Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
Nature of Business
Sugarmade,
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “we”, “us” or “the/our Company”) is a publicly-traded company incorporated
in the state of Delaware. Our previous legal name was Diversified Opportunities, Inc. Our Company, Sugarmade, Inc. operates much of its
business activities through our subsidiaries, SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation (“SWC’’), NUG Avenue, Inc.,
a California corporation (“Nug Avenue”), and Lemon Glow Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”).
Sugarmade, Inc. was founded in 2010. In 2014, CarryOutSupplies.com was acquired by Sugarmade, Inc., creating the Company as it is today.
Shares
of our common stock are quoted on the OTC Markets, which is a quotation system for early-stage and developing companies. Our trading
symbol is “SGMD”. Our corporate website is www.Sugarmade.com.
As
of the date of this filing, we are involved in several business sectors and business ventures:
Paper
and paper-based products: The supply of consumable products to the quick-service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry,
and as an importer and distributor of non-medical personal protection equipment to business and consumers, via our CarryOutSupplies.com
subsidiary (“Carryout Supplies”). Carryout Supplies is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies,
servicing more than 2,000 quick-service restaurants. The primary products are plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice
cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, edible packaging, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons, and similar products for this
market sector. This subsidiary, which was formed in 2009, was recently expanded to also offer non-medical personal protective equipment.
NUG
Avenue, Inc. investment into licensed cannabis delivery in Los Angeles area markets. During February 2021, we became a majority owner
of NUG Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“NUG Avenue”), which operates a licensed and regulated cannabis delivery service
out of Lynwood, California, serving the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area (the “Lynwood Operations”). The Company currently
owns a majority stake of seventy percent (70%) of NUG Avenue’s Lynwood Operations and holds first rights of refusal on NUG Avenue’s
business expansion relative to the cannabis marketplace. By way of our capital injection made into NUG Avenue and by via our 70% ownership
position, we consolidate and recognize 100% of the revenues and 70% of profits or loss generated by NUG Ave for its Lynwood Operation.
Cannabis
products delivery service and sales: As a joint owner in the Budcars licensed cannabis delivery service brand (“Budcars”
or the “Budcars Brand”). Budcars operates a licensed cannabis delivery service in the Sacramento, California area. During
early 2020, the Company entered into agreement with Indigo Dye Group (“Indigo”) to acquire 40% stake in the Budcars Brand
and in the Sacramento delivery operations. Under the terms of the agreement with Indigo, Sugarmade acquired an option to purchase an
additional 30% interest in Budcars. Upon exercise of this option, the Company would acquire a controlling interest in Indigo. As of June
30, 2021, the option has not yet been exercised and the Company’s stake in Budcars was at 40%. Starting on October 1, 2020, the
Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore,
the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company
is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent
of Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated
and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and changed to equity method of accounting.
Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not to continue to make monthly payments,
its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of December 31, 2020, the Company made
$59,370 additional payments, and hold approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo. As of June 30, 2021, the Company recorded equity
method investment in affiliates at $441,407, net with $81,725 loss from equity method investment. (See Note 6 and Note 7)
Selected
cannabis and hemp projects: On May 12, 2021, SugarMade, Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended (the “Merger
Agreement”) by and between Lemon Glow Corporation, a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), Carnaby Spot Bay Corp,
a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”) and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder
Representative”), pursuant to which, on May 25, 2021 and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement,
Merger Sub merged with and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). The principal
asset of Lemon Glow is land and the Company is not an operating company. As a result of the Merger, Lemon Glow became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“GAAP”).
Principles
of consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation
(“SWC’’), Lemon Glow Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), and its majority owned subsidiary,
NUG Avenue, Inc., a California corporation (“Nug Avenue”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Going
concern
The
Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet
its obligations, in which it has not been successful, and/or obtaining additional financing from its shareholders or other sources, as
may be required.
Our
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates
the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts
and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Management
is endeavoring to increase revenue-generating operations. While priority is on generating cash from operations through the sale of the
Company’s products, management is also seeking to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including
the sale of the Company’s equity and/or debt securities, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms to our Company,
or which may not be available at all. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our business
as desired and our operating results will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse
effects on us and/or our stockholders. Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless
of operating results and may involve restrictions limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional
funds, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences
or privileges senior to those of the current holders of our common stock.
Business
combinations
The
Company applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, in accounting for its acquisitions. It requires the Company to recognize separately
from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, at the acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date
is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed. The Company used third party valuation company to determine the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding
offset to goodwill.
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
We
recognize revenue in accordance with FASB ASC No. 606, Revenue Recognition. Sugarmade applied a five-step approach in determining
the amount and timing of revenue to be recognized: (1) identifying the contract with a customer, (2) identifying the performance obligations
in the contract, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
and (5) recognizing revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied.
Substantially
all of the Company’s revenue is recognized at the time control of the products transfers to the customer.
Leases
In
February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02,
which requires lessees to recognize the rights and obligations created by leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about
leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements
to Topic 842, and ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842. The new standard establishes a right-of-use
model (ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer
than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense
recognition in the statement of operations.
The
new standard became effective April 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all
leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of
the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second
option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and
the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the
new standard for the comparative periods. The Company adopted the new standard on July 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition
approach as of the effective date of the initial application. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in
transition. The Company elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permits entities not to reassess under the new
lease standard prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company does not expect
to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements.
The
most significant effects of the adoption of the new standard relate to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease labilities on our
balance sheet for office operating leases and providing significant new disclosures about our leasing activities.
The
new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. The Company has also elected the short-term
leases recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means that the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities,
and this includes not recognizing ROU assets and lease liabilities, for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The
Company also currently expects to elect the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for its leases. All existing
leases are reported under this rule.
Under
ASC 840, leases were classified as either capital or operating, and the classification significantly impacted the effect the contract
had on the company’s financial statements. Capital lease classification resulted in a liability that was recorded on a company’s
balance sheet, whereas operating leases did not impact the balance sheet.
Property
and equipment
Property
and equipment is stated at the historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation on property and equipment is provided using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets for both financial and income tax reporting purposes as follows:
Machinery
and equipment
|
|
|
3-15
years
|
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
|
7
years
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
5
years
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
30
years
|
|
Expenditures
for renewals and betterments are capitalized while repairs and maintenance costs are normally charged to the statement of operations
in the year in which they are incurred. In situations where it can be clearly demonstrated that the expenditure has resulted in an increase
in the future economic benefits expected to be obtained from the use of the asset, the expenditure is capitalized as an additional cost
of the asset.
Upon
sale or disposal of an asset, the historical cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization of such asset were removed from
their respective accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the statements of income.
The
Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.
In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment
include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand,
competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded
in operating expenses during the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
assets, which include property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability
of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows,
an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair
value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.
Based on its review, there was $43,800 and $2,066,958 impairment loss of its long-lived assets as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Income
taxes
We
account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their perspective
tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years
in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are recorded, when necessary,
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
As
a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740’’), which clarifies the accounting
and disclosure for uncertainty in tax position, as defined, ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain
aspect of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes.
We
adopted the provisions of ASC 740 as of October 2, 2008 and have analyzed filing positions in each of the federal and state jurisdictions
where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have identified the U.S. federal
and California as our ‘major’ tax jurisdictions and generally, we remain subject to Internal Revenue Service examination
after our 2013 U.S. federal income tax returns. However, we have certain tax attribute carryforwards, which will remain subject to review
and adjustment by the relevant tax authorities until the statute of limitations closes with respect to the year in which such attributes
are utilized.
We
believe that our income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and do not anticipate any adjustments that will
result in a material change to our financial position. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant
to ASC 740. In addition, we did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of ASC 740. Our policy for recording
interest and penalties associated with income-based tax audits is to record such items as a component of income taxes. We have
not taken any uncertain positions that would necessitate recording of tax related liability as of June 30, 2021 and 2020.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under
the acquisition method. Intangible assets represent purchased intangible assets including developed technology and in-process research
and development, technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and
trademarks and tradenames. Purchased finite-lived intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and trademarks and tradenames
are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of the terms of the agreement, or estimated useful life. We capitalize cannabis cultivation
license acquired as part of a business combination.
Stock
based compensation
Stock
based compensation cost to employees is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and
will be recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). We estimate
the fair value of employee stock options granted using the Binomial Option Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value
of stock options will include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, the expected
option term, the risk-free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility and the expected annual dividend yield on our
common stock. We use our company’s own data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected
forfeiture rate. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value
of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.
Loss
per share
We
calculate basic earnings per share (“EPS”) by dividing our net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the period, without considering common stock equivalents. Diluted BPS is computed by dividing net income or net loss by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents, such
as options and warrants. Options and warrants are only included in the calculation of diluted EPS when their effect is dilutive.
Fair
value of financial instruments
ASC
Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure
of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level
1- observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level
2 - include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level
3 - unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The
Company used Level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology for the derivative liabilities for conversion feature of the convertible notes
and warrants in determining the fair value using Lattice Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:
Derivative
instruments
The
fair value of derivative instruments is recorded and shown separately under liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives liability
are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations under non-operating income (expense).
Our
Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify
as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially
recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated
statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes- Merton
option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative
instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting
period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash
settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Segment
Reporting
FASB
ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting’’, requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting.
The management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the Company for making operating
decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure,
or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company.
The
Company’s financial statements reflect that substantially all of its operations are conducted in three industry segments
– (1) paper and paper-based products such as paper cups, cup lids, food containers, etc., which accounts approx. 44% of
the Company’s revenues; (2) Non-medical supplies such as non-medical fascial mask, which accounts approx. 0% of the Company’s
total revenues; (3) Cannabis products delivery service and sales, which accounts approx. 56% of the Company’s total revenues.
New
accounting pronouncements
In
December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. The pronouncement simplifies the
accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. The
pronouncement also improves consistent application of and simplifies GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing
guidance. ASU 2019-12 will be effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted. We are still
evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures
(Topic 323), and Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815), which clarifies the interaction of rules for equity securities, the equity method
of accounting, and forward contracts and purchase options on certain types of securities. The guidance clarifies how to account for the
transition into and out of the equity method of accounting when considering observable transactions under the measurement alternative.
The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim reporting periods within those
annual periods, with early adoption permitted. The Company have adopted this ASU on the consolidated financial statements in the year
ended June 30, 2021. The adoption had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements in the year ended June 30, 2021.
Prior
period reclassification
Certain
prior period balance sheet accounts have been reclassified in conformity with current period presentation including reclassification
of $4,000 from derivative liability to warrant liability. The reclassification had no effect to the company’s consolidated statement
of operations, statement of cash flow or statement of shareholder’s equity.
3.
Business Combination
On
May 12, 2021, SugarMade, Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between
Lemon Glow Corporation, a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), Carnaby Spot Bay Corp, a California corporation and a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”) and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder Representative”), pursuant
to which, on May 25, 2021 and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with
and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Lemon Glow
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Acquisition
Consideration
The
following table summarizes the fair value of purchase price consideration to acquire Lemon Glow
(In US $000’s):
Purchase
Consideration Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
US $000’s
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Consideration
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
$
|
4,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Consideration
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
$
|
7,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing
Debt Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,043
|
|
Total
Purchase Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,749
|
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
The
cash consideration consists of $280,000 in cash and $3,976,000 in promissory notes with 5% simple interest.
|
|
(2)
|
The
equity consideration consists of 660,571,429 shares of Common stock and 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred stock.
|
Purchase
Price Allocation
The
following is an allocation of purchase price as of the May 25, 2021 acquisition closing date based upon an estimate of the fair value
of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed by the Company in the acquisition (in thousands):
Allocation
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
US $000’s
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Assets
Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Property,
Plant & Equipment
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
$
|
2,348
|
|
Total
Tangible Asset Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cannabis
Cultivation License
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,637
|
|
Total
Identifiable Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assembled
Workforce
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
Goodwill
(Excluding Assembled Workforce)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
Total
Economic Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
Consideration to be Allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,749
|
|
Notes:
|
(3)
|
The
value of the land is excluded in the calculation of depreciation.
|
Assumptions
in the Allocations of Purchase Price
Management
prepared the purchase price allocations for Lemon Glow relied upon reports of a third party valuation expert to calculate the fair value
of certain acquired assets, which primarily included identifiable intangible assets, and property and equipment.
Estimates
of fair value require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to
the acquired workforce, and other benefits that the Company believes will result from integrating the operations of the Lemon Glow with
the operations of Sugarmade. Certain liabilities included in the purchase price allocations are based on management’s best estimates
of the amounts to be paid or settled and based on information available at the time the purchase price allocations were prepared.
The
fair value of the identified intangible assets acquired from the Lemon Glow was estimated using an income approach. Under the income
approach, an intangible asset’s fair value is equal to the present value of future economic benefits to be derived from ownership
of the asset. Indications of value are developed by discounting future net cash flows to their present value at market-based rates of
return. More specifically, the fair value of the cannabis cultivation license was determined using the MPEEM method. MPEEM is an income
approach to fair value measurement attributable to a specific intangible asset being valued from the asset grouping’s overall cash-flow
stream. MPEEM isolates the expected future discounted cash-flow stream to its net present value. Significant factors considered in the
calculation of the cannabis cultivation license intangible assets were the risks inherent in the development process, including the likelihood
of government regulation and market acceptance.
In
connection with the acquisition of Lemon Glow, the Company has assumed certain operating liabilities which are included in the respective
purchase price allocations above.
Goodwill
recorded in connection with Lemon Glow was approximately $757,648. The Company does not expect to deduct any of the acquired goodwill
for tax purposes.
Proforma
Combined Financial Information
The
following table presents unaudited pro forma combined financial information for each of the periods presented, as if the acquisitions
of Lemon Glow had occurred at March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2020:
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheets
As
of March 31, 2021
|
|
Lemon
Glow Company
|
|
|
Sugarmade
Inc.
|
|
|
Pro
Forma Merger Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
Forma Combined
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
18,211
|
|
|
|
269,885
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
568,096
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75,040
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,040
|
|
Inventory,
net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
692,460
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
692,460
|
|
Loan
receivables, current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loan
receivables - related party, current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
208,931
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,931
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,066,597
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066,597
|
|
Right
of use asset, current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
237,556
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,556
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
18,211
|
|
|
|
2,550,469
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,848,680
|
|
Noncurrent
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery
and Equipment, net
|
|
|
87,645
|
|
|
|
390,189
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
477,834
|
|
Land
Improvements, net
|
|
|
341,681
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,681
|
|
Estate
Property - Land
|
|
|
1,922,376
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,922,376
|
|
Intangible
asset, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,578
|
|
|
|
10,572,600
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
10,587,178
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573,000
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
573,000
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loan
receivables - related party, noncurrent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
196,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,000
|
|
Right
of use asset, noncurrent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
549,261
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
549,261
|
|
Investment
to Indigo Dye
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
564,819
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,819
|
|
Total
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
2,351,702
|
|
|
|
1,714,847
|
|
|
|
11,145,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,212,149
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
2,369,913
|
|
|
|
4,265,316
|
|
|
|
11,425,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,060,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
payable due to bank
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,982
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,982
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
85,157
|
|
|
|
1,753,855
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,839,012
|
|
Customer
deposits
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
660,268
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060,268
|
|
Customer
overpayment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,183
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,183
|
|
Unearned
revenue
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,379
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,379
|
|
Other
payables
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
812,069
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
812,069
|
|
Accrued
interest
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
515,767
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
519,267
|
|
Accrued
compensation and personnel related payables
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Notes
payable - Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Notes
payable - Related Parties, Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,427
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,427
|
|
Lease
liability - Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
231,305
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,305
|
|
Loans
payable - Current
|
|
|
113,891
|
|
|
|
350,221
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
464,112
|
|
Loan
payable - Related Parties, Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
238,150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,150
|
|
Convertible
notes payable, Net, Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,982,902
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,982,902
|
|
Derivative
liabilities, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,723,899
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,723,899
|
|
Due
to related parties
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
Warrants
liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,216
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,216
|
|
Shares
to be issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
136,577
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,577
|
|
Total
curent liabilities
|
|
|
606,792
|
|
|
|
9,553,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,159,992
|
|
Non-current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
Payable
|
|
|
1,381,593
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,976,000
|
|
|
b
|
|
|
5,357,593
|
|
Loans
payable
|
|
|
54,408
|
|
|
|
366,495
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
420,903
|
|
Lease
liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
591,116
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
591,116
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
2,042,793
|
|
|
|
10,510,811
|
|
|
|
3,976,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,529,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity (deficiency):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized 1,541,500 shares issued outstanding at March 31, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
7,142
|
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000,000 shares authorized, 4,718,104,197 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2021
|
|
|
394,773
|
|
|
|
4,718,105
|
|
|
|
660,571
|
|
|
c
|
|
|
5,773,449
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,095,927
|
|
|
|
6,783,429
|
|
|
cd
|
|
|
69,879,356
|
|
Share
to be issued, Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Common
Stock Subscribed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,008
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(67,653
|
)
|
|
|
(74,350,923
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,418,576
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ deficiency
|
|
|
327,120
|
|
|
|
(6,299,342
|
)
|
|
|
7,449,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,477,378
|
|
Non-Controlling
Interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,847
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,847
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficiency)
|
|
|
327,120
|
|
|
|
(6,245,495
|
)
|
|
|
7,449,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531,225
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficiency)
|
|
|
2,369,913
|
|
|
|
4,265,316
|
|
|
|
11,425,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,060,829
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
For
the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2021
|
|
Lemon
Glow
Company
|
|
|
Sugarmade
Inc.
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Merger
Adjustment
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
Revenues,
net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,851,822
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,851,822
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,502,247
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,502,247
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,349,575
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,349,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
11,256
|
|
|
|
1,446,038
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,457,294
|
|
Advertising
and Promotion Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
378,068
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
378,068
|
|
Marketing
and Research Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
364,580
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
364,580
|
|
Professional
Expense
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
|
|
756,444
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
760,580
|
|
Salaries
and Wages
|
|
|
7,080
|
|
|
|
368,616
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
375,696
|
|
Stock
Compensation Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
82,250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
82,250
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(22,472
|
)
|
|
|
(2,046,421
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,068,893
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,099
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,099
|
|
Gain
in loss of control of VIE
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
313,928
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
313,928
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(45,181
|
)
|
|
|
(1,920,660
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,965,841
|
)
|
Bad
debts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(133,235
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(133,235
|
)
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
506,559
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
506,559
|
|
Warrant
Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55,695
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55,695
|
|
Loss
on notes conversion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss
on settlement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(80,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(80,000
|
)
|
Gain
on asset disposal
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization
of debt discount
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,605,144
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,605,144
|
)
|
Debt
forgiveness
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(55,054
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(55,054
|
)
|
Total
non-operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(45,181
|
)
|
|
|
(3,912,812
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,957,993
|
)
|
Equity
Method Investment Loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(67,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,961,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(48,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
(48,756
|
)
|
Net
loss attributable to SugarMade Inc.
|
|
$
|
(67,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,912,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(48,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
Diluted
net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding *
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,247,070,176
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,247,070,176
|
|
*
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debts and exercising of warrants were excluded in calculating diluted loss per share
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
As
of June 30, 2020
|
|
Lemon
Glow
Company
|
|
|
Sugarmade
Inc.
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Merger
Adjustment
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues,
net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,354,102
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,354,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,851,940
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,851,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,502,162
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,502,161.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,620,529
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,620,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,118,367
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,118,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,613,044
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,613,044
|
)
|
Bad
debts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(240,157
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(240,157
|
)
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,442,295
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,442,295
|
)
|
Warrant
Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(119,526
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(119,526
|
)
|
Gain
on debt conversion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(184,626
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(184,626
|
)
|
Loss
on settlement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(393,135
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(393,135
|
)
|
Loss
on asset disposal
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(119,044
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(119,044
|
)
|
Amortization
of debt discount
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,823,500
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,823,500
|
)
|
Debt
forgiveness
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
590,226
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
590,226
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,201
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,201
|
)
|
Impairment
Loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,066,958
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,066,958
|
)
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-operating expenses, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,416,195
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,416,195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(21,534,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(21,534,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(195,416
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(195,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributable to SugarMade Inc.
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(21,339,146
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(21,339,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Diluted
net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding *
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
958,183,933
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
958,183,933
|
|
*
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debts and exercising of warrants were excluded in calculating diluted loss per share
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
The
pro forma combined financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated
results of operations of the consolidated business had the acquisitions actually occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2020 or of
the results of future operations of the consolidated business. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect any operating
efficiencies and cost saving that may be realized from the integration of the acquisitions in the Company’s consolidated statements
of operations.
4.
Concentration
Customer
For
the year ended June 30, 2021, our Company earned net revenues of $3,979,049. The company have the following concentration of revenue
with customer that represent over 10% of overall revenue. The highest revenue from (1) customer accounted for 11.6% as percentage of
overall revenue for the year ended June 30, 2021.
For
the year ended June 30, 2020, our Company earned net revenues of $4,362,585. The company does not have any concentration of revenue with
any customer that represent over 10% of overall revenue. The highest revenue from (2) customers accounted for 5.90% and 5.1% respectively,
as percentage of overall revenue for the year ended June 30, 2020.
Suppliers
For
the year ended June 30, 2021, we purchased products for sale by the company’s subsidiaries from several contract manufacturers
located in Asia and the U.S. A substantial portion of the Company’s inventory is purchased from two (2) suppliers. The two (2)
suppliers accounted as follows: Two suppliers accounted for 33.2% and 19.40%, respectively, of the Company’s total inventory
purchase for the year ended June 30, 2021.
For
the year ended June 30, 2020, we purchased products for sale by the company’s subsidiaries from several contract manufacturers
located in Asia and the U.S. A substantial portion of the Company’s inventory is purchased from two (2) suppliers. The two (2)
suppliers accounted as follows: Two suppliers accounted for 25.5% and 16.20%, respectively, of the Company’s total inventory
purchase for the year ended June 30, 2020.
Concentration
of risk
The
Company sold non-medical facial mask during the year ended June 30, 2020, which accounts approx. 25% of the total revenue of the
Company for the year ended June 30, 2020. During the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company wrote off all the non-medical facial mask
inventories because of the demand of non-medical facial mask is declining, the masks are not selling at a profitable price.
Segment
reporting information
A
reconciliation of the Company’s segment operating income to the Consolidated Statements of Operations for June 30, 2021 and 2020
is as follows:
Segment
operating income
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Paper
and paper based products
|
|
$
|
1,748,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,832,286
|
|
Licensed
cannabis delivery
|
|
|
2,230,349
|
|
|
|
1,439,653
|
|
Non-medical
supplies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,090,646
|
|
Total
operating income
|
|
$
|
3,979,049
|
|
|
$
|
4,362,585
|
|
5.
Equity Transaction – Exclusive License Rights
During
December 2017, the Company entered into a master marketing agreement with BizRight, LLC, a leading marketer and manufacturer of hydroponic
growth supplies, which offers a range of hydroponics-related products including: HPS grow lights, electronic ballasts, HPS Bulbs, nutrient
mixes, environmental control products, pH measurement and calibration solutions and other grow and storage products. BizRight operates
the ZenHydro.com website and other e-commerce properties, and sells various products to distributors and retailers. On April 11, 2018,
the same rights under the master marketing agreement were assigned to BZRTH Inc. On February 5, 2019, the Company exercised its option
to acquire BZRTH and the transaction closed on October 30, 2019. On January 15, 2020, the Company entered into a Rescission and Mutual
Release Agreement (“Agreement”) with each of the parties agreeing to rescind the transaction and return all consideration
exchanged pursuant to the Stock Exchange Agreement.
6.
VIE
On
February 7, 2020, the Company entered into a share sale and purchase agreement (the “Indigo Agreement”) with Indigo Dye Group
Corp. (“Indigo”), a corporation located in Sacramento, California. Indigo carries on business as a cannabis seller and delivery
business under the name BudCars. The major Cannabis Products include Flower, Edibles, Vape Cartridges, Pre-Rolls, & Concentrates,
etc. All the products are finished goods. In addition, Indigo is operating a non-store front retail delivery business (Type-9 License#
C9-0000286) in California.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Indigo Agreement, the Company agreed to invest $700,000 (the “Investment”) into Indigo for inventory,
equipment, and marketing expenses. The Investment shall be made in twelve monthly equal installments of $58,333 with the acceleration
of the payment schedule possible depending on business growth, cash flow needs and capital availability.
In
exchange, the Company received 40% of Indigo’s issued shares upon execution of the final agreement. The value used for this transaction
is $1,750,000 and each percentage (1%) of the company is worth $17,500. In the event that the Company is not able to make a payment of
$58,333 in any month, it will have 90 days to cure the default. On the 91st day the investment plan will cease and the amount of invested
capital will be calculated based on an enterprise value of $1,750,000 or $17,500 per 1% of owned equity.
In
addition, subject to the terms and conditions of the Indigo Agreement, the Company has the option to acquire an additional 30% interest
in Indigo. Upon exercise of the option, the Company would obtain control over Indigo.
From
late May 2020 until September 30, 2020, the Company was actively involved in development of Indigo’s operations with power to direct
the activities and significantly impact Indigo’s economic performance. The Company also has obligations to absorb losses and right
to receive benefits from Indigo. As such, in accordance with ASC 810-10-25-38A through 25-38J, Indigo is consolidated as an VIE of the
Company.
Starting
on October 1, 2020, the Company began to explore new locations via purchasing equity into other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery
for the entire state of California. Therefore, the Company is not likely to proceed with the option to acquire the
additional 30% interest in Indigo at this time. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations
and the Company will be pursuing cannabis delivery moving forward, independently from Indigo Dye Group. As of June 30, 2021, the Company
continues to hold approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo but ceased to have a controlling interest in the partnership and it was
deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $564,819 estimated fair value and changed to equity
method of accounting. See footnote #7 Non-controlling interest and deconsolidation of VIE for details.
7.
Non-controlling Interest and Deconsolidation of VIE
Starting
in fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Company had a variable interest entity, Indigo Dye Group, for accounting purposes. The Company
owned approximately 29% of Indigo’s outstanding equity and as of September 30, 2020, involved its day-to-day operations, which
gave the Company the power to direct the activities of Indigo that most significantly impact its economic performance. Accordingly, the
Company recognized the carrying value of the non-controlling interest as a component of total shareholders’ equity, and the consolidated
financial statements included the financial position and results of operations of Indigo as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2020
and September 30, 2020.
Starting
on October 1, 2020, the Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery for the
entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in
Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue
cannabis delivery independent from Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of
Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and
changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not
to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of
December 31, 2021, the Company made $59,370 in additional payments, and holds approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo.
(See Note 6)
The
net asset value of the Company’s variable interest in Indigo Dye Group was approximately $326,812 as of October 1, 2020, the date
of deconsolidation. The value of the Company’s variable interest on the date of deconsolidation was based on management’s
estimate of the fair value of Indigo at that time. The Company concluded that the market approach was the most appropriate method to
determine the fair value of the entity on the date of deconsolidation, given that Indigo raised equity funding from third-party investors
around the same period (i.e., level 2 inputs). The Company recognized a gain on deconsolidation of approximately $313,928 with no related
tax impact, which is included in other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations. As the Company is not obligated to fund
future losses of Indigo, the carrying amount is the Company’s maximum risk of loss and accounted as equity method investment in
affiliates in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2021. As of June 30, 2021, the Company recorded
equity method investment in affiliates at $441,407, net with $81,725 loss from equity method investment.
8.
Litigation
From
time to time and in the course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief.
The amount of the ultimate liability, if any, from such claims cannot be determined. As of June 30, 2021, there were no legal claims
pending or threatened against the Company that, in the opinion of our management would be likely to have a material adverse effect
on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, as of the date of this filing, we were involved in the following
legal proceedings.
●
|
On
December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two convertible note holders and investors in the Company. On February
21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vs. Sugarmade. Under the terms of
the settlement agreement, the company agreed to pay the plaintiffs $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included
the payoff of two notes outstanding. The parties had estimated the value of the notes at approximately $80,000. As of June 30, 2020,
third parties had purchased two (2) notes of approximately $80,000. As of June 30, 2021, there remains a balance, plus accrued
interest on the $227,000 and on the $80,000 due under the notes.
|
There
can be no assurances the ultimate liability relative to these lawsuits will not exceed what is outlined above.
9.
Cash
Cash
and cash equivalents consist of amounts held as bank deposits and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity
of three months or less.
From
time to time, we may maintain bank balances in interest bearing accounts in excess of the $250,000 currently insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation for interest bearing accounts (there is currently no insurance limit for deposits in noninterest bearing accounts).
We have not experienced any losses with respect to cash. Management believes our Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk
with respect to its cash.
10.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts
receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts, net of any estimated allowances for doubtful accounts. We grant unsecured
credit to our customer’s deemed credit worthy. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and potential credit losses estimated by
management are charged to operations on a regular basis. At the time, any particular account receivable is deemed uncollectible, the
balance is charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company had accounts receivable, net of allowance, of $435,598 and $134,517
as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively; and allowance for doubtful accounts of $259,761 and $447,498 as of June 30, 2021 and 2020,
respectively.
11.
Loan Receivable
Loan
receivables amounted $196,000 ($0 current and $196,000 noncurrent) and $1,365 ($1,365 current and $0 noncurrent) as of June 30, 2021
and 2020, respectively. Loan receivables are mainly advanced payments to the other companies.
12.
Loan Receivable – Related Parties
Loan
receivables – related parties amounted to $0 and $318,535 ($122,535 current and $196,000 noncurrent) as of June 30, 2021
and June 30, 2020, respectively. Loan receivables – related parties are mainly advanced payments to the related party companies
for business expense.
13.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of finished goods paper and paper-based products such as paper cups and food containers ready for sale and is stated at the
lower of cost or market. We value our inventory using the weighted average costing method. Our Company’s policy is to include as
a part of inventory any freight incurred to ship the product from our contract manufacturers to our warehouses. Outbound freights costs
related to shipping costs to our customers are considered period costs and reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses.
We regularly review inventory and consider forecasts of future demand, market conditions and product obsolescence.
If
the estimated realizable value of our inventory is less than cost, we make provisions in order to reduce its carrying value to its estimated
market value. On a consolidated basis, as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the balance for the inventory totaled $441,582 and $679,471, respectively.
$0 was reserved for obsolescent inventory for the year ended June 30, 2021, and $15,445 were reserved for obsolescent inventory
for the year ended June 30, 2020.
14.
Other Current Assets
As
of June 30, 2021 and 2020, other current assets consisted of the following:
|
|
For
the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Prepaid
Deposit
|
|
$
|
113,988
|
|
|
$
|
48,483
|
|
Prepaid
Inventory
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
65,449
|
|
Employees
Advance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
|
|
35,590
|
|
|
|
35,157
|
|
Others
|
|
|
32,879
|
|
|
|
113,991
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
182,457
|
|
|
$
|
263,404
|
|
15.
Intangible Asset
On
April 1, 2017, the Company entered into a distribution and intellectual property assignment agreement with Wagner Bartosch, Inc. (“Wagner’’)
for use of their Divider’™ used in frozen desserts and other related uses. In lieu of cash payment under the agreement, the
Company was obliged to issue common shares of the Company valued at $75,000 for acquiring the use right of the distribution and intellectual
property. The Company amortized this use right as intangible asset over ten years, and recorded $1,400 and $1,400 amortization
expense for the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
On
May 17, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between Carnaby Spot
Bay Corp, a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), Lemon Glow Company, a California
corporation (the “Lemon Glow”) and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder Representative”), pursuant to which, upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub would merge with and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon
Glow being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). The Company valued the cannabis cultivation license from Lemon
Glow at $10,637,000 with remaining economic life of 9 years as of June 30, 2021. The intangible assets have not started to amortize
as of June 30, 2021.
16.
Goodwill
Goodwill
arises from the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair
value of the net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired. The fair values of net tangible assets and intangible assets
acquired are based upon preliminary valuations and the Company’s estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement
period. There was $757,648 and $0 of goodwill recorded as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
17.
Property, Plant and Equipment
As
of June 30, 2021 and 2020, property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
June
30, 2021
|
|
|
June
30, 2020
|
|
Office
and equipment
|
|
$
|
820,149
|
|
|
$
|
739,447
|
|
Motor
vehicles
|
|
|
166,079
|
|
|
|
164,244
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,922,376
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Leasehold
Improvement
|
|
|
365,620
|
|
|
|
24,742
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,274,224
|
|
|
|
928,163
|
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(524,884
|
)
|
|
|
(429,116
|
)
|
Plant
and Equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,749,340
|
|
|
$
|
499,047
|
|
For
the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, depreciation expenses amounted to $105,982 and $110,032, respectively.
The
Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.
In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment
include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand,
competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded
in operating expenses during the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.
18.
Equity Method Investments in Affiliates
Investment
to Indigo Dye Inc. –
For
the fiscal syear ended June 30, 2020, the Company accounted for its investment in Indigo Dye Group as a variable interest entity.
The Company owned approximately 29% of Indigo’s outstanding equity and as of September 30, 2020, involved its day-to-day operations,
which gave the Company the power to direct the activities of Indigo that most significantly impact its economic performance. Accordingly,
the Company recognized the carrying value of the non-controlling interest as a component of total shareholders’ equity, and the
consolidated financial statements included the financial position and results of operations of Indigo as of and for the periods ended
June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2020.
During
quarter ended December 31, 2020, the Company plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other Brand/Franchises to cover delivery
for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest
in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to
pursue cannabis delivery independent from Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business
of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $564,819 estimated fair value and
changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not
to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of
June 30, 2021, the Company did not receive any distributions nor dividends from Indigo Dye. In addition, the Company impaired $43,800
of the investment as of December 31, 2020 due to lack of providing financial information from Indigo Dye Inc. As of June 30, 2021, the
Company still held approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo Dye Group.
As
of June 30, 2021, the Company recorded equity method investment in affiliates at $441,407, net with $81,725 loss from equity method
investment.
19.
Unrealized Gain on Securities
In
October 2019, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with iPower Inc., formerly
known as BZRTH Inc. (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed to buy
100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of iPower Inc. in exchange for $870,000 in cash, $7,130,000 under a promissory note,
up to 650,000 shares of Sugarmade’s common stock, and up to 3,500,000 shares of Sugarmade’s Series B preferred stock.
Due
to certain disputes that arose between the parties with respect to certain terms and conditions contained in the Share Exchange Agreement,
the parties entered into a Rescission and Mutual Release Agreement on January 15, 2020 (the “Rescission Agreement”). Pursuant
to the terms of the Rescission Agreement, iPower Inc. and its stockholders returned the shares of Sugarmade common stock and preferred
stock and issued to Sugarmade 102,248 (204,496 post forward split) shares of the Company’s common stock valued at current market
value of $1,451,922 as of June 30, 2021. The shares are free trading.
For
the years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, unrealized gain on securities amounted at current market value of $1,451,922 and $0, respectively.
20.
Unearned Revenue
Unearned
revenue amounted $0 and $53,248 as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Unearned revenues are mainly due to contracts with extended
payment terms, acceptance provisions and future delivery obligation.
21.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities amounted $2,058,839 and $1,583,228 as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Accounts payables
are mainly payables to vendors and accrued liabilities are mainly accrued interest of convertible notes payables and accrued contingent
liabilities (see item 3. legal proceeding).
|
|
June
30, 2021
|
|
|
June
30, 2020
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
1,464,692
|
|
|
$
|
1,330,939
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
310,528
|
|
|
|
25,289
|
|
Contingent
liabilities
|
|
|
283,619
|
|
|
|
227,000
|
|
Total
accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
|
|
$
|
2,058,839
|
|
|
$
|
1,583,228
|
|
22.
Other Payables
Other
payables amounted $750,485 and $691,801 as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Other payables are mainly credit card payables.
As of June 30, 2021, the Company had 8 credit cards, one American Express is a charge card with no limit and zero interest. The remaining
7 cards had total credit limit of $85,000, and APR from 11.24% to 29.99%.
23.
Customer Deposits
Customer
deposits amounted $751,919 and $466,337 as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Customer deposits are mainly advanced payments from
customers.
24.
Convertible Notes
As
of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the balance owing on convertible notes, net of debt discount, with terms as described below was $1,439,116
and $1,740,122, respectively.
Convertible
notes issued prior to the year ended June 30, 2020 were as follows:
Convertible
note 1: On August 24, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $25,000. The note
has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30
days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 2: On September 18, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $25,000. The note
has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30
days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 3: On December 21, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $100,000. The note
has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30
days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 4: On November 1, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $100,000. The note
has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of June
30, 2021, the note has been fully repaid by cash.
Convertible
note 5: On November 16, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $80,000. The note
has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of June
30, 2021, the note has been fully repaid by cash.
Convertible
note 6: On November 16, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $40,000. The note
has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of June
30, 2021, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 7: On December 3, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $35,000. The note
has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of June
30, 2021, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 8: On September 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $165,000
(includes $16,250 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 9: On October 28, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $225,500
(includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 10: On October 28, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $225,500
(includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 11: On November 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150
(includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 12: On November 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150
(includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 13: On December 10, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700
(includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 14: On December 10, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700
(includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 15: On December 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $112,200
(includes $12,200 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 16: On October 31, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $139,301.
The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share.
As of June 30, 2021, the note was in default.
Convertible
note 17: On November 1, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000.
The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share.
As of June 30, 2021, the note was in default.
Convertible
note 18: On January 3, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $112,200
(includes $12,200 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2021, the note
has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 19: On January 14, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $150,000
(includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully repaid by cash.
Convertible
note 20: On January 22, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $128,000
(includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 10%. The conversion price for the
note is 35% discount to average of two lowest closing prices for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully repaid by cash.
Convertible
note 21: On February 4, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000
(includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for
the note is $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2021, the note has been fully repaid by cash.
Convertible
note 22: On February 18, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000
(includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for
the note is $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 23: On March 5, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000
(includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 24: On April 24, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $75,000
(includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 25: On June 10, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300
(includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The
conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 26: On June 18, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300
(includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The
conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
notes issued prior to the year ended June 30, 2021 were as follows:
Convertible
note 27: On July 6, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $77,000
(includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 38% discount to average of three lowest trading prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 28: On July 7, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $153,000
(includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 10%. The conversion price for the
note is 35% discount to average of two lowest trading prices for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully repaid by cash.
Convertible
note 29: On July 16, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $260,700
(includes $23,700 OID and $12,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%.
The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.
As of June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 30: On July 21, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $200,200
(includes $18,200 OID and $7,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The
conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of
June 30, 2021, the note has been fully converted.
Convertible
note 31: On September 8, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000
(includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 180 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for
the note is $0.01 per share. After the six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed
price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion
notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent. As of June 30, 2021, the note was in default.
Convertible
note 32: On September 10, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $227,700
(includes $20,700 OID and $7,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The
conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. During
the year ended June 30, 2021, the note holder converted $117,700 of the principal amount plus $7,352 accrued interest expense into 90,167,551
shares of the Company’s common stock. As of June 30, 2021, the remaining balance of the note was $110,000.
Convertible
note 33: On September 24, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $212,300
(includes $19,300 OID). The note is due 180 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for
the note is $0.01 per share. After the six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed
price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion
notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent.
Convertible
note 34: On October 8, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $231,000
(includes $21,000 OID). The note is due 180 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for
the note is $0.01 per share. After the six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed
price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion
notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent.
Convertible
note 35: On October 13, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $275,000
(includes $25,000 OID). The note is due 180 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for
the note is $0.01 per share. After the six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed
price of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion
notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent.
Convertible
note 36: On November 10, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $58,300
(includes $5,300 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.
Convertible
note 37: On February 8, 2021, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $69,300
(includes $6,300 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the
note is 60% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.
On
June 14, 2021, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $300,000. The note
is due in three years and bear an interest rate of 1%. The conversion price for the note is lesser of $0.0036 and 85% of the lesser of
(i) 5 days VWAP on the trading day preceding the conversion date, and (ii) the VWAP on the conversion date.
In
connection with the convertible debt, debt discount balance as of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020 were $391,086 and $880,879, respectively,
and were being amortized and recorded as interest expenses over the term of the convertible debt.
As
of the year ended June 30, 2021, debt discount of the convertible notes consisted of following:
|
|
|
|
Debt
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Discount
|
|
Start
Date
|
|
End
Date
|
|
As
of 6/30/2020
|
|
|
Addition
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
As
of 6/30/2021
|
|
9/27/2019
|
|
9/25/2019
|
|
$
|
35,553
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(35,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
9/27/2019
|
|
9/25/2019
|
|
|
3,884
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,884
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/28/2019
|
|
10/27/2020
|
|
|
65,069
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(65,069
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/28/2019
|
|
10/27/2020
|
|
|
7,499
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,499
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/28/2019
|
|
10/27/2020
|
|
|
65,069
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(65,069
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/28/2019
|
|
10/27/2020
|
|
|
7,499
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,499
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
11/29/2020
|
|
11/30/2020
|
|
|
39,605
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39,605
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
11/29/2020
|
|
11/30/2020
|
|
|
4,648
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,648
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
11/29/2020
|
|
11/30/2020
|
|
|
39,605
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39,605
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
11/29/2020
|
|
11/30/2020
|
|
|
4,648
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,648
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
12/10/2019
|
|
12/10/2020
|
|
|
42,309
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42,309
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
12/10/2019
|
|
12/10/2020
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,211
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
12/10/2019
|
|
12/10/2020
|
|
|
42,309
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42,309
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
12/10/2019
|
|
12/10/2020
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,211
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
12/27/2019
|
|
12/27/2020
|
|
|
49,180
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(49,180
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
12/27/2019
|
|
12/27/2020
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
1/3/2020
|
|
12/27/2020
|
|
|
50,139
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(50,139
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
1/3/2020
|
|
12/27/2020
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,117
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
1/14/2020
|
|
1/14/2021
|
|
|
79,525
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(79,525
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
1/14/2020
|
|
1/14/2021
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
1/22/2020
|
|
1/22/2021
|
|
|
53,327
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(53,327
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
1/22/2020
|
|
1/22/2021
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,689
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
2/4/2020
|
|
8/4/2020
|
|
|
21,154
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(21,154
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
2/18/2020
|
|
8/18/2020
|
|
|
26,923
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(26,923
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
3/5/2021
|
|
|
82,893
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(82,893
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
3/5/2021
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,038
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
4/24/2020
|
|
4/24/2021
|
|
|
59,600
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59,600
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
4/24/2020
|
|
4/24/2021
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/10/2020
|
|
6/10/2021
|
|
|
28,356
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(28,356
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/10/2020
|
|
6/10/2021
|
|
|
6,776
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,776
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/18/2020
|
|
6/18/2021
|
|
|
29,014
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(29,014
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
6/18/2020
|
|
6/18/2021
|
|
|
6,775
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,775
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/6/2020
|
|
7/6/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/6/2020
|
|
7/6/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/7/2020
|
|
7/7/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
(150,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/7/2020
|
|
7/7/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/16/2020
|
|
7/16/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
(225,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/16/2020
|
|
7/16/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35,700
|
|
|
|
(35,700
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/21/2020
|
|
7/21/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
(175,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
7/21/2020
|
|
7/21/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
|
|
(25,200
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
9/10/2020
|
|
9/10/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
(160,548
|
)
|
|
|
39,452
|
|
9/10/2020
|
|
9/10/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27,700
|
|
|
|
(22,388
|
)
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
11/10/2020
|
|
11/11/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
(31,694
|
)
|
|
|
18,306
|
|
11/10/2020
|
|
11/11/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
|
|
(5,276
|
)
|
|
|
3,024
|
|
9/8/2020
|
|
3/10/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93,077
|
|
|
|
(93,077
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
9/8/2020
|
|
3/10/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
9/13/2020
|
|
3/25/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
189,093
|
|
|
|
(189,093
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
9/13/2020
|
|
3/25/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,300
|
|
|
|
(19,300
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/8/2020
|
|
4/9/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
(210,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/8/2020
|
|
4/9/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
(21,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/13/2020
|
|
4/13/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
10/13/2020
|
|
4/13/2021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
2/8/2021
|
|
2/9/2022
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
59,985
|
|
|
|
(23,273
|
)
|
|
|
36,712
|
|
2/8/2021
|
|
2/9/2022
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,315
|
|
|
|
(3,614
|
)
|
|
|
5,701
|
|
6/14/2021
|
|
6/14/2024
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
286,765
|
|
|
|
(4,186
|
)
|
|
|
282,578
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
880,879
|
|
|
$
|
2,150,435
|
|
|
$
|
(2,640,228
|
)
|
|
$
|
391,086
|
|
25.
Derivative Liabilities
The
derivative liability is derived from the conversion features in note 22 and stock warrant in note 24. All were valued using the weighted-average
Binomial option pricing model using the assumptions detailed below. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the derivative liability was $2,217,361
and $5,597,095, respectively. The Company recorded $1,087,485 gain and $1,442,295 loss from changes in derivative liability during the
year ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:
|
|
June
30, 2020
|
|
Annual
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected
Life (Years)
|
|
|
0.50-1.00
|
|
Risk-Free
Interest Rate
|
|
|
0.16-2.10
|
%
|
Expected
Volatility
|
|
|
113-175
|
%
|
|
|
June
30, 2021
|
|
Annual
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected
Life (Years)
|
|
|
0.50-3.00
|
|
Risk-Free
Interest Rate
|
|
|
0.01-0.46
|
%
|
Expected
Volatility
|
|
|
89-236
|
%
|
Fair
value of the derivative is summarized as below:
Beginning
Balance, June 30, 2020
|
|
$
|
5,597,095
|
|
Additions
|
|
$
|
2,663,892
|
|
Mark
to Market
|
|
$
|
(230,573
|
)
|
Cancellation
of Derivative Liabilities Due to Cash Repayment
|
|
$
|
(856,910
|
)
|
Reclassification
to APIC Due to Conversions
|
|
$
|
(4,956,143
|
)
|
Ending Balance, June
30, 2021
|
|
|
2,217,361
|
|
26.
Stock Warrants
On
September 7, 2018, the Company entered a settlement agreement with several investors to settle all disputes by issues additional unrestricted
shares. In connection with the note each individual investor will also receive warrants equal to the number of the shares the investors
own as of the effective date of the settlement agreement. The warrants have a life of five years with an exercise price as of the date
of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $56,730. As of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the fair value of the
warrant liability was $1,042 and $1,910, respectively.
On
February 4, 2020, the Company entered a warrant agreement with an accredited investor up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the
Company at exercise price of $0.008 per share, subject to adjustment. The warrants have a life of five years with an exercise price as
of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $80,000. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the fair value of
the warrant liability was $20,000 and $78,000, respectively.
As
of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the total fair value of the warrant liability was $21,042 and $79,910, respectively.
The
Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:
Warrants
liability:
|
|
June
30, 2020
|
|
Annual
dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected
life (years)
|
|
|
3.0-5.0
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
0.18-1.69
|
%
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
137-318
|
%
|
Warrants
liability:
|
|
June
30, 2021
|
|
Annual
dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected
life (years)
|
|
|
2.0-4.0
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
0.18-0.46
|
%
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
132-166
|
%
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
contractual
life
|
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2019
|
|
|
1,083,880
|
|
|
$
|
0.034
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(505,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.008
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2020
|
|
|
1,578,880
|
|
|
$
|
0.021
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2021
|
|
|
1,578,880
|
|
|
$
|
0.026
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
27.
Note Payable
Note
payable due to bank
During
October 2011, we entered into a revolving demand note (line of credit) arrangement with HSBC Bank USA, with a revolving borrowing limit
of $150,000. The line of credit bears a variable interest rate of one quarter percent (0.25%) above the prime rate (3.25% as of September
30, 2013). In the event the deposit account is not established or minimum balance maintained, HSBC can charge a higher rate of interest
of up to 4.0% above prime rate. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the loan principal balance was $25,982 and $25,982, respectively.
Notes
payable due to non-related parties
On
June 15, 2018, the Company entered into a promissory note with one of the accredited investors. The original principal amount was $20,000
and the note bears 8% interest per annum. The note was payable upon demand. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, this note had a balance of
$33,047 and $20,000, respectively.
Notes
payable due to related parties
On
January 23, 2013, the Company entered into a promissory note with its former employee of the Company who owns less than 5% of the Company’s
stock. The original principal amount was $40,000 and the note bears no interest. The note was payable upon demand. As of June 30, 2021
and 2020, this note had a balance of $15,427 and $15,427, respectively.
28.
Related Party Transactions
On
January 23, 2013, SWC received a loan from an employee for $40,000. The amount of loan bears no interest. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020,
the balance of loans payable is $15,427 and $15,427, respectively.
On
July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bears no interest and amortized on a monthly basis over the
life of the loan. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the balance of the loans payable were $49,447 and $30,000, respectively.
On
November 21, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bears no interest and due in September 30, 2017. As of
June 30, 2021. the note was in default. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the balance of the loans payable were $83,275 and $5,943, respectively.
On
September 1, 2017, the Company had related party transaction with LMK Capital LLC, a related party company owned by Jimmy Chan, the Company’s
CEO. The amount of the loan payable/receivable bears no interest and due on demand. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the balance of the
loan payable to LMK were $26,452 and $0, respectively, and the balance of loan receivable were $0 and $122,535, respectively.
On
May 25, 2021, Lemon Glow received a loan from an officer. The amount of the loan bears no interest and due on demand. As of June 30,
2021 and 2020, the balance of the loans were $3,000 and $0, respectively.
As
of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company had outstanding balance of $179,258 and $78,000 owed to various related parties, respectively.
See note 27 and 29 for the details.
29.
Loans Payable
On
October 1, 2017, SGMD entered a straight promissory note with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing $100,000 with
maturity date on June 30, 2018; the note bears an interest rate of 33.33%. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the note was in default and
the outstanding balance under this note was $49,541 and $96,401, respectively.
During
the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company entered a series of short-term loan agreements with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater
Asia) for borrowing $375,000, with interest rate at 40% - 50% of the principal balance. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the outstanding
balance with Greater Asia loans were $100,000 and $100,000, respectively.
On
January 6, 2015, the Company entered into repayment agreement with its former employee for a loan of $9,500 at no interest. As of June
30, 2021 and 2020, the Company has an outstanding balance of $0 and $3,584, respectively.
On
July 1, 2012, Carryout Supplies entered an equipment loan agreement with a bank with maturity on June 21, 2024. The monthly payment is
$648. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the outstanding balance under this loan were $16,805 and $24,524, respectively.
On
March 18, 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement for $150,000 with Celtic Bank with maturity date on March 18, 2020. As of June
30, 2021 and 2020, the outstanding balance under this loan were $0 and $117,635, respectively.
On
June 26, 2020, the Company entered into a government loan agreement for $8,000 with maturity date on December 26, 2020. As of June 30,
2021 and 2020, the outstanding balance under this loan were $0 and $8,000, respectively.
On
April 27, 2020, we entered into a loan borrowed $110,000 from Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note issued
by Company to Lender (the “PPP Note”). The loan was made pursuant to the Payroll Protection Program established as part of
the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The PPP Note bears interest at 1.00% per annum,
and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The PPP Note contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment
defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of default may result
in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the PPP Note. As of June 30, 2021, the loan has been fully forgiven
by the government and the remaining balance was zero as of June 30, 2021.
On
July 28, 2020, we entered into a loan borrowed $159,900 from Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note issued
by Company to Lender (the “PPP Note”). The loan was made pursuant to the Payroll Protection Program established as part of
the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The PPP Note bears interest at 1.00% per annum
and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The PPP Note contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment
defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of default may result
in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the PPP Note.
On
January 25, 2021, we entered into a loan borrowed $96,595 from Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note
issued by Company to Lender (the “PPP Note”). The loan was made pursuant to the Payroll Protection Program established as
part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The PPP Note bears interest at 1.00% per
annum and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The PPP Note contains customary events of default relating to, among other things,
payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of default
may result in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the PPP Note.
The
Company accounting for the PPP loan under Topic 470: (a). Initially record the cash inflow from the PPP loan as a financial liability
and would accrue interest in accordance with the interest method under ASC Subtopic 835-30; (b). Not impute additional interest at a
market rate; (c). Continue to record the proceeds from the loan as a liability until either (1) the loan is partly or wholly forgiven
and the debtor has been legally released or (2) the debtor pays off the loan; (d). Would reduce the liability by the amount forgiven
and record a gain on extinguishment once the loan is partly or wholly forgiven and legal release is received.
On
February 15, 2021, the Company entered a promissory note with Manuel Rivera for borrowing $100,000 with maturity date on September 15,
2021; the note bears a monthly interest of $3,500 for 7 months. The Company shall pay the investor a fee of $70,000 within 45 days of
its first harvest. As of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the outstanding loan balance under this note was $100,000 and $0, respectively.
On
March 24, 2021, the Company entered into auto loan agreement with John Deere Financial for an auto loan of $69,457 for 60 months at annual
percentage rate of 2.85%. As of June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020, the Company has an outstanding balance of $65,726 and $0, respectively.
As
of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company had an outstanding loan balance of $701,193 and $517,260, respectively.
29.
Loans Payable – Related Parties
On
July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bears no interest and amortized on a monthly basis over the
life of the loan. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the balance of the loan were $49,447 and $30,000, respectively.
On
November 21, 2016, SWC received a loan from a former independent consultant. The amount of the loan bears no interest and due in September
30, 2017. As of June 30, 2021. the note was in default. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the balance of the loans were $83,275 and $5,943,
respectively.
On
May 25, 2021, Lemon Glow received a loan from an officer. The amount of the loan bears no interest and due on demand. As of June 30,
2021 and 2020, the balance of the loans was $3,000 and $0, respectively.
On
September 1, 2017, the Company had related party transaction with LMK Capital LLC, a related party company owned by Jimmy Chan, the Company’s
CEO. The amount of the loan payable/receivable bears no interest and due on demand. As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the balance of the
loan payable to LMK were $26,452 and $0, respectively, and the balance of loan receivable were $0 and $122,535, respectively.
As
of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company had an outstanding related party loan balance of $163,831 and $35,943, respectively.
30.
Shares to Be Issued
As
of June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company had entered into one consulting service agreement and one employment agreement, which had potential
shares to be issued in total amount of $138,077 and $101,577, respectively.
31.
Equity Transactions
The
Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock and 10,000,000 shares of $.001 par value
preferred stock.
As
of June 30, 2020, the Company had 1,763,277,230 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding and 3,541,500 shares of its preferred
stock issued and outstanding.
During
the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company issued 2,620,000,001 shares of common stock for cash in total amount of $4,171,000.
During
the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company issued 2,451,338,059 shares of common stock to convert the convertible notes with accrued interest
in total amount of $2,560,369.
During
the periods from December 14, 2014 through March 31, 2015, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock from an EB5
Program Investment. Five years from the date of issue (the “Conversion Date”), assuming Investor is approved for l-526, and
each Preferred Share will automatically convert into that number of Common Shares having a “fair market value” of the Initial
Investment plus a five (5) percent annualized return on Initial Investment, Fair market value will be determined by averaging the closing
sale price of a Common Share for the 40 trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion on the U.S. stock exchange on which
Common Shares are publicly traded. Should the Investor be unsuccessful in liquidating the Common Shares within 90 days after the Conversion
Date, the Company shall buy back total Common Shares owned by Investor at a fixed amount of $500,000.00 plus 5% ROI per annum.
During
the year ended June 30, 2021, those shares were automatically converted into 360,647,019 of common shares with a fair market value of
$2,000,000 of initial investment plus a five percent annualized return on initial investment (“ROI”), or total ROI of $500,000.
During
the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company issued 187,673,367 shares of common stock for service compensation in total fair value of $455,894.
During
the year ended June 30, 2021, the Company issued 19,600,000 shares of common stock for shares subscribed in prior year in total fair
value of $196,000.
On
May 11, 2021, the Company and Jimmy Chan, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and a Director of the Company, entered
into the Stock Redemption Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2021, with the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Redemption Agreement,
Mr. Chan agreed to sell, and the Company agreed to purchase, 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series B Stock held by Mr. Chan
in exchange for $1.00 in cash consideration. The Stock Purchase closed on May 11, 2021, and after the close of the Stock Purchase, the
1,000,000 shares of the Series B Stock previously held by Mr. Chan were returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Series
B Stock of the Company.
As
of June 30, 2021, the Company had 7,402,535,677 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding.
As
of June 30, 2021, the Company had 541,500 shares of its Series B preferred stock issued and outstanding.
32.
Commitments and Contingencies
On
February 23, 2018 the Company entered into lease agreement for a new office space as part of the plan to expand operation, the lease
is set to commence Commencing March 1, 2018. The term of the lease is for a (5) Five Years with 1 month free on the 1st year of the term.
The monthly rent on the 1st year will be $11,770 with a 3% increase for each subsequent year. Total commitment for the full term of the
lease will be $737,367. As of the date of this filing, this property became the headquarter of the company.
Our
warehouse along with some office space is located at 20529 East Walnut Drive North, Diamond Bar, California, where we lease approximately
11,627 square feet of combined space. The lease term is for five years and two months ending on April 30, 2025. The current monthly rental
payment for the facility is $13,022.
On
February 1, 2021, the Company entered into lease agreement with Magnolia Extracts, LLC dba Nug Ave-Lynwood, a California limited liability
company for a certain regulatory permit issued by the City of Lynwood authorizing commercial retailer non-storefront operations at 11118
Wright Road, Lynwood, CA 90262. The lease is set to commence Commencing February 1, 2021. The lease payment shall equal $10,000 per month
and the lease term is on month by month basis. Parties have agreed that the first month’s rent payment shall equal $7,000 and the
Company shall pay to owner a refundable security deposit of $20,000 within 10 days of the effective day.
For
The Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2021
|
|
|
|
Lease
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
lease cost (included in general and administration in the Company’s unaudited condensed statement of operations)
|
|
$
|
308,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Information
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
220,328
|
|
Remaining
lease term – operating leases (in years)
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
Average
discount rate – operating leases
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
The
supplemental balance sheet information related to leases for the periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
Right-of-use assets
|
|
$
|
243,406
|
|
Long-term
Right-of-use assets
|
|
$
|
486,253
|
|
Total
operating lease assets
|
|
$
|
729,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
operating lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
239,521
|
|
Long-term
operating lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
524,149
|
|
Total
operating lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
763,670
|
|
Maturities
of the Company’s lease liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period ending June
30,
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
2022
|
|
|
305,040
|
|
2023
|
|
|
273,425
|
|
2024
|
|
|
172,465
|
|
2025
|
|
|
147,446
|
|
Total
lease payments
|
|
|
898,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
Imputed interest/present value discount
|
|
|
(134,706
|
)
|
Present
value of lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
763,669
|
|
33.
Income Tax
The
deferred tax asset as of June 30, 2021 and 2020 consisted of the following:
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Net
Operating Loss Carryforwards
|
|
$
|
13,021,807
|
|
|
$
|
12,028,883
|
|
Less
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(13,021,807
|
)
|
|
|
(12,028,883
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Management
provided a deferred tax asset valuation allowance equal to the potential benefit due to the Company’s loss. When the Company demonstrates
the ability to generate taxable income, management will re-evaluate the allowance.
As
of June 30, 2021, the Company has net operating loss carryforward of $74,348,595 which is available to offset future taxable income that
expires by year 2037.
TCJA
modified net operating loss (NOL) rules. For most taxpayers, NOLs arising in tax years ending after 2017 can only be carried forward.
Exceptions apply to certain farming losses and NOLs of insurance companies other than a life insurance company.
For
losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, the new law limits the NOL deduction to 80% of taxable income.
Reconciliation
between the provision for income taxes and the expected tax benefit using the federal statutory rate of 21% for 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
US
federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
State
tax – net of benefit
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
Non-deductible
expenses, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Increase
in valuation allowance
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
34.
Subsequent Events
Convertible
note conversions
Subsequent
to October 11, 2021, there were multiple accredited investors converted approx. $451,600 of the convertible notes with accrued interest
into 614,728,579 shares of the Company’s common stocks.