VVVVVV
23 horas hace
Well, that’s your opinion and you’re entitled to one but, I bet you’re just venting. No fact that they’re not negotiating. We can only go by what the court was told.
Full disclosure, I don’t pretend to know and or understand these RICO allegations. But, if they’re in fact true, VPLM is in a position of tremendous strength. You can bet, after their crew of attorneys verify all these claims and if they’re true, there more than likely be a deal done.
Now, remember there’s still the remaining RBR patents. They know whether they’re infringing or not. If they realize there’s value, this will encourage an acquisition. Win win
IMHO
VVVVVV
1 día hace
There’s no reason for more media coverage at this time. Not sure what exactly it is you don’t seem to comprehend? Emil made it clear they’re negotiating, hence the reason for the extension.
Emil previously stated that if there’s no progress, then VPLM would serve. He then sent out notice that they’d serve. Well, what do you think he did that for? Come on pal, use your head.
They’re not negotiating a few hundred million dollars. These cases take time. The big three probably have fifteen attorneys each evaluating these charges. Not to mention evaluating the possible value of the RBR patents, etc. If they realize VPLM has a legitimate RICO case, then they’ll agree on a fair and reasonable agreement. But, if they believe it’s merit less, then they’ll fight it.
More than likely the only way Emil and his wife can sell a few billion shares, is an acquisition!
It would be naive to think this can be done in ninety days.
I believe the hold up in serving is a good thing. Shareholders shouldn’t be wanting for that to happen.
IMHO
Spyke37
1 día hace
I have an alternate take. The overarching goal here is to work toward a settlement that can be monetized either in a solid valuation for the stock, or a purchase of the company that can be redeemed by shareholders. The RICO, or threat of RICO, seems to have gotten the attention of the defendants. That cudgel still remains in VPLM's hands, but it would appear that it has motivated the defendants to discuss the possibility of the outcomes I listed above in some kind of meaningful way. During this phase of the negotiations, it would seem like bad form to continue threatening and badgering the defendants as opposed to working to iron out an agreement. If we go past the service date deadline and nothing happens, with no plausible explanation, this is a different discussion. Until then, like always, we are waiting on a binary event. Until that time I wouldn't spend a lot of time trying to guess what will happen. The fact that it seems like VPLM does not feel the need to reiterate their threat of RICO leads me to believe that some kind of progress is being made. Obviously I could be wrong and my idea of progress could be much different than other shareholders. This fact remains; little old VPLM, has gotten the attention of some of the largest companies in the world, that already puts them in pretty rare company, irrespective of what the final outcome may be. At least there is a sense that some kind of inflection point is imminent.
peniiespincher12345
1 día hace
If the Ricos are so bad why has no one from VPLM mentioned it to anyone? No news no more letters to shareholders. No more anything. Why would that be? Lets threaten that then never act on it, you know cause if you wanted to speed things up a little. Or maybe put a little fire under their a$$ wouldn't you talk about it. At least to shareholders?
Oh ya, this is the same company where Emil issues a personal letter to shareholders in October. In this letter he said he was going to do more of these to keep their legal proceedings transparent for shareholders. And I quote!!!!! "To keep you well-informed, we’ll be sharing regular updates over the coming weeks, each highlighting a key
element of the new complaints. These updates aim to illustrate how these filings significantly strengthen our
case over previous versions." Then what do you know complete reversal no news back into their hole like the rats they are.
Here is the letter for you guys to actually use your brain for once.
https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66cf412e89a5f926b40df155/6723acfcf9d459f9e44530a1_67211e2b49ab357171880b3e_Letter%20to%20Shareholders%20from%20Chairman%20Oct%2029%202024.pdf
You know some cold hard facts. Not the regular good for nothing spews on this sub.
But ya this company is so beyond joke status, Emil Rich and co should be tar and feathered in the middle of the square. I would laugh my butt off while he screams in pain. And my claims still remain that they are on this board to make sure this stock doesn't go to zero and they can keep their ATM churning like a bunch of immoral, slimey, good for nothing losers.
VVVVVV
1 día hace
You know, I wonder, how you’d be feeling right now if you were one of either general counsel and or company officers, being named in a RICO charge? I’d imagine your attitude would be greatly different right now. Trust me! You wouldn’t be eating and or sleeping. You might even be on antidepressants, if you were in their shoes. JMHO
Who really knows, maybe these claims are merit less, who really knows at this point.
You may want to ask yourself why Amazon brought on a “bet the farm” law firm, December 30th? Hmmm….
The remaining RBR patent (s) is where there’s enough value to acquire VPLM. Win-win for both parties.
I believe this will boil down to how much Emil will settle on.
Sometimes people hear what they want to hear. Not serving at this point is a good thing.
LMAO
ham n slam
2 días hace
none of us are attorneys , so don't even bother..sunspotter believes he's one, but then again, I thought he was a "FED" G_MAN"" who only takes down penny stocks ..lmao..at this point we need a statement from Emil, or documents stating they were served! or they're negotiating.. nothing more nothing less..I'm still accruing shares , so anything sub one is ok in my book.glta
GreenBackClub
2 días hace
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
Texas Western District Court
Judge: Alan D Albright
Case #: 6:21-cv-00672
Nature of Suit 830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Filed: Jun 25, 2021
Terminated: Aug 15, 2024
Docket
Parties (5)
Opinions (2)
Docket last updated: 5 hours ago
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
231 misc Sealed Document - Patent Cases only Tue 03/18 1:39 PM
Sealed Document: March 5, 2025 Hearing Transcript (Exhibit A) of230 Joint MOTION for Redaction of March 5, 2025 Hearing Transcript re224 Transcript of Sealed or In Camera Proceedings Filed by Cellco Partnership, Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp. (Hector, William)
230 motion Miscellaneous Relief Tue 03/18 1:36 PM
Joint MOTION for Redaction of March 5, 2025 Hearing Transcript re224 Transcript of Sealed or In Camera Proceedings Filed by Cellco Partnership, Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp..(Hector, William)
Att: 1 Exhibit B - Redacted Transcript,
Att: 2 Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion for Redaction of March 5, 2025 Hearing