destroyed Certificate(s) included in the letter of transmittal and in the instruction booklet to the letter of transmittal. You will also need to pay a premium and
service fee as calculated in the letter of transmittal to support the purchase of the blanket bond for your lost shares of Baxter common stock. Upon receipt of the completed applicable letter of transmittal (appropriately notarized) with the
required information, the surety bond payment and the service fee, your shares of Baxter common stock will be included in the exchange offer, subject to acceptance by Baxter.
Withdrawal Rights
Shares of Baxter common stock tendered
pursuant to the exchange offer may be withdrawn at any time before 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016) and, unless Baxter has previously accepted them pursuant to the
exchange offer, may also be withdrawn at any time after the expiration of 40 business days from the commencement of the exchange offer. Once Baxter accepts shares of Baxter common stock pursuant to the exchange offer, your tender is irrevocable.
For a withdrawal of shares of Baxter common stock to be effective, the exchange agent must receive from you a written notice of withdrawal or facsimile
transmission of notice of withdrawal, in the form of the notice of
81
withdrawal provided by Baxter, at one of its addresses or fax numbers, respectively, set forth in the instructions booklet to the letter of transmittal, and your notice must include your name and
the number of shares of Baxter common stock to be withdrawn, as well as the name of the registered holder, if it is different from that of the person who tendered those shares.
If shares of Baxter common stock have been tendered pursuant to the procedures for book-entry tender through DTC discussed in the section entitled
Procedures for Tendering, any notice of withdrawal must specify the name and number of the account at DTC to be credited with the withdrawn shares and must otherwise comply with the procedures of DTC.
If you hold your shares through a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, custodian or similar institution, you should consult that institution on the
procedures you must comply with and the time by which such procedures must be completed in order for that institution to provide a written notice of withdrawal or facsimile notice of withdrawal to the exchange agent on your behalf before 11:59 p.m.,
New York City time, on the expiration date of the exchange offer. If you hold your shares through such an institution, that institution must deliver the notice of withdrawal with respect to any shares you wish to withdraw. In such a case, as a
beneficial owner and not a registered stockholder, you will not be able to provide a notice of withdrawal for such shares directly to the exchange agent.
Baxter will decide all questions as to the form and validity (including time of receipt) of any notice of withdrawal, in its sole discretion. Baxter may
delegate such power in whole or in part to the exchange agent. None of Baxter, Baxalta, the dealer manager, the exchange agent, the information agent nor any other person will be under any duty to give notification of any defects or irregularities
in any notice of withdrawal or will incur any liability for failure to give any notification. Any such determinations may be challenged in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Any shares of Baxter common stock validly withdrawn will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for purposes of the exchange offer.
However, you may re-tender withdrawn shares of Baxter common stock by following one of the procedures discussed in the section entitled Procedures
for Tendering at any time prior to the expiration of the exchange offer (or pursuant to the instructions sent to you separately).
If you hold
shares of Baxter common stock (or if shares are allocable to you) through the Savings Plans, your plan administrator will provide you with instructions on how to withdraw your direction to tender through the designated website. You must record your
withdrawal on the designated website at any time before 4:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 17, 2016, or, if the exchange offer is extended, any new plan participant withdrawal deadline established by the plan administrator.
Withdrawing Your Shares After the Final Exchange Ratio Has Been Determined.
Subject to any extension of the exchange offer period, the final
exchange ratio will be available by 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the trading day (currently expected to be May 17, 2016) preceding the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016). If you are a registered
stockholder of Baxter common stock and you wish to withdraw your shares after the final exchange ratio has been determined, then you must deliver a written notice of withdrawal or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal to the exchange agent
prior to 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date of the exchange offer, in the form of the notice of withdrawal provided by Baxter. Medallion guarantees will not be required for such withdrawal notices. If you hold Baxter common
stock through a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, custodian or similar institution, any notice of withdrawal must be delivered by that institution on your behalf. DTC is expected to remain open until 5:00 p.m., New York City time, and
institutions may be able to process withdrawals through DTC during that time (although there is no assurance that will be the case). Once DTC has closed, if you beneficially own shares that were previously delivered through DTC, then in order to
withdraw your shares the institution through which
82
your shares are held must deliver a written notice of withdrawal or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal to the exchange agent prior to 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration
date of the exchange offer. Such notice of withdrawal must be in the form of DTCs notice of withdrawal and must specify the name and number of the account at DTC to be credited with the withdrawn shares and must otherwise comply with
DTCs procedures. Shares can be withdrawn only if the exchange agent receives a withdrawal notice directly from the relevant institution that tendered the shares through DTC. On the last day of the exchange offer, beneficial owners who cannot
contact the institution through which they hold their shares will not be able to withdraw their shares.
Except for the withdrawal rights described above,
any tender made under the exchange offer is irrevocable.
Delivery of Baxalta Common Stock; Book-Entry Accounts
Physical certificates representing shares of Baxalta common stock will not be issued pursuant to the exchange offer, including in respect of any shares
delivered to the exchange agent in certificated form. Rather than issuing physical certificates for such shares to tendering stockholders, the exchange agent will cause shares of Baxalta common stock to be credited in book-entry form to direct
registered accounts maintained by Baxaltas transfer agent for the benefit of the respective holders (or, in the case of shares tendered through DTC, to the account of DTC so that DTC can credit the relevant DTC participant and such participant
can credit its respective account holders). Promptly following the crediting of shares to your respective direct registered account, you will receive a statement from Baxaltas transfer agent evidencing your holdings, as well as general
information on the book-entry form of ownership.
If shares of Baxalta common stock are to be issued to a person other than the signer of the letter of
transmittal, a check is to be issued in the name of, and/or shares of Baxter common stock not tendered or not accepted for exchange in the exchange offer are to be issued or returned to, a person other than the signer of the letter of transmittal,
or a check is to be mailed to a person other than the signer of the letter of transmittal or to an address other than that shown on the first page of the letter of transmittal, then the information in Special Transfer Instructions and/or
Special Delivery Instructions enclosed with the letter of transmittal filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part will need to be completed. Baxter has no obligation pursuant to such
instructions to transfer any such shares from the name of the registered holder(s) thereof if Baxter does not accept any such shares for exchange. If no such instructions are given, all such shares not accepted for exchange in the exchange offer
will be credited in book-entry form to the registered holders in a direct registered account maintained by Baxters transfer agent even if tendered in certificated form.
With respect to any shares tendered through DTC, a stockholder may request that shares not exchanged be credited to a different account maintained at DTC by
providing the appropriate instructions pursuant to DTCs applicable procedures. If no such instructions are given, all such shares of Baxter common stock not accepted will be returned by crediting the same account at DTC as the account from
which such shares of Baxter common stock were delivered.
Extension; Amendment
Extension or Amendment by Baxter
Baxter expressly
reserves the right, in its sole discretion, for any reason, to extend the period of time during which the exchange offer is open and thereby delay acceptance for exchange of, and the exchange for, any shares of Baxter common stock validly tendered
and not validly withdrawn in the exchange offer. For example, the exchange offer can be extended if any of the conditions to completion of the exchange offer described in the next section entitled Conditions to Completion of the Exchange
Offer are not satisfied or, where permissible, waived prior to the expiration of the exchange offer.
Baxter expressly reserves the right, in its
sole discretion, to amend the terms of the exchange offer in any respect prior to the expiration date of the exchange offer (currently expected to be May 18, 2016).
83
If Baxter materially changes the terms of or information concerning the exchange offer, it will extend the
exchange offer if required by applicable law. Generally speaking, an offer must remain open under SEC rules for a minimum of five business days from the date that notice of the material change is first given. The length of time will depend on the
particular facts and circumstances giving rise to the extension.
As required by applicable law, the exchange offer will be extended so that it remains
open for a minimum of ten business days following the applicable announcement if:
|
|
|
Baxter changes the method for calculating the number of shares of Baxalta common stock offered in exchange for each share of Baxter common stock; and
|
|
|
|
the exchange offer is scheduled to expire within ten business days of announcing any such change.
|
If Baxter
extends the exchange offer, is delayed in accepting for exchange any shares of Baxter common stock or is unable to accept for exchange any shares of Baxter common stock under the exchange offer for any reason, then, without affecting Baxters
rights under the exchange offer, the exchange agent may retain on Baxters behalf all shares of Baxter common stock tendered. These shares of Baxter common stock may not be withdrawn except as provided in the section entitled
Withdrawal Rights.
Baxters reservation of the right to delay acceptance of any shares of Baxter common stock is subject to
applicable law, which requires that Baxter pay the consideration offered or return the shares of Baxter common stock deposited promptly after the termination or withdrawal of the exchange offer.
Baxter will issue a press release or other public announcement no later than 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the next business day following any extension,
amendment, non-acceptance or termination of the previously scheduled expiration date of the exchange offer.
Method of Public Announcement.
Subject to applicable law (including Rules 13e-4(d), 13e-4(e)(3) and 14e-1 under the Exchange Act, which require that any material change in the information published, sent or given to stockholders in connection with the exchange offer be promptly
disclosed to stockholders in a manner reasonably designed to inform them of the change) and without limiting the manner in which Baxter may choose to make any public announcement, Baxter assumes no obligation to publish, advertise or otherwise
communicate any such public announcement other than by issuing a release via BusinessWire that is posted to Baxters website.
Conditions to
Completion of the Exchange Offer
Baxter will not be required to accept shares for exchange and may terminate the exchange offer if:
|
|
|
the private letter ruling from the IRS, regarding certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution by Baxter on July 1, 2015 of approximately 80.5% of the shares of Baxalta common stock to
stockholders of Baxter and certain related transactions, is invalidated or otherwise ceases to be effective in whole or in part;
|
|
|
|
Baxter notifies Baxalta that Baxter has received a written proposal for an alternative transaction involving Baxalta common stock that Baxters board of directors reasonably determines, in its good faith judgment,
to be in the best interests of its stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any of the following events occurs, or Baxter reasonably expects any of the following events to occur:
|
|
|
|
any general suspension of trading in, or limitation on prices for, securities on any national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter market in the United States;
|
|
|
|
a declaration of a banking moratorium or any suspension of payments in respect of banks in the United States;
|
84
|
|
|
a commencement of a war (whether declared or undeclared), armed hostilities or other national or international calamity, including an act of terrorism, directly or indirectly involving the United States, which would
reasonably be expected to affect materially and adversely, or to delay materially, the completion of the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
if any of the situations described in the immediately preceding three bullet points exists, as of the date of the commencement of the exchange offer, the situation deteriorates materially;
|
|
|
|
a decline of at least 10% in the closing level of either the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the Standard & Poors 500 Index from the closing level established on April 20, 2016;
|
|
|
|
a material adverse change in the business, prospects, condition (financial or other), results of operations or stock price of Baxalta;
|
|
|
|
a material adverse change in the business, prospects, condition (financial or other), results of operations or stock price of Baxter;
|
|
|
|
any action, litigation, suit, claim or proceeding is instituted that would be reasonably likely to enjoin, prohibit, restrain, make illegal, make materially more costly or materially delay completion of the exchange
offer;
|
|
|
|
any order, injunction, stay, judgment or decree is issued by any U.S. federal or state court, government, governmental authority or other regulatory or administrative authority having jurisdiction over Baxter and
Baxalta and is in effect, or any law, statute, rule, regulation, legislation, interpretation, governmental order or injunction shall have been enacted or enforced, any of which would reasonably be likely to restrain, prohibit or delay completion of
the exchange offer or materially impair the contemplated benefits of the exchange offer to Baxter or Baxalta;
|
|
|
|
the registration statement on Form S-4 of which this prospectus is a part shall not have become effective under the Securities Act prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date of the exchange offer
(currently expected to be May 18, 2016);
|
|
|
|
any stop order suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part has been issued, or any proceeding for that purpose has been initiated by the SEC and not concluded or
withdrawn; or
|
|
|
|
a market disruption event occurs with respect to Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock and such market disruption event has, in Baxters reasonable judgment, impaired the benefits of the exchange offer.
|
If any of the above events occurs and exists at the scheduled expiration date, Baxter may:
|
|
|
terminate the exchange offer and promptly return all tendered shares of Baxter common stock to tendering stockholders;
|
|
|
|
extend the exchange offer and, subject to the withdrawal rights described in Withdrawal Rights above, retain all tendered shares of Baxter common stock until the extended exchange offer expires;
|
|
|
|
amend the terms of the exchange offer; and/or
|
|
|
|
waive the unsatisfied condition (except the conditions relating to the absence of an injunction and the effectiveness of the registration statement for shares of Baxalta common stock to be distributed in the exchange
offer) and, subject to any requirement to extend the period of time during which the exchange offer is open, complete the exchange offer.
|
These conditions are for the sole benefit of Baxter. If any condition occurs, Baxter will timely disclose the occurrence of such condition. Except as
described in the immediately preceding bullet point, Baxter may waive any condition in whole or in part at any time in its sole discretion, subject to applicable law. Baxters failure to exercise its rights under any of the above conditions
does not represent a waiver of these rights, except that if a
85
condition occurs, and Baxter proceeds with the exchange offer without disclosure of the occurrence of such condition, such condition will be deemed to have been waived by Baxter. Each right is an
ongoing right which may be asserted by Baxter at any time. However, all conditions to completion of the exchange offer must be satisfied or, where permissible, waived by Baxter before the expiration of the exchange offer. Any determination or
interpretation by Baxter concerning the conditions described above may be challenged in a court of competent jurisdiction.
If a stop order issued by the
SEC is in effect with respect to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, Baxter will not accept any shares of Baxter common stock tendered and will not exchange shares of Baxalta common stock for any shares of Baxter common
stock.
Fees and Expenses
Baxter has retained J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC to act as dealer manager and as financial advisor, D.F. King & Co., Inc. to act as the information agent and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. to act as the exchange agent in connection with the exchange offer.
The dealer manager, the information agent and the exchange agent each will receive reasonable compensation for their respective services, will be reimbursed
for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and will be indemnified against specified liabilities in connection with their services, including liabilities under the federal securities laws.
The dealer manager and its affiliates have in the past provided investment banking services to Baxter and Baxalta and their respective affiliates, for which
it has received customary compensation. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC also acted as an initial purchaser in connection with Baxaltas June 2015 offering of senior notes. In the ordinary course of business, the dealer manager is engaged in
securities trading and brokerage activities as well as investment banking and financial advisory services. In the ordinary course of its trading and brokerage activities, the dealer manager and certain of its affiliates may from time to time hold
positions of Baxter common stock and Baxalta common stock in its proprietary accounts or those of its customers, and to the extent it holds shares of Baxter common stock in these accounts at the time of the exchange offer, the dealer manager and/or
certain of its affiliates may tender these shares.
For the purposes of U.S. securities laws, Baxter may be deemed to be an underwriter of the shares of
Baxalta common stock issued in the exchange offer.
Legal and Other Limitations; Certain Matters Relating to Non-U.S. Jurisdictions
Although Baxter will deliver this prospectus to its stockholders to the extent required by U.S. law, including stockholders located outside the United States,
this prospectus is not an offer to sell or exchange and it is not a solicitation of an offer to buy any shares of Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock in any jurisdiction in which such offer, sale or exchange is not permitted.
Countries outside the United States generally have their own legal requirements that govern securities offerings made to persons resident in those countries
and often impose stringent requirements about the form and content of offers made to the general public. Baxter has not taken any action under those non-U.S. regulations to facilitate a public offer to exchange Baxter common stock for Baxalta common
stock outside the United States but may take steps to facilitate such tenders. Therefore, the ability of any non-U.S. person to tender Baxter common stock in the exchange offer will depend on whether there is an exemption available under the laws of
such persons home country that would permit the person to participate in the exchange offer without the need for Baxter or Baxalta to take any action to facilitate a public offering in that country or otherwise. For example, some countries
exempt transactions from the rules governing public offerings if they involve persons who meet certain eligibility requirements relating to their status as sophisticated or professional investors.
86
All tendering holders are deemed to make certain representations by executing the letter of transmittal,
including (in the case of non-U.S. holders) as to the availability of an exemption under their home country laws that would allow them to participate in the exchange offer without the need for Baxter or Baxalta to take any action to facilitate a
public offering in that country or otherwise. Baxter will rely on those representations and, unless the exchange offer is terminated, plans to accept shares tendered by persons who properly complete the letter of transmittal and provide any other
required documentation on a timely basis and as otherwise described herein.
Non-U.S. stockholders should consult their advisors in considering whether
they may participate in the exchange offer in accordance with the laws of their home countries and, if they do participate, whether there are any restrictions or limitations on transactions in Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock that may
apply in their home countries. Baxter, Baxalta and the dealer manager cannot provide any assurance about whether such limitations exist.
87
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF BAXALTA COMMON STOCK
Baxter has informed Baxalta that, prior to or following the completion of the exchange offer, Baxter intends to make a contribution to Baxters U.S.
pension fund or distribute as a special dividend to all Baxter stockholders, on a pro rata basis, some or all of its remaining shares of Baxalta common stock prior to any Shire or Baxalta shareholder vote with respect to the merger, which are
expected to be taken at meetings held on May 27, 2016, and, in any event, during the 18-month period following the distribution on July 1, 2015. Baxter is currently in the process of finalizing a contribution of 17,145,570 shares of Baxalta
common stock to its U.S. pension fund. To the extent Baxter holds any Baxalta common stock or Shire Securities received in exchange for such common stock pursuant to the merger at the end of the 18-month period, as the case may be, Baxter has
advised Baxalta that it will dispose of such stock in one or more transactions (including potentially through underwritten equity offerings) as soon as practicable thereafter, taking into account market conditions and its business judgment, but in
no event later than five years after the distribution.
88
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BAXALTA
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements consist of an unaudited pro forma combined statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2015. An unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet and statement of income as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 has not been presented with the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements because the
separation and associated transactions are reflected in the companys historical unaudited condensed consolidated and combined interim financial statements and presented elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements illustrate the financial impacts of the separation and the related transactions described below. The
unaudited pro forma combined statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 assumes that the separation and related transactions described below had occurred as of January 1, 2015.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of income has been derived from Baxaltas historical audited consolidated and combined financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus and has been adjusted to give effect to the following items related to the separation and the associated transactions:
|
|
|
the contribution by Baxter to Baxalta, pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, of the assets and liabilities that comprise Baxaltas business;
|
|
|
|
the impact of transfers, to Baxalta upon separation, of various corporate and other assets and liabilities not included in Baxaltas historical combined balance sheet;
|
|
|
|
interest expense related to the incurrence of $5 billion of debt at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.76%; and
|
|
|
|
the impact of the manufacturing and supply agreement, the transition services agreement and other commercial agreements between Baxter and Baxalta and the provisions contained therein.
|
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements are for informational purposes only and do not purport to represent what Baxaltas financial
position and results of operations actually would have been had the separation and related transactions occurred on the dates indicated, or to project Baxaltas financial performance for any future period. The unaudited pro forma combined
financial statements are based on information and assumptions, which are described in the accompanying notes.
The Baxalta historical financial
information, which was the basis for the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements, was presented on a consolidated basis for periods after the July 1, 2015 separation and on a carve-out basis for periods prior to the separation as
Baxalta was not operated as a separate, independent company for the periods presented prior to the separation. Accordingly, such financial information prior to the separation reflects an allocation of certain corporate costs for corporate
administrative services, including general corporate expenses related to tax, treasury, finance, audit, risk management, legal, information technology, human resources, shareholder relations, compliance, shared services, insurance, employee benefits
and incentives and stock-based compensation. These historical allocations may not be indicative of Baxaltas future cost structure; however, the pro forma results have not been adjusted to reflect any potential changes associated with Baxalta
being an independent public company as such amounts are estimates that are not factually supportable.
The computation of basic EPS for all periods
disclosed prior to the separation was calculated using the shares distributed and retained by Baxter on July 1, 2015 totaling 676 million. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS for the periods prior to separation
also include 5 million of diluted common share equivalents for stock options, RSUs and PSUs, as these share-based awards were previously issued by Baxter and outstanding at the time of separation and were assumed by Baxalta following the
separation.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements reported below should be read in conjunction with the section herein entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Baxalta, as well as the audited consolidated and combined financial statements and the corresponding notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
89
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
$
|
6,230
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
(A)(E)(F)
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(B)(E)(F)
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(E)
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
139
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(D)
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(A)
|
Reflects the effect of the manufacturing and supply agreement that Baxalta and Baxter entered into in connection with the separation. The net sales adjustment of $82 million reflects the additional sales that Baxalta
would have recorded for product manufactured and sold to Baxter for the year ended December 31, 2015, under the manufacturing and supply agreement. Pricing under this agreement reflects Baxaltas costs plus a profit on certain steps of the
manufacturing process. The cost of sales adjustment of $83 million reflects the impact of costs incurred to manufacture certain products for Baxter as well as the incremental costs that Baxalta would have recorded for the year ended
December 31, 2015, for purchases of other products from Baxter under the manufacturing and supply agreement. Historically, inventory transfers between Baxter and Baxalta were recorded at cost. The pro forma adjustments for the year ended
December 31, 2015 exclude net sales of $71 million and related cost of sales recognized for the companys manufacturing and supply agreement with Baxter following the July 1, 2015 separation as those costs are reflected in
Baxaltas historical statement of income.
|
(B)
|
Reflects $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the difference in costs to be incurred by Baxalta for certain services to be provided by Baxter under the transition services agreement. The pro forma
adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2015 excludes costs incurred under the transition services agreement following the July 1, 2015 separation as those costs are reflected in Baxaltas historical statement of income.
|
(C)
|
Reflects interest expense related to $5 billion in debt that Baxalta incurred in connection with the separation including amortization of debt discounts related to the original issue discount and fees paid by Baxalta.
The pro forma adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2015 excludes net interest expense of $48 million incurred during the period following the debt issuance and reflected in the companys historical statement of income. The
weighted-average interest rate on the debt including amortization of the debt discount is approximately 3.76%. Interest expense was calculated assuming constant debt levels throughout the periods. The pro forma interest expense has not been reduced
by the amount that the company believes would have been capitalized had the debt been outstanding for the entire period. Baxalta estimates that this would have been approximately $34 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 (relating to the
period prior to the separation).
|
(D)
|
Reflects the tax effects of the pro forma adjustments at the applicable statutory income tax rates.
|
(E)
|
Reflects a reduction in operating expenses of $22 million ($8 million in cost of sales, $12 million in selling, general and administrative expenses and $2 million in research and development expenses) for the year ended
December 31, 2015 associated with the actual transfer of net retirement obligations from Baxter to Baxalta.
|
(F)
|
Reflects incremental depreciation expense of $3 million ($1 million in cost of sales and $2 million in selling, general and administrative expenses) during the year ended December 31, 2015 for assets transferred to
Baxalta pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement that were not included in Baxaltas historical financial statements prior to the July 1, 2015 separation.
|
91
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA OF
BAXALTA
The following table sets forth selected financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011,
for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, and as of March 31, 2016. This selected financial data reflects the consolidated position of Baxalta and its consolidated subsidiaries as an independent, publicly-traded company for periods on or
after its separation from Baxter on July 1, 2015. Selected financial data for periods prior to July 1, 2015 reflect the combined historical business and operations of the company as it was historically managed as part of Baxter, and have
been prepared on a carve-out basis for the purpose of presenting Baxaltas historical financial condition and results of operations. Baxalta did not operate as a standalone entity prior to the separation, and accordingly the
selected financial data presented herein for periods prior to the separation is not necessarily indicative of Baxaltas performance following the separation and does not reflect what Baxaltas performance would have been had Baxalta
operated as an independent publicly traded company.
The consolidated or combined statement of income data for 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the
consolidated or combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were derived from Baxaltas audited consolidated and combined financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The combined
statement of income data for 2012 and the combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were derived from Baxaltas audited combined financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The combined statement of
income data for 2011 and the combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 were derived from the companys unaudited combined financial statements that are not included in this prospectus.
The Baxalta condensed consolidated and combined statements of income data for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, and the condensed
consolidated and combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2016 has been derived from Baxaltas unaudited condensed consolidated and combined interim financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited condensed consolidated and combined interim financial statement data has been prepared on a basis consistent with which Baxaltas audited
consolidated and combined financial statements have been prepared, except income taxes for the interim period which are based on the estimated effective tax for the full year, and in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments, consisting of
only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of such data. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
92
The selected financial information should be read in conjunction with the discussion in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Baxalta, the companys audited consolidated and combined financial statements (and the corresponding notes thereto) and the companys
unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements (and the corresponding notes thereto) included in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Income and Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,555
|
|
|
$
|
5,310
|
|
|
$
|
5,218
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
1,205
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
Net income from continuing operations per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
1
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
Diluted
1
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
2
|
|
|
$12,824
|
|
|
$
|
12,329
|
|
|
$
|
8,583
|
|
|
$
|
7,559
|
|
|
$
|
6,088
|
|
|
$
|
5,300
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
$ 5,317
|
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
93
1
|
On July 1, 2015, Baxter distributed approximately 544 million shares of Baxalta common stock to its shareholders and retained an additional 132 million shares. The computation of basic EPS for periods
prior to the separation was calculated using the shares distributed and the shares retained by Baxter on July 1, 2015 totaling 676 million. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS for periods prior to the separation
included 5 million of diluted common share equivalents related to employee equity awards outstanding as of July 1, 2015.
|
2
|
The company has elected to adopt new income tax accounting guidance on a retrospective basis, as further discussed in Note 2 and Note 13 in the companys audited consolidated and combined financial statements. As a
result, the company has made certain reclassifications to its consolidated or combined balance sheets starting with the period ending December 31, 2015 and retroactively applying to prior year balances disclosed in the table above. The
reclassifications had the effect of decreasing total assets by $201 million, $183 million, $106 million and $125 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
94
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF BAXALTA
The following is managements discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Baxalta Incorporated (Baxalta or the company) for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. This section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and accompanying notes appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Company Overview
Baxalta is a global, innovative
biopharmaceutical leader with a sustainable portfolio of differentiated therapies that seek to address unmet medical needs across many disease areas, including hemophilia, immunology and oncology. More specifically, the company develops,
manufactures and markets a diverse portfolio of treatments for hemophilia and other bleeding disorders, immune deficiencies, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, burns and shock, and other chronic and acute medical conditions, as well as oncology
treatments for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Baxalta is also investing in emerging technology platforms, including gene therapy and biosimilars.
Baxaltas business strategy is aimed at improving diagnosis, treatment and standards of care across a wide range of bleeding disorders and other rare
chronic and acute medical conditions, capitalizing on the companys differentiated portfolio, ensuring the sustainability of supply to meet growing demand for therapies across core disease areas, and accelerating innovation by developing and
launching new treatments while leveraging its expertise into new emerging therapeutics through acquisitions of and collaborations with others.
Separation from Baxter on July 1, 2015
On
July 1, 2015, Baxalta separated from Baxter International Inc. (Baxter) and became an independent public company (the separation). To effect the separation, the two companies undertook a series of transactions to separate entities and net
assets. As a result of these transactions, Baxalta holds the biopharmaceuticals business that was a part of Baxter prior to the separation. On July 1, 2015, Baxter distributed to its shareholders 80.5% of the common stock of Baxalta. Baxter
retained an approximate 19.5% ownership stake in Baxalta immediately following this distribution. Baxalta common stock began trading regular way under the ticker symbol BXLT on the New York Stock Exchange on July 1,
2015.
In January 2016 and March 2016, Baxter exchanged a portion of its retained stake in Baxalta common stock for indebtedness of Baxter held by third
parties. The shares of Baxalta common stock exchanged were then sold by such third parties in secondary public offerings pursuant to registration statements filed by Baxalta. Following these transactions, Baxter held approximately 4.5% of
Baxaltas total shares outstanding.
Merger Agreement with Shire plc
In January 2016, the company announced that it had reached an agreement (merger agreement) with Shire plc (Shire) under which Shire will acquire Baxalta,
forming a global leader in rare diseases. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Baxalta shareholders will receive $18.00 in cash and 0.1482 Shire American Depository Shares (ADS), per each Baxalta share. The transaction has been approved by the
boards of directors of both Shire and Baxalta. Closing of the transaction is subject to approval by Baxalta and Shire shareholders, certain regulatory approvals, receipt of certain tax opinions and other customary closing conditions. The Baxalta and
Shire stockholder votes are scheduled to be taken at meetings held on May 27, 2016. The transaction is expected to close in early June 2016.
The merger agreement provides for certain termination rights for both Shire and Baxalta. Upon termination of the merger agreement under certain specified
circumstances, Baxalta may be required to disburse to Shire a termination fee of $369 million and Shire may be required to pay the company a termination fee of $369 million. In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified
circumstances following the receipt of
95
an acquisition proposal by Baxalta, Baxalta may be required to reimburse Shire for transaction expenses up to $110 million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee
subsequently disbursed by Baxalta), and if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Shire, Shire may be required to reimburse Baxalta for transaction expenses up to
$65 million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently payable by Shire).
For further discussion on the proposed merger
with Shire, refer to the sections of this prospectus entitled The TransactionsThe Proposed Merger and BusinessThe Proposed Merger.
Financial Results OverviewThree Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
three months ended March 31 (in millions, except percentage
information)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Baxaltas global net sales totaled approximately $1.5 billion during the three months ended March 31, 2016, an
increase of 14% over the three months ended March 31, 2015. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, net sales increased 18%.
For further discussion
regarding the companys sales information, see Results of OperationsThree Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015Net Sales.
The companys net income from continuing operations was $145 million and $262 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. The decrease
was driven by the impact of special items, including a $105 million R&D charge associated with an upfront payment to a collaboration partner and a $66 million business optimization charge both recorded during the current year period. Excluding
the impact of special items from both periods, net income from continuing operations increased 11%.
Financial Results OverviewFull Year 2015,
2014 and 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions, except percentage
information)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,555
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
(22
|
%)
|
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
Baxaltas global net sales totaled approximately $6.1 billion in 2015, an increase of 3% over 2014. Excluding the
impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, net sales increased 11%. Sales in the United States totaled $3.3 billion in 2015, an increase of 10% over 2014, and international sales totaled $2.8 billion, a decrease of 4% over 2014.
Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, 2015 international net sales increased 13% over 2014. The company experienced constant currency revenue growth of 7% and 15% in its hematology and immunology businesses,
respectively, driven by strong global sales of ADVATE, FEIBA and immunoglobulin therapies. In addition, the company launched its Oncology business in 2015 through the acquisition of ONCASPAR as further described below, recording Oncology net sales
of $87 million during the year.
In 2014, Baxaltas global net sales totaled approximately $6.0 billion and increased 7% compared to 2013 at actual
foreign currency exchange rates (8% excluding foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations). Hemophilia sales increased 7% due to strong demand for ADVATE and the success of new products like RIXUBIS. Inhibitor Therapies grew 14% due to increased
demand and the promotion of the prophylaxis indication for FEIBA. BioTherapeutics and Immunologbulin Therapies net sales increased 9% and 4%, respectively, reflecting increased sales of immunoglobulin therapies, including HYQVIA, and albumin
products. Refer to the Results of Operations section below for further discussion regarding the companys sales.
96
The companys net income from continuing operations was $928 million in 2015 as compared to $1.2 billion in
2014, a decrease of 22%. While the company drove sales growth across its businesses, net income from continuing operations was impacted by expenses related to special items such as charges related to the separation from Baxter and an increase in
upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners. Excluding the impact of special items, net income from continuing operations decreased 8% in 2015 compared to 2014 due to investments in the research and development (R&D) pipeline,
incremental costs associated with operating as a standalone company and interest expense associated with the June 2015 debt issuance.
Net income from
continuing operations in 2014 of $1.2 billion decreased 8% compared to $1.3 billion during 2013. The decrease was driven primarily by special items, including R&D charges of $217 million in 2014 for both upfront and milestone payments. Special
items are further discussed in the Results of Operations section below. Excluding the impact of special items, net income from continuing operations increased 11% in 2014 as compared to 2013 due to sales growth, an improvement in gross
margin percentage and increased income from equity method investments.
New Product Launches
The companys long-term prospects are influenced by the ability to successfully launch new products and therapies. During 2015, the companys new
product revenues totaled nearly $300 million. The company believes it has the capability to launch approximately 20 new products by 2020. Recent new products include:
|
|
|
ADYNOVATE: Within the Hemophilia product category, the company launched ADYNOVATE in the United States in November 2015 following U.S. regulatory approval. ADYNOVATE is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII
treatment for hemophilia A, which offers a twice-weekly dosing schedule compared to the conventional 3-4 doses weekly.
|
|
|
|
HYQVIA: Within the Immunoglobulin Therapies product category, HYQVIA, a differentiated subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment, received European regulatory approval in 2013 for treatment of adults with primary and
secondary immunodeficiency syndromes, and U.S. regulatory approval in 2014 for the treatment of adults with primary immunodeficiency syndrome. HYQVIA was first launched in certain European markets in late 2013 and in the United States in late 2014.
|
|
|
|
OBIZUR: Within the Inhibitor Therapies product category, OBIZUR received regulatory approval in the United States and Canada in 2014 and 2015, respectively, for the treatment of patients with acquired hemophilia A.
Baxalta recorded its first commercial sale of OBIZUR in the United States in late 2014. Regulatory approval in Europe for the treatment of adults with acquired hemophilia A was received in November 2015.
|
|
|
|
ONCASPAR: The company began selling its first oncology product through the acquisition of ONCASPAR (pegaspargase) from Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A (Sigma-Tau) in July 2015. Refer to the discussion below for further
information regarding the acquisition of the ONCASPAR business.
|
|
|
|
RIXUBIS: Within the Hemophilia product category, the company received FDA approval for RIXUBIS for the treatment of adults in 2013 and for pediatric use in 2014. The company has also received European approval of
RIXUBIS for both adult and pediatric use. RIXUBIS is a recombinant based therapy for the treatment of hemophilia B. The product was introduced in the U.S. market in late 2013 and first launched in Europe in April 2015.
|
The company has also launched or received regulatory approval in recent years for VONVENDI (as further discussed below), the prophylaxis indication for FEIBA,
FLEXBUMIN 5% (part of the albumin product portfolio), BAXJECT III (a needleless reconstitution system for ADVATE allowing patients to prepare their treatment with fewer steps compared to the previous process) and myPKFit (a web-based individualized
dosing device for prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A with ADVATE).
97
Research and Development and External Innovation
Baxalta continues to make substantial investments in R&D in support of its ongoing proprietary research programs and through collaborations with third
parties for the development of new products and therapies. R&D expenses were $1.2 billion, or 19% of global net sales, during 2015 and $280 million, or 18% of global net sales, during the first three months of 2016. The company believes its
R&D pipeline will provide a catalyst for future growth. R&D expenses primarily relate to programs focused on rare diseases and areas of unmet medical need.
The companys overall R&D strategy includes the continued pursuit of collaborations and partnerships with third parties that are developing new
products and therapies. These collaborations generally involve the company obtaining commercialization rights from third parties in exchange for an upfront payment upon execution of the agreement and potential future payments related to the
achievement of development, regulatory approval or commercial milestones, as well as potential royalty payments on future sales.
The companys
various collaborative arrangements include agreements with the following partners:
|
|
|
Symphogen for the development and commercialization of up to six immuno-oncology therapies currently in early-stage development.
|
|
|
|
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Merrimack) for the development and commercialization of all potential indications of nal-IRI (MM-398), including pancreatic cancer, in most markets outside the United States.
|
|
|
|
Coherus Biosciences, Inc. (Coherus) for the development and commercialization of a biosimilar to ENBREL
®
(etanercept) in Europe, Canada, Brazil and other markets
outside the United States, along with first refusal rights for other biosimilars under development.
|
|
|
|
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Momenta) for the development and commercialization of biosimilars.
|
The
company recorded R&D expenses associated with upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners of $390 million, $217 million and $78 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, as well as $105 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2016. There were no upfront or milestone payments to collaboration partners during the three months ended March 31, 2015.
In July 2015,
the company entered into an agreement with SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group (SFJ) relating to adalimumab, a biosimilar being developed pursuant to the collaboration agreement with Momenta, whereby SFJ will fund up to $200 million of development costs
related to adalimumab in exchange for payments in the event the product obtains regulatory approval in the United States or Europe.
Baxalta has also
acquired several companies in recent years with R&D projects that align with Baxaltas therapeutic areas of focus. In 2015, the company acquired SuppreMol GmbH (SuppreMol) for consideration of $228 million, obtaining its early-stage
research programs related to treatment options for autoimmune and allergic diseases. In 2014, Baxalta acquired Chatham Therapeutics, Inc. (Chatham) for consideration of $147 million, obtaining its gene therapy programs related to treatments of
hemophilia. As part of its strategy to further develop its pipeline, Baxalta also makes equity investments in companies developing high-potential technologies to accelerate innovation and growth for the company.
In 2015, the company announced the opening of its global innovation center in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which serves as the companys headquarters for
R&D and certain other functions. The global innovation center positions the company to accelerate innovation by building on its pipeline in core areas of expertise, strengthen and build upon R&D collaborations with partners in new and
emerging biotechnology areas, and optimize R&D productivity while enhancing patient care globally.
98
The companys R&D pipeline includes projects in the preclinical or exploratory phase through late-stage
clinical trials or pending regulatory approval. The following are several projects that have recently received regulatory approval or are pending regulatory approval and have either recently completed or are currently in late-stage clinical trials:
|
|
|
VONVENDI: a recombinant therapy providing a pure von Willebrand disease (VWD) factor with customized dosing. VWD is a genetic disorder that results in impaired clotting with limited other treatment options. The company
received U.S. regulatory approval in December 2015 and anticipates the product will be broadly available in the United States in late 2016.
|
|
|
|
BAX 817: a recombinant factor VIIa for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors. In March 2015, the company announced positive results from its Phase III clinical trial
evaluating the safety and efficacy of BAX 817.
|
|
|
|
20% GAMMAGARD LIQUID SubQ: a higher-potency immunoglobulin therapy offering patients faster infusions with less volume. The company has filed for approval in Europe in May 2015 and in the United States in September
2015.
|
|
|
|
BAX 2200: a biosimilar to ENBREL
®
(etanercept) that is indicated for the treatment of autoimmune deficiencies in Europe, Canada, Brazil and other markets. This is
Baxaltas most advanced biosimilar, and, in January 2016, Baxalta announced that it had met its primary end point in its Phase III clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis. There is also a Phase III clinical trial on-going for psoriasis, and,
in early stage clinical trials, Coherus has demonstrated pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence versus the innovator molecule. This program is part of a collaboration agreement with Coherus.
|
|
|
|
nal-IRI (MM-398): an investigational drug candidate for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with a gemcitabine-based therapy. A Phase III trial has been completed, and Baxalta
filed for approval in the EU in May 2015 for second-line pancreatic cancer. This program is part of a collaboration agreement with Merrimack. In October 2015, Merrimack received regulatory approval for nal-IRI in the United States and Taiwan.
|
Refer to the section of this prospectus entitled Business for additional projects in the R&D pipeline, including
earlier-stage R&D programs. The company also incurs R&D expenses in support of regulatory filings, lifecycle management activities on existing products, and on infrastructure and management of the companys overall research and
development initiatives.
Other Recent Events and Initiatives
ONCASPAR Business Acquisition
In July 2015, the company
acquired the ONCASPAR (pegaspargase) product portfolio from Sigma-Tau, a privately held biopharmaceutical company based in Italy, through the acquisition of 100% of the shares of a subsidiary of Sigma-Tau for $890 million. Through the acquisition,
the company gained the marketed biologic treatment ONCASPAR, the investigational biologic calaspargase pegol, and an established oncology infrastructure with clinical and sales resources. ONCASPAR is a first-line biologic used as part of a
chemotherapy regimen to treat patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It is currently marketed in the United States, Germany, Poland and certain other countries, and recently received EU approval. The companys results of operations
discussed below include the results of the acquired business beginning with the closing of the transaction in July 2015.
99
Capacity Expansion Efforts
To support expected long-term demand for currently marketed products and anticipated new product launches, the company has and continues to invest in several
projects aimed at expanding capacity, including the following:
|
|
|
In 2015, the company made progress in its construction of a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Covington, Georgia to support demand for plasma-derived therapies. Commercial production in the Covington, Georgia
facility is expected begin in 2018.
|
|
|
|
The companys new recombinant biologic manufacturing facility in Singapore received FDA approval for the production of ADVATE bulk drug substance in November 2015, having previously received European regulatory
approval in 2014.
|
|
|
|
The company also has a manufacturing and supply agreement with Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation of the Netherlands (Sanquin), and in 2015 Sanquin received European regulatory approval for processing plasma into bulk drug
substance for HYQVIA and GAMMAGARD LIQUID.
|
Divestiture of Vaccines Business
In December 2014, the company completed the divestiture of its commercial vaccines business and recorded an after-tax gain of $417 million. During 2015, the
company recorded additional net after-tax gains of $31 million resulting primarily from working capital adjustments and the sale of certain vaccines-related R&D programs. The operating results and gains from the divestitures of the vaccines
business have been reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Refer to Note 18 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for additional information regarding the presentation of
the vaccines business. Unless otherwise stated, financial results discussed herein reflect continuing operations.
Basis of Preparation in the
Historical Financial Statements
The historical financial statements reflect the consolidated results of operations of the company as an independent,
publicly traded company beginning with the July 1, 2015 separation from Baxter. Prior to the separation, the company did not operate as an independent, standalone company, but rather as a part of a larger group of companies controlled by
Baxter. The historical financial statements for periods prior to July 1, 2015 reflect the combined results of operations of the company as carved-out from the combined reporting entity of Baxter (carve-out financial statements). There are
limitations inherent in the preparation of all carve-out financial statements due to the fact that the companys business was previously part of a larger organization. The basis of preparation included in the audited consolidated and combined
financial statements provides a detailed description of the treatment of historical transactions in periods prior to the separation. During these periods, the companys net income was most notably impacted by the following consequences of
carve-out accounting and the separation:
|
|
|
Baxter utilized a centralized treasury management system and neither cash nor debt was allocated to Baxalta in the carve-out financial statements. In connection with the separation, the capital structures of both
companies were re-aligned, resulting in Baxalta incurring its own debt and having adequate cash to fund its operations. The indebtedness has caused Baxalta to record interest expense beginning in June 2015. The results of operations of the company
did not include a significant amount of interest expense prior to June 2015. Any additional borrowings entered into in the future will further increase interest expense.
|
|
|
|
Additionally, as foreign currency risk was also hedged through the centralized treasury management system prior to separation, the company was not allocated gains or losses related to foreign currency exposures on
balance sheet positions in the carve-out financial statements. Following the separation, the company manages its foreign currency risk through various hedging activities and recognizes gains or losses related to foreign currency exposures on balance
sheet positions through other (income) expense, net.
|
100
|
|
|
Prior to the separation, the combined statements of income included an allocation to the company from Baxter for the services provided by various Baxter functions including, but not limited to, executive oversight,
treasury, finance, legal, human resources, tax planning, internal audit, financial reporting, information technology and investor relations. The amounts of these allocations may not necessarily be indicative of the similar costs the company will
incur as an independent, standalone company. The total amount allocated to Baxalta from Baxter was $284 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $538 million, $596 million and $594 million during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The total amount allocated to Baxalta from Baxter during the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $132 million.
|
|
|
|
The company has incurred certain separation costs, which are primarily associated with the design and establishment of Baxalta as a standalone public company. These costs are included in the separation- and
integration-related costs or the separation costs lines within the tables under the Special Items captions below. The company expects to incur additional separation costs in future periods, certain of which may be capitalized in relation
to operating infrastructure, such as information technology.
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense was computed on a separate company basis, as if operated as a standalone entity, a separate entity, or a separate consolidated group in each material jurisdiction in which the company operates. Income
tax expense included in the combined financial statements prior to the separation may not be indicative of the companys future expected tax rate.
|
|
|
|
Concurrent with the separation, Baxalta entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement (MSA) with Baxter whereby Baxalta and Baxter produce certain products for one another at agreed upon terms. The MSA results in
changes to both sales and cost of goods sold in periods after the separation because products were transferred at cost between Baxter and the businesses that comprised Baxalta prior to the separation.
|
101
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSThree Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015
Special Items
The following table provides a summary of
the companys special items and the related impact by line item on the companys results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions, except as otherwise indicated)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Gross Margin
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business optimization items
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Intangible asset amortization expense
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Separation- and integration-related costs, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
(96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Gross Margin Ratio
|
|
|
(6.2 pts
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6 pts
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation- and integration-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Business optimization items
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Selling, General and Administrative Expense Ratio
|
|
|
3.2 pts
|
|
|
|
2.6 pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development
Expenses
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Separation- and integration-related costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Business optimization items
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Income) Expense, Net
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation- and integration-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of special items
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Effective Tax Rate
|
|
|
(3.4 pts
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3 pts
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items, net of tax
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
For Gross Margin, a number in parentheses represents an expense to the company, whereas in all other categories a number in parentheses represents a benefit.
|
2
|
Includes a portion allocated from Baxter related to shared activities or functions.
|
Management believes that
providing the separate impact of the above items on the companys results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), when used in conjunction with the results presented in accordance with
GAAP, can facilitate an additional analysis of the companys results of operations, particularly in evaluating performance from one period to another. In periods prior to the separation, the special items identified above reflected the portions
of special items reported by Baxter that were attributable to Baxalta.
Intangible Amortization Expense
Intangible asset amortization expense, which includes amortization of an inventory fair value step-up during the three months ended March 31, 2016
relating to the acquisition of ONCASPAR, is identified as a special item to facilitate an evaluation of operating performance, particularly in terms of cash returns, and is similar to how management internally assesses performance.
102
Additional items as described below are identified as special items because they are highly variable,
difficult to predict, and of a size that may substantially impact the companys reported operations for a period.
Upfront and Milestone Payments
to Collaboration Partners
Upfront and milestone payments related to collaborations that have been expensed as R&D are uncertain and often result
in a different payment and expense recognition pattern than internal R&D activities and therefore are typically treated as special items. Refer to the Research and Development Expenses caption below for additional information
regarding the companys upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners.
Business Optimization Items
The companys results for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were impacted by costs associated with optimizing its overall cost structure on a
global basis by streamlining certain operations and rationalizing certain manufacturing facilities. The costs consisted of impairments of fixed assets and inventories, as well as estimated severance and other costs.
Prior to the separation, the company participated in business optimization plans initiated by Baxter. The companys results for the three months ended
March 31, 2015 were impacted primarily by benefits from adjustments to business optimization estimates initially recorded in prior periods. The net benefit during the three months ended March 31, 2015 prior to the separation included a
portion allocated from Baxter related to shared functions or activities.
Separation- and Integration-Related Costs, Net
During both periods presented above, the company incurred costs related to the separation from Baxter and establishing Baxalta as an independent, standalone
public company. The company also incurred integration-related expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2016 associated with the proposed merger with Shire.
Special Items Impacting Income Tax Expense
Income tax
expense in all periods included the net tax benefit from the special pre-tax items discussed above.
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
(in millions, except percentage information)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
879
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency unfavorably impacted the net sales growth rate by 4 percentage points during the first quarter of
2016, due to a stronger U.S. dollar, primarily relative to the Euro, during the current year period compared to the prior year period.
The
comparisons presented at constant currency rates reflect comparative local currency sales at the prior years foreign exchange rates. This measure provides information on the change in net sales assuming that foreign currency exchange rates had
not changed between the prior and the current period. The company believes that the non-GAAP measure of change in net sales at constant currency rates, when used in conjunction with the GAAP measure of change in net sales at actual currency rates,
can facilitate an additional analysis of the companys results of operations, particularly in evaluating performance from one period to another.
103
The tables below present sales results for Baxaltas product categories. The commentary beneath
discusses growth drivers at constant currency rates.
Hematology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
(in millions, except percentage information)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
Hemophilia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
(11
|
%)
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
644
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inhibitor Therapies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Hematology
|
|
$
|
843
|
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hemophilia
includes sales of recombinant and plasma-derived hemophilia products (primarily factor VIII and
factor IX).
Net sales growth during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was primarily driven by increased sales of recombinant factor VIII
therapies:
|
|
|
U.S. growth was driven by both volume increases and modest pricing improvements for ADVATE. The late 2015 launch of ADYNOVATE, the companys extended half-life recombinant factor VIII therapy, also contributed to
the growth rate.
|
|
|
|
Internationally, sales growth was unfavorably impacted by the timing of ADVATE shipments to Brazil as part of the companys partnership with Hemobrás. Partially offsetting this impact was increased demand
for recombinant factor VIII therapies across other international markets.
|
|
|
|
Globally, recombinant factor VIII therapies contributed approximately 4 percentage points to the Hemophilia product categorys net sales growth rate.
|
Increased sales of RIXUBIS, a recombinant factor IX therapy that was first introduced in the U.S. market in 2013 and certain other markets beginning in 2015,
contributed approximately 1 percentage point to the Hemophilia net sales growth rate.
The company expects continued competition from new entrants;
however, long-term growth in the Hemophilia product category is expected to be driven by strong underlying global demand, further penetration in markets outside the United States, and launches of new therapies, including ADYNOVATE, across a variety
of geographies.
Inhibitor Therapies
include sales of the companys products to treat patients with congenital hemophilia A or B who have
developed inhibitors, as well as patients that have developed acquired hemophilia A due to an inhibitor.
104
Growth in net sales was driven by strong global sales of the companys plasma-based inhibitor bypass
therapy, FEIBA. Globally, FEIBA contributed approximately 22 percentage points to the Inhibitor Therapies net sales growth rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016:
|
|
|
In the United States, strong FEIBA growth was driven primarily by increased demand, including continued advancement in prophylactic use and enhanced penetration of the inhibitor portfolio in the acute care setting.
|
|
|
|
Strong international growth was due primarily to increased sales in Brazil, which included a favorable impact from timing of tender sales, as well as expanded use and continued penetration into certain other markets.
|
Immunology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
(in millions, except percentage information)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
Immunoglobulin Therapies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioTherapeutics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Immunology
|
|
$
|
653
|
|
|
$
|
554
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immunoglobulin Therapies
includes sales of the companys antibody-replacement immunoglobulin therapies.
Net sales growth during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was driven by increased global demand for the companys immunoglobulin therapies,
which resulted in:
|
|
|
HYQVIA patient growth in both the United States and international markets. HYQVIA, the companys differentiated immunoglobulin therapy for patients with primary immunodeficiency, was first launched in certain
European markets in 2013 and in the United States in 2014.
|
|
|
|
Increased sales of other immunoglobulin therapy offerings in the United States, despite conversion of certain patients to HYQVIA. The company also benefited internationally from increased supply and further penetration
into emerging markets.
|
To support expected long-term demand for the companys immunoglobulin therapies and other plasma-based
therapies, Baxalta is expanding its capacity through ongoing yield improvements, a contract manufacturing services agreement with Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation of the Netherlands and construction of a new manufacturing site in Covington, Georgia.
BioTherapeutics
includes sales of the companys plasma-based therapies to treat alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, burns and shock, and other
chronic and acute blood-related conditions, as well as revenue from manufacturing and supply arrangements.
105
Net sales growth during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was primarily driven by:
|
|
|
Revenues related to the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (MSA) with Baxter of $41 million in the three months ended March 31, 2016, which contributed approximately 31 percentage points to the BioTherapeutics net
sales growth rate. In connection with the separation, Baxalta and Baxter entered into the MSA whereby Baxalta manufactures and sells certain products and materials to Baxter. MSA revenues with Baxter are reported as international sales.
|
|
|
|
Increased international sales of albumin products, primarily due to volume growth. Globally, albumin products contributed approximately 18 percentage points to the product categorys net sales growth rate.
|
|
|
|
Strong U.S. demand for therapies that treat alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, which contributed approximately 7 percentage points to the global BioTherapeutics net sales growth rate.
|
Oncology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
Oncology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
International
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oncology
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oncology
includes sales of the companys therapies to treat patients with cancer. The company began
reporting Oncology revenues during the third quarter of 2015 following the acquisition of the ONCASPAR business, which the company completed in July 2015. ONCASPAR is a first-line biologic used as part of a chemotherapy regimen to treat patients
with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The companys R&D pipeline has the potential to deliver a wide range of new oncology therapies, including certain therapies in late-stage clinical trials or pending regulatory approvals.
Gross Margin and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
(as a percent of net sales)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
54.1
|
%
|
|
|
58.0
|
%
|
|
|
(3.9 pts
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
Gross Margin
The special items identified above had an unfavorable impact of 6.2 and 0.6 percentage points on the gross margin percentage during the first three months
ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Refer to the Special Items caption above for additional details.
Excluding the impact of
special items, gross margin in the three months ended March 31, 2016 improved compared to the prior year period due to benefits from increased sales of higher-margin products such as ADVATE and FEIBA, a favorable contribution from ONCASPAR
sales and impacts from the basis of preparation of the carve-out financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2015 which caused lower pension-related and other costs during the current year period as compared to the prior year
period. Partially offsetting the above factors was the impact of lower-margin revenues recorded in 2016 associated with the MSA with Baxter.
106
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Following the July 1, 2015 separation from Baxter, the composition of Baxaltas selling, general and administrative expenses changed. The company no
longer receives a significant allocation of costs from Baxter associated with certain corporate or other functions, and instead incurs actual costs associated with operating as a standalone public company, including expenses associated with certain
separation-related agreements entered into with Baxter. Refer to Note 14 to the unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for further information regarding the separation-related agreements.
The special items identified above had an unfavorable impact of 3.2 and 2.6 percentage points on the selling, general and administrative expense ratio during
the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In addition to the impact of special items, the three months ended March 31, 2016
were impacted by additional costs associated with operating as a standalone public company, including expenses related to the transition services agreement with Baxter, which in the aggregate exceeded allocated costs from Baxter during the prior
year period. In addition, the companys selling, general and administrative expense ratio during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was unfavorably impacted by costs supporting the companys emerging oncology business, launch
excellence initiatives and other investments supporting expansion of the companys commercial and international operations.
Business Optimization
Items
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the company approved a business optimization plan to optimize its overall cost structure on a
global basis by streamlining certain operations and rationalizing certain manufacturing facilities. The company recorded a charge of $66 million in cost of sales during the three months ended March 31, 2016 associated with this plan. The charge
consisted of fixed asset and inventory impairments of $36 million and estimated severance and other costs of $30 million.
The company expects to realize
$37 million of annualized savings, primarily within cost of sales when this program is fully implemented in 2017.
Prior to the separation, the company
participated in business optimization plans initiated by Baxter. The companys results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 included charges of $3 million allocated from Baxter and benefits of $10 million resulting from favorable
adjustments to business optimization estimates initially recorded in prior periods. The company estimates that it has fully realized savings associated with business optimization initiatives initiated prior to the separation.
Refer to Note 6 to the unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for further information regarding
business optimization items.
Research and Development Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentage information)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
Discovery, clinical and lifecycle management
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
|
(3%)
|
|
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Other research and development expenses
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
|
79%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D expense as a % of sales
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.6 pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
Discovery, clinical and lifecycle management expenses
consist of costs supporting specific
R&D projects, including those in the exploratory or preclinical phase, those in early- or late-stage clinical trials, as well as those pending regulatory approval or supporting development of products that have already obtained regulatory
approval.
While the companys investments in discovery, clinical and lifecycle management R&D activities associated with several projects across
hematology, immunology and oncology increased, total expenses decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the prior year period due primarily to the following factors:
|
|
|
An agreement with SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group (SFJ) that the company entered into in the second quarter of 2015 for the reimbursement of certain biosimilar development costs, which resulted in less R&D expense for the
company during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the prior year period. Biosimilar development costs funded by SFJ during the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $24 million.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in development costs related to ADYNOVATE, which obtained regulatory approval in the United States in November 2015.
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, including strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the prior year period.
|
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
charged to R&D expense during the three months ended March 31, 2016 included a
$105 million upfront payment to Precision Biosciences (Precision) related to the development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. There were no upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners charged to R&D expense
during the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Other research and development expenses
include costs not directly attributable to
individual projects and include depreciation and other facility-based expenses, medical and regulatory affairs functions, pharmacovigilance, other infrastructure and management costs supporting multiple projects, as well as special items such as
business optimization and separation- and integration-related costs.
Other research and development expenses increased during the three months ended
March 31, 2016 as compared to the prior year period primarily due to investments in infrastructure to support a standalone R&D function and several key projects in the companys R&D pipeline, as well as a charge in the current year
period associated with terminating an existing project.
Net Interest Expense
On June 23, 2015, Baxalta issued debt directly attributable to its business and began recording interest expense. Net interest expense during the three
months ended March 31, 2016 of $23 million primarily reflects interest expense associated with the June 2015 debt issuance and is net of portions capitalized, amortization of deferred hedging gains and losses, and interest income.
Prior to the June 2015 debt issuance and during the three months ended March 31, 2015, Baxters third-party debt and the related interest expense
were not allocated to the company as the company was not the legal obligor of the debt and Baxter borrowings were not directly attributable to the companys business.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
During the three months
ended March 31, 2016, other (income) expense, net was $21 million of income and consisted primarily of a $20 million gain following the settlement of an indemnification liability with Baxter.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, other (income) expense, net was $12 million of expense and consisted primarily of other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $9 million to write-down two of the companys investments to their fair values.
108
Income Taxes
Effective Income Tax Rate
The companys effective
income tax rate from continuing operations was 15.7% and 22.7% during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The companys effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate each year due to state
and local taxes, certain operations that are subject to tax incentives, and foreign taxes that are different from the U.S. federal statutory rate. In addition, the effective tax rate can be affected each period by discrete factors and events.
The effective income tax rate decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015 primarily
due to an increase in the amount of expenditures qualifying for the U.S. Research & Experimentation tax credit and the settlement of an indemnification liability with Baxter.
109
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSYears Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Special Items
The following table provides a summary of
the companys special items and the related impact by line item on the companys results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions, except as otherwise
indicated)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Gross Margin
1
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset amortization expense
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
Separation costs
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business optimization items
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Gross Margin Ratio
|
|
|
(1.4 pts
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3 pts
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4 pts
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses
1
|
|
|
|
|
Separation costs
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Business development items
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plasma related litigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
84
|
|
Business optimization items
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Branded Prescription Drug Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turkey VAT charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Selling, General and Administrative Expense Ratio
|
|
|
3.3 pts
|
|
|
|
1.0 pts
|
|
|
|
1.9 pts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development
Expenses
1
|
|
|
|
|
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Impairment charges and adjustments
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation costs
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business optimization items
2
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Income) Expense, Net
1
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment charge
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Currency-related item
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business development items
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent payment liabilities
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense
1
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of special items
|
|
$
|
(156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Effective Tax Rate
|
|
|
(0.1 pts
|
)
|
|
|
0.7 pts
|
|
|
|
(2.9 pts
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Special Items, net of tax
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
For Gross Margin, a number in parentheses represents an expense to the company, whereas in all other categories a number in parentheses represents a benefit.
|
2
|
Includes a portion allocated from Baxter related to shared activities or functions.
|
Management believes
that providing the separate impact of the above items on the companys results presented in accordance with GAAP, when used in conjunction with the results presented in accordance with GAAP, can facilitate an additional analysis of the
companys results of operations, particularly in evaluating performance from one period to another. In periods prior to the separation, the special items identified above reflected the portions of special items reported by Baxter that were
attributable to Baxalta.
110
Intangible Amortization Expense
Intangible asset amortization expense, which includes amortization of an inventory fair value step-up during the year ended December 31, 2015 related to
the acquisition of ONCASPAR, is identified as a special item to facilitate an evaluation of current and past operating performance, particularly in terms of cash returns, and is similar to how management internally assesses performance.
Upfront and Milestone Payments to Collaboration Partners
Upfront and milestone payments related to collaborations that have been expensed as R&D are uncertain and often result in a different payment and expense
recognition pattern than internal R&D activities and therefore are typically treated as special items. Refer to the Research and Development Expenses section below for additional information regarding the companys upfront and
milestone payments to collaboration partners.
Business Optimization Items
The company has participated in business optimization plans initiated by Baxter prior to the separation, which were in an effort to streamline international
operations, rationalize manufacturing facilities, enhance general and administrative infrastructure and re-align certain R&D activities and programs. The companys results for the periods presented above were impacted by charges associated
with these plans, as well as benefits from adjustments to business optimization charge estimates. The amount of business optimization charges or benefits incurred during the current and prior year periods and the impacted statement of income line
items are presented in the table above.
The net benefit or charge in periods prior to the separation included a portion allocated from Baxter related to
shared functions or activities.
Separation Costs
During 2015 and 2014, the company incurred costs to separate from Baxter and establish Baxalta as an independent, standalone public company. The amount of
separation costs incurred during the current and prior year periods and the impacted statement of income line items are presented in the table above.
Plasma Related Litigation
During 2013, the company
recorded legal related charges in selling, general and administrative expenses of $84 million for class-action litigation associated with pricing of plasma-derived therapies, $10 million of which was reversed during 2014 following the settlement of
the plasma related litigation.
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Payment Liabilities
The company recorded gains and losses in other (income) expense, net from changes in the fair value of contingent payment liabilities associated with
previously completed business combinations. Significant changes in fair value are generally driven by changes in the estimated probability of achieving milestones or estimated product sales projections. Gains and losses during the periods presented
above primarily include the following:
|
|
|
Gain of $66 million during 2015 associated with the 2014 acquisition of AesRx, LLC (AesRx).
|
|
|
|
Gain of $33 million during 2015 and losses of $124 million and $18 million during 2014 and 2013, respectively, associated with the 2013 acquisition of OBIZUR and related assets from Inspiration BioPharmaceuticals, Inc.
and Ipsen Pharma S.A.S. (Inspiration / Ipsen).
|
111
Other Special Items Impacting 2015
|
|
|
The company recorded $81 million of impairment charges within R&D expenses primarily resulting from a decrease in the fair value of in-process R&D (IPR&D) acquired as part of the 2014 acquisition of AesRx.
The fair value decreased as a result of the companys decision in 2015 not to pursue further development activities related to the acquired project.
|
|
|
|
The company incurred $12 million of non-recurring net business development expenses primarily associated with the acquisition of the ONCASPAR business from Sigma-Tau within selling, general and administrative expenses
and other (income) expense, net.
|
|
|
|
The company incurred $25 million of unrealized foreign currency losses in other (income) expense, net during the fourth quarter of 2015 following an announcement in December by the Argentine government lifting currency
controls, resulting in the Argentine Peso devaluing nearly 30% in one day.
|
Other Special Items Impacting 2014
|
|
|
During 2014, selling, general and administrative expenses included a charge of $26 million to account for an additional year of the Branded Prescription Drug Fee in accordance with final regulations issued by the
Internal Revenue Service.
|
Other Special Items Impacting 2013
|
|
|
During 2013, selling, general and administrative expenses included an $8 million charge related to VAT matters in Turkey.
|
Special Items Impacting Income Tax Expense
Income tax
expense in all periods included the net tax benefit from the special pre-tax items discussed above. In addition, income tax expense in 2013 included a benefit of $34 million related to the reversal of accruals for uncertain tax positions in
Switzerland.
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions, except percentage information)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
$
|
3,016
|
|
|
$
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,555
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency unfavorably impacted the net sales growth rate by 8 and 1 percentage points in 2015 and 2014,
respectively, principally due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro, Russian Ruble and Japanese Yen.
Refer to the Net
Sales caption in the Results of OperationsThree Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 section above for a description of net sales growth at constant currency rates and reasons for use of this non-GAAP measure.
112
The tables below present sales results for Baxaltas product categories. The commentary beneath discusses
growth drivers at constant currency rates.
Hematology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions, except percentage
information)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Hemophilia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,339
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
(12
|
%)
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,840
|
|
|
$
|
2,984
|
|
|
$
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inhibitor Therapies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
(6
|
%)
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Hematology
|
|
$
|
3,627
|
|
|
$
|
3,728
|
|
|
$
|
3,437
|
|
|
|
(3
|
%)
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hemophilia
includes sales of recombinant and plasma-derived hemophilia products (primarily factor VIII and factor
IX).
Net sales growth in 2015 and 2014 was the result of strong global demand for recombinant factor VIII therapies, including ADVATE.
|
|
|
In the United States, recombinant factor VIII sales growth in 2015 was driven by increased volumes and modest pricing improvements. Volume growth was driven by increased prophylactic use and the launch of ADYNOVATE, the
companys extended half-life factor VIII treatment for hemophilia that was approved in the United States in November 2015. The company experienced modest market share loss due to entrance of new competition which partially offset the above
factors. U.S. sales growth in 2014 was driven primarily by increased volumes.
|
|
|
|
Internationally, growth in both periods was driven by penetration into certain markets, including increased ADVATE shipments to Brazil as part of the companys partnership with Hemobrás, particularly in 2014
compared to 2013.
|
|
|
|
Globally, recombinant factor VIII therapies contributed approximately 4 and 7 percentage points to the Hemophilia product categorys net sales growth rate for 2015 and 2014, respectively.
|
The launch and growth of RIXUBIS, which was first introduced in the U.S. market in 2013 and certain other markets beginning in 2015, contributed approximately
1 percentage point to the Hemophilia net sales growth rate in both 2015 and 2014.
The company expects continued competition from new entrants; however,
long-term growth in the Hemophilia product category is expected to be driven by strong underlying global demand, further penetration in markets outside the United States, and launches of new therapies, including ADYNOVATE, across a variety of
geographies.
Inhibitor Therapies
include sales of the companys products to treat patients with congenital hemophilia A or B who have
developed inhibitors, as well as patients that have developed acquired hemophilia A due to an inhibitor.
113
Growth in net sales during 2015 and 2014 was driven by strong global sales of the companys plasma-based
inhibitor bypass therapy, FEIBA. Globally, FEIBA contributed approximately 12 and 15 percentage points to the Inhibitor Therapies net sales growth rate in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
|
|
|
In the United States, strong FEIBA growth in both periods was driven by increased volume associated with advancement in prophylactic use, with modest pricing improvements also benefitting 2015 net sales growth.
|
|
|
|
Internationally, FEIBA growth in both periods resulted from expanded use and enhanced penetration into new and existing markets.
|
Net sales growth for Inhibitor Therapies in 2015 also reflected a modest impact from the U.S. launch of OBIZUR in late 2014, a recombinant porcine factor VIII
therapy for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A.
Immunology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions, except percentage
information)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Immunoglobulin Therapies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,350
|
|
|
$
|
1,272
|
|
|
$
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,677
|
|
|
$
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioTherapeutics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
684
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Immunology
|
|
$
|
2,434
|
|
|
$
|
2,224
|
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immunoglobulin Therapies
includes sales of the companys antibody-replacement immunoglobulin therapies.
Net sales growth during 2015 and 2014 was driven by increased global demand for immunoglobulin therapies, including GAMMAGARD LIQUID and HYQVIA.
|
|
|
The company launched HYQVIA, a differentiated immunoglobulin therapy for patients with primary immunodeficiency, in the United States during the second half of 2014 and in certain European markets beginning in the
second half of 2013, which contributed to the product categorys net sales growth rate in both periods.
|
To support expected long-term
demand for the companys immunoglobulin therapies and other plasma-based therapies, Baxalta is expanding its capacity through ongoing yield improvements, a contract manufacturing services agreement with Sanquin and construction of a new
manufacturing site in Covington, Georgia.
BioTherapeutics
includes sales of the companys plasma-based therapies to treat alpha-1 antitrypsin
deficiency, burns and shock, and other chronic and acute blood-related conditions, as well as revenue from manufacturing and supply arrangements.
Net
sales growth in 2015 was primarily impacted by:
|
|
|
Revenues related to the MSA with Baxter of $71 million in 2015, which contributed approximately 13 percentage
points to the BioTherapeutics net sales growth rate. In connection with the separation,
|
114
|
Baxalta and Baxter entered into the MSA whereby Baxalta manufactures and sells certain products and materials to Baxter. Baxalta began recording revenues associated with the MSA with Baxter
during 2015, which are reported in international sales.
|
|
|
|
Increased sales of albumin products, which contributed approximately 11 points to the product categorys net sales growth rate, driven by increased volumes in the United States and China.
|
|
|
|
Benefit from revenues recorded from a contract manufacturing agreement related to the divested commercial vaccines business, which are reported in international sales.
|
Net sales growth in 2014 was primarily driven by increased demand for albumin products within the United States and several emerging markets, partially offset
by lower albumin sales in China due to licensure delays that impacted shipments in the first half of 2014. Globally, albumin products contributed 10 percentage points to the BioTherapeutics net sales growth rate in 2014.
Oncology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At actual
currency rates
|
|
|
At constant
currency rates
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Oncology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
International
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oncology
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/Mnot meaningful
Oncology
includes sales of the companys therapies to treat patients with cancer. The company began reporting Oncology revenues during 2015
following the acquisition of the ONCASPAR business, which the company completed in July 2015. ONCASPAR is a first-line biologic used as part of a chemotherapy regimen to treat patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The companys R&D
pipeline has the potential to deliver a wide range of new oncology therapies, including certain therapies in late-stage clinical trials or pending regulatory approvals.
Gross Margin and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
years ended December 31 (as a percent of net sales)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.2pts
|
|
|
|
0.9 pts
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.8pts
|
|
|
|
(0.6 pts
|
)
|
Gross Margin
The special
items identified above had an unfavorable impact of 1.4, 0.3 and 0.4 percentage points on the gross margin percentage during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Refer to the Special Items section above for additional details.
Excluding the impact of special items, gross margin in 2015 reflects a favorable impact from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and hedging
activities, benefits from increased sales of higher-margin products such as ADVATE and FEIBA, and a favorable contribution from ONCASPAR sales. Partially offsetting the above factors was the impact of lower-margin revenues recorded in 2015
associated with the MSA with Baxter.
115
In 2014 as compared to 2013, gross margin percentage improved primarily due to growth in higher margin products
such as ADVATE and FEIBA and lower pension expense allocated from Baxter, partially offset by an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Following
the July 1, 2015 separation from Baxter, the composition of Baxaltas selling, general and administrative expenses has changed. The company no longer receives a significant allocation of costs from Baxter associated with certain corporate
or other functions, and instead incurs costs associated with operating as a standalone public company, including expenses associated with certain separation-related agreements entered into with Baxter. Refer to Note 17 to the audited consolidated
and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for further information regarding the separation-related agreements.
The special items
identified above had an unfavorable impact of 3.3, 1.0 and 1.9 percentage points on the selling, general and administrative expense ratio during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In addition to the impact of special items, 2015 was impacted by additional costs associated with operating as a standalone public company, including expenses
related to the transition services agreement with Baxter, which in aggregate exceeded allocated costs from Baxter during the prior year period. In addition, the companys selling, general and administrative expense ratio in 2015 was unfavorably
impacted by costs supporting the companys emerging oncology business, an increase in investments related to new product launches, including for the ADYNOVATE launch, launch excellence initiatives and other investments supporting expansion of
the companys commercial and international operations.
In 2014 as compared to 2013, excluding the impact of special items, the selling, general and
administrative expense ratio increased primarily due to select investments and spending on marketing and promotional programs for new launches and initiatives partially offset by leverage from higher sales, savings from business optimization
initiatives and lower pension expense allocated from Baxter.
Business Optimization Items
The company has participated in business optimization plans initiated by Baxter prior to the separation, which were in an effort to streamline international
operations, rationalize manufacturing facilities, enhance general and administrative infrastructure and re-align or cancel certain R&D activities and programs. The related net charges or benefits in 2015, 2014 and 2013 are presented above under
the heading Special Items. The company estimates that it has fully realized savings associated with past initiatives and it has not implemented significant new business optimization plans following its separation from Baxter. Refer to
Note 7 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for further information regarding business optimization items.
Research and Development Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions, except percentage
information)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Discovery, clinical and lifecycle management
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
178
|
%
|
Other research and development expenses
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
|
$
|
820
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D expense as a % of sales
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.3pts
|
|
|
|
3.1pts
|
|
116
Discovery, clinical and lifecycle management expenses
consist of costs supporting specific R&D
projects, including those in the exploratory or preclinical phase, those in early- or late-stage clinical trials, as well as those pending regulatory approval or supporting development of products that have already obtained regulatory approval.
The growth in discovery, clinical and lifecycle management R&D expenses in 2015 as compared to 2014 was impacted by the following:
|
|
|
Increased development costs supporting oncology programs, including nal-IRI for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer, and pacritinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis;
|
|
|
|
Increased investments in research projects related to the development and manufacture of hemophilia treatments, including gene therapy development.
|
|
|
|
Increased costs supporting development of treatments using immunoglobulin therapies.
|
|
|
|
An agreement with SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group (SFJ) that the company entered into in 2015 for the reimbursement of certain biosimilar development costs, which resulted in less R&D expenses for the company in 2015
compared to 2014. Biosimilar development costs in 2015 funded by SFJ were $58 million. The SFJ agreement is further discussed in Note 5 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Partial offset from the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, including strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro in 2015 as compared to 2014.
|
The growth in discovery, clinical and lifecycle management R&D expenses in 2014 as compared to 2013 included the following:
|
|
|
Increased expenses supporting the development of ADYNOVATE, which was submitted for U.S. regulatory approval in December 2014 and launched in November 2015.
|
|
|
|
Increased investments related to biosimilar development.
|
|
|
|
Partial offset for lower expenses associated with the companys Alzheimers program, which was suspended in 2013 following a Phase III trial that did not meet its primary endpoint.
|
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
during 2015 included an accrued expense of $175 million for an upfront payment to
Symphogen related to the development of early-stage immuno-oncology therapies, as well as milestone payments totaling $215 million. Milestone payments included payments to Merrimack related to the development of nal-IRI, a pancreatic cancer drug,
Coherus related to the development of a biosimilar to ENBREL
®
(etanercept), and CTI BioPharma Corp. (CTI BioPharma) related to the development of pacritinib.
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners during 2014 included an upfront payment of $100 million to Merrimack and milestone payments totaling
$117 million primarily to Coherus, CTI BioPharma and Momenta for the development of biosimilars.
Upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners
in 2013 included payments totaling $78 million to Coherus and CTI BioPharma.
Other research and development expenses
include costs not
directly attributable to individual projects and include depreciation and other facility-based expenses, medical and regulatory affairs functions, pharmacovigilance, other infrastructure and management costs supporting multiple projects, as well as
special items such as impairment charges, business optimization items and separation costs. The following special items were reported in other research and development expenses during the periods presented above:
|
|
|
IPR&D impairment charge of $81 million during 2015, primarily related to IPR&D acquired in the 2014 acquisition of AesRx.
|
117
|
|
|
Business optimization items consisting of a $9 million benefit during 2015 and net charges of $21 million and $24 million during 2014 and 2013, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Separation costs of $15 million and $13 million during 2015 and 2014, respectively.
|
Excluding the impact of
the special items described above, other R&D expenses increased 20% during 2015 and 12% during 2014, primarily due to investments in infrastructure to support a standalone R&D function and several key projects in the companys R&D
pipeline, as well as increased expenses related to medical affairs.
Net Interest Expense
On June 23, 2015, Baxalta issued debt directly attributable to its business and began recording interest expense. Net interest expense during 2015 of $48
million primarily reflects interest expense associated with the June 2015 debt issuance and is net of portions capitalized, amortization of deferred hedging gains and losses, and interest income. The June 2015 debt issuance is further discussed in
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.
Prior to the June 2015 debt issuance, Baxters third-party debt and the related
interest expense were not allocated to the company as the company was not the legal obligor of the debt and Baxter borrowings were not directly attributable to the companys business.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
During 2015, other (income)
expense, net was $102 million of income and consisted primarily of the following items:
|
|
|
Gains of $97 million, a special item, due to adjustments in the fair value of contingent payment liabilities associated primarily with the 2014 acquisition of AesRx and the 2013 acquisition of Chatham.
|
|
|
|
Gains from the sale of investments and equity method income totaling $31 million.
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency losses of $25 million following an announcement from the Argentine government lifting currency controls, resulting in the Argentine Peso devaluing nearly 30% in one day, a special item.
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment charges of $14 million due to the duration of declines in fair value of three of the companys investments.
|
During 2014, other (income) expense, net was $104 million of expense and consisted primarily of the following items:
|
|
|
Loss of $124 million, a special item, resulting from an increase in the fair value of a contingent payment liability associated with the acquisition of OBIZUR and related assets from Inspiration / Ipsen.
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment charge of $45 million, a special item, to write-down the companys investment in the common stock of Onconova to its fair value.
|
|
|
|
Income from equity method investments of $64 million which primarily represented distributions from funds that sold portfolio companies as well as gains from the sale of certain investments.
|
During 2013, other (income) expense, net was $1 million of expense and consisted primarily of the following items:
|
|
|
Income from equity method investments of $23 million.
|
|
|
|
Loss of $18 million, a special item, resulting from an increase in the fair value of a contingent payment liability associated with the acquisition of OBIZUR and related assets from Inspiration / Ipsen.
|
118
Income Taxes
Effective Income Tax Rate
The effective income tax rate
for continuing operations was 22.5% in 2015, 22.6% in 2014 and 20.1% in 2013. The companys effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate each year due to state and local taxes, certain operations that are subject to
tax incentives and foreign taxes that are different from the U.S. federal statutory rate.
The average foreign effective tax rate on international pre-tax
income was 9.0%, 5.4% and 5.3% for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The companys average foreign effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate as a result of tax incentives in jurisdictions outside of the United States,
as well as foreign earnings in tax jurisdictions with lower statutory rates than the United States. In addition, the effective tax rate can be affected each period by discrete factors and events. Refer to Note 14 to the audited consolidated and
combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for further information regarding the companys income taxes.
The effective income tax
rate in 2015 was comparable to the effective tax rate in 2014. The impact of an increase in charges related to the separation that were deductible at tax rates higher than the effective rate and a decrease in the non-deductible charge for the
Branded Prescription Drug Fee were largely offset by an increase in charges associated with upfront and milestone payments made to collaboration partners that were deductible at tax rates lower than the effective tax rate.
The effective income tax rate in 2014 increased as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in the companys Branded Prescription Drug Fee, which is
not deductible for federal income tax purposes, a change to the earnings mix from lower tax to higher tax rate jurisdictions and a reduction in reversals of reserves for uncertain tax position benefits.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The company believes
that its existing capital resources, as supplemented by its cash flows generated from operating activities, will be adequate to satisfy its operations and capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, its ability to fund its operations and
capital needs could be adversely affected if there is a material decline in the demand for the companys products or in the solvency of its customers or suppliers, deterioration in the companys key financial ratios or credit ratings or
other significant unfavorable changes in conditions.
Financial Condition
The following table summarizes components of the companys financial condition as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and as of March 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of
March 31,
|
|
|
as of
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
1,001
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets (including cash and equivalents)
|
|
$
|
4,876
|
|
|
$
|
4,708
|
|
|
$
|
3,093
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
2,898
|
|
|
$
|
2,797
|
|
|
$
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5,624
|
|
|
$
|
5,268
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
Cash and Equivalents
The companys investment policy allows it to invest its cash in highly liquid investment vehicles, including institutional money market funds,
certificates of deposits or time deposit accounts. The companys cash and equivalents balance decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2016 due primarily to $280 million of upfront payments associated with collaboration agreements with
Symphogen and Precision and $235 million of capital expenditures, partially offset by increases in short-term debt of $302 million and cash generated from operations of $128 million. The companys cash flows are further discussed under the
Historical Cash Flow Trends caption below.
Prior to the separation, Baxalta participated in Baxters centralized treasury
management system, which included centralized cash pooling and overall financing arrangements. At December 31, 2014, Baxalta did not report cash and equivalents on its balance sheet due to its participation in Baxters centralized treasury
management system.
Working Capital
The
companys working capital is calculated as current assets, including cash and equivalents, less current liabilities. The increase in working capital from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015 is driven by $1.0 billion of cash and equivalents
as of December 31, 2015, compared to zero cash and equivalents in working capital as of December 31, 2014 due to the companys participation in Baxters centralized treasury management system prior to the separation. Refer to the
discussion below under the heading Historical Cash Flow Trends for information regarding changes in the companys cash and equivalents.
Excluding cash and equivalents, the companys working capital as of December 31, 2015 of $1.8 billion increased compared to $1.5 billion as of
December 31, 2014, driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
Increases in inventory and receivables (including due from Baxter) due to growth in the companys commercial operations.
|
|
|
|
Decrease in income tax payables due largely to the basis of preparation included in the carve-out financial statements, as further discussed in the Historical Cash Flow Trends section below.
|
Partially offsetting the factors above was an increase in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, including a $175 million accrual
for an upfront collaboration payment made to Symphogen in January 2016.
Working capital increased 4% during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations contributed to the modest increase during the period.
Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Commercial Paper
During the three months ended March 31,
2016, the company issued and redeemed commercial paper, of which $300 million was outstanding as of March 31, 2016 with a weighted-average interest rate of 1.12%. This commercial paper is classified as short-term debt on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet. The company did not have any commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2015 or 2014.
Senior Notes
On June 23, 2015, the company issued senior notes with a total aggregate principal amount of $5 billion. The company used the net proceeds to make a cash
distribution of $4 billion to Baxter as partial consideration for the contribution of net assets to the company in connection with the separation, and the remainder has been or is intended to be used for general corporate purposes, including funding
of acquisitions. The $4 billion cash distribution to Baxter was made on June 23, 2015. The $5 billion in senior notes consist of the following tranches:
|
|
|
$375 million aggregate principal of senior notes bearing a floating coupon rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.780% and maturing in June 2018.
|
120
|
|
|
$375 million aggregate principal of senior notes bearing a fixed coupon rate of 2.000% and maturing in June 2018.
|
|
|
|
$1.0 billion aggregate principal of senior notes bearing a fixed coupon rate of 2.875% and maturing in June 2020.
|
|
|
|
$500 million aggregate principal of senior notes bearing a fixed coupon rate of 3.600% and maturing in June 2022.
|
|
|
|
$1.75 billion aggregate principal of senior notes bearing a fixed coupon rate of 4.000% and maturing in June of 2025.
|
|
|
|
$1.0 billion aggregate principal of senior notes bearing a fixed coupon rate of 5.250% and maturing June 2045.
|
Refer to Note 9 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for information regarding interest rate derivative
contracts the company has entered into related to the senior notes.
Prior to the June 2015 debt issuance, no debt was allocated to Baxalta because
Baxalta was not the legal obligor of the debt and the borrowings were not directly attributable to Baxaltas business.
Capital Lease Obligations
The company leases certain facilities under capital leases. During 2014, the company entered into a leasing arrangement for a new global innovation
center in Cambridge, Massachusetts and recorded a capital lease obligation of $263 million. During 2015, the company entered into a leasing arrangement for its corporate headquarters in Bannockburn, Illinois and recorded a capital lease obligation
of $41 million. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the companys total capital lease obligations, including current portion, were $319 million and $275 million, respectively.
There were no significant changes to the companys capital lease obligations during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Baxalta expects its
principal uses of cash in the future would be primarily to fund its operations, working capital needs, capital expenditures, repayment of borrowings, strategic investments and dividends paid to shareholders. Refer to the Historical Cash Flow
Trends section below for further discussion of the companys cash flows during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
The companys principal sources of cash include its operating cash flows and current or future financing arrangements, including the June 2015 senior
note issuance described above, borrowings under the companys commercial paper program and liquidity provided by credit facilities, including those described below. The merger agreement with Shire limits the amount of future indebtedness the
company can incur.
In July 2015, the company entered into a credit agreement providing for a senior revolving credit facility that provides the company
with access to an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.2 billion maturing in 2020, of which no amounts are currently outstanding. Effective November 12, 2015 the company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the credit agreement. The amendment
narrowed the definition of Change of Control. The other material terms of the credit agreement, including covenants, remained unchanged. The facility enables the company to borrow funds on an unsecured basis at variable interest rates,
and contains various financial and other covenants, including a net leverage ratio covenant and an interest coverage ratio covenant, as well as events of default with respect to the company. The credit facility also provides for the issuance of
letters of credit, which reduces the maximum capacity of this facility. At March 31, 2016, the amount of letters of credit issued was immaterial. The non-performance of any financial institution supporting either of the credit facilities would
reduce the maximum capacity of these facilities by each institutions respective commitment.
121
The company also entered into a Euro-denominated senior revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal
amount of up to 200 million maturing in 2020, with similar terms as the above credit facility, of which no amounts are currently outstanding. Effective November 12, 2015, the company entered into an amendment to this credit facility.
Similar to the amendment discussed above, this amendment narrows the definition of Change of Control. The non-performance of any financial institution supporting either of the credit facilities would reduce the maximum capacity of these
facilities by each institutions respective commitment.
A significant portion of the companys net cash provided from operations is generated
within the United States, allowing the company to indefinitely reinvest a portion of its foreign earnings in jurisdictions outside of the United States. The company believes its U.S. cash flows from operations together with repatriations of foreign
earnings that are not deemed permanently invested are adequate to meet its ongoing cash flow obligations in the United States.
Dividends and Share
Repurchase Authorization
On July 28, 2015, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share of common
stock, which was paid on October 1, 2015 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on September 4, 2015. On November 28, 2015, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share of
common stock, which was paid on January 4, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 17, 2015. On February 23, 2016, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share
of common stock, which was paid on April 1, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 10, 2016. Pursuant to the merger agreement with Shire, the company is prohibited from declaring a quarterly dividend in excess
of $0.07 per share.
On July 28, 2015, Baxaltas Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization which allowed the company to
repurchase up to $1 billion of its common stock. The company did not repurchase any of its common stock during 2015 and, pursuant to the merger agreement with Shire, the company may not repurchase or otherwise acquire its own common stock.
Historical Cash Flow Trends
The companys
historical cash flows reflect both continuing and discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Years ended
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net cash provided from (used from) operations
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
(142
|
)
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
(2,293
|
)
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and
equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and equivalents
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,001
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided From Operations
Operating cash flows during the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased as compared to the prior year period due in part to improved net income excluding
non-cash charges.
Also contributing to the increase were lower reported cash outflows related to income taxes, which was primarily due to the basis of
preparation of the carve-out financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2015. In the carve-out financial statements, the company maintained an income tax payable to/from account with Baxter, and was deemed to have settled its current
income tax payables with Baxter annually on the first day of each year. This annual settlement resulted in a significant operating cash outflow related to income taxes reported in the accrued liabilities line within the condensed combined statement
of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015, which reflected the full prior years current income tax expense and other current tax balances.
122
The decrease in net cash provided by operations during 2015 as compared to the prior year was driven by lower net
income excluding certain non-cash charges and gains. Sales growth and the resulting growth in gross profit was more than offset by increased expenses, including from separation costs and increased investments in the R&D pipeline. Also
contributing to the decrease in net cash provided from operations was an increase in certain working capital items, including accounts receivables and inventories, as the company supports growth in its commercial operations. The basis of preparation
of the carve-out financial statements also unfavorably impacted the change in operating cash flows:
|
|
|
The companys 2015 net cash provided from operations reflects an annual settlement of the companys current income tax payable account on January 1, 2015 of $356 million and an additional $119 million
paid to taxing authorities as a stand-alone company in the second half of the year.
|
|
|
|
The company also incurred operating cash outflows associated with interest expense in 2015 which compares to no interest payments in 2014.
|
The companys net cash provided from operations for the second half of 2015 (period following the separation) was $608 million, which reflected growth as
compared to net cash provided by operations of $191 million during the first six months of 2015 (period before the separation). The growth was driven in part by:
|
|
|
The basis of preparation of the carve-out financial statements in periods prior to the separation regarding the current income tax payable, as described above, resulting in higher outflows in the first half of 2015 as
compared to the second half.
|
|
|
|
Lower cash outflows associated with working capital, including the impact of the annual settlement of certain incentive compensation programs during the first half of the year.
|
Net cash provided by operations decreased in 2014 as compared to 2013 as the impact of sales growth was more than offset by an increase in tax-related items,
increased payments to collaboration partners upon the achievement of R&D related milestones and the settlement of the companys plasma-related litigation.
Net Cash Used For Investing Activities
The
companys net cash used for investing activities was essentially flat during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the prior year period as an increase in cash outflows for acquisitions was offset by lower capital
expenditures. The companys net cash used for investing activities increased in 2015 as compared to 2014 due primarily to increased cash outflows for acquisitions and a 2014 cash inflow of $640 million from the sale of the commercial vaccines
business. The divestiture of the commercial vaccines business drove the decrease in 2014 as compared to 2013.
Cash outflows for acquisitions, net of cash
acquired were $280 million and $228 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, cash outflows for acquisitions, net of cash acquired included a $175 million upfront
payment associated with a collaboration agreement with Symphogen, for the development of immuno-oncology therapies, which was charged as R&D expense during 2015 upon entering into the agreement, and a $105 million upfront payment associated with
a collaboration agreement with Precision for the development of CAR T cell therapies. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, cash outflows for acquisitions, net of cash acquired included $228 million for the acquisition of SuppreMol GmbH, a
privately held biopharmaceuticals company based in Germany.
Cash outflows for acquisitions, net of cash acquired during 2015, 2014 and 2013 were
$1.2 billion, $185 million and $111 million, respectively. During 2015, cash outflows for acquisitions, net of cash acquired included $890 million for the acquisition of the ONCASPAR business from Sigma-Tau and $228 million for the acquisition of
SuppreMol, a privately held biopharmaceuticals company based in Germany. During 2014, cash outflows for acquisitions, net of cash acquired included $100 million for an upfront collaboration payment to Merrimack and $70 million and $15 million for
the acquisitions of Chatham and AesRx, respectively. During 2013, cash
123
outflows for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, included $51 million for the acquisition of OBIZUR and related assets from Inspiration / Ipsen, $30 million for an upfront collaboration payment
to Coherus and $30 million for an upfront collaboration payment to CTI BioPharma.
Capital expenditures were $235 million and $301 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease was driven primarily by lower expenditures associated with the construction of the Covington, Georgia manufacturing facility as the company has completed a significant
portion of the construction. Commercial production at the Covington, Georgia facility is expected to begin in 2018.
Capital expenditures during 2015,
2014 and 2013 were $1.2 billion, $970 million and $797 million, respectively. The increase in capital expenditures in 2015 compared to 2014 was driven by several projects aimed at improving manufacturing capacity for the companys products,
including increased expenditures associated with the construction of the Covington, Georgia manufacturing facility. The increase in 2015 was also driven by expenditures related to the companys corporate headquarters in Bannockburn, Illinois
and its global innovation center located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. In 2014 as compared to 2013, capital expenditures associated with the Covington, Georgia facility primarily drove the increase.
Net Cash Provided From (Used For) Financing Activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2016 net cash provided from financing activities primarily included the following:
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuances and repayments of commercial paper of $300 million.
|
|
|
|
Proceeds and excess tax benefits from share-based payments under employee benefit plans of $74 million.
|
|
|
|
Payment of $48 million for the companys quarterly dividend declared in November 2015.
|
During the three
months ended March 31, 2015, cash flows provided from financing activities were entirely related to net transactions with Baxter. Refer to Note 1 to the unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements included in this prospectus
for further information regarding the basis of preparation of the financial statements in periods prior to the separation.
Proceeds from the
issuance of long-term debt totaled $4.9 billion during 2015 and reflected cash inflows from the debt issuance described above, and were net of a debt discount and deferred issuance costs totaling $59 million. The company also reported proceeds and
excess tax benefits from share-based payments under employee benefit plans of $64 million and dividend payments of $47 million during 2015.
Other
cash provided from or used for financing activities during 2015, 2014 and 2013, presented above, primarily reflected net cash outflows from transactions with Baxter, which were $2.5 billion, $856 million and $571 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. The net transactions with Baxter during 2015 included a $4 billion cash distribution to Baxter as partial consideration for the contribution of assets to Baxalta from Baxter in connection with the separation and cash contributions
received from Baxter in connection with the formation of Baxalta legal entities. As of July 1, 2015, outstanding pre-separation receivables and payables with Baxter were reclassified from net parent company investment to due to or from Baxter
in the consolidated balance sheet. The settlement of these outstanding pre-separation receivables and payables with Baxter are reported in financing activities in periods following the separation because an operating cash flow associated with these
transactions would have already been reported prior to the separation.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Baxalta engages in business with foreign governments in certain countries that have experienced deterioration in credit and economic conditions, including
Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Brazil. As of March 31, 2016,
124
the companys net accounts receivable from the public sector in Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy totaled $95 million, of which Greece receivables represented a $27 million balance. The
company also has significant accounts receivable related to its Hemobrás partnership in Brazil totaling $174 million at March 31, 2016.
Global
economic conditions and liquidity issues in certain countries have resulted, and may continue to result, in delays in the collection of receivables and credit losses. While the company believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts as of March
31, 2016 is adequate, future governmental actions and customer-specific factors may require the company to re-evaluate the collectability of its receivables and the company could potentially incur additional credit losses that materially impact its
results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Baxalta periodically enters into off-balance sheet arrangements. Certain contingencies arise in the normal course of business and, in accordance with GAAP, are
not recorded in the consolidated or combined balance sheet (such as contingent milestone payments associated with the companys collaboration agreements). Also, upon resolution of uncertainties, the company may incur charges in excess of
presently established liabilities for certain matters (such as contractual indemnifications).
The companys significant off-balance sheet
arrangements and contingencies are discussed in the consolidated and combined financial statements. Refer to Note 5, Note 11 and 17, and Note 16 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for
information regarding collaboration agreements, indemnifications and legal contingencies, respectively.
Material updates to off-balance sheet
arrangements are discussed in the unaudited condensed consolidated and combined interim financial statements contained in this prospectus. Refer to Note 4, Note 14 and Note 13 thereto for information regarding collaboration agreements,
indemnifications and legal contingencies, respectively.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2015, the company had contractual obligations, excluding accounts payable and accrued liabilities, payable or maturing in the following
periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
one year
|
|
|
One to
three years
|
|
|
Three to
five years
|
|
|
More than
five years
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5,450
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
1,036
|
|
|
$
|
3,612
|
|
Interest on debt and capital lease
obligations
(a)
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
(b)
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Purchase obligations
(c)
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
10,770
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
1,941
|
|
|
$
|
1,915
|
|
|
$
|
6,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Interest payments on capital lease obligations are calculated for future periods using interest rates in effect at the end of 2015. The projected payments only pertain to obligations outstanding at December 31,
2015.
|
(b)
|
Other long-term liabilities include long-term obligations recorded on the companys consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 that are not presented separately within the table above. They include,
among other items, the fair value of contingent payment liabilities associated with acquisitions and deferred tax liabilities. The company projected the timing of the future cash payments of its other long-term liabilities based on contractual
maturity dates (where applicable) and estimates of the timing of payments (for liabilities with no contractual maturity dates). The actual timing of payments could differ from the estimates.
|
(c)
|
Includes the companys significant contractual unconditional purchase obligations. For cancelable agreements, any penalty due upon cancellation is included. These commitments do not exceed the companys
projected requirements and are in the normal course of business. Examples include firm commitments for raw material purchases, utility agreements and service contracts.
|
125
The following items have been excluded from the table above:
|
|
|
The company is contractually obligated to pay third parties upon the achievement of development, regulatory and commercial milestones, as well as potential royalty payments, associated with its collaboration agreements.
Obligations associated with these arrangements have not been incurred and as such have not been recorded on the companys consolidated balance sheet. Potential future milestone payments associated with the companys collaborations were
approximately $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2015 which excludes potential royalty payments. Of the potential $2.1 billion, the company anticipates less than $235 million of potential payments will become payable in 2016.
|
|
|
|
An unfunded commitment at December 31, 2015 of $79 million as a limited partner in multiple investment companies, in which the timing of future payments is uncertain.
|
|
|
|
Long-term liability relating to gross unrecognized tax benefits of $17 million at December 31, 2015, in which the timing of reversal is uncertain.
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities relating to pension and other post-employment benefits of $499 million and related cash outflows, in which timing of funding is uncertain and dependent on future movements in interest rates and
investment returns, changes in laws and regulations and other variables.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Currency Risk
The company is primarily exposed
to foreign exchange risk with respect to recognized assets and liabilities, forecasted transactions and net assets denominated in the Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound, Swiss Franc, Australian Dollar, Turkish Lira, Russian Ruble, Chinese Renminbi,
Colombian Peso and Argentine Peso. The company manages its foreign currency exposures on a consolidated basis, which allows the company to net exposures and take advantage of any natural offsets. In addition, the company uses derivative and
nonderivative financial instruments to further reduce the net exposure to foreign exchange. Gains and losses on the hedging instruments offset losses and gains on the hedged transactions and reduce the earnings and shareholders equity
volatility relating to foreign exchange. Financial market and currency volatility may limit the companys ability to hedge these exposures in a cost-effective manner.
The company may use options, forwards and cross-currency swaps to hedge the foreign exchange risk to earnings relating to forecasted transactions denominated
in foreign currencies and recognized assets and liabilities. The maximum term over which the company has cash flow hedge contracts in place related to forecasted transactions as of March 31, 2016 is 12 months. The company also enters into derivative
instruments to hedge certain intercompany and third-party receivables and payables and debt denominated in foreign currencies.
As part of its
risk-management program, the company performs a sensitivity analysis to assess potential changes in the fair value of its foreign exchange instruments relating to hypothetical and reasonably possible near-term movements in foreign exchange rates.
A sensitivity analysis of changes in the fair value of foreign exchange option and forward contracts outstanding at March 31, 2016, while not
predictive in nature, indicated that if the U.S. dollar uniformly weakened by 10% against all currencies, on a net-of-tax basis, the net asset balance of $4 million would decrease by $38 million resulting in a net liability.
The sensitivity analysis model recalculates the fair value of the foreign exchange option and forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2015 by
replacing the actual exchange rates at December 31, 2015 with exchange rates that are 10% weaker to the actual exchange rates for each applicable currency. All other factors are held constant. The sensitivity analysis disregards the possibility
that currency exchange rates can move in opposite directions and that gains from one currency may or may not be offset by losses from another currency. The analysis also disregards the offsetting change in value of the underlying hedged transactions
and balances.
126
The consolidated statement of income is exposed to currency risk from various transactions, including
intercompany receivables and payables, where the denominated currency of the transaction differs from the functional currency of one or more of the companys subsidiaries. A sensitivity analysis that measures the unfavorable impact to income
from continuing operations before income taxes from a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to multiple currencies indicates an unfavorable impact of $35 million as of March 31, 2016. This sensitivity analysis holds all other
variables equal and does not reflect any hypothetical benefits that would be derived from hedging activities, including cash holdings in similar foreign currencies, that the company has historically utilized to mitigate its exposure to movements in
foreign exchange rates.
The company is also exposed to translation risk on non-U.S. dollar-denominated net assets. A sensitivity analysis indicated that
a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound, Swiss Franc and Australian Dollar, the companys most significant foreign currency exposures, would decrease net assets by $380 million. The
change in net assets associated with the translation of these currencies is generally recorded as currency translation adjustment within accumulated comprehensive income in shareholders equity of the companys consolidated balance sheets.
Interest Rate and Other Risks
In June 2015,
the company issued senior notes with a total aggregate principal amount of $5 billion. The $5 billion of senior notes includes both fixed and floating interest rates. As a result of the June 2015 debt offering, the company is exposed to the risk
that its earnings or cash flows could be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. The companys policy is to manage this risk to an acceptable level, which includes using interest rate swaps to convert a portion of its fixed-rate
debt into variable-rate debt.
As part of its risk management program, the company performs sensitivity analyses to assess potential gains and losses in
earnings related to hypothetical movements in interest rates. A 23 basis-point increase in interest rates (approximately 10% of the companys weighted-average interest rate from the June 2015 debt issuance through December 31, 2015)
affecting the companys financial instruments, including debt obligations and related derivatives, would have an immaterial effect on the companys 2015 earnings and on the fair value of the companys fixed-rate debt as of
December 31, 2015.
With respect to the companys investments, the company believes any reasonable possible near-term losses in earnings, cash
flows and fair values would not be material to the companys consolidated financial position.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Refer to Note 1 to the unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for information regarding new accounting
standards, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The prospective adoption of new accounting during the three months ended March 31, 2016 did not
have a significant impact on the companys results of operations as compared to the prior year period.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. A summary of the companys significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus. Certain of the
companys accounting policies are considered critical because these policies are the most important to the depiction of the companys financial statements and require significant, difficult or complex judgments by the company, often
requiring the use of estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results that differ from the companys estimates could have an unfavorable effect on the companys results of operations and financial
position. The company applies estimation methodologies consistently from year to year. The following is a summary of accounting policies that the company considers critical to the consolidated and combined financial statements.
127
Revenue Recognition, Related Provisions and Allowances
The companys policy is to recognize revenues from product sales when earned. Specifically, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. For product sales, revenue is not recognized until title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. The shipping terms
for the majority of the companys revenue arrangements indicate that title and risk of loss pass at delivery.
The company periodically and
systematically evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable and determines the appropriate reserve for doubtful accounts. In determining the amount of the reserve, the company considers historical credit losses, the past-due status of
receivables, payment history and other customer-specific information, and any other relevant factors or considerations.
Provisions for rebates,
chargebacks to wholesalers and distributors, returns and discounts (collectively, sales deductions) are provided for at the time the related sales are recorded, and are reflected as a reduction of sales. The sales deductions are based
primarily on estimates of the amounts earned or will be claimed on such sales. The companys most significant and judgmental sales deductions are rebates and wholesaler and distributor chargebacks.
Rebates include amounts estimated to be paid to third parties based either on contractual obligations that vary by product, customer or statutory
requirements. Contractual rebate obligations are based on units sold, customer inventory levels, forecasted customer buying patterns and historical experience. Contractual rebate obligations are settled up to 12 months after date of sale, and
accruals are adjusted throughout the contract period as actual contract performance measures become known. Statutory rebate estimates, which include payments under Medicaid, TRICARE and Medicare Part D reimbursement programs, are generally based on
historical payment data and estimates of future utilization based on established formulas or requirements, including the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. All liabilities associated with
rebates are reviewed regularly taking into consideration known market events and trends as well as internal and external historical data. The company believes the methodology used to accrue rebates is reasonable and appropriate given the current
circumstances and facts.
Chargeback provisions are based on the differential of product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and distributors and
prices paid by eligible customers under product pricing or customer contractual agreements, and may fluctuate based on channel strategy shifts, inventory levels, and end customer pricing strategies and mix. Such amounts are generally settled within
one year of initial shipment.
Legal Contingencies
The company is involved in product liability, patent, commercial, regulatory and other legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of business. The
company records a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better estimate, the minimum amount in the range
is accrued. If a loss is not probable or a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, no liability is recorded. The company has established reserves for certain of its legal matters. At March 31, 2016, total legal liabilities were $23 million.
The companys loss estimates are generally developed in consultation with outside counsel and are based on analyses of potential outcomes. With
respect to the recording of any insurance recoveries, after completing the assessment and accounting for the companys legal contingencies, the company separately and independently analyzes its insurance coverage and records any insurance
recoveries that are probable of occurring at the gross amount that is expected to be collected. In performing the assessment, the company reviews available information, including historical company-specific and market collection experience for
similar claims, current facts and circumstances pertaining to the particular insurance claim, the financial viability of the applicable insurance company or companies, and other relevant information.
128
While the liability of the company in connection with certain claims cannot be estimated with certainty, and
although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a significant impact on the companys results of operations and cash flows for that period, the outcome of these legal proceedings is not expected to
have a material adverse effect on the companys consolidated financial position. While the company believes it has valid defenses in these matters, litigation is inherently uncertain, excessive verdicts do occur, and the company may in the
future incur material judgments or enter into material settlements of claims.
Income Taxes
The company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Provisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes are calculated on reported
pre-tax earnings based on current tax laws. Deferred taxes are provided using enacted tax rates on the future tax consequences of temporary differences, which are the differences between the financial statement carrying amount of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and the tax benefits of carryforwards. A valuation allowance is established or maintained when, based on currently available information, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax
asset will not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is warranted, the company evaluates factors such as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carryback and carryforward periods, and tax strategies that could
potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. The realizability assessments made at a given balance sheet date are subject to change in the future, particularly if earnings of a subsidiary are significantly higher or
lower than expected, or if the company takes operational or tax planning actions that could impact the future taxable earnings of a subsidiary.
In the
normal course of business, the company is audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, and is periodically challenged regarding the amount of taxes due. These challenges relate to the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of
income among various tax jurisdictions. The company believes its tax positions comply with applicable tax law and the company intends to defend its positions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various tax filing positions, the company
records reserves for uncertain tax positions in accordance with GAAP, based on the technical support for the positions, the companys audit experience with similar situations, and potential interest and penalties related to the matters. The
companys results of operations and effective tax rate in a given period could be impacted if, upon final resolution with taxing authorities, the company prevailed in positions for which reserves have been established, or was required to pay
amounts in excess of established reserves.
Valuation of Intangible Assets, Including IPR&D
The company acquires intangible assets and records them at fair value. Valuations are generally completed for business acquisitions using a discounted cash
flow analysis, incorporating the stage of completion and consideration of market participant assumptions. The most significant estimates and assumptions inherent in a discounted cash flow analysis include the amount and timing of projected future
cash flows, the discount rate used to measure the risks inherent in the future cash flows, the assessment of the assets life cycle, and the competitive and other trends impacting the asset, including consideration of technical, legal,
regulatory, economic and other factors. Each of these factors and assumptions can significantly affect the value of the intangible asset.
Acquired
IPR&D is the value assigned to acquired technology or products under development which have not received regulatory approval and have no alternative future use.
Acquired IPR&D included in a business combination is capitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. Development costs incurred after the acquisition
are expensed as incurred. Upon receipt of regulatory approval of the related technology or product, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is then accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset and amortized on a straight-line basis over its
estimated useful life. If the R&D project is abandoned, the indefinite-lived asset is charged to expense.
129
R&D acquired in transactions that are not business combinations is expensed immediately. For such
transactions, payments made to third parties on or after regulatory approval are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the related asset, and are classified as intangible assets.
Due to the inherent uncertainty associated with R&D projects, there is no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from the underlying
assumptions used to prepare discounted cash flow analyses, nor that the R&D project will result in a successful commercial product.
Valuation of
Contingent Consideration Resulting from Business Combinations
The company recognizes contingent consideration liabilities resulting from business
combinations at estimated fair value on the acquisition date. The contingent consideration liabilities are revalued subsequent to the acquisition date with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Contingent payments related to acquisitions
consist of development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments, in addition to sales-based payments, and are valued using discounted cash flow techniques. Significant estimates and assumptions required for these valuations include the
probability of achieving milestones, product sales projections under various scenarios and discount rates used to calculate the present value of the estimated payments. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities result from
changes in these estimates and assumptions. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of the estimates and assumptions as of the acquisition date and in post-acquisition periods. Accordingly, the use of alternative
estimates or assumptions would increase or decrease the estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities, and could materially impact the companys results of operations in any given period. At December 31, 2015 the
companys consolidated balance sheet included $433 million of contingent consideration liabilities resulting from business combinations.
Impairment of Assets
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets are subject to impairment reviews annually, and whenever indicators of impairment exist. The company performs an annual impairment review of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year. No goodwill impairment was recorded in 2015,
2014 or 2013. For the annual impairment review, the company may elect to complete a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value and, if the company
determines it is not, then it would not be required to calculate the fair value of the reporting unit. For its 2015 annual impairment review, the company elected to complete the qualitative assessment and concluded further quantitative testing was
not required. The company performs a qualitative assessment of other indefinite-lived intangible assets, including IPR&D, at least annually. If the intangible asset is determined to be more likely than not impaired as a result of the assessment,
the company completes a quantitative impairment test.
Intangible assets with definite lives and other long-lived assets (such as fixed assets) are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The companys impairment reviews are based on an estimated future cash flow approach that requires
significant judgment with respect to future volume, revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working capital use, foreign currency exchange rates, the selection of an appropriate discount rate, asset groupings and other assumptions and
estimates. The estimates and assumptions used are consistent with the companys business plans and a market participants views of the company and similar companies. The use of alternative estimates and assumptions could increase or
decrease the estimated fair values of the assets, and potentially result in different impacts to the companys results of operations. Actual results may differ from the companys estimates.
Pension and Other Postemployment Benefit (OPEB) Plans
Background and impact of separation from Baxter
Prior to
the second quarter of 2015 and with the exception of certain Austrian defined benefit pension plans, of which Baxalta was the sole sponsor, the companys employees participated in certain U.S. and international
130
defined benefit pension and other post-employment benefit (OPEB) plans sponsored by Baxter. Baxalta accounted for these plans as multiemployer plans prior to the second quarter of 2015, at which
time no liabilities or plan assets were included in the companys combined balance sheets.
During the second quarter of 2015, Baxalta assumed
certain pension and OPEB obligations and plan assets related to newly-created single employer plans for Baxalta employees, as well as pension obligations and plan assets associated with its employees who participated in certain plans that split
following the separation. The company accounted for certain plans with delayed split dates as multiple-employer plans beginning in the second quarter of 2015 because the company was responsible for its employees retiring during the interim period.
Measurement of funded status and net periodic benefit cost
The valuation of the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for the companys pension and OPEB plans is calculated using actuarial assumptions. These
assumptions are reviewed at least annually, and revised if appropriate. The significant assumptions include the following:
|
|
|
interest rates used to discount pension and OPEB plan liabilities;
|
|
|
|
the long-term rate of return on pension plan assets;
|
|
|
|
rates of increases in employee compensation (used in estimating liabilities);
|
|
|
|
anticipated future healthcare costs (used in estimating the OPEB plan liability); and
|
|
|
|
other assumptions involving demographic factors such as retirement, mortality and turnover (used in estimating liabilities).
|
Selecting assumptions involves an analysis of both short-term and long-term historical trends and known economic and market conditions at the time of the
valuation (also called the measurement date). The use of different assumptions would result in different measures of the funded status and net cost. Actual results in the future could differ from expected results. The company is not able to estimate
the probability of actual results differing from expected results, but believes its assumptions are appropriate.
The companys key assumptions are
listed in Note 12 in to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus.
131
BUSINESS
Overview
Baxalta Incorporated (Baxalta or the company)
is a global, innovative biopharmaceutical leader with a sustainable portfolio of differentiated therapies that seek to address unmet medical needs across many disease areas, including hemophilia, immunology and oncology. More specifically, the
company develops, manufactures and markets a diverse portfolio of treatments for hemophilia and other bleeding disorders, immune deficiencies, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, burns and shock, and other chronic and acute medical conditions, as well
as oncology treatments for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Baxalta is also investing in emerging technology platforms, including gene therapy and biosimilars.
Baxaltas business strategy is aimed at improving diagnosis, treatment and standards of care across a wide range of bleeding disorders and other rare
chronic and acute medical conditions, capitalizing on the companys differentiated portfolio, ensuring the sustainability of supply to meet growing demand for therapies across core disease areas, and accelerating innovation by developing and
launching new treatments while leveraging its expertise into new emerging therapeutics through acquisitions of and collaborations with others.
Baxalta
was incorporated in Delaware on September 8, 2014 in connection with the separation of Baxter International Inc.s biopharmaceuticals business from its diversified medical products businesses. The companys corporate headquarters are
located at 1200 Lakeside Drive, Bannockburn, Illinois.
Separation from Baxter
Baxalta separated from Baxter International Inc. (Baxter) on July 1, 2015, becoming an independent company as a result of a pro rata distribution by
Baxter of 80.5% of Baxaltas common stock to Baxters shareholders. Baxter retained an approximate 19.5% ownership stake in Baxalta immediately following the distribution. On July 1, 2015, Baxters shareholders of record as of
the close of business on June 17, 2015 received one share of Baxalta common stock for every one share of Baxters common stock held as of the record date. Baxalta common stock began trading regular way under the ticker symbol
BXLT on the New York Stock Exchange on July 1, 2015.
In January 2016 and March 2016, Baxter exchanged a portion of its retained stake in
Baxalta common stock for indebtedness of Baxter held by a third parties. The shares of Baxalta common stock exchanged were then sold by such third parties in secondary public offerings pursuant to registration statements filed by Baxalta. Following
these transactions, Baxter held approximately 4.5% of Baxaltas total shares outstanding.
The Proposed Merger
On January 11, 2016, Shire, Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Shire, and Baxalta entered into the merger agreement, pursuant to which, subject to
the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into Baxalta, with Baxalta being the surviving corporation, and Baxalta will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Shire.
On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each share of Baxalta common stock issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (other than treasury shares of Baxalta and any shares of Baxalta common stock owned by Shire or any subsidiary of Shire (including Merger Sub) or Baxalta, and other than shares of
Baxalta common stock as to which dissenters rights have been properly exercised) will be canceled and converted into the right to receive both (i) $18.00 in cash, without interest and (ii) 0.1482 of Shire ADS duly and validly issued
against Shire ordinary shares, par value £0.05 per share (the per share stock consideration), except that cash will be paid in lieu of fractional Shire ADSs. Although Shire will permit holders of Baxalta common stock to elect to receive
0.4446 of a Shire ordinary share for each outstanding share of Baxalta common stock in lieu of the per share stock consideration, the deadline for making such election is expected to have passed before the exchange offer is complete.
132
Under the merger agreement, Shire agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to appoint Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.,
chairman of the Baxalta Board of Directors, and two additional members of the Baxalta Board, jointly selected by the chairman of the Baxalta Board and chairman of the Shire board of directors following consultation with the Nomination Committee of
the Shire board, to the Shire board of directors, effective upon the closing of the merger. Following the appointment of such directors, Shire agreed to nominate the same individuals as directors, to the extent such individuals are willing to serve
and have complied in a satisfactory manner, in the good faith reasonable judgment of the Shire board, with the attendance and performance expectations of the Shire board, at the 2017 Shire stockholder meeting. Since the date of the merger agreement,
Dr. Hockmeyer has decided to withdraw himself from consideration for such an appointment due to personal reasons and therefore only two members of the Baxalta Board will be considered for nomination.
The consummation of the merger is subject to certain closing conditions, including the approval of holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding Baxalta
common stock and the approval of holders of a majority of Shire ordinary shares present and voting in person or by proxy, the receipt of certain regulatory approvals, the absence of a material adverse effect with respect to Shire and
Baxalta, the receipt by Shire and Baxter of certain tax opinions set forth in the letter agreement described in the section of this prospectus entitled Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements
with BaxterLetter Agreement, and other conditions specified in the merger agreement.
Because the record date for the special meeting of the
stockholders of Baxalta to approve the merger has already occurred, you will not be entitled to vote on the merger with Shire with respect to shares of Baxalta common stock you receive in the exchange offer.
The merger agreement provides that, during the period from the date of the merger agreement until the effective time of the merger, Baxalta will be subject to
certain restrictions on its ability to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties, to provide non-public information to third parties and engage in discussions with third parties regarding alternative acquisition proposals, except
that Baxalta may, in response to an unsolicited acquisition proposal, engage in discussions with, and provide non-public information to, a third party if Baxaltas Board of Directors determines in good faith that the acquisition proposal
constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute or lead to a superior proposal. Baxaltas Board of Directors may make an adverse recommendation and terminate the merger agreement after receiving a superior proposal,
subject to Shires right to match the superior proposal during a negotiation period of 5 days (with subsequent negotiation periods of 4 days if the superior proposal is amended). A superior proposal is a written acquisition proposal
providing for a transfer of control of at least 50% of the stock or assets of Baxalta, which Baxaltas Board of Directors determines in good faith (i) to be reasonably likely to be consummated if accepted and (ii) to be more favorable
to Baxaltas stockholders from a financial point of view than the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Shire is subject to generally reciprocal non-solicitation obligations, except that Baxalta
does not have similar rights to match a superior proposal received by Shire.
The merger agreement provides for certain termination rights for both Shire
and Baxalta. Upon termination of the merger agreement under certain specified circumstances, Baxalta may be required to disburse to Shire a termination fee of $369 million and Shire may be required to pay the company a termination fee of $369
million. In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Baxalta, Baxalta may be required to reimburse Shire for transaction expenses up to $110 million
(which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently disbursed by Baxalta), and if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Shire, Shire may be
required to reimburse Baxalta for transaction expenses up to $65 million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently payable by Shire).
Shire and Baxalta each made certain representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement, including, among other things, covenants by Shire and
Baxalta to conduct their businesses in the ordinary course during the period between the execution of the merger agreement and consummation of the merger.
133
Products
Baxaltas business consists of a portfolio of products serving patient needs in a variety of ways. The section of this prospectus entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Baxalta and the notes to the financial statements contained herein present certain financial information related to Baxaltas products by
reference to five categories of productsHemophilia, Inhibitor Therapies, Immunoglobulin Therapies, BioTherapeutics and Oncologythat are further described below, together with selected details for products within each category.
Hemophilia.
Baxalta is a market leader in hemophilia therapies, and expects to continue to build on that leadership position with new therapies
for bleeding disorders. The Hemophilia category accounted for $2.8 billion, $3.0 billion and $2.8 billion, or 46%, 50% and 50%, of Baxaltas sales in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Hemophilia products currently offered by Baxalta include:
|
|
|
ADVATE.
ADVATE [Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)] is the worlds leading recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) therapy. ADVATE is a recombinant antihemophilic factor indicated for use in adults and children
with hemophilia A (congenital factor VIII deficiency or classic hemophilia) for control and prevention of bleeding episodes, perioperative management and routine prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes.
|
|
|
|
ADYNOVATE
. In November 2015, Baxalta received regulatory approval for ADYNOVATE in the United States. ADYNOVATE is an extended half-life rFVIII treatment for hemophilia A based on ADVATE. ADYNOVATE uses the same
manufacturing process as ADVATE and adds a proven technology, PEGylation (a chemical process that prolongs the amount of time a compound remains in circulation, potentially allowing for fewer injections), which Baxalta has exclusively licensed from
Nektar Therapeutics. The United States patent covering the composition of matter for this technology has a protected expiry date of 2024, subject to potential patent-term extension as applicable.
|
|
|
|
RECOMBINATE.
RECOMBINATE [Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant)], as with ADVATE, is a recombinant antihemophilic factor indicated for use in adults and children with hemophilia A for control and prevention of
bleeding episodes, perioperative management and routine prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes. RECOMBINATE was Baxaltas first recombinant therapy and was introduced in 1992.
|
|
|
|
HEMOFIL M.
HEMOFIL M [Antihemophilic Factor (Human) Method M, Monoclonal Purified] is indicated in hemophilia A for the prevention and control of hemorrhagic episodes. Antihemophilic factor (AHF) is a protein
found in normal plasma which is necessary for clot formation. The administration of HEMOFIL M provides an increase in plasma levels of AHF and can temporarily correct the coagulation defect of patients with hemophilia A.
|
|
|
|
IMMUNATE.
Immunate is a highly purified, double virus inactivated, plasma derived Factor VIII/von Willebrand Factor complex concentrate, suitable for the treatment of hemophilia A and von Willebrand disease with
FVIII deficiency.
|
|
|
|
IMMUNINE.
Immunine Purified Factor IX Concentrate VirusInactivated is indicated for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding episodes caused by congenital or acquired factor IX deficiency (hemophilia B, or
Christmas disease, hemophilia B with factor IX inhibitors, and acquired factor IX deficiency due to spontaneous development of factor IX inhibitors).
|
|
|
|
RIXUBIS.
RIXUBIS [Coagulation Factor IX (Recombinant)] was launched in the United States in 2013 for the treatment of hemophilia B. RIXUBIS is an injectable medicine used to replace clotting factor IX that is
missing in people with hemophilia B.
|
|
|
|
PROTHROMPLEX TOTAL.
PROTHROMPLEX TOTAL is a powder and solvent for solution for injection containing human
prothrombin complex and is indicated in adults for the treatment and perioperative prophylaxis of bleeding in acquired deficiency of prothrombin complex coagulation
|
134
|
factors, as well as for the treatment and perioperative prophylaxis of hemorrhages in congenital deficiency of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors when purified specific coagulation factor
concentrate is not available.
|
Inhibitor Therapies.
The Inhibitor Therapies category accounted for $787 million, $744
million and $651 million, or 13%, 13% and 12% of Baxaltas sales in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Baxaltas current Inhibitor Therapies products are:
|
|
|
FEIBA.
FEIBA [Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex] is the companys plasma-based inhibitor bypass therapy, and is a leading plasma-derived inhibitor management therapy. FEIBA is indicated for use in hemophilia
A and hemophilia B patients with inhibitors for control of spontaneous bleeding episodes, to cover surgical interventions and routine prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes.
|
|
|
|
OBIZUR.
OBIZUR [Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence] is an acquired hemophilia A therapy that consists of a recombinant porcine factor VIII.
|
Immunoglobulin Therapies.
Baxaltas sales related to Immunoglobulin Therapies products were $1.8 billion, $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, or
28%, 28% and 29% of Baxaltas sales in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Immunoglobulin Therapies products currently offered by Baxalta include:
|
|
|
GAMMAGARD LIQUID / KIOVIG.
GAMMAGARD LIQUID [Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human)] is the companys liquid formulation of the antibody-replacement therapy immunoglobulin product. GAMMAGARD LIQUID is used to
treat patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID). The most common types of PID result in an inability to make a very important type of protein called antibodies, which help the body fight off infections from bacteria or viruses. GAMMAGARD LIQUID
is made from human plasma that is donated by healthy people and contains antibodies collected from these healthy people that replace the missing antibodies in PID patients. KIOVIG is the brand name used for GAMMAGARD LIQUID outside of the United
States.
|
|
|
|
HYQVIA. HYQVIA [Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase] is a product consisting of human normal immunoglobulin (IG) and recombinant human hyaluronidase (licensed from Halozyme). The IG
provides the therapeutic effect and the recombinant human hyaluronidase facilitates the dispersion and absorption of the IG administered subcutaneously, increasing its bioavailability. The IG is a 10% solution that is prepared from human plasma
consisting of at least 98% immunoglobulin G, which contains a broad spectrum of antibodies. HYQVIA is the only subcutaneous IG treatment for PID patients with a dosing regimen requiring only one infusion up to once per month and one injection site
per infusion to deliver a full therapeutic dose of IG. HYQVIA is approved in Europe for use by adults with PID syndromes and myeloma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with severe secondary hypogammaglobulinemia and recurrent infections, and in
the United States for adults with PID.
|
|
|
|
GAMMAGARD S/D.
GAMMAGARD S/D [Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human)] is indicated for the treatment of PID in patients two years old and older. GAMMAGARD S/D is also indicated for prevention of bacterial infections
in hypogammaglobulinemia and/or recurrent bacterial infections associated with B-cell CLL, treatment of adult patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) to increase platelet count and to prevent and/or control bleeding, and
prevention of coronary artery aneurysms associated with Kawasaki Syndrome in pediatric patients.
|
|
|
|
SUBCUVIA.
Subcuvia [Human Normal Immunoglobulin] is a replacement therapy in adults and children with PID syndromes, as well as replacement therapy in myeloma and CLL with severe secondary hypogammaglobulinemia
and recurrent infections, that is infused subcutaneously.
|
135
BioTherapeutics.
Baxaltas sales related to BioTherapeutics products were $684 million, $547
million and $502 million, or 11%, 9% and 9% of Baxaltas sales in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. BioTherapeutics products currently offered by Baxalta include:
|
|
|
FLEXBUMIN.
Baxaltas FLEXBUMIN [Albumin (Human)] products are indicated for hypovolemia, hypoalbuminemia due to general causes and burns, and for use during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery as a component of
the pump prime, while FLEXBUMIN 25% is also indicated for hypoalbuminemia associated with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and nephrosis, and hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN). FLEXBUMIN is the first and only preparation of human
albumin to be packaged in a flexible plastic container. The FLEXBUMIN flexible, shatterproof container offers important safety features for hospitals by eliminating risk of glass breakage and affords the ability to infuse without a vented
administration set. The lighter weight and reduced space requirements for FLEXBUMIN compared to glass containers of equal volume make Baxaltas FLEXBUMIN products more compatible with hospital inventory storage systems. FLEXBUMINs product
portfolio includes multiple formulations with both 5% in a 250 mL solution and 25% in 50 and 100 mL solutions.
|
|
|
|
BUMINATE.
Baxaltas BUMINATE [Albumin (Human)] products are indicated for hypovolemia, hypoalbuminemia associated with general causes and burns, and use during or prior to cardiopulmonary bypass surgery as a
component of the pump prime, while BUMINATE 25% is also indicated for hypoalbuminemia associated with ARDS and nephrosis, and HDN. Baxaltas BUMINATE products offer the same high-quality human albumin as FLEXBUMIN, but packaged in glass bottles
as BUMINATE in various concentrations and bottle sizes.
|
|
|
|
ARALAST NP.
ARALAST NP is an alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (Alpha1-PI) indicated for chronic augmentation therapy in adults with clinically evident emphysema due to severe congenital deficiency of Alpha1-PI
(alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency). ARALAST NP increases antigenic and functional (anti-neutrophil elastase capacity, ANEC) serum levels and antigenic lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF) levels of Alpha1-PI.
|
|
|
|
GLASSIA NP.
GLASSIA NP is also an Alpha1-PI used for adults who have clinically evident emphysema due to severe congenital alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. GLASSIA is used to increase antigenic and functional
(anti-neutrophil elastase capacity, or ANEC) serum levels and antigenic lung ELF levels of Alpha1-PI.
|
|
|
|
CEPROTIN.
CEPROTIN is a protein C concentrate [(Human)] replacement therapy to increase protein C to levels that reduce symptoms by allowing the blood to clot normally. Protein C plays an important part in blood
clotting by stopping the blood from clotting when enough clots have been produced. If not corrected, damage from too much clotting can cause death.
|
Oncology.
Baxaltas Oncology sales were $87 million in 2015 resulting from the companys acquisition of the ONCASPAR (pegaspargase)
leukemia product portfolio from Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A.
|
|
|
ONCASPAR.
ONCASPAR is indicated as a component of a multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimen for the first-line treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and for the treatment of patients with ALL
and hypersensitivity to native forms of L-asparaginase. ONCASPAR is currently approved in the United States as a first line treatment and was recently approved more broadly in the EU for use as a combination therapy for the treatment of ALL in
pediatric patients from birth to 18 years as well as adult patients.
|
Enhancements and Increased Access to Approved Products.
Baxalta also works to expand treatment options for patients by seeking additional indications for and developing innovative enhancements to its existing product portfolio. Further, Baxalta often seeks to expand access to its products for patients
geographically by seeking regulatory approvals for its products throughout the globe and developing innovative partnerships with foreign governments.
136
Building a Diversified Biopharmaceutical Pipeline
Baxalta is committed to developing a robust new product pipeline focused on new and innovative biopharmaceuticals that address unmet medical needs. This
includes exploring new indications and emerging uses based on Baxaltas current portfolio, as well as executing product enhancements designed to meet patient and provider needs. Baxaltas internal development programs are augmented with a
number of collaborations that leverage Baxaltas proven expertise and extend the pipeline into new therapeutic areas.
Among the promising products,
therapies and acquisitions in Baxaltas pipeline are the following:
Hematology
VONVENDI.
VONVENDI is a recombinant therapy providing a pure von Willebrand disease (VWD) factor with customized dosing. VWD is a
genetic disorder that results in impaired clotting with limited other treatment options. The company received U.S. regulatory approval in December 2015 and anticipates the product will be broadly available in the United States in late 2016.
BAX 826.
BAX 826 is an investigational, extended half-life rFVIII treatment targeting weekly dosing for hemophilia A patients. In
November 2015, the company announced the submission of a clinical trial application to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency to initiate a first-in-human clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BAX 826 and, in
March 2016, the company announced that it had commenced its Phase I clinical trial of BAX 826.
BAX 335 (Gene Therapy)
. BAX 335 is
an investigational factor IX gene therapy treatment for hemophilia B. The AAV8 vector-based technology has the potential to re-define the concept of longer-acting therapy. A Phase I/II open-label clinical trial to assess the safety and optimal
dosing schedule of BAX 335 is ongoing.
BAX 817
. BAX 817 is a recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for the treatment of acute bleeding
episodes in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors. In March 2015, the company announced positive results from its Phase III clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of BAX 817.
Immunology
20%
GAMMAGARD LIQUID SubQ
. 20% GAMMAGARD LIQUID SubQ is a higher-potency immunoglobulin therapy offering patients faster infusions with less volume. Baxalta filed for approval in Europe in May 2015 and in the United States in September 2015.
HYQVIA
. Baxalta is undertaking efforts to expand indications for HYQVIA, including for the treatment of chronic inflammatory
demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), a neurological disorder characterized by progressive weakness and impaired sensory function in the legs and arms. A Phase III clinical trial is underway.
SM101
. In March 2015, Baxalta acquired SuppreMol GmbH (SuppreMol), a biopharmaceutical company based in Germany with an early-stage
development portfolio of novel treatment options for autoimmune and allergic diseases, focusing on the modulation of Fc receptor signaling pathways, an immune target that could have broad applications in autoimmune disorders. SuppreMols
pipeline includes lead candidate SM101, an investigational immunoregulatory treatment that has completed Phase IIa studies for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a disorder in which the immune system attacks healthy tissue.
Oncology
ONCASPAR.
In July 2015, Baxalta acquired the ONCASPAR (pegaspargase) product portfolio from Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A. Through the
acquisition, Baxalta gained the investigational biologic calaspargase pegol that is in development for the treatment of ALL with an increased shelf life that is expected to reduce dosing frequency.
137
nal-IRI (MM-398)
. Baxalta has entered into an exclusive license and collaboration
agreement with Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Merrimack) for the development and commercialization of nanoliposomal irinotecan injection, or nal-IRI (MM-398), an investigational drug candidate for the treatment of patients with metastatic
pancreatic cancer previously treated with a gemcitabine-based therapy. For more information on this collaboration, refer to the section below entitled Collaborations.
BAX 069.
BAX 069 is a monoclonal antibody with a novel mode of action for the treatment of solid tumors, targeting the oxidized form of
cytokine macrophage migration inhibitor factor (oxMIF). BAX 069 is currently in Phase II clinical trials (colorectal cancer and malignant ascites).
Symphogen Collaboration.
In late December 2015, Baxalta entered into a strategic immuno-oncology collaboration with Symphogen. Together,
Baxalta and Symphogen expect to advance novel therapeutics against six checkpoint targets, with the first program expected to enter clinical studies in 2017. For more information on this collaboration, refer to the section below entitled
Collaborations.
Biosimilars
With more than $70 billion in branded biologics going off patent between 2014 and 2021, biosimilars present an attractive growth opportunity
for Baxalta. Baxaltas biosimilar collaborations include the following:
BAX 2200
. Baxalta has established a collaboration with
Coherus Biosciences, Inc. (Coherus) to develop and commercialize BAX 2200, a biosimilar product candidate for ENBREL
®
(etanercept), indicated for the treatment of autoimmune deficiencies, in
Europe, Canada, Brazil and other markets. This is Baxaltas most advanced biosimilar, and, in January 2016, Baxalta announced that it had met its primary end point in its Phase III clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis. There is also a Phase
III clinical trial ongoing for psoriasis and, in early stage clinical trials, Coherus has demonstrated pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence versus the innovator molecule.
BAX 923
. Baxalta is collaborating with Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Momenta) on the development and commercialization of BAX 923, a
biosimilar product candidate for HUMIRA
®
(adalimumab). In December 2015, Baxalta announced that BAX923 met the primary endpoint in a study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of BAX923 compared to
both U.S. and EU sourced HUMIRA
®
reference products in healthy volunteers. Separately, in October 2015 the company initiated a pivotal clinical trial for BAX923 in patients with chronic plaque
psoriasis.
Research and Development Activities
Baxaltas investment in R&D is essential to its future growth and its ability to remain competitive in the markets in which it participates.
Accordingly, Baxalta continues to focus its investment in R&D programs to enhance future growth through clinical differentiation. Expenditures for Baxaltas R&D activities were $1.2 billion in 2015, $820 million in 2014 and $595 million
in 2013 and were $280 million during the first three months of 2016. These expenditures include costs associated with R&D activities performed at Baxters R&D centers as well as in-licensing, milestone and reimbursement payments made to
partners for R&D work performed at non-Baxalta locations. Included in Baxaltas R&D activities in 2015 were upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners of $390 million.
Baxalta intends to develop and grow its product portfolio primarily through external innovation, including through acquisitions, asset purchases, in-licensing
transactions, development, supply and distribution agreements and other strategic partnerships, which will be complimented by ongoing internal R&D efforts. Such arrangements with third parties often result in Baxalta making an upfront payment to
its partners upon the initial execution of a collaboration or similar agreement and future contingent payments to Baxaltas partners upon the achievement of development, regulatory, commercial or other milestones. These upfront payments and
pre-regulatory approval milestone payments are expensed to R&D and may result in significant R&D charges in one period with no comparable charge or charges in another period. The timing and impact of these payments on the companys
results of operations and financial condition may be difficult to predict.
138
In 2014, Baxalta announced that the company entered into a long-term lease in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for a
facility that now serves as the companys global innovation center, and as the headquarters for Research & Development, Oncology, Biosimilars and Business Development. Also in 2014, Baxalta entered into a strategic partnership with
Quintiles, a leading global provider of biopharmaceutical development and commercial outsourcing services, pursuant to which Quintiles assumed responsibility for certain routine clinical development activities for Baxalta and provides strategic
input to certain R&D programs. Baxalta will maintain the leadership, management and accountability roles for its R&D programs, as well as operational responsibility for its early stage and non-clinical research.
For more information on the companys R&D activities, refer to the section of this prospectus entitled Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of BaxaltaExecutive SummaryResearch and Development and External Innovation.
Collaborations
Baxalta has entered into several
significant collaborations, alliances and other business development transactions to support its growth, including:
|
|
|
Merrimack Collaboration.
In September 2014, Baxalta entered into an exclusive license and collaboration agreement with Merrimack for the development and commercialization of nal-IRI (MM-398), an investigational
drug candidate for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with a gemcitabine-based therapy, for all potential indications outside the United States and Taiwan. A Phase III trial has been completed, and Baxalta
filed for approval for second-line pancreatic cancer in the EU in May 2015. In October 2015, Merrimack received regulatory approval for nal-IRI in the United States and Taiwan.
|
|
|
|
Coherus Collaboration
. Baxalta has established a collaboration with Coherus to develop and commercialize BAX 2200, a biosimilar product candidate for
ENBREL
®
(etanercept), indicated for the treatment of autoimmune deficiencies, in Europe, Canada, Brazil and other markets.
|
|
|
|
Momenta Collaboration
. Baxalta is collaborating with Momenta on the development and commercialization of adalimumab (BAX 923), a biosimilar product candidate for
HUMIRA
®
, which is currently in early-stage development.
|
|
|
|
Symphogen Collaboration
. In late December 2015, Baxalta entered into a strategic immuno-oncology collaboration with Symphogen, a private biopharmaceutical company developing recombinant antibodies and antibody
mixtures. Together, Baxalta and Symphogen expect to advance novel therapeutics against six checkpoint targets, with the first program expected to enter clinical studies in 2017. On a product-by-product basis, following successful completion of Phase
I clinical trials, Baxalta will have exclusive option rights to complete late-stage development and worldwide commercialization.
|
For
more information about Baxaltas collaborations, alliances and other significant business development transactions, refer to the discussion in Note 5 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements and Note 4 to the unaudited
condensed consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus.
Quality Management
Baxaltas success depends upon the quality of its products. Quality management plays an essential role in meeting customer requirements, preventing
defects, facilitating continuous improvement of the companys products, processes and services, and assuring the safety and efficacy of the companys products. Baxalta has one quality system deployed globally that enables the design,
development, manufacturing, packaging, sterilization, handling, distribution and labeling of the companys products to ensure they conform to customer requirements. In order to continually improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the quality
system, various measurements, monitoring and analysis methods such as management reviews and internal, external and vendor audits are employed at local and central levels.
139
Each product that Baxalta markets is required to meet specific quality standards, both in packaging and in
product integrity and quality. If any product is determined to be compromised at any time, Baxalta endeavors to take all corrective and preventive actions necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and to meet customer expectations.
Intellectual Property
Patents and other proprietary
rights are essential to Baxaltas business. Baxalta relies on patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how and confidentiality agreements to develop, maintain and strengthen its competitive position. Baxalta owns a number of patents
and trademarks throughout the world and has entered into license arrangements relating to various third-party patents and technologies. Products manufactured by Baxalta are sold primarily under its own trademarks and trade names. Some products
distributed by the company are sold under the companys trade names, while others are sold under trade names owned by its suppliers or partners. Trade secret protection of unpatented confidential and proprietary information is also important to
Baxalta. The company maintains certain details about its products, processes and technology as trade secrets and generally requires employees, consultants, parties to collaboration agreements and other business partners to enter into confidentiality
agreements. These agreements may be breached and Baxalta may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, Baxaltas trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that
Baxaltas employees, consultants, parties to collaboration agreements and other business partners use intellectual property owned by others in their work for the company, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and
inventions.
Biologics are entitled to exclusivity under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which was passed on March 23,
2010 as Title VII to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The BPCIA provides a pathway for approval of biosimilars following the expiration of 12 years of exclusivity for the innovator biologic and a potential additional 180
day-extension term for conducting pediatric studies. The BPCIA also includes an extensive process for the innovator biologic and biosimilar manufacturer to litigate patent infringement, validity and enforceability prior to the approval of the
biosimilar. The BPCIA does not, however, change the duration of patents granted on biologic products. For more information regarding governmental regulation of biosimilars, refer to the section below entitled Regulation.
Baxaltas policy is to protect its products and technology through patents, and the maintenance of trade secrets and trademarks on a worldwide basis.
This protection is sought in a manner that balances the cost of such protection against obtaining the greatest value for the company. Baxalta also recognizes the need to promote the enforcement of its intellectual property and takes commercially
reasonable steps to enforce its intellectual property around the world against potential infringers, including judicial or administrative action where appropriate.
Baxalta operates in an industry susceptible to significant patent litigation. At any given time, the company is involved as either a plaintiff or defendant in
a number of patent infringement and other intellectual property-related actions. Such litigation can result in significant royalty or other payments or result in injunctions that can prevent the sale of products.
Regulation
The operations of Baxalta and many of the
products it manufactures or sells are subject to extensive regulation by numerous government agencies, both within and outside of the United States. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the China Food and
Drug Administration (CFDA) and other government agencies both inside and outside of the United States regulate the testing, safety, effectiveness, manufacturing, labeling, promotion and advertising, distribution and post-market surveillance of
Baxaltas products. The company must obtain specific approval from FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities before it can market and sell most of its products in a particular country.
140
In the United States, Baxaltas products often undergo a three phase clinical testing program, with the
results of preclinical and clinical trials submitted to FDA in the form of either a Biologics License Application (BLA) for biologic products or a New Drug Application (NDA) for non-biologic products. Most non-U.S. jurisdictions where Baxalta
markets its products have product approval and post-approval regulatory processes that are similar in principle to those in the United States. In Europe, for example, there are several tracks for marketing approval, depending on the type of product
for which approval is sought. Under the centralized procedure in Europe, a company submits a single application to the EMA that is similar to the BLA or NDA, as applicable, in the United States. A marketing application approved by the European
Commission (EC) is valid in all member states. In addition to the centralized procedure, Europe also has various other methods for submitting applications and receiving approvals. Regardless of the approval process employed, various parties share
responsibilities for the monitoring, detection and evaluation of adverse events post-approval, including national authorities, the EMA, the EC and the marketing authorization holder. In some regions, it is possible to receive an
accelerated review whereby the national regulatory authority will commit to truncated review timelines for products that meet specific medical needs.
The complex nature of biologics, including biosimilar formulations of reference biologic products, has warranted the creation of biosimilar regulatory
approval pathways with strict, science-based approval standards that take into account patient safety considerations. These biosimilar approval pathways are considered to be more abbreviated than for new biologics, although they are significantly
different from the abbreviated approval pathways available for generic drugs (small-molecule drugs that are the same as, and bioequivalent to, an already-approved small molecule drug). The European Union has created a pathway for the
approval of biosimilars, and has published guidance for approval of certain biosimilar products. In the U.S., the BPCIA was passed in 2010 and authorized FDA to approve biosimilars, but the U.S. approval pathway for biosimilar applications remains
relatively untested and is subject to ongoing guidance from FDA. While mature pathways for regulatory approval of generic drugs and healthcare systems exist around the globe that support and promote the substitutability of generic drugs, the
approval pathways for biosimilar products remain in various stages of development, as do private and public initiatives or actions supporting the substitutability of biosimilar products. Thus, the extent to which biosimilars will be viewed as
readily substitutable, and in practice readily substituted, for the reference biologic product is still being determined.
The BPCIA establishes a period
of 12 years of data exclusivity for reference biologic products in order to preserve incentives for future innovation. Under this framework, FDA cannot make a product approval effective for any biosimilar application until at least 12 years after
the reference products date of first licensure.
Additionally, any changes to current products may be subject to vigorous regulatory review,
including multiple submissions to the applicable authority, and approvals are not certain. Even after the company obtains regulatory approval to market a product, the product and the companys manufacturing processes and quality systems are
subject to continued review by FDA and other regulatory authorities globally. State agencies in the United States also regulate the facilities, operations, employees, products and services of the company within their respective states. The company
and its facilities are subject to periodic inspections and possible administrative and legal actions by FDA and other regulatory agencies inside and outside of the United States. Such actions may include warning letters, product recalls or seizures,
monetary sanctions, injunctions to halt manufacture and distribution of products, civil or criminal sanctions, refusal of a government to grant approvals or licenses, restrictions on operations or withdrawal of existing approvals and licenses. As
situations require, the company takes steps to ensure safety and efficacy of its products, such as removing products found not to meet applicable requirements from the market and improving the effectiveness of quality systems.
Baxalta and its products are also subject to various other regulatory regimes both inside and outside the United States. In the United States alone, the
company is subject to the oversight of FDA, the Office of the Inspector General within the Department of Health and Human Services (OIG), the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Environmental Protection
Agency, the Department of Defense and Customs and Border Protection, in addition to others. The company supplies products and services to healthcare
141
providers that are reimbursed by federally funded programs such as Medicare. As a result, the companys activities are subject to regulation by CMS and enforcement by OIG and DOJ. In
jurisdictions outside of the United States, the companys activities are subject to regulation by government agencies including the EMA in Europe, CFDA in China and other agencies in other jurisdictions. Many of the agencies enforcing these
laws have increased their enforcement activities with respect to healthcare companies in recent years. These actions appear to be part of a general trend toward increased enforcement activity globally.
The sales, marketing and pricing of products and relationships that pharmaceutical companies have with healthcare providers are under increased scrutiny by
federal, state and foreign government agencies. Compliance with the Anti-Kickback Statute, False Claims Act, Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (including as these laws relate to off-label promotion and production of products) and other healthcare
related laws, as well as competition, data and patient privacy and export and import laws, is under increased focus by the agencies charged with overseeing such activities, including FDA, OIG, DOJ and the Federal Trade Commission. Anti-kickback laws
make it illegal to solicit, offer, receive or pay any remuneration in exchange for or to induce the referral of business, including the purchase or prescription of a particular drug that is reimbursed by a state or federal program. False claims laws
prohibit knowingly and willingly presenting, or causing to be presented for payment to third-party payors (including Medicare and Medicaid) any claims for reimbursed drugs or services that are false or fraudulent, claims for items or services not
provided as claimed or claims for medically unnecessary items or services. Violations of fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, as well as the possibility of exclusion
from federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid).
DOJ and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have also increased their focus
on the enforcement of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), particularly as it relates to the conduct of pharmaceutical companies. The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their employees, contractors or
agents from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Healthcare professionals in many countries are employed by the government and consequently may be considered government officials.
Foreign governments have also increased their scrutiny of pharmaceutical companies sales and marketing activities and relationships with healthcare providers and competitive practices generally.
FDA regulates all advertising and promotion activities and communications for products under its jurisdiction both before and after approval. A company can
make only those claims relating to safety and efficacy that are approved by FDA. Healthcare providers are permitted to prescribe drugs for off-label usesthat is, uses not approved by FDA and therefore not described in the
drugs labelingbecause FDA does not regulate the practice of medicine. However, FDA regulations impose stringent restrictions on manufacturers communications regarding off-label uses. Broadly speaking, a manufacturer may not promote
a drug for off-label use, but may engage in non-promotional, balanced communication regarding off-label use under certain conditions. Failure to comply with applicable FDA requirements and restrictions in this area may subject a company to adverse
publicity and enforcement action by FDA, DOJ, OIG and the Department of Health and Human Services, as well as state authorities. Noncompliance could subject a company to a range of penalties that could have a significant commercial and financial
impact, including civil and criminal fines and the imposition of agreements that materially restrict the manner in which a company promotes or distributes its products.
Ethics and Compliance
In order to maintain compliance
with applicable laws and regulations, Baxalta has established a comprehensive global ethics and compliance program. The program is intended to prevent, detect and mitigate risk across the organization and throughout the lifecycle of Baxaltas
products. Baxaltas program starts with a culture and expectation of compliance at all levels of the organization. It also includes, among other things, resources to address compliance globally; formal compliance governance; mechanisms to
intake questions and concerns; policies, processes and procedures; communications; training; various forms of risk-based auditing and
142
monitoring; review of alleged misconduct; and, when necessary, disciplinary action for failure to comply. All of these actions are intended to protect Baxalta from conduct by individual employees
and agents that may be in violation of legal and regulatory requirements and the companys compliance expectations.
Compliance with applicable laws
and regulations is costly and materially affects Baxaltas business. Baxalta expects that compliance with laws and regulations around the globe will increasingly require significant technical expertise and capital investment. Healthcare
regulations substantially increase the time, difficulty and costs incurred in obtaining approval to market and promote products, and Baxaltas failure to meet its compliance obligations may result in regulatory and enforcement actions, the
seizure or recall of products, the suspension or revocation of the authority necessary for product production and sale, and other civil or criminal sanctions, including fines and penalties. The company expects to continuously devote substantial
resources to proactively maintain, administer and expand its compliance program globally.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution Capabilities
Baxalta has its own direct sales force and also makes sales to and through independent distributors, drug wholesalers acting as sales agents and specialty
pharmacy or other alternate site providers. The company reviews its sales channels from time to time, and will make changes in its sales and distribution model as the company believes necessary to best implement the companys business plan and
strategies. Managed care providers (for example, health maintenance organizations), hospitals and state and federal government agencies are also important customers.
In the United States, third parties warehouse and ship a significant portion of the companys products through their distribution centers. These centers
are generally stocked with adequate inventories to facilitate prompt customer service. Sales and distribution methods include frequent contact by sales and customer service representatives, automated communications via various electronic purchasing
systems, circulation of catalogs and merchandising bulletins, direct-mail campaigns, trade publication presence and advertising.
International sales are
made and products are distributed on a direct basis or through independent distributors or sales agents in approximately 100 countries. In many international locations, including much of Europe, Latin America, Asia and Australia, for example, the
government purchases products through public tenders or collective purchasing.
International Operations
A significant portion of the companys revenues are generated outside of the United States and geographic expansion remains a core component of the
companys strategy. Baxaltas international presence includes operations in Europe (including Eastern and Central Europe), the Middle East, Africa, Asia-Pacific, Latin America and Canada. The company is subject to certain risks inherent in
conducting business outside of the United States. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to Baxaltas BusinessBaxalta is subject to risks associated with doing business globally and Risk FactorsRisks Related to
Baxaltas BusinessChanges in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates could have a material adverse effect on Baxaltas operating results and liquidity.
For financial information about foreign and domestic operations and geographic information, refer to the discussion in Note 19 to the audited consolidated and
combined financial statements contained in this prospectus. For more information regarding foreign currency exchange risk, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
BaxaltaQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskCurrency Risk.
Third Party Agreements
Baxalta has agreements with third parties for process development, analytical services and manufacturing of certain products. Baxalta procures certain products
and services from a limited number of suppliers and, in some
143
cases, a single supply source. Baxalta also has certain agreements with Baxter entered into at the time of Baxaltas separation from Baxter, including as described in the section of this
prospectus entitled Agreements Between Baxter and Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with BaxterManufacturing and Supply Agreement.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
Baxalta
purchases, in the ordinary course of business, raw materials and supplies essential to its operations from numerous suppliers around the world, including in the United States. While efforts are made to diversify Baxaltas source of components
and materials, in certain instances Baxalta acquires components and materials from a sole supplier.
Human plasma is a critical raw material in
Baxaltas business. The company believes that its ability to internally and externally source plasma represents a distinctive and flexible infrastructure, which provides the company a unique capability with respect to the consistent delivery of
high quality plasma-based products. Baxalta owns and operates plasma collection facilities in the United States and Austria through its wholly owned subsidiary BioLife Plasma Services L.P. (BioLife). BioLife operates and maintains more than 80
state-of-the-art plasma collection facilities in 24 states throughout the United States and at seven locations in Austria. Baxalta also maintains relationships with other plasma suppliers to ensure that it retains the flexibility to meet market
demand for its plasma-based therapies, including through its 10-year contract manufacturing agreement with Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation of the Netherlands.
There have been no recent significant availability problems or supply shortages with respect to raw materials.
For additional information regarding sources and availability of raw materials, refer to the section of this prospectus entitled Risk FactorsRisks
Related to Baxaltas BusinessIf Baxalta is unable to obtain sufficient components or raw materials on a timely basis or if it experiences other manufacturing or supply difficulties, its business may be adversely affected.
Competition and Healthcare Cost Containment
Baxalta
enjoys leading positions based on a number of competitive advantages. The Baxalta business benefits from continued innovation in its products and therapies, consistency of its supply of products, strong customer relationships and the technological
advantages of its products.
Baxalta faces substantial competition from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other companies of all sizes, in the United
States and internationally, and such competitors continue to expand their manufacturing capacity and sales and marketing channels. Competition is primarily focused on cost-effectiveness, price, service, product effectiveness and quality, patient
convenience and technological innovation. There has been increasing consolidation in the companys customer base, which continues to result in pricing and market pressures.
The principal sources of competition for Baxaltas principal products globally are as follows:
|
|
|
ADVATE: Xyntha
®
/ReFacto AF
®
(Pfizer and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum); Kogenate
®
(Bayer); Helixate
®
(CSL Behring); Eloctate
®
(Biogen Idec); NovoEight
®
(Novo Nordisk); and Nuwiq
®
(Octapharma).
|
|
|
|
FEIBA: NovoSeven
®
/NovoSeven RT
®
(Novo Nordisk); Coagil
VII
®
(Pharmstandard); and Facteur VII-LFB
®
(LFB Group).
|
|
|
|
GAMMAGARD LIQUID: Privigen
®
/Hizentra
®
/Carimune
NF
®
(CSL Behring); Flebogamma DIF
®
/Gamunex-C
®
(Grifols); Octagam
®
/Octagam 10
®
/Gammanorm
®
(Octapharma); Ig Vena
®
/Gammaked
®
(Kedrion); and Intratect 10%
®
/Intratect, Intraglobin F
®
/Bivigam
®
(Biotest).
|
144
Additionally, for each of the principal products listed above, there are additional competitive products or
alternative therapy regimens available on a more limited geographic basis throughout the world.
In March 2010, the PPACA was enacted in the United
States, and implemented a number of changes in how companies are compensated for providing healthcare products and services. The PPACA includes several provisions which impact the companys businesses in the United States, including a tax on
the sales of its pharmaceutical products to the government, increased Medicaid rebates and an expansion of the 340B Drug Pricing Program which provides certain qualified entities, such as hospitals serving disadvantaged populations, with discounts
on the purchase of drugs for outpatient use and an excise tax on the sale of certain drugs and medical devices.
For additional information regarding
competition and healthcare cost containment, refer to the discussion of such matters in the Risk Factors section, including the following:
|
|
|
Risks Related to Baxaltas BusinessBaxaltas products face substantial competition in the product markets in which it operates.
|
|
|
|
Risks Related to Baxaltas BusinessIf reimbursement or other payment for Baxaltas current or future products is reduced or modified in the United States or abroad, including through the
implementation of government-sponsored healthcare reform or other similar actions, cost containment measures, or changes to policies with respect to pricing, taxation or rebates, then Baxaltas business could suffer.
|
|
|
|
Risks Related to Baxaltas BusinessBaxalta faces competition in the development of relationships with research, academic and governmental institutions.
|
Employees
Baxalta employed approximately 17,000 persons
as of December 31, 2015. Outside of the United States, some of Baxaltas employees are represented by unions or works councils. Baxalta believes that it has good relations with its employees and their unions and works councils.
Environmental Matters
Environmental policies of the
company require compliance with all applicable environmental regulations and contemplate, among other things, appropriate capital expenditures for environmental protection.
Divestitures and Discontinued Operations
In July 2014,
the company entered into an agreement to sell its commercial vaccines business and committed to a plan to divest the remainder of its vaccines business, which included certain R&D programs. In December 2014, the company completed the sale of the
commercial vaccines business and in August 2015, completed the divestiture of certain vaccines-related R&D programs. As a result of the divestitures, the operations and cash flows of the vaccines business have been eliminated from the ongoing
operations of the company. In addition, the company will not have significant continuing involvement or cash flows from the operations associated with the vaccines business.
145
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth
information regarding individuals serving as Baxaltas executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Title
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
John Glasspool
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Head of Corporate Strategy and Customer Operations
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Hematology
|
Anne-Marie Law
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Head of Human Resources
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Immunology
|
David D. Meek
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Oncology
|
John J. Orloff, M.D.
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Head of Research & Development and Chief Scientific Officer
|
Dagmar Rosa-Björkeson
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Biosimilars
|
Patrice Zagame, M.D.
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Intercontinental
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Baxalta. Prior to joining Baxalta, he
served as Baxters Corporate Vice President and President, BioScience, having served in that capacity from October 2010 until the separation. Dr. Hantson joined Baxter in May 2010 as Corporate Vice President and President, International.
From 2001 to May 2010, Dr. Hantson held various positions at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, the most recent of which was Chief Executive Officer, Pharma North America. Prior to Novartis, he spent 13 years with Johnson & Johnson
in roles of increasing responsibility in marketing and clinical research and development.
Robert J. Hombach
serves as the Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer of Baxalta. He served as Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Baxter from July 2010 until the separation. From February 2007 to March 2011, Mr. Hombach also
served as Treasurer of Baxter and from December 2004 to February 2007, he was Vice President of Finance, Europe for Baxter. Prior to that, Mr. Hombach served in a number of finance positions of increasing responsibility in the planning,
manufacturing, operations and treasury areas at Baxter.
Peter G. Edwards
serves as the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Baxalta.
Prior to joining Baxalta in June 2015, Mr. Edwards served as Senior Vice President of Mallinckrodt plc, a position he held since June 2013. Mr. Edwards served as Vice President and General Counsel of Covidiens Pharmaceuticals
business from May 2010 until June 2013, when Mallinckrodt became an independent public company. Prior to Covidien, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for the Solvay Group in Brussels, Belgium from June 2007 until April 2010
and previous to that, held positions of increasing responsibility with Eli Lilly and Company.
John Glasspool
serves as Executive Vice President
and Head of Corporate Strategy and Customer Operations for Baxalta. Mr. Glasspool has more than 20 years of industry experience. He served as Baxters Vice President, New Therapies and Market Developments from 2012 until the separation.
Mr. Glasspool had previously spent approximately 10 years with Novartis Pharmaceuticals, where he served in several Senior Vice President and Vice President positions, including Head of Region/Europe, Vaccines and Diagnosis and Head of Pricing,
Market Access and Commercial Operations. Mr. Glasspool previously held key positions in market and sales for Johnson & Johnson and Scotia Pharmaceuticals.
146
Brian Goff
serves as Executive Vice President and President, Hematology for Baxalta. Mr. Goff has
more than 20 years of industry experience. He served as Baxters Global Franchise Head for Hemophilia from 2012 until the separation. Prior to joining Baxter, Mr. Goff was the Vice President and Head of the Primary Care Business Unit for
Novartis Pharmaceuticals and had served in other key leadership positions at Novartis since 2005, including global brand leadership in Basel, Switzerland. Before joining Novartis in 2005, he worked for 14 years in key positions in sales and product
management in the pharmaceutical division of Johnson & Johnson.
Anne-Marie Law
serves as Executive Vice President and Head of Human
Resources for Baxalta. Ms. Law has more than 25 years of human resources experience. From 2009 until joining Baxalta in 2015, Ms. Law served in various senior positions at McKesson Corporation, including most recently as Senior Vice
President, Human Resources McKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology since 2011. Ms. Law also served as Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources of VeriSign, Inc. from 2007 to 2009. Prior to joining VeriSign, Ms. Law spent approximately
eight years in human resources leadership positions with Xilinx, Inc.
Jacopo Leonardi
serves as Executive Vice President and President, Immunology
for Baxalta. Mr. Leonardi has 20 years of industry experience. He served as Baxters Region Head, North America Hematology Division in 2015 until the separation. From 2014 until 2015, he was General Manager, U.S. Hemophilia for Baxter, and
prior to that he served in senior sales and marketing roles since 2009 for Baxters Hemophilia and U.S. BioTherapeutics businesses. Mr. Leonardi served in various roles at Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson from 1996 to 2009,
including 10 years in senior marketing and other leadership roles.
David D. Meek
serves as Executive Vice President and President, Oncology for
Baxalta. Mr. Meek has more than 25 years of industry experience. He has served as Baxters Vice President, Global Head of Oncology from July 2014 until the separation. Mr. Meek served as Chief Commercial Officer of Endocyte, Inc., a
public biopharmaceuticals company, from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Meek previously spent approximately seven years with Novartis Pharmaceuticals, where he served in several executive leadership positions, including Region Head, Novartis Oncology, Europe
and President and CEO of Novartis, Canada. Prior to joining Novartis, Mr. Meek spent approximately 15 years with Johnson & Johnson, where he served in various commercial executive leadership roles.
John J. Orloff, M.D.
serves as Executive Vice President, Head of Research & Development and Chief Scientific Officer for Baxalta.
Dr. Orloff has more than 30 years of industry and clinical experience, and, prior to joining Baxter in 2014 as Vice President, R&D in Bioscience, Dr. Orloff served as the Global Head of Clinical Development at Merck Serono
Pharmaceuticals since 2014. He previously spent approximately 10 years with Novartis Pharmaceuticals, where he served in several Senior Vice President and Vice President positions, including Chief Medical Officer, Head of U.S. Medical and Regulatory
Affairs and Global Head of Regulatory Strategy for Drug Regulatory Affairs. Prior to Novartis, Dr. Orloff spent 6 years in leadership roles at Merck Research Laboratories and 7 years on the faculty of the Yale University School of Medicine.
Dagmar Rosa-Björkeson
serves as Executive Vice President and President, Biosimilars. Ms. Rosa-Björkeson has more than 20 years of
industry experience, and, prior to joining Baxter as its biosimilars program leader in 2014, she served in multiple capacities at Novartis Pharmaceuticals over 17 years where she was most recently Vice President, Head of Multiple Sclerosis.
Previously she held other Vice President positions at Novartis, including having served as Country Head for Sweden and in leadership roles focused on sales and branding. Before her time at Novartis, she held sales oriented roles with Forest
Pharmaceutical, Ferguson Advertising and Hoechst-Roussell Pharmaceuticals.
Patrice Zagame, M.D.
serves as Executive Vice President and President,
Intercontinental for Baxalta. Dr. Zagame has more than 25 years of industry experience, and, prior to joining Baxter in 2014, Dr. Zagame was Country Head for Brazil at Sanofi, a position he held since 2013. He was employed by Novartis
Pharmaceuticals since 1996, where he served as a country head in several other emerging and developed markets, including
147
France, Venezuela and Argentina, as well as serving terms as Head of Pharma Division, Regional Marketing Director and Integration Officer. Prior to his time at Novartis, Dr. Zagame held
management and sales positions at Glaxo-Wellcome and Rhone-Poulenc.
All executive officers hold office until the next annual election of officers and
until their respective successors are elected and qualified.
Board of Directors
The following table sets forth information with respect to those persons who serve on Baxaltas Board of Directors, including Dr. Hantson, whose
biographical information is included in the section of this prospectus entitled Executive Officers. Each person listed below was appointed to Baxaltas Board of Directors prior to, or on the date of, the separation other than
Dr. Ferrante and Dr. Nader who were appointed effective July 27, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Title
|
Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
Chairman
|
Blake E. Devitt
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Director
|
Karen J. Ferrante, M.D.
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
John D. Forsyth
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
Gail D. Fosler
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
James R. Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
François Nader, M.D.
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
Albert P.L. Stroucken
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.
serves as Chairman of Baxaltas Board of Directors. Dr. Hockmeyer founded
MedImmune, Inc., a healthcare company focused on infectious diseases, cancer and inflammatory diseases, and served as Chairman and/or Chief Executive Officer of MedImmune from 1988 to 2007. Prior to that, he was vice president of laboratory research
and product development at Praxis Biologics Inc. and chief of the Department of Immunology at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Dr. Hockmeyer serves as a director of GenVec Inc. and previously served as a director of Baxter International
Inc., MedImmune, Inc., Middlebrook Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Blake E. Devitt
retired in 2004 from the public
accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP. During his 33-year career at Ernst & Young, Mr. Devitt held several positions, including Senior Audit Partner and Director, Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industry Practice, from 1994
to 2004. Mr. Devitt previously served as a director of Baxter International Inc.
Karen J. Ferrante, M.D.
has served as chief medical officer
and head of R&D at Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing proprietary therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer and other hormonally-driven diseases, since April 2014. Prior to
Tokai, Dr. Ferrante spent six years, 2007 to 2013, at Takeda Pharmaceutical Company and Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company, serving most recently as head of Takedas Oncology Therapeutic Area. Prior to Millennium, Dr. Ferrante
spent eight years, 1999 to 2007, in Global Research and Development at Pfizer and was appointed vice president of Global Research and Development and therapeutic area clinical leader in Oncology Development in 2007. Dr. Ferrante began her
pharmaceutical career in 1995 at Bristol-Myers Squibb as associate director of Clinical Oncology, focusing on drug development and team leadership.
John D. Forsyth
has served as Chairman of Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, a healthcare insurance provider for residents of Iowa and South Dakota,
since 2000 and Chief Executive Officer since 1996. Prior to that, he spent 26 years at the University of Michigan, holding various positions, including President and Chief Executive Officer of the University of Michigan Health System.
Mr. Forsyth serves as a director of Baxter International Inc.
148
Gail D. Fosler
is President of The GailFosler Group LLC, a strategic advisory service for global business
leaders and public policy makers that she has led since 2010. Prior to that, she spent more than 20 years at The Conference Board, a global research and business membership organization, where she held several positions including President,
Executive Vice President and Chief Economist. Ms. Fosler previously served as a director of Baxter International Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.
James
R. Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D.
is Chief Executive Officer and Chief Medical Officer of Healing Our Village, Inc., a healthcare corporation that specializes in targeted advocacy, training, education, disease management and outreach for primary health
care professionals and minority communities, having previously served as Executive Vice President for Clinical Affairs at Healing Our Village from 2005 to 2007. Dr. Gavin is also Clinical Professor of Medicine and Senior Advisor of Health
Affairs at Emory University, a position he has held since 2005, and Clinical Professor of Medicine at the Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, a position he has held since 2008. From 2002 to 2005, Dr. Gavin was President of
the Morehouse School of Medicine and from 1991 to 2002, he was Senior Science Officer at Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization. Dr. Gavin serves as a director of Baxter International Inc. and previously
served as a director of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Nuvelo Inc.
François Nader, M.D.
served as the president and chief executive
officer of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a company that specializes in drugs for rare diseases, from 2008 to 2015, and previously served as chief operating officer in 2007 and chief medical and commercial officer in 2006. Before NPS, Dr. Nader was
a venture partner at Care Capital. Prior to that, he served on the North America Leadership Team of Aventis and its predecessor companies holding a number of executive positions in the U.S. and Canada, including senior vice president, U.S.
integrated healthcare markets and North America medical and regulatory affairs. Previously, he led the global commercial operations at the Pasteur Vaccines division of Rhone-Poulenc. Mr. Nader also serves as Chairman of Acceleron Pharma Inc. He
previously served as Executive Director at NPS and director at Trevena, Inc.
Albert P.L. Stroucken
has served as Chairman of the Board of
Owens-Illinois, Inc., a glass packaging company, since 2006. From 2006 until December 2015, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Owens-Illinois, Inc. From 1998 to 2006, Mr. Stroucken served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of H.B. Fuller Company, a manufacturer of adhesives, sealants, coatings, paints and other specialty chemicals. Mr. Stroucken served as Chairman of the Board of H.B. Fuller Company from 1999 to 2006. From 1997 to 1998, he was General
Manager of the Inorganics Division of Bayer AG. From 1992 to 1997, Mr. Stroucken was Executive Vice President and President of the Industrial Chemicals Division of Bayer Corporation. Mr. Stroucken also serves as a director of Baxter
International Inc.
Baxaltas Board of Directors is divided into three approximately equal classes. The term of the first class of directors will
expire on the date of the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, the term of the second class of directors will expire on the date of the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, and the term of the third class of directors will expire on the date of the
2018 annual meeting of shareholders. The first class is comprised of Mr. Devitt, Dr. Nader and Ms. Fosler; the second class is comprised of Mr. Forsyth, Dr. Gavin and Mr. Stroucken; and the third class is comprised of
Dr. Hockmeyer, Dr. Hantson and Dr. Ferrante. Commencing with the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, directors for each class will be elected at the annual meeting of shareholders held in the year in which the term for that class
expires and thereafter will serve for a term of three years.
In light of the pending merger, Baxalta has cancelled its 2016 annual meeting of
shareholders scheduled for May 10, 2016, and does not intend to hold the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders if the merger is completed in 2016. If the merger agreement is terminated or the proposal to adopt the merger agreement is not approved
by Baxalta shareholders at the Baxalta special meeting that the company intends to hold on May 27, 2016, Baxalta intends to call an annual meeting of shareholders.
149
Committees of the Board of Directors
Baxaltas Board of Directors (the Board of Directors) has the following standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance
Committee and Quality and Compliance Committee. Each committee consists solely of independent directors and is governed by a written charter. All such committee charters are available on Baxaltas website at
www.baxalta.com
.
Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee is comprised of Mr. Devitt (Chair), Ms. Fosler, Dr. Nader and Mr. Stroucken, each of whom is
independent under the rules of the NYSE and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Baxalta Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Devitt and Stroucken and Dr. Nader are each an audit committee financial expert for purposes of
the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee is primarily concerned with the integrity of Baxaltas financial statements, system of internal accounting controls, the internal and external audit process, and the process for monitoring compliance
with laws and regulations. The Audit Committees duties include: (1) reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of Baxaltas internal control over financial reporting with management and the external and internal auditors, and reviewing
with management Baxaltas disclosure controls and procedures; (2) retaining and evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent auditor; (3) approving audit and permissible non-audit engagements to be
undertaken by the independent registered public accounting firm; (4) reviewing the scope of the annual external and internal audits; (5) reviewing and discussing Baxaltas financial statements (audited and non-audited), as well as
earnings press releases and related information, prior to their filing or release; (6) overseeing legal and regulatory compliance as it relates to financial matters; (7) holding separate executive sessions with the independent registered
public accounting firm, the internal auditor and management; and (8) discussing guidelines and policies governing the process by which Baxalta assesses and manages risk.
Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee is comprised of Mr. Forsyth (Chair), Dr. Gavin, Dr. Hockmeyer, Dr. Nader and
Mr. Stroucken, each of whom is independent under the rules of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee has the ability to exercise the authority of the Baxalta Board of Directors relating to employee benefit and equity-based plans and the
compensation of the companys officers. The Compensation Committees duties include: (1) making recommendations for consideration by the Board of Directors, in executive session and in coordination with the Corporate Governance
Committee, concerning the compensation of Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer; (2) determining the compensation of the companys officers (other than Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer) and advising the Board of Directors of such
determination; (3) making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans and exercising the authority of the Board of Directors concerning benefit plans; (4) serving as the
administration committee of the companys equity-based plans; (5) making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning director compensation; (6) reviewing the adequacy of the companys stock ownership guidelines and
periodically assessing compliance with these guidelines; and (7) overseeing the companys compensation philosophy and strategy and periodically assessing the risk related to its compensation policies and practices. The Corporate Governance
and Compensation Committees work together to establish a link between Dr. Hantsons performance and decisions regarding his compensation. All compensation actions relating to Dr. Hantson are subject to the approval of the independent
directors of the Board of Directors.
The Compensation Committee has the sole and direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation and oversight of
the work of any advisor retained by the Compensation Committee, and it has directly engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FwC) as its compensation consultant. Additionally, Aon Hewitt assists the Compensation Committee with the compilation
of market data from time to time. FwC reports directly and exclusively to the Compensation Committee and provides no other services to Baxalta except advising on executive and Board compensation matters. FwC provides analyses and recommendations
that inform the Compensation Committees decisions, but does not decide or approve any compensation actions. During 2015, FwC advised the Compensation Committee Chairman on setting agenda items for Committee meetings; reviewed management
proposals presented to the Compensation Committee; and conducted a review of the compensation of non-employee directors at Baxaltas peer companies. In accordance the rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange regarding the independence
of compensation consultants, FwC provided the Compensation
150
Committee information regarding any personal, financial, or business relationships between FwC and Baxalta, its management or the members of the Compensation Committee that could impair its
independence or present a conflict of interest. Based on its review of this information, the Compensation Committee determined that there were no relationships that impair the independence or create a conflict of interest between Baxalta and FwC and
the partners, consultants, and employees who provide services to the Compensation Committee.
Corporate Governance Committee.
The Corporate
Governance Committee is comprised of Dr. Hockmeyer (Chair), Mr. Devitt, Dr. Ferrante, Mr. Forsyth and Ms. Fosler, each of whom is independent under the rules of the NYSE. The Corporate Governance Committee assists and
advises the Baxalta Board of Directors on director nominations, corporate governance and general Board of Directors organization and planning matters. The Corporate Governance Committees duties include: (1) developing criteria for use in
evaluating and selecting candidates for election or re-election to the Board of Directors and assisting the Board of Directors in identifying and attracting qualified director candidates, as well as in assessing director independence;
(2) identifying and recommending to the Board of Directors the director nominees for the annual meeting of shareholders and recommending persons to fill any vacancy on the Board of Directors; (3) determining Board of Directors committee
structure and membership; (4) overseeing the succession planning process for management, including Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer; (5) developing, implementing and overseeing an annual process for evaluating the performance of
Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer; (6) developing, implementing and overseeing an annual process for evaluating Board of Directors and committee performance; and (7) reviewing at least annually the adequacy of Baxaltas Corporate
Governance Guidelines.
Quality and Compliance Committee.
The Quality and Compliance Committee is comprised of Dr. Gavin (Chair),
Mr. Devitt, Dr. Ferrante, Ms. Fosler and Dr. Hockmeyer. The Quality and Compliance Committee assists the Baxalta Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to legal, regulatory, quality and other
compliance matters. The Quality and Compliance Committees duties include: (1) reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the companys policies, practices and procedures with respect to FDA and similar compliance and product quality
and safety; (2) receiving regular reports regarding significant compliance matters from the senior management; and (3) reviewing with management strategic issues and corporate actions relating to current and emerging political, corporate
citizenship and public policy issues that may affect the business operations, performance or public image of the company, including those related to public affairs, political advocacy, environmental health and safety and sustainability, corporate
social responsibility and philanthropic activities. In addition, the Quality and Compliance Committee coordinates with the Audit Committee regarding oversight of non-financial compliance.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2015, Drs. James R. Gavin III, Wayne T. Hockmeyer and François Nader and Messrs. John D. Forsyth (Chair) and Albert P.L. Stroucken served on
Baxaltas Compensation Committee. None of the members of the Compensation Committee has been an officer or employee of Baxalta. None of Baxaltas executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company
that has an executive officer that serves on Baxaltas Compensation Committee.
Corporate Governance
The Board of Directors periodically reviews its corporate governance practices and take other actions to address changes in regulatory requirements,
developments in governance best practices and matters raised by shareholders.
Director Independence
Baxaltas Board of Directors adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that require that the Baxalta Board of Directors be composed of a majority of
directors who meet the criteria for independence established by the rules of the NYSE. To be considered independent, the Board of Directors must affirmatively determine that a
151
director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with Baxalta (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Baxalta),
and solely with regard to Compensation Committee members, consider all relevant factors that could impair the ability of such Compensation Committee members to make independent judgments about executive compensation. In making its independence
determinations, the Board of Directors considers transactions, relationships and arrangements between Baxalta and entities with which directors are associated as executive officers, directors and trustees. When these transactions, relationships and
arrangements exist, they are in the ordinary course of business and are of a type customary for a global company such as Baxalta.
The Board has
determined that each of Drs. Hockmeyer, Ferrante, Gavin and Nader and Messrs. Devitt, Forsyth and Stroucken and Ms. Fosler is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE and Baxaltas Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Director Qualifications
The
experience, expertise and knowledge represented by the Board of Directors as a collective body allows the Board to lead Baxalta in a manner that serves its shareholders interests appropriately. Set forth below is a discussion of the key
qualifications for each of the directors which align with the criteria included in Baxaltas Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Mr. Devitt
Significant accounting expertise and knowledge of the healthcare industry through his 33-year career at Ernst & Young,
including his service as Director of the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industry Practice
Dr. Ferrante
More than 20 years of broad
oncology drug development experience and demonstrated leadership across the pharmaceutical industry at both large corporations and small biotech firms
Mr. Forsyth
Extensive experience in the healthcare industry as well as an understanding of the challenges associated with leading and
operating within large, complex organizations as current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield and his 25 years of management experience at the University of Michigan Health System
Ms. Fosler
Substantial experience with respect to corporate best practices as well as significant global economic expertise, with an emphasis
on emerging markets, especially China, as a result of her more than 20-year leadership career at The Conference Board and her other public-company board service
Dr. Gavin
Extensive medical and scientific expertise and knowledge of the healthcare industry as a result of the positions he has held at
Emory University, the Morehouse School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute as well as leadership experience given his service as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Medical Officer of Healing Our Village, Inc.
Dr. Hantson
Extensive experience leading and operating within global, multi-faceted corporations and deep knowledge of the biopharmaceuticals
industry as a result of more than 25 years spent in roles of increasing responsibility at Baxter, Novartis and Johnson & Johnson
Dr. Hockmeyer
Substantial experience developing and running a significant biopharmaceutical company as founder and Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of MedImmune and significant scientific and clinical expertise as a result of his roles at Praxis Biologics Inc. and Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Dr. Nader
Extensive experience developing and running a drug company for close to eight years as Chief Executive Officer of NPS
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and more than 30 years of global biopharmaceutical industry experience in senior operational and scientific roles
Mr. Stroucken
Substantial experience leading and operating large, multi-faceted corporations and financial expertise as a result of serving
as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Owens-Illinois, Inc. and H.B. Fuller Company as well as experience in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries through his roles at Bayer
152
Nomination of Directors
It is the policy of the Corporate Governance Committee to consider candidates for director recommended by shareholders, members of the Board and management.
The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all candidates for director in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation. Shareholder recommendations for candidates for director should include the same information required by
Baxaltas amended and restated bylaws that is required to nominate a director and be sent to the Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Baxalta Incorporated, 1200 Lakeside Drive, Bannockburn, Illinois 60015.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Baxalta Board of Directors has adopted a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist it in guiding Baxaltas governance practices. These
practices will be regularly re-evaluated by the Corporate Governance Committee in light of changing circumstances in order to continue serving the companys best interests and the best interests of its shareholders. Baxaltas Corporate
Governance Guidelines cover topics including, but not limited to, director qualification standards, director responsibilities (including those of the Chairman), director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, director
orientation and continuing education, succession planning and the annual evaluations of the Board of Directors and its committees. In accordance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board of Directors meets in executive session at every
meeting of the Board. Such executive sessions are chaired by the Chairman of the Board, Dr. Hockmeyer. Baxaltas Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on Baxaltas website at
www.baxalta.com
.
Communicating with the Board of Directors
Shareholders and other interested parties may contact any of Baxaltas directors, including the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the non-management
directors as a group, by writing a letter to Baxalta Director c/o Corporate Secretary, Baxalta Incorporated, 1200 Lakeside Drive, Bannockburn, Illinois 60015 or by sending an e-mail to boardofdirectors@baxalta.com. Baxaltas Corporate Secretary
will forward communications to the Board directly to the Chairman, unless a different director is specified.
Director Qualification
Standards
Baxaltas Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the
Board of Directors the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members in the context of the makeup of the Board of Directors and developing criteria for identifying and evaluating Board candidates.
The process that this committee will use to identify a nominee to serve as a member of the Board of Directors will depend on the qualities being sought. From
time to time, Baxalta may engage an independent search firm to assist the committee in identifying individuals qualified to be Board members. Board members should have backgrounds that when combined provide a portfolio of experience and knowledge
that will serve Baxaltas governance and strategic needs.
In the process of identifying nominees to serve as a member of the Board of Directors, the
Corporate Governance Committee will consider diversity of background, including diversity of gender, race, ethnic or geographic origin, age and experience (including in business, government and education as well as healthcare, science and
technology) as a relevant factor in the selection process. This factor is relevant as a diverse Board of Directors is likely to be a well-balanced Board of Directors with varying perspectives and a breadth of experience that will positively
contribute to robust discussion at Board of Directors meetings.
A nominees ability to meet the independence criteria established by the NYSE will
also be a factor in the nominee selection process.
Once a candidate has been identified, the Corporate Governance Committee and the independent search
firm, if any, will engage in a process that includes a thorough investigation of the candidate, an examination of his or her business background and education, research on the individuals accomplishments and qualifications, an
in-
153
person interview and reference checking. If this process generates a positive indication, the members of the Corporate Governance Committee and the Chairman of the Board of Directors will meet
separately with the candidate and then confer with each other regarding their respective impressions of the candidate. If the individual was positively received, the Corporate Governance Committee will then recommend the individual to the full Board
of Directors for further meetings and evaluation and ultimately election. If the full Board of Directors agrees, the Chairman of the Board of Directors will then be authorized to extend an offer to the individual candidate.
Board Leadership Structure
Baxaltas Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the Board of Directors flexibility in determining its leadership structure. Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
serves as Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer and Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D. serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Baxalta believes that this leadership structure, which separates the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles, is
optimal at this time because it allows Dr. Hantson to focus on operating and managing Baxalta following Baxaltas transition to being a public company while Dr. Hockmeyer can focus on the leadership of the Board of Directors. The
Chairman of the Board of Directors, pursuant to Baxaltas amended and restated bylaws, presides at all meetings of the Board of Directors and shareholders, and acts as liaison between the Board of Directors and the shareholders. The Board of
Directors will periodically evaluate leadership structure and determine whether continuing the separate roles of Board of Directors Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is in Baxaltas best interests based on circumstances existing at the time,
including the skills and experience that the selected Chairman and Chief Executive Officer bring to these roles.
Code of Conduct
Baxalta has adopted a Code of Conduct that requires all its business activities to be conducted in compliance with laws, regulations, and ethical
principles and values. The Code of Conduct applies to all members of Baxaltas Board of Directors and all of Baxaltas employees, including Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and other senior
financial officers. Any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller or persons performing similar functions will be disclosed on
Baxaltas website. The Code of Conduct is available on Baxaltas website at
www.baxalta.com
.
2015 Non-Employee Director Compensation
Pursuant to Baxaltas Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the structure of Baxaltas
non-employee director compensation, as well as the amounts paid to Baxaltas non-employee directors and making recommendations to Baxaltas Board of Directors regarding such structure and amounts. In connection with the separation, the
Board of Directors adopted non-employee director compensation programs that were based on Baxters, including the Baxalta Incorporated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan. The table below summarizes the elements and amount of compensation
outlined in the Baxalta Incorporated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
Element
(1)(2)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
Additional Retainer for the Chair of the Board of Directors
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
Additional Fees and Retainers for Committee Service:
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee (meeting fee per member /annual chair retainer)
|
|
$
|
2,000 / $20,000
|
|
Compensation Committee (meeting fee per member /annual chair retainer)
|
|
$
|
2,000 / $15,000
|
|
Corporate Governance Committee (meeting fee per member /annual chair retainer)
|
|
$
|
2,000 / $15,000
|
|
Quality and Compliance Committee (meeting fee per member /annual chair retainer)
|
|
$
|
2,000 / $15,000
|
|
Annual Equity Grant
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
$
|
128,000
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
154
(1)
|
Cash retainers are paid quarterly in arrears.
|
(2)
|
Each new non-employee director receives an equity award grant upon initially being appointed or elected to the Board, prorated for time served that year, and an annual equity award grant thereafter. Baxalta grants each
non-employee director an annual equity award in the form of RSUs and stock options for a number of shares of Baxalta common stock on the grant date equal to the dollar value referenced above and based on the fair value of the awards at grant date.
Both RSUs and stock options granted pursuant to the Baxalta Incorporated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan generally vest in full on the date of the first annual shareholders meeting following the date of grant. As a result of the
cancellation of Baxaltas 2016 annual shareholders meeting in light of the proposed merger with Shire, however, the Baxalta Incorporated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan was amended to provide that outstanding stock option and RSU
grants made in 2015 will vest on May 10, 2016, the date the 2016 annual shareholders meeting was originally scheduled.
|
Non-employee directors may receive additional compensation for the performance of duties assigned by the Board of Directors or its committees that are
considered beyond the scope of their ordinary responsibilities. In connection with the unsolicited proposal to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Baxalta made by Shire in July 2015, and the work performed in connection therewith, the
Board of Directors resolved to pay each director a meeting fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the Board attended where the primary purpose of the meeting was to discuss the unsolicited proposal from Shire. Dr. Gavin and Messrs. Forsyth and
Stroucken recused themselves from discussions related to Shire because they were and continue to be members of Baxters board of directors. From time to time, the Board of Directors may also establish ad hoc committees to address particular
matters, such as the Transaction Committee, which was established by the Board of Directors in December 2015 to serve as a committee of the Board of Directors to review and approve certain actions related to the unsolicited proposal from Shire. In
2015, the Transaction Committee consisted of Drs. Hockmeyer and Nader and Mr. Devitt. The Board of Directors resolved to pay each member of the Transaction Committee a meeting fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the Transaction Committee
attended.
Any non-employee director may elect to defer payment of cash and/or equity into the Baxalta Incorporated Directors Deferred Compensation
Plan (the directors deferred compensation plan). For directors, deferred balances under Baxalta Incorporated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan are generally paid upon termination from board service. In 2015, Drs. Gavin and Nader were
the only directors who elected to defer payment of a portion of their cash compensation into the directors deferred compensation plan. Baxalta also reimburses directors for reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in connection with
attendance at Board and committee meetings and attendance at director education programs. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to participate in Baxaltas matching gifts program. The maximum matching gift total for a non-employee
director participant in the program is $20,000 in any calendar year, which is greater than the maximum amount the program will match for employees.
The
following table details the total compensation of Baxaltas non-employee directors for 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Amounts
Earned or
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(2)(3)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
(4)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Blake E. Devitt
(5)
|
|
$
|
106,500
|
|
|
$
|
121,412
|
|
|
$
|
61,518
|
|
|
$
|
12,087
|
|
|
$
|
301,517
|
|
Karen Ferrante, M.D.
(7)
|
|
$
|
65,083
|
|
|
$
|
96,084
|
|
|
$
|
48,753
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
$
|
210,187
|
|
John D. Forsyth
(6)
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
64,008
|
|
|
$
|
32,499
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
156,680
|
|
Gail D. Fosler
(5)
|
|
$
|
92,500
|
|
|
$
|
121,412
|
|
|
$
|
61,518
|
|
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
$
|
276,817
|
|
James R. Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D.
(6)
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
64,008
|
|
|
$
|
32,499
|
|
|
$
|
5,175
|
|
|
$
|
161,682
|
|
Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.
(5)
|
|
$
|
174,000
|
|
|
$
|
121,412
|
|
|
$
|
61,518
|
|
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
$
|
358,317
|
|
Francois Nader, M.D.
(7)
|
|
$
|
83,083
|
|
|
$
|
96,084
|
|
|
$
|
48,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,267
|
|
|
$
|
233,187
|
|
Albert P.L. Stroucken
(6)
|
|
$
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
64,008
|
|
|
$
|
32,499
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
159,180
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs in accordance with the
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock
|
155
|
Compensation (FASB ASC Topic 718). Baxalta determines the grant date fair value of RSUs by multiplying the number of RSUs granted by the closing market price of one share of Baxalta common stock
(or one share of Baxter stock if granted prior to the separation) on the award grant date. As of December 31, 2015, each non-employee director had the following number of RSUs outstanding: Mr. Devitt (3,781 and 33.55 dividend shares
accrued); Dr. Ferrante (3,140 and 6.85 dividend shares accrued); Mr. Forsyth (2,036 and 4.43 dividend shares accrued); Ms. Fosler (3,817 and 35.55 dividend shares accrued); Dr. Gavin (7,178 and 153.82 dividend shares accrued);
Dr. Hockmeyer (3,781 and 35.55 dividend shares accrued); Dr. Nader (3,140 and 6.85 dividend shares accrued); and Mr. Stroucken (2,032 and 4.43 dividend shares accrued).
|
(2)
|
The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Refer to Note 15 to the audited consolidated and combined financial
statements contained in this prospectus for more information on how grant date fair values of stock options are calculated.
|
(3)
|
As of December 31, 2015, each non-employee director had the following number of options outstanding: Mr. Devitt (47,971); Dr. Ferrante (5,960); Mr. Forsyth (44,560); Ms. Fosler (37,971);
Dr. Gavin (44,560); Dr. Hockmeyer (46,191); Dr. Nader (5,960); and Mr. Stroucken (44,560).
|
(4)
|
The amounts in this column include charitable matching contributions made pursuant to Baxaltas matching gifts program in 2015 on behalf of certain directors as follows: Mr. Devitt ($10,700), Dr. Gavin
($5,000) and Dr. Nader ($5,000). Mr. Devitts donation is the only component of All Other Compensation that involved an amount equal to or greater than $10,000 for any director in 2015. All other amounts in this column represent
dividend equivalent payments on RSUs held by the non-employee directors during 2015 (including any RSUs with deferred vesting pursuant to the directors deferred compensation plan).
|
(5)
|
At the time of the separation, Mr. Devitt, Ms. Fosler and Dr. Hockmeyer were members of Baxaltas Board of Directors, but were not members of Baxters board of directors having resigned
immediately prior to the separation. The amounts set forth above reflect an RSU award with respect to 3,575 shares of Baxalta common stock and a stock option award with respect to 12,588 shares of Baxalta common stock, both issued in replacement of
the 2015 annual equity grants that each director received from Baxter that were converted into Baxalta equity in connection with the separation. Amounts set forth above also reflect an incremental grant of RSUs with respect to 206 shares of Baxalta
common stock and stock options with respect to 293 shares of Baxalta common stock to reflect the difference between the Baxter annual grant amount and the Baxalta annual grant amount. For more information about these awards refer to the section of
this prospectus entitled Executive CompensationOutstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Year-EndAdjustments to Equity Awards in connection with the Spin-off.
|
(6)
|
At the time of the separation, Dr. Gavin and Messrs. Forsyth and Stroucken became members of Baxaltas Board of Directors and retained their positions on Baxters board of directors. The amounts set forth
above reflect a grant of 2,032 RSUs and 3,810 stock options from Baxalta equal to 50% of Baxaltas annual grant amount as compensation for their service to Baxalta during the second half of 2015.
|
(7)
|
Drs. Ferrante and Nader joined the Board of Directors on July 27, 2015, and the amounts set forth above reflect pro-rated compensation for their Board service awarded to them on July 27, 2015. Drs. Ferrante
and Nader each received a pro-rated RSU award with respect to 3,140 shares of Baxalta common stock with a value of $96,084 on the date of grant and also received a pro-rated stock option award with respect to 5,960 shares of Baxalta common stock
with a value of $48,753 on the date of grant.
|
156
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This
Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the Compensation Discussion and Analysis) describes Baxaltas executive compensation for the year ended December 31, 2015. In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we summarize the
objectives regarding Baxaltas named executive officers, as well as the pay philosophy established for Baxaltas named executive officers, the process used to examine performance in the context of executive pay decisions, and the
performance goals and results for each named executive officer. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the tabular disclosures regarding the compensation of Baxaltas named executive officers in 2015, which
can be found in the Executive Compensation Tables.
In accordance with SEC rules and regulations, Baxaltas named executive
officers in 2015 include Baxaltas Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as Baxaltas executive officers on December 31, 2015. Accordingly,
Baxaltas named executive officers for 2015 consist of the following five individuals:
|
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Hombach, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer
|
|
|
|
Peter G. Edwards, Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
|
Brian Goff, Executive Vice President and President, Hematology
|
|
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi, Executive Vice President and President, Immunology
|
Introduction
Prior to the separation, Baxalta was a wholly owned subsidiary of Baxter. Compensation decisions for Baxaltas named executive officers prior to the
separation were made by Baxters Compensation Committee in the case of Dr. Hantson and Mr. Hombach, since they both were executive officers at Baxter, and by Baxter management or negotiated in conjunction with their hiring in the case
of the other named executive officers. In connection with the separation, Baxaltas Compensation Committee (the Compensation Committee) and Board of Directors adopted compensation programs developed by Baxter. Baxalta reviewed and approved the
compensation decisions related to Baxaltas executive officers made by Baxter prior to the separation. In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, decisions made or reviewed by the Compensation Committee are indicated by phrases like
the Compensation Committee established or the Compensation Committee determined. Decisions made by Baxter prior to the Baxaltas separation are indicated by phrases like Baxter established or Baxter
determined. In addition, any compensation decisions and actions taken with regard to Dr. Hantson discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis were ultimately determined by Baxaltas Board of Directors acting on the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee in accordance with the responsibilities and authority outlined in the Compensation Committee Charter, and any such discussion should be understood to reflect the approval of the full Board of Directors.
Compensation determinations for Baxaltas named executive officers in 2015 were driven in part by special circumstances surrounding the separation.
In anticipation of the separation, Baxter recruited and relocated executive officers to its corporate headquarters in northern Illinois and to Baxaltas global innovation and R&D center in Cambridge, Massachusetts, including
Dr. Hantson and Mr. Edwards. Baxter also implemented, and Baxalta later approved, compensation programs to motivate and retain its executives, taking into account the risks and uncertainties inherent in a spin-off transaction. In addition,
Baxter approved an increase in the compensation for some of Baxaltas executive officers in recognition of their new roles and expanded responsibilities following the separation. Accordingly, actions related to the separation affected the
compensation of Baxaltas named executive officers in 2015.
157
Additional information about Baxaltas senior executive team is set forth in the section of this prospectus
entitled ManagementExecutive Officers.
Compensation Program and Philosophy
As noted above, in connection with the separation, Baxalta adopted compensation programs that were similar to those in place at Baxter immediately prior to the
separation. The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors undertook to evaluate and refine Baxaltas executive compensation program and philosophy to meet prevailing business needs and to reflect anticipated local market demands allowing
Baxalta to attract and retain leading talent from a range of biopharmaceutical organizations. Baxalta expects that its executive compensation program and philosophy will continue to evolve, particularly in light of the proposed merger with Shire.
Structure of Compensation Program
Pay-for-Performance
The majority of compensation for each
named executive officer is at risk and subject to specific annual and long-term performance requirements. Annual cash bonus payouts are determined by annual performance relative to pre-defined financial measures, discussed in more detail
below. In 2013 and 2014, Baxter used its three-year growth in shareholder value relative to its peer group and three-year performance against annual return on invested capital (ROIC) targets to determine the payout for 50% of Baxters annual
equity awards to executive officers, which were granted in the form of performance share units. Neither Baxter nor Baxalta awarded performance share units to any Baxalta executive officer in 2015. In addition and as discussed below under the heading
Adjustments to Equity Awards in connection with the Spin-off, in connection with the separation, the 2015 performance measure for certain performance share units previously awarded by Baxter to Baxaltas executive officers was
adjusted to reflect Baxters achievement of its ROIC performance target for the first six months of 2015 and Baxaltas achievement of its ROIC performance target for the last six months of 2015.
Financial Measures
The Compensation Committee utilizes
pre-defined financial measures to assess performance for purposes of funding the annual cash bonus pool from which annual cash bonuses will be paid. The financial measures for the first half of 2015 were determined by Baxter prior to the separation,
which were weighted 50% on Baxter adjusted EPS and 50% on Baxter adjusted sales. In August 2015, Baxaltas Compensation Committee approved the financial measures applicable for the second half of 2015 which were weighted 50% on Baxalta adjusted
EPS and 50% on Baxalta adjusted sales.
Each of the Baxter Compensation Committee and the Baxalta Compensation Committee also approved a funding matrix
establishing various plan funding levels for executive officers (ranging from 92% to 100%) based on performance against pre-established targets for each applicable measure. If both financial measures were met in a given six-month period, then the
cash bonus pool would be funded at one times the base salary for each executive officer (with the exception of Dr. Hantson, whose maximum funding is one times his target bonus for each performance period). If the minimum performance level was
not met for one or both of the metrics in a given six-month period, then Baxters Compensation Committee in the case of the first half of 2015, or Baxaltas Compensation Committee in the case of the second half of 2015, had the discretion
to fund the cash bonus pool relative to that metric at zero. For performance between the minimum and maximum levels for each metric, the cash bonus pool funding calculation is determined on an interpolated basis from 50% to 100%. The Baxalta
Compensation Committee may then use its negative discretion to adjust each executive officers actual annual bonus payment. For more detailed information regarding the annual cash bonuses and the final determinations related
thereto, refer to the section below Elements of CompensationCash Bonus Awards.
158
Individual Performance
The goals set for each Baxalta named executive officer for 2015 reflect the responsibilities that are attributed to each of these officers and the special
circumstances surrounding the separation. In evaluating each officers performance against his goals, the Compensation Committee considered not only whether an objective was met, but also the extent to which the objective was met. As discussed
further below, the Compensation Committee adjusted cash bonuses payable for 2015 for individual performance on a discretionary basis in light of the Compensation Committees overall assessment of how well an executive officer fulfilled his
obligations to Baxalta in 2015.
Performance of Baxalta Common Stock
The performance of Baxalta common stock determines the value of the stock options and restricted stock units that are held by the named executive officers.
Role of the Compensation Committee and Management
On July 1, 2015, in connection with the separation, Baxaltas Compensation Committee was established to oversee Baxaltas executive compensation
policies and to determine the amounts and elements of compensation for Baxaltas executive officers. As set forth in its charter, the Compensation Committees responsibilities include, among others:
|
|
|
making recommendations for consideration by the Board of Directors, in executive session and in coordination with the Corporate Governance Committee, concerning the compensation of Baxaltas Chief Executive
Officer;
|
|
|
|
determining the compensation of Baxaltas officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer) and advising the Board of Directors of such determination;
|
|
|
|
making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans and exercising the authority of the Board of Directors concerning benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
serving as the administration committee of Baxaltas equity-based plans;
|
|
|
|
making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning director compensation;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the adequacy of Baxaltas stock ownership guidelines and periodically assessing compliance with these guidelines; and
|
|
|
|
overseeing Baxaltas compensation philosophy and strategy and periodically assessing the risk related to its compensation policies and practices.
|
Accordingly, since July 1, 2015, Baxaltas Compensation Committee has been responsible for the review and approval of compensation matters related
to Baxaltas executives. With respect to compensation for Baxaltas named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee for approval, which the
Compensation Committee considers with the assistance of its compensation consultant (as described further below under the heading Role of the Compensation Consultant). With respect to compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, which
is subject to review and approval by the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers compensation with the assistance of its compensation consultant, and then makes a recommendation to the Board. In addition, members of
Baxaltas management may provide input, make recommendations and provide ongoing assistance to the Compensation Committee with respect to the design, operation, objectives and values of the various elements of Baxaltas compensation
program in order to provide appropriate performance and retention incentives for Baxaltas named executive officers.
A copy of the Compensation
Committee charter has been posted in the About Us section of the Baxalta website accessible at
www.baxalta.com,
under the Governance tab. As of December 31, 2015, the
159
Compensation Committee consisted of Drs. James R. Gavin III, Wayne T. Hockmeyer and François Nader and Messrs. John D. Forsyth (Chair) and Albert P.L. Stroucken. Each Compensation
Committee member was appointed as such in connection with the separation, with the exception of Dr. Nader who was appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee on July 28, 2015. Each Compensation Committee member is an independent
director as determined by the Board of Directors, based upon the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules and Baxaltas Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
For
determinations related to executive compensation matters concerning Baxaltas executive officers prior to the separation, the Baxter Compensation Committee was advised by its compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co. Inc. (FwC).
FwCs perspective was particularly important in 2015, because of the special circumstances surrounding the separation. Baxaltas Compensation Committee determined to retain FwC as its compensation consultant as well. Since the separation,
FwC has advised the Compensation Committee on executive compensation matters, including the evaluation of the peer group discussed below.
Peer
Group and Use of Peer Group Data
Leading up to the separation, the Baxter Compensation Committee, with the assistance of FwC, established a peer
group of companies to benchmark and set compensation for Baxaltas named executive officers (the Baxter selected peer group). As set forth in the table below, the Baxter selected peer group includes companies in the healthcare industry,
companies that focus specifically on biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and health care equipment and other companies from which Baxalta may recruit or with which Baxalta may otherwise compete for executive talent:
|
|
|
|
|
AbbVie Inc.
|
|
Celgene Corporation
|
|
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.*
|
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
C.R. Bard, Inc.*
|
|
Mallinckrodt PLC
|
Allergan PLC
|
|
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
Medtronic PLC*
|
Amgen Inc.
|
|
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.*
|
|
St. Jude Medical Inc.*
|
Biogen Inc.
|
|
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
|
|
United Therapeutics Corporation
|
Boston Scientific Corporation*
|
|
Hologic, Inc.*
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
|
|
Illumina, Inc.*
|
|
Zoetis, Inc.
|
*
|
Represents a medical device or equipment company with a high amount of R&D spending.
|
Compensation
determinations in connection with the separation were based on the analysis conducted by FwC. This analysis included a review of executive compensation data for companies in the Baxter selected peer group, as well as other survey data, and included
both a comparison of the total direct compensation for each of Baxaltas executive officers against that of executives in comparable positions and/or with comparable roles at other similarly sized companies and an analysis of each element of
compensation.
Compensation for each of the named executive officers was determined by using competitive market data for similar positions based on the
Baxter selected peer group. Regular, ongoing target pay is based on the median in mix of compensation elements and total compensation of the Baxter selected peer group, primarily to reflect differences in individual performance, pay history,
experience in role and internal equitability.
Elements of Compensation
For 2015, Baxaltas executive compensation program included the following elements:
|
|
|
equity-based incentive awards.
|
160
In addition to these elements of compensation, Baxaltas named executive officers are eligible for other
benefits and perquisites, as discussed below under Other Benefits and Perquisites. Baxaltas named executive officers are also eligible to participate in employee benefit programs generally offered to Baxaltas other
employees.
Base Salary
Base salaries are paid to
provide a fixed component of compensation for the named executive officers. As noted above, 2015 base salary determinations for Baxaltas named executive officers were initially made by Baxter while those individuals were executive officers
and/or employees of Baxter. After reviewing the market and competitive data for the executives level of responsibility following the separation, targeting the 50
th
percentile of the Baxter
selected peer group, and reviewing individual performance, experience and skills, the Baxter Compensation Committee recommended proposed compensation decisions for Baxaltas executive officers effective upon the date of the distribution. These
recommendations were subsequently reviewed and ratified by the newly constituted Baxalta Compensation Committee on the date of the distribution.
The
following table sets forth base salary determinations by Baxter for each of Baxaltas named executive officers in 2015, as well as the base salary determinations approved by the Baxalta Compensation Committee, effective July 1, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Annual Base Salary
as of
June 30, 2015
|
|
|
Annual Base Salary
Effective
July 1, 2015
|
|
|
Percent
Change
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
$
|
785,000
|
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Brian Goff
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
$
|
345,180
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
As set forth in the table above, the Compensation Committee approved an increase to the annual base salaries of Messrs.
Hombach, Goff and Leonardi to $825,000, $575,000 and $500,000, respectively, effective July 1, 2015. The Compensation Committee believes that these increases were appropriate to reflect the level of responsibility following the separation and
to be competitive with base salaries for comparable positions of companies comprising the Baxter selected peer group. In the case of Mr. Leonardi, the increase to his base salary was also the result of his promotion to an executive vice
president effective as of July 1, 2015. Prior to assuming this new role, Mr. Leonardi had served as Baxters Region Head, North America Hematology Division, and prior to that he was Baxters General Manager U.S. Hemophilia.
Cash Bonus Awards
Annual Cash Bonus Program
Baxaltas annual cash bonus program is based on the Baxter incentive structure and aligned with competitive market rates, based on peer company
comparisons. This incentive structure is intended to reward both company and individual performance by providing officers with an opportunity to receive additional cash compensation based on both company performance relative to the financial targets
described below and the Compensation Committees assessment of how well an officer performed in his or her role during the applicable year. In assessing an individual officers performance, the Compensation Committee considers the
individuals present and potential contribution to Baxalta and considers various performance criteria which include, but are not limited to, implementation of critical projects (e.g., acquisitions or divestitures), product development,
regulatory or quality performance and innovation or research goals. The Compensation Committee believes it is important to consider an individuals performance in assessing compensation and not just Baxters and Baxaltas overall
performance in the first half of 2015 and the second half of 2015, respectively, relative to the financial targets discussed above. In addition, cash bonuses may be periodically used by Baxalta for recruitment purposes in order to competitively
compensate and attract high performing executives.
161
As discussed above, the financial measures for the first half of 2015 were determined by Baxters
Compensation Committee and the financial measures for the second half of 2015 were determined by Baxaltas Compensation Committee. Each executive officer was eligible to receive a maximum cash bonus equal to one times annual base salary (other
than Dr. Hantson, whose maximum cash bonus is equal to one times his bonus target) for each half of 2015. The maximum bonus that could have been paid to any executive officer for each half of 2015 was the lesser of (i) one times an
officers salary (or one times bonus target in the case of Dr. Hantson) or (ii) $5 million (the maximum bonus specified in the Baxalta Incorporated 2015 Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan)), for an aggregate annual maximum equal to
the lesser of (i) two times an officers salary (or two times bonus target in the case of Dr. Hantson) or (ii) $10 million (the maximum bonus specified in the Incentive Plan).
The table below shows the adjusted EPS and adjusted sales targets for each half of 2015 as well as actual results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2H 2015
(1)
|
|
|
1H 2015
(2)
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Achievement
%
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Achievement
%
|
|
Adjusted EPS
(3)
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
117.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
$
|
2.01
|
|
|
|
110.3
|
%
|
Adjusted Sales (in millions)
(4)
|
|
$
|
3,367
|
|
|
$
|
3,583
|
|
|
|
106.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,900
|
|
|
$
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
101.4
|
%
|
(1)
|
Represents Baxaltas adjusted EPS (as calculated in Footnote 3 below) and adjusted sales (as calculated in Footnote 4 below) for the second half of 2015.
|
(2)
|
Represents Baxters adjusted EPS (as calculated in Footnote 3 below) and adjusted sales (as calculated in Footnote 4 below) for the first half of 2015.
|
(3)
|
Each of Baxter and Baxalta calculated adjusted EPS for purposes of funding the cash bonus pool the same way adjusted EPS was calculated for their respective publicly announced resultsthat is, the special items
that were excluded from EPS to arrive at adjusted EPS were the same.
|
(4)
|
Baxalta uses adjusted sales (rather than net sales) as a target for the same reason that Baxalta has provided sales guidance excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, which is that the company believes it
provides a better perspective on underlying sales growth. The use of budgeted exchange rates allows the company to evaluate final performance on the same foreign currency basis that was used for setting the target and establishing the budget.
|
Based on the performance shown in the above table, in August 2015, Baxters Compensation Committee certified achievement of the
financial targets for the first half of 2015 at 100% of target, and thus each officers cash bonus for the first half of the year was funded to the maximum amount permitted under the Incentive Plan. And then in February 2016, Baxaltas
Compensation Committee certified achievement of the financial targets for the second half of 2015 at 100% of target such that each officers maximum bonus for the second half of the year was also funded to the maximum amount permitted under the
Incentive Plan. Therefore, each officers annual cash bonus pool was funded at two times their base salary (or two times the bonus target in the case of Dr. Hantson) in relation to their 2015 cash bonus award.
Based on the Committees assessment of the performance of each officer of the company, the Committee has the ability to elect to exercise negative
discretion to determine the actual cash bonus amount paid to each executive officer. Any negative discretion takes into account the Compensation Committees view of how well each officer performed his or her responsibilities during
the relevant period. As a result, the actual cash bonus paid to each executive officer was calculated for each half of the year, as applicable, using the following formula: (x) the product of such officers cash bonus target multiplied by
(y) either the Baxter or the Baxalta performance adjustment percentage, as applicable, multiplied by (z) such officers individual performance adjustment percentage as determined by the Baxalta Compensation Committee.
Cash bonus program target payouts for each of Baxaltas named executive officers for 2015 were based on targets approved by Baxters Compensation
Committee prior to the distribution and ratified by Baxaltas Compensation Committee upon the distribution, and range from 65%135% of annual base salary. These target payouts were based on competitive market data for similar positions,
targeting the 50
th
percentile of the Baxter
162
selected peer group which Baxalta believes is consistent with a business emphasizing long-term growth and innovation. The following table sets forth the determinations of the 2015 annual cash
bonus program targets for each of Baxaltas named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 Annual Cash Bonus
Program Targets
|
|
Name
|
|
Percentage of
Base Salary
|
|
|
Cash
Value of Target
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
135
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,485,000
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
$
|
783,750
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
(1)
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
$
|
357,500
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
$
|
373,750
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
(1)
|
In connection with the recruitment of Mr. Edwards to join Baxalta as General Counsel, Baxter set his 2015 annual cash bonus program target payout at 65% of his annual base salary and provided that he would be
eligible for a full year bonus in 2015.
|
As described above, the first step in calculating an officers cash bonus payout in a given
year depends on the impact of company performance relative to the financial targets set for the plan as a whole. The funding schedule associated with each metric set for the company performance ranges from 0% to 150% with the baseline for each
metric being 100% (i.e., the company must achieve a given financial target for the funding for such metric to be 100% and funding can range from 0% to 150%). The band of funding around the baseline varies by metric. This variation reflects the
probability of achievement of a given target based on historical performance data as well as the scope of the given metric. For each half of the year reflected in the table above, the relative weighting of the financial targets was set at 50%.
Therefore, in accordance with the associated funding schedule for each metric, company performance translated into an adjustment to each officers cash bonus of 137% of target for the first half of the year and 150% of target for the second
half of the year. Together, this resulted in an overall adjustment of each officers cash bonus tied directly to company performance of 143% for the full year, which is consistent with the companys pay-for-performance philosophy.
The Compensation Committee then assigned individual performance adjustment percentages for each of the named executive officers, which had the effect of
increasing the annual cash bonus program payouts to an amount above target for each named executive officer in 2015 (except for Dr. Hantson), but below the funded maximum described above. Dr. Hantson was paid the maximum bonus allowed
under the Incentive Plan, equal to two times his bonus target. In determining the individual performance adjustment percentages for the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considered the roles and relative contributions of each
named executive officer in achieving the companys strong financial results for 2015, product innovation achievements and global growth initiatives, and ultimately, the delivery of tremendous value to shareholders through negotiating and
signing the merger agreement with Shire in early January 2016, all as discussed in the section of this prospectus entitled Business. The following table sets forth the impact both the company performance and the individual assessment had
on the total annual cash bonus payout for each executive in 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Company
Performance
Funding
Percentage
|
|
|
Cash Bonus
Reflecting
Company
Performance
|
|
|
Individual
Assessment
|
|
|
Total
2015 Annual
Cash Bonus
Payout
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
143
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,123,550
|
|
|
|
140
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,970,000
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
143
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,120,763
|
|
|
|
144
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,610,000
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
143
|
%
|
|
$
|
511,225
|
|
|
|
157
|
%
|
|
$
|
804,400
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
143
|
%
|
|
$
|
534,463
|
|
|
|
157
|
%
|
|
$
|
840,900
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
143
|
%
|
|
$
|
464,750
|
|
|
|
157
|
%
|
|
$
|
731,300
|
|
163
Spin-Off Retention Cash Bonus Awards
As Baxter worked toward a successful transition plan to create two new independent companies, retaining senior leadership talent through and after the
transition date was critical to both the execution of the plan and business continuity. Baxter determined to implement a program for select management employees tied to the successful completion of the separation. Under the program, participants
were eligible to receive 75%150% of their cash bonus award target based on Baxters assessment of their individual performance as it related to the successful completion of the separation. Under this program, Mr. Hombach, the only
Baxalta named executive officer who was a participant in the program, was eligible for a cash bonus with a target of $750,000. Baxter determined that all bonuses under the program would be paid at 150% of target to recognize the time and effort each
participant dedicated to the successful completion of the separation while also conducting their regular day-to-day responsibilities. Accordingly, Mr. Hombach received $1,125,000 under the program in 2015.
Other Special One-Time Bonus Awards
In connection with
the recruitment of Mr. Edwards to join Baxalta as General Counsel, Baxter agreed to pay Mr. Edwards a one-time signing bonus of $250,000 in 2015.
Equity-Based Incentive Awards
Equity awards are the most
significant components of each named executive officers compensation package. Equity awards are intended to motivate executive officers to drive the long-term performance of Baxalta and to align their interests with those of Baxaltas
shareholders. This emphasis is appropriate as these officers have the greatest role in establishing Baxaltas direction and should have the greatest proportion of their compensation aligned with the long-term interests of shareholders. This
alignment is furthered by requiring officers to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines discussed below under the heading Compensation Policies and PracticesBaxaltas Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers and
Non-Employee Directors; Prohibitions on Trading.
Annual Equity Awards
Prior to the separation, Dr. Hantson and Messrs. Hombach, Goff and Leonardi participated in Baxters equity compensation program. Accordingly, their
annual equity awards for 2015 were based on Baxters determination under its equity compensation program, which involved individual performance assessments and consideration of Baxters peer group. Mr. Edwards did not participate in
Baxters equity compensation program because his employment with Baxter began on June 17, 2015, which was after Baxters regular grant date. As a result, all equity granted to Mr. Edwards in 2015 was granted under Baxaltas
equity compensation program.
Concurrently with the separation, holders of Baxter stock options, restricted stock units and performance share units, to
the extent granted prior to January 1, 2015 and whether vested or unvested, generally received both adjusted Baxter awards and Baxalta awards. Baxter stock options and restricted stock units granted on or after January 1, 2015, whether
vested or unvested, were generally adjusted into corresponding awards of either Baxter or Baxalta equity based on which company employed the employee holding such awards immediately following the separation, and such awards are subject to the
original vesting schedule.
In connection with the separation, Baxalta approved the Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units, performance shares, dividend equivalent units, performance share units, cash incentive awards and other equity-based awards. Baxalta intends to grant equity-based
incentive awards under the Incentive Plan to its eligible employees on an annual basis. All grants of Baxalta equity-based incentive awards in connection with the separation were issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan, including special equity-based
awards to Baxaltas named executive officers, as discussed below under the section entitled Founders Grants.
164
Founders Grants
In connection with the separation, the Compensation Committee approved a special one-time grant of stock options pursuant to the Incentive Plan to each of
Dr. Hantson and Messrs. Hombach, Goff and Leonardi (each, a founders grant). Each stock option granted as a founders grant will vest in full on the fifth anniversary of July 1, 2015 (subject to accelerated vesting as discussed
below under the section entitled Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control), the date of grant, and each was granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of Baxaltas common stock on date of grant,
and a value equal to the amount listed next to each officers name based on the Black-Scholes valuation on such date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Total Award
Value
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
5,500,000
|
|
|
|
507,380
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
$
|
4,125,000
|
|
|
|
380,535
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
$
|
2,875,000
|
|
|
|
265,221
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
230,627
|
|
Consistent with many spin-off transactions, these one-time special founders grants are intended to serve as a way to
ensure continued service to Baxalta by key individuals involved in the successful completion of the separation and to further strengthen the link between shareholder value creation and executive compensation.
Other Special One-Time Grants
The Baxalta Compensation
Committee approved one-time incremental equity grants for each of Dr. Hantson and Messrs. Hombach, Goff and Leonardi. These grants serve to bring each of their Baxter equity grants that were converted in connection with the separation up to a
level commensurate with their positions, compensation and targets at Baxalta. As Mr. Edwards joined after Baxter made its 2015 annual equity awards and prior to the separation, the Compensation Committee determined to approve an equity grant
for Mr. Edwards to cover his service to Baxalta, prorated through the remainder of 2015. Each incremental equity grant was split evenly between restricted stock units and stock options, vesting ratably over three years from July 1, 2015,
the date of grant. The amount of restricted stock units granted to each named executive officer was determined by the closing stock price on the date of grant. The exercise price of the stock options is equal to the closing price of Baxaltas
common stock on the date of grant. The number of stock options granted was determined utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation on such date. The following table sets forth the final number of restricted stock units and stock options granted to each of
Baxaltas named executive officers as a special one-time incremental equity grant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Total Award
Value
|
|
|
Number
of RSUs
|
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
5,600,000
|
|
|
|
88,889
|
|
|
|
328,253
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
9,524
|
|
|
|
35,170
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
$
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
20,635
|
|
|
|
76,202
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
9,524
|
|
|
|
35,170
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
$
|
740,000
|
|
|
|
11,746
|
|
|
|
43,376
|
|
In connection with the recruitment of Mr. Edwards to join Baxalta as General Counsel, Baxter agreed to, and the Baxalta
Compensation Committee subsequently approved, an additional special one-time grant of restricted stock units with respect to shares of Baxalta common stock with a value equal to $5,100,000, with such grant representing a replacement for equity that
Mr. Edwards forfeited at his prior employer upon joining Baxter in anticipation of the spin-off. The restricted stock units were granted pursuant to the Incentive Plan on July 1, 2015 and vest ratably over four years from the date of
grant.
165
Other Benefits and Perquisites
Baxaltas named executive officers are eligible to participate in employee benefit programs generally offered to other employees. In addition, Baxalta
provides certain other perquisites to its named executive officers that are not generally available to other employees, as described below. These perquisites are reported in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table.
Relocation Program
Baxalta maintains a relocation
program for employees who are relocated for business reasons. Under this program, Baxalta provides relocation assistance to its executive officers, which may include reimbursement for commuting expenses, temporary living expenses, home sale expenses
and loss on sale, household goods moving and storage, and cost of living adjustments. Prior to the separation, Dr. Hantson and Mr. Edwards were provided relocation benefits by Baxter under its relocation program. Effective upon the
separation, Baxalta assumed responsibility for providing relocation benefits to Dr. Hantson and Mr. Edwards under the Baxalta relocation program. During 2015, Dr. Hantson and Mr. Edwards were paid an aggregate of $171,649 and
$39,986, respectively, in relocation benefits, including amounts paid to reimburse them for the income tax payable on such benefits. For more detailed information regarding the relocation benefits provided to Baxaltas executive officers, refer
to the 2015 Summary Compensation Table.
Pension and Supplemental Pension Plans
Baxter employees that were hired prior to December 31, 2006, including Mr. Hombach, participated in Baxters pension and supplemental pension
plans. The named executive officers other than Mr. Hombach were not eligible to participate in Baxters pension and supplemental pension plans because such plans were closed to new participants as of December 31, 2006. Employees hired
or rehired after that date by Baxter received an additional employer contribution from Baxter equal to 3% of his or her compensation in Baxters tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan and nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
In accordance with the employee matters agreement that Baxalta entered into with Baxter at the time of the spin-off, Baxalta established pension and
supplemental pension plans with terms substantially similar to the corresponding plans of Baxter. The assets and liabilities under the corresponding Baxter plans with respect to transferred employees based in the United States, including
Mr. Hombach, were transferred to the corresponding Baxalta plans. Transferred employees, including Mr. Hombach, are eligible to participate in such Baxalta plans to the extent they were eligible to participate in the corresponding Baxter
plans as of the applicable employment transfer date. Such transferred employees will receive credit for Baxter service to the extent credited under the corresponding Baxter plan and will receive recognition for compensation paid by Baxter that was
recognized under the corresponding Baxter plan as though it were compensation paid by Baxalta. For additional information regarding the employee matters agreement, refer to the section of this prospectus entitled Agreements Between Baxter and
Baxalta and Other Related Party TransactionsAgreements with BaxterEmployee Matters Agreement.
Deferred Compensation Plan
Each of the named executive officers is eligible to participate in the Baxalta Incorporated and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan (the deferred
compensation plan), which permits the officer to defer the receipt of covered compensation and receive a 3.5% company match. Baxalta allows named executive officers to participate in a deferred compensation plan to provide a market competitive plan
as well as to facilitate retirement savings as part of the total compensation program in a cost- and tax-effective way for Baxalta. For Baxter employees who became Baxalta employees following the separation, including Baxaltas named executive
officers, Baxalta assumed the obligations for benefits accrued while they were Baxter employees under the Baxter deferred compensation plan. Baxaltas deferred compensation plan permits certain management employees to defer payment and taxation
of a portion of salary and bonus and receive an investment return on the
166
deferred amount based on several investment alternatives. Contributions made by Baxalta with respect to the named executive officers are set forth in Executive Compesation
Tables2015 Summary Compensation Table.
Other
All other perquisites that Baxalta provides to its named executive officers are minimal. During 2015, Baxaltas named executive officers were eligible for
reimbursement for executive physical examinations and related health services, and they participated in programs generally offered to Baxaltas other employees, including medical insurance, dental insurance, life insurance and long-term
disability insurance and Baxaltas tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan. In addition, all employees are eligible to participate in Baxaltas matching gifts program under which Baxaltas program matches gifts made by employees and
directors to eligible non-profit organizations. The maximum gift total for an executive officer participant in the program is $10,000 in any calendar year, which is greater than the maximum amount the program will match for other employees. For more
detailed information regarding benefits and perquisites provided to Baxaltas named executive officers, refer to Executive Compensation Tables2015 Summary Compensation Table.
Compensation Policies and Practices
Baxaltas Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers and Non-Employee Directors; Prohibitions on Trading
To align their economic interests with those of Baxalta shareholders, Baxaltas executive officers and non-employee directors are required to own a
specified amount of Baxalta stock. Each of Baxaltas executive officers is required to achieve ownership of Baxalta common stock valued at a minimum of four times annual base salary (six times annual base salary in the case of Baxaltas
Chief Executive Officer). Each of Baxaltas non-employee directors is required to achieve ownership of Baxalta common stock valued at a minimum of five times their annual cash retainer. In each case, the required ownership requirements must be
met within five years of becoming an executive officer or non-employee director. These requirements, like the executive compensation recoupment policy discussed below, help ensure long-term focus and appropriate levels of risk-taking by
Baxaltas executive officers and non-employee directors.
Pursuant to Baxaltas securities trading policy, all Baxalta employees, including all
named executive officers, and directors are prohibited from engaging in short-term trading activities and option transactions in Baxalta stock. As a result, such persons cannot enter into any put or call options or otherwise
buy or sell derivatives on any Baxalta stock. Additionally, it is Baxaltas policy to not permit officers to pledge Baxalta stock as collateral for loans or otherwise as a security interest.
Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices
With the assistance of FwC, the Baxter Compensation Committee reviewed Baxters material compensation policies and practices applicable to its employees,
including its executive officers, and concluded that these policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Baxter. The key features of the executive compensation program that support this
conclusion include:
|
|
|
appropriate pay philosophy, peer group and market positioning;
|
|
|
|
effective balance in cash and equity mix, short- and long-term focus, corporate, business unit and individual performance focus and financial and non-financial performance measurement and discretion; and
|
|
|
|
meaningful risk mitigants, such as the stock ownership guidelines and executive compensation recoupment policy discussed below.
|
167
Baxalta has not yet established compensation policies and practices that differ significantly from the policies
and practices established by Baxter and reviewed by the Baxter Compensation Committee. Baxalta plans to review its material compensation policies and practices once they are established by Baxaltas Compensation Committee and expects to assess
how those policies and practices may create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Baxalta as such policies and practices are implemented, unless otherwise no longer necessary to the proposed merger.
Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy
Baxalta has an
executive compensation recoupment policy that applies to all cash bonuses paid by Baxalta under its incentive plans and all grants of equity awarded by Baxalta to any person designated as an officer by the Board. Following any restatement of
Baxaltas financial results that requires an amendment to any previously filed results, or if an officer violates a restrictive covenant contained in any agreement between Baxalta and such officer, the Board will review the facts and
circumstances relating to the restatement or the violation and take any actions it deems appropriate with respect to executive incentive compensation. With respect to a restatement, the Board will consider whether an officer received compensation
based on performance reported, but not actually achieved, or was accountable for the events that led to the restatement, including any misconduct. Actions the Board may take include: recovery, reduction or forfeiture of all or part of any bonus,
equity or other compensation previously provided or to be provided in the future; disciplinary actions; and the pursuit of any other remedies.
Severance Arrangements
Baxaltas named
executive officers are eligible for certain severance and change in control benefits. Severance benefits are generally set forth in the severance agreements to which each named executive officer became a party in 2015. Each severance agreement, as
amended, provides for benefits to Baxaltas named executives in connection with a change in control. In addition, in 2014 in connection with the anticipated distribution, Mr. Hombach entered into a severance agreement with Baxter that
became an obligation of Baxalta upon completion of the distribution (the spin-off severance agreement). The spin-off severance agreement provides for payments to Mr. Hombach if his employment is terminated by Baxalta without Cause
(as defined in the spin-off severance agreement) prior to the first anniversary of the distribution date. For additional information regarding severance payments and benefits, refer to the section below Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control.
In addition, Baxaltas standard terms and conditions for equity grants include a double-trigger
vesting provision, which provides that vesting would be accelerated if the recipients employment is terminated by Baxalta other than for Cause or by the recipient for Good reason, as such terms are defined in the
Incentive Plan, in either case within two years following a change of control of Baxalta (if the awards are assumed in the transaction). For additional information regarding severance payments and benefits, refer to the section contained in this
prospectus entitled Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.
In the event that awards are not assumed in connection
with a change of control, Baxaltas Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, adjust outstanding equity incentive awards under the Incentive Plan in the manner it deems equitable, which may include cancellation of certain outstanding
equity incentive awards in return for cash payment of the current value of such award, determined as though such award is fully vested at the time of payment.
Pursuant to the merger agreement related to Baxaltas proposed merger with Shire, Shire has agreed to assume outstanding Baxalta equity incentive awards
upon consummation of the merger. For additional information regarding the proposed merger, refer to the sections of this prospectus entitled The TransactionsThe Proposed Merger and BusinessThe Proposed Merger.
168
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2015, Drs. Gavin, Hockmeyer and Nader and Messrs. Forsyth (Chair) and Stroucken served on Baxaltas Compensation Committee. None of the members of
the Compensation Committee has been an officer or employee of Baxalta. None of Baxaltas executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on Baxaltas
Compensation Committee.
Executive Compensation Tables
The following tables contain compensation information for Baxaltas named executive officers for 2015. Each of Baxaltas named executive officers was
employed by Baxter prior to the separation; therefore, the compensation information included below for periods prior to July 1, 2015 reflects compensation earned at Baxter in accordance with the design and objectives of the Baxter executive
compensation programs in place prior to the separation. The compensation decisions regarding Baxaltas named executive officers prior to the separation were made by the Baxter Compensation Committee or by Baxter executive officers. Executive
compensation decisions following the separation were made by Baxaltas Compensation Committee. The information included in the tables below should be read in conjunction with the section above Executive Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.
2015 Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
(1)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
(2)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(3)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(4)
|
|
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
(5)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
(6)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
1,119,231
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,497,392
|
|
|
$
|
9,661,907
|
|
|
$
|
2,970,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
331,499
|
|
|
$
|
18,580,029
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
833,846
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
972,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,191,276
|
|
|
$
|
1,370,850
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
118,315
|
|
|
$
|
4,486,828
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
742,308
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,096,573
|
|
|
$
|
1,428,483
|
|
|
$
|
1,004,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
135,267
|
|
|
$
|
4,406,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
832,577
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,941,511
|
|
|
$
|
5,786,910
|
|
|
$
|
1,610,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,504,883
|
|
|
$
|
66,158
|
|
|
$
|
12,867,039
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
755,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,886,103
|
|
|
$
|
1,191,276
|
|
|
$
|
1,049,061
|
|
|
$
|
2,601,713
|
|
|
$
|
57,478
|
|
|
$
|
9,540,631
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
687,692
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
877,271
|
|
|
$
|
1,142,793
|
|
|
$
|
890,435
|
|
|
$
|
744,791
|
|
|
$
|
54,510
|
|
|
$
|
4,397,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
302,500
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,750,010
|
|
|
$
|
650,003
|
|
|
$
|
804,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,616
|
|
|
$
|
7,812,529
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
581,040
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
771,368
|
|
|
$
|
3,592,024
|
|
|
$
|
840,900
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,772
|
|
|
$
|
5,832,104
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Hematology
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
478,800
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
588,014
|
|
|
$
|
362,252
|
|
|
$
|
352,853
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,002
|
|
|
$
|
1,829,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
432,363
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
574,996
|
|
|
$
|
3,057,652
|
|
|
$
|
731,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,754
|
|
|
$
|
4,828,065
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Immunology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts shown in this column represent the spin-off retention cash bonus for Mr. Hombach and the sign-on cash bonus for Mr. Edwards. Mr. Hombach was paid a $1,125,000 one-time spin-off retention cash
bonus in 2015, which was approved by the Baxter Compensation Committee in connection with the spin-off. Mr. Edwards was paid a one-time signing bonus of $250,000 in 2015.
|
(2)
|
Awards granted in 2015 represent the value of RSUs granted and the value of PSUs granted in prior years for which the performance measures were established in 2015. The grant date fair value of the maximum amount of
shares payable under the PSUs granted in prior years, but for which the performance measures were established in 2015, is as follows: Dr. Hantson ($960,078); Mr. Hombach ($848,312); Mr. Goff ($131,204); and Mr. Leonardi
($44,844). New PSUs were not granted to the named executive officers in 2015. Awards granted for 2014 and 2013 represent the aggregate fair value of RSUs and PSUs granted. All amounts reflect the grant date fair value computed in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 718. RSU awards were valued as of the grant date by multiplying the closing price of the common stock of the applicable entity on the NYSE on that date by the number of shares subject to the awards. Refer to Note 15 to the audited
consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for more information on how grant date fair values of PSUs were calculated. Dividend equivalents accrue on the PSUs and RSUs and are paid only if the underlying awards vest.
For further information on these awards, see the 2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and the accompanying narrative.
|
169
(3)
|
Awards granted in 2015 represent the value of stock options, including founders grants made to Dr. Hantson and Messrs. Hombach, Goff and Leonardi. Amounts shown reflect a grant date fair value computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, rather than an amount paid to or realized by the named executive officer. These amounts also include the incremental fair value of the conversion from Baxter stock options granted in 2015 prior to the distribution
to Baxalta stock options. Refer to Note 15 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for more information on how grant date fair values of the stock options were calculated. For further information on
these awards, see the 2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and the accompanying narrative.
|
(4)
|
2015 amounts represent payouts under Baxaltas 2015 annual cash bonus program. 2014 and 2013 amounts, if any, represent cash awards earned by such named executive officer under Baxters annual cash bonus
plans. For a description of the methodology applied in determining the payouts under Baxaltas 2015 annual cash bonus program, refer to the section above Executive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements of
CompensationCash Bonus Awards.
|
(5)
|
Amounts shown in this column for Mr. Hombach represent the aggregate change in actuarial present value in his pension benefits that Baxalta assumed from Baxter in connection with the separation.
|
(6)
|
The elements of compensation included in the All Other Compensation column for 2015 are set forth in the table below.
|
The amounts shown for All Other Compensation for 2015 include (a) contributions to the named executives account under the Baxalta
Incorporated 401(k) Savings Plan; (b) contributions to the named executives account under the deferred compensation plan; (c) Baxalta-paid life insurance premiums and matching charitable gifts; (d) relocation payments; and
(e) tax reimbursements, all as detailed in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
401(k) Plan
Contributions
|
|
|
Deferred
Compensation
Contributions
|
|
|
Life Insurance
Premiums and
Matching Charitable
Gifts
(1)
|
|
|
Relocation
(2)
|
|
|
Tax
Reimbursements
(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
17,225
|
|
|
$
|
140,717
|
|
|
$
|
1,908
|
|
|
$
|
95,513
|
|
|
$
|
76,136
|
|
|
$
|
331,499
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
$
|
9,275
|
|
|
$
|
54,979
|
|
|
$
|
1,904
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
66,158
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
$
|
13,806
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
24,552
|
|
|
$
|
15,434
|
|
|
$
|
55,616
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
$
|
17,225
|
|
|
$
|
20,075
|
|
|
$
|
9,472
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,772
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
$
|
17,225
|
|
|
$
|
13,896
|
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,754
|
|
(1)
|
For Mr. Goff, the amount set forth above reflects $8,500 in charitable matching contributions for 2015 made under the Baxalta matching gifts program.
|
(2)
|
In anticipation of the separation, Baxter provided relocation benefits to Dr. Hantson and Mr. Edwards under the Baxter executive relocation program. Baxalta assumed these costs and future payments associated
with these benefits in connection with the separation. The amounts set forth above reflect relocation benefits provided to Dr. Hantson and Mr. Edwards related to commuting expenses, temporary living expenses, home sale expenses and loss on
sale, household goods moving and storage, and/or cost of living adjustments.
|
(3)
|
Tax reimbursements represent amounts paid related to certain relocation benefits provided to Dr. Hantson and Mr. Edwards.
|
170
2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
|
|
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
or
Units
(#)
(2)
|
|
|
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
Exercise
or
Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(4)
|
|
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)
(5)
|
|
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
Threshold
(#)
|
|
|
Target
(#)
|
|
|
Maximum
(#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485,000
|
|
|
|
2,970,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,936
|
|
|
$
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
1,361,910
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,253
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
2,799,997
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,380
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
5,500,000
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,217,349
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800,004
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 3 2013)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
4,029
|
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,693
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 2 2014)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
5,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,346
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783,750
|
|
|
|
1,650,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,936
|
|
|
$
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
1,361,910
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,170
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,535
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
4,125,000
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,217,349
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,006
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 3 2013)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
6,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,810
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 2 2014)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
5,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,346
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,500
|
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,202
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
650,003
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,003
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,100,007
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,750
|
|
|
|
1,150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,168
|
|
|
$
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
417,028
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,170
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,221
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
2,874,996
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,760
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,006
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 3 2013)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,337
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 2 2014)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,265
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,674
|
|
|
$
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
187,658
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,376
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
369,997
|
|
Stock Option Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,627
|
|
|
$
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
2,499,997
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,575
|
|
RSU Grant
|
|
|
7/1/2015
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369,999
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 3 2013)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
ROIC PSU Grant (tranche 2 2014)
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,634
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts shown represent award opportunities under Baxaltas 2015 annual cash bonus program at 100% of
target bonus as well as the maximum bonus payable under the Incentive Plan. There is no minimum threshold for annual cash bonuses. Each of the Target and the Maximum column reflects the aggregate award for both performance
periods in 2015 (i.e., the first half of 2015 and the second half of 2015). For each half of 2015, the maximum award for each officer was one times the base salary in effect during the relevant performance period, with the exception of
Dr. Hantson, whose maximum award for each half of 2015 is one times his target bonus. The amounts shown were calculated using the following base salaries: Mr. Hombach 825,000, Mr. Edwards 550,000, Mr. Goff
575,000 and Mr. Leonardi 500,000. For 2015, the financial
|
171
|
targets under Baxaltas 2015 annual cash bonus program were met. As a result, the named executive officers were eligible to receive the maximum bonus subject to Baxaltas Compensation
Committee negative discretion. The actual cash bonus paid to each named executive officer for his 2015 performance is reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation above in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table. For a description of
the methodology applied in determining final payouts under Baxaltas 2015 annual cash bonus program, refer to the section above Executive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements of CompensationCash Bonus
Awards.
|
(2)
|
Unless otherwise noted, all stock awards (a) are RSUs granted in 2015, (b) are granted under the Incentive Plan and (c) vest ratably in annual one-third (1/3) increments over the three-year period
beginning on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.
|
(3)
|
Unless otherwise noted, all stock option awards (a) are nonqualified stock options granted in 2015, (b) are granted under the Incentive Plan, (c) vest ratably in annual one-third (1/3) increments
over the three-year period beginning on the one-year anniversary of the grant date and (d) have a term of ten years.
|
(4)
|
The option exercise price for the stock options dated March 3, 2015 was the closing price of Baxter common stock on the date the stock options were granted (as adjusted for the distribution). The option exercise
price for the stock options dated July 1, 2015 was the closing price of Baxalta common stock on the date the stock options were granted.
|
(5)
|
For stock options granted prior to the distribution, the amounts also include the incremental fair value of the conversion from Baxter stock options to Baxalta stock options as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 718.
|
(6)
|
Awards were converted to Baxalta awards from Baxter awards granted prior to the spin-off. These awards were converted at the time of distribution using a ratio of approximately 2.1667 shares of Baxalta common stock to
one share of Baxter common stock. For stock option grants, the strike price of the stock option was adjusted by dividing the exercise price for shares of Baxter common stock by approximately 0.4615.
|
(7)
|
Represents (i) incremental grant of stock options in connection with the spin-off that serves as either (y) an incremental make-whole for service to Baxalta, prorated through the remainder of 2015, or
(x) as a way to cover additional and separate service to Baxalta, prorated through the remainder of 2015. See Executive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements of CompensationEquity-Based Incentive Awards.
|
(8)
|
Represents a founders grant awarded as a special, one-time award associated with the founding of Baxalta as a new public company that are scheduled to vest in full on the fifth anniversary of July 1, 2015.
For more information, refer to the section above Executive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements of CompensationEquity-Based Incentive Awards.
|
(9)
|
Represents an incremental grant of RSUs in connection with the spin-off that serves as either (i) an incremental make-whole for service to Baxalta, prorated through the remainder of 2015, or (ii) as a way to
cover additional and separate service to Baxalta, prorated through the remainder of 2015. For more information, refer to the section above Executive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements of CompensationEquity-Based
Incentive Awards.
|
(10)
|
PSU awards were granted to the executive officer in March 2013 (2013 Baxter PSUs) while the executive officer was a Baxter employee. Upon the distribution, the 2013 Baxter PSUs were converted such that for each 2013
Baxter PSU granted the executive officer received one PSU that will be paid out in Baxalta common stock and one PSU that will be paid out in Baxter common stock, both based on the achievement of annual ROIC goals over the three-year performance
period commencing with the year in which the PSUs were awarded, which for this grant was January 1, 2013. The amounts set forth in the Threshold, Target and Maximum columns represent the number of shares of
both Baxter and Baxalta common stock that would be paid out under the third of the three ROIC performance periods of the 2013 ROIC PSUs if the annual ROIC goal for 2015 meets 93%, 100% and 107% of the target, respectively. Because of the spin-off,
the 2015 performance period for certain converted and outstanding PSUs, including the 2013 ROIC PSUs, was divided into two periods: (i) January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015, based on Baxter performance during such period as reviewed and
certified by Baxters Compensation Committee; and (ii) July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, based on Baxaltas performance during such period as reviewed and certified by Baxters Compensation Committee with consideration
given to Baxaltas Compensation Committee assessment for such period. This modification was necessary as the performance metrics applicable to the PSUs would no longer be meaningful following the spin-off. The awards maintained their original
vesting schedule. Performance was reviewed and certified by the Baxter Compensation Committee such that PSUs were earned at 62% of target payout for the first half of 2015 and at 200% of target payout for the second half of 2015.
|
(11)
|
PSU awards were granted to the executive officer in March 2014 (2014 Baxter PSUs) while the executive officer was a Baxter employee. Upon the distribution, the 2014 Baxter PSUs were converted, such that for each 2014
Baxter PSU granted the executive officer received one PSU that will be paid out in Baxalta common stock and one PSU that will be paid out in Baxter common stock, both based on the achievement of annual ROIC goals over the three-year performance
period commencing with the year in which the PSUs were awarded, which for this grant was January 1, 2014. The amounts set forth in the Threshold, Target and Maximum columns represent the number of shares of
both Baxter and Baxalta common stock that would be paid out under the second of the three ROIC performance periods of the 2014 ROIC PSUs if Baxters annual ROIC goal for 2015 meets 93%, 100% and 107% of the target, respectively. Because of the
spin-off, the 2015 performance period for certain converted and outstanding PSUs, including the 2014 ROIC PSUs, was divided into two periods: (i) January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015, based on Baxter performance during such period as
reviewed and certified by Baxters Compensation Committee; and (ii) July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, based on Baxaltas performance during such period as reviewed and certified by Baxters Compensation Committee with
consideration given to Baxaltas Compensation Committee assessment for such period. This modification was necessary as the performance metrics applicable to the PSUs would no longer be meaningful following the spin-off. The awards maintained
their original vesting schedule. Performance was reviewed and certified by the Baxter Compensation Committee such that PSUs were earned at 62% of target payout for the first half of 2015 and at 200% of target payout for the second half of 2015. The
remaining one-third of the 2014 ROIC PSUs, which is based on the achievement of annual ROIC goals in 2016, is not included in the above table because it is not considered granted for accounting purposes until the ROIC goals are set for the year.
|
(12)
|
Represents a special one-time grant of 161,905 RSUs granted in connection with the recruitment of Mr. Edwards to join Baxalta as General Counsel, which vest ratably over four years from the date of grant. For more
information, refer to the section above Executive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements of CompensationEquity-Based Incentive Awards.
|
172
Replacement Awards Granted in 2015
Replacement Awards.
As discussed above, Baxalta approved the Incentive Plan in connection with the spin-off. The Incentive Plan provides for the
grant of replacement awards (Replacement Awards) in accordance with the terms of the employee matters agreement entered into in connection with the spin-off. As discussed below under the heading Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015
Year-EndAdjustments to Equity Awards in connection with the Spin-off, the employee matters agreement addresses, among other things, the mechanism for the conversion and adjustment of equity awards (including stock options, PSUs and RSUs)
in connection with the spin-off into Replacement Awards based on shares of Baxter common stock and/or Baxalta common stock, as applicable. In connection with the spin-off, Baxaltas named executive officers received Replacement Awards with
respect to their outstanding Baxter equity-based awards, which are reflected in the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Year-End table below.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(2)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Performance
Period and
PSU
Type
(3)(4)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(3)(4)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(3)(4)
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
84,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.83
|
|
|
|
3/4/2021
|
|
|
|
196,100
|
|
|
|
7,653,784
|
|
|
|
2013 2015
|
(G)
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
503,678
|
|
|
|
|
88,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.53
|
|
|
|
3/6/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 2016
|
(G)
|
|
|
8,991
|
|
|
|
350,905
|
|
|
|
|
79,302
|
|
|
|
39,651
|
|
|
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
3/3/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
(R)
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
503,678
|
|
|
|
|
34,393
|
|
|
|
68,788
|
|
|
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
3/4/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
(R)
|
|
|
8,991
|
|
|
|
350,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,936
|
|
|
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
3/3/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,380
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,253
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
49,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.83
|
|
|
|
3/4/2021
|
|
|
|
101,361
|
|
|
|
3,956,124
|
|
|
|
2013 2015
|
(G)
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
402,959
|
|
|
|
|
88,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.53
|
|
|
|
3/6/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 2016
|
(G)
|
|
|
8,991
|
|
|
|
350,905
|
|
|
|
|
63,442
|
|
|
|
31,721
|
|
|
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
3/3/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
(R)
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
402,959
|
|
|
|
|
34,393
|
|
|
|
68,788
|
|
|
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
3/4/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
(R)
|
|
|
8,991
|
|
|
|
350,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,936
|
|
|
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
3/3/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,535
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,170
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,202
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
182,938
|
|
|
|
7,140,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.15
|
|
|
|
6/1/2022
|
|
|
|
30,081
|
|
|
|
1,174,070
|
|
|
|
2013 2015
|
(G)
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
54,547
|
|
|
|
|
17,182
|
|
|
|
8,591
|
|
|
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
3/3/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 2016
|
(G)
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
61,815
|
|
|
|
|
10,458
|
|
|
|
20,918
|
|
|
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
3/4/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
(R)
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
54,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,168
|
|
|
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
3/3/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
(R)
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
61,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,221
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,170
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.53
|
|
|
|
3/6/2022
|
|
|
|
22,217
|
|
|
|
867,141
|
|
|
|
2013 2015
|
(G)
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
17,627
|
|
|
|
|
5,551
|
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
|
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
3/3/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 2016
|
(G)
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
22,172
|
|
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
7,509
|
|
|
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
3/4/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
(R)
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
17,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,674
|
|
|
|
32.04
|
|
|
|
3/3/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
(R)
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
22,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,627
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,376
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7/1/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
(1)
|
The chart below represents stock options vesting as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
March 2016
|
|
|
July 2016
|
|
|
March 2017
|
|
|
July 2017
|
|
|
March 2018
|
|
|
July 2018
|
|
|
July 2020
|
|
Dr. Hantson
|
|
|
170,023
|
|
|
|
109,417
|
|
|
|
130,373
|
|
|
|
109,418
|
|
|
|
95,979
|
|
|
|
109,418
|
|
|
|
507,380
|
|
Mr. Hombach
|
|
|
162,093
|
|
|
|
11,723
|
|
|
|
130,373
|
|
|
|
11,723
|
|
|
|
95,979
|
|
|
|
11,724
|
|
|
|
380,535
|
|
Mr. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Goff
|
|
|
48,439
|
|
|
|
11,723
|
|
|
|
39,848
|
|
|
|
11,723
|
|
|
|
29,390
|
|
|
|
11,724
|
|
|
|
265,221
|
|
Mr. Leonardi
|
|
|
19,754
|
|
|
|
14,458
|
|
|
|
16,980
|
|
|
|
14,459
|
|
|
|
13,225
|
|
|
|
14,459
|
|
|
|
230,627
|
|
(2)
|
The amounts in the column represent RSU awards and earned but unvested PSUs from the 2013 PSU grant relating to the 2013 and 2014 ROIC performance period. The earned but unvested PSUs vested in February 2016. Amounts in
the columns also represent earned but unvested PSUs from the 2014 PSU grant relating to the 2014 ROIC performance period. The earned but unvested PSUs will vest in January 2017. In addition, the amounts in the column for Dr. Hantson reflect
176,884 RSUs which include 5,339 dividend shares accrued and will vest as follows: 12,665 in March 2016, 29,334 in July 2016, 12,665 in March 2017, 16,666 in June 2017, 29,333 in July 2017, 12,667 in March 2018, 16,667 in June 2018, 30,222 in July
2018 and 16,667 in June 2019. The amounts in the column for Mr. Hombach reflect 87,519 RSUs which include 1,956 dividend shares accrued and will vest as follows: 12,665 in March 2016, 3,143 in July 2016, 12,665 in March 2017, 40,000 in June
2017, 3,143 in July 2017, 12,667 in March 2018 and 3,238 in July 2018. The amounts in the column for Mr. Edwards reflect 182,540 RSUs which include 398 dividend shares accrued and will vest as follows: 47,286 in July 2016, 47,286 in July 2017,
47,491 in July 2018 and 40,477 in July 2019. The amounts in the columns for Mr. Goff reflect 27,810 RSUs which include 444 dividend shares accrued and will vest as follows: 5,964 in March 2016, 3,143 in July 2016, 5,159 in March 2017, 3,143 in
July 2017, 3,000 in September 2017, 4,223 in March 2018 and 3,238 in July 2018. The amounts in the column for Mr. Leonardi reflect 21,378 RSUs which include 243 dividend shares accrued and will vest as follows: 2,495 in March 2016, 3,877 in
July 2016, 2,237 in March 2017, 3,876 in July 2017, 3,000 in September 2017, 1,900 in March 2018 and 3,993 in July 2018. Amounts shown in the columns also include the dividend shares accrued on the RSUs granted to each of the named executive
officers. The market value of these unvested RSUs is based on the closing price of Baxalta common stock on December 31, 2015 ($39.03).
|
(3)
|
For the grants noted with a (G), these amounts represent the threshold number and value of shares of common stock that an officer would receive under the growth in shareholder value (GSV) PSUs granted for the
20132015 and 20142016 performance periods. The market value of the performance share units included in these columns is based on the closing price of Baxalta common stock on December 31, 2015 ($39.03). Amounts in these columns also
include the dividend shares accrued on the performance share units. With respect to the GSV PSUs granted for the 20132015 performance period, the final award determinations have been made by the Baxter Compensation Committee, such that
performance did not result in a payout thereunder. Final payouts under the GSV PSUs for the 20142016 performance periods will not be known until the respective performance period is completed, and therefore it is possible that no shares of
common stock will be paid out under these GSV PSUs. For more information about these awards, see the section below entitled Adjustments to Equity Awards in connection with the Spin-off.
|
(4)
|
For the grants noted with an (R), amounts represent the maximum number and value of shares of common stock that an officer would receive under the ROIC PSUs granted in 2013 and 2014. The market value of the performance
share units included in these columns is based on the closing price of Baxalta common stock on December 31, 2015 ($39.03). Amounts in these columns also include the dividend shares accrued on the performance share units. With respect to the
2015 performance period, which is the second of the three annual ROIC performance periods for the ROIC PSUs granted in 2014 and the third of the three annual ROIC performance periods for the ROIC PSUs granted in 2013, final award determinations have
been made by the Baxter Compensation Committee, and the 2013 ROIC PSUs vested on February 15, 2016 at 126%. However, the 2014 grants will not pay out until 2017, and therefore it is possible that no shares of common stock will be earned with
regard to the remaining annual performance periods if the established targets are not met for those periods. For more information about these awards, see the section below entitled Adjustments to Equity Awards in connection with the
Spin-off.
|
Adjustments to Equity Awards in connection with the Spin-off.
In connection with the spin-off, Baxalta
entered into the employee matters agreement with Baxter, which governs, among other things, Baxaltas compensation and employee benefit obligations following the spin-off with respect to Baxaltas current employees. The employee matters
agreement addresses, among other things, the mechanism for the adjustment and conversion of outstanding incentive awards (including stock options, PSUs and RSUs) in connection with the spin-off into Replacement Awards based on Baxter common shares
and/or Baxaltas common stock, as applicable. For purposes of the vesting of the Replacement Awards, continued employment or service with Baxter, or with Baxalta, will be treated as continued employment for purposes of both Baxters and
Baxalta equity awards. Under the employee matters agreement and subject to limited exceptions:
|
|
|
each Baxter stock option granted prior to January 1, 2015 (other than new hire grants made on or after July 1, 2014) that remained outstanding immediately prior to the separation, whether vested or unvested,
was converted concurrently with the separation into both an adjusted Baxter stock option and a Baxalta stock option;
|
174
|
|
|
each Baxter stock option granted on or after January 1, 2015 (or, with respect to new hire grants, on or after July 1, 2014), but prior to the separation that was outstanding immediately prior to the
separation, whether vested or unvested, was converted concurrently with the separation into (x) an adjusted Baxter stock option in the case of Baxter employees or (y) a Baxalta stock option in the case of Baxalta employees;
|
|
|
|
each PSU award granted prior to January 1, 2015 that was outstanding immediately prior to the separation was converted (whether vested or unvested) into (x) a number of PSU awards that will be paid out in
Baxter common stock (each a Baxter PSU award) equal to the number of Baxter common shares payable in respect of such Baxter PSU award and (y) an equal number of PSU awards that will be paid out in Baxalta common stock;
|
|
|
|
each holder of RSU awards granted prior to January 1, 2015 (other than new hire grants made on or after July 1, 2014) and that will be paid out in Baxter common stock (each a Baxter RSU award) that were
outstanding immediately prior to the separation, whether vested or unvested, received (in addition to retaining such Baxter RSU awards) concurrently with the separation an equal number of RSU awards that will be paid out in Baxalta common stock
(each a Baxalta RSU award); and
|
|
|
|
each Baxter RSU award granted on or after January 1, 2015 (or, with respect to new hire grants, on or after July 1, 2014) but prior to the separation that was outstanding as of immediately prior to the
separation, whether vested or unvested, were converted concurrently with the separation into (x) an adjusted Baxter RSU award in the case of Baxter employees or (y) a Baxalta RSU award in the case of Baxalta employees.
|
Baxter PSUs were granted to Dr. Hantson and Messrs. Hombach, Goff and Leonardi in March 2013 (2013 Baxter PSUs) and March 2014 (2014 Baxter PSUs) while
each executive was a Baxter employee. The 2013 Baxter PSUs and 2014 Baxter PSUs were each divided into two equal tranches. The payout of shares of Baxter common stock was set at a range of 0% to 200% of the number of PSUs awarded. The first of these
tranches, the GSV PSUs, has a payout amount determined by Baxters growth in shareholder value up until the separation and the combined Baxter and Baxalta growth in shareholder value following the separation relative to the growth in
shareholder value of the healthcare peers included in Baxters peer group during the three-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2013 for the 2013 Baxter PSUs and January 1, 2014 for 2014 Baxter PSUs. The second of these
tranches, the ROIC PSUs, has a payout amount based on the achievement of annual or semi-annual ROIC goals over the three-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2013 for the 2013 Baxter PSUs and January 1, 2014 for 2014 Baxter
PSUs. Upon the separation, the 2013 Baxter PSUs and 2014 Baxter PSUs were converted such that for each respective PSU granted prior to the spin-off, the named executive officer received one PSU that will be paid out in Baxalta common stock and one
PSU that will be paid out in Baxter common stock.
Because of the spin-off, the 2015 performance period for all converted and outstanding Baxalta ROIC
PSUs relating to 2013 Baxter ROIC PSUs and 2014 Baxter ROIC PSUs were divided into two periods: (i) January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015, based on Baxter performance during such period as reviewed and certified by Baxters
Compensation Committee; and (ii) July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, based on Baxaltas performance during such period as reviewed and certified by Baxters Compensation Committee with consideration given to Baxaltas
Compensation Committee assessment for such period. This modification was necessary as the performance metrics applicable to such PSUs would no longer be meaningful following the spin-off. The awards maintained their original vesting schedule.
Performance was reviewed and certified by the Baxter Compensation Committee such that PSUs were earned at 62% of target payout for the first half of 2015 and at 200% of target payout for the second half of 2015.
The Replacement Awards that a holder received in connection with the spin-off are subject to substantially the same terms, vesting conditions and other
restrictions, if any, that were applicable prior to the spin-off.
175
2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
(3)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Vesting($)
(4)
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,350
|
|
|
|
2,611,325
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,537
|
|
|
|
906,014
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
19,748
|
|
|
|
9,792
|
|
|
|
497,018
|
|
(1)
|
Mr. Leonardi exercised these stock options in March 2015, prior to the separation.
|
(2)
|
Represents the aggregate dollar amount realized upon the exercise of stock options.
|
(3)
|
Includes the amount of Baxter PSUs and RSUs that vested prior to the separation.
|
(4)
|
Represents the market value of PSUs and RSUs on the date of vesting as calculated by multiplying the closing price of Baxters or Baxaltas common stock, as applicable, on the vesting date by the number of
shares acquired before withholding taxes.
|
2015 Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
|
Number
of Years
Credited
Service(#)
|
|
|
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year
($)
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
(2)
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,400,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Pension Plan
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
7,140,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts in this column have been determined as follows: the accrued benefit was calculated using pensionable earnings and benefit service through 2015; present value of this accrued benefit payable at the earlier of
normal retirement (age 65) or the earliest point where it would be unreduced (85 points, where each year of age and Baxter and Baxalta service equals one point) was calculated as an annuity payable for the life of the participant only; the present
value of the benefit at the assumed payment age was discounted with interest only to the current age as of measurement date. The present values of the accrued benefits disclosed in the table above are primarily based on the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
Assumption
|
|
Value
|
Discount Rate
|
|
4.60%
|
Postretirement Mortality
|
|
Retirement Plan 2014, projected with generational improvement
|
Termination/Disability
|
|
None assumed
|
Retirement Age
|
|
Earlier of age 65 or attainment of 85 points
|
Other assumptions not explicitly mentioned are the same as those assumptions used for financial
reporting. Please refer to Note 12 to the audited consolidated and combined financial statements contained in this prospectus for more information on these assumptions.
(2)
|
Aside from Mr. Hombach, all other named executive officers of Baxalta are not eligible to participate in either the pension or supplemental pension plan that Baxalta adopted from Baxter because they joined Baxter
after these plans were closed as of December 31, 2006. Instead, they received an additional employer contribution equal to 3% of their compensation in Baxters tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan and nonqualified deferred compensation
plan during their employment with Baxter in 2015 and receive additional employer contributions equal to 3% of their compensation in Baxaltas tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan and nonqualified deferred compensation plan since the
separation.
|
176
Baxaltas tax-qualified pension plan is a broad-based retirement income plan. The normal retirement (age 65)
benefit equals (i) 1.75 percent of a participants Final Average Pay multiplied by the participants number of years of pension plan participation, which includes participation in the Baxter tax-qualified pension plan for
Baxalta employees that were transferred in connection with the separation, minus (ii) 1.75 percent of a participants estimated primary social security benefit, multiplied by the participants years of pension plan participation.
Final Average Pay is equal to the average of a participants five highest consecutive calendar years of earnings out of his or her last ten calendar years of earnings. In general, the compensation considered in determining the
pension payable to the named executive officer includes salary and cash bonuses awarded under the officer bonus program. Although age 65 is the normal retirement age under the pension plan, the pension plan has early retirement provisions based on a
point system. Under the point system, each participant is awarded one point for each year of pension plan participation and one point for each year of age. Participants who terminate employment after accumulating at least 65 points, and who wait to
begin receiving their pension plan benefits until they have 85 points, receive an unreduced pension plan benefit regardless of their actual age when they begin receiving their pension plan benefits.
Baxaltas supplemental pension plan is offered to provide a benefit for the amount of eligible compensation that is disallowed as pensionable earnings
under the pension plan pursuant to provisions of the Code which limit the benefit available to highly compensated employees under qualified pension plans. Accordingly, this plan is available to all employees eligible to participate in the pension
plan whose benefit under the pension plan is limited by the Code. If the present value of the benefit exceeds $50,000, the participant will be paid in an annuity commencing when the participant is first eligible for early retirement, regardless of
whether the participant elects to commence his or her qualified plan benefit at that time. As permitted by certain transitional rules under the tax regulations, persons who were participants in the Baxter plan at the end of 2007 were given a
one-time option to elect a different commencement date. Deferred salary and bonus amounts that may not be included under the pension plan are included in the supplemental plan.
Participation in the Baxter pension and supplemental pension plans was closed as of December 31, 2006. Any participant who transferred to Baxalta as an
employee from Baxter as part of the separation that was hired by Baxter after that date is not eligible to participate in the Baxalta pension plan or supplemental pension plan, but instead receives an additional employer contribution equal to 3% of
his or her compensation in Baxaltas tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan (and nonqualified deferred compensation plan).
2015
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
(1)
|
|
|
Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY
($)
(3)
|
|
|
Aggregate Balance
at Last FYE
($)
|
|
Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
89,003
|
|
|
|
140,717
|
|
|
|
(4,410
|
)
|
|
|
846,349
|
|
Robert J. Hombach
|
|
|
113,715
|
|
|
|
54,979
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
|
|
720,260
|
|
Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Goff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,075
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
35,341
|
|
Jacopo Leonardi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,896
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
27,559
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts in this column are included in either the Salary or Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation columns of the 2015 Summary Compensation Table.
|
(2)
|
Amounts in this column are included in the All Other Compensation column of the 2015 Summary Compensation Table.
|
(3)
|
Amounts in this column are not included in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table as Baxaltas deferred compensation plan provides participants with a subset of investment elections available to all eligible employees
under Baxaltas tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan.
|
A participant in Baxaltas deferred compensation plan may elect to defer
a portion of his or her eligible compensation (up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of eligible bonus) during the calendar year as long as the
177
participant makes such election prior to the beginning of the calendar year or within a prescribed period after beginning employment with Baxalta. For named executive officers, eligible
compensation under the deferred compensation plan includes a participants base salary and any annual cash bonus. Participants in the deferred compensation plan may select from a subset of investment elections available to all eligible
employees under Baxaltas tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan. Amounts in a participants account are adjusted on a daily basis upward or downward to reflect the investment return that would have been realized had such amounts been
invested in the investments selected by the participant. Participants may elect to change their investment elections once each calendar month. Baxalta is also required to match contributions to the deferred compensation plan dollar-for-dollar up to
3.5% of a participants eligible compensation. Any participant who transferred to Baxalta as an employee from Baxter as part of the separation that either was hired by Baxter after December 31, 2006, or elected as of January 1, 2008
will not continue to accrue benefits in the Baxter pension plan, but instead receives a Baxalta contribution equal to 3.0% of his or her eligible compensation in excess of the compensation that is recognized in the tax-qualified Section 401(k)
plan, regardless of whether the participant is otherwise eligible to elect to defer a portion of his or her compensation. Deferrals under the plan are not recognized as eligible compensation for the qualified pension plan (but are recognized in the
supplemental pension plan) or in calculating benefit pay under Baxaltas welfare benefit plan and result in lower compensation recognized for company matching under Baxaltas tax-qualified Section 401(k) plan.
Participants may elect to be paid distributions either in a lump sum payment or in annual installment payments over two to fifteen years. Such election must
be made when the participant first becomes eligible to participate in the plan. Distributions will be paid in the first quarter of the plan year following such participants termination of employment unless such participant is a specified
employee as defined in Section 409A of the Code. No distributions will be paid in connection with the termination of a specified employee until at least six months following such termination and any amounts that would have otherwise been
paid during such six month period shall be accumulated and paid in a lump sum, without interest, at the expiration of such period.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
On July 1, 2015, each of Baxaltas named executive officers became a party to a severance agreement with Baxalta that provides for certain payments
in the event Baxalta undergoes a change in control and such executive officer is involuntarily terminated by the company or voluntarily terminates his employment with the company for good reason, as that term is defined in the severance
agreement. In the case of Dr. Hantson and Mr. Hombach, each had an existing severance agreement with Baxter prior the separation. These severance agreements became obligations of Baxalta upon completion of the separation and were
terminated as a consequence of Dr. Hantson and Mr. Hombach entering into severance agreements with Baxalta. In consideration for the benefits provided under the severance agreement, each named executive officer has agreed with Baxalta to
be bound for two years from the date of his termination to noncompetition, nonsolicitation and nondisparagement covenants. A condition for receiving the payments discussed below is the execution of a customary release of claims in a form reasonably
acceptable to Baxalta.
Payments under the severance agreements, as amended, as of December 31, 2015 included:
|
|
|
a lump sum cash payment generally equal to twice the aggregate amount of such officers salary and target bonus (reported as severance payments in the table below);
|
|
|
|
a prorated bonus payment;
|
|
|
|
a lump sum cash payment generally equal to continued retirement and savings plan accruals for two years;
|
|
|
|
two years of continued health and welfare benefit coverage;
|
|
|
|
outplacement expense reimbursement in an amount not exceeding $50,000; and
|
|
|
|
a cutback, such that, to the extent payments under the severance agreement would trigger excise tax,
payments would be reduced to the extent necessary to prevent any portion of the payments from
|
178
|
becoming nondeductible by Baxalta under Section 280G of the Code or subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, but only if, by reason of that reduction, the net
after-tax benefit received by the executive exceeds the net after-tax benefit the executive would receive if no reduction was made.
|
The
table set forth below shows Baxaltas potential payment and benefit obligations to each named executive officer assuming that a change in control of Baxalta has occurred and, as a result, such officer is terminated or terminates his employment
for good reason on December 31, 2015. The accelerated vesting of equity awards that is included in the table below would occur as a result of the terms of the equity compensation programs governing these awards, which are broadly applicable to
all recipients, rather than as a result of the terms of the severance agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Hantson
|
|
|
Mr. Hombach
|
|
|
Mr. Edwards
|
|
|
Mr. Goff
|
|
|
Mr. Leonardi
|
|
Severance Payments
|
|
$
|
5,170,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,217,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,815,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,897,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,650,000
|
|
Prorated Bonus Payments
(1)
|
|
$
|
1,485,000
|
|
|
$
|
783,750
|
|
|
$
|
357,500
|
|
|
$
|
373,750
|
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
Additional Payments Related to Retirement and Savings Plans
|
|
$
|
315,883
|
|
|
$
|
1,206,574
|
|
|
$
|
117,888
|
|
|
$
|
116,361
|
|
|
$
|
90,931
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefit Coverage
|
|
$
|
34,158
|
|
|
$
|
34,150
|
|
|
$
|
31,253
|
|
|
$
|
32,386
|
|
|
$
|
31,608
|
|
Accelerated Vesting of Equity
Awards
(2)(3)
|
|
$
|
22,007,597
|
|
|
$
|
14,226,293
|
|
|
$
|
7,713,878
|
|
|
$
|
4,936,495
|
|
|
$
|
3,591,105
|
|
Outplacement Expenses
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Tax Cutback
(4)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(515,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,062,638
|
|
|
$
|
19,518,267
|
|
|
$
|
10,085,520
|
|
|
$
|
6,891,267
|
|
|
$
|
5,738,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents full 2015 bonus target as the officer would receive an annual bonus payment for the performance period in which the termination occurs.
|
(2)
|
Represents the in-the-money value of unvested stock options, the value of unvested RSUs and the target amount of PSUs based on Baxaltas closing stock price on December 31, 2015 ($39.03) and
Baxters closing stock price on December 31, 2015 ($38.15).
|
(3)
|
For each of Mr. Hombach and Mr. Goff, amounts also include the value of retention awards in the form of Baxter RSUs that each received in June 2014 and September 2014, respectively. These retention RSUs were
granted in anticipation of the separation, vest on the third anniversary from the date of grant and vest immediately in the event of an involuntary termination, except for a termination for Cause (as defined in the equity compensation
program under which such RSUs were issued). Upon the separation, these Baxter RSUs converted into Baxalta RSUs, subject to the same vesting terms. At December 31, 2015, each had the following number of retention RSUs outstanding:
Mr. Hombach40,000 and 1,267 dividend shares accrued, with a value based on Baxaltas closing stock price referenced in Footnote 2 above; and Mr. Goff3,000 and 73 dividend shares accrued, with a value based on
Baxaltas closing stock price referenced in Footnote 2 above.
|
(4)
|
Represents the amount that would need to be forfeited by the executive pursuant to the cutback provision in their severance agreement as of December 31, 2015.
|
Severance Agreement Amendment
In connection with
entering into the merger agreement, on January 11, 2016, Baxalta agreed to amend its severance agreements. The severance agreement amendments provide certain executive officers, including all of Baxaltas named executive officers, with a
full tax gross-up for excess parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code if there is a change of control and the severance benefits provided in the severance agreements exceed the 280G limit.
179
Spin-Off Severance Agreement
In 2014, in connection with the anticipated separation, Mr. Hombach entered into a severance agreement with Baxter, which was assumed by Baxalta (the
spin-off severance agreement). The spin-off severance agreement provides for payments to Mr. Hombach if his employment is terminated by Baxalta without Cause (as defined in the spin-off severance agreement) prior to July 1,
2016, the first anniversary of the completion of the separation. In such event, the payments include a lump sum payment equal to 1.5 times Mr. Hombachs salary and target bonus, a lump sum payment covering six months of cost-sharing for
health insurance coverage and outplacement expense reimbursement in an amount not exceeding $50,000. The table set forth below shows Baxaltas potential payment and benefit obligations to Mr. Hombach assuming that he was terminated by
Baxalta without Cause (as defined in the spin-off severance agreement) on December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hombach
|
|
Severance Payments
|
|
$
|
2,413,125
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefit Coverage
|
|
|
8,141
|
|
Outplacement Expenses
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,471,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the terms of the spin-off severance agreement, to the extent that any other agreement, including
Mr. Hombachs other severance agreement with the company, also provides for the payment of severance upon a termination of employment occurring during the term of the spin-off severance agreement, Mr. Hombach would only be entitled to
receive the greater of the severance provided under the spin-off severance agreement or such other agreement or arrangement, without duplication.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The
following table provides information relating to shares of common stock that may be issued under Baxaltas existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
Number of Shares
to be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
|
|
|
(b)
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
|
|
|
(c)
Number of Shares Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Shares
Reflected
in Column(a))
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders
|
|
|
41,802,676
|
(1)
(4)
|
|
$
|
29.55
|
(2)
|
|
|
41,368,439
|
(3)
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
41,802,676
|
(1)(4)
|
|
$
|
29.55
|
(2)
|
|
|
41,368,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes purchase rights under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, eligible employees may purchase shares of common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of base pay at a
purchase price equal to 85% of the closing market price on the purchase date (as defined by the Employee Stock Purchase Plan). A participating employee may not purchase more than $25,000 in fair market value of common stock under the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan in any calendar year and may withdraw from the Employee Stock Purchase Plan at any time.
|
(2)
|
Restricted stock units and performance share units are excluded when determining the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options.
|
(3)
|
Includes (i) 2,560,866 shares of common stock available for purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and (ii) 38,807,573 shares of common stock available under the 2015 Incentive Plan.
|
(4)
|
Includes outstanding awards of 37,709,440 stock options, which have a weighted-average exercise price of $29.55 and a weighted-average remaining term of 6.6 years, 3,480,192 shares of common stock issuable upon vesting
of restricted stock units, and 613,044 shares of common stock reserved for issuance in connection with performance share unit grants.
|
180
AGREEMENTS BETWEEN BAXTER AND BAXALTA AND OTHER RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Agreements with Baxter
Following
the separation, Baxalta and Baxter operate separately, each as an independent public company. Prior to the separation, Baxalta and Baxter entered into a separation and distribution agreement and several other agreements to effect the separation and
provide a framework for Baxaltas relationship with Baxter after the separation. These agreements govern the relationships between Baxter and Baxalta subsequent to the completion of the separation and provide for the separation between Baxter
and Baxalta of the assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after the separation. In addition to the
separation and distribution agreement (which contains many of the key provisions related to Baxaltas separation from Baxter and the distribution of certain of Baxaltas shares of common stock to Baxter stockholders), these agreements
include:
|
|
|
the transition services agreement;
|
|
|
|
the long term services agreement;
|
|
|
|
the tax matters agreement;
|
|
|
|
the manufacturing and supply agreement;
|
|
|
|
the employee matters agreement;
|
|
|
|
the trademark license agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Galaxy license agreement;
|
|
|
|
the international commercial operations agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the stockholders and registration rights agreement with respect to Baxters continuing ownership of Baxalta common stock.
|
The material agreements described below have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and the summaries
below set forth the terms of the agreements that Baxalta believes are material. These summaries are qualified in their entireties by reference to the full text of the applicable agreements.
Baxter and Baxalta entered into other agreements prior to the separation that are not material to Baxaltas business. These agreements include lease and
sublease agreements, agreements related to sharing of resources and costs related to company planes, as well as certain distribution and other commercial agreements. In connection with the merger, Baxalta also entered into a letter agreement with
Baxter and Shire, which addresses certain aspects of the tax matters agreement and modifies certain aspects of the shareholders and registration rights agreement. For more information on the letter agreement, refer to the section below
Letter Agreement.
Revenues associated with the manufacturing and supply agreement with Baxter were $71 million during the six
months ended December 31, 2015 and $41 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The manufacturing and supply agreement did not contribute a significant amount of gross margin or net income to the companys results of
operations during the six months ended December 31, 2015 or the three months ended March 31, 2016. Additionally, during the six months ended December 31, 2015 and the three months ended March 31, 2016, the company incurred selling, general
and administrative expenses of approximately $65 million and $30 million, respectively, associated with the transition services agreement. Net costs charged to Baxter related to the long term services agreement were immaterial for the six months
ended December 31, 2015 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Under the terms of the international commercial operations agreement
with Baxter, the company is responsible for the business activities conducted by Baxter on its behalf in certain countries, and is subject to the risks and entitled to the benefits generated by these operations and assets. As a result, the related
assets and liabilities and results of operations have been reported in the companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the six
181
months ended December 31, 2015 and in the companys condensed consolidated and combined interim financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Net sales
related to these operations totaled approximately $414 million and $121 million during the six months ended December 31, 2015 and the three months ended March 31, 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2015, the assets and liabilities
consisted of inventories of $101 million, other current assets of $236 million and accrued liabilities of $46 million. At March 31, 2016, the assets and liabilities consisted of inventories of $29 million, other current assets of $97 million
and accrued liabilities of $10 million. The decreases in inventories and assets and liabilities to be transferred to Baxalta, held by Baxter were primarily due to completion of the legal transfer of certain operations during the three months ended
March 31, 2016.
Other amounts due to or from Baxter primarily relate to intercompany balances which originated prior to the separation and ongoing
transactions with Baxter associated with the separation-related agreements described above, including current tax-related indemnification liabilities of $4 million and $75 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and
long-term tax-related indemnification liabilities of $69 million and $51 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Certain indemnification liabilities classified as short-term as of December 31, 2015 were settled during the
three months ended March 31, 2016 or were reclassified to long-term as of March 31, 2016 due to changes in the estimated date of resolution. The company recorded a gain in other (income) expense, net of $20 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2016 following the settlement of an indemnification liability with Baxter.
The Separation and Distribution Agreement
The separation and distribution agreement sets forth the agreements between Baxter and Baxalta regarding the principal transactions required to effect
Baxaltas separation from Baxter and other agreements governing Baxaltas relationship with Baxter.
The separation and distribution agreement
identified assets transferred, liabilities assumed and contracts assigned to each of Baxalta and Baxter as part of the separation, and it provided for when and how these transfers, assumptions and assignments were to have occurred or will occur. In
particular, the separation and distribution agreement provides, among other things, for the following, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein:
|
|
|
certain assets related to the businesses and operations of Baxters biopharmaceuticals business and any other assets specified in the separation and distribution agreement, which are collectively referred to as the
Baxalta Assets, were or will be transferred to Baxalta or one of Baxaltas subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
certain liabilities (including whether accrued, contingent or otherwise) arising out of or resulting from the Baxalta Assets, other liabilities related to the businesses and operations of Baxters
biopharmaceuticals business and any other liabilities specified in the separation and distribution agreement, which are collectively referred to as the Baxalta Liabilities, were retained by or transferred to Baxalta or one of Baxaltas
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
all of the assets and liabilities (including whether accrued, contingent or otherwise) other than the Baxalta Assets and Baxalta Liabilities (such assets and liabilities are referred to as the Baxter Assets and Baxter
Liabilities, respectively) were retained by or transferred to Baxter or one of its subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Baxalta and Baxter were and are to continue to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause certain shared contracts to be assigned in part to Baxalta or Baxaltas applicable subsidiaries, appropriately amended, or
replaced or otherwise addressed in a manner that allows each of Baxalta and Baxter and their respective subsidiaries to retain the appropriate portion of the benefits and burdens of those contracts in light of the separation of the
biopharmaceuticals business from Baxters other businesses.
|
Except as expressly set forth in the separation and distribution agreement
or any ancillary agreement, neither Baxalta nor Baxter made any representation or warranty as to the assets, business or liabilities transferred or assumed as part of the separation, as to any approvals or notifications required in connection with
the transfers,
182
as to the value of or the freedom from any security interests of any of the assets transferred, as to the absence or presence of any defenses or right of setoff or freedom from counterclaim with
respect to any claim or other asset of either Baxalta or Baxter, or as to the legal sufficiency of any assignment document or instrument delivered to convey title to any asset or thing of value to be transferred in connection with the separation.
Except as set forth in the separation and distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement, all assets were transferred on an as is, where is basis and the respective transferees bears the economic and legal risks that any
conveyance will prove to be insufficient to vest in the transferee good and marketable title, free and clear of all security interests, and that any necessary consents or governmental approvals are not obtained or that any requirements of laws,
agreements, security interests or judgments are not complied with. In general, each of Baxter and Baxalta assumed liability for all pending, threatened and unasserted legal matters related to its own business or its assumed or retained liabilities
and have agreed to indemnify the other party for any liability to the extent arising out of or resulting from such assumed or retained legal matters. In addition, the separation and distribution agreement provides for cross-indemnities principally
designed to place financial responsibility for the obligations and liabilities of the Baxalta business with Baxalta and financial responsibility for the obligations and liabilities of Baxters remaining business with Baxter. Specifically, each
of Baxalta and Baxter have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other party, its subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents against any liabilities resulting from, arising out of or resulting from,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
the liabilities that each such party assumed or retained pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement (which, in the case of Baxalta, would include the Baxalta Liabilities and, in the case of Baxter, would
include the Baxter Liabilities);
|
|
|
|
in the case of Baxalta, the conduct of any business by it or any of its subsidiaries following the separation;
|
|
|
|
in the case of Baxter, the conduct by it and its subsidiaries of their respective businesses, other than as conducted on behalf of Baxalta or any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
any breach by such party of the separation and distribution agreement or the other transaction agreements (subject to the limitations, if any, expressly set forth in such agreements);
|
|
|
|
in the case of Baxalta, any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact or omission or alleged omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein not misleading, with respect to all information contained in Baxaltas registration statement on Form 10 initially filed under the Exchange Act on December 10, 2014, together with all amendments and supplements thereto or the
information statement forming a part of such registration statement as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time, except to the extent made explicitly in Baxters name or the omission of which makes any statement made explicitly
in Baxters name misleading; and
|
|
|
|
in the case of Baxter, any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact made explicitly in Baxters name in Baxaltas registration statement on Form 10 initially filed under the Exchange Act
on December 10, 2014, together with all amendments and supplements thereto or the information statement forming a part of such registration statement as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time, or an omission or alleged
omission to state a material fact necessary to make any such statement made explicitly in Baxters name not misleading.
|
The separation
and distribution agreement also specifies procedures with respect to claims subject to indemnification and related matters.
Each of the parties agreed to
cooperate with the other party and use commercially reasonable efforts to take or to cause to be taken all actions, and to do, or to cause to be done, all things necessary or advisable under applicable law or contractual obligations to consummate
the transactions contemplated by, and effectuate the provisions and purposes of, the separation and distribution agreement and the other transaction agreements. The separation and distribution agreement provides that, in the event that the transfer
or assignment of certain assets and liabilities to Baxalta or Baxter, as applicable, did not occur prior to the separation (including as a result of governmental or
183
other required third-party consents not being received prior to such time), then until such assets or liabilities are able to be transferred or assigned, Baxalta or Baxter, as applicable, will
hold such assets on behalf of and for the benefit of the other party and will pay, perform and discharge such liabilities, for which the other party will reimburse Baxter or Baxalta, as applicable, for all payments made in connection with the
performance and discharge of such liabilities.
The separation and distribution agreement also governs the rights and obligations of Baxter and Baxalta
regarding the separation.
Under the separation and distribution agreement, following the separation, Baxalta and Baxter are obligated to provide each
other access to information in certain circumstances. The separation and distribution agreement also imposes obligations with respect to retention of information and confidentiality.
The separation and distribution agreement provides for the allocation among the parties of rights and obligations under existing insurance policies with
respect to occurrences prior to completion of the separation and sets forth procedures for the administration of insured claims. In addition, the separation and distribution agreement allocates between the parties the right to proceeds and the
obligation to incur certain deductibles under certain insurance policies.
Transition Services Agreement
Baxalta and Baxter entered into a transition services agreement prior to the separation pursuant to which Baxalta and Baxter and their respective subsidiaries
provide to each other, on an interim, transitional basis, various services. The services to be provided by Baxter include, among others, finance, information technology, human resources, quality, supply chain and certain other administrative
services, and will generally be provided on a cost-plus basis. The services generally commenced on the distribution date and will generally terminate within 24 months (or 36 months in the case of certain information technology services) following
the distribution date.
Baxalta anticipates that it will be in a position to complete the transition away from most of the transition services on or
before the date that is 24 months following the distribution date, or 36 months in the case of certain information technology services. The recipient of services will generally have the right to terminate any or all services upon 180 days
notice and will have the right to extend the initial duration of some or all of the services for up to six months.
Long Term Services Agreement
Baxter and Baxalta entered into a long term services agreement prior to the separation pursuant to which Baxter and Baxalta and their respective
subsidiaries provide to each other certain services at facilities shared by the parties following the separation. These services include providing utilities and other critical services, the absence of which could disrupt the parties
operations. The recipient of services generally has the right to terminate any or all services upon 180 days notice. The services are generally provided on a cost basis in light of the services generally allowing the parties to each benefit
from the continued sharing of fixed costs for services used by each of them.
Tax Matters Agreement
Baxalta and Baxter entered into the tax matters agreement prior to the distribution which generally governs Baxaltas and Baxters respective rights,
responsibilities and obligations after the distribution with respect to taxes for any tax period ending on or before the distribution date, as well as tax periods beginning before and ending after the distribution date. In addition, the tax matters
agreement addresses the allocation of liability for taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to effectuate the distribution. In addition, under the tax matters agreement, Baxalta is required to indemnify Baxter
against any tax liabilities resulting from
184
Baxaltas action or inaction that causes the Baxter Transactions or certain related transactions to be taxable. Baxalta is required to indemnify Baxter against any tax liabilities as a
result of the acquisition of Baxaltas stock or assets, even if Baxalta did not participate or otherwise facilitate the acquisition.
On
January 11, 2016, Baxter, Shire and Baxalta entered into the letter agreement in connection with the merger, which, among other things, supplements certain aspects of the tax matters agreement. Under the letter agreement, from and after the
closing of the merger, Baxalta agreed to indemnify, and Shire agreed to guarantee such indemnity to, Baxter and each of its affiliates and each of their respective officers, directors and employees against certain tax-related losses attributable to,
or resulting from (in whole or in part) the merger (as described in more detail in the letter agreement). For a description of the letter agreement, refer to the section below Letter Agreement. For a description of Baxters
waiver of certain rights contained in the tax matters agreement, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Separation and DistributionBaxalta may not be able to engage in certain corporate transactions after the separation.
Baxaltas and Shires indemnification obligations to Baxter and its subsidiaries, officers, directors and employees under the tax matters agreement
and letter agreement are not limited in amount or subject to any cap. If Baxalta and Shire are required to indemnify Baxter and its subsidiaries and their respective officers and directors under the circumstances set forth in the tax matters
agreement (as supplemented by the letter agreement), it could have a material adverse effect on Baxalta and Shire.
For a description of the potential
effect of the merger on the tax treatment of the Baxter Transactions, including this exchange offer, refer to the section of this prospectus entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Proposed Merger with ShireThe merger could
result in significant liability to Baxalta and Shire if it causes the Baxter Transactions to be taxable.
Manufacturing and Supply Agreement
Baxalta entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement with Baxter prior to the separation pursuant to which Baxalta or Baxter, as the case may
be, will manufacture, label and package products for the other party.
The terms of the manufacturing and supply agreement range in initial duration from
five to ten years, with the five-year arrangements generally having a single one-year extension right and the ten-year arrangements having four five-year extension rights. The manufacturing and supply obligations will generally be performed on a
cost-plus basis.
The terms of the manufacturing and supply agreement are subject to early termination at the option of the purchaser upon not less than
one-years notice, and are also subject to termination in the event of ongoing breach not cured within 60 days or a bankruptcy-related event of the other party.
The manufacturing and supply agreement provides Baxalta the right during the ten-year initial term for manufacturing of Baxaltas Flexbumin products
(plus any extension period thereafter when Baxter continues to have such production capabilities) to purchase equipment that includes Baxter proprietary technology used to manufacture Baxaltas Flexbumin product line. Any such equipment
purchased by Baxalta will be at Baxters fully loaded costs thereof, plus the same mark-up applied to other production under the manufacturing and supply agreement. Baxaltas rights to such technology are limited by the terms of the Galaxy
license agreement described below in the section entitled Galaxy License Agreement, including with respect to the use of such technology and the physical location and ownership of any such equipment.
Employee Matters Agreement
Baxalta also entered
into an employee matters agreement with Baxter. The employee matters agreement allocates assets, liabilities and responsibilities relating to employee compensation and benefit plans and programs and other related matters in connection with the
separation, including the treatment of outstanding incentive awards and certain retirement and welfare benefit obligations, both in and outside of the United States.
185
The employee matters agreement provides that, unless otherwise specified, Baxalta will be responsible for
liabilities associated with employees who transferred to Baxalta, whether incurred prior to or after the separation, and Baxter will be responsible for liabilities associated with other employees, including employees retained by Baxter and, except
in only a limited number of locations, any former employee.
Baxalta employees generally became eligible to participate in Baxalta benefit plans as of the
distribution date. In general, Baxalta benefit plans contain terms substantially similar to those of the corresponding Baxter plans.
In general, Baxalta
will credit each employee with his or her service with Baxter prior to the separation for all purposes under the Baxalta benefit plans, so long as such crediting does not result in a duplication of benefits.
In accordance with the employee matters agreement, Baxalta has established a deferred compensation plan (the Baxalta DCP), with terms comparable in the
aggregate to those of the Baxter International Inc. and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan as of the distribution date, except that the investment options are different under the Baxalta DCP. Additionally, Baxalta assumed, and has caused the
Baxalta DCP to assume, all liabilities for obligations under the Baxter International Inc. and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan for the benefits of each transferred employee. Also, Baxter and Baxalta have caused the accounts of each
transferred employee participating in the Baxter International Inc. and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan to be transferred to the Baxalta DCP. Baxalta has credited each transferred employees account with the amount deferred by such
person into the Baxter International Inc. and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan as of the employment transfer date (plus employer contributions) and will recognize and honor all deferral and distribution elections made by such individual.
Baxalta has established a U.S. pension plan with terms substantially similar to the corresponding plan at Baxter and non-U.S. pension and retirement plans
(whether defined contribution or defined benefit pension plans) with terms reasonably comparable to the corresponding non-U.S. plans at Baxter; provided that in a limited number of countries the parties will continue to share plans for a
transitional period. The assets and liabilities under the corresponding Baxter plans with respect to transferred employees have been or will be transferred to the corresponding Baxalta plan. Transferred employees are eligible to participate in such
Baxalta plans to the extent they were eligible to participate in the corresponding Baxter plans as of the applicable pension separation date or employment transfer date, and they will receive credit for Baxter service to the extent credited under
the corresponding Baxter Plan and recognition for compensation paid by Baxter that was recognized under the corresponding Baxter plan as though it were compensation paid by Baxalta.
Welfare Plans
Baxalta has established health and welfare
plans with terms comparable in the aggregate to the corresponding Baxter health and welfare plans. Baxalta will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such plans to waive for purposes of initial enrollment all limitations as to preexisting
conditions, service conditions or waiting periods that were not in effect under the corresponding Baxter health and welfare plans as of the employment transfer date, and to take into account eligible expenses incurred by a transferred employee in
the portion of the year prior to the transfer date for purposes of satisfying deductible and other out-of-pocket requirements, as well as prior claim experience with the corresponding Baxter health and welfare plans with respect to maximum benefits
available.
In accordance with the employee matters agreement, Baxter retains liability for claims incurred under the Baxter health and welfare plans,
except that Baxalta is responsible for claims incurred by employees who have transferred to Baxalta. Baxalta shall generally be responsible for disability benefits with respect to transferred employees, subject to exceptions specified in the
employee matters agreement. Following the distribution date, Baxalta employees will generally participate in Baxaltas health and welfare plans. Baxter retains liability for retiree medical and life insurance benefits for employees continuing
with Baxter and for former employees.
186
Equity Compensation Awards
The employee matters agreement provides that the outstanding Baxter equity awards held by Baxter and Baxalta employees are to be treated as described in the
section of this prospectus entitled Executive CompensationExecutive Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements of CompensationEquity-Based Incentive Awards. If local regulations outside the United States or the terms
of any employment agreement do not permit use of any adjustment method described therein or would cause an adverse effect for equity award holders, a compliant alternative adjustment method is to be used.
Trademark License Agreement
Baxalta and Baxter
entered into a transitional trademark license agreement pursuant to which each has granted the other a non-exclusive, royalty-free and worldwide license to use certain of each others trademarks following the separation, with the license
granted to Baxter limited to use by Baxter in its performance of its obligations under the separation transaction agreements. The license to Baxalta allows it to continue using certain of Baxters trademarks (including the Baxter name) in order
to provide sufficient time for Baxalta to rebrand or phase out its use of the licensed marks. Baxalta will use commercially reasonable efforts to take all such actions necessary to allow it to conduct its business without using Baxters
trademarks and will generally discontinue such use as soon as reasonably practicable. In addition to the general requirement that Baxalta discontinue use as soon as reasonably practicable, Baxalta is required to cease all use of the licensed marks
within a specified period of time after the distribution date. If Baxalta is unable to discontinue use of the licensed marks within these time frames, it may request Baxters consent for an extension with such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld. Baxter may immediately terminate its license to Baxalta if Baxalta breaches any of its obligations under the agreement and fails to cure such breach within a reasonable period of time.
Galaxy License Agreement
Baxalta entered into an
intellectual property license agreement with Baxter pursuant to which Baxalta received a perpetual, non-transferrable, non-sublicenseable, royalty-free, fully paid, worldwide license to certain intellectual property known as the Galaxy technology in
order to allow Baxalta to continue using such technology in its plasma-derived products. This license primarily provides Baxalta with the right to Galaxy trademarks, as well as know-how and trade secrets necessary to operate and maintain (but not to
manufacture) equipment using the Galaxy technology. The license is exclusive to Baxalta with respect to the production and packaging of products that are primarily and directly derived from the fractionation of plasma, and Baxaltas rights only
apply to the production and packaging of any of Baxaltas products that are primarily and directly derived from the fractionation of plasma.
The
license rights granted to Baxalta only apply with respect to specified equipment purchased or otherwise transferred from Baxter, and only with respect to the use of such equipment at a list of Baxalta-owned locations agreed upon in advance by Baxter
and Baxalta.
The license is subject to termination in the event of ongoing breach not cured within 45 days, a bankruptcy-related event of the other party
or in connection with any assignment in violation of the agreement. Following any termination or at any time when Baxter has the right to terminate the license agreement, Baxter will have the right to purchase any of the specified equipment to which
the license rights apply or applied at a price equal to the then-current net book value of such equipment.
International Commercial Operations
Agreement
The local separation of Baxaltas business in certain countries outside the United States did not occur prior to the distribution
date due to regulatory requirements, the need to obtain consents from local governmental authorities, and other business reasons. The international commercial operations agreement provides for the conduct of the Baxalta business by Baxter in such
countries until the local separation is completed, and provides that Baxalta will be subject to all the risks and burdens of, and will be entitled to all the rewards generated by, the Baxalta business during such period. The international commercial
operations agreement also governs the process for the local separation of Baxaltas business following the distribution date.
187
Shareholders and Registration Rights Agreement
Baxter and Baxalta entered into a shareholders and registration rights agreement pursuant to which Baxalta agreed that, upon the request of Baxter or
certain subsequent transferees as further defined therein, Baxalta will use its reasonable best efforts to effect the registration under applicable federal and state securities laws of any shares of Baxaltas common stock retained by Baxter.
Baxter exercised a portion of its demand registration rights pursuant to such agreement to cause Baxalta to register the shares to be exchanged in this exchange offer. In addition, Baxter agreed to vote any shares of Baxaltas common stock that
it retains immediately after the distribution in proportion to the votes cast by Baxaltas other stockholders. In connection with such agreement, Baxter grants Baxalta a proxy to vote its shares of Baxaltas retained common stock in such
proportion. Such proxy, however, will be automatically revoked as to a particular share upon any sale or transfer of such share from Baxter to a person other than Baxter, and neither the shareholders and registration rights agreement nor proxy
limits or prohibits any such sale or transfer. The letter agreement among Baxalta, Baxter and Shire entered into in connection with the proposed merger modifies certain aspects of the shareholders and registration rights agreement.
Letter Agreement
On January 11, 2016,
Baxter, Shire and Baxalta entered into a letter agreement (the letter agreement) in connection with the merger, which, among other things, addresses certain aspects of the tax matters agreement and modifies certain aspects of the shareholders
and registration rights agreement.
Under the letter agreement, Baxter agreed under certain circumstances to express its support for the merger and waived
its appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with the merger. Under the letter agreement, Baxter represented to Shire and Baxalta that it had received an opinion from its tax advisor and, in connection with the execution of the merger
agreement, Shire received an opinion from its tax advisor, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (Cravath). In addition, under the letter agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the merger, Baxter, Shire and Baxalta agreed to deliver certain
representation letters to each of Cravath and Baxters tax advisor. The letter agreement provides that Baxter will use its reasonable best efforts to cause its tax advisor to deliver a tax opinion immediately prior to the closing of the merger
as required by the letter agreement, and Shire will use its reasonable best efforts to cause Cravath to deliver immediately prior to the closing of the merger a tax opinion required by the letter agreement.
Under the letter agreement, from and after the closing of the merger, Baxalta agreed to indemnify, and Shire agreed to guarantee such indemnity to, Baxter and
each of its affiliates and each of their respective officers, directors and employees against certain tax-related losses resulting from the merger (other than losses resulting from any disposition of Baxalta common stock by Baxter (i) that are
not attributable to the merger and (ii) other than in the distribution on July 1, 2015 and certain debt-for-equity exchanges, exchange offers, contribution of Baxalta shares to Baxters U.S. pension fund or a dividend distribution to
Baxters stockholders (in each case as contemplated by the letter agreement)).
Under the letter agreement, Shire agreed to cooperate with Baxalta
and Baxter to enable Baxalta to comply with its obligations under the shareholders and registration rights agreement and to use its reasonable best efforts to facilitate Baxters disposition of Baxalta common stock in certain SEC
registered offerings. Each of Shire and Baxalta agreed in the letter agreement not to hold their respective stockholder meetings to approve, and not to consummate, the merger before the earliest of (a) the date that Baxter has completed
marketing periods for two debt-for-equity exchanges and one equity exchange offer with respect to its Baxalta common stock, (b) the date on which Baxter has disposed of all its Baxalta common stock and (c) May 26, 2016 (subject to
tolling or extension (generally to no later than June 25, 2016) under certain circumstances).
The letter agreement may be terminated (a) by
mutual written consent of Shire, Baxalta and Baxter, (b) by Shire or Baxalta upon termination of the merger agreement or (c) upon the closing of the merger, in each case subject to the terms of the letter agreement.
188
Baxalta Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions
Pursuant to Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by Baxalta, the Baxalta Board of Directors or a committee thereof is charged with reviewing related person
transactions regardless of whether the transactions are reportable pursuant to applicable rules of the SEC. For purposes of this policy, a related person transaction includes any transaction in which the company was or is to be a
participant and in which any related person has a direct or indirect material interest other than transactions that involve less than $50,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions. For any related person transaction to be consummated or to
continue, the Board of Directors or the applicable committee thereof must approve or ratify the transaction. The Board of Directors or committee thereof is to approve or ratify a transaction if the Board of Directors or such committee first
determines that such transaction is in Baxaltas best interest. Related person transactions will be reviewed as they arise and are reported to the Board of Directors or applicable committee. The Board of Directors or applicable committee also
reviews materials prepared by the Corporate Secretary to determine whether any related person transactions have occurred that have not been reported. Baxalta has adopted a policy requiring it to disclose all related person transactions in the
companys applicable filings to the extent required by the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
Other than the letter agreement, all of the
transactions with Baxter during 2015 were pursuant to agreements entered into while Baxalta was a wholly owned subsidiary of Baxter and were not approved or ratified pursuant to the policy described above.
189
SECURITY OWNERSHIP BY DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND 5% BENEFICIAL
OWNERS OF BAXTER AND BAXALTA
Baxters Common Stock Ownership by Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Beneficial Owners
The following tables set forth information as of April 11, 2016 regarding beneficial ownership of Baxter common stock by executive officers, directors and
persons known to Baxter to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of Baxter common stock.
Shares are beneficially owned when an individual has voting
and/or investment power over the shares or could obtain voting and/or investment power over the shares within 60 days. Voting power includes the power to direct the voting of the shares and investment power includes the power to direct the
disposition of the shares.
Unless otherwise noted, shares listed below are owned directly or indirectly with sole voting and investment power.
None of the Baxter directors and executive officers, individually or as a group, beneficially owns greater than 1% of Baxters outstanding shares of
Baxter common stock. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with an asterisk (*).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares of
Common Stock
(1)
|
|
|
Shares Under
Exercisable
Options
(2)
|
|
|
Percent
of
Class
(3)
|
|
Non-employee Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Thomas F. Chen
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
9,720
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Uma Chowdhry
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
9,720
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. John D. Forsyth
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
|
|
36,977
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. James R. Gavin III
|
|
|
19,330
|
|
|
|
35,090
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Peter S. Hellman
(4)
|
|
|
14,973
|
|
|
|
35,090
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Munib Islam
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Michael F. Mahoney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Carole J. Shapazian
(6)
|
|
|
9,620
|
|
|
|
25,090
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Thomas T. Stallkamp
(7)
|
|
|
29,143
|
|
|
|
21,110
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. K J. Storm
|
|
|
16,104
|
|
|
|
35,090
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Albert P.L. Stroucken
(8)
|
|
|
16,349
|
|
|
|
35,090
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.
|
|
|
570,438
|
|
|
|
2,911,145
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. James K. Saccaro
|
|
|
12,574
|
|
|
|
90,030
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Robert J. Hombach
(9)
|
|
|
22,868
|
|
|
|
302,175
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. José E. Almeida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Jeanne K. Mason
|
|
|
49,786
|
|
|
|
357,191
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. David P. Scharf
|
|
|
42,167
|
|
|
|
359,450
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Ludwig N. Hantson
|
|
|
39,893
|
|
|
|
360,704
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)
(4)(10)
|
|
|
931,792
|
(11)
|
|
|
5,021,204
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects shares over which the person held voting and/or investment power as of April 11, 2016.
|
(2)
|
Reflects options that are exercisable as of April 11, 2016 and options which become exercisable within 60 days thereafter.
|
(3)
|
Based on 551,530,470 shares outstanding as of April 11, 2016.
|
(4)
|
Includes 560 shares not held directly by Mr. Hellman but held by or for the benefit of his spouse.
|
(5)
|
Mr. Islam has disclaimed beneficial ownership of the RSUs and stock options granted to him in connection with his appointment to the Board, by virtue of his employment relationship with Third Point LLC (Third
Point) as set forth on a related Form 4 filed by Third Point and Daniel Loeb on October 1, 2015. Third Point and Mr. Loeb may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of such securities.
|
190
(6)
|
Includes 6,120 shares not held directly by Ms. Shapazian but in a family trust for which she is a trustee.
|
(7)
|
Includes 22,600 shares not held directly by Mr. Stallkamp but in a spousal lifetime access trust for which he is a trustee.
|
(8)
|
Includes 696 shares not held directly by Mr. Stroucken but in a family trust of which he is a beneficial owner.
|
(9)
|
Includes 24,814 options which are owned by Mr. Hombach in a constructive trust and as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
(10)
|
The number of persons included in this group does not include Messrs. Parkinson and Hombach and Dr. Hantson as they were not executive officers of Baxter as of April 11, 2016.
|
(11)
|
Includes 394 shares not held directly by Mr. Robert Felicelli, Corporate Vice President, Quality, but for the benefit of his spouse and son.
|
As of April 11, 2016, the following entities were the only persons known to Baxter to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of Baxter
common stock, based on public filings made with the SEC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
|
Percent
of Class
(1)
|
|
Third Point LLC
(2)
390 Park Avenue, 19th Floor
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
53,850,000
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
BlackRock, Inc.
(3)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
39,122,504
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Wellington Management Group LLP
(4)
280 Congress Street
Boston, MA 2210
|
|
|
32,929,474
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
The Vanguard Group
(5)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
|
32,092,496
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
(1)
|
Based on 551,530,470 shares outstanding as of April 11, 2016.
|
(2)
|
Based solely on Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13D filed by Third Point and Mr. Loeb, Third Points founder, on September 30, 2015, each of Third Point and Mr. Loeb beneficially own the reported
shares which are held of record by the Third Point funds party to the Third Point Support Agreement. Additionally, as set forth on the Third Point Schedule 13D, each of Third Point and Mr. Loeb has shared voting and dispositive power with
respect to the reported shares.
|
(3)
|
Based solely on Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock) on February 10, 2016 (BlackRock Schedule 13G), BlackRock reported that it beneficially owns the reported shares, which are
owned of record by the BlackRock subsidiaries set forth on Exhibit A to the BlackRock Schedule 13G. Additionally, according to the BlackRock Schedule 13G, BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 34,307,493 of the reported shares, no shared
voting power with respect to any of the reported shares and has sole dispositive power with respect to the reported shares.
|
(4)
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by Wellington Management Group LLP (Wellington Management Group), Wellington
Group Holdings LLP (Wellington Group), Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (Wellington Investment Advisors) and Wellington Management Company LLP (Wellington Management Company) on February 11, 2016 (the Wellington Schedule 13G), the
reported shares are owned of record by clients of one or more of the investment advisors set forth on Exhibit A thereto, which investment advisors are directly or indirectly owned by Wellington Management Group. According to the Wellington Schedule
13G, (i) each of Wellington Management Group, Wellington Group and Wellington Investment Advisors has no sole voting or dispositive power with respect to any of the reported shares, has shared voting power with respect to 10,366,383 of the
reported shares, has shared dispositive power with
|
191
|
respect to 32,929,474 of the reported shares and beneficially own 32,929,474 of the reported shares and (ii) Wellington Management Company has no sole voting or dispositive power with
respect to any of the reported shares, has shared voting power with respect to 9,444,410 of the reported shares, has shared dispositive power with respect to 31,246,877 of the reported shares and beneficially own 31,246,877 of the reported shares.
|
(5)
|
Based solely on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed by The Vanguard Group on February 10, 2016, The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 1,024,823 of the reported shares, has sole dispositive
power with respect to 31,030,806 of the reported shares, has shared voting power with respect to 55,300 of the reported shares and has shared dispositive power with respect to 1,061,690 of the reported shares. Additionally, The Vanguard Group
reported that it may be deemed to beneficially own all of the reported shares.
|
Baxaltas Common Stock Ownership by Directors,
Executive Officers and 5% Beneficial Owners
The following tables set forth information as of April 11, 2016 regarding beneficial ownership of Baxalta
common stock by executive officers, directors and persons known to Baxalta to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of Baxalta common stock.
Shares
are beneficially owned when an individual has voting and/or investment power over the shares or could obtain voting and/or investment power over the shares within 60 days. Voting power includes the power to direct the voting of the shares and
investment power includes the power to direct the disposition of the shares.
Unless otherwise noted, shares listed below are owned directly or indirectly
with sole voting and investment power.
None of the Baxalta directors and executive officers, individually or as a group, beneficially owns greater than
1% of Baxaltas outstanding shares of Baxalta common stock. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with an asterisk (*).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares of
Common Stock
(1)
|
|
|
Shares Under
Exercisable Options
(2)
|
|
|
Percent
of
Class
(3)
|
|
Non-employee Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Blake E. Devitt
|
|
|
27,971
|
|
|
|
47,971
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Karen J. Ferrante
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
5,960
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. John D. Forsyth
|
|
|
28,997
|
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ms. Gail D. Fosler
|
|
|
34,865
|
|
|
|
37,971
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. James R. Gavin III
|
|
|
37,062
|
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Wayne T. Hockmeyer
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
|
46,191
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. François Nader
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
5,960
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Albert P.L. Stroucken
(4)
|
|
|
23,355
|
|
|
|
38,900
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Ludwig N. Hantson
|
|
|
49,561
|
|
|
|
456,682
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Robert J. Hombach
(5)
|
|
|
34,360
|
|
|
|
398,153
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Peter G. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Brian Goff
|
|
|
9,248
|
|
|
|
113,079
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Jacopo Leonardi
(6)
|
|
|
9,224
|
|
|
|
31,110
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)
|
|
|
332,082
|
|
|
|
1,545,844
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects shares over which the person held voting and/or investment power as of April 11, 2016. None of the holdings represents holdings of more than 1% of Baxaltas outstanding common stock.
|
192
(2)
|
Reflects options that are exercisable as of April 11, 2016 and options which become exercisable within 60 days thereafter.
|
(3)
|
Based on 683,082,565 shares outstanding as of April 11, 2016.
|
(4)
|
Includes 696 shares not held directly by Mr. Stroucken but in a family trust of which he is a beneficial owner.
|
(5)
|
Includes 24,814 options which are owned by Mr. Hombach in a constructive trust and as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
(6)
|
Includes 1,094 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Leonardi as of April 11, 2016 in Baxaltas tax-qualified section 401(k) plan, over which Mr. Leonardi has voting and investment power.
|
As of April 11, 2016, the following entity was the only person known to Baxalta to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of Baxalta common
stock, based on public filings made with the SEC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
|
Percent
of Class
(1)
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
(2)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
38,437,301
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
(1)
|
Based on 683,082,565 shares outstanding as of April 11, 2016.
|
(2)
|
Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2016 by BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock) on behalf of itself and its wholly owned subsidiaries, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock
(Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock (Singapore) Limited, BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management, Ireland Limited, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited,
BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Capital Management, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock
Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Japan Co Ltd, BlackRock Life Limited and Xulu, Inc. BlackRock reported that as of December 31, 2015 it had sole
voting power with respect to 33,595,330 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 38,437,301 shares of our common stock, and that the shares are beneficially owned by BlackRock and its wholly owned subsidiaries identified
above. The number of shares held by BlackRock and its related entities may have changed since the filing of the Schedule 13G.
|
193
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
This section addresses all U.S. federal income tax consequences of the exchange offer that Baxter believes are material to holders of Baxter common stock that
exchange shares of Baxter common stock for shares of Baxalta common stock pursuant to the exchange offer. This section is based on the Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code, and interpretations of such authorities by the courts
and the IRS, all as they exist as of the date of this prospectus and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This section is limited to holders of Baxter common stock that are U.S. holders, as defined below, that hold
their shares of Baxter common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. Further, this section does not discuss all tax considerations that may be relevant to holders of Baxter common stock in light of their
particular circumstances, nor does it address the consequences to holders of Baxter common stock subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, such as tax-exempt entities, partnerships (including entities treated as
partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes), persons who acquire such shares of Baxter common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, financial institutions, insurance companies, dealers or
traders in securities, and persons who hold their shares of Baxter common stock as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion, constructive sale, synthetic security, integrated investment or other risk-reduction transaction for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. This section does not address any U.S. federal estate, gift or other non-income tax consequences or any state, local or foreign tax consequences, or the consequences of the Medicare tax on net investment income.
Holders of Baxter common
stock should consult their tax advisors as to the particular tax consequences to them of the exchange offer and the merger.
For purposes of this
section, a U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of Baxter common stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or a resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized under the laws of the United States or any state or political subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust, if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions, or
(ii) in the case of a trust that was treated as a domestic trust under the law in effect before 1997, a valid election is in place under applicable Treasury regulations.
|
If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of Baxter common stock, the tax treatment
of a partner in the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding shares of Baxter common stock and partners in such partnerships should consult their respective tax
advisors regarding the tax consequences of the exchange offer and the merger.
The Proposed Merger with Shire
If the merger is consummated, U.S. holders of Baxter common stock who participate in the exchange offer and continue to hold Baxalta common stock at the
closing of the merger will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the receipt of cash and Shire Securities pursuant to the merger. Baxter intends to take the position that the merger does not alter the tax treatment of the
exchange offer, as described below in The Exchange Offer, to Baxter or U.S. holders of Baxter common stock who participate in the exchange offer; however, there can be no assurances in this regard. For a description of the
potential effect of the merger on the tax treatment of the Baxter Transactions, including this exchange offer, refer to the section of this prospectus
194
entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Proposed Merger with ShireThe merger could result in significant liability to Baxalta and Shire if it causes the Baxter Transactions to
be taxable.
The Exchange Offer
Baxter
received a ruling from the IRS and a tax opinion from KPMG that collectively provided that the distribution on July 1, 2015 qualified as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355, 361 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. Such ruling and tax opinion also
collectively provided for a tax-free exchange of shares of Baxter common stock for shares of Baxalta common stock within 18 months of the distribution. Baxter also received an opinion from KPMG on specific issues relating to the exchange offer.
Based on the forgoing and Baxters belief of the continuing applicability of the IRS ruling, Baxter believes the exchange offer will have the following consequences (subject to the discussion above in The Proposed Merger with
Shire):
|
|
|
Baxter will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
holders of Baxter common stock who participate in the exchange offer will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the receipt of shares of Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
the tax basis of the Baxalta common stock, including any fractional share deemed received, in the hands of a holder of Baxter common stock who exchanges Baxter common stock for Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer
will be, immediately after the exchange offer, the same as the tax basis of the shares of Baxter common stock exchanged therefor;
|
|
|
|
each Baxter stockholders holding period in the Baxalta common stock received in the exchange offer will include the holding period of the Baxter common stock exchanged therefor; and
|
|
|
|
a holder of Baxter common stock who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the tax basis of the
fractional share deemed to be received, as determined above, and the amount of cash received.
|
Although the IRS private letter ruling is
generally binding on the IRS, the continuing validity of such ruling is subject to the completeness of facts and accuracy of factual representations and assumptions made in the ruling. The opinions of KPMG are based upon various factual
representations and assumptions, as well as certain undertakings made by Baxter and Baxalta. If any of the factual representations or assumptions in the IRS private letter ruling or tax opinions are untrue or incomplete in any material respect, an
undertaking is not complied with, or the facts upon which the IRS private letter ruling or tax opinions are based are materially different from the actual facts relating to the exchange offer, the IRS private letter ruling or tax opinions may not be
valid. The opinions of KPMG also are solely limited to the U.S. federal income tax consequences set forth therein and do not address any other tax consequences. Neither the IRS private letter ruling nor the tax opinions took into account the merger.
Moreover, opinions of a tax advisor are not binding on the IRS. As a result, the conclusions expressed in the opinion of a tax advisor could be successfully challenged by the IRS, and if the IRS prevails in such challenge, the tax consequences to a
holder of Baxter common stock who participates in the exchange offer could be materially less favorable.
If the exchange offer were determined not
to qualify as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 361 of the Code, each Baxter stockholder who receives shares of Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer would generally be treated as recognizing gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax
purposes equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares of Baxalta common stock received by the stockholder and its tax basis in the shares of Baxter common stock exchanged therefor, or, in certain circumstances, as receiving a
taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of the shares of Baxalta common stock received by the stockholder. In addition, Baxter would recognize gain with respect to the transfer of Baxalta common stock in the exchange offer and possibly
with respect to certain related transactions.
195
Even if the exchange offer otherwise qualifies as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 361 of the Code,
the exchange offer and other transfers of Baxalta common stock by Baxter could be taxable to Baxter and result in a significant U.S. federal income tax liability to Baxter (but not to holders of Baxter common stock or Baxalta common stock) under
Section 355(e) of the Code if one or more persons acquire a 50-percent or greater interest (measured by vote or value) in the stock of Baxter or in the stock of Baxalta as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the
separation and distribution of Baxters biopharmaceuticals business. The process for determining whether an acquisition is part of a plan or series of related transactions under these rules is complex, inherently factual and subject to
interpretation of the facts and circumstances of a particular case. If Section 355(e) of the Code were to apply, including as a result of the merger, Baxter would recognize gain with respect to the transfer of Baxalta common stock by Baxter in
the exchange offer and possibly with respect to certain related transactions. In certain cases, Baxalta would be required to indemnify Baxter for any resulting taxes and related expenses, which amount could be material.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares
No fractional shares
of Baxalta common stock will be distributed to tendering Baxter stockholders in connection with the exchange offer. All such fractional shares resulting from the exchange offer will be aggregated and sold by the exchange agent, and the proceeds, if
any, less any brokerage commissions or other fees, will be distributed to tendering Baxter stockholders in accordance with their fractional interest in the aggregate number of shares sold. A holder that receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of
Baxalta common stock as a part of the exchange offer will generally recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the cash received for such fractional share and the holders tax basis in the fractional share determined as
described under The Exchange Offer, above. Any such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if a tendering Baxter stockholder held such stockholders tendered stock for more than one year at the time of the
exchange offer. Long-term capital gains generally are subject to preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax for certain non-corporate taxpayers (including individuals). The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations.
Information Reporting and Back-up Withholding
Payments of cash in lieu of a fractional share of Baxalta common stock made in connection with the exchange offer may, under certain circumstances, be subject
to backup withholding unless a holder provides proof of an applicable exemption or a correct taxpayer identification number, and otherwise complies with the requirements of the backup withholding rules. Corporations and non-U.S. holders are
generally exempt from backup withholding, but may be required to provide a certification to establish their entitlement to the exemption. Backup withholding does not constitute an additional tax, but is an advance payment that may be refunded or
credited against a holders U.S. federal income tax liability if the required information is timely supplied to the IRS.
Treasury regulations
require certain holders who are significant distributees (i.e., Baxter shareholders who, immediately before the split-off, (i) owned at least 5% (by vote or value) of the total outstanding stock of Baxter or (ii) owned securities in
Baxter with an aggregate tax basis of $1 million or more, and who receive Baxalta common stock pursuant to the exchange offer) to attach to their U.S. federal income tax returns for the year in which the exchange offer occurs a statement setting
forth certain information with respect to the transaction. Baxter will provide holders of Baxter common stock with the information necessary to comply with this requirement. Holders should consult their tax advisors to determine whether they are
significant distributees required to provide the foregoing statement.
196
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF BAXALTA
The following is a summary of the material terms of Baxaltas capital stock that are contained in Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. The summaries and descriptions below do not purport to be complete statements of the relevant provisions of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation or of the amended and restated bylaws.
The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to these documents, which you must read (along with the applicable provisions of Delaware law) for complete information on Baxaltas capital stock. The amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and the amended and restated bylaws are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
General
Baxaltas authorized capital stock
consists of 2.5 billion shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 100 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Baxaltas Board of Directors may establish the rights and preferences of the preferred stock
from time to time. On June 29, 2015, Baxalta designated 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock as the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in connection with the stockholder rights plan that expired on May 1, 2016. As of April 30, 2016,
683,539,950 shares of Baxaltas common stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
Common Stock
Each holder of Baxalta common stock is
entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted upon by the holders of Baxalta common stock, and there are no cumulative voting rights. Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding preferred stock, holders of Baxalta common
stock will be entitled to receive ratably the dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by its Board of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. If there is a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Baxalta, holders
of its common stock would be entitled to ratable distribution of its assets remaining after the payment in full of liabilities and any preferential rights of any then outstanding preferred stock.
Holders of Baxalta common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions
applicable to the common stock. The powers, preferences and rights of the holders of Baxalta common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that Baxalta may
designate and issue in the future.
Preferred Stock
Under the terms of Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation, its Board of Directors is authorized, subject to limitations prescribed by
the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), and by the amended and restated certificate of incorporation, to issue up to 100 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series without further action by the holders of its common stock.
Baxaltas Board of Directors has the discretion, subject to limitations prescribed by the DGCL and by Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation, to determine the powers, preferences and rights and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof, including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption provisions and liquidation preferences, of each series of preferred stock.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Various Provisions of Delaware Law and Baxaltas Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated
Bylaws
Provisions of the DGCL and Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could make it more
difficult to acquire Baxalta by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise, or to remove incumbent officers and directors. These provisions, summarized below, are expected to
197
discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and takeover bids that its Board of Directors may consider inadequate and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of the company to
first negotiate with Baxaltas Board of Directors. Baxalta believes that the benefits of increased protection of its ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure it outweigh the
disadvantages of discouraging takeover or acquisition proposals because, among other things, negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute
. Baxalta is subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, an anti-takeover statute. In general,
Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years following the time the person became an interested
stockholder, unless the business combination or the acquisition of shares that resulted in a stockholder becoming an interested stockholder is approved in a prescribed manner. Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or
stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Generally, an interested stockholder is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years prior to the
determination of interested stockholder status did own) 15 percent or more of a corporations voting stock. The existence of this provision would be expected to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance
by Baxaltas Board of Directors, including discouraging attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of common stock held by Baxaltas shareholders.
Classified Board
. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that its Board of Directors is to be
divided into three classes. The directors in the first of the three classes have terms expiring at the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. The directors in the second of the three classes have terms expiring at the 2017 annual meeting of
shareholders, and the directors in the third of the three classes have terms expiring at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. Commencing with the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, directors for each class will be elected at the annual meeting
of shareholders held in the year in which the term for that class expires and thereafter will serve for a term of three years. Baxaltas amended and restated bylaws provide that at any meeting of shareholders for the election of directors at
which a quorum is present, the election will be determined by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote in the election, with incumbent directors not receiving a majority of the votes cast required to tender their
resignations for consideration by the Board, except that in the case of a contested election, the election will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote in the election. Under the classified Board
provisions, it would take at least two elections of directors for any individual or group to gain control of Baxaltas Board of Directors. Accordingly, these provisions could discourage a third party from initiating a proxy contest, making a
tender offer or otherwise attempting to gain control of Baxalta.
Removal of Directors
. Baxaltas amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that its shareholders may only remove its directors for cause.
Amendments to Certificate of
Incorporation
. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of its voting stock then outstanding is required to amend certain provisions, including relating to
the number, term and removal of its directors, the filling of its Board vacancies, the calling of special meetings of shareholders, shareholder action by written consent, director and officer indemnification, and the amendment, adoption, alteration
or repeal of Baxaltas amended and restated bylaws.
Amendments to Bylaws
. Baxaltas amended and restated bylaws
provide that they may be amended, adopted, altered or repealed by Baxaltas Board of Directors or may be amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of holders of at least 80% of Baxaltas shares present in person or by proxy and entitled
to vote on the matter at any meeting of the shareholders if notice of such proposed amendment or repeal is contained in the notice of such meeting.
198
Size of Board and Vacancies
. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides that the number of directors on its Board of Directors will be fixed exclusively by its Board of Directors at a number of directors not less than four (4) and not more than thirteen (13). Any vacancies created in its
Board of Directors resulting from any increase in the number of directors or the death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office or other cause may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a
quorum is present, or by a sole remaining director. Any director appointed to fill a vacancy on Baxaltas Board of Directors will be appointed for a term expiring at the next election of the class for which such director has been appointed, and
until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.
Special Shareholder Meetings
. Baxaltas amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that only the chairman of its Board of Directors, its chief executive officer or its Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Board of Directors may call special meetings of
Baxalta shareholders. Shareholders may not call special shareholder meetings.
Shareholder Action by Written Consent
.
Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation expressly eliminates the right of its shareholders to act by written consent. Shareholder action must take place at a duly called annual meeting or a special meeting of Baxalta
shareholders.
Requirements for Advance Notification of Shareholder Nominations and Proposals
. Baxaltas amended and restated
bylaws establish advance notice procedures with respect to shareholder proposals and nomination of candidates for election as directors other than nominations made by or at the direction of its Board of Directors or a committee of its Board of
Directors.
No Cumulative Voting
. The DGCL provides that shareholders are denied the right to cumulate votes in the election of
directors unless the companys certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting.
Undesignated Preferred Stock
. The authority of Baxaltas Board of Directors to issue preferred stock could potentially be used to
discourage attempts by third parties to obtain control of Baxaltas company through a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise by making such attempts more difficult or more costly. Baxaltas Board of Directors is able to issue
preferred stock with voting rights or conversion rights that, if exercised, could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock.
Limitations on Liability, Indemnification of Officers and Directors, and Insurance
The DGCL authorizes corporations to eliminate or limit the personal liability of directors to corporations and their shareholders for monetary damages for
breaches of directors fiduciary duties as directors, and Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation includes such an exculpation provision. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and
restated bylaws include provisions that require Baxalta to indemnify, to the fullest extent allowable under the DGCL, the directors and officers of Baxalta or any of its subsidiaries. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation
and amended and restated bylaws also provide that Baxalta must pay the expenses incurred by the indemnified person in defending or otherwise participating in any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, subject to Baxaltas receipt of an
undertaking from the indemnified party that such party will repay such amount if it is ultimately determined that such party is not entitled to be indemnified by Baxalta. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation expressly
authorizes Baxalta to carry insurance to protect Baxaltas directors and officers against liability asserted against them or incurred by them in any such capacity.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against Baxaltas directors and officers,
even though such an action, if successful, might
199
otherwise benefit Baxalta and its shareholders. However, these provisions do not limit or eliminate Baxaltas rights, or those of any shareholder, to seek non-monetary relief such as
injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a directors duty of care. The provisions do not alter the liability of directors under the federal securities laws. In addition, investments in Baxalta may be adversely affected to the
extent that, in a class action or direct suit, the company pays the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
Exclusive Forum
Baxaltas amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that unless the Board of Directors otherwise determines, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of Baxalta,
any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director or officer of Baxalta to Baxalta or Baxaltas shareholders, creditors or other constituents, any action asserting a claim against Baxalta or any
current or former director or officer of Baxalta arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or any action asserting a claim against Baxalta or any current or former
director or officer of Baxalta that relates to the internal affairs or governance of Baxalta that arises under or by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware. However, if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismisses any such action
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the action may be brought in another state court sitting in the State of Delaware.
Authorized but Unissued
Shares
Baxaltas authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock will be available for future issuance without shareholder
approval unless otherwise required by applicable law, including any stock exchange requirement. Baxalta may use additional shares for a variety of purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, to fund acquisitions and as
employee compensation. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of Baxalta by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or
otherwise.
Listing
Baxaltas common stock is
listed on the NYSE under the symbol BXLT.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for Baxaltas common stock is Computershare:
Computershare
P.O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842-3170
(866) 433-8297
www.computershare.com/investor
200
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
Upon completion of the exchange offer, Baxter stockholders who exchange their shares of Baxter common stock for shares of Baxalta common stock will become
stockholders of Baxalta. These holders rights will continue to be governed by Delaware law and will be governed by Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. Because Baxter and Baxalta are
both organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, differences in the rights of a stockholder of Baxter from those of a stockholder of Baxalta arise principally from provisions of the constitutive documents of each of Baxter and Baxalta.
The following is a summary of certain important differences between Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated
bylaws and Baxters amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. This summary is not a complete statement of the rights of stockholders of the two companies or a complete description of the specific
provisions referred to below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Baxters and Baxaltas constitutive documents (as such documents may be amended), which you should read. Copies of these documents have been filed with
the SEC. To find out where you can get copies of these documents, see Incorporation by Reference.
Authorized Capital Structure and
Liquidation Rights of Baxalta and Baxter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class of Security
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Liquidation
Preference
|
|
Baxalta:
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxalta common stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
2,500,000,000
|
|
|
|
683,539,950
|
|
|
|
683,539,950
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Baxalta preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Baxter:
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxter common stock, par value $1.00 per share
|
|
|
2,000,000,000
|
|
|
|
683,437,055
|
|
|
|
552,108,998
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Baxter preferred stock, no par value
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
100 per share
|
|
(1)
|
As of April 30, 2016.
|
(2)
|
As of April 30, 2016.
|
Stockholders Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxalta
|
|
Baxter
|
Dividend Policy
|
|
Baxalta has no legal or contractual obligation to pay dividends.
|
|
Baxter has no legal or contractual obligation to pay dividends.
|
|
|
|
Voting, Generally
|
|
Baxalta common stock:
one vote per share
each director shall
be elected by the majority (i.e. exceeding 50%) of the votes cast; provided, however, if the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, then a plurality vote
|
|
Baxter common stock:
one vote per share
each director shall
be elected by the majority (i.e. exceeding 50%) of the votes cast; provided, however, if the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, then a plurality vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes cast with respect to a nominee shall exclude abstentions with respect to such nominee.
|
|
Votes cast with respect to a nominee shall exclude abstentions with respect to such
nominee.
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxalta
|
|
Baxter
|
Stockholder Action by Written Consent
|
|
Stockholder actions may not be taken by written consent in lieu of a meeting.
|
|
Stockholder actions may not be taken by written consent in lieu of a meeting.
|
|
|
|
Number of Directors and Size of Board
|
|
Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors, but in no event shall there be
less than four or more than 13 directors. Baxaltas Board of Directors has currently set the number of directors at 9.
|
|
Baxters amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the number of directors may be fixed from time to time by the board of directors but in no event shall be less than nine or more than 17 directors.
Baxters board of directors has currently set the number of directors at 12.
|
|
|
|
Term of Directors
|
|
Directors serve for three-year terms until such directors successor is elected and qualified or until such directors earlier death, resignation or removal.
|
|
Directors serve for three-year terms until such directors successor is elected and qualified or until such directors earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal.
|
|
|
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a director may only be removed for cause and only by the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors.
|
|
Baxters amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws are silent on removal of directors. Pursuant to Section 141(k) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (DGCL), because
Baxter has a classified board, any director or the entire board of directors may be removed by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors only for cause. Baxters stockholders approved an amendment
to Baxters amended and restated certificate of incorporation at Baxters 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to which, if validated by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the classified board structure will be fully eliminated by
2018.
|
|
|
|
Vacancies
|
|
Vacancies are filled by the majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
|
|
Vacancies are filled by the vote of the majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxalta
|
|
Baxter
|
Advance Notice Procedures for a Stockholder Proposal
|
|
In general, a stockholder wishing to nominate a director or raise another proposal must notify Baxalta in writing no less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of
stockholders.
|
|
In general, a stockholder wishing to nominate a director or raise another proposal must notify Baxter in writing no less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of
stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This notice must contain specific information concerning the person to be nominated or the matters to be brought before the meeting as well as specific information concerning the stockholder submitting the proposal.
|
|
This notice must contain specific information concerning the person to be nominated or the matters to be brought before the meeting as well as specific information concerning the stockholder submitting the proposal.
|
|
|
|
Proxy Access
|
|
Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws do not contain any provisions that permit shareholders to nominate directors for inclusion in the proxy statement for Baxaltas
annual meeting to elect directors.
|
|
Beginning with the 2017 annual meeting, eligible Baxter stockholders can nominate, for election to the Baxter board of directors, candidates who will be included in the related proxy statement as a stockholder nominee. Beginning
with the 2017 annual meeting, under the proxy access provisions of Baxters amended and restated bylaws, stockholders can nominate up to two individuals, or 20% of the board of directors (or, if 20% of the board of directors would not be a
whole number, the closest whole number below 20%), whichever is greater, for election at an annual stockholders meeting; provided that the nominating stockholder (or group of up to 20 stockholders) has held at least 3% of Baxters outstanding
shares for at least three years.
|
|
|
|
Calling Special Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
Special meetings of Baxaltas stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer and
president, or by the corporate secretary at the direction of the board of directors.
Stockholders of Baxalta may not call a special meeting.
|
|
Special meetings of Baxters stockholders may be called by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer or by the corporate secretary at the direction of the board of directors or upon request in writing
from holders of at least 25% of the outstanding shares of Baxter common stock entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting.
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxalta
|
|
Baxter
|
Amendment
|
|
Amendments to provisions of Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation generally require a resolution of the board of directors and the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding capital stock entitled to vote; however, certain provisions (i.e., classified board, stockholder action by written consent, limitation on stockholders ability to call a special meeting) require the affirmative vote of at least 80%
of the voting power of all shares then outstanding.
|
|
Amendments to provisions of Baxters amended and restated certificate of incorporation generally require a resolution of the board of directors and the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding capital stock entitled to vote; however, the provisions regarding a classified board may only be amended or repealed with approval of at least two-thirds of Baxters outstanding shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxaltas amended and restated bylaws may be amended by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the board of directors, without the need for stockholder approval. The by-laws may be adopted, amended or repealed by the
affirmative vote of at least 80% of the voting power of all shares then outstanding and entitled to vote at any regular meeting of the stockholders or at any special meeting of the stockholders if notice of such proposed adoption, amendment or
repeal is contained in the notice of such special meeting.
|
|
Baxters amended and restated bylaws may be amended or repealed by (i) the affirmative vote of a majority of the board of directors present at any meeting or (ii) the affirmative vote of a majority of the stock present in
person or by proxy and entitled to vote at any regular or special meeting of the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
Business Combinations with Interested Parties
|
|
Section 203 of the DGCL (relating to business combinations with interested stockholders) applies to Baxalta.
|
|
Section 203 of the DGCL (relating to business combinations with interested stockholders) applies to Baxter.
|
204
LEGAL MATTERS
Stephanie D. Miller, Baxaltas Senior Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and Mayer Brown LLP will pass upon certain legal
matters for us with respect to this offering. Ms. Miller owns shares of, and options on, both Baxalta and Baxter common stock, both directly and as a participant in various stock and employee benefit plans. Baxter is being represented in
connection with the exchange offer by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. The dealer manager is being represented in connection with the exchange offer by Sidley Austin LLP. Sidley Austin LLP has represented Baxter and Baxalta from
time to time on various legal matters unrelated to the exchange offer.
EXPERTS
The consolidated and combined financial statements of Baxalta as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2015 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
The consolidated financial statements and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
(which is included in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting) incorporated in this prospectus by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 of Baxter International Inc. have
been so incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting. With respect to the unaudited financial
information of Baxter International Inc. for the
three-month
periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, incorporated by reference in this prospectus, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reported that it has applied limited
procedures in accordance with professional standards for a review of such information. However, the separate report of said firm dated May 6, 2016 incorporated by reference herein states that the firm did not audit and does not express an opinion on
that unaudited financial information. Accordingly, the degree of reliance on such information should be restricted in light of the limited nature of the review procedures applied. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not subject to the liability provisions
of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for its report on the unaudited financial information because that report is not a report or a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
205
GLOSSARY OF SCIENTIFIC TERMS
Below is a list of additional scientific terms and their respective meanings which are used throughout this prospectus.
Acquired Hemophilia A
:
A rare, potentially life-threatening bleeding disorder, which, unlike congenital hemophilia, typically affects older
adults and occurs in both males and females. In acquired hemophilia A, individuals typically experience subcutaneous, soft tissue, and post-surgical bleeding. The comorbidities in this typically elderly population also pose a particular challenge to
treat serious bleeding episodes.
Biologics
:
Medical products made from a variety of natural sources (human, animal or microorganism)
intended to treat diseases and medical conditions or used to prevent or diagnose diseases; products include vaccines, blood and blood products, allergenic extracts, human cells and tissues, gene therapies and cellular therapies.
Biosimilars
:
A biological product that is highly similar to a U.S.-licensed reference biological product notwithstanding minor differences in
clinically inactive components, and for which there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of the safety, purity, and potency of the product.
Extended Half-Life
:
Prolonged circulation of the replacement clotting factor therapy in the body.
Hemophilia A
:
The most common type of hemophilia which occurs when clotting factor VIII (fVIII), a naturally occurring protein in blood that
controls bleeding, is not present in sufficient amounts or is absent. Without enough fVIII, people with hemophilia can experience spontaneous, uncontrolled internal bleeding that is painful, debilitating, damaging to joints and potentially fatal.
Hemophilia B
:
The second most common type of hemophilia (also known as Christmas disease) and the result of insufficient amounts of
clotting factor IX, a naturally occurring protein in blood that controls bleeding. Hemophilia B is often a debilitating, chronic disease with complications that include bleeding episodes, hemophilic arthropathy (bleeding into a joint) and
hospitalization.
Hyaluronidase
:
A naturally occurring enzyme that temporarily locally degrades hyaluronan (a naturally occurring
space-filling, gel-like substance that is a major component of normal tissues throughout the body, such as skin and cartilage, and abnormal tissues, such as tumors) thereby facilitating the penetration and diffusion of other drugs and fluids that
are injected under the skin.
Hypoalbumenia
:
A medical condition where levels of albumin in blood serum are abnormally low.
Hypogammaglobulinemia
:
Type of primary immunodeficiency disease with a predisposition toward infections that normally are defended against by
antibody responses.
Hypovolemia
:
An abnormal decrease in the volume of blood plasma.
Inhibitor Management Therapy
:
The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to factor VIII (fVIII) or factor IX (fIX) is the most
significant complication of hemophilia treatment. The major morbidity that results from the development of an inhibitor in patients with hemophilia is bleeding that is difficult to treat. Inhibitor management relies initially on immune tolerance
induction, particularly in patients with severe Hemophilia A. Failing that, management depends on hemostatic therapies that bypass the missing clotting factor. Bypassing agents treat bleeding by producing thrombin via pathways that do not require
fVIII or fIX, and include recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates.
Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN)
:
A
rare, auto immune-mediated disorder characterized by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs, most commonly starting with the arms, leading
206
to significant difficulty with simple manual tasks. MMN is caused by disorder/malfunctions in the conduction
pathway of motor nerves, limiting transmission of electrical impulses and if left untreated, often progresses to more severe weakness, including muscle atrophy, involuntary twitching and cramps.
Pharmacokinetic
:
The rate and extent to which a drugs active ingredient is made available to the body and the way it is distributed in,
metabolized by, and eliminated from the human body.
Primary Immunodeficiency (PID)
:
A group of over 150 diseases in which part of the
bodys immune system is missing or does not function properly. Normally, the immune system protects the body from pathogenic microorganisms like bacteria, viruses, and fungi, which can cause infectious diseases. When any part of a persons
immune system is absent or dysfunctional, they are more likely to become infected and may take longer to recover from infections. When a defect in the immune system is inherited, it is called primary immunodeficiency.
von Willebrand Disease (VWD)
:
An autosomal genetic disorder related to quantitative deficits and/or qualitative defects of von Willebrand
Factor, the result of which is impaired hemostasis. It is the most common hereditary coagulation disorder. Many people who have VWD may experience mild symptoms, but some patients can experience severe bleeding events similar to bleeding experienced
by patients with hemophilia.
.
207
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BAXALTA
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Baxalta Incorporated:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated and combined balance sheets and the related consolidated and combined statements of income,
comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Baxalta Incorporated and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated and combined financial statements, the Company changed the manner in
which it accounts for the classification of deferred income tax balances in 2015.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 3, 2016
F-2
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions, except share data)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,001
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts and other current receivables, net
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,708
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
12,329
|
|
|
$
|
8,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value (shares authorized of 2,500,000,000 at December 31, 2015 and zero at December 31, 2014,
shares issued and outstanding of 679,287,500 at December 31, 2015 and zero at December 31, 2014)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net parent company investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
5,747
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
12,329
|
|
|
$
|
8,583
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-3
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,555
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-4
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax benefit (expense) of $0 in 2015, $28 in 2014, and ($14) in 2013
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Pension and other employee benefits, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($14) in 2015, $5 in 2014 and ($2) in 2013
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($6) in 2015, $2 in 2014, and ($3) in 2013
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Hedging activities, net of tax benefit (expense) of ($4) in 2015 and less than $1 in 2014
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-5
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Cash flows from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Business optimization (benefits) charges, net
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit and OPEB cost
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent payment liabilities
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
IPR&D impairment charge
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Changes in balance sheet items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and other current receivables, net
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
Due to/from Baxter International Inc
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business optimization payments
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operations
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1,216
|
)
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
Divestiture of vaccines business
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
$
|
(2,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
(501
|
)
|
|
$
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of obligations
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transactions with Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
(2,455
|
)
|
|
|
(856
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
Proceeds and excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities
|
|
$
|
2,492
|
|
|
$
|
(872
|
)
|
|
$
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,001
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-6
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Net Parent
Company
Investment
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
Total
Equity
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,465
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,351
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
Net transfers to Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,243
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,243
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,179
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Net transfers from Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(433
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(433
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,747
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
Net transfers to Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,374
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,374
|
)
|
Separation-related adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Reclassification of net parent company investment to additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon separation
|
|
|
676,424,202
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Shares issued under employee benefit plans and other
|
|
|
2,863,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
Dividends declared ($0.14 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
679,287,500
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-7
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PREPARATION
Baxalta Incorporated, together with its
subsidiaries, (Baxalta or the company) is a global innovative biopharmaceutical leader with a sustainable portfolio of differentiated therapies that seek to address unmet medical needs across many disease areas, including hematology, immunology and
oncology.
Separation from Baxter
Baxalta was incorporated in Delaware on September 8, 2014. The company separated from Baxter International Inc. (Baxter) on July 1, 2015 (the separation), becoming an independent company as a
result of a pro rata distribution by Baxter of 80.5% of Baxaltas common stock to Baxters shareholders. Baxter retained an approximate 19.5% ownership stake in Baxalta immediately following this distribution. Baxters Board of
Directors approved the distribution of its shares of Baxalta on June 5, 2015. Baxaltas Registration Statement was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 9, 2015. On July 1, 2015,
Baxters shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 17, 2015 received one share of Baxalta common stock for every one share of Baxters common stock held as of the record date. Baxalta common stock began trading
regular way under the ticker symbol BXLT on the New York Stock Exchange on July 1, 2015.
In January 2016, Baxter
exchanged a portion of its retained stake in Baxalta common stock for indebtedness of Baxter held by a third party. The shares of Baxalta common stock exchanged were then sold in a secondary public offering pursuant to a registration statement filed
by Baxalta. Immediately following this transaction, Baxter held approximately 13.9% of Baxaltas total shares outstanding.
Merger
Agreement with Shire
In January 2016, the company announced that it had reached an agreement (merger agreement) with Shire plc (Shire)
under which Shire would acquire Baxalta, forming a global leader in rare diseases. Under the terms of the agreement, Baxalta shareholders will receive $18.00 in cash and 0.1482 Shire American Depository Shares (ADS) per each Baxalta share. The
transaction has been approved by the boards of directors of both Shire and Baxalta. Closing of the transaction is subject to approval by Baxalta and Shire shareholders, certain regulatory approvals, receipt of certain tax opinions and other
customary closing conditions. The transaction is expected to close in mid-2016.
The merger agreement provides for certain termination rights
for both Shire and Baxalta. Upon termination of the merger agreement under certain specified circumstances, Baxalta may be required to disburse to Shire a termination fee of $369 million and Shire may be required to pay the company a termination fee
of $369 million. In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Baxalta, Baxalta may be required to reimburse Shire for transaction expenses up to $110
million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently disbursed by Baxalta), and if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Shire,
Shire may be required to reimburse Baxalta for transaction expenses up to $65 million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently payable by Shire).
Nature of Business
The principal business of the company is the development, manufacture
and marketing of a diverse portfolio of treatments for hemophilia and other bleeding disorders, immune deficiencies, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, burns and shock, and other chronic and acute medical conditions, as well as oncology treatments for
acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The company is also investing in emerging technology platforms, including gene therapy and biosimilars.
F-8
The companys business strategy is aimed at improving diagnosis, treatment and standards of care across
a wide range of bleeding disorders and other rare chronic and acute medical conditions, capitalizing on the companys differentiated portfolio, ensuring the sustainability of supply to meet growing demand for therapies across core disease
areas, and accelerating innovation by developing and launching new treatments while leveraging its expertise into new emerging therapeutics through acquisitions of and collaborations with others.
The companys primary manufacturing facilities are located in the United States, Austria, Switzerland, Singapore and Belgium. The company
distributes its products through its own direct sales force, independent distributors and drug wholesalers, and sells to customers throughout the world.
Basis of Preparation
The accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements
reflect the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations of the company as an independent, publicly-traded company for periods after the July 1, 2015 separation. The consolidated and combined financial statements
reflect the combined financial position and combined results of operations of the company as a combined reporting entity of Baxter for periods prior to the separation.
During 2015, the company recorded certain separation-related adjustments in its statement of changes in equity, resulting in a net $72 million decrease in equity. The adjustments primarily related to
differences in the amount of assets, liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) transferred to Baxalta (transferred items) and the amount of the transferred items reported in the companys combined balance sheet as of
June 30, 2015. In addition, the company reported separation-related adjustments for deferred hedging gains and pension losses reported in AOCI that were assumed during the three months ended June 30, 2015. Additional separation-related
adjustments could be recorded in future periods.
Prior to the separation, the combined financial statements were prepared on a standalone
basis and were derived from Baxters consolidated financial statements and accounting records as if the former biopharmaceuticals business of Baxter had been part of Baxalta. The combined financial statements reflected the companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows as the business was operated as part of Baxter prior to the separation, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).
Prior to the separation, the combined financial statements included the attribution of certain assets and liabilities that were historically held at the
Baxter corporate level but which were specifically identifiable or attributable to the company. All intercompany transactions and accounts within the company were eliminated. All transactions between the company and Baxter were considered to be
effectively settled in the combined financial statements at the time the transaction was recorded. The total net effect of the settlement of the transactions with Baxter were reflected in the combined statements of cash flows in periods prior to the
separation as a financing activity and in the combined balance sheet as net parent company investment.
Prior to the separation, the combined
financial statements included an allocation of expenses related to certain Baxter corporate functions, including senior management, legal, human resources, finance, treasury, information technology, and quality assurance. These expenses were
allocated to the company based on direct usage or benefit where specifically identifiable, with the remainder allocated primarily on a pro rata basis of revenue, headcount, square footage, or other measures. The company considers the expense
methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods prior to the separation. However, the allocations may not be indicative of the actual expense that would have been incurred had the company operated as an independent, publicly traded company
for the periods prior to the separation.
In periods prior to the separation, Baxaltas employees participated in various benefit and
share-based compensation plans maintained by Baxter. A portion of the cost of those plans was included in the companys financial statements. However, the combined balance sheets in periods prior to the separation did not include any equity
related to share-based compensation plans. As of and prior to December 31, 2014, the companys
F-9
combined balance sheets did not include net pension obligations, with the exception of those related to certain plans in Austria. Refer to Note 12 and Note 15 for further description of the
accounting for retirement and other benefit programs and share-based compensation, respectively.
Prior to the separation, the companys
equity balance represented the excess of total assets over total liabilities, including the due to/from balances between the company and Baxter (net parent company investment) and AOCI. Net parent company investment was primarily impacted by
distributions and contributions to or from Baxter, which were the result of treasury activities and net funding provided by or distributed to Baxter, including a $4 billion cash distribution made by Baxalta to Baxter in June 2015. In connection with
the separation, the companys net parent company investment balance was reclassified to additional paid-in capital.
NOTE 2
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the company to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts
and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications
had no effect on previously reported results of operations or shareholders equity.
Revenue Recognition
The company recognizes revenues from product sales when earned. Specifically, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. For product sales, revenue is not recognized until title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. The shipping terms for the majority of
the companys revenue arrangements indicate title and risk of loss pass at delivery. Provisions for rebates, chargebacks to wholesalers and distributors, returns, and discounts are provided for at the time the related sales are recorded, and
are reflected as a reduction of sales.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include cash, time deposits, certificate of deposits and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
In the normal course of business, the company provides credit to its customers and maintains reserves for potential credit losses. The companys allowance for doubtful accounts was $11 million, $20
million and $21 million as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015 was primarily due to reserves in countries with operations
that have not yet transferred to Baxalta, which were reported in the companys combined reserves as of December 31, 2014 but not in its consolidated reserves as of December 31, 2015. Refer to Note 17 for additional information
regarding operations in countries that have not yet transferred from Baxter to Baxalta.
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
F-10
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. Market value for
raw materials is based on replacement costs, and market value for work in process and finished goods is based on net realizable value.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
2,259
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
6,567
|
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,533
|
)
|
|
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (PP&E), net
|
|
$
|
5,034
|
|
|
$
|
4,192
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets,
which range from 20 to 50 years for buildings and improvements and from three to 15 years for machinery and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the related facility lease (including any renewal periods, if appropriate)
or the asset, whichever is shorter. Machinery and equipment includes capitalized software costs, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the software. The companys policy is to place construction in
process assets in service and begin depreciation when the asset is ready for its intended use.
Depreciation expense was $204 million in 2015,
$189 million in 2014, and $168 million in 2013. The companys accumulated depreciation balance did not significantly change from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Increases resulting from depreciation expense were offset
primarily by disposals of assets that had previously been fully depreciated or impaired and cumulative translation adjustments (CTA).
Gross
assets recorded under capital leases and reported in buildings and leasehold improvements and construction in progress were $339 million and $283 million as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and associated
accumulated depreciation was $7 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Acquisitions
Results of operations of acquired companies are included in the companys results of operations as of the respective acquisition
dates. The purchase price of each acquisition is allocated to the net assets acquired based on estimates of their fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any purchase price in excess of these net assets is recorded as goodwill. The allocation of
purchase price in certain cases may be subject to revision based on the final determination of fair values during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date.
Contingent consideration is recognized at the estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of contingent
considerations are recognized in earnings.
Research and Development
Research and development (R&D) costs are expensed as incurred. Pre-regulatory approval contingent milestone obligations to counterparties in collaborative arrangements are expensed when the milestone
is achieved. Payments made to counterparties on or after regulatory approval are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the related product. Amounts capitalized for such payments are included in other intangible assets, net of
accumulated amortization.
F-11
Acquired in-process R&D (IPR&D) is the value assigned to products under development acquired in a
business combination which have not received regulatory approval and have no alternative future use. Acquired IPR&D is capitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. Development costs incurred after the acquisition date are expensed as
incurred. Upon receipt of regulatory approval of the related product, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset and generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of the
related product, subject to annual impairment reviews as discussed below. If the R&D project is abandoned, the indefinite-lived asset is charged to expense.
Collaborative Arrangements
The company enters into collaborative arrangements in the
normal course of business. These collaborative arrangements take a number of forms and structures, and are designed to enhance and expedite long-term sales and profitability growth. These arrangements generally provide that the company obtain
commercialization rights to a product under development. The agreements often require the company make upfront payments and include additional contingent milestone payments relating to the achievement of specified development, regulatory and
commercial milestones, as well as royalty payments. The company may also be responsible for other on-going costs associated with the arrangements, including R&D cost reimbursements to the counterparty.
Royalty payments are expensed as cost of sales when they become due and payable. Any purchases of product from the partner during the development stage
are expensed as R&D, while such purchases during the commercialization phase are capitalized as inventory and recognized as cost of sales when the related finished products are sold. The company presents upfront payments to collaboration
partners as investing activities and milestone payments as operating activities in the consolidated and combined statements of cash flows.
Business Optimization Charges
The
company records liabilities for costs associated with exit or disposal activities in the period in which the liability is incurred. Employee termination costs are primarily recorded when actions are probable and estimable. Costs for one-time
termination benefits in which the employee is required to render service until termination in order to receive the benefits are recognized ratably over the future service period.
Goodwill
Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an impairment review annually and
whenever indicators of impairment exist. Goodwill would be impaired if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeded the fair value of that reporting unit. For the annual impairment review, the company may elect to complete a qualitative
assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value and, if the company determines it is not, then it would not be required to calculate the fair value of the reporting
unit. If the company elects to bypass the qualitative assessment or determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then the company would calculate the fair value of the
reporting unit using the present value of estimated cash flows discounted using a risk-free market rate adjusted for a market participants view of similar companies and perceived risks in the cash flows. If the carrying value of the
reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the implied fair value of goodwill is determined by subtracting the fair value of all identifiable net assets other than goodwill from the fair value of the reporting unit, with an
impairment charge recorded for the excess, if any, of carrying amount of goodwill over the implied fair value.
Intangible Assets Not
Subject to Amortization
Indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as acquired IPR&D, are subject to an impairment review annually and
whenever indicators of impairment exist. Indefinite-lived intangible assets would be impaired if the carrying amount of the asset exceeded the fair value of the asset.
F-12
Other Long-Lived Assets
The company reviews the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, other than goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization, for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In evaluating recoverability, the company groups assets and liabilities at the lowest level such that the identifiable cash flows relating to the company are largely independent
of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. The company then compares the carrying amounts of the assets or asset groups with the related estimated undiscounted future cash flows. In the event impairment exists, an impairment charge is
recorded as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the fair value.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Provisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes are calculated on reported
pre-tax earnings based on current tax laws. Deferred taxes are provided using enacted tax rates on the future tax consequences of temporary differences, which are the differences between the financial statement carrying amount of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and the tax benefits of carryforwards. A valuation allowance is established or maintained when, based on currently available information, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax
asset will not be realized.
With respect to uncertain tax positions, the company determines whether the position is more likely than not to
be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. Any tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured and recognized in the consolidated financial statements at the largest amount of
benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The liability relating to uncertain tax positions is classified as current in the consolidated balance sheets to the extent the company anticipates making a payment
within one year. Interest and penalties associated with income taxes are classified in the income tax expense line in the consolidated statements of income.
In the companys financial statements for periods prior to July 1, 2015, income tax expense and tax balances were calculated as if the company was a separate taxpayer, although the
companys operations were included in tax returns filed by Baxter. After separation on July 1, 2015, income tax expense and income tax balances represent the companys federal, state and foreign income taxes as an independent company.
Prior to the separation, Baxalta maintained an income taxes payable to/from account with Baxter. Baxalta is deemed to have settled current
tax balances with the Baxter taxpaying entities in the respective jurisdictions. These settlements were reflected as changes in net parent company investment.
As a standalone entity, the company will file tax returns on its own behalf and its deferred taxes and effective tax rate may not be comparable to those in historical periods.
New Accounting Standards
In February
2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is to be
applied using a modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the company beginning on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The
company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB
issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 requires that equity investments, except those accounted for under
the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee, to be measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net income. In addition, the ASU requires a qualitative assessment of equity
investments without readily
F-13
determinable fair values when assessing impairment, the evaluation of a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities and certain presentation and
disclosures for financial instruments. ASU
2016-01
is applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, which will be January 1, 2018.
Early adoption is not permitted. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as
noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than being separated into current and noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 31, 2016. Early adoption is permitted, and the
company has elected to early adopt on a retroactive basis, which resulted in certain reclassifications to the December 31, 2014 combined balance sheet as further described in Note 14.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which clarifies that inventory should be measured at the lower of cost or net
realizable value. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 will be effective for
the company beginning on January 1, 2016, and prospective application is required. Early adoption is permitted. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, IntangiblesGoodwill and OtherInternal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40):
Customers Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, which provides guidance to customers about how to account for cloud computing arrangements when such arrangements include software licenses. ASU No. 2015-05 will be
effective for the company beginning on January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The standard may be applied retrospectively or prospectively. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30):
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent
with debt discounts. ASU No. 2015-03 will be effective for the company beginning on January 1, 2016, and retrospective application is required. Early adoption is permitted, and the company has adopted Accounting Standard Codifications ASC
No. 2015-03 effective June 30, 2015. Refer to Note 8 for additional information.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (ASU 2014-09), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be
entitled to when products are transferred to customers. In July 2015, the FASB voted to approve a one-year deferral on the original effective date of January 1, 2017; therefore ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for the company beginning on
January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective date. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of
adoption. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new revenue standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (ASU 2014-08), which amends the definition of a discontinued operation in ASC 205-20 and provides additional
requirements for the entities with its disposal transaction to qualify as a discontinued operation. ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for all disposals beginning on or after December 15, 2014 (with early adoption permitted). The company
did not early adopt the new guidance and it was effective for the company for periods beginning with its first interim period ending March 31, 2015. ASU
2014-08
did not have a material impact on the
consolidated and combined financial statements upon adoption.
F-14
NOTE 3
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Net Interest Expense
As described in Note 8, the company issued senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $5 billion in June 2015. Prior to the issuance of the senior
notes, Baxters third-party debt and the related interest expense were not allocated to the company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Interest costs
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest costs capitalized
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Income) Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net gains related to investments
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
Change in fair value of contingent payment liabilities
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Due from Baxter International Inc
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Employee compensation and withholdings
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Accrued rebates
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Due to Baxter International Inc
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, payroll and certain other taxes
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Other
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
|
$
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Pension and other employee benefits
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Contingent payment liabilities
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Due to Baxter International Inc
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
|
F-15
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
Non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
Assets acquired through capital lease obligations
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
Interest and taxes paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Interest paid, excluding portion capitalized
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the separation, the companys current income tax payables were deemed to be settled with Baxter. Income
taxes paid reflect payments in the second half of 2015 following the separation. Interest paid in the table primarily reflects payments associated with the companys June 2015 debt issuance as further described in Note 8.
Dividends and Share Repurchase Authorization
On February 23, 2016, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share of common stock. The quarterly dividend is payable on April 1, 2016 to shareholders of record
as of the close business on March 10, 2016. On November 17, 2015, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share of common stock. The quarterly dividend was paid on January 4, 2016 to shareholders
of record as of the close of business on December 4, 2015. On July 28, 2015, Baxaltas Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share of common stock. The quarterly dividend was paid on October 1, 2015,
to shareholders of record as of the close of business on September 4, 2015. Pursuant to the merger agreement with Shire, the company is prohibited from declaring a quarterly cash dividend in excess of $0.07 per share.
On July 28, 2015, Baxaltas Board of Directors also approved a share repurchase authorization which allows the company to repurchase up to
$1 billion of its common stock. The company did not repurchase any of its common stock during 2015, and pursuant to the merger agreement with Shire, the company may not repurchase or otherwise acquire its own common stock.
NOTE 4
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The denominator for basic earnings per common
share (EPS) is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share units (PSUs) is reflected in the denominator for diluted
EPS using the treasury stock method. The numerator for both basic and diluted EPS is net income, net income from continuing operations, or income from discontinued operations, net of tax.
On July 1, 2015, Baxter distributed approximately 544 million shares of Baxalta common stock to its shareholders and retained an additional 132 million shares. The computation of basic EPS
for periods prior to the separation was calculated using the shares distributed and retained by Baxter on July 1, 2015 totaling 676 million. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS for periods prior to the separation
included 5 million of diluted common share equivalents for stock options, RSUs and PSUs as calculated using the treasury stock method as of July 1, 2015, as these share-based awards were previously issued by Baxter and outstanding at the
time of separation and were assumed by Baxalta following the separation.
F-16
The following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Basic shares
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted EPS excluded 16 million equity awards for 2015 and 19 million equity awards for each
of 2014 and 2013 as their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted EPS.
NOTE 5
ACQUISITIONS AND COLLABORATIONS
Acquisitions
The following table summarizes the fair value of consideration transferred and the recognized amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of
the acquisition date for the companys material acquisitions during 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
ONCASPAR
|
|
|
SuppreMol
|
|
|
Chatham
|
|
|
AesRx
|
|
|
Inspiration/Ipsen
OBIZUR
|
|
Consideration transferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Fair value of contingent payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
Fair value of consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable net assets
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
|
While the valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are substantially complete, measurement period
adjustments for the acquisitions in 2015 may be recorded in the future as the company finalizes its fair value estimates. Pro forma financial information has not been included because the acquisitions, individually and in the aggregate, would not
have had a material impact on the companys consolidated and combined results of operations.
ONCASPAR Business Acquisition
In July 2015, the company acquired the ONCASPAR (pegaspargase) product portfolio from Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A (Sigma-Tau), a privately
held biopharmaceutical company based in Italy, through the acquisition of 100% of the shares of a subsidiary of Sigma-Tau. Through the acquisition, the company gained the marketed biologic treatment ONCASPAR, the investigational biologic
calaspargase pegol, and an established oncology infrastructure with clinical and sales resources. ONCASPAR is a first-line biologic used as part of a chemotherapy regimen to treat patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. As of the acquisition
date, it was marketed in the United States, Germany, Poland and certain other countries, and recently received EU approval. The acquired net assets comprised a business based on the acquired inputs, processes and outputs. As a result, the
transaction was accounted for as a business combination.
F-17
The company allocated $794 million of the total consideration to developed technology, which reflected
rights to the ONCASPAR product portfolio. The developed technology is being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 16 years. Long-term liabilities acquired consist primarily of deferred tax liabilities. The goodwill,
which is not deductible for tax purposes, includes the value of potential future technologies as well as the overall strategic benefits of the acquisition to the company and its oncology pipeline.
The purchase price allocations described above reflect measurement period adjustments recorded in the fourth quarter of 2015 as the company substantially
completed its estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The measurement period adjustments included increases of $13 million, $5 million and $3 million to intangible assets, inventory and long-term liabilities,
respectively. The adjustments resulted in a corresponding decrease in goodwill of $15 million. The measurement period adjustments did not have a material impact on the companys results of operations.
Historical annual sales for ONCASPAR were approximately $100 million, and the company has recorded ONCASPAR net sales of $87 million from the acquisition
date through December 31, 2015. The company incurred acquisition-related costs of $17 million during 2015, which were primarily recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
SuppreMol Acquisition
In March 2015, the company acquired all of the outstanding shares of
SuppreMol GmbH (SuppreMol), a privately held biopharmaceutical company based in Germany. Through the acquisition, the company acquired SuppreMols early-stage pipeline of treatment options for autoimmune and allergic diseases, as well as its
operations in Munich, Germany. The acquired investigational treatments will complement and build upon the companys immunology portfolio and offer an opportunity to expand into new areas with significant market potential and unmet medical needs
in autoimmune diseases. The acquired net assets comprised a business based on the acquired inputs, processes and outputs. As a result, the transaction has been accounted for as a business combination.
The company allocated $179 million of the total consideration to IPR&D, which is being accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. The
acquired IPR&D primarily relates to SuppreMols lead candidate
SM-101,
an investigational immunoregulatory treatment, which had completed Phase IIa studies at the time of the acquisition. This project
was expected to be completed in approximately 5 years as of the acquisition date. The value of the IPR&D was calculated using cash flow projections adjusted for the inherent technical, regulatory, commercial and obsolescence risks in such
activities, discounted at a rate of 20%. Additional R&D will be required prior to regulatory approval, and as of the acquisition date, incremental R&D costs were projected to be in excess of $400 million. Other assets acquired included
deferred tax assets of $17 million and long-term liabilities acquired included $52 million of deferred tax liabilities. The goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes, includes the value of potential future technologies as well as the
overall strategic benefits of the acquisition to the company.
AesRx, LLC Acquisition
In June 2014, the company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in AesRx, LLC (AesRx), obtaining AesRxs program related to the
development and commercialization of treatments for sickle cell disease.
The company made an initial payment of $15 million, and as of the
acquisition date may make additional payments of up to $278 million related to the achievement of development and regulatory milestones, in addition to sales milestones of up to $550 million. The estimated fair value of the contingent payment
liabilities at the acquisition date was $65 million, which was recorded in long-term liabilities, and was calculated based on the probability of achieving the specified milestones and the discounting of expected future cash flows.
F-18
The company allocated $78 million of the total consideration to acquired IPR&D, which was accounted for
as an indefinite-lived intangible asset, with the residual consideration of $2 million recorded as goodwill. The acquired IPR&D related to AesRxs sickle cell disease program, which was in Phase II clinical trials at the time of the
acquisition, and was expected to be completed in approximately five years. The value of IPR&D was calculated using cash flow projections adjusted for the inherent technical, regulatory, commercial and obsolescence risks in such activities,
discounted at a rate of 15.5%. Additional R&D was required prior to obtaining regulatory approval and, as of the acquisition date, incremental R&D costs were projected to be in excess of $40 million.
During 2015, the company decided not to pursue further development activities related to the acquired project. The company recorded a charge of $81
million in R&D expenses to fully impair the acquired IPR&D and a gain of $66 million resulting primarily from the reduction of the fair value of contingent payment liabilities to zero as of December 31, 2015.
Chatham Therapeutics, LLC Acquisition
In April 2014, the company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in Chatham Therapeutics, LLC (Chatham), obtaining potential treatments for
hemophilia B utilizing Chathams gene therapy technology.
The company made an initial payment of $70 million, and as of the acquisition
date may make additional payments of up to $560 million related to the achievement of development, regulatory and first commercial sale milestones, in addition to other sales milestones of up to $780 million. The estimated fair value of the
contingent payment liabilities at the acquisition date was $77 million, which was recorded in long-term liabilities, and was calculated based on the probability of achieving the specified milestones and the discounting of expected future cash flows.
As of December 31, 2015, the estimated fair value of the contingent payments was $74 million, with changes in the estimated fair value recognized in other (income) expense, net within the consolidated and combined statements of income. Refer to
Note 10 for additional information regarding the contingent payment liability.
The company allocated $74 million of the total consideration
to acquired IPR&D, which is being accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset, with the residual consideration of $73 million recorded as goodwill. The acquired IPR&D primarily relates to Chathams hemophilia A (factor VIII)
program, which was in preclinical stage at the time of the acquisition and was expected to be completed in approximately 10 years as of the acquisition date. The value of the IPR&D was calculated using cash flow projections adjusted for the
inherent technical, regulatory, commercial and obsolescence risks in such activities, discounted at a rate of 12%. Additional R&D will be required prior to obtaining regulatory approval and, as of the acquisition date, incremental R&D costs
were projected to be in excess of $130 million. The goodwill, which may be deductible for tax purposes depending on the ultimate resolution of the contingent payment liabilities, includes the value of potential future technologies as well as the
overall strategic benefits of the acquisition to the company in the hemophilia market.
Inspiration / Ipsen Acquisition
In March 2013, the investigational hemophilia compound OBIZUR and related assets were acquired from Inspiration BioPharmaceuticals, Inc. (Inspiration),
and certain other OBIZUR related assets, including manufacturing operations, were acquired from Ipsen Pharma S.A.S. (Ipsen) in conjunction with Inspirations bankruptcy proceedings. Ipsen was Inspirations senior secured creditor and had
been providing Inspiration with debtor-in-possession financing to fund Inspirations operations and the sales process. Additionally, Ipsen was the owner of certain assets acquired in the transaction.
OBIZUR is a recombinant porcine factor VIII that was approved in the United States in 2014 and in Canada and Europe in 2015 for the treatment of patients
with acquired hemophilia A, and is being investigated for the treatment of congenital hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.
F-19
The estimated fair value of contingent payment liabilities at the acquisition date was $269 million, based
on the probability of achieving the specified milestones, of up to $135 million, and sales-based payments, and the discounting of expected future cash flows. The estimated fair value of contingent payment liabilities was recorded in other long-term
liabilities as part of the consideration transferred. As of December 31, 2015, the estimated fair value of the contingent payments was $360 million, with changes in the estimated fair value recognized in other (income) expense, net within the
consolidated and combined statements of income. Refer to Note 10 for additional information regarding the contingent payment liability.
Goodwill of $7 million principally included the value associated with the assembled workforce at the acquired manufacturing facility. The goodwill is
deductible for tax purposes. Other intangible assets of $288 million related to acquired IPR&D activities, and the total was accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date. The value of the IPR&D was calculated
using cash flow projections adjusted for the inherent technical, regulatory, commercial and obsolescence risk associated with such activities, discounted at a rate of 13%. In 2014, the acquired IPR&D was reclassified as a definite-lived
intangible asset following regulatory approval. It is being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 15 years.
Collaborations
Precision BioSciences
In February 2016, Baxalta entered into a strategic immuno-oncology collaboration with Precision BioSciences (Precision), a private
biopharmaceutical company based in the United States, specializing in genome editing technology. Together, Baxalta and Precision will develop chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies for up to six unique targets, with the first program
expected to enter clinical studies in late 2017. On a product-by-product basis, following successful completion of early-stage research activities up to Phase 2, Baxalta will have exclusive option rights to complete late-stage development and
worldwide commercialization. Precision is responsible for development costs for each target prior to option exercise. The company will make an upfront payment of $105 million to Precision, which will be recorded as R&D expense in the first
quarter of 2016. The company may make additional payments related to option fees and development, regulatory, and commercial milestones totaling up to $1.6 billion, in addition to future royalty payments on worldwide sales. Precision also has the
right to participate in the development and commercialization of any licensed products resulting from the collaboration through a 50/50 co-development and co-promotion option in the United States.
Symphogen
In December 2015, the company
entered into a research, option and commercial agreement with Symphogen, a private biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Denmark that is developing recombinant antibodies and antibody mixtures. Under the terms of the agreement, the company has
options to obtain exclusive licensing rights for three specified proteins in development for the treatment of immune-oncology diseases as well as three additional proteins that may be selected at a later date. Each option is exercisable for a period
of 90 days when each protein is ready for Phase II clinical trials. Symphogen is responsible for development costs for each protein until option exercise, at which point Baxalta would be responsible for development costs.
The company made an upfront payment of $175 million in January 2016, which was recognized as R&D expense in 2015 upon entering into the agreement.
Each option exercise fee is variable depending on when it is exercised, with a maximum exercise price of up to 20 million for each protein. The company may make additional payments of up to approximately 1.2 billion related to
development, regulatory and commercial milestones achieved after option exercise for all six proteins, in addition to future royalty payments.
SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group
In June 2015,
the company entered into an agreement with SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group (SFJ) relating to adalimumab (BAX 923), whereby SFJ will fund up to $200 million of specified development costs related to the companys BAX 923 program, in exchange for
payments in the event the product obtains regulatory approval in
F-20
the United States or Europe. The terms of the agreement include funding limitations of up to $50 million for incurred costs through Phase I development and cumulative spending caps in six month
intervals through December 31, 2017. The contingent success payments total approximately 5.5 times the incurred development costs and are payable in annual installments over an approximate eight-year period following the dates of regulatory
approval. The development funding from SFJ is being recognized as an offset to R&D expenses as incurred because there is substantive and genuine transfer of risk to SFJ. The R&D expense offset for 2015 totaled $58 million. BAX923 is one of
the biosimilars in which the company is collaborating with Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as further described below.
Merrimack
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
In September 2014, the company entered into an exclusive license agreement with Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Merrimack) relating to the development and commercialization of MM-398 (nanoliposomal irinotecan injection), also known as nal-IRI. The arrangement includes all potential indications for MM-398 across all markets with the exception of
the United States and Taiwan. The first indication being pursued is for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. In 2014, the company recognized an R&D charge of $100
million related to the upfront payment. Upon entering into the agreement, the company had the potential to make future payments of up to $870 million related to the achievement of development, regulatory, and commercial milestones, in addition to
royalty payments.
CTI BioPharma Corp.
In November 2013, the company acquired approximately 16 million shares of CTI BioPharma Corp. (CTI BioPharma), which was formerly named Cell Therapeutics, Inc., common stock for $27 million. The
company also entered into an exclusive worldwide licensing agreement with CTI BioPharma to develop and commercialize pacritinib, a novel investigational JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor with activity against genetic mutations linked to myelofibrosis, leukemia
and certain solid tumors. At the time the company entered into the agreement, pacritinib was in Phase III development for patients with myelofibrosis, a chronic malignant bone marrow disorder. Under the terms of the agreement, the company gained
commercialization rights for all indications of pacritinib outside the United States, while the company and CTI BioPharma will jointly commercialize pacritinib in the United States. Under the terms of the initial agreement, CTI BioPharma is
responsible for the funding of the majority of development activities as well as the manufacture of the product. In 2013, the company recognized an R&D charge of $33 million related to an upfront payment. Upon entering into the agreement, the
company had the potential to make future payments of up to $302 million related to the achievement of development, regulatory and commercial milestones, in addition to future royalty payments.
In June 2015, the company entered into an amendment with CTI BioPharma Corp (CTI BioPharma). Pursuant to the amendment, the company paid $32 million to
CTI BioPharma relating to two contingent milestone payments included in the original agreement. The company obtained certain additional rights relating to manufacturing and supply, and CTI BioPharma committed to spend a specified amount on the
development of pacritinib through February 2016, with failure to do so resulting in payments to the company equal to the deficiency.
Coherus Biosciences, Inc.
In August 2013, the company entered into an exclusive license agreement with Coherus Biosciences, Inc. (Coherus) to develop and commercialize a biosimilar to ENBREL
®
(etanercept) for Europe, Canada, Brazil and certain other markets. The company also has the right of first refusal
to certain other biosimilars in the collaboration. Under the terms of the agreement, Coherus is responsible for the development plan, preparation of regulatory filings, and manufacture of the product, subject to certain cost reimbursement by the
company. The company can terminate the agreement if certain costs exceed a specific cap. In 2013, the company recognized an R&D charge of $30 million related to its decision to pursue the development of etanercept. Upon entering into the
agreement, the company had the potential to make future payments of up to $169 million relating to the achievement of development and regulatory milestones, in addition to future royalty payments.
F-21
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
In February 2012, the company entered into an exclusive license agreement with Momenta to develop and commercialize biosimilars. The arrangement includes specified funding by the company, as well as other
responsibilities, relating to development and commercialization activities. In 2012, the company recognized an R&D charge of $33 million related to an upfront payment. Upon entering into the agreement, the company had the potential to make
future payments of up to approximately $202 million related to the exercise of options to develop additional products and the achievement of technical, development and regulatory milestones for these products, in addition to future royalty payments
and potential profit-sharing payments.
Payments to Collaboration Partners
R&D expenses related to payments to collaboration partners were $430 million, $242 million and $80 million during 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Expenses related to upfront payments were $175
million, $100 million and $63 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively; and expenses related to milestone payments were $215 million, $117 million and $15 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The remainder primarily related to
R&D cost reimbursements. Payments to collaboration partners classified in cost of sales were not significant in 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Unfunded Contingent Payments
At
December 31, 2015, the companys unfunded contingent milestone payments associated with all of its collaborative arrangements totaled $2.1 billion. This total includes contingent payments associated with the SFJ agreement related to
development costs funded through December 31, 2015. This total excludes contingent royalty and profit-sharing payments, contingent payment liabilities arising from business combinations, which are further discussed in Note 11, and potential
milestone payments and option exercise fees associated with the Symphogen arrangement because they would be payable only if the company chooses to exercise one or more of its options. Based on the companys projections, any contingent payments
made in the future will be more than offset by the estimated net future cash flows relating to the rights acquired for those payments.
NOTE 6
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The following is a summary of the activity in goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
75
|
|
Currency translation and other adjustments
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
281
|
|
Currency translation and other adjustments
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
|
The additions during 2015 related to the acquisition of the ONCASPAR business and SuppreMol. The additions during 2014
primarily related to the acquisition Chatham. These acquisitions are further discussed in Note 5.
As of December 31, 2015, there were no
accumulated goodwill impairment losses.
F-22
Other intangible assets, net
The following is a summary of the companys other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Developed
technology,
including patents
|
|
|
Other amortized
intangible assets
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived
intangible assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross other intangible assets
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross other intangible assets
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
|
The increase in other intangible assets, net during the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to IPR&D
acquired in the acquisition of SuppreMol and developed technology acquired in the acquisition of the ONCASPAR business, partially offset by an impairment charge on IPR&D from the AesRx acquisition, as further described in Note 5, amortization
expense and CTA.
Intangible asset amortization expense was $53 million and $16 million in the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. The following table presents anticipated annual amortization expense for 2016 through 2020 for definite-lived intangible assets recorded as of December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Anticipated annual intangible asset amortization expense
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
BUSINESS OPTIMIZATION ITEMS
Prior to the separation, the company participated
in business optimization plans initiated by Baxter. The companys total charges (benefits) related to business optimization plans are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Charges
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
Reserve adjustments
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total business optimization (benefits) expenses
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
Business optimization (benefits) expenses in continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
During 2015, the company adjusted certain previously estimated business optimization charges resulting in a $17 million
benefit. The adjustments were primarily due to lower severance payments than previously estimated from business optimization programs in prior years. The 2015 period also included charges of $5 million in selling, general and administrative expenses
primarily relating to re-alignment of certain functions. During 2014, the company recorded charges of $2 million in cost of sales, $1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses and $22 million in R&D expenses (with an additional $8
million recorded in discontinued operations). The charges during 2014 primarily related to re-alignment of certain R&D activities and rationalization of manufacturing facilities. During 2013, the company recorded charges of $5 million in cost of
sales, $3 million in selling, general and administrative expenses and $24 million in R&D expenses (with an additional $101 million recorded in discontinued operations). The charges during 2013 included severance and other non-cash impairment
losses associated with the discontinuation of certain R&D programs associated with the vaccines business.
F-23
The following table summarizes activity in the reserves related to business optimization initiatives:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Reserves as of December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
5
|
|
Reserve adjustments
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Separation-related adjustments and other
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Utilization
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
Reserves as of December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
Separation-related adjustments and other included a reduction in the companys business optimization reserves
related to certain liabilities that were not transferred to Baxalta as part of the separation and the impact of CTA.
The reserves are
expected to be substantially utilized by the end of 2016. Management believes that these reserves are adequate. However, adjustments may be recorded in the future as the programs are completed.
NOTE 8
DEBT, CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
As of December 31, 2014 and through the date
of the senior notes issuance described below, Baxters third-party debt and the related interest expense were not allocated to the company as the company was not the legal obligor of the debt and Baxter borrowings were not directly attributable
to the companys business.
Significant Debt Issuances
On June 23, 2015, the company issued senior notes with a total aggregate principal amount of $5 billion. The company used the net proceeds to make a cash distribution of $4 billion to Baxter as
partial consideration for the contribution of net assets to the company in connection with the separation, and the remainder was or is intended to be used for general corporate purposes, including to fund acquisitions. The $4 billion cash
distribution to Baxter was made on June 23, 2015.
Below is a summary of the companys debt and capital lease obligations
outstanding as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except for percentage information)
|
|
Aggregate
Principal
|
|
|
Coupon
Rate
|
|
|
Effective Interest
Rate in
2015
1
|
|
|
Carrying Amount at
December 31, 2015
2
|
|
Variable-rate notes due 2018
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
|
LIBOR plus 0.78%
|
|
|
|
1.3%
|
|
|
$
|
373
|
|
Fixed-rate notes due 2018
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
2.000%
|
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Fixed-rate notes due 2020
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2.875%
|
|
|
|
2.9%
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
Fixed-rate notes due 2022
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
3.600%
|
|
|
|
3.6%
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Fixed-rate notes due 2025
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
4.000%
|
|
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
Fixed-rate notes due 2045
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
5.250%
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
Other (including capital lease obligations)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,268
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
|
|
1
|
Excludes the effect of any related interest rate swaps.
|
2
|
Book values
include any discounts, premiums and adjustments related to hedging instruments.
|
F-24
In connection with this issuance, the company recognized a debt discount of $51 million and deferred
issuance costs totaling $8 million, which were recorded as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt. Refer to Note 9 for information regarding interest rate derivative contracts the company has entered into related to the senior
notes.
Credit Facilities
In
July 2015, the company entered into a credit agreement providing for a senior revolving credit facility that provides the company with access to an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.2 billion maturing in 2020, of which no amounts are currently
outstanding. Effective November 12, the company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the credit agreement. The amendment narrows the definition of Change of Control. The other material terms of the credit agreement, including
covenants, remain unchanged. The facility enables the company to borrow funds on an unsecured basis at variable interest rates, and contains various financial and other covenants, including a net leverage ratio covenant and an interest coverage
ratio covenant, as well as events of default with respect to the company. The credit facility also provides for the issuance of letters of credit, which reduces the maximum capacity of this facility. At December 31, 2015, the amount of letters
of credit issued was insignificant.
The company also entered into a Euro-denominated senior revolving credit facility in an aggregate
principal amount of up to 200 million maturing in 2020, with similar terms as the above credit facility, of which no amounts are currently outstanding. Effective November 12, 2015, the company entered into an amendment to this
credit facility. Similar to the amendment discussed above, this amendment narrows the definition of Change of Control. The non-performance of any financial institution supporting either of the credit facilities would reduce the maximum
capacity of these facilities by each institutions respective commitment.
The company also maintains other credit arrangements, which
totaled $80 million at December 31, 2015. There were no borrowings outstanding under these arrangements at December 31, 2015.
Capital Lease Obligations
The company
leases certain facilities under capital leases. During 2014, the company entered into a leasing arrangement for a new global innovation center in Cambridge, Massachusetts and recorded a capital lease obligation of $263 million. During 2015, the
company entered into a leasing arrangement for its corporate headquarters in Bannockburn, Illinois and recorded a capital lease obligation of $41 million. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the companys total capital lease obligations,
including current maturities, were $319 million and $275 million, respectively.
Future Payments on Capital Lease Obligations and Debt
Maturities
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
2017
|
|
|
31
|
|
2018
|
|
|
768
|
|
2019
|
|
|
18
|
|
2020
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
Total obligations
|
|
|
5,450
|
|
Fair value hedges and unamortized bond discounts
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5,268
|
|
|
|
F-25
NOTE 9
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
The company does not hold any instruments for
trading purposes and none of the companys outstanding derivative instruments contain credit-risk-related contingent features.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The
company is exposed to the risk that its earnings and cash flows could be adversely impacted by fluctuations in benchmark interest rates relating to its existing debt obligations or anticipated issuances of debt. The companys policy is to
manage this risk to an acceptable level.
Foreign Currency Risk Management
The company is primarily exposed to foreign exchange risk with respect to recognized assets and liabilities, forecasted transactions and net assets denominated in the Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound,
Swiss Franc, Australian Dollar, Turkish Lira, Russian Ruble, Chinese Renminbi, Colombian Peso and Argentine Peso.
In periods prior to the
separation, the company participated in Baxters foreign currency risk management program through a central shared entity, which entered into derivative contracts to hedge foreign currency risk associated with forecasted transactions for the
entire company, including for Baxaltas operations. Gains and losses on derivative contracts entered into by Baxter were allocated to Baxalta and partially offset gains and losses on underlying foreign currency exposures. The fair value of
outstanding derivative instruments were not allocated to Baxaltas combined balance sheets. In connection with the separation, the company began entering into foreign currency derivative contracts on its own behalf and has recorded the related
fair value on its consolidated and combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. The contracts are classified as either short-term or long-term based on the scheduled maturity of the instrument.
Cash Flow Hedges
The company may use
options, including collars and purchased options, and forwards to hedge the foreign exchange risk to earnings relating to forecasted transactions and recognized assets and liabilities. In December 2014 and during the three months ended
March 31, 2015, the company entered into $1.8 billion of forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge the risk to earnings associated with movements in benchmark interest rates relating to an anticipated issuance of debt. The total notional
amount of the forward-starting interest rate swaps was $550 million as of December 31, 2014. During 2015, in conjunction with the debt issuance described in Note 8, the company terminated the swaps, which resulted in a $37 million net gain that
was deferred in AOCI and is being amortized as a decrease to net interest expense over the terms of the underlying debt.
For each derivative
instrument that is designated and effective as a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in AOCI and then recognized in earnings consistent with the underlying hedged item. Option premiums or net premiums paid are initially
recorded as assets and reclassified to other comprehensive income (OCI) over the life of the option, and then recognized in earnings consistent with the underlying hedged item. Cash flow hedges are classified in net sales, cost of sales, and net
interest expense, and primarily relate to forecasted third-party sales denominated in foreign currencies, forecasted intercompany sales denominated in foreign currencies, and anticipated issuances of debt, respectively. The maximum term over which
the company has cash flow hedge contracts in place related to forecasted transactions as of December 31, 2015 was 12 months. The notional amount of foreign exchange contracts were $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2015.
In certain instances, the company may discontinue cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transactions are no longer probable of occurring. As
of December 31, 2015, all forecasted transactions were probable of occurring and no gains or losses were reclassified into earnings.
F-26
Fair Value Hedges
The company uses interest rate swaps to convert a portion of its fixed-rate debt into variable-rate debt. These instruments hedge the companys earnings from changes in the fair value of debt due to
fluctuations in the designated benchmark interest rate. For each derivative instrument that is designated and effective as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized immediately to earnings, and offsets the loss or gain on
the underlying hedged item. Fair value hedges are classified in net interest expense, as they hedge the interest rate risk associated with certain of the companys fixed-rate debt.
The total notional amount of interest rate swaps was $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2015. There were no interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges as of December 31, 2014.
Undesignated Derivative Instruments
The
company uses forward contracts to hedge earnings from the effects of foreign exchange relating to certain of the companys intercompany and third-party receivables and payables denominated in a foreign currency. These derivative instruments
generally are not formally designated as hedges, the terms of these instruments generally do not exceed one month, and the change in fair value of these derivatives are reported in earnings.
The total notional amount of undesignated derivative instruments was $209 million as of December 31, 2015.
Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments
The following tables summarize the income
statement locations and gains and losses on the companys derivative instruments for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss)
recognized in OCI
|
|
|
Location of gain (loss) in
income statement
|
|
|
Gain (loss)
reclassified
from
AOCI into income
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of gain (loss) in
income statement
|
|
|
Gain (loss)
recognized in income
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Fair value hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Undesignated derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
During 2015, the company assumed pre-tax deferred gains of $43 million related to certain foreign exchange contracts from
Baxter, which were recorded in AOCI.
For the companys fair value hedges, a loss of $4 million was recognized in net interest expense
during 2015, as adjustments to the underlying hedged item, fixed-rate debt. Ineffectiveness related to the companys cash flow and fair value hedges for 2015 was not material.
As of December 31, 2015, $11 million of deferred, net after-tax gains on derivative instruments included in AOCI are expected to be recognized in earnings during the next 12 months, coinciding with
when the hedged items are expected to impact earnings. Refer to Note 13 for the balance in AOCI associated with cash flow hedges.
F-27
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the classification and estimated fair value of the companys derivative instruments as of December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in asset positions
|
|
|
Derivatives in liability positions
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
Undesignated derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the classification and estimated fair value of the companys derivative instruments as
of December 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in asset positions
|
|
|
Derivatives in liability positions
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
While the companys derivatives are all subject to master netting arrangements, the company presents its assets and
liabilities related to derivative instruments on a gross basis within the consolidated and combined balance sheets. Additionally, the company is not required to post collateral for any of its outstanding derivatives. If the companys
derivatives were presented on a net basis, an asset of $25 million and liability of $1 million would be reported at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
NOTE 10
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Securitization arrangement
In April 2015, the company entered into agreements related to its trade receivables originating in Japan with a financial institution in which the entire
interest in and ownership of the receivables are sold. While the company services the receivables in its Japanese securitization arrangement, no servicing asset or liability is recognized because the company receives adequate compensation to service
the sold receivables.
During 2015, sold receivables were $165 million and cash collections remitted to the owners of the receivables were $98
million. The effect of currency exchange rate changes and net losses relating to the sales of receivables were immaterial.
Fair Value
Measurements
The fair value hierarchy under the accounting standard for fair value measurements consists of the following three levels:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets that the company has the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities;
|
F-28
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not
active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market and include the use of judgment by the companys
management about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
|
The following tables
summarize the bases used to measure financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated and combined balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of fair value measurement
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign government debt securities
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent payments related to acquisitions
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of fair value measurement
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign government debt securities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent payments related to acquisitions
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2015, cash and equivalents of $1.0 billion included money market funds of approximately $100
million. Money market funds would be considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
F-29
For assets that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, the fair value is the published market
price per unit multiplied by the number of units held, without consideration of transaction costs. The fair values of foreign government debt securities are obtained from pricing services or broker/dealers who either use quoted prices in an active
market or proprietary pricing applications, which include observable market information for like or same securities.
Contingent payments
related to acquisitions consist of development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments, in addition to sales-based payments, and are valued using discounted cash flow techniques. The fair value of development, regulatory and commercial
milestone payments reflects managements expectations of probability of payment, and increases or decreases as the probability of payment or expectation of timing of payments changes. As of December 31, 2015, managements expected
weighted-average probability of payment for development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments was approximately 21%, with individual probabilities ranging from 10%80%. As of December 31, 2015 the weighted average discount rate
used in the fair value estimates was 8.1%.
The fair value of sales-based payments is based upon probability-weighted future revenue
estimates, and increases or decreases as revenue estimates or expectations of timing of payments change.
The following table provides
information relating to the companys investments in available-for-sale equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amortized
cost
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains
|
|
|
Unrealized
(losses)
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale equity securities
|
|
|
$55
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale equity securities
|
|
|
$59
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
During 2015, the company recorded $14 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges based on the duration of losses
related to three of the companys investments. During 2014, the company recorded a $45 million other-than-temporary impairment charge to write-down the investment in Onconova common stock to its fair value based on the duration and severity of
the loss. The other-than-temporary impairment charges recorded during 2015 and 2014 were reported in other (income) expense, net.
During
2013, the company acquired approximately 16 million shares of CTI BioPharma common stock, which are classified as available-for-sale equity securities, for $27 million. Refer to Note 5 for additional information regarding the CTI BioPharma
arrangement.
The company had cumulative unrealized gains on available-for-sale debt securities of less than $1 million as of both
December 31, 2015 and 2014.
F-30
The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value measurements that use significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3), which consists of contingent payments related to acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Contingent
payments
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
142
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Net losses recognized in earnings
|
|
|
124
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
Separation related adjustment
|
|
|
37
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Net gains recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
|
In 2015, the company recognized a gain of $97 million in other (income) expense, net related to a reduction of the
estimated fair value of contingent payment liabilities for certain milestones associated with the acquisitions of OBIZUR, Chatham, and AesRx. Also, the company recorded a separation-related adjustment of $37 million in 2015 for contingent payment
liabilities related to foreign exchange losses that were not previously allocated to Baxalta in periods prior to the separation.
In 2014, the
companys additions related to the contingent payment liabilities associated with the acquisitions of Chatham and AesRx. The net loss recognized in earnings and reported in other (income) expense, net primarily related to an increase in the
estimated fair value of contingent payment liabilities associated with the 2013 acquisition of OBIZUR and related assets from Inspiration / Ipsen.
Book Values and Fair Values of Financial Instruments
In addition to the financial
instruments that the company is required to recognize at fair value on the consolidated and combined balance sheets, the company has certain financial instruments that are recognized at historical cost or some basis other than fair value. For these
financial instruments, the following table provides the values recognized on the consolidated or combined balance sheets and the approximate fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book values
|
|
|
Approximate fair values
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
December 31,
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of lease obligations
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
|
Investments include certain cost method investments whose fair value is based on Level 3 inputs. The estimated fair value
of capital lease obligations is based on Level 2 inputs. The estimated fair values of long-term debt were computed by multiplying price by the notional amount of the respective debt instrument. Price is calculated using the stated terms of the
respective debt instrument and yield curves commensurate with the companys credit risk. The discount factors used in the calculations reflect the non-performance risk of the company. The carrying values of the other financial instruments
approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturities of most of these assets and liabilities.
F-31
During 2015 and 2014, the company recorded $31 million and $64 million of income in other (income) expense,
net related to equity method investments, which primarily represented realized gains from funds that sold portfolio companies in both periods, as well as gains from the sale of certain investments in 2015 and 2014.
NOTE 11
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Lease Commitments
The company leases certain facilities and equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates. The leases generally provide for the company to pay
taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating costs of the leased property. Most of the operating leases contain renewal options. Operating lease rent expense was $52 million in 2015, $42 million in 2014 and $40 million in 2013.
The following table summarizes future minimum operating lease payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ending December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Future minimum operating lease payments
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
Limited Partnership Commitments
The company has unfunded commitments of $79 million as a limited partner in various equity investments as of December 31, 2015.
Indemnifications
During the normal course of business, the company enters into
indemnities, commitments and guarantees pursuant to which the company may be required to make payments related to specific transactions. In addition, the company indemnifies its directors and officers for certain losses and expenses upon the
occurrence of certain prescribed events. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for any limitation on the maximum potential for future payments that the company could be obligated to make. To help address some
of these risks, the company maintains various insurance coverages. Based on experience and evaluation of the agreements, the company does not believe that any significant payments related to its indemnities will occur, and therefore the company has
not recorded any associated liabilities, other than for certain tax-related indemnifications described in Note 14.
Other
Contingencies
The company has other contingencies associated with its collaborative arrangements, as further discussed in Note 5, and
legal contingencies, as further discussed in Note 16.
NOTE 12
RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFIT PROGRAMS
Shared Baxter Plans Prior to the Separation
Prior to the transfer of net pension and other post-employment benefit (OPEB) plan obligations discussed below and with the exception of
certain Austrian defined benefit pension plans, of which Baxalta was the sole sponsor prior to any transfers, the companys employees participated in certain U.S. and international defined benefit pension and OPEB plans sponsored by Baxter.
These plans included participants of Baxters other businesses and were accounted for as multiemployer plans in the companys combined financial statements prior to the transfer into newly-created plans sponsored by Baxalta. As a result,
no asset or liability was recorded by the company in its combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 to recognize the funded status of these plans. The costs of these plans were allocated to the company and recorded in cost of sales,
selling, general and administrative expenses and R&D expenses in the combined statements of income. For the Baxter sponsored defined benefit pension and OPEB plans, Baxalta recorded expense of $16 million, $37 million and $45 million for 2015,
2014 and 2013, respectively, relating to Baxalta employees participation in Baxter sponsored plans.
F-32
The company has been the sole sponsor for certain Austrian defined benefit plans prior to the separation and
has accounted for the Austrian defined benefit plans as single employer plans for the periods presented below.
Impact of Separation
During the second quarter of 2015, Baxalta assumed certain pension and OPEB obligations and plan assets related to newly-created single
employer plans for Baxalta employees, as well as pension obligations and plan assets associated with its employees who participated in certain plans that split following the separation. The company accounted for certain plans with delayed split
dates as multiple-employer plans beginning in the second quarter of 2015 because the company was responsible for its employees retiring during the interim period.
The assumed pension obligations related to plans in the United States generally related to only active employees who transferred to Baxalta in connection with the separation. The company generally did not
assume obligations associated with retired or otherwise inactive employees in the United States.
Reconciliation of Pension and OPEB Plan
Obligations, Assets and Funded Status
The benefit plan information in the table below pertains to all of the companys pension and
OPEB plans, both in the United States and in other countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Assumption of benefit obligations from Baxter
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain)/ loss
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Assumption of plan assets from Baxter
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at December 31
|
|
$
|
(156
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(314
|
)
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated and combined balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liability
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Noncurrent liability
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized at December 31
|
|
$
|
(156
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(314
|
)
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Foreign exchange and other during 2015 includes approximately $9 million of benefit obligations associated
with the Austrian plans that were transferred from the company to Baxter. The assumption of benefit obligations and plan assets from Baxter include adjustments recorded during the second half of 2015.
Accumulated Benefit Obligation Information
The pension obligation information in the table above represents the projected benefit obligation (PBO). The PBO incorporates assumptions relating to future compensation levels. The accumulated benefit
obligation (ABO) is the same as the PBO except that it includes no assumptions relating to future compensation levels. The ABO for all of the companys U.S. pension plans was $315 million at the December 31, 2015 measurement date. The ABO
for all of the companys International pension plans was $343 million and $133 million at the December 31, 2015 and 2014 measurement dates, respectively.
The information in the funded status table above represents the totals for all of the companys pension plans. The following is information relating to the individual plans in the funded status table
above that have an ABO in excess of plan assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABO
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABO
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is information relating to the individual plans in the funded status table above that have a PBO in excess
of plan assets (many of which also have an ABO in excess of assets, and are therefore also included in the table directly above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Net Pension and OPEB Plan Payments for the Next 10 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
International
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 through 2025
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Total expected net benefit payments for next 10 years
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
The expected net benefit payments above reflect the companys share of the total net benefits expected to be paid
from the plans assets (for funded plans) or from the companys assets (for unfunded plans). The federal subsidies relating to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act are not expected to be significant.
F-34
Amounts Recognized in AOCI
The pension and OPEB plans gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition assets or obligations not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost are recognized on a net-of-tax basis
in AOCI and will be amortized from AOCI to net periodic benefit cost in the future.
The following is a summary of the pre-tax losses included
in AOCI at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
International
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Prior service credit and transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
Total pre-tax loss recognized in AOCI at December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prior service credit and transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax loss recognized in AOCI at December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2015, the company assumed approximately $200 million of pre-tax losses included in AOCI in
connection with the separation.
Refer to Note 13 for the net-of-tax balances included in AOCI as of each of the year-end dates. The following
is a summary of the net-of-tax amounts recorded in OCI relating to pension and OPEB plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S Pension and OPEB
|
|
|
International Pension
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Gain (loss) arising during the year, net of tax expense (benefit) for U.S. plans of $3 in 2015 and $0 in 2014 and 2013 and for
international plans of $6 in 2015, ($6) in 2014 and $1 in 2013
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Amortization of loss to earnings, net of tax expense for U.S. plans of $2 in 2015 and $0 in 2014 and 2013 and for international
plans of $3 in 2015, $1 in 2014, and $1 in 2013
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Pension and other employee benefits gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
Amounts Expected to be Amortized from AOCI to Net Periodic Benefit Cost in 2016
With respect to the AOCI balance at December 31, 2015, the following is a summary of the pre-tax amounts expected to be amortized to net periodic
benefit cost in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
U.S.
Pension
|
|
|
International
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prior service credit and transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
Total pre-tax amount expected to be amortized from AOCI to net pension and OPEB cost in 2016
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
F-35
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
International
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net losses and other deferred amounts
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used in Determining Benefit Obligations at the Measurement Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
International
Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.60%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1.50%
|
|
|
|
2.00%
|
|
|
|
4.65%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.80%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.20%
|
|
|
|
3.50%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Annual rate of increase in the per-capita cost
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
6.50%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Rate decreased to
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
by the year ended
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
The assumptions above, which were used in calculating the December 31, 2015 measurement date benefit obligations,
will be used in the calculation of net periodic benefit cost in 2016.
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used in Determining Net Periodic
Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension
|
|
|
International Pension
|
|
|
OPEB
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.30%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1.11%
|
|
|
|
3.30%
|
|
|
|
3.25%
|
|
|
|
4.30%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.25%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
5.31%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.80%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.41%
|
|
|
|
3.50%
|
|
|
|
3.50%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Annual rate of increase in the per-capita cost
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
6.50%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Rate decreased to
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
by the year ended
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
The company establishes the expected return on plan assets assumption primarily based on a review of historical compound
average asset returns, both company-specific and relating to the broad market (based on the companys asset allocation), as well as an analysis of current market and economic information and future expectations. The company plans to use a 7.00%
assumption for its funded U.S. plan for 2016.
Effect of a One-Percent Change in Assumed Healthcare Cost Trend Rate on the OPEB Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One percent
increase
|
|
|
One percent
decrease
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components of OPEB cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Effect on OPEB obligation
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
F-36
Pension Plan Assets
A benefits committee of members of senior management is responsible for supervising, monitoring and evaluating the invested assets of the companys funded pension plans. The benefits committee, which
meets at least quarterly, abides by documented policies and procedures relating to investment goals, targeted asset allocations, risk management practices, allowable and prohibited investment holdings, diversification, use of derivatives, the
relationship between plan assets and benefit obligations, and other relevant factors and considerations. In the United States, the benefits committee has hired an outsourced chief investment officer (oCIO) provider, Goldman Sachs Asset Management,
to perform the day-to-day management of pension assets.
The benefits committees documented policies and procedures include the
following:
|
|
|
Ability to pay all benefits when due;
|
|
|
|
Targeted long-term performance expectations relative to applicable market indices, such as Standard & Poors, Russell, MSCI EAFE, and
other indices;
|
|
|
|
Targeted asset allocation percentage ranges (summarized below), and periodic reviews of these allocations;
|
|
|
|
Specified investment holding and transaction prohibitions (for example, private placements or other restricted securities, securities that are not
traded in a sufficiently active market, short sales, certain derivatives, commodities and margin transactions);
|
|
|
|
Specified portfolio percentage limits on holdings in a single corporate or other entity (generally 5%, except for holdings in U.S. government or agency
securities);
|
|
|
|
Specified average credit quality for the fixed-income securities portfolio (at least A- by Standard & Poors or A3 by Moodys);
|
|
|
|
Specified portfolio percentage limits on foreign holdings; and
|
|
|
|
Periodic monitoring of oCIO performance and adherence to the benefits committees policies.
|
Plan assets are invested using a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity securities, debt securities and other investments are used to
preserve asset values, diversify risk and exceed the planned benchmark investment return. Investment strategies and asset allocations are based on consideration of plan liabilities, the plans funded status and other factors, such as the
plans demographics and liability durations. Investment performance is reviewed by the benefits committee on a quarterly basis and asset allocations are reviewed at least annually.
Plan assets are managed in a balanced equity and fixed income portfolio. The target allocations for plan assets are 75 percent in an equity portfolio and 25 percent in a fixed income portfolio. The
documented policy includes an allocation range based on each individual investment type within the major portfolios that allows for a variance from the target allocations of approximately five percentage points. The equity portfolio may include
common stock of U.S. and international companies, common/collective trust funds, mutual funds, hedge funds and real asset investments. The fixed income portfolio may include cash, money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less,
U.S. and foreign government and governmental agency issues, common/collective trust funds, corporate bonds, municipal securities, derivative contracts and asset-backed securities.
While the benefits committee provides oversight over plan assets for U.S. and international plans, the summary above is specific to the plans in the United States. The plan assets for international plans
are managed and allocated by the entities in each country, with input and oversight provided by the benefits committee.
F-37
The following tables summarize the bases used to measure the pension plan assets and liabilities that are
carried at fair value on a recurring basis for the U.S. funded plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of fair value measurement
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Common/collective trust funds
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common/collective trust funds
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge fund
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of pension plan assets
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the bases used to measure the pension plan assets and liabilities that are carried at fair
value on a recurring basis for the international funded plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of fair value measurement
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Government agency issues
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual Funds
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large cap
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid cap
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small cap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate funds
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other holdings
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of pension plan assets
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
The assets and liabilities of the companys pension plans are valued using the following valuation
methods:
|
|
|
Investment category
|
|
Valuation methodology
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
These largely consist of a short-term investment fund, U.S. dollars and foreign currency. The fair value of the short-term
investment fund is based on the net asset value
|
Government agency issues
|
|
Values are based quoted prices in an active market
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
Values are based on the valuation date in an active market
|
Common stock
|
|
Values are based on the closing prices on the valuation date in an active market on national and international stock
exchanges
|
Mutual funds
|
|
Values are based on the net asset value of the units held in the respective fund which are obtained from national and
international exchanges
|
Common/collective trust funds
|
|
Values are based on the net asset value of the units held at year end
|
Real estate funds
|
|
The value of these assets are either determined by the net asset value of the units held in the respective fund which are
obtained from national and international exchanges or based on the net asset value of the underlying assets of the fund provided by the fund manager
|
Other holdings
|
|
The value of these assets vary by investment type and are primarily based on reputable pricing vendors that typically use
pricing matrices or models
|
|
Expected Pension and OPEB Plan Funding
The companys funding policy for its pension plans is to contribute amounts sufficient to meet legal funding requirements, plus any additional amounts that the company may determine to be appropriate
considering the funded status of the plans, tax deductibility, the cash flows generated by the company, and other factors. Volatility in the global financial markets could have an unfavorable impact on future funding requirements. The company has no
obligation to fund its principal plans in the United States in 2016. The company continually reassesses the amount and timing of any discretionary contributions. The company expects to make cash contributions to its pension plans of at least $9
million in 2016, primarily related to the companys international plans. The company expects to have net cash outflows relating to its OPEB plan of less than $1 million in 2016.
The table below details the funded status percentage of the companys pension plans as of December 31, 2015, including certain plans that are unfunded in accordance with the guidelines of the
companys funding policy outlined above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31, 2015 (in millions)
|
|
Qualified
plans
|
|
|
Nonqualified
plan
|
|
|
Funded
plans
|
|
|
Unfunded
plans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
PBO
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
Funded status percentage
|
|
|
63%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
43%
|
|
|
|
U.S. Defined Contribution Plan
Most U.S. employees are eligible to participate in a qualified defined contribution plan. Company contributions were $21 million in 2015, $20 million in 2014 and $16 million in 2013.
F-39
NOTE 13
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following is a net-of-tax summary of the
changes in AOCI by component for the years ended 2015 and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Foreign
Currency
Translation
|
|
|
Pension and
Other Employee
Benefits
|
|
|
Available- for-
sale Securities
|
|
|
Hedging
Activities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
(387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(433
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
Separation-related adjustments
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
(359
|
)
|
|
$
|
(186
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Foreign
Currency
Translation
|
|
|
Pension and
Other Employee
Benefits
|
|
|
Available-for-
sale Securities
|
|
|
Hedging
Activities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
(387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(a)
|
See table below
for details about these reclassifications.
|
The net separation-related adjustments during 2015 primarily related to the
assumption of deferred hedging gains and deferred pension losses during the second quarter of 2015, as well as differences between AOCI transferred to Baxalta as a result of the separation and AOCI reported in the companys combined balance
sheet as of June 30, 2015.
F-40
The following is a summary of the amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income during the years ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Location of impact in income statement
|
|
Amortization of pension and other employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial losses and other
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
Total before tax
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on hedging activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before tax
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale equity security
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
Gain on available-for-sale equity security
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
Total before tax
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
|
|
Total reclassification for the period
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
Total net of tax
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts in parentheses indicate reductions to net income.
|
(b)
|
These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost disclosed in Note 12.
|
NOTE 14
INCOME TAXES
Income from Continuing Operations Before
Income Tax Expense by Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
International
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
|
$
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
F-41
Income Taxes on Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
International
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense Reconciliation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Income tax expense at U.S. statutory rate
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
Tax incentives
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Foreign taxes less than U.S. rate
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
State and local taxes
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Branded Prescription Drug Fee
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Research and Orphan Drug Credit
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Domestic manufacturing deduction
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax contingencies
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Other items
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
|
The effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 22.5% in 2015, 22.6% in 2014, and 20.1% in 2013. As detailed
in the income tax expense reconciliation table above, the companys effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate each year due to certain operations that are subject to tax incentives, state and local taxes, and foreign taxes
that are different than the U.S. federal statutory rate. In addition, the effective tax rate can be impacted each period by discrete factors and events.
The benefit from foreign operations reflects the impact of lower income tax rates in locations outside the United States, as well as tax exemptions and incentives in Switzerland, Singapore, and other
foreign tax jurisdictions. Earnings outside the United States of $77 million incurred prior to the separation are not deemed to be indefinitely reinvested and have an associated income tax of $9 million. Management intends to continue to reinvest
all other historical and future earnings in several jurisdictions outside of the United States indefinitely, and therefore has not recognized U.S. income tax expense on these earnings.
F-42
The company has received tax incentives in certain taxing jurisdictions outside the United States. The
financial impact of the reductions as compared to the statutory tax rates is indicated in the income tax expense reconciliation table above. The tax reductions as compared to the local statutory rate favorably impacted earnings from continuing
operations per diluted share by $0.17 in 2015, $0.16 in 2014 and $0.21 in 2013.
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and retirement benefits
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
Tax credits and net operating losses
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries unremitted earnings
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Other items
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
In 2015, certain prior period amounts were reclassified to conform with the current period presentation, primarily in
connection with the classification of prepaid taxes associated with deferred intercompany profit in inventory from the deferred taxes rollforward. The company has elected to adopt ASU No. 2015-17, as further discussed in Note 2, starting with
the period ending December 31, 2015 and retroactively applying to the balances as of December 31, 2014. The company has prepared these financial statements in accordance with the new guidance requiring that all deferred tax assets and
liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. Additional reclassifications were made with respect to prior period deferred items to better identify the true nature of these items and to
conform with the current period presentation. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-17 has the effect of reducing short-term deferred income taxes by $215 million, increasing other long-term assets by $14 million, reducing short-term liabilities by $4
million and reducing other long-term liabilities by $197 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 2015, the
company has no material loss or credit carryforwards for U.S. or state tax purposes. As of December 31, 2015, the company had foreign operation loss carryforwards of $50 million and no foreign tax credit carryforwards. The company maintains no
material valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets because the company believes it is more likely than not that these assets will be fully realized. The company evaluates the need for valuation allowances on a continuous basis, and as
circumstances change, the need for a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets may arise.
Deferred income taxes have not been provided
on approximately $6.4 billion of the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as these earnings have been indefinitely reinvested for continued use in foreign operations. If these undistributed earnings are repatriated to the U.S. in the
foreseeable future, the company would incur an income tax expense of approximately $2.2 billion, excluding any potential foreign tax credits or future changes in tax law.
F-43
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The following is a reconciliation of the companys unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of and for the years ended (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Balance at beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
Increase associated with tax positions taken during the current year
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Decrease associated with tax positions taken during a prior year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Separation related adjustment
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
Decrease associated with lapses in statutes of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
Baxalta and Baxter entered into a tax sharing agreement, effective on the date of separation, which employs a tracing
approach to determine which company is liable for certain pre-separation income tax items. If a liability arises and is attributable to the Bioscience business, the liability would be allocated to Baxalta. If a liability arises and is attributable
to the Medical Device, Renal or Biosurgery businesses, it would be allocated to Baxter.
The table above reflects a reduction of $60 million
related to tax periods prior to the separation for which Baxter is the primary obligor. However, under U.S. Treasury Regulations, each member of a consolidated group is jointly and severally liability for the U.S. federal income tax liability of
each other member of the consolidated group. Accordingly, with respect to periods in which Baxalta was included in the Baxter consolidated group, Baxalta could be liable to the U.S. government for any U.S. federal income tax liability tax incurred
by the consolidated group, to the extent not discharged by any other member.
Baxalta will be directly responsible for tax contingencies and
related interest and penalties for its newly formed legal entities for periods after separation or in instances where an existing entity was transferred to Baxalta upon separation. As a result, Baxalta has continued to account for these tax
contingencies.
If recognized, the net amount of contingent tax liabilities that would impact the companys effective tax rate is
$17 million. The company does not expect that it is reasonably possible that any of its uncertain tax liability positions will be settled in the next twelve months. The company believes adequate provision has been made for all income tax
uncertainties. Baxalta recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The amounts expensed and the liabilities accrued are immaterial as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. Uncertain
tax positions are included as a long-term liability on the consolidated balance sheets.
In the normal course of business, the company may be
audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, and may be periodically challenged regarding the amount of taxes due. As of December 31, 2015, Baxalta entities were not subject to any ongoing income tax audits.
NOTE 15
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
2015 Baxalta Incentive Plan
In connection with the separation, the company adopted the 2015 Baxalta Incorporated Incentive Plan which provides for the assumption of certain awards
granted under the Baxter incentive stock programs and provides for additional shares of common stock available for issuance with respect to awards for participants. The 2015 Baxalta Incorporated Incentive Plan initially provided for 91 million
shares of common stock for issuance with respect to awards for participants. At December 31, 2015, approximately 39 million shares were available for future awards.
F-44
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Nearly all employees are eligible to participate in the companys employee stock purchase plan. The employee purchase price is 85% of the closing market price on the purchase date. The plan is
considered compensatory and related expense recorded by the company was immaterial. The employee stock purchase plan provided for 3 million shares of common stock available for issuance to eligible participants, of which approximately
2.6 million shares were available for future awards as of December 31, 2015.
During 2015, the company issued approximately
0.4 million shares under the current employee stock purchase plan. The number of shares under subscription at December 31, 2015 totaled approximately 1 million.
Impact of Separation from Baxter
Prior to the separation, Baxalta employees participated
in Baxters incentive stock program and Baxalta recorded costs in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and R&D expenses for its employees participation in the program. In connection with the separation,
outstanding Baxter equity awards granted prior to January 1, 2015 and held by Baxter or Baxalta employees were adjusted into both Baxter and Baxalta equity awards. Awards granted after January 1, 2015 and certain awards granted during 2014
were adjusted entirely into corresponding awards of either Baxter or Baxalta, based on which company would employ the holder following the separation. The value of the combined Baxter and Baxalta stock-based awards after the separation was designed
to generally preserve the intrinsic value and the fair value of the award immediately prior to separation. In periods following the separation, Baxalta records share-based compensation costs relating to its employees Baxalta and Baxter equity
awards.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The table presents share-based compensation expense by statement of income line item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
The related tax benefit recognized was $18 million in 2015, $10 million in 2014 and $9 million in 2013.
Stock Options
Stock options have been
granted to employees and non-employee directors with exercise prices at least equal to 100% of the companys share price on the date of grant. Stock options typically have a contractual term of 10 years. The grant-date fair value, adjusted for
estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the substantive vesting period.
Stock options granted to
employees prior to the separation generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period. In July 2015, the company made a one-time grant totaling 1.6 million stock options to 5 senior executives that cliff-vest 5 years from the grant
date. Stock options granted to non-employee directors generally cliff-vest one year from the grant date (collectively, stock options with service conditions).
In December 2015, the company granted 2.6 million stock options with both a market based and service condition to certain employees (stock options with service and market conditions). These options
vest in 2 years if the companys share price remains at or above a specified price target for 20 consecutive days during a 2 year performance period.
F-45
Post-Separation Valuation Assumptions
The weighted-average Black-Scholes assumptions used in estimating the fair value of stock options with service conditions granted in 2015 by Baxalta following the separation, along with the
weighted-average grant-date fair values, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
31%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.1%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.9%
|
|
Fair value per stock option
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
The stock-options with service and market conditions granted during December 2015 were valued using a Monte Carlo model,
with assumptions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
30%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.8%
|
|
Fair value per stock option
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
Pre-Separation Valuation Assumptions
The weighted-average Black-Scholes assumptions used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted by Baxter prior to the separation during each year, along with the weighted-average grant-date
fair values, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
|
|
0.9%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
2.6%
|
|
Fair value per stock option
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
Option Activity and Weighted-Average Unrecognized Expense
A summary of Baxalta stock option activity held by both Baxalta and Baxter employees for the period following the separation is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(options and aggregate intrinsic values in thousands)
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Weighted-average
remaining
contractual
term (in years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
|
|
Options converted on July 1, 2015 in connection with the separation
|
|
|
35,199
|
|
|
$
|
28.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
33.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,842
|
)
|
|
|
27.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
32.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
32.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
37,710
|
|
|
$
|
29.55
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
357,376
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
36,621
|
|
|
$
|
29.46
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
350,508
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
19,562
|
|
|
$
|
26.98
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
235,652
|
|
|
|
F-46
The total intrinsic value of Baxalta stock options exercised by both Baxter and Baxalta employees following
the separation was $17 million during 2015.
As of December 31, 2015, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested Baxter
and Baxalta stock options held by Baxaltas employees of $60 million is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
RSUs
RSUs have been granted to employees and non-employee directors. RSUs granted to
employees generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period and RSUs granted to non-employee directors generally cliff-vest one year from the grant date. The grant-date fair value, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is recognized as
expense on a straight-line basis over the substantive vesting period. The fair value of RSUs is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of the companys common stock on the date of grant.
A summary of Baxalta RSU activity held by both Baxalta and Baxter employees for the period following the separation is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(share units in thousands)
|
|
Share units
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
grant-date
fair value
1
|
|
Nonvested RSUs converted on July 1, 2015 in connection with the separation
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
$
|
31.98
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
33.34
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
30.20
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
32.06
|
|
|
|
Nonvested RSUs at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
3,390
|
|
|
$
|
32.30
|
|
|
|
1
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value has been adjusted for the impact of the separation
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 2015 following the separation was $33.34. The fair value of RSUs vested in 2015 following
the separation was $4 million.
As of December 31, 2015, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested Baxalta or Baxter
RSUs held by Baxaltas employees of $54 million is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
PSUs
Prior to the separation, Baxter
granted certain company employees PSUs that vest based on return on invested capital (ROIC) performance or market conditions. The vesting condition for ROIC PSUs is set at the beginning of each year for each tranche of the award during the
three-year service period. Compensation cost for the ROIC PSUs was measured based on the fair value of the awards on the date the vesting terms for each tranche of the award are established and the quoted price of Baxter common on the grant date for
each tranche of the award. The compensation cost for these PSUs is adjusted at each reporting date to reflect the estimated probability of achieving the vesting condition.
F-47
The fair value of PSUs based on market conditions was determined using a Monte Carlo model. A Monte Carlo
model uses stock price volatility and other variables to estimate the probability of satisfying the market conditions and the resulting fair value of the award. The compensation cost is not adjusted for changes in estimated probability of achieving
the vesting condition. The following table presents the assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the market-condition PSUs, along with their grant-date fair values, during 2014 and 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Baxter volatility
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
Peer group volatility
|
|
|
13%-58%
|
|
|
|
13%-38%
|
|
Correlation of returns
|
|
|
0.23-0.66
|
|
|
|
0.37-0.62
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
0.3%
|
|
Fair value per PSU
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
A summary of Baxalta PSU activity related to shares held by both Baxalta and Baxter employees for the period following
the separation is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(share units in thousands)
|
|
Share units
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
grant-date
fair value
1
|
|
Nonvested PSUs converted on July 1, 2015 in connection with the separation
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
30.17
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
31.49
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
30.10
|
|
|
|
Nonvested PSUs at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
28.50
|
|
|
|
1
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value has been adjusted for the impact of the separation
|
As of December 31, 2015, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested Baxalta or Baxter PSUs held by Baxaltas employees of $2
million is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of approximately 1 year.
NOTE 16
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The company is involved in product liability,
patent, commercial, and other legal matters that arise in the normal course of the companys business. The company records a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of
a probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better estimate, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. If a loss is not probable or a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, no liability is recorded. As of
December 31, 2015, the companys total recorded reserves with respect to legal matters were $23 million and were primarily reported in other long-term liabilities.
Management is not able to estimate the amount or range of any loss for certain contingencies for which there is no reserve or additional loss for matters already reserved. While the liability of the
company in connection with the claims cannot be estimated and although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a significant impact on the companys results of operations and cash flows for that period,
the outcome of these legal proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the companys combined financial position. While the company believes that it has valid defenses in these matters, litigation is inherently uncertain,
excessive verdicts do occur, and the company may incur material judgments or enter into material settlements of claims.
F-48
The company remains subject to the risk of future administrative and legal actions. With respect to
governmental and regulatory matters, these actions may lead to product recalls, injunctions, and other restrictions on the companys operations and monetary sanctions, including significant civil or criminal penalties. With respect to
intellectual property, the company may become exposed to significant litigation concerning the scope of the companys and others rights. Such litigation could result in a loss of patent protection or the ability to market products, which
could lead to a significant loss of sales, or otherwise materially affect future results of operations.
NOTE 17
AGREEMENTS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH BAXTER
Separation-Related Agreements with Baxter
In connection with the separation, the company entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement, transition services agreement and
international commercial operations agreement with Baxter.
Under the terms of the manufacturing and supply agreement, Baxalta manufactures
certain products and materials and sells them to Baxter at an agreed-upon price reflecting Baxaltas cost plus a mark-up for certain products and materials. As a result, the company began recording revenues associated with the manufacturing and
supply agreement during 2015 that were not recorded during periods prior to the separation. Revenues associated with the manufacturing and supply agreement with Baxter were $71 million during 2015. The company also began purchasing products and
materials from Baxter at cost plus a mark-up beginning during 2015. The costs associated with the manufacture of these products were included at cost without a mark-up in the companys results of operations in periods prior to the separation.
The manufacturing and supply agreement did not contribute a significant amount of gross margin or net income to the companys results of operations during 2015.
Under the terms of the transition services agreement, Baxalta and Baxter provide various services to each other on an interim, transitional basis. The services provided by Baxter to Baxalta include
certain finance, information technology, human resources, quality, supply chain and other administrative services and functions, and are generally provided on a cost-plus basis. The services generally extend for approximately 2 years following the
separation except for certain information technology services that may extend for 3 years following the separation. During 2015, the company incurred selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $65 million associated with the
transition services agreement with Baxter.
For a certain portion of the companys operations, the legal transfer of Baxaltas net
assets did not occur by the separation date of July 1, 2015 due to the time required to transfer marketing authorizations and other regulatory requirements in each of these countries. Under the terms of the international commercial operations
agreement with Baxter, the company is responsible for the business activities conducted by Baxter on its behalf, and is subject to the risks and entitled to the benefits generated by these operations and assets. As a result, the related assets and
liabilities and results of operations have been reported in the companys consolidated financial statements. Net sales related to these operations totaled approximately $414 million for the last six months of 2015 following the separation. At
December 31, 2015, the assets and liabilities consisted of inventories, which are reported in inventories on the consolidated balance sheet, and other assets and liabilities, which are reported in due to or from Baxter International Inc., net,
on the consolidated balance sheet. The majority of these operations are expected to be transferred to the company by the end of 2016.
The
company and Baxter also entered into a separation and distribution agreement, tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement and a long-term services agreement in connection with the separation.
F-49
The following is a summary of the amounts in the consolidated balance sheet due to or from Baxter, including
the assets and liabilities of certain of the companys operations that have not yet transferred to Baxalta and are held by Baxter as of the balance sheet date:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets to be transferred to Baxalta, held by Baxter
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
Other amounts due from Baxter
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
Due from Baxter International Inc.
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities to be transferred to Baxalta, held by Baxter
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Other amounts due to Baxter
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
Due to Baxter International Inc.
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
Other amounts due to or from Baxter primarily relate to intercompany balances which originated prior to the separation
and ongoing transactions with Baxter associated with the separation-related agreements described above, including current tax-related indemnification liabilities of $75 million and long-term tax-related indemnification liabilities of $51 million.
Corporate Overhead and Other Allocations from Baxter Prior to Separation
Prior to the separation, the company did not operate as a standalone business and had various relationships with Baxter whereby Baxter provided services to the company. In the financial statements prior
to the separation, Baxter provided the company certain services, which included, but were not limited to, executive oversight, treasury, finance, legal, human resources, tax planning, internal audit, financial reporting, information technology and
investor relations. The financial information in the combined financial statements in periods prior to the separation did not necessarily include all the expenses that would have been incurred had the company been a separate, standalone entity.
Baxter charged the company for these services based on direct and indirect costs. When specific identification was not practicable, a proportional cost method was used, primarily based on sales, headcount, or square footage. These allocations were
reflected as follows in financial statements for periods prior to the separation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
6 months ended
June 30, 2015
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2013
|
|
Cost of sales allocations
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Selling, general and administrative allocations
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
Research and development allocations
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other expense, net allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Total corporate overhead and other allocations from Baxter
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
|
Management believes that the methods used to allocate expenses to the companys historical financial statements were
reasonable.
Centralized Cash Management Prior to Separation
Prior to the separation, Baxter used a centralized approach to cash management and financing of operations. The majority of the companys subsidiaries were party to Baxters cash pooling
arrangements with several financial institutions to maximize the availability of cash for general operating and investing purposes. Under these cash pooling arrangements, cash balances were swept regularly from the companys accounts. Cash
transfers to and
F-50
from Baxters cash concentration accounts and the resulting balances at the end of each reporting period were reflected in net parent company investment in the combined balance sheets. At
December 31, 2014, cash and equivalents were not allocated to the company due to Baxters centralized approach to cash management.
NOTE 18
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In July 2014, the company entered into an
agreement with Pfizer, Inc. to sell its commercial vaccines business and committed to a plan to divest the remainder of its vaccines business, which included certain R&D programs. In December 2014, the company completed the divestiture of the
commercial vaccines business and recorded an after-tax gain of $417 million. During 2015, the company recorded a net after-tax gain of $3 million as a result of purchase price adjustments.
In December 2014, the company entered into a separate agreement with Nanotherapeutics, Inc. for the sale of certain vaccines-related R&D programs. The company completed the divestiture in August 2015
and received cash proceeds of approximately $34 million and recorded an after-tax gain of $28 million.
As a result of the divestitures, the
operations and cash flows of the vaccines business have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the company.
Following is a summary of
the operating results of the vaccines business, which have been reflected as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes, excluding gain on sale
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Gain on sale before income taxes
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 19
GEOGRAPHIC AND PRODUCT INFORMATION
Net sales are based on product shipment
destination and assets are based on physical location.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
$
|
3,016
|
|
|
$
|
2,861
|
|
Rest of world
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and combined net sales
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
PP&E, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,173
|
|
|
$
|
2,411
|
|
|
$
|
1,472
|
|
Austria
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Rest of world
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and combined PP&E, net
|
|
$
|
5,034
|
|
|
$
|
4,192
|
|
|
$
|
3,376
|
|
|
|
F-51
Significant Product Sales
The following is a summary of net sales for the Companys five product categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31 (in millions)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Hemophilia
1
|
|
$
|
2,840
|
|
|
$
|
2,984
|
|
|
$
|
2,786
|
|
Immunoglobulin Therapies
2
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
Inhibitor Therapies
3
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
BioTherapeutics
4
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
Oncology
5
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated and combined net sales
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,555
|
|
|
|
1
|
Primarily includes sales of recombinant factor VIII and factor IX products (ADVATE, ADYNOVATE, RECOMBINATE, and RIXUBIS) and plasma-derived hemophilia
products (primarily factor VII, factor VIII and factor IX).
|
2
|
Includes sales of antibody-replacement immunoglobulin therapy products, including GAMMAGARD LIQUID, SUBCUVIA and HYQVIA.
|
3
|
Includes sales of FEIBA, a plasma-derived hemophilia product to treat patients who have developed inhibitors and OBIZUR, a recombinant porcine factor
VIII product for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A.
|
4
|
Includes primarily plasma-derived specialty therapies including albumin and alpha-1 antitrypsin products, as well as contract manufacturing revenue.
|
5
|
Includes sales of ONCASPAR, a treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
|
Concentration of Credit Risk
The company engages in business with foreign governments in
certain countries that have experienced deterioration in credit and economic conditions, including Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Brazil. As of December 31, 2015, the companys net accounts receivable from the public sector in Greece,
Spain, Portugal and Italy totaled $80 million, of which Greece receivables represented an immaterial balance. The company also has significant accounts receivable related to its Hemobrás partnership in Brazil totaling $207 million at
December 31, 2015.
Global economic conditions and liquidity issues in certain countries have resulted, and may continue to result, in
delays in the collection of receivables and credit losses. While the company believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2015 is adequate, future governmental actions and customer-specific factors may require the
company to re-evaluate the collectability of its receivables and the company could potentially incur additional credit losses that materially impact its results of operations.
F-52
NOTE 20
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
First
quarter
|
|
|
Second
quarter
|
|
|
Third
quarter
|
|
|
Fourth
quarter
|
|
|
Full year
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
1,429
|
|
|
$
|
1,595
|
|
|
$
|
1,763
|
|
|
$
|
6,148
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
Income from continuing operations
1
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per common share
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
1
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations per common share
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Net income
1
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
Net income per common share
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
1,452
|
|
|
$
|
1,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
Income from continuing operations
2
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
2
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
Income from discontinued operations per common share
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
Net income
2
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Net income per common share
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1
|
The first quarter of 2015 included net after-tax charges from continuing operations of $33 million related to intangible asset amortization, business
optimization items, and separation costs; and a $9 million after-tax favorable adjustment to the gain recorded on sale of the companys commercial vaccines business reported in discontinued operations. The second quarter of 2015 included net
after-tax charges from continuing operations of $109 million related to intangible asset amortization, business optimization items, separation costs, and milestone payments associated with the companys collaboration agreements; and a $4
million after-tax charge reported in discontinued operations. The third quarter of 2015 included net after-tax charges from continuing operations of $104 million related to intangible asset amortization, separation costs, IPR&D and other
impairment charges, a decrease in the fair value of contingent payment liabilities, milestone payments associated with the companys collaboration agreements and business development items; and a $28 million after-tax gain recorded on the sale
of certain vaccines R&D programs reported in discontinued operations. The fourth quarter of 2015 included net after-tax charges from continuing operations of $286 million related to intangible asset amortization, business optimization items,
separation costs, upfront and milestone payments to collaboration partners, a decrease in the fair value of contingent payment liabilities, a currency-related item
|
F-53
|
and favorable adjustments to previously recorded impairment charges; and a $6 million after-tax unfavorable adjustment to the gain recorded on sale of the companys commercial vaccines
business reported in discontinued operations.
|
2
|
The first quarter of 2014 included net after-tax charges from continuing operations of $24 million related to intangible asset amortization, business
optimization items, plasma-related litigation and milestone payments associated with the companys collaboration agreements; and an $8 million after-tax charge reported in discontinued operations. The second quarter of 2014 included net
after-tax charges from continuing operations of $63 million related to intangible asset amortization, business optimization items, separation costs, milestone payments associated with the companys collaboration agreements and an increase in
fair value of contingent payment liabilities. The third quarter of 2014 included net after-tax charges from continuing operations of $166 million related to intangible asset amortization, business optimization items, separation costs, the Branded
Prescription Drug Fee and milestone payments associated with the companys collaboration arrangements; and after-tax charges of $5 million after-tax charge reported in discontinued operations. The fourth quarter of 2014 included net after-tax
charges from continuing operations of $146 million related to intangible asset amortization, business optimization items, separation costs, milestone payments associated with the companys collaboration agreements, other-than-temporary
impairment and an increase in fair value of contingent payment liabilities; and a $417 million after-tax gain on the sale of the companys commercial vaccines business reported in discontinued operations.
|
F-54
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
March 31,
2016
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
1,001
|
|
Accounts and other current receivables, net
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,876
|
|
|
|
4,708
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
5,208
|
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
12,824
|
|
|
$
|
12,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,317
|
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value (shares authorized of 2,500,000,000 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, shares issued and
outstanding of 682,775,012 at March 31, 2016 and 679,287,500 at December 31, 2015)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
4,103
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
4,220
|
|
|
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
12,824
|
|
|
$
|
12,329
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-55
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-56
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax (expense) benefit of ($6) and $3 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
Pension and other employee benefits, net of tax benefit (expense) of $5 and ($3) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and
2015, respectively
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax benefit (expense) of $8 and ($4) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and
2015, respectively
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Hedging activities, net of tax benefit of $6 and $20 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-57
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended,
March
31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Cash flows from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net periodic pension benefit and OPEB cost
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Business optimization charges (benefits)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Changes in balance sheet items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and other current receivables, net
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Due to/from Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
Business optimization payments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided from (used for) operations
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net transactions with Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
Increase in debt with maturities of three months or less, net
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds and excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from financing activities
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-58
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Net Parent
Company
Investment
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
Total
Equity
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(433
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,747
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Net transfers to Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,172
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(808
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,364
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
679,287,500
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
4,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,924
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Separation-related adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Shares issued under employee benefit plans and other
|
|
|
3,487,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.07 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2016
|
|
|
682,775,012
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
(358
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,220
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.
F-59
BAXALTA INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PREPARATION
Baxalta Incorporated, together with its
subsidiaries, (Baxalta or the company) is a global innovative biopharmaceutical leader with a sustainable portfolio of differentiated therapies that seek to address unmet medical needs across many disease areas, including hematology, immunology and
oncology.
Separation from Baxter
Baxalta was incorporated in Delaware on September 8, 2014. The company separated from Baxter International Inc. (Baxter or Parent) on July 1, 2015 (the separation), becoming an independent company as a
result of a pro rata distribution by Baxter of 80.5% of Baxaltas common stock to Baxters shareholders. Baxter retained an approximate 19.5% ownership stake in Baxalta immediately following the distribution. Baxalta common stock began
trading regular way under the ticker symbol BXLT on the New York Stock Exchange on July 1, 2015.
In January 2016 and
March 2016, Baxter exchanged portions of its retained stake in Baxalta common stock for indebtedness of Baxter held by third parties. The shares of Baxalta common stock exchanged were then sold by such third parties in secondary public offerings
pursuant to registration statements filed by Baxalta. Following these transactions, Baxter held approximately 4.5% of Baxaltas total shares outstanding.
In April 2016, Baxter commenced an offer to exchange up to 13.4 million shares of Baxalta common stock that are currently owned by Baxter, which represents approximately 2.0% of the outstanding common
stock of Baxalta, for shares of Baxter common stock that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn in the exchange offer. Prior to or following the completion of that exchange offer, Baxter has informed Baxalta that Baxter intends to make a
contribution to Baxters U.S. pension fund or distribute as a special dividend to all Baxter stockholders, on a pro rata basis, some or all of its remaining shares of Baxalta common stock. Following the completion of these transactions, if
Baxter disposes of all of the remaining shares of Baxalta common stock held by it, Baxalta will be wholly independent from Baxter, except that certain agreements between Baxter and Baxalta will remain in place.
Merger Agreement with Shire plc
In
January 2016, the company announced that it had reached an agreement (merger agreement) with Shire plc (Shire) under which Shire would acquire Baxalta, forming a global leader in rare diseases. Under the terms of the agreement, Baxalta shareholders
will receive $18.00 in cash and 0.1482 Shire American Depository Shares (ADS) per each Baxalta share. The transaction has been approved by the boards of directors of both Shire and Baxalta. Closing of the transaction is subject to approval by
Baxalta and Shire shareholders, certain regulatory approvals, receipt of certain tax opinions and other customary closing conditions. The Baxalta and Shire shareholder votes are scheduled for May 27, 2016. The transaction is expected to close in
early June 2016.
The merger agreement provides for certain termination rights for both Shire and Baxalta. Upon termination of the merger
agreement under certain specified circumstances, Baxalta may be required to disburse to Shire a termination fee of $369 million and Shire may be required to pay the company a termination fee of $369 million. In addition, if the merger agreement is
terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Baxalta, Baxalta may be required to reimburse Shire for transaction expenses up to $110 million (which expenses would be credited against any
termination fee subsequently disbursed by Baxalta). Conversely, if the merger agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances following the receipt of an acquisition proposal by Shire, Shire may be required to reimburse Baxalta for
transaction expenses up to $65 million (which expenses would be credited against any termination fee subsequently payable by Shire).
F-60
Basis of Preparation
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements of the company for all periods presented have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly,
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. The year-end condensed
consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes contained in the companys 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 3, 2016 (2015 Annual Report).
In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the interim periods. All such
adjustments, unless otherwise noted herein, are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year.
As further described above, Baxalta became an independent publicly traded company following the separation from Baxter on July 1, 2015. The accompanying
unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements reflect the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the company as an independent, publicly-traded company for periods after the July 1, 2015 separation.
The consolidated and combined financial statements reflect the combined results of operations of the company as a combined reporting entity of Baxter for periods prior to the separation.
Prior to the separation, the companys financial statements were prepared on a standalone basis and were derived from Baxters consolidated financial statements and accounting records as if the
former biopharmaceuticals business of Baxter had been part of Baxalta. The combined financial statements reflected the companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows as the business was operated as part of Baxter prior to
the separation, in conformity with GAAP.
Prior to the separation, all transactions between the company and Baxter were considered to be
effectively settled in the combined financial statements at the time the transaction was recorded. The total net effect of the settlement of the transactions with Baxter were reflected in the statements of cash flows in periods prior to the
separation as a financing activity and in the statement of shareholders equity as net parent company investment.
Prior to the
separation, the combined financial statements included an allocation of expenses related to certain Baxter corporate functions, including senior management, legal, human resources, finance, treasury, information technology, and quality assurance.
These expenses were allocated to the company based on direct usage or benefit where specifically identifiable, with the remainder allocated primarily on a pro rata basis of revenue, headcount, square footage, or other measures. The company considers
the expense methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods prior to the separation. However, the allocations may not be indicative of the actual expense that would have been incurred had the company operated as an independent, publicly
traded company for the periods prior to the separation.
Prior to the separation, the companys equity balance represented the excess of
total assets over total liabilities, including the due to/from balances between the company and Baxter (net parent company investment) and accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). Net parent company investment was primarily impacted by
distributions and contributions to or from Baxter, which were the result of treasury activities and net funding provided by or distributed to Baxter. In connection with the separation, the companys net parent company investment balance was
reclassified to additional paid-in capital.
New Accounting Standards
In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employer Share-Based Compensation Accounting, which includes provisions
F-61
intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. Key provisions of ASU 2016-09 include a requirement to record
tax effects of share-based payments at settlement (or expiration) through the statement of income, which is to be adopted on a prospective basis, and to report tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments as operating activities on the
statement of cash flows, which can be adopted on a prospective or retrospective basis. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for the company beginning on January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The company is currently evaluating the impact of
adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which
requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. ASU
2016-02 will be effective for the company beginning on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 requires that equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee, be measured at fair value, with
subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net income. In addition, the ASU requires a qualitative assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values when assessing impairment, the evaluation of a valuation allowance on a
deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities and certain presentation and disclosures for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal
year of adoption, which will be January 1, 2018. Early adoption is not permitted. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which clarifies that inventory should be
measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and
transportation. The company adopted ASU No. 2015-11 beginning on January 1, 2016 on a prospective basis. The impact of this adoption was not material.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customers Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing
Arrangement, which provides guidance to customers about how to account for cloud computing arrangements when such arrangements include software licenses. The company adopted ASU
No. 2015-05
beginning on
January 1, 2016 on a prospective basis. The impact of this adoption was not material.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (ASU 2014-09), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be
entitled to when products are transferred to customers. In July 2015, the FASB voted to approve a one-year deferral on the original effective date of January 1, 2017; therefore ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for the company beginning on
January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective date. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of
adoption. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new revenue standard on its consolidated financial statements.
F-62
NOTE 2
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Net Interest Expense
The company issued senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $5 billion in June 2015. Prior to the issuance of the senior notes, Baxalta
recorded no interest expense because Baxters third-party debt and the related interest expense were not allocated to the company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Interest costs
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest costs capitalized
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
2,237
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Due from Baxter
|
|
|
$387
|
|
|
|
$397
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
$601
|
|
|
|
$620
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Due to Baxter
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
Accrued rebates
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Employee compensation and withholdings
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Property, payroll and certain other taxes
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Other
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,244
|
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
F-63
Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Pension and other employee benefits
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
Contingent payment liabilities
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Long-term deferred income taxes
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Due to Baxter
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Other
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
$
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk
Baxalta engages in business with foreign governments in certain countries that have experienced deterioration in credit and economic conditions, including Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Brazil. As of
March 31, 2016, the companys net accounts receivable from the public sector in Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy totaled $95 million, of which Greece receivables represented a $27 million balance. The company also has significant accounts
receivable related to its Hemobrás partnership in Brazil totaling $174 million at March 31, 2016.
Global economic conditions and
liquidity issues in certain countries have resulted, and may continue to result, in delays in the collection of receivables and credit losses. While the company believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts as of March 31, 2016 is adequate,
future governmental actions and customer-specific factors may require the company to re-evaluate the collectability of its receivables and the company could potentially incur additional credit losses that materially impact its results of operations.
NOTE 3
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The denominator for basic earnings per common
share (EPS) is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share units (PSUs) is reflected in the denominator for diluted
EPS using the treasury stock method. The numerator for both basic and diluted EPS is net income, net income from continuing operations, or income from discontinued operations, net of tax.
On July 1, 2015, Baxter distributed approximately 544 million shares of Baxalta common stock to its shareholders and retained an additional 132 million shares. The computation of basic EPS for the three
months ended March 31, 2015 was calculated using the shares distributed and retained by Baxter on July 1, 2015 totaling 676 million. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2015 included
5 million of diluted common share equivalents for stock options, RSUs and PSUs as calculated using the treasury stock method as of July 1, 2015, as these share-based awards were previously issued by Baxter and outstanding at the time of separation
and were assumed by Baxalta following the separation.
The following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Basic shares
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted EPS excluded 3 million and 19 million weighted-average equity awards outstanding for the
three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 as their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on diluted EPS.
F-64
NOTE 4
ACQUISITIONS AND COLLABORATIONS
Acquisitions
SuppreMol Acquisition
In March 2015, the
company acquired all of the outstanding shares of SuppreMol GmbH (SuppreMol), a privately held biopharmaceutical company based in Germany, for cash of $228 million, net of cash acquired. Through the acquisition, the company obtained SuppreMols
early-stage pipeline of treatment options for autoimmune and allergic diseases, as well as its operations in Munich, Germany. The acquired investigational treatments complement and build upon the companys immunology portfolio and offer an
opportunity to expand into new areas with significant market potential and unmet medical needs in autoimmune diseases. The acquired net assets comprised a business based on the acquired inputs, processes and outputs. As a result, the transaction was
accounted for as a business combination.
ONCASPAR Business Acquisition
In July 2015, the company acquired the ONCASPAR (pegaspargase) product portfolio from Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A (Sigma-Tau), a privately held biopharmaceutical company based in Italy, through the
acquisition of 100% of the shares of a subsidiary of Sigma-Tau, for cash of $890 million, net of cash acquired. Through the acquisition, the company gained the marketed biologic treatment ONCASPAR, the investigational biologic calaspargase pegol,
and an established oncology infrastructure with clinical and sales resources. ONCASPAR is a first-line biologic used as part of a chemotherapy regimen to treat patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. As of the acquisition date, it was marketed
in the United States, Germany, Poland and certain other countries, and recently received EU approval. The acquired net assets comprised a business based on the acquired inputs, processes and outputs. As a result, the transaction was accounted for as
a business combination. ONCASPAR sales recorded by the company during the 3 months ended March 31, 2016 were $52 million.
Collaborations
Precision BioSciences
In
February 2016, Baxalta entered into a strategic immuno-oncology collaboration with Precision BioSciences (Precision), a private biopharmaceutical company based in the United States, specializing in genome editing technology. Together, Baxalta and
Precision will develop chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies for up to six unique targets, with the first program expected to enter clinical studies in late 2017. On a product-by-product basis, following successful completion of
early-stage research activities up to Phase 2, Baxalta will have exclusive option rights to complete late-stage development and worldwide commercialization. Precision is responsible for development costs for each target prior to option exercise.
The company made an upfront payment of $105 million to Precision, which was recorded as R&D expense during the three months ended March
31, 2016. The company may make additional payments related to option fees and development, regulatory, and commercial milestones totaling up to $1.6 billion, in addition to future royalty payments on worldwide sales. Precision also has the right to
participate in the development and commercialization of any licensed products resulting from the collaboration through a 50/50 co-development and co-promotion option in the United States.
Research and Development Costs Funded by Collaboration Partners
The company recorded
offsets to R&D expense of $24 million for development costs funded by collaboration partners during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
F-65
Unfunded Contingent Payments
At March 31, 2016, the companys unfunded contingent milestone payments associated with all of its collaborative arrangements totaled $1.8 billion. This total includes contingent payments
associated with R&D costs funded by collaboration partners through March 31, 2016. This total excludes contingent royalty and profit-sharing payments, contingent payment liabilities arising from business combinations, potential milestone
payments and option exercise fees associated with certain of the companys collaboration agreements that become payable only if the company chooses to exercise one or more of its options and potential contingent payments associated with R&D
costs that may be funded by collaboration partners in the future. Based on the companys projections, any contingent payments made in the future will be more than offset by the estimated net future cash flows relating to the rights acquired for
those payments.
NOTE 5
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The following is a summary of the activity in goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
$829
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
37
|
|
Currency translation and other adjustments
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
$883
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2016, there were no accumulated goodwill impairment losses.
Other intangible assets, net
The
following is a summary of the companys other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Developed
technology,
including patents
|
|
|
Other amortized
intangible assets
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived
intangible assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross other intangible assets
|
|
|
$1,287
|
|
|
|
$30
|
|
|
|
$246
|
|
|
|
$1,563
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
$1,074
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$246
|
|
|
|
$1,320
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross other intangible assets
|
|
|
$1,247
|
|
|
|
$29
|
|
|
|
$238
|
|
|
|
$1,514
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
$1,057
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$238
|
|
|
|
$1,295
|
|
|
|
The increase in other intangible assets, net during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was due to foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations, partially offset by amortization expense.
Intangible asset amortization expense was $19 million and $8 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The following table presents anticipated annual amortization expense for 2016 through 2020 for definite-lived intangible assets recorded as of March 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years ending (in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Anticipated annual intangible asset amortization expense
|
|
|
$78
|
|
|
|
$75
|
|
|
|
$75
|
|
|
|
$71
|
|
|
|
$71
|
|
|
|
F-66
NOTE 6
BUSINESS OPTIMIZATION ITEMS
The companys total charges (benefits)
related to business optimization plans are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Charges
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Reserve adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
Total business optimization expenses (benefits)
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the company approved a business optimization plan to optimize its overall
cost structure on a global basis by streamlining certain operations and rationalizing certain manufacturing facilities. The company recorded a charge of $66 million in cost of sales during the three months ended March 31, 2016 associated with this
plan. The charge consisted of fixed assets and inventory impairments of $36 million and estimated severance and other costs of $30 million.
Prior to the separation, the company participated in business optimization plans initiated by Baxter. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the
company adjusted its previously estimated business optimization charges due to changes in assumptions resulting in a $10 million benefit recorded during the period. The adjustments were primarily due to lower severance payments than previously
estimated from business optimization programs in prior years.
The following table summarizes activity in the reserves during the three months
ended March 31, 2016 related to business optimization initiatives:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Reserves as of December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
30
|
|
Utilization
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments and other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
Reserves as of March 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
The reserves are expected to be substantially utilized by the end of 2016. Management believes that these reserves are
adequate. However, adjustments may be recorded in the future as the programs are completed.
NOTE 7
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
The company does not hold any instruments for
trading purposes and none of the companys outstanding derivative instruments contain credit-risk-related contingent features.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The
company is exposed to the risk that its earnings and cash flows could be adversely impacted by fluctuations in benchmark interest rates relating to its existing debt obligations or anticipated issuances of debt. The companys policy is to
manage this risk to an acceptable level.
F-67
Foreign Currency Risk Management
The company is primarily exposed to foreign exchange risk with respect to recognized assets and liabilities, forecasted transactions and net assets denominated in the Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound,
Swiss Franc, Australian Dollar, Turkish Lira, Russian Ruble, Chinese Renminbi, Colombian Peso and Argentine Peso. The companys policy is to manage this risk to an acceptable level.
In periods prior to the separation, the company participated in Baxters foreign currency risk management program through a central shared entity, which entered into derivative contracts to hedge
foreign currency risk associated with forecasted transactions for the entire company, including for Baxaltas operations. Gains and losses on derivative contracts entered into by Baxter were allocated to Baxalta and partially offset gains and
losses on underlying foreign currency exposures. The fair values of outstanding derivative instruments were not allocated to Baxaltas balance sheets. In connection with the separation, the company began entering into foreign currency
derivative contracts on its own behalf and has recorded the related fair value on its condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The contracts are classified as either short-term or long-term based on the
scheduled maturity of the instrument.
Cash Flow Hedges
The company may use options, including collars and purchased options, and forwards to hedge the foreign exchange risk to earnings relating to forecasted transactions and recognized assets and liabilities.
The company may use forward-starting interest rate swaps and treasury rate locks to hedge the risk to earnings associated with movements in interest rates relating to anticipated issuances of debt.
For each derivative instrument that is designated and effective as a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in AOCI and then
recognized in earnings consistent with the underlying hedged item. Option premiums or net premiums paid are initially recorded as assets and reclassified to other comprehensive income (OCI) over the life of the option, and then recognized in
earnings consistent with the underlying hedged item. Cash flow hedges are classified in net sales, cost of sales, and net interest expense, and primarily relate to forecasted third-party sales denominated in foreign currencies, forecasted
intercompany sales denominated in foreign currencies, and anticipated issuances of debt, respectively.
The maximum term over which the
company has cash flow hedge contracts in place related to forecasted transactions as of March 31, 2016 was 12 months. The notional amount of foreign exchange contracts totaled $1.1 billion as of March 31, 2016 and $1.2 billion as of December 31,
2015. There were no interest rate contracts designated as cash flow hedges outstanding at March 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015.
In certain
instances, the company may discontinue cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transactions are no longer probable of occurring. As of March 31, 2016, all forecasted transactions were probable of occurring and no gains or losses were
reclassified into earnings.
Fair Value Hedges
The company uses interest rate swaps to convert a portion of its fixed-rate debt into variable-rate debt. These instruments hedge the companys earnings from changes in the fair value of debt due to
fluctuations in the designated benchmark interest rate. For each derivative instrument that is designated and effective as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized immediately to earnings, and offsets the respective loss
or gain on the underlying hedged item. Fair value hedges are classified in net interest expense, as they hedge the interest rate risk associated with certain of the companys fixed-rate debt.
The notional amount of interest rate swaps totaled $1.0 billion at both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Undesignated Derivative Instruments
The
company uses forward contracts to hedge earnings from the effects of foreign exchange relating to certain of the companys intercompany and third-party receivables and payables denominated in a foreign currency. These
F-68
derivative instruments generally are not formally designated as hedges, the terms of these instruments generally do not exceed one month and the change in fair value of these derivatives are
reported in earnings.
The notional amount of undesignated derivative instruments totaled $142 million as of March 31, 2016 and $209 million
as of December 31, 2015.
Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments
The following tables summarize the income statement locations and gains and losses on the companys derivative instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss)
recognized in
OCI
|
|
|
Income statement location
|
|
Gain (loss)
reclassified from
AOCI into income
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss)
recognized in income
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Income statement location
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Fair value hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Undesignated derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
For the companys fair value hedges, a loss of $36 million was recognized in net interest expense during the three
month period ending March 31, 2016, as adjustments to the underlying hedged item, fixed-rate debt. Ineffectiveness related to the companys cash flow and fair value hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 was not
material.
As of March 31, 2016, $1 million of deferred, net after-tax gains on derivative instruments included in AOCI are expected to be
recognized in earnings during the next 12 months, coinciding with when the hedged items are expected to impact earnings. Refer to Note 10 for the balance in AOCI associated with cash flow hedges.
F-69
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the classification and estimated fair value of the companys derivative instruments as of March 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in asset positions
|
|
|
Derivatives in liability positions
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
Undesignated derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the classification and estimated fair value of the companys derivative instruments as
of December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in asset positions
|
|
|
Derivatives in liability positions
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
|
Balance sheet location
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments designated as hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
Undesignated derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
While the companys derivatives are all subject to master netting arrangements, the company presents its assets and
liabilities related to derivative instruments on a gross basis within the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the company is not required to post collateral for any of its outstanding derivatives. If the companys derivatives
were presented on a net basis, assets of $48 million and $25 million would be reported at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
F-70
NOTE 8
DEBT, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper
As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015,
there were no outstanding borrowings under the companys primary and Euro-denominated revolving credit facilities. The companys maximum capacity of the facilities is reduced for the issuance of letters of credit. As of March 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015, the amount of letters of credit issued was immaterial.
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the company issued
and redeemed commercial paper, of which $300 million was outstanding as of March 31, 2016, with a weighted-average interest rate of 1.12%. This commercial paper is classified as short-term debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The
company did not have any commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2015.
Securitization arrangement
In April 2015, the company entered into agreements related to its trade receivables originating in Japan with a financial institution in which the entire
interest in and ownership of the receivables are sold. While the company services the receivables in its Japanese securitization arrangement, no servicing asset or liability is recognized because the company receives adequate compensation to service
the sold receivables.
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, sold receivables were $48 million and cash collections remitted to the
owners of the receivables were $61 million. The effect of currency exchange rate changes and net losses relating to the sales of receivables were immaterial.
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables summarize the bases under the fair value
hierarchy used to measure financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of fair value measurement
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance as of
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign government debt securities
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent payments
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
|
F-71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of fair value measurement
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign government debt securities
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent payments
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
Foreign currency derivative contracts
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
|
For assets that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, the fair value is the published market price per unit
multiplied by the number of units held, without consideration of transaction costs. The fair values of foreign government debt securities are obtained from pricing services or broker/dealers who either use quoted prices in an active market or
proprietary pricing applications, which include observable market information for like or same securities. Primarily all of the derivatives entered into by the company are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted prices exist for
such instruments. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are discounted cash flow and Black-Scholes models. The key inputs used to value these instruments are observable and vary depending on the type of derivative, and
include contractual terms, interest rate yield curves and foreign exchange rates.
The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value
measurements that use significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), which consists of contingent payment liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Contingent
payments
|
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
$433
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
23
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of March 31, 2016
|
|
|
$458
|
|
|
|
The addition during the three months ended March 31, 2016 relates to the formation of a joint venture in Turkey that is
consolidated. The company has an option to acquire the remaining 50% of the Turkey joint venture from the non-controlling owners and the non-controlling owners have a put option to sell their 50% ownership to the company in 2021 and every 5 years
thereafter. The fair value of the option to acquire the 50% interest was $23 million as of March 31, 2016 and was calculated using a discounted cash flow technique.
Contingent payments related to acquisitions consist of development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments, in addition to sales-based payments, and are valued using discounted cash flow techniques.
The fair value of development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments reflects managements expectations of probability of payment, and increases or decreases as the probability of payment or expectation of timing of payments changes.
Managements expected weighted-average probability of payment for development,
F-72
regulatory and commercial milestone payments was approximately 21% as of both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, with individual probabilities ranging from 10%-80%. The weighted average
discount rate used in the fair value estimates was 8.1% as of both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The fair value of sales-based payments is based upon probability-weighted future revenue estimates, and increases or decreases as revenue
estimates or expectations of timing of payments change.
Available for Sale Securities
The following table provides information relating to the companys investments in available-for-sale equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amortized
cost
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains
|
|
|
Unrealized
(losses)
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
March 31, 2016
Available-for-sale equity securities
|
|
|
$55
|
|
|
|
$10
|
|
|
|
$(20
|
)
|
|
|
$45
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
Available-for-sale equity securities
|
|
|
$55
|
|
|
|
$28
|
|
|
|
$ (5
|
)
|
|
|
$78
|
|
|
|
The company recorded $9 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges in other (income) expense, net during the
three months ended March 31, 2015 based on the duration of losses related to two of the companys investments. There were no other-than-temporary impairment charges recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as the company believes
the unrealized losses to be temporary in nature.
Book Values and Fair Values of Financial Instruments
In addition to the financial instruments that the company is required to recognize at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, the company
has certain financial instruments that are recognized at historical cost or some basis other than fair value. For these financial instruments, the following table provides the values recognized on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the
approximate fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book values
|
|
|
Approximate fair values
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
March 31,
2016
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
March 31,
2016
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
5,317
|
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
|
$
|
5,639
|
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
|
Investments include certain cost method investments whose fair value is based on Level 3 inputs. The estimated fair value
of capital lease obligations is based on Level 2 inputs. The estimated fair values of long-term debt were computed by multiplying price by the notional amount of the respective debt instrument. Price is calculated using the stated terms of the
respective debt instrument and yield curves commensurate with the companys credit risk. The discount factors used in the calculations reflect the non-performance risk of the company. The carrying values of the other financial instruments
approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturities of most of these assets and liabilities.
Limited Partnership Commitment
The company had unfunded commitments of $75 million and $79 million as a limited partner in various equity investments as of March 31,
2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
F-73
NOTE 9
RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFIT PROGRAMS
Shared Baxter Plans Prior to the Separation
During the second quarter of 2015, Baxalta assumed certain pension and other post-employment benefit (OPEB) obligations and plan assets
related to newly-created single employer plans for Baxalta employees, as well as pension obligations and plan assets associated with its employees who participated in certain plans that split following the separation.
Prior to the assumption of these net pension and OPEB plan obligations, and with the exception of certain Austrian defined benefit pension plans of which
Baxalta was previously the sole sponsor, the companys employees participated in certain U.S. and international defined benefit pension and OPEB plans sponsored by Baxter. These plans included participants of Baxters other businesses and
were accounted for as multiemployer plans in the companys financial statements prior to the transfer into newly-created plans sponsored by Baxalta. The costs of these plans were allocated to the company and recorded in cost of sales, selling,
general and administrative expenses and R&D expenses in the condensed combined statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2015. For the Baxter sponsored defined benefit pension and OPEB plans, Baxalta recorded expense of $12
million during the three months ended March 31, 2015.
The company has been the sole sponsor for certain Austrian defined benefit plans prior
to the separation and has accounted for the Austrian defined benefit plans as single employer plans for both periods presented below.
Net
Periodic Benefit Cost
Net periodic benefit cost associated with Baxaltas single employer pension and OPEB plans consisted of the
following for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension and OPEB
|
|
|
International Pension
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service costs
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest costs
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net losses and other deferred amounts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
The U.S. OPEB plan is not presented separately because the net periodic benefit cost associated with the plan was not
significant for the periods presented.
F-74
NOTE 10
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following is a net-of-tax summary of the
changes in AOCI by component for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Foreign
Currency
Translation
|
|
|
Pension and
Other Employee
Benefits
|
|
|
Available-for-
sale Securities
|
|
|
Hedging
Activities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
(359
|
)
|
|
$
|
(186
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
|
$
|
(179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Foreign
Currency
Translation
|
|
|
Pension and
Other Employee
Benefits
|
|
|
Available-for-
sale Securities
|
|
|
Hedging
Activities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
(387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(433
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
(740
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(a)
|
See table below for details about these reclassifications.
|
F-75
The following is a summary of the amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income during the three months ended
March 31, 2016 and 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Income Statement Location
|
|
Amortization of pension and other employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial losses and other
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
Total before tax
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
|
|
Gains on hedging activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before tax
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
|
|
Losses on
available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale equity security
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
Total before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
|
|
Total reclassification for the period
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
Total net of tax
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts in parentheses indicate reductions to net income.
|
(b)
|
These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost disclosed in Note 9.
|
NOTE 11
INCOME TAXES
Effective Tax Rate
The companys effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 15.7% and 22.7% during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. The companys effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate each year due to state and local taxes, certain operations that are subject to tax incentives and foreign taxes that are different from the U.S.
federal statutory rate. In addition, the effective tax rate can be affected each period by discrete factors and events.
The effective
income tax rate during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was favorably impacted by an increase in the amount of expenditures qualifying for the U.S. Research & Experimentation tax credit and the settlement of an indemnification liability
with Baxter. The effective income tax rate during the three month ended March 31, 2015 was favorably impacted by separation-related costs incurred during the period that were deductible at tax rates higher that the effective tax rate.
F-76
NOTE 12
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Impact of Separation from
Baxter
Prior to the separation, Baxalta employees participated in Baxters incentive stock program and Baxalta recorded expenses in
cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and R&D expenses for its employees participation in the program. In connection with the separation, outstanding Baxter equity awards granted prior to January 1, 2015 and held by
Baxter or Baxalta employees were adjusted into both Baxter and Baxalta equity awards. Awards granted after January 1, 2015 and certain awards granted during 2014 were adjusted entirely into corresponding awards of either Baxter or Baxalta, based on
which company would employ the holder following the separation. The value of the combined Baxter and Baxalta stock-based awards after the separation was designed to generally preserve the intrinsic value and the fair value of the award immediately
prior to separation. In periods following the separation, Baxalta records share-based compensation costs relating to its employees Baxalta and Baxter equity awards.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The table below presents share-based compensation expense
by statement of income line item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
The company did not grant stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The weighted-average Black-Scholes assumptions used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2015 by Baxter prior to the separation, along with the weighted-average grant-date fair values, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended,
March 31, 2015
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
20%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
Fair value per stock option
|
|
|
$ 9.2
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of Baxalta stock options exercised by both Baxter and Baxalta employees was $40 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2016.
As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested Baxalta and Baxter
stock options held by Baxaltas employees totaled $52 million, and is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
RSUs
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the company awarded approximately 2.6
million RSUs, which were primarily part of its annual equity grant to employees.
F-77
As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested Baxalta and Baxter RSUs
held by Baxaltas employees totaled $132 million, and is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.
PSUs
The company did not grant PSUs
during the three months ended March 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested Baxalta and Baxter PSUs held by Baxaltas employees totaled $2 million, and is expected to be recognized as expense
over a weighted-average period of less than one year.
NOTE 13
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The company is involved in product liability,
patent, commercial, and other legal matters that arise in the normal course of the companys business. The company records a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of
a probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better estimate, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. If a loss is not probable or a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, no liability is recorded. As of March 31,
2016, the companys total recorded reserves with respect to legal matters were $23 million and were primarily reported in other long-term liabilities.
Management is not able to estimate the amount or range of any loss for certain contingencies for which there is no reserve or additional loss for matters already reserved. While the liability of the
company in connection with the claims cannot be estimated and although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a significant impact on the companys results of operations and cash flows for that period,
the outcome of these legal proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the companys consolidated financial position. While the company believes that it has valid defenses in these matters, litigation is inherently
uncertain, excessive verdicts do occur, and the company may incur material judgments or enter into material settlements of claims.
The company
remains subject to the risk of future administrative and legal actions. With respect to governmental and regulatory matters, these actions may lead to product recalls, injunctions, and other restrictions on the companys operations and monetary
sanctions, including significant civil or criminal penalties. With respect to intellectual property, the company may become exposed to significant litigation concerning the scope of the companys and others rights. Such litigation could
result in a loss of patent protection or the ability to market products, which could lead to a significant loss of sales, or otherwise materially affect future results of operations.
NOTE 14
AGREEMENTS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH BAXTER
Separation-Related Agreements with Baxter
In connection with the separation, the company entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement, transition services agreement and
international commercial operations agreement with Baxter.
Under the terms of the manufacturing and supply agreement, Baxalta manufactures
certain products and materials and sells them to Baxter at an agreed-upon price reflecting Baxaltas cost plus a mark-up for certain products and materials. As a result, the company has recorded revenues associated with the manufacturing and
supply agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2016 that were not recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2015. Revenues associated with the manufacturing and supply agreement with Baxter were $41 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2016. The manufacturing and supply agreement did not contribute a significant amount of gross margin or net income to the companys results of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
F-78
Under the terms of the transition services agreement, Baxalta and Baxter provide various services to each
other on an interim, transitional basis. The services provided by Baxter to Baxalta include certain finance, information technology, human resources, quality, supply chain and other administrative services and functions, and are generally provided
on a cost-plus basis. The services generally extend for approximately 2 years following the separation except for certain information technology services that may extend for 3 years following the separation. During the three months ended
March 31, 2016, the company incurred selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $30 million associated with the transition services agreement with Baxter.
For a certain portion of the companys operations, the legal transfer of Baxaltas net assets did not occur by the separation date of July 1, 2015 due to the time required to transfer
marketing authorizations and other regulatory requirements in certain countries. Under the terms of the international commercial operations agreement with Baxter, the company is responsible for the business activities conducted by Baxter on its
behalf, and is subject to the risks and entitled to the benefits generated by these operations and assets. As a result, the related assets and liabilities and results of operations have been reported in the companys condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements.
In February 2016, the transfer of certain of these operations to Baxalta was completed. A majority of the
remaining operations held by Baxter as of March 31, 2016 are expected to be transferred by the end of 2016.
Net sales related to operations not
transferred to Baxalta and held by Baxter totaled approximately $121 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the assets and liabilities consisted of inventories, which are reported in
inventories on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as other assets and liabilities, which are reported in due to or from Baxter within the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The company and Baxter also entered into a separation and distribution agreement, tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement and a long-term services agreement in connection with the separation.
The following is a summary of the amounts in the condensed consolidated balance sheets due to or from Baxter, including the assets and
liabilities of certain of the companys operations that have not yet transferred to Baxalta and are held by Baxter as of the balance sheet date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets to be transferred to Baxalta, held by Baxter
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
Other amounts due from Baxter
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
Due from Baxter
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities to be transferred to Baxalta, held by Baxter
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Other amounts due to Baxter
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
Due to Baxter
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
The decreases in inventories and assets and liabilities to be transferred to Baxalta, held by Baxter were primarily due
to completion of the legal transfer of certain operations during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Other amounts due to or from Baxter
primarily relate to intercompany balances which originated prior to the separation and ongoing transactions with Baxter associated with the separation-related agreements described above, including current tax-related indemnification liabilities of
$4 million and $75 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and long-term tax-related indemnification liabilities of $69 million and $51 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Certain
indemnification liabilities classified as short-term as of December 31, 2015 were settled during the three months ended March 31, 2016 or were reclassified to long-term as of March 31, 2016 due to changes in the estimated date of resolution. The
company recorded a gain in other (income) expense, net of $20 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 following the settlement of an indemnification liability with Baxter.
F-79
Corporate Overhead and Other Allocations from Baxter Prior to Separation
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the company did not operate as a standalone business and had various relationships with Baxter whereby
Baxter provided services to the company. In the financial statements prior to the separation, Baxter provided the company certain services, which included, but were not limited to, executive oversight, treasury, finance, legal, human resources, tax
planning, internal audit, financial reporting, information technology and investor relations. The financial information in the combined financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2015 did not necessarily include all the expenses that
would have been incurred had the company been a separate, standalone entity. Baxter charged the company for these services based on direct and indirect costs. When specific identification was not practicable, a proportional cost method was used,
primarily based on sales, headcount, or square footage. These allocations were reflected as follows during the three months ended March 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Three months ended
March 31, 2015
|
|
Cost of sales allocations
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative allocations
|
|
|
122
|
|
Research and development allocations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Total corporate overhead and other allocations from Baxter
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
|
Management believes that the methods used to allocate expenses to the companys historical financial statements were
reasonable.
NOTE 15
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In December 2014 and August 2015, the company
completed the divestitures of its commercial vaccines business and certain vaccines-related R&D programs, respectively. The three months ended March 31, 2015 includes a net after-tax gain of $9 million as a result of a purchase price adjustment
related to the December 2014 divestiture of the commercial vaccines business.
As a result of the divestitures, the operations and cash flows
of the vaccines business were eliminated from the ongoing operations of the company. The companys results did not include income from discontinued operations during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Following is a summary of the operating
results and gain on the sale of the vaccines business during the three months ended March 31, 2015, which have been reflected as discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes, excluding gain on sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gain on sale before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
F-80
The exchange agent for the exchange offer is:
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
The letter of transmittal and certificates evidencing shares of Baxter common stock and any other required documents should be sent or
delivered by each stockholder or broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee to the exchange agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., at one of its addresses set forth in the instructions booklet to the letter of transmittal.
Notices of guaranteed delivery and notices of withdrawal may be sent to the exchange agent by facsimile transmission at (617) 360-6810, and the receipt of such facsimile transmission may be confirmed by telephone at (781) 575-2332.
Questions or requests for assistance may be directed to the information agent at the addresses and telephone numbers listed below. Additional
copies of this prospectus and the applicable letter of transmittal and instructions thereto may be obtained from the information agent. A stockholder may also contact brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies or similar institutions for
assistance concerning the exchange offer.
The information agent for the exchange offer is:
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall
Street, New York, NY 10005
1-800-622-1649 (toll-free in the United States)
1-212-269-5550 (for banks and brokers)
The dealer manager for the exchange offer is:
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 20.
|
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
|
The DGCL authorizes corporations to
limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors to corporations and their shareholders for monetary damages for breaches of directors fiduciary duties as directors, and Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation
includes such an exculpation provision. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include provisions that require Baxalta to indemnify, to the fullest extent allowable under the DGCL, the
directors and officers of Baxalta or any of its subsidiaries. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws also provide that Baxalta must pay the expenses incurred by the indemnified person in
defending or otherwise participating in any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, subject to Baxaltas receipt of an undertaking from the indemnified party that such party will repay such amount if it is ultimately determined that
such party is not entitled to be indemnified by Baxalta. Baxaltas amended and restated certificate of incorporation expressly authorizes Baxalta to carry insurance to protect Baxaltas directors and officers against liability asserted
against them or incurred by them in any such capacity.
The registrant has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and
officers. Subject to certain limited exceptions, under these agreements, the registrant will be obligated, to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL, to indemnify such directors and officers against all expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid
in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of any actions brought against them by reason of the fact that they were directors or officers of the registrant or were officers, directors, employees or
agents of any other corporation or enterprise of which they were serving at the request of the registrant. The registrant also maintains liability insurance for its directors and officers in order to limit its exposure to liability for
indemnification of such persons.
ITEM 21.
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
See Exhibit Index.
(b)
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
None.
(A) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the Securities Act) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with
the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
II-1
(B) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond to requests for information that is
incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to Item 4, 10(b), 11, or 13 of this form, within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means. This
includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through the date of responding to the request.
(C) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction,
and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became effective.
II-2
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 4 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Bannockburn, State of Illinois, on May 12, 2016.
|
|
|
Baxalta Incorporated
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Ludwig N. Hantson
|
|
|
Name: Ludwig N. Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Amendment No. 4 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4 has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on May 12, 2016.
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
*
Ludwig N.
Hantson, Ph.D.
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
|
|
|
*
Robert J.
Hombach
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Operations Officer
(principal financial officer)
|
|
|
*
John A.
McCoy
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller
(principal accounting officer)
|
|
|
*
Wayne T.
Hockmeyer, Ph.D.
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
*
Blake E.
Devitt
|
|
Director
|
|
|
*
Karen J.
Ferrante, M.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
*
John D.
Forsyth
|
|
Director
|
II-3
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
*
Gail D.
Fosler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
*
James R.
Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
*
François Nader, M.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
*
Albert P.L.
Stroucken
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Stephanie D. Miller
|
|
|
Attorney-in-Fact
|
II-4
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated,
filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 11, 2016, among Shire plc, BearTracks, Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed January
11, 2016).
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Baxalta Incorporateds Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 30,
2015).
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Shareholders and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta
Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture between Baxalta Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, dated as of June 23, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed
June 23, 2015).
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, to the Indenture dated as of June 23, 2015, between Baxalta Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, dated as of June 23, 2015 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed June 23, 2015).
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2015, by and among Baxalta Incorporated, Baxter International Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and UBS Securities LLC as
representatives of the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed June 23, 2015).
|
|
|
5.1**
|
|
Opinion of Stephanie D. Miller regarding the validity of the common stock.
|
|
|
8.1*
|
|
Opinion of KPMG LLP, dated June 30, 2015.
|
|
|
8.2*
|
|
Opinion of KPMG LLP, dated May 12, 2016.
|
|
|
C 10.1
|
|
Form of Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Baxalta Incorporated, filed April 10, 2015).
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Transition Services Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July
2, 2015).
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2,
2015).
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed
July 2, 2015).
|
II-5
|
|
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2,
2015).
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Trademark License Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July
2, 2015).
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
International Commercial Operations Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among Baxalta World Trade LLC, Baxalta GmbH, Baxalta Holding B.V., Baxter World Trade Corporation, Baxter Healthcare SA and Baxter Holding B.V.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Long Term Services Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between Baxter International Inc. and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July
2, 2015).
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Galaxy License Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and among Baxter International Inc., Baxter Healthcare SA and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta
Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.10
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Baxalta Incorporated, filed April 10, 2015).
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated February 20, 2015, between Hub Mid-West LLC and Baxter Healthcare Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 of Baxalta
Incorporated, filed May 29, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.12
|
|
Baxalta Incorporated 2015 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Baxalta Incorporateds Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-205329 filed June 29, 2015).
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2015, among Baxalta Incorporated as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and certain other financial institutions named therein (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.14
|
|
2015 Baxalta Incorporated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.15
|
|
First Amendment to the Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan of Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed April 7, 2016).
|
|
|
C 10.16
|
|
Baxalta Incorporated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.17
|
|
Baxalta Incorporated and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Baxalta Incorporateds Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-205330 filed June 29, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.18
|
|
Baxalta Incorporated and Subsidiaries Supplemental Pension Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.19
|
|
Form of Severance Agreement entered into with executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.20
|
|
Baxalta Incorporated Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed July 2, 2015).
|
II-6
|
|
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2015, among Baxalta Incorporated as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and certain other financial institutions named
therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Baxalta Incorporated, filed November 12, 2015).
|
|
|
C 10.22
|
|
Amendment to Form of Severance Agreement entered into with executive officers, effective as of November 11, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Baxalta Incorporated, filed November 12,
2015).
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2016, among Baxter International Inc., Shire plc and Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed January 11,
2016).
|
|
|
C 10.24
|
|
Form of Severance Agreements Amendment between Baxalta Incorporated and certain of Baxalta Incorporateds executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K of Baxalta Incorporated,
filed January 11, 2016).
|
|
|
12*
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
|
15*
|
|
Letter Re Unaudited Interim Financial Information of Baxter International Inc.
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Baxalta Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Baxalta Incorporated, filed March 3, 2016).
|
|
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (with respect to Baxalta).
|
|
|
23.2*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (with respect to Baxter).
|
|
|
23.3**
|
|
Consent of Stephanie D. Miller (included in Exhibit 5.1 above).
|
|
|
23.4*
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP (included in Exhibit 8.2 above).
|
|
|
24.1**
|
|
Powers of Attorney (included on signature pages to initial filing of this Registration Statement on Form S-4 on March 21, 2016).
|
|
|
99.1**
|
|
Form of Letter of Transmittal
|
|
|
99.2**
|
|
Instructions for Letter of Transmittal
|
|
|
99.3**
|
|
Form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery
|
|
|
99.4**
|
|
Form of Letter to Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Other Nominees
|
|
|
99.5**
|
|
Form of Letter to Clients for Use by Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Other Nominees
|
|
|
99.6**
|
|
Form of Notice of Withdrawal
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
C
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
II-7
Baxalta Incorporated (NYSE:BXLT)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Abr 2024 a May 2024
Baxalta Incorporated (NYSE:BXLT)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De May 2023 a May 2024