- Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials (definitive) (DEFA14A)
18 Noviembre 2011 - 1:19PM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-
6(e)(2)
)
|
o
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
þ
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
PENN MILLERS HOLDING CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ
|
|
No fee required.
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENT TO DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 29, 2011
EXPLANATORY NOTE
These supplemental disclosures to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed by Penn
Millers Holding Corporation (the Company) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)
on October 21, 2011 (the Definitive Proxy Statement) are being made to update certain information
in the Definitive Proxy Statement concerning litigation and regulatory matters related to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as of September 7, 2011 whereby
Panther Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of ACE American Insurance Company (ACE),
will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of
ACE (the Merger). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, upon completion of the Merger, each
outstanding share of Company common stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive
$20.50 per share in cash. Defined terms used but not defined herein have the meaning set forth in
the Definitive Proxy Statement.
Litigation Related to the Merger
As previously disclosed beginning on page 49 of the Definitive Proxy Statement, immediately after
the announcement of the Merger, certain law firms announced purported investigations of potential
claims against the board of directors of the Company and, in doing so, solicited shareholders to
assert claims in connection with the Merger. The board of directors subsequently received two
letters purportedly on behalf of shareholders demanding that the board of directors take
appropriate action against the directors of the Company and any other individuals responsible for
allegedly causing harm to the Company in connection with the Merger. The first letter, received on
September 20, 2011, was withdrawn shortly thereafter when the Company ascertained that the supposed
shareholder lacked standing to assert a demand. The second letter was received on September 29,
2011.
In response to the letters, the board of directors established a special litigation committee
comprising independent directors John L. Churnetski, Robert A. Nearing, Jr., E. Lee Beard and Kim
E. Michelstein, with Mr. Churnetski serving as chairman of the committee. The special litigation
committee engaged Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP as independent legal counsel to advise the committee
in connection with the response to the letters. Upon the advice and with the assistance of its
counsel, the special litigation committee has conducted an internal investigation of the claims set
forth in the letter received September 29, 2011.
On October 26, 2011, a putative class action lawsuit relating to the Merger was filed in the Court
of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (the Court) on behalf of a proposed class of shareholders
of the Company by one of the shareholders who made demand on the Company without waiting for the
Companys reply to that demand. The complaint is a derivative action, on behalf of the Company, and
a shareholder class action and names as defendants the members of the Companys board of directors,
as well as ACE. The complaint generally alleges, among other things, that the director defendants
breached their fiduciary duties by entering into the Merger Agreement because of a conflict of
interest and through an inadequate process, failed to disclose adequately all material information
relating to the proposed Merger, and intentionally interfered with contractual voting rights by
failing to provide adequate disclosure. The lawsuit challenges the Merger and seeks various forms
of relief, including injunctive relief that would, if granted, prevent the Merger from being
consummated in accordance with the Merger Agreement.
On November 4, 2011, the plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order, seeking to
enjoin the meeting of the shareholders at which the shareholders are to vote upon the Merger. At a
hearing held on November 7, 2011, the Court declined to grant the temporary restraining order.
Instead, pursuant to
Pennsylvania law, the Court permitted limited and expedited discovery focused upon the special
litigation committees process.
On November 8, 2011, the special litigation committee issued its report (1) concluding that a suit
by the Company against the ten directors is not in the best interests of the Company or its
shareholders and that there is no basis to assert the claims set forth in the plaintiffs demand
letter, (2) rejecting the demand made by the plaintiff, and (3) concluding that there is no basis
for the suit filed by the plaintiff and the Company should seek dismissal of the complaint filed by
the plaintiff. Consistent with the special litigation committee report, the Company believes that
the claims made in the letter and the allegations in the lawsuit are without merit and intends to
contest them vigorously.
On November 15, 2011, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint with the Court, raising
substantially the same allegations as the initial complaint, as well as several challenges to the
special litigation committees process. On November 17, 2011, the Company filed a motion to
dismiss the amended complaint. The Company expects the plaintiff to oppose the Companys motion to
dismiss.
Regulatory Matters
As previously disclosed beginning on page 48 of the Definitive Proxy Statement, in addition to
the approval of Companys shareholders, the consummation of the Merger is subject to the
appropriate regulatory approvals from the state insurance regulators, the expiration or termination
of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976
(the HSR Act), and other terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. On September 27,
2011, the Company filed a notification and report form with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and
the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice under the HSR Act. On October 4, 2011, the
Company received notification from the FTC of early termination of the HSR Act waiting period. On
September 27, 2011, ACE filed an application with the Pennsylvania Insurance Department for
approval of the Merger. In a decision and order dated November 9, 2011, the Pennsylvania Insurance
Commissioner approved the Merger. Subject to the satisfaction of necessary closing conditions, the
Merger is expected to be consummated during the fourth quarter of 2011.
Penn Millers Holding Corp. (MM) (NASDAQ:PMIC)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
Penn Millers Holding Corp. (MM) (NASDAQ:PMIC)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024