Fannie Mae (QB) (FNMAG) Noticias

I am assuming you are on this board as a liberator and supporter of having FNMA released after so many years, supporting the truth about the happening with the stock. So, Commander, be cognizant of the newfound interest in the stock (the struggle to get it release) and display leadership qualities, which should be expected from commanders in the armed forces.

As you can see, many of the "i have been here forever" boys are just posting about this. I am long like you and have skin in the game. Many on this board (seems anyway) trust the amount of time you have been in it.
As such, I asked you a legitimate question. If you take it as an attack, that may demonstrate that you may be TOO invested to see the difference. Again, just an observation.

Pulte working hard first day on the job.

Still working hard in DC rn with the team at U.S. Federal Housing FHFA. First 24 hours have been fun! 🤩— Pulte (@pulte) March 14, 2025

Attack, no. I have own the stock a lot less time than you, yes. Since Sept of last year. I never said the ruling was fake news. If someone needs to read more of the content, may I make a suggestion. My question was on the authenticity of the source. I would assume after years of "fake news" that you would question it as well. Especially now, so near the "blue skies" you mentioned earlier. I listen, pay attention and am objective. I just don't have as much time as you (given the past YEARS) have had. I am merely asking the questions, that I feel should be asked.

Double BOOM

-Boat

🚨 BREAKING: Judge Lamberth Cleared To Sign Fannie / Freddie Court Victory $FNMA $FMCC@pulte @SecScottBessent— Nico (@nicosintichakis) March 14, 2025

PERMANENT and ONGOING and CURRENT harm are the key words here @kthomp19

For the foregoing reasons, the Court will deny defendants Motion for JAMOL

If the shoe fits ...

You've been here a whole 8 days and

attack easily identifiable legal document

as fake news we have been waiting

YEARS for ...so post less and do

a little more research before posting 🤔

Hey buddy, you just showed up acting like a bad rash...people have been on this GSE board longer than your attention span.

They know what's going on....



FNMA

FOFreddie, I do not have the answers to your questions, we do know Freddie was chartered to provide competition in the secondary market; blending the two maybe as utilities would be sensible…

Concerning Pulte appointing Ackman to the FNMA board, I think would be a fantastic move for the shareholders.

Rule of Law Guy. Thoughts on this ? He says revising the ERCF rule could take 1 year.

Any attempt by FHFA to revise the ERCF may involve a requirement under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) to submit a lowered capital standard to public notice and comment, which could take 6-12 months from start of drafting the rule, to receiving comments, to publishing the final rule.
In order to streamline this process, the Trump 47 administration may consider a short GSE recap/release bill appended to the reconciliation bill expected to be taken up later this year (which requires on 50 votes in the Senate for passage).

Would it make sense for a GSE recap/release bill to be a part of the 2025 budget reconciliation legislation?

Any question regarding FHFA/Treasury authority to recap/release the GSEs administratively, or for Treasury to transact with respect to its SPS investment, would be resolved by a GSE recap/release bill in reconciliation that expressly authorizes FHFA/Treasury to do so.

One might imagine a relatively short bill that authorizes FHFA/Treasury to consummate a GSE recap/release.

As discussed above, a GSE recap/release bill in reconciliation could approve a GSE regulatory capital standard that is less conservative than the ERCF, and would expressly supplant the ERCF, avoiding the necessity for FHFA to go through an APA hearing procedure.

Republicans drafting the reconciliation budget package will be looking for “pay-fors” to add to the budget revenue scoring of the reconciliation bill. The new tax bill will be an important part of the reconciliation budget package. The projected valuation of Treasury’s SPS interest (valued by Ackman to be >$300 billion) could be applied to “pay for” the tax cuts expected in the new tax bill.

This “pay for” could not be incorporated into the reconciliation bill budgetary scoring if GSE recap/release proceeds administratively.

I like sources that are verifiable and have substantial data.

Ok. Ok. Now we are talking.

Link to the courtlistener cache if anyone wants to do a full read https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.163155/gov.uscourts.dcd.163155.439.0_1.pdf

just a question. I want it to be true as much as you. I just want to make sure it is on the up and up. Just a question. If you can answer with a reason, no problem. If it makes sense and verifiable, no problem.

Navy. Another quick question. Why is the rest of the document black and white and the dates purple?

If it is real, it is real. I ask the questions and you (because you know everything) answer them. That is what YOUR board is expecting. If you are straight, shouldn't be a problem.

No need for the idiot comment. Sounded like BS to me. Do you like fake news? Then people will ask questions. I know you have been here a while but no need to be a 🕳️

Price Targets ? 🥳

6.12 and 6.7 triggered in spspa is legal way to rid contract

It's the actual filed today document of the

case - pg 2 of 22 jus look and read it idiot !

US District Court for the District of Columbia case # 1:13-mc-1288 google it yourself. All defendants' motions to overturn the verdict denied; the verdict stands.

He is opening the books 

I am discovering a lot of things 👀— Pulte (@pulte) March 14, 2025

The Right People are in Now Place.

Perfect Timing.
The day after Pulte’s confirmation.

This administration is all about getting things done.



Ron

Yeah. that's official, but this news about lawsuit. Sketchy as heck. proof?

It's official.

Director William J. Pulte was officially sworn in today after being nominated by President Trump and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in a bipartisan 56-43 vote. #GoldenAgeofHousing #MakeHousingGreatAgain pic.twitter.com/lDTlOSY5ru— FHFA (@FHFA) March 14, 2025

Yeah. but, who is this guy? not financial media guy. Not news until its verified.

So this ruling officially deems the NWS illegal? Or just the damage of Shrholder value? How will this affect Shrholder price on release? My opinion, they can’t take anymore value from us without triggering a lawsuit that will absolutely halt release.

Looks like real news to me.

Almost a full year later. Crooked Judge needs to be admonished, and leave the bench

I like your simple formula… Well said!

You could've been a mathematician.

Michael

Lamberth ruling ...

Bill Pulte's new Office ...

Either way $612M won't change the PPS that much, true or not true.(a little, if true). More good up for the shareholders that sued (again, if true). They get a new feather in their cap. Forward progress, I guess

Not sure this is actually true. Check sources.

Exciting news Rick!

I'm thinking you may have had something to do with this.

Michael 

Was the original post from a Dancing with the Stars guy? Alec Mazo? Story sounds thin. No real press.

$300 by the end of the year. Even Goldmansachs is buying.

Was the original post from a Dancing with the Stars guy? Alec Mazo? Story sounds thin. No real press.

I think Monday is going to be a very green day:
1. Senate passed the budget - No Shutdown.
2. Lamebreath finally signed the case and we officially have a public win on the books.
3. Pulte doing everything but sending up a flare to say this is happening.
I think it all adds up to a $1+ Monday.

Agree. And those who have nothing to add, please like and repost the responses you agree with.

I ain't sure I believe this about a Lamberth
new ruling - LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE
(not you, Nagra but whoever posted it
on X)

100%

Repercussions on PPS?

The people on the boards have long since changed out since the housing crisis. I think we are on the 2nd or 3rd iteration of board members. The corporate structure is already there. The plans for stock incentives is not hard to figure out. They just have been prevented from implementing stock incentive plans for the board members and have had their pay limited. There is no need to change CEOs when the ones in place have been advocating for release and have negotiated the path to exit conservatorship

Was that the big news He was referring to?

‘If you have any ideas on what Fannie or Freddie could be doing better…’

My issue is not with F&F, my issue is with FHFA, that self-serving parasitic agency that was only suppose to keep F&F in c-ship for a short time; however, anointed themselves masters of the kingdom.

That agency needs a Toby Keith boot up their arse..

I could say more, but it’s Friday.

they are two privately owned businesses. There would be anti-trust laws to prevent them from being merged. It absolutely not in the cards. and combining them would not lower rates. I understand what you are saying but you are legitimately talking about creating a monopoly which is why they were broken up in the first place when privatized originally. The GSEs would never be released if that were to happen. And the government would essentially keep raising fees on mortgages like local governments do on property taxes. One really large organization does not create efficiencies. Theoretically, it should. In practice it never does because the organization gets lazy from the lack of competition.

There will be no appeal.Congratulations again!

This is great news!!! @SecScottBessent will not appeal the 8-0 jury verdict as it is not MAGA and cannot be won on appeal and is delaying MAGA, The government LOST!! (Finally after 16 years of misbehavior) @pulte @FHFA @POTUS— Ano (@Ano3020100) March 14, 2025