Novo Resources Corp. (
Novo or
the Company) (ASX: NVO) (TSX: NVO & NVO.WT.A)
(OTCQX: NSRPF) is pleased to announce that a ~4,000 m RC drill
program at
Nunyerry North, which is located in the
southern Egina Gold Camp (
EGC), will commence next
week following completion of heritage clearance and earthworks. The
follow-up drill program will test significant gold targets
generated during the maiden drill program in 2023.
In addition, a maiden RC drill program is
planned to test three significant gold and
gold-copper(+-platinum-palladium) targets in the Karratha
District, which were defined by a combination of mapping,
surface geochemistry and historic geophysics (IP chargeability)
with programs to be completed at North Whundo, Railway Bore
and East Well. This ~3,500 m program is scheduled to start
immediately after completion of the Nunyerry North drilling
program.
Also in the Egina Gold Camp, Earn-in and JV
partner De Grey Mining (De Grey) is scheduled to
commence aircore (AC) and RC programs in Q2 2024.
AC drilling will be completed for target generation, and RC
drilling completed for follow-up target testing at
Heckmair, Irvine and Lowe.
Figure 1: Novo tenure showing
priority project areas in the Egina Gold Camp and Karratha
District
Nunyerry North (70% Novo / 30% Creasy
Group)
The Nunyerry North prospect lies in the southern
EGC, located ~150 km from Port Hedland. The prospect is located
along the southern extent of the Tabba Tabba Shear, a deep tapping
gold-fertile structural corridor, where Novo has focussed
exploration over the last eighteen months.
Novo completed a maiden RC drilling program of
30 holes for 2,424 m at Nunyerry North in Q4 2023, generating
significant gold intercepts in quartz vein arrays (some of which
are blind at surface) hosted in a particular basalt unit.
Significant intercepts from RC drilling at
Nunyerry North1 include:
-
6 m @ 6.12 g/t Au from 37 m (NC017)
-
11 m @ 2.52 g/t Au from 22 m, including 6 m at 4.19 g/t Au from 22
m (NC014)
-
13 m @ 1.89 g/t Au from surface (NC004)
-
4 m @ 5.71 g/t Au from 40 m (NC015)
-
17 m @ 1.34 g/t Au from 37 m, including 4 m at 3.77 g/t Au from 50
m (NC022)
-
14 m at 1.14 g/t Au from 39 m, including 4 m at 2.16 g/t Au from 41
m (NC006)
Figure 2: Nunyerry North
geological interpretation, 2023 drill hole locations and drill
target areas.
A program of ~4,000 m follow-up RC drilling is
scheduled to commence next week at Nunyerry North, testing strike
extensions of known mineralisation where high-grade surface gold in
soil anomalism is present; down plunge of existing intercepts; and
for repeat lodes at depth.
The upcoming Nunyerry North drilling program
successfully qualified for the Exploration Incentive Scheme (EIS),
awarding up to A$180,000 towards the drilling campaign.
The EIS is a Western Australian State Government
initiative that aims to encourage exploration in Western Australia
by co-funding 50% of direct drilling costs. The qualification
process is highly competitive and only selected projects that meet
eligibility criteria are accepted for participation. The EIS
funding is designed to address significant knowledge gaps and
critical uncertainties in an underexplored area.
The Nunyerry North program comprises deep and
early diamond holes to be drilled from June 2024 to fast-track
development of the prospect.
Egina Earn-in/JV (De Grey earning 50%
interest)
The Egina Earn-in and JV is located in the
northwest of the EGC. De Grey plan to commence exploration field
programs in Q2 2024, which will include: a high-resolution
aeromagnetic survey over the Becher and Heckmair
area; ground gravity surveys in select areas; AC drilling
planned for target generation; and RC drilling for follow-up target
testing at Heckmair, Irvine and Lowe.
Field-based exploration activities will progress
subject to access to the Yandeyarra Reserve, cultural heritage
surveys and permitting.
Karratha District
Recent exploration in the Karratha District has
advanced several drill targets, including North Whundo,
Railway Bore and East Well.
A maiden RC drilling program is planned to test
these three high-priority prospects for Au and Au-Cu (+-Pt and Pd)
mineralisation immediately after completing the Nunyerry North
drilling.
Figure 3: Karratha District
showing Novo tenure and significant prospects
North Whundo (Cu-Au-PGE target)
North Whundo is an outstanding
target, delineated by a significant 1.2 km long Cu-Pd-Au anomaly,
with highly anomalous rock chip results including peak values of
4.1 g/t Au+Pt+Pd and 3.9 % Cu (Appendix
1).
North Whundo was defined by Westfield Minerals
in the early 1970s as prospective for Cu-Ni, near the contact of a
large structurally complex, layered mafic/ultramafic intrusive
complex. Westfields conducted mapping, drilling, and induced
polarization surveys (IP) and defined three
targets2, but did not analyse for Au, Pt or Pb. Results and
technical information from Westfield Minerals are historical and do
not meet current reporting requirements. Information was disclosed
in annual exploration reports filed by Westfield Minerals on the
Western Australian Department of Energy, Mines, Industry Regulation
and Safety’s (“DEMIRS”) website in 2004 and utilised to assist
exploration targeting.
Novo conducted 80 m x 40 m spaced soil sampling
in 2023, returning a very high order 1.2 km long high-order
Cu-Pd-Au-(Pt) soil anomaly at >550 ppm Cu and 30 ppb Pd. Peak
soil values include 1,233 ppm Cu, 125 ppb Pd, 536 ppb Pt and 66 ppb
Au. The linear anomaly trends northwest, parallel to the margins of
the mafic/ultramafic intrusion with a secondary 1 km long anomaly
of the same magnitude trending east-west (Figure 4).
Rock chip sampling by Novo also returned highly
anomalous results over 1 km strike including peak values of 4.1 g/t
Au+Pt+Pd and 3.9% Cu, and up to 0.74 g/t Au and 3.32 g/t Pd.
Mineralisation includes disseminated and stringer forms in moderate
south dipping zones, truncated by a swarm of NW trending faults.
The target style is interpreted to be structurally modified
magmatic Cu-Au-Pd.
Results listed for North Whundo are not
necessarily representative of mineralisation across the
district.
Figure 4: Karratha district
prospects and Cu surface geochemistry over 1XD magnetic data.
_______________2 Refer to Westfield Minerals N.L 1972 Annual
Report Mt Roe – North Whundo M.C.’s – WAMEX Open File Data Report
A3348.
Railway Bore & East Well
The Railway Bore Cu-Au target
is an E-W trending complex array of malachite-bearing brecciated
quartz veins and sericite-silica-sulphide altered suite of
porphyritic felsic intrusions. The target strikes over 300 m and is
open under regolith along strike. Peak rock chip results include
9.6 g/t Au, 11.9% Cu and 26 g/t Ag (Appendix
1).
The East Well Cu-Au-Pd target
is a 60 m wide > 200 ppm Cu in soil anomaly (pXRF) trending over
a strike of 450 m and with a peak pXRF soil result of 1,750 ppm Cu.
Anomalous Cu-Au (+/- Pt-Pd) mineralisation is associated with an
E-W shear along the contact of a mafic intrusive suite and basement
felsic volcanics. Mineralisation includes malachite-bearing,
brecciated and silica-altered gabbro with quartz-carbonate
stockwork veining. Rock chip sampling returned peak values
including 1.3 g/t Au, 214 ppb Pd, 46 ppb Pt and 0.6% Cu (Appendix
1).
Railway Bore lies immediately southwest of a
swarm of narrow high-grade gold quartz veins with peak rock sample
values of 133.2 g/t Au and anomalous Cu and Bi. These veins trend
over ~5 km strike towards East Well, where they manifest as a
single narrow high-grade vein and return values up to 73.9 g/t Au.
The strong gold results and geochemical associations along this ~ 5
km trend suggests the presence of a larger, potentially intrusion
related system.
The above results at Railway Bore and East Well
are not necessarily representative of mineralisation across the
district.
Forward Exploration Program
The ~4,000 m RC follow-up drilling at Nunyerry
North is scheduled to commence next week.
Novo’s maiden RC drilling program at the North
Whundo, Railway Bore and East Well prospects is scheduled to start
in Q2 2024 and will total ~3,500 m to test Au and Au-Cu (+/- Pt-Pd)
targets defined by a combination of mapping, surface geochemistry
and historic geophysics (IP chargeability and anomalies).
De Grey Mining is scheduled to commence drilling
programs in Q2 2024, which includes AC drilling for target
generation and RC drilling for follow-up target testing at
Heckmair, Irvine and Lowe.
ANALYTIC METHODOLOGY
Rock chip samples of 1 – 3 kg were submitted to
Intertek commercial Genalysis (“Intertek”) in
Perth, Western Australia where they were dried and crushed to -3 mm
and pulverized to 75 µm or better (prep code SP64), with a > 85%
pass, then assayed for Au by 50 g charge fire assay FA50/OE and for
48 elements using four acid digest – MS finish (4A/MS). Selected
samples were assayed for Pt and Pd in addition to Au using 50 g
charge fire assay FA50/OE. Elements that reported above the upper
detection limit for 4A/MS were reanalysed using method 4AH/OE.
A minimum of 2 CRM standards relevant for the
style of mineralisation and 2 blanks were submitted per 100
samples.
Soil samples were sieved to < 80 mesh and
submitted to Intertek for aqua regia to analyse for 33 elements.
Selected samples were assayed using 25 g charge fire assay FA25/MS
for Au, Pt and Pd.
A minimum of 2 CRM standards, 2 blanks and 4
field duplicates were submitted per 100 samples.
pXRF readings of soils and rock chips were taken
using a NITON XLT5 model and were used to aid field interpretation
and identification of anomalous target mineralogy and pathfinder
elements. The Niton pXRF machine was calibrated daily and checked
against reference material four times per 100 samples and at the
start and end of each day.
There were no limitations to the verification
process and all relevant data was verified by a qualified
person/competent person (as defined in National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI
43-101) and the Australasian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves
(JORC Code, Appendix 2) respectively) by reviewing
QAQC performance of inserted reference material and the analytical
procedures undertaken by Intertek.
ABOUT NOVO
Novo explores and develops its prospective land
package covering approximately 7,000 square kilometres in the
Pilbara region of Western Australia, along with the 22 square
kilometre Belltopper project in the Bendigo Tectonic Zone of
Victoria, Australia. In addition to the Company’s primary focus,
Novo seeks to leverage its internal geological expertise to deliver
value-accretive opportunities to its shareholders.
Authorised for release by the Board of
Directors.
CONTACT
Investors:Mike Spreadborough +61 8 6400 6100
info@novoresources.com |
North American Queries:Leo Karabelas+1 416 543
3120leo@novoresources.com |
Media:Cameron Gilenko+61 466 984
953cgilenko@citadelmagnus.com |
QP STATEMENT
Ms De Luca (MAIG), is the qualified person, as
defined under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure
for Mineral Projects, responsible for, and having reviewed and
approved, the technical information contained in this news release.
Mrs De Luca is Novo’s General Manger Exploration.
JORC COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The information in this report that relates to
rock chip sample results at the Karratha District (North Whundo,
Railway Bore and East Well) is based on information reviewed and
approved by Ms De Luca, who is a full-time employee of Novo
Resources Corp. Ms De Luca is a Competent Person who is a member of
the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Ms De Luca has
sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of
mineralisation and the type of deposits under consideration and to
the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as
defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting
of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Ms De
Luca consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based
on her information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this news release that
relates to previously reported exploration results at Nunyerry
North is extracted from Novo's announcement titled upgraded
Nunyerry North drill results deliver high-grade intercepts up to
6.12 g/t Au released to ASX on 27 March 2024 and which is available
to view at www.asx.com.au. The Company confirms that the form and
context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have
not been materially modified from the original market
announcement.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some statements in this news release may contain
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and
Australian securities law and regulations. In this news release,
such statements include but are not limited to planned exploration
activities and the timing of such. These statements address future
events and conditions and, as such, involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by the statements. Such factors include, without
limitation, customary risks of the resource industry and the risk
factors identified in Novo’s annual information form for the year
ended December 31, 2023 which is available under Novo’s profile on
SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and in the Company’s prospectus dated 2
August 2023 which is available at www.asx.com.au. Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date those statements are made.
Except as required by applicable law, Novo assumes no obligation to
update or to publicly announce the results of any change to any
forward-looking statement contained or incorporated by reference
herein to reflect actual results, future events or developments,
changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting the
forward-looking statements. If Novo updates any forward-looking
statement(s), no inference should be drawn that the Company will
make additional updates with respect to those or other
forward-looking statements.
APPENDIX
Appendix 1 – Rock sample results for the Karratha
District(All sample locations are GPS located on MGA_2020
zone 50.)
Sample ID |
Type |
Prospect |
Au (ppm) |
Cu (ppm) |
Pd (ppb) |
Pt (ppb) |
Easting GDA94 Z50 |
Northing GDA94 Z50 |
A008961 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.411 |
21875 |
1377.2 |
76.6 |
495,386 |
7,678,094 |
A008962 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.013 |
778 |
78.7 |
8.8 |
495,579 |
7,678,034 |
A008963 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.049 |
659.2 |
74.1 |
8 |
495,569 |
7,678,043 |
A008964 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.002 |
404 |
22.1 |
2.9 |
495,605 |
7,678,024 |
A008966 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.099 |
10915.8 |
470.9 |
76.5 |
495,237 |
7,678,176 |
A008967 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.19 |
17268.4 |
997 |
301.6 |
495,265 |
7,678,164 |
A008968 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.04 |
3985.4 |
461.6 |
66.4 |
495,335 |
7,678,161 |
A008969 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.53 |
38757 |
3322.2 |
276.8 |
495,376 |
7,678,085 |
A008970 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.104 |
14979.3 |
598.8 |
114.1 |
495,163 |
7,678,265 |
A008971 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.092 |
6591.4 |
864 |
88.9 |
495,174 |
7,678,246 |
A008972 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.062 |
6812.6 |
478.4 |
81.3 |
495,222 |
7,678,200 |
A008973 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.088 |
7349.5 |
465.3 |
46.4 |
495,557 |
7,677,942 |
A008974 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.078 |
11403.6 |
1045.1 |
109 |
495,895 |
7,677,772 |
A008975 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.013 |
2629.2 |
263.9 |
53.9 |
495,967 |
7,677,731 |
A008976 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.07 |
8152.6 |
448.9 |
66.8 |
495,956 |
7,677,748 |
NVO-9251 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.173 |
12995.7 |
709.6 |
167.7 |
495,854 |
7,677,837 |
W19896 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.051 |
4296.7 |
254.4 |
33.1 |
495,482 |
7,677,984 |
W19897 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.745 |
15508.5 |
1321.2 |
125.8 |
495,343 |
7,678,137 |
W19898 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.211 |
11003.6 |
687.7 |
126.3 |
495,303 |
7,678,071 |
W19899 |
Rock Chip |
North Whundo |
0.114 |
5701.1 |
386.5 |
69.6 |
495,471 |
7,678,000 |
NVO-01520 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.861 |
20000* |
not assayed |
496,157 |
7,672,083 |
NVO-01521 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.116 |
538.1 |
not assayed |
496,325 |
7,672,117 |
NVO-01522 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
133.22 |
10417.3 |
not assayed |
496,625 |
7,672,182 |
NVO-01523 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
2.83 |
571.5 |
not assayed |
496,668 |
7,672,333 |
NVO-01524 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.07 |
39.6 |
not assayed |
496,782 |
7,672,443 |
NVO-01525 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
13.86 |
72.6 |
not assayed |
495,964 |
7,672,111 |
NVO-01526 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.13 |
4550.7 |
not assayed |
495,850 |
7,672,012 |
NVO-01527 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.255 |
12646 |
not assayed |
496,464 |
7,671,603 |
NVO-9132 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.022 |
30.2 |
not assayed |
496,092 |
7,671,683 |
NVO-9137 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.013 |
91.5 |
not assayed |
496,190 |
7,672,383 |
NVO-9138 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
10.173 |
45.6 |
not assayed |
496,184 |
7,672,372 |
NVO-9143 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.066 |
3746.1 |
738.3 |
275.1 |
496,085 |
7,671,544 |
NVO-9144 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.01 |
55.9 |
6.1 |
2.7 |
496,288 |
7,671,682 |
NVO-9145 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
9.617 |
65.1 |
12.9 |
3.8 |
496,345 |
7,671,695 |
NVO-9146 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.037 |
2879.4 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
496,376 |
7,671,715 |
NVO-9147 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.054 |
795.1 |
13.8 |
3.3 |
496,381 |
7,671,708 |
NVO-9148 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.003 |
361.3 |
10.7 |
5.3 |
496,373 |
7,671,701 |
NVO-9149 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.012 |
665.7 |
147.7 |
23.9 |
496,169 |
7,671,604 |
NVO-9204 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.0005 |
11.9 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,075 |
7,672,527 |
NVO-9205 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.006 |
68.3 |
1 |
1.2 |
496,270 |
7,672,549 |
R00321 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.006 |
668.1 |
X |
X |
496,320 |
7,671,776 |
R06951 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
16.626 |
161.3 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,540 |
7,672,967 |
R06952 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
8.548 |
91.9 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,514 |
7,672,939 |
R06954 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.045 |
280.3 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,409 |
7,671,730 |
R06955 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.098 |
457.6 |
3.9 |
1.6 |
496,359 |
7,671,711 |
R06956 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.01 |
1575.9 |
8.8 |
2.9 |
496,366 |
7,671,701 |
R06957 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.06 |
18.7 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,406 |
7,671,684 |
R06959 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.012 |
94365 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
496,441 |
7,671,772 |
R06960 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.017 |
118686 |
1.7 |
0.9 |
496,440 |
7,671,749 |
R06961 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.009 |
642.4 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
496,377 |
7,671,786 |
R06962 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.201 |
7284.1 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
496,408 |
7,671,810 |
R06964 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.03 |
197.7 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,521 |
7,671,826 |
R06965 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.013 |
291.3 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,607 |
7,671,806 |
R06994 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.0005 |
6.2 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
496,028 |
7,672,509 |
R06995 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.0005 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
496,044 |
7,672,558 |
W10966 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
1.017 |
12570 |
142.8 |
145.2 |
496,010 |
7,671,603 |
W19958 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.231 |
20666 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
496,364 |
7,671,722 |
W19959 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.149 |
35516 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
496,365 |
7,671,716 |
W19960 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.007 |
580.2 |
6 |
11.3 |
496,333 |
7,671,767 |
W19983 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
0.009 |
7.8 |
X |
X |
496,141 |
7,671,716 |
W19994 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
6.462 |
9281.7 |
X |
X |
496,158 |
7,672,233 |
W19995 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
8.147 |
77.3 |
X |
X |
496,185 |
7,672,373 |
W19996 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
5.621 |
2945.8 |
X |
X |
496,194 |
7,671,955 |
W19997 |
Rock Chip |
Railway Bore |
7.632 |
245.8 |
X |
X |
496,175 |
7,672,014 |
18KAR123 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
11.214 |
123.4 |
not assayed |
499,076 |
7,674,656 |
18KAR124 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
73.923 |
1415 |
not assayed |
499,048 |
7,674,614 |
18KAR125 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
6.659 |
17.2 |
not assayed |
498,912 |
7,674,556 |
18KAR126 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.093 |
56.3 |
not assayed |
499,016 |
7,674,626 |
18KAR127 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.03 |
47.2 |
not assayed |
499,019 |
7,674,615 |
18KAR128 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.122 |
46.8 |
not assayed |
498,985 |
7,674,590 |
18KAR129 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.831 |
53.7 |
not assayed |
498,986 |
7,674,587 |
NVO-9130 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.051 |
107.7 |
not assayed |
498,332 |
7,674,195 |
NVO-9131 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.252 |
4032.8 |
not assayed |
498,369 |
7,674,220 |
NVO-9188 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.005 |
329.5 |
4.4 |
3 |
498,452 |
7,674,217 |
R06966 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
11.499 |
56753 |
3 |
X |
498,176 |
7,673,771 |
R06967 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.031 |
3222.7 |
76 |
11 |
498,414 |
7,674,223 |
R06968 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.211 |
4711.7 |
86 |
11 |
498,655 |
7,674,325 |
R06991 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.096 |
4913.8 |
200.2 |
27.2 |
498,591 |
7,674,279 |
R06992 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.001 |
49.4 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
498,612 |
7,674,279 |
R06993 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.003 |
79.6 |
3 |
1.2 |
498,815 |
7,674,360 |
W10054 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.01 |
24.6 |
X |
X |
499,238 |
7,675,023 |
W10087 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
13.988 |
703.9 |
X |
X |
499,354 |
7,674,998 |
W10088 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
24.954 |
1101.6 |
X |
X |
499,339 |
7,674,992 |
W10751 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
1.325 |
3724.2 |
163 |
32 |
498,592 |
7,674,279 |
W10752 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
0.15 |
6538.7 |
214 |
46 |
498,596 |
7,674,272 |
W19998 |
Rock Chip |
East Well |
5.12 |
207.1 |
X |
X |
498,760 |
7,674,421 |
* upper
detection limit reached and not re-assayed using dilution method
4AH/OE |
|
Appendix 2 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table
1
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this
section.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
- Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut channels, random
chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
- Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
- Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are
Material to the Public Report.
- In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this
would be relatively simple (e.g., ‘reverse circulation drilling was
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more
explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g., submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
|
- Rock chips samples were collected by
grab sampling 1 – 3 kg of material which were dispatched to
Intertek Genalysis, Western Australia for analysis. Sample sites
were selected based to be representative on the lithology sampled,
and the same sampling technique was employed at each sample site
where possible.
- Soil samples of 200g were collected
from small pits 2cm – 20 cm depth and sieved to <80#. Analysis
depends on anticipated target mineralisation and includes aqua
regia for all soils with optional fire assay for Au / Pt / Pd
analysis.
- pXRF readings of soils were taken
using a NITON XLT5 model and were used to aid field interpretation
and identification of anomalous target mineralogy and pathfinder
elements. The Niton pXRF machine was calibrated daily.
|
Drilling techniques |
- Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g.,
core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails,
face-sampling bit, or other type, whether core is oriented and if
so, by what method, etc).
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Drill sample recovery |
- Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed.
- Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
- Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade
and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Logging |
- Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
- Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core
(or costean, channel, etc) photography.
- The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
- If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all
core taken.
- If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc
and whether sampled wet or dry.
- For all sample types, the nature, quality, and appropriateness
of the sample preparation technique.
- Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages
to maximise representivity of samples.
- Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of
the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
- Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
|
- Rock chip samples were dried, crushed and pulverised (SP64) by
Intertek Genalysis to create a 50 g charge, then assayed for Au
(+/- Pt and Pd) by fire assay FA50/OE and for 48 elements using
four acid digest – MS finish (4A/MS).
- Soil samples required no prep and were analysed for 32 elements
by aqua regia digest with MS finish (lab method AR25/MS). Selected
grids were analysed by 25g charge Fire Assay-MS finish for Au, Pt
and Pd.
- pXRF readings of soils were taken using a NITON XLT5 model and
were used to aid field interpretation and identification of
anomalous target mineralogy and pathfinder elements. The Niton pXRF
machine was calibrated daily.
- The sampling techniques and sample size is considered
appropriate for this style of mineralisation.
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
- The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
- For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments,
etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including
instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
- Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g., standards,
blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (if lack of bias) and precision have
been established.
|
- The rock chip sample assay methodology noted above is
considered appropriate for the style of mineralisation tested. The
method includes inserting 2 CRM standards and 2 blanks per 100
samples or at least one of each per sample submission.
- The soil sample assay methodology has low level detection for
gold and multi-elements and is considered appropriate for soil
geochemistry for outcropping or near surface mineralisation. The
method includes insertion of at least 2 blanks 2 CRM standards and
4 field duplicates per 100 samples.
- pXRF readings of soils were taken using a NITON XLT5 model and
were used to aid field interpretation and identification of
anomalous target mineralogy and pathfinder elements. This is
appropriate for first pass reconnaissance and anomaly definition.
The machine is calibrated daily and at least four CRMs are inserted
per 100 samples and at the start and end of the day.
- No QAQC issues were detected.
|
Verification of sampling and assaying |
- The verification of significant intersections by either
independent or alternative company personnel.
- The use of twinned holes.
- Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
- Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
|
- Primary data was collected in the field and stored using
database compatible excel templates which were then forwarded to
the database manager email for upload to the Geobank (v2022.5)
database, buffered through a validation portal that ensures code
and primary record compliance. Geobank is a front-end UX/UI tender
software platform (developed and sold by Micromine) attached to a
SQL v15.1 server.
- Assay data were loaded from lab certificates received from the
registered laboratory by an internal database manager or external
database consultant, and industry-standard audit trails and
chain-of-custody was adhered to.
- Verification included checking the data against original logs
and utilising laboratory certificates.
- No adjustments of the assay data were made.
|
Location of data points |
- Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes
(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
- Specification of the grid system used.
- Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
|
- All surface sample reconnaissance
locations were recorded in by hand-held GPS using the GDA94-Z50
co-ordinate system.
|
Data spacing and distribution |
- Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
- Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.
- Whether sample compositing has been applied.
|
- Limited rock samples are taken and are indicative of potential
grade tenor. These do not indicate any continuity or scale
potential.
- Soil samples at North Whundo and East Well were taken on a
nominal 80 m x 40 m grid, with infill soil sampling at 40m x 20m
spacing at East Well. Railway Bore was sampled at a nominal 60 m x
40 m grid.
|
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
- Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling
of possible structures and the extent to which this is known,
considering the deposit type.
- If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if
material.
|
- Soil and pXRF sample grids were orientated to best intersect
the lithological and structural trends at right angles.
|
Sample security |
- The measures taken to ensure sample security.
|
- All samples are stored and managed on site by internal staff.
Samples are then transported by reputable companies to a registered
laboratory where they are stored in a locked facility before being
tracked and processed through the preparation and analysis system
at the laboratory.
|
Audits or reviews |
- The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and
data.
|
- No audits have been undertaken.
|
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this
section.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
- Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
- The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along
with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the
area.
|
- The prospects are part of the Karratha District and are located
on Exploration License E47/3601, approximately 35km south of
Karratha. The tenement is subject to the Comet Well Joint Venture
agreement, with Novo Resources holding a 80% interest, Gardner
Mining Pty Ltd 10% and Bradley Adam Smith 10%.
- There are several Registered Heritage Sites within this
tenement, however not overlapping with the immediate drilling
area.
- The prospects fall under the granted Ngarluma Native Title
determination WC1999/014 and is subject to a land access and
mineral exploration agreement with the Native Title Holders.
- The tenements are currently in good standing and there are no
known impediments.
|
Exploration done by other parties |
- Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other
parties.
|
- In 1969 – 1970, Westfield completed 474 stream sediment samples
and ground magnetics & IP surveys, including over North Whundo.
521 m of RC and 355 m of diamond drilling were completed in the
district.
- Consolidated Gold Fields (later Noranda Australia) explored for
Cu / Zn deposits at Whundo and surrounding areas between 1972 –
1983 and produced 5840 tonnes at 4.19% Cu, 48.8 ppm Ag and 1.2 ppm
Au from a trial mine at Whundo. Later, they completed EM surveys
and drilled a best Au of 0.7 g/t associated with elevated Cu, Pb,
Zn, Ag. Further drilling was recommended but not completed.
- Fox Resources were active between 2009 – 2017 and completed
various EM surveys, rock chip, soil, auger, RC and Diamond drilling
and identified a system of nuggety gold hosted in narrow quartz
veins near the contact of the Nallana and Tozer Formation and
sub-parallel trends to the north. Best gold values returned 80 ppm
in rock chips and diamond drilling. Bulk testing in 2014 at East
Well produced a grade of 8.8 g/t.
- IP surveys and geochemical coverage by these and other
explorers are used by Novo to direct reconnaissance and detailed
exploration and have been vital in the recognition of the current
targets.
|
Geology |
- Deposit type, geological setting, and style of
mineralisation.
|
- The Karratha district comprises a northeast-southwest
orientated ~ 4 km gold and base metal structural corridor south of
the Sholl Shear Zone.
- Mineralisation is hosted within Archean felsic and mafic
intrusions, that intruded both syn and post-bimodal volcanism
within an intra-oceanic arc setting during the Prinsep Orogeny (3.2
– 2.83 Ga). Mineralised and sericite-silica-chlorite altered felsic
intrusions (e.g. Railway Bore) that formed syn-collision may be
prospective for porphyry-like Au-Cu mineralisation. Mineralised
mafic intrusions (e.g. North Whundo) provide the potential for
Au-Cu-PGE orthomagmatic or structurally reworked deposits across
the tenement.
|
Drill hole Information |
- A summary of all information material to the understanding of
the exploration results including a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes, including Easting and
northing of the drill hole collar, Elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar, dip
and azimuth of the hole, down hole length and interception depth
plus hole length.
- If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis
that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not
detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person
should clearly explain why this is the case.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Data aggregation methods |
- In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging
techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g., cutting
of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should
be stated.
- Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of
high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some
typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in
detail.
- The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
values should be clearly stated.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept
lengths |
- These relationships are particularly important in the reporting
of Exploration Results.
- If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill
hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
- If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g., ‘down hole
length, true width not known’).
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
- Rock sample results are indicative in nature and, whilst
representatively sampling the target lithology, do not contain any
width or length information other than a qualitative description of
the target.
- Mapping and sampling have informed the proposed follow up
drilling, which aims to perpendicularly intersect stratigraphy and
potential mineralisation.
|
Diagrams |
- Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being
reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view
of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
|
- Refer to the body of the release for appropriate maps and
diagrams.
|
Balanced reporting |
- Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
|
- All rock sample results are reported in Appendix 1. Soil sample
analytical and pXRF results are not listed here but summarised in
diagrams and in the body of the release.
|
Other substantive exploration data |
- Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
|
|
Further work |
- The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g., tests for
lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).
- Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not commercially
sensitive.
|
- Refer to the body of the release.
|
(No Section 3 or 4 report as no Mineral Resources or Ore
Reserves are reported in this Appendix)
Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/104a73f1-047f-48ad-aa74-b2bf42a7dbeb
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/345c47f5-847d-48d5-8593-0d8d203faa49
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e2646636-d8bf-4de7-8a28-13d208e49914
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/57d5eac1-1e5f-474b-b411-861d7b01599b
Novo Resources (TSX:NVO.WT)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Nov 2024 a Dic 2024
Novo Resources (TSX:NVO.WT)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Dic 2023 a Dic 2024