LANG & SCHWARZ Tradecenter (EL43) Noticias

It`s happening as we speak!

https://investorshub.advfn.com/Euro-Sun-Mining-Inc-CPNFF-16633

I just don’t want to spend the money right now

lol

🤣 😂 🤣nice try never said that and please provide receipts of that empty claim about me

F- as always

ES Minining is HOT now!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Euro-Sun-Mining-Inc-CPNFF-16633

What's your take on world population squirrel?  You one of those people who say we need less or one of those people who say we need MORE?

There have been 10s of lawsuits filed related to all matters of convervatorship. Can you point to a single ruling that even begins to show that the judiciary agrees with you? If you can, then the likelihood of true upside scenarios occurring go up significantly. Otherwise my running assumption is th

ES Minining is HOT now!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Euro-Sun-Mining-Inc-CPNFF-16633

LOLs, For some reason I was feeling Rubio wasn't the best fit, when posting ..

... maybe State Departments after Trump's will carry on it's humanitarian proud and very worthy record, with
re-inclusion of support for minority groups current GOP conservatives have ideological

This kind of stuff is just breaking my heart.

Check p. 129 of the pdf in https://www.fanniemae.com/media/54826/display Fannie Mae's 2024 10-K form to see its risk-weighted assets of $1.364T.

Check p. 217 of the pdf in https://otp.investis.com/clients/us/federal_homeloan/SEC/sec-show.aspx?FilingId=18181861&Cik=0001026214&Type=

You know, I always like a little reading material when I hit the john, but that's ridiculous.

I have no reason to lie to you about it zona

Unlike you I have no boss who gives me marching orders.

Do I laugh or cry?

https://youtu.be/isNlC0RYOyE?si=2JPsJf7kc-9VmrsP

Can anyone explain this. In reviewing the 12/31/24 financials of FMCC and FNMA, I see that FNMA drew $119.8B
from treasury back in 08-10 financial crisis. FNMA now show senior preferreds of 120.8B.

The senior prefs had an initial liquidation preference of $1B and that got incre

At this point I think there are negative political consequences to a SPS cramdown scenario because in a SPS cramdown the JPS holders will come out at PAR while common will be in the $ 5 to $ 10 range depending on the ultimate dilution.

A few years ago Treasury's lawyers thought that i

Ok, but what does this have to do with Treasury owning 92% of AIG for a very short period of time?

Quite a bit, given that Treasury did own 92% at one point and had no controlling interest issues.

Familiar and incorrect. When the GSEs are released, which they will be eventually, we will see what residual value remains in the common. I do not need to file a lawsuit to reap my share of the residual value. Time will tell us more accurately than a court document.

That's not at all

I don't know what the blog says as its behind the paywall. But I have pointed this out before - I believe that he can change the ECRF by a Final Notice - no drawn out comment period necessary. I have done this at one agency. We found that there was a rule that was clearly harming the Government and

There is an accounting rule that the balance sheet should be added to that of the parent if the have a stake above a certain threshold. My memory is that those making the takeover thought that the threshold was 80%.

Perhaps it was 80% in the past, but in 2014 it was changed to 95%.

My understanding is 80%. That's the reason for the free warrants to be set at 79.99%. In fact, in most other countries, the limit is 50%.

The warrants were issued in 2008 while the FASB pushdown accounting rule wasn't published until 2014. Perhaps the threshold was 80% in 2008, but it

1. Treasury: they can make all different kinds of salads: 79%, 90% and 95%...2. Me: I am happy with $30/shares, below that I am not satisfied.

Then you better cross your fingers, like Ackman does, that Treasury exercises the warrants. You're not getting $30 per share if Treasury ends

In the midst of this Signal chat issue this stock may see some see some unbelievable growth as it works up to the Big N uplist. Should be a fun ride.

Any updated thoughts on cap requirements? That will be a huge swing factor in all of this. 2.5% and almost no dilution beyond government. 4.5% and it's ugly. I haven't seen a peep related to this.

You will have to be more specific.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/t