14th
November 2024
Power Metal Resources
PLC
("Power Metal" or the
"Company")
Perch River - Significant Uranium Target
Outlined
Geochemical Sampling from the 'Rapids
Target' Returns Area of Anomalous Uranium, Lead Isotopic and Radon
Results from the Perch River Uranium Project.
Power Metal Resources plc (AIM:POW,
OTCQB:POWMF), the London-listed exploration company with a global
project portfolio, is pleased to report on results from the
uranium-focused joint venture (the "Joint Venture" or "JV") with
UCAM Ltd ("UCAM" or the "Investor") involving Power Metal's
portfolio of uranium licences. This release details the results
from the recently completed helium, hydrogen, radon and soil
geochemistry surveys from the Perch River Uranium Project ("Perch
River" or the "Project"), Saskatchewan, Canada.
HIGHLIGHTS
·
Combined soil geochemistry
and radon sampling completed on the Project has defined a new
target area, named the 'Rapids Target', which consists of
multiple overlapping geochemical and radon anomalies located within
a geological and geophysical setting that is highly prospective for
unconformity-hosted uranium mineralisation.
·
An airborne electromagnetic
and radiometric geophysical survey to provide modern high
resolution geophysical information on the Project, and specifically
across the Rapids Target, is due to commence in the next few weeks,
with the JV considering next steps.
·
Ground gas sampling was
completed in select areas of the Project, indicating local
enrichment in hydrogen close to the Rapids Target.
Sean Wade, Chief Executive Officer of
Power Metal Resources plc, commented:
"Following
immediately on from our update on Badger Lake and the upcoming work
planned there, it is also very pleasing to be able to further
inform shareholders about the identification of another significant
uranium target area.
"The results
of the next round of surveying will determine next steps in respect
to drilling, and we look forward to updating shareholders on that
in due course."
Overview of the Perch River
Project
The 54.55 km2 area Perch River
Uranium Project is located in the northeast of the Athabasca Basin
in northern Saskatchewan, approximately 30km south east from the
community of Black Lake. The Athabaca Basin is a world class
district for uranium exploration and production, and is home to
such mines and projects as Cameco's McArthur River, NexGen's Arrow,
and Fission's Triple R.
The Perch River is prospective for unconformity
related uranium, the style of mineralisation which features a high
grade uranium orebody in close proximity to an unconformity between
crystalline basement, and younger sandstones. Based on historical
drillhole data1, and information acquired from the
Saskatchewan Geological Survey2 is thought to be shallow
lying between 50m and 200m depth.
The Project has been intermittently explored
over a period of approximately 40 years, with historical work
including multiple geophysical surveys, soil sampling programmes
and four drillholes in 1980 by SMDC1 and in 2021 by
Purepoint Uranium Group Ltd3 have been completed on the
Project.
Overview of the Rapids
Target
From the previous exploration completed by
multiple operators in the area of Perch River, the Power Metal
technical team determined the Rapids Target (or the "Target") to be
a prospective area for combined radon gas and soil sampling; based
on the following datapoints:
Ø The Target lies in
close proximity to a historical electromagnetic geophysical
conductor4; electromagnetic conductors are key targets
for exploration in the Athabasca Basin, as they may represent
graphitic rocks in the basement. The majority of uranium deposits
in the Athabasca Basin share a spatial relationship with graphitic
rocks in the basement.
Ø The target is in the
vicinity of a significant Bouguer gravity low5,
identified through a historical ground-based survey located to the
north of the Font du Lac River. A historical airborne
survey6 have also indicated a potential gravity low in
the vicinity of the Target, below the Font du Lac River.
Gravity Lows are key targets for unconformity-related uranium, as
they are interpreted to represent the lower-density alteration
mineralogy, which is commonly associated with unconformity-related
mineralised systems.
Ø The Target is in the
vicinity of the inferred north-south Font du Lac Fault. Elsewhere
in the Athabasca Basin, north-south trending fault structures are
known to have a spatial relationship with significant buried
uranium mineralisation. Additionally, previous work7
indicates the Rapids Target is in the vicinity of 'fault relay
zone' within the Font du Lac Fault, where the fault 'jumps' between
two individual fault planes. Fault relay zones are typically areas
of intense structural deformation, which may be amicable to fluid
flow and, thus, uranium mineralisation.
Ø The Target is within
a magnetic low. Magnetic lows are known to be targets for
unconformity-related uranium and may represent prospective
graphitic or metapelite lithologies.
Based on historical exploration reports
acquired by Power Metal, there has never been any systematic
surface sampling in the vicinity of the Rapids Target, and minimal
modern geophysical work, with previous operators focussing to the
north and west of the Target. From the 2024 sampling now completed,
multiple coincident geochemical and radon anomalies exist at the
Rapids Target:
Ø Anomalous/highly
elevated radon gas results in and adjacent to the Target, these
anomalies are present on both sides of the Font du Lac River.
Additionally, hydrogen gas sampling has shown localised
elevations.
Ø Anomalous results for
uranium, cobalt, nickel and rare earth elements - these are all
known to be associated with unconformity-related uranium elsewhere
in the Athabasca Basin.
Ø Anomalous
206/204Pb isotopic soil results located immediately west
of the Rapids Target and along the Font du Lac river. Alongside
being statistically anomalous for the samples collected on Perch
River, these results are generally very high in comparison to
samples from other uranium districts.
More information on the multiple coincident
geochemical and radon anomalies overlying the Rapids Target is
presented below.
Helium and Hydrogen
Sampling
Following the staking of Perch River in summer
2023, Power Metal commissioned a remote sensing hyperspectral data
compilation and processing study. Results from the study
highlighted the presence of several very strong hyperspectral
helium gas anomalies on the Project8. To evaluate this
feature, the JV completed a dense (25m) grid of soil gas
sampling in and around the main hyperspectral anomaly, as well as
additional points in proximity to the Font du Lac River.
Sampling of soil gas has indicated a cluster of
highly elevated hydrogen results in close proximity to the Rapids
Target and to the northeast along the Font du Lac River. Secondary
emissions are recorded in the vicinity of the previously identified
helium hyperspectral anomaly but are considered to be unrelated.
Hydrogen gas is inferred to be generated by uranium deposits
through the electrolysis of water following the decay of a uranium
atom, and thus elevated hydrogen may be related to uranium
mineralisation.
From the sampling completed, values of soil gas
helium within the hyperspectral anomaly were not found to be
anomalous, and did not exhibit anomalism in line with the response
in the hyperspectral data. At this time, the helium hyperspectral
anomaly reported prior is considered to be an error in the analysis
of the hyperspectral imagery, possibly related to wildfires at the
time of Sentinel 2 satellite imagery.
Radon Sampling
A total of 344 radon cup samples were completed
on the Perch River Project by RadonEx Ltd; the results of which are
shown on Figure 1. At the Rapids Target, anomalous results
(up to 2.32 pCi/m2/sec) are present to the northwest of
the Font du Lac River, and elevated results extend over 300m to the
south of the Rapids Target. These results, combined with the soil
geochemistry offer a highly prospective target for future
work.
In the north of the sampling grid, a further
target was delineated which is now named the 'Northern Linear Radon
Anomaly', which trends east-west over an area of approximately 800
m x 150 m. This area of elevated radon (upto 2.2
pCi/m2/sec), does not show sustained relationships with
elevated uranium, lead isotopic values or other elements in soils,
but presents a new target, for which further work is needed to
understand it's prospectivity.
Radon is a radioactive gas generated by the
radioactive decay of uranium, which then rises to the earth's
surface via faults and fractures. The radon cup sampling method
works by trapping ground gas within a small chamber that is placed
in a small hand-excavated pit within the ground. The chamber
contains a charged plate that loses charge due to the release of
ionising radiation caused by the decay of the unstable radon atom,
this loss of charge is then measured. The method is less
susceptible to materials within drift and the surficial geology of
a project than traditional soil sampling methodologies alone.
however, as with any surficial-based sampling techniques, the risk
of radon being derived from uraniferous material transported by
glacial/fluvial activity remains.
Figure 1: In
Situ Radon Results from the Perch River Project.
Soil Sampling
During the 2024 sampling campaign a total of
291 soil samples were tested using the Ionic Leach plus Lead
Isotopes assay suite at ALS Geochemistry laboratory located in
Vancouver, Canada. The Ionic Leach method is designed only to
extract the 'mobile' ions from a soil sampling. These 'mobile' ions
are those which are more likely to have been derived from buried
mineralisation rather than the material which makes up the soil.
These ions are weakly bound to the soil particles, and thus Ionic
Leach uses a weak acid to separate those weak bonds, isolate the
'mobile' ions, and not extract the vast majority of the material
which makes up the soil - material that could potentially contain
detrital mineralogy derived from glaciation or fluvial activity.
The detrital mineralogy of soil could obscure the geochemistry of a
potential deposit at depth. Traditional 'partial' or 'total' leach
methods use stronger acids to extract more of the sample, but carry
a risk of extracting detrital material which may be unrelated to
the underlying geology.
The Ionic Leach method was specifically chosen
for use on the Perch River Project as the area is known to have
been affected by glaciation as is the case for the entirety of the
Athabasca Basin. The risk remains, however, that these signatures,
and those of radon, are derived from glacial/fluvial material, and
this must be considered in future exploration. In order to further
mitigate these results, they are considered in the context of other
existing available datasets, predominantly geophysics, which is a
measure of geological properties that are considered to be in-situ
and not transported.
Lead
Isotopes
In the south of the sample gird (Figure 2),
multiple anomalous 206Pb/204Pb results are
present along the western bank of the Font du Lac River, and
further anomalous and highly elevated samples are present in the
vicinity of the Rapids Target.
Significantly, the values of the
206Pb/204Pb ratio far exceed the level
identified in soils over uranium deposits in Wyoming and lead
isotope values from sandstone in close proximity to a uranium
deposit located within the Thelon Basin.9,10
Lead 206 (206Pb) is derived from the
radiogenic decay of uranium, while 204Pb is stable, and
does not decay, nor is it derived from the radioactive decay of
other elements. By comparing the ratio between the level of
206Pb and 204Pb in a sample, an indication
can be given of how much of the lead was derived from the decay of
uranium verses other sources. In the event a sample has a high
ratio of 206Pb (I.e. more 206Pb), this
indicates that a greater proportion of the lead in the sample was
derived from uranium mineralisation, and may be associated with
uranium mineralisation.
Figure 2: Lead
Isotope (206/204Pb ratio) Results from the Perch River
Project.
Uranium-in-Soil
Results
At the Rapids Target (Figure 3), the U-in-soil
results highlight a sustained area of elevated uranium with
multiple anomalous values also identified in the southwest of the
sampling area.
Importantly, the anomalous uranium values are
not present in the same samples as those with highly elevated
206Pb/204Pb samples, or elevated
206Pb. Statistical analysis of the data has shown that
there is a limited correlation between the uranium and
206Pb datasets; this indicates that the potential
detrital signature from the U-in-soil values is minimal and thus
improves the confidence that these anomalous uranium results are
derived from a uraniferous source at depth. Furthermore,
comparison with historical soil sampling to the north of the Font
du Lac River, which utilised total and partial leach techniques,
and thus may have been susceptible to detrital signatures,
indicates minimal correlation with the results from this
survey.
Figure 3:
Uranium-in-soil Results from the Perch River
Project
Other
Elements
Nickel, cobalt, copper and rare earth elements
- which are known to have an association with unconformity-related
uranium, are anomalous to the south of the Rapids Target, with a
similar distribution to uranium.
The presence of a significant U-in-soil anomaly
that broadly coincides with lead isotopic values suggestive of
uranium mineralisation and other elements is highly significant.
Sustained anomalism - but with different distribution of elevated
values between uranium and lead isotopes minimises the risk that
the anomalies are derived from glacial material, as it would be
unusual for detrital material to contain all of these elements in
the same distribution. Additionally, each element behaves
differently in groundwater and soils, influencing the pathway it
would take from a theoretical deposit to the surface. Sustained
anomalies in uranium, lead, cobalt, nickel, and rare earth elements
may, therefore, suggest a shared source at depth.
REFERENCES
1 Saskatchewan Mining Development Corporation, 1981,
Black Lake Project, Permits 3 and 4, MPP 1065 and 1066 1980 Diamond
Drilling, 74P02-0012
2 Top Crystalline Basement Structure Contours, Athabasca Region,
Saskatchewan, Canada, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, UTM NAD83
Zone13,
https://gisappl.saskatchewan.ca/WebDocs/Geo_Atlas/MetaData/Top_Crystalline_basement_structure_contours.html
3
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/purepoint-uranium-completes-drilling-at-umfreville-and-provides-an-update-on-tabbernor-projects-895628970.html
4 SMDC; 1978, Airborne Geophysical Survey, SMDC Permit # 3
NTS 74-P-3 Black Lake Project, 74P-0004
5 Purepoint Uranium Group Inc., 2017, Umfreville Project,
2017 Exploration Report, MAW02161
6 Purepoint Uranium Group Inc. 2008, Umfreville Lake and
Newnham South Projects 2007 Exploration Report,
74P02-0023
7
Purepoint Uranium Group Inc. 2007, Umfreville
Lake, McEwen Lake and Newnham South Project Fall 2005 and 2006
Exploration Report, 74P-0017.
8
https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/power_metal_resources/news/rns/story/rd1n0pr
9 Abzalov, M.Z., 2021, Geochemical exploration for buried
sandstone-hosted uranium mineralisation using mobile U and Pb
isotopes: case study of the REB deposit, Great Divide Basin,
Wyoming, Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, Volume
21
10 Quirt, D.,Benedicto, A., 2020, Lead Isotopes in Exploration
for Basement-Hosted Structurally Controlled Unconformity-Related
Uranium Deposits: Kiggavik Project (Nunavut, Canada),
Minerals10(6), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10060512
QUALIFIED PERSON STATEMENT
The technical information contained
in this disclosure has been read and approved by Mr Nick O'Reilly
(MSc, DIC, MIMMM QMR, MAusIMM, FGS), who is a qualified geologist
and acts as the Qualified Person under the AIM Rules - Note for
Mining and Oil & Gas Companies. Mr O'Reilly is a Principal
consultant working for Mining Analyst Consulting Ltd which has been
retained by Power Metal Resources PLC to provide technical
support.
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes
of Article 7 of the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) 596/2014 as it
forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union
(Withdrawal) Act 2018 ("MAR"), and is disclosed in accordance with
the Company's obligations under Article 17 of
MAR.
For
further information please visit https://www.powermetalresources.com/
or
contact:
Power Metal Resources plc
|
|
Sean Wade (Chief Executive
Officer)
|
+44 (0) 20 3778 1396
|
|
|
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP
(Nomad and Joint Broker)
|
|
Ewan Leggat/Caroline Rowe
|
+44 (0) 20 3470 0470
|
|
|
Tamesis Partners LLP (Joint
Broker)
|
|
Richard Greenfield/Charlie Bendon
|
+44 (0) 20 3882 2868
|
|
|
BlytheRay (PR Advisors)
Tim Blythe/Megan Ray
|
+44 (0) 20 7138 3204
|
NOTES TO EDITORS
Power Metal Resources plc -
Background
Power Metal Resources
plc (AIM:POW, OTCQB:POWMF) is a London-listed metals
exploration company which finances and manages global resource
projects and is seeking large scale metal discoveries.
The Company has a principal focus on
opportunities offering district scale potential across a global
portfolio including precious, base and strategic metal exploration
in North America, Africa, Saudi Arabia and Australia.
Project interests range from
early-stage greenfield exploration to later-stage prospects
currently subject to drill programmes.
Power Metal will develop projects
internally or through strategic joint ventures until a project
becomes ready for disposal through outright sale or separate
listing on a recognised stock exchange thereby crystallising the
value generated from our internal exploration and development
work.
Value generated through disposals
will be deployed internally to drive the Company's growth or may be
returned to shareholders through share buy backs, dividends or
in-specie distributions of assets.