- Annual Report (10-K)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal ended December 31, 2011.

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 001-35034

WOLVERINE BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland

27-3939016

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)


5710 Eastman Avenue, Midland, Michigan		48640
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (989) 631-4280

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

(Title of each class to be registered)

(Name of each exchange on which

each class is to be registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price on June 30, 2011, as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market, was approximately $36.9 million.

As of March 30, 2012, there were 2,507,500 issued and outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

(1) Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant (Part III).

TABLE OF CONTENTS



ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	41

ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	41

ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	41

ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	42

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	42

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	42

ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	43

ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	43

ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	58

ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	58

ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	58

ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	58

ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	59

ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	60

ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	60

ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	60

ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	60

ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	60

ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	61

	CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-1

PART I

ITEM 1.

Business

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect,” “will,” “may” and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

•

statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;

•

statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;

•

statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and

•

estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations and are inherently subject to significant business, economic, legal, governmental, technological and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. We are under no duty to and do not take any obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus, except as otherwise required by securities and other applicable laws.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:

•

general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected;

•

competition among depository and other financial institutions;

•

changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments;

•

adverse changes in the securities markets;

•

changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements;

•

our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;

•

our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, if any;

•

our ability to deploy the proceeds we received in our initial stock offering;

•

changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

•

changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

•

changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans;

•

changes in our financial condition or results of operations that reduce capital; and

•

changes in the financial condition or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own.

Because of these and a wide variety of other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements.

In this Annual Report, the terms “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. and Wolverine Bank, unless the context indicates another meaning.

BUSINESS OF WOLVERINE BANK

General

Wolverine Bank (Bank), a wholly owned subsidiary of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. (Company), is a federally chartered savings bank headquartered in Midland, Michigan. Wolverine Bank was originally chartered in 1933. At December 31, 2011, we had $293.7 million of total assets, $161.4 million of deposits and $65.0 million of total stockholder’s equity. We provide financial services primarily to individuals, families and businesses in the Great Lakes Bay Region of Michigan and to a lesser extent throughout all of Michigan through our three banking offices located in Midland, Michigan, which is the County Seat of Midland County, and our banking office and loan center located in Frankenmuth and Saginaw, Michigan, respectively, which are located in neighboring Saginaw County. Midland, Michigan is located approximately 120 miles northwest of Detroit and approximately 90 miles north of Lansing, Michigan, in the eastern portion of Michigan’s lower peninsula.

Our business consists primarily of taking deposits from the general public and investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations and borrowings, in commercial real estate loans including multi-family loans and land loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and home equity loans and lines of credit and to a lesser extent, construction loans, commercial non-mortgage loans and consumer loans (consisting primarily of mobile home loans, automobile loans, loans secured by savings deposits and other consumer loans). At December 31, 2011, $154.3 million, or 58.3%, of our total loan portfolio was comprised of commercial real estate loans including multi-family mortgage loans and land loans, and $68.3 million, or 25.8%, of our total loan portfolio was comprised of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. We may invest in securities, including U.S. government and agency debt securities, and to a lesser extent, municipal obligations.

We offer a variety of deposit accounts, including statement savings accounts, certificates of deposit, money market accounts, commercial and consumer checking accounts and retirement accounts, including health savings accounts.

We offer extended hours at our branch offices, and we are dedicated to offering alternative banking delivery systems utilizing state-of-the-art technology, including ATMs, online banking, remote deposit capture, telephone banking, and mobile banking delivery systems.

Generally, we retain in our portfolio all adjustable-rate loans that we originate, as well as fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with terms of less than 15 years. Consistent with prudent interest rate risk strategy and based upon the market and rate environment, we will consider holding in our portfolio longer term fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Historically, as part of our interest rate risk strategy, we have sold into the secondary market substantially all of our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with terms of 15 years or greater on a servicing-released basis. In 2011 we originated for sale and sold $37.2 million of fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, including refinances, into the secondary market in order to generate fee income and consistent with our interest rate risk strategy.

Wolverine Bank’s executive offices are located at 5710 Eastman Avenue, Midland, Michigan 48640. Our telephone number at this address is (989) 631-4280. Our website address is www.wolverinebank.com. Information on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this Annual Report.

Market Area

Wolverine Bank operates from three banking offices located in Midland, Michigan, one banking office and a loan center, located, in Frankenmuth and Saginaw, respectively, which are located in neighboring Saginaw County, Michigan. The Great Lakes Bay Region of Michigan which is located in the eastern portion of Michigan’s lower peninsula, approximately 120 miles north of Detroit, is our primary market area for both lending and deposits.

Our operations tend to be influenced by the economic trends experienced throughout Michigan. Wolverine Bank competes for deposits with community banking institutions, credit unions and regional and superregional financial institutions with greater financial and other resources than we have. In recent years, both our primary market area as well as Michigan as a whole has experienced limited to negative growth, reflecting in part, the economic downturn. Future business and growth opportunities will be influenced by economic and demographic characteristics of our primary market area and of Michigan.

Midland County has a total population of approximately 84,000 and Saginaw County has a total population of approximately 200,000. Our primary market area has experienced limited or negative population growth from 2000 to 2011. Specifically, Midland County’s population remained nearly unchanged over the 2000 to 2011 period, while Saginaw County’s population shrank at a 0.4% compounded annual rate over the period. The foregoing demographic trends are projected to continue for both Saginaw and Midland Counties where modest population shrinkage is projected through 2015. Household growth trends coincide with the population growth trends as growth also has been modest over the 2000 to 2011 period. Households within Midland and Saginaw Counties, Michigan are expected to remain flat or shrink modestly over the next four year period.

Midland County’s per capita and median household income levels approximate Michigan and national averages. Conversely, per capita and household income levels were below these averages for Saginaw County in 2011.

Historically, our primary market area, and specifically the City and County of Midland, has been heavily dependent upon the three largest employers: The Dow Chemical Company, MidMichigan Medical Center and Dow Corning Corporation. These three entities employ approximately 10,000 persons in Midland County. The Dow Chemical Company is a major multinational producer of specialty chemicals, advanced materials, agro sciences technology-based products and solutions and Dow Corning is a producer of silicone, specialty chemicals, lubricants and healthcare products. In addition, these companies have been in the forefront of the development and commercialization of solar energy products and technologies. Historically, these companies have been very important to the local economy because of the employment opportunities and their philanthropic and outgrowth activities.

According to the Michigan Bureau of Labor Market Information and Strategic Initiatives, as of December 2011, Unemployment rates in Midland County, the Bay City Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”) and the Saginaw MSA were 7.0%, 8.4% and 8.6%, respectively. The unemployment rate at December 31, 2011 for the State of Michigan was 9.0% and the national average is 8.3%. While there has been some improvement in the unemployment rate over the last twelve months, Wolverine Bank’s primary market area continues to be significantly affected by the weaknesses in the national and Michigan economies, and any recovery is expected to be slow and prolonged.

Competition

We face intense competition in our market area both in making loans and attracting deposits. We compete with credit unions which historically have had a very strong presence in Michigan. We also compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and investment banking firms. Some of our competitors have greater name recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting customers, and offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide.

Specifically, we are subject to a high level of competition from two sources. Chemical Bank holds an approximate 66% share of commercial bank and thrift deposits in our market in Midland County as well as a significant market share in other contiguous markets. Additionally, the Dow Chemical Employees Credit Union operates through a single office in Midland and holds in excess of $1.1 billion of deposits. Thus, while the presence of Dow Chemical and Dow Corning corporate headquarters in Midland provides high earnings and has limited the economic deterioration experienced in many similar Michigan jurisdictions, our ability to capture banking relationships from Dow employees is difficult due to the significant presence of these institutions.

Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the communities surrounding our banking offices located in the Great Lakes Bay Region of Michigan, and specifically the Michigan counties of Midland and Saginaw. As of June 30, 2011, the latest date for which FDIC data are available, we ranked second of nine bank and thrift institutions with offices in Midland County with a 13.1% deposit market share. When including credit unions, which have a substantial deposit market share in our primary market area, we held approximately 6.1% of the total federally insured deposits in Midland County. We are the only savings institution located in Midland County and we had nominal net deposit growth of 0.6% annually over the 2007 to 2011 period. We ranked 13 ^th of 16 bank and thrift institutions with offices in Saginaw County with a 1.2% market share. When including credit unions, our market share dropped to 0.6% of the federally insured deposits within Saginaw County.

Lending Activities

Our principal lending activity is the origination of commercial mortgage loans including multifamily and land loans, residential mortgage loans and home equity loans, and to a lesser extent, construction loans, commercial non-mortgage loans and other consumer loans. The following table provides a historical breakdown of our loan portfolio at the end of each of our last five years.

Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.


	At December 31,
	2011					2010					2009					2008					2007
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	68,287		25.8	%	$	76,801		30.5	%	$	85,163		33.7	%	$	109,179		39.9	%	$	110,516		41.8	%
Home equity		13,572		5.1			12,252		4.9			11,775		4.7			13,704		5.0			15,513		5.9
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate ^{(1) (2)}		89,463		33.8			84,172		33.5			85,497		33.7			83,816		30.6			117,441		44.5
Multifamily		51,411		19.4			37,485		14.9			33,713		13.3			25,463		9.3			—		—
Land		13,445		5.1			16,071		6.4			17,404		6.9			17,444		6.4			—		—
Construction ⁽³⁾ :
Residential		4,897		1.8			3,543		1.4			2,534		1.0			6,524		2.4			12,697		4.8
Residential non-owner occupied		5,218		2.0			1,760		0.7			3,631		1.4			7,699		2.8			—		—
Non-residential		9,589		3.6			7,823		3.1			1,386		0.5			185		0.1			—		—

Total mortgage loans		255,882		96.6			239,907		95.4			241,103		95.3			264,014		96.5			256,167		97.0
Commercial non-mortgage		7,675		2.9			10,434		4.1			10,521		4.2			8,069		2.9			6,874		2.6
Other consumer		1,247		0.5			1,229		0.5			1,326		0.5			1,688		0.6			1,165		0.4

Total loans		264,804		100.0	%		251,570		100.0	%		252,950		100.0	%		273,771		100.0	%		264,206		100.0	%

Other items:
Unearned fees and discounts, net		440					345					351					431					465
Undisbursed loan funds		11,198					8,159					1,724					3,538					4,752
Allowance for loan losses		9,503					9,775					6,507					3,379					3,017

Total loans, net	$	243,663				$	233,291				$	244,368				$	266,423				$	255,972

(1)	For the year ended December 31, 2007 information for commercial real estate mortgage loans includes multifamily loans and land loans.

(2)	Includes $24.9 million and $27.1 million of non-owner occupied one- to four-family rental properties at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(3)	For the year ended December 31, 2007 information for construction loans includes residential non-owner occupied loans and non-residential loans.

Loan Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The following table summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. We have no demand loans, loans having no stated repayment schedule or maturity, or overdraft loans.


	One-to four-family Mortgage					Home Equity					Multifamily					Land					Commercial Real Estate
	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Due During the Years Ending December 31,
2012	$	4,953		6.11	%	$	5,177		4.72	%	$	13,165		5.78	%	$	12,000		4.88	%	$	17,057		5.89	%
2013		5,315		5.93			2,510		4.86			12,142		5.17			1,092		6.58			19,414		5.32
2014		5,537		5.47			1,504		4.73			2,235		6.14			170		5.68			11,722		5.83
2015 to 2016		9,839		5.27			2,424		5.34			19,058		5.91			166		5.86			28,285		5.72
2017 to 2021		10,605		5.61			1,957		4.63			4,811		6.78			17		6.13			12,889		5.77
2022 to 2026		1,948		5.29			0		0			0		0			0		0			0		0
2027 and beyond		30,090		5.27			0		0			0		0			0		0			96		6.00

Total	$	68,287		5.45	%	$	13,572		4.84	%	$	51,411		5.79	%	$	13,445		5.04	%	$	89,463		5.69	%


	Construction Residential					Construction Residential Non-Owner Occupied					Construction- Non Residential					Commercial Non-Mortgage					Other Consumer					Total
	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Due During the Years Ending December 31,
2012	$	231		4.45	%	$	506		4.46	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	5,939		5.48	%	$	511		3.12	%	$	59,539		5.50	%
2013		0		0			0		0			44		6.75			173		5.80			161		6.10			40,851		5.37
2014		0		0			0		0			0		0			27		5.04			478		5.43			21,673		5.68
2015 to 2016		0		0			4,386		5.06			0		0			1,536		5.90			67		4.20			65,761		5.65
2017 to 2021		239		5.25			0		0			532		5.75			0		0			30		6.88			31,080		5.79
2022 to 2026		0		0			0		0			5,065		4.50			0		0			0		0			7,013		4.72
2027 and beyond		4,427		5.07			326		4.45			3,948		4.45			0		0			0		0			38,887		5.16

Total	$	4,897		5.05	%	$	5,218		4.98	%	$	9,589		4.56	%	$	7,675		5.57	%	$	1,247		4.54	%	$	264,804		5.50	%

The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of fixed- and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2011 that are contractually due after December 31, 2012.


	Due After December 31, 2012
	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	54,827	$	8,507	$	63,334
Home equity		8,395		0		8,395
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate		59,801		12,605		72,406
Multifamily		30,863		7,383		38,246
Land		1,445		0		1,445
Construction		3,618		15,349		18,967

Total mortgage loans		158,949		43,844		202,793
Commercial non-mortgage		1,197		539		1,736
Other consumer		736		0		736

Total loans	$	160,882	$	44,383	$	205,265

Commercial Real Estate, Multifamily and Land Loans. We originate commercial real estate mortgage loans, loans on multifamily dwellings and loans on undeveloped land. At December 31, 2011, $89.5 million, or 33.8% of our loan portfolio, consisted of commercial real estate loans, $51.4 million, or 19.4% of our loan portfolio, consisted of multifamily loans, and $13.4 million, or 5.1% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of land loans. Of the $154.3 million of commercial real estate loans, $24.1 million were secured by non-owner occupied one- to four-family rental properties.

We originate commercial real estate and multifamily loans secured primarily by office buildings, strip mall centers, owner-occupied offices, hotels, condominiums, apartment buildings and developed lots. At December 31, 2011, our commercial real estate, multifamily and land loans had an average loan balance of approximately $321,000. At December 31, 2011, substantially all of our commercial real estate, multifamily and land loans were secured by properties located in Michigan. On a limited basis to existing local customers of Wolverine Bank, we have made commercial real estate loans outside of Michigan, and at December 31, 2011 we had one commercial real estate loan outside of Michigan which was collateralized by land in Colorado with a loan balance of $764,000 and was performing in accordance with its terms.

Our commercial real estate, multifamily and land loans are generally written for terms of up to five years with a balloon payment at the end of the fifth year, with a 15 year amortization schedule. Our Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, and on a limited basis other commercial real estate loans, are originated with terms of up to 10 years. On occasion, we may make these types of loans with amortization terms of up to 25 years. The majority of our commercial real estate, multifamily and land loans have fixed interest rates. The rates on our adjustable-rate commercial real estate and multifamily loans are generally tied to the prime interest rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal . Many of our adjustable-rate commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and, therefore, require a “balloon” payment at maturity. Historically, our commercial real estate, multifamily and land loans have not been subject to prepayment penalties. A portion of our commercial real estate and multifamily loans represent permanent financing for borrowers who have completed real estate construction for which we previously provided construction financing.

In underwriting commercial real estate and multifamily loans, we generally lend up to 70% of the property’s appraised value and up to 65% of the property’s appraised value if the property is unimproved land. On occasion, we may lend up to 80% of the appraised value on these types of loans. We base our decisions to lend on the economic viability of the property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In

evaluating a proposed commercial real estate loan, we emphasize the ratio of the property’s projected net cash flow to the loan’s debt service requirement (generally requiring a minimum ratio of 120%), computed after deduction for a vacancy factor and property expenses we deem appropriate. Personal guarantees are typically obtained from commercial borrowers. We generally require title insurance insuring the priority of our lien, fire and extended coverage casualty insurance, and, if appropriate, flood insurance, in order to protect our security interest in the underlying property.

Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher interest rates and have shorter terms than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Commercial real estate loans, however, entail significant additional credit risks compared to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, as they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment of loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the related real estate project, and thus may be subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the general economy. Also, if we make a land acquisition loan on property that is not yet approved for the planned development, there is the risk that approvals will not be granted or will be delayed.

At December 31, 2011, our largest commercial real estate loan had an outstanding balance of $4.2 million, was secured by commercial/industrial properties and condominiums, and was performing.

One- to Four-Family Residential Mortgage Loans. At December 31, 2011, $68.3 million, or 25.8% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. We offer residential mortgage loans that conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting standards (conforming loans) as well as non-conforming loans. We generally underwrite our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans based on the applicant’s employment and credit history and the appraised value of the subject property. We also offer loans through various agency programs which are originated for sale.

We currently offer fixed-rate conventional mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years that are fully amortizing with monthly loan payments, and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that generally provide an initial fixed interest rate for one year with annual interest rate adjustments thereafter, that amortize over a period up to 30 years. Private mortgage insurance is generally required for all of our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans that exceed an 80% loan-to-value ratio. At December 31, 2011, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans totaled $59.8 million, of which $22.2 million contained 5-year balloon payment terms, and adjustable-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans totaled $8.5 million.

Our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans are generally conforming loans, underwritten according to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac guidelines. We generally originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans in amounts up to the maximum conforming loan limits as established by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which is currently $417,000 for single-family homes. At December 31, 2011, we had 17 one- to four-family residential mortgage loans that had principal balances in excess of $417,000. At that date, our average one- to four-family residential mortgage loan had a principal balance of $97,000. We also originate loans above the lending limit for conforming loans, which we refer to as “jumbo loans.” Most of our jumbo loans are originated with a five-year fixed-rate term and a balloon payment, with up to a 30 year amortization schedule. Additionally, occasionally we will originate fixed-rate jumbo loans with terms of up to 30 years. At December 31, 2011, our largest one- to four-family residential mortgage loan had an outstanding balance of $1.4 million and was performing in accordance with its terms.

We actively monitor our interest rate risk position to determine the desirable level of investment in fixed-rate mortgages. In recent years there has been increased demand for long-term fixed-rate loans, as market rates have dropped and remained near historic lows. As a result, we have sold substantially all of our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans that do not contain balloon payment terms as these loans have all had terms of 15 years or greater. Generally, however, we retain in our portfolio fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with terms of less than 15 years, although this has represented a very small percentage of the fixed-rate loans that we have originated in recent years due to the favorable long-term rates for borrowers.

We currently offer several types of adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by residential properties with interest rates that are fixed for an initial period of one year. We offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans that are fully amortizing. After the initial fixed period, the interest rate on adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally resets every year based upon a contractual spread or margin above the one year Treasury Note, adjusted to a constant maturity, as published weekly by the Federal Reserve Board, subject to periodic and lifetime limitations on interest rate changes. Generally the initial change in interest rates on our adjustable-rate mortgage loans cannot exceed two percentage points, subsequent interest rate changes cannot exceed two percentage points and total interest rate changes cannot exceed six percentage points over the life of the loan.

Adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally present different credit risks than fixed-rate mortgage loans, primarily because the underlying debt service payments of the borrowers increase as interest rates increase, thereby increasing the potential for default and higher rates of delinquency. At the same time, the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest rates. Since changes in the interest rates on adjustable-rate mortgages may be limited by an initial fixed-rate period or by the contractual limits on periodic interest rate adjustments, adjustable-rate loans may not adjust as quickly to increases in interest rates as our interest-bearing liabilities.

We do not offer or purchase loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as “Option ARM” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan.

We generally require title insurance on all of our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, and we also require that borrowers maintain fire and extended coverage casualty insurance in an amount at least equal to the lesser of the loan balance or the replacement cost of the improvements. We also require flood insurance, as applicable. We do not conduct environmental testing on residential mortgage loans unless specific concerns for hazards are identified by the appraiser used in connection with the origination of the loan.

Construction Loans. We also originate construction loans for one- to four-family residential properties and commercial properties, including multifamily properties. At December 31, 2011, $19.7 million, or 7.4%, of our total loan portfolio, consisted of construction loans, $10.1 million of which were secured by one- to four-family residential real estate and $9.6 million of which were secured by commercial real estate.

We make construction loans for commercial properties, including multifamily loans and commercial “mixed-use” buildings and homes built by developers on speculation. Construction loans for commercial real estate are made in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, and are generally limited to a 70% loan-to-completed appraised value ratio. We generally require that a commitment for permanent financing be in place prior to closing the construction loan. At December 31, 2011, our largest construction loan had a principal balance of $5.1 million and was secured by a hotel. This loan was performing in accordance with its terms at December 31, 2011.

Construction loans for one- to four-family residential properties are originated with a maximum loan to value ratio of 70% and are generally “interest-only” loans during the construction period which typically does not exceed nine months. After this time period, the loan converts to permanent, amortizing financing following the completion of construction. Depending on the complexity of the construction project, we may choose to extend the term of an “interest-only” construction loan made on a one- to four-family residential property. At December 31, 2011, the additional unadvanced portion of these construction loans totaled $10.9 million.

Repayment of loans on income-producing property is normally expected from the property’s eventual rental income, income from the borrower’s operations, the personal resources of the guarantor, or the sale of the subject property. Repayment of construction loans is usually expected from permanent financing upon completion of construction. We typically provide the permanent mortgage financing on our construction loans on income-producing property.

Generally, before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by a state-certified or state-licensed appraiser. We review and inspect properties before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan.

Construction financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost is inaccurate, we may be required to advance additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Moreover, if the estimated value of the completed project is inaccurate, the borrower may hold a property with a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction loan upon the sale of the property. Construction loans also expose us to the risk that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with specifications and projected costs. In addition, the ultimate sale or rental of the property may not occur as anticipated.

Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit . In addition to traditional one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, we offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit that are secured by the borrower’s primary or secondary residence. Home equity loans and lines of credit are generally underwritten using the same criteria that we use to underwrite one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Home equity loans may be underwritten with a loan-to-value ratio of 80% when combined with the principal balance of the existing first mortgage loan. Our home equity loans are primarily originated with fixed rates of interest with terms of up to five years and a balloon payment and a 15-year amortization schedule. Home equity lines of credit generally are originated with variable rates tied to the prime interest rate, with an established floor and monthly payments of 2.0% of the outstanding balance.

At December 31, 2011 we had $13.6 million, or 5.1% of our total loan portfolio in home equity loans and $1.8 million of home equity lines of credit and $2.0 million of undisbursed funds related to home equity lines of credit.

Home equity loans secured by second mortgages have greater risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans secured by first mortgages. We face the risk that the collateral will be insufficient to compensate us for loan losses and costs of foreclosure. When customers default on their loans, we attempt to foreclose on the property and resell the property as soon as possible to minimize foreclosure and carrying costs. However, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to compensate us for the amount of the unpaid loan and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from those customers. Particularly with respect to our home equity loans, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for our loans.

Commercial Non-Mortgage Loans . We also originate commercial non-mortgage (term) loans and variable lines of credit. These loans are generally originated to small- and medium-sized companies in our primary market area. Our commercial non-mortgage loans are generally used for working capital purposes or for acquiring equipment, inventory or furniture. These loans are primarily secured by business assets other than real estate, such as business equipment and inventory, accounts receivable or stock. The commercial non-mortgage loans that we offer have fixed interest rates or variable-rate indexed to the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal, and with terms ranging from one to seven years. Our commercial non-mortgage loan portfolio consists primarily of secured loans.

At December 31, 2011, we had $7.7 million of commercial non-mortgage loans outstanding, representing 2.9% of our total loan portfolio.

When making commercial non-mortgage loans, we consider the financial statements, lending history and debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business and the value of the collateral, if any. Virtually all of our loans are guaranteed by the principals of the borrower.

Commercial non-mortgage loans generally have a greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans. Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment and other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial non-mortgage loans are of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial non-mortgage loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Further, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. We seek to minimize these risks through our underwriting standards.

At December 31, 2011, our largest commercial non-mortgage loan outstanding was for $4.3 million and was secured by stock and other collateral. At December 31, 2011, this loan was performing in accordance with its terms.

Consumer Loans . To a lesser extent, we offer a variety of consumer loans, including new and used automobile loans, recreational vehicle loans, and loans secured by certificates of deposits and other collateral, including marketable securities. At December 31, 2011, our consumer loan portfolio totaled $1.2 million, or 0.5% of our total loan portfolio.

Consumer loans generally have shorter terms to maturity, which reduces our exposure to changes in interest rates. In addition, management believes that offering consumer loan products helps to expand and create stronger ties to our existing customer base by increasing the number of customer relationships and providing cross-marketing opportunities.

Consumer and other loans generally have greater risk compared to longer-term loans secured by improved, owner-occupied real estate, particularly consumer loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. As a result, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations and Servicing. Lending activities are conducted primarily by our loan personnel operating at our main office and our loan center. All loans that we originate are underwritten pursuant to our standard policies and procedures. In addition, our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans generally incorporate Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines. We originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. Our ability to originate fixed- or adjustable-rate loans is dependent upon the relative customer demand for such loans, which is affected by current market interest rates as well as anticipated future market interest rates. Our loan origination and sales activity may be adversely affected by a rising interest rate environment which typically results in decreased loan demand. Most of our commercial real estate and commercial non-mortgage loans are generated by our internal business development efforts and referrals from professional contacts. Most of our originations of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, consumer loans and home equity loans and lines of credit are generated by existing customers, referrals from realtors, residential home builders, walk-in business and from our website.

Consistent with our interest rate risk strategy, in the low interest rate environment that has existed in recent years, we have sold on a servicing-released basis substantially all of the conforming, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with maturities of 15 years or greater that we have originated.

From time to time, we will purchase loan participations secured by properties within and outside of our primary market area in which we are not the lead lender. Historically, the loan participations have been secured by one- to four-family residential properties and commercial properties throughout Michigan. In these circumstances, we follow our customary loan underwriting and approval policies. We have sufficient capital to take advantage of these opportunities to purchase loan participations, as well as strong relationships with other community banks in our primary market area and throughout Michigan that may desire to sell participations, and we intend to increase our purchases of participations in the future as a growth strategy. At December 31, 2011, our loan participations totaled $6.7 million, or 2.5% of our loan portfolio, all of which were outside our primary market area. We have not sold participations in loans to other banks.

The following table shows the loan origination, purchases, sale and repayment activities of Wolverine Bank, for the periods indicated.


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Originations by type :
Mortgage loans:
Residential	$	45,457		$	57,962		$	74,798
Commercial		68,267			62,190			49,416
Construction		26,538			18,701			11,125
Home equity		10,335			7,432			6,585
Commercial non-mortgage		1,648			3,624			6,238
Other consumer		225			345			1,597

Total loans originated		152,470			150,254			149,759

Purchases :
Mortgage loans:
Residential		—			1,000			—
Commercial Real Estate		—			1,492			—
Commercial non-mortgage		—			—			2,050

Total loans purchased		—			2,492			2,050

Sales and repayments:
Mortgage loans:
Residential		(53,971	)		(67,324	)		(98,597	)
Commercial		(51,676	)		(62,568	)		(39,525	)
Construction		(19,960	)		(13,126	)		(17,982	)
Home equity		(9,015	)		(6,956	)		(8,514	)
Commercial non-mortgage		(4,407	)		(3,711	)		(5,836	)
Other consumer		(207	)		(442	)		(1,960	)

Total sales and repayments		(139,236	)		(154,127	)		(172,414	)

Total loans sold		(37,292	)		(49,163	)		(66,210	)

Principal repayments		(101,944	)		(104,965	)		(106,204	)

Total reductions		(139,236	)		(154,128	)		(172,414	)

Increase (decrease) in other items, net		(2,862	)		(9,695	)		(1,234	)

Net increase (decrease)	$	10,372		$	(11,077	)	$	(21,839	)

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority . Our lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our Board of Directors. The loan approval process is intended to assess the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral that will secure the loan. To assess the borrower’s ability to repay, we review the borrower’s employment and credit history and information on the historical and projected income and expenses of the borrower. We will also evaluate a guarantor when a guarantee is provided as part of the loan.

Wolverine Bank’s policies and loan approval limits are established by our Board of Directors. Our Manager of Commercial Underwriting may approve secured commercial loans up to $500,000 and unsecured loans up to $50,000. Similarly, our Manager of Consumer Underwriting has authority to approve secured consumer loans up to $350,000, saleable secured residential loans up to the secondary market limit (currently $417,000) and unsecured loans up to $50,000. The President and CEO may approve secured loans up to $1.0 million and unsecured loans up to $500,000. The President and CEO in combination with a Manager of Underwriting may approve secured loans up to $1,500,000 or unsecured loans up to $750,000, and these limits are increased to $2,000,000 (consumer or residential loans), $2,500,000 (commercial loans) and $1,000,000 (unsecured loans) with the addition of a second Manager of Underwriting. Two or more board members may approve loans up to $3,500,000. All loans in excess of $3,500,000 must be approved by the Board of Directors. There are higher limits for each lending authority described above for renewals or extensions.

We generally require appraisals by a rotating list of independent, licensed, third-party appraisers of all real property securing loans. All appraisers are approved by the Board of Directors annually.

Non-performing and Problem Assets

For all of our loans, once a loan is 15 days delinquent, a computer generated past due notice is mailed. Past due notices continue to be mailed monthly in the event the account is not brought current. Prior to the time a loan is 30 days past due, we attempt to contact the borrower by telephone. Thereafter we continue with follow-up calls. Generally, once a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, if no work-out efforts have been pursued, we commence the foreclosure or repossession process. A summary report of all loans 90 days or more past due, or 30 days or more past due if the loan is less than 1 year old, is provided monthly to our Board of Directors.

Loans are usually placed on non-accrual status when the payment of principal and/or interest is 90 days or more past due. Loans are also placed on non-accrual status when it is determined collection of principal or interest is in doubt or if the collateral is in jeopardy. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is fully reversed, and further income is recognized only to the extent received and only after the loan is returned to accrual status. The loans are typically returned to accrual status if unpaid principal and interest are repaid so that the loan is current.

Non-Performing Assets. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets at the dates indicated. At the dates presented, we had no loans that were delinquent 90 days or greater and that were still accruing interest.


	At December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans:
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	922		$	1,118		$	426		$	—		$	77
Home equity		165			76			—			—			—
Commercial mortgage loans: ⁽¹⁾
Commercial real estate		3,652			4,051			4,029			1,337			1,498
Multifamily		—			—			—			—			—
Land		7,833			2,069			2,602			1,978			—
Construction		2			92			183			358			190
Commercial non-mortgage		375			—			—			—			—
Other consumer		—			—			—			—			—

Total non-accrual loans ⁽²⁾		12,949			7,406			7,240			3,673			1,765

Troubled debt restructurings:
One-to four-family		648			467			224			—			—
Commercial real estate		959			97			302			—			—

		1,607			564			526			—			—

Total non-performing loans		14,556			7,970			7,766			3,673			1,765

Real estate owned:
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		616			256			256			149			570
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate		524			1,805			334			562			255
Land		225			307			—			140			—
Construction		—			—			—			—			325
Home Equity		—			7			—			—			—

Total real estate owned		1,365			2,375			590			851			1,150

Total non-performing assets	$	15,921		$	10,345		$	8,356		$	4,524		$	2,915

Ratios:
Non-performing loans to total loans		5.8	%		3.3	%		3.1	%		1.4	%		0.7	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		5.4	%		3.3	%		2.7	%		1.4	%		0.9	%

(1)	For the year ended December 31, 2007, information for commercial real estate mortgage loans includes multifamily loans and land loans.

(2)	At December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, includes $4.8, $4.3 and $3.4 million of troubled debt restructurings, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, gross interest income that would have been recorded had our non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms was $496,000. We recognized interest income of $160,000 on such loans for the year ended December 31, 2011.

At December 31, 2011, our non-accrual loans totaled $14.6 million. The non-accrual loans consisted primarily of five commercial real estate relationships with principal balances totaling $9.4 million and allowances of $1.9 million. These loans are secured by non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential properties, multifamily and commercial real estate properties and development land.

Other than as disclosed in the above tables, there are no other loans at December 31, 2011 that management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms.

Troubled Debt Restructurings. Troubled debt restructurings are defined under ASC 310-40 to include loans for which either a portion of interest or principal has been forgiven, or for loans modified at interest rates or on terms materially less favorable than current market rates. We periodically modify loans to extend the term or make other concessions to help borrowers stay current on their loans and to avoid foreclosure. We generally do not forgive principal or interest on loans or modify the interest rates on loans to rates that are below market rates. At December 31, 2011, we had $6.4 million of troubled debt restructurings, of which $4.8 million were included as non-accrual loans in the preceding table. At December 31, 2011 our troubled debt restructuring related to 20 loans, 14 of which related to commercial real estate.

Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our loan portfolio delinquencies at the dates indicated.


	Loans Delinquent For								Total
	60 to 89 Days				90 Days and Over				Total
	Number		Amount		Number		Amount		Number		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
At December 31, 2011
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		1	$	83		2	$	575		3	$	658
Home equity		—		—		3		165		3		165
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate		1		128		4		980		5		1,108
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—		—
Land		1		0		5		906		6		906
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total mortgage loans		3		211		14		2,626		17		2,837

Commercial non-mortgage		—		—		1		375		1		375
Other consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total loans		3	$	211		15	$	3,001		18	$	3,212

At December 31, 2010
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		3	$	598		9	$	1,092		12	$	1,690
Home equity		2		115		1		76		3		191
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate		1		97		4		1,061		5		1,158
Multifamily		1		4,266		—		—		1		4,266
Land		—		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total mortgage loans		7		5,076		14		2,229		21		7,305

Commercial non-mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total loans		7	$	5,076		14	$	2,229		21	$	7,305

At December 31, 2009
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		5	$	253		5	$	400		10	$	653
Home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate		1		147		5		1,134		6		1,281
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—		—
Land		1		42		8		2,181		9		2,223
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total mortgage loans		7		442		18		3,715		25		4,157

Commercial non-mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total loans		7	$	442		18	$	3,715		25	$	4,157

At December 31, 2008
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		1	$	47		—	$	—		1	$	47
Home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial mortgage loans ⁽¹⁾ :
Commercial real estate		1		960		2		378		3		1,338
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—		—
Land		1		157		1		150		2		307
Construction		2		253		2		356		4		609

Total mortgage loans		5		1,417		5		884		10		2,301

Commercial non-mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		—


	Loans Delinquent For								Total
	60 to 89 Days				90 Days and Over				Total
	Number		Amount		Number		Amount		Number		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total loans		5	$	1,417		5	$	884		10	$	2,301

At December 31, 2007
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		1	$	10		1	$	77		2	$	87
Home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial mortgage loans ⁽¹⁾ :
Commercial real estate		1		565		8		1,498		9		2,063
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—		—
Land		—		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		2		253		1		190		3		443

Total mortgage loans		4		828		10		1,765		14		2,593
Commercial non-mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other consumer		1		—		—		—		1		—

Total loans		5	$	828		10	$	1,765		15	$	2,593

(1)	For the year ended December 31, 2007, information for commercial real estate mortgage loans includes multifamily loans and land loans.

Total delinquent loans decreased by $4.1 million to $3.2 million at December 31, 2011 from $7.3 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease in delinquent loans was due primarily to a decrease of $4.2 million in commercial mortgage loans delinquent 60-89 days.

Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets . Real estate acquired by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. When property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Estimated fair value generally represents the sale price a buyer would be willing to pay on the basis of current market conditions, including normal terms from other financial institutions, less the estimated costs to sell the property. Holding costs and declines in estimated fair market value result in charges to expense after acquisition. In addition, we could repossess certain collateral, including automobiles and other titled vehicles, called other repossessed assets. At December 31, 2011, we had $1.4 million in real estate owned.

Classification of Assets. Our policies, consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for the classification of loans and other assets that are considered to be of lesser quality as substandard, doubtful, or loss assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets (or portions of assets) classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not expose us to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of the afore-mentioned categories, but which possess potential weaknesses that deserve our close attention, are required to be designated as special mention.

When we classify assets as either substandard or doubtful, we undertake an impairment analysis which may result in allocating a portion of our general loss allowances to a specific allowance for such assets as we deem prudent. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to absorb credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the balance sheet date. When we classify a problem asset as doubtful, we charge the asset off. For other classified assets, we provide a specific allowance for that portion of the asset that is considered uncollectible. Our determination as to the classification of our assets and the amount of our loss allowances are subject to review by our principal federal regulator, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency, which can require that we establish additional loss allowances. We regularly review our asset portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.

The following table sets forth our amounts of classified assets, assets designated as special mention and criticized assets (classified assets and loans designated as special mention) as of December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007. At the dates presented we had no assets classified as doubtful. At December 31, 2011, we had specific allowances of $3.5 million for our substandard assets and $328,000 for special mention assets.


	At December 31,
	2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Classified Assets:
Substandard	$	26,089	$	26,905	$	25,881	$	12,481	$	3,480

Total classified assets		26,089		26,905		25,881		12,481		3,480
Special mention		16,774		13,964		13,504		4,735		1,444

Total criticized assets	$	42,863	$	40,869	$	39,385	$	17,216	$	4,924

Of the $26.1 million of substandard assets at December 31, 2011, $22.5 million were comprised of commercial real estate loans, $2.8 million were comprised of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and approximately $800,000 were comprised home equity and construction loans.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses . Our allowance for loan losses is the amount considered necessary to reflect probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.

Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of two key elements: (1) specific allowances for identified problem loans; and (2) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio.

Specific Allowances for Identified Problem Loans . We establish a specific allowance when loans are determined to be impaired. Loss is measured by determining the present value of expected future cash flows, the loan’s observable market value, or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses. Factors in identifying a specific problem loan include: (1) the strength of the customer’s personal or business cash flows; (2) the availability of other sources of repayment; (3) the amount due or past due; (4) the type and value of collateral; (5) the strength of our collateral position; (6) the estimated cost to sell the collateral; and (7) the borrower’s effort to cure the delinquency. In addition, for loans secured by real estate, we consider the extent of any past due and unpaid property taxes applicable to the property serving as collateral on the mortgage.

General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio . We establish a general allowance for loans that are not deemed impaired to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, has not been allocated to particular problem assets. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category and assigning allowance percentages based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio. The allowance may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectability of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are re-evaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current real estate environment. Although our policy allows for a general valuation allowance on certain smaller-balance, homogenous pools of loans classified as substandard, we have historically evaluated every loan classified as substandard, regardless of size, for impairment in establishing a specific allowance.

In addition, as an integral part of their examination process, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require that we recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

We periodically evaluate the carrying value of loans and the allowance is adjusted accordingly. While we use the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the information used in making the evaluations.

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well secured and in the process of collection. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not collected for loans, including troubled debt restructurings, that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Generally, loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.


	At or For the Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	9,775		$	6,507		$	3,379		$	3,017		$	3,054

Charge-offs:
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		(335	)		(33	)		(104	)		—			(128	)
Home equity		(161	)		—			—			—			—
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate		(785	)		(1,597	)		(351	)		(390	)		(161	)
Multifamily		—			—			—			(575	)		—
Land		(391	)		(109	)		(140	)		(75	)		—
Construction		—			—			—			—			(49	)
Commercial non-mortgage		—			—			—			—			(70	)
Other consumer		(3	)		(7	)		(10	)		(5	)		(11	)

Total charge-offs		(1,675	)		(1,746	)		(605	)		(1,045	)		(419	)

Recoveries:
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family		2			54			21			85			1
Home equity		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial mortgage loans ⁽¹⁾ :
Commercial real estate		5			229			326			73			138
Multifamily		—			—			48			36			—
Land		4			226			85			68			—
Construction		—			10			—			—			53
Commercial non-mortgage		—			—			—			—			—
Other consumer		7			4			3			3			2

Total recoveries		18			523			483			265			194

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(1,657	)		(1,223	)		(122	)		(780	)		(225	)
Provision (recovery to allowance) for loan losses		1,385			4,491			3,250			1,142			188

Balance at end of period	$	9,503		$	9,775		$	6,507		$	3,379		$	3,017

Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding (annualized)		(0.7	)%		(1.0	)%		0.0	%		(0.3	)%		(0.1	)%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of period		65.3	%		122.6	%		83.8	%		92.0	%		170.9	%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of period		3.7	%		4.0	%		2.6	%		1.3	%		1.2	%

(1)	For the year ended December 31, 2007, information for commercial real estate mortgage loans includes multifamily loans and land loans.

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category, the total loan balances by category (including loans held for sale), and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.


	At December 31,
	2011					2010					2009
	Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	1,580		25.8	%	$	2,079		30.5	%	$	1,246		33.8	%
Home equity		290		5.1			313		4.9			161		4.7
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate		3,462		33.8			3,914		33.5			3,019		33.7
Multifamily		1,933		19.4			1,765		14.9			949		13.3
Land		1,622		5.1			1,036		6.4			838		6.9
Construction		423		7.4			367		5.2			129		3.0
Commercial non-mortgage		165		2.9			269		4.1			148		4.1
Other consumer		28		0.5			32		0.5			17		0.5

Total allocated allowance		9,503		100.0			9,775		100.0			6,507		100.0

Total	$	9,503		100.0	%	$	9,775		100.0	%	$	6,507		100.0	%


	At December 31,
	2008					2007
	Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential mortgage loans:
One-to four-family	$	1,173		40.0	%	$	945		41.9	%
Home equity		145		5.0			133		5.9
Commercial mortgage loans ⁽¹⁾ :
Commercial real estate		1,227		30.5			1,759		44.4
Multifamily		270		9.3			—		—
Land		305		6.4			—		—
Construction		155		5.3			111		4.8
Commercial non-mortgage		86		2.9			59		2.6
Other consumer		18		0.6			10		0.4

Total allocated allowance		3,379		100.0			3,017		100.0

Total	$	3,379		100.0	%	$	3,017		100.0	%

(1)	For the year ended December 31, 2007, information for commercial real estate mortgage loans includes multifamily loans and land loans.

The allowance for loan losses decreased $272,000, or 2.8%, to $9.5 million at December 31, 2011 from $9.8 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease was based upon management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. At December 31, 2011, the allowance for loan losses represented 3.7% of total loans compared to 4.0% of total loans at December 31, 2010.

Investments

We conduct investment transactions in accordance with our board approved investment policy which is reviewed at least annually by the Audit Committee of the Board, and any changes to the policy are subject to ratification by the full Board of Directors. This policy dictates that investment decisions give consideration to the safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential returns, the ability to provide collateral for pledging requirements, minimizing exposure to credit risk, potential returns and consistency with our interest rate risk management strategy. Authority to make investments under approved guidelines is delegated to our management investment committee, comprised of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer. All investments are reported to the Board of Directors for ratification at the next regular board meeting.

Our current investment policy permits us to invest in any legally permissible investment security, including U.S. Treasury obligations, agency debt securities insured and guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae and other eligible federal agencies, municipal securities, banker’s acceptances, certificates of deposit, overnight investments and eligible mutual funds.

We do not engage in any speculative trading or any transactions in short sales, options, mortgage derivative products or other financial derivative products. In recent years we have not purchased any mortgage-backed securities. As a federal savings bank, Wolverine Bank is generally not permitted to invest in equity securities, although this general restriction does not apply to Wolverine Bancorp, Inc., which may acquire up to 5% of voting securities of any company without regulatory approval.

ASC 320-10, “Investment – Debt and Equity Securities” requires that, at the time of purchase, we designate a security as held to maturity, available-for-sale, or trading, depending on our ability and intent. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value, while securities held to maturity are reported at amortized cost. We do not maintain a trading portfolio.

U.S. Government and Agency Debt Securities. While United States Government and federal agency securities generally provide lower yields than other investments, including interest earning certificates of deposit, we maintain these investments, to the extent appropriate, for liquidity purposes and as collateral for borrowings.

Municipal Obligations. At December 31, 2011 we held one municipal obligation totaling $315,000. Our policy allows us to purchase municipal securities of credit-worthy issuers. We are not permitted to invest more than 2.0% of our total assets in municipal obligations.

Investment Securities Portfolio. The following table sets forth the composition of our investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis stock and federally insured interest earning time deposits. All of such securities were classified as held-to-maturity.


	At December 31,
	2011				2010				2009
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Government sponsored agencies	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,000	$	1,016
Municipal obligations		315		315		388		388		420		420

Total	$	315	$	315	$	388	$	388	$	1,420	$	1,436

Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the investment securities portfolio at December 31, 2011 are summarized in the following table. At such date, all of our securities were held to maturity. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early redemptions that may occur. The yields on municipal securities have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis.


	One Year or Less					More than One Year through Five Years					More than Five Years through Ten Years					More than Ten Years					Total Securities
	Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Held to maturity securities:
Municipal obligations	$	—		—		$	—		—		$	315		3.90	%	$	—		—		$	315	$	—		3.90	%

Total	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	315		3.90	%	$	—		—	%	$	315	$	—		3.90	%

Sources of Funds

General. Deposits traditionally have been our primary source of funds for our lending and investment activities. We also borrow, primarily from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, to supplement cash flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for interest rate risk management purposes and to manage our cost of funds. Our additional sources of funds are the proceeds from the sale of loans originated for sale, scheduled loan payments, maturing investments, loan prepayments, Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis advances, retained earnings and income on other earning assets.

Deposits. We generate deposits primarily from the areas in which our branch offices are located. We rely on our competitive pricing, convenient locations and customer service to attract and retain both retail and commercial deposits. Additionally, we have attracted deposits from numerous Michigan cities, townships, counties and nonprofit organizations due to our successful marketing efforts, community ties, and financial stability and strength.

We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms. Our deposit accounts consist of savings accounts, checking accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit and retirement accounts. At December 31, 2011, we had $2.4 million in brokered deposits, of which approximately $575,000 were through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) network. When a customer makes a deposit and requests the full protection of FDIC insurance, but where such deposit exceeds applicable limits, we may use the CDARS network to place the funds into certificates of deposit issued by banks in the network so that the full amount of the deposit is insured by the FDIC.

Interest rates, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies, including the cost of alternate sources of funds, and market interest rates, liquidity requirements, interest rates paid by competitors and our deposit growth goals.

At December 31, 2011, we had a total of $71.6 million in certificates of deposit, of which $55.6 million had remaining maturities of one year or less.

The following tables set forth the distribution of our average total deposit accounts, by account type, for the periods indicated.


	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2011								2010
	Average Balance		Percent			Weighted Average Rate			Average Balance		Percent			Weighted Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Deposit type:
Savings accounts	$	9,859		5.9	%		0.07	%	$	9,604		5.4	%		0.08	%
Checking accounts		25,844		15.5			0.13	%		25,952		14.5			0.18	%
Money market accounts		53,472		32.1			0.56	%		44,764		25.0			0.75	%
Certificates of deposit		77,570		46.5			1.88	%		98,803		55.1			2.83	%

Total deposits	$	166,745		100.0	%		1.08	%	$	179,124		100.0	%		1.81	%


	2009
	Average Balance		Percent			Weighted Average Rate
Deposit type:
Savings accounts	$	9,077		5.3	%		0.06	%
Checking accounts		16,834		9.8			0.11	%
Money market accounts		34,928		20.2			0.90	%
Certificates of deposit		111,566		64.7			3.17	%

Total deposits	$	172,405		100.0	%		2.25	%

The following table sets forth the amount of our certificates of deposit classified by interest rate as of the dates indicated.


	At December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest Rate:
Less than 2.00%	$	47,226	$	42,497	$	44,715
2.00% to 2.99%		4,039		12,642		6,130
3.00% to 3.99%		12,513		7,170		14,026
4.00% to 4.99%		4,634		10,527		15,618
5.00% to 5.99%		3,203		14,162		25,109
6.00% to 6.99%		1		55		63
7.00% to 7.99%		—		—		—

Total	$	71,616	$	87,053	$	105,661

Borrowings. Our borrowings consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. At December 31, 2011, we had access to additional Federal Home Loan Bank advances of up to $7.3 million with the purchase of additional FHLB stock. The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our borrowings at the dates and for the periods indicated.


	At or For the Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at end of period	$	65,860		$	76,795		$	90,000
Average balance during period	$	70,163		$	86,077		$	91,308
Maximum outstanding at any month end	$	71,833		$	90,000		$	92,000
Weighted average interest rate at end of period		4.16	%		4.54	%		5.02	%
Average interest rate during period		4.54	%		4.82	%		5.09	%

Subsidiary Activities

Wolverine Bank is the wholly owned subsidiary of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. Wolverine Bank has one subsidiary, Wolserv Corporation, a Michigan corporation which has a membership interest in a title company.

Expense and Tax Allocation

Wolverine Bank has entered into an agreement with Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. to provide it with certain administrative support services, whereby Wolverine Bank will be compensated at not less than the fair market value of the services provided. In addition, Wolverine Bank and Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. have an agreement for allocating and for reimbursing the payment of their consolidated tax liability.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

Wolverine Bank is supervised and examined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and is subject to examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s deposit insurance fund and depositors, and not for the protection of stockholders. Under this system of federal regulation, financial institutions are periodically examined to ensure that they satisfy applicable standards with respect to their capital adequacy, assets, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market interest rates. Wolverine Bank also is a member of and owns stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, which is one of the twelve regional banks in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Wolverine Bank also is regulated to a lesser extent by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or Federal Reserve Board, which governs reserves to be maintained against deposits and other matters. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency examines Wolverine Bank and prepares reports for the consideration of its Board of Directors on any operating deficiencies. Wolverine Bank’s relationship with its depositors and borrowers also is regulated to a great extent by federal law and, to a much lesser extent, state law, especially in matters concerning the ownership of deposit accounts and the form and content of Wolverine Bank’s loan documents.

Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on Wolverine Bancorp, Inc., Wolverine Bank and their operations.

As a savings and loan holding company, Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is required to comply with the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board and to file certain reports with and is subject to examination by the Federal Reserve. Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act’) made extensive changes in the regulation of federal savings banks such Wolverine Bank. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision was eliminated. Responsibility for the supervision and regulation of federal savings banks was transferred to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is the agency that is currently primarily responsible for the regulation and supervision of national banks. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has assumed responsibility for implementing and enforcing many of the laws and regulations applicable to federal savings banks. The transfer of regulatory functions took place as of July 21, 2011. At the same time, responsibility for the regulation and

supervision of savings and loan holding companies, such as Wolverine Bancorp, Inc., was transferred to the Federal Reserve Board, which supervises bank holding companies. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve Board. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau assumed responsibility for the implementation of the federal financial consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations, a function previously assigned to prudential regulators, and has authority to impose new requirements. However, institutions of less than $10 billion in assets, such as Wolverine Bank, will continue to be examined for compliance with consumer protection and fair lending laws and regulations by, and be subject to the primary enforcement authority of, their prudential regulator rather than the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The material regulatory requirements that are applicable to Wolverine Bank and Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. are described below.

New Federal Legislation

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act significantly changed the current bank regulatory structure and affect the lending, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated our previous primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and required Wolverine Bank to be regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for national banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also authorized the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies like Wolverine Bancorp, Inc., in addition to bank holding companies which it currently regulates. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board’s current regulations applicable to bank holding companies, including holding company capital requirements, applies to savings and loan holding companies like Wolverine Bancorp, Inc., unless an exemption exists. These capital requirements are substantially similar to the capital requirements currently applicable to Wolverine Bank, as described in “—Federal Banking Regulation—Capital Requirements.” The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries, and the components of Tier 1 capital are restricted to capital instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions. Bank holding companies with assets of less than $500 million are exempt from these capital requirements. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of trust preferred securities are excluded from Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank or savings and loan holding companies with less than $15 billion of assets. The legislation also establishes a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital requirements within 18 months that take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.

The Dodd-Frank Act also created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions such as Wolverine Bank, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets will be examined by their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also weakens the federal preemption available for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.

The legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act increased stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.

Federal Banking Regulation

Business Activities. A federal savings bank derives its lending and investment powers from the Home Owners’ Loan Act, as amended, and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Under these laws and regulations, Wolverine Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate, commercial business and consumer loans, certain types of debt securities and certain other assets, subject to applicable limits. Wolverine Bank also may establish subsidiaries that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for Wolverine Bank, including real estate investment and securities and insurance brokerage. The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the payment of interest on commercial checking accounts effective July 21, 2011.

Capital Requirements. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulations require savings banks to meet three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital ratio, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for savings banks receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS rating system), and an 8% risk-based capital ratio.

The risk-based capital standard for savings banks requires the maintenance of Tier 1 (core) and total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 200%, assigned by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Core capital is defined as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary capital include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital. Additionally, a savings bank that retains credit risk in connection with an asset sale may be required to maintain additional regulatory capital because of the purchaser’s recourse against the savings bank. In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency takes into consideration not only these numeric factors but qualitative factors as well, and has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual associations where necessary.

At December 31, 2011 Wolverine Bank’s capital exceeded all applicable requirements. See “Historical and Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Compliance.”

Loans-to-One Borrower. Generally, a federal savings bank may not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily marketable collateral, which generally does not include real estate. As of December 31, 2011, we had two loan relationships in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. One lending relationship, with a single or related group of borrowers, totaled $9.9 million, which represented 18.5% of Wolverine Bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. We utilized the special lending limits for small business loans for this expanded lending authority which allows a savings institution to lend up to an additional 10% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. Therefore, Wolverine Bank was in compliance with the loans-to-one borrower limitations.

Qualified Thrift Lender Test. As a federal savings bank, Wolverine Bank must satisfy the qualified thrift lender, or “QTL,” test. Under the QTL test, Wolverine Bank must maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” in “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months of the most recent 12-month period.

“Portfolio assets” generally means total assets of a savings bank, less the sum of specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, and the value of property used in the conduct of the savings bank’s business.

Wolverine Bank also may satisfy the QTL test by qualifying as a “domestic building and loan association” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

A savings bank that fails the qualified thrift lender test must operate under specified restrictions set forth in the Home Owners’ Loan Act. The Dodd-Frank Act made non-compliance with the QTL Test potentially subject to agency enforcement action for a violation of law. At December 31, 2011, Wolverine Bank maintained approximately 85.9% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and, therefore, satisfied the QTL test.

Capital Distributions. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulations govern capital distributions by a federal savings bank, which include cash dividends, stock repurchases and other transactions charged to the savings bank’s capital account. A savings bank must file an application for approval of a capital distribution if:

•

the total capital distributions for the applicable calendar year exceed the sum of the savings bank’s net income for that year to date plus the savings bank’s retained net income for the preceding two years;

•

the savings bank would not be at least adequately capitalized following the distribution;

•

the distribution would violate any applicable statute, regulation, agreement or Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -imposed condition; or

•

the savings bank is not eligible for expedited treatment of its filings.

Even if an application is not otherwise required, every savings bank that is a subsidiary of a holding company must still file a notice with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency at least 30 days before the Board of Directors declares a dividend or approves a capital distribution.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency may disapprove a notice or application if:

•

the savings bank would be undercapitalized following the distribution;

•

the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness concerns; or

•

the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute, regulation or agreement.

In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an insured depository institution shall not make any capital distribution, if after making such distribution the institution would be undercapitalized. A savings bank may not make a capital distribution that would reduce its regulatory capital below the amount required for the liquidation account established in connection with its conversion to stock form.

Liquidity. A federal savings bank is required to maintain a sufficient amount of liquid assets to ensure its safe and sound operation.

Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws. All savings banks have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income borrowers. In connection with its examination of a federal savings bank, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is required to assess the savings bank’s record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those statutes. A savings bank’s failure to comply with the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could, at a minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications such as branches or mergers, or in restrictions on its activities. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice. Wolverine Bank received a “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating in its most recent federal examination. The Community Reinvestment Act requires all institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to publicly disclose their rating.

Transactions with Related Parties. A federal savings bank’s authority to engage in transactions with its affiliates is limited by Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulations and by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and its implementing Regulation W promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. An affiliate is generally a company that controls, or is under common control with an insured depository institution such as Wolverine Bank. Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is an affiliate of Wolverine Bank. In general, transactions between an insured depository institution and its affiliates are subject to certain quantitative and collateral requirements. In addition, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulations prohibit a savings bank from lending to any of its affiliates that are engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other than a subsidiary. Finally, transactions with affiliates must be consistent with safe and sound banking practices, not involve low-quality assets and be on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable transactions with non-affiliates. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency requires savings banks to maintain detailed records of all transactions with affiliates.

Wolverine Bank’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders:

(i)

be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and

(ii)

not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Wolverine Bank’s capital.

In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by Wolverine Bank’s Board of Directors.

Enforcement. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has primary enforcement responsibility over federal savings banks and has the authority to bring enforcement action against all “institution-affiliated parties,” including directors, officers, stockholders, attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on a federal savings bank. Formal enforcement action by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order, to removal of officers and/or directors of the institution, and the appointment of a receiver or conservator. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and actions, and range up to $25,000 per day, unless a finding of reckless disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as $1 million per day. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also has the authority to terminate deposit insurance or to recommend to the Director of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency that enforcement action be taken with respect to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to take action under specified circumstances.

Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal law requires each federal banking agency to prescribe certain standards for all insured depository institutions. These standards relate to, among other things, internal controls, information systems and audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation, and other operational and managerial standards as the agency deems appropriate. Interagency guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the appropriate federal banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard. If an institution fails to meet these standards, the appropriate federal banking agency may require the institution to implement an acceptable compliance plan. Failure to implement such a plan can result in further enforcement action, including the issuance of a cease and desist order or the imposition of civil money penalties.

Prompt Corrective Action Regulations . Under prompt corrective action regulations, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is authorized and, under certain circumstances, required to take supervisory actions against undercapitalized savings banks. For this purpose, a savings bank is placed in one of the following five categories based on the savings bank’s capital:

•

well-capitalized (at least 5% leverage capital, 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 10% total risk-based capital);

•

adequately capitalized (at least 4% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8% total risk-based capital);

•

undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8% total risk-based capital);

•

significantly undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital, 3% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 6% total risk-based capital); and

•

critically undercapitalized (less than 2% tangible capital).

Generally, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is required to appoint a receiver or conservator for a savings bank that is “critically undercapitalized” within specific time frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency within 45 days of the date a savings bank receives notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Any holding company of a savings bank that is required to submit a capital restoration plan must guarantee the lesser of an amount equal to 5% of the savings bank’s assets at the time it was notified or deemed to be undercapitalized by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the amount necessary to restore the savings bank to adequately capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place until the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency notifies the savings bank that it has maintained adequately capitalized status for each of four consecutive calendar quarters, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has the authority to require payment and collect payment under the guarantee. Failure by a holding company to provide the required guarantee will result in certain operating restrictions on the savings bank, such as restrictions on the ability to declare and pay dividends, pay executive compensation and management fees, and increase assets or expand operations. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency may also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions against undercapitalized savings banks, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors.

At December 31, 2011, Wolverine Bank met the criteria for being considered “well-capitalized.”

Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008. Also, under the Dodd-Frank Act, noninterest-bearing checking accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012.

On November 12, 2009, the FDIC approved a final rule requiring insured depository institutions to prepay, on December 31, 2009, their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. Estimated assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010 were based upon the assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added for the 2011 and 2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual growth in the assessment base was assumed. Prepaid assessments are to be applied against the actual quarterly assessments until exhausted, and may not be applied to any special assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused prepayments will be returned to the institution on June 30, 2013. We recorded the pre-payment as a prepaid expense, which will be amortized to expense over three years. Based on our deposit and assessment rate as of September 30, 2009, our prepayment amount was $994,000.

Effective April 1, 2011, the FDIC implemented a requirement of the Dodd-Frank Act to revise its assessment system to base it on each institution’s total assets less tangible capital of each institution instead of deposits. The FDIC also revised its assessment schedule so that it ranges from 2.5 basis points for the least risky institutions to 45 basis points for the riskiest.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. The Bank does not believe that it is taking or is subject to any action, condition or violation that could lead to termination of its deposit insurance.

All FDIC-insured institutions are required to pay a pro rata portion of the interest due on obligations issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) for anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the annualized FICO assessment was equal to 1.00 cents for each $100 in domestic deposits maintained at an institution. Assessments related to the FICO bond obligations were not subject to the December 31, 2009 prepayment.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Bank paid $18,000 related to the FICO bonds and $244,000 pertaining to deposit insurance assessments.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or regulatory condition imposed in writing. We do not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.

Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements . Federal savings banks are prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.

Federal Home Loan Bank System. Wolverine Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities involved in home mortgage lending. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, Wolverine Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank. As of December 31, 2011, Wolverine Bank was in compliance with this requirement.

Other Regulations

Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Wolverine Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Wolverine Bank’s operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:

•

Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

•

Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

•

Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;

•

Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

•

Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;

•

Truth in Savings Act; and

•

rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.

The operations of Wolverine Bank also are subject to the:

•

Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;

•

Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;

•

Check Clearing for the 21 ^st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;

•

The USA PATRIOT Act, which requires savings banks to, among other things, establish broadened anti-money laundering compliance programs, and due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements that also apply to financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations; and

•

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties.

Holding Company Regulation

General . Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is a non-diversified savings and loan holding company within the meaning of the Home Owners’ Loan Act. As such, Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is registered with the Federal Reserve Board and is subject to Federal Reserve Board regulations, examinations, supervision and reporting requirements. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority over Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. and its non-insured subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings institution.

Permissible Activities. Under present law, the business activities of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is generally limited to those activities permissible for financial holding companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or for multiple savings and loan holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature, including underwriting equity securities and insurance as well as activities that are incidental to financial activities or complementary to a financial activity. The Dodd-Frank Act added that any savings and loan holding company that engages in activities permissible for a financial holding company must meet the qualitative requirements for a bank holding company to be a financial holding company and conduct the activities in accordance with the requirements that would apply to a financial holding company’s conduct of the activity. A multiple savings and loan holding company is generally limited to activities permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act, subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, and certain additional activities authorized by Federal Reserve Board regulations.

Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including Wolverine Bancorp, Inc., directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of another savings institution or holding company thereof, without prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Board. It also prohibits the acquisition or retention of, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of a nonsubsidiary company engaged in activities that are not closely related to banking or financial in nature, or acquiring or retaining control of an institution that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Federal Reserve Board must consider the financial and managerial resources, future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.

Capital. Savings and loan holding companies are not currently subject to specific regulatory capital requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, requires the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to depository institutions themselves. Instruments such as cumulative preferred stock and trust preferred securities will no longer be includable as Tier 1 capital, as is currently permitted for bank holding companies. Instruments issued prior to May 19, 2010 will be grandfathered for companies with consolidated assets of $15 billion or less. There is a five-year transition period (from the July 21, 2010 effective date of the Dodd-Frank Act) before the capital requirements will apply to savings and loan holding companies.

Dividends. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy guidance regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies that it has made applicable to savings and loan holding companies as well. In general, the Federal Reserve Board’s policies provide that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Federal Reserve Board guidance provides for prior regulatory review of capital distributions in certain circumstances such as where the company’s net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or the company’s overall rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with the company’s capital needs and overall financial condition. The ability of a holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act extended the “source of strength” doctrine to savings and loan holding companies. The regulatory agencies must issue regulations requiring that all bank and savings and loan holding companies serve as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.

Federal Securities Laws

Our common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We are subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of shares of common stock that were issued in our initial stock offering does not cover the resale of those shares. Shares of common stock purchased by persons who are not our affiliates may be resold without registration. Shares purchased by our affiliates are subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. If we meet the current public information requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, each affiliate of ours that complies with the other conditions of Rule 144, including those that require the affiliate’s sale to be aggregated with those of other persons, would be able to sell in the public market, without registration, a number of shares not to exceed, in any three-month period, the greater of 1% of our outstanding shares, or the average weekly volume of trading in the shares during the preceding four calendar weeks. In the future, we may permit affiliates to have their shares registered for sale under the Securities Act of 1933.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer will be required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about our internal control over financial reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could materially affect internal control over financial reporting. We may be subject to further reporting and audit requirements beginning with the year ending December 31, 2011 under the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We have policies, procedures and systems designed to ensure compliance with these regulations.

TAXATION

Federal Taxation

General. Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. and Wolverine Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize material federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. and Wolverine Bank.

Method of Accounting . For federal income tax purposes, Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries currently report income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting with a tax year ending December 31st for filing its consolidated federal income tax returns. The Small Business Protection Act of 1996 eliminated the use of the reserve method of accounting for bad debt reserves by savings institutions, effective for taxable years beginning after 1995.

Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences, referred to as “alternative minimum taxable income.” The alternative minimum tax is payable to the extent alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of an exemption amount. Net operating losses can, in general, offset no more than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. Certain payments of alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. At December 31, 2011, Wolverine Bank had no minimum tax credit carryforward.

Net Operating Loss Carryovers. Generally, a financial institution may carry back net operating losses to the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years. However, as a result of recent legislation, subject to certain limitations, the carryback period for net operating losses incurred in 2008 or 2009 (but not both years) has been expanded to five years. At December 31, 2010, Wolverine Bank had a net operating loss which is expected to be carried back resulting in no net operating loss carryforward.

Corporate Dividends. We may exclude from our income 100% of dividends received from Wolverine Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations.

Audit of Tax Returns. Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries’ federal income tax returns have not been audited in the most recent five-year period.

State Taxation

Companies headquartered in Michigan, such as Wolverine Bank, are subject to a Michigan capital tax which is an assessment of 0.235% of a company’s consolidated net capital, based on a rolling five-year average. Other applicable state taxes include generally applicable sales, use and real property taxes.

As a Maryland business corporation, Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is required to file annual franchise tax return with the State of Maryland.

Personnel

As of December 31, 2011, we had 48 full-time employees and 24 part-time employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that we have a good working relationship with our employees.

Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K

This Annual Report on Form 10-K is available on our website at www.wolverinebank.com. Information on the website is not incorporated into, and is not otherwise considered a part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 1A.

Risk Factors

The presentation of Risk Factors is not required for smaller reporting companies like Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

ITEM 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

ITEM 2.

Properties

We operate from our main office in Midland, Michigan, and from our two branch offices located in Midland, Michigan, our one branch office located in Frankenmuth, Michigan and our loan center located in Saginaw, Michigan. The net book value of our premises, land and equipment was $1.5 million

At December 31, 2011. The following tables set forth information with respect to our banking offices, including the expiration date of leases with respect to leased facilities.


Address	Leased or Owned	Year Acquired or Leased		Expires
Main Office :
5710 Eastman Avenue Midland, Michigan 48640	Owned		1979		n/a

Branch Offices :

Downtown Office: * 118 Ashman Street Midland, Michigan 48640	Leased		2005		2015

S. Saginaw Road Office: 1015 S. Saginaw Road Midland, Michigan 48640	Owned		1974		n/a

Frankenmuth Office: 464 N. Main Street Frankenmuth, Michigan 48734	Owned		1978		n/a

Loan Center :

Saginaw Loan Center: * 3200 Tittabawassee Road, Suite 2 Saginaw, Michigan 48604	Leased		1999		2012

*	Downtown office includes an option to renew the lease for one additional term of five years each, and the Saginaw Loan Center is a month-to-month lease.

ITEM 3.

Legal Proceedings

At December 31, 2011, we were not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business which, in the aggregate, involve amounts which management believes will not materially adversely affect our financial condition, our results of operations or our cash flows.

ITEM 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(a) Market, Holder and Dividend Information. The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “WBKC.” The approximate number of holders of record of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. common stock as of March 30, 2012 was 675. Certain shares of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. are held in “nominee” or “street” name and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the foregoing number. The following table presents quarterly market information for Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock for the year ended December 31, 2011 beginning January 20, 2011 (the date of completion of the Company’s initial public offering). The following information with respect to trading prices was provided by the Nasdaq Capital Market.


Year ended December 31, 2011	High		Low		Dividends Declared
Quarter ended December 31, 2011	$	14.73	$	13.75	$	—
Quarter ended September 30, 2011		13.50		14.90		—
Quarter ended June 30, 2011		15.04		14.35		—
Quarter ended March 31, 2011		14.48		12.00		—

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. does not currently pay cash dividends on its common stock. Dividend payments by Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. are dependent on dividends it receives from Wolverine Bank, because Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. has no source of income other than dividends from Wolverine Bank, earnings from the investment of proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock retained by Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. and interest payments with respect to Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.’s loan to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. See “Item 1. Business –Supervision and Regulation – Federal Banking Regulation – Capital Distributions.”

At December 31, 2011 there were no equity compensation plans other than our employee stock ownership plan under which equity securities of the registrant are authorized for issuance for issuance.

(b)

Report of Offering of Securities and Use of Proceeds Therefrom. Not applicable.

(c)

Purchases of Equity Securities By the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On February 14, 2012, the Registrant’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to 5% of our issued and outstanding shares, or up to approximately 125,375 shares. The repurchase program permits shares to be repurchased in open market or private transactions, through block trades, and pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Repurchases will be made at management’s discretion at prices management considers to be attractive and in the best interests of both the Company and its stockholders, subject to the availability of stock, general market conditions, the trading price of the stock, alternative uses for capital, and our financial performance. Open market purchases will be conducted in accordance with the limitations set forth in Rule 10b-18 of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements.

The repurchase program may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason, including market conditions, the cost of repurchasing shares, the availability of alternative investment opportunities, liquidity, and other factors deemed appropriate. These factors may also affect the timing and amount of share repurchases. The repurchase program does not obligate us to purchase any particular number of shares, and there is no guarantee as to the exact number of shares to be repurchased by us.

ITEM 6.

Selected Financial Data

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

At December 31, 2011, we had total assets of $293.7 million, compared to total assets of $314.2 million at December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we had net income of $1.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we had a net loss of $3.6 million.

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on our loan and investment portfolios and the interest expense we incur on our deposits and, to a lesser extent, our borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by service charges and other fees, provision for loan losses, gains on sales of loans originated for sale and other income. Our noninterest expense consists primarily of salaries and employee benefits, net occupancy and equipment expense, information technology, professional and services fees, FDIC deposit insurance and other real estate owned expense.

Our results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, as well as changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable laws, regulations or government policies may materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Historically, substantially all of our loans have been collateralized by real estate and at December 31, 2011 and 2010, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans including home equity loans and lines of credit, commercial real estate loans including multifamily loans and land loans and construction loans, comprised 96.6% and 95.4%, of our total loan portfolio, respectively.

We do not offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as “Option ARM” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on his or her loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan. We generally do not offer “subprime loans” (loans that are made with low down-payments to borrowers that have had payment delinquencies, previous loan charge-offs, judgments and bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (generally defined as loans having less than full documentation).

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to remain a profitable, community-oriented financial institution offering deposit and loan products to retail and business customers in our primary market area. Additionally, we are seeking to expand our presence in new markets. We were established in 1933 and have operated continuously in the Great Lakes Bay Region of Michigan since that date. We are committed to meeting the financial needs of the communities in which we operate, and we are dedicated to providing quality personal service to our customers. We offer a broad range of financial services to consumers and businesses from our four banking offices and one loan center. Our business strategy includes the following elements:

Growing our loan portfolio by continuing to emphasize the origination of commercial and residential real estate loans, including increasing our loan participations, while maintaining strong asset quality. At December 31, 2011, commercial real estate loans, including multifamily loans and land loans, comprised 58.3% of our total loan portfolio. These loans generally are higher-yielding than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, and also generally have a shorter term than our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans which helps our interest rate risk management. We intend to continue to make these types of loans a significant part of our total loan portfolio. We currently participate with other community banks that serve as the lead lender in commercial mortgage loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and commercial non-mortgage loans collateralized by properties that are located both within and outside of our primary market area. We intend to increase the amount of our loan participations in an effort to continue to grow our loan portfolio. However, we still apply our prudent underwriting standards to any potential participation loan and this is causing slow growth in our participation loan portfolio.

Maintaining prudent underwriting standards and aggressively monitoring our loan portfolio to maintain asset quality . We introduce loan products only when we are confident that our staff has the necessary expertise to originate and administer such loans, and that sound underwriting and collection procedures are in place. Our goal is to continue to improve our asset quality through prudent underwriting standards and the diligence of our loan collection personnel. At December 31, 2011, our ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 5.75%. At December 31, 2011, our ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 65.29%, and our ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans was 3.73%.

Reducing our overall cost of funds by emphasizing lower cost core deposits, including low cost public funds from municipalities, townships and non-profit organizations and reducing our borrowings. We offer interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing checking accounts, money market accounts and savings accounts (collectively referred to as core deposits), which generally are lower-cost sources of funds than certificates of deposit, and are less sensitive to withdrawal when interest rates fluctuate. At December 31, 2011, 55.6% of our total deposits consisted of these lower cost core deposits compared to 50.2% and 36.9% of total deposits at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Additionally, at December 31, 2011 we held approximately $21.9 million of low-cost checking and money market account funds from Michigan cities, townships, counties and nonprofit organizations (which we call “public funds”) due, we believe, to our successful marketing efforts, community ties, and

financial stability and strength. We intend to continue emphasizing our core deposits, including public funds, as a source of funds. Additionally, we intend to reduce our borrowings from the FHLB of Indianapolis. With respect to our commercial real estate customers, we encourage commercial banking borrowers to open checking accounts with us at the time they establish a borrowing relationship with us, and we intend to continue to pursue this strategy to grow this source of lower cost deposits.

Managing interest rate risk. Successfully managing interest rate risk is, and will continue to be, an integral part of our business strategy. Management and the Board of Directors evaluate the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, and determine the level of risk that is appropriate and consistent with our capital levels, liquidity and performance objectives. In particular, during the current low interest rate environment, we have sought to minimize the risk of originating long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans by originating such loans for sale in the secondary market and, in particular, selling substantially all of our conforming fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with terms of 15 years or greater. In addition, a significant portion of our loan portfolio consists of commercial real estate mortgage loans which generally have shorter terms and provide higher yields than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. We also monitor the mix of our deposits. Our strategy is to continue managing interest rate risk in response to changes in the local and national economy.

Expanding our banking franchise. We currently operate from four banking offices and one loan center. We intend to evaluate additional branch expansion opportunities through acquisitions and de novo branching. In addition, we intend to evaluate acquisitions of other financial institutions, or the deposits and assets of other institutions, including in FDIC-assisted acquisitions, as opportunities present themselves (although we currently have no understandings or agreements to acquire other banks, thrifts, branches thereof or other financial services companies).

The successful implementation of these strategies will allow us to offer our clients a broad range of financial products and services. Our goal is to have full relationship banking with our clients.

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or discretion or make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income, to be critical accounting policies. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies.

Allowance for Loan Losses. We believe that the allowance for loan losses and related provision for loan losses are particularly susceptible to change in the near term, due to changes in credit quality which are evidenced by trends in charge-offs and in the volume and severity of past due loans. In addition, our portfolio is comprised of a substantial amount of commercial real estate loans which generally have greater credit risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage and consumer loans because these loans generally have larger principal balances and are non-homogenous.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Based on our estimate of the level of allowance for loan losses required, we record a provision for loan losses as a charge to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level. The estimate of our credit losses is applied to two general categories of loans:

•

loans that we evaluate individually for impairment under ASC 310-10, “Receivables;” and

•

groups of loans with similar risk characteristics that we evaluate collectively for impairment under ASC 450-20, “Loss Contingencies.”

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and reflects consideration of all significant factors that affect the collectability of the loan portfolio. The factors used to evaluate the collectability of the loan portfolio include, but are not limited to, current economic conditions, our historical loss experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the financial strength of the borrower, and estimated value of any underlying collateral. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are subject to significant revision as more information becomes available. Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we have established which could have a material negative effect on our financial results. See also “Business of Wolverine Bank—Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Income Tax Accounting. The provision for income taxes is based upon income in our consolidated financial statements, rather than amounts reported on our income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on our deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. Under U.S. GAAP, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The determination as to whether we will be able to realize the deferred tax assets is highly subjective and dependent upon judgment concerning our evaluation of both positive and negative evidence, our forecasts of future income, applicable tax planning strategies, and assessments of current and future economic and business conditions. Positive evidence includes the existence of taxes paid in available carryback years as well as the probability that taxable income will be generated in future periods, while negative evidence includes any cumulative losses in the current year and prior two years and general business and economic trends. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Any required valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense in the period and could have a significant impact on our future earnings. Positions taken in our tax returns may be subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. The benefit of an uncertain tax position is initially recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are both initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Differences between our position and the position of tax authorities could result in a reduction of a tax benefit or an increase to a tax liability, which could adversely affect our future income tax expense.

We believe our tax policies and practices are critical accounting policies because the determination of our tax provision and current and deferred tax assets and liabilities have a material impact on our net income and the carrying value of our assets. We believe our tax liabilities and assets are properly recorded in the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and no valuation allowance was necessary.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

Total assets decreased $20.5 million, or 6.5%, to $293.7 million at December 31, 2011 from $314.2 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily the result of paying off maturing Federal Home Loan Bank advances and decreases in certificate of deposit liabilities and interest-earning demand deposits all resulting in a decrease in cash and cash equivalents, offset by an increase in net loans.

Interest-earning demand deposits decreased $34.9 million, or 71.8%, to $13.7 million at December 31, 2011 from $48.6 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease in interest-earning demand deposits was primarily due to the result of the net activity between the decrease in deposit liabilities, paying off maturing Federal Home Loan Bank advances and funding loan growth. Interest-earning time deposits increased $6.2 million, or 41.6%, to $21.1 million at December 31, 2011 from $14.9 million at December 31, 2010 reflecting normal cash management.

Net loans increased $10.4 million, or 4.5%, to $243.7 million at December 31, 2011 from $233.3 million at December 31, 2010 as our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans decreased by $8.5 million, to $68.3 million at December 31, 2011 from $76.8 million at December 31, 2010, primarily due to repayments and refinances. We do not hold significant fixed rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans in our portfolio especially at this time of historic low interest rates. Additionally, land loans decreased $2.7 million to $13.4 million from $16.1 million and commercial non-mortgage loans decreased $2.7 million, to $7.7 million from $10.4 million. These items were offset by increases in multifamily loans of $13.9 million, or 37.2%, to $51.4 million, from $37.5 million at December 31, 2010. The majority of the $13.9 million consists of five multifamily loans that were opened in 2011 that totaled $11.4 million at December 31, 2011. We had an increase in construction loans of $6.6 million, or 50.1%, to $19.7 million, from $13.1 million and in commercial real estate of $5.3 million, or 6.3%, to $89.5 million from $84.2 million. During 2011, we opened three significant construction loans and four significant commercial real estate loans, which totaled $13.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011.

Securities held to maturity, consisting of one municipal security at December 31, 2011, decreased $73,000 to $315,000 at December 31, 2011 from $388,000 at December 31, 2010.

Real estate owned decreased $1.0 million, or 41.7%, to $1.4 million at December 31, 2011 from $2.4 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease in other real estate owned resulted from write-downs of $468,000 and sales of $2.1 million offset by new foreclosures of $1.6 million, primarily composed of three commercial mortgage properties totaling $638,000 and three 1 to 4-family properties totaling $424,000. Of the $2.1 million in sales of other real estate owned, $1.1 million came from one relationship which was foreclosed on in late 2010.

Other assets, consisting primarily of prepaid FDIC assessments and deferred federal taxes, decreased $700,000, or 10.9%, to $5.7 million at December 31, 2011, from $6.4 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in deferred taxes.

Deposits decreased $13.3 million, or 7.6%, to $161.4 million at December 31, 2011 from $174.7 million at December 31, 2010. Certificates of deposit decreased $15.5 million, or 17.7%, to $71.6 million at December 31, 2011 from $87.1 million at December 31, 2010. Our core deposits (consisting of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing checking accounts, money market accounts and savings accounts) increased $2.2 million, or 2.5%, to $89.8 million at December 31, 2011 from $87.6 million at December 31, 2010. We believe the increase in our core deposits resulted primarily from continuing to build relationships with our existing customers as well as our marketing efforts with new customers.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $10.9 million to $65.9 million at December 31, 2011 from $76.8 million at December 31, 2010 as a result of paying off maturing advances.

Total stockholders’ equity increased $23.1 million, or 55.1%, to $65.0 million at December 31, 2011 from $41.9 million at December 31, 2010. The increase resulted from our initial public offering net proceeds of $21.8 million which closed on January 19, 2011, and net income of $1.1 million during the year ended 2011. The gross proceeds were $25.1 million which were netted against an unearned ESOP of $2.0 million and offering expenses of $1.3 million. We also released shares from our ESOP which increased our total stockholder equity by $141,000 in 2011.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

General. We recorded net income of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to net loss of $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The net income for 2011 is primarily due to the fact that our provision for loan loss expense for 2011 was $1.4 million, a decrease of $3.1 million or 69.2% as compared to 2010. Also, our interest expense decreased $2.3 million, or 32.1%, to $5.0 million in 2011 as compared to$7.3 million in 2010. Our net loss during the 2010 period resulted primarily from a $4.5 million provision for loan losses charge taken during 2010 and a one-time charge of $2.9 million taken in connection with the freezing and funding of our multi-employer defined benefit pension plan.

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income decreased $824,000, or 5.4%, to $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as the average balance of interest-earning assets decreased $9.6 million to $293.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $302.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and the average yield on interest-earning assets decreased 11 basis points to 4.91% during 2011 from 5.02% during 2010. The decrease in our average yield on interest-earning assets was due primarily to the general decline in market interest rates.

The biggest component decrease in average interest-earning assets was in other interest-earning assets, which decreased $11.4 million, or 19.5%, to $47.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $58.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The average yield on other interest-earning assets decreased 30 basis points to 0.46% for the year ended December 31, 2011 from 0.76% for the year ended December 31, 2010. This was offset by an increase in the average balance of total net loans of $2.5 million, or 1.0%, to $241.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $238.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Interest income on loans decreased $620,000, or 4.2%, to $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $14.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as the average yield on net loans decreased 32 basis points to 5.83% for the year ended December 31, 2011 from 6.15% for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflecting the lower market interest rate environment.

Interest income on investment securities, other interest earning assets and FHLB of Indianapolis stock decreased $219,000, or 39.1%, to $341,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $560,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. This includes interest income on interest-earning demand deposits, interest-earning time deposits and held-to-maturity securities.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $2.3 million, or 32.1%, to $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities decreased $27.7 million, or 10.5%, to $236.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $264.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and the average rate we paid on these liabilities decreased 67 basis points to 2.10% from 2.77%. The biggest component decrease was in interest expense on certificates of deposit which decreased $1.3 million, or 48.1%, to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,

resulting from a $21.2 million decrease in the average balance of certificates of deposits to $77.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $98.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and a 97 basis point decrease in the cost of these funds to 1.88% for 2011 from 2.85% for 2010.

The average balance of our core deposits, consisting of checking accounts, money market accounts and savings accounts, increased $8.9 million, or 11.0%, to $89.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $80.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the interest on core deposits decreased $39,000 to $341,000 for 2010 from $380,000 for 2010. The cost of these funds decreased 9 basis points to 0.38% for the year ended December 31, 2011, from 0.47% for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Interest expense on borrowed funds, consisting entirely of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, decreased by $965,000, or 23.3%, to $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as our average balance of these borrowings decreased $15.4 million and the average rate paid decreased 31 basis points to 4.54% from 4.85%. Throughout the year of 2011, we paid off $11.0 million worth of maturing Federal Home Loan Bank advances. In addition, in the third quarter of 2011, we restructured $18.0 million of outstanding advances under the Federal Loan Home Bank of Indianapolis’ ‘blend and extend’ program, costing 3.78% with a weighted average maturity of 19 months to 2.69% with a weighted average remaining maturity of 62 months. We have another $4.0 million of Federal Home Loan Bank advances maturing in 2012 which will be paid off.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.5 million, or 19.5%, to $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as our net interest earning assets increased to $56.4 million from $38.3 million, our net interest rate spread increased 55 basis points to 2.80% from 2.25% and our net interest margin increased 58 basis points to 3.10% from 2.52%. The increases in our net interest rate spread and net interest margin reflected our ongoing interest rate risk strategy of selling in the secondary market long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans during the current low interest rate environment, a shift from lower yielding interest-earning demand deposits to interest-earning time deposits and loans, paying off and restructuring Federal Home Loan Bank advances and a shift from higher costing certificate of deposit liabilities to core deposits.

Provision for Loan Losses. Based on our analysis of the factors described in “Critical Accounting Policies — Allowance for Loan Losses,” we recorded a provision for loan losses of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and a provision for loan losses of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The factors used to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance and provision for loan losses of the loan portfolio include, but are not limited to, current economic conditions, our historical loss experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the financial strength of the borrower, and estimated value of any underlying collateral. At December 31, 2011, non-performing assets totaled $16.0 million, or 6.3% of total loans, as compared to $10.3 million, or 3.3% of total loans, at December 31, 2010. The increase in non-performing assets was primarily in the land loan portfolio, a higher risk portfolio compared to our one- to four-family residential mortgage loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses to total loans receivable decreased to 3.73% at December 31, 2011 from 4.02% at December 31, 2010.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans decreased to 65.3% at December 31, 2011 from 122.6% at December 31, 2010, while our non-performing loans increased by $6.6 million from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011 primarily due to one relationship which moved to non-performing status, but is adequately collateralized. To the best of our knowledge, we have provided for all losses that are both incurred and reasonable to estimate at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Of the $5.2 million loan relationship that was moved to non-performing status as of June 30, 2011, approximately 50% is collateralized by developed commercial land and approximately 50% is collateralized by developed residential single-family lots and three single-family homes built on speculation. The entire relationship is cross collateralized and all of these properties are located within Michigan. It has been rated substandard for over two years and has been specifically reviewed for impairment for that entire period. Therefore, we believe that our allowance for loan loss is adequate as of December 31, 2011.

All loans rated substandard are reviewed for impairment at least quarterly. The specific allowance for this relationship was increased from $90,000 to $500,000 as o June 30, 2011. We have maintained regular communications with the borrower regarding monthly payments and financial performance, with the goal of reaching a mutually beneficial workout strategy. Overall, management continues to focus on resolving nonperforming assets and improving asset quality. In addition to our collections department personnel, in working out loans, we continue to involve business development officers and, on significant assets, underwriters and senior management.

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income decreased by $376,000, or 18.6%, to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease of $265,000 on net gains on loan sales, a decrease of $209,000 on net gain (loss) on sale of other real estate owned and a decrease of $98,000 on gross income on other real estate owned. These items were offset by a $165,000 settlement of an insurance claim made under our financial institution bond. This settlement relates to an expense we incurred in connection with an external wire transfer in June 2010.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense decreased $2.9 million, or 26.6%, to $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily attributable to a $2.6 million decrease in salaries and related expenses due to a $3.2 million charge we incurred in June 2010 in connection with the freezing and funding of our multi-employer defined benefit pension plan. We also had a decrease of $356,000 resulting from an expense we incurred in connection with an external wire transfer fraud in 2010. Excluding these one-time charges incurred in 2010, noninterest expense would have increased by $700,000.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). We recorded a $576,000 income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to a $(1.9 million) income tax benefit for 2010, reflecting the income of $1.7 million before income tax expense during the year ended December 31, 2011 versus the loss of $5.5 million before income tax benefit during the year ended December 31, 2010. Our effective tax rate was 34.2% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to an effective tax benefit rate of 34.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Asset Quality

At December 31, 2011, we had 7 loans, totaling $744,000, for which we had temporarily extended the maturities while working on the loan renewal process. During the renewal process, the borrowers continue repayment according to the original loan terms which are at market interest rates. Of these loans, one loan for $466,000 was classified as substandard and one loan for $31,000 was considered special mention. At December 31, 2011, none of these loans was considered a troubled debt restructuring because none of these extensions were made due to financial difficulties of the borrower, and all of these loans were considered performing at December 31, 2011.

Average Balances and Yields

The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. Tax-equivalent yield adjustments have not been made for tax-exempt securities. All average balances are based on month-end balances which management deems to be representative of the operations of Wolverine Bank. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the table as loans carrying a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.


	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2011							2010							2009
	Average Outstanding Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Total loans	$	241,115	$	14,047		5.83	%	$	238,601	$	14,652		6.14	%	$	261,901	$	16,100		6.15	%
Securities and other:
U.S. Government and agency securities		320		13		4.06			818		31		3.79			3,626		101		2.79
FHLB Stock		4,482		113		2.52			4,686		82		1.75			4,700		101		2.15
Other		47,380		215		0.46			58,837		447		0.76			39,305		608		1.55

Total interest earning assets		293,297		14,388		4.91			302,942		15,212		5.02			309,532		16,910		5.46
Non-interest earning assets		10,212							9,851							3,472

Total assets	$	303,509						$	312,793						$	313,004

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Regular savings accounts	$	9,859		7		0.07		$	9,604		7		0.08		$	9,077		5		0.06
Checking accounts		25,844		34		0.13			25,953		43		0.17			16,834		19		0.11
Money market accounts		53,472		301		0.56			44,764		330		0.74			34,928		315		0.90
Certificates of deposit		77,570		1,461		1.88			98,803		2,815		2.85			111,566		3,533		3.17

Total interest-bearing deposits		166,745		1,803		1.08			179,124		3,195		1.78			172,405		3,872		2.25
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		70,163		3,183		4.54			85,515		4,147		4.85			91,308		4,650		5.09
Other secured borrowings		—		—		—			—		—		—			—		—		—

Total interest-bearing liabilities		236,908		4,986		2.10			264,639		7,342		2.77			263,713		8,522		3.23
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		2,335							4,411							3,342

Total liabilities		239,243							269,050							267,055
Equity		64,266							43,743							45,949

Total liabilities and equity	$	303,509						$	312,793						$	313,004

Net interest income			$	9,402						$	7,870						$	8,388

Net interest rate spread ⁽¹⁾						2.80	%						2.25	%						2.23	%
Net interest earning assets ⁽²⁾			$	56,389						$	46,147						$	45,819

Net interest margin ⁽³⁾						3.10	%						2.52	%						2.71	%
Average interest earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities						123.80	%						114.47	%						117.37	%

(1)	Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.

(2)	Net interest earning assets represents total interest earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(3)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest earning assets.

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the fiscal years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated to the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of change in each.


	Years Ended December 31, 2011 vs. 2010									Years Ended December 31, 2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (Decrease) Due to						Total Increase (Decrease)			Increase (Decrease) Due to						Total Increase (Decrease)
	Volume			Rate			Total Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Total Increase (Decrease)
	(In thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Loans	$	(441	)	$	(164	)	$	(605	)	$	(785	)	$	(660	)	$	(1,445	)
Held to maturity securities		(21	)		3			(18	)		(93	)		23			(70	)
Other		(60	)		(142	)		(202	)		197			(375	)		(178	)

Total interest earning assets		(522	)		(303	)		(825	)		(681	)		(1,012	)		(1,693	)

Interest bearing liabilities:
Regular savings accounts		0			(1	)		(1	)		0			2			2
Checking accounts		4			(13	)		(9	)		10			15			25
Money market accounts		65			(93	)		(28	)		72			(56	)		16
Certificates of deposit		(535	)		(818	)		(1,353	)		(367	)		(352	)		(719	)

Total interest-bearing deposits		(466	)		(925	)		(1,391	)		(285	)		(391	)		(676	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(733	)		(232	)		(965	)		(259	)		(244	)		(503	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		(1,199	)		(1,157	)		(2,356	)		(544	)		(635	)		(1,179	)

Change in net interest income	$	677		$	854		$	1,531		$	(137	)	$	(377	)	$	(514	)

Management of Market Risk

General . Because the majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates, our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. We are vulnerable to an increase in interest rates to the extent that our interest bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly than our interest earning assets. As a result, a principal part of our business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and limit the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has established an internal Asset/Liability Management Committee pursuant to our Interest Rate Risk Management Policy that is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors.

Our interest rate sensitivity is monitored through the use of a net interest income simulation model which reports the cumulative and noncumulative interest rate risk gap and generates estimates of the change in our net interest income. The modeling assumes loan prepayment rates, reinvestment rates and new volumes based on historical experience and current economic conditions.

We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to control the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability management, we currently use the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:

(i)

sell the majority of our long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans that we originate;

(ii)

lengthen the weighted average maturity of our liabilities through retail deposit pricing strategies and through longer-term wholesale funding sources such as fixed-rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis;

(iii)

invest in shorter- to medium-term investment securities and interest earning time deposits;

(iv)

originate commercial mortgage loans, including multi-family loans and land loans, commercial loans and consumer loans, which tend to have shorter terms and higher interest rates than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, and which generate customer relationships that can result in larger noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts; and

(v)

maintain adequate levels of capital.

Net Portfolio Value. The Office of the Comptroller of Currency requires the computation of amounts by which the net present value of an institution’s cash flow from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items (the institution’s net portfolio value or “NPV”) would change in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. Previously, the Office of Thrift Supervision provided all institutions that filed a Consolidated Maturity/Rate Schedule as a part of their quarterly Thrift Financial Report with an interest rate sensitivity report of net portfolio value. Institutions are now required to develop their own rate sensitivity analysis report, or contract with a third party vendor who specializes in the analysis of interest rate risk analysis. Wolverine Bank will be utilizing Thomas Ho Company to analyze interest rate risk sensitivity. The Thomas Ho Company model uses a discounted cash flow analysis and an option-based pricing approach to measure the interest rate sensitivity of net portfolio value. The Thomas Ho Company model estimates the economic value of each type of asset, liability and off-balance-sheet contract under the assumption of instantaneous rate increases or decreases of 100 to 300 basis points in 100 basis point increments. An increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the “Change In Rates” column below.

The table below sets forth, as of December 31 2011, the calculation of the estimated changes in our net portfolio value that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.


At December 31, 2011
Change in Interest Rates (basis points) ⁽¹⁾	Estimated NPV ⁽²⁾		Estimated (Decrease) in NPV						NPV as a Percentage of Present Value of Assets ⁽³⁾
			Estimated (Decrease) in NPV						NPV Ratio ⁽⁴⁾			Increase (Decrease) (basis points)
			Amount			Percent			NPV Ratio ⁽⁴⁾			Increase (Decrease) (basis points)
(Dollars in thousands)
+300	$	61,863	$	4,879			9	%		20.46	%		191
+200		60,735		3,751			7	%		19.96	%		141
+100		59,139		1,056			4	%		19.33	%		78
0		56,984		—			—			18.55	%		—
-100		53,244		(3,739	)		(7	%)		17.36	%		(119	)

(1)	Assumes an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.

(2)	NPV is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.

(3)	Present value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming cash flows on interest earning assets.

(4)	NPV Ratio represents NPV divided by the present value of assets.

The table above indicates that at December 31, 2011, in the event of a 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 7% increase in net portfolio value. In the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 7% decrease in net portfolio value.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in determining interest rate risk through changes in net portfolio value. Modeling changes in net portfolio value require making certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value tables presented assume that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and assume that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the net portfolio value tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest income and will differ from actual results.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan sales and repayments, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, and maturities of securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee is responsible for establishing and monitoring our liquidity targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient liquidity exists for meeting the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawals of our customers as well as unanticipated contingencies. For the year ended December 31, 2011, our liquidity ratio averaged 19.6% of our total assets. We believe that we have enough sources of liquidity to satisfy our short- and long-term liquidity needs as of December 31, 2011.

We regularly monitor and adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of: (i) expected loan demand; (ii) expected deposit flows; (iii) yields available on interest earning deposits and securities; and (iv) the objectives of our asset/liability management program. Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest earning deposits and short- and medium-term securities.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets are affected by our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents totaled $14.1 million. Interest earning time deposits which can offer additional sources of liquidity, totaled $21.1 million at December 31, 2011.

Our cash flows are derived from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities as reported in our Statements of Cash Flows included in our financial statements.

At December 31, 2011, we had $20.7 million in loan commitments outstanding, including $4.7 million in unused lines of credit to borrowers. Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2011 totaled $55.6 million, or 34.5% of total deposits. Of this amount, approximately $12.1 million were paying above-market rates at a weighted average yield of 3.15%. These certificates were originated under our three-year guaranteed upward repricing certificate of deposit product, and the corresponding higher interest rates reflect the higher market interest rate environment at the time that these deposits were originated. It is not our intention to pay above-market rates to keep these deposits upon maturity, and we are uncertain as to what amount of these deposits we will be able to retain. If these deposits do not remain with us, we may be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before December 31, 2012, although we would expect to pay lower rates on certificates which are maturing and which will either not renew or will renew at market rates. Additionally, the additional capital that we raised in our stock offering which closed in January 2011 provided additional liquidity. Moreover, it is our intention as we continue to grow our commercial real estate loan portfolio, to emphasize lower cost deposit relationships with these commercial customers and thereby replace the higher cost certificates with lower cost deposits. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

Our primary investing activity is originating loans. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we originated $152.5 million and $150.2 million of loans, respectively.

Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. We had a net decrease in total deposits of $13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors, and by other factors.

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. If we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, which provides an additional source of funds. Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $65.9 million at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $10.8 million from December 31, 2010. Federal Home Loan Bank advances have been used primarily to fund loan demand. At December 31, 2011, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $73.1 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and had additional Fed Funds purchase limits of $8.0 million with three correspondent banks.

Wolverine Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At December 31, 2011, Wolverine Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. Wolverine Bank is considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Supervision and Regulation – Federal Banking Regulation – Capital Requirements” and Note 10 – Regulatory Matters of the notes to the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The net proceeds from our stock offering which closed in January 2011 significantly increased our liquidity and capital resources. Over time, the initial level of liquidity will be reduced as net proceeds from the stock offering are used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of new loans. We believe our financial condition and results of operations will be enhanced by the net proceeds from the stock offering, resulting in increased net interest earning assets and net interest income. However, due to the increase in equity resulting from the net proceeds raised in the stock offering, our return on equity will be adversely affected.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations represent our future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make. For additional information, see Note 13 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities of the notes to the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include data processing services, operating leases for premises and equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements,” which added disclosure requirements about transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, clarified existing fair value disclosure requirements about the appropriate level of disaggregation, and clarified that a description of valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value was required for recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and 3 fair value measurements. Management has determined the adoption of these provisions of this ASU only affected the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and as a result did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. This ASU also requires that Level 3 activity about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements be presented on a gross basis rather than as a net number as currently permitted. This provision of the ASU is effective for our reporting period ending March 31, 2011. Management has determined that the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses,” which added disclosure requirements about an entity’s allowance for loan losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The required disclosures include a roll forward of the allowance for credit losses on a portfolio segment basis and information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loan and credit quality indicators. ASU 2010-20 will be effective for the reporting period ending December 31, 2010, as it relates to disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period. Management has determined the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

Our financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. U.S. GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without consideration of changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than the effects of inflation.

ITEM 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning at page
F-1.

ITEM 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

ITEM 9A.

Controls and Procedures

(a) An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2010. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

(b) Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting.

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework.” Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective, based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

ITEM 9B.

Other Information

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and all other employees and directors. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.wolverinebank.com .

Information concerning directors and executive officers of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Proposal I—Election of Directors.”

ITEM 11.

Executive Compensation

Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Executive Compensation.”

ITEM 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information concerning security ownership of certain owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Voting Securities and Principal Holder Thereof.”

ITEM 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Information concerning relationships, transactions and director independence is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Transactions with Certain Related Persons” and “Board Independence.”

ITEM 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned “Proposal II-Ratification of Appointment of Auditor.”

PART IV

ITEM 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The documents filed as a part of this Form 10-K are:

(A)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;

(B)

Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2011 and 2010;

(C)

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010;

(D)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010;

(E)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010; and

(F)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or has been included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(3) Exhibits



		3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.*

		3.2		Bylaws of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.*

		4		Form of Common Stock Certificate of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.*

		10.1		Employment Agreement of David H. Dunn*

		10.2		Employment Agreement of Rick A. Rosinski*

		10.3		2002 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended*

		10.4		2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended for Dunn*

		10.5		2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended for Rosinski*

		21		Subsidiaries

		31.1		Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

		31.2		Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

		32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

		101		INS XBRL Instance

		101		SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

		101		CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

		101		DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

		101		LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label

		101		PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

*	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-169432), initially filed September 16, 2010.

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Accountants’ Report and Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

F-1

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

December 31, 2011 and 2010

Contents



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-3

Consolidated Financial Statements

Balance Sheets			F-4

Statements of Operations			F-5

Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity			F-6

Statements of Cash Flows			F-7

Notes to Financial Statements			F-8

F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee and Board of Directors

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Midland, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc., as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits also included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ BKD, LLP

BKD, LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

March 30, 2012

F-3

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)



	2011			2010
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	454		$	386
Interest-earning demand deposits		13,669			48,550

Cash and cash equivalents		14,123			48,936
Interest-earning time deposits		21,146			14,931
Held to maturity securities		315			388
Loans held for sale		666			748
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $9,503 and $9,775		243,663			233,291
Premises and equipment, net		1,503			1,644
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,391			4,609
Other real estate owned		1,365			2,375
Accrued interest receivable		833			851
Other assets		5,677			6,433

Total assets	$	293,682		$	314,206

Liabilities and Retained Earnings

Liabilities
Deposits	$	161,364		$	174,692
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		65,860			76,795
Stock conversion related liabilities		—			19,108
Interest payable and other liabilities		1,481			1,667

Total liabilities		228,705			272,262
Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share:
Authorized – 100,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding – 2,507,500	$	25		$	—
Additional paid-in capital		23,806			—
Unearned employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)		(1,906	)		—
Retained earnings		43,052			41,944

Total stockholders’ equity		64,977			41,944

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	293,682		$	314,206

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-4

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)


	2011			2010
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans	$	14,047		$	14,652
Investment securities and other		341			560

Total interest and dividend income		14,388			15,212

Interest Expense
Deposits		1,803			3,195
Borrowings		3,183			4,147

Total interest expense		4,986			7,342

Net Interest Income		9,402			7,870

Provision for Loan Losses		1,385			4,491

Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses		8,017			3,379

Noninterest Income
Service charges and fees		260			270
Net gains on loan sales		724			989
Gross income on real estate owned		112			210
Loans fees earned		233			239
Net gain (loss) on sale of other real estate owned		(48	)		161
Recovery of wire transfer fraud		165			—
Other		201			154

Total noninterest income		1,647			2,023

Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		3,847			6,421
Net occupancy and equipment expense		762			703
Information technology expense		240			223
Federal deposit insurance corporation premiums		287			289
Professional and service fees		606			402
Other real estate owned expense		755			1,042
Loan legal expenses		131			276
Loss on wire transfer		—			356
Other		1,352			1,160

Total noninterest expense		7,980			10,872

Income (Loss) Before Income Tax		1,684			(5,470	)

Provision (Credit) for Income Taxes		576			(1,858	)

Net Income (Loss)	$	1,108		$	(3,612	)

Earnings Per Share:
Basic	$	0.45			N/A

Diluted	$	0.45			N/A

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)


	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Unearned ESOP Shares			Retained Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at January 1, 2010	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	45,556		$	45,556
Net loss		—		—		—			(3,612	)		(3,612	)

Balances at December 31, 2010	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	41,944		$	41,944

Net income		—		—		—			1,108			1,108

ESOP Shared earned		—		41		100			—			141

Issuance of 2,507,500 shares of common stock, net of offering costs		25		23,765		(2,006	)		—			21,784

Balances at December 31, 2011	$	25	$	23,806	$	(1,906	)	$	43,052		$	64,977

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-6

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)


	2011			2010
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	1,108		$	(3,612	)
Items not requiring (providing) cash
Depreciation		218			238
Provision for loan losses		1,385			4,491
Writedowns of other real estate		468			—
Amortization of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		65			—
Deferred income taxes		61			151
Loss on other real estate owned		48			455
Earned ESOP Shares		141			—
Loans originated for sale		(37,207	)		(49,243	)
Proceeds from loans sold		38,013			50,151
Gain on sale of loans		(724	)		(989	)
Gain on sale of premises or equipment		(31	)		—
Changes in
Interest receivable and other assets		72			(2,323	)
Interest payable and other liabilities		455			(26	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		4,072			(707	)

Investing Activities
Net change in interest-earning time deposits		(6,215	)		7,788
Proceeds from calls, maturities and pay-downs of held to maturity securities		73			1,032
Net change in loans		(13,345	)		3,681
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		64			—
Reclamation of FHLB Stock Proceeds from sale of real estate owned		219 2,081			91 631
Purchase of premises and equipment		(109	)		(10	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(17,232	)		13,213

Financing Activities
Net change in money market, checking and savings accounts		2,108			25,811
Net change in certificates of deposit		(15,437	)		(18,608	)
Proceeds from stock conversion		2,676			19,108
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		8,000			10,000
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(19,000	)		(23,205	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(21,653	)		13,106

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(34,813	)		25,612

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year		48,936			23,324

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year	$	14,123		$	48,936

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information
Interest paid	$	5,061		$	7,481
Income taxes paid		610			—
Loans transferred to other real estate		1,588			2,905

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 1:

Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Wolverine Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), is a federally chartered savings bank primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking and financial services to individual and business customers in the Great Lakes Bay Region and beyond. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions. The Company is subject to the regulation of the Federal Reserve Board and the Bank is subject to the regulation of the Officer of the Comptroller of the Currency, and both undergo periodic examinations.

The Company’s additional wholly owned subsidiary, Wolserv Corporation, is included in the consolidated financial statements.

On January 19, 2011, the Bank consummated its mutual to stock conversion (“Conversion”) and the related initial public stock offering of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc. In the Conversion, the Bank converted from a federal mutual savings bank to a federal stock savings bank. Also in connection with the Conversion, the Company was formed in September 2010, and, upon consummation of the Conversion on January 19, 2011, became the savings and loan holding company of the Bank. As part of the Conversion and offering, the Company issued and sold shares of its capital stock to eligible depositors of the Bank and the public pursuant to an independent valuation appraisal of the Bank and the Company on a converted basis that was conducted by an independent appraisal firm. At December 31, 2010 the Conversion had not yet been consummated; and accordingly, the information contained in these financial statements at and for the year ended December 31, 2010 is for that of the Bank on an unconsolidated basis with the Company. See Note 15 for additional information.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-8

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans and financial instruments.

Cash Equivalents

We considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Securities

Held-to-maturity securities, which include any security for which we have the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.

Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded as interest income from securities. Realized gains and losses are recorded as net security gains (losses). Gains and losses on securities are determined on the specific-identification method.

Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to noninterest income. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded in noninterest income, and direct loan origination costs and fees are deferred at origination of the loan and are recognized in noninterest income upon sale of the loan.

Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoffs are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, any deferred fees or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest income is reported on the interest method and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status at ninety days past due and interest is considered a loss, unless the loan is well-secured. Accrued interest for loans placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income.

F-9

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to income. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers nonclassified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss given default derived from our internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the group’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans. Accordingly, we do not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment measurements, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.

F-10

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Premises and Equipment

Depreciable assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is charged to expense using the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 3 to 39 years.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Federal Home Loan Bank stock is a required investment for institutions that are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The required investment in the common stock is based on a predetermined formula, carried at cost, and evaluated for impairment.

Real Estate Owned

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net income or expense from foreclosed assets.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes ). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. We determine deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur.

Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

F-11

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

We recognize interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax expense.

We file consolidated income tax returns with our subsidiaries.

Current Economic Conditions

The current protracted economic decline continues to present financial institutions with difficult circumstances and challenges which in some cases have resulted in large and unanticipated declines in the fair values of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and significant credit quality problems, including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to us.

Due to national, state and local economic conditions, values for commercial and development real estate have declined, and the market for these properties is less strong than in the past. Given the volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the consolidated financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments in asset values, the allowance for loan losses and capital that could negatively impact our ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. The amendments to the Codification in ASU No. 2011-12 are effective at the same time as the amendments in ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, so that entities will not be required to comply with the presentation requirements in ASU No. 2011-05 that ASU No. 2011-12 is deferring. There was no significant effect to the Company’s financial statement disclosure upon adoption of this ASU.

In order to defer only those changes in ASU No. 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in ASU No. 2011-12 supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU No. 2011-05. The amendments are being made to allow the FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the FASB is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU No. 2011-05. The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.

F-12

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

All other requirements in ASU No. 2011-05 are not affected by ASU No. 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities should begin applying these requirements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter. We will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and we do not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

The eligibility criteria for offsetting are different in IFRS and U.S. GAAP. Offsetting, otherwise known as netting, is the presentation of assets and liabilities as a single net amount in the statement of financial position (balance sheet). Unlike IFRS, U.S. GAAP allows companies the option to present net in their balance sheets derivatives that are subject to a legally enforceable netting arrangement with the same party where rights of set-off are only available in the event of default or bankruptcy.

To address these differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP, in January 2011 the FASB and the IASB (the Boards) issued an exposure draft that proposed new criteria for netting that were narrower than the current conditions currently in U.S. GAAP. Nevertheless, in response to feedback from their respective stakeholders, the Boards decided to retain their existing offsetting models. Instead, the Boards have issued common disclosure requirements related to offsetting arrangements to allow investors to better compare financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS or U.S. GAAP.

The amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Coinciding with the release of ASU No. 2011-11, the IASB has issued Disclosures—Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to IFRS 7). This amendment requires disclosures about the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities common to those in ASU No. 2011-11.

An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. We will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and we do not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-09, intended to address concerns from various users of financial statements on the lack of transparency about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Users of financial statements have requested additional disclosure to increase awareness of the commitments and risks involved with participating in multiemployer pension plans. The amendments in this ASU will require additional disclosures about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Previously, disclosures were limited primarily to the historical contributions made to the plans.

F-13

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

ASU 2011-09 applies to nongovernmental entities that participate in multiemployer plans. For public entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permissible for both public and nonpublic entities. ASU 2011-09 should be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented. We do not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-08, intended to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50%.

ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. We will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and we do not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional potential common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method.

Unearned ESOP shares, which are not vested, are excluded from the computation of average shares outstanding. The Company had no outstanding options during 2011 and 2010.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2010 financial statements to conform to the 2011 financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

F-14

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 2:

Restriction on Cash and Due From Banks

We are required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve required at December 31, 2011 was $25.

The financial institution holding a portion of our cash accounts is participating in the FDIC’s Transaction Account Guarantee Program. Pursuant to legislation enacted in 2010, the FDIC will fully insure all noninterest-bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012, at all FDIC-insured institutions.

Effective July 21, 2010, the FDIC’s insurance limits permanently increased to $250. At December 31, 2011, our interest-bearing cash accounts exceeded federally insured limits by $1,232. Additionally, approximately $658 and $7,237 of cash is held by the FHLB of Indianapolis and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, which is not federally insured.

Note 3:

Securities

The amortized cost and approximate fair values of securities are as follows:


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Approximate Fair Value
Held to Maturity Securities:
December 31, 2011
Municipals	$	315	$	—	$	—	$	315

December 31, 2010
Municipals	$	388	$	—	$	—	$	388

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Within one year	$	—	$	—
One to five years		—		—
Five to ten years		315		315
After ten years		—		—

Totals	$	315	$	315

There were no sales of securities during 2011 or 2010.

F-15

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 4:

Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

Categories of loans include:


	December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
Real Estate
One-to four-family	$	68,287	$	76,801
Home equity		13,572		12,252
Commercial mortgage loans
Commercial real estate		89,463		84,172
Multifamily		51,411		37,485
Land		13,445		16,071
Construction		19,704		13,126
Commercial Non-mortgage		7,675		10,434
Consumer		1,247		1,229

Total loans		264,804		251,570
Less
Net deferred loan fees, premiums and discounts		440		345
Undisbursed portion of loans		11,198		8,159
Allowance for loan losses		9,503		9,775

Net loans	$	243,663	$	233,291

The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:

1-4 Family, Home Equity, and Consumer

With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are primarily owner occupied, we generally establish a maximum loan-to-value ratio and require PMI if that ratio is exceeded. Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences, and consumer loans are typically secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties.

F-16

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Commercial real estate and multi-family

Commercial real estate and multi-family loans generally have greater credit risk than the owner-occupied one- to four-family residential mortgage loans that we originate for retention in our loan portfolio. Repayment of these loans generally depends, in large part, on sufficient income from the property securing the loan or the borrower’s business to cover operating expenses and debt service. These types of loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Changes in economic conditions that are beyond the control of the borrower may affect the value of the security for the loan, the future cash flow of the affected property or business, or the marketability of a construction project with respect to loans originated for the acquisition and development of property. Additionally, due to declining property values in our primary market area and in Michigan, the loan to value ratios of many of our commercial real estate and multi-family have increased significantly from the loan to value ratios that were assigned to these loans at the time of origination.

Land

Land loans generally have greater credit risk than the owner-occupied one-to four-family residential mortgage loans that we originate for retention in our portfolio. Repayment of these loans generally depends, in large part, on the sale of the land. The sale of land can either take place when the land is undeveloped, or developed. Generally, other cash flow sources of the borrower are utilized to make additional payments on land loans. Changes in economic conditions that are beyond the control of the borrower may affect the value of the security for the loan, the future cash flow of the affected property or business, or the marketability of a construction project with respect to loans originated for the acquisition and development of property. Additionally, due to declining property values in our primary market area and in Michigan, the loan to value ratios of many of our land loans have increased significantly from the loan to value ratios that were assigned to these loans at the time of origination.

F-17

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Construction

Construction loans include those for one- to four-family residential properties and commercial properties, including multifamily loans and commercial “mixed-use” buildings and homes built by developers on speculation. Construction loans for one- to four-family residential properties are originated with a maximum loan to value ratio of 70% and are generally “interest-only” loans during the construction period which typically does not exceed nine months. Construction loans for commercial real estate are made in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, and are generally limited to a 70% loan-to-completed appraised value ratio. For all construction loans, we generally require that a commitment for permanent financing be in place prior to closing the construction loan.

Repayment of one-to four-family residential property loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment of commercial property loans and homes built by developers on speculation is normally expected from the property’s eventual rental income, income from the borrower’s operations, the personal resources of the guarantor, or the sale of the subject property. Generally, before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by a state-certified or state-licensed appraiser. We review and inspect properties before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan.

Commercial non-mortgage

In determining the appropriate level of allowance for loan loss, we analyze various components of our portfolio. The following components are analyzed: all substandard loans on an individual basis; all loans that are designated special mention or closely monitored; loans not classified according to purpose or collateral type; and overdrawn deposit account balances.

F-18

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

We also factor in historical loss experience and qualitative considerations, including trends in charge offs and recoveries; trends in delinquencies and impaired/classified loans; effects of credit concentrations; changes in underwriting standards and loan review system; experience in lending staff; current industry conditions; and current market conditions.

In instances where risk and loss exposure is clearly identified with a particular asset, a specific valuation allowance will be established or the asset or a portion of the asset will be charged off.

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:


Loan Class	1-4 Family			Home Equity			Commercial Real Estate			Multifamily		Land			Construction		Commercial Non- Mortgage			Consumer			Total
Year to date analysis
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$	2,079		$	313		$	3,914		$	1,765	$	1,036		$	367	$	269		$	32		$	9,775
Provision charged to expense		(166	)		138			328			168		973			56		(104	)		(8	)		1,385
Losses charged off		(335	)		(161	)		(785	)		—		(391	)		—		—			(3	)		(1,675	)
Recoveries		2			—			5			—		4			—		—			7			18

Balance, end of period	$	1,580		$	290		$	3,462		$	1,933	$	1,622		$	423	$	165		$	28		$	9,503

Ending Balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	111		$	—		$	1,538		$	829	$	1,332		$	2	$	—		$	—		$	3,812

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,469		$	290		$	1,924		$	1,104	$	290		$	421	$	165		$	28		$	5,691

Loans:
Ending Balance	$	68,287		$	13,572		$	89,463		$	51,411	$	13,445		$	19,704	$	7,675		$	1,247		$	264,804

Ending Balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,314		$	327		$	9,206		$	9,854	$	8,710		$	174	$	375		$	—		$	31,960

Ending Balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	64,973		$	13,245		$	80,257		$	41,557	$	4,735		$	19,530	$	7,300		$	1,247		$	232,844

F-19

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)


Loan Class	1-4 Family			Home Equity		Commercial Real Estate			Multifamily		Land			Construction		Commercial Non- Mortgage		Consumer			Total
As of December 31, 2010
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$	1,246		$	161	$	3,019		$	949	$	838		$	129	$	148	$	17		$	6,507
Provision charged to expense		812			152		2,263			816		80			228		121		19			4,491
Losses charged off		(33	)		—		(1,597	)		—		(109	)		—		—		(7	)		(1,746	)
Recoveries		54			—		229			—		227			10		—		3			523

Balance, end of year	$	2,079		$	313	$	3,914		$	1,765	$	1,036		$	367	$	269	$	32		$	9,775

Ending Balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	108		$	—	$	1,798		$	819	$	633		$	21	$	—	$	—		$	3,379

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,971		$	313	$	2,116		$	946	$	403		$	346	$	269	$	32		$	6,396

Loans:
Ending Balance	$	76,801		$	12,252	$	84,172		$	37,485	$	16,071		$	13,126	$	10,434	$	1,229		$	251,570

Ending Balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,798		$	210	$	9,075		$	9,048	$	8,067		$	231	$	—	$	—		$	29,429

Ending Balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	74,003		$	12,042	$	75,097		$	28,437	$	8,004		$	12,895	$	10,434	$	1,229		$	222,141

Consistent with regulatory guidance, charge offs on all loan segments are taken when specific loans, or portions thereof, are considered uncollectible. Our policy is to promptly charge these loans off in the period the uncollectible loss is reasonably determined.

For all loan portfolio segments except one-to-four family residential loans and consumer loans, we promptly charge off loans, or portions thereof, when available information confirms that specific loans are uncollectible based on information that includes, but is not limited to, (1) the deteriorating financial condition of the borrower, (2) declining collateral values, and/or (3) legal action, including bankruptcy, that impairs the borrower’s ability to adequately meet its obligations. For impaired loans that are considered to be solely collateral dependent, a partial charge off is recorded when a loss has been confirmed by an updated appraisal or other appropriate valuation of the collateral.

F-20

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

We charge off one-to-four family residential and consumer loans, or portions thereof, when we reasonably determine the amount of the loss. We adhere to timeframes established by applicable regulatory guidance which provides for the charge off of one-to-four family first and junior lien mortgages to the net realizable value less costs to sell when the loan is 180 days past due, charge off of unsecured open-end loans when the loan is 180 days past due, and charge down to the net realizable value when other secured loans are 120 days past due. Loans at these respective delinquency thresholds for which we can clearly document that the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection, such that collection will occur regardless of delinquency status, need not be charged off.

The following table presents the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:


	1-4 Family				Home Equity				Commercial Real Estate				Multifamily
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010
Pass	$	61,574	$	68,831	$	13,331	$	11,982	$	63,107	$	56,335	$	34,012	$	20,017
Pass (Closely Monitored)		3,387		4,494		—		17		9,136		9,284		5,581		10,716
Special Mention		508		492		35		43		8,512		10,433		6,043		1,701
Substandard		2,818		2,984		206		210		8,708		8,120		5,775		5,051
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	68,287	$	76,801	$	13,572	$	12,252	$	89,463	$	84,172	$	51,411	$	37,485


	Land				Construction				Commercial Non-Mortgage				Consumer				Total
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010
Pass	$	3,043	$	4,130	$	19,410	$	12,895	$	7,034	$	9,041	$	1,242	$	1,199	$	202,753	$	184,430
Pass (Closely Monitored)		797		2,902		120		—		162		1,203		5		30		19,188		28,646
Special Mention		1,572		1,105		—		—		104		190		—		—		16,774		13,964
Substandard		8,033		7,934		174		231		375		—		—		—		26,089		24,530
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	13,445	$	16,071	$	19,704	$	13,126	$	7,675	$	10,434	$	1,247	$	1,229	$	264,804	$	251,570

F-21

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

We categorize loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation and current economic trends, among other factors. We analyze loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed during the loan approval process and is updated as circumstances warrant.

The Pass asset quality rating encompasses assets that have performed as expected. These assets generally do not have delinquency or servicing issues. Loans assigned this rating include loans to borrowers possessing solid credit quality with acceptable risk. Borrowers in these grades are differentiated from higher grades on the basis of size (capital and/or revenue), leverage, asset quality, stability of the industry or specific market area and quality/coverage of collateral. These borrowers generally have a history of consistent earnings and reasonable leverage.

The Closely Monitored asset quality rating encompasses assets that have been brought to the attention of management and may, if not corrected, warrant a more serious quality rating by management. These assets are usually in the first phase of a deficiency situation and may possess similar criteria as Special Mention assets. This grade includes “pass grade” loans to borrowers which require special monitoring because of deteriorating financial results, declining credit ratings, decreasing cash flow, increasing leverage, marginal collateral coverage or industry stress that has resulted or may result in a changing overall risk profile.

The Special Mention asset quality rating encompasses assets that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. This grade is intended to include loans to borrowers whose credit quality has clearly deteriorated and where risk of further decline is possible unless active measures are taken to correct the situation. Weaknesses are considered potential at this state and are not yet fully defined.

The Substandard asset quality rating encompasses assets that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any; assets having a well-defined weakness(es) based upon objective evidence; assets characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected; or the possibility that liquidation will not be timely. Loans categorized in this grade possess a well defined credit weakness and the likelihood of repayment from the primary source is uncertain. Significant financial deterioration has occurred and very close attention is warranted to ensure the full repayment without loss. Collateral coverage may be marginal and the accrual of interest has been suspended.

The Doubtful asset quality rating encompasses assets that have all of the weaknesses of those classified as Substandard. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

F-22

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

The Loss asset quality rating encompasses assets that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets of the bank is not warranted. A loss classification does not mean that an asset has no recovery or salvage value; instead, it means that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off or reserving all or a portion of a basically worthless asset, even though partial recovery may be realized in the future.

The following table is a summary of our past due and non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:


As of December 31, 2011:	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Nonaccrual		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Total Loans>90 Days & Accruing		Total Nonaccrual
1-4 Family	$	1,117	$	83	$	575	$	—	$	1,775	$	66,512	$	68,287	$	—	$	922
Home Equity		—		—		165		—		165		13,407		13,572		—		165
Commercial Real Estate		614		128		980		—		1,722		87,741		89,463		—		3,652
Multifamily		4,199		—		—		—		4,199		47,212		51,411		—		—
Land		—		—		906		—		906		12,539		13,445		—		7,833
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		19,704		19,704		—		2
Commercial Non-Mortgage		—		—		375		—		375		7,300		7,675		—		375
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		1,247		1,247		—		—

Total	$	5,930	$	211	$	3,001	$	—	$	9,142	$	255,662	$	264,804	$	—	$	12,949

F-23

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)


As of December 31, 2010:	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Nonaccrual		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Total Loans>90 Days & Accruing		Total Nonaccrual
1-4 Family	$	129	$	598	$	1,092	$	—	$	1,819	$	74,982	$	76,801	$	—	$	1,118
Home Equity		—		115		76		—		191		12,061		12,252		—		76
Commercial Real Estate		83		97		1,061		—		1,241		82,931		84,172		—		4,051
Multifamily		—		4,266		—		—		4,266		33,219		37,485		—		—
Land		54		—		—		—		54		16,017		16,071		—		2,069
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		13,126		13,126		—		92
Commercial Non-Mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		10,434		10,434		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		1,229		1,229		—		—

Total	$	266	$	5,076	$	2,229	$	—	$	7,571	$	243,999	$	251,570	$	—	$	7,406

Nonaccrual Loan and Past Due Loans. The accrual of interest is discontinued on all loan classes at the time the loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. The entire balance of a loan is considered delinquent if the minimum payment contractually required to be made is not received by the specified due date

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off is reversed against interest income. Subsequent payments on non-accrual loans are recorded as a reduction of principal, and interest income is recorded only after principal recovery is reasonably assured. Nonaccrual loans are returned to accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the financial position of the borrower indicates there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of interest or principal. We generally require a period of satisfactory performance of not less than six months before returning a nonaccrual loan to accrual status.

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. Interest income on loans individually classified as impaired is recognized on a cash basis after all past due and current principal payments have been made.

F-24

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

The following tables present impaired loans for the year ended December 31, 2011:


As of December 31, 2011	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		YTD Average Balance		YTD Interest Income
Loans w/o a specific valuation allowance
1-4 Family	$	1,921	$	1,963	$	—	$	1,777	$	114
Home Equity		327		432		—		190		22
Commercial Real Estate		3,018		3,046		—		2,560		157
Multifamily		290		290		—		131		5
Land		—		—		—		85		—
Construction		172		172		—		73		5
Commercial Non-Mortgage		375		375		—		293		11
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Loans w/ a specific valuation allowance
1-4 Family	$	1,393	$	1,423	$	111	$	1,249	$	51
Home Equity		—		—		—		72		—
Commercial Real Estate		6,188		6,653		1,538		5,975		334
Multifamily		9,564		9,565		829		9,391		538
Land		8,710		9,386		1,332		8,180		377
Construction		2		2		2		112		—
Commercial Non-Mortgage		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Total
1-4 Family	$	3,314	$	3,386	$	111	$	3,026	$	165
Home Equity		327		432		—		262		22
Commercial Real Estate		9,206		9,699		1,538		8,535		491
Multifamily		9,854		9,855		829		9,522		543
Land		8,710		9,386		1,332		8,265		377
Construction		174		174		2		185		5
Commercial Non-Mortgage		375		375		—		293		11
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	31,960	$	33,307	$	3,812	$	30,088	$	1,614

F-25

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

The following tables present impaired loans for the period ended December 31, 2010:


	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Specific Allowance
Loans w/o a specific valuation allowance
1-4 Family	$	1,578	$	1,578	$	—
Home Equity		210		210		—
Commercial Real Estate		2,260		2,260		—
Multifamily		—		—		—
Land		282		282		—
Construction		139		139		—
Commercial Non-Mortgage		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—
Loans with a specific valuation allowance
1-4 Family	$	1,220	$	1,220	$	108
Home Equity		—		—		—
Commercial Real Estate		6,815		6,815		1,798
Multifamily		9,048		9,048		819
Land		7,785		7,785		633
Construction		92		92		21
Commercial Non-Mortgage		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—
Total impaired loans
1-4 Family	$	2,798	$	2,798	$	108
Home Equity		210		210		—
Commercial Real Estate		9,075		9,075		1,798
Multifamily		9,048		9,048		819
Land		8,067		8,067		633
Construction		231		231		21
Commercial Non-Mortgage		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—

Total	$	29,429	$	29,429	$	3,379

F-26

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

We have entered into transactions with certain executive officers, directors and their affiliates (related parties). In management’s opinion, such loans and other extensions of credit and deposits were made in the ordinary course of business and were made on substantially the same terms (including interest rates and collateral) as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. Further, in management’s opinion, these loans did not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Loans to related parties at December 31, 2011 totaled $489. The aggregate amount of loans, as defined, to such related parties at December 31, 2010 totaled $2,084 reduced by $2,097 which resulted from paydowns and the retiring of a board member, and increased by new debt of $502.

Interest of $1,614 and $979 was recognized on average impaired loans of $30,088 and $21,676 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR)

We may grant a concession or modification for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial condition that we would not otherwise consider resulting in a modified loan which is then identified as a troubled debt restructuring. We may modify loans through rate reductions, short-term extensions of maturity, interest only payments, or payment modifications to better match the timing of cash flows due under the modified terms with the cash flows from the borrowers’ operations. Loan modifications are intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral.

We identify loans for potential restructure primarily through direct communication with the borrower and evaluation of the borrower’s financial statements, revenue projections, tax returns, and credit reports. Even if the borrower is not presently in default, management will consider the likelihood that cash flow shortages, adverse economic conditions, and negative trends may result in a payment default in the near future.

For one-to-four family residential and home equity lines of credit, a restructure often occurs with past due loans and may be offered as an alternative to foreclosure. There are other situations where borrowers, who are not past due, experience a sudden job loss, become over-extended with credit obligations, or other problems, have indicated that they will be unable to make the required monthly payment and request payment relief.

When considering a loan restructure, management will determine if: (i) the financial distress is short or long term; (ii) loan concessions are necessary; and (iii) the restructure is a viable solution.

When a loan is restructured, the new terms often require a reduced monthly debt service payment. No TDRs that were on non-accrual status at the time the concessions were granted have been returned to accrual status. For commercial loans, management completes an analysis of the operating entity’s ability to repay the debt. If the operating entity is capable of servicing the new debt service requirements and the underlying collateral value is believed to be sufficient to repay the debt in the event of a future default, the new loan can be placed on accrual status after six months of performance with the new loan terms. To date, there have been no commercial loans restructured and immediately placed on accrual status after the execution of the TDR.

F-27

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

For retail loans, an analysis of the individual’s ability to service the new required payments is performed. If the borrower is capable of servicing the newly restructured debt and the underlying collateral value is believed to be sufficient to repay the debt in the event of a future default, the new loan can be placed on accrual status after six months of performance to the new loan terms. The reason for the TDR is also considered, such as paying past due real estate taxes or payments caused by a temporary job loss, when determining whether a retail TDR loan could be returned to accrual status. Retail TDRs remain on nonaccrual status until sufficient payments have been made to bring the past due principal and interest current and/or after six months of performance to the new loan terms at which point the loan could be transferred to accrual status.

Effective July 1, 2011, we adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring . As a result of adopting the provisions of ASU 2011-02, we reassessed all loan modifications occurring since January 1, 2011 for identification as TDRs.

The following table summarizes the loans that have been restructured as TDRs during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011:


	Twelve Months Ended
	December 31, 2011
			Balance		Balance
			prior to		after
	Count		TDR		TDR
	(Dollars in thousands)
One-to four-family		3	$	657	$	657
Home equity		3		140		140
Commercial real estate		10		1,672		1,723
Land		6		668		668
Construction		1		90		90

Total loans		23	$	3,227	$	3,278

The TDRs described above did not have a material impact on the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The following table sets forth our TDRs that had payment defaults during 2011. Default occurs when a TDR is 90 days or more past due, transferred to nonaccrual status, or transferred to other real estate owned within twelve months of restructuring. Of the total, one loan totaling $97,000 was subsequently foreclosed and is included in the December 31, 2011 other real estate owned balance. This loan had a specific reserve of $84,000, making the amount transferred to other real estate owned $13,000. This $84,000 is included as a charge-off in the activity of our allowance for loan losses. The Home Equity loan was entirely charged-off and the $25,000 was included in our activity of our allowance for loan losses.


			Default
	Count		Balance
	(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family residential		1	$	97
Home equity		1	$	25

Total loans		2	$	122

F-28

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Management monitors the TDRs based on the type of modification or concession granted to the borrower. These types of modifications may include rate reductions, payment/term extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, and other applicable actions. During the year ended December 31, 2011, management predominantly utilized rate reductions and lower monthly payments, either from a longer amortization period or interest only repayment schedule, because these concessions provide needed payment relief without risking the loss of principal. Management will also agree to a forbearance agreement when it is deemed appropriate to avoid foreclosure.

Note 5:

Premises and Equipment

Major classifications of premises and equipment, stated at cost, are as follows:


	2011			2010
Land	$	514		$	546
Buildings and improvements		3,268			3,258
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		2,630			2,531

		6,412			6,335
Less accumulated depreciation		(4,909	)		(4,691	)

Net premises and equipment	$	1,503		$	1,644

F-29

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 6:

Deposits

Deposits at year-end are summarized as follows:


	2011		2010
Savings accounts	$	10,040	$	10,006
Checking accounts		28,337		25,060
Money market accounts		51,371		52,573
Certificates of deposit		71,616		87,053

	$	161,364	$	174,692

At December 31, 2011, scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are as follows:


2012	$	55,624
2013		8,011
2014		2,592
2015		2,041
2016		344
Thereafter		3,004

	$	71,616

Time deposits of $100 or more were $36,596 and $44,222 at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Note 7:

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled $66,000 and $77,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. At December 31, 2011, the advances are at fixed rates and bear interest at rates ranging from 1.92% to 5.78% and are secured by loans under a blanket collateral agreement as well as specific deposits at the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $123,743. Advances are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment.

F-30

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Aggregate annual maturities of our Federal Home Loan Bank advances at December 31, 2011, are:


2012	$	4,000
2013		—
2014		12,000
2015		19,000
2016		16,000
Thereafter		15,000

Total borrowings		66,000
Remaining prepayment penalty	$	(140	)

Total	$	65,860

Note 8:

Income Taxes

The provision (credit) for income taxes includes these components:


	2011		2010
Taxes currently payable	$	516	$	(2,009	)
Deferred income taxes		61		151

Income tax expense (credit)	$	577	$	(1,858	)

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax expense is shown below:


	2011			2010
Computed at the statutory rate (34%)	$	573		$	(1,859	)
Increase (decrease) resulting from
Tax exempt interest		(4	)		(7	)
Other		8			8

Actual tax expense (credit)	$	577		$	(1,858	)

F-31

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

The tax effects of temporary differences related to deferred taxes shown on the consolidated balance sheets were:


	2011		2010
Deferred tax assets
Allowance for loan losses	$	1,935	$	2,175
Depreciation		97		70
Nonaccrual loan interest		—		80
Deferred loan fees		160		142
Deferred compensation		184		132
Real estate owned		136		14
Other		60		60

		2,572		2,673

Deferred tax liabilities
FHLB stock dividends		55		58
Other		—		70

		55		128

Net deferred tax asset	$	2,517	$	2,545

Retained earnings at December 31, 2010 include approximately $2,019 for which no deferred federal income tax liability has been recognized. This amount represents an allocation of income to bad debt deductions for tax purposes only. Reduction of amounts so allocated for purposes other than tax bad debt losses or adjustments arising from carryback of net operating losses would create income for tax purposes only, which would be subject to the then-current corporate income tax rate. The deferred income tax liabilities on the preceding amounts that would have been recorded if they were expected to reverse into taxable income in the foreseeable future were approximately $686 at December 31, 2010.

ASC Topic 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company did not identify any uncertain tax positions that it believes should be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The open tax years subject to examination by taxing authorities are the years subsequent to 2007.

F-32

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 9:

Regulatory Matters

We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below). Management believes, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, that we meet all capital adequacy requirements to which we are subject.

As of December 31, 2011, the most recent notification from the Office of Comptroller of the Currency categorized us as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, we must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed our category.

Our actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.


	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2011
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	56,267		24.9	%	$	18,113		8.0	%	$	22,641		10.0	%
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)		53,401		23.6			9,057		4.0			13,585		6.0
Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)		53,401		18.2			8,814		3.0			14,691		5.0
Tier I capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		53,401		18.2			5,876		2.0			N/A		N/A
Tangible capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		53,401		18.2			4,407		1.5			N/A		N/A

As of December 31, 2010
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	44,759		20.2	%	$	17,728		8.0	%	$	22,161		10.0	%
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)		41,944		18.9			8,864		4.0			13,296		6.0
Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)		41,944		13.3			9,432		3.0			15,720		5.0
Tier I capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		41,944		13.3			6,288		2.0			N/A		N/A
Tangible capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		41,944		13.3			4,716		1.5			N/A		N/A

F-33

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 10:

Employee Benefits

During June 2010, our Board of Directors elected to freeze the future accrual of benefits under the multi-employer Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (PDBPFI) and notified the PDBPFI of its intention to withdraw from the plan. We fully funded all pension liabilities and subsequently withdrew from the plan on December 16, 2010 at a cost of $2,934. Pension expense was approximately $3,079 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

We have a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. Employees may contribute up to 100% (adopted in 2010; prior maximum was 50%) of their compensation with us matching 100% of the employee’s contribution on the first 3% of the employee’s compensation and 50% of the employee’s contributions that exceed 3% but does not exceed 5%. Additionally, we can make discretionary contributions to our 401 (k) plan. Employer contributions charged to expense for the years ended 2011 and 2010 were $72 and $60, respectively.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)

As part of the conversion, we established an ESOP covering substantially all of our employees. The ESOP acquired 200,600 shares of WBKC common stock at $10.00 per share in the conversion with funds provided by a loan from the Company. Accordingly, $2,006 of common stock acquired by the ESOP was shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Shares are released to participants proportionately as the loan is repaid. Compensation expense is recorded equal to the fair market value of the stock when contributions, which are determined annually by our Board of Directors, are made to the ESOP.

ESOP expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $62.


	December 31, 2011
Allocated shares		10,030
Unearned shares		190,570

Total ESOP shares		200,600

Fair value of unearned shares at December 31	$	2,687

We are obligated at the option of each beneficiary to repurchase shares of the ESOP upon the beneficiary’s termination or after retirement. At December 31, 2011, the fair value of the 10,300 allocated shares held by the ESOP is $141. In addition, there are no outstanding shares held by former employees that are subject to an ESOP-related repurchase option. The fair value of all shares subject to the repurchase obligation is $0.

F-34

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 11:

Disclosures About Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements , defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets under the valuation hierarchy. We have no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and no liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent)

Loans for which it is probable that we will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment. Allowable methods for determining the amount of impairment include estimating fair value using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans.

If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor to the value.

Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when impairment is determined using the fair value method.

F-35

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2011 and 2010:


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
December 31, 2011
Impaired loans	$	9,587	$	—	$	—	$	9,587

December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	20,988	$	—	$	—	$	20,988

The $9,587 of fair value of impaired loans in 2011 was comprised of 13 loan relationships. Of those 13 relationships, 2 have a combined fair value of $6,246. The $20,988 of fair value of impaired loans in 2010 was comprised of 33 loans. Of those 33 loans, 5 loans have a combined fair value of $15,218.

The following table presents estimated fair values of our financial instruments recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at amounts other than fair value. The fair values of certain of these instruments were calculated by discounting expected cash flows, which involves significant judgments by management and uncertainties. Because no market exists for certain of these financial instruments and because management does not intend to sell these financial instruments, we do not know whether the fair values shown below represent values at which the respective financial instruments could be sold individually or in the aggregate.


	2011				2010
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,123	$	14,123	$	48,936	$	48,936
Interest-earning time deposits		21,146		21,146		14,931		14,931
Held to maturity securities		315		315		388		388
Loans held for sale		666		674		748		754
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		243,663		245,377		233,291		237,704
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,391		4,391		4,609		4,609
Interest receivable		833		833		851		851

Financial liabilities
Deposits		161,364		164,968		174,692		177,089
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		65,860		74,229		76,795		83,337
Stock conversion related liabilities		—		—		19,108		19,108
Interest payable		226		226		301		301

F-36

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at amounts other than fair value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Interest-Earning Time Deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, Interest Receivable, Loans held for sale and Interest Payable, Stock Conversion Related Liabilities

The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Held to Maturity Securities

Fair values equal quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is estimated based on quoted market prices of similar securities.

Loans

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Loans with similar characteristics were aggregated for purposes of the calculations.

Deposits

Deposits include demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and certain money market deposits. The carrying amount approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing debt.

Commitments to Originate Loans, Letters of Credit and Lines of Credit

Loan commitments and letters-of-credit generally have short-term, variable rate features and contain clauses which limit the Company’s exposure to changes in customer credit quality. Accordingly, their carrying values, which are immaterial at the respective balance sheet dates, are reasonable estimates of fair value.

F-37

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 12:

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit and overdraft protection, are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used. Off-balance-sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment.

At year-end, these financial instruments are summarized as follows:


	2011			2010
	Variable Rate		Fixed Rate	Variable Rate			Fixed Rate
Commitments to extend credit	$	12,123	$3,863		$	11,881	$	3,432
Unused portions of lines of credit		677	4,039			1,156		2,615
Standby letters of credit		12	319			12		517
Commercial letters of credit		23	40			68		—

Commitments to make loans generally expire within thirty to ninety days, while unused lines of credit expire at the maturity date of the individual loans. At December 31, 2011, the rates for amounts in the fixed rate category ranged from 3.25% to 6.75%.

Note 13:

Earnings Per Share


	Year Ended
	December 31, 2011
Basic and diluted
Earnings:
Net Income (1)	$	1,048

Shares (1):
Weighted average common shares outstanding		2,507
Less: Average unearned ESOP shares		(198	)

Average shares		2,309

Net income per common share, basic and diluted (1)	$	0.45

(1)	Calculated from January 20, 2011, the effective date of the conversion and stock offering to the period end.

F-38

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 14:

Condensed Financial Information (Parent Company Only)

Presented below is condensed financial information as to financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company:

Condensed Balance Sheets


	December 31,
	2011
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,683
ESOP note receivable		1,930
Investment in subsidiary		53,401
Other assets		143

Total assets	$	65,157

Liabilities—Other	$	180

Stockholders’ Equity		64,977

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	65,157

F-39

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Condensed Statements of Income


	December 31,
	2011
Income	$	62

Expenses		381

Loss Before Income Tax and Equity in Undistributed Net Loss		(319	)

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		—

Loss Before Equity in Undistributed Net Income Loss of Subsidiaries		(319	)

Equity in Undistributed Net Income of Subsidiary		1,427

Net Income	$	1,108

F-40

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows


	December 31,
	2011
Operating Activities
Net income	$	1,108
Items not requiring (providing) cash:
Undistributed net income of subsidiary		(1,427	)
Change in other assets		(143	)
Change in other liabilities		180

Net cash used in operating activities		(282	)

Investing Activities
Origination of note receivable		(2,006	)
Investment in subsidiary		(9,889	)
ESOP payment received		76

Net cash used in investing activities		(11,819	)

Financing Activities
Net proceeds from stock conversion		21,784

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		9,683

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		—

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$	9,683

F-41

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 15:

Plan of Conversion and Change in Corporate Form

On January 19, 2011, the Bank converted into a stock savings bank structure with the establishment of a stock holding company (Company), as parent of the Bank. The Bank converted to the stock form of ownership, followed by the issuance of all of the Bank’s outstanding stock to the Company. A total of 2,507,500 shares of the Company were issued at $10.00 per share for total gross offering proceeds of $25,075. In addition, the Bank’s Board of Directors adopted an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) which subscribed 8% of the common stock sold in the offering, for a total of $2,006. The Company is organized as a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland and owns all of the outstanding common stock of the Bank.

The conversion costs of issuing the common stock, approximately $1,270, were deducted from the sales proceeds of the offering. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had incurred $743 of these conversion costs and were included in other assets on the accompanying December 31, 2010, balance sheet.

In accordance with Federal regulations, at the time of the completion of our mutual to stock conversion, the Bank substantially restricted retained earnings by establishing a liquidation account. The liquidation account will be maintained for the benefit of eligible account holders and supplemental eligible account holders who continue to maintain their accounts at the Bank after conversion. The liquidation account will be reduced annually to the extent that eligible account holders and supplemental eligible account holders have reduced their qualifying deposits. Subsequent increases will not restore an eligible account holder’s or and supplemental eligible account holder’s interest in the liquidation account. In the event of a complete liquidation of the Bank, and only in such event, each account holder will be entitled to receive a distribution from the liquidation account in an amount proportionate to the adjusted qualifying account balances then held. The Bank may not pay dividends if those dividends would reduce equity capital below the required liquidation account amount.

The conversion will be accounted for as a change in corporate form with the historic basis of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and equity unchanged as a result.

Stock conversion related liabilities of $19,108 are the funds received, or held, from potential investors as part of the subscription offering as of December 31, 2010.

F-42

Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(Dollars in Thousands)

Note 16:

Subsequent Events

Stock Repurchase Plan

On February 14, 2012, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to 5% of our issued and outstanding shares, or up to approximately 125,375 shares. The repurchase program permits shares to be repurchased in open market or private transactions, through block trades, and pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The repurchase program may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason, including market conditions, the cost of repurchasing shares, the availability of alternative investment opportunities, liquidity, and other factors deemed appropriate. These factors may also affect the timing and amount of share repurchases. The repurchase program does not obligate the us to purchase any particular number of shares, and there is no guarantee as to the exact number of shares to be repurchased by us.

F-43

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.

Date: March 30, 2012	By:	/s/ David H. Dunn

		David H. Dunn
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ David H. Dunn	President, Chief Executive		March 30, 2012
David H. Dunn	Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Rick A. Rosinski	Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer		March 30, 2012
Rick A. Rosinski	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ Richard M. Reynolds	Chairman of the Board		March 30, 2012
Richard M. Reynolds

/s/ Roberta N. Arnold	Director		March 30, 2012
Roberta N. Arnold

/s/ Eric P. Blackhurst	Director		March 30, 2012
Eric P. Blackhurst

/s/ J.W. Fisher	Director		March 30, 2012
J.W. Fisher

/s/ Ron R. Sexton	Director		March 30, 2012
Ron R. Sexton

/s/ J. Donald Sheets	Director		March 30, 2012
J. Donald Sheets

/s/ Howard I. Ungerleider	Director		March 30, 2012
Howard I. Ungerleider

/s/ Joseph M. VanderKelen	Director		March 30, 2012
Joseph M. VanderKelen

EXHIBIT INDEX



3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.*

3.2		Bylaws of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.*

4		Form of Common Stock Certificate of Wolverine Bancorp, Inc.*

10.1		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of David H. Dunn**

10.2		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Rick A. Rosinski**

10.3		2002 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended*

10.4		2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended for Dunn*

10.5		2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended for Rosinski*

21		Subsidiaries

23		Consent of Independent Auditor

31.1		Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101		INS XBRL Instance

101		SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101		CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101		DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101		LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label

101		PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation