- &Nbsp; (10-K)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2009

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission file number: 000-51932

SYNTEC BIOFUEL INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Washington	91-2031335
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

Suite 206, 388 Drake Street Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada	V6B 6A8
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(604) 648-2090
Registrant's telephone number(including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
[ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
[ ] Yes [X] No

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
[ ] Yes [X] No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The aggregate value of the issuer's common stock held by non-affiliates (assuming that the issuer's only affiliates are its' directors, officers and 10% or greater stockholders) of the issuer as of December 31, 2009 was $8,444,748.80

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Not applicable

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable Date: March 26, 2010 - 35,837,412

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this Form 10-K under "Item 1. Business", "Item 2. Properties", "Item 3. Legal Proceedings", and "Item 7. Management's Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere constitute "forward-looking statements" are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act"). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Syntec Biofuel Inc., a company organized under the laws of Washington the Company, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions; competition; success of operating initiatives; our ability to raise capital and the terms thereof; changes in business strategy or development plans; future rental revenues; the continuity, experience and quality of our management; changes in or failure to comply with government regulations or the lack of government authorization to continue our projects; and other factors referenced in the Form 10-K.

The use in this Form 10-K of such words as "believes", "plans", "anticipates", "expects", "intends", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. The success of the Company is dependent on our efforts, the employees and many other factors including, primarily, our ability to raise additional capital.

We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and estimates of our management as well as on assumptions made by and information currently available to us at the time such statements were made. Forward looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward looking statements, including, without limitation, the failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis for operations and to build a pilot or demonstration plant, inability of achieving commercialization of the catalysts, inability to obtain sustainable feedstock at an economical price, a major drop in price for biofuel and other risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, either as a result of the matters set forth or incorporated in this Report generally and certain economic and business factors, some of which may be beyond our control.

We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

The basic concept of Syntec's business plan is to license their core technology to third party operators who will pay Syntec a Licensing fee of $250,000 plus a royalty fee of 3% of sales (approx. $0.06 cents per gallon) of alcohol produced. Syntec will also earn commission on the sale of catalysts. The business strategy is to license their technology to companies that will build smaller plants i.e. 12 MM gpy in close proximity or co-located with a feedstock supplier (to reduce biomass and transport costs and secure a guaranteed feedstock supply). Syntec will also market technology licenses to companies such as Methanex, Sasol, B.P. Mitsui and Sabic that may utilize a portion of their natural gas to produce Mixed Alcohols, which have a higher commodity value than methanol.

In order to license our technology, we have to showcase our process in an industrial environment so that a potential licensee can see a tree going in one side and liquid fuel coming out the other side. To achieve this Syntec has to build a Pilot Plant which they can do by building a back end reactor to an existing gasifier at a reduced cost.

Syntec has been offered access to a 3 tpd gasifier in Mississippi which has been operating for over 4 years. Syntec proposes to engineer and build a reactor to fit onto the backend of this gasifier.

Syntec has achieved a yield of 110 gallons of alcohol per ton of biomass (one of the highest yields in the world) and will use the pilot facility as a showcase for viewing by potential licensees and investors. Such a Pilot plant is expected to cost approximately $3 million.

On a more pragmatic level, Syntec is also planning to test their catalysts using natural gas which is currently used for heat and electricity as well as for production of methanol. Syntec will market their catalyst technology to companies producing methanol such as Methanex, Mitsui, B.P. Mitsubishi, Sabic and others who could increase revenue by producing a mixed alcohol that has a far greater value than methanol.

Syntec is continuously working on improving their catalysts to maximize yield and productivity. Subsequent to September 30, 2009, we have entered into a Collaborative Research Agreement with the University of British Columbia (UBC) who will perform the final stage of testing the effect of contaminants on Syntec's catalysts and enhancement of efficiencies prior to scale up to Pilot Plant. Syntec donated laboratory equipment to UBC in lieu of part of the fees. Syntec has also entered into a Joint Development Agreement with EERC (part of the University of North Dakota) to perfect a process to produce bio-butanol.

The Biofuel market has been battered by the financial melt down and low ethanol and methanol pricing tied to the price of oil. However, the future of biofuel is almost guaranteed with the US Government mandating 21 billion gallons of cellulosic biofuel by 2022 and the push towards a 15% blending requirement.

The corn ethanol producers have been hit hard with increased prices for Corn and a corresponding drop in price for ethanol. As a result, many companies have, and are, going bankrupt. Fortunately, the Syntec catalyst produces mixed alcohols which include Propanol and Butanol. These two alcohols sell for greater than $5 a gallon and raise the average price of our combined mix of alcohols well above the price of ethanol. This mitigates the risk of developing a process to produce diverse alcohols and is a hedge against betting on a single biofuel such as ethanol. There is the added tax credit incentive of $1.01 a gallon in the USA which will be shared with the refinery blenders and makes the production of ethanol and methanol an economically viable process.

Syntec is still very bullish on achieving success as a leader in the thermo-chemical race. Producing ethanol and other alcohols from waste biomass is still very compelling and our projected production cost of $0.88 per gallon is still one of the lowest in the biofuel industry. Our technology is far simpler and more stable than using enzymes and fermentation to break down cellulose and should consistently be able to be produced at a much lower price.

Principal Products

Syntec's process is a biomass-to-alcohol (“B2A”) conversion path quite similar to modern day methanol or gas-to-liquid production processes used commercially by companies such as Methanex, Shell, and Sasol. The key differentiating factors are the feedstocks, catalysts and operating parameters.

There are 3 basic steps in the B2A process:

	i.	production of syngas (CO, H2) either through the gasification of biomass feedstock, or through steam reforming/partial oxidation of biogas or landfill gas,
	ii.	conversion of syngas to bio-alcohols over Syntec catalyst in a fixed bed reaction unit,
	iii.	separation and purification of bio-alcohols (high purity) to ethanol, methanol, n-propanol and n-butanol.

The B2A process has the potential for higher yields and lower production costs per ton of feedstock than any other production path in commercial use today. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the B2A process will enable the conventional ethanol industry to also use these well established chemical processes to obtain production and efficiency metrics beyond what traditional grain based fermentation processes can offer.

Perhaps the most important aspect of the Syntec Process is the ability to convert abundant, low cost waste products into ethanol and bio-alcohols without harming the agricultural land base or competing with consumable food stocks. Moreover, enough biomass exists and is renewed every year in North America, and other parts of the world, to significantly reduce a country's dependence on imported oil required for petroleum derived fuels.

Utilization of Syntec's proprietary Ethanol catalyst enables the B2A process to produce a mixed product of methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol. Syntec's bio-butanol development program with EERC will utilize the B2A process in conjunction with a newly developed catalyst to produce bio-butanol.

The Company business model is to sell licenses and enter joint venture partnerships to generate revenue from licensing fees, royalty fees, joint venture profit participation, sale of turnkey facilities and commission on the sale of catalysts.

Source and Availability of Raw Materials

Raw materials and components for the current research and development phase of operations are available in close proximity to the facility.

Upon commercialization, raw materials for Syntec's B2A process will be readily available due to the ability to utilize waste feed stocks such as mill residues, forest residues, agricultural residues and MSW.

Intellectual Property

The Company owns the patent “Catalysts and processes for the manufacture of lower aliphatic alcohols from syngas” (patent number 7,384,987) which was approved on the 10th of June, 2008. A second international Patent was applied for in July, 2008 and is now pending. The Company considers the combination of the Syntec catalyst and the B2A process to be unique which differentiates the Company from its competitors.

Competitive Analysis

Ethanol is currently produced primarily via a dry milling fermentation process of food chain feedstock such as corn, sugar cane, wheat or barley. This process is well developed but remains subject to a number of negative externalities, including increase in food costs, using farmland for transport purposes rather than food production, water issues, net energy values and high cost volatility associated with grain feedstock usage.

Competitive research is currently being undertaken to produce ethanol with catalytic synthesis (using various metals, slurry bed reactors or significantly higher pressure), enzymatic fermentation (which uses enzymes to break down bio-waste), dilute acid hydrolysis fermentation and concentrated acid hydrolysis fermentation. Each of the

fermentation methods requires considerable energy and time to produce ethanol, affecting the production volumes and economic viability. In addition, fermentation technologies are sensitive to feedstock variations.

We do not believe that any ethanol producing method will prevail, to the exclusion of others, as every ethanol producer, whether from biogas, biomass, corn and/or sugar is vital to achieve the mandated ethanol requirements to reduce consumers' dependence on oil. We do however believe that our process is the best solution as it is less disruptive, has a lower cost, is less destructive to the environment, produces greater green gas reduction and does not require valuable farmland to produce.

Our technology has the added benefit of producing not only ethanol but also methanol, propanol and butanol. These additional alcohols allow for entry into the bio-chemical market which is growing rapidly as companies look for sustainable replacements to petrochemicals. The multiple product streams and markets hedge against price fluctuations in one product and lessen the impact of gasoline prices on the economic viability of the business.

The primary focus of the Company is research and development of the B2A process and the Syntec catalysts since the acquisition of the intellectual property on September 28, 2007. The Company has spent $343,715 in 2008 and $83,587 in 2009 in continued research and development.

The biofuel market has been hard hit by escalation in feedstock costs and drop in fuel prices which has resulted in many biofuel companies losing money and in some cases going bankrupt. This has given the bio-fuel industry a black eye with investors. As Syntec's technology produces not only biofuel but chemical /alcohols from biomass but also produces mixed alcohols from natural gas and gasified coal, we are not strictly a biofuel company and we therefore propose to apply to change our name to Synthenol Inc.

As the company has transferred their laboratory to the University of British Columbia we do not have any Employees other than the Officers of the Company.

We are subject to disclosure filing requirements including filing a Form 10-K annually and Form 10-Q quarterly. In addition, we will file Form 8-K and other proxy and information statements from time to time as required.

The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, ("SEC"), at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

We provide an annual report that includes our audited financial information to our shareholders upon written request. We also make our financial information equally available to any interested parties or investors through compliance with the disclosure rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. More information about the Company can be found at www.syntecbiofuel.com .

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

At present, in order to reduce overhead expenses, the Company does not maintain a physical office in the United States. Our current administrative facility is located at Suite 206, 388 Drake Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

We may from time to time be involved in various claims, lawsuits, disputes with third parties, actions involving allegations of discrimination, or breach of contract actions incidental to the operation of its' business. We currently are not involved in any such litigation.

No matter was submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The Company's stock is traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board under the symbol, SYBF. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the range of high and low bid prices for the Company's Common Stock:

The over-the-counter quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, with retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

As of February 11, 2010, we had 60 shareholders of record of common stock, including shares held by brokerage clearing houses, depositories or otherwise in unregistered form.

We have not declared any cash dividends with respect to our common stock and do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future. There are no material restrictions or limiting that is likely to limit the Company's ability to pay dividends in its common stock.

Set forth below is information related to the securities we sold during the last fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not purchase any of our common stock shares.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to business and economic risks and uncertainties, and our actual results could differ materially from those forward-looking statements. The following discussion regarding our financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto.

We have not currently generated any revenue from operations and do not expect to report any significant revenue from operations until research and development efforts mature and we have completed a demonstration plant. Even after the completion of a demonstration plant, there can be no assurance that we will generate positive cash flow and

there can be no assurances as to the level of revenues, if any, that we may actually achieve from the Syntec technology.

Since inception, we have funded operations through common stock issuances, related and non-related party loans in order to meet our strategic objectives. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain further funds to continue with our efforts to establish a new business.

We expect to continue to incur substantial losses in our efforts to establish a new business. We are a development stage company. In a development stage company, management devotes most of its activities to establishing a new business. As of December 31, 2009, we had a working capital deficit of $1,694,475. We are in immediate need of further working capital and are considering options with respect to financing in the form of debt, equity or a combination thereof.

Our cash position is $10,228 as of December 31, 2009 and was $1,419 at December 31, 2008.

Our primary source of funds since incorporation has been through the issue of our common stock, the proceeds of the initial public offering and loans to us by related parties and third parties.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern and fund operations through the remainder of 2010 is contingent upon its ability to raise funds through equity or debt financing.

The Company has arranged loans from third party lenders in order to fund the on going operations of the business. These loans have been secured by way of Promissory Notes.

The Company had no revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Expenses decreased from $1,307,689 in 2008 as compared to $819,000 in 2009. In 2009, the Company incurred consultant and management fees of $250,765 as compared to $375,863 in 2008 as the R&D shifted to the University of British Columbia. The interest fees were $89,292 in 2009 as compared to $46,604 in 2008 for increasing loans for operations. Furthermore, the development fees decreased from $343,715 in 2008 to $83,587 in 2009 as the development transitioned to UBC. The net loss for 2009 was $839,512 as compared to $1,301,740 in 2008. Our net loss per share is at $0.02 for 2009 and $0.04 for 2008.

The discussions and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, including the discussion on liquidity and capital resources, are based upon the financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management re‑evaluates its estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis particularly those related to the determination of the impairment of its intangible assets. Actual results could differ from the estimates. We believe the following are the critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the financial statements.

We have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in the preparation of our financial statements which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.

Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, they may ultimately differ from actual results. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us, which have a material impact on our financial condition and results. Management believes its critical accounting policies reflect its most significant estimates and assumptions used in the presentation of our

financial statements. Our critical accounting policies include debt management and accounting for stock-based compensation. We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as "special purpose entities".

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance that establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur subsequent to the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The statement defines two types of subsequent events (1) recognized subsequent events, which provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, and (2) non-recognized subsequent events, which provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date, but arose before the financial statements were issued. Recognized subsequent events are required to be recognized in the financial statements, and non-recognized subsequent events are required to be disclosed. The adoption had no material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued the Accounting Standards Codification, which establishes a sole source of US authoritative GAAP. The Codification is meant to simplify user access to all authoritative accounting guidance by reorganizing US GAAP pronouncements into approximately ninety accounting topics within a consistent structure; its purpose is not to create new accounting and reporting guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have an effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Other pronouncements issued by the FASB or other authoritative accounting standards groups with future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to be significant to the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

SYNTEC BIOFUEL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009 and 2008

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Syntec Biofuel Inc., a development stage company, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Syntec Biofuel Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has not generated revenues since inception, has incurred losses in developing its business, and further losses are anticipated. The Company requires additional funds to meet its obligations and the costs of its operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in this regard are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

SYNTEC BIOFUEL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

SYNTEC BIOFUEL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

SYNTEC BIOFUEL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

SYNTEC BIOFUEL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

SYNTEC BIOFUEL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009

There have been no changes in Accountants in the two most recent fiscal years and no disagreements with Accountants on accounting and financial disclosure. The fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were audited by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Syntec Biofuel Inc. in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Syntec Biofuel Inc. in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Syntec Biofuel, Inc. has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2009, and, based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance of compliance.

Our management does not expect that our Disclosure Controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well developed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of the control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their design and monitoring costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of a system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or because the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.

The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or

operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2), (3) and (4) above did not have an affect on the Company's financial results. However, management believes that the lack of outside directors on the Company's board of directors can resulting in oversight in the establishing and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures which can affect the process of preparing Company's financial statements.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's Board. In addition, management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the following material weaknesses (i) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (ii) ineffective controls over period end financial close and reporting processes. Further, management believes that the hiring of additional personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge will result in proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the accounting department. Additional personnel will also provide the cross training needed to support the Company if personnel turn over issues within the accounting department occur. This coupled with the appointment of additional outside directors will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues the Company may encounter in the future.

We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP., the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2009 and have concluded that no change has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

All information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the three months ended December 31, 2009 was reported on Form 8-K.

1 Mr. Jackson was elected as officer and director in March 2000.
2 Janet Cheng was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on September 28, 2007. She was appointed as a Director on November 8, 2007.

Mr. Jackson has been a real estate land developer and investment banker since 1978. Mr. Jackson is currently president of Hillcon Developments Ltd., a position he has held since 1995. Mr. Jackson's duties with Hillcon Developments include locating properties, preparing pro forma statements, raising capital, marketing, and dealing with Canadian governmental agencies, architects, and engineers. In his capacity as president for Hillcon Developments, he has been responsible for raising $50 million for 22 projects with a market value in excess of $150 million. He also acts as corporate counsel for Hillcon, and prepares all legal documents and negotiates all contracts.

From July 1999 to September 2001, Mr. Jackson was the chief executive officer and director of Poker.com Inc., a company that traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “PKER”. The Company changed its name to LegalPlay Entertainment Inc.

Mr. Jackson has served as president of Ryerson Corporation A.V.V., a position he has held since January 2000. Ryerson is an investment company and Mr. Jackson's duties include overseeing investment strategies.

Mr. Jackson also currently serves as president of Uninet Technologies Inc., an Internet software developer. He has held that position since January 1999.

From June 1985 to November 1987, Mr. Jackson worked with Geneva Capital Corporation, where his functions included taking companies public on the TSX Venture Exchange, the Toronto Stock Exchange, and NASDAQ. He acted as counsel for the Company and prepared all offering memoranda, and other legal documents. He also raised capital for the Company and negotiated all contracts.

Mr. Jackson served as a director of Waterloo Resources Inc. from August 1985 to December 1987, Lucky Mines Inc. from August 1985 to December 1987, and Burcon Developments Inc. from December 1987 to August 1988. Waterloo, Lucky Mines and Burcon were all public companies listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange.

Janet Cheng was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on September 28, 2007 as was appointed as a Director on November 8, 2007. Ms. Cheng is a Certified Public Accountant with a diverse knowledge of corporate finance. During the past five years she has assisted both private companies and public companies by managing their financial risk and assuring compliance with financial reporting requirements.

To the best of the registrant's knowledge, during the past five years, no director, executive officer or control person:

Based solely on our review of the copies of the Section 16(a) forms we received covering acquisition and disposition transactions in our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009, we believe that each person who, at any time during that fiscal year, was a director, executive officer, or beneficial owner of 10% or more of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all its employees, including its chief executive officer, chief financial and accounting officer, controller, and any persons performing similar functions. Such Code of Ethics is published on the Company's internet website (www.syntecbiofuel.com).

At present we do not have a separately designated standing audit committee and does not have an audit committee financial expert. The entire board of directors is acting as our Company's Audit Committee. The board of directors has determined that our Company is, at present, a development company and has not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business operations.

The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation paid by us to the President and the other highest paid executive officers (the “Named Executive Officer”) during the three most recent fiscal years.

1 Mr. Jackson was elected as officer and director in March 2000. Michael Jackson became Chief Executive Officer on October 15, 2008
2 Dr. George Kosanovich was appointed as Chief Executive Officer on September 28, 2007. He was appointed as a Director on November 19, 2007. George Kosanovich resigned as Chief Executive Officer on October 15, 2008
3 Janet Cheng was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on September 28, 2007. She was appointed as a Director on November 8, 2007.

The Company does not have a standing compensation committee or committed performing similar function as the Company is, at present, a development company. The entire Board of Directors acts as the compensation committee.

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2009, the number of Common Stock and the corresponding percentage ownership of (i) each person who held of record, or was known by us to own beneficially, more than five percent of our Common Stock, (ii) each director and executive officer of the Company, and (iii) all directors and executive officers of us as a group. The computation is based upon 33,194,079 shares of common stock being outstanding.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe the following persons have sole voting and investment power with respect to the number of shares set forth opposite their names.

¹ Michael Jackson is the controlling shareholder of Ryerson Corporation A.V.V. and has indirect control over a further 882,000 owned directly and indirectly by family members. He is the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chairman of the Board of Syntec Biofuel Inc.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The Company has issued a Promissory Note to CAJ Business Solutions Ltd (formerly Impulse Advertising Ltd) for the amount of $246,300. The Note is secured by a General Security Agreement, earns interest of 10% and is due and payable on June 30, 2010. Carol Jackson, spouse of Michael Jackson, President of our Company, is the President of CAJ Business Solutions Ltd.

Our policy regarding related transactions requires that any director or officer who has an interest in any transaction to be approved by our Board of Directors disclose the presence and the nature of the interest to the Board of Directors prior to any approval of the transaction by the Board of Directors. The transaction may then be approved by a majority of the disinterested directors, provided that an interested director may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting of the Board of Directors to approve the transaction. Our policy regarding compensation for directors and officers is that the Board of Directors may, without regard to personal interest, establish the compensation of directors for services in any capacity.

The aggregate fees paid for 2009 fiscal year for professional services rendered by the principal accountant, Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP Chartered Accountants (“DMCL”) for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-Q and 10-K are as follows:

There were no additional aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP, Chartered Accountants, that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under Item 9(e) (1) of Schedule 14A.

There were no additional aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP, Chartered Accountants, for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

There were no additional aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP, Chartered Accountants, other than the services reported in Item 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A.

We are not filing any financial statement schedules as part of this Form 10-K because such schedules are either not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

The following exhibits are either provided with this Annual Report or are incorporated herein by reference:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Quarter Ended	High Price	Low Price
March 31 2008	1.250	0.550
June 30 2008	1.300	0.450
September 2008	1.010	0.550
December 2008	1.010	0.200
March 31 2009	0.500	0.100
June 30 2009	0.250	0.100
September 2009	0.400	0.200
December 2009	0.550	0.150

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	N/A	N/A	N/A
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	N/A	N/A	N/A
Total	N/A	N/A	N/A

ASSETS		December 31,		December 31,
		2009		2008

Current Assets
Cash	$	10,228	$	1,419
Receivables		23,328		23,283

		33,556		24,702

Equipment (Note 4)		169,658		254,839

Intellectual property (Note 3)		5,100,000		5,100,000
Intangible assets (Note 3)		20,000		20,000

	$	5,323,214	$	5,399,541

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	198,717	$	193,324
Current portion of obligation under capital lease (Note 4)		10,634		16,411
Due to related parties (Note 5)		1,107,077		561,209
Notes payable (Note 6)		411,603		238,158

		1,728,031		1,009,102

Obligation under capital lease (Note 4)		-		9,175

		1,728,031		1,018,277

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3, 5, and 6) Subsequent Events (Note 10)

Preferred stock:
Authorized: 20,000,000 with a par value of $0.0001
Issued and outstanding: None		-		-
Common stock (Note 7):
Authorized: 100,000,000 with a par value of $0.0001
Issued and outstanding: 35,237,412 (December 31, 2008: 33,194,079)		3,523		3,319
Additional paid-in capital		6,501,277		6,328,543
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(15,165)		104,342
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(2,894,452)		(2,054,940)

		3,595,183		4,381,264

	$	5,323,214	$	5,399,541

						March 15,
						2000
						(Date of
	Year ended					Inception) to
	December 31,					December 31,
		2009		2008		2009
						(Unaudited)

Expenses
Consulting fees	$	33,600		$ 44,216	$	284,858
Depreciation		62,033		56,553		131,347
Development fees (Note 3)		83,587		343,715		518,538
Filing fees		8,393		11,133		50,671
Financing charges		189,084		85,011		284,719
Foreign exchange loss		26,112		60,947		87,059
Interest expense		89,292		46,604		169,361
Management fees (Note 5)		217,165		331,647		675,725
Marketing		2,767		13,968		55,881
Office and miscellaneous		10,178		38,908		76,122
Professional fees		56,712		176,273		345,742
Rent (Note 5)		21,017		22,514		49,113
Rights and licenses costs		-		-		25,015
Travel		19,060		76,200		123,699
Write-down of website		-		-		5,000

Loss from operations		(819,000)		(1,307,689)		(2,882,850)

Write-off of equipment (Note 4)		(14,237)		-		(14,237)
Loss on sale of equipment (Note 4)		(6,275)		-		(6,275)
Other income		-		5,949		8,910

Net loss	$	(839,512)	$	(1,301,740)	$	(2,894,452)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.02)	$	(0.04)
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted		33,700,225		33,097,807

Comprehensive loss
Net loss	$	(839,512)	$	(1,301,740)	$	(2,894,452)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(119,507)		102,283		(15,165)

Total comprehensive loss	$	(959,019)	$	(1,199,457)	$	(2,909,617)

						March 15,
						2000
		Year ended				(Inception) to
		December 31,				December 31,
		2009		2008		2009
						(Unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(839,512)	$	(1,301,740)	$	(2,894,452)
Non-cash items:
Depreciation		62,033		56,553		131,347
Financing charges		135,492		32,600		169,492
Accrued interest on notes payable		61,659		7,512		77,483
Foreign exchange on notes payable		33,981		-		33,981
Interest on capital lease obligation		2,940		1,637		4,577
Shares issued for consulting		9,600		-		9,600
Legal and organizational expenses		-		-		8,000
Rights and licenses costs		-		-		24,751
Share subscriptions receivable		-		-		575
Write-down of website		-		-		5,000
Write-off and loss on sale of equipment		20,512		-		20,512
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(45)		(17,033)		(23,328)
Prepaids		-		31,092		-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		5,393		169,010		198,715
Amounts due to related parties		96,382		105,552		251,018

Net cash used in operating activities		(411,565)		(914,817)		(1,982,729)

Cash flows from investing activities
Investment in equipment		-		(29,422)		(33,667)
Proceeds on sale of equipment		2,636		-		2,636
Repayment of debt assumed		-		-		(350,000)
Rights and licenses		-		-		(1)
Website cost		-		-		(5,000)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		2,636		(29,422)		(386,032)

Cash flows from financing activities
Common stock issued for cash		145,000		51,155		1,422,767
Proceeds from notes payable		121,996		49,480		326,102
Payments under capital lease obligation		(17,892)		(31,537)		(49,429)
Proceeds from related parties		288,141		264,773		694,714

Net cash provided by financing activities		537,245		333,871		2,394,154

Effect of exchange rates on cash		(119,507)		102,283		(15,165)

Change in cash		8,809		(508,085)		10,228

Cash, beginning		1,419		509,504		-

Cash, ending	$	10,228	$	1,419	$	10,228

Datos

Noticias

Herramientas

Mercados

Descubrir

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Flujo de Opciones

Monitor

SYBF Syntec Biofuel Inc (GM)

Noticias sobre SYBF

Su Consulta Reciente

Empresa

Negocios

Popular

Obtener la aplicación

										Deficit
								Accumulated		Accumulated
						Additional		Other		During the
		Common Stock				Paid-in		Comprehensive		Development
		Number		Amount		Capital		Income (Loss)		Stage		Total

Balance, March 15, 2000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Stock issued for legal and organizational expenses at a fair market value of $0.01 per share		1,600,000		160		7,840		-		-		8,000
Stock issued for acquisition of a license at a fair market value of $0.01 per share		7,000,000		700		34,300		-		-		35,000
Dividend deemed paid		-		-		(10,250)		-		-		(10,250)
Net loss for the period		-		-		-		-		(32,750)		(32,750)


Balance, December 31, 2000		8,600,000		860		31,890		-		(32,750)		-
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(500)		(500)


Balance, December 31, 2001		8,600,000		860		31,890		-		(33,250)		(500)
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(1,857)		(1,857)


Balance, December 31, 2002		8,600,000		860		31,890		-		(35,107)		(2,357)
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(6,529)		(6,529)


Balance, December 31, 2003		8,600,000		860		31,890		-		(41,636)		(8,886)
Stock issued as a private placement at $0.025 per share		8,474,000		847		105,077		-		-		105,924
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(20,074)		(20,074)


Balance, December 31, 2004		17,074,000		1,707		136,967		-		(61,710)		76,964
Stock issued as a private placement for at $0.025 per share		26,000		3		323		-		-		326
Stock issuance cost		-		-		(5,313)		-		-		(5,313)
Unrealized gain on translation		-		-		-		610		-		610
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(51,014)		(51,014)


Balance, December 31, 2005		17,100,000		1,710		131,977		610		(112,724)		21,573
Stock issued as a private placement at $1.00 per share		2,500		-		1,250		-		-		1,250
Unrealized gain on translation		-		-		-		(539)		-		(539)
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(191,081)		(191,081)


Balance, December 31, 2006		17,102,500		1,710		133,227		71		(303,805)		(168,797)
Unrealized gain on translation		-		-		-		1,988		-		1,988
Discount on notes payable		-		-		15,770		-		-		15,770
Stock issued for assumption of assets at fair value of $0.4550 per share		11,000,000		1,100		5,003,900		-		-		5,005,000
Stock issued as a private placement at $0.231 per share		4,870,129		487		1,124,513		-		-		1,125,000
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(449,395)		(449,395)


Balance, December 31, 2007		32,972,629		3,297		6,277,410		2,059		(753,200)		5,529,566
Unrealized gain on translation		-		-		-		102,283		-		102,283
Stock issued as part of private placement at $0.231 per share		221,450		22		51,133		-		-		51,155
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(1,301,740)		(1,301,740)


Balance, December 31, 2008		33,194,079		3,319		6,328,543		104,342		(2,054,940)		4,381,264
Unrealized gain on translation		-		-		-		(119,507)		-		(119,507)
Stock issued for consulting services at $0.21 per share		10,000		1		2,099		-		-		2,100
Stock issued as part of private placement at $0.075 per share		1,933,333		193		144,807		-		-		145,000
Stock issued for consulting services at $0.075 per share		100,000		10		7,490		-		-		7,500
Discount on notes payable		-		-		18,338		-		-		18,338
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-		(839,512)		(839,512)


Balance, December 31, 2009	$	35,237,412	$	3,523	$	6,501,277	$	(15,165)	$	(2,894,452)	$	3,595,183

	Basis	Rate

Computer equipment	Straight-line and declining balance	30%
Office and laboratory equipment	Straight-line	20%
Equipment under capital lease	Straight-line	20%

		Cost		Accumulated Depreciation		Sales and write-offs		December 31, 2009 Net Book Value		December 31, 2008 Net Book Value
Computer equipment	$	6,907	$	3,356	$	(3,551)	$	-	$	4,439
Office equipment		15,416		5,875		(9,541)		-		11,597
Laboratory equipment		245,395		98,973		(10,056)		136,366		194,414
Equipment under capital lease		55,486		22,194		-		33,292		44,389

	$	323,204	$	130,398	$	( 23,148)	$	169,658	$	254,839

Lease payment	$	11,107
Amount representing interest		(473)
Total obligation under capital lease	$	10,634


		2009		2008

Non-capital tax loss carry forwards	$	2,860,000	$	2,110,000
Statutory tax rate		30%		30%
Effective tax rate		-		-
Deferred tax asset		858,000		633,000
Change in valuation allowance		(858,000)		(633,000)
Net deferred tax asset	$	-	$	-

	(1)	has filed a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law, nor had a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or present of such a person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer within two years before the time of such filing;

	(2)	were the subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of the following activities:

		(i)	acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director of any investment company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

		(ii)	engaging in any type of business practice;

		(iii)	engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodity laws.

	(3)	were the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described above under this Item, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

	(4)	were found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission to have violated any federal or state securities law and the judgment in such civil finding or find by the Securities and Exchange Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

	(5)	were found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated. However, Michael Jackson was charged and pleaded guilty under section 239(1) of the Income Tax Act on December 10, 2009 for failing to disclose capital gain from a 2005 transaction to the Canadian Revenue department, Mr Jackson share of the capital gain earned from the sale of a software program in Gibraltar amounted to approx. US$1,225,000 which was not taxable in Gibraltar nor repatriated to Canada. No other director, executive officer or control person were convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses).

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Michael Jackson ¹ Chairman, President	2007 2008 2009	- -	- -			- -		44,528 144,240 144,000	44,528 144,240 144,000
George Kosanovich ² Chief Executive officer	2007 2008	-	-			-		39,750 104,586	39,750 104,586
Janet Cheng ³ Chief Financial Officer	2007 2008 2009	-	-			-		12,000 38,720 26,781	12,000 38,720 26,781

Name and Address	Number of Shares	Percentage Owned
CEDE & CO New York, NY	3,350,840	9.35%
Ryerson Corporation A.V.V. 1 c/o 7 Abraham de Veerstraat P.O. Box 840, Curacao Netherlands Antilles	9,055,000	25.27%
Iris International Le Montaigne 7 Avenue de Grande-Bretagne MC 98000 Monaco.	5,663,000	15.80%
Wood Energy Resources LLC 8159 Titleist Drive Pineville, LA 71360	4,697,872	13.11%
Montilla Capital Inc. c/o 7 Abraham de Veerstraat P.O. Box 840, Curacao Netherlands Antilles	2,794,013	7.80%
Michael Jackson Director and President	814,000 9,937,000 ¹	2.27% 25.27%
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group	10,751,000	30.18%

	2009	2008
DMCL audit	$25,000-28,000 (estimated)	$26,250
DMCL audit-related	$14,700	$13,913

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit

3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated July 26, 2006 (1)

3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws dated July 12, 2006 (1)

4.1	Specimen Stock Certificate for Shares of Common Stock of the Company (2)

10.1	License Agreement (3)

10.2	Assignment of License Agreement (3)

10.3	Settlement Agreement (4)

10.4	Manufacturing Agreement (4)

10.5	Acquisition Agreement of the URL (5)

10.6	Asset Purchase and Assignment Agreement (6)

10.7	Amendment to Asset Purchase and Assignment(7)

10.8	Intellectual Property And Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 28, 2007 (8)

	Amendment To Intellectual Property And Asset Purchase dated October 25, 2007 (9)

10.9	General Security Agreement dated June 20, 2008 (10)

21.1	List of Subsidiaries

31.1	302 Certification for the Chief Executive Officer

31.2	302 Certification for the Chief Financial Officer

32.1	Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

/s/ Michael Jackson Michael Jackson Director, CEO	Date: March 31, 2010


/s/ Janet Cheng	Date: March 31, 2010
Janet Cheng Director, CFO

Tendencias Ahora

Listas Principales

Datos

Noticias

Herramientas

Mercados

Descubrir

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Flujo de Opciones

Monitor

SYBF Syntec Biofuel Inc (GM)

Noticias sobre SYBF

Su Consulta Reciente

Empresa

Negocios

Popular

Obtener la aplicación