Fannie Mae (QB) (FNMAH) Cotización

$$BOOM! Sure you did. So many people, so many outright (what do we call these)

DJT WOULD SAY finally this board is free from those lunatic , low IQ .losers ,kthomp ,arnold,clark and the others suckers,

FnF both companies not getting full exposure coz of OTC trading.
As soon they get out of this OTC platform to NYSE, where both giants will get full exposure.
FnF best performing stocks of the year, once listed fully expecting to see $35/share.
REMINDER: The DJT2.0 release EO is arriving soon !!

Awww, she was as valuable to all GSE shareholders as all of those GSE misinformative skateboarder SA articles.

She will not be missed by any chickens that would have been used for all of those rubber chicken freeloading luncheon dinners.

Fnma

So Pulte sent 4 more memos removing the BS rules related to a broad array of liberal policies that ST put in place. Loving this guy. $fnma #fanniegate sorry sandra thompson— you didnt lock your policies in!— Fanniegate Hero (@DoNotLose) March 25, 2025

Seeking Alpha is used toilet paper.

Seeking Alpha is a Hedgie rag

https://seekingalpha.com/news/4424939-sa-asks-should-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-be-privatized

More Pulte cuts to red tape Documents ...

pic.twitter.com/pYbj3STfer— Pulte (@pulte) March 25, 2025

I respect the strategy but I’m not feeling like it’s time. Think we retest highs then I’ll consider a small 10-15% sell on commons. We are so freaking close now though it’s hard to let go, but sometimes it’s nice to have funds to buy any dips.

FHFA chief says conforming loan limits will hold steady amid broader shakeup at housing agencies

Despite sweeping changes at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHFA Director Bill Pulte confirms the agency will maintain current lending thresholds

By Matthew Sellers - 25 Mar 2025

The head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has confirmed that the conforming loan limits for 2025 will remain intact, offering stability in an otherwise volatile period for the nation’s housing finance system.

“There are no plans to do anything as it relates to the conforming loan limit,” FHFA Director Bill Pulte said this week, signaling a pause on changes to one of the agency’s most closely watched levers.

The conforming loan limit—the maximum size of a mortgage that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can purchase—has been set at $806,500 for 2025. That figure, which applies to most of the United States, represents a 5.2% increase over last year, consistent with the growth in average U.S. home prices tracked by the agency’s house price index.

While the loan ceiling in high-cost markets such as parts of California and New York can rise as high as $1,209,750, this year’s adjustments follow a statutory formula outlined in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), tying the limits to national price trends.

Pulte, a home-building scion and newcomer to public service, was recently confirmed as FHFA director under the Trump administration. His short tenure has already seen dramatic changes, including a purge of top executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a reshuffling of their boards of directors. Pulte appointed himself chairman of both entities before the abrupt resignation of one of his new appointees, entrepreneur and Musk confidant Christopher Stanley.

Despite the leadership churn, Pulte appears intent—at least for now—on keeping certain housing market parameters steady. That includes the conforming loan limits, which directly affect the size and cost of mortgages accessible to middle- and upper-middle-income borrowers.

Both Fannie and Freddie have been under government conservatorship since the 2008 financial crisis. They support roughly $12 trillion in the U.S. mortgage market by purchasing loans from lenders, bundling them into securities, and guaranteeing investors against losses from borrower defaults.

The Trump administration has revived efforts to reduce the federal footprint in housing finance. Long-held Republican goals to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are reportedly back on the table. According to sources familiar with the matter, discussions have included transferring Treasury’s stake in the companies to a potential sovereign wealth fund—a novel idea floated by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on a recent podcast.

Some analysts estimate the government’s share of the two firms could be worth over $250 billion, positioning the plan as a potential windfall in an era of mounting federal deficits. However, critics warn that pushing the firms into private hands too hastily could rattle the mortgage-backed securities market and push up home loan rates.

“There’s a lot of pressure on a pretty unseasoned board and management team,” said Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi, noting that while the U.S. economy remains stable for now, an economic downturn could quickly test the new leadership’s capacity.

Inside the FHFA, the pace of change has also been jarring. According to the National Treasury Employees Union, dozens of staff have been placed on indefinite administrative leave, some notified in makeshift meeting rooms, including an unused cafeteria space.

Pulte, who has been highly active on social media, shared footage of empty workstations during a recent visit to agency offices. “There are some really great people inside of these businesses, and the good news for them is there is a lot of upward mobility, to earn and grow MORE!” he posted on X.

While the FHFA has remained silent on the broader shake-up, concerns are emerging that internal disruptions could impact key regulatory functions, from fair-housing oversight to mortgage pricing. A top bank regulator warned that technical glitches or pricing missteps—even if minor—could erode investor confidence in mortgage-backed securities and push borrowing costs higher.

In this uncertain environment, maintaining the conforming loan limit offers one point of continuity. The CATO Institute, a libertarian think tank, has advocated for tighter restrictions on government-backed lending, urging that the FHA and GSEs focus more narrowly on first-time homebuyers and lower-priced homes.

But for now, that vision is not shared by the FHFA’s new leader—at least not publicly. With house prices continuing to rise in most of the country, and with few signs of a slowdown, the decision to keep the current loan limit in place may offer temporary reassurance to lenders, borrowers, and investors alike.

As the Trump administration explores transformative moves in housing finance, the preservation of existing loan thresholds underscores the delicate balancing act between ideology and market stability.

The trend is up. Not down.

Bill Pulte cutting more GSE red tape

with latest Document release...

You're new here I'm thinking? Sherwin Williams likes to show up here around 3: 30 to 3:45 about 3 days a week ( more or less) to say Hi.....those of us that have been here  longer then we'd like to remember are numb to it.

Federal housing agency will not cut Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits, new director says

Federal housing agency will not cut Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits, new director sayshttps://t.co/zQQHaQagdu— Cmdr Ron Luhmann (@usnavycmdr) March 25, 2025

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/25/fhfa-will-not-cut-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-loan-limits.html

It's a technical pattern. It could be human psychology or even self-fulfilling because every other trader think it'll happen. I already 10x my principal, I'm okay with missing 4x from here. I've opened some more buys at $5, but will go heavy buys in at $4, if it does happen.

I know there are plenty of positive news out there. The buy signal for me would be when we see Congress people buying. Or else, I'll just sit with my profits in cash.

Remember, no-one went broke taking profit. This is NFA.

U right but we been poor for 15 years in straight line DOWN....

This is actually good news despite the recommendation of the CATO institute to reduce the size. Loan limits at the GSE level is at the back end of the process for home loans. The banks should be regulated to do this when the loan is originated. It's redundant process to do it at the GSE level. Why should GSE be determining home buyer ability to buy a home after the loan has been made.

pic.twitter.com/r1HBuxDQVB— Pulte (@pulte) March 25, 2025

First time that I can remember FMCC having a better day than FNMA. I own both equally.

Fannie Mae - All The Way
Freddie Mac - Load Up and Don't Look Back
ATTENTION Fannie/Freddie INSIDERS
Go ahead and start packin' 'em in...I won't tell the SEC -I Promise
Insiders go ahead and start loadin' like the WildMen/Women You Are

Isn't it risky to sell at this period of time, when we expecting an uplisting news and end conservatorship EO ? May miss the opportunity in making few thousands, agree anything may happen and nothing is guaranteed till it' happen. That's why stuck here for more than 15 years foolishly. Hope at least this momentum is real and no more backwards.

Federal housing agency will not cut Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits, new director says

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/25/fhfa-will-not-cut-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-loan-limits.html

All good. Just talking about what I'm seeing. If I see it, I'm not the only trader seeing it either. It was $7.45 then, broke the $7.41 support and now $7.33. I want all of us to be rich, but it doesn't happen in a straight line up.

MM are trying to tank it at EOD

I’m just goofing around. I just don’t believe in witchcraft aka technical analysis lmao. That tax bill is gonna be rough. Only reason I didn’t sell more at $6-7 myself. I too bought it back at $5 but only 10% of common position. Didn’t want the tax obligation.

A person after my own heart. Ample volatility to trade in and out of. Situation with mumerous variables still very much in flux.

you can watch it on Robinhood, but not trade it...according to Robinhood.

I bought plenty at

Amelia is going to wait until FnF reaches $95 - $100/share, just like the rest of us. One Happy Family !!

Are you creating a loop hole that it's Freddie reaching 10, by which time Fannie mae may be 11.xx as the exit date?  Or is it 10 and you are out of Fannie and when Freddie reaches 10, you are out of Freddie 

There have been 10s of lawsuits filed related to all matters of convervatorship. Can you point to a single ruling that even begins to show that the judiciary agrees with you? If you can, then the likelihood of true upside scenarios occurring go up significantly. Otherwise my running assumption is the government (Trump on down) has tremendous economic and opium to the masses incentive to exercise all of their perceived economic rights.

Lol look at this idiot. He’s never seen the bat symbol before. This means we are going to the moon. Bruce Wayne about to buy in. Buckle up!

Head and shoulder? Looks like it's setting up for some dry scalp with dandruff.

Very interesting.  We are being mentioned everywhere.
https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/2025032588/what-is-treasury-chief-scott-bessent-focusing-2

Looks like it's setting up for a head and shoulders pattern. I don't like shorting, but it looks like a technical drop from here.

Dyesir2025,… Under the funding agreement the Treasury paid to Fannie $119.8 billion Form 10k December 31, 2024 page 8

Under the funding agreement the Treasury paid to Freddie $71.6 billion Form 10k December 31, 2024 page 5

$191.4 billion total draws from Treasury

$181.4 billion Fannie returned to Treasury. Form 10K Dec 31, 2024. Page 9

$119.7 billion Freddie returned to Treasury. Form 10K Dec 31, 2024. Page 5

Total $301.1 billion returned to the treasury.

Explained: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175821446

I take it you have no interest in collecting dividends from F&F?

A really good sign. RH must be getting lots of requests from its clients.

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/9q2FzXz3

Anything below 9 is a good sign the stock is investable under optimal conditions. CNBC is tracking a foward P/E of 2.something. So really the only things holding back the GSEs are Recapitalization, Conservatorship, and relisting. And of course a plan on how to accomplish those things.

It is both.
Hearing Robinhood looking to make exception for Fannie Mae $FNMA and Freddie Mac $FMCC and add to trading platform while on OTCBB— Nico (@nicosintichakis) March 25, 2025

I need to correct a statement from last post.

$119.8 billion has been paid to the company from the Treasury under this funding commitment; Page 8, Form 10k 2024…

NOT: $119.8 billion has been paid to the Treasury under this funding commitment; Page 8, Form 10k 2024

If it breaks $8 and stays above, then we have something to talk about.

I find myself longing for the good old times of 9:30a - 12 noon and the steady 5% climb...

The company gave away the Senior Preferred Stock for FREE. Treasury took it upon themselves and authorized a 200 billion commitment available in exchange for One Million Shares (1,000,000) with an initial liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. Shares of senior equity illegal and unconstitutional.

$119.8 billion has been paid to the Treasury under this funding commitment; Page 8, Form 10k 2024

Fannie Mae stockholders’ equity: Senior preferred stock $120.8 billion Page 68, Form 10k 2024

(Actually, the SPS is recorded at 120,836 billion... maybe the treasury charged a $36 million fee for the paperwork! Ha) ...

$120.8 billion minus 119.8 billion = $1 billion

The company gave away the Senior Preferred Stock for free along with the 79.9 % warrants to be purchased at a nominal price. The Treasury did not pay to the company a billion dollars.

Quote: “We did not receive any cash proceeds from Treasury at the time the senior preferred stock or the warrant was issued.” End of Quote
page 25 Form 10K December 31, 2008

link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/310522/000095013309000487/w72716e10vk.htm#304;;;;

Senior preferred 1,000

Page 143

Quote: “If the warrant is exercised, the stated value of the common stock issued will be reclassified as “Common stock” in our consolidated balance sheet. Because the warrant’s exercise price of $0.00001 per share is considered non-substantive (compared to the market price of our common stock), the warrant was evaluated based on its substance rather than its form.” End of Quote

Page F 10

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/310522/000095013309000487/w72716e10vk.htm#304;;

If it’s just Fannie it might explain the spread.

It may be an indication that it's getting uplistting ?