Seafarer Exploration Corp (PK) (SFRX) Noticias

Ok so the stalker says...

That posts non stop and goes back years on my posts. Lol

So impressive that you are so interested in me too.

Okay. So the shareholder who said Torres…….

wasn’t a novice and turned down big money to come and work for SFRX, and also said they would soon be bringing up treasure at Melbourne EIGHT YEARS AGO is the opinion that matters?

Too funny!

What matters most is the opinion of a shareholder vs a stalker?

Is that the question you meant to ask?

If so yes the shareholders opinion Trump's the stalker.

Kyle making treasure hunting great again!

You said Torres was not a novice……

Doesn’t that mean you believed him after talking with him?

You said he was turning down big money to come and work with SFRX.

You also said SFRX was getting a Recovery Permit for Melbourne, didn’t you?

But what ultimately matters is what time of the day someone posts?

Or if they own shares?

You’re a hoot!

Maybe I will just go to a random board and proclaim I know everything and everyone else is wrong.


Not!!!!!

And the peanut gallery has spoken.

Lol. The three stooges.


Let's see who would I believe?

The three guys that nothing better to do than stalk the board of a stock they don't own on a Friday night....????

That alone I am laughing at .

There will be a lot of interest soon. NO DOUBT BY UNEDUCATED AND UNSOPHISTICATED PIPE DREAMERS

THAT'S BEEN THE STATUS QUO SINCE, WELL, FOREVER

There will be a lot of interest soon.

Quote:I speak with Kyle pretty often and our last conversation was an awkward silence.

Meaning they have reached a point in their progress where there is absolutely nothing they can say that wouldn't be inappropriate.

Trust me I tried to pry and I got shut down.

Which is really good news as far as I see it.

You can interpret that the way you want. So either that is good news or criticism. Depending on your outlook.

Don't forget to load the boat...just sayin
👍️ 0
_____________________________________________

Like what would you expect him to say? SeaSearcher gold and silver pin-pointed targets on site haven't proven out and we're trying to figure out how we're going to cover our ass. That's just my interpretation but I just don't understand how much kool-aid people are going to keep drinking.

That would be nice 👍

They have a media deal. Kyle said……

so at the investor conference last year.

That’s why it’s all hush, hush Buttercup!

I remember when you talked to Torres. That must have been quite the conversation. You certainly seemed impressed.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=144612964

Soon, huh?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124074067

You got it all figured out!

Love it!

Happy Friday!

There will be a lot of interest soon.

I speak with Kyle pretty often and our last conversation was an awkward silence.

Meaning they have reached a point in their progress where there is absolutely nothing they can say that wouldn't be inappropriate.

Trust me I tried to pry and I got shut down.

Which is really good news as far as I see it.

You can interpret that the way you want. So either that is good news or criticism. Depending on your outlook.

Don't forget to load the boat...just sayin

Not a big deal. Good to see some interest!

Any just like that negative on the day

Wow, great open!!

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

SFRX's issue could be they're too brilliant........

Let's say they put the ShipShark (aka GalleonFinder) in the water at Juno, and let's "assume" it said there was a treasure ship within 50 miles.

I know the San Miguel Archangel shipwreck (Amelia Research and Recovery) is at Jupiter Inlet. Maybe it detected that treasure ship which is why they believe there is treasure at Juno. It would be within 50 miles.

If they can't tweak the ShipShark and dial back the range, then that could be the issue.

Just a thought.

Happy Thursday!

Ya I kinda don't get the not diving on targets either. But hey let's scan the ocean floor to Africa and hope everyone else pays for it. Still got my shares that I put to sleep just in case though.

Seems they are just too busy 'scanning' rather than digging a hole to recover already pin-pointed treasure. Now mid-September and who cares about something so trivial as recovering gold and silver.

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

I wonder why they haven’t provided an……

update on the device.

Maybe they’re working on a JV with SpaceX????

Hmmm

Side-scan sonar is useful "if" you're.......

on a wreck that sunk with a valuable cargo.

Any technology is ONLY useful on junk sites because after a few dives that should help you determine to move on.

The reason there is NO announcement of treasure should be obvious when one reads SFRX reports, as well as the reports of the ones that were there before SFRX.

There is no technology that can find what isn't there. IF the device works it's telling me what I already know, which is Juno is a junk site.

As far as the GalleonFinder Kyle says they're building, it's amazing that he can say such crap with a straight face. If they had technology that was even half that good, they wouldn't be selling discounted shares to raise money.

I happen to notice that Legacy Network hasn't posted a video since they did the promo tour hyping SFRX's rise to a 3-cent stock.

https://www.youtube.com/@venturelounge/videos

Kyle is right, there is no other company in the industry that compares to SFRX, but it isn't something to brag about.

If they have a 50 mile searcher, why did they need to spend $48,000 on the side scanner.

He also mentions the device they have that detects a treasure ship within 50 miles.

Big deal

I bet SpaceX has a device that detects a treasure ship from space

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

No, no, no. Here’s Kyle discussing the…….

GalleonFinder. At least that’s what I call it.

You can jump to the 6:30 mark and the 26:20 mark for the meat. Be prepared to be amazed.

He says Melbourne was a dud, yet they renewed the permits.

He also proclaims there is no other company in the industry that compares to SFRX. I agree with him on that.

He also mentions the device they have that detects a treasure ship within 50 miles.

You can’t make this crap up.

Enjoy! The film crews should have been on site since day one at Juno!

The GalleonFinder? Is that what they call their SSS-600K side scan sonar they leased/purchased a year ago May? The SSS-600K side scan sonar does a good job by itself. Doesn’t need any R&D $$.

Why?

IMO, because NOTHING is as it seems.

One can always rely on SFRX to fail, also IMO.

Looks like today is indeed the day that the PPS could trade below a half penny, AGAIN

One thing you can never say
Is that you haven't been told

That’s probably for the device Kyle said……

they can put in the water and it can detect a treasure ship within 50 miles.

It’s part of their two-pronged approach, or so it seems.

They apparently lack the ability to recognize what a treasure laden shipwreck site would like, hence the SeaSearcher.

And to make up for the lack of competent research, they invented the GalleonFinder(?).

Just a WAG!

#realmenofgenius

Just a question, if the SeaSearcher works, why are they spending $11,100 avg a week on R&D the first 6 months of this year?

If the SeaSearcher works, Why don’t they fulfill their contract for scanning services to a third party explorer that the have been paid $140,000 deposit?

For those who don’t read the 10-Q:

During 2021 the Company entered into an agreement to provide scanning services using its SeaSearcher technology to a corporation involved in searching for historic shipwreck material. Under the terms of the agreement the Company received an upfront payment of $140,000 which has been included in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023 as deferred revenue as the services have not yet been provided.

I guess we will see. Maybe hear something this week? Not cheering, or pooing anything. Just hoping this long journey pays out a little.

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

I'd like to see that. Hope it happens. But I still have my doubts because of the history. Hope it explodes and we all do very well.

I’ve never said I would be loading……

at the first press release. Again, you mischaracterized my comments Buttercup.

The PR’s are what you and others are focused on, and because you’re invested you’re getting emotional. I get that. It happens once you invest.

What I said repeatedly is that IF they find substantial treasure at Juno, I will load the boat. I do not believe they will, and I do not believe it’s the site to prove to the world the tech works. It can’t find what is NOT there.

But let’s say they move on to another site and provide actual research and supporting documentation that suggests they are at or near a historical shipwreck. I may load the boat or at least take a position based on that if the wreck had the right legal profile.

Do I think that will happen? Of course not, but if it did…..

You and others predetermined based on hype that there was treasure at Juno with NO supporting data or documentation.

You do you and I’ll do me. But please stop suggesting I said things I didn’t.

GL Buttercup!

Happy Monday!

When they announce treasure at Juno (and they will) I'm really interested to read the reactions of posters here. Most have been here a long time whether for or against the company. I think we will make a ton of money and get some entertainment at the same time.

Quote: I have millions of reasons also, but I also have been holding these millions of reasons for a long timeand the dance continues.
Not being a negative Nelly, just keeping it real. Just in case.
Many of you still believe in fairy tales and unicorns, I don't.
👍️ 0
________________________________

You are one of the very few here that is not in denial to the reality of the issues. First of all, the Juno Beach ship-'scuttle' (my opinion) bears no supportive research providing the name of the ship, the tonnage of the ship, number of artillery pieces, a treasure manifest along with the date of it's supposed sinking (scuttling). Yet there are supposedly billions in treasure on board. Eighty feet of water, an extreme challenge for free diving salvage in the 16th Century but yet there are no cannons on site.

As to SeaSearcher, some years ago supposedly the big break through in treasure hunting was the molecular frequency discriminator. This could be tuned to a transmitting frequency for either gold or silver. Targets could be buried (unbeknown to the operator) a half a mile away and the operator could actually trace the frequency line right to the buried target and pin-point it. Amazingly true but for some unexplainable reason, no one could ever prove that a real treasure was found anywhere using this application. That's how I view SeaSearcher.

I mentioned this before but if I'm not mistaken Kennedy already stated that the SeaSearcher has located gold and silver targets on the Juno site. If working as its claimed, they also know the depth and size pf the target. Do I have that correct? Just no time to do one simple proofing dig? Of course Kennedy would say everything is working just fine. What else would one expect him to say? Not that it means anything but when they excavate and recover this believed treasure, I shall be the first to apologize for my pointed skepticism.

I don’t need some super duper gadget to tell me what the data and research already tell us.


You also say you will be loading the boat with shares at the first press release.

Doesn't that mean the sea searcher works?

Don't respond or respond. Don't care that is all the arguing you are getting from me today.

Keep posting while you can. Your time is almost up.

If the device works they won’t diving…….

There was no treasure at the ballast pile. No cannons. It’s a dud site. Theses facts can’t disputed, only ignored.

I don’t need some super duper gadget to tell me what the data and research already tell us.

That said, if they begin diving and there is no treasure, then what?

Doesn’t that mean the device doesn’t work?

GL

Worse case? I think most likely. Years and years of practice.

I'm 50/50 , I think sea sercher works, but not sure of treasure at Juno.
It is being dragged out. Should be showtime soon.

I have millions of reasons also, but I also have been holding these millions of reasons for a long timeand the dance continues.
Not being a negative Nelly, just keeping it real. Just in case.
Many of you still believe in fairy tales and unicorns, I don't.

There was an old saying, everyone likes a little??? But nobody likes a smart ??? Real shareholders are waiting and watching for news! Negative nellies, don’t help, don’t contribute anything. I have millions of reasons to see something positive be announced!! I have millions of reasons not to see negative things happen! Jmo

Nope. Sea searcher works great.

No more excuses

Juno has treasure or it doesn't.

We will find out one way or the other very soon.

I think it absolutely does, but of course those that think they know everything say the opposite. So I guess you can pick a side.

You would think so, however, I think there will be an excuse.
My guess is something off about the seasercher and now they will have to rescann entire area and will take the next 2 years lol.
Just a guess
I do hope I'm wrong, but I'm just giving a worse case scenario lol.

What else could the diving delay be ?
Hmmm it's got to be the billions in treasure.

There is no more excuses.

The news is coming any time now.

The next update in my opinion will be a press release.

They must be finding tons of targets in scanning to not be diving this long.
Hopefully it's the 15 billion dollars worth of treasure.
It must be all over the place , we should be very rich soon.

What else could the diving delay be ?
Hmmm it's got to be the billions in treasure.

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

That lawsuit led to Pretend Radio creating……

a podcast series. It’s quite entertaining. Here’s one of the episodes that includes SFRX’s CEO.

Hope you had a great time.

The sites are now being investigated with the new technology. It would pin point any treasure.

Maybe the next museum you go to will have treasure from Juno wreck site.

They don’t have an ID of the wreck……

and the site has been explored dating back to at least the late 80’s.

The ballast pile had no treasure and there are no cannons at the site.

But the CEO suggested potentially billion$ at Juno.

Manifests, historical data, and a path to title generally lead real salvors to projects. Not so with SFRX.

But hey, at least they have title.

GL