New Pacific Metals Corp. (“New Pacific” or the “Company”) is
pleased to announce that the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary has
signed an agreement with an arm’s length private Bolivian
corporation (the “Vendor”) to acquire a 98% interest in the
Silverstrike silver project (the “Silverstrike Project” or the
“Project”) from the Vendor by making a one-time cash payment of
US$1.35 million. New Pacific will cover 100% of the future
expenditures of exploration, mining, development and production
activities. The agreement has a term of 30 years and
renewable for another 15 years without any payment and is subject
to an approval by Autoridad Jurisdiccional Administrativa Minera
(“AJAM”) in Bolivia.
The Silverstrike Project, at an elevation of
4,000 to 4,500 metres (“m”), is located approximately 140
kilometres (“km”) southwest of La Paz, Bolivia or approximately 450
km northwest of New Pacific’s Silver Sand Project. The
Silverstrike Project consists of nine (9) Special Temporary
Authorizations (“ATEs”) with an area of approximately 13km2
currently in the process of conversion to ‘Mining Administrative
Contracts’ before AJAM. The Vendor has also applied for
exploration rights over areas surrounding the Silverstrike Project
as part of the transaction.
Geologically, the Silverstrike Project is
composed of Tertiary red sandstones and mudstone sequences (Mauri
and Beren Formations) that were extruded by a Tertiary rhyolitic
volcanic dome and associated pyroclastic sediments.
The Project contains extensive silver mining
dumps (Figure-1) the results of Spanish Colonial mining activities
which exploited near surface polymetallic silver-gold-lead-zinc
(Ag-Au-Pb-Zn) mineralized bodies. Currently there are no
active mining activities on site. The Silverstrike Project is
divided into three areas according to the styles of mineralization:
- Subvertical Ag-Pb-Zn mineralized fractures developed in
sub-horizontal sandstones at Silverstrike North, where the
mineralization seems to be related to bleached whitish sandstones
by hydrothermal fluids. The style of silver mineralization is
similar to that in Silver Sand Project;
- Disseminated Ag-Au-Pb-Zn mineralization associated with
rhyolitic volcanic dome or diatreme of 900m by 900m extent at the
Silverstrike Central; and
- Ag-Pb-Zn Mineralization in quartz and K-feldspar phenocryst
rhyolite that intruded into red sandstone strata at Silverstrike
South.
Rio Tinto extensively sampled the mining dumps
in the Project area and drilled four diamond drill holes at
Silverstrike North, and four diamond holes and twelve RC holes in
Silverstrike Central in 1995. Near surface Ag-Au-Pb-Zn
mineralization was identified in all three areas.
Figure 1 is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/c15e6cd0-358e-499a-9592-cf88481619cc
Silverstrike North
By access and locations, the Silverstrike North
is divided into the Valley Zone, North Top, South Top, West Top,
and the CP Zone.
Silver-containing sulfosalts and sulfides fill
in open fractures in bleached sandstones in forms of sheeted veins,
swarm veinlets, stockworks and crackle breccias at the Silverstrike
North over an area of 3km by 3km. Dense fractures occur
dominantly along the north-west-west to north-west directions at
high angles that are generally confined within the red sandstone
and only stringers or feeder zones cutting through the underlying
red mudstones.
Rio Tinto has sampled extensively the mining
dumps on surface (Photo 1) over an area 1.5km by 1.5km in 1995,
yielding average grades of 150-200g/t silver and 1% lead (Figure
2). Rio Tinto also completed 1,000.6m of diamond drilling in
four holes at Silverstrike North. The PFZ001 hole intercepted
2m @ 1,254 g/t Ag, 0.33% Pb, 0.19% Zn and 0.48% Cu from 88m to 90m,
and the PFZ002 hole intercepted 2m @ 237 g/t Ag, 0.6% Pb, 0.07% Zn
and 0.5% Cu from 120m to 122m.
Two holes drilled at the CP Zone did not
intercept any meaningful mineralization.
Figure 2 is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/d423f4f5-ff33-4fda-bbdf-51b6ba2166be
Twenty-four grab samples taken by New Pacific
from the mining dumps in the Valley Zone (including valley, slope
and North Top) returned average grades 185g/t Ag, 0.93% Pb, 0.07%
Zn and 0.21% Cu (Table 1)1. Fifteen grab samples from the
mining dumps from the South Top and the CP zone averaged 193g/t Ag,
0.68% Pb, 0.08% Zn and 0.27% Cu. These results are consistent
with the historical dump sampling results by Rio Tinto (Figure 2,
Table 1). Future drilling by New Pacific will focus on the
bleached sandstones from the South Top, North Top and the West
Top.
Table 1 - Grab Sampling Results of Mining Dumps at
Silverstrike by New Pacific1 |
SAMPLE # |
Au g/t |
Ag g/t |
Pb_% |
Zn_% |
Cu_% |
Rock Type |
|
Location |
SM006209 |
0.01 |
171 |
0.47 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006210 |
0.01 |
149 |
0.62 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006211 |
0.01 |
392 |
0.67 |
0.05 |
0.25 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006212 |
0.01 |
473 |
1.11 |
0.10 |
0.42 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006213 |
0.01 |
3 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006214 |
0.01 |
354 |
1.05 |
0.08 |
0.33 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006215 |
0.01 |
251 |
3.34 |
0.09 |
0.35 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006216 |
0.01 |
29 |
0.79 |
0.11 |
0.07 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006217 |
0.01 |
317 |
0.94 |
0.10 |
0.26 |
sandstone |
|
Valley Zone |
SM006218 |
0.01 |
69 |
1.00 |
0.06 |
0.34 |
sandstone |
|
North Slope |
SM006219 |
0.01 |
271 |
1.05 |
0.26 |
1.00 |
sandstone |
|
North Slope |
SM006220 |
0.01 |
488 |
0.81 |
0.08 |
0.74 |
sandstone |
|
North Slope |
SM006221 |
0.01 |
447 |
1.99 |
0.12 |
0.34 |
sandstone |
|
North Slope |
SM006222 |
0.01 |
139 |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
sandstone |
|
North Top |
SM006223 |
0.01 |
44 |
0.81 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
sandstone |
|
North Top |
SM006224 |
0.01 |
49 |
0.98 |
0.09 |
0.01 |
sandstone |
|
North Top |
SM006225 |
0.01 |
78 |
0.37 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
SM006226 |
0.01 |
53 |
0.29 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
SM006227 |
0.01 |
94 |
0.49 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
SM006228 |
0.01 |
119 |
0.99 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
SM006229 |
0.01 |
116 |
0.79 |
0.09 |
0.15 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
SM006230 |
0.01 |
174 |
0.88 |
0.02 |
0.10 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
SM006231 |
0.01 |
63 |
1.45 |
0.01 |
0.16 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
SM006232 |
0.01 |
95 |
1.26 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
sandstone |
|
South Slope |
Average |
0.01 |
185 |
0.93 |
0.07 |
0.21 |
|
|
|
SM006233 |
0.01 |
151 |
0.33 |
0.70 |
0.33 |
sandstone |
|
CP Zone |
SM006234 |
0.01 |
33 |
0.31 |
0.03 |
0.13 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006235 |
0.01 |
111 |
0.40 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006236 |
0.01 |
35 |
0.19 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006237 |
0.01 |
113 |
0.35 |
0.02 |
0.09 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006238 |
0.01 |
94 |
0.21 |
0.03 |
0.14 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006239 |
0.01 |
230 |
0.82 |
0.03 |
0.13 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006240 |
0.01 |
163 |
0.16 |
0.03 |
0.19 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006241 |
0.01 |
186 |
0.47 |
0.05 |
0.25 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006242 |
0.01 |
70 |
0.31 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006243 |
0.01 |
675 |
0.79 |
0.05 |
0.68 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006244 |
0.01 |
285 |
4.43 |
0.04 |
0.56 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006245 |
0.01 |
89 |
0.68 |
0.04 |
0.17 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006246 |
0.01 |
545 |
0.19 |
0.03 |
0.11 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
SM006247 |
0.01 |
119 |
0.51 |
0.03 |
1.00 |
sandstone |
|
South Top |
Average |
0.01 |
193 |
0.68 |
0.08 |
0.27 |
|
|
South Top & CP Zone |
SM006248 |
0.01 |
166 |
2.03 |
0.97 |
0.02 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike South |
SM006249 |
0.01 |
340 |
3.99 |
1.44 |
0.02 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike South |
SM006250 |
0.01 |
375 |
3.87 |
2.28 |
0.09 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike South |
Average |
0.01 |
294 |
3.30 |
1.56 |
0.04 |
|
|
Silverstrike South |
SM006251 |
0.01 |
28 |
0.21 |
0.18 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006252 |
0.01 |
19 |
0.19 |
0.06 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006253 |
0.01 |
15 |
0.04 |
0.15 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006254 |
0.01 |
13 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006255 |
0.01 |
19 |
0.04 |
0.34 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006256 |
0.01 |
23 |
0.06 |
0.18 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006257 |
0.01 |
9 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006258 |
0.01 |
271 |
0.30 |
1.43 |
0.03 |
volcanic breccia |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006259 |
0.01 |
254 |
0.41 |
1.62 |
0.04 |
volcanic breccia |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006260 |
0.01 |
350 |
0.41 |
0.37 |
0.02 |
volcanic breccia |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006261 |
0.01 |
246 |
0.49 |
0.47 |
0.03 |
volcanic breccia |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006262 |
0.01 |
370 |
0.82 |
0.56 |
0.08 |
volcanic breccia |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006263 |
0.01 |
84 |
0.16 |
0.11 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006264 |
0.01 |
44 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006265 |
0.01 |
46 |
0.31 |
1.19 |
0.04 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006266 |
0.21 |
81 |
0.58 |
2.46 |
0.14 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006267 |
0.01 |
35 |
0.30 |
0.85 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006268 |
0.01 |
78 |
0.34 |
29.20 |
0.06 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006269 |
0.01 |
26 |
0.08 |
0.34 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006270 |
0.01 |
30 |
0.08 |
0.27 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006271 |
0.01 |
13 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006272 |
0.01 |
28 |
0.05 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006273 |
0.01 |
9 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006274 |
0.01 |
16 |
0.05 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006275 |
0.01 |
21 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006276 |
0.02 |
49 |
0.12 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006278 |
0.01 |
60 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006279 |
0.01 |
87 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006280 |
0.01 |
68 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
rhyolite |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006281 |
0.02 |
15 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006282 |
0.02 |
13 |
0.12 |
0.14 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006283 |
0.01 |
2 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006284 |
0.07 |
3 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006285 |
0.02 |
2 |
0.10 |
0.18 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006286 |
0.06 |
19 |
0.13 |
0.19 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006287 |
0.04 |
2 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006288 |
0.03 |
1 |
0.08 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006289 |
0.01 |
18 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006290 |
0.01 |
9 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006291 |
0.01 |
2 |
0.14 |
0.16 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006292 |
0.02 |
3 |
0.22 |
0.82 |
0.02 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006293 |
0.10 |
5 |
0.29 |
1.15 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006294 |
0.05 |
8 |
0.17 |
0.12 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006295 |
0.03 |
2 |
0.10 |
0.15 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006296 |
0.04 |
3 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006297 |
0.20 |
2 |
0.12 |
0.33 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006298 |
0.17 |
13 |
0.11 |
0.16 |
0.03 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006299 |
0.12 |
5 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
0.01 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
SM006300 |
0.03 |
1 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
epiclastic |
|
Silverstrike Central |
Average |
0.03 |
51 |
0.16 |
0.91 |
0.02 |
|
|
Silverstrike Central |
1 The grab samples are selected samples and are
not necessarily representative of the mineralization hosted on the
property.
Photo 1 is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/383e8cba-5329-464a-af98-16e07df6f9e4
Silverstrike Central
Ubiquitous disseminated silver-gold-lead-zinc
mineralization occurs in volcanic epiclastic sediments and breccias
associated with rhyolite intrusives in a Tertiary volcanic diatreme
system of 900m by 900m size. Historical mining sites and
dumps are scattered around, but there are no active mining
activities currently. In 1995, Rio Tinto completed four
diamond coring holes totaling 1,267m with the best intercept 220m @
45g/t Ag, 0.51% Pb and 0.44% Zn from 13.0m to 233.0m in hole BER-3
in the northern silver-lead-zinc mineralization area, and 12
reverse circulation holes totaling 2,986.7m with the best intercept
of 62m @ 0.74g/t Au and 0.3% Pb from 112m to 174m in hole BRC-004
in the southern gold mineralization area.
Forty-nine grab samples from surface outcrops
and dumps at Silverstrike Central returned average grades of 51g/t
Ag, 0.16% Pb and 0.91% Zn (Figure 3, Table 1).
Figure 3 is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/02b24de3-efe6-4186-b74b-e5a28d7c9013
Silverstrike South
A 300m long East-West trending historical
Colonial era adits and declines plus surface mining cuts along
structures developed in the quartz-potassium feldspar phenocryst
rhyolite body that intruded red sandstones with extensive mining
dumps. Mineralization is hosted in sheared rhyolite along the
contact structure of rhyolite intrusive with Tertiary red
sandstones with the true width of mineralization unknown due to
covering of mining dumps and talus. No modern exploration or
current mining was recoded.
Three samples from the mining dumps at the
Silverstrike South returned average grades of 294g/t Ag, 3.3% Pb,
1.56% Zn (Table 1). Extensive post mineralization and active
hydrothermal sinter and sinter sediments have also developed along
the nearby river which may have made the geology more complex for
the purpose of exploring Ag-Pb-Zn mineralization associated
rhyolites.
By using the geological knowledge gained at
exploring the Silver Sand Project, the Company believes that the
Silverstrike Project represents an opportunity similar to the
Silver Sand Project with the potential to explore for large scale
silver mineralization system.
Quality Assurance and Quality
Control
The grab samples with results released in the
news release were shipped in securely sealed bags by New Pacific
staff in the Company’s vehicles directly from field to ALS Global
in Oruro, Bolivia for preparation, and ALS Global in Lima, Peru for
geochemical analysis. All samples are first analyzed by a
multi-element ICP package (ALS code ME-MS41) with ore grade over
limits for silver, lead and zinc further analyzed using ALS code
OG46. Further silver over limits are analyzed by gravimetric
analysis (ALS code of GRA21).
The assay results of the grab samples are used
for reconnaissance purpose, hence no certified reference materials
and blank materials were inserted to the normal sample sequence.
However, internal QAQC results of ALS did not show any
significant bias of analysis or contamination during sample
preparation.
Technical information contained in this news
release has been reviewed and approved by Alex Zhang, P. Geo., Vice
President of Exploration, who is a Qualified Person for the
purposes of NI 43-101.
ABOUT NEW PACIFIC
New Pacific is a Canadian exploration and
development company which owns the Silver Sand Project, in the
Potosi Department of Bolivia and the Tagish Lake Gold Project in
Yukon, Canada.
For further information,
please contact:
New Pacific Metals Corp. Gordon Neal President Phone: (604)
633-1368 Fax: (604) 669-9387
info@newpacificmetals.com www.newpacificmetals.com
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation
Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the
TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
Certain of the statements and information in
this news release constitute “forward-looking information” within
the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial securities laws. Any
statements or information that express or involve discussions with
respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections,
objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but
not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “is
expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”,
“estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategies”, “targets”,
“goals”, “forecasts”, “objectives”, “budgets”, “schedules”,
“potential” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions,
events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be
taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms
and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and
may be forward-looking statements or information.
Forward-looking statements or information are
subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ
from those reflected in the forward-looking statements or
information, including, without limitation, risks relating to:
fluctuating equity prices, bond prices, commodity prices;
calculation of resources, reserves and mineralization, foreign
exchange risks, interest rate risk, foreign investment risk; loss
of key personnel; conflicts of interest; dependence on management
and others.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that
may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements or
information. Forward-looking statements or information are
statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and
actual achievements of the Company or other future events or
conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements or information due to a variety of
risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without
limitation, those referred to in the Company’s Annual Information
Form for the year ended June 30, 2019 under the heading “Risk
Factors”. Although the Company has attempted to identify important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there
may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated,
estimated, described or intended. Accordingly, readers should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or
information.
The Company’s forward-looking statements or
information are based on the assumptions, beliefs, expectations and
opinions of management as of the date of this news release, and
other than as required by applicable securities laws, the Company
does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements
or information if circumstances or management’s assumptions,
beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, or changes in any
other events affecting such statements or information. For the
reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance
on forward-looking statements or information.
New Pacific Metals (TSXV:NUAG)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
New Pacific Metals (TSXV:NUAG)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024