fink
3 años hace
Most definitely far from dead. It just adds more cost to a shell.
I bet Synergy is going to get a rush of customers holding control of shells.
Good for us, Ben knows the good from the bad. I can imagine he’s going to be bending over a few shell guys. ie, Ribs. They saw the train light heading their way in the long tunnel. That God for them they already forged a relationship with synergy. That one in particular is a gut buster to me. Just because you can by a jet, doesn’t mean you can start it up. Punks. When I read that synergy tweet Friday morning, I laughed so hard. Poured in $2k slapping like a drunk’n sailor.
Talk about showing your hand. JW Roth is going to be bent over the buffet table.
Back in the day, Scottrade let us buy Grey sheet shares.
The trick was to match up your buy with a BID order. It had to be exact. One for one. Snd you could get ignored for weeks.
fink
3 años hace
Mid August.
If the shell looks like nothing is going on through the courts, you might want to not be holding shares. DE plays like this are a prime example. But I love the SS here.
Shells in Bankruptcy
Maybe ones with maxed out A/S
Most of synergies I’m willing to hold into the grey sheets if the float is low.
I spoke with Ben. An extra $10-25k is not bad for a good clean shell to clear delisting hell. It’s just an extra cost. No big deal.
But one with a blown multi Billion A/S, unpaid taxes, no T/A, unconverted debt? Toast till the end of time.
I think it will thin the pool of R/M players. Guys like Ben will rise to the top.
Good Shells will become even more valuable like IHAI types.
Delaware and Texas shells got me nervous.
And always remember this. A shell can not convert old toxic debt notes while under delinquency.
If a shell knee jerks to get off the greys, it opens up those one notes to legally be converted..by law. Those note holders can sue. Adds a long legal court drama.
It’s why is a good thing to have a shell today with the stop sign till the R/M goes through. Allow the New Co to bring it current.
Best to go back and read those old 10ks to get a hint of old unconverted debt. Those shells are as good as dead forever. And I mean the ones in the $300k+ and above notes. $10-20k notes can be negotiated with a level head.
Float # x Price is below $500k-$1mm I’ll hold past Aug 28th
This is what I’ve been stewing over.,
I like CERX’s last 8k after they dropped the Form 15. It looks like they washed the Company out with the second R/S. 5mm O/S is nothing. If you read the last 10Q it said “LIFE” owned 57% of the shares. Retail 43%
I’d assume that same 57% owns that portion of the 5mm OS today. Hell they voted for the storm 15 and R/S it’s probably who Ben is dealing with behind the scenes. Who are they? They probably have no clue who to bring one if these back to life and park a New Company story in it. All old Preferrd share warrant expired years ago.
Float must be around 2mm. WOW!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=9174798&guid=pnXUkaTrf7nAFth
See, I’ll hold this one into the delisting limbo. No more than $2k of my money.,
It she runs hard between now snd Aug 15th, I’ll get some of my cash out. I’m definitely loading on the BID niw, flipping above 60% for free shares. But no volume and a 100% spread with no sign of news potential? I ain’t getting anything.
I’m not slapping with other Synergy plays popp’n every week.
This second guessing is part of the game.
To me it’s way more fun than casinos.,
LINK Oracle
4 años hace
Update 2/12/21
ALKN Alkane, Inc. now has a hearing is set for April 19, 2021. I am still waiting on the other two Florida companies (BABL Buildablock Corp. & BDCM Broadcast Marketing Group, Inc.) to be filed and hearing to be scheduled.
I had a productive conference call with my California attorney (Bret Anderson) and team regarding the petitions (THDS 3Dshopping.com & AESO Atlantic Energy Solutions, Inc.) which the judge denied my request to be appointed to the board. The plan going forward and suggested by the judge was to have a shareholder meeting ordered by the court and to do elections at the meeting. This seems to be a viable option and the attorney is going to try to get hearings scheduled as soon as possible ordering this.
For Delaware petitions I talked with the Chancellors clerk today and was told the cases (ICRD, AVSR, AVPI, SNRY, IPUB, CERX, FRMB) are on the Chancellor’s desk to review and that he is extremely busy.
On EMDF XL Rent, Inc. we have a term sheet signed. The other party is now asking for some due diligence on the company before proceeding which we have an attorney assisting with.
GVDI Golden Valley Development, Inc. is a little delayed in completing branding for the new business direction, but I was told everything should be completed by next week.
MerthyrQ
4 años hace
It looks like you may not understand how this works...
The old shareholders holding a controlling interest, often a relative massive controlling interest sell their shares outside the market. It may be possible for the old shareholders to elect the new board prior to the sale, but often it is the new controlling shareholders who elect a new Board of Directors, themselves, and then the new Board of Directors elect the new officers......again themselves. They may make changes later.
So, the old shareholders, the old controlling ones, often the insiders, do make the changes to allow for the new insiders to have control, by selling their shares.
The new controllers, often referred to as the new owners even though they don't own the floating shares, then take the company in the direction they wish.
Note; Not all idle corporations which are publicly traded, have the characteristics suitable for this kind of venture. The may have old liens, IRS problems, lawsuits, and other baggage which makes the company undesirable. Many corporate shells sold have been out of business for several years, or more.
That is why you seen interest in some old shells and the posts on such Boards as this speak of merger, buyout, or other terms suggesting a change in leadership and ownership of a controlling interest.
Enough teaching of this subject!
MerthyrQ
4 años hace
Perhaps some investors would see the "lawyer present" data and sufficient to make a highly speculative purchase. Perhaps that is why the stock is at an unsustainable higher value. If the a lawyer is present and a merger occurs then perhaps, in a very long shot, the shell becomes very much alive. Some bottom feeders thrive on this environment.
The officers and directors may be long gone, but they still own the stock. And, what does "long gone" mean. Those big shareholders still have the voting power to establish a Board of Directors, and in turn, officers.