Worldwide NFT Inc (PK) (WNFT) Noticias

I see he talks garbage on all the GS boards.

I don't know about the time frame for a decision as it has dragged on for so long, but the statement made about the Justices is a blatant lie. He has to be citing Nevada or it is meaningless. Wait, it still is meaningless.

"Court Judges will be changed after the new president came. "

There are seven Justices on the court, who are elected to six-year terms in officially nonpartisan elections and who are not subject to term limits, which were rejected by voters in 1996. The Governor appoints Justices in the case of a vacancy. The most senior justice becomes Chief Justice for a two-year term.

Supreme Court of Nevada - Wikipedia

Wikipedia

There will be no changes in the Nevada Court

With a total of seven justices on the Nevada Supreme Court, three justices ran for re-election without opposition.

https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_Supreme_Court_elections,_2024

You are so full of it Teebagger. That's not how the state judicial system works.
Try to read up before you spew.
Makes you small, impotent and laughable.

Nevada? Court Judges will be changed after the new president came.

There are seven Justices on the court, who are elected to six-year terms in officially nonpartisan elections and who are not subject to term limits, which were rejected by voters in 1996. The Governor appoints Justices in the case of a vacancy. The most senior justice becomes Chief Justice for a two-year term.

Supreme Court of Nevada - Wikipedia

Wikipedia

There will be no changes in the Nevada Court

With a total of seven justices on the Nevada Supreme Court, three justices ran for re-election without opposition.

https://ballotpedia.org/Nevada_Supreme_Court_elections,_2024

Another 6 months wait is likely now for the court to give a decision about Calasse's case. Court Judges will be changed after the new president came. Further delays. This ticker will trade at 0.0060 for a while. 
BAAAAAM FAAAAAACCTT !!

Sharp had 3 years to find a reverse merger candidate and failed and now it is an asset Sharp claims for each shell.

Sharp brought in 2 assets to FORW and both were scams (Ligand and Maverick) - so Sharp is incompetent at vetting assets.

"Well, the vetting in search of legitimate assets for $SRNW $WNFT $FORW and $GVSI continues. So much for my retirement this year. But I continue to sift through the inquiries. George Tweeted"

It has been 6 years as CEO for FORW and it is still a disaster.

IG

Outstanding volume today.

IG

Drew... Good God man. Im not trying to be a prick just for the sake of it. Nor am I trying to cast some kind of "Ha, I got it right" vibe on myself.

.....BUUUUT, 99.9999999% of these tickers are - were - and always will be, made to trade and that's it. ....If one is a good study of Fear and Greed (Sentiment/human nature basically) they might do well out here in OTC land. But no matter how good they/you/me are, much of this is simply time and chance. I'm sure you understand this.

As to the matter at hand ie WNFT, I am surprised how long this case has taken (as is my Lawer/Friend/Two houses down neighbor that I have mentioned in the past - yes, he really exists). ...I believe that eventually, things will get resolved here. ...But at what cost??

TYRUS's coment resonates pretty hard here.... because it struck as a
sad overall

I mean seriously, look what has happen to you as a result of your "From my cold dead hands" - "Sell this ticker to everyone on the planet" mentality:

A permanent ban by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the loss of a small fortune.

I get absolutely NO hard-on from watching people lose money...NONE. But Fu*kin-A man, you are out here still "die-harding" this with two different handles/aliases (BigMoneyChalupa). Look, I hope this play makes you rich ...I REALLY fcking do. If I could just flick a switch and make happen I most certainly would.

Hell, I'm not sure why Im even responding here, its not like you asked me anything... But COME ON MAN.

I think we all knew it would not happen this year. Thing is, it still could happen at literally any moment. First step is for the non functioning criminal run court system to do the right thing and then we can move on to a merger here.

*sad post overall, in its tone. 

(I think you'd agree with that)

Seriously? 99% of buys today were .0085. Where is there any flip for a 20% profit? The trading does not show anything.

I wanted you to know i read all of your well written reply, but stopped short of giving the ol "thumbs up" because it struck as a
sad overall. 

I think you'd be better off cashing out whatever $ is left in WNFT at this point and maybe put it into your Draft Kings account and bet on Mahomes instead of Sharp. 

Your #2 statement, "Calasse is not an issue," is true today. The rest of that is not accurate and illogic based on known events. 
Calasse rejected George's buyout offers that George made the moment Calasse emerged from the shadows in early 2022. George in a public fit of stubbornness and self-righteousness then publicly announced a "fuck you" to Calasse, and the two entered the ongoing never-ending court fight.
In the meantime, in the spring of 2022, the once hot market for NFTs cooled off dramatically.  Those three factors, Calasse's stupidity, George's stubbornness and the cooling off of NFT market caused the head of the NFT company to withdraw from the tentative reverse merger agreement with George. 
Had Calasse not entered the picture, or had Calasse accepted George's first offer and said thank you very much, $WNFT would've went on a pretty epic run in dollars.
So, saying Calasse is a non-issue now is disingenuous because you use present tense.
Nearly three years ago, Calasse WAS a major, colossal issue, which both Calasse and George bungled into becoming WNFT shareholders' collective nightmare. 

The minor spike in price today was a small nice 20% profit day trade. But it will go to 0.0060 during November.

Let me guess, they are all on his shit list ?

Thank You M.P. gltu

George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC
@GeorgeASharp
Well, the vetting in search of legitimate assets for $SRNW $WNFT $FORW and $GVSI continues. So much for my retirement this year. But I continue to sift through the inquiries.
2:58 AM · Oct 29, 2024

Thank you,

Well, the vetting in search of legitimate assets for $SRNW $WNFT $FORW and $GVSI continues. So much for my retirement this year. But I continue to sift through the inquiries. George Tweeted 

Any chance you can post the tweet, thanks 

George just mentioned all 4 of his shells in a new tweet!

#1 It is a proven fact that George did not create the TSNP run. He even has admitted so as he was one of the pumpers.
#2. Calasse is a non issue. If George had such a great merger candidate it would have gone through and George could have paid Calasse to take a hike.

TSNP ran because of a perfect storm. The company had a great P/R campaign announcing all kinds of great things while many new investors were stuck at home playing the market.

Even George was pumping HMBL!

It is a well known fact that none of the early HMBL claims came to fruition which is evident by its present PPS.

Will we ever see an TSNP/HMBL run ever again? Possible
Here probably will never happen as the catalysts

Here is a good read on HMBL

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

and for clarification, by listing $TSNP twice, perhaps I am emphasizing the (potential) power of Sharp and his "gang" to (potentially) create large runs from scratch.

I can tell you why I'm still here Tyrus, and it's not for any good reason I can tell you that. Lol

The primary reason I am still here is because when I was close to becoming a millionaire on paper, I told myself I would be holding for a merger or nothing.

Calasse has been nothing but a burden and a parasite to this stock. I have been holding out hope since 2022 that a resolution would come about this case.

Unfortunately nothing has happened, and it seems as though the SC has brushed this under their desk and it is collecting dust.

The other reason I am holding this stock into the (potential) stratosphere is due to regret minimization theory. It's basically the idea that if I were to sell now and the stock did in fact hit say $2+ some day, I would strongly regret the decision. Sure, it may never hit that price, but if it does, then I would strongly regret giving up after holding so long.

So in my mind, I turned less than $10,000 into $1.6 million at the peak in roughly a year with $WNFT (and perhaps a few other trades mixed in there). I believe I can do it again or even greater, and that the opportunity for that to happen can be with this stock.

But if not, I will collect my massive L and let us all eat cake. There's always another stock out there, another opportunity that could be the next $TSNP, or $AABB, or $ALPP, or $TSNP, or $GOFF, etc.

Take care Tyrus. Hope this answered your question and $WAX to the moon.

Yeppers, the court tanked the stock. Has nothing to do with GS lying and scamming! SMH

insane how a court can take this long on such a simple issue and therefore tank a stock 99%. Totally insane non functioning country we have.

You are the legal expert and your contributions have been very valuable.

I understand how OTC share selling schemes operate.

If big news comes out - play the price action and always take profits.

Hijacked/custodianship shells that don't have a Form 211 filed are very unlikely for FINRA to process it. This happened with the changes to 15c2-11 in September 2011. Which has pretty much stopped all shell hijackings.

This can be seen by all 3 Sharp hijacked shells still have the 15c2-11 warning of Unsolicited Quotes Only.

I have never seen a real private company use a hijacked shell to go public. I feel very confident that Sharp will never do a reverse merger.

IG

How long more time court to decide Any limit 

Sharp has one SEC reporting Shell and he hasn't done anything of value to any of the shells.

It has been 9 months since Sharp filed a S-1 for FORW. That is a very long time - obviously there is a problem.

There really isn't anyway to know how much Sharp has spent on the shells - it looks like Sharp paying Attorney fees with equity.

It has been 6 years since Sharp became CEO of GRDO/FORW and the company still hasn't generated any revenue.

IG

Sharp is too busy losing money on his pony addiction!


Well the silver lining of him consistently losing money on his horses is that eventually, he's going to need to earn some income somewhere.

Since he's gotten as much out of the HMBL experience as he could, presumably his source of income will be one of the trifecta. Ideally he will find an actual merger and make everyone money, but worst case he'll at least share "big news" or do something positive and astute investors can profit from the rollercoaster ride.

I'm holding too, waiting for a miracle. Looks like we will need a miracle for Sh_thead to come through.
Jmo for what it's worth.

I can't answer that, I'm pretty sure he didn't put all this money into
these tickers just to walk away, I'm no different than anyone else
do i want it yesterday of course, i do, but that's not how it works,
i could sell and move on, or hold and keep waiting, I'm going to
hold....
glta

Today is the one year mark for the case

Sharp is too busy losing money on his pony addiction!

There's no excuse for srnw, it's ready to go. But nobody in their right mind will do business with a sh_thead like Sharp.
It is, what it is.

I have to agree with you, it's been ridiculous needless to say. Sh_thead really should have worked out a deal with the other scumbag. Nfts were hot and the stock would have been a monster.
But all that has diminished including Sh_theads reputation. There really aren't any companies out there that want to do business with sharp at this point.
His arrogance and bashing of other stocks makes him look like a childish fool.

He brought that up on himself, and he had the audacity to blame shareholders for the big flop with gvsi.
Who in their right minds, or have any respect for their company wants to do business with a sh_thead like that?
Seriously, who would ?
Nobody I know.
This bottom feeder Sharp has cost his investors millions in losses due to his childish and arrogant self.

Well we can all hope for the best, but I think Sharp is a real pos.
Good luck everyone.

The Breach of Fiduciary case would have to go back to around 2013 when Warwick Calasse was the alleged CEO. But why did they file the Form 15 like below?
Gary O'Flynn appeared to be pulling the strings. JMHO, Sharp would have a tough time.

Date: May 16, 2013 By: /s/ Warwick Calasse
------------------------------------
Gary O'Flynn
President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director

The Bad - I like Sharp but feel he should have just paid C off and went forward with merger...it's just the cost of doing business...

I don't think you can call it "paying someone off" if the end result is that they keep their legally owned shares.

In fact, it feels like the opposite. Calasse should have 'paid Sharp off' by agreeing to cancel a vast majority of his shares just to avoid the entire fiasco.

It's like giving the mob a cut for 'protection.' There's no legal basis for it, but not doing it can result in a very unpleasant experience.

I think ARobinson is referring to the Breach of Fiduciary case that was scheduled for Jan 13th 2025, it has been vacated. clarkcountycourts.us/Portal/ A-22-858709-B | Worldwide NFT, Inc., Plaintiff(s) vs. Warwick Calasse, Defendant(s) .....not the NVSC appeal. I always thought the BOF case was being used as leverage to get Calasse to drop his NCSC appeal case which would be a good move, IMO but now it looks like they want to wait to see what NVSC decides from the way I read it. As you said both parties have submitted arguments on the appeal and screening was completed Oct 24, 2023 so we are almost to the 1 year mark and still no decision.

Thank you for the update, I had missed that it was vacated. Looks like it will be postponed until the NVSC issues a decision, whenever that will be.

I honestly don't know what Sharp's plan was for the BOF case, other than to harass Calasse and/or show his supporters that he's "doing something." It never really felt like actual leverage, and I never got the impression that Sharp had actual legal arguments. I'd be surprised if it even went to trial, and even more surprised if Sharp won, but it may be effective as a threat of additional legal expenses.

The fact that they postponed it also seems to weaken their case. If they had a winning argument, why wait? Go ahead and persuade the court. Postponing makes it clear that they aren't worried about the BOF itself, just the potential leverage in case the NVSC decision favors Calasse.

Its 360 days or 60 days 

FYI....Tomorrow is the 1 year anniversary of the NV Supreme Court having everything they need to go make a decision and no news since .... 1 year... SMH

Case Information: 84758
CALASSE VS. SHARP Court: Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s): Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A815182 Classification: Civil Appeal - General - Other
Case Status: Screening Completed
Replacement: Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge: 06/02/2022 / Nitz, Dana SP Status: Completed

10/24/2023 Case Status Update: Briefing Completed/To Screening.(SC)

Agree...

Here since < that fantastic forward split...

The Good - all/any gains will be "long term"

The Bad - I like Sharp but feel he should have just paid C off and went forward with merger...it's just the cost of doing business...

The Ugly - that a case can be held up this long in court...

Here's hoping C is kicked to curb, new name, new merger (a Great one) and wait worth it, tax wise

Come on George, once court rules, it'll be "go Go GO" time

💪⚡️🙏🌟

Can the courts make a decision.   Just crazy.  Make a decision look at the damn case 

It's been 3 years and Sharp hasn't accomplished anything of value - Sharp filed a Form 15 and deregistered the stock and no longer report to the SEC.

"Didn't Sharp say as long as it takes ? What will be, will be"

The funny part is that you still believe in Sharp.

What is the excuse for SRNW?

IG

Didn't Sharp say as long as it takes ? What will be, will be

If any of the Sharp shells go on a run - it would be because the insiders are doing wash trades and spoofing - to create a fake run while they dump more stock.

Don't be so naive and gullible. Sharp dupe the novice investors.

IG

Sharp tweeted about 60 days then bla bka other stocks
Disappeared about own stocks

Fking Sharp so sick of this a hole

Still 69 days waiting

When news ? When