THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONTAINS INSIDE
INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ARTICLE 7 OF REGULATION 2014/596/EU
WHICH IS PART OF DOMESTIC UK LAW PURSUANT TO THE MARKET ABUSE
(AMENDMENT) (EU EXIT) REGULATIONS (SI 2019/310) ("UK MAR"). UPON
THE PUBLICATION OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT, THIS INSIDE INFORMATION (AS
DEFINED IN UK MAR) IS NOW CONSIDERED TO BE IN THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN.
NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR
DISTRIBUTION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN OR
INTO THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, JAPAN, THE REPUBLIC OF
SOUTH AFRICA OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE TO DO SO WOULD
CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE RELEVANT LAWS OF SUCH
JURISDICTION.
30 May 2024
Cobra Resources
plc
("Cobra"
or the "Company")
Boland Re-Assay
Results
Further demonstrating scale
of ionic mineralisation amenable to ISR
Cobra
(LSE: COBR), an exploration
company advancing a strategy to lower the cost of critical rare
earth production at its Wudinna Project in South Australia, is
pleased to announce re-assay results from a further 195 samples (17
drillholes) which continue to support ionic rare earth
mineralisation continuity and scalability at the Boland
discovery.
Metallurgical testing aimed at
demonstrating the suitability for in situ recovery ("ISR") mining -
a low cost, low-disturbance method - is advancing with full results
expected in June 2024. The opportunity for Cobra is to demonstrate
Boland as the world's only ionic clay rare earth project amenable
to controlled ISR in a region which already utilises the ISR
extraction method at a number of operating mines. The Company aims
to achieve this through benchscale studies currently underway,
followed by an infield pilot study.
Boland Re-Assay Results Highlights
·
Scale
- results extend the defined rare
earth mineralisation footprint to over 33 km2, with
mineralisation being open in multiple directions along the
palaeochannel, supporting the Company's interpretation that
lithologies hosting ionic mineralisation extend up to 139
km2 of the Narlaby system at the Boland prospect alone.
Re-assay results have refined targeting for upcoming resource
focused drilling
·
High grade
intersections - 10 holes recorded 2m
downhole composites exceeding 1,000 ppm Total Rare Earth Oxide
("TREO"), where composites yield heavy rare earth ("HREO")
enrichment up to 40% of the TREO
·
ISR
- the unique geology at Boland enables ISR as a
preferred mining method. ISR is demonstrated by the uranium
industry to be the lowest cost form of mining with the lowest
associated environmental risk. Bench-scale tests are currently
underway at ANSTO and, if initial AMSUL wash recoveries can be
emulated under ISR conditions, Boland will be demonstrated as
globally unique, being the only ionic clay project amenable to
controlled ISR
·
Further results
pending - a further 674 samples from
25 drillholes have been taken across the Yarranna SE Uranium
prospect, where a >4km uranium bearing rollfront has been
defined by previous explorers. Samples are being analysed for REEs
and uranium and will inform native title and approval requirements
for follow-up drilling
Rupert Verco, CEO of Cobra,
commented:
"Boland is shaping up to be a company-making project (See
Appendix 1). Whilst scale and ionic metallurgy are important, it is
the amenability of Boland's geology to ISR that has the ability to
make it unique and commercially competitive. The uranium industry
has already demonstrated that ISR mining can be effectively
deployed in South Australian palaeochannel systems, where capital,
operational and environmental costs are materially reduced compared
to hard rock mines.
Through re-assaying (See Appendix 2), we have cost effectively
defined scale and de-risked planned resource focused drilling where
we can target demonstrated mineralisation and execute follow-up
drilling to deliver a maiden resource at Boland.
We
are well positioned to capitalise on our first-in-market advantage.
Results from our initial bench-scale ISR trials are expected in
June (See Appendix 3), where subsequent tests will inform an
infield pilot test, and we have already installed the wellfield
infrastructure which we aim to implement in 2025. Through this
strategy, we aim to demonstrate that via ISR, the cost of
extraction is materially lower and profitable at current rare earth
market prices."
Further information on Cobra's Boland rare earth discovery,
re-assay results, and benchscale ISR tests follows in the
appendices below.
Enquiries:
Cobra Resources plc
Rupert Verco (Australia)
Dan Maling (UK)
|
via Vigo
Consulting
+44 (0)20
7390 0234
|
SI
Capital Limited (Joint Broker)
Nick Emerson
Sam Lomanto
|
+44
(0)1483 413 500
|
Global Investment Strategy (Joint Broker)
James Sheehan
|
+44 (0)20
7048 9437
james.sheehan@gisukltd.com
|
Vigo
Consulting (Financial Public Relations)
Ben Simons
Kendall Hill
|
+44 (0)20
7390 0234
cobra@vigoconsulting.com
|
The person who arranged for the
release of this announcement was Rupert Verco, Managing Director of
the Company.
Information in this announcement
relates to exploration results that have been reported in the
following announcements:
·
Wudinna Project Update: "Re-Assay Results Confirm High Grades Over Exceptional Scale at
Boland", dated 26 April 2024
·
Wudinna Project Update: "Drilling results from
Boland Prospect", dated 25 March 2024
·
Wudinna Project Update: "Historical Drillhole
Re-Assay Results", dated 27 February 2024
·
Wudinna Project Update: "Ionic Rare Earth
Mineralisation at Boland Prospect", dated 11 September
2023
·
Wudinna Project Update: "Exceptional REE Results
Defined at Boland", dated 20 June 2023
Competent Persons Statement
Information in this announcement has
been assessed by Mr Rupert Verco, a Fellow of the Australasian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Verco is an employee of
Cobra and has more than 16 years' industry experience which is
relevant to the style of mineralisation, deposit type, and activity
which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined
in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves of JORC.
This includes 11 years of Mining, Resource Estimation and
Exploration.
About Cobra
In 2023, Cobra discovered a rare
earth deposit with the potential to re-define the cost of rare
earth production. The highly scalable Boland ionic rare earth
discovery at Cobra's Wudinna Project in South Australia's Gawler
Craton is Australia's only rare earth project amenable for in situ
recovery (ISR) mining - a low cost, low disturbance method. Cobra
is focused on de-risking the investment value of the discovery by
proving ISR as the preferred mining method which would eliminate
challenges associated with processing clays and provide Cobra with
the opportunity to define a low-cost pathway to
production.
Cobra's Wudinna tenements also
contain extensive orogenic gold mineralisation, including a 279,000
Oz gold JORC Mineral Resource Estimate, characterised by
potentially open-pitable, high-grade gold
intersections.
Follow us on social media:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cobraresourcesplc
X (Twitter):
https://twitter.com/Cobra_Resources
Subscribe to our news alert service:
https://cobraplc.com/news/
Appendix 1: Cobra's Boland Rare Earth
Discovery
·
Ionic clay hosted rare earths present as a low
capital, low operating cost source of heavy and magnet rare earth
metals
·
Processing of clay ores induces several operating
challenges, including productivity loss, material handling,
dewatering, reagent use and reclamation
·
Ionic rare earth mineralisation at Boland exists
in permeable geology in an environment that permits ISR, thus
bypassing the challenges associated with processing of clay
ores
·
ISR is the preferred method of recovery used in
the uranium industry, where1:
o Global ISR production accounted for ~60% of mined uranium in
2022
o Capital expenditure for ISR is 1-15% of conventional
mines
o Operating costs of ISR is generally 30-40% lower than
traditional mines
o Environmental impact and rehabilitation cost is significantly
lower than traditional mines
·
South Australia is home to Australia's only three
operating ISR uranium mines and has a regulatory framework that
supports ISR mining
·
Bench-scale leach studies under ISR conditions are
currently underway at ANSTO, a first for ionic REE projects outside
of China
·
Cobra has installed a wellfield to rapidly advance
the project towards an infield pilot study
·
Cobra aims to demonstrate that the cost of
production at Boland can be materially reduced via ISR, providing
operating resilience to volatile rare earth markets which has
stalled the commencement of many rare earth projects
·
Re-assaying of historic uranium focused drilling
is being used to confirm the scale of rare earth mineralisation.
These results confirm the presence of rare earth mineralisation
over a strike of 12 km, where mineralisation is open in most
directions. Follow-up drilling will aim to infill these results to
support a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") at
Boland
Appendix 2: Boland Re-Assay Results -
Further Significant Intersections
·
Based on metallurgical recoveries, light magnet
rare earths Nd + Pr represent 48% of recoverable value, whilst
heavy rare earths represent almost 50% of recoverable value, with
heavy magnet rare earths Dy + Tb contributing a significant portion
of heavy rare earth value
·
IR 123 intersected 10m at 1,501 ppm Total Rare
Earth Oxide ("TREO"), where Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 (Nd+Pr) totals 206 ppm
and Dy2O3 + Tb2O3 (Dy + Tb) totals 6 ppm from 20m
·
IR 234 intersected 2m at 778 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 167 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 16 ppm from 26m and 4m at
1,407 ppm TREO, where Nd + Pr totals 302 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 13
ppm from 48m
·
IR 235 intersected 2m at 515 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 95 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 7 ppm from 22m and 8m at 1,279
ppm TREO, where Nd + Pr totals 318 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 13 ppm
from 56m
·
IR 236 intersected 6m at 968 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 208 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 32 ppm from 2m
·
IR 239 intersected 4m at 945 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 190 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 22 ppm from 20m
·
IR 245 intersected 6m at 820 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 171 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 15 ppm from 10m
·
IR 244 intersected 8m at 566 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 110 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 16 ppm from 8m, including 2m
at 1,084 ppm TREO, where Nd + Pr totals 222 ppm and Dy + Tb totals
34 ppm from 8m
·
IR 243 intersected 4m at 509 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 95 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 11 ppm from 8m and 2m at 1,030
ppm TREO, where Nd + Pr totals 211 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 17 ppm
from 14m
·
IR 242 intersected 4m at 793 ppm TREO, where Nd +
Pr totals 158 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 16 ppm from 10m, and 2m at
1221 ppm TREO, where Nd + Pr totals 262 ppm and Dy + Tb totals 18
ppm from 16m, and 6m at 582 ppm TREO, where Nd + Pr totals 121 ppm
and Dy + Tb totals 5 ppm from 28m
1 United States Nuclear
Regulatory Commisions www.nrc.gov TradeTech - the nuclear
review (October 2016)
Figure 1: Plan detailing the
extent of re-analysis results, previous Cobra drilling, pending
assays and the modelled extent of the geological stratigraphy that
hosts 'Zone 3' mineralisation identified in Boland wellfield
drilling
Table 1: Significant Intersections
Hole ID
|
From (m)
|
To (m)
|
Int (m)
|
TREO
|
Pr6O11
|
Nd2O3
|
Tb2O3
|
Dy2O3
|
MREO %
|
HREO%
|
IR
245
|
10.0
|
16.0
|
6.0
|
820
|
38
|
133
|
2
|
12
|
23%
|
14%
|
IR
244
|
8.0
|
16.0
|
8
|
566
|
23
|
87
|
2
|
14
|
22%
|
25%
|
Incl.
|
8.0
|
10.0
|
2.0
|
1,084
|
45
|
177
|
5
|
29
|
24%
|
27%
|
IR
243
|
8.0
|
12.0
|
4.0
|
509
|
21
|
74
|
2
|
9
|
21%
|
20%
|
and
|
14.0
|
16.0
|
2
|
1,030
|
47
|
164
|
3
|
14
|
22%
|
13%
|
IR
242
|
10.0
|
14.0
|
4
|
793
|
34
|
124
|
3
|
13
|
22%
|
17%
|
and
|
16.0
|
18.0
|
2
|
1,221
|
58
|
204
|
3
|
15
|
23%
|
12%
|
and
|
28.0
|
34.0
|
6
|
582
|
28
|
93
|
1
|
4
|
22%
|
8%
|
IR
241
|
6.0
|
8.0
|
2
|
563
|
28
|
103
|
2
|
11
|
25%
|
18%
|
IR
239
|
20.0
|
24.0
|
4
|
945
|
41
|
149
|
3
|
19
|
22%
|
24%
|
IR
236
|
2.0
|
8.0
|
6
|
968
|
42
|
166
|
5
|
27
|
25%
|
28%
|
IR
235
|
22.0
|
24.0
|
2
|
515
|
23
|
72
|
1
|
6
|
20%
|
12%
|
and
|
56.0
|
64.0
|
8
|
1,279
|
70
|
248
|
2
|
11
|
26%
|
8%
|
IR
234
|
26.0
|
28.0
|
2
|
778
|
36
|
131
|
3
|
13
|
23%
|
14%
|
and
|
48.0
|
52.0
|
4
|
1,407
|
68
|
234
|
2
|
11
|
22%
|
7%
|
IR
133
|
28.0
|
30.0
|
2
|
764
|
44
|
153
|
4
|
20
|
29%
|
16%
|
IR
123
|
8.0
|
12.0
|
4
|
598
|
24
|
87
|
2
|
13
|
21%
|
25%
|
and
|
20.0
|
30.0
|
10
|
1,501
|
47
|
159
|
1
|
5
|
14%
|
3%
|
Incl.
|
20.0
|
22.0
|
2
|
4,395
|
137
|
460
|
3
|
11
|
14%
|
2%
|
Appendix 3: Update on Benchscale ISR Tests
·
A column leach test is currently underway at the
Australian Nuclear Scientific Technology Organisation ("ANSTO")
where the progressive recovery of rare earths under ISR conditions
is being evaluated. Initial test parameters include:
o 25cm
column of zone 3 Boland core
o 0.5M
ammonium sulphate (NH4)2SO4 as
lixiviant
o pH3
maintained by H2SO4
o Temperature maintained at 27°C
o Column pressurised at 6-9 bar to reflect aquifer under
injection
o Current injection rate is achieving 1 pore volume over six
days
o Test
is scheduled to be completed by 5 June 2024
·
Results are expected to be received in June
2024
·
Subsequent to results, a second larger test shall
be conducted to test repeatability at a larger scale
·
The pregnant liquor solution from these tests
shall be used to define and optimise a processing pathway to
produce a mixed rare earth carbonate ("MREC")
Figure 2: A photograph of the
bench-scale ISR column leach test underway at ANSTO, testing the
progressive recovery of rare earths under ISR
conditions
Appendix 4: JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table
1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
|
JORC Code
explanation
|
Commentary
|
Sampling
techniques
|
·
Nature and
quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
·
Include
reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
·
Aspects of the
determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report.
·
In cases where
'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively
simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for
fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such
as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules)
may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
|
·
Rotary mud and aircore drilling were used to
obtain 1m - 2m sample intervals.
·
A number of core holes were drilled to validate
aircore results and estimate gamma radiation
disequilibrium.
·
Carpentaria Exploration Company Pty Ltd conducted
drilling between 1979 - 1984.
|
Drilling
techniques
|
·
Drill type (eg
core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method,
etc).
|
· All
drillholes were drilled at 90 degrees (vertical) due to the
flat-lying nature of mineralisation.
· NQ
diameter (76mm) drill holes were used to obtain 1m down-hole
samples.
· Drillholes were wireline logged using undisclosed gamma
tools.
· Core
samples from twinned aircore holes were used to determine sample
representation and disequilibrium between gamma measured radiation
and actual Uranium quantities.
|
Drill sample
recovery
|
·
Method of
recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
·
Measures taken
to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
·
Whether a
relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
|
· Reports imply that samples obtained by aircore drilling were
considered superior owing to circulation problems encountered with
rotary mud drilling.
· 1m
sample composites are considered to provide reasonable
representation of the style of mineralisation.
· 2m
samples are indicative of the lateral distribution of rare earth
grade and the approximate stratigraphic location of the rare earth
grade.
|
Logging
|
·
Whether core and
chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
·
Whether logging
is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
·
The total length
and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
|
· Drillhole samples were logged by a onsite geologist and
correlated to downhole geophysical logs that demonstrate
correlation between lithology units and gamma peaks.
· Oxidation state and the presence of reductants were
logged
· Sample
loss was recorded
· Pulps
have been reviewed and correlated to logging.
|
Sub-sampling techniques and
sample preparation
|
·
If core, whether
cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
·
If non-core,
whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
·
For all sample
types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
·
Quality control
procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
·
Measures taken
to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
·
Whether sample
sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
|
· Limited information concerning subsampling techniques is
available.
· Twinned core holes, measured disequilibrium factors and
duplicate sampling imply quality control.
|
Quality of assay data and
laboratory tests
|
·
The nature,
quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
·
For geophysical
tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters
used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
·
Nature of
quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
|
· Original historic select samples were sent to COMLABS for XRF
and AAS analysis. Sample suites were variable across
submissions.
· Historic results are considered semiquantitative, further
re-assays would increase the confidence of historic sample
results.
· Chip
reassays were analysed via a 4 acid digest. This method is
considered a near total digest. Rare earth minerals have potential
for incomplete digestion. These minerals are not considered as
potential sources of extractable mineralization in this deposit
type.
|
Verification of sampling and
assaying
|
·
The verification
of significant intersections by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
·
The use of
twinned holes.
·
Documentation of
primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
·
Discuss any
adjustment to assay data.
|
· Significant intercepts have been reviewed by Mr Rupert Verco
and reviewed by Mr Robert Blythman (the competent
persons)
· Historic cuttings samples retained within the Tonsely core
library have been secured and are being re-analysed to confirm
results.
|
Location of data
points
|
·
Accuracy and
quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in
Mineral Resource estimation.
·
Specification of
the grid system used.
·
Quality and
adequacy of topographic control.
|
· Collar
locations have been sourced from the SARIG publicly available
dataset.
· Drill
collars were surveyed on local grids established using ensign GPS.
Coordinates have been transposed to MGA94 Zone 53.
|
Data spacing and
distribution
|
·
Data spacing for
reporting of Exploration Results.
·
Whether the data
spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
·
Whether sample
compositing has been applied.
|
·
Samples were selected to provide representative
regional indicators of geology and mineralization without a fixed
spacing
·
No sample compositing has been applied
·
The data spacing and distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the interpretation of roll-front, sandstone hosted Uranium
mineralisation.
·
Interpretation of historic results supports the
flat lying continuous mineralisation.
|
Orientation of data in
relation to geological structure
|
·
Whether the
orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
·
If the
relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if
material.
|
·
Drillholes were vertical and drilled perpendicular
to the mineralization.
|
Sample
security
|
·
The measures
taken to ensure sample security.
|
·
The security procedures are unknown
|
Audits or
reviews
|
·
The results of
any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and
data.
|
·
No independent audits have been
undertaken.
·
The CSIRO re-analysed mineralized intersections,
actively too water samples and validated the factors of
disequilibrium being used to estimate Uranium grade.
·
Proceeding tenement holders confirmed Uranium
grades.
·
Cobra currently re-analysing results to confirm
Uranium grades.
|
Appendix 5: Section 2 Reporting of Exploration
Results
Criteria
|
JORC Code explanation
|
Commentary
|
Mineral tenement and land
tenure status
|
·
Type, reference
name/number, location and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
·
The security of
the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the
area.
|
·
EL6967 & 6968 are 100% held by Lady Alice
Mines Pty Ltd, a Cobra Resources Plc company.
·
Native title agreements need to be gained before
land access by the department of Environment and Water can be
granted.
|
Exploration done by other
parties
|
·
Acknowledgment
and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
|
·
Carpentaria: 1979-1984 explored for Sandstone
hosted Uranium.
·
Mount Isa Mines: 1984-1988 explored for Sandstone
hosted Uranium
·
BHP: 1989-1992 explored for heavy mineral sands
(HMS) and base metal
·
Peko Exploration: 1991-1992
·
Diamond Ventures explored for diamonds in
Kimberlites during the 1990s
·
Iluka: 2005-2016 explored for HMS and
Uranium
·
Minatour Exploration: 2000-2004 explored for
Sandstone hosted Uranium and IOCG mineralisation
·
Toro Energy Limited: 2004-2008 explored for
sandstone hosted Uranium
|
Geology
|
·
Deposit type,
geological setting and style of mineralisation.
|
·
Basement Geology is dominated by Archean Sleaford
and Proterozoic Hiltaba Suite Granites.
·
Granite plutons are enriched in uranium bearing
minerals with background U being ~10-20 times
background.
·
The Narlaby Palaeochanel and Eucla Basins overlie
basement rocks Interbedded channel sands sourced from local bedrock
and Eocene age clays are interbedded within the Palaeochannel and
basin.
·
Highly enrich groundwaters within the
Palaeochannel suggest the mobilization from both channel fill and
regional basement for Uranium and REE.
·
Uranium mineralisation is hosted in Roll-front
style mineralisation when fluids are oxidizing reduced channel
sediments
·
REE's are adsorbed to the contacts of reduced clay
interbeds.
|
Drillhole
Information
|
·
A summary of all
information material to the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the
drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced
Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
o dip and azimuth of the
hole
o down hole length and
interception depth
o hole
length.
·
If the exclusion
of this information is justified on the basis that the information
is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
|
·
Plans demonstrate the location of
drillholes.
·
Coordinates can be publicly accesses through the
South Australian SARIG portal.
·
No relevant material has been excluded from this
release.
|
Data aggregation
methods
|
·
In reporting
Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off
grades are usually Material and should be stated.
·
Where aggregate
intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail.
·
The assumptions
used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
|
·
Reported summary intercepts are weighted averages
based on length.
·
No maximum/ minimum grade cuts have been
applied.
·
eU3O8 grades have been calculated using a
disequilibrium factor of 1.8
|
Relationship between
mineralisation widths and intercept lengths
|
·
These
relationships are particularly important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
·
If the geometry
of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is
known, its nature should be reported.
·
If it is not
known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be
a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width
not known').
|
·
Holes are drilled vertically. Reported
intersections reflect true width.
|
Diagrams
|
·
Appropriate maps
and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
|
·
Relevant diagrams have been included in the
announcement.
|
Balanced
reporting
|
·
Where
comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misIeading reporting of
Exploration Results.
|
·
All drillhole locations have been shown on
plans
|
Other substantive exploration
data
|
·
Other
exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported
including (but not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
|
·
Reported results reflect publicly available
information.
|
Further
work
|
·
The nature and
scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).
·
Diagrams clearly
highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this
information is not commercially sensitive.
|
·
Re-analysis of historical drill samples is
underway. Samples shall be analysed for REE and Uranium to confirm
historical results.
·
Previous TEM surveys are being re-interpreted to
improve Palaeochannel interpretation and to identify potential
pathways of fluid oxidation.
·
Ground water sampling planned.
·
Digitization of downhole wireline logs to
re-interpret mineralized roll-fronts.
|
Prospect
|
Hole number
|
Grid
|
Northing
|
Easting
|
Boland
|
IR
246
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6360973
|
533829
|
Boland
|
IR
245
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6360773
|
533029
|
Boland
|
IR
244
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6360873
|
531829
|
Boland
|
IR
243
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6361173
|
532229
|
Boland
|
IR
242
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6361473
|
532829
|
Boland
|
IR
241
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6362373
|
533329
|
Boland
|
IR
239
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6362273
|
534329
|
Boland
|
IR
238
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6362373
|
534930
|
Boland
|
IR
236
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6361373
|
536130
|
Boland
|
IR
235
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6365273
|
534229
|
Boland
|
IR
234
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6365573
|
533629
|
Boland
|
IR
232
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6365773
|
532729
|
Boland
|
IR
135
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6364173
|
535230
|
Boland
|
IR
134
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6361323
|
536630
|
Boland
|
IR
133
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6362573
|
535505
|
Boland
|
IR
123
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6361573
|
535604
|
Boland
|
IR
122
|
GDA94 /
MGA zone 53
|
6363173
|
535054
|