Seabridge Gold (TSX:SEA) (NYSE:SA) announced today that winter
drilling at its 100%-owned Courageous Lake Project has successfully
identified two new gold zones, Olsen and Marsh Pond, with widths
and grades suggesting they could make a contribution to project
resources similar to the Walsh Lake Deposit discovered by Seabridge
in 2012. This year’s drill program also found two other
target zones that, with additional work, could potentially
contribute to the resource base at the Courageous Lake Project.
Three targets did not return positive results.
Walsh Lake has a near surface inferred resource
of 482,000 ounces of gold (4.6 million tonnes grading 3.24 g/T).
Metallurgical testing has demonstrated that the material is
free-milling with cyanide recoveries as high as 95%.
The 2018 winter drill program at Courageous Lake
was designed as an initial drill test of seven targets reporting
historical gold occurrences to determine which ones had sufficient
grade, strike and width within 200 meters of surface to potentially
replicate the Walsh Lake Deposit (see map). All the targets
accompany deformation zones within a well-defined stratigraphic
package near the contact between metamorphosed volcanic rocks and
clastic metasedimentary rocks and each produced a consistent
geophysical response. Seabridge has now tested the favourable
stratigraphy over a distance of 7.5 kilometers but it can be traced
for more than 53kilometers through the entire Seabridge claim
block.
Rudi Fronk, Chairman and CEO of Seabridge,
commented: “We see the potential for a more economic Courageous
Lake Project at current gold prices by mining higher-grade,
free-milling satellite deposits like Walsh Lake as well as the
refractory reserves in the much larger FAT deposit. We are
therefore very pleased with the results from this year’s drilling
because we now have two more attractive targets for follow-up work
as well as some potentially significant new target ideas we need to
evaluate. Our next step is to develop a conceptual design for a
greater Courageous Lake operation that could exploit the satellite
deposits early in the project life.”
Assay results from the four most prospective
targets are as follow:
Target Area |
Drill Hole |
TotalLength(meters) |
From(meters) |
To(meters) |
Intercept(meters) |
GoldGrade(g/T) |
Marsh Pond |
CL-284 |
201.0 |
105.0 |
119.0 |
14.0 |
3.08 |
Marsh Pond |
CL-285 |
198.0 |
75.5 |
99.5 |
24.0 |
2.13 |
including |
90.5 |
99.5 |
9.0 |
5.02 |
|
147.3 |
151.8 |
4.5 |
2.41 |
Marsh Pond |
CL-287 |
210.0 |
126.1 |
144.0 |
17.9 |
1.72 |
including |
126.1 |
133.5 |
7.4 |
3.17 |
Olsen |
CL-286 |
330.0 |
43.8 |
84.2 |
40.4 |
3.04 |
including |
57.0 |
84.2 |
27.2 |
4.14 |
Olsen |
CL-288 |
279.0 |
156.5 |
170.8 |
14.3 |
0.93 |
North Bulldog |
CL-275 |
201.0 |
100.0 |
119.1 |
19.1 |
1.40 |
including |
57.0 |
119.1 |
5.0 |
4.71 |
North Bulldog |
CL-276 |
252.0 |
171.5 |
185.0 |
13.5 |
0.62 |
201.5 |
215.0 |
13.5 |
0.60 |
North Bulldog |
CL-277 |
201.0 |
134.0 |
145.0 |
11.0 |
1.17 |
North Bulldog |
CL-278 |
278.0 |
165.0 |
177.0 |
12.0 |
0.47 |
North Bulldog |
CL-280 |
402.0 |
No significant intervals |
North Bulldog |
CL-283 |
398.0 |
No significant intervals |
Perrson |
CL-289 |
147.0 |
8.9 |
12.5 |
3.7 |
2.88 |
75.0 |
78.0 |
3.0 |
7.44 |
Perrson |
CL-291A |
206.0 |
78.0 |
87.0 |
9.0 |
2.59 |
Perrson |
CL-293 |
159.0 |
39.7 |
43.5 |
3.9 |
2.66 |
Perrson |
CL-295 |
198.0 |
No significant intervals |
Perrson |
CL-296 |
177.0 |
93.0 |
96.0 |
3.0 |
1.70 |
This drill program orientated holes to intersect
the targets perpendicular to the strike of the zones, to obtain a
true width intersection of the target feature. It is believed
that these intervals represent the true width of the target zones,
but additional drilling is required to confirm the zone widths.
Both the Marsh Pond and Olsen targets returned
results that meet the program’s goals of identifying gold-bearing
zones with characteristics similar to the Walsh Lake
discovery. These two target zones appear to duplicate the
upper and lower stratigraphic intervals found at Walsh Lake. Drill
testing is required to determine if these zones could be connected
to form a single, larger occurrence.
The Marsh Pond target is recognized over a
strike distance of about 400 meters with gold concentrated in a
broad zone of silicic alteration, quartz veining and sulfide
mineralization. Intercalated within the sedimentary rocks in
the Marsh Pond target are narrow felsic volcanic units. These
units show more intense silica alteration, sulfide mineralization
and consistently higher gold grades.
Thus far, the target at Olsen shows roughly 400
meters of strike, represented by a broad zone of silica alteration
in fine grained metasedimentary rocks. Deformation in this
target is broader than expected and accompanied by intense sericite
alteration with intervals of abundant quartz veining.
North Bulldog was originally thought to be two
parallel geophysical anomalies which were targeted separately in
this drill program. These anomalies have now been consolidated into
a single target zone just over 1,000 meters in strike length. The
North Bulldog area returned numerous intervals with grades below
our requirements. A broad deformation zone at the contact of
sedimentary rocks and mafic volcanic rocks contains localized
quartz veining and silica-sericite alteration. In addition,
intervals of silica alteration and quartz veining were discovered
above the deformed contact in fine grained sedimentary rock.
The size of this target and an abundance of gold in these holes
warrant more effort to refine a target that could meet grade
requirements.
Perrson is a gold-bearing vein in an isolated
surface exposure within a historic prospect pit. Expectations
were for this to be a discreet occurrence along the target
stratigraphic contact. The wide vein and structural off-sets
provide evidence that this target could be the southern terminus of
the Walsh Lake deposit. Additional work is required to
establish this connection but this target remains a priority as it
could significantly expand the limits of the Walsh Lake
deposit.
The Courageous Lake Project covers almost all of
the 53 km long Mathews Lake Greenstone Belt (MLGB) which hosts
Seabridge's Felsic-Ash-Tuff (FAT) deposit. A July 2012
Pre-feasibility Study estimated that the FAT Deposit contains 6.46
million ounces of proven and probable gold reserves over
approximately 2.5 kilometers of strike length as follows:
Courageous Lake Mineral
Reserves
Reserve Category |
Tonnes (000’s) |
Diluted Grade(g/T) |
Contained Gold (000’s
Ounces) |
Proven |
12,300 |
2.41 |
960 |
Probable |
78,800 |
2.17 |
5,500 |
Total |
91,100 |
2.20 |
6,460 |
Exploration activities by Seabridge at the
Courageous Lake Project were conducted under the supervision of
William E. Threlkeld, Registered Professional Geologist, Senior
Vice President of the Company and a Qualified Person as defined by
National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Threlkeld has reviewed and approved
this news release. A rigorous quality control/quality
assurance protocol was employed in this drill program, including
blank and certified reference standard inserted by the Company at
the rate of not less than one of each type of sample in every assay
batch processed by the laboratory. Repeats and re-splits of
the sample rejects were analyzed at a rate of not less than one
sample in every 25. Samples were assayed at an ISO certified
laboratory in Vancouver, B. C. using fire assay atomic adsorption
methods for gold and total digestion ICP methods for other
elements. Intervals that returned greater than 10g/T Au were
re-assayed using gravimetric finishes. Intervals with very
high gold grades and surrounding intervals were also analysed using
metallic screen fire assay techniques; this method was completed on
2.5% of the analyses. Cross-check analyses were conducted at
a second external laboratory on 10% of the samples.
Seabridge Gold holds a 100% interest in several
North American gold resource projects. The Company's principal
assets are the KSM and Iskut properties located near Stewart,
British Columbia, Canada and the Courageous Lake gold project
located in Canada's Northwest Territories. For a breakdown of
Seabridge's mineral reserves and resources by project and category
please visit the Company's website at
http://www.seabridgegold.net/resources.php.
Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange, New
York Stock Exchange, nor their Regulation Services Providers,
accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this
release.
All reserve and resource estimates
reported by the Corporation were calculated in accordance with the
Canadian National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy Classification system. These standards differ
significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. Mineral resources which are not mineral
reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
This document contains "forward-looking
information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation
and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This
information and these statements, referred to herein as
"forward-looking statements" are made as of the date of this
document. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or
future performance and reflect current estimates, predictions,
expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but
are not limited to, statements with respect to: (i) the potential
of any of the gold zones and target zones to contribute to Project
resources; (ii) the estimated amount and grade of mineral reserves
and estimates underlying the reserve determination, including
estimates of resources, the capital costs of constructing mine
facilities and bringing a mine into production, the amount of
future production and estimates of operating costs, net cash flow
and economic returns from an operating mine; (iii) the potential to
improve Project economics by mining higher-grade, free-milling
satellite deposits like Walsh Lake; (iv) the new target zones
appearing to duplicate the upper and lower stratigraphic intervals
found at Walsh Lake; and (v) the possibility that the Perrson
target could be the southern terminus of the Walsh Lake deposit.
Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to
predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives
or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words
or phrases such as "expects", "anticipates", "plans", "projects",
"estimates", "envisages", "assumes", "intends", "strategy",
"goals", "objectives" or variations thereof or stating that certain
actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or
"will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of
these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of
historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements are based
on Seabridge's or its consultants' current beliefs as well as
various assumptions made by them and information currently
available to them. These assumptions include: (i) the presence of
and continuity of metals at the Project at observed or modeled
grades; (ii) the capacities of various machinery and equipment;
(iii) the availability of personnel, machinery and equipment at
estimated prices; (iv) exchange rates; (v) metals sales prices;
(vi) appropriate discount rates; (vii) tax rates and royalty rates
applicable to the proposed mining operation; (viii) financing
structure and costs; (ix) anticipated mining losses and dilution;
(x) metallurgical performance; (xi) reasonable contingency
requirements; (xii) success in realizing proposed operations;
(xiii) receipt of regulatory approvals on acceptable terms, (xiv)
the negotiation of satisfactory terms with impacted Treaty and
First Nations groups; and (xv) continuity of observed
mineralization and its association with other geological
structures. Although management considers these assumptions to be
reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may
prove to be incorrect. Many forward-looking statements are made
assuming the correctness of other forward-looking statements, such
as statements of net present value and internal rates of return,
which are based on most of the other forward-looking statements and
assumptions herein. The cost information is also prepared using
current values, but the time for incurring the costs will be in the
future and it is assumed costs will remain stable over the relevant
period.
By their very nature, forward-looking
statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general
and specific, and risks exist that estimates, forecasts,
projections and other forward-looking statements will not be
achieved or that assumptions do not reflect future experience. We
caution readers not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could
cause the actual outcomes to differ materially from the beliefs,
plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates
assumptions and intentions expressed in such forward-looking
statements. These risk factors may be generally stated as the risk
that the assumptions and estimates expressed above do not occur,
but specifically include, without limitation: risks relating to
variations in the mineral content within the mineralized material
identified, in particular mineral reserves or mineral resources,
from that predicted; variations in rates of recovery and
extraction; developments in world metals markets; risks relating to
fluctuations in the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar;
increases in the estimated capital and operating costs or
unanticipated costs; difficulties attracting the necessary work
force; increases in financing costs or adverse changes to the terms
of available financing, if any; tax rates or royalties being
greater than assumed; changes in development or mining plans due to
changes in logistical, technical or other factors; changes in
project parameters as plans continue to be refined; risks relating
to receipt of regulatory approvals or settlement of an agreement
with impacted Treaty and First Nations groups; the effects of
competition in the markets in which Seabridge operates; operational
and infrastructure risks and the additional risks described in
Seabridge's Annual Information Form filed with SEDAR in Canada
(available at www.sedar.com) for
the year ended December 31, 2017 and in the Corporation's Annual
Report Form 40-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on EDGAR (available at
www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml).Seabridge
cautions that the foregoing list of factors that may affect future
results is not exhaustive.
When relying on our forward-looking
statements to make decisions with respect to Seabridge, investors
and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and
other uncertainties and potential events. Seabridge does not
undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written
or oral, that may be made from time to time by Seabridge or on our
behalf, except as required by law.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD"Rudi
Fronk"Chairman and C.E.O.
For further information, please contact:Rudi P. Fronk, Chairman
and C.E.O.Tel: (416) 367-9292 Fax: (416)
367-2711Email: info@seabridgegold.net
Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024