Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (PK) (DBMM) Cotización

Banks failed once before, some years ago I beleive it will happen again but one small private family owned bank only grow stronger.Dbmm is getting very strong and some are afraid and looking for failure

2025 will bring the largest number of bank collapses in US history.
When banks need cash, those that lent money call in their margins.

No one is worried here though. The naked short crew pretends like it isn't true.
What's a shorty to do~?

$DBMM accumulation/distribution still going UP.

And with the advent of technologies comes the quick change to the markets.
Things are happening faster and faster and faster as time goes on.

Shareholders know.

$DBMM baby~!

LongStoryShort💹Andrew's Cooked,Kramers Left Right?💹$90 Incoming💹

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-25995

inCourt UnderOath💹SEC triedBashing $DBMM+Mgmt💹(D0H! Br. at 25-28.)

$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,

DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that
the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.

The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit,
while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.

Source:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf

Great Stuff
12 wins
Timely Filings Matter= Sometimes
Late Filings Matter= Sometimes
Delays Matter = Sometimes
Judges Matter = Sometimes

MASSIVE💹MOASS Incoming💹Per SEC SHORT Regs.,Right idiot?

Give me an D
Give me an B
Give me an M
Give me an M

*****💩DBMM💩 Hilarious !!! Now the BS is Massive short squeeze here ??? With no short interest to cover on a triple zero stock ???



🤔HUZZAH !!! CASE CLOSED !!!🤔

More double-speak Poo. Unreal.

Credentialed advisors, eh? Sure Poo.

Keep tossing that term around. Like it means anything.

Everyone knows the reason why financial reports exit and why they are required to be published. They are there to provide transparency about the financial stability of a company, to investors who might want to invest in them.

Your explanations of the way unpaid salary is disclosed makes it seem like the SEC wants to make it as murky and unclear as possible. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Quit trying to lead investors astray. You’re no good at it.

again to obfuscate because your opinion has no facts and credentialed advisors prepare the data and the SEC never intends for non-approved naysayers to make up the dialogue to create chaos.

Full of crap . Always making it up as he goes along.

8 total posts, 9 if you include mine. 5 of which were posted during trading hours. 4 of those 5 posts are from pumpers. You want to blame everything on bashers when they are not even posting. Its hilarious you think 4 or 5 posters on a message board can suppress a stock or company progress. You truly are a clueless clown.

They have been caught lying too many times in the past it's documented  loss of credibility 

Perfect example of you trying to cloud the FACTS.

The audited financials ARE CRYSTAL CLEAR. They show the unpaid salary to Reggie and Linda in every year I outlined. Yet it is not listed as a liability in the 10K.

You are basically saying:

“Pay no attention to all that unpaid salary listed in all those 10K’s! Don’t worry about the liability those unpaid salaries represent.”

It’s total BS Poo. You obviously are not denying that the unpaid salary exists, and are just telling shareholders to ignore it!

Face it. It exists and at some point, both Linda and Reggie will want it. HOW does the company pay that back? DBMM has almost no cash and never HAS HAD that much cash at any point in their history! You think they will magically get hundreds of clients signed on in 2025 and somehow become wildly profitable??!! There’s very little chance of that and YOU KNOW IT!

It sounds like you think you know EXACTLY how the SEC wants unpaid salary accounted for. I don’t think you do AT ALL! But, IF you DO??

Then tell the board all about it Poo! Grace the board with all your wisdom.

LOL. Cannot WAIT to see THIS!

Xactly!💹Massive Squeeze INCOMING💹BillionsShortNaked💹

It explains the situation about shorting and naked shorting perfectly!

Again, this is a MUST WATCH video for anyone who believes in $DBMM (naked or otherwise)!

I'd love to hear a rebuttal to the facts that he presents! Crickets. chirp.

Watch the WHOLE thing until he starts babbling at the end!
click here for mobile Link

Topics Related to $DBMM:
a ClayTrader Video 2,308 Other Stocks |Kramer |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James

Perfect example of why SEC directs sharehohders to sources . Not to bashers who conflate numbers, who know nothing about SEC instructions to Company’s approved financial advisors and auditors. The Advisors know the regs, the instructions and the intent. It is dumb as a rock to think a basher knows better. The experts know and report properly. Intentially asking for info you are not licensed to have is why there are experts and the SEC so states.

Deliberately creating chaos to damage DBMM.

Read Update the Company chose to post on its website when he raised the same nonsense in Sept 2024. Update on public info DBMM website . Have a read and ignore crap. Accrued Comp activity is complicated and the SEC has its regulations, instructions and financial advisors , including Company accountants and independent Auditors. Another gotcha?

From Special Shareholder Update 3 -

‘Items’ are mandated in 10-K. Items are under instructions from SEC. The SEC has excluded many 10-K. ‘Items’ in the 10-Q’s. The 10-K is the annual audit, in which Item 11 is Executive Compensation. ‘There is no Item requirement for Accrued Compensation.’ It is merely a point in time ‘Note’ in the Financial Statements.

‘Notes’ follow the Financial Statements and are the point in time details which are prepared by the designated experts. The instructions are different and there is no intended tie points, rather many different inclusions and exclusions comparing two (2) years. Aggregated numbers are the point in time of the report, just like ‘Net Loss,’ or other line categories.”

The SEC approves public company advisors and FD regs are to stay away from online chatrooms as unauthentic. Ignore.

Oh wow.

*****🟥🟥🟥 Oh gosh oh gee ! Now I am hearing nonsense 80 - 90 BUCKS is possible for DBMM ??? not even a 🟥massive reverse split 🟥can get this OTC stinky pinky stock to those numbers

With no revenues ? little assets ? convertible debt ! SMH



ENOUGH SAID HUZZAH🤪 !!

💹per SEC💹💹Regulations $90 Possible, Correct Idiot?💹

If it were INVESTING, you’d pay complete attention to the accuracy of management’s statements, the fruition of promises made and, most importantly, the numbers in the financial statements. You do not. You choose to believe myths that have never been proven, lies that have been proven and 100% blind hope.

Therefore, it’s GAMBLING. And you’re STILL a miserable failure at the game.

Poo - we’ve BEGGED you for years to bring on the law suit. Not a single critic here has flinched from that empty threat. There’s a reason neither you, nor the company who pays you, has done it nor will do it. Public, legal exposure to this company and its management along with the disclosures (private emails, phone records, travel receipts, private funding info, etc are NOT protected in court) that would ensue would likely put people in jail. The LAST thing Linda wants to do is attempt to sue a shareholder. As inept at running a business as they are Reggie and Linda aren’t THAT stupid. If anything, any critics here who have lost money have cause to sue you and the company for promoting lies, illegal pumping and constantly threatening to sue them for expressing opinions! But, let’s face it, the company and its management (and very likely you) are broke. There’s nothing to be gained from a lawsuit (else it would have been done).

But I triple dog DARE ya to sue. That goes for any of you long term “investors”. What’s wrong? Chicken? Bring it on or S….T….F….U….

DBMM baby…. 🙄 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

By the way, it’s 950am in Barcelona. No one cares enough about this trash to post “at all hours of the night”. Don’t think yourself to be THAT important. Off to Ibragué, Colombia, next to enjoy some fresh Colombian coffee (and maybe a couple of beautiful women). As always, the coffee is on me if you’re there. The women are on me too. 😂😂😂

*****🟥🟥🟥 Short story long 🚽DBMM🚽 is a failing company for 20 years thats going down hill fast ! -- Wh👀ps !

ENOUGH SAID HUZZAH🤪 !!!

LongStoryShort💹Andrew's Cooked,Kramers Left Right?💹$85 Incoming💹

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-25995

inCourt Hearing💹D0E triedCrying V. $DBMM+Mgmt💹(D0H! Br. at 25-28.)

$DBMM has obtained resources to complete the re-audit, bring the Company current, & continue its timely filings,

DOE once again rejects the Law Judge’s analysis and conclusion that
the Company explained the reasons for the reporting violations and demonstrated that it had taken effective measures to ensure timely filing.

The Company undertook and successfully completed the re-audit,
while also addressing and resolving the litigation. Having resolved those issues, the Company then ensured, for three years, the timely filing of its periodic reports. Its assurances are more than credible; they have been borne out by years of filings.

Source:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf

*****💩DBMM💩 FUNDERS ??? LMAO !!! the only funders here are toxic note lenders making a killing off of share holders back

ENOUGH SAID HUZZAH🤪 !!!

UPDATE💹Funders Wait 💹2Ensure $DBMM Still Trades💹idiot

$DBMM has the Ability to move forward, to continue to grow its business, benefits its shareholders and asks that the Commission affirm the decision of the Law Judge denying revocation of its registration.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Company submits that revocation of its registration is not necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors, and that the denial of revocation should be affirmed.

Dated: March 26, 2021
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/Maranda Fritz_____________________ Maranda E. Fritz
Maranda E. Fritz PC
335 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Source: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-2021-03-26-respondent-appellees-brief.pdf

Great Stuff
12 wins
3+Years Compliance
Deterrent
Kramer $DBMM

So let me get this straight... someone who liked the company... posted supporting it for years... watched their investment tank as revenues fell, losses piled up, and promises were never met...

If they now dare to speak critically about the company... they are a "basher" and their opinions should be ignored?

Well, personally, I question the integrity of anyone that closes their eyes to failure and attacks those that dare to speak up!

When did it become wrong to criticize failure? I mean, besides in your mind...

Bashers are too obvious, first it was revocation, now bankruptcy?

Never happen.
1. Relationships are everything
2. Movers always wrong
3. LTIs here to stay as Company. Cashflow loans (their cashflow) and long term play until revenues meet new model, pivoting AI. states until ultimately NASDAQ.
4. Blueprint being executed.
5. Many tech center US companies follow successful model.

No one gets to steal the Company by trashing management, ignoring all interim events.

With that monstrous contingent liability, and miniscule assets, is that not the classic example of chapter 7 BK?
And I do not mean Berger King.

*****🟥🟥🟥 LOL ! now I am hearing 🟥nonsense🟥Kramer naked shorted DBMM



ENOUGH SAID HUZZAH🤪 !!!

Xcellent💹Kramers 100% involved💹Billions Naked Short?💹

It explains the situation about shorting and naked shorting perfectly!

Again, this is a MUST WATCH video for anyone who believes in $DBMM (naked or otherwise)!

I'd love to hear a rebuttal to the facts that he presents! Crickets. chirp.

Watch the WHOLE thing until he starts babbling at the end!
click here for mobile Link

Topics Related to $DBMM:
a ClayTrader Video 2,308 Other Stocks |Kramer |Avid Traders Interview with COO Reggie James

But thats not how they were written was it.

THE COMPANY would have to PROVE that bad actors are specifically trying to depress the price.
No one here is trying to do that. Linda sucks for 22 years now, obviously cant run a company. Looks like DC is a lemon.
Personally I think this company 'could' succeed if Linda was gone.
NONE of the above is attempting to depress the price. On the contrary, as a shareholder I have an opinion, that is my right.
Others post clips from the filings, nothing wrong there unless the filings are.

So go ahead and gather your proof but be wary of the countersuit. Those 'cases' you quote have many traits that just arent found here.

Uh ohhhh. You're gonna hear from a very cranky Poo after this one, methinks.

My digging into the salaries assigned to DBMM's two executives have opened up some interesting questions about the present "accrued compensation" numbers listed in the most recent published financials! Something just doesn't add up!

Here is a link to the latest 10K published:
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1127475/000118518524001176/dbmm20240831_10k.htm

The present accrued compensation amounts are listed here:

Note 7 - Accrued Compensation

The Company owes $1,109,178 and $1,313,536 as of August 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, in accrued compensation and expenses to certain directors and consultants. The amounts are non-interest bearing.


Yet gathering all the "unpaid salary" numbers for Linda and Reggie PER YEAR - since 2007 - reveals the following:


Since 2012, Reggie James has accrued $54,000 each year in "unpaid salary". This amounts to $648,000. Any other salary listed was already paid to Mr. James (OVER $1.5M).

Reggie James:

Unpaid Salary to date - $648,000

Since 2007, the following Unpaid Salary numbers for Ms. Linda Perry are stated in the PUBLISHED FINANCIALS:

2007 - $162,590 Not Paid (Salary of $185,000 - with $22,410 being paid in cash)
2008 - $177,500 Not Paid (Salary of $185,000 - with $7,500 being paid in cash)
2009 - $157,500 Not Paid (Salary of $185,000 - with $27,500 being paid in cash)
2010 - $0 (10K lists $107,414 as being "earned" - no amount was stated as being PAID)
2011 - $150,000 Not Paid
2012 - $150,000 Not Paid
2013 - $150,000 Not Paid
2014 - $150,000 Not Paid

2015 - $ 14,166*Not Paid
2016 - $150,000 Not Paid
2017 - $150,000 Not Paid

2018 - $150,000 Not Paid
2019 - $150,000 Not Paid
2020 - $150,000 Not Paid
2021 - $150,000 Not Paid
2022 - $150,000 Not paid
2023 - $150,000 Not Paid
2024 - $150,000 Not Paid
===============
$2,461,756 in Unpaid Salary

*The "Super 10K" covering the years of 2015 through 2017 state Ms. Perry received $150,000 per year, of which $135,834 was PAID to her! The 10K does not state which years that amount was paid to her, so I simply accounted for all of it in the year of 2015.


Adding up the numbers per year from EACH of the legal and published AUDITED 10K annual reports gives a FAR DIFFERENT amount than the Accrued Compensation figure in Note 7 of the 2024 10K!

Reggie James has unpaid salary of $648,000, as per the numbers taken from EACH YEARLY 10K (as of fiscal year 2024)!

Linda Perry has unpaid salary of $2,461,756, as per the numbers taken from EACH YEARLY 10K (as of fiscal year 2024)!

Combined, that's $3,109,756!

The figure in Note 7 for the accrued compensation in the latest 10K lists the figure at $1,109,178 for the 2024 Fiscal Year . Yet by the numbers taken from EACH PUBLISHED 10K? Just Linda Perry alone should have almost $2.5 MILLION DOLLARS in unpaid salary! Why isn't this listed under the "accrued compensation" note???? Maybe the SEC should be informed of this difference???

I mean really. IF the "salary not paid" to Linda and Reggie (approx $3.1M) is not represented in the "Accrued Compensation" amount in Note 7? Then WHERE IN THE FINANCIALS IS IT REPRESENTED? That "salary not paid" is a liability, is it not? Anyone think that Reggie and Linda is going to say "hey guys - let's just forget about all the past salaries I'm owed! Forget about it. It's all GOOD!"

I SERIOUSLY doubt THAT is going to HAPPEN! So, that unpaid salary is a liability, and I cannot find anywhere in the 10K where it is listed.

Think the SEC would be interested in this?

Those pesky LTIs.

😆😸😅😸🤣😸😂😹😂

If DBMM goes bankrupt, the LTI's will get the company lock stock and barrel!

Common shareholders will get nothing.

That is how bankruptcy of a publicly traded company works!

I agree. All it would take is for these mysterious "LTI's" to say "OK. We don't need the loss write off anymore. We're done. No more loans for you. And by the way? Pay us back what you owe us".

Since DBMM has a miniscule amount of cash available, they would have to use shares to pay off that $3M+ loan debt. And at today's share price? They would need a STAGGERING 4.285 BILLION SHARES to pay it off. They only have a little over ONE Billion authorized shares left to use. So, IF it happened like that? Shareholders would likely see another increase in the Authorized and THEN Outstanding shares.

But I doubt that would actually happen. DBMM would simply BK out and STIFF their "LTI's". After all, Linda has done it to other lenders too. THAT is a matter of RECORD. There would most likely be another law suit against DBMM and the lenders would likely have to settle for a lesser amount (like Asher had to).

Then DBMM (and the lowly shareholders) would blow away in the wind.

How can anyone take you seriously? Remember this doozie? Were you paid to promote?



Lets GO DBMM!

Do you work in the same boiler room as Pink, or just another victim?
Ahhh thank you PINK. And BTW I do LOVE PINK, thanks for the kind heads up and the information.

You have been spouting off about a naked short position in DBMM for over 5 years now! Need links?

How has that lie worked out for you?

How much are you down?

Remember Rick, no naked shorts in this play. 24/7/365 negative narrative is all fiction too.

Company is such a failure to have come back from what "they" thought was a slam dunk revocation. Then it was the expert market with a CE designation.

Sure took the Commish a longtime (years) to "review" this ticker, right~?

All attempts to sink $DBMM have failed. Stick around..... the party may just be getting started.

That's why they call it investing. High risk........ high reward.

$DBMM baby~!

When it was at .03, we were promised .50-$1.50

You weren't promised anything dude. It's called INVESTING, not promises.
AND you could have cashed out at $0.03.

But since you don't own any shares anyway, no gain or loss for you.

🤣😸😅😸😆😸😂😹😂

$DBMM baby~!

That "not long for the world" statement still holds true to this day. DBMM cannot continue to operate at such huge losses. At some point the loan money will run out and they will be forced into bankruptcy liquidation. Not that they have anything of value.

I just don't understand why you continue to try and mislead traders with complete nonsense. All anyone has to do is look at the numbers in their audited 10k to see this company is just days away from bankruptcy. It could come today, tomorrow, or next year. If they don't start generating some revenue, bankruptcy will be coming like a freight train and current shareholders get $0.

So how about you stop trying to con traders with lies in hopes of them buying this stock? Take your own advice and let traders do their own due diligence. If anyone wants to buy this garbage after reading their latest audited 10k then they deserve the loss.

For those unaware. Poo28 = Love*Pink. Check the posting history.

Huzzah!

You really need to talk with someone who understands the law and stop relying on your own confused interpretations of complex, totally unrelated, and mostly political lawsuits!

STOP TRYING TO MISLEAD OTHERS!

First and foremost you are dead wrong about who the critics are here! The bulk of those posting critically here, I believe, are harmed shareholders with no collusion whatsoever aside from a common anger at management for destroying their investment!

Secondly, opinions like "DBMM not long for this world" are protected speech and are definitely NOT defamation! If I, or anyone else, portrayed myself as a financial expert and was giving financial advice to a paying client and said that, sure, that could be actionable. Intelligent and experienced posters stating their personal opinions (most after considerable research) of past similar cases is why iHub is a great site!

I closely watched an attempted lawsuit against iHub posters for defamation that was FAR worse than hurting someone's feelings. The CEO had his subpoena for identities quashed, ended up owing TRIPLE the defendants (iHub's) legal costs, and skipped the country to avoid paying!

If the company is really so damn naive to believe that there are naked shorts posting critically here that are colluding to harm the company, I hope that they have deep pockets and a strong desire for public embarrassment!

Oh wow.  6 billion naked shorts on deck.  Easy $10 print.  I am a genius.  Oh wow.  Oh boy oh girl.

Follow the defamation cases in the Courts.

Name calling and BS nonsense to depress pps, particularly when corrected and then tens and tens of thousands of Archived lies and opinions threatening which never happen.

It's all for shorters, bad actors, and self-serving manipulators, the bashers gig. Remember, “Nov 2019, DBMM not long for this world?” Five days later, the case was dismissed. Hahaha. That is why shareholders do their own due diligence with direction from the SEC.

Listen to the guidance from SEC re sources. Go DBMM.

Oh wow.  Here we go.

*****🟥🟥🟥 Oh gosh oh gee ! Now I am hearing nonsense 80 - 90 BUCKS is possible for DBMM ??? not even a 🟥massive reverse split 🟥can get this OTC stinky pinky stock to those numbers

With no revenues ? little assets ? convertible debt ! SMH



ENOUGH SAID HUZZAH🤪 !!

💹wow 80-$90 INCOMING! 💹UCLA💹Xerox|Mercedes|Santander|AbbeyRoadInst|Chatsworth|Ernst&Young|Omnisport|PinsentMasons

Facts and Data Speak for Themselves.
Source: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166123457

https://www.dbmmgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/DBMM_Creds_Deck_2024_2.pdf
Clients|4+Years Timely|12Wins|ALJs|Great Stuff

Check the chart... then pull your head out of the sand... then call the Harvard Queen and demand competent MANAGEMENT.  

😂😂😂😂 When it was at .03, we were promised .50-$1.50…. When it was at .02, the chart looked “coiled and ready”…. When it was at .017, the shares were “tasty. NOM NOM NOM”….. When it was at .006, the blogger tried to convince his base that it was oversold and die for a spike…. When it was at .0008, the gambler thought he could flip it real quick….. Now it’s at .0006 and here you are, thinking it will do something different than it’s done for twenty rock solid years straight…..

Good luck!!!! I hope the volume is there to allow you to sell whatever you buy….. Almost everyone who gets suckered into this quicksand, ends up holding and holding and holding and hoping that some new sucker will come along all while pretending to be confident. Holding a loss for YEARS sucks, doesn’t it Ginger? Or Johnny? Or Jimmy? Or Poo - oh, wait, you get paid to promote this with lies while ignoring the difficult questions…