China Gold International Announces Pre-Feasibility Study for
Expansion of the Jiama Project with IRR of 53.7% and Project Update
VANCOUVER,
Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire/ - China
Gold International Resources Co. Ltd. (TSX: CGG, HK: 2099) (the
"Company") is pleased to announce the results of an updated NI
43-101 compliant, Independent Pre-Feasibility Study for the Phase
II Expansion of its Jiama Copper-Polymetallic Mine, (the "Project")
in Tibet Autonomous Region, China.
The Pre-Feasibility Study was completed by Minarco-MineConsult
(MMC), part of the Runge Limited Group of Companies, in conjunction
with independent consulting engineers and management.
(All amounts in US dollars unless otherwise
stated)
Highlights
- Copper (Cu) Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources increased
to 10.2 billion pounds of metal at 0.44% Cu;
- Copper Proved and Probable Mineral Reserves Increased to 6.2
billion pounds of metal at 0.77% Cu;
- Production from open-pit and underground operations is expected
to produce 6.3 million tonnes and 6 million tonnes (Mt) of
run-of-mine ("ROM") ore per annum respectively;
- Ramp up to an annual processing capacity of 12.3 Mt of ROM ore,
over a 31 year period, producing approximately:
-
- 176 million pounds of copper per annum
- 35 thousand ounces of gold (Au) per annum
- 2.7 million ounces of silver (Ag) per annum
- 2.3 thousand tonnes of molybdenum (Mo) per annum
- Estimated capital expenditures of $705
million;
- After-tax Net Present Value (NPV) of $1.2 billion with a discount rate of 9% at metal
price assumptions of: $2.90/lb Cu,
$18/lb Mo, $1,380/oz Au, $16.5/oz Ag
- After-tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 53.7% and payback
period of 4.5 years
- Pre-tax NPV of $1.5 billion with
IRR of 60.4%;
- Life of Mine (LOM) projected average cash cost $1.76/lb Cu equivalent, or $1.52/lb Cu with other metals credited;
- Average annual net cash flow of $120
million for 31 year LOM;
- Contribution of Cu, Mo, Au and Ag to gross revenues are 75%,
11%, 7% and 6% respectively. Lead (Pb) and Zinc (Zn)
contributes less than 1% of overall revenue; and
- Undiscounted, cumulative net cash flow, is approximately
$3.8 billion
Dr. Xin Song, CEO
of the Company, commented, "With a potential increase in the
processing capacity from 6,000 to 40,000 tonnes per day (tpd),
along with a longer mine life of close to 31 years, we are very
pleased with the future outlook of the operation. Highlights of the
study show a payback period of less than 5 years, an internal rate
of return of 53.7% and an after-tax NPV of approximately
$1.2 billion, indicating solid
economics and strong annual net cash flow of $120 million over the mine life. During
2012, we continued to increase our reserve and resource base, and
we work to achieve the expansion of this strategic asset."
Overview
The Jiama Project is a large scale polymetallic
(Cu, Mo, Au, Ag, Pb, Zn) deposit located about 60 kilometers east
of Lhasa City along the Sichuan-Tibet Highway within the Gangdise
Copper Metallogeny Belt in Central Tibet, China.
The Company plans to expand the Project from its
current processing capacity of 6,000 to 40,000 tpd of ore through
the expansion of current open-pit operations and the development of
new open-pit and underground mining operations. The Phase II
Expansion will include four open pits, one underground, and a new
floatation plant with a processing capacity of 34,000 tpd of
ore. The total Project processing capacity will be increased
from its current production rate of 1.8 Mt of ore per year to 12.3
Mt of ore per year, producing approximately 176 Mlb of Cu, 2.3 Kt
of Mo, 35 Koz of Au, 2.7 Moz of Ag, per annum over a period of 31
years. LOM average head grade will be 0.77%, 0.03%, 0.22 g/t and 12
g/t for Cu, Mo, Au and Ag respectively.
Geology
The Project is located in the central-south
portion of the Gangdise-Nianqing Tanggula Terrane. Stratigraphy
outcropping in the Project area is dominated by passive
epicontinental clastic-carbonate rocks. Three types of
copper-polymetallic mineralization are observed within the Project.
These include Skarn, Hornfels and porphyry hosted mineralization.
All three styles of mineralization are structurally controlled with
concentrations occurring along shear/structure zones and
mineralization offset by thrust and detachment faults as well as
associated with anticlines and synclines.
Mining
The Phase II Expansion Project will include the
addition of four open pits and one underground mine.
The four open pits are designed to mine all
three types of mineralization, producing approximately 6.3 Mt of
ROM ore and removing about 19 Mt of waste rock per annum with a LOM
stripping ratio of 3.01. The underground mine is designed to
mine the high grade portion of the skarn type mineralization and
will produce approximately 6 Mt of ROM ore per annum.
Processing and Products
The Company plans to expand the Project's
processing capacity from its current 1.8 Mt of ore per year to 12
Mt of ore per year, producing approximately 176 Mlb of Cu, 2.3 Kt
of Mo, 35 Koz of Au, 2.7 Moz of Ag, per annum over a period of 31
years. The end products include copper, moly, lead, and zinc
concentrates, with other metals as by-products, which will be sold
to smelters within China.
The processing recovery estimates are based on
the current processing test work completed by a number of leading
Chinese research institutes and two years of actual production
data. The processing recoveries estimated for the different rock
types are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Jiama Copper-Polymetallic Project
-Recovery Factors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore (Rock) Type |
|
|
Product |
|
|
Element |
|
|
Recovery (%) |
Cu-Mo Ore
(Skarn) |
|
|
Cu Concentrate |
|
|
Cu |
|
|
88 |
|
|
Au |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Ag |
|
|
65 |
|
|
Mo
Concentrate |
|
|
Mo |
|
|
70 |
Cu-Mo Ore
(Hornfels & Porphyry) |
|
|
Cu
Concentrate |
|
|
Cu |
|
|
84 |
|
|
Mo
Concentrate |
|
|
Mo |
|
|
48 |
Cu-Pb-Zn Ore
(Skarn) |
|
|
Cu Concentrate |
|
|
Cu |
|
|
88 |
|
|
Au |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Ag |
|
|
60 |
|
|
Pb
Concentrate |
|
|
Pb |
|
|
88 |
|
|
Zn
Concentrate |
|
|
Zn |
|
|
75 |
Source: MMC Derived based on Testwork
Reports
Life of Mine Operating Costs
The LOM average operating costs are listed in
Table 2.
Table 2: Jiama
Copper-Polymetallic Project - Life of Mine Operating Costs (USD/ t
processed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Centre |
|
|
|
USD/t waste |
|
|
|
USD/t processed |
Overburden Removal |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
Open Cut Mining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.81 |
Underground Mining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.08 |
Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.45 |
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.43(Cu/Mo)/13.33(Cu/Pb/Zn) |
Admin & Other Overheads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.37 |
Total Mine Operating Costs/t
processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.5/47.43 |
Metal Selling and Transport |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.22 |
Average royalty per ROM tonne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.10 |
Total Project Operating Costs/t
processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.82/53.75 |
Capex and Cash Flow Analysis
Estimated capital expenditures for the Phase II
Expansion of the Project will be approximately $705 million, including, $221 million for new floatation plant,
$355 million for mining, $76 million for engineering, $28 million for loan interest and $24 million mining camp.
The long term metal prices used for the
Pre-Feasibility Study are $2.90/lb,
$1,380/oz, $16.5/oz and $18/lb
for Cu, Au, Ag and Mo respectively, the long term price for both
zinc (Zn) and lead (Pb) is at $2,000/tonne.
The after-tax net present value ("NPV") is
$1.2 billion with a discount rate of
9%, giving the capital expenditure payback period of 4.5 years, LOM
average cash cost of Cu equivalent of $1.76/lb, or $1.52/lb Cu with other metals credited, and the
after-tax IRR of 53.7%. The undiscounted, cumulative net cash
flow is approximately $3.8 billion.
The indicated contribution of Cu, Mo, Au and Ag to gross revenues
are 75%, 11%, 7% and 6% respectively. Zn and Pb account for
less than 1% of overall revenue.
Table 3: Jiama Copper-Polymetallic Project -
NPV and IRR Summary
Long
Term Metal Price |
|
NPV ($
Million) |
IRR |
Cu
($/lb) |
Mo
($/lb) |
Au
($/oz) |
Ag
($/oz) |
@0% |
@7% |
@9%
Base Case |
@11% |
$2.90 |
$18 |
$1,380 |
$16.50 |
Pre-Tax |
$4,480 |
$1,820 |
$1,470 |
$1,204 |
60.4% |
After-Tax |
$3,841 |
$1,542 |
$1,239 |
$1,010 |
53.7% |
Mineral Resources Estimate
A Mineral Resource estimate, dated April 28, 2012, has been independently completed
by MMC in accordance with the CIM Definitions Standards under NI
43-101. The updated Mineral Resource is based on 22 infill drill
holes totaling 10,720m completed in late 2011. These holes were
drilled within the proposed pit locations which enabled detailed
mine planning to be undertaken. Further drilling has recently
been completed over the South Pit area to upgrade the
classification of the existing Inferred Mineral Resources within
the pit areas with sampling and assaying ongoing.
During the review of the data MMC noted that
whilst the mineralisation occurs all within a single mineralised
body, Au and Ag mineralisation within the orebody had a
significantly higher spatial variability than the other elements.
As a result MMC has classified the Au and Ag resource presented in
Table 5 separately; this classification takes into
account the proposed large scale mining techniques where Au and Ag
will only be credits to the overall products from the operations.
MMC has assumed that Au and Ag will not be used as a single cut-off
grade for a selected mining block and will be mined in conjunction
with the other elements.
The Mineral Resources are summarized in
Tables 4 and 5. The Mineral Resources presented in
Table 5 for Au and Ag are inclusive and not in
addition to the Mineral Resources in Table 4 and
occur within the same mineralised body.
Table 4: Jiama
Project - Cu, Mo, Pb and Zn Mineral Resources
Reported at a 0.3 % Cu Equivalent Cut Off Grade*, as of April
28, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock
Type |
|
Class |
|
Quantity
Mt |
|
Cu % |
|
Mo % |
|
Pb % |
|
Zn % |
|
Cu Metal
(kt) |
|
Mo Metal
(kt) |
|
Pb Metal
(kt) |
|
Zn Metal
(kt) |
Skarn |
|
Measured |
|
35.6 |
|
0.71 |
|
0.048 |
|
0.11 |
|
0.07 |
|
252 |
|
17 |
|
38 |
|
25 |
|
|
Indicated |
|
293.2 |
|
0.73 |
|
0.043 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.06 |
|
2,135 |
|
127 |
|
201 |
|
163 |
|
|
M+I |
|
328.8 |
|
0.73 |
|
0.044 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.06 |
|
2,388 |
|
144 |
|
239 |
|
187 |
|
|
Inferred |
|
174 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.045 |
|
0.16 |
|
0.08 |
|
1,036 |
|
79 |
|
286 |
|
146 |
Hornfels |
|
Measured |
|
38.4 |
|
0.28 |
|
0.035 |
|
0.04 |
|
0.01 |
|
107 |
|
14 |
|
14 |
|
5 |
|
|
Indicated |
|
626.1 |
|
0.31 |
|
0.031 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.01 |
|
1,952 |
|
196 |
|
66 |
|
64 |
|
|
M+I |
|
664.5 |
|
0.31 |
|
0.032 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.01 |
|
2,059 |
|
210 |
|
80 |
|
69 |
|
|
Inferred |
|
219 |
|
0.29 |
|
0.034 |
|
0.03 |
|
0.01 |
|
633 |
|
74 |
|
72 |
|
32 |
Porphyry |
|
Measured |
|
2.1 |
|
0.22 |
|
0.056 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.01 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Indicated |
|
57.7 |
|
0.33 |
|
0.043 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.01 |
|
188 |
|
25 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
|
M+I |
|
59.8 |
|
0.32 |
|
0.043 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.01 |
|
193 |
|
26 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
|
Inferred |
|
2.9 |
|
0.23 |
|
0.099 |
|
0.02 |
|
0.04 |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
Total |
|
Measured |
|
76 |
|
0.48 |
|
0.042 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.04 |
|
364 |
|
32 |
|
52 |
|
30 |
|
|
Indicated |
|
977.1 |
|
0.44 |
|
0.036 |
|
0.03 |
|
0.02 |
|
4,275 |
|
348 |
|
271 |
|
232 |
|
|
M+I |
|
1,053.1 |
|
0.44 |
|
0.036 |
|
0.03 |
|
0.02 |
|
4,640 |
|
380 |
|
323 |
|
262 |
|
|
Inferred |
|
395.9 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.039 |
|
0.09 |
|
0.05 |
|
1,676 |
|
156 |
|
359 |
|
179 |
Table 5: Jiama
Project - Au and Ag Mineral Resources
Reported at a 0.3% Cu Equivalent Cut Off Grade* (>0.02 Au
g/t), as of April 28, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Type |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Quantity (Mt) |
|
|
Au g/t |
|
|
Ag g/t |
|
|
Au Moz |
|
|
Ag Moz |
Skarn |
|
|
Indicated |
|
|
256.5 |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
17.01 |
|
|
2.537 |
|
|
140.290 |
|
|
|
Inferred |
|
|
117.0 |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
1.472 |
|
|
62.077 |
Hornfels |
|
|
Indicated |
|
|
178.6 |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
0.337 |
|
|
14.486 |
|
|
|
Inferred |
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
0.186 |
|
|
11.195 |
Porphyry |
|
|
Indicated |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
8.22 |
|
|
0.121 |
|
|
4.145 |
|
|
|
Inferred |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
10.79 |
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.128 |
Total |
|
|
Indicated |
|
|
450.8 |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
10.97 |
|
|
2.995 |
|
|
158.921 |
|
|
|
Inferred |
|
|
186.2 |
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
12.26 |
|
|
1.659 |
|
|
73.400 |
Note: Figures reported are rounded which may result in
small tabulation errors.
Cu Equivalent is based on associated component
grades, process recoveries and bank consensus forecast metal
pricing as at May 2012 (before tax).
The key inputs are outlined in Table 6 below:
Table 6: Jiama
Copper-Polymetallic Project - Copper Equivalence Parameters Mineral
Reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Recoveries |
|
|
Skarn |
|
|
Skarn (Cu/Pb/Zn Ore) |
|
|
Hornfels/Porphyry |
Copper |
|
|
88.00% |
|
|
88.00% |
|
|
84.00% |
Molybdenum |
|
|
70.00% |
|
|
- |
|
|
48.00% |
Gold |
|
|
45.00% |
|
|
45.00% |
|
|
|
Silver |
|
|
65.00% |
|
|
60.00% |
|
|
|
Lead |
|
|
|
|
|
75.00% |
|
|
|
Zinc |
|
|
|
|
|
88.00% |
|
|
|
Product Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper USD per lb |
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
2.90 |
Molybdenum USD per lb |
|
|
15.50 |
|
|
- |
|
|
15.50 |
Gold USD per Troy ounce |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
Silver USD per Troy ounce |
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
Lead USD per tonne |
|
|
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
Zinc USD per tonne |
|
|
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
Copper Equivalence
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
Molybdenum |
|
|
2.5540 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.7513 |
Gold |
|
|
0.2478 |
|
|
0.2478 |
|
|
|
Silver |
|
|
0.0051 |
|
|
0.0051 |
|
|
|
Zinc |
|
|
|
|
|
0.2023 |
|
|
|
Lead |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1884 |
|
|
|
Mineral Reserves Estimate
A Mineral Reserve estimate, dated April 28, 2012, has been independently completed
by MMC in accordance with the CIM Definitions Standards under NI
43-101.
Table 7 presents the Mineral
Reserves estimate for the Project reported at a 0.35% Cu-equivalent
cut-off grade for the ore extracted via open cut methods and 0.5%
to 0.65% Cu-equivalent cut-off grade for the ore extracted via
underground methods. The Mineral Reserves is inclusive of, and not
additional to the Mineral Resources in Tables 4 and
5.
Table 7: Jiama Project
Statement of NI 43-101 Mineral Reserve Estimate as of April 28,
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Metals |
Type |
|
Ore |
|
Cu |
|
Mo |
|
Au |
|
Ag |
|
Pb |
|
Zn |
|
Cu |
|
Mo |
|
Au |
|
Ag |
|
Pb |
|
Zn |
|
|
kt |
|
% |
|
% |
|
g/t |
|
g/t |
|
% |
|
% |
|
kt |
|
kt |
|
t |
|
t |
|
kt |
|
kt |
Tongqianshan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Probable |
|
2,632 |
|
0.57 |
|
0.014 |
|
0.15 |
|
8.05 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
15.0 |
|
0.37 |
|
0.39 |
|
21.2 |
|
- |
|
- |
Subtotal |
|
2,632 |
|
0.57 |
|
0.014 |
|
0.15 |
|
8.05 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
15.0 |
|
0.37 |
|
0.39 |
|
21.2 |
|
- |
|
- |
Waste |
|
7,770 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Strip Ratio* |
|
2.95 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Niumatang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Probable |
|
15,328 |
|
1.24 |
|
0.044 |
|
0.57 |
|
25.77 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
189.5 |
|
6.74 |
|
8.78 |
|
394.9 |
|
- |
|
- |
Subtotal |
|
15,328 |
|
1.24 |
|
0.044 |
|
0.57 |
|
25.77 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
189.5 |
|
6.74 |
|
8.78 |
|
394.9 |
|
- |
|
- |
Waste |
|
141,919 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Strip Ratio* |
|
9.26 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
South Pit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Probable |
|
38,231 |
|
0.93 |
|
0.021 |
|
0.22 |
|
20.90 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
354.0 |
|
8.03 |
|
8.53 |
|
799.0 |
|
- |
|
- |
Subtotal |
|
38,231 |
|
0.93 |
|
0.021 |
|
0.22 |
|
20.90 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
354.0 |
|
8.03 |
|
8.53 |
|
799.0 |
|
- |
|
- |
Waste |
|
233,346 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Strip Ratio* |
|
6.10 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Jiaoyan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Probable |
|
146,017 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.016 |
|
0.03 |
|
1.11 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
611.8 |
|
23.36 |
|
4.53 |
|
161.6 |
|
- |
|
- |
Subtotal |
|
146,017 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.016 |
|
0.03 |
|
1.11 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
611.8 |
|
23.36 |
|
4.53 |
|
161.6 |
|
- |
|
- |
Waste |
|
224,620 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Strip Ratio* |
|
1.54 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Underground (north) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
16,241 |
|
1.14 |
|
0.073 |
|
0.38 |
|
21.69 |
|
0.108 |
|
0.058 |
|
185.6 |
|
11.90 |
|
6.15 |
|
352.3 |
|
17.5 |
|
9.5 |
Probable |
|
113,158 |
|
1.10 |
|
0.049 |
|
0.42 |
|
20.61 |
|
0.039 |
|
0.033 |
|
1,241.9 |
|
55.30 |
|
47.60 |
|
2,332.1 |
|
44.5 |
|
37.0 |
Subtotal |
|
129,399 |
|
1.10 |
|
0.052 |
|
0.42 |
|
20.74 |
|
0.048 |
|
0.036 |
|
1,427.5 |
|
67.20 |
|
53.75 |
|
2,684.4 |
|
62.0 |
|
46.5 |
Underground
(south) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
8,673 |
|
0.63 |
|
0.014 |
|
0.29 |
|
0.38 |
|
0.116 |
|
10.855 |
|
54.8 |
|
1.26 |
|
2.48 |
|
3.3 |
|
10.1 |
|
941.5 |
Probable |
|
23,190 |
|
0.67 |
|
0.016 |
|
0.09 |
|
10.82 |
|
0.094 |
|
0.125 |
|
155.1 |
|
3.76 |
|
2.05 |
|
251.0 |
|
21.8 |
|
28.9 |
Subtotal |
|
31,864 |
|
0.66 |
|
0.016 |
|
0.14 |
|
7.98 |
|
0.100 |
|
3.046 |
|
209.9 |
|
5.02 |
|
4.53 |
|
254.3 |
|
31.9 |
|
970.4 |
Total Reserves
Open Cut + Underground |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
24,914 |
|
0.96 |
|
0.053 |
|
0.35 |
|
14.27 |
|
0.111 |
|
3.817 |
|
240.4 |
|
13.15 |
|
8.63 |
|
355.6 |
|
27.6 |
|
950.9 |
Probable |
|
338,556 |
|
0.76 |
|
0.029 |
|
0.21 |
|
11.70 |
|
0.020 |
|
0.019 |
|
2,567.3 |
|
97.57 |
|
71.88 |
|
3,959.8 |
|
66.4 |
|
65.9 |
Total |
|
363,470 |
|
0.77 |
|
0.030 |
|
0.22 |
|
11.87 |
|
0.026 |
|
0.280 |
|
2,807.7 |
|
110.72 |
|
80.50 |
|
4,315.4 |
|
94.0 |
|
1,016.9 |
-Note: Figures reported are rounded which may result in small
tabulation errors
-Information on the Cu Equivalent Cut-off grade calculation are
outlined in the Mineral Resource section of this release.
*Strip ratio units are waste tonne: ore tonne
An NI 43-101 Pre-Feasibility Study Technical
Report is being prepared by MMC to support the Statement of Mineral
Resources and Mineral Reserves and this will be available on SEDAR
and on the Company's website within the next forty-five days.
Project Update
As of October 7,
2012, the Company has completed a further infill drilling
program to upgrade the resource confidence and help further
optimize the mine design and reserves of the Jiama deposit. The
program consisted of 90 drill holes for a total of 40,496 meters,
including: 71 regular in-fill resource drill holes (31,489 m), 13
geo-technical drill holes (4,835 m), and 6 geo-hydrological holes
(4,172 m). Assaying and geological logging and testing of the core
from this program is ongoing and this information will be included
in future updates of the Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves.
The Company is currently completing further
metallurgical testing of both skarn and hornfels ores to further
optimize the molybdenum and precious metal recoveries especially in
lower grade ores. Further testing underway in the hornfels mostly
located in the Jiaoyan pit area, will be focused on further
refining the Cu-Mo separation.
Based on the above infill drilling and
metallurgical program the Company aims to release an update of the
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves in the first half of
2013.
About China Gold International
Resources
China Gold International Resources Corp Ltd is
based in Vancouver, BC,
Canada and operates both the CSH
Gold Mine in Inner Mongolia, and the Jiama Copper-Polymetallic Mine
in Tibet Autonomous Region of China. CGG's objective is to continue to build
shareholder value by growing production at its current mining
operations, expanding its resource base, and aggressively acquiring
and developing new projects internationally. The Company is listed
on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: CGG) and the Main Board of the
Stock Exchange of Hong Kong
Limited (HKEx: 2099).
QUALIFIED PERSON
An Independent Pre-Feasibility Study Technical
Report titled "Jiama Copper-Polymetallic Project, Metrorkongka
County, Tibet Autonomous Region People's Republic of China" with an
effective date of October 25, 2012
has been prepared by MMC. The report will be available on SEDAR
(www.sedar.com) within 45 days of this release.
Mr. Jeremy Lee
Clark, a full time Principal Geologist for MMC, and a
Qualified Person as defined by NI-43-101, has reviewed the data
underlying the Mineral Resource and supervised the estimation of
the Mineral Resource as well as reviewed the entire Pre-Feasibility
Technical Report. Jeremy has approved the technical and scientific
information pertaining to the Jiama Project's Mineral Resources and
Geology contained in this release.
Mr. Anthony Robert
Cameron, a part time Associate Mining Engineer engaged by
MMC, and a Qualified Person as defined by NI-43-101, has reviewed
the data underlying the Mineral Reserve and supervised the
estimation of the Mineral Reserve as well as reviewed the reserve
sections of the Pre-Feasibility Technical Report. Anthony has
approved the technical and scientific information pertaining to the
Jiama Project's Mineral Reserves, Life of Mine Operating Costs and
Capex and Cashflow Analysis contained in this release.
Mr. Andrew James Haigh
Newell, a full time Executive Processing Consultant Engineer
for MMC, and a Qualified Person as defined by NI-43-101, has
reviewed the data underlying the Processing aspects of the project
and sections of the Pre-Feasibility Technical Report. Andrew has
approved the technical and scientific information pertaining to the
Jiama Project's Processing and Products contained in this
release.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information regarding China Gold
International Resources contained herein may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable
securities laws. Forward-looking statements may include estimates,
plans, expectations, opinions, forecasts, projections, guidance or
other statements that are not statements of fact. Although China
Gold International Resources believes that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can
give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been
correct. China Gold International Resources cautions that actual
performance will be affected by a number of factors, most of which
are beyond its control, and that future events and results may vary
substantially from what China Gold International Resources
currently foresees. Factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include
market prices, exploitation and exploration results, continued
availability of capital and financing and general economic, market
or business conditions. The forward-looking statements are
expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.
The information contained herein is stated as of the current date
and subject to change after that date.
SOURCE China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.