Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our company's common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "NORX".
Our stock did not begin trading until March 5, 2013.
20
Holders
As of June 4, 2013, there were 12 stockholders of record and an aggregate of 38,250,000 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Our common shares are issued in registered form. The transfer agent of our company's common stock is Empire Stock Transfer, Inc. at 1859 Whitney Mesa Dr., Henderson, NV 89014.
Description of Securities
The authorized capital stock of our company consists of 150,000,000 of common stock, at $0.001 par value, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, at $0.001 par value.
Dividend Policy
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
We do not have in effect any compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance and we do not have any outstanding stock options.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
We did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act during the year ended February 28, 2013, that were not otherwise disclosed on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or our current reports on Form 8-K filed during the year ended February 28, 2013.
During July to September 2012 we sold 33,250,000 shares at $0.01 per share for total proceeds of $33,250, under our recent S-1 Registration Statement offering.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended February 28, 2013.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
As a “smaller reporting company,” we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 9 of this annual report.
21
Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Results of Operations
We have generated no revenues and have incurred $44,090 in expenses since inception through February 28, 2013.
The following table provides selected financial data about our company for the year ended February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012.
Balance Sheet Date
|
|
02/28/13
|
|
02/29/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
99,550
|
$
|
177
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
125,114
|
$
|
19,241
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
114,473
|
$
|
4,392
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
10,641
|
$
|
14,849
|
|
Plan of Operation
We are a start-up, exploration-stage company and have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business operations.
Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion on our audited financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2013. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin removing and selling minerals. There is no assurance we will ever reach this point. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources from other sources. Our only other source for cash at this time is investments by others. We must raise cash to implement our project and stay in business. As of February 28, 2013, our company had $99,550 in cash on hand.
On March 12, 2013 our company entered into a farmout agreement with Summit West Oil, LLC for approximately 10,000 acres of oil and gas exploration property in northwest Montana. Under the terms of the farmout agreement, we are required to carry out the following expenditures in order to earn ownership of the property:
·
$60,000 by April 5, 2013 for the acquisition of seismic and other exploration data (requirement met);
·
$140,000 by April 30, 2013 for the reinterpretation of the seismic data as well as delineation and surveying of potential drill locations (requirement met);
·
Drilling of an additional horizontal well at an estimated expenditure of $5,000,000 by June 30, 2013;
·
Drilling of a horizontal well at an estimated expenditure of $5,000,000 by December 31, 2013; and
·
Drilling of an additional horizontal well at an estimated expenditure of $5,000,000 by December 31, 2014.
If we are unable to complete any phase of exploration because we do not have sufficient capital, we will cease operations until we raise more money. If we cannot or do not raise additional capital, we will cease operations. If we cease operations, we do not have any additional plans at this time.
22
Limited Operating History; Need for Additional Capital
There is no historical financial information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are an exploration stage corporation and have not generated any revenues from operations. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources, possible delays in the exploration of our properties, and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services.
To become profitable and competitive, we must conduct the research and exploration of our properties before we start production of any minerals we may find. We sought equity financing to provide for the capital required to implement our research and exploration phases. We believe that the funds raised from our offering will allow us to operate for one year.
We have no assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working Capital
|
|
Year Ended,
|
|
|
|
February 28,
2013
|
|
|
|
February 29,
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
$
|
106,050
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
$
|
9,387
|
|
|
$
|
Nil
|
|
Working Capital Deficit
|
$
|
96,663
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Cash Flows
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 28,
2013
|
|
|
|
February 29,
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from (used in) Operating Activities
|
$
|
(40,377
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
Cash Flows from (used in) Investing Activities
|
$
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
Cash Flows from (used in) Financing Activities
|
$
|
139,750
|
|
|
$
|
15,257
|
|
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash During Period
|
$
|
99,373
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
As at February 28, 2013, our company’s cash balance was $99,550 compared to $177 as at February 29, 2012 and our total assets were $125,114 compared with $19,241 as at February 29, 2012. The increase in cash was primarily due to a secured promissory note (the “Note”) in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 10% which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of February 27, 2015. The principal amount of the Note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.25 per share.
23
As at February 28, 2013, our company had total liabilities of $114,473 compared with total liabilities of $4,392 as at February 29, 2012. The increase in total liabilities was primarily attributed to a convertible notes payable.
As at February 28, 2013, our company had a working capital of $96,663 compared with a working capital of $177 as at February 29, 2012. The increase in working capital was primarily attributed to a secured promissory note (the “Note”) in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 10% which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of February 27, 2015. The principal amount of the Note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.25 per share.
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
During the year ended February 28, 2013, our company used $40,377 in cash from operating activities compared to the use of $80 of cash for operating activities during the year ended February 29, 2012. The increase in cash used for operating activities was attributed to increases in expenses paid on our company’s behalf by a related party, accretion expenses on the oil and gas property and accounts payable.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
During the year ended February 28, 2013, our company used $Nil cash for investing activities compared to cash used in investing activities of $15,000 during the year ended February 28, 2012.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
During the year ended February 28, 2013, our company received $139,750 in cash in financing activities primarily from proceeds from convertible notes payable and the issuance of common shares compared to cash provided by financing activities of $15,257 for the year ended February 29, 2012.
To meet our need for cash we raised $33,250 from the sale of 33,250,000 registered shares pursuant to our S-1 Registration Statement filed with the SEC, which became effective on July 12, 2012.
Our directors have verbally agreed to advance funds, on an as-needed basis, to assist in start-up operations, including expenses associated with our current offering, and to continue limited operations if sufficient funds are not raised in our offering. The directors both proposed the verbal commitment to loan in order to ensure that our company would be able to continue its operations in the event sufficient funds are not raised in our offering. While they have agreed to advance the funds, the agreement is verbal. Because there is no written agreement to loan funds and the verbal agreement may be withdrawn at any time, the verbal agreement is unenforceable. To date, Dallas Kerkenezov, one of our officers and directors, is the only director to advance funds to our company. As of February 28, 2013, Mr. Kerkenezov has advanced $8,274.
We received our initial funding of $20,257 through the sale of common stock to Dallas Kerkenezov, who purchased 30,513,100 shares of common stock at $0.001 in February 2012 for $10,257 and for forgiveness of a note payable for $5,000, and, 10,000,000 shares to Sasha Heredia for a $5,000 subscription receivable which was paid in August 2012. During the year ended February 28, 2013, we issued 33,250,000 shares of common stock at $0.001, resulting in total shares issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2013 of 73,763,100. From inception until the date of this filing, we have had limited operating activities. Our financial statements from inception (November 12, 2010) through the period ended February 28, 2013, reported no revenues and a net loss of $44,090.
24
Effective February 27, 2013, our company entered into a secured promissory note in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription. The note bears interest at an annual rate of 10% which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of February 27, 2015. The principal amount of the note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.25 per share.
Subsequent to February 28, 2013, our company entered in the following notes:
·
Effective April 5, 2013, we entered into a secured promissory note in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement. The note bears interest at an annual rate of 10% which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of April 5, 2015. The principal amount of the note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.30 per share.
·
Effective April 25, 2013, we entered into a secured promissory note in an aggregate principal amount of $180,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement between our company and Jackson Bennett, LLC. The note bears interest at an annual rate of 10% which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of April 25, 2015. The principal amount of the note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.50 per share.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements of our company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars. Our company's fiscal year end is February 28.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Our company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. Our company had $99,550 and $177 of cash and cash equivalents at February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, respectively.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the assets and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
25
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
Our company computes net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,"Earnings per Share". SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement.
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. At February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, no potentially dilutive shares were issued or outstanding.
Oil and Gas Properties
Our company uses the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties. Under this method, all acquisition, exploration and development costs, including certain payroll, asset retirement costs, other internal costs, and interest incurred for the purpose of finding oil and natural gas reserves, are capitalized. Internal costs that are capitalized are directly attributable to acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Costs associated with production and general corporate activities are expensed in the period incurred. Proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas properties are applied to reduce the capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties unless the sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves, in which case a gain or loss is recognized.
Capitalized costs associated with impaired properties and capitalized costs related to properties having proved reserves, plus the estimated future development costs, and asset retirement costs under ASC 410 “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations”, are amortized using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves. Capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties, net of accumulated amortization and deferred income taxes, are limited to the total of estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and natural gas reserves, discounted at ten percent, plus the cost of unevaluated properties.
There are many factors, including global events that may influence the production, processing, marketing and price of oil and natural gas. A reduction in the valuation of oil and natural gas properties resulting from declining prices or production could adversely impact depletion rates and capitalized cost limitations. Capitalized costs associated with properties that have not been evaluated through drilling or seismic analysis, including exploration wells in progress at February 29, 2012, are excluded from the unit-of-production amortization. Exclusions are adjusted annually based on drilling results and interpretative analysis.
Sales of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to the net full cost pool with no gain or loss recognized, unless the adjustment would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. If it is determined that the relationship is significantly altered, the corresponding gain or loss will be recognized in the statements of operations.
Costs of oil and gas properties are amortized using the units of production method.
26
Ceiling test: Under the full-cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is the estimated after-tax future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, discounted at 10 percent per annum and adjusted for cash flow hedges. Estimated future net cash flows exclude future cash outflows associated with settling accrued asset retirement obligations. Our company has adopted U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Release 33-8995 and the amendments to ASC 932, “Extractive Industries — Oil and Gas” (the Modernization Rules). Under the Modernization Rules, estimated future net cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months, held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.
Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional depletion, depreciation and amortization expense (“DD&A”) in the accompanying statement of operations. Such limitations are tested quarterly. As of February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, capitalized costs did not exceed the ceiling limitation, and no write-down was indicated.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to our company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on our company's present or future consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
27
NORSTRA ENERGY, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
INDEX TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
From Inception on November 12, 2010 through February 28, 2013
|
Page
|
|
|
Audit Report of Independent Accountants
|
F-2
|
|
|
Balance Sheets
|
F-3
|
|
|
Statements of Operations
|
F-4
|
|
|
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
F-5
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-6
|
|
|
Notes to the Audited Financial Statements
|
F-7
|
_______________________________________
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Norstra Energy, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Norstra Energy, Inc. (“the Company”) as of February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012 and the related statements of
operations
, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended and for the cumulative period from November 12, 2010 (date of inception) through February 28, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Norstra Energy, Inc. (“the Company”) as of February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012 and the related statements of
operations
, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended and for the cumulative period from November 12, 2010 (date of inception) through February 28, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover its operating costs which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC
Salt Lake City, UT
June 5, 2013
F-2
Norstra Energy Inc
.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
|
|
February 28,
2013
|
|
February 29,
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$
|
99,550
|
$
|
177
|
Deposits
|
|
6,500
|
|
-
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
106,050
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (full cost method)
|
|
19,064
|
|
19,064
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
19,064
|
|
19,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$
|
125,114
|
$
|
19,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUTIY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
1,113
|
$
|
-
|
Due to shareholder
|
|
8,274
|
|
-
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
9,387
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
5,059
|
|
4,392
|
Convertible notes payable
|
|
100,000
|
|
-
|
Accrued interest – note payable
|
|
27
|
|
-
|
Total Long Term Liabilities
|
|
105,086
|
|
4,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
114,473
|
|
4,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.001, 50,000,000 preferred shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
Common Stock, par value $0.001, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 73,763,100 and 40,513,100 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
73,763
|
|
40,513
|
Subscriptions receivable
|
|
-
|
|
(5,000)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
(19,032)
|
|
(19,032)
|
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage
|
|
(44,090)
|
|
(1,632)
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
10,641
|
|
14,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
125,114
|
$
|
19,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
Norstra Energy
Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
|
February
|
Cumulative
From Inception
(November 12, 2010) to
February 28,
|
|
|
|
28, 2013
|
29, 2012
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
27,901
|
|
80
|
|
29,206
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
327
|
|
994
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
|
13,863
|
|
-
|
|
13,863
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
42,431
|
|
407
|
|
44,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
(27)
|
|
-
|
|
(27)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
|
$
|
(42,458)
|
$
|
(407)
|
$
|
(44,090)
|
Basic and Diluted loss per Common Share
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00)
|
$
|
(0.00)
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
59,585,703
|
|
1,275,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
Norstra Energy, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
For the Period Beginning November 12, 2010 (Inception) to February 28, 2013
|
Common Shares
|
|
Additional Paid-In
|
|
Subscriptions
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Total Stockholders’
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Receivable
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance- November 12, 2010 (Inception)
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution (no shares issued), November 2010
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1,225
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1,225
|
Loss for the period
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,225)
|
|
(1,225)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance – February 28, 2011
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1,225
|
|
-
|
|
(1,225)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued for cash at
$0.001 per share upon conversion of debt
|
20,513,100
|
|
20,513
|
|
(10,257)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
10,257
|
Common shares issued for cash at
$0.001 per share
|
10,000,000
|
|
10,000
|
|
(5,000)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
5,000
|
Common shares issued upon execution of subscription agreement at $0.001 per share
|
10,000,000
|
|
10,000
|
|
(5,000)
|
|
(5,000)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Loss for the year
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(407)
|
|
(407)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance – February 29, 2012
|
40,513,100
|
|
40,513
|
|
(19,032)
|
|
(5,000)
|
|
(1,632)
|
|
14,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued for cash at $0.001 per share
|
33,250,000
|
|
33,250
|
|
-
|
|
5,000
|
|
-
|
|
38,250
|
Loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(42,458)
|
|
(42,458)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance – February 28, 2013
|
73,763,100
|
$
|
73,763
|
$
|
(19,032)
|
$
|
-
|
|
(44,090)
|
$
|
10,641
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
Norstra Energy, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
|
Year Ended February
|
Cumulative
From Inception
(November 12, 2010) to
February 28,
|
|
28, 2013
|
29, 2012
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period
|
$
|
(42,458)
|
$
|
(407)
|
$
|
(44,090)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses paid on the Company’s behalf by a related party
|
|
6,774
|
|
-
|
|
6,774
|
Accretion expense – oil and gas property
|
|
667
|
|
327
|
|
994
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
(6,500)
|
|
-
|
|
(6,500)
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
1,113
|
|
-
|
|
1,113
|
Accrued interest, note payable
|
|
27
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
(40,377)
|
|
(80)
|
|
(41,708)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of oil and gas leases
|
|
-
|
|
(15,000)
|
|
(15,000)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
-
|
|
(15,000)
|
|
(15,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable to related party
|
|
1,500
|
|
5,000
|
|
6,500
|
Proceeds from subscription receivable
|
|
5,000
|
|
-
|
|
5,000
|
Issuance of common stock for cash
|
|
33,250
|
|
10,257
|
|
44,731
|
Proceeds from convertible notes payable
|
|
100,000
|
|
-
|
|
100,027
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
139,750
|
|
15,257
|
|
156,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
99,373
|
|
177
|
|
99,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period
|
|
177
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period
|
$
|
99,550
|
$
|
177
|
$
|
99,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing and Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in exchange for forgiveness of related party debt
|
|
-
|
|
5,000
|
|
5,000
|
Stock subscription receivable
|
|
-
|
|
5,000
|
|
5,000
|
Capitalized asset retirement obligation
|
|
-
|
|
4,064
|
|
5,059
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financials.
F-6
Norstra Energy Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS
NORSTRA ENERGY INC. (“the Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, U.S. on November 12, 2010. The Company is in the exploration stage as defined under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915 and it intends to engage in the exploration and development of oil and gas properties.
The Company has not generated any revenue to date and consequently its operations are subject to all risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise. For the period from inception, November 12, 2010 through February 28, 2013 the Company has accumulated losses of $44,090.
On March 30, 2012, the Company approved a 2:1 forward split of the Company’s stock. Following this split, the Company’s authorized capital increased to 150,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share and the outstanding shares of the Company’s capital stock has since increased to 73,763,100. The effect of this forward split has been retroactively applied to the common stock balances at February 29, 2012, and reflected in all common stock activity reflected in these financial statements since that time.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars. The Company's fiscal year end is February 28.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. The Company had $99,550 and $177 of cash and cash equivalents at February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, respectively.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Financial Instruments
The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments approximates their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
F-7
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation is accounted for at fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718). To date, the Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the assets and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260,"Earnings per Share". ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement.
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. At February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, no potentially dilutive shares were issued or outstanding.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB ASC is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties. Under this method, all acquisition, exploration and development costs, including certain payroll, asset retirement costs, other internal costs, and interest incurred for the purpose of finding oil and natural gas reserves, are capitalized. Internal costs that are capitalized are directly attributable to acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Costs associated with production and general corporate activities are expensed in the period incurred. Proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas properties are applied to reduce the capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties unless the sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves, in which case a gain or loss is recognized.
F-8
Capitalized costs associated with impaired properties and capitalized costs related to properties having proved reserves, plus the estimated future development costs, and asset retirement costs under ASC 410 “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations”, are amortized using the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves. Capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties, net of accumulated amortization and deferred income taxes, are limited to the total of estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and natural gas reserves, discounted at ten percent, plus the cost of unevaluated properties.
There are many factors, including global events that may influence the production, processing, marketing and price of oil and natural gas. A reduction in the valuation of oil and natural gas properties resulting from declining prices or production could adversely impact depletion rates and capitalized cost limitations. Capitalized costs associated with properties that have not been evaluated through drilling or seismic analysis, including exploration wells in progress at February 29, 2012, are excluded from the unit-of-production amortization. Exclusions are adjusted annually based on drilling results and interpretative analysis.
Revenue recognition: Sales of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to the net full cost pool with no gain or loss recognized, unless the adjustment would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. If it is determined that the relationship is significantly altered, the corresponding gain or loss will be recognized in the statements of operations. Costs of oil and gas properties are amortized using the units of production method.
Ceiling test: Under the full-cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is the estimated after-tax future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, discounted at 10 percent per annum and adjusted for cash flow hedges. Estimated future net cash flows exclude future cash outflows associated with settling accrued asset retirement obligations. The Company has adopted U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Release 33-8995 and the amendments to ASC 932, “Extractive Industries — Oil and Gas” (the Modernization Rules). Under the Modernization Rules, estimated future net cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months, held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.
Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional depletion, depreciation and amortization expense (“DD&A”) in the accompanying statement of operations. Such limitations are tested quarterly. As of February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, capitalized costs did not exceed the ceiling limitation, and no write-down was indicated.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company records the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is
incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. If the liability is settled for an amount other than the recorded amount, a gain or loss is recognized.
F-9
NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN AND LIQUIDITY CONSIDERATIONS
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As at February 28, 2013, the Company had a loss from operations, for the year ended, of $42,431 an accumulated deficit of $44,090, and working capital of $96,663 and has earned no revenues since inception. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern.
The Company depends upon capital to be derived from future financing activities such as subsequent offerings of its common stock or debt financing in order to operate and grow the business. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising such are not limited to, acceptance of the Company's business plan, the ability to raise capital in the future, the ability to expand its customer base, and the ability to hire key employees to provide services. There may be other risks and circumstances that management may be unable to predict.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 4. CAPITAL STOCK
Authorized Stock
The Company has authorized 150,000,000 common shares and 50,000,000 preferred shares, both with a par value of $0.001 per share. Each common share entitles the holder to one vote, in person or proxy, on any matter on which action of the stockholders of the corporation is sought.
Share Issuance
In March 2012, the Company increased its authorized capital from 75,000,000 common shares to 150,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. The Company also authorized a stock split on a one (1) old for two (2) new basis retroactive to inception.
In February 2012, the Company issued 20,513,000 post-split shares of common stock (10,256,500 pre-split) for cash proceeds of $10,257. During the same month, the Company also issued 10,000,000 post-split shares of common stock (5,000,000 pre-split) for debt of $5,000 and 10,000,000 shares of post-split common stock (5,000,000 pre-split) for stock subscriptions receivable of $5,000. In August 2012 the payment was received for the subscriptions receivable. In July and August of 2012, 31,250,000 post-split shares were issued at a price of $0.001 for cash proceeds of $31,250. In September of 2012, 2,000,000 post-split shares were issued at a price of $0.001 for cash proceeds of $2,000.
There were 73,763,100 and 40,513,100 common shares issued and outstanding at February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, respectively.
F-10
NOTE 5. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company provides for income taxes under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. ASC 740 requires the use of an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect when these differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 requires the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The provision for income taxes differs from the amounts which would be provided by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% to the net loss before provision for income taxes for the following reasons:
|
|
February 28, 2013
|
|
|
February 29, 2012
|
Income tax expense at statutory rate
|
$
|
(14,436)
|
|
$
|
(555)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
14,436
|
|
|
555
|
Income tax expense per books
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of:
|
|
February 28, 2013
|
|
|
February 29, 2012
|
NOL Carryover
|
$
|
14,991
|
|
$
|
555
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
(14,991)
|
|
|
(555)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Income Tax laws of United States of America, net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $44,090 for federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. When a change in ownership occurs, net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.
NOTE 6. DUE TO RELATED PARTY
On February 23, 2012, an officer and director loaned the Company $5,000. On February 25, 2012 the company issued 10,000,000 post-split shares of common stock (5,000,000 pre-split) in extinguishment of the shareholder liability at $0.001 per share.
During the year ended February 28, 2013, an officer and director of the Company paid operating expenses on behalf of the Company amounting to $6,774. The same officer and director also loaned the Company $1,500. The resulting shareholder payable balance of $8,274 and $0 at February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012 respectively is unsecured, due on demand and is non-interest bearing.
F-11
NOTE 7. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
Effective February 27, 2013, the company entered into a secured promissory note in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 10%, which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of February 27, 2015. The principal amount of the Note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.25 per share.
NOTE 8. OIL AND MINERAL LEASES
On February 1, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated third-party entity to purchase a 100% interest and an 80% net revenue interest in an oil and mineral lease in Reno County, Kansas. As consideration for the purchase, the Company paid $15,000 in cash. The Company has not incurred any exploration or development costs in connection with this lease.
NOTE 9. ENVIROMENTAL AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES
The Company’s operations and earnings may be affected by various forms of governmental action in the United States. Examples of such governmental action include, but are by no means limited to: tax increases and retroactive tax claims; royalty and revenue sharing increases; import and export controls; price controls; currency controls; allocation of supplies of crude oil and petroleum products and other goods; expropriation of property; restrictions and preferences affecting the issuance of oil and gas or mineral leases; restrictions on drilling and/or production; laws and regulations intended for the promotion of safety and the protection and/or remediation of the environment; governmental support for other forms of energy; and laws and regulations affecting the Company’s relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, stockholders and others. Because governmental actions are often motivated by political considerations and may be taken without full consideration of their consequences, and may be taken in response to actions of other governments, it is not practical to attempt to predict the likelihood of such actions, the form the actions may take or the effect such actions may have on the Company.
Companies in the oil and gas industry are subject to numerous federal, state, local and regulations dealing with the environment. Violation of federal or state environmental laws, regulations and permits can result in the imposition of significant civil and criminal penalties, injunctions and construction bans or delays. A discharge of hazardous substances into the environment could, to the extent such event is not insured, subject the Company to substantial expense, including both the cost to comply with applicable regulations and claims by neighboring landowners and other third parties for any personal injury and property damage that might result.
The Company currently leases a property at which hazardous substances could have been or are being handled. In addition, many of these properties have been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or release of hydrocarbons or other wastes were not under the Company’s control. Under existing laws the Company could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators), to clean up contaminated property (including contaminated groundwater) or to perform remedial plugging operations to prevent future contamination. The Company is investigating the extent of any such liability and the availability of applicable defenses and believes costs related to these sites will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s net income, financial condition or liquidity in a future period.
F-12
The Company’s liability for remedial obligations includes certain amounts that are based on anticipated regulatory approval for proposed remediation of former refinery waste sites. Although regulatory authorities may require more costly alternatives than the proposed processes, the cost of such potential alternative processes is not expected to be a material amount. Certain environmental expenditures are likely to be recovered by the Company from other sources, primarily environmental funds maintained by certain states. Since no assurance can be given that future recoveries from other sources will occur, the Company has not recorded a benefit for likely recoveries.
There is the possibility that environmental expenditures could be required at currently unidentified sites, and new or revised regulations could require additional expenditures at known sites. However, based on information currently available to the Company, the amount of future remediation costs incurred at known or currently unidentified sites is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future net income, cash flows or liquidity. The Company has recorded $5,059 and $4,392 for its estimated asset retirement obligations as of February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, respectively. The Company also recorded $667 and $327 of accretion expense related to its asset retirement obligations as of February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012, respectively.
Changes to the asset retirement obligation were as follows:
|
|
February 28, 2013
|
|
|
February 29, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
4,392
|
|
|
$
|
---
|
|
Liabilities incurred
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
4,065
|
|
Disposal
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
5,059
|
|
|
$
|
4,392
|
|
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 12, 2013 the Company entered into a farmout agreement with Summit West Oil, LLC (the “Farmout Agreement”) for approximately 10,000 acres of oil and gas exploration property in northwest Montana (the “Property”). Under the terms of the Farmout Agreement, the Company is required to carry out the following expenditures in order to earn ownership of the property:
§
$60,000 by April 5, 2013 for the acquisition of seismic and other exploration data (paid);
§
$140,000 by April 30, 2013 for the reinterpretation of the seismic data as well as delineation and surveying of potential drill locations (paid);
§
Drilling of a horizontal well at an estimated expenditure of $5,000,000 by December 31, 2013;
§
Drilling of an additional horizontal well at an estimated expenditure of $5,000,000 by June 30, 2013; and
§
Drilling of an additional horizontal well at an estimated expenditure of $5,000,000 by December 31, 2014.
Once the above obligations are completed, the Company will hold a 100% working interest in the Property, subject to an underlying 20% royalty burden to Summit West Oil, LLC and the state of Montana.
F-13
On March 12, 2013, the Company entered into two consulting agreements with two officers, the Company President and CEO and with the CFO. Per the terms of the agreement, the CEO and President is to receive consulting fees of $5,000 per month and payable upon execution of the agreement, 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, which is convertible into 10,000,000 shares of common stock upon achievement of production from a well owned by us in the state of Montana. Per the terms of the agreement, the CFO is to receive $500 a month for services. Both agreements have a term of 12 months or until such time as terminated by either party by providing 30 days written notice.
On March 12, 2013, a Company officer and a former director cancelled a total of 35,513,100 shares of common stock held by them. The officer cancelled 27,013,100 and the former director cancelled 8,500,000. These shares were cancelled in order to make our more attractive for financing, given the capital requirements of the South Sun River Bakken Prospect.
On April 5, 2013, the company entered into a secured promissory note (the “Note”) in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 10% which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of April 5, 2015. The principal amount of the Note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.30 per share.
On April 25, 2013, the company entered into a secured promissory note in an aggregate principal amount of $180,000 pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 10% which is to be paid with principal in full on the maturity date of April 25, 2015. The principal amount of the Note together with interest may be converted into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $0.50 per share.
In accordance with ASC 855-10, the Company’s management has reviewed all material events and there are no additional material subsequent events to report.
F-14
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There were no disagreements with our accountants related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, internal controls or auditing scope or procedure during the two fiscal years and subsequent interim periods.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures not were effective such that the information relating to us required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. With the participation of our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2013 based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based upon such evaluation, our management concluded that we did maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2013 based on the COSO framework criteria.
This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for non-accelerated filers from the internal control audit requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended February 28, 2013, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
32
Item 9B. Other Information
Effective March 1, 2013, Dallas Kerkenezov resigned as president, chief executive officer, secretary, treasurer and director of our company. His
resignation was not the result of any disagreements with our company regarding our operations, policies, practices or otherwise.
Mr. Kerkenezov will remain as our chief financial officer. Also on March 1, 2013, Ms. Sasha Heredia resigned as our director.
Concurrently with Mr. Kerkenezov’s and Ms. Heredia’s resignations, our company appointed Glen Landry to act as
president, chief executive officer, secretary, treasurer and director of our company
, effective March 1, 2013.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
All directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of the security holders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers of our company are appointed by the board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. The directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:
Name
|
Position Held
with the Company
|
Age
|
Date First Elected or Appointed
|
Glen Landry
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
|
63
|
March 1, 2013
|
Dallas Kerkenezov
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
34
|
November 12, 2010
|
Business Experience
The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during at least the past five years of each director, executive officer and key employee of our company, indicating the person’s principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.
Glen Landry – President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Glen Landry has acted as our president, chief executive officer, secretary, treasurer and director since March 1, 2012. Glen Landry is a seasoned exploration geologist with almost 40 years of experience. Mr. Landry received his Bachelor of Science in Geology from the University of Montana in 1974. Since then, he has accumulated over 30 years of experience in the oil and gas industry alone. After finishing his degree he was employed as a consulting geologist for a number of mineral as well as oil and gas exploration companies, including Johns-Manville, Westinghouse, Peter Kiewitt, Chevron and Marathon throughout Montana, Wyoming and Alaska. During the 1980s he was president of Western Reserves, a Billings, Montana company engaged in exploration and production of oil and gas. The company was involved in a number of successful joint ventures as well as property acquisition of over 150 wells from Texaco. During this time he was also engaged by Occidental to undertake exploration work on claims in northwest Montana. After resigning from Western Reserves, Mr. Landry was again active as a consulting geologist for companies such as Apache and EnCana. Since 1997, Mr. Landry has been an independent exploration geologist and has been undertaking exploration and development work of a large number of oil and gas concessions throughout Montana. His focus has been on underdeveloped Alberta Fairway Bakken properties as well has heavy oil reserves in northwest Montana.
33
We appointed Glen Landry as an officer and director of our company because of his experience in the oil and gas industry.
Dallas Kerkenezov – Chief Financial Officer
Dallas Kerkenezov has acted as our chief financial officer since November 12, 2010. Mr. Kerkenezov resigned as our president, chief executive officer, secretary, treasurer and director on March 1, 2013. Mr. Kerkenezov has spent time in both Canada and Norway in the resource exploration and production industries. Currently Mr. Kerkenezov owns his own construction company `Rom for Bygg' where his work is primarily in the oil industry with platform construction. For the summers of 2009-2011 Mr. Kerkenezov worked in the Yukon helping run staking and drilling crews for various mineral exploration companies. Prior to this time (from 2005-2011) and during the off season Mr. Kerkenezov was employed as a carpenter with Byggefirma Tunge AS.
Employment Agreements
For the year ended February 28, 2013, we had no formal employment agreements with any of our employees, directors or officers.
Subsequent to the year ended February 28, 2013, on March 1, 2013, we entered into consulting agreements with Mr. Glen Landry, our president, chief executive officer, secretary, treasurer and director, and Mr. Dallas Kerkenezov, our chief financial officer. Mr. Landry will receive consulting fees of $5,000 per month and shall be issued 1,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, which will be convertible into 10,000,000 shares of our common stock upon achievement of production from a well owned by us in the state of Montana. Mr. Kerkenezov shall receive $500 a month for performing duties as our chief financial officer. Both agreements have a term of 12 months and may be terminated by either party by providing 30 days written notice.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between any of our directors, executive officers and proposed directors or executive officers.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
None of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:
1.
A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;
2.
Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
3.
Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:
34
|
i.
|
Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
|
Engaging in any type of business practice; or
|
|
|
|
|
iii.
|
Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;
|
|
|
|
4.
Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;
5.
Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;
6.
Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;
7.
Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:
|
i.
|
Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
|
Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or
|
|
|
|
|
iii.
|
Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or
|
|
|
|
8.
Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
35
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Our company’s common stock is not registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, officers, directors and principal shareholders are not subject to the beneficial ownership reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, members of our board of directors, our company's officers including our president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, employees, consultants and advisors. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
1.
honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
2.
full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us;
3.
compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
4.
the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and
5.
accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our company's senior officers commit to timely, accurate and consistent disclosure of information; that they maintain confidential information; and that they act with honesty and integrity.
In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly senior officers, have a responsibility for maintaining financial integrity within our company, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal and state securities laws. Any senior officer, who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to our company. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our company policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is attached hereto as Exhibit 14. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any person without charge, upon request. Requests can be sent to: Norstra Energy Inc., 2860 Exchange Boulevard, Suite 400, South Lake TX 76092.
Board and Committee Meetings
Our board of directors currently consists of only Mr. Glen Landry. The board held no formal meetings during the year ended February 28, 2013. As our company develops a more comprehensive board of directors all proceedings will be conducted by resolutions consented to in writing by all the directors and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the directors. Such resolutions consented to in writing by the directors entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the directors are, according to the Nevada General Corporate Law and our Bylaws, as valid and effective as if they had been passed at a meeting of the directors duly called and held.
36
Nomination Process
As of February 28, 2013, we did not effect any material changes to the procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors. Our board of directors does not have a policy with regards to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by our shareholders. Our board of directors has determined that it is in the best position to evaluate our company’s requirements as well as the qualifications of each candidate when the board considers a nominee for a position on our board of directors. If shareholders wish to recommend candidates directly to our board, they may do so by sending communications to the president of our company at the address on the cover of this annual report.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of the audit committee that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is "independent" as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We believe that members of our board of directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our directors do not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because they believe the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the members of our board of directors.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:
|
(a)
|
our principal executive officer;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended February 28, 2013 and 2012; and
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended February 28, 2013 and 2012,
|
|
|
|
who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than the principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year.
37
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock Awards
($)
|
Option Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
|
All Other Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Glen Landry
(2)
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
|
2013
2012
|
N/A
N/A
|
N/A
N/A
|
N/A
N/A
|
N/A
N/A
|
N/A
N/A
|
N/A
N/A
|
N/A
N/A
|
N/A
N/A
|
Dallas Kerkenezov
(1)
Chief Financial Officer
|
2013
2012
|
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil
|
Nil
Nil
|
(1)
|
Mr. Kerkenezov was appointed as president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, treasurer, and a director of the company on November 12, 2010. Mr. Kerkenezov resigned from all positions except chief financial officer on March 1, 2013.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Landry was appointed as president, chief executive officer, treasurer, and a director of the company on March 1, 2013.
|
|
|
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Other than set out below there are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. Our directors and executive officers may receive share options at the discretion of our board of directors in the future. We do not have any material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that share options may be granted at the discretion of our board of directors.
On March 1, 2013, we entered into consulting agreements with Mr. Glen Landry, our president and chief executive officer, and Mr. Dallas Kerkenezov. Mr. Landry will receive consulting fees of $5,000 per month and shall be issued 1,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, which will be convertible into 10,000,000 shares of our common stock upon achievement of production from a well owned by us in the state of Montana. Mr. Kerkenezov shall receive $500 a month for performing duties as our chief financial officer. Both agreements have a term of 12 months and may be terminated by either party by providing 30 days written notice.
Stock Option Plan
Currently, we do not have a stock option plan in favor of any director, officer, consultant or employee of our company.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
There were no grants of plan based awards during the year ended February 28, 2013.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
There were no outstanding equity awards at the year ended February 28, 2013.
38
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
During our fiscal year ended February 28, 2013 there were no options exercised by our named officer.
Compensation of Directors
We do not have any agreements for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors.
We have determined that none of our directors are independent directors, as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv)(B) of Schedule 14A under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
, as amended, and as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans
There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directors or a committee thereof.
Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers and Other Management
None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our company during the last two fiscal years, is or has been indebted to our company by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.
Compensation Committee
We currently do not have a compensation committee of the board of directors. The board of directors as a whole determines executive compensation.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth, as of June 4, 2013, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares, as well as by each of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.
39
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
|
Percentage
of Class
(1)
|
Glen Landry
(2)
2860 Exchange Boulevard, Suite 400
South Lake TX 76092
|
1,000,000 preferred shares
(4)
|
2.0% preferred shares
|
Dallas Kerkenezov
(3)
2860 Exchange Boulevard, Suite 400
South Lake TX 76092
|
3,500,000 common shares
Direct ownership
|
9.15%
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
(1)
|
3,500,000 common shares
1,000,000 preferred shares
|
9.15% common shares
2.0% preferred shares
|
Bank Gutenberg AG
Gutenbergstrasse 10
Zurich, CH8022
Switzerland
|
3,662,000
|
9.47%
|
Sierra Growth Inc.
Henville Building
Charlestown
Nevis
|
2,968,000
|
7.76%
|
(1)
Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on June 4, 2013. As of June 4, 2013, there were 38,250,000
shares of our company’s common stock issued and outstanding.
(2)
Glen Landry was appointed as president, chief executive officer, secretary, treasurer and director of our company on March 1, 2013;
(3)
Dallas. Kerkenezov was appointed as president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, treasurer, and a director of the company on November 12, 2010. Mr. Kerkenezov resigned from all positions except chief financial officer on March 1, 2013.
(4)
Mr. Landry holds 1,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, which will be convertible into 10,000,000 shares of our common stock upon achievement of production from a well owned by us in the state of Montana.
Changes in Control
We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement or provisions of our Articles or Bylaws the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company. There are not any provisions in our Articles or Bylaws, the operation of which would delay, defer, or prevent a change in control of our company.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Glen Landry, our only director, is not an independent director as he also serves as our
president, chief executive officer, secretary and treasurer.
40
As of February 28, 2013, our company was obligated to Dallas Kerkenezov, a former director, and current chief financial officer of our company, for a non-interest bearing demand loan with a balance of $8,274.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:
|
Year Ended
February 28,
2013
|
Year Ended
February 29,
2012
|
Audit Fees
(1)
|
$5,750
|
$2,000
|
Audit Related Fees
(2)
|
$0
|
$0
|
Tax Fees
(3)
|
$0
|
$0
|
All Other Fees
(4)
|
$0
|
$0
|
Total
|
$5,750
|
$2,000
|
(1) Audit fees consist of fees incurred for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements, for reviews of our interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.
(2) Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, but are not reported under “Audit fees.”
(3) Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.
(4) All other fees consist of fees billed for all other services.
Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.
Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.
41
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Financial statements for our company are listed in the index under Item 8 of this document
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not material or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
(3)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
|
3.01
|
|
Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 30, 2012)
|
3.02
|
|
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 30, 2012)
|
3.03
|
|
Certificate of Amendment (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 30, 2012)
|
3.04
|
|
Certificate of Change (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 30, 2012)
|
3.05
|
|
Certificate of Amendment (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2013)
|
(10)
|
|
Material Contracts
|
10.1
|
|
Oil and Gas Lease Assignment dated February 15, 2012 between our company and Keta Oil and Gas Inc. (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 30, 2012)
|
10.2
|
|
Oil and Gas Lease dated January 15, 2012 between Harry Mark Milford and Keta Oil and Gas Inc. (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on June 28, 2012)
|
10.3
|
|
Subscription Agreement dated February 27, 2013 between our company and Jackson Bennett LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2013)
|
10.4
|
|
Farmout Agreement dated March 12, 2013 between our company and Summit West Oil, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2013)
|
10.5
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated March 1, 2013 between our company and Glen Landry (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2013)
|
10.6
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated March 1, 2013 between our company and Dallas Kerkenezov (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2013)
|
10.7
|
|
Subscription Agreement dated April 25, 2013 between our company and Jackson Bennett LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2013)
|
(14)
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
14.1*
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
(31)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certifications
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Executive Officer
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.
|
(32)
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Executive Officer
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|
101
|
|
Interactive Data File
|
101**
|
|
Interactive Data File (Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2013 furnished in XBRL).
|
101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.DEF
101.LAB
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
42
**
|
Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.
|
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
|
NORSTRA ENERGY INC.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 7, 2013
|
/s/ Glen Landry
|
|
Glen Landry
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 7, 2013
|
/s/ Dallas Kerkenezov
|
|
Dallas Kerkenezov
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated: June 7, 2013
|
/s/ Glen Landry
|
|
Glen Landry
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
44
Norstra Energy (CE) (USOTC:NORX)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
Norstra Energy (CE) (USOTC:NORX)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024