ADVFN Logo ADVFN

No pudimos encontrar ningún resultado para:
Asegúrate de que la ortografía sea correcta o intenta ampliar tu búsqueda.

Tendencias Ahora

Listas Principales

Parece que no has iniciado sesión.
Haz clic en el botón de abajo para iniciar sesión y ver tu historial reciente.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Regístrate para obtener alertas en tiempo real, cartera personalizada y movimientos del mercado.
NanoLogix Inc (CE)

NanoLogix Inc (CE) (NNLX)

0.000004
0.00
(0.00%)
Cerrado 14 Marzo 2:00PM

Discusiones en tiempo real e ideas comerciales: opere con confianza con nuestra poderosa plataforma.

Estadísticas y detalles clave

Último Precio
0.000004
Postura de Compra
0.00
Postura de Venta
0.00
Volume Operado de la Acción
-
0.00 Rango del Día 0.00
0.000001 Rango de 52 semanas 0.02505
Precio Anterior
0.000004
Precio de Apertura
-
Hora
Última hora de negociación
Volumen promedio (3 m)
28,700
Volumen financiero
-
Precio Promedio Ponderado
-

NNLX Últimas noticias

Período †Variación(Ptos)Variación %AperturaPrecio MáximoPrecio MínimoAvg. Vol. diarioPrecio Promedio Ponderado
10000000CS
4004.0E-64.0E-64.0E-624004.0E-6CS
123.0E-63001.0E-64.0E-61.0E-6287001.13E-6CS
263.0E-63001.0E-60.025051.0E-61170413.483E-5CS
523.0E-63001.0E-60.025051.0E-6919752.267E-5CS
1563.0E-63001.0E-60.025051.0E-6562277.199E-5CS
260-0.026696-99.98501872660.02670.2471.0E-61390690.06926864CS

NNLX - Preguntas Frecuentes

¿Cuál es el precio actual de las acciones de NanoLogix (CE)?
El precio actual de las acciones de NanoLogix (CE) es US$ 0.000004
¿Cuál es el rango de negociación de 1 año para el precio de las acciones de NanoLogix (CE)?
NanoLogix (CE) ha negociado en un rango de US$ 0.000001 a US$ 0.02505 durante el último año

Movimientos

Ver todo
  • Volumen
  • % Mayores Alzas
  • % Mayores Bajas
SímboloPrecioVol.
AABVFAberdeen International Inc (PK)
US$ 0.0187
(0.00%)
0
AABKFAareal Bank AG (CE)
US$ 0.00
(0.00%)
0
AABBAsia Broadband Inc (PK)
US$ 0.0213
(0.00%)
0
AAALYAareal Bank AG (PK)
US$ 34.65
(0.00%)
0
AAAIFAlternative Investment Trust (PK)
US$ 0.55
(0.00%)
0
AABVFAberdeen International Inc (PK)
US$ 0.0187
(0.00%)
0
AABKFAareal Bank AG (CE)
US$ 0.00
(0.00%)
0
AABBAsia Broadband Inc (PK)
US$ 0.0213
(0.00%)
0
AAALYAareal Bank AG (PK)
US$ 34.65
(0.00%)
0
AAAIFAlternative Investment Trust (PK)
US$ 0.55
(0.00%)
0
GARPFGolden Agri Resource (PK)
US$ 0.185
(0.00%)
1.04M
ABSOFABS CBN Holdings Corporation (CE)
US$ 0.11
(0.00%)
395.66k
TCEHYTencent Holdings Ltd (PK)
US$ 66.32
(0.00%)
361.02k
NCLTYNitori Holdings Company Ltd (PK)
US$ 10.49
(0.00%)
298k
GRLTGrillit Inc (PK)
US$ 0.00065
(0.00%)
232k

NNLX Discussion

Ver más
yman yman 6 días hace
Hook, Line and Sinker. Interesting.
https://www.panmacmillan.com/blogs/literary/theranos-elizabeth-holmes-john-carreyrou
👍️ 2
Muggo11 Muggo11 6 días hace
Living my life and checking in for the first time in a while. I am completely ignorant of the law here but, Ant, admire what you are trying to do. As you know, I’ve owned shares since 2007 and have just held onto them (and now some of my quantum stocks have earned me far more than I lost on NNLX haha). More power to you. I never delete an email so I’ll take a look and see if I can find any directly from BB that might be useful to you.
👍️ 1
Ant4 Ant4 1 semana hace
Correct but the next interesting event will be their answer to my motion which is due on March 24, I then get an opportunity to respond by March 31. The question then is will the court grant my request for oral argument before making a decision.
👍️ 1
Ant4 Ant4 1 semana hace
Correct but the next interesting event will be their answer to my motion which is due on March 24, I then get an opportunity to respond by March 31. The question then is will the court grant my request for oral argument before making a decision.
👍️ 1
yman yman 1 semana hace
The motion for reconsideration set for April 7th.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/53516943/FAGAN_v_BARNHISER_et_al
👍️ 2
Jon Jon Jon Jon 1 semana hace
Any idea when the hearing for reinstatement will be?
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 1 semana hace
Yman. I will be addressing the patent issue once the case is reinstated. In short, although not an attorney I am very very confident the court will find that the patents are the property of Nanologix. There is a plethora of case law to support that.
👍️ 2
yman yman 1 semana hace
I understand how Bret and the Faro's are the inventors however in addition to the various releases they used the co facility, material and funds and that would seem to give ownership to Nanologix. Even if there is no ownership agreement their actions would appear to rule in favor of the co. If they are banking on the co did not exist they lead shareholders to believe it did and to me that is fraud and may end up with jail time. I guess the only way to find out if there is a complaint filed with the SEC. Opinion
👍️0
Omar8 Omar8 1 semana hace
DP,




From a post by ANT....."Jon Jon. 1st I do not have an attorney handling this I'm handling it myself. An attorney would have cost 30-40,000 already. I am familiar with the Faro's attorney a very large multi state firm where junior attorneys cost 4-500 and seniors cost 1000-1500. They have 3 attorneys working on this. I estimate they have alread spent over $50,000."


Seems they are trying to do whatever it takes.

Ants talk about company being void, that might explain somethings and maybe why BB walked away the way he did....

There are plenty of releases worded at least to me that the tech was the company.....yet look who is claiming the tech as theirs now ?
👍️0
Deep Pockets 11 Deep Pockets 11 2 semanas hace
The Hail Mary has been thrown......best of luck to all share holders ..........
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 2 semanas hace
The statement on the confirmation of the filing of my motion that there is no need to appear was by the court clerk not the judge. I have asked for oral argument as I did with my last filing which the Judge denied. Based on the arguments I made in this motion for reconsideration I raise numerous issues that are not cut and dry therefore the court should grant my request for oral argument. I also believe Faro's attorneys will request oral argument.

Although I am confident that the law is on my side and that the case will be reinstated I suspect that if it is Faro will ask the court to consider the 2nd argument they made in their motion to dismiss which the court apparently did not consider once the case was dismissed on the derivative issue. That 2nd argument is that Faro(s) are residents of Texas with no ties to NJ and therefore the NJ court has no jurisdiction over them. All I can say on this message board is I am unconcerned about that argument and I am confident the court has jurisdiction.

Stay tuned!
👍️ 2
jshdn jshdn 2 semanas hace
Hey Ant ... I didn't know the answer to this question but I am interested in chatting and just seeing if I can be of any help. You called me I think it was in the fall and I was in a family event. Now I've been trying to message you but it won't let me. Perhaps you can message me through this site. My general sense is that faro is not inherently evil but got duped in this theranos-like situation.
👍️0
yman yman 2 semanas hace
If Ant can make his case citing prior court rulings and company statements there is no need to appear. The court has spoken. Ant has a lot to work with, just hope he can get it all submitted.
👍️ 1
Omar8 Omar8 2 semanas hace
Jon Jon,




See what Ant posted..."FYI.....a derivative suit is filed when all shareholders were exposed to the same harm, ie they failed to tell all shareholders that the corp was voided in 2018, they now claim they own the patents, etc etc. In other words we were all harmed not just me. The reason they are claiming it is a derivative suit is it would have had to have been filed on behalf of all shareholders which I could not have done because as a non attorney I can only represent myself."

It's a joke they claim the patents are theirs after all those releases. This shows what Faro and BB really are, it's amazing how they are treating the shareholders. I see Ant posting here where is any of their posts at ? They don't care about the shareholders it's all about them. I hope it gets approved.

All those releases put out after 2018, they should be ashamed of themselves.
👍️0
Jon Jon Jon Jon 2 semanas hace
I would think he would want to be there to argue the revisit just to make sure it gets approved, especially with all the things he has presented to this board.
👍️ 1
yman yman 2 semanas hace
Motion to reconsider set for April 7. No appearance necessary.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/53516943/FAGAN_v_BARNHISER_et_al
👍️ 1
Omar8 Omar8 2 semanas hace
Ant4,






https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170377121


Hi, thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I cannot disclose my interest at this time although in my opinion the technology is very sound. Any idea of the percentage of equity the officers and directors own? Apparently they have not filed franchise tax returns in Delaware for several years and it looks like the corporation was deemed void in 2015. At this point I'm interested in buying 4.9% of the stock in private sales.



Another post not long after...

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170788165


From Delaware Secretary of State 3/1/18 is date the corporation was voided

Status: Incorporation Date / Formation Date: Entity Type: State: Status Date: NANOLOGIX, INC. Corporation Domestic Void, AR’s or Tax Delinquent General 6/21/1989 DELAWARE 3/1/2018

Keywords: ......VOID........ - Tax Delinquent........ - 3/1/18
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 2 semanas hace
Need help. Does anyone know or can find the 1st date I posted about the company being voided in Delaware? Thanks
👍️0
leroy kelly leroy kelly 2 semanas hace
If Giles Manley will talk, he would be a great choice to reach out to.

I exchanged emails with him, and talked to him once.

Back to John Tracy, I am sure he would speak freely to you.

He would have info on patent rights and most of the inter-workings since I believe he set most of the operations.
👍️ 1
yman yman 2 semanas hace
Omar: Correct William "Hank" Williams not to be confused with the country music singer Hank Williams.😀
👍️0
Omar8 Omar8 2 semanas hace
Yman,





"Yes Omar: VP Sales, Hank Williams and Dr Giles Manley."


I think his name is William “Hank” Lewis. It would be kind of cool if it was Hank Williams.

I wonder if they had any decent sales during his time.........
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 2 semanas hace
Yman, thanks for the posts. Some good info particularly about Giles Manley. Someone we need to talk to.
👍️ 1
Ant4 Ant4 2 semanas hace
Yman, thanks for the posts. Some good info particularly about Giles Manley. Someone we need to talk to.
👍️0
yman yman 2 semanas hace
Yes Omar: VP Sales, Hank Williams and Dr Giles Manley.
https://www.biospace.com/nanologix-inc-welcomes-vp-for-sales-and-marketing
https://www.aol.com/news/2012-11-13-us-environmental-protection-agency-issues-featured.html
👍️0
Omar8 Omar8 2 semanas hace
Yman,


There were other came and went very quickly.......




Who knows how much BS was being sling around. ? Was it true sales experienced a significant increase in Q3 or was he just blowing smoke up the shareholders rears ?

Giles Manley came and went maybe when saw what was going on he didnt want any part of it like the rest ? I think Giles was on the other board too at one time before he joined like that other young college person named Rails Splitter I think it was, he came and went never to be heard from again.




NanoLogix is pleased to announce sales experienced a significant increase in Q3. Essentially all of Q3 and current sales have been, and are, directly to the US Federal government or to Corporations for use on classified US Government projects. These sales are comprised of BNP kits and filled Petri plates. Major marketing for BNP and BioNanoFilter (BNF) bacteria detection kits is pending publication of two recently completed third-party studies in peer-reviewed science journals.

The company has had increasing interest in both its BioNanoPore (BNP) Petri-based sandwiched-membrane bacteria detection kits and also in standard filled Petri plates, both packed in NanoLogix's proprietary extended-life packaging. The internally developed patent pending packaging enables storage of both BNP and Petri for over one year in cold storage, and for at least three months at room temperature.

NanoLogix is honored to welcome Giles Manley, MD to the NanoLogix Science Advisory Board (SAB). Dr. Manley brings a wealth of medical, legal and business knowledge to the SAB.





"Dr. Manley's acceptance statement: "I am grateful for the invitation, and very excited about being part of NanoLogix by serving on their Science Advisory Board. What NanoLogix has accomplished over the last several years is truly amazing. There is no comparable system in the world that can deliver bacterial identification as cost effectively, quickly and accurately as their BNF and BNP product line... Through my career I have formed acquaintances with the Chiefs of Obstetrics at some of the top medical institutions in our country. I will make a concerted effort to get the necessary trials started and finished at places such as Harvard, Johns Hopkins and other institutions. I am hopeful that by the end of 2013 the standard for GBS screening will include our near-15 minute test at time of labor."
👍️0
yman yman 2 semanas hace
More background: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Rogers-5
https://nanologix.com/author/nanologix/page/2/
https://nanologix.com/category/updates/
👍️ 1
yman yman 2 semanas hace
The co had so many chances to survive and grow if only able to keep the likes of John Tracy and Jim Rogers. If anybody could screw things up it was Bret and Bret alone. It didn't take long for Dr Jim Rodger to make a quick exit. If I recall he was an important part in the development of the N assay and RVA and Bret screwed him.https://nanologix.com/nanologix-develops-sub-1-hour-coronavirus-19-detection-technology-and-welcomes-james-rogers-phd-as-chief-science-officer/
👍️ 1
yman yman 2 semanas hace
"Too bad he won't talk..." If compelled by a court he must.
👍️0
Omar8 Omar8 2 semanas hace
Too bad he won't talk....




I have seen many releases with RVA and N-Assay but never seen it worded like this below with the Flatpak..."exclusively licensed to NanoLogix "

This release is the only one I recall stating some tech being exclusively licensed to Nanologix.....ALL the releases with RVA and N-Assay I have seen don't word it like that Flatpak......ultimately It comes down to who owns RVA and N-Assay Patents....I see it as the shareholders but I base it on the releases....thats all I have to go by.


NanoLogix Provides Operations Update

June 11, 2013 02:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time
HUBBARD, Ohio--(BUSINESS WIRE)--NanoLogix Inc. (NNLX), an innovator in the accelerated detection, identification and antibiotic sensitivity determination of live bacteria, announces that the US Environmental Protection Agency and NanoLogix have agreed to extend their existing Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) for two years, with the new expiration being mid-2015. The CRADA is focused on using NanoLogix-based technologies for development of a comprehensive water quality test kit for testing drinking and source waters in all ten EPA regions.

NanoLogix continues to develop new products and new markets. The company has advanced in a number of areas, including development of new technologies, increasing sales and customer bases, and gaining substantial recognition in published research on NanoLogix products and techniques.

The technology developments at NanoLogix are revolutionary. Improving on existing bacterial diagnostic products and protocols, the Company is achieving success in the market for its Extended-Life Petri dishes and BNP diagnostic kits, both vacuum-packed in gas-charged FlatPacks. The FlatPack technology – exclusively licensed to NanoLogix – represents a major breakthrough in supply-chain management for these products.
👍️0
leroy kelly leroy kelly 2 semanas hace
John would be the best source outside of Bret or the Faro's.
👍️0
Omar8 Omar8 2 semanas hace
Another Interesting Release


So is this Nanologix and collaboration with University of Texas Health Science Center ( Faro ?) the early stuff that eventually became N-Assay ?

https://www.biospace.com/nanologix-inc-announces-development-of-multi-well-rapid-diagnostic-test-variant-and-exhibits-at-the-b-american-society-for-microbiology-b-genera

NanoLogix, Inc. Announces
Development of Multi-Well, Rapid Diagnostic Test Variant and Exhibits at the American Society for Microbiology General Meeting in San Francisco
June 13, 2012 | 3 min read
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email
Print
HUBBARD, Ohio, June 13, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- NanoLogix (OTC Markets:NNLX) announced today its R&D team in collaboration with University of Texas Health Science Center - Houston (UTHSC-Houston) researchers, are developing a multi-well, microplate reader variant of the company’s BioNanoFilter (BNF) diagnostics for use in large volume laboratory environments. Early analysis of the multi-well plates shows exceptionally fast live-threat results similar to the company’s standard BNF technology. Starting this week, the NanoLogix BNF and BioNanoPore (BNP) technology will be on exhibit at booth #841 at the 112th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology in San Francisco, June 16 June 19.

(Photo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120613/CL23734)

Research using NanoLogix technology from a recently completed clinical study will also be presented at the ASM General Meeting on June 17th. Dr. Jonathan Faro of UTHSC-Houston will present the research, which focused on detection, identification, and determination of antibiotic sensitivity of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) during pregnancy. Data showed NanoLogix diagnostics consistently provided results in a 4 to 6 hour window, dramatically shorter than standard culturing times of 48 to 72 hours. The data and the associated clinical study narrative is currently being formatted for submission for peer-review publication, as well as to the US FDA for acceptance as a non-invasive diagnostic technology.

“These are exciting times for NanoLogix,” said CEO Bret Barnhizer. “Our technology has the potential to dramatically affect the course of human health and events over the past eight months have greatly enhanced our position for the future.”

Rapid Live-Threat Tuberculosis Results

Recent R&D operations have also converged to dramatically enrich NanoLogix’ bacteria and protozoa detection technology portfolio.

The detection for Tuberculosis (TB) utilizing NanoLogix’ BNF and BioNanoPore (BNP) technologies has recently been completed by a major independent, third-party research laboratory. Live-threat TB was detected with NanoLogix BNP technology in 4 to 5 days, as opposed to 21 to 84 days with standard culture. TB was also detected and identified with the company’s BNF technology in less than two hours. Peer-reviewed publication and FDA submittal are in process for results from both BNP and BNF Tuberculosis research.

“We are thrilled to be dramatically cutting bacterial detection times from days to hours for many pathogens,” said Barnhizer. “Specifically, we have reduced wait times for TB from weeks to days, while protozoa detection times for Cryptosporidium, which is responsible for over 50 percent of waterborne illnesses, have been cut from weeks to hours. At the same time, we have been able to accomplish these results with improved quality of detection.”

About NanoLogix, Inc.

NanoLogix is a biotechnology company focused primarily on rapid diagnostics. Its products offer accelerated detection and identification of microorganisms. In addition to medical and homeland security applications, NanoLogix technology is applicable in pharmaceutical, industrial, veterinary and environmental testing. Patents granted to NanoLogix can be used in the areas of applied microbiology, soil microbiology, microbial physiology, molecular biology, pharmacology, pharmaco-kinetics, and antibiotic sensitivity. For more information visit www.nanologix.com.

Media Contact:
Lisa Ann Pinkerton
Technica Communications for NanoLogix
408-806-9626
lisaann@technicacommunications.com

Investor Contact:
Carol Surrena
NanoLogix, Inc.
330-534-0800
carol@nanologix.com

This press release contains statements, which may constitute “forward- looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of NanoLogix, Inc., and members of its management as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results.

SOURCE NanoLogix, Inc.
👍️0
Omar8 Omar8 2 semanas hace
DP,




What I see online with John is he worked from February 2011- Jun 2013.....I do now find it interesting he left around same time this release on N-Assay came out.
So why would John leave in June just when this big news was starting ? Interesting. So it seems he was around for N-Assay but not RVA...maybe it would be interesting to hear from too bad he's not talking it seems.




https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130610006681/en/US-EPA-and-NanoLogix-to-Extend-Agreement-to-2015





US EPA and NanoLogix to Extend Agreement to 2015

NanoLogix Provides Operations Update

June 11, 2013 02:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time
HUBBARD, Ohio--(BUSINESS WIRE)--NanoLogix Inc. (NNLX), an innovator in the accelerated detection, identification and antibiotic sensitivity determination of live bacteria, announces that the US Environmental Protection Agency and NanoLogix have agreed to extend their existing Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) for two years, with the new expiration being mid-2015. The CRADA is focused on using NanoLogix-based technologies for development of a comprehensive water quality test kit for testing drinking and source waters in all ten EPA regions.

NanoLogix continues to develop new products and new markets. The company has advanced in a number of areas, including development of new technologies, increasing sales and customer bases, and gaining substantial recognition in published research on NanoLogix products and techniques.

The technology developments at NanoLogix are revolutionary. Improving on existing bacterial diagnostic products and protocols, the Company is achieving success in the market for its Extended-Life Petri dishes and BNP diagnostic kits, both vacuum-packed in gas-charged FlatPacks. The FlatPack technology – exclusively licensed to NanoLogix – represents a major breakthrough in supply-chain management for these products. Customers using FlatPacked Petri dishes achieve significant cost savings and supply chain efficiencies over traditional Petri dishes available from other suppliers. Our products have virtually no breakage in shipment and storage, and have a shelf life far beyond that of traditional filled Petri dishes. Tests of our select nutrient agars demonstrate a usable shelf life, stored at room temperature, of at least one year. This is four times longer than the competition's filled Petri plates that require cold storage. Not requiring refrigeration of select media in filled Petri plates is one of the most important developments in bacterial culture and Petri in decades and provides the potential for use of our products throughout the world, with cold storage, expiration, and fragility no longer the concerns they have been for many decades. Shelf life tests of our filled Petri plates that are kept in cold storage, to date, have shown a usable shelf life of at least two years. All shelf life tests have been conducted by a major independent third-party research laboratory and are continuing.

Customers to date include the US EPA, independent research and hospital laboratories, and defense contractors. NanoLogix products are at present being used on at least six classified Federal government projects, with expanded use expected this year. Those projects are funded by the US Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and the US Environmental Protection Agency. In the past month, NanoLogix has hired four new production employees to cope with added demand.

NanoLogix has recently signed agreements with companies and distributors in Europe and Asia governing expansion of our business beyond US borders. The Company is currently in talks with other US and foreign-based corporations on use of BNP, BNF and Petri products. In April the Company received a granted patent in Japan for its BNP diagnostic technology. Since that event interests in Japan have approached NanoLogix regarding purchase of BNP for use in TB research.

In the past year we and our collaborators in research at University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston have made significant refinements to our existing technologies and have also developed one additional rapid test. The new test has been named the N-Assay. The N-Assay is a unique ELISA multi-well machine-readable assay that provides results for bacteria identification and antibiotic sensitivity in less than one hour with high sensitivity and specificity. Indications are that the N-Assay will provide rapid results for any bacteria for which an antibody exists. We at NanoLogix and the researchers using the N-Assay are very excited at this new development. The N-Assay is projected to provide a premier platform for Point-of–Care rapid diagnostics. N-Assay patent filings were made in 2013. It is projected that the N-Assay will be more suitable for use in some developed areas than our BNF identification technology, with the BNF useful in areas or regions that are less developed.

The Company exhibited at three professional conferences this year --- The American Society for Microbiology (ASM) BioDefense and Emerging Diseases Research meeting in Washington, DC in February, the Food Safety Summit in Baltimore, and the ASM Annual Meeting in Denver, both in May. At all of these meetings there was strong interest in our products, with sales and promise of sales as a result. At the Denver ASM meeting, the general and specific interest was far beyond any the Company has experienced at any of the consecutive ASM meetings attended since 2008.

About NanoLogix, Inc.

NanoLogix is a biotechnology company focused primarily on rapid diagnostics. Its products offer accelerated detection and identification of microorganisms. In addition to medical and homeland security applications, NanoLogix technology is applicable in pharmaceutical, industrial, veterinary and environmental testing.

Patents granted to NanoLogix can be used in the areas of applied microbiology, soil microbiology and bioremediation, microbial physiology, molecular biology, pharmacology, pharmaco-kinetics, and antibiotic sensitivity

For more information visit www.nanologix.com.

This press release contains statements, which may constitute "forward- looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of NanoLogix, Inc., and members of its management as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results.

Contacts
NanoLogix, Inc.
Investors:
Carol Surrena, 330-534-0800
carol@nanologix.com
👍️0
Deep Pockets 11 Deep Pockets 11 2 semanas hace
I spoke with John a few years back, he was living in Hanover Ma. He was unable to discuss Nanologix as I believe he had signed a non disclosure agreement....
👍️0
leroy kelly leroy kelly 3 semanas hace
John worked for Nanologix for three years.

Met with Faro in Pearson at least twice and talked with him numerous times.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110222005469/en/Reuters-Television-Report-features-NanoLogix-Biotechnology-and-University-of-Texas-Health-Science-Center-Clinical-Trial
👍️0
yman yman 3 semanas hace
Ant4: See 1/11/16.https://uk.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/NANOLOGIX-INC-120789511/news/NanoLogix-Seeks-Development-Marketing-Partner-for-Their-Sub-1-Hour-COVID-19-Detection-Tests-33844541 /Regarding JohnTracy he was brought on as Operational Manager and after a short stay left. John is highly respected. Resides in Mass. I got the impression that once he saw what was going on he wanted no part of it.
👍️ 1
Ant4 Ant4 3 semanas hace
Leroy. Who is Tracy, what was his involvement.

Thanks
Tom
👍️0
leroy kelly leroy kelly 3 semanas hace
You should reach out to John Tracy
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 3 semanas hace
JSHDN. Thanks for the post.

I think the statement in the PR............ "To bring the test to market, it’s likely a company would need to license the technology from NanoLogix".

Really? How does Nanologix license a technology / patent that according to Faro and Bret Nanologix doesn't own? Although I do not yet know who made or authored that statement it will be difficult for Faro to argue that he was unaware of it as he is quoted in the same PR.

If anyone else has any similar PR's, other writings, etc. it is important to get them to me ASAP.
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 3 semanas hace
Yman. You are correct for the most part it was a complete fraud. However I spent a lot of time with Faro and other researchers, etc and believe the technologies are very promising otherwise I wouldn't be spending considerable time and personal funds on this. Although I do not believe that Faro instituted the fraud or even knew about it is clear that Bret was behind it and he knew what he was doing was fraud, that's criminal. Potentially to make matters worse while pumping the company and the patent for COVID someone was dumping millions of shares at a time that the company did not exist. Although I do not know who owns what shares I doubt anyone other than Bret owned those millions of shares that were dumped. If it was Bret he is likely to be indicted. For the life of me I cannot understand why Bret and Faro have not done everything possible to settle this action. Although I do not believe either of the Faro's have any criminal liability I believe they certainly will have civil liability due to the fact that they sat back, did nothing and let Bret run his fraud. As just 1 example, Faro filed a certification in my matter stating that he asked Bret several times why the company was not holding SH meetings required by Delaware law. Bret's response was that a meeting would cost $30,000 and the company couldn't afford it. At the time of that conversation Faro was a Director for 3-4 years, in other words he knew or should have known that the company was in violation for several years. What did he or his father do? Nothing. To protect the shareholders that he had an obligation to do, what he should have done was resign from the board in a public statement and state the reason the company was in violation of the SH meeting requirement for several years. Stay tuned!
👍️ 2
yman yman 3 semanas hace
I have a hard time coming to grips with the co making representations that lead to buying and selling in a non existent co, according to DE. Furthermore how can Bret and Faro's claim ownership of the patents when they used the co facility to develop and fund those patents. I would think those actions are criminal and should be investigated to find out if true. Shareholders relied on co statements that made shareholders believe the co was real. Opinion.
👍️ 1
jshdn jshdn 3 semanas hace
Oops .... I shouldnt have posted the first one.
👍️0
jshdn jshdn 3 semanas hace
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095821180970120X

https://www.tribtoday.com/news/local-news/2020/05/hubbard-firm-has-patent-pending/
👍️0
Omar8 Omar8 3 semanas hace
Here is something...




https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/531888212/covid-19-rapid-test-patent-granted


"....The NanoLogix technology's additional ability to detect the presence of the neutralizing antibody to the virus is critical in determining the need for vaccination and the effectiveness and longevity of the antibodies that neutralize the infections."


I posted a few others earlier today....
👍️0
exploremore exploremore 3 semanas hace
There is no assignee on the patents. They stated they were not able to produce products and needed to find someone who was able to do so. I don't see Nanologix is even involved is this.

As i said, I support any effort you can take but I'm not a shareholder. It seemed obvious move to unload when they where going to be delisted.
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 3 semanas hace
The concept is simple. If the court decides that Bret and Faro always had an obligation to assign their rights to the patents and order that they be assigned you and all other shareholders would benefit from that. How that assignment could happen when the company is void is unknown is a question for another time that I will find an answer to. However, if I was Bret or Faro, if the court were to allow me to seek a declaratory judgment I would be worried.
👍️ 1
exploremore exploremore 3 semanas hace
I do wish you luck. i think Bret is a POS/
👍️ 1
exploremore exploremore 3 semanas hace
I don't know law! At this point the corporation is long gone, your fight is for the patents (where the name Nanologix does not exist). I don't know how any of this has anything to do with shareholders?
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 3 semanas hace
I NEED YOUR HELP To seek what is known as a declaratory judgement, in other words asking the court to decide and order that the patents were/are the property of the company I must provide evidence and argument that convinces the court 100% that both bret and faro committed to assign their rights in the patents to the company. Any help providing me any writing including press releases, email, text, etc wherein its stated or implied that the patents were owned by the company is greatly needed. Thanks
👍️0
Ant4 Ant4 3 semanas hace
I am very confident that the court will reconsider the dismissal and reinstate the action against all defendants. It is clear that when a corporation is void and has no structure, no directors or officers a single defendant cannot argue as a defense that a direct action as filed here must be a derivative as Faro's have argued. Based on that alone in my opinion that court must void the dismissal and reinstate the action against all defendants.

Assuming the court reinstates the case to expedite the process I will be filing a motion arguing that the patents are the property of Nanologix and being that they represent the only assets of the corporation the court should decide that issue now. I believe that the court will agree that if the ownership is the only issue deciding it now would be in everyone's best interest including the court's. If I were Jon Faro I would be very concerned about the court determining the ownership because if its decided the company owns it the only benefit to him would be through his very limited interest in the company, unlike Bret who we have to assume owns a substantial amount of shares. However, in reality if the patents are owned by the company that ownership would be subject to the debts of the company which we know is at least $400,000 to Delaware alone.
👍️ 2
exploremore exploremore 3 semanas hace
If you ask me I'd say Delaware has become bloated bureaucracy state incapable of common sense decisions!

https://x.com/LeaveDelaware
👍️0