Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) Noticias

from another site....
$NLST I think we have catalyst coming soon.Judge Gilstrap rescheduling the injunction hearing,Judge Scarsis final decision on BOC.Something also I noticed in the news ,that Thomas Massie agreed to collaborate with Vivek Ramaswamy on DOGE related initiatives! If everyone remembers Thomas introduced a bill earlier this year that called for the PTAB to be abolished.(RALIA)!I wonder what Elon and Viveks recommendations will to Congress when they learn of the abuse that has gone at the PTAB since 2012 ,and being an unnecessary bureaucratic institution created by the Obama administration,that’s sole purpose is to destroy patents that the USPTO itself qualified!Just a playground for Big Tech and their abuses! Also I am in the background waiting for the rescheduling of the injunction hearing,and will be there when it happens!At least one more trip to Marshall in my future.If Judge Gilstrap is replaced by Amos Mazzant I will have a shorter drive to Sherman Tx.GLLs I am-looking forward to 2025!

added 300 @ .9065 my original order at .89 almost filled lod .8910 that order is still in but theres a pretty large buyer at .90 41688 shares so doubtful my .89 will fill

man...lol!!! somethins gotta give at some point....under 90 cents at this point of the game is not legal!!!

lol!!! YODER back in the day....... https://media2.giphy.com/media/SehBMWicWhrIKXld5a/giphy.gif

FrankFromYahoo $NLST This is to illustrate what TOMKilA is saying: injunctions on the 608 patent applied to Samsung should also be strong argument for lift the stay in the Micron case on the very left. Would be inconsistant, if EDTX applies injunctions on 608 patent while WDTX keeps the stay. Micron has lost on these 3 patents (608, 036 and 314), since even the PTAB confirms validity despite their biased approach towards patentees. Injunctions on the 608 would very significantly anticipate payments for these 3 patents by Micron to NLST and possibly trigger a global settlement (considering also that the bill for MU was much higher on the 912 patent in their case in EDTX as compared to Samsung's bill). Copy-right STOKD !
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/929828/default.jpg

@microby

hybrid memory system
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/934742/default.png

Stokd $NLST Injunction is the current hot topic!
"The RESTORE Patent Rights Act: One Little Sentence that Could Change Everything"

"At its core, the RESTORE Act would establish a rebuttable presumption that courts should grant permanent injunctions when patent infringement is found. The key language is as follows:
If...the court enters a final judgment finding infringement of a right secured by patent, the patent owner shall be entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the court should grant a permanent injunction with respect to that infringing conduct."

"This would partially reverse the Supreme Court’s 15-year-old decision in eBay v. MercExchang, 547 US 388 (2006) which eliminated the near-automatic granting of injunctions in patent cases and instead required courts to apply a four-factor test..."

"Under the proposal, the four factors would (I presume) continue to apply, but with the burden shifted to adjudged infringers to show that they do not support injunctive relief"
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/12/restore-sentence-everything.html#more-45129

If anyone wants to talk about anything off topic please post it here....https://investorshub.advfn.com/Bottom-Swing-Plays-Chat-42983
As I was just ask by managment to stop posting anything o/t

Back to being mum I guess

TOMKiLA $NLST The injunction of patent 608 will open the doors to any possible deal if only for the fact that for these giants (now it's Samsung's turn), the loss would be really big regardless. If a judge blocked the sales of a product with hundreds of millions of revenues, the damage would be really impactful for Samsung. Imagine Micron that has already lost 3 lrdimm, the case is in stay but when it will be removed, then the damage will be impactful for their pockets and above all the injunctions would be decisive.

MICRON show us 13b dept + 6b cash.

Microns stock price decline is due to the company's decreased forward guidance. And of course, frigging Powells comments yesterday affected the entire market.

NLST:)$$$ mycrap is tumbling down and I bet they see the writing on the wall for NLST!!!

Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co, LTD (2:22-cv-00293)
District Court, E.D. Texas https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861664/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

872

Dec 18, 2024

Main Doc­ument

Sealed Response to Motion

TOMKiLA $NLST Micron is working hard with the HBM business, we NEED to win one HBM patent to make billion $ here! Read these info

In September, Micron officially introduced its HBM3E 12H. As per a previous report from Tom’s Hardware, the new products are designed for cutting-edge processors used in AI and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads, including NVIDIA’s H200 and B100/B200 GPUs.

Now, Micron notes that it continues to receive positive feedback from its leading customers for HBM3E 12H.

It is worth noting that Micron has increased its HBM total addressable market (TAM) estimate in 2025 from USD 25 billion to now exceed USD 30 billion. The company’s HBM is already sold out for 2025, with pricing determined.

In 2028, Micron expects HBM TAM to grow four times from the USD 16 billion level in 2024, and to exceed USD 100 billion by 2030.

Stokd $NLST Samsung's — "SEALED RESPONSE re 858 Netlist's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction And Then A Subsequent Permanent Injunction Upon The Resolution Of All Post-Trial Motions filed by Samsung Electronics"
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/922380/default.png

nice ya have to know anything under a buck is a gift, but why wait untill tomorrow morning to buy at .96 when you can buy now at .95?



just place your order for after hrs .95 and fill??

Bought 1000 today at .9597 and a order in premarket at .96

well, 9:30am will be here soon enough!!!

yup no hurry if I never get them its fine just a game I play everyday lol

ya might have to wait till tomorrow.

we'll see

good luck, its close..

one of these days!!!

yes order still there at .93

i'll be danged

its 94 time!!!

Well sure I'm just sayin it would be better tahn a double would make me feel better

i used to talk to her all the time about stuff before i bought in. like i said, if i would of bought this when i first found it i'd of made millions .10-.20 she was relentless about getting as much as possible. i knew she split after that 10 buck run, i would of too!!!

this is the chick.......... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=125189

100% is always nice but i didnt wait all these years to make 90 cents a share lol!!! you know what i mean!!!

way back before you started posting here was a lady that post all the time, she was from another country and told me she took the Ten a share and was moving to a dfferent country lol she did and she hasn't post here since... now of course i can't remember her name and which country she lived in or which country she moved to, my whole point is I should have lisend to her and sold when she did

I could live without the last 1200 if some kinda good news would come out that would double the sp

guess you'll find out in 40 minutes or so.

tried for 500 at .93 but didn't go that low still need 1200 to fill my qouta should have hit .94 I guess bid still in

lets go!!! break and hold a buck!!!

Stokd $NLST Remember this post below...well, it is 100% correct! I've had enough of fudsters pulling nonsense out of their a$$ and claiming it to be accurate... so I wanted to put it to rest.

Just called Gilstrap's courtroom deputy and she verified that Gilstrap is 🔥NOT RETIRING🔥, but simply passing the role of chief judge to another. He will remain our judge on our cases till all trials and appeals have concluded.

This should also serve as another reminder that fudsters will make up anything and claim it to be reality, with no verifiable proof or source material...simply what they wish to be true is what they proclaim, at every step on every aspect. 🤡

Stokd
Dec 10, 2024 5:05 PM

$NLST First I’ll address the easiest and less significant subject of recent discussions—judge Mazzant taking the role of chief judge of East District Texas from Gilstrap. Don’t worry as there are no clear indications yet that we’re losing Gilstrap.

Pic below—“The chief judge of a United States district court serves a term of seven years or until they reach the age of 70, whichever comes first. The chief judge RETURNS to active service after their term ends.”

Gilstrap became chief in 2018, 7 years to 2025.

Important to not conflate and understand the difference/significance between the role of district court CHIEF judge and district court judge.

There's no information on Gilstrap retiring, we don’t know if he's leaving or staying on but not in a role of chief. Of course we have to wait and see, but as it stands now from what we know, he will stay on as a district court judge in the eastern district of Texas, and will continue to handle our cases pre and post CAFC appeal or on remand.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/752549/default.png

thread...... https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/597015361

Went for nibble we'll see 2.30

k so the way to sticky go to manage ......... my stickies ............ type in message number you want stickied done 2 minute or less

everythings cool eye, done deal, you can have the next one!!!

let me know what you need posted

you bet

Stokd $NLST An example of exactly how/why the CAFC will undo some PTAB decisions of unpatentability for Netlist.

2 articles—1 pay/1 free—same decision.
Dec16: "CAFC Vacates PTAB Win for Centripetal Due to Board’s Poorly Articulated Motivation to Combine Analysis"
https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/12/16/cafc-vacates-ptab-win-centripetal-boards-poorly-articulated-motivation-combine-analysis/id=184197/

Dec17: "Assembling the Obviousness Puzzle: Why Piecemeal Prior Art Analysis Falls Short"
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/12/assembling-obviousness-piecemeal.html

"CAFC said the PTAB erred by not sufficiently explaining its reasoning with respect to its motivation to combine analysis."—which it couldn't then and won't on remand, or would have initially.

"CAFC said the Board failed to explain what it meant by “necessary bridge” and that it MERELY SUMMARIZED PAN’s ARGUMENTS on motivation to combine..."

"Additionally, the Board erred in looking at each reference individually rather than in combination..."

"CAFC asserted that the “language that Centripetal quotes is not the Board’s analysis, but rather the Board’s recital of Centripetal’s OWN POSITION.”—what a hit job!

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/892698/default.png

Good info was just thinking of buying another 1k. Thanks

Saucehead
7m

$NLST I think the injunction will be ruled in favor of netlist that s why I’m covering my short and going long starting tomorrow

wow this dude has been trashing NLST for ever Maybe the worm is turning.....

injunct them.....hang'm high!!! this is where efficient infringement gets reverse engineered...........

C.K. Hong , Netlist's Chief Executive Officer, said, "The ‘608 has gone through the IPR process to Final Written Decision and none of the challenged claims were found to be unpatentable. We are pleased that the PTAB has confirmed the validity of this patent after a jury recently found it to be valid and infringed by Samsung. With the November jury verdict and the validation by the PTAB we now have the opportunity for the court to consider Netlist's injunction request."
About Netlist Netlist is a leading innovator in advanced memory and storage solutions, pushing the boundaries of technology to deliver unparalleled performance and reliability. With a rich portfolio of patented technologies, Netlist inventions are foundational to the advancement of AI which is revolutionizing computing and empowering businesses and industries to thrive in the digital age. To learn more about Netlist , please visit www.netlist.com.
Safe Harbor Statement This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical facts and often address future events or Netlist's future performance. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release include statements about Netlist's ability to execute on its strategic initiatives. All forward-looking statements reflect management's present expectations regarding future events and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among others: risks that a counterparty may appeal a jury verdict or judgment which could cause a lengthy delay in Netlist's ability to collect the damage award or overturn the verdict or judgment or reduce the damages award; potential delays in expected litigation and other milestones; risks related to Netlist's plans for its intellectual property, including its strategies for monetizing, licensing, expanding, and defending its patent portfolio; risks associated with patent infringement litigation initiated by Netlist , or by others against Netlist , as well as the costs and unpredictability of any such litigation; risks associated with Netlist's product sales, including the market and demand for products sold by Netlist and its ability to successfully develop and launch new products that are attractive to the market; the success of product, joint development and licensing partnerships; the competitive landscape of Netlist's industry; and general economic, political and market conditions, including quarantines, factory slowdowns and/or shutdowns, acts of terrorism, war and other conflicts. All forward-looking statements reflect management's present assumptions, expectations and beliefs regarding future events and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements. These and other risks and uncertainties are described in Netlist's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for its most recently completed quarter ended September 28, 2024 , filed on November 7, 2024 , and the other filings it makes with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including any subsequently filed quarterly and current reports. In light of these risks, uncertainties and other factors, these forward-looking statements should not be relied on as predictions of future events. These forward-looking statements represent Netlist's assumptions, expectations and beliefs only as of the date they are made, and except as required by law, Netlist undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
For more information, please contact:

most definitely < less than 48 hours.

I don't believe that's correct. I've stickied posts immediately. I believe it says that posts OLDER than 48 hours old cannot be stickied, doesn't it?

(Post must be < 48 hours old)

Translation - Post must be less than 48 hours old

ok it says the post has to be 48 hrs old before it can be stickied
so remind me on the morrow

I tried to PM you but was unable to. At any rate it's fairly easy:

1. Open the post he's referring to (Stokd's flow chart for the PTAB Patent info). Double click the link, to open Stokd;s chart.

2. Right click he chart and select "save file". Save the file to your computer. Note the location where the file was saved.

3. Hover your mouse over your profile pic, located in the top right hand corner of your screen. Bring the pointer down and click on "my image gallery"

4. In the very top part, see "upload new image" in the blue band? Just below it is a button called "choose file". Click on that button and a new window will open. That window represents the files on your computer. Go to the location where you saved the chart file from the fish's post. Double click that file. The file name should then appear to the right of the "choose file" button. Now click the green "Upload" button to the right. You should now see Stokd's chart appear in your image gallery for iHub. (your image gallery pics are just below that section you were just working in).

Tell me when you get that far. There's only a few more steps to add it to the sticky list

where do I even find where it says sticky????

lol!! i dont know exactly. i just keep following the instructions until i get it right. yes i am tec stupid and not kidding. but one of you guys needs to put that post up there because it will keep all of us updated on about how long till we get paid.