UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2024
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from to
Commission file number:
001-38716
GAMIDA CELL LTD.
(Exact Name of Registrant
as Specified in its Charter)
Israel | | Not Applicable |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
116 Huntington Avenue, 7th Floor | | |
Boston, MA | | 02116 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(617) 892-9080
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former
address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | | Trading Symbol | | Name of exchange on which registered |
Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share | | GMDAQ | | * |
* | On April 8, 2024, the issuer’s
ordinary shares were suspended from trading on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq. On April 16, 2024, the registrant’s ordinary
shares began trading on the OTC Pink Marketplace under the symbol “GMDAQ.” |
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting
company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☒ |
Emerging growth company | ☐ | | |
If an emerging growth
company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐
No ☒
The registrant had 154,013,109
ordinary shares outstanding as of May 16, 2024.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Trademarks and Trade Names
Unless the context requires
otherwise, “Gamida,” “Gamida Cell,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”
mean Gamida Cell Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gamida Cell Inc.
Gamida Cell and Omisirge
are trademarks of ours that we use in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report. This Quarterly Report also includes trademarks,
tradenames, and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, our trademarks and tradenames referred
to in this Quarterly Report appear without the ® or ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way,
that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or the right of the applicable licensor to our trademark
and tradenames. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names or trademarks to imply a relationship with,
or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.
PART I-FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND ITS
SUBSIDIARY
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2024
U.S. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS
UNAUDITED
INDEX
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
|
| |
March 31, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
| (unaudited) | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
ASSETS | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 24,776 | | |
$ | 46,554 | |
Short-term restricted deposit | |
| 3,048 | | |
| 3,056 | |
Inventory | |
| 1,966 | | |
| 1,906 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 1,027 | | |
| 1,610 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |
| 2,541 | | |
| 1,420 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total current assets | |
| 33,358 | | |
| 54,546 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS: | |
| | | |
| | |
Restricted deposits | |
| 377 | | |
| 377 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | |
| 40,223 | | |
| 41,264 | |
Operating lease right-of-use assets | |
| 2,779 | | |
| 3,177 | |
Other long-term assets | |
| 2,821 | | |
| 2,822 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total non-current assets | |
| 46,200 | | |
| 47,640 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total assets | |
$ | 79,558 | | |
$ | 102,186 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
|
| |
March 31, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |
| | |
| |
Trade payables | |
$ | 5,433 | | |
$ | 1,880 | |
Employees and payroll accruals | |
| 5,041 | | |
| 5,637 | |
Operating lease liabilities | |
| 1,135 | | |
| 1,270 | |
Accrued interest of convertible senior notes | |
| 645 | | |
| 1,780 | |
Convertible senior notes, net | |
| 75,102 | | |
| 6,505 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | |
| 7,345 | | |
| 8,129 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 94,701 | | |
| 25,201 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Convertible senior notes, net | |
| - | | |
| 73,041 | |
Warrants liability | |
| 281 | | |
| 3,284 | |
Long-term operating lease liabilities | |
| 1,849 | | |
| 2,127 | |
Other long-term liabilities | |
| 1,457 | | |
| 1,482 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total non-current liabilities | |
| 3,587 | | |
| 79,934 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total liabilities | |
| 98,288 | | |
| 105,135 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT): | |
| | | |
| | |
Share capital - | |
| | | |
| | |
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.01 par value - Authorized: 325,000,000 shares at March 31, 2024 (unaudited) and at December 31, 2023; Issued 154,204,735 and 144,596,195 at March 31, 2024 (unaudited) and December 31, 2023 respectively; Outstanding: 154,050,953 and 144,443,714 shares at March 31, 2024 (unaudited) and December 31, 2023, respectively | |
| 416 | | |
| 391 | |
Treasury ordinary shares of NIS 0.01 par value - 153,782 and 152,481 shares at March 31, 2024 (unaudited) and December 31, 2023, respectively | |
| * | | |
| * | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 480,628 | | |
| 476,488 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (499,774 | ) | |
| (479,828 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total shareholders’ deficit | |
| (18,730 | ) | |
| (2,949 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit | |
$ | 79,558 | | |
$ | 102,186 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and
per share data)
| |
Three months ended March 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
(unaudited) | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net revenue | |
$ | 890 | | |
$ | - | |
Cost of sales | |
| 916 | | |
| - | |
Excess Capacity | |
| 2,692 | | |
| - | |
Research and development expenses, net | |
| 2,936 | | |
* | 8,840 | |
Selling, general and administrative | |
| 19,482 | | |
* | 10,740 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total operating loss | |
| 25,136 | | |
| 19,580 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Financial (income) expenses | |
| (5,190 | ) | |
| 1,380 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | 19,946 | | |
$ | 20,960 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders, basic and diluted | |
| 0.13 | | |
| 0.27 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average number of shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders, basic and diluted | |
| 152,711,493 | | |
| 76,760,688 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and
per share data)
| |
Three months ended March 31, 2023 (unaudited)
| |
| |
Ordinary
shares | | |
Additional
paid-in | | |
Treasury | | |
Accumulated | | |
Total shareholders’ | |
| |
Number | | |
Amount | | |
capital | | |
shares | | |
deficit | | |
deficit | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2022 | |
| 74,583,026 | | |
$ | 211 | | |
$ | 408,598 | | |
$ | * | | |
$ | (416,832 | ) | |
$ | (8,023 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Issuance of ordinary shares upon release of restricted share units | |
| 107,627 | | |
| * | | |
| * | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| * | |
Treasury shares | |
| (3,667 | ) | |
| * | | |
| * | | |
| * | | |
| - | | |
| * | |
Issuance of ordinary shares, for 2022 Notes | |
| 3,774,545 | | |
| 1 | | |
| 6,899 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 6,900 | |
Issuance of ordinary shares, net of issuance expenses** | |
| 3,572,115 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 5,207 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 5,217 | |
Share-based compensation | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,499 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,499 | |
Net Loss | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (20,960 | ) | |
| (20,960 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance as of March 31, 2023 | |
| 82,033,646 | | |
$ | 222 | | |
$ | 422,203 | | |
$ | * | | |
$ | (437,792 | ) | |
$ | (15,367 | ) |
| |
Three months ended March 31, 2024 (unaudited)
| |
| |
Ordinary
shares | | |
Additional
paid-in | | |
Treasury | | |
Accumulated | | |
Total shareholders’ | |
| |
Number | | |
Amount | | |
capital | | |
shares | | |
deficit | | |
deficit | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2023 | |
| 144,443,714 | | |
| 391 | | |
| 476,488 | | |
| * | | |
| (479,828 | ) | |
| (2,949 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Issuance of ordinary shares upon release of restricted share units | |
| 246,120 | | |
| * | | |
| * | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| * | |
Treasury shares | |
| (1,301 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| * | | |
| - | | |
| * | |
Issuance of ordinary shares, net of issuance expenses*** | |
| 9,362,420 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 2,967 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,992 | |
Share-based compensation | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,173 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,173 | |
Net Loss | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (19,946 | ) | |
| (19,946 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance as of March 31, 2024 | |
| 154,050,953 | | |
| 416 | | |
| 480,628 | | |
| * | | |
| (499,774 | ) | |
| (18,730 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and
per share data)
| |
Three
months ended
March 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
(unaudited) | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Net Loss | |
$ | (19,946 | ) | |
$ | (20,960 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | |
| 1,130 | | |
| 106 | |
Financing income, net | |
| (1,106 | ) | |
| (464 | ) |
Share-based compensation | |
| 1,173 | | |
| 1,499 | |
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs | |
| 220 | | |
| 196 | |
Change in fair value of warrants liability | |
| (3,003 | ) | |
| - | |
Change in fair value in convertible note | |
| (3,003 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Operating lease right-of-use assets | |
| 398 | | |
| 527 | |
Operating lease liabilities | |
| (413 | ) | |
| (686 | ) |
Increase in inventory | |
| (60 | ) | |
| - | |
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | |
| (1,120 | ) | |
| 661 | |
Increase (decrease) in trade payables | |
| 3,553 | | |
| (1,986 | ) |
Decrease in accrued expenses and current liabilities | |
| (1,404 | ) | |
| (1,177 | ) |
Decrease in accounts receivable | |
| 583 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash used in operating activities | |
| (22,998 | ) | |
| (22,284 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | |
| (89 | ) | |
| (827 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
$ | (89 | ) | |
$ | (827 | ) |
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and
per share data)
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Principal payment of convertible senior note | |
$ | (1,661 | ) | |
$ | - | |
Proceeds from share issuance, net | |
| 2,992 | | |
| 5,217 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | |
| 1,331 | | |
| 5,217 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Effect of exchange rate changed on cash and cash equivalents | |
| (22 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | |
| (21,778 | ) | |
| (17,894 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |
| 46,554 | | |
| 64,657 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | |
$ | 24,776 | | |
$ | 46,763 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Significant non-cash transactions: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Conversion of 2022 Notes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 6,900 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for interest | |
$ | 2,301 | | |
$ | 2,203 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
GAMIDA CELL LTD. AND
ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and
per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| a. | Gamida Cell Ltd., founded in 1998, is
a cell therapy pioneer working to turn cells into powerful therapeutics. The Company has
a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary, Gamida Cell Inc. (the “Subsidiary”), which was
incorporated in 2000, under the laws of the State of Delaware. The financial statements represents
the consolidation of these two entities (the “Company”). The Company applies
a proprietary expansion platform leveraging the properties of nicotinamide, or NAM, to allogeneic
cell sources including umbilical cord blood-derived cells and natural killer, or NK, cells
to create cell therapy candidates, with the potential to redefine standards of care. |
| b. | On April 17, 2023, the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration approved the Company’s allogenic cell therapy, Omisirge (omidubicel-onlv),
for use in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with hematologic malignancies
who are planned for umbilical cord blood transplantation following myeloablative conditioning
to reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the incidence of infection. In addition, the
Company has applied its NAM cell expansion technology to NK cells, to develop its initial
NK product candidate, GDA-201, an investigational, NK cell-based immunotherapy for the treatment
of hematologic and solid tumors in combination with standard of care antibody therapies. |
| c. | Prior to FDA approval of Omisirge in April 2023, the Company devoted substantially all of its efforts toward research and development activities. In the course of such activities, the Company has sustained operating losses and expects such losses to continue in the foreseeable future. The Company’s accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2024 was $499,774 and negative cash flows from operating activities during the period ended March 31, 2024 were $22,998. As of March 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $24,776 in cash and cash equivalents. The Company has limited available cash resources and requires additional financing in order to continue to fund its current operations beyond the second quarter of 2024, and to pay existing and future liabilities and other obligations. |
On March 26, 2024, the Company entered
into a Restructuring Support Agreement (the “Support Agreement”) with certain funds managed by Highbridge Capital Management,
LLC. These funds hold all of the Company exchangeable senior notes issued in 2021 and 2022.
Pursuant to the Support Agreement, the
Company and Highbridge have agreed to restructure all of outstanding equity and debt in a voluntary restructuring proceeding in the District
Court of Beersheba, Israel that is governed by Israeli law, referred to as the restructuring process.
If this process is completed as contemplated
by the Support Agreement, all outstanding shares of Gamida Cell Ltd. will be cancelled, after which Gamida Cell Ltd. will continue to
exist as a private operating company that is owned entirely by Highbridge. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, each holder of ordinary
shares of the Company as of the completion of the restructuring process will be entitled to certain contingent value rights agreement
to be executed in connection with the restructuring process.
There is no assurance that the Company will complete the restructuring
process as currently contemplated. If the Company is unable to complete the restructuring process in the anticipated timeline, the Company
expects that it will enter into involuntary restructuring proceedings in Israeli court and the Company’s shareholders would not receive
any proceeds from such proceedings.
During the three months ended March 31,
2024, the Company had a reduction in workforce in which the employment of approximately 25% of the Company’s employees was terminated.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the
carrying amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that would result if the Company were unable to continue as a going concern.
| d. | In March 2024, the Company implemented a reduction in headcount of approximately 35 employees or 25% of the Company’s then current workforce. The Company incurred total one-time costs related to the workforce reduction of approximately $1,996 for the three months ended March 31, 2024 of which $134 was reflected in excess capacity, $457 in research and development, and $1,405 in selling, general and administrative expenses. |
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 2:- | SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
| a. | Basis of presentation of the financial statements: |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”)
for interim financial information and in accordance with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information
or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted, pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes
necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of a normal recurring nature, which are necessary
for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for the periods presented.
The accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31,
2023 filed with the SEC on March 27, 2024. The interim period results do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for
any other interim period or for the full fiscal year.
The preparation of the unaudited condensed financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company’s management believes that the estimates, judgement
and assumptions used are reasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions
can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the dates of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and
the reported amount of expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates may include: revenue recognition, such as returns of product sold,
stock-based compensation, impairment of inventory, warrants liability, convertible senior note and impairment of long lived assets. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Inventories are stated at the lower of
cost or net realizable value; cost is determined using the average cost method. The Company regularly evaluates its ability to realize
the value of inventory. If the inventories are deemed damaged, if actual demand of the Company’s therapies deteriorates, or if
market conditions are less favorable than those projected, inventory reserves or write-offs may be required.
During the three months period ended March 31, 2024, a reserve for
slow-moving inventory approaching expiration dates and inventory obsolescence of $276 was recorded.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 2:- | SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
Revenues are recognized in accordance
with ASC 606. Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the
customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
The Company’s revenues are comprised
of product revenue which represents the sales of Omisirge. The Company has a sole distributor in the United States and sells to this
customer.
To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that are within the
scope of Topic 606, the Company performs the following five steps:
| (i) | Identify the contract(s) with a customer: |
The Company enters into an enforceable
contract with a customer that defines each party’s rights regarding delivery of and payment for a Product, (ii) the contract has
commercial substance and (iii) the Company determines that collection of substantially all consideration for such Product is probable
based on the payer’s intent and ability to pay the promised consideration.
| (ii) | Identify the performance obligations in
the contract: |
The Company’s contracts include the
sale and delivery of Omisirge, which represent the Company’s single performance obligation under each contract.
| (iii) | Determine the transaction price: |
The transaction price is determined
based on the consideration to which the Company will be entitled in exchange for providing a Product to the customer. To the extent the
transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included
in the transaction price utilizing either the expected value method or the most likely amount method depending on the nature of the variable
consideration. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a
significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur.
Product revenues are recognized, at
the time of delivery to the transplant center.
| (iv) | Allocate the transaction price to the
performance obligations in the contract: |
The entire transaction price is allocated
to the single performance obligation.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 2:- | SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
| (v) | Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity
satisfies a performance obligation: |
Revenue is recognized when or as performance
obligations are satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. Control either transfers over time or
at a point in time, which affects when revenue is recorded.
Revenues from sales of products are
recognized at a point in time based on the transfer of control of the product, which is 24 hours after delivery to a transplant center.
The Company applied the practical
expedient in ASC 606 and did not evaluate payment terms of one year or less for the existence of a significant financing component.
As of March 31, 2024 all of the company’s
revenues were incurred in USA and the payment terms are typically 95 days based on customary practices.
Accounts receivable are recorded net
of credit losses allowance for any potential uncollectible amounts.
The Company’s accounts receivable
balance consists of amounts due from product sales to a single customer which is the Company’s sole distributor of Omisirge in
the United States.
The Company makes estimates of expected
credit and collectability trends for the allowance for credit losses based upon its assessment of various factors, the age of the trade
receivable balances, credit quality of its customers, current economic conditions, reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic
conditions, and other factors that may affect its ability to collect from customers.
As of March 31, 2024 no allowances for
credit losses of trade receivable were recorded.
Cost of sales includes direct costs attributable
to the production of Omisirge. Cost of sales includes raw materials, production, labor, and certain maintenance and indirect manufacturing
overheads costs, quality testing directly related to the product, and depreciation on equipment used in the manufacturing of Omisirge. It
also includes any cost of batch failure losses and royalty expenses. Cost of sales for Omisirge are recognized when batch failure
or revenue is recognized.
Excess Capacity costs reflect those labor and manufacturing overhead
costs incurred, above the amount of these costs absorbed in cost of sales as part of standard costs, which are based on staffed capacity
levels, given that the Company’s facility is staffed to produce the anticipated demand over the course of the coming year.
| h. | Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A): |
Beginning July 1, 2023, reporting of
Operating Expenses has been modified to reflect the Company’s transition to commercial stage. Costs that were previously reported
as Commercial and General & Administrative costs, are currently being reported as part of Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A)
expenses. SG&A costs consist mainly of personnel costs (including salaries, benefits and share-based compensation), supply chain
and quality assurance indirect expenses, medical affairs expenses, marketing and selling, finance, and legal expenses.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 2:- | SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.) |
| i. | Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted: |
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements
to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which requires public entities to disclose information about their reportable segments’ significant
expenses and other segment items on an interim and annual basis. Public entities with a single reportable segment are required to apply
the disclosure requirements in ASU 2023-07, as well as all existing segment disclosures and reconciliation requirements in ASC 280 on
an interim and annual basis. ASU 2023-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and for interim periods within
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting
ASU 2023-07.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU
2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires public entities, on an annual basis, to provide
disclosure of specific categories in the rate reconciliation, as well as disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction.
For the Company, ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2023-09.
Certain amounts in prior years’ financial
statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
The Company entered into operating
leases primarily for its production plant, and its laboratories and offices. The leases have remaining lease terms of up to six
years, and the Company does not assume renewals in its determination of the lease term unless the renewals are considered as reasonably
certain at lease commencement.
The components of operating lease
costs were as follows:
| |
Three months ended
March 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
(unaudited) | |
| |
| | |
| |
Operating lease costs | |
$ | 395 | | |
$ | 663 | |
Short-term lease costs | |
| - | | |
| 82 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total lease costs | |
$ | 395 | | |
$ | 745 | |
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
Supplemental balance
sheet information related to operating leases is as follows:
| |
Three
months ended
March 31,
2024 | |
| |
(unaudited) | |
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | |
| 3.09 | |
Weighted average discount rate | |
| 2.58 | % |
Maturities
of lease liabilities were as follows:
| |
As of March 31, 2024 | |
2024 | |
$ | 879 | |
2025 | |
| 1,038 | |
2026 | |
| 683 | |
Thereafter | |
| 520 | |
| |
| | |
Total undiscounted lease payments | |
| 3,120 | |
Less: Imputed interest | |
| 136 | |
| |
| | |
Present value of lease liabilities | |
$ | 2,984 | |
| NOTE 4: | CONVERTIBLE
SENIOR NOTES, NET |
| a. | On February 16, 2021, the Subsidiary issued convertible senior notes (the “2021 Notes”) due in 2026, in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000, pursuant to an Indenture between the Company, the Subsidiary, and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, dated February 16, 2021 (the “Indenture”). The 2021 Notes bear interest payable semiannually in arrears, at a rate of 5.875% per year. The 2021 Notes will mature on February 15, 2026, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms. |
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture,
the holders of the 2021 Notes have the right, prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding
February 15, 2026, to convert any 2021 Notes or portion thereof that is $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof, into the Company’s
ordinary shares at an initial conversion rate of 56.3063 shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2021 Notes (equivalent to an exchange
price of $17.76 per share). The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in specified events.
Upon the occurrence of a fundamental
change (as defined in the Indenture), holders of the 2021 Notes may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or a portion of their
2021 Notes, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes, plus
any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, interest accrued after the date of such repurchase notice. If certain fundamental
changes referred to as make-whole fundamental changes occur, the conversion rate for the 2021 Notes may be increased.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 4: | CONVERTIBLE
SENIOR NOTES, NET (Cont.) |
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture,
the Subsidiary may redeem for cash all or a portion of the 2021 Notes for cash, at its option, at a redemption price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the 2021 Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the notes to be redeemed, if the last reported
closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares has been at least 130% of the exchange price then in effect for at least 20 trading
days during any 30 consecutive trading day period, and in the event of certain tax law changes.
The Company accounts for its 2021 Notes
in accordance with ASC 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options”. The Convertible Notes are accounted for as a single
liability measured at its amortized cost, as no other embedded features require bifurcation and recognition as derivatives according
to ASC 815-40.
| |
As of
March 31,
2024 | | |
As of
December 31,
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
| |
Liability component: | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Principal amount | |
$ | 75,000 | | |
$ | 75,000 | |
Issuance costs | |
| (4,223 | ) | |
| (4,223 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Principal net of issuance costs | |
| 70,777 | | |
| 70,777 | |
Amortized issuance costs | |
| 2,484 | | |
| 2,264 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net carrying amount | |
$ | 73,261 | | |
$ | 73,041 | |
The total issuance costs of the 2021
Notes amounted to $4,223 and are amortized to interest expenses at an annual effective interest rate of 7.37%, over the term of the 2021
Notes.
| b. | In December 2022, the Company, as guarantor, and the Subsidiary entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with certain funds managed by Highbridge Capital Management, LLC (collectively, “Highbridge”), as the lenders (together with the other lenders from time to time party thereto, the “Lenders”), and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as collateral agent and administrative agent. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Subsidiary issued $25,000 aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes (the “2022” Notes). The 2022 Notes bear interest of 7.5% which will be paid on a quarterly basis and monthly principal installment payments. |
The 2022 Notes are exchangeable, at the
option of the lenders, into ordinary shares at an exchange rate of 0.52356 ordinary shares per $1.00 principal amount, together with
a make-whole premium equal to all accrued and unpaid and remaining coupons due through the maturity date. The exchange rate is subject
to adjustment in the event of ordinary share dividends, reclassifications and certain other fundamental transactions affecting the ordinary
shares. In addition, under certain circumstances, the Company can issue Ordinary shares in exchange for the discharge of the monthly
principal installment payments.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 4: | CONVERTIBLE
SENIOR NOTES, NET (Cont.) |
The Loan Agreement contains customary representations and warranties
and covenants, including a $20,000 minimum liquidity covenant and certain negative covenants restricting dispositions, changes in business
and business locations, mergers and acquisitions, indebtedness, issuances of preferred stock, liens, collateral accounts, restricted payments,
transactions with affiliates, compliance with laws, and issuances of capital stock. Most of these restrictions are subject to certain
minimum thresholds and exceptions. Certain of the negative covenants will terminate when less than $5,000 of principal amount is outstanding
under the Loan Agreement. Our initiation of voluntary restructuring proceedings in the District Court of Beersheba, Israel constituted
an event of default under the Loan Agreement. However, Highbridge has agreed not to pursue any remedies available to it under either the
Indenture or the Loan and Security Agreement so long as the Support Agreement is in effect.
The Company has elected the fair value
option to measure the 2022 Notes upon issuance, in accordance with ASC 825-10. Under the fair value option, the 2022 Notes are measured
at fair value each period with changes in fair value reported in the statements of operations. According to ASC 825-10, changes in fair
value that are caused by changes in the instrument-specific credit risk will be presented separately in other comprehensive income (loss).
As of March 31, 2024, the Company issued
10,044,275 and 1,210,322 Ordinary shares in exchange for the discharge of $16,107 of the aggregate outstanding balance and the discharge
of $1,451 interest make-whole payments, respectively, in respect of the 2022 Notes. As of March 31, 2024, the Company has paid $3,910
in principal payments and $1,729 in interest payments. The principal balance of the loan as of March 31, 2024 is $4,983.
| NOTE 5: | FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS |
The carrying amounts the Company’s
financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents is stated at their carrying value, which approximates their fair value due
to the short time to the expected receipt or payment.
The following table present information
about our financial instruments that are measured at fair value as of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023:
| |
March 31, 2024 | | |
December 31, 2023 | |
| |
Level 1 | | |
Level 3 | | |
Total | | |
Level 1 | | |
Level 3 | | |
Total | |
Financial assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Money market funds included in cash and cash
equivalent | |
$ | 21,015 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 21,015 | | |
$ | 46,554 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 46,554 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total assets measured at fair value | |
$ | 21,015 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 21,015 | | |
$ | 46,554 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 46,554 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Financial liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
2022 Notes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 1,841 | | |
$ | 1,841 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 6,505 | | |
$ | 6,505 | |
Warrants liability | |
| - | | |
| 281 | | |
| 281 | | |
| - | | |
| 3,284 | | |
| 3,284 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total liabilities measured at fair value | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 2,122 | | |
$ | 2,122 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 9,789 | | |
$ | 9,789 | |
See Note 4 “Convertible Senior
Notes” for the carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s 2021 Notes as of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
The Company classify Money market funds
within Level 1, and the 2021 Notes, 2022 Notes and warrants liability are classified within Level 3, because the Company uses quoted market
prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs or net asset value recovery analysis to determine
their fair value.
The warrants liability was valued using
a Black Scholes Option Pricing Model, which is considered to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. The Black Scholes model’s primary
unobservable input utilized in determining the fair value of the Private warrants is the expected volatility of the Ordinary shares.
The expected volatility was implied from a blend of the Company’s own Ordinary share and Public Warrant pricing, and the average
historical share volatilities of several unrelated public companies within the Company’s industry that the Company considers to
be comparable to its own business.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 5:- | FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (Cont.) |
The following table summarizes the warrant
liability activity as of March 31, 2024:
| |
Warrant liability | |
| |
| |
Balance December 31, 2023 | |
$ | 3,284 | |
Change in fair value | |
| (3,003 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance March 31, 2024 | |
$ | 281 | |
The key inputs used in the valuation
of the warrants liability as of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 the initial measurement date, are included below:
Input | |
March
31,
2024 | | |
December 31,
2023 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Exercise price | |
$ | 1.35 | | |
$ | 1.35 | |
Share price on date | |
$ | 0.04 | | |
$ | 0.41 | |
Risk-free rate | |
| 4.3 | % | |
| 4.0 | % |
Expected volatility | |
| 133 | % | |
| 90 | % |
Dividend Rate | |
| 0 | % | |
| 0 | % |
In the year ended December 31, 2023,
the 2022 Notes were valued using the Monte Carlo simulation analysis to generate expected future cash flows based on movement in the
Company’s stock price. These future cash flows were then discounted to present value. Cash flows associated with the future
conversion of loan principal into shares were discounted at the risk-free rate commensurate with the remaining term of the loan.
Future cash flows resulting from the contractual debt payments were discounted at a market yield. The significant inputs into the
Monte Carlo simulation were the closing stock price as of December 31, 2023, volatility analysis of the stock, and the risk-free
rate using U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Rate for the remaining time between the Valuation date and maturity date.
The fair value for the 2022 Notes liability
as of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023:
| |
2022 Notes | |
| |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2023 | |
$ | 6,505 | |
2024 principal payments | |
| (1,661 | ) |
Change in fair value | |
| (3,003 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance as of March 31, 2024 | |
| 1,841 | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2024,
the 2022 Notes were valued using the net asset value recovery analysis, in connection with the Support Agreement. The net asset value
recovery assumed no conversion of shares to pay principal or interest on the 2022 Notes. The net asset value recovery analysis incorporates
the Company’s assets and liabilities, with an emphasis on outstanding debt, to determine the fair value of the 2022 Notes.
The key inputs used in the valuation of
the 2022 Notes liability December 31, 2023:
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2023 | |
| |
| |
Voluntary conversion price | |
$ | 1.91 | |
Share price on date | |
$ | 0.41 | |
Risk-free rate | |
| 4.8 | % |
Expected volatility | |
| 109 | % |
Implied yield | |
| 31.0 | % |
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 6: | CONTINGENT
LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS |
From time to time the Company or its
subsidiary may be involved in legal proceedings and/or litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe it will have a material effect on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
As of March 31, 2024, the Company obtained
bank guarantees in the amount of $2,817, primarily in connection with an Investment Center grant in order to ensure the fulfillment of
the grant terms.
The Company has received grants from
the IIA to finance its research and development programs in Israel, through which the Company received IIA participation payments in
the aggregate amount of $37,082 through March 31, 2024, of which $34,477 is royalty-bearing grants and $2,605 is non-royalty-bearing
grants. In return, the Company is committed to pay IIA royalties at a rate of 3-3.5% of future sales of the developed products,
up to 100% of the amount of grants received.
Pursuant to the latest IIA regulations,
grants received form the IIA before June 30, 2017 bear an annual interest LIBOR rate that applied at the time of the approval of the
applicable file and such interest will apply to all the funding received under that approval. Grants received from the IIA after
June 30, 2017, bear an annual interest rate based on the 12-month LIBOR, until December 31, 2023, and as of January 1, 2024, bear an
annual interest rate based on the 12-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), or in an alternative publication by the
Bank of Israel, with the addition of 0.72%. Grants approved after January 1, 2024, will bear the higher of (i) the 12 months SOFR interest
rate, plus 1%, or (ii) a fixed annual interest rate of 4%.
Through March 31, 2024, the Company
has accrued $30 in royalty expenses. The Company’s contingent royalty liability to the IIA at March 31, 2024, including grants
received by the Company and the associated LIBOR interest on all such grants totaled $44,009.
| NOTE 7: | SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY |
Subject to the Company’s amended
and restated Articles of Association, the holders of the Company’s ordinary shares have the right to receive notices to attend
and vote in general meetings of the Company’s shareholders, and the right to share in dividends and other distributions upon liquidation.
On September 27, 2022, the
Company issued and sold, in an underwritten public offering, an aggregate of 12,905,000 of its Ordinary shares at a public offering
price of $1.55 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $20,000, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
offering expenses.
On April 19, 2023, the Company issued
and sold 17,500,000 of its Ordinary shares at a public offering price of $1.30 per ordinary share and accompanying warrants to purchase
17,500,000 Ordinary shares, for gross proceeds of approximately $22,750, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
offering expenses of $1,900.
From
January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024, the Company raised an additional $2,992 in net proceeds by issuing 9,362,420 additional ordinary
shares via an ATM offering, at an average public offering price of $0.32.
As part of its April 2023 underwritten public offering of its securities,
the Company granted certain investors 17,500,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s Ordinary shares that will expire on April 21,
2028. The warrants were classified as a liability on the balance sheet initially, and subsequently measured at fair value through earnings,
as the warrants are not considered indexed to the Company’s own equity pursuant to ASC 815-40. The change in fair value of the warrants
liability is recognized in financial expenses, net, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operation. During the three
months ended March 31, 2024, none of the warrants were exercised in exchange for any of the Company’s Ordinary shares.
During the three months ended March
31, 2024, the Company cancelled 1,301 outstanding restricted shares, whereby the restricted shares became treasury shares.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 8: | SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION |
On January 23, 2017, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2017 Share Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan” and together with the 2014 Plan,
the “Option Plans”), and the subsequent grant of options to the Company’s employees, officers and directors. Pursuant
to the 2017 Plan, the Company initially reserved for issuance 312,867 ordinary shares, nominal value NIS 0.01 each. On February 28, 2017,
the Company’s shareholders approved the 2017 Plan.
The 2017 Plan provides for the grant
of awards, including options, restricted shares and restricted share units to the Company’s directors, employees, officers, consultants
and advisors.
On February 25, 2021 and November 17,
2021, the board of directors and shareholders, respectively, approved an amendment and restatement of the 2017 Plan. The 2017 Plan, as
amended, also contains an “evergreen” provision, which provides for an automatic allotment of ordinary shares to be added
every year to the pool of ordinary shares available for grant under the 2017 Plan. Under the evergreen provision, on January 1 of each
year (beginning January 1, 2022), the number of ordinary shares available under the 2017 Plan automatically increases by the lesser of
the following: (i) 4% of our outstanding ordinary shares on the last day of the immediately preceding year; and (ii) an amount determined
in advance of January 1 by the board of directors. As of March 31, 2024, 3,385,056 shares were reserved for issuance under the 2017 Plan.
The Company estimates the fair value
of stock options granted using the binominal option-pricing model. The option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which
the most significant are the expected stock price volatility and the expected option term.
Expected volatility was calculated based
upon the Company’s historical share price and historical volatilities of similar entities in the related sector index. The expected
term of the options granted is derived from output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted
are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. treasury bonds with an equivalent term. The
Company has historically not paid dividends and has no foreseeable plans to pay dividends.
The following table lists the inputs
to the binomial option-pricing model used for the fair value measurement of equity-settled share options for the above Options Plans
for the three months ended March 31, 2023. The Company did not grant any options in 2024.
| |
Three
months ended
March 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
(unaudited) | |
| |
| | |
| |
Dividend yield | |
| - | | |
| 0 | % |
Expected volatility of the share prices | |
| - | | |
| 69 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | |
| - | | |
| 3.6 | % |
Expected term (in years) | |
| - | | |
| 8 | |
Based on the above inputs, the fair value
of the options was determined to be $0.99 - $1.85 per option at the grant date.
| b. | The following table summarizes the number of options granted to employees under the Option Plans as of March 31, 2024 and related information: |
| |
Number
of
options | | |
Weighted
average
exercise
price | | |
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term
(in years) | | |
Aggregate
intrinsic
value | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2023 | |
| 7,109,262 | | |
$ | 3.83 | | |
| 7.16 | | |
| 2,259 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Forfeited | |
| (23,602 | ) | |
| 2.21 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Expired | |
| (325,022 | ) | |
| 5.86 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2024 (unaudited) | |
| 6,760,638 | | |
| 3.84 | | |
| 6.91 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercisable as of March 31, 2024 (unaudited) | |
| 4,601,953 | | |
$ | 4.52 | | |
| 6.14 | | |
| - | |
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 8: | SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION (Cont.) |
As of March 31, 2024, there are $6,550
of total unrecognized costs related to share-based compensation that are expected to be recognized over a period of up to four years.
| c. | A summary of restricted shares and restricted shares unit activity as of March 31, 2024 is as follows: |
| |
Number
of
restricted shares
and restricted
share units
(unaudited) | | |
Weighted
average
grant date fair
value (unaudited) | |
| |
| | |
| |
Unvested as of December 31, 2023 | |
| 1,136,803 | | |
$ | 2.22 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 5,209,064 | | |
| 0.39 | |
Vested | |
| (270,769 | ) | |
| 2.67 | |
Forfeited | |
| (11,769 | ) | |
| 2.15 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Unvested as of March 31, 2024 | |
| 6,063,329 | | |
$ | 0.63 | |
| d. | The total share-based compensation expense related to all of the Company’s equity-based awards, recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023 is comprised as follows: |
| |
Three
months ended
March 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
(unaudited) | |
| |
| |
Cost of sales | |
$ | 9 | | |
$ | - | |
Excess Capacity | |
| 38 | | |
| - | |
Research and development expenses, net | |
| 159 | | |
| 414 | |
Selling general and administrative | |
| 967 | | |
| 1,085 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total share-based compensation | |
$ | 1,173 | | |
$ | 1,499 | |
| NOTE 9: | BASIC AND
DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE |
Basic net loss per ordinary share is
computed by dividing net loss for each reporting period by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during each year.
Diluted net loss per ordinary share is computed by dividing net loss for each reporting period by the weighted average number of ordinary
shares outstanding during the period, plus dilutive potential ordinary shares considered outstanding during the period, in accordance
with ASC No. 260-10 “Earnings Per Share”.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 9: | BASIC AND
DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE (Cont.) |
Details of the number of shares and loss
used in the computation of loss per share:
| |
Three months ended March 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
(unaudited) | |
| |
Weighted
number of
shares | | |
Net loss
attributable
to Ordinary
shares of the Company | | |
Weighted number of shares | | |
Net loss
attributable
to Ordinary
shares of the Company | |
For the computation of basic and diluted loss | |
| 152,711,493 | | |
| 19,946 | | |
| 76,760,688 | | |
| 20,960 | |
All outstanding convertible senior note
options, warrants, outstanding share options, and restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023 have been excluded
from the calculation of the diluted net loss per share, because all such securities are anti-dilutive for all periods presented. The
total number of potential shares excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share are as follows:
| |
Three
months ended
March 31, | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
(unaudited) | |
| |
| |
Convertible senior notes | |
| 9,948,582 | | |
| 17,428,634 | |
Warrants | |
| 17,466,730 | | |
| - | |
Outstanding share options | |
| 6,760,638 | | |
| 6,906,325 | |
Restricted shares | |
| 4,288,813 | | |
| 1,644,992 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total | |
| 38,464,763 | | |
| 25,979,951 | |
| NOTE 10: | SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS |
On March 26, 2024, the Company entered
into a Restructuring Support Agreement (the “Support Agreement”) with Highbridge Capital Management, LLC (“Highbridge”)
in order to set forth the terms for the restructuring of the Company’s outstanding debt and equity. If the restructuring process
is completed as contemplated by the Support Agreement, all outstanding ordinary shares of the Company will be cancelled and each shareholder
as of the completion of the restructuring process will be entitled to receive certain contingent value rights (“CVRs”) in
exchange for such cancelled shares. Gamida Cell Ltd. will continue to exist as a private operating company that is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Highbridge, and the Company’s business will continue as a going concern.
On May 8, 2024, the District Court entered
a Judgment in the Restructuring Proceeding, which, among other things, (i) approves the Debt Arrangement (the “Debt Arrangement”)
and other terms and conditions of the Company’s restructuring as set forth in the Support Agreement filed March 27, 2024, subject
to an amendment of section 5.3 of the Debt Arrangement improving the terms of the contingent value rights (“CVRs”) in accordance
with the District Court expert’s recommendation; and (ii) rejects all of the requests and claims made by certain shareholders of
the Company.
GAMIDA
CELL LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
U.S.
dollars in thousands (except share and per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
| NOTE 10: | SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS (Cont.) |
On April 22, 2024, Abigail Jenkins, the
CEO and President of the Company, solely in her capacity as the Company’s duly authorized foreign representative, or the Foreign
Representative, filed a petition for recognition for relief and for the recognition and enforcement of the District Court’s order
approving the debt arrangement in Israel under Chapter 15 of Title 11, or Chapter 15, of the United States Bankruptcy Code, or the Bankruptcy
Code, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, or the U.S. Court. On May 15, 2024, the U.S. Court issued two
orders: (i) granting recognition of the Israeli Restructuring Proceeding as the foreign main proceeding on a final basis; and (ii) recognizing
and enforcing the Israeli Court’s order approving the Debt Arrangement in the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
Pursuant to the Support Agreement as approved
by the District Court (subject to the amended terms of the CVRs) on May 8, 2024 and by the U.S. Court on May 15, 2024, each holder of
ordinary shares of the Company as of the completion of the restructuring process will be entitled to certain CVRs pursuant to a contingent
value rights agreement (the “CVR Agreement”), to be executed in connection with the restructuring process.
When issued, the CVRs will entitle the holders
to certain cash payments totaling up to $40 million upon the achievement of certain milestones as will be more fully set forth in the
CVR Agreement. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, Highbridge will fund the reorganized company following the restructuring process through
a secured debt facility of approximately $50 million, comprised of (i) $30 million of cash to be provided as soon as practicable following
the completion of the restructuring process; (ii) the remaining principal amount owed under the 2022 Notes; and (iii) the remaining approximately
$15 million to be provided by way of delayed draw term loans on terms and conditions to be agreed upon in principle with Highbridge prior
to the completion of the restructuring process.
On March 28, 2024, the Company received
a delisting notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq, notifying us that our ordinary shares were scheduled for delisting from
the Nasdaq Capital Market due to (i) the Restructuring Proceeding and the associated public interest concerns raised by such proceeding;
(ii) concerns regarding the residual equity interest of the existing listed securities holders; and (iii) concerns about the Company’s
ability to sustain compliance with all requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq. As a result, on April 25, 2024, the Nasdaq Stock
Market filed a Form 25 delisting our ordinary shares from Nasdaq and our ordinary shares began trading on the over-the-counter market
on April 26, 2024 under the symbol “GMDAQ.” In addition, on May 9, 2024, we filed (i) a post-effective amendment to various
outstanding registration statements on Form S-3, which amendment was declared effective by the SEC on May 13, 2023, and (ii) a post-effective
amendment to various outstanding registration statements on Form S-8, which amendment became effective immediately upon filing, each to
remove and withdraw from registration the shares that were registered but remained unsold thereunder. Immediately following the closing
of our restructuring process, which we anticipate will occur on or about May 24, 2024, we intend to file a Form 15 with the SEC to suspend
our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and will no longer be a public reporting company registered with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission. Except for the CVRs, the Company does not anticipate that its shareholders will otherwise receive any distribution
or recovery (cash or otherwise) as part of the restructuring process. There is no assurance that the Company will complete its restructuring
process as currently contemplated. If the Company is unable to complete its restructuring process on its anticipated timeline, the Company
expects that it will enter into involuntary restructuring proceedings in Israeli court and its shareholders would not receive any proceeds
from such proceedings.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report and the audited financial statements
and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023,
or Annual Report, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 27, 2024. The information in this
discussion contains forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which are subject to
the “safe harbor” created by those sections. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
concerning our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects and plans and objectives
of management. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,”
“may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We may not actually
achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on
our forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of their date. Actual results or events could differ materially from the
plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements that we make. These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including,
without limitation, the risks set forth in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report. The forward-looking
statements are applicable only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements.
Company
Overview
We
are a cell therapy pioneer working to turn cells into powerful therapeutics. We apply a proprietary expansion platform leveraging the
properties of nicotinamide, or NAM, to allogeneic cell sources including umbilical cord blood-derived cells and natural killer, or NK,
cells to create cell therapy candidates, with the potential to redefine standards of care. On April 17, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, or FDA, approved our allogeneic cell therapy, Omisirge (omidubicel-onlv), for use in adult and pediatric patients 12
years and older with hematologic malignancies who are planned for umbilical cord blood transplantation following myeloablative conditioning
to reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the incidence of infection.
In
the first quarter of 2023, we completed a strategic reprioritization of our business activities to reduce our operating expenses and
focus on the commercial launch of Omisirge® (omidubicel-onlv). The results of this reprioritization were a reduction in force of
approximately 17% of our workforce, completed in the second quarter of 2023, closure of our Jerusalem research and development facility
and termination of work on our preclinical NAM NK pipeline programs. We undertook these reprioritization efforts after unsuccessfully
seeking a strategic partnership or other transaction, such as a royalty financing, licensing, collaboration or other similar transaction.
We first engaged Moelis & Company LLC in July 2020 to pursue a royalty financing or other similar transaction related to Omisirge.
Most recently, in April 2023, we engaged Moelis & Company LLC as our financial advisor and commenced a strategic review process seeking
to secure a transaction that would support expanded access to Omisirge for patients and maximize value for our stakeholders. During the
course of this recent strategic review process, our board of directors explored a range of alternatives, including an asset sale, merger,
financing, licensing, and capital restructuring options. This strategic review process did not yield any viable strategic alternatives.
As a result, on March 26,
2024, we entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement, or the Support Agreement, with certain funds managed by Highbridge Capital Management,
LLC, which funds we collectively refer to as Highbridge. These funds hold all of our exchangeable senior notes issued in 2021 and 2022,
which together have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of May 1, 2024 of approximately $79.4 million. These exchangeable senior
notes represent substantially all of our outstanding debt. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, we and Highbridge agreed to restructure
all of our outstanding equity and debt in a voluntary restructuring proceeding in the District Court of Beersheba, Israel, or the District
Court, that is governed by Israeli law, referred to as our restructuring process. In addition, on April 22, 2024, Abigail Jenkins, solely
in her capacity as our duly authorized foreign representative, or the Foreign Representative, filed a petition for recognition for relief
and for the recognition and enforcement of the District Court’s order approving the debt arrangement in Israel under Chapter 15
of Title 11, or Chapter 15, of the United States Bankruptcy Code, or the Bankruptcy Code, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware, or the U.S. Court.
If the restructuring process
is completed as contemplated by the Support Agreement, all outstanding ordinary shares of Gamida Cell Ltd. will be cancelled and each
shareholder as of the completion of the restructuring process will be entitled to receive certain contingent value rights, or CVRs, in
exchange for such cancelled shares. Gamida Cell Ltd. will continue to exist as a private operating company that is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Highbridge, and our business will continue as a going concern. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, as approved by the District Court
(subject to the amended terms of the CVRs) on May 8, 2024 and by the U.S. Court on May 15, 2024, the CVRs will be issued pursuant to a
contingent value rights agreement, or the CVR Agreement, to be executed in connection with the restructuring process. When issued, the
CVRs will entitle the holders to certain cash payments totaling up to $40 million upon the achievement of certain milestones as will be
more fully set forth in the CVR Agreement. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, Highbridge will fund the reorganized company following the
restructuring process through a secured debt facility of approximately $50 million, comprised of (i) $30 million of cash to be provided
as soon as practicable following the completion of the restructuring process; (ii) the remaining principal amount owed under the 2022
Notes; and (iii) the remaining approximately $15 million to be provided by way of delayed draw term loans on terms and conditions to be
agreed upon in principle with Highbridge prior to the completion of the restructuring process.
On March 28, 2024, we received
a delisting notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq, notifying us that our ordinary shares were scheduled for delisting from
the Nasdaq Capital Market due to (i) the Restructuring Proceeding and the associated public interest concerns raised by such proceeding;
(ii) concerns regarding the residual equity interest of the existing listed securities holders; and (iii) concerns about the Company’s
ability to sustain compliance with all requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq. As a result, on April 25, 2024, the Nasdaq Stock
Market filed a Form 25 delisting our ordinary shares from Nasdaq and our ordinary shares began trading on the over-the-counter market
on April 26, 2024 under the symbol “GMDAQ.” In addition, on May 9, 2024, we filed (i) a post-effective amendment to various
outstanding registration statements on Form S-3, which amendment was declared effective by the SEC on May 13, 2023, and (ii) a post-effective
amendment to various outstanding registration statements on Form S-8, which amendment became effective immediately upon filing, each to
remove and withdraw from registration the shares that were registered but remained unsold thereunder. Immediately following the closing
of our restructuring process, which we anticipate will occur on or about May 24, 2024, we intend to file a Form 15 with the SEC to suspend
our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and will no longer be a public reporting company registered with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission. Except for the CVRs, we do not anticipate that our shareholders will otherwise receive any distribution or recovery
(cash or otherwise) as part of the restructuring process. There is no assurance that we will complete our restructuring process as currently
contemplated. If we are unable to complete our restructuring process on our anticipated timeline, we expect that we will enter into involuntary
restructuring proceedings in Israeli court and our shareholders will not receive any proceeds from such proceedings.
In connection with our restructuring
process and in order to attempt to extend our financial resources beyond the second quarter of 2024, we have reduced operating expenses
and we are implementing a workforce reduction plan pursuant to which we expect to reduce our workforce as of March 31, 2024 by approximately
25%, with such reductions expected to be complete by the closing of the restructuring process. Affected employees are being offered separation
benefits, including severance payments and temporary healthcare coverage assistance, which severance payments are required under applicable
law. Each affected employee’s eligibility for the separation benefits is contingent upon such employee’s execution of a separation
agreement that includes a general release of claims against us. We estimate that the severance and termination-related costs will be approximately
$1.8 million, and we recorded these charges primarily in the first quarter of 2024. Our remaining employees will continue to support the
commercialization of Omisirge and complete our restructuring process. The costs that we expect to incur in connection with our restructuring
process, including the workforce reduction, are subject to a number of assumptions, and actual results may differ materially from these
expectations. We may incur additional costs not currently contemplated due to events that may occur as a result of, or that are associated
with, our restructuring process and the workforce reduction plan. See “Item 1A: Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Financial
Position and Restructuring Process” for additional information.
Our financial statements have
been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is able to realize its assets and satisfy liabilities in the ordinary course
of business. The financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments relating to the carrying values and classification of assets
and liabilities that would be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Our audited consolidated financial statements
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 accompanying our previously filed annual report note that there is substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern, absent sources of additional liquidity. If we are unable to complete our restructuring process
as contemplated by the Support Agreement, we will likely enter involuntary restructuring proceedings in Israel and wind down our operations.
There would be significant costs associated with such proceedings and wind down, such as separation of employees and termination of contracts,
and we could owe certain taxes on any such transaction. If we enter involuntary restructuring proceedings, there will be no cash available
for distribution to shareholders after payment of the foregoing expenses.
Components
of Results of Operations
Revenue
We
currently have one product, Omisirge, which was approved by the FDA in April 2023, and we first recognized revenue from the sale of Omisirge
in the third quarter of 2023. In the future, we may generate revenue from a combination of product sales, reimbursements, up-front payments
and future collaborations.
Cost
of sales
As
we transitioned from a development stage company to a commercial stage company with recognized revenue, we began to report cost of sales.
Cost of sales are reported using a standard costing approach based on staffed capacity. Many of these costs were previously included
in research and development costs as described below.
The
direct costs of sales include: materials; testing; shipping; manufacturing; quality assurance and quality control labor; and direct overheads,
including manufacturing depreciation.
Royalty
expenses, which are a function of the revenue in the period, are also included in cost of sales. As applicable, cost of sales will also
recognize the expense for any batch failures incurred in the period.
Excess
capacity
Excess
capacity costs reflect labor and manufacturing overhead costs incurred, above the amount of these costs absorbed in cost of sales as
part of standard costs, which are based on staffed capacity levels, given that the Kiryat Gat facility is staffed to produce the anticipated
demand over the course of the coming year.
Research
and development expenses, net
Our
research and development expenses, net of IIA grants, consist primarily of:
| ● | salaries
and related costs, including share-based compensation expense, for our personnel in research
and development functions; |
| ● | expenses
incurred under agreements with third parties, including CROs, subcontractors, suppliers and
consultants, for the conduct of our preclinical studies and clinical trials; |
| ● | expenses
incurred to acquire, develop and manufacture preclinical study and clinical trial materials;
and |
| ● | facility
and equipment costs, including depreciation expense, maintenance and allocated direct and
indirect overhead costs. |
Research
and development expenses (net of grants) are recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss when incurred.
Through
March 31, 2024, we have received an aggregate of approximately $37.1 million in grants from the Israeli Innovation Authority, or the
IIA, including from the Bereshit Consortium sponsored by the IIA, of which $34.5 million is royalty-bearing grants, and approximately
$2.6 million is non-royalty-bearing grants, and all of which was awarded for research and development funding. Our total outstanding
obligation to the IIA through March 31, 2024, amounts to approximately $44.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the royalty-bearing grants,
we are obligated to pay the IIA royalties at the rate of between 3.0% to 3.5% on future sales of the developed product, up to a limit
of 100% of the amounts of the U.S. dollar-linked grants received, plus annual interest. Pursuant to the latest IIA regulations, grants
received from the IIA before June 30, 2017 bear an annual interest rate that applied at the time of the approval of the applicable file
and such interest will apply to all the funding received under that approval. Grants received from the IIA after June 30, 2017, bear
an annual interest rate based on the 12-month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, until December 31, 2023, and, as of January 1,
2024, bear an annual interest rate based on the 12-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or the SOFR, or in an alternative publication
by the Bank of Israel, with the addition of 0.72%. Grants approved after January 1, 2024, will bear the higher of (i) the 12-month SOFR
interest, plus 1% or (ii) a fixed annual interest rate of 4%. The Bereshit Consortium program does not require payments of royalties
to the IIA, but all other restrictions under the Innovation Law, such as local manufacturing obligations and know-how transfer limitations,
as further detailed hereunder, are applicable to the know how developed by us with the funding received in such consortium program.
In
addition to paying any royalties due, we must abide by other restrictions associated with receiving such grants under the Encouragement
of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 5744-1984, which will also continue to apply to us following
the repayment in full of the amounts due to the IIA. The Innovation Law restricts our ability to manufacture products and transfer technologies
outside of Israel, and may impair our ability to enter into agreements that involve IIA-funded products or know-how without the approval
of the IIA. Any approval, if given, will generally be subject to additional financial obligations by us. Failure to comply with the requirements
under the Innovation Law may subject us to mandatory repayment of grants received by us, together with interest and penalties, as well
as expose us to criminal proceedings.
Pursuant
to the IIA’s licensing rules, or the Licensing Rules, a grant recipient may enter into licensing arrangements or grant other rights
in know-how developed under IIA programs outside of Israel, subject to the prior consent of the IIA and payment of license fees, calculated
in accordance with the Licensing Rules. The amount of the license fees is based on various factors, including the consideration received
by the licensor in connection with the license, and shall not exceed six times the amount of the grants received by the grant recipient
(plus accrued interest) for the applicable know-how being licensed. In certain cases, such as when the license consideration includes
nonmonetary compensation or when a “special relationship” exists between the licensor and licensee (e.g., when a party controls
the other party or is the other party’s exclusive distributor), or when the agreed upon consideration does not reflect, in the
IIA’s opinion, the market value of the license, the IIA may base the value of the transaction on an economic assessment that it
obtains for such purpose.
Selling,
general and administrative (SG&A) expenses
General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, including share-based compensation, related to directors, executive,
finance, and administrative functions, facility costs and external professional service costs, including legal, accounting and audit
services and other consulting fees. Other significant expenses are related to audit, legal, regulatory and tax-related services, director
and officer insurance premiums, executive compensation, and other customary costs associated with being a public company.
Financial
expenses, net
Financial expenses, net,
include our financing expenses from the 2022 Notes and 2021 Notes, the fair value impact on our warrants and 2022 Notes, and financing
expenses relating to the issuance of warrants, after deducting financing income from deposits.
Analysis
of Results of Operations
Comparison
of the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023
The
following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023:
| |
Three months ended March 31, | | |
Change | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | | |
Amount | | |
Percentage | |
| |
(in thousands) | | |
| | |
| |
Net Revenue | |
$ | 890 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 890 | | |
| 100 | % |
Cost of Sales | |
| 916 | | |
| - | | |
| 916 | | |
| 100 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating Expenses | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Excess Capacity | |
| 2,692 | | |
| - | | |
| 2,692 | | |
| 100 | % |
Research and development expenses, net(1) | |
| 2,936 | | |
| 8,840 | | |
| (5,904 | ) | |
| (66.8 | )% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1) | |
| 19,482 | | |
| 10,740 | | |
| 8,742 | | |
| 81.4 | % |
Total operating loss | |
| 25,136 | | |
| 19,580 | | |
| 5,556 | | |
| 28.4 | % |
Financial (income) expenses, net | |
| (5,190 | ) | |
| 1,380 | | |
| (6,570 | ) | |
| (476.1 | )% |
Loss | |
$ | 19,946 | | |
$ | 20,960 | | |
$ | (1,014 | ) | |
| 4.8 | % |
| (1) | Includes
share-based compensation expense as follows: |
| |
Three
months ended March 31, | | |
Change | |
| |
2024 | | |
2023 | | |
Amount | | |
Percentage | |
| |
(in
thousands) | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Cost
of sales expenses | |
$ | 9 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 9 | | |
| 100 | % |
Excess
Capacity | |
| 38 | | |
| - | | |
| 38 | | |
| 100 | % |
Research
and development expenses, net | |
| 159 | | |
| 414 | | |
| (255 | ) | |
| (61.6 | )% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses | |
| 967 | | |
| 1,380 | | |
| (3,456 | ) | |
| (10.9 | )% |
Total
share-based compensation | |
$ | 1,173 | | |
$ | 1,499 | | |
$ | (326 | ) | |
| (21.7 | )% |
Net
revenue
Net
revenue, first recognized in the third quarter of 2023, consisted of three units of Omisirge being delivered to transplant centers, net
of revenue deductions.
Cost
of sales
Cost
of sales, first recognized in the third quarter of 2023, consists of direct costs, batch failure and royalty expenses described above.
In the first quarter we recognized expenses relating to two batch failures.
Excess
capacity
Excess capacity was $2.7
million in the period ended March 31, 2024, compared to zero expenses in the period ended March 31, 2023. The $2.7 million increase is
due to the labor and manufacturing overhead costs incurred, above the amount of these costs absorbed in cost of sales as part of standard
costs, because our facility was staffed to produce Omisirge that was not sold during the first quarter of 2024. In the period ending March
31, 2023, there was no excess capacity and no cost of sales because Omisirge had not yet received marketing approval from the FDA.
Research
and development expenses, net
Research and development
expenses, net, decreased by approximately $5.9 million to $2.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2024 from $8.9 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2023. The decrease was attributable mainly to the change in reporting of $4.2 million, moving indirect manufacturing,
quality related expenses and medical affairs expenses to selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and direct manufacturing
and quality expenses to cost of sales, a $2.0 million decrease associated with the discontinuation of development of our engineered NK
cell therapy pipeline, a $0.3 million in decreased spending associated with the Phase 3 clinical trial of Omisirge, including a decrease
in payments for manufacturing services, partially offset by workforce reduction expenses of $0.5 million and a decrease of $0.4 million
in IIA income.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Our selling, general and
administrative expenses increased by approximately $8.7 million to $19.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2024, from $10.7
million in the three months ended March 31, 2023. The increase was attributable mainly to increased costs relating to the RSA singed March
27, 2024 of $6.2 million, accrued expenses of $1.4 million related to the RIF announced on March 27, 2024, the change in reporting, including
supply chain expenses of $2.0 million including personnel costs and other indirect supply chain, quality expenses and medical affairs
expenses, and an increase in General and administrative expenses of $0.7 million, offset by Sales and marketing expenses decrease by approximately
$1.7 million due to launch readiness activities for Omisirge in Q1 2023 that were not incurred in the current period.
Financial income, net
Financial income, net, were
$5.2 million of income in the three months ended March 31, 2024, compared to $1.4 million of expenses in the three months ended March
31, 2023. The $6.6 million change in financial income was primarily due to $3.0 million of income related to the valuation of warrants
liability, and $3.0 million decrease of valuation of our secured convertible senior notes issued in December 2022.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have been devoting substantially
all of our efforts to support the commercialization of Omisirge and in pursuit of a strategic transaction. In the course of such activities
and our research and development activities, we have sustained operating losses and we expect such losses to continue in the foreseeable
future. Our accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2024 was $499.8 million and negative cash flows from operating activities during the year
ended March 31, 2024 was $23.0 million. We were unsuccessful in our efforts to seek a strategic transaction and as a result, we are undertaking
our restructuring process. Based on our assessment of our financial position at the date of issuance of our consolidated financial statements
for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, we believe that our existing capital resources will not be adequate to satisfy our expected liquidity
requirements through the end of the second quarter of 2024.
While
our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere
in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we believe that the accounting policies discussed below are critical to our financial results
and to the understanding of our past and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas involving management’s
estimates and assumptions. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if: (i) it requires us to make assumptions because information
was not available at the time or it included matters that were highly uncertain at the time we were making our estimate; and (ii) changes
in the estimate could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Convertible
notes
On
December 12, 2022, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, pursuant to which Gamida Cell Inc. issued $25.0 million in aggregate
principal amount in a convertible senior note, or the 2022 Note. The 2022 Note bears interest of 7.5% which will be paid on a quarterly
basis and monthly principal installment payments. The 2022 Note are exchangeable, at the option of the lenders, into ordinary shares
at an exchange rate of 0.52356 ordinary shares per $1.00 principal amount, together with a make-whole premium equal to all accrued and
unpaid and remaining coupons due through the maturity date. The exchange rate is subject to adjustment in the event of ordinary share
dividends, reclassifications and certain other fundamental transactions affecting the ordinary shares.
We
have elected the fair value option to measure the 2022 Note upon issuance, in accordance with ASC 825-10. Under the fair value option,
the 2022 Note is measured at fair value each period with changes in fair value reported in the statements of operations. According to
ASC 825-10, changes in fair value that are caused by changes in the instrument-specific credit risk will be presented separately in other
comprehensive income (loss).
Share-based
compensation
We
account for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC No. 718 “Compensation - Stock Compensation,” or ASC No. 718,
which requires companies to estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model.
The value of the award is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods, which is the vesting period of the respective
award, on a straight-line basis when the only condition to vesting is continued service. We selected the binominal option-pricing model
as the most appropriate fair value method for our option awards. The fair value of restricted shares, is based on the closing market
value of the underlying shares at the date of grant. Since our initial public offering, the fair value of our ordinary shares has been
determined based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Global Market. We recognize forfeitures of equity-based awards
as they occur.
Known
Trends, Events and Uncertainties
We
are subject to risks and uncertainties as a result of adverse geopolitical and macroeconomic events, including the ongoing conflict between
Israel and Hamas, an Islamist terrorist group that controls the Gaza Strip, and uncertain market conditions, including higher inflation
and supply chain disruptions, which could have a material impact on our business and financial results. The current scope of the conflict
involving Israel is proximate to our sole cell therapy manufacturing facility at Kiryat Gat, which creates uncertainty about our ability
to continue to produce Omisirge either because of an attack on or near our facility or because certain of our personnel may be called
for military service or otherwise unable to reach the facility. In addition, the conflict involving Israel may impact the flow of air
travel into and out of Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, which would adversely impact our ability to import starting materials into Israel
to manufacture Omisirge and our ability to export Omisirge manufactured for a given patient.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See
note 2 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2024 for a discussion of
recent accounting pronouncements.
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
Failure to achieve and maintain
effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operation or financial condition. In addition, current and potential shareholders could lose confidence
in our financial reporting, which could have a material adverse effect on the price of our ordinary shares. Pursuant to Section 404 and
the related rules adopted by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, our management is required to report on the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. We have completed the process of determining whether our existing internal controls
over financial reporting systems are compliant with Section 404 and whether there are any material weaknesses or significant deficiencies
in our existing internal controls. Based on this process, our management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting
were effective as of March 31, 2024.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Since our inception, we have
incurred losses and negative cash flows from our operations. For the quarters ended March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023, we incurred a net
loss of $19.9 million and $21.0 million, respectively, and net cash of $23.0 million and $22.3 million, respectively, was used in our
operating activities. As of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 we had negative working capital of $(61.3) million and $29.3 million, respectively,
and an accumulated deficit of $499.8 million and $479.8 million, respectively. Our principal sources of liquidity as of March 31, 2024
and March 31, 2023 consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $24.8 million and $46.6 million, respectively.
At-the-Market
Ordinary Shares Offering
On
June 5, 2023, we entered into an Amended and Restated Open Market Sale AgreementSM, or the Sales Agreement, under which we
have the option to offer and sell our ordinary shares having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $50.0 million from time to time
through Jefferies LLC. Pursuant to the Sales Agreement and upon delivery of notice by the Company, Jefferies may sell our ordinary shares
under an “at the market offering.” During the quarter ended March 31, 2024, we sold 9,362,420 ordinary shares for gross proceeds
of $3.1 million, resulting in net proceeds of $3.0 million after deducting sales commissions and offering expenses of $0.1 million. On
May 9, 2024, by filing the post-effective amendment to the registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-275579), we terminated
the offerings of the securities under the Sales Agreement.
Highbridge
Financings
On
February 16, 2021, Gamida Cell Inc. sold $75 million of the 2021 Notes to certain funds managed by Highbridge Capital Management, LLC,
which funds were accredited investors and qualified institutional buyers. The notes were sold at 100% of the principal amount thereof,
are senior unsecured obligations of ours and will accrue interest at a rate of 5.875% per year and are governed by an indenture. Subject
to certain limitations, the holders of the notes can elect to exchange the notes for our ordinary shares at an initial exchange rate
of 56.3063 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an exchange price of $17.76 per share). The sale was made in reliance
on the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. In connection with our restructuring process, all
of the $75 million outstanding principal amount (plus accrued and unpaid interest, fees and expenses) under the 2021 Notes will be exchanged
for all of the equity interests to be issued to Highbridge in the newly reorganized company.
On
December 12, 2022, we and our wholly owned subsidiary, Gamida Cell Inc., entered into the Loan Agreement, pursuant to which Gamida Cell
Inc. borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $25.0 million through the issuance and sale of the 2022 Note to a fund managed by Highbridge
Capital Management, LLC. The 2022 Note is exchangeable, at the option of the lenders, into our ordinary shares at an exchange rate of
0.52356 ordinary shares per $1.00 principal amount, together with a make-whole premium equal to all accrued and unpaid and remaining
coupons due through the maturity date. The exchange rate is subject to adjustment in the event of ordinary share dividends, reclassifications
and certain other fundamental transactions affecting the ordinary shares. We have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations
of Gamida Cell Inc. under the Loan Agreement and the 2021 Note and the obligations are secured by substantially all of our and our subsidiary’s
assets. The 2022 Note will mature on December 12, 2024, unless earlier repurchased, redeemed or exchanged in accordance with the terms,
and bear interest at the annual rate of 7.50%, payable on a quarterly basis, with the interest rate increasing to 12.00% at any time
upon any event of default under the Loan Agreement or certain failures to register the resale of the ordinary shares issuable pursuant
to the Note. As part of our restructuring process, we expect that Highbridge will provide a new secured debt facility on completion of
the restructuring that will include the remaining principal amount under the 2022 Note.
The
indenture governing the 2021 Note and Loan Agreement both contain customary representations and warranties and covenants, including a
$20.0 million minimum liquidity covenant and certain negative covenants restricting dispositions, changes in business and business locations,
mergers and acquisitions, indebtedness, issuances of preferred stock, liens, collateral accounts, restricted payments, transactions with
affiliates, compliance with laws, and issuances of capital stock. Most of these restrictions are subject to certain minimum thresholds
and exceptions. Certain of the negative covenants terminate with respect to the Loan Agreement when less than $5.0 million of principal
amount is outstanding under the 2022 Notes.
Capital
Resources
Overview
Through March 31, 2024, we have financed our operations primarily through
private placements and public offerings of equity securities, the 2021 Note, the 2022 Note and through the grants received from the IIA.
We have also entered into an Amended & Restated Open Market Sale AgreementSM with Jefferies LLC under which we have the
option to offer and sell our ordinary shares having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $50.0 million from time to time under an “at
the market offering” through Jefferies LLC, or our ATM facility. During the three months ended March 31, 2024, we sold 9,362,420
ordinary shares for net proceeds of $3.0 million, after deducting sales commissions under our ATM facility. In addition, on April 19,
2023, we entered into an underwritten public offering of 17,500,000 ordinary shares and 17,500,000 accompanying warrants at a public offering
price of $1.30 per ordinary share and accompanying warrant with Piper Sandler & Co., for net proceeds of $21.1 million, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. We believe our capital resources are insufficient to support our
ongoing operations, and we have initiated a restructuring process that we expect to be completed by the end of the second quarter of 2024.
Cash
flows
The
following table summarizes our statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023:
|
|
Three months ended
March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(22,998 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,284 |
) |
|
$ |
(714 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
Investing activities |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
89.2 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
5,217 |
|
|
|
(3,886 |
) |
|
|
(74.5 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities
The
cash used in operating activities during the aforementioned periods resulted primarily from our net losses incurred during such periods,
as adjusted for non-cash charges and measurements and changes in components of working capital. Adjustments to net losses for non-cash
items consisted mainly of share-based compensation, as well as the fair value impacts on our warrants liability and on the 2022 convertible
note.
Net
cash used in operating activities was $23.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2024, compared to $22.3 million used in operating
activities during the three months ended March 31, 2024. The $0.7 million increase in operating cash used was attributable primarily
costs associated with our strategic review and restructuring processes.
Net cash used in investing activities was $0.1 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2024, compared to $0.8 million provided by investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2023. The
$0.7 million decrease is primarily related to a decrease of purchases of property, plant, and equipment in the current period.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2024, compared to $5.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2023. The $3.9 million decrease is
related to a decrease in net proceeds from the sale of shares through the ATM facility in the current period and $1.7 million used on
principal payments for the 2022 convertible note.
Funding
Requirements
Although it is difficult
to predict future liquidity requirements, we believe that our current total existing funds will not be sufficient to support our ongoing
operating activities, including the restructuring process, through the end of the second quarter of 2024. These conditions raise substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and we have undertaken our restructuring process to maximize value for our stakeholders.
If we complete our restructuring process as currently contemplated, by the end of the second quarter of 2024, we will exist as a private
operating company that is a wholly owned subsidiary of Highbridge. If we are unable to complete our restructuring process by the end of
the second quarter of 2024, we will likely enter involuntary restructuring proceedings in Israel.
For
more information as to the risks associated with our operational needs, see “Item 1A: Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our
Financial Position and Restructuring Process.”
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not
applicable.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with
the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March
31, 2024 to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Our management, with participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2024. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2024 to provide reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed by us in this Quarterly Report was (a) reported within the time periods specified by SEC
rules and regulations and (b) communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding any required disclosure.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive, financial and accounting officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of March 31, 2024 based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework 2013 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting
was effective as of March 31, 2024.
Attestation
Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
Because
we are a non-accelerated filer, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting
firm.
Cybersecurity
For
a description of the risks from cybersecurity threats that may materially affect us and how they may do so, see our risk factors under
Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factor in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including “—If our information technology systems or
those third parties upon which we rely or our data, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse consequences resulting from
such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our
business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse consequences.”
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2024 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Internal Controls
In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management does not expect that our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control systems are met. Further, the design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. The design
of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there
can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal
control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the
reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control
over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings.
From
time to time, we may become party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we consider to be part of the ordinary course of business.
On
March 27, 2024, pursuant to Part 10 to the Israeli Restructuring and Financial Rehabilitation Law, 2018, Gamida Cell Ltd. filed a voluntary
proceeding for restructuring in the District Court of Beersheba, Israel, or the Restructuring Proceeding, to restructure our outstanding
debt and equity, or the Debt Arrangement. On May 8, 2024, the District Court entered a judgment in the Restructuring Proceeding, which,
among other things, (i) approved the Debt Arrangement and the other terms and conditions of the Company’s restructuring as set
forth in the Restructuring Support Agreement, dated March 26, 2024, among Gamida Cell Ltd., Gamida Cell Inc., and certain funds managed
by Highbridge Capital Management LLC, such funds, collectively referred to herein as Highbridge. The District Court’s approval
was subject to an amendment of section 5.3 of the Debt Arrangement improving the terms of the contingent value rights, or CVRs, in accordance
with the District Court expert’s recommendation; and it rejected all of the requests and claims made by certain shareholders of
the Company.
On April 22, 2024, Abigail Jenkins, solely in her capacity as a duly
authorized foreign representative, or the Foreign Representative, of Gamida Cell Ltd. filed a petition for recognition for relief under
Chapter 15 of Title 11, or Chapter 15, of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Court. The Foreign Representative sought recognition of the
Debt Arrangement commenced under Israel’s Bankruptcy and Economic Rehabilitation Law, 5778-2018 and Economic Rehabilitation Regulations,
5779-2019 pending before the District Court in Beersheba, or the Israeli Court, Case No. 63461-03-24, as (i) a foreign main proceeding
or, (ii) in the alternative, a foreign nonmain proceeding. The Foreign Representative additionally sought recognition and enforcement
of the Israeli Court’s order approving the Debt Arrangement in Israel. On May 15, 2024, the U.S. Court issued two orders: (i) granting
recognition of the Israeli Restructuring Proceeding as the foreign main proceeding on a final basis and (ii) recognizing and enforcing
the Israeli Court’s order approving the Debt Arrangement in the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
Investing
in our ordinary shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, in
addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, including the consolidated financial statements and the related
notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, before purchasing our ordinary shares. If any of the following risks actually occurs,
our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be negatively impacted. Additional risks and uncertainties
not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.
Summary
of Selected Risk Factors
Our
business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects. These risks are discussed more fully below
and include, but are not limited to, risks related to, the following:
| ● | We
will not be able to continue as a going concern and holders of our ordinary shares could
suffer a total loss of their investment. |
| ● | Pursuant
to the restructuring process as contemplated by the Support Agreement, if completed, holders
of our ordinary shares will have their equity cancelled and will be given certain contingent
value rights, or CVRs, which may have no value. |
| ● | Pursuit
of a strategic transaction has consumed a substantial portion of the time and attention of
our management and we expect that our restructuring process will continue to consume the
attention of our management, which may have an adverse effect on our business and results
of operations, and we may face increased levels of employee attrition. In addition, the third-party
costs associated with a potential strategic transaction have been and will continue to be
significant. |
| ● | While
we complete our restructuring process, we will be subject to the risks and uncertainties
associated with voluntary restructuring proceedings in Israel. |
| ● | We
have not generated significant revenue from product sales and may never be profitable. |
| ● | We
are heavily dependent on the success of Omisirge, including maintaining regulatory approval
in the U.S. and obtaining regulatory approvals in geographies outside of the United States,
and if Omisirge is not successfully commercialized, our business will be adversely affected. |
| ● | We
have limited experience producing Omisirge at commercial levels and we have limited experience
operating a cGMP compliant manufacturing facility. |
| ● | We
currently have a limited marketing and sales organization. If we are unable to establish
adequate sales and marketing capabilities to support the commercial launch of Omisirge or
enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell Omisirge, we may be unable to
generate sufficient product revenue. |
| ● | Sales
of Omisirge will be limited unless it achieves broad market acceptance by physicians, patients,
third-party payers, hospital pharmacists and others in the medical community. |
| ● | It
may be difficult for us to profitably sell Omisirge if coverage and reimbursement for Omisirge
is limited by government authorities and/or third-party payer policies. |
| ● | We
are subject to the risk of various legal and regulatory proceedings, including litigation
in the ordinary course of business. Our business further entails a significant risk of product
liability and our ability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage could have a material effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. |
| ● | Omisirge
and the administration process may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties
that could limit the commercial profile of an approved label or result in significant negative
consequences following marketing approval, and result in costly and damaging product liability
claims against us. |
| ● | Omisirge
will remain subject to regulatory scrutiny. |
| ● | We
may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designations that we have
obtained, including market exclusivity, which may cause our revenue, if any, to be reduced. |
| ● | Our
business operations and current and future relationships with healthcare professionals, consultants,
third-party payers, patient organizations and customers will be subject to applicable healthcare
regulatory laws, which could expose us to penalties. |
| ● | We
face competition from other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and our operating
results will suffer if we fail to compete effectively. |
| ● | Even
though Omisirge is approved by the FDA for marketing in the United States, we may never obtain
approval of Omisirge outside of the United States, which would limit our market opportunities
and adversely affect our business. |
| ● | The
misuse or off-label use of our products may harm our reputation in the marketplace, result
in injuries that lead to product liability suits or result in costly investigations, fines
or sanctions by regulatory bodies if we are deemed to have engaged in the promotion of these
uses, any of which could be costly to our business. |
| ● | Failure
or perceived failure to comply with existing or future laws, regulations, contracts, self-regulatory
schemes standards and other obligations related to data privacy and security (including security
incidents) could harm our business. Compliance or the actual or perceived failure to comply
with such obligations could increase the costs of our products/services, limit their use
or adoption, and otherwise negatively affect our operating results and business. |
| ● | We
rely on a limited number of suppliers to provide the raw materials other than cord blood
(serum and growth factor) needed to produce our product. We have a relationship with a single
supplier, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, for certain equipment (columns and beads) necessary to manufacture
our product. |
| ● | Our
reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets and other intellectual property,
which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets
and other intellectual property will be misappropriated or disclosed. |
| ● | We
face a variety of challenges and uncertainties associated with our dependence on the availability
of appropriate CBUs at cord blood banks for the manufacture of Omisirge. |
| ● | If
we are unable to obtain, maintain or protect intellectual property rights related to Omisirge,
we may not be able to compete effectively in our market. |
| ● | Our
ordinary shares were delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market and are currently traded on the
over-the-counter market. There is currently a limited and sporadic trading market for our
ordinary shares, and liquidity of the ordinary shares is limited. In connection with the
restructuring process, we expect to deregister our ordinary shares under the Exchange Act. |
| ● | The
market price of our ordinary shares may fluctuate significantly, which could result in substantial
losses by our investors. |
| ● | Significant
parts of our operations are located in Israel and, therefore, our results may be adversely
affected by political, economic and military conditions in Israel. |
Risks
Related to Our Financial Position and Restructuring Process
We
will not be able to continue as a going concern and holders of our ordinary shares could suffer a total loss of their investment.
Our cash balance as of March
31, 2024 was $24.8 million. Our preliminary estimated unrestricted cash balance as of May 19, 2024 was $8.3 million, reflecting a monthly
burn rate of $11.0 million, which we expect to continue. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern beyond the second quarter of 2024. We have incurred net losses each year since our inception in 1998, including net losses of
$19.9 million and $21.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and $63.0 million and $79.4 for the
years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of March 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $499.8 million.
Although
we have implemented significant cost reductions and other cash-focused measures to manage liquidity, including implementing a workforce
reduction of approximately 25% of our workforce as announced on March 27, 2024, without restructuring our substantial debt, we will not
have the necessary cash resources for our operations and to pay our outstanding obligations under the 2022 Notes (as defined below) and
the 2021 Notes (as defined below) as they become due. As of May 1, 2024, we owed approximately $4.4 million under our senior secured
exchangeable notes issued on December 12, 2022, or the 2022 Notes, and we owed approximately $75.0 million under our senior unsecured
exchangeable notes issued on February 16, 2021, or the 2021 Notes, and we have ongoing payment obligations under each of these notes.
With the goal of maximizing value for our stakeholders, on March 26, 2024, we entered into the Support Agreement with Highbridge, pursuant
to which we and Highbridge have agreed to restructure all of our outstanding equity and debt in a voluntary restructuring proceeding
that is governed by Israeli law, referred to as our restructuring process. If we are unable to complete our restructuring process as
contemplated by the Support Agreement, we will likely enter involuntary insolvency proceedings in Israel and wind down our operations.
There will be significant costs associated with such proceedings and wind down, such as separation of employees and termination of contracts,
and we could owe certain taxes on any such transaction. If we enter involuntary insolvency proceedings, we expect that there will be
no distribution (cash or otherwise) to shareholders after payment of the foregoing expenses and our shareholders will suffer a total
loss of their investment.
Pursuant
to the restructuring process as contemplated by the Support Agreement, if completed, holders of our ordinary shares will have their equity
cancelled and will be given certain contingent value rights, which may have no value.
If
our restructuring process is completed as contemplated by the Support Agreement, Gamida Cell Ltd. will be a newly reorganized private
operating company that is owned entirely by Highbridge and our business will continue as a going concern. No cash or other consideration will be available for distribution to our shareholders after discharge of our debts
and liabilities and payment of expenses associated with this process. However, pursuant to the Support Agreement, each holder of ordinary
shares of the Company as of the completion of the restructuring process will be entitled to receive certain CVRs pursuant to a contingent
value rights agreement, or the CVR Agreement, to be executed in connection with the restructuring process upon cancellation of such holder’s
ordinary shares and subject to the completion of the restructuring process.
When issued, the CVRs will entitle
the holders to certain cash payments totaling up to $40 million upon the achievement of certain revenue and commercial milestones as will
be more fully set forth in the CVR Agreement. The CVRs will not be transferable, will not have any voting or dividend rights, and interest
will not accrue on any amounts potentially payable pursuant to the CVRs. Accordingly, the right of any shareholder of record as of the
completion of our restructuring process to receive any future payment on or derive any value from the CVRs will be contingent solely upon
the achievement of the foregoing events within the time periods specified. For the quarter ended March 31, 2024, we had $1.0 million of
net revenues from sales of Omisirge, which were solely in the United States. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Omisirge will
be successfully commercialized or that the newly reorganized company will be able to achieve the milestones required for any payment under
the CVRs. If these milestones are not achieved for any reason within the time periods specified, no payments will be made under the CVRs,
and the CVRs will expire without value. Furthermore, the CVRs will be unsecured obligations and all payments pursuant to the CVRs, all
other obligations pursuant to the CVR Agreement and the CVRs and any rights or claims relating thereto will be subordinated in right of
payment to the prior payment in full of all current or future senior obligations or the reorganized company. Finally, the Israeli and
U.S. federal income tax treatment of the CVRs is unclear. There is no legal authority directly addressing the Israeli or U.S. federal
income tax treatment of the receipt of, and payments on, the CVRs, and there can be no assurance that Israel Tax Authority or the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service, would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position that could result in adverse Israeli or U.S.
federal income tax consequences to holders of the CVRs.
Pursuit
of a strategic transaction has consumed a substantial portion of the time and attention of our management and we expect that our restructuring
process will continue to consume the attention of our management, which may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations,
and we may face increased levels of employee attrition. In addition, the third-party costs associated with our restructuring process
have been and will continue to be significant.
While
we complete our restructuring process, our management has and will continue to be required to spend a significant amount of time and
effort focusing on the potential transaction. This diversion of attention may materially adversely affect the conduct of our business,
and, as a result, our financial condition and results of operations. During our strategic review process and our restructuring process,
our employees have faced considerable distraction and uncertainty and we expect to experience increased levels of employee attrition.
A loss of key personnel or material erosion of employee morale could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to maintain our
operations as a going concern, thereby adversely affecting our business and results of operations. The failure to retain members of our
management team and other key personnel could impair our ability to execute our restructuring process, thereby having a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations and increasing the likelihood that we will have to enter involuntary insolvency
proceedings.
Furthermore,
we have and expect to continue to incur significant third-party costs associated with negotiating and completing our restructuring process.
We can give no assurance as to the level of such costs, given that there can be no guarantee that we will complete our restructuring
process as currently contemplated, including with respect to the duration of the restructuring process.
While
we complete our restructuring process, we will be subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with voluntary restructuring proceedings
in Israel.
On March 27, 2024, we voluntarily
initiated restructuring proceedings pursuant to Israeli law and subject to the jurisdiction of Israeli courts. Our ability to continue
operating as a going concern will be subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with restructuring proceedings, including, among
others: our ability to execute, confirm and consummate our restructuring process; the high costs of restructuring proceedings and related
fees; our ability to obtain sufficient financing to allow us to emerge from insolvency and execute our business plan post-emergence, including
the fact that Highbridge is not required to provide any financing to the Company during the restructuring process or until its completion
(if completed), and our ability to comply with terms and conditions of that financing; our ability to continue our operations in the ordinary
course; our ability to maintain our relationships with our transplant centers and other third parties; our ability to obtain, maintain
or renew contracts that are critical to our operations on reasonably acceptable terms and conditions; our ability to attract, motivate
and retain key employees; heightened risks of shareholder and other litigation; and the actions and decisions of our stakeholders and
other third parties who have interests in our restructuring proceedings that may be inconsistent with our operational and strategic plans.
Any delays in our restructuring proceedings would increase the risks of our being unable to restructure our business and emerge from restructuring
proceedings and may increase our costs associated with the restructuring process, result in the termination of our Support Agreement,
and/or result in prolonged operational disruption or a complete wind down of our business. Also, we will need the prior approval of the
Highbridge for material transactions that are not included in a budget that has been approved by Highbridge, or which would result in
a material variance from such approved budget. Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with any restructuring proceedings, we
cannot accurately predict or quantify the ultimate impact of events that could occur during any such proceedings. There can be no guarantees
that we will emerge from restructuring proceedings and our restructuring process as a going concern. Further, we do not anticipate that
holders of our ordinary shares will receive any recovery (cash or otherwise) from our restructuring proceedings or restructuring process
at the completion of the process, except as may be payable pursuant to the CVRs.
Our
workforce reduction may not result in anticipated savings and could disrupt our business more than we expect.
On
March 27, 2024, we announced that our board of directors had authorized the termination of approximately 25% of our employees. We expect
to complete the workforce reduction during the second quarter of 2024. We may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits
and savings from this plan due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If we are unable to realize the expected cost
savings from the workforce reduction, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. We expect that our workforce
reduction and our restructuring process will be disruptive to our operations and could yield unanticipated consequences, such as attrition
beyond planned staff reductions, increased difficulties in our day-to-day operations and reduced employee morale. If employees who were
not affected by the workforce reduction seek alternative employment, this could result in our seeking contractor support at unplanned
additional expense.
Completion
of our restructuring process will constitute an event of default under the Indenture governing the 2021 Notes and the Loan and Security
Agreement governing the 2022 Notes.
Both
the Indenture governing the 2021 Notes and Loan and Security Agreement governing the 2022 Notes provide that a number of events will
constitute an event of default, including our initiation of voluntary restructuring proceedings in the District Court of Beersheba, Israel
and our filing of voluntary petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code. However, Highbridge has agreed not to pursue any remedies
available to it under either the Indenture or the Loan and Security Agreement so long as the Support Agreement is in effect. In an event
of default arising from insolvency, all obligations under the Indenture and the Loan and Security Agreement become immediately due and
payable without action by the lenders. If any other event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee or the holders of at least
25% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding 2021 Notes, in the case of the Indenture, or the administrative agent, at the
direction of certain of the lenders, in the case of the Loan and Security Agreement, may, without notice or demand, deliver a notice
of an event of default and by notice to us declare all obligations under the 2021 Notes and the 2022 Notes immediately due and payable.
Such acceleration of our debt under the Indenture or the Loan and Security Agreement would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity
and we would be forced into involuntary insolvency proceedings and wind down of our operations.
These
risks have been and are likely to continue to be exacerbated by our ongoing restructuring proceedings and the corresponding event of
default on our 2021 Notes and 2022 Notes, as further discussed herein. To the extent we are required or choose to seek third-party financing
in the future, including in connection with any exit financing contemplated by the Support Agreement, there can be no assurance that
we would be able to obtain any such required financing on a timely basis or at all, particularly in light of our ongoing restructuring
proceedings and the corresponding event of default on our 2021 Notes and 2022 Notes. Additionally, any future financing arrangements
could include terms that are not commercially beneficial to us, which could further restrict our operations and exacerbate any impact
on our results of operations and liquidity that may result from any of the factors described herein or other factors.
We
have not generated significant revenue from product sales and may never be profitable.
We
have not generated significant revenue from product sales and our ability to generate future revenue from the commercialization of Omisirge
is uncertain. We have had to invest certain costs to build out a sales and distribution team to support the launch of Omisirge. Furthermore,
generating revenue from product sales will depend heavily on our ability to:
| ● | commercialize
Omisirge with collaborators; |
| ● | obtain
regulatory approvals and marketing authorizations for Omisirge in jurisdictions outside of
the United States; |
| ● | expose,
educate and train physicians and other medical professionals to use Omisirge; |
| ● | maintain
regulatory approval for a sustainable and scalable in-house and/or third-party manufacturing
process for Omisirge that meets all applicable regulatory standards; |
| ● | establish
and maintain supply and, if applicable, manufacturing relationships with third parties that
can provide adequate, in both amount and quality, products to support the market demand for
Omisirge; |
| ● | ensure
procedures utilizing Omisirge are approved for coverage and adequate reimbursement from governmental
agencies, private insurance plans, managed care organizations, and other third-party payers
in jurisdictions where they have been approved for marketing; |
| ● | address
any competing technological and market developments that impact Omisirge or its prospective
usage by medical professionals; |
| ● | negotiate
favorable terms in any collaboration, licensing or other arrangements into which we may enter
and perform our obligations under such collaborations; |
| ● | maintain,
protect and expand our portfolio of intellectual property rights, including patents, patent
applications, trade secrets and knowhow; and |
| ● | avoid
and defend against third-party interference, infringement or other intellectual property
related claims; attract, hire and retain qualified personnel. |
Although
we have obtained regulatory approval to market Omisirge in the United States, our revenue growth potential will be dependent in part
upon the size of the markets in additional territories, if any, in which we gain regulatory approval for Omisirge, the accepted price
for Omisirge, our ability to obtain reimbursement for Omisirge at any price, whether we own the commercial rights for that territory
in which Omisirge has been approved and the expenses associated with manufacturing and marketing Omisirge for such markets. Therefore,
we may not generate significant revenue from the sale of Omisirge. Further, if we are not able to generate significant revenue from the
sale of Omisirge, we may be forced to curtail or cease our operations. Due to the numerous risks and uncertainties involved in product
development and commercialization, it is difficult to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses, or when, or if, we will be
able to achieve or maintain profitability.
Risks
Related to Commercialization of Omisirge
We
are heavily dependent on the success of Omisirge, including obtaining regulatory approvals in geographies outside of the United States,
and if Omisirge is not successfully commercialized, our business will be adversely affected.
To
date, we have deployed all our efforts and financial resources to: (i) research and develop our NAM cell expansion platform, our product,
Omisirge, and our NK cell portfolio, including conducting preclinical and clinical studies and providing general and administrative support
for these operations; (ii) develop and secure our intellectual property portfolio for our product candidates; (iii) establish our
manufacturing facility at Kiryat Gat to produce Omisirge for our clinical trials and commercial use, and (iv) establish a commercial
organization to support the launch of Omisirge.
Omisirge
may not attain market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payers or the medical community. We believe that the degree of
market acceptance and our ability to generate revenues from Omisirge will depend on a number of factors, including:
| ● | our
success in educating medical professionals and patients about the benefits, administration
and use of Omisirge; |
| ● | timing
of market introduction of medicines that may compete with Omisirge; |
| ● | our
ability to successfully continue to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Omisirge; |
| ● | continued
projected growth of the markets in which Omisirge competes; |
| ● | the
effectiveness of our marketing, sales and distribution strategy, and operations, as well
as that of any current and future licensees; |
| ● | the
extent to which physicians perform hematopoietic stem cell transplant, or HSCT; |
| ● | prevalence
and severity of any side effects; |
| ● | our
ability to fulfill requirements for maintaining regulatory approval in the US |
| ● | if
and when we are able to obtain regulatory approvals for additional indications for Omisirge; |
| ● | availability
of, and ability to maintain, coverage and adequate reimbursement and pricing from government
and other third-party payers for procedures utilizing Omisirge; |
| ● | potential
or perceived advantages or disadvantages of Omisirge over alternative treatments, including
cost of treatment and relative convenience and ease of administration; |
| ● | strength
of sales, marketing and distribution support; |
| ● | the
price of Omisirge, both in absolute terms and relative to alternative treatments; |
| ● | impact
of past and limitation of future medicine price increases; |
| ● | our
ability to maintain a commercially viable manufacturing process that is compliant with cGMP
and produces Omisirge at Kiryat Gat or through third party manufacturers; |
| ● | our
ability to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights with respect
to Omisirge; |
| ● | the
performance of third-party distribution partners, over which we have limited control; and |
| ● | medicine
labeling or medicine insert requirements of the FDA or other regulatory authorities. |
Many
of these commercial risks are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be able to commercialize Omisirge for
its target indication. If we fail to achieve these objectives or overcome the challenges presented above, we could experience significant
delays or an inability to successfully commercialize Omisirge. Accordingly, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue through
the sale of Omisirge to enable us to continue our business.
We
have limited experience producing Omisirge at commercial levels and we have limited experience operating a cGMP manufacturing facility.
We
do not have an extensive number of employees with the experience or ability to manufacture Omisirge at commercial levels. Although the
FDA has determined that our manufacturing facility at Kiryat Gat is cGMP compliant, the FDA and equivalent foreign regulatory authority
may still in the future find violations of cGMP at our facility. We may encounter technical or scientific issues related to manufacturing
or development that we may be unable to resolve in a timely manner or with available funds. We also may encounter problems hiring and
retaining the experienced specialist scientific, quality control and manufacturing personnel needed to operate our manufacturing process,
which could result in delays in our production or difficulties in maintaining compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Any
problems in our manufacturing process or facilities could make us a less attractive collaborator for potential partners, including larger
pharmaceutical companies, which could limit our access to additional attractive development programs. Problems in our manufacturing process
or facilities also could restrict our ability to meet market demand for Omisirge.
We
currently have a limited marketing and sales organization. If we are unable to establish adequate sales and marketing capabilities to
support the commercial launch of Omisirge or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell Omisirge, we may be unable to
generate any product revenue.
Although
we have a chief executive officer with commercial experience, and we have hired other commercial leaders to lead our efforts to commercialize
Omisirge, we currently have a limited sales and marketing organization, and we have limited experience selling and marketing Omisirge.
To successfully commercialize Omisirge, we will need to develop these capabilities, either on our own or with others. We may establish
a larger sales and marketing organization independently or by utilizing experienced third parties with technical expertise and supporting
distribution capabilities to commercialize Omisirge in major markets, all of which will be expensive, difficult and time consuming. Any
failure or delay in the development of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact our ability
to commercialize Omisirge.
Further,
our initial estimate of the size of the required sales force may be materially more or less than the size of the sales force actually
required to effectively commercialize Omisirge. As such, we may be required to hire sales representatives and third-party partners to
adequately support the commercialization of Omisirge, or we may incur excess costs if we hire more sales representatives than necessary.
With respect to certain geographical markets, we may enter into collaborations with other entities to utilize their local marketing and
distribution capabilities, but we may be unable to enter into such agreements on favorable terms, if at all. We also may enter into collaborations
with pharmaceutical companies to commercialize Omisirge. If our future collaborators do not commit sufficient resources to commercialize
Omisirge, if any, and we are unable to develop the necessary marketing capabilities on our own, we will be unable to generate sufficient
product revenue to sustain our business. We may compete with companies that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales
operations. Without an internal team or the support of a third party to perform marketing and sales functions, we may be unable to compete
successfully against these more established companies.
Our
efforts to educate the medical community, including physicians, hospital pharmacists and stem cell transplant specialists, and third-party
payers on the benefits of Omisirge may require significant resources and may never be successful. If Omisirge fails to achieve market
acceptance among physicians, patients or third-party payers, we will not be able to generate significant revenue from Omisirge, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Sales
of Omisirge will be limited unless it achieves broad market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payers, hospital pharmacists
and others in the medical community.
The
commercial success of Omisirge will depend upon the acceptance of Omisirge by the medical community, including physicians, patients,
healthcare payers and hospital personnel, including transplant teams and pharmacists. The degree of market acceptance will depend on
a number of factors, including:
| ● | the
demonstration of clinical safety and efficacy of Omisirge in clinical trials; |
| ● | the
efficacy, potential and perceived advantages of Omisirge over alternative treatments; |
| ● | the
prevalence and severity of any adverse side effects; |
| ● | product
labeling or product insert requirements of the FDA or other equivalent foreign regulatory
authorities, including any limitations or the black box warning contained in Omisirge’s
approved labeling; |
| ● | distribution
and use restrictions imposed by the FDA or other equivalent foreign regulatory authorities
agreed to by us as part of a mandatory or voluntary risk management plan; |
| ● | our
ability to obtain third-party payer coverage and adequate reimbursement for Omisirge; |
| ● | the
willingness of patients to pay for drugs out of pocket in the absence of third-party coverage; |
| ● | the
strength of marketing and distribution support; |
| ● | the
timing of market introduction of competitive products; |
| ● | the
availability of products and their ability to meet market demand; and |
| ● | publicity
concerning Omisirge or competing products and treatments. |
There
are a number of alternatives to Omisirge, including stem cell transplantation using cells from matched related donors, matched unrelated
donors, mismatched unrelated donors, haploidentical donors or unmodified umbilical cord blood. If Omisirge does not achieve an adequate
level of acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payers and hospital personnel, including transplant teams and pharmacists, we
may not generate sufficient revenue from Omisirge, and we may not become or remain profitable. In addition, our efforts to educate the
medical community and third-party payers on the benefits of Omisirge may require significant resources and may never be successful.
It
may be difficult for us to profitably sell Omisirge if coverage and reimbursement for Omisirge is limited by government authorities and/or
third-party payer policies.
Uncertainty
exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of Omisirge. In the United States and markets in other countries, sales of Omisirge
will depend, in part, on the extent to which third-party payers provide coverage, and establish adequate reimbursement levels, for Omisirge.
In the United States, third-party payers include federal and state healthcare programs, private managed care providers, health insurers
and other organizations.
The
process for determining whether a third-party payer will provide coverage for Omisirge may be separate from the process for establishing
the reimbursement rate that such a payer will pay for Omisirge. Third-party payers may limit coverage to specific products on an approved
list, or also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the FDA-approved products for a particular indication.
Third-party
payers are increasingly challenging the price, examining the medical necessity and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products,
therapies and services, in addition to questioning their safety and efficacy.
We
may need to conduct expensive pharmaco-economic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of Omisirge.
Omisirge may not be considered medically necessary or cost-effective. A payer’s decision to provide coverage for Omisirge does
not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further, the determination of one payer to provide coverage for Omisirge
does not assure that other payers will also provide such coverage for Omisirge. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available
to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development.
Different
pricing and reimbursement schemes exist in other countries. In the European Union, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from
country to country. The EU provides options for EU Member States to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national
health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. An EU Member State may
approve a specific price for the medicinal product, it may refuse to reimburse a product at the price set by the manufacturer or it may
instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market.
Other EU Member States allow companies to fix their own prices for products but monitor and control prescription volumes and issue guidance
to physicians to limit prescriptions. In addition, some EU Member States provide that products may be marketed only after a reimbursement
price has been agreed. Many EU Member States also periodically review their reimbursement procedures for medicinal products, which could
have an adverse impact on reimbursement status.
Moreover,
in order to obtain reimbursement for our products in some European countries, including some EU Member States, we may be required to
complete additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies (so
called health technology assessments). This Health Technology Assessment (“HTA”) of medicinal products is becoming an increasingly
common part of the pricing and reimbursement procedures in some EU Member States, including those representing the larger markets. The
HTA process is the procedure to assess therapeutic, economic and societal impact of a given medicinal product in the national healthcare
systems of the individual country. The outcome of an HTA will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal
products by the competent authorities of individual EU Member States. The extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced
by the HTA of the specific medicinal product currently varies between EU Member States.
Recently,
many countries in the EU have increased the amount of discounts required on pharmaceuticals and these efforts could continue as countries
attempt to manage healthcare expenditures, especially in light of the severe fiscal and debt crises experienced by many countries in
the EU. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription products, has become intense. As a result, increasingly
high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products. Political, economic, and regulatory developments may further complicate
pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained. Reference pricing used by various
EU Member States, and parallel trade (arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced EU Member States), can further reduce prices.
The
marketability of Omisirge may suffer if the government and third-party payers fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement. In
addition, emphasis on managed care in the United States has increased and we expect will continue to increase the pressure on healthcare
pricing. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status
is attained for Omisirge, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
In
addition to any healthcare reform measures that may affect reimbursement, market acceptance and sales of Omisirge will depend on, in
part, the extent to which the procedures utilizing Omisirge, performed by health care providers, will be covered by third-party payers,
such as government health care programs, commercial insurance and managed care organizations. In the event health care providers and
patients accept Omisirge as medically useful, cost effective and safe, there is uncertainty on how exactly Omisirge will be reimbursed.
Third-party payers determine the extent to which new products will be covered as a benefit under their plans and the level of reimbursement
for any covered product or procedure that may utilize a covered product. Coverage will be dependent on FDA-approval and other factors;
reimbursement may vary across payers which is a risk for our product candidates. Establishment of reimbursement guidelines for products
is difficult to predict at this time what third-party payers will decide with respect to the coverage and reimbursement for Omisirge.
A
primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere has been cost containment, including price controls, restrictions on coverage
and reimbursement and requirements for substitution of less expensive products. Third-party payers decide which products and procedures
they will pay for and establish reimbursement and co-payment levels. Government and other third-party payers are increasingly challenging
the prices charged for health care products and procedures, examining the cost effectiveness of procedures, and the products used in
such procedures, in addition to their safety and efficacy, and payers limit coverage and reimbursement to the appropriate patient per
a products label. We cannot be sure that coverage will be available for Omisirge, or, if coverage is available, the level of direct or
indirect reimbursement.
We
expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of Omisirge due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing
influence of health maintenance organizations, and additional legislative changes. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general,
particularly prescription drugs and other treatments, has become increasingly intense. As a result, high barriers exist to the successful
commercialization of new products. Further, the adoption and implementation of any future governmental cost containment or other health
reform initiative may result in additional downward pressure on the price that we may receive for Omisirge.
Reimbursement
by a third-party payer may depend upon a number of factors including the third-party payer’s determination that use of Omisirge
is:
| ● | a
covered benefit or part of a covered benefit under its health plan; |
| ● | safe,
effective and medically necessary; |
| ● | appropriate
for the specific patient; |
| ● | neither
experimental nor investigational. |
There
is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, the
principal decisions about reimbursement are typically made by The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, an agency within
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as CMS decides whether and to what extent products, and the procedures that utilize
such products, will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare. Private payers may follow CMS, but have their own methods and approval
processes for determining reimbursement for new products and the procedures that utilize such products.
No
uniform policy requirement for coverage and reimbursement exists among third-party payers in the United States. Similarly, health care
providers enter into participation agreements with third-party payers wherein reimbursement rates are negotiated. Therefore, coverage
and reimbursement can differ significantly from payer to payer and health care provider to health care provider. As a result, we cannot
be sure that coverage or adequate reimbursement will be available for Omisirge or procedures utilizing Omisirge. Also, we cannot be sure
that reimbursement amounts will not reduce the demand for, or the price of, Omisirge. If reimbursement is not available, or is available
only to limited levels, we may not be able to commercialize Omisirge or achieve profitably.
Omisirge
was granted specific ICD-10-PCS codes which map to DRG-014. In addition, CMS did indicate that Omisirge would be reimbursed as a stem
cell source for an allogeneic stem cell transplant, and, therefore would be considered an allogeneic stem cell transplant acquisition
cost under 42 CFR 412.113I(2)(vii), and Medicare’s share will be paid under reasonable cost as a donor source under the Section
108 legislation. As a result, we have withdrawn our NTAP application since the Omisirge reimbursement will be covered under Section 108.
There is a risk that CMS may modify their coverage and/or reimbursement approach in the future for new therapies, including for Omisirge.
We
are subject to the risk of various legal and regulatory proceedings, including litigation in the ordinary course of business. Our business
further entails a significant risk of product liability and our ability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage could have a material
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
In
the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to various legal and regulatory proceedings, which may include but are not limited
to those involving antitrust, tax, environmental, intellectual property, data privacy and other matters, including general commercial
litigation. Any claims raised in legal and regulatory proceedings, whether with or without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive
to defend and could divert management’s attention and resources. Additionally, the outcome of legal and regulatory proceedings
may differ from our expectations because the outcomes of these proceedings are often difficult to predict reliably. Various factors and
developments can lead to changes in our estimates of liabilities and related insurance receivables, where applicable, or may require
us to make additional estimates, including new or modified estimates that may be appropriate due to a judicial ruling or judgment, a
settlement, regulatory developments or changes in applicable law. A future adverse ruling, settlement or unfavorable development could
result in charges that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any particular period. In accordance with
customary practice, we maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these potential claims. In the future, we may not be able to
maintain insurance at commercially acceptable premium levels.
Furthermore,
our business exposes us to significant product liability risks inherent in the development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of therapeutic
treatments. Product liability claims could delay or prevent completion of our development programs. If we succeed in marketing products,
such claims could result in an FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority investigation of the safety and effectiveness of our products,
our manufacturing processes and facilities or our marketing programs and potentially a recall of our products or more serious enforcement
action, limitations on the approved indications for which they may be used or suspension, variation or withdrawal of approvals. Regardless
of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may also result in decreased demand for our products, injury to our reputation, costs
to defend the related litigation, a diversion of management’s time and our resources, substantial monetary awards to trial participants
or patients and a decline in our share price. We do not currently have product liability insurance and do not anticipate obtaining product
liability insurance until such time as we have received FDA or other comparable authority approval for a product and there is a product
that is being provided to patients outside of clinical trials. Any insurance we have or may obtain may not provide sufficient coverage
against potential liabilities. Furthermore, product liability insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. As a result, we may be unable
to obtain sufficient insurance at a reasonable cost to protect us against losses caused by product liability claims that could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Omisirge
and the administration process may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could limit the commercial profile of
an approved label or result in significant negative consequences following marketing approval, and result in costly and damaging product
liability claims against us.
Undesirable
side effects, including toxicity caused by Omisirge, could cause the FDA to withdraw approval of Omisirge for any or all targeted indications.
Drug-related,
drug-product related, formulation-related and administration-related side effects result in potential product liability claims, which
could exceed our insurance coverage.
Patients
who require HSCT are often already in severe and advanced stages of disease and have both known and unknown significant pre-existing
and potentially life-threatening health risks. Omisirge may be associated with infusion reactions, graft versus host disease, engraftment
syndrome, graft failure, and malignancies of donor origin.. Infusion reactions occurred following Omisirge infusion, including hypertension,
mucosal inflammation, dysphagia, dyspnea, vomiting and gastrointestinal toxicity were reported in 47% (55/117) patients transplanted
with Omisirge in clinical trials. Grade 3-4 infusion reactions were reported in 15% (18/117) of patients transplanted with Omisirge.
Primary graft failure, defined as failure to achieve an absolute neutrophil count greater than 500 per microliter blood by Day 42 after
transplantation, occurred in 3% (4/117) of patients in Omisirge clinical trials. Acute and chronic GvHD, including life-threatening and
fatal cases, occurred in patients transplanted with Omisirge. Grade II-IV acute GvHD was reported in 58% (68/117) of patients transplanted
with Omisirge. Grade III- IV acute GvHD was reported in 17% (20/117) of patients transplanted with Omisirge. Chronic GvHD occurred in
35% (41/117) of patients transplanted with Omisirge. Two patients treated with Omisirge developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative
disorder (PTLD) in the second-year post-transplant, and one patient developed a donor-cell derived myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) during
the fourth year post-transplant. In our first Phase 1/2 clinical trial of a fresh formulation of GDA-201, adverse events included one
patient who died of E. coli sepsis. Such events could subject us to costly litigation, require us to pay substantial amounts of money
to injured patients, delay, negatively impact or end our opportunity to receive or maintain regulatory approval to market our products,
or require us to suspend or abandon our commercialization efforts.
Even
in a circumstance in which we do not believe that an adverse event is related to our products, the investigation into the circumstance
may be time-consuming or inconclusive. For instance, allogeneic HSCT, the area in which Omisirge is being used, is associated with serious
complications, including death. In addition, there are expected toxicities for patients who receive an allogeneic HSCT, such as infertility.
Thus, while not directly associated with Omisirge, there are attendant risks with the space in which our product candidates operate,
and any related investigations may interrupt our development and commercialization efforts, delay our regulatory approval process, or
impact and limit the type of regulatory approvals our product candidates receive or maintain. As a result of these factors, a product
liability claim, even if successfully defended, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
Additionally,
if we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by Omisirge, a number of potentially significant negative consequences
could result, including, but not limited to:
| ● | Regulatory
authorities may suspend, vary or withdraw approvals of Omisirge; |
| ● | regulatory
authorities may require additional warnings on the label in addition to Omisirge’s
“black box” warning, such as a contraindication; |
| ● | additional
restrictions may be imposed on the marketing of Omisirge or the manufacturing processes for
Omisirge or any component thereof; |
| ● | we
may be required to create a REMS, or comparable foreign strategies, which could include a
medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients, a
communication plan for healthcare providers and/or other elements to assure safe use; |
| ● | we
may be required to recall Omisirge, change the way Omisirge is administered or conduct additional
clinical trials; |
| ● | we
could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients; |
| ● | Omisirge
may become less competitive; and |
| ● | our
reputation may suffer. |
Any
of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of Omisirge, and could significantly harm our business,
results of operations and prospects.
Risks
Related to Government Regulation
Omisirge
will remain subject to regulatory scrutiny.
Omisirge
will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements for manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling,
record-keeping, conduct of post-marketing studies, and submission of safety, efficacy, and other post- market information, including
both federal and state requirements in the United States and European Union and requirements of comparable regulatory authorities.
Manufacturers
and manufacturers’ facilities are required to comply with extensive requirements from the FDA, EU, national competent authorities
of the EU Member States and additional regulatory authorities, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform
to cGMP regulations. As such, we and our contract manufacturers will be subject to continual review and inspections, including periodic
unannounced inspections by the FDA, competent authorities of EU Member States or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to
monitor assess and ensure compliance with cGMP and adherence to commitments made in any approved marketing application. Our failure,
or the failure of our third-party manufacturers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us,
including shutdown of the third-party vendor or invalidation of drug product lots or processes, fines, injunctions, civil penalties,
delays, suspension, variation or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product, operating restrictions
and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our product and significantly harm our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must continue to expend time,
money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production, and quality control.
We
will have to comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for our product. Promotional communications with respect to
prescription drugs and biologics are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and must be consistent with the information
in the product’s approved label. As such, we may not promote our products “off-label” for indications or uses for which
we do not have approval. The holder of an approved application must submit new or supplemental applications and obtain approval for certain
changes to the approved product, product labeling, or manufacturing process. We could also be asked to conduct post-marketing clinical
studies to verify the safety and efficacy of our products in general or in specific patient subsets. An unsuccessful post- marketing
study or failure to complete such a study could result in the withdrawal of marketing approval.
If
a regulatory authority discovers previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency,
or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, or disagrees with the promotion, marketing or labeling of a product,
such regulatory authority may impose restrictions on that product or us, including requiring withdrawal of the product from the market.
If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory authority or enforcement authority may, among other things:
| ● | impose
civil or criminal penalties; |
| ● | Suspend,
vary or withdraw regulatory approval; |
| ● | suspend
any of our clinical studies; |
| ● | refuse
to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications submitted by us; |
| ● | impose
restrictions on our operations, including closing our contract manufacturers’ facilities;
or |
| ● | seize
or detain products, or require a product recall. |
Failure
to comply with EU and EU Member State laws that apply to the conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing approval, marketing authorization
of medicinal products and marketing of such products, both before and after grant of the marketing authorization, or with other applicable
regulatory requirements may result in administrative, civil or criminal penalties. These penalties could include delays or refusal to
authorize the conduct of clinical trials, or to grant marketing authorization, product withdrawals and recalls, product seizures, suspension,
withdrawal or variation of the marketing authorization, total or partial suspension of production, distribution, manufacturing or clinical
trials, operating restrictions, injunctions, suspension of licenses, fines and criminal penalties.
Any
government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could
generate negative publicity. Any failure to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements may significantly and adversely affect our ability
to commercialize and generate revenue from our products. If regulatory sanctions are applied or if regulatory approval is withdrawn,
the value of our company and our operating results will be adversely affected.
Moreover,
the policies of the FDA and of other equivalent foreign regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be
enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates.
We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or
executive action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the
adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval
that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.
We
may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designations that we have obtained, including market exclusivity,
which may cause our revenue, if any, to be reduced.
We
obtained orphan drug designation for Omisirge from the FDA and the European Commission for the treatment of hematologic malignancies,
and we may pursue orphan drug designation for certain of our future product candidates. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate
a drug or biologic product as an orphan drug if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition, defined as a patient population
of fewer than 200,000 in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable
expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the European Union, the European
Commission, following the EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, or COMP, opinion, grants orphan drug designation to promote
the development of products that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating
condition either (i) affecting not more than five in 10,000 persons in the European Union or (ii) without the benefits derived from orphan
sales of the drug in the European Union would be insufficient to justify the necessary investment in developing the drug or biological
product. In addition, there must be no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of the condition that has been authorized
in the EU, or, if such a method exists, the medicine must be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition.
In
the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical
trial costs, tax advantages, and application fee waivers. In addition, if a product receives the first FDA approval for the indication
for which it has orphan designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other
application to market the same drug for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing
of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity
the orphan patient population. In the European Union, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as reduction
of fees or fee waivers and, potentially, ten years of market exclusivity following the granting of marketing authorization. The period
of market exclusivity is extended by two years for orphan medicinal products that have also complied with an agreed PIP. However, this
period may be reduced to six years if, if at the end of the fifth year, the orphan drug designation criteria are no longer met, including
where it is shown that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity or where the prevalence
of the condition has increased above the threshold.
Even
though we obtained orphan drug designation for Omisirge from the FDA for the treatment of hematologic malignancies and from the European
Commission for allogeneic ex-vivo-expanded umbilical cord blood-derived haematopoietic CD34+ progenitor cells and allogeneic non-expanded
umbilical cord blood-derived haematopoietic mature myeloid and lymphoid cells (also known as NiCord), orphan drug exclusivity may not
effectively protect Omisirge from competition because different drugs with different active moieties can be approved for the same condition.
Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA or European Commission can subsequently approve the same drug with the same active moiety
for the same condition if the FDA or European Commission concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is safer, more
effective, or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory
review time of a drug or biologic nor gives the drug or biologic any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.
Enacted
and future healthcare legislation may affect the prices we may set for Omisirge.
In
the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of
legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future results of operations.
In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare
costs and improve the quality of healthcare. For example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively the PPACA, was enacted, which substantially changed the way healthcare
is financed by both governmental and private payers. Among the provisions of the PPACA, those of greatest importance to the pharmaceutical
and biotechnology industries include the following: imposed new fees on entities that manufacture or import certain branded prescription
drugs; expanded pharmaceutical manufacturer obligations to provide discounts and rebates to certain government programs; implemented
a licensure framework for follow-on biologic products; expanded health care fraud and abuse laws; revised the methodology by
which rebates owed by manufacturers to the state and federal government under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for certain
drugs and biologics, including products that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; imposed an additional rebate
similar to an inflation penalty on new formulations of drugs; extended the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to utilization of prescriptions
of individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; expanded the 340B program which caps the price at which manufacturers
can sell covered outpatient pharmaceuticals to specified hospitals, clinics and community health centers; and provided incentives
to programs that increase the federal government’s comparative effectiveness research.
There
have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the PPACA. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or Tax
Act, included a provision repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the PPACA on certain
individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual
mandate”. On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the PPACA is unconstitutional
in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Further, there have been a number of health reform
measures by the Biden administration that have impacted the PPACA. For example, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation
Reduction Act of 2022, or IRA, into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance
coverage in PPACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D
program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and by creating a new manufacturer discount
program. It is possible that the PPACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how such
challenges and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the PPACA and our business.
In
addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the PPACA was enacted. In August 2011,
the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, led to aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year.
These reductions went into effect in April 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, will remain in effect until
2032, unless additional action is taken by Congress. In January 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which,
among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer
treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three
to five years. These new laws or any other similar laws introduced in the future may result in additional reductions in Medicare and
other health care funding, which could negatively affect our customers and accordingly, our financial operations.
Moreover,
payment methodologies are subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory initiatives. For example, CMS has developed value-based
payment models for a variety of care settings, including the inpatient prospective payment system used for reimbursing inpatient hospital
services. In addition, recently there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for
their marketed products, which has resulted in several U.S. Presidential executive orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted
federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription
drugs under government payer programs, and review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs. For example, in
July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple
provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the Department of Health
and Human Services, or HHS, released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform
and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can
take to advance these principles. In addition, the IRA, among other things, (i) directs the Secretary of HHS to negotiate the price of
certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D, and subjects drug manufacturers
to civil monetary penalties and a potential excise tax by offering a price that is not equal to or less than the negotiated “maximum
fair price” under the law, and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that
outpace inflation. The IRA permits HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial
years. HHS has and will continue to issue and update guidance as these programs are implemented. These provisions took effect progressively
starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 29, 2023, HHS announced the list of the first ten drugs that will be subject to price negotiations,
although the Medicare drug price negotiation program is currently subject to legal challenges. In addition, in response to the Biden
administration’s October 2022 executive order, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for testing
by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility,
and improve quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any health reform measures in the future. Further,
on December 7, 2023, the Biden administration announced an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in
rights under the Bayh-Dole Act. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published for comment a Draft
Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product
as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised,
it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework.
We
expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that
the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for Omisirge or additional
pricing pressures.
Individual
states in the United States have also increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical
and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access
and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and
bulk purchasing. For example, on January 5, 2024, the FDA approved Florida’s Section 804 Importation Program (SIP) proposal to
import certain drugs from Canada for specific state healthcare programs. It is unclear how this program will be implemented, including
which drugs will be chosen, and whether it will be subject to legal challenges in the United States or Canada. Other states have also
submitted SIP proposals that are pending review by the FDA. Any such approved importation plans, when implemented, may result in lower
drug prices for products covered by those programs. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third- party payers or other
restrictions could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities
and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will
be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates
or put pressure on our product pricing.
In
the European Union, similar political, economic and regulatory developments may affect our ability to profitably commercialize our product
candidates, if approved. In addition to continuing pressure on prices and cost containment measures, legislative developments at the
European Union or member state level may result in significant additional requirements or obstacles that may increase our operating costs.
The delivery of healthcare in the European Union, including the establishment and operation of health services and the pricing and reimbursement
of medicines, is almost exclusively a matter for national, rather than European Union, law and policy. National governments and health
service providers have different priorities and approaches to the delivery of health care and the pricing and reimbursement of products
in that context. In general, however, the healthcare budgetary constraints in most European Union member states have resulted in restrictions
on the pricing and reimbursement of medicines by relevant health service providers. Any increase in European Union and national regulatory
burdens on those wishing to develop and market products could prevent or delay marketing approval of our product candidates, restrict
or regulate post- approval activities and affect our ability to commercialize our product candidates, if approved. In markets outside
of the United States and European Union, reimbursement and healthcare payment systems vary significantly by country, and many countries
have instituted price ceilings on specific products and therapies.
We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action
in the United States, the European Union or any other jurisdiction. If we or any third parties we may engage are slow or unable to adapt
to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third parties are not able to maintain
regulatory compliance, our product candidates may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or
sustain profitability.
Our
business operations and current and future relationships with healthcare professionals, consultants, third-party payers, patient organizations
and customers will be subject to applicable healthcare regulatory laws, which could expose us to penalties.
Our
business operations and current and future arrangements with healthcare professionals, consultants, third-party payers, patient organizations
and customers, may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse, privacy and security and other healthcare laws and regulations. These
laws may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we conduct our operations, including how we
research, market, sell and distribute our product candidates, if approved. Such laws include:
| ● | the
U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities
from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing any remuneration
(including any kickback, bribe, or certain rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly,
in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual
for, or the purchase, lease, order or recommendation of, any good, facility, item or service,
for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under any U.S. federal healthcare program,
such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge
of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation; |
| ● | the
U.S. federal civil and criminal false claims, including the civil False Claims Act, which
prohibit, among other things, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, and
civil monetary penalties laws which prohibit individuals or entities from knowingly presenting,
or causing to be presented, to the U.S. federal government, claims for payment or approval
that are false or fraudulent, knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false
record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim, or from knowingly making a false
statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the U.S. federal government.
Pharmaceutical manufacturers can cause false claims to be presented to the U.S. federal government
by engaging in impermissible marketing practices, such as the off-label promotion of a product
for an indication for which it has not received FDA approval. In addition, the government
may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the U.S.
federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the
civil False Claims Act; |
| ● | the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal and
civil liability for, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting
to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully
falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement,
in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services.
Similar to the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have
actual knowledge of the healthcare fraud statute implemented under HIPAA or specific intent
to violate it in order to have committed a violation; |
| ● | HIPAA,
as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or
HITECH, and its implementing regulations, which also imposes certain obligations, including
mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy and security of individually
identifiable health information of covered entities subject to the rule, such as health plans,
healthcare clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, as well as their business associates,
independent contractors of a covered entity that perform certain services involving the use
or disclosure of individually identifiable health information on their behalf and their subcontractors
that use, disclose, access, or otherwise process individually identifiable health information; |
| ● | the
Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, or the FDCA, which prohibits, among other things, the adulteration
or misbranding of drugs, biologics and medical devices; |
| ● | the
U.S. Public Health Service Act, which prohibits, among other things, the introduction into
interstate commerce of a biological product unless a biologics license is in effect for that
product; |
| ● | the
U.S. Physician Payments Sunshine Act and its implementing regulations, which requires certain
manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under
Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions,
to report annually to the government information related to certain payments and other transfers
of value to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists,
and chiropractors), certain other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants
and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests
held by physicians and their immediate family members; |
| ● | analogous
U.S. state laws and regulations, including: state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which
may apply to our business practices, including but not limited to, research, distribution,
sales and marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed
by any third-party payer, including private insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical
companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines
and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the U.S. federal government, or otherwise
restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources;
state laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to pricing
and marketing information, which requires tracking gifts and other remuneration and items
of value provided to healthcare professionals and entities; state and local laws requiring
the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; and state laws governing the
privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ
from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating
compliance efforts; the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, which
prohibits, among other things, U.S. companies and their employees and agents from authorizing,
promising, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, corrupt or improper payments or
anything else of value to non-U.S. government officials, employees of public international
organizations and non-U.S. government owned or affiliated entities, candidates for non-U.S.
political office, and non-U.S. political parties or officials thereof; and |
| ● | similar
healthcare laws and regulations in the European Union and other jurisdictions, including
reporting requirements detailing interactions with and payments to healthcare providers. |
Outside
the United States, interactions between pharmaceutical companies and health care professionals are also governed by strict laws, such
as national anti-bribery laws of European countries, national sunshine rules, regulations, industry self-regulation codes of conduct
and physicians’ codes of professional conduct. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in reputational risk, public
reprimands, administrative penalties, fines or imprisonment.
Ensuring
that our internal operations and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations
will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices do not comply
with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws
and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental laws and
regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant penalties, including civil, criminal and administrative penalties,
damages, fines, exclusion from government-funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid or similar programs in other countries
or jurisdictions, integrity oversight and reporting obligations to resolve allegations of non-compliance, disgorgement, individual imprisonment,
contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians
or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to not be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be
subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs and imprisonment,
which could affect our ability to operate our business. Further, defending against any such actions can be costly, time-consuming and
may require significant personnel resources. Therefore, even if we are successful in defending against any such actions that may be brought
against us, our business may be impaired.
Legislative
or regulatory healthcare reforms in the United States and abroad may make it more difficult and costly for us to produce, market and
distribute our products after clearance or approval is obtained.
From
time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the
manufacture and marketing of regulated products or the reimbursement thereof. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised
or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. We cannot determine what effect changes
in regulations, statutes, legal interpretation or policies, when and if promulgated, enacted or adopted may have on our business in the
future. Such changes could, among other things, require changes to manufacturing methods; recall, replacement, or discontinuance
of Omisirge; and additional recordkeeping.
We
face competition from other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and our operating results will suffer if we fail to compete effectively.
The
biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. We face
competition from major multinational pharmaceutical companies, established and early-stage biotechnology companies, and universities
and other research institutions. Many of our competitors have greater financial and other resources, such as larger research and development
staff and more experienced marketing and manufacturing organizations. Large pharmaceutical companies, in particular, have extensive experience
in clinical testing, obtaining regulatory approvals, recruiting patients and manufacturing pharmaceutical products. These companies also
have significantly greater research, sales and marketing capabilities and collaborative arrangements in our target markets with leading
companies and research institutions.
Established
pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel therapeutics or to in-license novel
therapeutics that could make the product candidates that we develop obsolete. As a result of all of these factors, our competitors may
succeed in obtaining patent protection or FDA approval or discovering, developing and commercializing treatments in the rare disease
indications that we are targeting before we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly
through collaborative arrangements with large, established companies.
Doctors
may recommend that patients undergo HSCT using cells from matched related donors, matched or mismatched unrelated donors, haploidentical
donors or unmodified umbilical cord blood instead of using Omisirge or may choose other therapy options instead of our other NAM-derived
product candidates. In addition, there are several clinical-stage development programs that seek to improve umbilical cord blood transplantation
through the use of ex vivo expansion technologies to increase the quantity of hematopoietic stem cells for use in HSCT or the use of
ex vivo differentiation technologies to increase the quantity of hematopoietic progenitor cells for use in HSCT. We are aware of several
other companies with product candidates in various stages of development for allogeneic HSCT grafts, including but not limited to ExCellThera
and Garuda Therapeutics. In addition, many universities and private and public research institutes may develop technologies of interest
to us but license them to our competitors. Our competitors may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing on an exclusive basis, technologies
and drug products that are more effective or less costly than Omisirge or any other product candidates that we are currently developing
or that we may develop, which could render our products obsolete and noncompetitive.
We
believe that our ability to successfully compete will depend on, among other things:
| ● | our
ability to protect, develop and maintain intellectual property rights related to our product; |
| ● | our
ability to maintain a good relationship with regulatory authorities; |
| ● | our
ability to commercialize and market any of our product candidates that receive regulatory
approval; |
| ● | market
perception and acceptance of stem cell therapeutics; |
| ● | acceptance
of our product by physicians and institutions that perform HSCT procedures; |
| ● | the
price of our product; |
| ● | coverage
and adequate levels of reimbursement under private and governmental health insurance plans,
including Medicare; and |
| ● | our
ability to manufacture and sell commercial quantities of Omisirge to the market. |
If
our competitors market products that are more effective, safer or less expensive than Omisirge, we may not achieve commercial success.
Any inability to successfully compete effectively will adversely impact our business and financial prospects.
Even
though Omisirge is approved by the FDA for marketing in the United States, we may never obtain approval of Omisirge outside of the United
States, which would limit our market opportunities and adversely affect our business.
Approval
of a product candidate in the United States by the FDA does not ensure approval of such product candidate by regulatory authorities in
other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by non-U.S. regulatory authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in
other countries or by the FDA. Sales of Omisirge or our other product candidates outside of the United States will be subject to the
regulatory requirements of other jurisdictions governing clinical trials and marketing approval. Even if the FDA grants marketing approval
for a product candidate, comparable regulatory authorities in other countries also must approve the manufacturing and marketing of the
product candidate in those countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review
periods different from, and more onerous than, those in the United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials.
In many countries outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale
in that country. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our product candidates, if approved, is also subject to approval.
Even
if a product candidate is approved in another country, the applicable regulatory authority may limit the indications for which the product
may be marketed, require extensive warnings on the product labeling or require expensive and time-consuming additional clinical trials
or reporting as conditions of approval. Regulatory authorities in countries outside of the United States and the European Union also
have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those countries. Obtaining non-U.S.
regulatory approvals and compliance with non-U.S. regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs
for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our product candidates in certain countries.
Further,
clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Also, regulatory approval
for a product candidate may be withdrawn. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements, our target market will be reduced and
our ability to realize the full market potential of Omisirge or our other product candidates will be harmed and our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects will be adversely affected.
The
misuse or off-label use of our products may harm our reputation in the marketplace, result in injuries that lead to product liability
suits or result in costly investigations, fines or sanctions by regulatory bodies if we are deemed to have engaged in the promotion of
these uses, any of which could be costly to our business.
In
the United States, we obtained marketing approval for Omisirge for use in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with hematologic
malignancies who are planned for umbilical cord blood transplantation following myeloablative conditioning to reduce the time to neutrophil
recovery and the incidence of infection. We train our Omisirge marketing and sales personnel to not promote Omisirge for any other uses
outside of any FDA-cleared indications for use, known as “off-label use.”
We
cannot, however, prevent a physician from using Omisirge off-label, when in the physician’s independent professional medical judgment,
he or she deems it appropriate. As a result, there may be increased risk of injury to patients if physicians attempt to use Omisirge
for these uses for which they are not approved. Furthermore, the use Omisirge for indications other than those approved by the FDA or
any non-U.S. regulatory body may not effectively treat such conditions, which could harm our reputation in the marketplace among physicians
and patients.
If
the FDA, the national competent authorities of the EU Member States any other regulatory body in a jurisdiction in which we operate determines
that our promotional materials or training constitute promotion of an off-label use, it could request that we modify our training or
promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions, including the issuance or imposition of an untitled letter,
which is used for violators that do not necessitate a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine or criminal penalties. It is also
possible that other federal, state or non-U.S. enforcement authorities might take action under other regulatory authority, such as false
claims laws, if they consider our business activities to constitute promotion of an off-label use, which could result in significant
penalties, including, but not limited to, criminal, civil and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, exclusion from
participation in government healthcare programs and the curtailment of our operations.
We are subject to stringent and evolving
United States and foreign laws, regulations and rules, contractual obligations, industry standards, policies and other obligations related
to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations
or actions; litigation (including class claims) and mass arbitration demands; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations;
reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse business consequences.
In the ordinary course of
business, we collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit,
and share (collectively, process) personal data and other sensitive data, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade
secrets, intellectual property, data we collect about trial participants in connection with clinical trials, and sensitive third-party
data (collectively, sensitive information). Our data processing activities subject us to numerous data privacy and security obligations,
such as various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contractual requirements,
and other obligations relating to data privacy and security.
In the United States, federal,
state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including data breach notification laws, personal data
privacy laws, consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act), and other similar laws (e.g., wiretapping
laws). For example, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health
Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), imposes specific requirements relating to the privacy,
security, and transmission of individually identifiable protected health information. In the past few years, numerous U.S. states—including
California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah—have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain obligations on
covered businesses, including providing specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording residents with certain rights concerning
their personal data. As applicable, such rights may include the right to access, correct, or delete certain personal data, and to opt-out
of certain data processing activities, such as targeted advertising, profiling, and automated decision-making. The exercise of these rights
may impact our business and ability to provide our products and services. Certain states also impose stricter requirements for processing
certain personal data, including sensitive information, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments. These state laws allow for
statutory fines for noncompliance. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights
Act of 2020 (“CPRA”), (collectively, “CCPA”) applies to personal data of consumers, business representatives,
and employees who are California residents, and requires businesses to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices and honor requests
of such individuals to exercise certain privacy rights. The CCPA provides for fines of up to $7,500 per intentional violation and allows
private litigants affected by certain data breaches to recover significant statutory damages. Although the CCPA exempts some data processed
in the context of clinical trials, the CCPA increases compliance costs and potential liability with respect to other personal data we
maintain about California residents. similar laws are being considered in several other states, as well as at the federal and local levels,
and we expect more states to pass similar laws in the future. While these states, like the CCPA, also exempt some data processed in the
context of clinical trials, these developments further complicate compliance efforts, and increase legal risk and compliance costs for
us, the third parties upon whom we rely, and our customers.
Outside the United States,
an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards govern data privacy and security. For example, the European Union’s
General Data Protection Regulation (“EU GDPR”), the United Kingdom’s GDPR (“UK GDPR”), Brazil’s General
Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or “LGPD”) (Law No. 13,709/2018), Israel’s
Protection of Privacy Law, Singapore’s Personal Data Protection Act impose strict requirements for processing personal data.
For example, under the GDPR,
companies may face temporary or definitive bans on data processing and other corrective actions; fines of up to 20 million Euros under
the EU GDPR, 17.5 million pounds sterling under the UK GDPR or, in each case, 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater; or private
litigation related to processing of personal data brought by classes of data subjects or consumer protection organizations authorized
at law to represent their interests. In the ordinary course of business, we may transfer personal data from Europe and other jurisdictions
to the United States or other countries. Europe and other jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring data to be localized or limiting the
transfer of personal data to other countries. In particular, the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and the United Kingdom (“UK”)
have significantly restricted the transfer of personal data to the United States and other countries whose privacy laws it generally believes
are inadequate. Other jurisdictions may adopt similarly stringent interpretations of their data localization and cross-border data transfer
laws. Although there are currently various mechanisms that may be used to transfer personal data from the EEA and UK to the United States
in compliance with law, such as the EEA’s standard contractual clauses, the UK’s International Data Transfer Agreement / Addendum,
and the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and the UK extension thereto (which allows for transfers to relevant U.S.-based organizations who
self-certify compliance and participate in the Framework), these mechanisms are subject to legal challenges, and there is no assurance
that we can satisfy or rely on these measures to lawfully transfer personal data to the United States. If there is no lawful manner for
us to transfer personal data from the EEA, the UK or other jurisdictions to the United States, or if the requirements for a legally compliant
transfer are too onerous, we could face significant adverse consequences, including the interruption or degradation of our operations,
the need to relocate part of or all of our business or data processing activities to other jurisdictions (such as Europe) at significant
expense, increased exposure to regulatory actions, substantial fines and penalties, the inability to transfer data and work with partners,
vendors and other third parties, and injunctions against our processing or transferring of personal data necessary to operate our business.
Additionally, companies that transfer personal data out of the EEA and UK to other jurisdictions, particularly to the United States, are
subject to increased scrutiny from regulators, individual litigants, and activist groups. Some European regulators have ordered certain
companies to suspend or permanently cease certain transfers out of Europe for allegedly violating the ’ GDPR’s cross-border
data transfer limitations. In addition to data privacy and security laws, we are contractually subject to industry standards adopted by
industry groups and, we are, or may become subject to such obligations in the future. We are also bound by contractual obligations related
to data privacy and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful. For example, certain privacy laws,
such as the GDPR, require our customers to impose specific contractual restrictions on their service providers.
We publish privacy policies,
marketing materials and other statements, such as compliance with certain certifications or self-regulatory principles, regarding data
privacy and security. If these policies, materials, or statements are found to be deficient, lacking in transparency, deceptive, unfair,
or misrepresentative of our practices, we may be subject to investigation, enforcement actions by regulators or other adverse consequences.
Obligations related to data privacy and security (and consumers’ data privacy expectations) are quickly changing, becoming increasingly
stringent, and creating uncertainty.
Additionally, these obligations
may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict among jurisdictions. Preparing for
and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources, which may necessitate changes to our services, information
technologies, systems, and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal data on our behalf.
We may at times fail (or
be perceived to have failed) in our efforts to comply with our data privacy and security obligations. Moreover, despite our efforts, our
personnel or third parties on whom we rely on may fail to comply with such obligations, which could negatively impact our business operations.
If we or the third parties on which we rely fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with applicable data privacy and
security obligations, we could face significant consequences, including but not limited to: government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations,
fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar); litigation (including class-action claims) and mass arbitration demands; additional
reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on processing personal data; orders to destroy or not use personal data; and imprisonment
of company officials. In particular, plaintiffs have become increasingly more active in bringing privacy-related claims against companies,
including class claims and mass arbitration demands. Some of these claims allow for the recovery of statutory damages on a per violation
basis, and, if viable, carry the potential for monumental statutory damages, depending on the volume of data and the number of violations.
Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, or financial condition, including but not limited
to: loss of customers; interruptions or stoppages in our business operations (including clinical trials); inability to process personal
data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; limited ability to develop or commercialize our products; expenditure of time and resources
to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or substantial changes to our business model or operations.
Risks Related to our Reliance on Third Parties
We rely on a limited number of suppliers
to provide the raw materials other than cord blood (serum and growth factor) needed to produce our product candidates. We have a relationship
with a single supplier, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, for certain equipment (columns and beads) necessary to manufacture our product candidates.
We do not have any control
over the availability of these raw materials or pieces of equipment. If we or our providers are unable to purchase these raw materials
or equipment on acceptable terms, at sufficient quality levels, or in adequate quantities, if at all, the development and commercialization
of our product candidates or any future product candidates, could be delayed or there could be a shortage in supply, which could impair
our ability to meet our development objectives for our product candidates or generate revenue from the sale of any approved products.
Even following our establishment
of our own planned cGMP-compliant manufacturing capabilities, we intend to continue to rely on third-party suppliers for these raw materials
and pieces of equipment, which will expose us to risks including:
| ● | failure of any supplier to become or maintain its status as a cGMP-compliant manufacturer of raw materials,
which status is a prerequisite to our attainment of a BLA for Omisirge and our other product candidate; |
| ● | termination or nonrenewal of supply or service agreements with third parties in a manner or at a time
that is costly or damaging to us; and |
| ● | disruptions to the operations of our third-party suppliers and service providers caused by conditions
unrelated to our business or operations, including the bankruptcy of the supplier or service provider. |
Our reliance on third parties requires
us to share our trade secrets and other intellectual property, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or
that our trade secrets and other intellectual property will be misappropriated or disclosed.
Because we rely on third
parties to provide us with the materials that we use to develop and manufacture Omisirge, we may, at times, share trade secrets and other
intellectual property with such third parties. We seek to protect our proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality
agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, collaborative research agreements, consulting agreements, or other similar
agreements with our collaborators, advisors, employees and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing proprietary information.
These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, such as trade secrets
and intellectual property. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share trade secrets
and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated
into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based,
in part, on our know-how and trade secrets, a competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets or other unauthorized use or disclosure
would impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Despite our efforts to protect
our trade secrets, our competitors or other third parties may discover our trade secrets, either through breach of these agreements, independent
development or publication of information including our trade secrets by third parties. A competitor’s or other third party’s
discovery of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position and have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects.
We face a variety of challenges and
uncertainties associated with our dependence on the availability of human umbilical cord blood units, or CBUs, at cord blood banks for
the manufacture of Omisirge.
CBUs are one of the raw materials
for the manufacture of Omisirge. The CBUs currently used in the manufacture of Omisirge are procured directly by the clinical cell processing
facilities from cord blood banks, which hold more than 250,000 CBUs in the United States that have been donated, processed and cryopreserved.
However, the availability of CBUs for the manufacture of Omisirge depends on a number of regulatory, political, economic and technical
factors outside of our control, including:
| ● | government policies relating to the regulation of CBUs for clinical use; |
| ● | the availability of government funding for cord blood banks; |
| ● | pregnancy and birth rates, and the willingness of mothers to consent to the donation of CBUs and the terms
of such consent; |
| ● | individual cord blood bank policies and practices relating to CBU acquisition and banking; |
| ● | the methods used in searching for and matching CBUs to patients, which involve emerging technology related
to current and future CBU parameters that guide the selection of an appropriate CBU for transplantation; and |
| ● | methods for the procurement and shipment of CBUs and their handling and storage at clinical sites, any
or all of which may have been complicated by public health policies aimed at slowing the spread of the COVID-19 virus. |
Additionally, we do not have
control over the types of CBUs used in the manufacture of Omisirge. We rely heavily on these clinical cell processing facilities to procure
CBUs from cord blood banks that are compliant with government regulations and within the current standard of care. In addition, we may
identify specific characteristics of CBUs, such as their volume and red blood cell content, that may limit their ability to be used to
manufacture Omisirge even though these CBUs may otherwise be suitable for use in allogeneic transplant. As a result, the requirement for
CBUs to meet our specifications may limit the potential inventory of CBUs eligible for use in the manufacture of Omisirge. There is a
large variability in the tests, methods and equipment utilized by cord blood banks in testing CBUs before storage. This could result in
CBUs that are found to be unsuitable for production after their arrival at the manufacturing site. In the United States, cord blood banks
are required to file a BLA and meet certain continued regulatory requirements in order to bank and provide CBUs for transplantation. Despite
these requirements, most of the cord blood banks in the United States are not licensed. While the FDA currently allows CBUs from unlicensed
cord blood banks to be used for transplantation and we have used CBUs from such facilities in the manufacture of Omisirge for our clinical
trials, the FDA may later prohibit the use of such CBUs for transplantation. Additionally, although CBUs from non-U.S. cord blood banks,
which are generally unlicensed, are currently available in the United States for use in transplantation and we have used CBUs from non-U.S.
cord blood banks in our clinical trials, we will not be able to use cord blood from non-U.S. cord blood banks for the manufacturing of
Omisirge. Any inability to procure adequate supplies of CBUs will adversely impact our ability to develop and commercialize Omisirge.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
If we are unable to obtain, maintain
or protect intellectual property rights related to Omisirge, we may not be able to compete effectively in our market.
We rely upon a combination
of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our technologies and
product candidates. Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection
in the United States and in other countries with respect to our proprietary technology and product candidates.
We have sought to protect
our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and in other countries, with respect to our novel technologies
and product candidates, which are important to our business. Patent prosecution is expensive and time consuming. We may not be able to
prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner or in all jurisdictions.
It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development activities before it is too late
to obtain patent protection.
Further, the patent position
of biopharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions for which legal principles
remain unsettled. This renders the patent prosecution process particularly expensive and time-consuming. There is no assurance that all
potentially relevant prior art relating to our patent applications has been found and that there are no material defects in the form,
preparation, or prosecution of our patent applications, which can invalidate a patent or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending
patent application. Even if patents do successfully issue, and even if such patents cover our product, because the issuance of a patent
is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, our patents or pending patent applications may be challenged
in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad, which may result in such patents being narrowed, found unenforceable
or invalidated. For example, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, or USPTO, or become involved in post-grant review procedures, oppositions, derivations, reexaminations, inter parts review, or
IPR, or interference proceedings, in the United States or elsewhere, challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An
adverse determination in any such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held
unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology
and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged,
our patent applications and any future patents may not adequately protect our intellectual property, provide exclusivity for our product,
or prevent others from designing around our claims. Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties,
which may have an adverse impact on our business.
If we cannot obtain and maintain
effective patent rights for our product, we may not be able to compete effectively and our business and results of operations would be
harmed.
In addition to the protection
afforded by any patents that have been or may be granted, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect
proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we elect not to patent, and for processes for which patents are difficult to enforce.
However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by entering
into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. We also seek to preserve the integrity
and confidentiality of our data, trade secrets and intellectual property by maintaining the physical security of our premises and physical
and electronic security of our information technology systems. Notwithstanding these measures, organizations and systems, agreements or
security measures may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets and intellectual
property may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. Although we expect all our employees and consultants
and other third parties who may be involved in the development of intellectual property for us to assign their inventions to us, and all
of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary knowhow, information, or technology to
enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot provide any assurances that we have entered into such agreements with all applicable
third parties or that all such agreements have been duly executed. Even if we have entered into such agreements, we cannot assure you
that our counterparties will comply with the terms of such agreements or that the assignment of intellectual property rights under such
agreements is self-executing. We may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us,
to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property. If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in
addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights. Even if we are successful in prosecuting or defending
against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to our senior management and scientific personnel.
We also cannot assure you
that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain
access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. Misappropriation or unauthorized
disclosure of our trade secrets and intellectual property could impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect
on our business. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets and intellectual property are deemed inadequate, we may
have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating the trade secret. Any of the foregoing could significantly harm
our business, results of operations and prospects.
Patent reform legislation and rule
changes could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense
of any issued patents.
Our ability to obtain patents
is highly uncertain because, to date, some legal principles remain unsettled, there has not been a consistent policy regarding the breadth
or interpretation of claims allowed in patents in the United States and the specific content of patents and patent applications that are
necessary to support and interpret patent claims is highly uncertain due to the complex nature of the relevant legal, scientific, and
factual issues. Changes in either patent laws or interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish
the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our patent protection.
For example, on September
16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant
changes to United States patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also
affect patent litigation. The USPTO has developed new and untested regulations and procedures to govern the full implementation of the
Leahy-Smith Act and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first to
file provisions only became effective in March 2013. Prior to March 2013, in the United States, the first to invent was entitled to the
patent. As of March 2013, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first to file a patent application is generally
entitled to the patent. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications
in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore,
we cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our patents or pending patent applications, or that we were
the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. The Leahy-Smith Act has also introduced procedures making it easier for third
parties to challenge issued patents, as well as to intervene in the prosecution of patent applications. Finally, the Leahy-Smith Act contains
new statutory provisions that require the USPTO to issue new regulations for their implementation, and it may take the courts years to
interpret the provisions of the new statute.
However, the Leahy-Smith
Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement
or defense of our issued patents. Further, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing
the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In addition
to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty
with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the
laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce
patents that we have owned or licensed or that we might obtain in the future. Any inability to obtain, enforce, and defend patents covering
our proprietary technologies would materially and adversely affect our business prospects and financial condition.
Similarly, changes in patent
laws and regulations in other countries or jurisdictions or changes in the governmental bodies that enforce them or changes in how the
relevant governmental authority enforces patent laws or regulations may weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents
that we own or that we may obtain in the future. Further, the laws of some countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent
or in the same manner as the laws of the United States. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending
our intellectual property both in the United States and abroad. For example, if the issuance to us, in a given country, of a patent covering
an invention is not followed by the issuance, in other countries, of patents covering the same invention, or if any judicial interpretation
of the validity, enforceability, or scope of the claims, or the written description or enablement, in a patent issued in one country is
not similar to the interpretation given to the corresponding patent issued in another country, our ability to protect our intellectual
property in those countries may be limited. Changes in either patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and
other countries may materially diminish the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our patent protection. Any of the
foregoing could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.
If our trademarks and trade names
are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our business may be adversely
affected.
Our registered or unregistered
trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks.
We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names, which we need to build name recognition by potential partners
or customers in our markets of interest. Over the long term, if we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and
trade names, then we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected. If other entities use trademarks
similar to ours in different jurisdictions, or have senior rights to ours, it could interfere with our use of our current trademarks throughout
the world.
Intellectual property rights of third
parties could adversely affect our ability to continue to commercialize our product. Such litigation or licenses could be costly or not
available on commercially reasonable terms.
It is inherently difficult
to conclusively assess our freedom to operate without infringing on or otherwise violating third-party rights. Our competitive position
may suffer if patents issued to third parties or other third-party intellectual property rights cover our product or elements thereof,
or our manufacturing or uses relevant to our development plans. In such cases, we may not be in a position to continue to commercialize
our product unless we successfully pursue litigation to nullify or invalidate the third-party intellectual property right concerned, or
enter into a license agreement with the intellectual property right holder, if available on commercially reasonable terms.
There may also be pending
patent applications that if they result in issued patents, could be alleged to be infringed by our product. If such an infringement claim
should be brought and be successful, we may be required to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees
if we are found to have willfully infringed, we may be forced to cease the commercialization of our product, or we may need to seek a
license from any patent holders. No assurances can be given that a license will be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
Even if we were able to obtain such a license, it could be granted on non-exclusive terms, thereby providing our competitors and other
third parties access to the same technologies licensed to us.
It is also possible that
we have failed to identify relevant third-party patents or applications. For example, U.S. applications filed before November 29, 2000,
and certain U.S. applications filed after that date that will not be filed outside the U.S. remain confidential until patents issue. Patent
applications in the U.S. and elsewhere are published approximately 18 months after the earliest filing to which priority is claimed, with
such earliest filing date being commonly referred to as the priority date. Therefore, patent applications covering our product or platform
technology could have been filed by others without our knowledge. Additionally, pending patent applications which have been published
can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could cover our platform technologies or our product . Third-party
intellectual property right holders may also actively bring infringement claims against us. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to
successfully defend, settle or otherwise resolve such infringement claims. If we are unable to successfully settle future claims on terms
acceptable to us, we may be required to engage in or continue costly, unpredictable and time-consuming litigation. If we fail in any such
dispute, in addition to being forced to pay damages, we may be temporarily or permanently prohibited from commercializing our product
that are held to be infringing. We might, if possible, also be forced to redesign our product so that we no longer infringe the third-party
intellectual property rights, which may not be commercially feasible. Any of these events, even if we were ultimately to prevail, could
require us to divert substantial financial and management resources that we would otherwise be able to devote to our business and otherwise
significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.
Third-party claims of intellectual
property infringement may prevent or delay our development and commercialization efforts.
Our commercial success depends
in part on our avoiding infringing or otherwise violating the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. There have been many lawsuits
and other proceedings involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, including
patent infringement lawsuits, interferences, oppositions, post grant review, IPR, and reexamination proceedings before the USPTO and corresponding
non-U.S. patent offices. Numerous U.S. and non-U.S. issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties,
exist in the fields in which we developed our product. As the pharmaceutical industry expands and more patents are issued, the risk increases
that our product may be subject to claims of infringement of the patent rights of third parties or other intellectual property claims.
Third parties may assert
that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization. There may be third-party patents or patent applications with
claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture, or methods for treatment related to the use or manufacture of our product.
Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications that may later result in
issued patents that our product may infringe. In addition, third parties may obtain patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies
infringes upon these patents. If any third-party patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover the manufacturing process
of our product, any materials formed during the manufacturing process or any final product itself, the holders of any such patents may
be able to block our ability to continue to commercialize such product unless we obtain a license under the applicable patents, or until
such patents expire or are finally determined to be invalid or unenforceable.
Similarly, if any third-party
patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover aspects of our formulations, processes for manufacture, or methods of
use, the holders of any such patents may be able to block our ability to continue to commercialize our product unless we obtain a license
or until such patent expires or is finally determined to be invalid or unenforceable. In either case, such a license may not be available
on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Parties making claims against
us may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to further commercialize our product. Defense
of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee
resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including
treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, pay royalties, redesign our infringing products or obtain one or more
licenses from third parties, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure.
Furthermore, because of the
substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential
information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results
of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative,
it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our ordinary shares. Any of the foregoing could significantly harm our business,
results of operations and prospects.
We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or
enforce our intellectual property, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe,
misappropriate or otherwise violate our intellectual property or that of our licensors that we may acquire in the future. To counter infringement
or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. If we initiate legal proceedings
against a third party to enforce a patent covering our product, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product
is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability
are common, and there are numerous grounds upon which a third party can assert invalidity or unenforceability of a patent. In an infringement
proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using
the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. Third parties may also raise similar
claims before administrative bodies in the United States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re-examination,
post grant review, inter parties review, or IPR, and equivalent proceedings in non-U.S. jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings).
Such proceedings could result in revocation of or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our product. The outcome
following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we
cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we, our patent counsel, and the patent examiner were unaware during
prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and
perhaps all, of the patent protection on our product. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more
of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could
have a material adverse impact on our business.
Interference proceedings
provoked by third parties or brought by us may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patent applications.
An unfavorable outcome could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing
party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms. Our defense
of litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management
and other employees. We may not be able to prevent misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where
the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States.
Furthermore, because of the
substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential
information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results
of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative,
it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our ordinary shares. Any of the foregoing could significantly harm our business,
results of operations and prospects.
We may be subject to claims that our
employees, consultants, or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties or that
our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.
We employ individuals who
were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors.
Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants and independent contractors do not use the proprietary information or know-how
of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have inadvertently
or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any of our employees’
former employers or other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such
claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel, which could adversely
impact our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a
distraction to management and other employees. Any of the foregoing could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.
We may be subject to claims challenging
the inventorship of our intellectual property.
We may be subject to claims
that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in or right to compensation with respect to our current patent
and patent applications, future patents or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. For example, we may have inventorship
disputes arise from conflicting obligations of consultants or others who were involved in developing our product. Litigation may be necessary
to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or claiming the right to compensation. If we fail in defending any such
claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or
right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful
in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.
To the extent that our employees have not effectively waived the right to compensation with respect to inventions that they helped create,
they may be able to assert claims for compensation with respect to our future revenue. As a result, we may receive less revenue from future
products if such claims are successful, which in turn could impact our future profitability, business, results of operations and prospects.
We may become subject to claims for
remuneration or royalties for assigned service invention rights by our employees, which could result in litigation and adversely affect
our business.
A significant portion of
our intellectual property has been developed by our employees in the course of their employment for us. Under the Israeli Patent Law,
5727-1967, or the Patent Law, inventions conceived by an employee in the course and as a result of or arising from his or her employment
with a company are regarded as “service inventions,” which belong to the employer, absent a specific agreement between the
employee and employer giving the employee service invention rights. The Patent Law also provides that if there is no such agreement between
an employer and an employee, the Israeli Compensation and Royalties Committee, or the Committee, a body constituted under the Patent Law,
shall determine whether the employee is entitled to remuneration for his inventions. Case law clarifies that the right to receive consideration
for “service inventions” can be waived by the employee and that in certain circumstances, such waiver does not necessarily
have to be explicit. The Committee will examine, on a case-by-case basis, the general contractual framework between the parties, using
interpretation rules of the general Israeli contract laws. Further, the Committee has not yet determined one specific formula for calculating
this remuneration (but rather uses the criteria specified in the Patent Law). Although we generally enter into assignment-of-invention
agreements with our employees pursuant to which such individuals assign to us all rights to any inventions created in the scope of their
employment or engagement with us, we may face claims demanding remuneration in consideration for assigned inventions. As a consequence
of such claims, we could be required to pay additional remuneration or royalties to our current and/or former employees, or be forced
to litigate such claims, which could negatively affect our business.
Obtaining and maintaining our patent
protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by government
patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
Periodic maintenance fees,
renewal fees, annuity fees and various other government fees on patents and/or applications will be due to be paid to the USPTO and various
government patent agencies outside of the United States over the lifetime of our patents and/or applications and any patent rights we
may own or license in the future. We rely on our outside counsel or third-party service providers to pay these fees due to the USPTO and
non-U.S. patent agencies. The USPTO and various non-U.S. government patent agencies require compliance with several procedural, documentary,
fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. We employ reputable law firms and other professionals
to help us comply. In many cases, an inadvertent lapse can be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the
applicable rules. There are situations, however, in which non-compliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patents or patent applications,
resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, potential competitors might be
able to enter the market and this circumstance could harm our business.
We may enjoy only limited geographical
protection with respect to certain patents and we may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
Filing and prosecuting patent
applications and defending patents covering our product in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. Competitors
may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may
export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement rights are not as strong as that
in the United States. These products may compete with our product, and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective
or sufficient to prevent them from competing.
In addition, we may decide
to abandon national and regional patent applications before grant. The examination of each national or regional patent application is
an independent proceeding. As a result, patent applications in the same family may issue as patents in some jurisdictions, such as in
the United States, but may issue as patents with claims of different scope or may even be refused in other jurisdictions. It is also quite
common that depending on the country, the scope of patent protection may vary for the same product candidate or technology. The laws of
some jurisdictions do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws or rules and regulations in the United States,
and many companies have encountered significant difficulties in protecting and defending such rights in such jurisdictions. The legal
systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets and other
intellectual property protection, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing
products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in other jurisdictions, whether or
not successful, could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our
patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing as patents, and could
provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies
awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful.
Accordingly, our efforts
to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual
property that we develop or license. Furthermore, while we intend to protect our intellectual property rights in our expected significant
markets, we cannot ensure that we will be able to initiate or maintain similar efforts in all jurisdictions in which we may wish to market
our product. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate, which may have
an adverse effect on our ability to successfully commercialize our product in all our expected significant non-U.S. markets. If we encounter
difficulties in protecting, or are otherwise precluded from effectively protecting, the intellectual property rights important for our
business in such jurisdictions, the value of these rights may be diminished and we may face additional competition from others in those
jurisdictions.
Some countries also have
compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, some countries
limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In those countries, the patent owner may have
limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patents. If we are forced to grant a license to third parties with
respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired.
Patent terms may be inadequate to
protect our competitive position on our product for an adequate amount of time.
Patents have a limited lifespan.
In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest
U.S. non-provisional filing date. Various extensions may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited.
Even if patents covering our product are obtained, once the patent life has expired for our product, we may be open to competition from
competitive medications, including biosimilar and generic medications. Our patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights
to exclude others from commercializing product candidates similar or identical to Omisirge.
Depending upon the timing,
duration and conditions of any FDA marketing approval of our product candidates, one or more of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited
patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Amendments,
and similar legislation in the European Union. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension of up to five years for a patent
covering an approved product as compensation for effective patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process.
However, we may not receive an extension if we fail to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, fail
to apply within applicable deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements.
Moreover, the length of the extension could be less than we request. Only one patent per approved product can be extended, the extension
cannot extend the total patent term beyond 14 years from approval and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using
it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension
is less than we request, the period during which we can enforce our patent rights for the applicable product candidate will be shortened
and our competitors may obtain approval to market competing products sooner. As a result, our revenue from applicable products could be
reduced. Further, if this occurs, our competitors may take advantage of our investment in development and trials by referencing our clinical
and preclinical data and launch their product earlier than might otherwise be the case, and our competitive position, business, financial
condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially harmed.
Intellectual property rights do not
necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive advantage.
The degree of future protection
afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately
protect our business or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. The following examples are illustrative:
| ● | others may be able to make products that are similar to our product but that are not covered by the claims
of the patents that we own; |
| ● | we might not have been the first to invent the inventions covered by our patents or the first to file
patent applications covering our inventions; |
| ● | others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies
without infringing our intellectual property rights; |
| ● | it is possible that our pending patent applications will not lead to issued patents; |
| ● | issued patents that we own may be held invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges by our
competitors; |
| ● | issued patents that we own may not provide coverage for all aspects of our product in all countries; |
| ● | our competitors might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent
rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets; |
| ● | we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable; and |
| ● | the patents of others may have an adverse effect on our business. |
Should any of
these events occur, they could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.
Risks Related to Our Business Operations
We rely on a single facility to manufacture
Omisirge that is located in Kiryat Gat, Israel, proximate to the ongoing hostilities between Israel and Hamas in and around the Gaza Strip.
Damage to this site, or hesitancy on the part of our customers to place orders with us, as a result of such hostilities or otherwise could
have a material adverse effect on our ability to manufacture Omisirge and generate revenue.
We are solely dependent on
our facility in Kiryat Gat, Israel for the manufacture of the commercial supply of Omisirge. This facility has been cGMP certified by
the FDA and completed physical inspection by the Israeli Ministry of Health. Ongoing hostilities between Israel and Hamas in and around
the Gaza Strip could severely disrupt our manufacturing operations at our Kiryat Gat facility, as could other hostilities that could occur
whether or not related to the current violence, as well as severe natural disasters or other damage to this site. If any event were to
occur that prevents us from using all or a significant portion of this facility or otherwise disrupts our operations, it may be difficult
or, in certain cases, impossible for us to continue manufacturing Omisirge for a substantial period of time in sufficient quantities or
at all. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans that we have in place currently are limited and are unlikely to prove adequate
to guarantee a continuation of supply of Omisirge in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. Even if the physical plant of our
Kiryat Gat facility is not damaged in the ongoing hostilities, if certain or all of our on-site employees are called for military service,
we may be unable to produce Omisirge at our Kiryat Gat facility at anticipated levels or at all. Furthermore, our customers may be hesitant
to place orders with us as a result of these hostilities. The ongoing hostilities could also disrupt our supply chain. We rely on our
ability to import starting materials into Israel (including CBUs) to manufacture Omisirge and our ability to export Omisirge manufactured
for a given patient. If the conflict between Israel and Hamas affects the flow of air travel into and out of Ben Gurion Airport in Tel
Aviv, it could have a material adverse impact on our ability to manufacture and deliver Omisirge and generate revenue. Failure to produce
our sole commercial product for an extended period of time could lead to a material decline in our revenue and our ability to function
as an ongoing commercial enterprise.
Our commercial insurance
does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism, including any prospective damage to our
facility at Kiryat Gat resulting therefrom. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages
that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that such government coverage will be maintained or that it
will sufficiently cover any such potential damages. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Completion of our restructuring process
depends in part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent on
our employees, consultants and advisors. The loss of their services without a proper replacement may adversely impact the achievement
of our objectives, including completion of our restructuring process. Our employees, consultants and advisors may leave our employment
at any time. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms or at all, given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical
companies for individuals with similar skill sets and the increased uncertainty caused by our restructuring process. The inability to
recruit and retain qualified personnel, or the loss of the services of any members of our senior management team without proper replacement,
may impede our ability to complete our restructuring process.
Business disruptions could seriously
harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase costs and expenses.
Our operations and those
of our third-party suppliers and collaborators could be subject to earthquakes, power shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages,
floods, hurricanes or other extreme weather conditions, public health crises, labor disputes, war or other business interruptions. Although
we have limited business interruption insurance policies in place, any interruption could come with high costs for us, as salaries and
loan payments would usually continue. Moreover, any interruption could seriously harm one or more of our research, development or manufacturing
programs, the commercialization of any approved product or our clinical trial operations.
The recent attack by Hamas
and other terrorist organizations from the Gaza Strip on Israel and Israel’s declaration of war against them, and the war in Ukraine,
causes and may continue to cause geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainty, and an escalation of the conflict could disrupt our supply
chain. Furthermore, both the war in Ukraine and the war between Hamas and Israel have resulted in significant disruptions to global financial
markets, which may adversely affect our ability to raise capital or complete our strategic restructuring process. The resulting high inflation
rates may materially affect our business and corresponding financial position and cash flows. Inflationary factors, such as increases
in interest rates and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Rising interest rates also present a recent challenge
impacting the U.S. economy and could make it more difficult for us to obtain traditional financing on acceptable terms, if at all, in
the future. Furthermore, such economic conditions have produced downward pressure on share prices.
If our information technology systems
or those third parties upon which we rely or our data, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse consequences resulting from
such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our
business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse consequences.
In the ordinary course of
business, we collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit,
and share (collectively, process) personal data and other sensitive data, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade
secrets, intellectual property, data we collect about trial participants in connection with clinical trials, and sensitive third-party
data (collectively, sensitive information). Cyber-attacks, malicious internet-based activity, online and offline fraud, and other similar
activities threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our sensitive information and information technology systems,
and those of the third parties upon which we rely. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect,
and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors, “hacktivists,” organized
criminal threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors. Some
actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including without limitation nation-state actors for geopolitical
reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we, the third
parties upon which we rely, and our customers may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks,
that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our goods and services.
We and the third parties
upon which we rely are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through
deep fakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as fake, and phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms),
malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing attacks, credential
harvesting, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware
failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, attacks
enhanced or facilitated by AI, and other similar threats.
In particular, severe ransomware
attacks are becoming increasingly prevalent and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, ability to provide our products
or services, loss of sensitive information and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the
negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or
regulations prohibiting such payments. Remote work has become more common and has increased risks to our information technology systems
and data, as more of our employees utilize network connections, computers and devices outside our premises or network, including working
at home, while in transit and in public locations.
Future or past business transactions
(such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be
negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, we may
discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to
integrate companies into our information technology environment and security program.
We rely on third-party service
providers and technologies to operate critical business systems to process sensitive information in a variety of contexts, including,
without limitation, hosting companies, contract research organizations, and other functions. Our ability to monitor these third parties’
information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place. If our
third-party service providers experience a security incident or other interruption, we could experience adverse consequences.
While we may be entitled
to damages if our third-party service providers fail to satisfy their privacy or security-related obligations to us, any award may be
insufficient to cover our damages, or we may be unable to recover such award. In addition, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency
and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties’ infrastructure in our supply chain or our third-party partners’
supply chains have not been compromised.
While we have implemented
security measures designed to protect against security incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. Any
of the previously identified or similar threats could cause a security incident or other interruption that could result in unauthorized,
unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to our sensitive
information or our information technology systems, or those of the third parties upon whom we rely. A security incident or other interruption
could disrupt our ability (and that of third parties upon whom we rely) to provide our products. We may expend significant resources or
modify our business activities (including our clinical trial activities) to try to protect against security incidents.
Certain data privacy and
security obligations may require us to implement and maintain specific security measures or industry-standard or reasonable security measures
to protect our information technology systems and sensitive information. Applicable data privacy and security obligations may require
us to notify relevant stakeholders, including affected individuals, customers, regulators, and investors, of security incidents. Such
disclosures are costly, and the disclosure or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to adverse consequences. If we (or
a third party upon whom we rely) experience a security incident or are perceived to have experienced a security incident, we may experience
adverse consequences, such as government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections);
additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing sensitive information (including personal data); litigation
(including class claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary fund diversions; diversion of management
attention; interruptions in our operations (including availability of data); financial loss; and other similar harms. Security incidents
and attendant consequences may prevent or cause customers to stop using our products, deter new customers from using our products, and
negatively impact our ability to grow and operate our business.
Our contracts may not contain
limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient
to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our data privacy and security obligations. We cannot be sure that our insurance
coverage will be adequate or sufficient to protect us from or to mitigate liabilities arising out of our privacy and security practices,
that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that such coverage will pay future claims.
In addition to experiencing a security incident, third parties may gather, collect, or infer sensitive information about us from public
sources, data brokers, or other means that reveals competitively sensitive details about our organization and could be used to undermine
our competitive advantage or market position.
We may be subject to extensive environmental,
health and safety, and other laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions.
Our business involves the
controlled use, directly or indirectly through our service providers, of hazardous materials, various biological compounds and chemicals;
therefore, we, our agents and our service providers may be subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including
those governing air emissions, water and wastewater discharges, noise emissions, the use, management and disposal of hazardous, radioactive
and biological materials and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. The risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials
cannot be eliminated. If an accident, spill or release of any regulated chemicals or substances occurs, we could be held liable for resulting
damages, including for investigation, remediation and monitoring of the contamination, including natural resource damages, the costs of
which could be substantial. We are also subject to numerous environmental, health and workplace safety laws and regulations, including
those governing laboratory procedures, exposure to blood-borne pathogens and the handling of biohazardous materials and chemicals. Although
we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover the costs and expenses that may be incurred because of injuries to our employees
resulting from the use of these materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Additional
or more stringent federal, state, local or non-U.S. laws and regulations affecting our operations may be adopted in the future. We may
incur substantial capital costs and operating expenses and may be required to obtain consents to comply with any of these or certain other
laws or regulations and the terms and conditions of any permits or licenses required pursuant to such laws and regulations. For instance,
we have undergone inspections and obtained approvals from various governmental agencies. We hold a general business license from the City
of Jerusalem that is valid until December 31, 2027.
We also hold a toxic substances
permit from the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection (the Hazardous Material Division) and a Certificate of GMP Compliance of
a Manufacturer from the Israeli Ministry of Health - Pharmaceutical Administration. Failure to renew any of the foregoing licenses and
permits may harm our on-going and future operations. In addition, fines and penalties may be imposed for noncompliance with environmental,
health and safety and other laws and regulations or for the failure to have, or comply with the terms and conditions of our business license,
or required environmental or other permits or consents.
Our employees and independent contractors
may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements.
We are exposed to the risk
of fraud or other misconduct by our employees and independent contractors. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional failures
to comply with FDA and other equivalent foreign regulations, provide accurate information to the FDA or equivalent foreign regulatory
authorities, comply with manufacturing standards we may establish, comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations,
report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business
arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks,
self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing
and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee and independent contractor misconduct
could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, including individually identifiable information,
creating fraudulent data in our preclinical studies or clinical trials or illegal misappropriation of product candidates. If our operations
are found to be in violation of any of these laws, we may be subject to significant penalties, including civil, criminal and administrative
penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from government-funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid or similar programs in
other countries or jurisdictions, integrity oversight and reporting obligations to resolve allegations of non-compliance, disgorgement,
imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. It is
not always possible to identify and deter misconduct by employees and other third parties, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent
this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations
or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. Additionally, we are subject to
the risk that a person or government could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. If any such actions are instituted
against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on
our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.
Under current Israeli law, we may
not be able to enforce employees’ covenants not to compete and therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting
from the expertise of some of our former employees.
We generally enter into non-competition
agreements with our key employees, in most cases within the framework of their employment agreements.
These agreements prohibit
our key employees, if they cease working for us, from competing directly with us or working for our competitors for a limited period.
Under applicable Israeli law, we may be unable to enforce these agreements or any part thereof. If we cannot enforce our noncompetition
agreements with our employees, then we may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of our former employees,
which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and ability to capitalize on our proprietary information.
Risks Related to Ownership of our Ordinary
Shares
Our ordinary shares were delisted
from The Nasdaq Global Market and are currently traded on the over-the-counter market. There is currently a limited and sporadic trading
market for our ordinary shares, and liquidity of the ordinary shares is limited. In connection with the restructuring process, we expect
to deregister our ordinary shares under the Exchange Act.
As previously disclosed,
our ordinary shares were delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market and trades in our ordinary shares began being quoted on the OTC market
on April 16, 2024 under the symbol “GMDAQ.” In addition, on May 9, 2024, we filed a post-effective amendment to various outstanding
registration statements on Form S-3, which amendment was declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”) on May 13, 2024, and a post-effective amendment to various outstanding registration statements on Form S-8, which amendment
became effective immediately upon filing, each to remove and withdraw from registration the shares that were registered but remained unsold
thereunder. We can provide no assurance that our ordinary shares will continue to trade on the OTC market, whether broker-dealers will
continue to provide public quotes of our ordinary shares on this market, whether the trading volume of our ordinary shares will be sufficient
to provide for an efficient trading market or whether quotes for our ordinary shares will continue on this market in the future, which
could result in significantly lower trading volumes and reduced liquidity for investors seeking to buy or sell our ordinary shares. Furthermore,
because of the limited market and generally low volume of trading in our ordinary shares, the price of our ordinary shares could be more
likely to be affected by broad market fluctuations, general market conditions, and changes in the markets’ perception of our ordinary
shares.
We intend to file a Form
15 with the SEC, at which time we anticipate that our obligation to file periodic reports under the Exchange Act, including annual reports
on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K will be suspended, and that all requirements associated
with being an Exchange Act-registered company, including the requirement to file current and periodic reports, will terminate 90 days
thereafter. Accordingly, there will be significantly less information regarding us available to shareholders and potential investors.
Following delisting and deregistration,
it could become more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate price quotations for, our ordinary shares, and there would likely also
be a reduction in our coverage by securities analysts and the news media, which could cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline
further. Also, it may be difficult for us to raise additional capital if we are not listed on a major American exchange.
“Penny stock” rules may
make buying or selling our securities difficult which may make our ordinary shares less liquid and make it harder for investors to buy
and sell our securities.
Trading in our securities
is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and it is anticipated that trading in our securities will continue to be
subject to the penny stock rules for the foreseeable future. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be
any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules require that any
broker-dealer who recommends our securities to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors must, prior to the sale, make
a special written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to execute the transaction.
Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure
schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers
must disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities
they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements may discourage broker-dealers from recommending transactions
in our securities, which could severely limit the liquidity of our securities and consequently adversely affect the market price for our
securities.
The market price of our ordinary shares
may fluctuate significantly, which could result in substantial losses by our investors.
The stock market in general,
and the market for pharmaceutical companies in particular, has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating
performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your ordinary shares at or above the
price you paid for them. In addition, our ordinary shares have been delisted from Nasdaq and now trade on the OTC market. See also the
risk factor titled “Our ordinary shares were delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market and are currently traded on the over-the-counter
market. There is currently a limited and sporadic trading market for our ordinary shares, and liquidity of the ordinary shares is limited.
In connection with the restructuring process, we expect to deregister our ordinary shares under the Exchange Act.”
The following factors, in
addition to other risk factors described in this section, may have a significant impact on the market price of our ordinary shares:
| ● | investor reaction to the news of our restructuring process; |
| ● | success of the commercial launch of Omisirge; |
| ● | announcements of therapeutic innovations or new products by us or our competitors; |
| ● | adverse actions taken by regulatory authorities with respect to our manufacturing supply chain or sales
and marketing activities; |
| ● | changes or developments in laws or regulations, and payer reimbursement requirements applicable to any
candidate product in any of our platforms; |
| ● | any adverse changes to our relationship with manufacturers or suppliers, especially manufacturers of candidate
products; |
| ● | any intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other actions in which we may become involved; |
| ● | announcements concerning our competitors or the pharmaceutical industry in general; |
| ● | achievement of expected product sales and profitability or our failure to meet expectations; |
| ● | our commencement of, or involvement in, litigation; |
| ● | any changes in our board of directors or management; |
| ● | any escalation or expansion of the ongoing hostilities between Israel and Hamas in and around the Gaza
Strip or in the Middle East more generally; and |
| ● | the other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section. |
If our quarterly operating
results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our ordinary shares could decline substantially.
Furthermore, any quarterly fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the price of our shares to fluctuate substantially.
We believe that quarterly comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication
of our future performance.
Further, the stock market
in general and the market for biotechnology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies like ours, including due to coordinate buying and selling
activities and market manipulation. Broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the market price of our ordinary shares regardless
of our actual operating performance. In addition, a systemic decline in the financial markets, recent and potential future disruptions
in access to bank deposits or lending commitments due to bank failures and related factors beyond our control may cause our share price
to decline rapidly and unexpectedly. Price volatility of our ordinary shares might be worse if the trading volume of our ordinary shares
is low. In the past, following periods of market volatility, shareholders have often instituted securities class action litigation. If
we were involved in securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and divert resources and attention of management from our
business, even if we are successful.
Sales of a substantial number
of shares of our ordinary shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price
of our ordinary shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to
predict the effect that sales may have on the prevailing market price of our ordinary shares. In addition, we have registered all ordinary
shares that we may issue under our equity compensation plans, and, as such, these shares can be freely sold in the public market upon
issuance.
Moreover, the liquidity of
our ordinary shares may be limited, not only in terms of the number of ordinary shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but
by potential delays in the timing of executing transactions in our ordinary shares and a reduction in security analyst and media’s
coverage of our company, if any. These factors may result in lower prices for our ordinary shares than might otherwise be obtained and
could also result in a larger spread between the bid and ask prices for our ordinary shares. In addition, without a large float, our ordinary
shares will be less liquid than the stock of companies with broader public ownership and, as a result, the trading prices of our ordinary
shares may be more volatile. In the absence of an active public trading market, an investor may be unable to liquidate its investment
in our ordinary shares. Trading of a relatively small volume of our ordinary shares may have a greater impact on the trading price of
our ordinary shares than would be the case if our public float were larger. We cannot predict the prices at which our ordinary shares
will trade in the future.
If we are or become classified as
a “passive foreign investment company,” our U.S. shareholders may suffer adverse tax consequences as a result.
Generally, for any taxable
year, if at least 75% of our gross income is passive income, or at least 50% of the value of our assets (generally determined based on
a weighted quarterly average) is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income,
including cash, we would be characterized as a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. For purposes of these tests, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, gains from commodities and securities transactions,
certain gains from the disposition of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties which are received from
unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. If we are characterized as a PFIC, our U.S. shareholders
may suffer adverse tax consequences, including having gains realized on the sale of our ordinary shares treated as ordinary income, rather
than capital gain, the loss of the preferential rate applicable to dividends received on our ordinary shares by individuals who are U.S.
holders, having interest charges apply to distributions by us and gains from the sales of our ordinary shares, and additional tax reporting
requirements.
Our status as a PFIC generally
will depend on the nature and composition of our income and the nature, composition and value of our assets (which generally will be determined
based on the fair market value of each asset, with the value of goodwill and going concern value determined in large part by reference
to the market value of our ordinary shares from time to time, which may be volatile). If our market capitalization declines while we hold
a substantial amount of cash for any taxable year, we may be a PFIC for such taxable year. The manner and timeframe in which we spend
the cash we raise in any offering, the transactions we enter into, and how our corporate structure may change in the future will affect
the nature and composition of our income and assets. Our PFIC status may depend, in part, on the treatment of payments we receive from
other sources (including government grants), which is uncertain, and the magnitude of such payments compared to passive income from investments.
The Company has not yet determined its PFIC status for 2023. Because the determination of whether we are a PFIC for any taxable year is
a factual determination made annually after the end of each taxable year by applying principles and methodologies that in some circumstances
are unclear and subject to varying interpretation, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC in any taxable year.
Accordingly, our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status for any taxable year ended.
The tax consequences that
would apply if we are classified as a PFIC would also be different from those described above if a U.S. shareholder were able to make
a valid “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, election.
If a “United States person”
is treated as owning at least 10% of our shares, such holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
If a “United States
person” is treated as owning (directly, indirectly or constructively through the application of attribution rules) at least 10%
of the value or voting power of our shares, such person may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each
“controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any). Because our group includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, certain
of our current or future non-U.S. subsidiaries could be treated as controlled foreign corporations (regardless of whether we are or are
not treated as a controlled foreign corporation). A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to annually
report and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of the controlled foreign corporation’s “Subpart F income,”
“global intangible low-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property, whether or not such controlled foreign corporation
makes any distributions. An individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally
would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S.
corporation. A failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject a United States shareholder to significant monetary penalties
and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to the United States shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the
year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurances that we will assist investors in determining whether
we (or any of our current or future non-U.S. subsidiaries) are treated as a controlled foreign corporation or whether such investor is
treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any of such controlled foreign corporations or furnish to any United States shareholders
information that may be necessary to comply with the aforementioned reporting and tax paying obligations. United States investors should
consult their own advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to their investment in our shares.
The intended tax effects of our corporate
structure and intercompany arrangements depend on the application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions and on how we operate our business.
During the ordinary course
of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, our effective
tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and
other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. As we intend to operate in numerous countries and taxing jurisdictions, the application
of tax laws can be subject to diverging and sometimes conflicting interpretations by tax authorities of these jurisdictions. It is not
uncommon for taxing authorities in different countries to have conflicting views, for instance, with respect to, among other things, the
manner in which the arm’s length standard is applied for transfer pricing purposes, or with respect to the valuation of intellectual
property.
If tax authorities in any
of the countries in which we operate were to successfully challenge our transfer prices as not reflecting arms’ length transactions,
they could require us to adjust our transfer prices and thereby reallocate our income to reflect these revised transfer prices, which
could result in a higher tax liability to us. In addition, if the country from which the income is reallocated does not agree with the
reallocation, both countries could tax the same income, potentially resulting in double taxation. If tax authorities were to allocate
income to a higher tax jurisdiction, subject our income to double taxation or assess interest and penalties, it would increase our consolidated
tax liability, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Similarly, a tax authority
could assert that we are subject to tax in a jurisdiction where we believe we have not established a taxable connection, often referred
to as a “permanent establishment” under international tax treaties, and such an assertion, if successful could increase our
expected tax liability in one or more jurisdictions.
Future changes to tax laws could materially
adversely affect our company and reduce net return to our shareholders.
Tax laws are dynamic and
subject to change as new laws are passed and interpretations of the law are issued or applied. Such changes may include (but are not limited
to) the taxation of operating income, investment income, dividends received, or (in the specific context of withholding tax) dividends
paid. For instance, the recently enacted Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposes, among other rules, a 15% minimum tax on the book income
of certain large corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain corporate stock repurchases. We are unable to predict what tax reform may
be proposed or enacted in the future or what effect such changes would have on our business, but such changes, to the extent they are
brought into tax legislation, regulations, policies, or practices, could affect our financial position and overall or effective tax rates
in the future in countries where we have operations, reduce post-tax returns to our shareholder, and increase the complexity, burden,
and cost of tax compliance.
For U.S. tax purposes, our ability
to use our net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.
Under the Tax Act, as modified
by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, U.S. federal net operating losses, or NOLs, generated in taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017, may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such NOLs may be limited. In addition, under Section
382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change”
(generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its stock ownership over a three-year period) is subject to limitations
on its ability to utilize its pre-change U.S. federal NOLs to offset future taxable income. If we have undergone an ownership change in
the past, or if future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, results in an ownership change, our ability
to utilize our U.S. federal NOLs may be limited by Section 382 of the Code. As a result, even if we earn net taxable income, our ability
to use our NOLs to offset such income may be limited, which could increase our tax liability and decrease our cash flow. It is uncertain
if and to what extent states will conform to U.S. federal income tax law with respect to the treatment of NOLs.
The tax benefits that are available
to us require us to continue to meet various conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which could increase our costs
and taxes.
Some of our operations in
Israel may entitle us to certain tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, or the Investment
Law, once we begin to produce revenue. If we do not meet the requirements for maintaining these benefits, they may be reduced or cancelled
and the relevant operations would be subject to Israeli corporate tax at the standard rate, which is set at 23% in 2023 and thereafter.
In addition to being subject to the standard corporate tax rate, we could be required to refund any tax benefits that we will receive,
plus interest and penalties thereon. Even if we continue to meet the relevant requirements, the tax benefits that our current “Preferred
Enterprise” is entitled to may not be continued in the future at their current levels or at all. If these tax benefits were reduced
or eliminated, the amount of taxes that we will pay would likely increase, as all our operations would consequently be subject to corporate
tax at the standard rate, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, if we increase our activities outside
of Israel, for example, by way of acquisitions, our increased activities may not be eligible for inclusion in Israeli tax benefits programs.
We have never paid cash dividends
on our share capital, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or
paid cash dividends on our ordinary shares. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation
and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, capital
appreciation, if any, of our ordinary shares will be investors’ sole source of gain for the foreseeable future. In addition, Israeli
law limits our ability to declare and pay dividends, and may subject our dividends to Israeli withholding taxes.
Risks Related to Israeli Law and Our Operations
in Israel
Conditions in Israel, including the
most recent attack by Hamas and other terrorist organizations from the Gaza Strip and elsewhere in the region, and Israel’s war
against them, may adversely affect our operations and limit our ability to market our products, which would lead to a decrease in revenues.
Significant parts of our operations are located in Israel and, therefore, our results may be adversely affected by political, economic
and military conditions in Israel.
Because a material part of
our operations are conducted in Israel and certain members of our management as well as many of our employees and consultants, including
employees of our service providers, are located in Israel, our business and operations are directly affected by economic, political, geopolitical
and military conditions in Israel. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between
Israel and its neighboring countries and terrorist organizations active in the region. These conflicts have involved missile strikes,
hostile infiltrations and terrorism against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, which have negatively affected business conditions
in Israel.
In October 2023, Hamas terrorists
infiltrated Israel’s southern border from the Gaza Strip and conducted a series of attacks on civilian and military targets. Hamas
also launched extensive rocket attacks on Israeli population and industrial centers located along Israel’s border with the Gaza
Strip and in other areas within the State of Israel. These attacks resulted in extensive deaths, injuries and kidnapping of civilians
and soldiers. Following the attack, Israel’s security cabinet declared war against Hamas and a military campaign against these terrorist
organizations commenced in parallel to their continued rocket and terror attacks. In addition, since the commencement of these events,
there have been continued hostilities along Israel’s northern border with Lebanon (with the Hezbollah terror organization) and southern
border (with the Houthi movement in Yemen, as described below). It is possible that hostilities with Hezbollah in Lebanon will escalate,
and that other terrorist organizations, including Palestinian military organizations in the West Bank as well as other hostile countries,
such as Iran, will join the hostilities. Such clashes may escalate in the future into a greater regional conflict.
The intensity and duration
of Israel’s current war against Hamas is difficult to predict, as are such war’s economic implications on the Company’s
business and operations and on Israel’s economy in general. These events may be intertwined with wider macroeconomic indications
of a deterioration of Israel’s economic standing that may involve a downgrade in Israel’s credit rating by rating agencies
(such as the recent downgrade by Moody’s of its credit rating of Israel from A1 to A2, as well as the downgrade of its outlook rating
from “stable” to “negative”), which may have a material adverse effect on the Company and its ability to effectively
conduct its operations.
In connection with the Israeli
security cabinet’s declaration of war against Hamas and possible hostilities with other organizations, several hundred thousand
Israeli military reservists were drafted to perform immediate military service. Although many of such military reservists have since been
released, they may be called up for additional reserve duty, depending on developments in the war in Gaza and along Israel’s other
borders. Certain of our employees and consultants in Israel, in addition to employees of our service providers located in Israel, have
been called, and additional employees may be called, for service in the current or future wars or other armed conflicts with Hamas as
well as the other pending or future armed conflicts in which Israel is or may become engaged, and such persons may be absent for an extended
period of time. As a result, our operations may be disrupted by such absences, which disruption may materially and adversely affect our
business and results of operations. Additionally, the absence of employees of our Israeli suppliers and contract manufacturers, due to
their military service in the current or future wars or other armed conflicts may disrupt their operations, which in turn may prevent
or delay shipments of our products, harm our operations and product development and cause any future sales to decrease.
The hostilities with Hamas,
Hezbollah and other organizations and countries have included and may include terror, missile and drone attacks. In the event that our
facilities are damaged as a result of hostile actions, or hostilities otherwise disrupt our ongoing operations, our ability to deliver
or provide products and services in a timely manner to meet our contractual obligations towards customers and vendors could be materially
and adversely affected. Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism.
Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts
of war, we cannot assure you that such government coverage will be maintained or that it will sufficiently cover our potential damages.
Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, some countries
around the world restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries may impose restrictions on doing
business with Israel and Israeli companies if hostilities in Israel or political instability in the region continue or increase. These
restrictions may limit materially our ability to obtain raw materials from these countries or sell our products and provide our services
to companies and customers in these countries. In addition, there have been increased efforts by countries, activists and organizations
to cause companies and consumers to boycott Israeli goods and services. In addition, in January 2024, the International Court of Justice,
or ICJ, issued an interim ruling in a case filed by South Africa against Israel in December 2023, making allegations of genocide amid
and in connection with the war in Gaza, and ordered Israel, among other things, to take measures to prevent genocidal acts, prevent and
punish incitement to genocide, and take steps to provide basic services and humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza. There are concerns
that companies and businesses will terminate, and may have already terminated, certain commercial relationships with Israeli companies
following the ICJ decision. The foregoing efforts by countries, activists and organizations, particularly if they become more widespread,
as well as the ICJ rulings and future rulings and orders of other tribunals against Israel (if handed), may materially and adversely impact
our ability to and provide sell our products and services outside of Israel.
Furthermore, following Hamas’
attack on Israel and Israel’s security cabinet declaration of war against Hamas, the Houthi movement, which controls parts of Yemen,
launched a number of attacks on marine vessels traversing the Red Sea, which marine vessels were thought to either be in route towards
Israel or to be partly owned by Israeli businessmen. The Red Sea is a vital maritime route for international trade traveling to or from
Israel. As a result of such disruptions, we may experience in the future delays in supplier deliveries (including electronic components
and other products upon which we rely) extended lead times, and increased cost of freight, increased insurance costs, purchased materials
and manufacturing labor costs. The risk of ongoing supply disruptions may further result in delayed deliveries of our products and may
also have adverse impact on economic conditions in Israel.
Finally, political conditions
within Israel may affect our operations. Israel has held five general elections between 2019 and 2022, and prior to October 2023, the
Israeli government pursued extensive changes to Israel’s judicial system, which sparked extensive political debate and unrest. In
response to such initiative, many individuals, organizations and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, voiced concerns that
the proposed changes may negatively impact the business environment in Israel including due to reluctance of foreign investors to invest
or transact business in Israel, as well as to increased currency fluctuations, downgrades in credit rating, increased interest rates,
increased volatility in security markets and other changes in macroeconomic conditions. To date, these initiatives have been substantially
put on hold. If such changes to Israel’s judicial system are again pursued by the government and approved by the parliament, this
may have an adverse effect on our business, our results of operations and our ability to raise additional funds, if deemed necessary by
our management and board of directors.
Because we incur a portion of our
expenses in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our financial condition and results of operations may be harmed by currency fluctuations
and inflation.
While our reporting and functional
currency is the U.S. dollar, we pay a meaningful portion of our expenses in NIS, Euros and other currencies. The salaries of our Israeli
employees, many of our general and administrative expenses (including rent for our real property facility in Israel), and the fees that
we pay to certain of our partners, are denominated in NIS. Certain of our suppliers are located in Europe and are paid in Euros. As a
result, we are exposed to the currency fluctuation risks relating to the denomination of our future expenses in U.S. dollars. More specifically,
if the U.S. dollar becomes devalued against the NIS or the Euro, our NIS- or Euro- denominated expenses will be greater than anticipated
when reported in U.S. dollars. Inflation in Israel compounds the adverse impact of such devaluation by further increasing the amount of
our Israeli expenses. Israeli inflation may also (in the future) outweigh the positive effect of any appreciation of the U.S. dollar relative
to the NIS, if, and to the extent that, it outpaces such appreciation or precedes such appreciation. The Israeli rate of inflation did
not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition during 2022 or 2023. Given our general lack of currency hedging arrangements
to protect us from fluctuations in the exchange rates of the NIS or the Euro and other non-U.S. currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar
(and/or from inflation of such non-U.S. currencies), we may be exposed to material adverse effects from such movements. We cannot predict
any future trends in the rate of inflation in Israel or in Europe or the rate of devaluation (if any) of the U.S. dollar against the NIS
or the Euro.
Provisions of Israeli law and our
amended and restated articles of association may delay, prevent or make undesirable an acquisition of all or a significant portion of
our shares or assets.
Certain provisions of Israeli
law and our amended and restated articles of association could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and may
make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us or for our shareholders to elect different individuals to our board of directors,
even if doing so would be beneficial to our shareholders, and may limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future
for our ordinary shares. For example, our amended and restated articles of association provide that our directors are elected on a staggered
basis, such that a potential acquirer cannot readily replace our entire board of directors at a single annual general meeting of the
shareholders. In addition, Israeli corporate law regulates mergers and requires that a tender offer be affected when more than a specified
percentage of shares in a company are purchased.
Our amended and restated
articles of association also include, among others things, the following restrictions which may delay, prevent or make undesirable an
acquisition of all or a significant portion of our shares or assets:
| ● | An amendment to our amended and restated articles of association generally require a vote of the holders
of a majority of our outstanding ordinary shares entitled to vote present and voting on the matter at a general meeting of shareholders
(referred to as simple majority), and the amendment of a number of provisions, such as the provision dividing our directors into three
classes, requires a vote of the holders of at least 60% of our voting power. The affirmative vote of a majority of the directors in addition
to the approval of our shareholders, is also required in order to amend our amended and restated articles of association. |
| ● | A director may not be removed except by a vote of the holders of at least 60% of our voting power, unless
otherwise the director is prohibited from serving as a director under applicable law or upon a determination by the board that their physical
or mental state prevents them from serving; and director vacancies may be filled by our board of directors. |
| ● | Subject to certain exceptions, we are restricted from engaging in certain business combination transactions,
with any shareholder who holds 20% or more of our voting power. The transactions subject to such restrictions include mergers, consolidations
and dispositions of our assets with a market value of 10% or more of our assets or outstanding shares. Subject to certain exceptions,
such restrictions will apply for a period of three years following each time a shareholder became the holder of 20% or more of our voting
power. |
| ● | Subject to certain exceptions, there is a restriction on certain transactions which may have a significant
effect on the Company’s structure, assets or business, including significant mergers and acquisitions, a disposition of all or substantially
all of the assets of the Company, a voluntary dissolution and material changes to the principal business of the Company. |
Further, Israeli tax considerations
may make potential transactions undesirable to us or to some of our shareholders whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty
with Israel granting tax relief to such shareholders from Israeli tax. With respect to certain mergers, Israeli tax law may impose certain
restrictions on future transactions, including with respect to dispositions of shares received as consideration, for a period of two years
from the date of the merger.
Furthermore, under the Encouragement
of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 5744-1984 (formerly known as the Law for the Encouragement of
Research and Development in Industry 5744-1984), and the regulations and guidelines promulgated thereunder, or the Innovation Law, to
which we are subject due to our receipt of grants from the Israel Innovation Authority, or IIA (formerly known as the Office of the Chief
Scientist of the Ministry of Economy and Industry, or the OCS), a recipient of IIA grants such as us must report to IIA regarding any
change of control of our company or regarding any change in the holding of the means of control of our company which results in any non-
Israeli citizen or resident becoming an “interested party”, as defined in the Innovation Law, in our company, and in the latter
event, the non-Israeli citizen or resident will be required to execute an undertaking in favor of IIA, in a form prescribed by IIA, acknowledging
the restrictions imposed by such law and agreeing to abide by its terms.
Investors may have difficulties enforcing
a U.S. judgment, including judgments based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or asserting
U.S. securities laws claims in Israel.
Service of process upon us
and enforcement of judgments obtained in the United States against us may be difficult to obtain within the United States. We have been
informed by our legal counsel in Israel that it may be difficult to assert claims under U.S. securities laws in original actions instituted
in Israel or obtain a judgment based on the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws. Israeli courts may refuse to hear
a claim based on a violation of U.S. securities laws against us because Israel may not be the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim.
In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the
claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proved as a fact, which can be a time-consuming
and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel addressing
the matters described above. Israeli courts might not enforce judgments rendered outside Israel, which may make it difficult to collect
on judgments rendered against us.
Moreover, among other reasons,
including but not limited to, fraud or absence of due process, or the existence of a judgment which is at variance with another judgment
that was given in the same matter if a suit in the same matter between the same parties was pending before a court or tribunal in Israel,
an Israeli court will not enforce a non-Israeli judgment if it was given in a state whose laws do not provide for the enforcement of judgments
of Israeli courts (subject to exceptional cases) or if its enforcement is likely to prejudice the sovereignty or security of the State
of Israel.
Your liabilities and responsibilities
as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law, which differs in some material respects from the U.S. law that governs the liabilities
and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. corporations.
We are incorporated under
Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our amended and restated articles of association
and the Israeli Companies Law 5759-1999, or the Companies Law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights
and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, pursuant to the Companies Law each shareholder of an
Israeli company has to act in good faith in exercising his or her rights and fulfilling his or her obligations toward the company and
other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his or her power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general
meeting of shareholders and class meetings, on amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s
authorized share capital, mergers, and transactions requiring shareholders’ approval under the Companies Law. In addition, a controlling
shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote
or who has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or officer in the company, or has other powers toward the company,
has a duty of fairness toward the company. However, Israeli law does not define the substance of this duty of fairness.
Because Israeli corporate
law has undergone extensive revision in recent years, there is little case law available to assist in understanding the implications of
these provisions that govern shareholder behavior.
Our amended and restated articles
of association provide that unless we consent to an alternate forum, the federal district courts of the United States shall be the exclusive
forum of resolution of any claims arising under the Securities Act which may impose additional litigation costs on our shareholders.
Our amended and restated
articles of association provide that the federal district courts of the United States shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution
of any complaint asserting a cause or causes of action arising under the Securities Act, including all causes of action asserted against
any defendant to such complaint. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all
such Securities Act actions. Accordingly, both U.S. state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. This choice of
forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with
us or our directors, officers or other employees and may increase the costs associated with such lawsuits, which may discourage such lawsuits
against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our amended and restated
articles of association inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings,
we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business
and financial condition. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in our share capital shall be deemed to have
notice of and to have consented to the choice of forum provisions of our amended and restated articles of association described above.
This provision would not apply to shall not apply to causes of action arising under the Exchange Act.
Our amended and restated articles
of association provide that unless the Company consents otherwise, the competent courts of Tel Aviv, Israel shall be the sole and exclusive
forum for substantially all disputes between the Company and its shareholders under the Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law,
which could limit its shareholders ability to brings claims and proceedings against, as well as obtain favorable judicial forum for disputes
with the Company, its directors, officers and other employees.
The competent courts of Tel
Aviv, Israel shall be the exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action
asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of the Company to the Company or the Company’s
shareholders, or (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Companies Law or the Israeli Securities Law.
This exclusive forum provisions is intended to apply to claims arising under Israeli Law and would not apply to claims brought pursuant
to the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or any other claim for which federal courts would have exclusive jurisdiction. Such exclusive
forum provision in our amended and restated articles of association will not relieve the Company of its duties to comply with federal
securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and shareholders of the Company will not be deemed to have waived the Company’s
compliance with these laws, rules and regulations. This exclusive forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim
in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with the Company or its directors or other employees which may discourage lawsuits against
the Company, its directors, officers and employees.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
As previously disclosed,
our initiation of voluntary restructuring proceedings in the Israeli Court on March 27, 2024 and our filing of voluntary petitions for
relief under the Bankruptcy Code constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the Indenture
and the Loan and Security Agreement. However, Highbridge has agreed not to pursue any remedies available to it under either the Indenture
or the Loan and Security Agreement so long as the Support Agreement is in effect.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are
filed as part of this report:
Exhibit
Number |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Association of the Registrant, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-38716), filed with the SEC on November 14, 2023). |
3.2 |
|
Memorandum of Association of the Registrant (unofficial English translation from Hebrew original), as amended on September 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Form F-1 (File No. 333-227601), filed with the SEC on September 28, 2018). |
4.1 |
|
Description of Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-38716), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2022). |
4.2 |
|
Form of Ordinary Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-38716), filed with the SEC on April 21, 2023). |
10.1 |
|
Restructuring Support Agreement, dated March 26, 2024, by and among the Registrant, Gamida Cell Inc. and certain funds managed by Highbridge Capital Management LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2024). |
10.2^ |
|
Employment Agreement, effective September 19, 2022, by and between Gamida Cell Inc. and Abigail Jenkins, as amended on March 12, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2024). |
10.3^ |
|
Employment Agreement, dated July 20, 2020, by and between Gamida Cell Inc. and Michele Korfin, as amended on March 12, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2024). |
10.4^ |
|
Employment Agreement, dated July 15, 2021, by and between Gamida Cell Inc. and Josh Patterson, as amended on July 15, 2022 and March 12, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2024). |
10.5^ |
|
Employment Agreement, dated April 30, 2017, by and between Gamida Cell Inc. and Ronit Simantov, as amended on July 26, 2022 and March 14, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2024). |
31.1* |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2* |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1*# |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS |
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document - The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document |
101.SCH |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
104 |
|
The cover page from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q has been formatted in Inline XBRL |
| ^ | Indicates management plan or agreement. |
| # | The information in Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act (including this Quarterly Report), unless the Registrant specifically incorporates the foregoing
information into those documents by reference. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
Gamida Cell Ltd. |
|
|
May 23, 2024 |
By: |
/s/ Abigail Jenkins |
|
|
Abigail Jenkins |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
May 23, 2024 |
By: |
/s/ Terry Coelho |
|
|
Terry Coelho |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
00-0000000
NONE
0.13
0.27
152711493
76760688
152711493
76760688
19946000
20960000
false
--12-31
Q1
0001600847
0001600847
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
2024-05-16
0001600847
2024-03-31
0001600847
2023-12-31
0001600847
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2022-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2022-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember
2022-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2022-12-31
0001600847
2022-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2023-03-31
0001600847
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
2024-03-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:ExcessCapacityMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:TwentyTwentyOneNotesMember
2021-02-16
0001600847
gmda:TwentyTwentyOneNotesMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:TwentyTwentyOneNotesMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:TwentyTwentyOneNotesMember
us-gaap:ConvertibleNotesPayableMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:LoanAgreementMember
2022-12-31
0001600847
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:LoanAgreementMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
srt:MaximumMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
srt:MinimumMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:DebtWithConversionAndOtherOptionsMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:DebtWithConversionAndOtherOptionsMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
gmda:MoneyMarketFundsIncludedInCashAndCashEquivalentMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
gmda:MoneyMarketFundsIncludedInCashAndCashEquivalentMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:MoneyMarketFundsIncludedInCashAndCashEquivalentMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
gmda:MoneyMarketFundsIncludedInCashAndCashEquivalentMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
gmda:MoneyMarketFundsIncludedInCashAndCashEquivalentMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
gmda:MoneyMarketFundsIncludedInCashAndCashEquivalentMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
gmda:TwoThousandTwentyTwoNotesMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
gmda:WarrantLiabilityMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
gmda:WarrantLiabilityMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:WarrantLiabilityMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member
gmda:WarrantLiabilityMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member
gmda:WarrantLiabilityMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
gmda:WarrantLiabilityMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
2023-12-30
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputExercisePriceMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputExercisePriceMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputSharePriceMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputSharePriceMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputRiskFreeInterestRateMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputRiskFreeInterestRateMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputPriceVolatilityMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputPriceVolatilityMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputDiscountRateMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:MeasurementInputDiscountRateMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
gmda:MeasurementInputVoluntaryConversionPriceMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
gmda:MeasurementInputExpectedVolatilityMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
gmda:MeasurementInputImpliedYieldMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
gmda:GovernmentsGrantsMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:GovernmentsGrantsMember
us-gaap:SecuredOvernightFinancingRateSofrOvernightIndexSwapRateMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RoyaltyMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
2022-09-27
0001600847
2022-09-27
2022-09-27
0001600847
2023-04-19
0001600847
2023-04-19
2023-04-19
0001600847
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
us-gaap:IPOMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:TwoThousandSeventeenPlanMember
2017-01-23
0001600847
2021-02-25
0001600847
gmda:TwoThousandSeventeenPlanMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
2023-12-31
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember
2023-12-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CostOfSalesMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:CostOfSalesMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
gmda:ExcessCapacityMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtSecuritiesMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtSecuritiesMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
gmda:OutstandingShareOptionsMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
gmda:OutstandingShareOptionsMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember
2024-01-01
2024-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember
2023-01-01
2023-03-31
0001600847
us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember
2024-04-22
2024-04-22
0001600847
us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember
2024-04-22
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
iso4217:ILS
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
xbrli:pure
Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Abigail L. Jenkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of Gamida Cell Ltd.
(the “Company”), and Terry Coelho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of his or
her knowledge:
“This certification accompanies the Form
10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of Gamida Cell Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.”