PROPOSAL NO. 1
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
On February 14, 2013, the Board, based upon the recommendation of a special committee of the Board comprised solely of disinterested directors (the “Special Committee”), adopted resolutions (1) declaring that an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split, as described below, was advisable and (2) directing that a proposal to approve the Reverse Stock Split be submitted to the shareholders of our Common Stock for their approval.
REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
The primary objective of the Reverse Stock Split is to “cash out” those shareholders holding less than 2,000 shares of Common Stock as of the Effective Date. As of February 15, 2013, we had approximately 2,698 shareholders, comprised of approximately 334 holders of record (including DTC position listings) and approximately 2,364 beneficial holders.
Of our approximately 334 shareholders of record, about 146 holders own 2,000 shares or more. Those 146 holders in turn own a total of 223,727,480 million shares. The other 188 shareholders own only about 370,997 shares in total. These 188 shareholders in total represented approximately 56.3% of the total number of record holders of Common Stock, but own less than 0.2% of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock.
As of February 15, 2013, there were approximately 1,910 Non-Objecting Beneficial Owner accounts, with 647 owning 2,000 shares or more, totaling 28,134,815 million shares. The other 1,263 accounts in total represented approximately 46.8% of the total number of holders of Common Stock, but owned less than 0.30% of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Based on share ownership data as of February 15, 2013, assuming all record and beneficial holders of our Common Stock who hold fewer than 2,000 shares were cashed out at the time of the Reverse Stock Split, we would be left with approximately 793 record and beneficial holders (exclusive of Objecting Beneficial Owner accounts) after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, and the total number of shareholders after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split would be reduced by approximately 64.7% (exclusive of Objecting Beneficial Owner accounts).
The Company would benefit from cost savings as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. The costs of administering each registered shareholder’s account are the same regardless of the number of shares held in each account. Therefore, the Company’s costs to administer numerous small accounts (which account for approximately 64.7% of all shareholders, exclusive of Objecting Beneficial Owner accounts) are disproportionately high when compared to the total number of shares involved. These costs include administration of stock certificates including printing, affidavits of lost stock certificates, and reissuance, printing and postage costs to mail the consent solicitation materials, and similar costs associated with required mailings to shareholders holding shares in street name through a nominee (i.e., a bank or broker).
The Reverse Stock Split allows shareholders with small accounts to cash out their positions without transaction costs, such as brokerage fees.
The Board reserves the right to elect to abandon the Reverse Stock Split, if it determines, in its sole discretion at any time prior to implementation, that the Reverse Stock Split is no longer in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
5
Certain Risks Associated With the Reverse Stock Split
Shareholders owning fewer than 2,000 shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the Effective Date would, after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, no longer have any equity interest in the Company and therefore would not participate in our future earnings or growth, if any. It is expected that approximately 1,451 holders (exclusive of Objecting Beneficial Owner accounts) would be fully cashed out in the Reverse Stock Split. It will not be possible for cashed out shareholders to re-acquire an equity interest in the Company unless they purchase an interest from a remaining shareholder.
The Reverse Stock Split would require shareholders who own fewer than 2,000 shares of Common Stock to involuntarily surrender their shares for cash. These shareholders would not have the ability to continue to hold their shares. The ownership interest of these shareholders would be terminated as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, but the Board has concluded that the completion of the Reverse Stock Split overall would benefit these shareholders because of, among other reasons, the liquidity provided to them by the Reverse Stock Split at a price determined by the Board to be fair to these shareholders.
The market price per new share of Common Stock after the Reverse Stock Split may not rise or remain constant in proportion to the reduction in the number of old shares of Common Stock outstanding before the Reverse Stock Split. The market price of Common Stock would also be based on the Company’s performance and other factors, some of which are unrelated to the number of shares outstanding. Both the total market capitalization of a company and the market price of a share of such company’s Common Stock on a split-corrected basis following a Reverse Stock Split may be lower than they were before the Reverse Stock Split.
STRUCTURE OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
If the approved Reverse Stock Split occurs, the Reverse Stock Split of Common Stock would become effective on the date and in the manner set forth in the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Florida, in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A
. All shareholders on the Effective Date would receive 1 share of Common Stock for every 2,000 shares of Common Stock held by them at that time.
No fractional shares of our Common Stock will be issued as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, shareholders (“Cash Recipient Shareholders”) who otherwise would be entitled to receive fractional shares because they hold a number of shares of Common Stock not evenly divisible by 2,000 shall, upon compliance with the procedures set forth below under “Exchange Procedures,” be entitled to receive cash in an amount as described below under “Determination of Fractional Share Price.” For example:
·
If a shareholder holds 21,000 shares of Common Stock on the Effective Date, he or she would hold 10 shares following the Reverse Stock Split and be paid cash for the .5 share that was remaining.
·
If a shareholder holds 1,500 shares of Common Stock on the Effective Date, he or she would not hold any shares of Common Stock following the Reverse Stock Split, and would be paid cash for the .75 share.
The below charts outline the capital structure prior to and immediately following the Reverse Stock Split. Note the number of shares disclosed as “Issued and Outstanding” in the below chart accounts for the number of shares issued and outstanding as of the record date.
|
Number of shares of
Common Stock prior to
Reverse Stock Split
|
Number of shares of
Common Stock after
Reverse Stock Split
|
Authorized
|
250,000,000
|
250,000,000
|
Issued and Outstanding
|
224,098,447
|
111,393
|
Reserved for Issuance
|
5,564,696
|
2,782
|
Authorized but Unissued
|
25,901,553
|
249,888,607
|
6
DETERMINATION OF FRACTIONAL SHARE PRICE
In order to avoid the expense and inconvenience of issuing fractional shares after the Reverse Stock Split,
the Company may either (a) arrange for the sale of these fractional shares in the open market and the distribution of the net proceeds (after customary brokerage commissions and other expenses) from such sales to the Cash Recipient Shareholders; or (b) deposit cash with the transfer agent for payment for the Cash Recipient Shareholders’ fractional shares.
The Board currently intends to have the Company pay cash (without interest and subject to withholding taxes) for the fractional shares without selling any shares in the open market. If the Board changes its intention, we will publicly announce the decision in a press release. If the fractional shares are not sold in the open market, the price paid to Cash Recipient Shareholders will be based upon a price per pre-split share of Common Stock equal to the higher of (i) the average daily closing price per share of our Common Stock on the OTCQB for the twenty (20) trading days immediately before and including the Effective Date and (ii) $0.04 (the “Fractional Share Price”).
Promptly after the date on which we effect the Reverse Stock Split, the Company intends to deposit cash believed to be sufficient to cover the aggregate Fractional Share Price for all the fractional shares with its transfer agent, which will be held in trust for the benefit of the Cash Recipient Shareholders. Promptly after the Reverse Stock Split, all Cash Recipient Shareholders will receive cash equal to the Fractional Share Price, without interest, of the shares of Common Stock they held immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split that were not combined into whole shares of Common Stock upon consummation of the Reverse Stock Split, as described below in “Exchange Procedures.”
The Company believes that it will have adequate funds to pay the Fractional Share Price to all Cash Recipient Shareholders. Certain principal shareholders of the Company have indicated that, in the event that the Company does not have such adequate funds, they will provide financing in the form of bridge loans sufficient to compensate for any shortfall. In the event such financing is necessary, the Company may subsequently seek to issue equity in order to raise capital for repayment purposes.
FAIRNESS OF THE PROPOSED REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
The Board has determined that the terms of the proposed Reverse Stock Split are fair to the shareholders of the Company, including the Cash Recipient Shareholders, based upon the recommendation of the Special Committee, which was formed by the Board to evaluate the terms of the proposed Reverse Stock Split and to advise the Board in connection therewith. In connection with its deliberations, the Special Committee retained UHY Advisors MI, Inc. (“UHY”) to address the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by the Cash Recipient Shareholders in connection with the Reverse Stock Split, as described below. After careful consideration of the Fairness Opinion (as defined below), the Special Committee unanimously concluded that the Fractional Share Consideration to be paid to Cash Recipient Shareholders in connection with the Reverse Stock Split is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Company.
Fairness Opinion
Pursuant to its arrangement with the Special Committee, UHY has delivered an opinion (the “Fairness Opinion”) to the Special Committee. The Fairness Opinion states that, subject to the assumptions, conditions and limitations contained therein, in the opinion of UHY as of December 3, 2012, cash consideration of $0.04 per share to be paid to the Cash Recipient Stockholders in connection with the Reverse Stock Split would be fair, from a financial point of view, to the Cash Recipient Stockholders.
7
UHY's professionals have significant experience in providing valuation advice for various purposes, including reverse stock splits and fairness opinions, amongst other things. No material relationship has existed between UHY or any of its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Company or any of its affiliates, on the other, during the past two years, and no such relationship is currently contemplated. The Special Committee selected UHY to deliver a fairness opinion in connection with the proposed Reverse Stock Split on the basis of the firm’s reputation and expertise.
The Special Committee did not impose any limitations on the scope of the investigation or analyses undertaken by UHY in connection with the Fairness Opinion. The Special Committee did not provide any instructions to UHY regarding the manner in which it conducted such investigations and analyses.
Pursuant to the terms of its engagement letter with the Company, UHY is entitled to an aggregate fee of approximately $55,000. UHY and its affiliates have prepared numerous fairness opinions and regularly provide valuation and advisory services to private and public clients relating to mergers and acquisitions activity, financial and tax reporting, and litigation issues. Many possess valuation accreditations from the American Society of Appraisers (ASA), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (CPA/ABV), and Chartered Financial Analyst Institute (CFA). In addition, UHY is to be reimbursed for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including outside legal fees, and will be held harmless by the Company under certain circumstances arising in connection with the Fairness Opinion. The fees to be paid to UHY under the Opinion Engagement Letter were agreed between UHY and the Special Committee. None of the fees payable to UHY are contingent upon the conclusions reached by UHY in the Fairness Opinion or on the completion of the Reverse Stock Split.
For purposes of rendering the Fairness Opinion, UHY assumed, with the Special Committee’s approval, that the Consideration to be paid to Cash Recipient Shareholders in connection with the Reverse Stock Split would equal $0.04 per pre-split share of Common Stock (i.e., the minimum Fractional Share Price per share). This per share price approximated the average daily closing price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on the OTCQB during the five trading days immediately before and including the date of the Fairness Opinion.
In connection with its analysis, UHY made such reviews, analyses, and inquiries as it deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. The principal sources of information used in performing its analysis included, but were not limited to:
·
the Company’s Form 10-K as filed with the SEC for the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2011 (which included audited financial statements for each year);
·
The Company’s Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC for the period ended June 30, 2012;
·
The Company’s Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC for the period ended September 30, 2012;
·
The Company’s internally prepared unaudited financial statements for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2012;
·
The Company’s 2010 and 2011 Form 1120 U.S. Income Tax Return;
·
The Company’s internally prepared budget for the year ending December 31, 2013;
·
The Company’s internally prepared capital expenditure plan for 2013;
·
The Company’s internally prepared plan, including incremental cost and capital expenditure requirements, for its testing business;
·
Internally prepared customer lists and sales detail;
8
·
A review of tables summarizing the Company’s capitalization, including outstanding warrants, derivatives, and restricted stock grants, with the exception of a complete derivative securities provisions review;
·
The Company management’s 2
nd
Quarter 2012 presentation to the Board dated August 8, 2012;
·
Draft of the Consent Solicitation Agreement dated August 3, 2012 regarding the Reverse Stock Split;
·
Letter of Representation signed by Mark Yung and Praveen Nair regarding the future prospects and risks of the Company;
·
Information obtained from the Company’s website;
·
Discussions with the Company’s management concerning its business, industry, history, as well as the Company’s current and future prospects in the emissions control market and testing market;
·
Limited information on the Company’s sales prospects and backlog;
·
Limited information on the Company’s existing lawsuit for collection of unpaid invoices related to goods delivered to a former dealer;
·
A review of publicly available financial data of certain publicly traded companies that UHY deemed relevant;
·
A review of available information regarding certain merger and acquisition transactions that UHY deemed relevant; and
·
Other such financial studies, analyses, investigations, research, and consideration of other information, facts and data as UHY deemed necessary or appropriate.
The following is a summary of the principal financial analyses performed by UHY in its preparation of the Fairness Opinion.
·
Discounted Cash Flow
. A Discounted Cash Flow analysis establishes the value of a company whose asset base is determined to consist primarily of intangible assets, through the capitalization of free cash flows anticipated to be generated by the company. The procedure requires calculating the net present value of the projected cash flow provided to UHY by the Company discounted by a risk-adjusted rate of return over the anticipated economic life of the investment, with further adjustment for certain balance sheet items, including excess working capital, interest-bearing debt, and tax benefits not already included in the projected cash flows.
·
Comparable Sales
. This analysis establishes value through a comparative analysis of publically available information about sales of similar companies (or stock interests) active in similar industry sectors. The approach compares ratios of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow quantities versus known public valuations and extrapolates the subject company’s value from said ratios. UHY considered the publically available information as to comparable sales to be very limited.
·
Historic Trading Price
. The Company’s daily stock price in the OTCQB market reflects an assessment of value. UHY considered the trend over time and the current stock price, recognizing that transactions in this market generally represent small, non-controlling interests in the Company, that the stock is thinly traded, and that the price to be paid under the Reverse Stock Split will be based on this market. UHY also considered liquidity-related costs associated with this market and/or reflected in the freely traded price.
9
·
Net Book Value
.
This analysis values the Company common stock based upon the net book value of the Company’s assets, less its liabilities as reflected on its financial statements.
UHY also considered, among other things, the following factors to be particularly relevant to its overall conclusion.
1.
Attainment of the company’s forecasts will require significant improvement from historic results, and the Company’s future underperformance relative to those forecasts would further reduce UHY’s valuation conclusions, a key aspect of its overall conclusion on the financial fairness of the Reverse Stock Split.
2.
The Company has no history of generating profits, and cash flows from operations have generally been negative historically.
3.
Under the terms of the Reverse Stock Split, selling shareholders avoid significant liquidity-related costs (in percentage terms) which would otherwise be incurred to monetize their pre-Reverse Stock Split investment in the Company.
4.
Selling shareholders may retain non-fractional shares, and all shareholders have the ability to purchase additional the Company shares before or after the Reverse Stock Split in the event they wish to maintain their financial exposure to the Company’s stock.
5.
The number of shares likely to be acquired via the Reverse Stock Split represents a small fraction of the Company’s total outstanding shares and will not create a new control group or materially change the ownership structure.
6.
the Company has significant Net Operating Losses (NOLs) for tax purposes, the material value of which can be realized only by the future production of profits.
7.
The value and use of NOLs is dependent on the Internal Revenue Code; UHY assumed the existing treatment afforded NOLs under the Code will remain consistent in future years.
8.
A significant portion of the Company’s historic revenue was reliant on the availability of federal and state funds (and regulation) to fund the purchase of its emission control products
.
There is significant pressure to reduce government spending at both federal and state levels, and California (a key market for the Company’s products) is facing particularly high financial pressures
.
Future changes in the appropriated funding to support emission control devices, and to enforce regulations associated with emissions, are likely to have a significant impact on the Company’s future sales
.
This inherent risk in the Company’s business cannot be precisely measured.
9.
Actual market demand for emission control devices similar to those sold by the Company has been significantly lower than the levels forecasted by industry participants (including MECA (Manufacturers of Emissions Controls Association).
10
The opinion expressed by UHY was provided for the information and assistance of our Special Committee in connection with its consideration of the Reverse Stock Split and such opinion does not constitute a recommendation as to any action the Special Committee, the Board, or any Shareholder should take in connection with the Reverse Stock Split or any aspect thereof and is not a recommendation to any person on how such person should vote with respect to the Reverse Stock Split or any other matter presented in this Consent Statement. The amount of consideration to be paid to the Cash Recipient Stockholders was determined by the Company, and UHY did not provide a recommendation with respect thereto. UHY has expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split and its opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Cash Recipient Stockholders of a payment of $0.04 per share and UHY is expressing no opinion as to procedural fairness or any other measure of fairness. The Fairness Opinion may not be relied upon by any person or party other than the Special Committee.
The Fairness Opinion is subject to the assumptions and limitations contained therein and should be read in its entirety. The Fairness Opinion is one factor, among others, that the Special Committee considered in assessing the Reverse Stock Split and making its recommendation to the Board. The Fairness Opinion is included as
Exhibit B
to this Consent Statement.
In rendering the Fairness Opinion, UHY assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or otherwise made available to it by the Company, their representatives or advisors or otherwise obtained by UHY from other sources and UHY did not independently verify (nor did UHY assume responsibility or liability for independently verifying) any such information or its accuracy or completeness. With respect to the Company’s internally prepared budget, we advised UHY, and UHY assumed, without independent investigation, that such budget was reasonably prepared and reflected the best then available estimates and good faith judgment of the Company’s senior management as to the Company’s expected future competitive, operating and regulatory environments and related financial performance. UHY expressed no opinion with respect to such internally prepared budget or the assumptions on which it was based. UHY did not conduct and was not provided with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities of the Company nor did UHY conduct any physical inspection of the Company’s assets.
The Fairness Opinion was necessarily based upon financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated, and the information made available to the UHY, as of the date of such opinion. UHY does not have any obligation to advise any person of any change in any fact or matter affecting its opinion which may come or be brought to UHY’s attention after the date of such opinion, subsequent developments may affect UHY’s opinion and UHY does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
EFFECT OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT ON COMMON STOCK OF THE COMPANY
The Reverse Stock Split would not change the par value per share or the number of authorized shares of Common Stock. Also, the Reverse Stock Split would not affect the public registration of our Common Stock with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the Company would continue to be subject to periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act. We expect that our Common Stock would continue to be quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “ESWW”.
The number of shares of authorized Common Stock would not change as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. On December 31, 2012, there were 224,098,447 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. Following the Reverse Stock Split, the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock would be reduced by (a) the difference between the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to the Reverse Stock Split and the number of shares of Common Stock that are issued as a result of the Reverse Stock Split and (b) the aggregate number of fractional shares of the Cash Recipient Shareholders that the Company purchases from the Cash Recipient Shareholders. Based on information as of the date of this Consent Statement, we believe that there would be approximately 111,293 shares of Common Stock outstanding after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split.
11
After the Effective Date, each remaining shareholder would own fewer shares of Common Stock. Thus, following the Reverse Stock Split, because the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock would decrease, the number of shares remaining available for issuance under our Articles of Incorporation would significantly increase. Because our shareholders have no preemptive rights to purchase or subscribe for any of our unissued Common Stock, the future issuance of additional shares of Common Stock would reduce our current shareholders’ percentage ownership interest in the total outstanding shares of Common Stock. In the absence of a proportionate increase in our future earnings and book value, an increase in the number of our outstanding shares of Common Stock would dilute our projected future earnings per share, if any, and book value per share of all our outstanding shares of Common Stock. If these factors were reflected in the price per share of our Common Stock, the potential realizable value of a shareholder’s investment could be adversely affected. An issuance of additional shares could therefore have an adverse effect on the potential realizable value of a shareholder’s investment. These additional shares of Common Stock would be available for issuance from time to time for corporate purposes such as, but not limited to, raising additional capital, acquisitions of companies or assets and sales of securities exercisable for Common Stock. We believe that the availability of the additional shares may provide us with the flexibility to meet our business needs as they arise. If we issue additional shares for any purposes, the ownership interest of our current shareholders would be diluted in the same manner as would result from any other share issuance. As of the date of this filing, the Company has no definitive plans or arrangements in this regard, other than as discussed under “Determination of Fractional Share Price” with respect to the potential issuance of equity in order to raise capital to repay bridge loans in connection with any shareholder financing.
The Reverse Stock Split Proposal has been prompted solely by the business considerations discussed above under “Reasons for the Proposed Reverse Stock Split.” Nevertheless, the additional shares of Common Stock that would become available for issuance following the Reverse Stock Split could also be used by the Company’s management to delay or prevent a change in control. The Board is not aware of any pending takeover or other transactions that would result in a change in control of the Company, and the proposal was not adopted in response to any such proposals.
Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Employee Plans, Options, Restricted Stock Awards and Units, Warrants, and Convertible or Exchangeable Securities
Based upon the Reverse Stock Split ratio determined by the Board, proportionate adjustments are generally required to be made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise or conversion of all outstanding options, warrants, convertible or exchangeable securities entitling the holders to purchase, exchange for, or convert into, shares of Common Stock. This would result in approximately the same aggregate price being required to be paid under such options, warrants, convertible or exchangeable securities upon exercise, and approximately the same value of shares of Common Stock being delivered upon such exercise, exchange or conversion, immediately following the Reverse Stock Split as was the case immediately preceding the Reverse Stock Split. The number of shares deliverable upon settlement or vesting of restricted stock unit awards will be similarly adjusted, subject to our treatment of fractional shares. The number of shares reserved for issuance pursuant to these securities will be proportionately based upon the reverse stock split ratio determined by the Board, subject to our treatment of fractional shares. Shares of restricted stock will be treated as are all shares of stock, subject to the continued application of the vesting provisions.
12
EXCHANGE PROCEDURES
Beneficial Holders of Common Stock (i.e. shareholders who hold in street name)
Upon the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split, we intend to treat shares held by shareholders through a bank, broker, custodian or other nominee in the same manner as registered shareholders whose shares are registered in their names. Banks, brokers, custodians or other nominees will be instructed to effect the Reverse Stock Split for their beneficial holders holding our Common Stock in street name. However, these banks, brokers, custodians or other nominees may have different procedures than registered shareholders for processing the Reverse Stock Split. Shareholders who hold shares of our Common Stock with a bank, broker, custodian or other nominee and who have any questions in this regard are encouraged to contact their banks, brokers, custodians or other nominees.
Registered “Book-Entry” Holders of Common Stock (i.e. shareholders that are registered on the transfer agent’s books and records but do not hold stock certificates)
Certain of our registered holders of Common Stock may hold some or all of their shares electronically in book-entry form with the transfer agent. These shareholders do not have stock certificates evidencing their ownership of the Common Stock. They are, however, provided with a statement reflecting the number of shares registered in their accounts.
Shareholders who hold shares electronically in book-entry form with the transfer agent will not need to take action (the exchange will be automatic) to receive whole shares of post-Reverse Stock Split Common Stock, subject to adjustment for treatment of fractional shares.
Holders of Certificated Shares of Common Stock
Shareholders holding shares of Common Stock in certificated form will be sent a transmittal letter by our transfer agent after the Effective Date. The letter of transmittal will contain instructions on how a shareholder should surrender his, her or its certificate(s) representing shares of Common Stock (the “Old Certificates”) to the transfer agent in exchange for certificates representing the appropriate number of whole shares of post-Reverse Stock Split Common Stock (the “New Certificates”). No New Certificates will be issued to a shareholder until such shareholder has surrendered all Old Certificates, together with a properly completed and executed letter of transmittal, to the transfer agent. No shareholder will be required to pay a transfer or other fee to exchange his, her or its Old Certificates. Shareholders will then receive a New Certificate representing the number of whole shares of Common Stock that they are entitled as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, subject to the treatment of fractional shares described herein. Until surrendered, we will deem outstanding Old Certificates held by shareholders to be cancelled and only to represent the number of whole shares of post-Reverse Stock Split Common Stock to which these shareholders are entitled, subject to the treatment of fractional shares. Any Old Certificates submitted for exchange, whether because
of a sale, transfer or other disposition of stock, will automatically be exchanged for New Certificates. If an Old Certificate has a restrictive legend on the back of the Old Certificate(s), the New Certificate will be issued with the same restrictive legends that are on the back of the Old Certificate(s).
SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD NOT DESTROY ANY STOCK CERTIFICATE(S) AND SHOULD NOT SUBMIT ANY STOCK CERTIFICATE(S) UNTIL REQUESTED TO DO SO.
Fractional Shares
We do not currently intend to issue fractional shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Therefore, we will not issue certificates representing fractional shares. In lieu of issuing fractions of shares, we intend to pay the Fractional Share Price in cash as follows:
13
• If a shareholder’s shares are held in street name, payment of the Fractional Share Price will be deposited directly into the shareholder’s account with the organization holding the shareholder’s shares.
• If the shareholder’s shares are registered directly in the shareholder’s name, payment of the Fractional Share Price will be made by check, sent to the shareholder directly from our transfer agent upon receipt of the properly completed and executed transmittal letter and original stock certificates.
Those shareholders who hold less than 2,000 shares would be eliminated as a result of the payment of the Fractional Share Price in lieu of any fractional share interest in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.
Shareholders should respond promptly to the communications they receive from the Company’s transfer agent. It is the Company’s present intention that if a shareholder is entitled to cash payment and such shareholder has not delivered his Old Certificate(s) to the Company by the second anniversary of the Effective Date, then the payment that he would otherwise be entitled to receive would be turned over to the Company.
All amounts owed to you will be subject to applicable federal income tax and state abandoned property laws. You will not receive any interest on cash payments owed to you as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.
The contact information for our transfer agent is as follows:
Bay City Transfer Agency & Registrar Inc.
7075 Gratiot Road
Suite One
Saginaw, MI 48609
Phone: 989-891-9720
Fax: 989-414-1412
e-mail: tom@baycitytransfer.com
ACCOUNTING CONSEQUENCES
The par value per share of Common Stock would remain unchanged at $0.001 per share after the Reverse Stock Split. As a result, on the Effective Date, the stated capital on the Company’s balance sheet attributable to Common Stock would be reduced proportionally, based on the combined effect of the Reverse Stock Split, from its present amount, and the additional paid-in capital account would be credited with the amount by which the stated capital is reduced. The per Common Stock share net income or loss would be increased and the current net book value per share would increase because there would be fewer shares of Common Stock outstanding. It is not anticipated that any other accounting consequences would arise as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
We have summarized below the material federal income tax consequences to the Company and shareholders resulting from the Reverse Stock Split. This summary is based on existing U.S. federal income tax law, which may change, possibly retroactively. This summary does not discuss all aspects of federal income taxation which may be important to you in light of your individual circumstances. Many shareholders (such as financial institutions, insurance companies, broker-dealers, tax-exempt organizations, and foreign persons) may be subject to special tax rules. Other shareholders may also be subject to special tax rules, including but not limited to: shareholders who received the Company stock as compensation for services or pursuant to the exercise of an employee stock option, or shareholders who have held, or will hold, stock as part of a straddle, hedging, or conversion transaction for federal income tax purposes. In addition, this summary does not discuss any state, local, foreign, or other tax considerations. This summary assumes that you are a U.S. citizen and have held, and will hold, your shares as capital assets for investment purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). You should consult your tax advisor as to the particular federal, state, local, foreign, and other tax consequences, in light of your specific circumstances.
14
We believe that the Reverse Stock Split would be treated as a “tax-free recapitalization” for federal income tax purposes. This will result in no material federal income tax consequences to the Company.
Federal Income Tax Consequences to Shareholders Who Are Not Cashed Out by the Reverse Stock Split:
If you (a) continue to hold Common Stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, and (b) you receive no cash as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, you will not recognize any gain or loss in the Reverse Stock Split and you will have the same adjusted tax basis and holding period in your Common Stock, as the case may be, as you had in such stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.
Federal Income Tax Consequences to Cash Recipient Shareholders:
If you receive cash as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, your tax consequences will depend on whether, in addition to receiving cash, you or a person or entity related to you continues to hold Common Stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, as explained below.
Shareholders Who Exchange All of Their Common Stock for Cash as a Result of the Reverse Stock Split.
If you (a) receive cash in exchange for a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, (b) you do not continue to hold any Company stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, and (c) you are not related to any person or entity that holds Common Stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, you will recognize capital gain or loss. The amount of capital gain or loss you recognize will equal the difference between the cash you receive for your cashed-out stock and your aggregate adjusted tax basis in such stock.
If you are related to a person or entity who continues to hold Common Stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, you will recognize gain in the same manner as set forth in the previous paragraph, provided that your receipt of cash either (a) is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend,” or (b) is a “substantially disproportionate redemption of stock,” as described below:
“Not Essentially Equivalent to a Dividend.” You will satisfy the “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” test if the reduction in your proportionate interest in Company resulting from the Reverse Stock Split is considered a “meaningful reduction” given your particular facts and circumstances. The Internal Revenue Service has ruled that a small reduction by a minority shareholder whose relative stock interest is minimal and who exercises no control over the affairs of the corporation will satisfy this test.
“Substantially Disproportionate Redemption of Stock.” The receipt of cash in the Reverse Stock Split will be a “substantially disproportionate redemption of stock” for you if the percentage of the outstanding shares of Common Stock owned by you immediately after the Reverse Stock Split is less than 80% of the percentage of shares of Common Stock owned by you immediately before the Reverse Stock Split and you own less than 50% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock after the Reverse Stock Split.
In applying these tests, you will be treated as owning shares actually or constructively owned by certain individuals and entities related to you. If the redemption of shares of Common Stock is not treated as capital gain under any of the tests, then the entire amount of the payment you receive for your shares will be treated first as ordinary dividend income to the extent of your ratable share of Company’s undistributed earnings and profits, then as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of your aggregate adjusted tax basis in your shares, and any remaining gain will be treated as capital gain.
15
Shareholders Who Both Receive Cash and Continue to Hold Common Stock Immediately After the Reverse Stock Split.
If you receive cash as a result of the Reverse Stock Split and continue to hold Common Stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, you generally will be subject to the same rules for determining tax treatment as described above, the same as if you constructively continue to hold shares of Common Stock. If you meet either the “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” test or the “substantially disproportionate redemption of stock” test, then you will recognize gain, but not loss, in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the excess of the sum of aggregate fair market value of your shares of Common Stock plus the cash received over your adjusted tax basis in the shares, or (b) the amount of cash received in the Reverse Stock Split. In determining whether you meet either test, you must take into account as shares you own both shares of Common Stock that you actually own and constructively own (
i.e
., shares owned by certain individuals or entities related to you) before and after the Reverse Stock Split. Your aggregate adjusted tax basis in your shares of Common Stock held immediately after the Reverse Stock Split will be equal to your aggregate adjusted tax basis in your shares of Common Stock held immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split, increased by any gain recognized in the Reverse Stock Split, and decreased by the amount of cash received in the Reverse Stock Split.
Any gain or loss recognized in the Reverse Stock Split will be treated, for federal income tax purposes, as long-term capital gain or loss (assuming that your receipt of cash either (a) is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” with respect to you, or (b) is a “substantially disproportionate redemption of stock” with respect to you) provided that you have held your shares for more than one year. If you acquired shares redeemed in the Reverse Stock Split at different times, you will be required to compute such gain or loss and determine whether such gain or loss is long-term or not, separately with respect to each such acquisition of shares. If your gain is not treated as capital gain under any of these tests, the gain will be treated as ordinary dividend income to you to the extent of your ratable share of Company’s undistributed earnings and profits, then as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of your aggregate adjusted tax basis in your shares, and any remaining gain will be treated as a capital gain.
YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR AS TO THE PARTICULAR FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN, AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, IN LIGHT OF YOUR SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES.
ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS
Our Board does not intend to use the ability to issue additional Common Stock to discourage tender offers or takeover attempts. However, the effective increase in the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock may be construed as having an anti-takeover effect by permitting the issuance of shares to purchasers who might oppose a hostile takeover bid or oppose any efforts to amend or repeal certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation or bylaws, each as amended. Except as described above under “Determination of Fractional Share Price,” we currently do not have any plans to issue additional shares of Common Stock. The proposed amendment is not in response to any effort on the part of any party to accumulate Common Stock or to acquire control of the Company by means of merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, or to change management.
CONTINUED REPORTING
After consummation of the Reverse Stock Split we will continue to be subject to reporting obligations under Section 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). We are currently eligible to deregister our Common Stock under Section 12(g) of the Securities Act even without giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, but we have no current intention to deregister our Common Stock under Section 12(g) of the Securities Act, whether or not the Reverse Stock Split is consummated.
16
REQUIRED VOTE
The proposed amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation must be approved by a majority of the outstanding voting shares of our Common Stock.
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
The Company’s shareholders as of the record date are entitled to rights of appraisal under the FBCA.
This Consent Statement shall be considered the appraisal notice required under Section 607.1322 of the FBCA
. Under Section 607.1302 of the FBCA, a shareholder of the Company who does not wish to accept the Fractional Share Price may exercise appraisal rights and, if the Reverse Stock Split is consummated, obtain the payment of the “fair value” of the shareholders’ shares of Common Stock (as valued immediately prior to the consummation of the Reverse Stock Split in accordance with Florida law). Such fair value is exclusive of any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the Reverse Stock Split, unless such exclusion would be inequitable to the Company and its remaining shareholders.
In order to exercise appraisal rights, a shareholder of the Company must strictly comply with the statutory procedures of Sections 607.1301 through 607.1333 of the FBCA, which are summarized below. A copy of the full text of those sections is included as
Exhibit C
to this Consent Statement. Shareholders of the Company are urged to read
Exhibit C
in its entirety and to consult with their legal advisers. Each shareholder of the Company who desires to assert such shareholder’s appraisal rights is cautioned that failure on the shareholder’s part to adhere strictly to the requirements of Florida law in any regard will cause a forfeiture of any appraisal rights.
Procedures for Exercising Rights of Appraisal
. The following summary of Florida law is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the applicable provisions of the FBCA included as
Exhibit C
to this Consent Statement.
The Board, based upon the recommendation of the Special Committee, has determined that the fair value of each fractional share is the Fractional Share Price. If a shareholder does not accept this offer and desires to exercise such shareholder’s appraisal rights, he or she must deliver to the Company, within 20 days of receiving this Consent Statement, a written notice of intent to demand payment for such shareholder’s shares if the Reverse Stock Split is effectuated. A written consent card indicating “Consent withheld (against)” with respect to the Reverse Stock Split Proposal will not alone be deemed to be the written notice of intent to demand payment and will not be deemed to satisfy the notice requirements under the FBCA. A shareholder that wishes to assert appraisal rights need not submit a written consent card against the Reverse Stock Split Proposal, but cannot submit a written consent card, or allow any nominee who holds such shares for the shareholder to submit a written consent card, in favor of the Reverse Stock Split Proposal. A written consent submitted in favor of the Reverse Stock Split Proposal will constitute a waiver of the shareholder’s appraisal rights. The written notice of intent to demand payment should be delivered either in person or by mail (certified mail, return receipt requested, being the recommended form of transmittal) to:
Praveen Nair
Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc.
200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
(905) 695-4141
All such notices must be signed in the same manner as the shares are registered on the books of the Company. If a shareholder has not provided written notice of intent to demand payment within 20 days of receiving this Consent Statement, the shareholder will be deemed to have waived the shareholder’s appraisal rights.
17
If a shareholder timely submits written notice of such shareholder's intent to demand payment, he or she must also complete the enclosed form attached hereto as
Exhibit D
(the “Appraisal Form”), and return the completed Appraisal Form, along with any share certificates in his or her possession, to Praveen Nair at the above address, in order to exercise appraisal rights.
If Praveen Nair does not receive the Appraisal Form and share certificates on or before April 17, 2013 (the “Shareholder Appraisal Deadline”), such shareholder shall be deemed to have waived his or her right to demand appraisal with respect to the shares. If a shareholder decides to exercise appraisal rights, such shareholder may still subsequently decline to exercise his or her appraisal rights and withdraw from the appraisal process by notifying Praveen Nair in writing within twenty days following the Shareholder Appraisal Deadline.
Upon written request, Praveen Nair will provide to any shareholder information related to the number of shareholders who return the Appraisal Forms by the Shareholder Appraisal Deadline and the total number of shares owned by them within ten days following the Shareholder Appraisal Deadline.
We anticipate consummating the Reverse Stock Split approximately 10 days following receipt of the required shareholder approval.
Pursuant to Section 607.1322 of the FBCA, attached as
Exhibit E
hereto are certain financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 and attached as
Exhibit F
hereto are certain financial statements of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
A shareholder exercising appraisal rights must execute and return the appraisal election form in accordance with the instructions provided therein and, in the case of certificated shares, deposit the shareholder’s certificates in accordance with the terms of the notice by the date referred to therein. Any such shareholder failing to return a
properly completed appraisal election form and, in the case of certificated shares, deposit the shareholder’s certificates, within the period stated in the form, will lose such shareholder’s appraisal rights and be bound by the terms of the Reverse Stock Split.
A shareholder who has delivered the appraisal election form and, in the case of certificated shares, such shareholder’s stock certificates, may decline to exercise appraisal rights and withdraw from the appraisal process by giving written notice to the Company within the time period specified in the appraisal election form. Thereafter, a shareholder may not withdraw from the appraisal process without the written consent of the Company. Upon a withdrawal, the right of the shareholder to be paid the fair value of such shareholder’s shares will cease, and the shareholder will be reinstated as a shareholder of the Company.
If the shareholder accepts the Company’s offer in the appraisal election form to pay the Company’s estimate of the fair value of the shares of Common Stock, payment for the shares of the shareholder is to be made within 90 days after the receipt of the appraisal election form by the Company or its agent. Upon payment of the agreed value, the shareholder will cease to have any interest in such shares.
Sections 607.1326 and 607.1330 of the FBCA address what should occur if a shareholder fails to accept the Company’s offer to pay the value of the shares as estimated by the Company and the Company fails to comply with the demand of the shareholder to pay the value of the shares as estimated by the shareholder, plus interest.
If a shareholder refuses to accept the Company’s offer to pay the value of the shares as estimated by the Company and the Company fails to comply with the demand of the shareholder to pay the value of the shares as estimated by the shareholder, plus interest, then within 60 days after receipt of a written demand from any dissenting shareholder, the Company shall file an action requesting that the fair value of such shares be determined by the court.
18
If the Company fails to institute a proceeding within the above-prescribed period, any shareholder that has made a demand under Section 607.1326 of the FBCA may do so in the name of the Company. A copy of the initial pleading will be served on each shareholder who has made such a demand. The Company is required to pay each shareholder the amount found to be due within 10 days after final determination of the proceedings, which amount may, in the discretion of the court, include a fair rate of interest, which will also be determined by the court. Upon payment of the judgment, the shareholder ceases to have any interest in such shares.
Section 607.1331 of the Florida Statutes provides that the costs of a court appraisal proceeding, including reasonable compensation for, and expenses of, appraisers appointed by the court, shall be determined by the court and assessed against the Company, except that the court may assess costs against all or some of the shareholders demanding appraisal, in amounts the court finds equitable, to the extent that the court finds such shareholders acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith with respect to their appraisal rights. The court also may assess the fees and expenses of counsel and experts for the respective parties, in amounts the court finds equitable, against (i) the Company and in favor of any or all shareholders if the court finds the Company did not substantially comply with the notification provisions set forth in Sections 607.1320 and 607.1322, or (ii) either the Company or shareholder, in favor of any other party, if the court finds that the party against whom the fees and expenses are assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith with respect to the appraisal rights. If the court in an appraisal proceeding finds that the services of counsel for any shareholder were of substantial benefit to other shareholders, and that the fees for those services should not be assessed against the Company, the court may award to such counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the amounts awarded the shareholders who were benefited. To the extent that the Company fails to make a required payment when a shareholder accepts the Company’s offer to pay the value of the shares as estimated by the Company, the shareholder may sue directly for the amount owed and, to the extent successful, shall be entitled to recover from the Company all costs and expenses of the suit, including counsel fees.
Any shareholder who perfects his right to be paid the fair value of his the Company shares will recognize gain or loss, if any, for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the receipt of cash for those shares. The amount of gain or loss and its character as ordinary or capital gain or loss will be determined in accordance with applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. See “Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences.”
BECAUSE OF THE COMPLEXITY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA LAW RELATING TO APPRAISAL RIGHTS, SHAREHOLDERS WHO ARE CONSIDERING EXERCISING APPRAISAL RIGHTS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN LEGAL ADVISERS.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU CONSENT TO PROPOSAL NO. 1
19
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, to the best knowledge of the Company, as of February 15, 2013, certain information with respect to (1) beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding Common Stock, (2) beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by each director and named executive, (3) beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by all directors and officers as a group.
Unless otherwise noted, all shares are beneficially owned and the sole voting and investment power is held by the persons/entities indicated.
Calculations are based upon the aggregate of all shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of February 15, 2013 in addition to shares issuable upon exercise of options currently exercisable or becoming exercisable within 60 days and which are held by the individuals named on the table.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER
|
TOTAL BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP
|
(1)
|
PERCENT OF
CLASS
|
Mark Yung, Executive Chairman
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
8,271,059
|
(2)
|
3.62%
|
Nitin M. Amersey, Director
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
400,000
|
(3)
|
0.18%
|
John D. Dunlap, III, Director
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
350,000
|
(4)
|
0.16%
|
Zohar Loshitzer, Director
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
191,667
|
(5)
|
0.09%
|
Benjamin Black, Director
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
191,667
|
(6)
|
0.09%
|
Joshua Black, Director
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
191,667
|
(7)
|
0.09%
|
John Suydam, Director
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
191,667
|
(8)
|
0.09%
|
John J Hannan, Director
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
2,325,834
|
(9)
|
1.04%
|
Frank Haas, Chief Technology Officer
and Chief Regulatory Officer
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
246,050
|
(10)
|
0.11%
|
Virendra Kumar,
Vice President of Operations c/o 200 Progress Drive Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
0
|
|
0.00%
|
Praveen Nair, Chief Financial Officer
c/o 200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
|
900
|
(11)
|
0.00%
|
31
NAME AND ADDRESS OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER
|
TOTAL BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP
|
(1)
|
PERCENT OF
CLASS
|
John J. Hannan as Trustee
of the Black Family 1997 Trust
c/o 9 West 57TH Street, Suite 4300
New York NY 10019
|
30,645,399
|
(12)
|
13.67%
|
Leon D. Black
c/o 9 West 57TH Street, Suite 4300
New York NY 10019
|
12,622,980
|
(13)
|
5.63%
|
John J. Hannan as Trustee
of the Leon D. Black Trust UAD
11/30/92 FBO Alexander Black
c/o 9 West 57TH Street, Suite 4300
New York NY 10019
|
9,909,949
|
(14)
|
4.42%
|
John J. Hannan as Trustee
of the Leon D. Black Trust UAD
11/30/92 FBO Benjamin Black
c/o 9 West 57TH Street, Suite 4300
New York NY 10019
|
9,909,949
|
(15)
|
4.42%
|
John J. Hannan as Trustee
of the Leon D. Black Trust UAD
11/30/92 FBO Joshua Black
c/o 9 West 57TH Street, Suite 4300
New York NY 10019
|
9,909,949
|
(16)
|
4.42%
|
John J. Hannan as Trustee
of the Leon D. Black Trust UAD
11/30/92 FBO Victoria Black
c/o 9 West 57TH Street, Suite 4300
New York NY 10019
|
9,909,949
|
(17)
|
4.42%
|
Richard R. Ressler
C/O CIM GROUP
6922 Hollywood Boulevard
Los Angeles CA 90028
|
2,134,167
|
(18)
|
0.95%
|
Orchard Investments, LLC
C/O CIM GROUP
6922 Hollywood Boulevard
Los Angeles CA 90028
|
17,270,553
|
(19)
|
7.71%
|
Bengt G. Odner
15 Rue Du Cendrier, 6TH Floor
Geneva V8 1211
|
36,050,000
|
(20)
|
16.09%
|
Sedam Ltd
15 Rue Du Cendrier, 6TH Floor
Geneva V8 1211
|
36,050,000
|
(20)
|
16.09%
|
Financial Trust Co. Inc.
6100 Red Hook Quarter B-3
St. Thomas, VSVI-00802
|
13,350,205
|
(21)
|
5.96%
|
All current directors and executive
officers as a group (Eleven persons)
|
82,645,706
|
|
36.81%
|
(1) Calculated on the basis of 224,098,447 shares of Common Stock outstanding plus, in the case of any person with the right to acquire beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock within 60 days of February 15, 2013, the number of such shares.
32
(2) Includes 41,667 shares of restricted Common Stock, also includes 8,229,938 shares of restricted Common Stock granted for services rendered, of which 4,114,696 shares were issued on the date of grant (December 7, 2012) and the balance of 4,114,696 shares will be issued on February 28, 2013.
(3) Includes 300,000 shares of restricted Common Stock and options to purchase 50,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.27 per share expiring August 6, 2013 also includes stock grants of 50,000 shares of restricted Common Stock vesting on December 31, 2013.
(4) Includes 300,000 shares of restricted Common Stock, also includes stock grants of 50,000 shares of restricted Common Stock vesting on December 31, 2013.
(5) Includes 141,667 shares of restricted Common Stock, also includes stock grants of 50,000 shares of restricted Common Stock vesting on December 31, 2013.
(6) Mr. Benjamin Black is a beneficiary of the Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Benjamin Black (the “Benjamin Trust”) and the Black Family 1997 Trust (the “1997 Trust”). John J. Hannan is the trustee of the Benjamin Trust and the 1997 Trust and has the sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the Benjamin Trust and the 1997 Trust. Mr. Benjamin Black disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by the Benjamin Trust and the 1997 Trust.
Includes 141,667 shares of restricted Common Stock, also includes stock grants of 50,000 shares of restricted Common Stock vesting on December 31, 2013.
(7) Mr. Joshua Black is a beneficiary of the Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Joshua Black (the “Joshua Trust”) and the 1997 Trust. John J. Hannan is the trustee of the Joshua Trust and the 1997 Trust and has the sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the Joshua Trust and the 1997 Trust. Mr. Joshua Black disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by the Joshua Trust and the 1997 Trust.
Includes 141,667 shares of restricted Common Stock, also includes stock grants of 50,000 shares of restricted Common Stock vesting on December 31, 2013.
(8) Includes 141,667 shares of restricted Common Stock, also includes stock grants of 50,000 shares of restricted Common Stock vesting on December 31, 2013.
(9) Includes 2,275,834 shares of Common Stock directly owned by John J. Hannan, also includes stock grants of 50,000 shares of restricted Common Stock vesting on December 31, 2013. As the trustee of each of the 1997 Trust, the Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Alexander Black (the “Alexander Trust”), the Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Victoria Black (the “Victoria Trust”), the Benjamin Trust and the Joshua Trust, Mr. Hannan is the beneficial owner of an additional 70,285,195 shares of Common Stock.
(10) Includes 246,050 shares of Common Stock.
(11) Includes 900 shares of Common Stock.
(12) Includes 30,645,399 shares of Common Stock directly beneficially owned by the 1997 Trust. John J. Hannan is the trustee of the 1997 Trust and has the sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to shares of Common Stock held by the 1997 Trust.
(13) Includes 12,622,980 shares of Common Stock directly owned by Mr. Leon Black.
(14) Includes 9,909,949 shares of Common Stock directly beneficially owned by the Alexander Trust. John J. Hannan is the trustee of the Alexander Trust and has the sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares of Common Stock held by the Alexander Trust.
33
(15) Includes 9,909,949 shares of Common Stock directly beneficially owned by the Benjamin Trust. John J. Hannan is the trustee of the Benjamin Trust and has the sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares of Common Stock held by the Benjamin Trust.
(16) Includes 9,909,949 shares of Common Stock directly beneficially owned by the Joshua Trust. John J. Hannan is the trustee of the Joshua Trust and has the sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares of Common Stock held by the Joshua Trust.
(17) Includes 9,909,949 shares of Common Stock directly beneficially owned by the Victoria Trust. John J. Hannan is the trustee of the Victoria Trust and has the sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares of Common Stock held by the Victoria Trust.
(18) Includes 2,134,167 shares of Common Stock directly owned by Richard S. Ressler. Richard Ressler is the President of Orchard Capital Corporation, the Manager of Orchard Investments LLC.
(19) Includes 17,270,553 shares of Common Stock directly owned by Orchard Investments, LLC (“Orchard”).
(20) The aggregate amount of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Bengt Odner, a former director of the Company, is represented by 1,412,205 shares of Common Stock and 50,000 shares of Common Stock underlying stock options that may be exercised. In addition to the direct ownership listed herein, Mr. Odner has indirect beneficial ownership of 34,587,795 shares by way of Sedam Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Cyprus, which is controlled by a trust of which Mr. Bengt Odner is the sole beneficiary.
(21) Includes 13,350,205 shares of Common Stock directly owned by Financial Trust Co. Inc.
Changes in Control
We are not currently party to any arrangements which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control.
INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON
No person who has been a director or executive officer of the Company since the beginning of 2012, nor any associate of any such director or executive officer has any substantial interest, direct or indirect, by security holdings or otherwise, in the Reverse Stock Split Proposal and the Stock Plan Proposal, other than their interests in the Reverse Stock Split Proposal as shareholders and their interests in the Stock Plan Proposal as employees or directors, as the case may be.
It should be noted that, due to the treatment of fractional shares and elimination of shareholders holding fewer than 2,000 shares of Common Stock, the proportionate share voting power of each director and executive officer that holds at least 2,000 shares of our Common Stock will increase, subject to the treatment of fractional shares with respect to any such director or executive officer.
OTHER MATTERS
Solicitation of Consents
We will bear the entire cost of solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Consent Statement, the attachments hereto, and any additional solicitation material furnished to shareholders. Copies of solicitation material will be furnished to fiduciaries and custodians holding shares in their names that are beneficially owned by others. The original solicitation of consents by mail may be supplemented by a solicitation by telephone, telegram, or other means by our directors, officers, or employees. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any of those services. Except as described above, we do not presently intend to solicit consents other than by mail.
34
Shareholder Communications
Shareholders wishing to communicate with the Board may direct such communications to the Board of Directors c/o Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc., 200 Progress Drive, Montgomeryville, PA 18936, Attn: Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary will present a summary of all shareholder communications to the Board at subsequent Board meetings. The directors will have the opportunity to review the actual communications at their discretion.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Consent Statement includes forward-looking statements. You can identify our forward-looking statements by the words “expects,” “projects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” plans,” “predicts,” “estimates” and similar expressions.
The forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about us. The Company cautions you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that we cannot predict. In addition, the Company has based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what the Company has expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements.
You should rely only on the information the Company has provided in this Consent Statement. The Company has not authorized any person to provide information other than that provided herein. The Company has not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. You should not assume that the information in this Consent Statement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of the document.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information with the Commission. You can read and copy any materials that the Company files with the Commission at the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information about the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission also maintains a Web site that contains information we file electronically with the Commission, which you can access over the Internet at www.sec.gov.
You should rely only on the information contained in, or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to, this Consent Statement. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you with different information. You should not assume that the information in this Consent Statement is accurate as of any date other than February 28, 2013, or such earlier date as is expressly set forth herein.
Dated: February 28, 2013
|
By order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Mark Yung
By: Mark Yung
Its: Executive Chairman
|
35
EXHIBIT A
FORM OF
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
STATE OF FLORIDA
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
TO
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida (the “Corporation”), in accordance with the provisions of Section 607.1006 of the Florida Business Corporation Act (the “FBCA”) thereof, hereby certifies:
First:
Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph to the end thereof:
Upon the filing and effectiveness pursuant to the FBCA of the articles of amendment adding this paragraph to Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Reverse Stock Split Effective Time”), each two thousand (2000) shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Corporation (“Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split Effective Time either issued and outstanding or held by the Corporation as treasury stock shall be combined into one (1) validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock without any further action by the Corporation or the holder thereof (the “Reverse Stock Split”); provided that no fractional shares shall be issued to any holder and that in lieu of issuing any such fractional shares, the Corporation shall pay cash equal to the number of shares of Common Stock held by any such holder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split that were not combined into whole shares of Common Stock upon consummation of the Reverse Stock Split, multiplied by the fair market value of one pre-Reverse Stock Split share (equal to the higher of (i) the average daily closing price per share of the Common Stock on the OTCQB for the twenty (20) trading days immediately before and including the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split and (ii) $0.04). Each certificate that immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split Effective Time represented shares of Common Stock (“Old Certificates”), shall thereafter represent that number of shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Common Stock represented by the Old Certificate shall have been combined, subject to the elimination of fractional share interests as described above.
Second:
The only voting group entitled to vote on the amendments contained in these Articles of Amendment was the holders of shares of Corporation’s Common Stock. The number of vote cast for the amendments above by the shareholders was sufficient for their approval.
Third:
These Articles of Amendment were duly adopted by the shareholders on
[•]
, 2013
A1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
, the Corporation has caused Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation to be signed by the undersigned, Mark Yung, an authorized officer, and the undersigned has executed these Articles of Amendment and affirms the foregoing as true and under penalty of perjury this ___ day of ________, 2013.
By: _______________________________
Mark Yung, Executive Chairman
A2
EXHIBIT B
FAIRNESS OPINION OF UHY ADVISORS MI, INC.
December 3, 2012
The Special Committee of the
Board of Directors of
Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc.
c/o Mark Yung, Chairman
200 Progress Drive
Montgomerville, PA 18936
Dear Special Committee Members:
The Special Committee (the “Special Committee” or “you”) of the Board of Directors of Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (“ESW” or the “Company”) has requested UHY Advisors MI, Inc. (“UHY” or “we”) to render an opinion (the “Opinion”) with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the selling ESW shareholders of the cash consideration (the “Consideration”) to be received by certain ESW shareholders in connection with ESW’s proposed repurchase of fractional shares of ESW common stock (the “Repurchase”) resulting from a 2000-1 reverse stock split of ESW’s common stock (the “Stock Split”, and with the Repurchase collectively, the “Transaction”). We understand the Company plans to finally determine the Consideration to be paid for the fractional shares based on the average daily closing price per share of ESW’s common stock on the OTCQB market where ESW’s shares are traded for the five trading days immediately before and including the effective date of the Stock Split, and that ESW will use existing cash resources to effectuate the Transaction. For purposes of rendering this Opinion, we have assumed, with your approval, that the Consideration to be paid will equal $.04 per pre-split share of ESW common stock.
Background to the Transaction and this Opinion
We understand that prior to the Transaction, ESW will have only common stock outstanding or issuable and there are approximately 230 million shares of ESW common stock outstanding or expected to be authorized, vested, and issued pursuant to the proposed 2012 Stock Plan, prior to the Transaction. There are also options to purchase common stock with various expiration dates with strike prices significantly greater than the existing market prices, but that no other offering or sale of ESW’s common stock is planned or contemplated. We also understand that the number of shares expected to be Repurchased is less than 5 million, and that the final number will be based on the ownership as of the effective date of the Stock Split. We also understand that as of September 30, 2012 approximately 58% of ESW shares are held by officers and directors of ESW and their respective affiliates, and another shareholder owns slightly more than 5% of ESW’s common stock (collectively, the “Control Group”); that additional shares are expected to be issued to members of the Control Group under the proposed 2012 Stock Plan; and that as a result of the Transaction, the Control Group’s ownership of ESW’s common stock is expected to increase by not more than 2% of ESW’s total outstanding common stock.
Our Opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the assumed price of $.04 in the Repurchase. We have not been requested to opine as to, and our Opinion does not in any manner address: (i) the underlying business decision of the Board of Directors, the Special Committee, the Company or its stockholders or any other party to proceed with the Transaction, the Stock Split or any other matters; (ii) the merits of the Transaction relative to any alternative business strategies that may exist for the Company or the effect of any other transactions in which the Company might have engaged; (iii) the terms of any agreements or documents related to, or the form or any portion or aspect of, the Transaction, except as specifically set forth herein; (iv) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the Transaction to the Company or to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company, except as specifically set forth herein; or (v) the solvency, creditworthiness or fair value of the Company
under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters either before or after the Transaction. Further, our Opinion is not intended to, and does not, constitute a recommendation to any member of the Special Committee or any third party as to how they should vote or proceed in regard to the Transaction. The Opinion and the accompanying presentation provided to you are only to be utilized by the Special Committee as one factor to consider in the process of analyzing the Transaction. Moreover, we were not engaged to recommend, and we did not recommend, how the Consideration would be determined. The Opinion is solely from a financial point of view and does not cover the procedural fairness of the Transaction or other possible measures of fairness. Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation is intended in matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax or other similar professional advice.
B1
In connection with our analysis, we have made such reviews, analyses, and inquiries as we have deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. The principal sources of information used in performing our analysis included, but were not limited to:
·
ESW’s Form 10-K as filed with the SEC for the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2011 (which included audited financial statements for each year);
·
ESW’s Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC for the period ended June 30, 2012;
·
ESW’s Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC for the period ended September 30, 2012;
·
ESW’s internally prepared unaudited financial statements for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2012;
·
ESW’s 2010 and 2011 Form 1120 U.S. Income Tax Return;
·
ESW’s internally prepared budget for the year ending December 31, 2013;
·
ESW’s internally prepared capital expenditure plan for 2013;
·
ESW’s internally prepared plan, including incremental cost and capital expenditure requirements, for its testing business;
·
Internally prepared customer lists and sales detail;
·
A review of tables summarizing ESW’s capitalization, including outstanding warrants, derivatives, and restricted stock grants, with the exception of a complete derivative securities provisions review;
·
ESW management’s 2
nd
Quarter 2012 presentation to the Board of Directors dated August 8, 2012;
·
Draft of the Consent Solicitation Agreement dated August 3, 2012 regarding the Transaction;
·
Letter of Representation signed by Mark Yung and Praveen Nair regarding the future prospects and risks of ESW;
·
Information obtained from ESW’s website;
·
Discussions with ESW’s management concerning its business, industry, history, as well as ESW’s current and future prospects in the emissions control market and testing market;
B2
·
Limited information on ESW’s sales prospects and backlog
·
Limited information on ESW’s existing lawsuit with E. Global Solutions
·
A review of publicly available financial data of certain publicly traded companies that we deemed relevant;
·
A review of available information regarding certain merger and acquisition transactions that we deemed relevant; and
·
Other such financial studies, analyses, investigations, research, and consideration of other information, facts and data as we deemed necessary or appropriate.
Our Opinion assumes that the assets, liabilities, financial condition, and prospects of ESW as of the date of this letter have not changed materially since the date of the most recent financial information provided to us. We did not assume any responsibility to perform, and did not perform, an independent evaluation, physical inspection or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (contingent or actual) of ESW nor did we undertake any analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or contingent rights or liabilities to which ESW is or may be a party or otherwise subject to. In rendering our Opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information that was publicly available, furnished by ESW, or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us without independent verification of such information. ESW has represented and warranted that all information provided or otherwise made available to us is true, complete and correct in all material respects and does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not false or misleading. We have assumed, with your consent and without independent verification, that the financial forecasts and projections, provided to us have been reasonably prepared and based upon reasonable assumptions and reflect the best currently available estimate of the expected future competitive, operating and regulatory environments and financial results of ESW, and we have relied upon such projections in arriving at our Opinion. We have not been engaged to assess the reasonableness or achievability of such forecasts and projections or the assumptions upon which they were based, and we express no view as to the forecasts, projections, or assumptions. We have also assumed that the Transaction will be consummated in a timely manner and in accordance with applicable corporate law.
Our Opinion is necessarily based on business, economic, market, and other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated by us at the date of this letter. It should be noted that although subsequent developments may affect this Opinion, we do not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm our Opinion or to otherwise comment on or consider events occurring after the date of this Opinion. We reserve the right, however, to withdraw, revise, or modify our Opinion based upon additional information that may be provided to or obtained by us after the issuance of the Opinion that suggests, in our judgment, a material change in the assumptions upon which our Opinion is based.
We will receive a fee for our services; however, no portion of the fee is contingent upon the consummation of the Transaction or the conclusions reached in the Opinion and we do not in any manner warrant or predict results or final developments in this matter. Further, none of our employees who worked on this engagement has any known financial interest in the assets or equity of ESW or the outcome of our engagement. In addition, ESW has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of our engagement. We have not previously provided financial advisory services, accounting, tax or other services to ESW.
Our opinion is issued only to you and may not be relied upon by any other person (including, without limitation, any stockholder) or used for any other purpose. Our opinion may not be quoted or referred to, in whole or in part, filed with, or furnished or disclosed to any other party, or used for any other purpose, without our prior written consent
B3
Opinion Process and Selected Considerations
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complete process that involves the application of subjective business judgments in determining the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. UHY did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, when considered independently of the other analyses conducted by UHY, supported or failed to support our Opinion as to the fairness of the Transaction from a financial point of view. UHY believes that the analyses must be considered in their entirety, and that selecting portions of the analyses or the factors considered, without considering all analyses and factors together, could create an imperfect view of the processes underlying the analyses performed by UHY in connection with the preparation of the Opinion.
The following is a summary of the principal financial analyses performed by UHY to arrive at our Opinion.
·
Discounted Cash Flow
. A Discounted Cash Flow analysis establishes the value of a company whose asset base is determined to consist primarily of intangible assets, through the capitalization of free cash flows anticipated to be generated by the company. The procedure requires calculating the net present value of the projected cash flow provided to us by ESW discounted by a risk-adjusted rate of return over the anticipated economic life of the investment, with further adjustment for certain balance sheet items, including excess working capital, interest-bearing debt, and tax benefits not already included in the projected cash flows.
·
Comparable Sales
. This analysis establishes value through a comparative analysis of publically available information about sales of similar companies (or stock interests) active in similar industry sectors. The approach compares ratios of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow quantities versus known public valuations and extrapolates the subject company’s value from said ratios. We considered the publically available information as to comparable sales to be very limited.
·
Historic Trading Price
. ESW’s daily stock price in the OTCQB market reflects an assessment of value. We considered the trend over time and the current stock price, recognizing that transactions in this market generally represent small, non-controlling interests in ESW, that the stock is thinly traded, and that the price to be paid under the Transaction will be based on this market. We also considered liquidity-related costs associated with this market and/or reflected in the freely traded price.
·
Net Book Value
. This analysis values ESW common stock based upon the net book value of ESW’s assets, less its liabilities as reflected on its financial statements.
We also considered, among other, the following factors to be particularly relevant to our overall conclusion.
1)
Attainment of the company’s forecasts will require significant improvement from historic results, and ESW’s future underperformance relative to those forecasts would further reduce UHY’s valuation conclusions, a key aspect of our overall conclusion on the financial fairness of the Transaction.
2)
The Company has no history of generating profits, and cash flows from operations have generally been negative historically.
3)
Under the terms of the Transaction, selling shareholders avoid significant liquidity-related costs (in percentage terms) which would otherwise be incurred to monetize their pre-Transaction investment in ESW.
B4
4)
Selling shareholders may retain non-fractional shares, and all shareholders have the ability to purchase additional ESW shares before or after the Transaction in the event they wish to maintain their financial exposure to ESW’s stock.
5)
The number of shares likely to be acquired via the Transaction represents a small fraction of ESW’s total outstanding shares and will not create a new control group or materially change the ownership structure.
6)
ESW has significant Net Operating Losses (NOLs) for tax purposes, the material value of which can be realized only by the future production of profits.
7)
The value and use of NOLs is dependent on the Internal Revenue Code; we have assumed the existing treatment afforded NOLs under the Code will remain consistent in future years.
A significant portion of ESW’s historic revenue was reliant on the availability of federal and state funds (and regulation) to fund the purchase of its emission control products. There is significant pressure to reduce government spending at both federal and state levels, and California (a key market for ESW’s products) is facing particularly high financial pressures. Future changes in the appropriated funding to support emission control devices, and to enforce regulations associated with emissions, are likely to have a significant impact on ESW’s future sales. This inherent risk in ESW’s business cannot be precisely measured.
8)
Actual market demand for emission control devices similar to those sold by ESW has been significantly lower than the levels forecasted by industry participants (including MECA [Manufacturers of Emissions Controls Association].)
Conclusion
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that as of the date of this Opinion, that the Consideration of a $0.04/share amount to be paid in the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the ESW stockholders whose shares are being repurchased.
Very truly yours,
/S/ UHY ADVISORS MI, INC.
UHY ADVISORS MI, INC.
B5
EXHIBIT C
FLORIDA APPRAISAL RIGHTS STATUTES
FLORIDA APPRAISAL RIGHTS STATUTES
607.1301 Appraisal rights; definitions.
--The following definitions apply to ss. 607.1302 -607.1333:
(1) "Affiliate" means a person that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another person or is a senior executive thereof. For purposes of s. 607.1302 (2)(d), a person is deemed to be an affiliate of its senior executives.
(2) "Beneficial shareholder" means a person who is the beneficial owner of shares held in a voting trust or by a nominee on the beneficial owner's behalf.
(3) "Corporation" means the issuer of the shares held by a shareholder demanding appraisal and, for matters covered in ss. 607.1322 -607.1333, includes the surviving entity in a merger.
(4) "Fair value" means the value of the corporation's shares determined:
(a) Immediately before the effectuation of the corporate action to which the shareholder objects.
(b) Using customary and current valuation concepts and techniques generally employed for similar businesses in the context of the transaction requiring appraisal, excluding any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the corporate action unless exclusion would be inequitable to the corporation and its remaining shareholders.
(c) For a corporation with 10 or fewer shareholders, without discounting for lack of marketability or minority status.
(5) "Interest" means interest from the effective date of the corporate action until the date of payment, at the rate of interest on judgments in this state on the effective date of the corporate action.
(6) "Preferred shares" means a class or series of shares the holders of which have preference over any other class or series with respect to distributions.
(7) "Record shareholder" means the person in whose name shares are registered in the records of the corporation or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent of the rights granted by a nominee certificate on file with the corporation.
(8) "Senior executive" means the chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, or anyone in charge of a principal business unit or function.
(9) "Shareholder" means both a record shareholder and a beneficial shareholder.
History. --s. 118, ch. 89-154; s. 21, ch. 2003-283; s. 2, ch. 2005-267.
C1
607.1302 Right of shareholders to appraisal. --
(1) A shareholder of a domestic corporation is entitled to appraisal rights, and to obtain payment of the fair value of that shareholder's shares, in the event of any of the following corporate actions:
(a) Consummation of a conversion of such corporation pursuant to s. 607.1112 if shareholder approval is required for the conversion and the shareholder is entitled to vote on the conversion under ss. 607.1103 and 607.1112 (6), or the consummation of a merger to which such corporation is a party if shareholder approval is required for the merger under s. 607.1103 and the shareholder is entitled to vote on the merger or if such corporation is a subsidiary and the merger is governed by s. 607.1104 ;
(b) Consummation of a share exchange to which the corporation is a party as the corporation whose shares will be acquired if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the exchange, except that appraisal rights shall not be available to any shareholder of the corporation with respect to any class or series of shares of the corporation that is not exchanged;
(c) Consummation of a disposition of assets pursuant to s. 607.1202 if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the disposition, including a sale in dissolution but not including a sale pursuant to court order or a sale for cash pursuant to a plan by which all or substantially all of the net proceeds of the sale will be distributed to the shareholders within 1 year after the date of sale;
(d) An amendment of the articles of incorporation with respect to the class or series of shares which reduces the number of shares of a class or series owned by the shareholder to a fraction of a share if the corporation has the obligation or right to repurchase the fractional share so created;
(e) Any other amendment to the articles of incorporation, merger, share exchange, or disposition of assets to the extent provided by the articles of incorporation, bylaws, or a resolution of the board of directors, except that no bylaw or board resolution providing for appraisal rights may be amended or otherwise altered except by shareholder approval; or
(f) With regard to a class of shares prescribed in the articles of incorporation prior to October 1, 2003, including any shares within that class subsequently authorized by amendment, any amendment of the articles of incorporation if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the amendment and if such amendment would adversely affect such shareholder by:
1. Altering or abolishing any preemptive rights attached to any of his or her shares;
2. Altering or abolishing the voting rights pertaining to any of his or her shares, except as such rights may be affected by the voting rights of new shares then being authorized of any existing or new class or series of shares;
3. Effecting an exchange, cancellation, or reclassification of any of his or her shares, when such exchange, cancellation, or reclassification would alter or abolish the shareholder's voting rights or alter his or her percentage of equity in the corporation, or effecting a reduction or cancellation of accrued dividends or other arrearages in respect to such shares;
C2
4. Reducing the stated redemption price of any of the shareholder's redeemable shares, altering or abolishing any provision relating to any sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of any of his or her shares, or making any of his or her shares subject to redemption when they are not otherwise redeemable;
5. Making noncumulative, in whole or in part, dividends of any of the shareholder's preferred shares which had theretofore been cumulative;
6. Reducing the stated dividend preference of any of the shareholder's preferred shares; or
7. Reducing any stated preferential amount payable on any of the shareholder's preferred shares upon voluntary or involuntary liquidation.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the availability of appraisal rights under paragraphs (1)(a), (b), (c), and (d) shall be limited in accordance with the following provisions:
(a) Appraisal rights shall not be available for the holders of shares of any class or series of shares which is:
1. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; or
2. Not so listed or designated, but has at least 2,000 shareholders and the outstanding shares of such class or series have a market value of at least $10 million, exclusive of the value of such shares held by its subsidiaries, senior executives, directors, and beneficial shareholders owning more than 10 percent of such shares.
(b) The applicability of paragraph (a) shall be determined as of:
1. The record date fixed to determine the shareholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the meeting of shareholders to act upon the corporate action requiring appraisal rights; or
2. If there will be no meeting of shareholders, the close of business on the day on which the board of directors adopts the resolution recommending such corporate action.
(c) Paragraph (a) shall not be applicable and appraisal rights shall be available pursuant to subsection (1) for the holders of any class or series of shares who are required by the terms of the corporate action requiring appraisal rights to accept for such shares anything other than cash or shares of any class or any series of shares of any corporation, or any other proprietary interest of any other entity, that satisfies the standards set forth in paragraph (a) at the time the corporate action becomes effective.
C3
(d) Paragraph (a) shall not be applicable and appraisal rights shall be available pursuant to subsection (1) for the holders of any class or series of shares if:
1. Any of the shares or assets of the corporation are being acquired or converted, whether by merger, share exchange, or otherwise, pursuant to the corporate action by a person, or by an affiliate of a person, who:
a. Is, or at any time in the 1-year period immediately preceding approval by the board of directors of the corporate action requiring appraisal rights was, the beneficial owner of 20 percent or more of the voting power of the corporation, excluding any shares acquired pursuant to an offer for all shares having voting power if such offer was made within 1 year prior to the corporate action requiring appraisal rights for consideration of the same kind and of a value equal to or less than that paid in connection with the corporate action; or
b. Directly or indirectly has, or at any time in the 1-year period immediately preceding approval by the board of directors of the corporation of the corporate action requiring appraisal rights had, the power, contractually or otherwise, to cause the appointment or election of 25 percent or more of the directors to the board of directors of the corporation; or
2. Any of the shares or assets of the corporation are being acquired or converted, whether by merger, share exchange, or otherwise, pursuant to such corporate action by a person, or by an affiliate of a person, who is, or at any time in the 1-year period immediately preceding approval by the board of directors of the corporate action requiring appraisal rights was, a senior executive or director of the corporation or a senior executive of any affiliate thereof, and that senior executive or director will receive, as a result of the corporate action, a financial benefit not generally available to other shareholders as such, other than:
a. Employment, consulting, retirement, or similar benefits established separately and not as part of or in contemplation of the corporate action;
b. Employment, consulting, retirement, or similar benefits established in contemplation of, or as part of, the corporate action that are not more favorable than those existing before the corporate action or, if more favorable, that have been approved on behalf of the corporation in the same manner as is provided in s. 607.0832; or
c. In the case of a director of the corporation who will, in the corporate action, become a director of the acquiring entity in the corporate action or one of its affiliates, rights and benefits as a director that are provided on the same basis as those afforded by the acquiring entity generally to other directors of such entity or such affiliate.
(e) For the purposes of paragraph (d) only, the term "beneficial owner" means any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, or understanding, other than a revocable proxy, has or shares the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, shares, provided that a member of a national securities exchange shall not be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities held directly or indirectly by it on behalf of another person solely because such member is the recordholder of such securities if the member is precluded by the rules of such exchange from voting without instruction on contested matters or matters that may affect substantially the rights or privileges of the holders of the securities to be voted. When two or more persons agree to act together for the purpose of voting their shares of the corporation, each member of the group formed thereby shall be deemed to have acquired beneficial ownership, as of the date of such agreement, of all voting shares of the corporation beneficially owned by any member of the group.
C4
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the articles of incorporation as originally filed or any amendment thereto may limit or eliminate appraisal rights for any class or series of preferred shares, but any such limitation or elimination contained in an amendment to the articles of incorporation that limits or eliminates appraisal rights for any of such shares that are outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of such amendment or that the corporation is or may be required to issue or sell thereafter pursuant to any conversion, exchange, or other right existing immediately before the effective date of such amendment shall not apply to any corporate action that becomes effective within 1 year of that date if such action would otherwise afford appraisal rights.
(4) A shareholder entitled to appraisal rights under this chapter may not challenge a completed corporate action for which appraisal rights are available unless such corporate action:
(a) Was not effectuated in accordance with the applicable provisions of this section or the corporation's articles of incorporation, bylaws, or board of directors' resolution authorizing the corporate action; or
(b) Was procured as a result of fraud or material misrepresentation.
History. --s. 119, ch. 89-154; s. 5, ch. 94-327; s. 31, ch. 97-102; s. 22, ch. 2003-283; s. 1, ch. 2004-378; s. 3, ch. 2005-267.
607.1303 Assertion of rights by nominees and beneficial owners. --
(1) A record shareholder may assert appraisal rights as to fewer than all the shares registered in the record shareholder's name but owned by a beneficial shareholder only if the record shareholder objects with respect to all shares of the class or series owned by the beneficial shareholder and notifies the corporation in writing of the name and address of each beneficial shareholder on whose behalf appraisal rights are being asserted. The rights of a record shareholder who asserts appraisal rights for only part of the shares held of record in the record shareholder's name under this subsection shall be determined as if the shares as to which the record shareholder objects and the record shareholder's other shares were registered in the names of different record shareholders.
(2) A beneficial shareholder may assert appraisal rights as to shares of any class or series held on behalf of the shareholder only if such shareholder:
(a) Submits to the corporation the record shareholder's written consent to the assertion of such rights no later than the date referred to in s. 607.1322 (2)(b)2.
(b) Does so with respect to all shares of the class or series that are beneficially owned by the beneficial shareholder.
C5
History. --s. 23, ch. 2003-283.
607.1320 Notice of appraisal rights. --
(1) If proposed corporate action described in s. 607.1302 (1) is to be submitted to a vote at a shareholders' meeting, the meeting notice must state that the corporation has concluded that shareholders are, are not, or may be entitled to assert appraisal rights under this chapter. If the corporation concludes that appraisal rights are or may be available, a copy of ss. 607.1301 -607.1333 must accompany the meeting notice sent to those record shareholders entitled to exercise appraisal rights.
(2) In a merger pursuant to s. 607.1104, the parent corporation must notify in writing all record shareholders of the subsidiary who are entitled to assert appraisal rights that the corporate action became effective. Such notice must be sent within 10 days after the corporate action became effective and include the materials described in s. 607.1322.
(3) If the proposed corporate action described in s. 607.1302 (1) is to be approved other than by a shareholders' meeting, the notice referred to in subsection (1) must be sent to all shareholders at the time that consents are first solicited pursuant to s. 607.0704, whether or not consents are solicited from all shareholders, and include the materials described in s. 607.1322.
History. --s. 120, ch. 89-154; s. 35, ch. 93-281; s. 32, ch. 97-102; s. 24, ch. 2003-283.
607.1321 Notice of intent to demand payment. --
(1) If proposed corporate action requiring appraisal rights under s. 607.1302 is submitted to a vote at a shareholders' meeting, or is submitted to a shareholder pursuant to a consent vote under s. 607.0704, a shareholder who wishes to assert appraisal rights with respect to any class or series of shares:
(a) Must deliver to the corporation before the vote is taken, or within 20 days after receiving the notice pursuant to s. 607.1320 (3) if action is to be taken without a shareholder meeting, written notice of the shareholder's intent to demand payment if the proposed action is effectuated.
(b) Must not vote, or cause or permit to be voted, any shares of such class or series in favor of the proposed action.
(2) A shareholder who does not satisfy the requirements of subsection (1) is not entitled to payment under this chapter.
History. --s. 25, ch. 2003-283; s. 7, ch. 2004-378.
607.1322 Appraisal notice and form. --
(1) If proposed corporate action requiring appraisal rights under s. 607.1302 (1) becomes effective, the corporation must deliver a written appraisal notice and form required by paragraph (2)(a) to all shareholders who satisfied the requirements of s. 607.1321. In the case of a merger under s. 607.1104, the parent must deliver a written appraisal notice and form to all record shareholders who may be entitled to assert appraisal rights.
C6
(2) The appraisal notice must be sent no earlier than the date the corporate action became effective and no later than 10 days after such date and must:
(a) Supply a form that specifies the date that the corporate action became effective and that provides for the shareholder to state:
1. The shareholder's name and address.
2. The number, classes, and series of shares as to which the shareholder asserts appraisal rights.
3. That the shareholder did not vote for the transaction.
4. Whether the shareholder accepts the corporation's offer as stated in subparagraph (b)4.
5. If the offer is not accepted, the shareholder's estimated fair value of the shares and a demand for payment of the shareholder's estimated value plus interest.
(b) State:
1. Where the form must be sent and where certificates for certificated shares must be deposited and the date by which those certificates must be deposited, which date may not be earlier than the date for receiving the required form under subparagraph 2.
2. A date by which the corporation must receive the form, which date may not be fewer than 40 nor more than 60 days after the date the subsection (1) appraisal notice and form are sent, and state that the shareholder shall have waived the right to demand appraisal with respect to the shares unless the form is received by the corporation by such specified date.
3. The corporation's estimate of the fair value of the shares.
4. An offer to each shareholder who is entitled to appraisal rights to pay the corporation's estimate of fair value set forth in subparagraph 3.
5. That, if requested in writing, the corporation will provide to the shareholder so requesting, within 10 days after the date specified in subparagraph 2., the number of shareholders who return the forms by the specified date and the total number of shares owned by them.
6. The date by which the notice to withdraw under s. 607.1323 must be received, which date must be within 20 days after the date specified in subparagraph 2.
C7
(c) Be accompanied by:
1. Financial statements of the corporation that issued the shares to be appraised, consisting of a balance sheet as of the end of the fiscal year ending not more than 15 months prior to the date of the corporation's appraisal notice, an income statement for that year, a cash flow statement for that year, and the latest available interim financial statements, if any.
2. A copy of ss. 607.1301 -607.1333.
History. --s. 26, ch. 2003-283.
607.1323 Perfection of rights; right to withdraw. --
(1) A shareholder who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must execute and return the form received pursuant to s. 607.1322 (1) and, in the case of certificated shares, deposit the shareholder's certificates in accordance with the terms of the notice by the date referred to in the notice pursuant to s. 607.1322 (2)(b)2. Once a shareholder deposits that shareholder's certificates or, in the case of uncertificated shares, returns the executed forms, that shareholder loses all rights as a shareholder, unless the shareholder withdraws pursuant to subsection (2).
(2) A shareholder who has complied with subsection (1) may nevertheless decline to exercise appraisal rights and withdraw from the appraisal process by so notifying the corporation in writing by the date set forth in the appraisal notice pursuant to s. 607.1322 (2)(b)6. A shareholder who fails to so withdraw from the appraisal process may not thereafter withdraw without the corporation's written consent.
(3) A shareholder who does not execute and return the form and, in the case of certificated shares, deposit that shareholder's share certificates if required, each by the date set forth in the notice described in subsection (2), shall not be entitled to payment under this chapter.
History. --s. 27, ch. 2003-283.
607.1324 Shareholder's acceptance of corporation's offer. --
(1) If the shareholder states on the form provided in s. 607.1322 (1) that the shareholder accepts the offer of the corporation to pay the corporation's estimated fair value for the shares, the corporation shall make such payment to the shareholder within 90 days after the corporation's receipt of the form from the shareholder.
(2) Upon payment of the agreed value, the shareholder shall cease to have any interest in the shares.
History. --s. 28, ch. 2003-283.
607.1326 Procedure if shareholder is dissatisfied with offer. --
(1) A shareholder who is dissatisfied with the corporation's offer as set forth pursuant to s. 607.1322 (2)(b)4. must notify the corporation on the form provided pursuant to s. 607.1322 (1) of that shareholder's estimate of the fair value of the shares and demand payment of that estimate plus interest.
C8
(2) A shareholder who fails to notify the corporation in writing of that shareholder's demand to be paid the shareholder's stated estimate of the fair value plus interest under subsection (1) within the timeframe set forth in s. 607.1322 (2)(b)2. waives the right to demand payment under this section and shall be entitled only to the payment offered by the corporation pursuant to s. 607.1322 (2)(b)4.
History. --s. 29, ch. 2003-283.
607.1330 Court action. --
(1) If a shareholder makes demand for payment under s. 607.1326 which remains unsettled, the corporation shall commence a proceeding within 60 days after receiving the payment demand and petition the court to determine the fair value of the shares and accrued interest. If the corporation does not commence the proceeding within the 60-day period, any shareholder who has made a demand pursuant to s. 607.1326 may commence the proceeding in the name of the corporation.
(2) The proceeding shall be commenced in the appropriate court of the county in which the corporation's principal office, or, if none, its registered office, in this state is located. If the corporation is a foreign corporation without a registered office in this state, the proceeding shall be commenced in the county in this state in which the principal office or registered office of the domestic corporation merged with the foreign corporation was located at the time of the transaction.
(3) All shareholders, whether or not residents of this state, whose demands remain unsettled shall be made parties to the proceeding as in an action against their shares. The corporation shall serve a copy of the initial pleading in such proceeding upon each shareholder party who is a resident of this state in the manner provided by law for the service of a summons and complaint and upon each nonresident shareholder party by registered or certified mail or by publication as provided by law.
(4) The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is commenced under subsection (2) is plenary and exclusive. If it so elects, the court may appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and recommend a decision on the question of fair value. The appraisers shall have the powers described in the order appointing them or in any amendment to the order. The shareholders demanding appraisal rights are entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil proceedings. There shall be no right to a jury trial.
(5) Each shareholder made a party to the proceeding is entitled to judgment for the amount of the fair value of such shareholder's shares, plus interest, as found by the court.
(6) The corporation shall pay each such shareholder the amount found to be due within 10 days after final determination of the proceedings. Upon payment of the judgment, the shareholder shall cease to have any interest in the shares.
History. --s. 2, ch. 2004-378.
C9
607.1331 Court costs and counsel fees. --
(1) The court in an appraisal proceeding shall determine all costs of the proceeding, including the reasonable compensation and expenses of appraisers appointed by the court. The court shall assess the costs against the corporation, except that the court may assess costs against all or some of the shareholders demanding appraisal, in amounts the court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds such shareholders acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith with respect to the rights provided by this chapter.
(2) The court in an appraisal proceeding may also assess the fees and expenses of counsel and experts for the respective parties, in amounts the court finds equitable:
(a) Against the corporation and in favor of any or all shareholders demanding appraisal if the court finds the corporation did not substantially comply with ss. 607.1320 and 607.1322 ; or
(b) Against either the corporation or a shareholder demanding appraisal, in favor of any other party, if the court finds that the party against whom the fees and expenses are assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith with respect to the rights provided by this chapter.
(3) If the court in an appraisal proceeding finds that the services of counsel for any shareholder were of substantial benefit to other shareholders similarly situated, and that the fees for those services should not be assessed against the corporation, the court may award to such counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the amounts awarded the shareholders who were benefited.
(4) To the extent the corporation fails to make a required payment pursuant to s. 607.1324, the shareholder may sue directly for the amount owed and, to the extent successful, shall be entitled to recover from the corporation all costs and expenses of the suit, including counsel fees.
History. --s. 30, ch. 2003-283; s. 98, ch. 2004-5.
607.1332 Disposition of acquired shares
. --Shares acquired by a corporation pursuant to payment of the agreed value thereof or pursuant to payment of the judgment entered therefor, as provided in this chapter, may be held and disposed of by such corporation as authorized but unissued shares of the corporation, except that, in the case of a merger or share exchange, they may be held and disposed of as the plan of merger or share exchange otherwise provides. The shares of the surviving corporation into which the shares of such shareholders demanding appraisal rights would have been converted had they assented to the merger shall have the status of authorized but unissued shares of the surviving corporation.
History. --s. 31, ch. 2003-283.
C10
607.1333 Limitation on corporate payment. --
(1) No payment shall be made to a shareholder seeking appraisal rights if, at the time of payment, the corporation is unable to meet the distribution standards of s. 607.06401. In such event, the shareholder shall, at the shareholder's option:
(a) Withdraw his or her notice of intent to assert appraisal rights, which shall in such event be deemed withdrawn with the consent of the corporation; or
(b) Retain his or her status as a claimant against the corporation and, if it is liquidated, be subordinated to the rights of creditors of the corporation, but have rights superior to the shareholders not asserting appraisal rights, and if it is not liquidated, retain his or her right to be paid for the shares, which right the corporation shall be obliged to satisfy when the restrictions of this section do not apply.
(2) The shareholder shall exercise the option under paragraph (1)(a) or paragraph (b) by written notice filed with the corporation within 30 days after the corporation has given written notice that the payment for shares cannot be made because of the restrictions of this section. If the shareholder fails to exercise the option, the shareholder shall be deemed to have withdrawn his or her notice of intent to assert appraisal rights.
History. --s. 32, ch. 2003-283.
C11
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
200 Progress Drive
Montgomeryville, PA 18936
APPRAISAL FORM
It is understood that, subject to shareholder approval, a reverse stock split is to be effected by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") as described in the Consent Solicitation Statement, dated February 28, 2013 (the "Consent Solicitation Statement"), sent by the Company to its shareholders (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Pursuant to the terms of the Reverse Stock Split, shareholders owning a number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001, of the Company (the "Common Stock") not evenly divisible by 2,000 will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares in an amount equal to the number of shares of Common Stock held by any such holder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split that were not combined into whole shares of Common Stock upon consummation of the Reverse Stock Split, multiplied by the higher of (i) the average daily closing price per share of the Common Stock on the OTCQB for the twenty trading days immediately before and including the Effective Date of the Reverse Stock Split and (ii) $0.04 per share (the "Fractional Share Price"). It is anticipated that the Effective Date of the Reverse Stock Split will be approximately 10 days following receipt of the required shareholder approval.
The undersigned shareholder (the “Shareholder”) is providing this appraisal form in connection with the Reverse Stock Split to assert such Shareholder’s appraisal rights pursuant to Section 607.1322 of the Florida Business Corporation Act with respect to the receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares.
Name of Shareholder:
Address of Shareholder:
Number of Shares of Common Stock held by Shareholder before giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split:
The Shareholder acknowledges that he, she or it did not consent to the Reverse Stock Split.
The Company has offered to pay the Shareholder the Fractional Share Price per share for each share of Common Stock owned by the Shareholder before giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split. The Shareholder hereby:
Rejects the offer
Accepts the offer
If the offer above is rejected, the Shareholder estimates the fair value of the shares of the Company to be $__________ per share, and demands payment of $_______ per share as payment of the Shareholder’s estimated value, plus interest.
D1
If the shares of Common Stock are held in certificated form, the certificates must be delivered with this Appraisal Form to the Company. The Shareholder acknowledges that he, she or it:
Holds the shares of Common Stock in certificated form and has enclosed such certificates with this Appraisal Form.
Does not hold the shares of Common Stock in certificated form and has not enclosed any certificates with this Appraisal Form.
This Appraisal Form and certificates, if any, must be delivered to the Company at the address provided above, Attention: Praveen Nair, Chief Financial Officer, on or before April 17, 2013 or the Shareholder will have waived his, her or its appraisal rights set forth in the Consent Solicitation Statement.
Shareholder
By:
Print Name:
Date:
D2
EXHIBIT E
audited Financial statements for the year ended december 31, 2011
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ 1,103,649
|
|
$ 13,328
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
for doubtful accounts of $1,398 (2010 - $70,028) (Note 2)
|
1,204,734
|
|
2,279,149
|
|
Inventory, net of reserve of $223,007 (2010 - $0) (Note 5)
|
2,431,027
|
|
4,414,518
|
|
Prepaid expenses and sundry assets
|
295,211
|
|
261,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
5,034,621
|
|
6,968,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment under construction (Note 6)
|
198,416
|
|
185,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
|
1,271,989
|
|
1,931,373
|
|
depreciation of $6,867,760 (2010 - $5,765,164)
|
|
|
|
|
and loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
of $163,668(2010 - $0) (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal use software under development (Note 2)
|
--
|
|
126,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and trademarks, net of accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
amortization of $2,131,077
|
--
|
|
16,145
|
|
(2010 - $2,115,091) (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6,505,026
|
|
$ 9,227,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan (Note 8)
|
$ --
|
|
$ 3,424,889
|
|
Accounts payable
|
1,384,972
|
|
2,495,070
|
|
Accrued liabilities (Note 17)
|
592,760
|
|
512,964
|
|
Exchange feature liability (Notes 10 and 12)
|
--
|
|
2,133,862
|
|
Customer deposits
|
--
|
|
29,322
|
|
Redeemable Class A special shares (Note 9)
|
453,900
|
|
453,900
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligation (Note 15)
|
1,241
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
2,432,873
|
|
9,053,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation (Note 15)
|
--
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
2,432,873
|
|
9,055,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Events (Note 21)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity (Notes 12 and 13)
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 (2010 - 250,000,000)
|
|
|
|
|
shares authorized; 219,450,447 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
issued and outstanding (2010 - 129,463,767)
|
219,450
|
|
129,463
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
56,606,629
|
|
43,567,531
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
--
|
|
446,549
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(52,753,926)
|
|
(43,971,021)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
4,072,153
|
|
172,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6,505,026
|
|
$ 9,227,571
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
E1
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ 11,885,665
|
|
$ 10,437,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
9,712,850
|
|
7,261,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
2,172,815
|
|
3,175,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, office and general costs
|
|
3,891,814
|
|
4,719,362
|
|
Restructuring charges (Note 17)
|
|
1,385,685
|
|
--
|
|
Research and development costs
|
|
692,977
|
|
783,944
|
|
Officers' compensation and directors' fees
|
|
700,140
|
|
954,054
|
|
Consulting and professional fees
|
|
336,523
|
|
451,345
|
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
248,306
|
|
103,256
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
366,266
|
|
837,448
|
|
Loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment (Note 6)
|
|
163,668
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,785,379
|
|
7,849,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
(5,612,564)
|
|
(4,673,760)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
--
|
|
(183,858)
|
Amortization of deferred costs
|
|
--
|
|
(117,131)
|
Long-term debt accretion
|
|
--
|
|
(768,981)
|
Inducement premium
|
|
--
|
|
(2,909,872)
|
Mark to market adjustment on advance share subscription
|
|
--
|
|
1,247,119
|
Change in fair value of exchange feature liability (Note 10)
|
|
(578,739)
|
|
(2,021,213)
|
Interest on notes payable to related party
|
|
(126,850)
|
|
(11,342)
|
Interest accretion expense
|
|
(3,506,074)
|
|
--
|
Financing charge on embedded derivative liability (Note 7)
|
|
(485,101)
|
|
--
|
Gain on convertible derivative (Note 7)
|
|
1,336,445
|
|
--
|
Bank fees related to credit facility covenant waivers (Note 8)
|
|
(154,205)
|
|
--
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
--
|
|
(8,828)
|
Interest income
|
|
--
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
(9,127,088)
|
|
(9,447,641)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation of Canadian subsidiaries
|
|
(102,366)
|
|
21,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss
|
|
$ (9,229,454)
|
|
$ (9,426,475)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share (basic and diluted) (Note18)
|
|
$ (0.05)
|
|
$ (0.08)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic and diluted) (Note18)
|
170,818,147
|
|
112,793,477
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
E2
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional
|
|
Other Comprehensive
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Stockholders'
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Paid-In Capital
|
|
Income
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2010
|
73,823,851
|
|
$ 73,822
|
|
$ 26,083,635
|
|
$ 425,383
|
|
$ (34,523,380)
|
|
$ (7,940,540)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(9,447,641)
|
|
(9,447,641)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
(Note 13)
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
93,189
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
93,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued from share subscription
|
1,500,000
|
|
1,500
|
|
598,500
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker fees related to share subscription
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(24,000)
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(24,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of exchange feature liability
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(112,649)
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(112,649)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inducement on conversion of debentures with related party
|
4,375,668
|
|
4,376
|
|
1,658,377
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
1,662,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued on conversion of debentures
|
49,764,248
|
|
49,765
|
|
14,730,479
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
14,780,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature of convertible debentures
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
540,000
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation of Canadian subsidiaries
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
21,166
|
|
--
|
|
21,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2011
|
129,463,767
|
|
$ 129,463
|
|
$ 43,567,531
|
|
$ 446,549
|
|
$ (43,971,021)
|
|
$ 172,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(9,127,088)
|
|
(9,127,088)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation (Note 13)
|
816,668
|
|
817
|
|
179,944
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
180,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation of Canadian subsidiaries
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(102,366)
|
|
--
|
|
(102,366)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment due to change in
functional currency (Note 3)
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(344,183)
|
|
344,183
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for prior transactions (Note 12)
|
22,500,000
|
|
22,500
|
|
5,344,830
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
5,367,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription of common stock (Note 12)
|
66,670,012
|
|
66,670
|
|
7,933,734
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
8,000,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right offering costs (Note 12)
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(419,410)
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(419,410)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2011
|
219,450,447
|
|
$ 219,450
|
|
$ 56,606,629
|
|
$ --
|
|
$ (52,753,926)
|
|
$ 4,072,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
E3
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$ (9,127,088)
|
|
$ (9,447,641)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest accretion expense
|
|
|
3,506,074
|
|
--
|
|
Change in fair value of exchange feature liability (Note 10)
|
|
|
578,739
|
|
2,021,213
|
|
Financing charge on embedded derivative liability (Note 7)
|
|
485,101
|
|
--
|
|
Loss on disposal of inventory
|
|
|
627,507
|
|
195,293
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
718,884
|
|
1,045,096
|
|
Loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment (Note 6)
|
|
295,238
|
|
--
|
|
Interest on notes payable to related party
|
|
|
126,850
|
|
--
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
179,944
|
|
93,189
|
|
Amortization of patents and trademarks
|
|
|
16,145
|
|
213,212
|
|
Inducement premium
|
|
|
--
|
|
2,909,872
|
|
Mark to market adjustment on advance share subscription
|
|
--
|
|
(1,247,119)
|
|
Long-term debt accretion
|
|
|
--
|
|
768,981
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
--
|
|
183,858
|
|
Amortization of deferred costs
|
|
|
--
|
|
117,131
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
--
|
|
60,855
|
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
--
|
|
8,828
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(131,570)
|
|
--
|
|
Gain on convertible derivative
|
|
|
(1,336,445)
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,066,467
|
|
6,370,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash flows from operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
activities resulting from changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,168,397
|
|
(1,195,868)
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,362,672
|
|
(3,066,562)
|
|
Prepaid expenses and sundry assets
|
|
|
(53,998)
|
|
(14,163)
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,030,904)
|
|
1,459,220
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
(29,322)
|
|
19,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,416,845
|
|
(2,797,908)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(2,643,776)
|
|
(5,875,140)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
131,570
|
|
703
|
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(233,337)
|
|
(254,581)
|
|
Internal use software under development
|
|
|
--
|
|
(121,133)
|
|
Addition to property, plant and equipment under construction
|
|
(150,618)
|
|
(39,177)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(252,385)
|
|
(414,188)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from convertible debentures placement
|
|
|
--
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
Debt issuance cost
|
|
|
--
|
|
(80,625)
|
|
Bank loan
|
|
|
--
|
|
3,312,254
|
|
Repayment of bank loan
|
|
|
(3,434,075)
|
|
(723,431)
|
|
Rights offering costs
|
|
|
(419,410)
|
|
--
|
|
Notes payable to related party
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
--
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,857,997
|
|
600,000
|
|
Broker fees related to share subscription
|
|
|
--
|
|
(24,000)
|
|
Repayment of notes payable to related party
|
|
|
--
|
|
(500,000)
|
|
Repayment of capital lease obligation
|
|
(3,800)
|
|
(13,769)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
4,000,712
|
|
5,570,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
1,104,551
|
|
(718,899)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on foreign operations
|
|
|
(14,230)
|
|
99,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
13,328
|
|
632,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
|
$ 1,103,649
|
|
$ 13,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid
|
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 13,157
|
Other non-cash conversion of loans and related interest
|
|
|
$ 4,126,850
|
|
$ 14,780,243
|
Reclassification of convertible derivative and exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities to equity
|
|
|
$ 4,861,256
|
|
$ --
|
Conversion of accrued expenses to equity
|
|
|
$ 16,374
|
|
$ --
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
E4
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND GOING CONCERN
Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company" or "ESW") through its wholly-owned subsidiaries is engaged in the design, development, manufacturing and sales of emissions control technologies, ESW also provides emissions testing and environmental certification services with its primary focus on the North American on-road and off-road diesel retrofit market. ESW currently manufactures and markets a line of catalytic emission control and enabling technologies for a number of applications.
The audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP"), which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern.
The Company has sustained recurring operating losses. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $52,753,926 and cash and cash equivalents of $1,103,649. During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2011 there were significant changes made to ESW’s business. These changes in operations, the relocation of the Company’s operations (See Note 2), and the prevailing economic conditions all create uncertainty in the operating results and accordingly there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating sufficient cash flow from operations or achieving profitability in the near future. As a result, there is substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company may require additional financing to fund its continuing operations, financing may not be available at acceptable terms or may not be available at all. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on obtaining additional financing and achieving and maintaining a profitable level of operations.
On February 17, 2011 and May 3, 2011, the Company raised a total of $4 million through the issuance of unsecured subordinated promissory notes (the “Notes”) to certain shareholders, including deemed affiliates of certain members of the Board of Directors of the Company. Proceeds from the Notes funded working capital, capital investments and other general corporate purposes. Proceeds from Notes, along with available cash, were used to fund the Company's additional working capital needs related to its summer sales.
Effective May 10, 2011, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with certain of its current shareholders and subordinated lenders under unsecured promissory notes (the “Bridge Lenders") for an aggregate amount of $4.0 million. As per the Investment Agreement, the Bridge Lenders agreed to provide a backstop commitment (the "Backstop Commitment") to a rights offering targeted by the Company to raise up to $8 million (the “Qualified Offering"). Under the Backstop Commitment, the Bridge Lenders agreed to purchase any shares offered in the Qualified Offering that were not purchased by the Company's shareholders of record, after giving effect to any oversubscriptions.
Effective June 30, 2011 the Company completed its rights offering. The Company's shareholders subscribed to 38,955,629 shares including over subscriptions. Under the Qualified Offering shareholders subscribed to $4.7 million, which was subscribed for via cash ($1.9 million), and the exchange of principal and accrued interest on the Notes and the Bridge Loan Notes (approximately $2.8 million). Under the Backstop Commitment, the Bridge Lenders purchased 27,714,385 shares of Common Stock at price of $0.12 per share for approximately $3.3 million, of which $2.0 million was paid in cash and $1.3 million was paid for through the exchange of the balance of principal and accrued interest due on the Notes. As a result of these transactions, the Company satisfied its obligations with the Bridge Lenders and effectively cancelled the Notes effective June 30, 2011.
Effective July 18, 2011, ESW’s wholly-owned subsidiary ESW Canada Inc, paid its senior lender the amount of $1.5 million (Canadian dollars) from the proceeds of the rights offering (see Note 12) to liquidate the outstanding balance on the bank loan. The senior lender has discharged all liens, encumbrances and securities against the Company and its subsidiaries and cancelled the March 31, 2010 demand revolving credit facility agreement.
E5
These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. All adjustments considered necessary for fair
presentation and of a normal recurring nature have been included in these consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, ESW America Inc. ("ESWA"), ESW Technologies Inc. ("ESWT"), ESW Canada Inc. ("ESWC"), Technology Fabricators Inc. (“TFI”) and BBL Technologies Inc. ("BBL"). All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation. Amounts in the consolidated financial statements are expressed in U.S. dollars.
Effective July 6, 2011, ESW setup a wholly-owned subsidiary TFI. TFI, a Delaware corporation to house ESW’s manufacturing operations that is co-located at 200 Progress Drive, Montgomeryville, PA, 18936 along with ESW’s Air Testing operations. All manufacturing activities are housed in TFI effective October 1, 2011.
ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include amounts for inventory valuation, impairment of property plant and equipment, share based compensation, redeemable class A special shares, valuation of the warrants, accrued liabilities and accounts receivable exposures.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business but mitigates the associated credit risk by performing credit checks and actively pursuing past due accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated and recorded based on management's assessment of the credit history with the customer and current relationships with them. On this basis management has determined that an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,398 and $70,028 was appropriate as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
INVENTORY
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market determined using the first-in first-out method. Inventory is periodically reviewed for use and obsolescence, and adjusted as necessary. Inventory consists of raw materials, work in progress and finished goods.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION
The Company capitalizes customized equipment built to be used in the future day to day operations at cost. Once complete and available for use, the cost for accounting purposes is transferred to property, plant and equipment, where normal depreciation rates apply.
E6
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 5 to 7 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated discounted cash flow used in determining the fair value of the asset. Due to changes in circumstances related to its on-going restructuring plan, ESW conducted a test for impairment as of December 31, 2011 and recognized an impairment loss of $163,668 (see Note 6 for details). Assets that have been held for sale during the year were written down to their fair value and depreciation has been suspended. Gains or losses not previously recognized resulting from the sale of an asset held for sale was recognized on the date of sale. For assets that are to be abandoned the undiscounted cash flows used in the test for recoverability are less than the long-lived assets carrying amount, the Company recognized an impairment loss as the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value at December 31, 2011.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company follows ASC Topic 360, which requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets' carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In performing the review for recoverability, if future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) from the use and ultimate disposition of the assets are less than their carrying values, an impairment loss represented by the difference between its fair value and carrying value, is recognized. Properties held for sale are recorded at the lower of the carrying amount or the expected sales price less costs to sell. Management reviewed the related assets for impairment in the fourth quarter (see Note 6 for details).
INTERNAL-USE SOFTWARE
ESW previously capitalized costs related to computer software obtained or developed for internal use. With the decision to relocate ESW’s manufacturing operations from Concord, Ontario, Canada to Montgomeryville, PA, the Company expensed the capitalized costs for internal use software and discontinued the implementation. Related costs are included as software impairment under restructuring costs (See: Note 2: RESTRUCTURING CHARGES).
Costs capitalized as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $0 and $126,340, respectively.
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
Patents and trademarks consist primarily of the costs incurred to acquire them from an independent third party. Intangible assets with a finite life are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset (or asset group) may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated discounted cash flow used in determining the fair value of the asset.
Patents and trademarks are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated life of ten years. Amortization expense for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $16,145 and $213,212 respectively. At December 31, 2011, Patents and trademarks were fully written down and have $0 carrying value.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
E7
Included in the ASC Topic 820 framework is a three level valuation inputs hierarchy with Level 1 being inputs and transactions that can be effectively fully observed by market participants spanning to Level 3 where estimates are unobservable by market participants outside of the Company and must be estimated using assumptions developed by the Company. The Company discloses the lowest level input significant to each category of asset or liability valued within the scope of ASC Topic 820 and the valuation method as exchange, income or use. The Company uses inputs which are as observable as possible and the methods most applicable to the specific situation of each company or valued item.
The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, redeemable Class A special shares and capital lease obligation approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. Per ASC Topic 820 framework these are considered Level 2 inputs where inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument might be adversely affected by a change in the interest rates. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, the Company manages exposure through its normal operating and financing activities.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company derives revenue primarily from the sale of its catalytic products. In accordance with ASC Topic 605, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the amount is fixed or determinable, risk of ownership has passed to the customer and collection is reasonably assured.
The Company also derives revenue (less than 4.8% and 1.5% of total revenue during the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.) from providing air testing and environmental certification services. Revenues are recognized upon delivery of testing services when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured.
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share when their effect is anti-dilutive.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are computed in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 740, which requires, among other things, a liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in their financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company is required to make certain estimates and judgments about the application of tax law, the expected resolution of uncertain tax positions and other matters. In the event that uncertain tax positions are resolved for amounts different than the Company's estimates, or the related statutes of limitations expire without the assessment of additional income taxes, the Company will be required to adjust the amounts of the related assets and liabilities in the period in which such events occur.
E8
Such adjustments may have a material impact on ESW's income tax provision and results of operations. Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements describes the guidance and the effects on results of operations and financial position arising from its adoption.
SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS
The Company’s shipping and handling costs of $138,815 (2010 – $109,638) are included in cost of goods sold for all periods presented. Additionally, the Company has recorded recoveries of these costs amounting to $77,963 (2010 - $78,004), which are included in revenues.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company is engaged in research and development work. Research and development costs are charged as operating expense of the Company as incurred. Any grant money received for research and development work is used to offset these expenditures. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company expensed $692,977 and $783,944 net of grant revenues, respectively, towards research and development costs. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, gross research and development expense, excluding any offsetting grant revenues amounted to $971,689 and $927,319, respectively, and grant money amounted to $278,712 and $143,375, respectively.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The consolidated financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC Topic 830. All assets and liabilities have been translated using the current exchange rate as at the balance sheet dates. Amounts included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss have been translated using the average exchange rate for the year. As a result of the change in accounting policy, all future translation adjustments that arise from translating the financial statements of the Company's foreign subsidiaries from local currency to U.S. dollars are recorded in net income.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
ASC Topic 830 establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income is reported as a component of stockholders' equity/(deficit). Other comprehensive income includes only foreign currency translation adjustments related to translation of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries from local currency to U.S. dollars. As a result of the change in accounting policy, the full amount of accumulated other comprehensive income was recognized in stockholders deficit.
PRODUCT WARRANTIES
The Company provides for estimated warranty costs at the time of sale and accrues for specific items at the time their existence is known and the amounts are determinable. The Company estimates warranty costs using standard quantitative measures based on industry warranty claim experience and evaluation of specific customer warranty issues. The Company currently records warranty costs as 2% of revenue. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $192,674 and $102,793, respectively, was accrued against warranty provision and included in accrued liabilities. For the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the total warranty, service, service travel and installation costs included in cost of sales were $272,966 and $224,766, respectively.
E9
SEGMENTED REPORTING
ESW operates in two reportable segments. ASC 280-10, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. ESW’s operating segments include manufacturing operations and air testing services. ESW’s Chief Operating Decision Maker is the Company’s Executive Chairman.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
ESW recognizes restructuring expenses as they are incurred. ESW also evaluates the inventory and property, plant and equipment associated with restructuring actions for impairment. Asset impairment and accelerated depreciation expenses primarily relate to inventory write-downs for rationalized products and adjustments in the carrying value of the closed facilities to the Company’s estimated fair value. In addition, the remaining useful lives of other property, plant and equipment associated with the related operations were re-evaluated based on the respective plan, resulting in the impairment of certain assets. In accordance with ASC 420-10-25-11 costs to terminate an operating lease" arise when a lessee will either: (a) terminate an operating lease; or (b) if it is unable to terminate the lease, discontinue its use of the asset and continue to make lease payments over the remaining term of the lease without benefit. When the lease will be terminated, the lessee should recognize a liability for the cost of terminating the lease at the time the lease is terminated. If the lease will not be terminated and the lessee will continue to incur costs under the lease without future benefit, the lessee should recognize a liability on the cease-use date (the date the lessee discontinues its use of the asset). In accordance with paragraphs 420-10-30-7 through 30-9, a liability for the remaining lease rentals, reduced by actual (or estimated) sublease rentals, would be recognized and measured at its fair value at the cease-use date. In accordance with paragraphs 420-10-35-1 through 35-4:, the liability would be adjusted for changes, if any, resulting from revisions to estimated cash flows after the cease-use date, measured using the credit-adjusted risk-free rate that was used to measure the liability initially.
NOTE 3 – CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY AND RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY
Effective October 1, 2011, ESW changed the functional currency for its Canadian operations from the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar. ESW’s sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Additionally, with the closure of its operation in Canada, the majority of our inventory is sourced from its U.S. operations. The change in functional currency is applied on a prospective basis. The U.S dollar translated amounts of nonmonetary assets and liabilities at October 1, 2011 became the historical accounting basis for those assets and liabilities at October 1, 2011.
Until the point of transition a cumulative translation adjustment of $102,366 was recognized in other comprehensive income, as a result of the change, losses of $186,812 were recognized through net income and were included in foreign exchange loss on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Since the accumulated other comprehensive income related only to foreign currency translation adjustments the full amount of accumulated other comprehensive income, $344,183, was reclassified into accumulated deficit.
The change in functional currency did not have a material effect on any other item on the consolidated balance sheets or the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
E10
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-5 – “Comprehensive Income – Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. This statement removed the presentation of comprehensive income in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The only two allowable presentations are below the components of net income in a statement of comprehensive income or in a separate statement of comprehensive income that begins with total net income. The guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In May 2011, an update was made by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). It provides amendments to the definition of fair value and the market participant concept, grants an exception for the measurement of financial instruments held in a portfolio with certain offsetting risks, and modifies most disclosures. The changes in disclosures include, for all Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used and a description of the valuation processes in place. The new guidance also requires disclosure of the highest and best use of a nonfinancial asset. This standard will be effective prospectively during interim and for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-22, Accounting for Various Topics - Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. This update amends various SEC paragraphs based on external comments received and the issuance of SAB 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. The adoption of this ASU had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-21, Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules. This updates various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies. The adoption of this ASU had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method. The objective of this Update is to provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-013, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU 2010-13 addresses the classification of an employee share-based award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security trades. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
E11
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force ("ASU 2009-13") (codified within ASC Topic 605). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 4 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash and highly liquid investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all of the Company's cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash.
NOTE 5 - INVENTORY
Inventory consists of:
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
INVENTORY
|
2011
|
2010
|
Raw materials
|
$846,113
|
$1,669,481
|
Work-in-process
|
1,705,346
|
2,737,545
|
Finished goods
|
102,575
|
7,492
|
|
$2,654,034
|
$4,414,518
|
Less: Reserve for inventory
|
(223,007)
|
--
|
|
$2,431,027
|
$4,414,518
|
The Company recorded inventory write downs amounting to $638,048 and $0 for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to certain inventory that were impaired as a result of the restructuring and product changes and were sold to recover cash.
NOTE 6 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
CLASSIFICATION
|
2011
|
2010
|
Plant, machinery and equipment
|
$ 6,338,221
|
$ 5,790,507
|
Office equipment
|
383,912
|
384,902
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
456,981
|
461,817
|
Vehicles
|
25,604
|
18,288
|
Leasehold improvements
|
1,098,699
|
1,041,023
|
|
8,303,417
|
7,696,537
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(6,867,760)
|
(5,765,164)
|
Less: impairment loss
|
(163,668)
|
--
|
|
$ 1,271,989
|
$ 1,931,373
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
Depreciation Expense
|
2011
|
2010
|
Depreciation expense included in cost of sales
|
$ 271,563
|
$ 174,012
|
Depreciation expense included in operating expenses
|
350,121
|
624,233
|
Depreciation expense included in research and development costs
|
97,200
|
246,849
|
Total depreciation expense
|
$ 718,884
|
$ 1,045,095
|
E12
At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $198,416 and $185,542, respectively, of customized equipment under construction.
The plant, machinery and equipment above include $37,508 and $37,939 in assets under capital lease with a corresponding accumulated depreciation of $34,384 and $25,723 as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
As a result of the decision to relocate ESW’s manufacturing operations, the Company recognized an impairment loss. The estimated recovery from the sale of plant and machinery and office equipment was expected to be minimal and, accordingly, the Company determined that the carrying value of these assets exceeded the sum of undiscounted cash flows from their use and eventual disposition. Due to uncertainties in both timing and amount of these cash flows, the Company utilized an expected present value technique to estimate the fair value. Based on this valuation, the Company assessed a value of $0 to these assets and recorded an impairment loss equal to the full amount of their carrying value. Recovery from the sale of these assets and differences due to exchange rate fluctuations will be offset against the impairment loss in the future periods. Impairment loss for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $163,668 and $0.
The details of impairment loss recognized for 2011 are summarized in the follows table:
Asset grouping
|
Impairment loss recognized
|
Plant and Machinery (Held for Sale)
|
$ 180,993
|
Office equipment (Held for Sale)
|
36,983
|
Leasehold improvements (disposed or abandoned)
|
93,328
|
Total impairment loss recognized June 30, 2011
|
311,304
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations
|
(16,066)
|
Gain on disposal of Plant and Machinery
|
(131,570)
|
Total impairment loss recognized December 31, 2011
|
$ 163,668
|
NOTE 7 - NOTES PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES
On February 17, 2011, the Company entered into note subscription agreements (collectively, the "Loan Agreements"), and issued unsecured subordinated promissory notes to, Orchard Investments, LLC; Black Family 1997 Trust; Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Alexander Black; Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Benjamin Black; Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Joshua Black; Leon D. Black Trust UAD 11/30/92 FBO Victoria Black; Leon D. Black; John J. Hannan and Richard Ressler (each individually a "Subordinated Lender" or "Holder" and collectively the "Subordinated Lenders" or "Holders") who are current shareholders and deemed affiliates of certain members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Loan Agreements were approved by the independent directors of the Company.
As per the Loan Agreements, the Subordinated Lenders made loans to the Company in the principal aggregate amount of $3 million, represented by unsecured subordinated promissory notes (the "Notes"), dated February 17, 2011. Proceeds of the Loan, along with available cash funded working capital, capital investments and other general corporate expenditures. The Notes bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum, payable in-kind on a monthly basis commencing March 17, 2011, up to the date on which the Notes are paid in full. The maturity date of the Loan was the earlier of: (i) the closing of a rights offering of the Company's common stock, at a sale price of $0.12 per share (adjusted for any stock split, stock dividend or other similar adjustment) pursuant to which the Company planned to offer rights to purchase approximately $8 million in shares of Common Stock (the "Qualified Offering"), and also permitted all Subordinated Lenders to exchange their Notes and accrued interest (including any notes that may be issued for payment of interest) for shares of Common Stock at $0.12 per share or (ii) June 17, 2011 (the "Outside Date").
E13
Effective June 14, 2011, the respective holders of ESW’s 10% unsecured subordinated promissory notes issued February 17, 2011 and May 3, 2011 in the aggregate principal amount of $4 million (collectively the "Notes") pursuant to the terms of the Notes, extended the maturity date of the Notes to July 15, 2011.
The terms of the Loan Agreements were analyzed in accordance with ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging. The Loan Agreements allowed for the price for Notes exchanged for Common Stock to be adjusted in certain circumstances. The potential adjustment in the exchange price precludes the Company from being qualified for the exemption from being considered to be a derivative instrument. As such, the option of the Holders to exchange Notes for Common Stock and the option of the Qualified Holders to invest the balance of $1 million aggregate amount to purchase Common Stock were determined to be derivatives embedded in the Notes. These embedded derivatives are bundled together as a single compound embedded derivative and recorded and valued as a liability at the time of issuance on February 17, 2011 and on March 31, 2011.
The fair values of the embedded derivatives issued under the Loan Agreements on February 17, 2011 and March 31, 2011 were determined to be $3,485,101 and $2,148,656, respectively, with the following respective assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 0.15% and 0.17%, (2) remaining contractual life of 4 and 2.5 months, (3) expected stock price volatility of 194% and 201%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. Since the fair values of the embedded derivatives were in excess of the proceeds, the Company recorded an immediate expense of $485,101 in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as a financing charge on embedded derivative liability. The embedded derivatives liability was recorded as a discount to the Notes at the time of issuance. The discount was recorded as interest accretion expense in the consolidated statement of operations using the effective-interest method. The change in the fair value of $1,336,445 of the embedded derivative liability was recorded as gain in the consolidated statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011.
Subsequently, on May 3, 2011, the Company entered into additional note subscription agreements and issued unsecured subordinated promissory notes (the “Bridge Notes”), with Orchard Investments, LLC ("Orchard"); Black Family 1997 Trust; Leon D. Black, UAD 11/30/92 FBO Alexander Black; Leon D. Black, UAD 11/30/92 FBO Benjamin Black; Leon D. Black, UAD 11/30/92 FBO Joshua Black; Leon D. Black, UAD 11/30/92 FBO Victoria Black; Leon D. Black; John J. Hannan and Richard Ressler ("Ressler") who are current shareholders and were subordinated lenders under prior loan agreements in the aggregate amount of $3 million with the Company entered into on February 17, 2011 and deemed affiliates of the Company. The Bridge Notes were approved by the Company's independent directors. Pursuant to the Loan agreements, the Subordinated Lenders made loans to the Company in the principal aggregate amount of $1 million subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreements and represented by unsecured subordinated convertible promissory notes. Proceeds of the Bridge Loan, along with available cash, were used by the Company to fund working capital.
The fair value of the embedded derivatives issued under The Bridge Notes Agreements effective May 3, 2011 was determined to be $506,074 with the following assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 0.60% (2) remaining contractual life of 48 days, (3) expected stock price volatility of 212%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. The embedded derivative liability was recorded as a discount to the Notes at the time of issuance. The discount is recorded as interest accretion expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss using the effective-interest method.
E14
Effective May 10, 2011, the Company
entered into an Investment Agreement (the "Investment Agreement")
with Orchard Investments, LLC ("Orchard"); Black Family 1997 Trust;
Leon D. Black, UAD 11/30/92 FBO Alexander Black; Leon D. Black, UAD 11/30/92
FBO Benjamin Black; Leon D. Black, UAD 11/30/92 FBO Joshua Black; Leon D.
Black, UAD 11/30/92 FBO Victoria Black; Leon D. Black; John J. Hannan and
Richard Ressler ("Ressler") (each individually a "Bridge
Lender" and collectively the "Bridge Lenders"). Pursuant to the
Investment Agreement, the Bridge Lenders agreed to provide a backstop
commitment to the Qualified Offering and agreed to collectively backstop the
Qualified Offering by purchasing from the Company at a subscription price of
$0.12 per share of Common Stock any shares not purchased by the Company's
shareholders of record who were entitled to participate in the rights offering
(after giving effect to any oversubscriptions) up to 29,166,667 shares of
Common Stock for a total purchase price of $3.5 million (the "Backstop
Commitment"). In addition to their rights to purchase shares pursuant to
the Qualified Offering and the Backstop Commitment, the Bridge Lenders had the
option, in their sole discretion, to purchase from the Company, at the
subscription price, any other shares not purchased by the Company's
stockholders through the Qualified Offering (the "Purchase Option").
If, after giving effect to the Qualified Offering, the Backstop Commitment and
the Purchase Option, any of the Bridge Lenders shall have been unable to
exchange any portion of their or its Notes, the Company also offered each
Bridge Lender the right to purchase additional shares of Common Stock at the
subscription price (payable through the exchange of Bridge Loans for Common
Stock) such that each Bridge Lender shall have exchanged all of their or its
notes for shares of Common Stock (the "Additional Subscription
Offer"). In addition, if Ressler and Orchard collectively acquired less
than $1.0 million worth of shares of Common Stock as part of the Qualified
Offering, the Backstop Commitment, the Purchase Option and the Additional
Subscription Offer, the Company agreed to offer to Ressler and Orchard an
additional number of shares of Common Stock equal to the shortfall amount at
the subscription price.
Effective
June 30, 2011 the Company closed its rights offering. As part of the rights
offering and the Investment Agreement, the principal due on the Notes and the
Bridge Notes, in the aggregate amount of $4,000,000, and corresponding interest
in the amount of $126,850, were converted into Common stock at the rights
offering price of $0.12 per share. As a result of these transactions, the
Company satisfied its obligations with respect to the Notes and the Bridge
Notes and both were cancelled.
As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there was no
outstanding principal and interest on notes payable to related parties.
The discount on the aggregate $4 million notes issued on
February 17, 2011 and May 3, 2011 was recorded as interest accretion expense in
the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss using the
effective-interest method. Due to the conversion of the note the Company
expensed the full amount of the discount and recorded interest accretion
expense of $3,506,074 in the consolidated statement of operations and
comprehensive loss for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2011. The
convertible derivative liability in the aggregate amount of $2,654,730 recorded
in relation to the aggregate $4 million notes issued on February 17, 2011 and
May 3, 2011 was transferred to equity on the consolidated balance sheet at June
30, 2011 (see Note 12).
E15
NOTE 8 - BANK LOAN
Effective March 31, 2010, ESW's subsidiary, ESW Canada, had
entered into a demand revolving credit facility agreement with a Canadian
chartered bank, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ("CIBC") to meet
working capital requirements (the "Demand Credit Agreement"). The
Demand Credit Agreement had a credit limit of $4 million Canadian. Borrowings
under the facility were limited to a percentage of accounts receivable plus a
percentage of inventories (capped at $1 million Canadian or 50% of the accounts
receivable portion) less any prior ranking claims. The Demand Credit Agreement
was guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries, ESWC, ESWA, BBL, and ESWT,
through a general security agreement over all assets to CIBC. The facility had
been guaranteed to CIBC under EDC's Export Guarantee Program. Borrowings under
the Demand Credit Agreement bore interest at 2.25% above CIBC's prime rate of
interest. Obligations under the Demand Credit Agreement were collateralized by
a first-priority lien on the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries,
including accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other tangible and
intangible property, including the capital stock of all direct subsidiaries.
The terms relating to the Demand Credit Agreement specifically
noted that the Company maintain a tangible net worth of at least $4.0 million
Canadian. The Demand Credit Agreement contained, among other things, covenants,
representations and warranties and events of default customary for a facility
of this type for the Company and its subsidiaries. Such covenants included
certain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens,
acquisitions and other investments, mergers, consolidations, liquidations and
dissolutions, sales of assets, dividends and other repurchases in respect of
capital stock, voluntary prepayments of certain other indebtedness, capital
expenditures and transactions with affiliates, subject to certain exceptions.
Under certain conditions amounts outstanding under the Demand Credit Agreement
could be accelerated. Such events included failure to comply with covenants,
breach of representations or warranties in any material respect, non-payment or
acceleration of other material debt, entry of material judgments not covered by
insurance, or a change of control of the Company.
On November 8, 2010, November 26, 2010, and December 23, 2010,
the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ESWC, received the first, second and
third waivers, respectively, of certain financial covenants under its Demand
Credit Agreement with CIBC. Without the waivers, the Company's subsidiary would
not be in compliance with the current ratio and effective tangible net worth
covenants as set forth in the Demand Credit Agreement. In the event that the
Company and its subsidiary, ESWC, failed to comply with the terms of the waiver
and meet the current ratio and effective tangible net worth covenants prior to
the end of the waiver period, same would constitute an event of default and the
bank loan may need to be repaid unless a further waiver or modification to the
Demand Credit Agreement could be obtained.
The third waiver provided by CIBC was through January 31, 2011
and also provided for a fee payable to the lender for the extension, as well as
a reduction in the maximum security margin deficit as defined under the Demand
Credit Agreement (by either reducing borrowing or increasing the borrowing
base) and an increase in the annual interest rate to CIBC's prime rate plus
4.50% from CIBC's prime rate plus 2.25% effective January 1, 2011.
Effective
February 4, 2011, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ESWC, received a
fourth waiver of certain financial covenants under its Demand Credit Agreement
with CIBC. Without the waiver, the Company's subsidiary would not have been in
compliance with the current ratio and effective tangible net worth covenants as
set forth in the Demand Credit Agreement. The fourth waiver provided by CIBC
extended the waiver period from January 31, 2011 through February 14, 2011 and
also provided for a fee payable to CIBC for the extension as well as requiring
the elimination of any margin deficit by February 14, 2011. In the event the
Company and its subsidiary, ESWC, failed to comply with the terms of the waiver
and meet the current ratio and effective tangible net worth covenants prior to
the end of the waiver period, same could constitute an event of default as set
forth in the Demand Credit Agreement unless a further waiver or modification to
the Demand Credit Agreement could be obtained.
E16
The closing of the $3 million
unsecured subordinated promissory notes effective February 17, 2011 allowed the
Company and its subsidiaries to comply with covenants and obligations under the
Demand Credit Agreement with CIBC dated March 10, 2010.
Effective May 31, 2011, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary
ESWC entered into a further modification of its Demand Credit Agreement dated
March 10, 2010 (the "Credit Agreement") whereby it received an
extension on the term of its Demand Credit Agreement from its commercial lender
through June 30, 2011. The new modification was subject to all covenants and
the security margin under the Demand Credit Agreement remaining in order at all
times. The commercial lender and the Company agreed to reduce the Operating
Loan limit as defined in the Demand Credit Agreement to a maximum of $1,500,000
Canadian or the borrowing base established by the security margin if less; all
loans made by the commercial lender were to be satisfied and the credit
facilities cancelled upon the earlier of the completion of the Company's rights
offering or June 30, 2011. The commercial lender had also advised that any
reasonable request for an extension of the June 30, 2011 date would be
considered in light of the Company's rights offering. With the modification to
the Demand Credit Agreement, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary ESWC agreed
to pay a fee to its commercial lender for the extension including reasonable
legal and advisory fees.
Effective July 18, 2011, ESW’s wholly-owned subsidiary ESW
Canada Inc, paid its senior lender the amount of $1.5 million (Canadian
dollars) from the proceeds of the rights offering (see Note 12) to liquidate
the outstanding balance on the bank loan. The senior lender has also discharged
all liens, encumbrances and securities against the Company and its subsidiaries
and cancelled the March 31, 2010 demand revolving credit facility agreement.
As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $0 and
$3,424,889, respectively, was owed under the credit facility to CIBC.
NOTE
9 - REDEEMABLE CLASS A SPECIAL SHARES
700,000 Class A special
|
$453,900 (based on the
historical
|
shares authorized,
|
exchange rate at the time of
|
issued, and outstanding.
|
issuance.)
|
The redeemable Class A special shares were issued by the
Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, BBL, without par value, and are redeemable
on demand by the holder of the shares, which is a private Ontario Corporation,
at $700,000 Canadian (which translates to $688,310 U.S. and $703,801 U.S. at
December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively). As the redeemable Class A special
shares were issued by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, BBL, the maximum
value upon which the Company is liable is the net book value of BBL. As of
December 31, 2011, BBL had an accumulated deficit of $1,194,705 U.S.
($1,847,203 Canadian) and $1,192,858 U.S. ($1,845,375 Canadian) as of December
31, 2010, respectively therefore, the holder would be unable to redeem the
redeemable Class A special shares at their ascribed value.
E17
NOTE 10 - CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
Included in the consolidated financial statements at December
31, 2011 is the effect of an exchange feature included in the terms of the
Share Subscription Agreement for $3,000,000 of Convertible Debentures issued on
March 19, 2010, ("2010 Debentures") . The March 2010 Convertible
Debentures were fully converted, including interest, into 6,007,595 shares of
common stock on March 25, 2010. The exchange feature provided that if within
twelve months from March 19, 2010, the Company enters into or closes another
financing or other transaction (which for securities law purposes would be
integrable with the offer and sale of the Securities) on terms and conditions
more favorable to another purchaser, the terms and conditions of the 2010
Debentures shall be adjusted to reflect the more favorable terms. The exchange
feature was determined by the Company to be a freestanding financial instrument
and also to be a liability within the scope of ASC 480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity, since there is an inverse relationship between the
stock price of the Company and the Company's obligation. On December 31, 2010,
the Company evaluated the fair value of the exchange feature based on the
probability of closing another financing by March 18, 2011, and the fair value
of the number of incremental shares to be issued at a lower estimated issue
price. The probability of closing another financing by March 18, 2011, was
estimated to be 100% on December 31, 2010. The fair value of the Company's
common stock was determined by the closing price on the valuation date. On
December 31, 2010, an exchange feature liability of $1,680,000 was recorded for
the 2010 Debentures (see Note 12). Effective February 17, 2011, the Company and
the 2010 Debenture investors reached an agreement (“the anti-dilution agreement”)
whereby the investors would receive an approximate aggregate of 19,000,000
additional shares of Common Stock at an estimated price of $0.12 in conjunction
with certain rights under the Prior Subscription Agreements in the event the
Company closed a Qualified Offering (see Note 7). At March 31, 2011, the
exchange feature liability related to the 2010 Debenture was recorded at a fair
value of $2,280,000 with the change in fair value of exchange feature liability
of $578,739 recorded as an expense in the consolidated statement of operations
and comprehensive loss.
At
June 30, 2011, concurrent with the closing of the rights offering, the
anti-dilution agreements were also closed. The exchange feature liability was
transferred to equity towards the issuance of 19,000,000 shares of Common Stock
at a price of $0.12 per share.
EXCHANGE
FEATURE LIABILITY TABLE
Transaction
Detail
|
Original
Instrument
|
Additional
Shares
|
Exchange
Feature
Liability
December 31,
2010
|
Change in fair
value of exchange
feature liability
March 31,
2011
|
Exchange
Feature
Liability
March 31,
2011
|
Exchange
Feature
Liability
December 31,
2011
|
Comments
|
March
2010 Offering
|
Convertible
Debenture
|
19,000,000
|
$ 1,680,000
|
$ 600,000
|
$ 2,280,000
|
$ --
|
See
Note 10
|
November
2010 Offering
|
Common
Stock and Warrants
|
1,750,000
|
225,600
|
(9,300)
|
216,300
|
--
|
See
Note 12
|
December
2010 Offering
|
Common
Stock and Warrants
|
1,750,000
|
228,262
|
(11,961)
|
216,300
|
--
|
See
Note 12
|
|
Totals
|
22,500,000
|
$ 2,133,862
|
$ 578,739
|
$ 2,712,600
|
$ --
|
|
There were no convertible debentures outstanding and zero
corresponding accrued interest as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, the debt discount of $768,981 and deferred cost of
$117,131 were fully amortized and expensed due to the conversion of the
debentures effective March 25, 2010.
LEGAL FEES RELATED TO THE 2010 CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
The Company had also recorded a deferred cost asset of $80,625
for legal fees paid in relation to the issuance of the 2010 Debentures. The
deferred costs were being amortized over the term of the 2010 Debentures using
the straight line method. At December 31, 2010, the deferred cost assets were
fully amortized due to the conversion of the debentures effective March 25,
2010.
E18
NOTE
11- INCOME TAXES
As
of December 31, 2011, there are tax loss carry forwards for Federal income tax
purposes of approximately $27,762,196 available to offset future taxable income
in the United States. The tax loss carry forwards expire in various years
through 2031. The Company does not expect to incur a Federal income tax
liability in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, a valuation allowance for the
full amount of the related deferred tax asset of approximately $9,716,769 has
been established until realizations of the tax benefit from the loss carry
forwards meet the "more likely than not" criteria.
|
|
LOSS
CARRY
|
YEAR
|
|
FORWARD
|
1999
|
|
$
407,067
|
2000
|
|
2,109,716
|
2001
|
|
2,368,368
|
2002
|
|
917,626
|
2003
|
|
637,458
|
2004
|
|
1,621,175
|
2005
|
|
2,276,330
|
2006
|
|
3,336,964
|
2007
|
|
3,378,355
|
2008
|
|
3,348,694
|
2009
|
|
2,927,096
|
2010
|
|
2,269,987
|
2011
|
|
2,163,360
|
Total
|
|
$27,762,196
|
Additionally,
as of December 31, 2011, the Company's two wholly-owned Canadian subsidiaries
had non-capital tax loss carry forwards of approximately $13,352,099 available
to be used, in future periods, to offset taxable income. The loss carry
forwards expire in various years through 2031. The deferred tax asset of
approximately $3,538,306 has been fully offset by a valuation allowance until
realization of the tax benefit from the non-capital tax loss carry forwards are
more likely than not.
|
|
LOSS
CARRY
|
|
|
FORWARD
FOREIGN
|
YEAR
|
|
OPERATIONS
|
2004
|
|
$
5,935
|
2005
|
|
--
|
2006
|
|
560,644
|
2007
|
|
7,052
|
2008
|
|
4,020,674
|
2009
|
|
2,798,436
|
2010
|
|
2,588,248
|
2011
|
|
3,371,110
|
Total
|
|
$13,352,099
|
E19
|
For
the period ended December 31,
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
Statutory tax rate:
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
35.00%
|
|
35.00%
|
Foreign
|
26.50%
|
|
31.00%
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
$(5,799,781)
|
|
$(
6,603,329)
|
Foreign
|
(3,327,307)
|
|
(2,844,312)
|
|
$(9,127,088)
|
|
$(
9,447,641)
|
Expected income tax recovery
|
$(2,945,043)
|
|
$(3,192,617)
|
|
|
|
|
Differences in income tax
resulting from:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment
(foreign operations)
|
138,779
|
|
44,330
|
Change in fair value of exchange
feature liability
|
202,559
|
|
707,424
|
Financing charge on embedded
derivative liability
|
169,785
|
|
--
|
Inducement premium on conversion
of debentures
|
--
|
|
1,018,455
|
Stock-based compensation
|
62,980
|
|
32,616
|
Gain on convertible derivative
|
(467,756)
|
|
--
|
Long-term debt interest expense
accretion
|
1,227,126
|
|
269,143
|
Mark to market adjustment on
advance share subscription
|
--
|
|
(436,492)
|
Accrued interest on loans
|
--
|
|
(116,212)
|
|
(1,611,570)
|
|
(1,673,353)
|
Benefit of losses not recognized
|
1,611,570
|
|
1,673,353
|
Income tax provision (recovery)
per financial statements
|
$
--
|
|
$
--
|
Components of deferred income tax assets are as follows:
|
As
at December 31,
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
$
488,494
|
|
$
119,226
|
Tax loss carry forwards
|
13,255,075
|
|
11,550,796
|
Total
|
13,743,569
|
|
11,670,022
|
Valuation allowance
|
(13,743,569)
|
|
(11,670,022)
|
Carrying value
|
$
--
|
|
$
--
|
Based on the Company’s current tax loss position tax benefits
to be recognized is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by
taxing authorities. The Company does not believe there will be any material
changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next twelve months.
The Company will recognize interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Accrued interest
and penalties will be included within the related tax liability line in the
consolidated balance sheet.
In many cases the Company's uncertain tax positions are
related to tax years that remain subject to examination by tax authorities. The
following describes the open tax years, by major tax jurisdiction, as of
December 31, 2011:
United States - Federal
|
2007 - present
|
United States - State
|
2007 - present
|
Canada - Federal
|
2008 - present
|
Canada - Provincial
|
2008 - present
|
E20
Valuation allowances reflect the
deferred tax benefits that management is uncertain of the Company's ability to
utilize in the future.
NOTE 12 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
On March 25, 2010, the Company issued 43,756,653 shares of
common stock in connection with the conversion of 2008 Debentures and 2009 Debentures
into equity .
On March 25, 2010, the Company issued 6,007,595 shares of
restricted common stock in connection with the conversion of 2010 Debentures
into equity.
On November 30, 2010, the Company issued 4,375,668 shares as
an inducement premium to the holders to convert all convertible debentures
outstanding as of March 25, 2010.
Effective October 14, 2010 the Company's Board of Directors
approved an increase in the authorized share capital.
Effective November 9, 2010 and December 8, 2010, the Company
closed on its first tranche and second tranche of a unit offering in the amount
of $300,000 per tranche for gross proceeds of $600,000 whereby the Company
issued 1,500,000 ("Unit Offering") units. The unit offering was for
up to $5 million. The units were in the form of shares of the Company's common
stock, par value $0.001 at $0.40 per share plus for each share of Common Stock
subscribed to under the unit offer the investor would receive one warrant, the
exercise price would be $0.55; if an Investor Warrant was exercised between the
first and second years from issuance, the exercise price would be $0.65. All
investor warrants as issued would be subject to adjustment in all respects in
the event of a stock split or similar adjustment by the Company. A commission
of 4% of the gross proceeds was paid from the proceeds of the unit offering and
7.5 units for every $100 of the gross proceeds raised were payable for brokers’
fees were treated as a cost of capital and no income statement recognition was
required.
The Share Subscription Agreement for the units contained an
exchange feature which provides that if within six months from effective date
of closing, the Company entered into or closed another financing or other
transaction (which for securities law purposes would be integrable with the
offer and sale of the Securities) on terms and conditions more favorable to
another purchaser, the terms and conditions of the unit offering would be
adjusted to reflect the more favorable terms. The exchange feature was
determined by the Company to be a freestanding financial instrument and also to
be a liability within the scope of ASC. On November 9, 2010, December 8, 2010
and December 31, 2010, the Company evaluated the fair value of the exchange
feature based on the probability of closing another financing within six months
and the fair value of the number of incremental shares and warrants to be
issued at a lower estimated issue price for units. The probability of closing
another financing in the next six months on November 9, 2010 and December 8,
2010 was estimated to be 50% and on December 31, 2010 was estimated to be 100%.
The
fair value of the Company's common stock was determined by the closing price on
the valuation date and the fair value of the warrants was determined using a
binomial option valuation model. Key assumptions for the binomial option
valuation were as follows:
E21
November
9, 2010 Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 9, 2010 -
|
|
Dec. 31, 2010 -
|
|
|
lower estimated
|
|
lower estimated
|
Valuation Date
|
Nov. 9, 2010
|
strike price
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
strike price
|
Strike Price - second year
|
$0.65
|
$0.63
|
$0.65
|
$0.36
|
Strike Price - first year
|
$0.55
|
$0.54
|
$0.55
|
$0.30
|
Closing market price
|
$0.39
|
$0.39
|
$0.22
|
$0.22
|
Volatility
|
135.72%
|
135.72%
|
113.47%
|
113.47%
|
Time to expiration
|
2
years
|
2
years
|
1.83
years
|
1.83
years
|
Risk free rate
|
0.46%
|
0.46%
|
0.61%
|
0.61%
|
Dividend yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 8, 2010 Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 8, 2010 -
|
|
Dec. 31, 2010 -
|
|
|
lower estimated
|
|
lower estimated
|
Valuation Date
|
Dec. 8, 2010
|
strike price
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
strike price
|
Strike Price - second year
|
$0.65
|
$0.39
|
$0.65
|
$0.36
|
Strike Price - first year
|
$0.55
|
$0.33
|
$0.55
|
$0.30
|
Closing market price
|
$0.24
|
$0.24
|
$0.22
|
$0.22
|
Volatility
|
132.07%
|
132.07%
|
117.03%
|
117.03%
|
Time to expiration
|
2
years
|
2
years
|
1.92
years
|
1.92
years
|
Risk free rate
|
0.63%
|
0.63%
|
0.61%
|
0.61%
|
Dividend yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
On December 31, 2010, an exchange feature liability of
$453,862 was recorded for the unit offering.
Effective February 17, 2011, the Company and the Unit Offering
investors reached an agreement whereby the investors received an approximate
aggregate of 3,500,000 additional shares of Common Stock at an estimated price
of $0.12 in conjunction with certain rights under the Share Subscription
Agreements in the event the Company closed a Qualified Offering (see Note 7).
At March 31, 2011 the exchange feature liability related to the shares in the
Unit Offering was recorded at a fair value of $432,600. At March 31, 2011 the
exchange feature liability related to the warrants in the Unit Offering was
recorded at a fair value of $0 since the probability of Company exchanging
warrants with a lower strike price is estimated to be 0%. The change in fair
value of exchange feature liability related to the Unit Offering of $(21,262)
was recorded as a reduction of the loss on fair value of exchange feature
liability related to the 2010 Debentures.
The
following table sets forth a summary of the shares issued on July 15, 2011 as a
result of the closing of the rights offering effective June 30, 2011:
|
Number
of Shares
|
Amount
|
Subscription receivable at June
30, 2011
|
32,143,170
|
$3,857,180
|
Conversion of notes payable to
related parties and related accrued interest (see Note 7)
|
34,390,418
|
4,126,850
|
Conversion of accrued expenses
|
136,424
|
16,374
|
Reclassification of conversion
option liabilities to equity (see Note 7)
|
--
|
2,654,730
|
Conversion of exchange feature
liability (see Note 10)
|
22,500,000
|
2,712,600
|
Rights offering costs
|
--
|
(419,410)
|
Total
|
89,170,012
|
$12,948,324
|
E22
Effective November 6, 2011 the Company issued 400,000
restricted shares of common stock to two board members in connection with
restricted stock grants under the 2010 stock incentive plan.
Effective November 6, 2011 the Company issued 166,668
restricted shares of common stock to four board members in lieu of outstanding
board fees.
Effective December 31, 2011 the Company issued 250,000
restricted shares of common stock to five board members in connection with
restricted stock grants under the 2010 stock incentive plan.
NOTE 13 - STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANT GRANTS
On
April 15, 2010 the Board of Directors granted an aggregate award of 900,000
stock options to a former executive officer and former director and one
director. The options vest over a period of three years with an exercise price
of $0.65 (fair market value of the Company's common stock as of the date of
grant) with expiry five years from the date of award. Effective February 7,
2011, with the resignation of a director, the unvested portion of the stock
options cancelled as a result of the resignation. The balance of the stock
option expense of the April 15, 2010 award is as follows:
DATE
|
STOCK
OPTION
|
|
EXPENSE
|
April 15, 2011
|
$
62,127
|
April 15, 2012
|
$
82,836
|
April 15, 2013
|
$
20,709
|
During the year ended December 31, 2011, 475,000 stock options
were issued, of which 225,000 of these stock options reported previously as
vesting over three years starting June 30, 2012. The 225,000 stock options
compensation expense was to be recognized as an expense over the vesting
period, which was to originally begin June 30, 2012. Consequently the Company
had not previously recognized a compensation expense in relation to these
options. As of October 6, 2011 the vesting terms of these 225,000 options were
amended to be as of October 6, 2011 and vest immediately at that date. The
amended stock option expense for these options has been recorded in the current
reporting period.
A
summary of option transactions, including those granted pursuant to the terms
of certain employment and other agreements is as follows:
|
STOCK
|
WEIGHTED
|
|
PURCHASE
|
AVERAGE
|
DETAILS
|
OPTIONS
|
EXERCISE
PRICE
|
OUTSTANDING, JANUARY 1, 2010
|
3,670,000
|
$
0.76
|
Granted
|
900,000
|
$
0.65
|
Expired
|
(970,000)
|
($
0.97)
|
OUTSTANDING, DECEMBER 31, 2010
|
3,600,000
|
$
0.68
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
475,000
|
$
0.12
|
Expired or Cancelled
|
(500,000)
|
($
0.73)
|
OUTSTANDING, DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
3,575,000
|
$
0.60
|
At December 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010 the outstanding
options have a weighted average remaining life of 13 months and 23 months,
respectively.
E23
The weighted average fair value of options granted during
2011 were $0.02 and $0.07 and options granted during 2010 was $0.41 and were
estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, using the following
assumptions:
|
2010
|
2011
|
Expected volatility
|
117%
|
111%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.08%
|
0.42%
|
Expected life
|
4
yrs
|
1.5
yrs
|
Dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Forfeiture rate
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
The
Black-Scholes option-pricing model used by the Company to calculate options and
warrant values was developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable,
fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly
differ from the Company's stock purchase options and warrants. The model also
requires highly subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility
and expected time until exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values.
Accordingly, management believes that this model does not necessarily provide a
reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company's stock options and
warrants.
At
December 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding options as follows:
NUMBER
OF
|
EXERCISE
|
|
OPTIONS
|
PRICE
|
EXPIRATION
DATE
|
2,150,000
|
$0.71
|
February
16, 2012
|
100,000
|
$1.00
|
February
8, 2013
|
250,000
|
$0.27
|
August
6, 2013
|
600,000
|
$0.65
|
April
15, 2015
|
250,000
|
$0.12
|
December
31, 2012
|
225,000
|
$0.12
|
June
30, 2016
|
3,575,000
|
|
|
Warrants
issued in connection with various private placements of equity securities are
treated as a cost of capital and no income statement recognition is required. A
summary of warrant transactions is as follows:
|
|
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
|
DETAILS
|
WARRANT
SHARES
|
EXERCISE
PRICE
|
OUTSTANDING, JANUARY 1, 2010
|
--
|
$
--
|
Granted
|
1,545,000
|
$
0.65
|
Exercised
|
--
|
$
--
|
Expired
|
--
|
$
--
|
OUTSTANDING, DECEMBER 31, 2010
& DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
1,545,000
|
$
0.65
|
Effective November 9, 2010 and December 8, 2010, the Company
closed on its first tranche and second tranche of a unit offering in the amount
of $300,000 per tranche for gross proceeds of $600,000 whereby the Company
issued 1,500,000 units. The unit offering was for up to $5 million. The units
were in the form of shares of the Company's common stock, at $0.40 per share
plus for each share of Common Stock subscribed to under the unit offer the
investor received one warrant exercisable for 1 share of common stock at $0.55;
if an Investor Warrant is exercised between the first and second years from
issuance, the exercise price will be $0.65. All investor warrants as issued are
subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split or similar adjustment by
the Company. A commission of 4% of the gross proceeds was paid and 7.5 units
for every $100 of the gross proceeds raised were payable for brokers’ fees.
E24
No warrants were issued during the
year ended December 31, 2011.
Effective November 6, 2011 the board approved restricted stock
grants to 7 board members under the 2010 stock incentive plan, as per the terms
of the grant each of the 7 board members will receive 150,000 shares vesting in
equal parts on December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013
subject to the execution of the requisite grant agreements. The board also
approved restricted stock grants to 2 board members for serving as chair to various
committees, as per the terms of the grant each of the 2 board members will
receive 200,000 shares vesting immediately subject to the execution of the
requisite grant agreements. Stock based compensation expense will be recorded
as of the vesting terms of the grants. Of the vested shares 650,000 restricted
shares of common stock have been issued as of December 31, 2011.
During
the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, $180,761 and $93,189, respectively,
has been recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss for stock based compensation.
NOTE 14 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended December 31, 2011, in addition to fees
and salaries as well as reimbursement of business expenses, transactions with
related parties include:
• $4,000,000 issuance of unsecured subordinated promissory
notes (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements).
• Investment agreement with Bridge lenders Effective May 10,
2011, (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements).
• The effect of an exchange feature included in the terms of
the Share Subscription Agreement for $3,000,000 of Convertible Debentures
issued on March 19, 2010 ("2010 Debentures") and fully converted
including interest into 6,007,595 shares of common stock on March 25, 2010. The
exchange feature provides that if within twelve months from March 19, 2010, the
Company entered into or closed another financing or other transaction (which
for securities law purposes would be integrable with the offer and sale of the
Securities) on terms and conditions more favorable to another purchaser, the
terms and conditions of the 2010 Debentures shall be adjusted to reflect the
more favorable terms. The exchange feature was determined by the Company to be
freestanding financial instrument and also to be a liability within the scope
of ASC 480 Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity since there is an inverse
relationship between the stock price of the Company and the Company's
obligation. On December 31, 2010, the Company evaluated the fair value of the
exchange feature based on the probability of closing another financing by March
18, 2011 and the fair value of the number of incremental shares to be issued at
a lower estimated issue price. The probability of closing another financing by
March 18, 2011 was estimated to be 100% on December 31, 2010. The fair value of
the Company's common stock was determined by the closing price on the valuation
date. On December 31, 2010, an exchange feature liability of $1,680,000 was
recorded for the 2010 Debentures (see Note 12). Effective February 17, 2011,
the Company and the 2010 Debenture investors reached an agreement whereby the
investors will receive an approximate aggregate of 19,000,000 additional shares
of Common Stock in conjunction with certain rights under the Prior Subscription
Agreements in the event the Company closed a qualified offering (see Note 7).
At March 31, 2011 the exchange feature liability related to the convertible
debentures was re-valued to $2,280,000 with the change in fair value of
exchange feature liability of $578,738 expense recorded in the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss. In March 2010, Orchard
invested $1 million in the $3 million convertible debentures offering; of the
exchange feature liability $760,000 was attributed to the investment made by
Orchard based on their relative contribution to the March 2010 subscription,
this amount was transferred to equity as of June 30, 2011. Orchard received
6,333,333 additional shares of Common Stock in conjunction with certain rights
under the Prior Subscription Agreements as the Company closed its Qualified
Offering on June 30, 2011 (see Note 7).
E25
• $275,000 related to services
provided by Orchard Capital Corporation under a services agreement effective
January 30, 2011. On April 19, 2011, the Company's Board of Directors ratified
a Services Agreement ("Agreement") between the Company and Orchard
Capital Corporation ("Orchard") which was approved by the Company's
Compensation Committee. Under the Agreement, which was effective as of January
30, 2011, Orchard agreed to provide services that may be mutually agreed to by
and between Orchard and the Company including those duties customarily
performed by the Chairman of the Board and executive of the Company as well as
providing advice and consultation on general corporate matters and other
projects as may be assigned by the Company's Board of Directors as needed.
Orchard has agreed to appoint Mark Yung, who is also employed by Orchard, as
the Company's Executive Chairman to act on Orchard's behalf and provide the
services to the Company under the Agreement. Orchard reserves the right to
replace Mr. Yung as the provider of services under the Agreement at its sole
option. The Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days
written notice unless otherwise provided for under the Agreement. Compensation
under the agreement is the sum of $300,000 per annum plus reimbursement for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Orchard. The agreement includes other
standard terms including indemnification and limitation liability provisions.
Orchard is controlled by Richard Ressler; affiliated entities of Orchard as
well as Richard Ressler own shares of the Company.
• Mr. Nitin
Amersey who is a director of the Company is listed as a control person with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of Bay City Transfer Agency Registrar Inc.,
the Company's transfer agent. He has no ownership equity in Bay City Transfer
Agency Registrar Inc. nor is he an officer or a director of Bay City Transfer
Agency Registrar Inc. For the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and
2010, the Company paid Bay City Transfer Agency Registrar Inc. $18,054 and
$7,363 respectively.
For the
year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, Mr. Nitin Amersey received $0 and
$25,500 for consulting services to the Company.
Mr. Peter Bloch a prior director of the Company provided
consulting services to the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2011 and
2010, the Company paid Mr. Bloch $88,796 and $112,104 for consulting services.
During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010
additional transactions with related parties included $6,134,024 related to
conversion of convertible debentures including interest of $634,024 thereon
into common stock; $1,032,849 related to inducement on early conversion of
convertible debentures; and the repayment of $511,342 principal and interest on
promissory note in addition to salaries and reimbursement of business expenses.
NOTE 15 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LEASES
Effective November 24, 2004, the Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, ESWA, entered into a lease agreement for approximately 40,220
square feet of leasehold space at 2 Bethlehem Pike Industrial Center,
Montgomery Township, Pennsylvania. The leasehold space houses the Company's
research and development facilities and also houses ESW’s new manufacturing
operations. The lease commenced on January 15, 2005 and was to expire January
31, 2010. Effective October 16, 2009, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary
ESWA entered into a lease renewal agreement with Nappen & Associates for
the leasehold property in Pennsylvania. There were no modifications to the
original economic terms of the lease under the lease renewal agreement. Under
the terms of the lease renewal, the lease term will now expire February 28,
2013. Effective March 31, 2011, ESWA entered into a lease amendment agreement
with Nappen & Associates for the leasehold property in Pennsylvania,
whereby ESWA has the sole option to extend the expiry of the lease agreement by
an additional 3 years if exercised, six months prior to February 28, 2013;
there were no modifications to the original economic terms of the lease.
E26
Effective December 20, 2004, the
Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ESWC, entered into an offer to lease
agreement for approximately 50,000 square feet of leasehold space in Concord,
Ontario, Canada. The leasehold space houses the Company's executive offices and
previously housed the manufacturing operations. The possession of the leasehold
space took place on May 24, 2005 and the term of the lease was extended to
September 30, 2010. ESWC renewed its lease agreement at the current property
for an additional five year term. The renewed lease period commenced on October
1, 2010 and ends on September 30, 2015.
The
following is a summary of the minimum annual lease payments, for both leases;
YEAR
|
|
|
|
2012
|
$454,642
|
2013
|
306,305
|
2014
|
283,603
|
2015
|
212,703
|
|
$1,257,253
|
LEGAL MATTERS
From time to time, the Company may be involved in a variety of
claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising from the ordinary course
of our business, breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax
and other matters. Although claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are
inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, ESW
believes that the resolution of current pending matters will not have a
material adverse effect on its business, consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flow. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can
have an adverse impact on ESW because of legal costs, diversion of management
resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that an unfavorable
resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially and
adversely affect ESW's financial position, results of operations or cash flows
in a particular period.
CAPITAL
LEASE OBLIGATION
The
Company is committed to the following lease payments in connection with the
acquisition of equipment under capital leases:
YEAR
|
|
|
|
2012
|
$1,259
|
|
|
Less imputed interest
|
(18)
|
Total obligation under capital
lease
|
1,241
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
(1,241)
|
Total long-term portion
|
$ 0
|
The Company incurred $17 and $2,374 of interest expense on capital
lease obligation for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
E27
NOTE 16 – OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company also derives revenue (4.8% of total revenue in
2011, and 1.5% in 2010) from providing air testing and environmental
certification services. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, all
revenues were generated from the United States. Expenses incurred in the United
States in 2011 relate to air testing, environmental certification services and
catalyst manufacturing operation, in 2010 catalyst manufacturing operations
were located in Canada. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, cost
of sales of $2,753,997 and $289,369, officers' compensation and directors fees
of $74,645 and $117,375, marketing, office and general costs of $940,304 and
$482,880, consulting and professional fees of $74,136 and $74,170, depreciation
and amortization of $302,207 and $239,319 and research and development of
$353,922 and $649,052 (net of grant funding), respectively.
As of December 31, 2011, property, plant and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation, located at the air testing facility and the
manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania amounted to $943,500 (2010 - $1,182,263)
and $281,088 (2010 - $0), respectively. All remaining long lived assets are
located in Concord, Ontario.
NOTE 17 - RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
During March 2011, the Board of Directors approved a
restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”), that the Company’s executive
management then implemented. As part of the Restructuring Plan the Company
accrued the expenses related to severance agreements with its former Chief
Executive Officer, Vice President of Operations and Director of Sales and
certain production employees. As of December 31, 2011, $0 (December 31, 2010 -
$0) was included in accrued liabilities related to the balance of severance
payments still outstanding. No further expense related to severance payments is
expected.
In August 2011, the Company’s restructuring plan was expanded
to include a reorganization plan to reduce its overhead costs by re-locating
its Canadian manufacturing operations into its facilities located in the United
States. The Board of Directors approved the amendment to the Restructuring
Plan. ESW believes that the synergies from operating at a single location will
provide significant financial and logistical advantages, as well as synergies
with its testing operations also located in the same facility. ESW has
transitioned the production from Concord, Ontario, Canada to its existing
facility located in Montgomeryville, PA, United States. ESW recognized a loss
on impairment of property plant and equipment of $0.16 million for the twelve
month period ended December 31, 2011 and restructuring charges amounted to
$1.38 million. In addition, ESW expects to incur an additional $0.1 million of
restructuring charges associated with the closure of the facility and transfer
of manufacturing equipment in 2012. Key components of our transition plan have
been completed by December 31, 2011.
In accordance with ASC 420-10-25-11 costs to terminate an
operating lease arise when a lessee will either: (a) terminate an operating
lease; or (b) if it is unable to terminate the lease, discontinue its use of
the asset and continue to make lease payments over the remaining term of the
lease without benefit. When the lease will be terminated, the lessee should
recognize a liability for the cost of terminating the lease at the time the
lease is terminated. If the lease will not be terminated and the lessee will
continue to incur costs under the lease without future benefit, the lessee
should recognize a liability on the cease-use date (the date the lessee
discontinues its use of the asset). In accordance with paragraphs 420-10-30-7
through 30-9, a liability for the remaining lease rentals, reduced by actual
(or estimated) sublease rentals, would be recognized and measured at its fair
value at the cease-use date. In accordance with paragraphs 420-10-35-1 through
35-4:, the liability would be adjusted for changes, if any, resulting from
revisions to estimated cash flows after the cease-use date, measured using the
credit-adjusted risk-free rate that was used to measure the liability
initially. The fair value estimate at the cease-use date amounts to $0.14
million associated with the release of its manufacturing facility at Concord,
Ontario, Canada. This fair value estimate will be re-measured and recorded as a
liability at June 30, 2012 the expected release date of the facility (revised
from previous estimate which was to release by December 31, 2011), any
sub-lease or rent earned from the Concord, Ontario, Canada facility in excess
of the fair value estimate will be used to offset this liability.
E28
Major components of the restructuring expenses are tabulated
below:
Details
|
Budgeted
Restructuring
Costs
|
Three months ended
December 31, 2011
|
Twelve months ended
December 31, 2011
|
Severance agreements
|
$670,870
|
$103,265
|
$748,155
|
Training and set up expenses
|
384,500
|
48,566
|
172,748
|
Travel and moving expenses
|
93,127
|
28,708
|
125,395
|
Software impairment
|
--
|
--
|
133,542
|
Product line changes
|
--
|
--
|
125,113
|
Others
|
20,873
|
57,062
|
80,732
|
Totals
|
$1,169,370
|
$237,601
|
$1,385,685
|
Restructuring charges relate to changes in the management and
reductions in work force of the Company's subsidiary, ESW Canada Inc., hiring,
training, moving, relocation charges related to the setup of the new
subsidiary, Technology Fabricators Inc., and write downs related to changes in
business strategy, product and software as a result of the decision to relocate
operations. Budgeted amounts include amounts estimated for moving, additional
training and relocation expenses that have not been accrued as of December 31,
2011 as these items are expensed as incurred.
The Company expensed amounts related to severance agreements
with its former Chief Executive Officer, Vice President of Operations and
Director of Sales and certain production employees, no further expense related
to severance payments are expected related to the 2011 restructuring.
NOTE 18 - LOSS PER SHARE
Potential common shares of 3,575,000 related to ESW's
outstanding stock options and 1,545,000 shares related to ESW's outstanding
warrants, were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share for the
year ended December 31, 2011 because the inclusion of these shares would be
anti-dilutive.
Potential common shares of 3,600,000 related to ESW's
outstanding stock options and 4,375,665 shares related to ESW's advance share
subscription were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share for
the year ended December 31, 2010 because the inclusion of these shares would be
anti-dilutive.
Consequently, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010,
basic and diluted loss per share are equal. The reconciliation of the number of
shares used to calculate the diluted loss per share is calculated as follows:
E29
|
|
For
the Year ended
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
.
|
NUMERATOR
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year
|
$
|
(9,127,088)
|
$
|
(9,447,641)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on
long-term debt
|
|
-
|
|
183,858
|
Amortization
of deferred costs
|
|
-
|
|
117,131
|
Long-term
debt accretion
|
|
-
|
|
768,981
|
Inducement
premium
|
|
-
|
|
2,909,872
|
Mark to
market adjustment on advance share subscription
|
|
-
|
|
(1,247,119)
|
Change in
fair value of exchange feature liability
|
|
578,739
|
|
2,021,213
|
Interest on
notes payable to related party
|
|
126,850
|
|
11,342
|
Interest
accretion expense
|
|
3,506,074
|
|
-
|
Financing
charge on embedded derivative liability
|
|
485,101
|
|
|
Gain on
convertible derivative
|
|
(1,336,445)
|
|
-
|
Bank fees
related to credit facility covenant waivers
|
|
154,205
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,612,564)
|
$
|
(4,682,363)
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
DENOMINATOR
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding
|
|
170,818,147
|
|
112,793,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of :
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
Warrants
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
Exchange
feature liability share
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
Exchange
of unsecured subordinated promissory notes
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
and
rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
170,818,147
|
|
112,793,477
|
NOTE 19 - RISK MANAGEMENT
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
AND ECONOMIC
DEPENDENCE
The Company's cash balances are maintained in various banks in
Canada and the United States. Deposits held in banks in the United States are
insured up to $250,000 per depositor for each bank by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation. Deposits held in banks in Canada are insured up to
$100,000 Canadian per depositor for each bank by The Canada Deposit Insurance
Corporation, a federal Crown corporation. Actual balances at times may exceed
these limits.
Accounts Receivable and Concentrations of Credit Risk: The
Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition and generally does not require collateral from its customers. The
Company also manages its credit risk by insuring certain of its accounts
receivable. Three of its customers accounted for 41.2%, 15.7% and 10.6%, of the
Company's revenue during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 37.4%, 25.1% and
14.0%, respectively, of its accounts receivable as of December 31, 2011.
E30
Three of the Company's customers
accounted for 21%, 19%, and 13%, of the Company's revenue during the year ended
December 31, 2010 and 48%, 21%, and 13%, respectively, of its accounts
receivable as at December 31, 2010.
For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company purchased
approximately 28.7% and 13.5% of its inventory from two vendors (2010 – two
vendors 27.0% and 11.1%). The accounts payable to these two vendors aggregated
approximately $511,271 and $786,163 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
NOTE 20 - COMPARATIVE FIGURES
Certain 2010 figures have been reclassified to conform to the
current financial statement presentation.
NOTE 21 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Effective February 3, 2012 ESW’s wholly-owned non-operational
subsidiary BBL Technologies Inc., filed for bankruptcy in the Province of
Ontario, Canada. Estimation of the effect of the bankruptcy proceedings on the
consolidated financial statements of ESW cannot be made until the bankruptcy
procedures are complete.
Effective March 5, 2012, ESW’s board approved the financing of
ESW America’s purchase of new dynamometers and air testing equipment under the
Pennsylvania Department Of Community & Economic Development - Machinery
& Equipment Loan Fund (“MELF”). MELF is designed to assist Pennsylvania
businesses in modernizing and upgrading their plants through low interest,
long-term loans for machinery and equipment. ESW America has been approved for
$0.5 million of MELF funding.
E31
EXHIBIT F
Financial statements for the quarter ended september 30, 2012
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEPTEMBER 30,
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4)
|
$ 559,109
|
|
$ 1,103,649
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
for doubtful accounts of $217,732 (2011 -
$1,398) (Note 2)
|
783,747
|
|
1,204,734
|
|
Inventory, net of reserve of $252,473 (2011
- $223,007) (Note 5)
|
2,443,494
|
|
2,431,027
|
|
Prepaid expenses and sundry assets
|
162,928
|
|
295,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
3,949,278
|
|
5,034,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment under
construction (Note 6)
|
577,610
|
|
198,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of
accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation of $4,030,007 (2011 -
$6,867,760) (Note 6)
|
1,005,913
|
|
1,271,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 5,532,801
|
|
$ 6,505,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$ 1,283,179
|
|
$ 1,384,972
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
649,165
|
|
592,760
|
|
Redeemable Class A special shares (Note 7)
|
-
|
|
453,900
|
|
Customer deposits
|
3,000
|
|
-
|
|
Current portion of loan payable (Note 16)
|
37,058
|
|
-
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligation
(Note 12)
|
-
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
1,972,402
|
|
2,432,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable (Note 16)
|
228,613
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
2,201,015
|
|
2,432,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity (Notes 9 and 10)
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000
(2011 - 250,000,000)
|
|
|
shares authorized; 219,450,447 (2011 -
219,450,447)
|
|
|
|
|
shares issued and outstanding
|
219,450
|
|
219,450
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
56,668,756
|
|
56,606,629
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(53,556,420)
|
|
(52,753,926)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
3,331,786
|
|
4,072,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 5,532,801
|
|
$ 6,505,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial
statements.
|
|
F1
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
AND COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
|
FOR THE NINE AND
THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
|
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
NINE MONTHS PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
|
|
THREE MONTHS PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
Revenue
|
$7,669,063
|
|
$8,314,076
|
|
$2,793,358
|
|
$3,213,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
5,002,206
|
|
7,091,546
|
|
1,802,470
|
|
2,506,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
2,666,857
|
|
1,222,530
|
|
990,888
|
|
706,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing, office and general expenses
|
2,548,309
|
|
2,872,802
|
|
682,799
|
|
865,237
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
-
|
|
1,148,083
|
|
-
|
|
624,809
|
|
Research and development costs
|
477,582
|
|
591,764
|
|
163,264
|
|
257,867
|
|
Officers' compensation and directors' fees
|
473,006
|
|
568,290
|
|
161,415
|
|
161,304
|
|
Consulting and professional fees
|
177,946
|
|
215,126
|
|
42,333
|
|
67,670
|
|
Foreign exchange loss / (gain)
|
63,698
|
|
68,222
|
|
20,655
|
|
(16,497)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Note 6)
|
152,726
|
|
292,911
|
|
37,609
|
|
78,406
|
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
(Note 6)
|
29,984
|
|
275,867
|
|
1,039
|
|
(35,437)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,923,251
|
|
6,033,065
|
|
1,109,114
|
|
2,003,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
(1,256,394)
|
|
(4,810,535)
|
|
(118,226)
|
|
(1,296,680)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on deconsolidation of subsidiary (Note
7)
|
453,900
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Change in fair value of exchange feature
liability (Note 11)
|
-
|
|
(578,739)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Interest on notes payable to related party
|
-
|
|
(126,850)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Interest accretion expense
|
-
|
|
(3,506,074)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Financing charge on embedded derivative
liability
|
-
|
|
(485,101)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Gain on convertible derivative
|
-
|
|
1,336,445
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Bank fees related to credit facility
covenant waivers
|
-
|
|
(154,205)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Gain on disposal of property and equipment
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(5,583)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
(802,494)
|
|
(8,325,059)
|
|
(118,226)
|
|
(1,302,263)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation of Canadian
subsidiaries
|
-
|
|
(102,366)
|
|
-
|
|
(228,323)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss
|
$(802,494)
|
|
$ (8,427,425)
|
|
$ (118,226)
|
|
$(1,530,586)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share (basic and diluted)
(Note14)
|
$ (0.00)
|
|
$ (0.05)
|
|
$ (0.00)
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding
(basic and diluted) (Note14)
|
219,450,447
|
|
154,755,625
|
|
219,450,447
|
|
205,064,429
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
|
|
F2
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
|
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Stockholders'
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Paid-In Capital
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2012
|
219,450,447
|
|
$ 219,450
|
|
$ 56,606,629
|
|
$(52,753,926)
|
|
$ 4,072,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
(802,494)
|
|
(802,494)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
--
|
|
--
|
|
62,127
|
|
--
|
|
62,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2012
|
219,450,447
|
|
$ 219,450
|
|
$ 56,668,756
|
|
$(53,556,420)
|
|
$ 3,331,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F3
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$ (802,494)
|
|
$ (8,325,059)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash
|
|
|
|
|
used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest accretion
expense
|
-
|
|
3,506,074
|
|
Change in fair value
of exchange feature liability
|
-
|
|
578,739
|
|
Financing charge on
embedded derivative liability
|
-
|
|
485,101
|
|
Loss on disposal of
inventory
|
-
|
|
469,148
|
|
Reserve on inventory
obsolescence
|
252,473
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation of
property, plant and equipment
|
414,782
|
|
572,057
|
|
Loss on impairment
of property, plant and equipment
|
43,812
|
|
286,444
|
|
Interest on notes
payable to related party
|
-
|
|
126,850
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
62,127
|
|
77,118
|
|
Amortization of
patents and trademarks
|
-
|
|
16,145
|
|
Provision for
doubtful accounts
|
213,810
|
|
-
|
|
Gain on disposal of
property and equipment
|
(13,828)
|
|
(10,578)
|
|
Gain on convertible
derivative
|
-
|
|
(1,336,445)
|
|
Gain on
deconsolidation of subsidiary
|
(453,900)
|
|
-
|
|
|
519,276
|
|
4,770,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash flows from
operating
|
|
|
|
|
activities resulting from changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
207,177
|
|
657,189
|
|
Inventory
|
(264,940)
|
|
1,079,405
|
|
Prepaid expenses and
sundry assets
|
132,283
|
|
(70,051)
|
|
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities
|
(45,388)
|
|
(908,569)
|
|
Customer deposits
|
3,000
|
|
(29,322)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,132
|
|
728,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(251,086)
|
|
(2,825,754)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale
of property and equipment
|
13,828
|
|
10,578
|
|
Acquisition of
property, plant and equipment
|
(192,518)
|
|
(27,604)
|
|
Addition to
property, plant and equipment under construction
|
(379,194)
|
|
(2,905)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(557,884)
|
|
(19,931)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes
payable to related parties
|
-
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
Proceeds from loan
payable
|
280,787
|
|
-
|
|
Repayment of loan
payable
|
(15,116)
|
|
-
|
|
Rights offering cost
|
-
|
|
(388,600)
|
|
Issuance of common
stock
|
-
|
|
3,857,180
|
|
Repayment of bank
loan
|
-
|
|
(3,492,108)
|
|
Repayment of capital
lease obligation
|
(1,241)
|
|
(3,479)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
264,430
|
|
3,972,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents
|
(544,540)
|
|
1,127,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain on foreign operations
|
-
|
|
(72,311)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period
|
1,103,649
|
|
13,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ 559,109
|
|
$ 1,068,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid
|
$ 3,434
|
|
$ -
|
|
Other non-cash
conversion of loans and related interest
|
$ -
|
|
$ 4,126,850
|
|
Reclassification of
convertible derivative and exchange
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities to
equity
|
$ -
|
|
$ 4,861,256
|
|
Conversion of
accrued expenses to equity
|
$ -
|
|
$ 16,374
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial
statements.
|
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND GOING CONCERN
Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the
"Company" or "ESW") through its wholly-owned subsidiaries
is engaged in the design, development, manufacturing and sales of emissions
control technologies. ESW also provides emissions testing and environmental
certification services with its primary focus on the North American on-road and
off-road diesel engine, chassis and after-treatment market. ESW currently
manufactures and markets a line of catalytic emission control and enabling
technologies for a number of applications focused on the retrofit market.
The unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"), which contemplates
continuation of the Company as a going concern.
The Company has sustained recurring operating losses. As of
September 30, 2012, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $53,556,420 and
cash and cash equivalents of $559,109. During the fiscal year 2011 there were
significant changes made to ESW’s business. These changes in operations, the
relocation of the Company’s operations, and the prevailing economic conditions
all create uncertainty in the operating results and, accordingly, there is no
assurance that the Company will be successful in generating sufficient cash
flow from operations or achieving profitability in the near future. As a
result, there is substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern. The Company may require additional financing to fund its
continuing operations. Financing may not be available at acceptable terms or
may not be available at all. The Company's ability to continue as a going
concern is dependent on obtaining additional financing and achieving and
maintaining a profitable level of operations.
Effective July 12, 2011, the Company raised a total of $4
million through the issuance of unsecured subordinated promissory notes (the
“Notes”) to certain shareholders, including deemed affiliates of certain
members of the Board of Directors of the Company. Proceeds from the Notes
funded working capital related to its 2011 sales, capital investments and other
general corporate purposes. Effective May 10, 2011, the Company entered into an
Investment Agreement with certain of its current shareholders and subordinated
lenders under unsecured promissory notes (the “Bridge Lenders") for an
aggregate amount of $4 million. As per the Investment Agreement, the Bridge
Lenders agreed to provide a backstop commitment (the "Backstop
Commitment") to a rights offering targeted by the Company to raise up to
$8 million (the “Qualified Offering"). Under the Backstop Commitment, the
Bridge Lenders agreed to purchase any shares offered in the Qualified Offering
that were not purchased by the Company's shareholders of record, after giving
effect to any oversubscriptions.
Effective June 30, 2011 the Company completed its rights
offering. The Company's shareholders subscribed to 38,955,629 shares including
over subscriptions. Under the Qualified Offering shareholders subscribed to
$4.7 million, which was subscribed for via cash ($1.9 million), and the
exchange of principal and accrued interest on the Notes and the Bridge Loan
Notes (approximately $2.8 million). Under the Backstop Commitment, the Bridge
Lenders purchased 27,714,385 shares of Common Stock at price of $0.12 per share
for approximately $3.3 million, of which $2.0 million was paid in cash and $1.3
million was paid for through the exchange of the balance of principal and
accrued interest due on the Notes. As a result of these transactions, the
Company satisfied its obligations with the Bridge Lenders and effectively
cancelled the Notes effective June 30, 2011.
Effective July 18, 2011, ESW’s wholly-owned subsidiary ESW
Canada Inc., paid its senior lender the amount of $1.5 million (Canadian
dollars) from the proceeds of the rights offering to liquidate the outstanding
balance on the bank loan. The senior lender has discharged all liens,
encumbrances and securities against the Company and its subsidiaries and
cancelled the June 30, 2010 demand revolving credit facility agreement.
F5
Effective May 1, 2012 the Company’s
wholly owned subsidiary ESW America Inc. received a $280,787 low interest loan
from The Machinery and Equipment Loan Fund (“MELF”), which is administered by
the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development. Proceeds
from the loan were used to purchase and upgrade equipment at the air testing
facility.
These unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification
of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that
might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
All adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, considered
necessary for fair presentation have been included in these unaudited
consolidated condensed financial statements.
NOTE 2 -
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, ESW
America Inc. ("ESWA"), ESW Technologies Inc. ("ESWT"), ESW
Canada Inc. ("ESWC") and Technology Fabricators Inc. (“TFI”). All
inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation.
Amounts in the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements are
expressed in U.S. dollars.
Effective February 3, 2012 BBL Technologies Inc. (“BBL”), a
non-operating subsidiary, filed for bankruptcy in the Province of Ontario,
Canada. At the time of filing, BBL had no assets but had issued and outstanding
redeemable Class A special shares. The Company did not provide any guarantee in
relation to these redeemable Class A special shares. As a result of BBL’s
filing for bankruptcy, the Company lost its control over BBL and has
deconsolidated BBL from the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements
on the filing date. The Company recorded a $453,900 and $0 gain in the
unaudited consolidated condensed statement of operations and comprehensive loss
for the nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2012 respectively,
upon deconsolidation of BBL.
ESTIMATES
The preparation of unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reported
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates
include amounts for inventory valuation, impairment of property plant and
equipment, share-based compensation, accrued liabilities and accounts
receivable exposures.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the
ordinary course of business but mitigates the associated credit risk by
performing credit checks and actively pursuing past due accounts. An allowance
for doubtful accounts is estimated and recorded based on management's
assessment of the credit history with the customer and current relationships
with them. On this basis management has determined that an allowance for
doubtful accounts of $217,732 and $1,398 was appropriate as of September 30,
2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
INVENTORY
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market determined
using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory is periodically reviewed for
use and obsolescence, and adjusted as necessary. Inventory consists of raw
materials, work-in-process and finished goods.
F6
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
The Company capitalizes customized equipment built to be used
in the future day to day operations at cost. Once complete and available for
use, the cost for accounting purposes is transferred to property, plant and
equipment, where normal depreciation rates apply.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost.
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets, generally 5 to 7 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged
to operations as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are
capitalized.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED
ASSETS
The Company follows the Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Topic 360, which requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
assets' carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In performing the review for
recoverability, if future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges)
from the use and ultimate disposition of the assets are less than their
carrying values, an impairment loss represented by the difference between its
fair value and carrying value, is recognized. Properties held for sale are
recorded at the lower of the carrying amount or the expected sales price less
costs to sell. Management reviewed certain assets for impairment in the first
quarter of 2012 (see Note 6 for details).
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
Included in the ASC Topic 820 framework is a three level
valuation inputs hierarchy with Level 1 being inputs and transactions that can
be effectively fully observed by market participants spanning to Level 3 where
estimates are unobservable by market participants outside of the Company and
must be estimated using assumptions developed by the Company. The Company
discloses the lowest level input significant to each category of asset or
liability valued within the scope of ASC Topic 820 and the valuation method as
exchange, income or use. The Company uses inputs which are as observable as
possible and the methods most applicable to the specific situation of each
company or valued item.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and loan payable approximate
fair value because of their short-term nature or current market rate for the
loan payable with a fixed rate. Per ASC Topic 820 framework these are
considered Level 2 inputs where inputs other than Level 1 that are observable,
either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for
similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a financial
instrument might be adversely affected by a change in the interest rates. In
seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, the Company
manages exposure through its normal operating and financing activities.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company derives revenue primarily from the sale of its
catalytic products. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the amount is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably
assured.
F7
The Company also derives revenue (approximately 7.9% and
4.9% of total revenue during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012
and 2011, respectively) from providing air testing and environmental
certification services. Revenues are recognized upon delivery of testing
services when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and collection of
the related receivable is reasonably assured.
LOSS PER
SHARE
Loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per
share when their effect is anti-dilutive.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are computed in accordance with the provisions of
ASC Topic 740, which requires, among other things, a liability approach to
calculating deferred income taxes. The Company recognizes deferred tax
liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that
have been recognized in its financial statements or tax returns. Under this
method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the
difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which
the differences are expected to reverse. The Company is required to make
certain estimates and judgments about the application of tax law, the expected
resolution of uncertain tax positions and other matters. In the event that
uncertain tax positions are resolved for amounts different than the Company's
estimates, or the related statutes of limitations expire without the assessment
of additional income taxes, the Company will be required to adjust the amounts
of the related assets and liabilities in the period in which such events occur.
Such adjustments may have a material impact on ESW's income
tax provision and results of operations.
SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS
The Company’s shipping and handling costs of $27,084 and
$30,466 are included in cost of sales for the three month periods ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Additionally, the Company has
recorded recoveries of these costs amounting to $23,327 and $19,251, which are
included in revenues for the three month periods ended September 30, 2012 and
2011, respectively.
The Company’s shipping and handling costs of $74,145 and
$87,625 are included in cost of sales for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Additionally, the Company has
recorded recoveries of these costs amounting to $59,324 and $58,952, which are
included in revenues for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and
2011, respectively.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company is engaged in research and development work.
Research and development costs are charged as operating expense of the Company
as incurred. Any grant money received for research and development work is used
to offset these expenditures. For the three month periods ended September 30,
2012 and 2011, the Company expensed $163,264 and $257,867, net of grant
revenues, respectively, towards research and development costs. For the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company expensed $477,582
and $591,764, net of grant revenues, respectively, towards research and
development costs.
For the three month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011,
gross research and development expense, excluding any offsetting grant
revenues, amounted to $163,264 and $257,867, respectively, and grant money
amounted to $0 and $0, respectively. For the nine month periods ended September
30, 2012 and 2011, gross research and development expense, excluding any
offsetting grant revenues, amounted to $477,582 and $870,476, respectively, and
grant money amounted to $0 and $278,712, respectively.
F8
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The functional currency of the Company and its foreign
subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. All of the Company’s revenue and materials
purchased from suppliers are denominated in or linked to the U.S. dollar.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than a functional currency are
converted to the functional currency on the transaction date, and any resulting
assets or liabilities are further translated at each reporting date and at
settlement. Gains and losses recognized upon such translations are included
within foreign exchange gain (loss) in the unaudited consolidated condensed
statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
PRODUCT WARRANTIES
The Company provides for estimated warranty costs at the time
of sale and accrues for specific items at the time their existence is known and
the amounts are determinable. The Company estimates warranty costs using
standard quantitative measures based on industry warranty claim experience and
evaluation of specific customer warranty issues. The Company currently
estimates warranty costs as 2% of revenue. As of September 30, 2012 and
December 31, 2011, $196,743 and $192,674, respectively, was accrued as warranty
provision and included in accrued liabilities. For the three month periods
ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the total warranty, service, service travel
and installation costs included in cost of sales were $74,311 and $83,712,
respectively. For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the
total warranty, service, service travel and installation costs included in cost
of sales were $216,745 and $175,699, respectively.
SEGMENT REPORTING
ESW operates in two reportable segments. ASC 280-10,
"Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information", establishes standards for the way that public business
enterprises report information about operating segments in the Company’s
consolidated condensed financial statements. Operating segments are components
of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that
is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to
allocate resources and in assessing performance. ESW’s operating segments
include manufacturing operations and air testing services (see Note 13). ESW’s
chief operating decision maker is the Company’s Executive Chairman.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In 2011, ESW underwent a significant restructuring of its
operations. ESW recognizes restructuring expenses as they are incurred. ESW
also evaluated the inventory and property, plant and equipment associated with
restructuring actions for impairment. Asset impairment and accelerated
depreciation expenses primarily relate to inventory write-downs for
rationalized products and adjustments in the carrying value of the closed
facilities to the Company’s estimated fair value. In addition, the remaining
useful lives of other property, plant and equipment associated with the related
operations were re-evaluated based on the respective plan, resulting in the
impairment of certain assets. In accordance with ASC 420-10-25-11 costs to
terminate an operating lease arise when a lessee will either: (a) terminate an
operating lease; or (b) if it is unable to terminate the lease, discontinue its
use of the asset and continue to make lease payments over the remaining term of
the lease without benefit. When the lease will be terminated, the lessee should
recognize a liability for the cost of terminating the lease at the time the
lease is terminated. If the lease will not be terminated and the lessee will
continue to incur costs under the lease without future benefit, the lessee
should recognize a liability on the cease-use date (the date the lessee
discontinues its use of the asset). In accordance with paragraphs 420-10-30-7
through 30-9, a liability for the remaining lease rentals, reduced by actual
(or estimated) sublease rentals, would be recognized and measured at its fair
value at the cease-use date. In accordance with paragraphs 420-10-35-1 through
35-4, the liability would be adjusted for changes, if any, resulting from
revisions to estimated cash flows after the cease-use date, measured using the
credit-adjusted risk-free rate that was used to measure the liability
initially.
As disclosed in Note 12, the Company entered into an agreement
with its former landlord for the full release of any future obligations under
the lease agreement.
F9
COMPARATIVE FIGURES
Certain 2011 figures have been reclassified to conform to the
current financial statement presentation.
NOTE 3 – RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-5 – “Comprehensive
Income – Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. This statement removed
the presentation of comprehensive income in the statement of changes in
stockholders’ equity. The only two allowable presentations are below the
components of net income in a statement of comprehensive income or in a
separate statement of comprehensive income that begins with total net
income. The guidance was effective for interim or annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU had no
effect on the Company's unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.
NOTE 4 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid
investments purchased with original maturities of generally 90 days or less at
the date of purchase. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all of the
Company's cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash.
NOTE 5 - INVENTORY
Inventory consists of:
|
September
30,
|
December 31,
|
Inventory
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
$
1,027,393
|
$
846,113
|
Work-in-process
|
1,627,338
|
1,705,346
|
Finished goods
|
41,236
|
102,575
|
|
2,695,967
|
2,654,034
|
Less: reserve for inventory
obsolescence
|
(252,473)
|
(223,007)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
2,443,494
|
$
2,431,027
|
NOTE 6 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the
following:
|
September
30,
|
December 31,
|
Classification
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Plant, machinery and equipment
|
$
3,746,328
|
$
6,294,458
|
Office equipment
|
152,329
|
357,717
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
242,090
|
449,147
|
Vehicles
|
19,468
|
25,604
|
Leasehold improvements
|
875,705
|
1,012,823
|
|
5,035,920
|
8,139,749
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(4,030,007)
|
(6,867,760)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
1,005,913
|
$
1,271,989
|
F10
Depreciation expense recognized in the unaudited
consolidated condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss was
included in the following captions:
|
|
|
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
Depreciation Expense
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
$ 82,369
|
$ 44,376
|
Operating
expenses
|
37,609
|
78,406
|
Research
and development
|
-
|
29,180
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$ 119,978
|
$ 151,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
Depreciation Expense
|
2012
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
$ 262,056
|
$ 207,920
|
Operating
expenses
|
152,726
|
276,765
|
Research
and development
|
-
|
87,372
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$ 414,782
|
$ 572,057
|
At
September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $577,610 and
$198,416, respectively, of customized equipment under construction.
At
March 31, 2012, the Company recognized an impairment loss for furniture,
fixtures and office equipment located at its Canadian facility. The estimated
recovery from the sale of furniture, fixtures and office equipment is expected
to be nominal and, accordingly, the Company has valued these assets as $0 and
recorded an impairment loss equal to the full amount of their carrying value.
The
details of impairment losses recognized are summarized in the following
table:
|
For
the three month period ended
|
Asset
grouping
|
September
30, 2012
|
September
30, 2011
|
Effect of exchange rate
fluctuations
|
$
1,039
|
$
(24,859)
|
Gain on disposal of plant and
equipment
|
-
|
(10,578)
|
|
|
|
Total impairment loss recognized
|
$
1,039
|
$
(35,437)
|
F11
|
For
the nine month period ended
|
Asset
grouping
|
September
30, 2012
|
September
30, 2011
|
Plant and machinery
|
$
-
|
$
180,993
|
Leasehold improvements
|
-
|
93,328
|
Furniture and fixtures (Abandonment)
|
1,864
|
-
|
Office equipment (Held for sale)
|
2,207
|
36,983
|
Computer hardware (Held for
sale)
|
19,131
|
-
|
Computer software (Held for
sale)
|
20,610
|
-
|
Total impairment loss recognized
|
43,812
|
311,304
|
Effect of exchange rate
fluctuations
|
-
|
(24,859)
|
Gain on disposal of plant and
equipment
|
(13,828)
|
(10,578)
|
|
|
|
Total impairment loss recognized
|
$
29,984
|
$
275,867
|
NOTE 7 - REDEEMABLE CLASS A SPECIAL SHARES
At December 31, 2011, the redeemable Class A special shares
that were issued by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, BBL, without par
value, were redeemable on demand by the holder of the shares, which is a
private Ontario Corporation, at $700,000 Canadian (historically translated to
$453,900 at December 31, 2011). On February 3, 2012, BBL filed for bankruptcy
and the redeemable Class A special shares were subsequently cancelled.
N
OTE 8 - INCOME TAXES
As of
September 30, 2012, there are tax loss carry forwards for Federal income tax
purposes of approximately $40,550,549 available to offset future taxable income
in the United States. The tax loss carry forwards expire in various years
through 2032. The Company does not expect to incur a Federal income tax
liability in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, a valuation allowance for the
full amount of the related deferred tax asset of approximately $14,192,692 has
been established until realizations of the tax benefit from the loss carry
forwards meet the "more likely than not" criteria.
Originating
|
Loss
|
Year
|
Carryforward
|
1999
|
$
407,607
|
2000
|
2,109,716
|
2001
|
2,368,368
|
2002
|
917,626
|
2003
|
637,458
|
2004
|
1,621,175
|
2005
|
2,276,330
|
2006
|
3,336,964
|
2007
|
3,378,355
|
2008
|
3,348,694
|
2009
|
2,927,096
|
2010
|
2,269,987
|
2011
|
2,212,173
|
2012
|
12,739,000
|
|
|
Total
|
$
40,550,549
|
F12
Additionally, as of September 30, 2012, the
Company's two wholly-owned Canadian subsidiaries had non-capital tax loss carry
forwards of approximately $3,196,134 available to be used, in future periods,
to offset taxable income. The loss carry forwards expire in 2031. The deferred
tax asset of approximately $846,975 has been fully offset by a valuation
allowance until realization of the tax benefit from the non-capital tax loss
carry forwards are more likely than not.
The
reconciliation of the difference between the income tax provision using the
statutory tax rates and the effective tax rate is as follows:
|
For
the nine month periods ended
|
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Statutory tax rates:
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
35.00%
|
35.00%
|
|
Canada
|
26.50%
|
26.50%
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income
taxes
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
$
(12,801,667)
|
$
(5,157,452)
|
|
Foreign
|
11,999,173
|
(3,167,607)
|
|
$
(802,494)
|
$
(8,325,059)
|
Expected tax recovery at statutory
tax rates
|
$
(1,300,803)
|
$
(2,644,524)
|
Differences in income taxes
resulting from:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and impairment (foreign operations)
|
(248,226)
|
69,293
|
|
Change
in fair value of exchange feature liability
|
-
|
202,559
|
|
Financing
charge on embedded derivative liability
|
-
|
169,785
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
21,745
|
26,982
|
|
Gain
on convertible derivative
|
-
|
(467,756)
|
|
Long-term
debt interest expense accretion
|
-
|
1,227,126
|
|
(1,527,284)
|
(1,416,535)
|
Benefit of losses not
recognized
|
1,527,284
|
1,416,535
|
Income tax provision per unaudited
consolidated
|
|
|
|
condensed financial statements
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
|
|
|
|
Components of deferred income tax assets are as follows:
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
$
-
|
$
488,494
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
15,039,667
|
13,255,075
|
|
15,039,667
|
13,743,569
|
Valuation allowance
|
(15,039,667)
|
(13,743,569)
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
Valuation allowances reflect the deferred tax benefits that
management is uncertain about regarding the Company's ability to utilize in the
future.
F13
Based on the Company’s current tax
loss position tax benefits to be recognized is more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company does not believe
there will be any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the
next twelve months.
The Company will recognize interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the unaudited
consolidated condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Accrued
interest and penalties will be included within the related tax liability line
in the consolidated condensed balance sheets.
In
many cases the Company's uncertain tax positions are related to tax years that
remain subject to examination by tax authorities. The following describes the
open tax years, by major tax jurisdiction, as of September 30, 2012:
United States – Federal
|
2008 – present
|
United States – State
|
2008 – present
|
Canada – Federal
|
2009 – present
|
Canada – Provincial
|
2009 – present
|
NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
No stock was issued during the
nine month period ended September 30, 2012.
NOTE 10 - STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANT GRANTS
STOCK OPTIONS
On
April 15, 2010, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) granted an aggregate award
of 900,000 stock options to a former executive officer and former director and
one director. The options vest over a period of three years with an exercise
price of $0.65 (fair market value of the Company's common stock as of the date
of grant) with expiry of five years from the date of award. Effective February
7, 2011, with the resignation of a director, the unvested portion of the stock
options were cancelled as a result of the resignation. The balance of the stock
option expense of the April 15, 2010 award is as follows:
|
Stock
Option
|
Date
|
Expense
|
April 15, 2011
|
$
62,127
|
April 15, 2012
|
$
82,836
|
April 15, 2013
|
$
20,709
|
A
summary of option transactions, including those granted pursuant to the terms
of certain employment and other agreements, is as follows:
|
Stock
purchase options
|
Weighted
average exercise price
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2011
|
3,600,000
|
$
0.68
|
Granted
|
475,000
|
$
0.12
|
Expired or cancelled
|
(500,000)
|
$
(0.73)
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2011
|
3,575,000
|
$
0.60
|
Expired
|
(2,150,000)
|
$
(0.71)
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2012
|
1,425,000
|
$
0.43
|
F14
At September 30, 2012, the
outstanding options have a weighted average remaining life of 22 months. All
options issued prior to 2010 have vested, and the April 15, 2010 options vest
over a period of three years, in three equal parts each year.
No
stock options were granted for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2011 was $0.02 and
was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following
assumptions:
|
2011
|
Expected volatility
|
111%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.42%
|
Expected life
|
1.5
yrs
|
Dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
Forfeiture rate
|
0.00%
|
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model used by the Company to
calculate options and warrant values was developed to estimate the fair value
of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions,
which significantly differ from the Company's stock purchase options and
warrants. The model also requires highly subjective assumptions, including
future stock price volatility and expected time until exercise, which greatly
affect the calculated values.
At September 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding options as
follows:
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
|
Options
|
Price
|
Expiration
Date
|
100,000
|
$1.00
|
February
8, 2013
|
250,000
|
$0.27
|
August
6, 2013
|
600,000
|
$0.65
|
April
15, 2015
|
250,000
|
$0.12
|
December
31, 2012
|
225,000
|
$0.12
|
June
30, 2016
|
1,425,000
|
|
|
Effective November 6, 2011, the Board approved restricted
stock grants to seven Board members under the 2010 stock incentive plan. As per
the terms of the grant, each of the seven Board members will receive 150,000
shares vesting in equal parts on December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2013 subject to the execution of the requisite grant agreements.
The Board also approved restricted stock grants to two Board members for
serving as chair to various committees. As per the terms of the grant, each of
the two Board members will receive 200,000 shares vesting immediately subject
to the execution of the requisite grant agreements. Stock-based compensation
expense will be recorded as of the vesting terms of the grants. Of the vested
shares 650,000 restricted shares of common stock were issued as of December 31,
2011.
Effective January 12, 2012, the Board approved a management
incentive plan which includes a 10% restricted common equity pool for
management. Key participants of this plan will be executive officers and a
member of the Company’s Board. Secondary participants will include other
management with a trickle down to other core members of the team. The program
entails a 5 year vesting program commencing January 2012, with an accelerated
vesting schedule for certain participants of the plan. The equity grants are
effective subject to the execution of the requisite grant agreements. No
agreements have been executed to date.
During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and
2011, $62,127 and $77,118, respectively, has been recorded in the unaudited
consolidated condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss for
stock-based compensation.
F15
WARRANTS
Warrants
issued in connection with various private placements of equity securities are
treated as a capital transaction and no income statement recognition is
required. A summary of warrant transactions is as follows:
|
Warrants
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2010
|
-
|
$
-
|
Granted
|
1,545,000
|
$
0.65
|
Expired or cancelled
|
-
|
$
-
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2010,
and 2011,
|
|
|
and
September 30, 2012
|
1,545,000
|
$
0.65
|
In 2010, the Company closed a unit offering in the amount of
$300,000 per tranche for gross proceeds of $600,000 whereby the Company issued
1,500,000 units. The unit offering was for up to $5 million. The units were in
the form of shares of the Company's common stock, at $0.40 per share plus for
each share of common stock subscribed to under the unit offer the investor
received one warrant exercisable for 1 share of common stock at $0.55; if an
Investor Warrant is exercised between the first and second years from issuance,
the exercise price will be $0.65. All investor warrants as issued are subject
to adjustment in the event of a stock split or similar adjustment by the
Company. A commission of 4% of the gross proceeds was paid and 7.5 units for
every $100 of the gross proceeds raised were payable for brokers’ fees.
No warrants were issued during the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011.
NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, in
addition to fees and salaries; reimbursement of business expenses; transactions
with related parties include:
• $225,000 related to services
provided by Orchard Capital Corporation under a services agreement effective
January 30, 2011. On April 19, 2011, the Company's Board ratified a Services
Agreement (the "Agreement") between the Company and Orchard Capital
Corporation ("Orchard") which was approved by the Company's
Compensation Committee. Under the Agreement, Orchard agreed to provide services
that may be mutually agreed to by and between Orchard and the Company including
those duties customarily performed by the Chairman of the Board and executive
of the Company as well as providing advice and consultation on general
corporate matters and other projects as may be assigned by the Company's Board
as needed. Orchard is controlled by Richard Ressler. Certain affiliated
entities of Orchard as well as Richard Ressler own shares of the Company.
• Mr. Nitin Amersey who is a director
of the Company is listed as a control person with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of Bay City Transfer Agency Registrar Inc., the Company's transfer
agent. Mr. Amersey is also a control person in Freeland Venture Resources Inc.,
which provide Edgar filing services to the Company. For the nine month period
ended September 30, 2012, the Company paid Bay City Transfer Agency Registrar
Inc. and Freeland Venture Resources Inc., $9,896 for services rendered.
In addition to fees and salaries and reimbursement of business
expenses, during the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 transactions
with related parties include:
• $4,000,000 issuance of unsecured
subordinated promissory notes to certain shareholders and deemed affiliates of
certain members of the Board of Directors. Interest expense on notes payable to
related parties amounted to $126,850.
F16
• Investment
agreement with Bridge lenders effective May 10, 2011.
• The effect of an exchange feature
included in the terms of the Share Subscription Agreement for $3,000,000 of
Convertible Debentures issued on March 19, 2010 ("2010 Debentures")
and fully converted including interest into 6,007,595 shares of common stock on
March 25, 2010. At March 31, 2011 the exchange feature liability related to the
convertible debentures was re-valued to $2,280,000 with the change in fair
value of exchange feature liability of $578,739 expense recorded in the
unaudited consolidated condensed statements of operations and comprehensive
loss. In March 2010, Orchard invested $1 million in the $3 million convertible
debentures offering; of the exchange feature liability $760,000 was attributed
to the investment made by Orchard based on their relative contribution to the
March 2010 subscription, this amount was transferred to equity as of June 30,
2011. Orchard received 6,333,333 additional shares of Common Stock in
conjunction with certain rights under the Prior Subscription Agreements as the
Company closed its Qualified Offering on June 30, 2011.
• $200,000 related to services
provided by Orchard under a services agreement effective January 30, 2011.
• For the nine month period ended
September 30, 2011, the Company paid Bay City Transfer Agency Registrar Inc.
$17,005.
NOTE 12 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LEASES
Effective November 24, 2004, the Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, ESWA, entered into a lease agreement for approximately 40,220
square feet of leasehold space at 2 Bethlehem Pike Industrial Center,
Montgomery Township, Pennsylvania. The leasehold space houses the Company's
research and development facilities and also houses ESW’s manufacturing
operations. The lease commenced on January 15, 2005. Effective October 16,
2009, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary ESWA entered into a lease renewal
agreement with Nappen & Associates for the leasehold property in
Pennsylvania. There were no modifications to the original economic terms of the
lease under the lease renewal agreement. Under the terms of the lease renewal,
the lease term was extended to February 28, 2013. Effective September 24, 2012,
ESWA entered into a second lease amendment agreement with Nappen &
Associates for the leasehold property in Pennsylvania, whereby ESWA extended
the term of the lease agreement by an additional 5 years. There were no
modifications to the original economic terms of the lease. Under the terms of
the second lease renewal, the lease will expire on February 28, 2018.
Effective December 20, 2004, the Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, ESWC, entered into a lease agreement for approximately 50,000
square feet of leasehold space in Concord, Ontario, Canada. The leasehold space
previously housed the Company's executive offices and the manufacturing
operations. The renewed lease period commenced on October 1, 2010 and ended on
September 30, 2015. Effective May 1, 2012, the landlord terminated
the lease agreement for the facility. The facility had been vacated prior
to the lease termination. Thereafter effective May 22, 2012, ESWC
and its former landlord entered into an agreement for the full release of any
future obligations under the lease agreement subject to payment of a
mutually agreed consideration payable through September 2012. The
agreement provides for a full and complete release of ESWC by the landlord for
the consideration and terms under the lease agreement. ESWC has fulfilled its
terms of the release. The following is a summary of the minimum annual
lease payments:
F17
Year
Ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|
|
2012 (excluding the nine months
ended September 30, 2012)
|
$
45,248
|
2013
|
180,990
|
2014
|
180,990
|
2015
|
180,990
|
2016
|
180,990
|
2017
|
180,990
|
2018
|
30,165
|
|
|
Total
|
$
980,363
|
LEGAL MATTERS
From time to time, the Company may be involved in a variety of
claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising from the ordinary course
of our business, collections claims, breach of contract claims, labor and
employment claims, tax and other matters. Although claims, suits,
investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results
cannot be predicted with certainty, ESW believes that the resolution of current
pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on its business,
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow. Regardless
of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on ESW because of legal
costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
The Company is pursuing a lawsuit in New York for collection
of unpaid invoices related to goods delivered to a former dealer.
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s
capital lease obligation amounted to $0 and $1,241, respectively.
NOTE 13 – OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company has two principal operating segments, air testing
services and catalyst manufacturing. These operating segments were determined
based on the nature of the products and services offered. Operating segments
are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating
decision-maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. The Company’s Executive Chairman has been identified as the chief
operating decision-maker, and directs the allocation of resources to operating
segments based on the profitability and cash flows of each respective segment.
The Company evaluates performance based on several factors, of
which the primary financial measure is net income. The accounting policies of
the business segments are the same as those described in “Note 2: Summary of
Accounting Policies.” No intersegment sales were made for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The following tables show the
operations of the Company’s reportable segments:
F18
For the three month period ended September
30, 2012
|
|
Catalyst
|
Air Testing
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$ 2,596,922
|
$ 196,436
|
$ -
|
$ 2,793,358
|
Net
income / (loss)
|
$ 330,400
|
$42,507
|
$ (491,133)
|
$ (118,226)
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2012
|
|
Catalyst
|
Air Testing
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$ 7,061,463
|
$ 607,599
|
$ -
|
$ 7,669,063
|
Net
loss
|
$ (12,485)
|
$ (407,628)
|
$ (382,381)
|
$ (802,494)
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2012
|
|
Catalyst
|
Air Testing
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$ 3,897,161
|
$ 1,509,682
|
$ 125,958
|
$ 5,532,801
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
under construction
|
$ 19,750
|
$ 557,860
|
$ -
|
$ 577,610
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
$ 199,494
|
$ 806,419
|
$ -
|
$ 1,005,913
|
Accounts
receivable
|
$ 663,712
|
$ 120,035
|
$ -
|
$ 783,747
|
Inventories
|
$ 2,368,061
|
$ 75,433
|
$ -
|
$ 2,443,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three month period ended September 30, 2011
|
|
Catalyst
|
Air Testing
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$ 2,985,390
|
$ 228,101
|
$ -
|
$ 3,213,491
|
Net
loss
|
$ (706,163)
|
$ (435,169)
|
$ (160 ,931)
|
$ (1,302,263)
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2011
|
|
Catalyst
|
Air Testing
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$ 7,907,566
|
$ 406,510
|
$ -
|
$ 8,314,076
|
Net
loss
|
$ (3,184,167)
|
$ (1,118,121)
|
$ (4,022,771)
|
$ (8,325,059)
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2011
|
|
Catalyst
|
Air Testing
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$ 4,329,986
|
$ 1,551,848
|
$ 623,192
|
$ 6,505,026
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
under construction
|
$-
|
$ 198,416
|
$ -
|
$ 198,416
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
$ 328,489
|
$ 943,500
|
$ -
|
$ 1,271,989
|
Accounts
receivable
|
$ 1,028,720
|
$ 176,014
|
$ -
|
$ 1,204,734
|
Inventories
|
$ 2,393,507
|
$ 37,520
|
$ -
|
$ 2,431,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14 - LOSS PER SHARE
Potential common shares of 1,425,000 related to ESW's
outstanding stock options and 1,545,000 shares related to ESW's outstanding
warrants, were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share for the
nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2012 because the inclusion of
these shares would be anti-dilutive.
Potential common shares of 3,575,000 related to ESW's
outstanding stock options and 1,545,000 shares related to ESW's outstanding
warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share for the
nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2011 because the inclusion of
these shares would be anti-dilutive.
F19
NOTE 15 - RISK MANAGEMENT
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND
ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE
The Company's cash balances are maintained in various banks in
Canada and the United States. Deposits held in banks in the United States are
insured up to $250,000 per depositor for each bank by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation. Deposits held in banks in Canada are insured up to
$100,000 Canadian per depositor for each bank by The Canada Deposit Insurance
Corporation, a federal crown corporation. Actual balances at times may exceed
these limits.
Accounts Receivable and Concentrations of Credit Risk: The
Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition and generally does not require collateral from its customers. Three
of its customers accounted for 26.9%, 20.4% and 8.1%, respectively, of the
Company's revenue during the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 and
33.0%, 17.2% and 15.7%, respectively, of its accounts receivable as of
September 30, 2012.
Three of its customers accounted for 40.1%, 12.9% and 9.1%,
respectively, of the Company's revenue during the nine month period ended
September 30, 2011 and 31.9%, 17.9% and 11.4%, respectively, of its accounts
receivable as of September 30, 2011.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, the
Company purchased approximately 18.5% and 13.4% of its inventory from two
vendors. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, the Company
purchased approximately 26.9% and 18.3% of its inventory from two vendors. The
accounts payable to these vendors aggregated approximately $548,792 and
$170,679 as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
NOTE 16 – LOAN PAYABLE
On April 25, 2012, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary ESWA
entered into a MELF Facility with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for up to
$500,000 for the purchase of equipment and related purchases. Two (2)
draw-downs are permitted under the MELF Facility by ESWA. The first draw
down of $280,787 was made under the MELF Facility in connection with equipment
purchased by ESWA on April 25, 2012 (the “Closing Date”). ESWA may make
one (1) additional draw-down per the terms of the MELF Facility so that the
aggregate amount borrowed under the MELF Facility may be up to $500,000. Terms
of the MELF Facility include initial interest at three (3%) percent per annum,
monthly blended payments of $3,710 and full repayment of the MELF Facility on
or before the first day of the eighty-fifth (85) calendar month following the
Closing Date. As part of the loan agreement, within three years from the
Closing Date ESWA is required to create, or retain, at its current location a
certain number of jobs that is specified in the loan application. A breach by
ESWA in the creation or maintenance of these jobs shall be considered an event
of default under the MELF Facility. In the event ESWA defaults on any payments,
the MELF Facility may be accelerated with full payment due along with certain
additional modifications including the increase in interest to twelve and one
half (12 1/2%) percent. The loan is secured by certain property and equipment
and corporate guarantee of the Company.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the loan
payable amounted to $265,671 and $0, respectively. For the nine month period
ended September 30, 2012, the Company paid interest amounting to $3,434
(September 30, 2011 - $0) on the loan and also repaid principal in the amount
of $15,116 (September 30, 2011 - $0).
F20
Loan maturities based on
outstanding principal are as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|
|
2012 (excluding the nine months
ended September 30, 2012)
|
$ 6,100
|
2013
|
37,244
|
2014
|
38,376
|
2015
|
39,544
|
2016
|
40,746
|
Thereafter
|
103,661
|
|
|
Total
|
$
265,671
|
NOTE 17 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 12, 2012, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary
ESWA made the second draw down per the terms of the MELF Facility in the amount
of $219,213. All other terms of the MELF facility remain unchanged. With the
second draw down total borrowings under the MELF Facility amount to $500,000.
F21
EXHIBIT
G
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
WORLDWIDE, INC. 2013 STOCK PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
WORLDWIDE, INC.
2013 STOCK PLAN
ARTICLE
I
PURPOSES
1.1
Purpose of Plan
. The purposes of the Environmental Solutions
Worldwide, Inc. 2013 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) are to advance the interests of
Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) and its shareholders by
providing significant incentives to selected officers, employees, and
consultants of the Company who contribute and are expected to contribute to the
success of the Company, and to enhance the interest of such officers and
employees in the Company’s success and progress by providing them with an
opportunity to become shareholders of the Company. Further, the Plan is
designed to enhance the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified
employees necessary for the success and progress of the Company.
ARTICLE
II
DEFINITIONS
2.1
Definitions.
Certain terms used herein shall have the meaning
below stated, subject to the provisions of Section 7.1 hereof.
(a)
“Award” means an award under the Plan as described in Article V.
Awards may be made under the Plan in the form of stock options, including Incentive
Stock Options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock
units, performance shares and share units and other stock-based Awards, as set
forth in Article V.
(b)
“Award Agreement” means a written agreement entered into between the Company
and a Grantee in connection with an Award.
(c)
“Board” or “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the
Company.
(d)
“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(e)
“Committee” means either (i) the Board of Directors or (ii) the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors or such other committee of the Board as
shall be appointed by the Board to administer the Plan pursuant to Article VII
hereof. Except as otherwise determined by the Board, the members of the
Committee, or the members of the Board who participate in decision making with
respect to the Plan, shall be “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b‑3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and “outside directors”
under Section 162(m) of the Code. The Committee may delegate any of its powers
under the Plan to a subcommittee of the Committee consisting of non-employee
directors and outside directors. The Committee may also authorize certain
officers of the Company to carry out the day-to-day administration of the Plan
in accordance with the Committee’s instructions.
G1
(f)
“Common Stock” means, subject to the provisions of Section 9.3, the
authorized common stock of the Company.
(g)
“Company” means Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc.
(h)
“Effective Date” means the date on which the Plan is adopted by the
Board or the date the Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company,
whichever is earlier.
(i)
“Employee” means (i) any individual who is a common-law employee of the
Company or of a Subsidiary, (ii) a member of the Board of Directors, or (iii)
any consultant or other persons to the extent permitted by the instructions to
Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, who performs services
for the Company or a Subsidiary. Service as a member of the Board of Directors
or as a consultant shall be considered employment for all purposes under the
Plan except the third sentence of Section 4.1.
(j)
“Fair Market Value” means, in respect of a share of Common Stock on any
date, the last reported sales price regular way on such date or, in case no
such reported sale takes place on such date, the last reported sales price
regular way on the day preceding such date on which a reported sale occurred,
in either case on the New York Stock Exchange or, if at the time the Common
Stock is not listed or admitted to trading on such Exchange, on the principal
national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is listed or admitted to
trading or, if at the time the Common Stock is not listed or admitted to
trading on any national securities exchange, in the National Association of
Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (“Nasdaq”) National Market System or,
if at the time the Common Stock is not listed or admitted to trading on any
national securities exchange or quoted on such National Market System, the
average of the closing bid and asked prices in the over-the-counter market as
furnished by any New York Stock Exchange member firm selected from time to time
by the Company for that purpose or, if the Common Stock is not traded over-the-counter,
as determined by the Committee using any reasonable valuation method.
(k)
“Grantee” means an Employee who receives a grant of Options or other
Award under the Plan.
(l)
“Incentive Stock Option” means an Option to purchase Common Stock,
granted by the Company to an Employee pursuant to Section 5.1 hereof, which
meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code.
(m)
“Nonstatutory Stock Option” means an Option to purchase Common Stock,
granted by the Company to an Employee pursuant to Section 5.1 hereof, which
does not meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or which provides, as
of the time the Option is granted, that it will not be treated as an Incentive
Stock Option.
(n)
“Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option.
(o)
“Option Agreement” means an agreement between the Company and a Grantee
evidencing the terms of an Option granted under the Plan.
G2
(p)
“Plan” means the Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. 2013 Stock
Plan, as set forth herein and as from time to time amended.
(q)
“Restricted Stock Agreement” means an agreement between the Company and
a Grantee evidencing the terms of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan.
(r)
“Subsidiary” means a subsidiary of the Company within the meaning of
Section 424(f) of the Code.
(s)
“Termination of Employment” means, unless otherwise determined by the
Committee, that a Grantee shall be deemed to have a “Termination of Employment”
upon ceasing employment with the Company or a Subsidiary (or, in the case of a
Grantee who is not an employee, upon ceasing association with the Company or a
Subsidiary as a director, consultant or otherwise). The Committee in its
discretion may determine (a) whether any leave of absence constitutes a
Termination of Employment for purposes of the Plan, (b) the impact, if
any, of any such leave of absence on Awards theretofore made under the Plan,
and (c) when a change in a Grantee’s association with the Company constitutes a
Termination of Employment for purposes of the Plan. The Committee may also
determine whether a Grantee’s Termination of Employment is for Cause (as
hereinafter defined) and the date of termination in such case.
ARTICLE
III
EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THE PLAN; RESERVATION OF SHARES
3.1
Effective
Date.
The Plan shall become effective as of the Effective Date.
3.2
Shares Reserved Under Plan.
The
total number of shares of Common Stock which may be transferred pursuant to
Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed 40,000,000 shares (or 20,000
shares if the Company consummates a reverse stock split of its Common Stock at
an exchange ratio of 1-for-2,000 shares) and, as an individual limitation, the
maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Options or Stock
Appreciation Rights may be granted to a Grantee in any one-year period may not
exceed 5,000,000 shares (or 2,500 shares if the Company consummates a reverse
stock split of its Common Stock at an exchange ratio of 1-for-2,000 shares).
Such shares may be authorized but unissued Common Stock or authorized and
issued Common Stock held in the Company’s treasury or acquired by the Company
for the purposes of the Plan. The Committee may direct that any stock
certificate evidencing shares issued pursuant to the Plan shall bear a legend setting
forth such restrictions on transferability as may apply to such shares pursuant
to the Plan. If any Award is forfeited or otherwise terminates or is canceled
without the delivery of shares of Common Stock, shares of Common Stock are
surrendered or withheld from any Award to satisfy a Grantee’s income tax
withholding obligations, or shares of Common Stock owned by a Grantee are
tendered to pay the exercise price of options or other Awards granted under the
Plan, then the shares covered by such forfeited, terminated or canceled Award
or which are equal to the number of shares surrendered, withheld or tendered
shall again become available for transfer pursuant to Awards granted or to be
granted under this Plan. Any shares of Common Stock delivered by the Company,
any shares of Common Stock with respect to which Awards are made by the Company
and any shares of Common Stock with respect to which the Company becomes
obligated to make Awards, through the assumption of, or in substitution for,
outstanding awards previously granted by an acquired entity, shall not be
counted against the shares available for Awards under this Plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of the cancellation or forfeiture of
Restricted Stock or other Award with respect to which dividends have been paid
or accrued, the number of shares with respect to such Restricted Stock or other
Award shall not be available for subsequent grants hereunder unless, in the
case of shares with respect to which dividends were accrued by unpaid, such
dividends are also canceled or forfeited. The Company shall at all times while
the Plan is in effect reserve such number of shares of Common Stock as will be
sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.
G3
3.3
Award
Agreements.
Each Award granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by an
Award Agreement, which shall contain such provisions as the Committee in its
discretion deems necessary or desirable. The Committee may grant Awards in
tandem with or in substitution for any other Award or Awards granted under this
Plan or any award granted under any other plan of the Company. Payments or
transfers to be made by the Company upon the grant, exercise or payment of an
Award may be made in such form as the Committee shall determine, including cash,
shares of Common Stock, other securities, other Awards or other property and
may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments or on a deferred
basis. A Grantee shall have no rights with respect to an Award unless such
Grantee accepts the Award within such period as the Committee shall specify by
executing an Award Agreement in such form as the Committee shall determine and,
if the Committee shall so require, makes payment to the Company in such amount
as the Committee may determine. The Committee shall determine if loans
(whether or not secured by shares of Common Stock) may be extended or
guaranteed by the Company with respect to any Awards. No Grantee of an Award
(or other person having rights pursuant to such Award) shall have any of the rights
of a shareholder of the Company with respect to shares subject to such Award
until the issuance of a stock certificate to such person for such shares.
Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, no adjustment
shall be made for dividends, distributions or other rights (whether ordinary or
extraordinary, and whether in cash, securities or other property) for which the
record date is prior to the date such stock certificate is issued.
ARTICLE
IV
PARTICIPATION
IN PLAN
4.1 Eligibility. Options or other Awards
under the Plan may be granted to any key Employee of the Company or a
Subsidiary who performs services for the Company or a Subsidiary that the
Committee deems to be of special importance to the growth and success of the
Company. The Committee shall determine those Employees to whom Options or
other Awards shall be granted, the type of Option or other Award to be granted
to each such person, and, subject to Section 3.2 hereof, the number of shares
of Common Stock subject to each such Option or other Award.
4.2 Participation Not Guarantee of
Employment or Retention.
Nothing in this Plan or in any Option Agreement
or any other Award Agreement shall in any manner be construed to limit in any
way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate an Employee’s
employment at any time, without regard to the effect of such termination on any
rights such Employee would otherwise have under this Plan, or give any right to
an Employee to remain employed by the Company or a Subsidiary thereof in any
particular position or at any particular rate of compensation.
ARTICLE
V
GRANT
AND EXERCISE OF OPTIONS; RESTRICTED STOCK; OTHER AWARDS
5.1 Grant of Options
. The Committee
may from time to time in its discretion grant Incentive Stock Options and/or
Nonstatutory Stock Options to Employees at any time after the Effective Date.
All Options under the Plan shall be granted within ten (10) years from the date
the Plan is adopted by the Board or the date the Plan is approved by the
stockholders of the Company, whichever is earlier.
5.2 Option
Terms.
Options granted under the Plan shall be subject to the following
requirements:
(a)
Option Price.
The exercise price of each Option shall not be
less than the higher of the par value or 100% of the Fair Market Value of the
shares of Common Stock subject to the Option on the date the Option is
granted. The exercise price of an Option may be subject to adjustment pursuant
to Section 9.3 hereof.
G4
(b)
Term of Option.
The term during which an Option is exercisable
shall be that period determined by the Committee as set forth in the applicable
Option Agreement, provided that no Option shall have a term that exceeds a
period of 10 years from the date of its grant.
(c)
Nontransferability of Option.
No Option granted under the Plan
shall be transferable by the Grantee otherwise than by will or the laws of
descent and distribution, and each such Option shall be exercisable during the
Grantee’s lifetime only by him. No transfer of an Option by a Grantee by will
or by the laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to bind the
Company unless the Company shall have been furnished with written notice
thereof and a copy of the will and/or such other evidence as the Committee may
determine necessary to establish the validity of the transfer. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, permit a Grantee to
transfer any Option, which is not an Incentive Stock Option, to one or more of
the Grantee’s immediate family members or to trusts established in whole or in
part for the benefit of the Grantee and/or one or more of such immediate family
members. For purposes of the Plan, the term “immediate family” shall mean the
Grantee’s spouse and issue (including adopted and step children).
(d)
Exercise of Option.
Unless the Option Agreement pursuant to
which an Option is granted provides otherwise, each Option shall become
exercisable, on a cumulative basis, with respect to 25% of the aggregate number
of the shares of Common Stock covered thereby on the first anniversary of the
date of grant and with respect to an additional 25% of the shares of Common
Stock covered thereby on each of the next three (3) succeeding anniversaries of
the date of grant; provided, however, the Committee may establish a different
vesting schedule for any optionee or group of optionees. Any portion of an
Option which has become exercisable shall remain exercisable until it is
exercised in full or terminates pursuant to the terms of the Plan or the Option
Agreement pursuant to which it is granted.
(e)
Acceleration of Exercise on Change of Control.
Notwithstanding
the provisions of paragraph (d) of this Section or any other restrictions
limiting the number of shares of Common Stock as to which an Option may be
exercised, each Option shall become immediately exercisable in full upon and
simultaneously with any “Change of Control” of the Company unless the Board
determines that the optionee has been offered substantially identical
replacement options and a comparable position at any acquiring company. For
purposes of this Plan, a “Change of Control” shall be deemed to have occurred
if:
(i) any “person,” as such term is used in
Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”) (other than the Company, any employee benefit plan
sponsored by the Company, any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities
under an employee benefit plan of the Company, or any corporation owned,
directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the
same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company), is or becomes the
“beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly
or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 50% or more of the
combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities;
G5
(ii) during any
period of two consecutive years individuals who at the beginning of such period
constitute the Board, and any new director (other than a director designated by
a person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect a
transaction described in clause (i), (iii) or (iv) of this Section) whose
election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders
was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then still in
office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose
election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any
reason to constitute at least a majority thereof;
(iii) the Company consummates a merger or
consolidation with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation
which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding
immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining
outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving
entity) more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of
the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger
or consolidation; or
(iv) the stockholders of the Company approve a
plan of complete liquidation of the Company or the Company consummates the sale
or disposition of all or substantially all of its assets. For the purposes of
this subsection (iv), “substantially all” of the Company’s assets shall mean
assets for which the price or consideration upon sale or disposition equals or
exceeds seventy-five percent (75%) or more of the fair market value of the
Company.
(f)
Incentive Stock Options
Granted to Ten Percent Shareholders.
No Incentive Stock Options shall be
granted to any Employee who owns, directly or indirectly within the mean of
Section 424(d) of the Code, stock possessing more than 10% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Subsidiary,
unless at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, the exercise price of
the Incentive Stock Option is at least 110% of the Fair Market Value of the
Common Stock subject to such Incentive Stock Option and such Incentive Stock
Option, by its terms, is not exercisable after the expiration of five years
from the date such Incentive Stock Option is granted.
(g)
Limitation on Incentive
Stock Options.
To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the
Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for
the first time by a Grantee during any calendar year (under all plans of the
Company and its parent and subsidiary corporations) exceeds $100,000 (or the
then applicable maximum under Section 422 of the Code), such Options shall
be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options. For this purpose, Options shall be
taken into account in the order in which they were granted and the Fair Market
Value of the Common Stock shall be determined as of the time the Option with
respect to such Common Stock is granted.
G6
5.3
Payment of
Exercise Price and Delivery of Shares.
(a)
Notice and Payment for
Shares.
Each Option shall be exercised by delivery of a written notice to
the Company in such form as the Committee shall approve stating the number of
the whole shares of Common Stock as to which the Option is being exercised and
accompanied by payment therefor. No Option shall be deemed exercised in the
event that payment therefor is not received and shares of Common Stock shall
not be issued upon the exercise of an Option unless the exercise price is paid
in full. Payment for shares of Common Stock purchased upon the exercise of an
Option shall be made by (i) cash, (ii) certified check payable to the order of
the Company, (iii) outstanding shares of Common Stock duly endorsed to the
Company (which shares of Common Stock shall be valued at their Fair Market
Value as of the day preceding the date of such exercise), (iv) any combination
of the foregoing, or (v) such other method of payment as may be provided in the
applicable Option Agreement.
(b)
Rights of Grantee in Stock.
Neither any Grantee nor the legal representatives, heirs, legatees or
distributees of any Grantee, shall be deemed to be the holder of, or to have
any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of an Option granted hereunder unless and until such
shares are issued to him or them and such person or persons have received a
certificate or certificates therefor. Upon the issuance and receipt of such
certificate or certificates, such Grantee or the legal representatives, heirs,
legatees or distributees of such Grantee shall have absolute ownership of the
shares of Common Stock evidenced thereby, including the right to vote such
shares, to the same extent as any other owner of shares of Common Stock, and to
receive dividends thereon, subject, however, to the terms, conditions and
restrictions of this Plan.
5.4 Restricted Stock.
The Committee
may from time to time in its discretion grant award shares of restricted stock
(“Restricted Stock”) to Employees at any time after the Effective Date. Each
award of Restricted Stock under the Plan shall be evidenced by a written
Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and the Grantee, in such form as
the Committee shall from time to time approve, and shall comply with the
following terms and conditions (and with such other terms and conditions not
inconsistent with the terms of this Plan as the Committee, in its discretion,
shall establish):
(a)
Number of Shares.
Each
Restricted Stock Agreement shall state the number of shares of Restricted Stock
to be subject to an award.
(b)
Restrictions.
Shares of
Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated
or otherwise disposed of, except by will or the laws of descent and
distribution, for such period as the Committee shall determine from the date on
which the award is granted (the “Restricted Period”). The Committee may also
impose such other restrictions and conditions on the shares as it deems
appropriate including the satisfaction of performance criteria. Certificates
for shares of stock issued pursuant to Restricted Stock awards shall bear an
appropriate legend referring to such restrictions, and any attempt to dispose
of any such shares of stock in contravention of such restrictions shall be null
and void and without effect. During the Restricted Period, such certificates
shall be held in escrow by an escrow agent appointed by the Committee. In
determining the Restricted Period of an award, the Committee may provide that
the foregoing restrictions shall lapse with respect to specified percentages of
the awarded shares on successive anniversaries of the date of such award.
G7
(c) Forfeiture.
Subject to such exceptions as may be determined by the Committee, if the
Grantee’s continuous employment with the Company or any Subsidiary shall
terminate for any reason prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period of an
award, any shares remaining subject to restrictions (after taking into account
the provisions of Section 5.4(e) hereof) shall thereupon be forfeited by the
Grantee and transferred to, and reacquired by, the Company or a Subsidiary at
no cost to the Company or Subsidiary.
(d) Ownership. During the
Restricted Period the Grantee shall possess all incidents of ownership of such
shares, subject to Section 5.4(b) hereof, including the right to receive
dividends with respect to such shares and to vote such shares.
(e) Accelerated Lapse of
Restrictions. The Committee shall have the authority (and the Restricted Stock
Agreement may, but need not, so provide) to cancel all or any portion of any
outstanding restrictions prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period with
respect to any or all of the shares of Restricted Stock awarded on such terms
and conditions as the Committee shall deem appropriate.
(f) Accelerated Lapse of
Restrictions on Change of Control. Notwithstanding anything else provided in
this Agreement, all outstanding restrictions on each share of Restricted Stock
shall immediately be canceled in full upon and simultaneously with any “Change
of Control” of the Company unless the Board determines that the Grantee has
been offered substantially identical replacement restricted stock and a
comparable position at any acquiring company.
5.5
Grant of
Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a) The Committee may grant stock
appreciation rights to such Employees, in such amounts and subject to such
terms and conditions, as the Committee shall determine in its discretion.
Stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all or any part of,
or independently of, any stock option granted under the Plan. A stock
appreciation right may be granted at or after the time of grant of such
option. A stock appreciation right shall become exercisable at such time or
times as determined by the Committee.
(b) The Grantee of a stock
appreciation right shall have the right, subject to the terms of the Plan and
the applicable Award Agreement, to receive from the Company an amount equal to
(a) the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date
of exercise of the stock appreciation right over (b) the exercise price of
such right as set forth in the Award Agreement (or over the option exercise
price if the stock appreciation right is granted in connection with a stock
option), multiplied by (c) the number of shares with respect to which the stock
appreciation right is exercised. Payment to the Grantee upon exercise of a
stock appreciation right shall be made in cash or in shares of Common Stock
(valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the stock
appreciation right) or both, as the Committee shall determine in its
discretion. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right granted in
connection with a stock option, the number of shares subject to the option
shall be correspondingly reduced by the number of shares with respect to which the
stock appreciation right is exercised. Upon the exercise of a stock option in
connection with which a stock appreciation right has been granted, the number
of shares subject to the stock appreciation right shall be correspondingly
reduced by the number of shares with respect to which the option is exercised.
G8
(c) Notwithstanding
anything else provided in this Agreement, each stock appreciation right shall
become immediately exercisable in full upon and simultaneously with any “Change
of Control” of the Company unless the Board determines that the Grantee has
been offered substantially identical replacement stock appreciation rights and
a comparable position at any acquiring company.
5.6
Grant of Restricted Stock Units.
(a) The Committee may grant Awards
of restricted stock units to such Employees, in such amounts, and subject to
such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine in its discretion,
subject to the provisions of the Plan. Restricted stock units may be awarded
independently of or in connection with any other Award under the Plan.
(b) At the time of grant, the
Committee shall specify the date or dates on which the restricted stock units
shall become vested, and may specify such conditions to vesting as it deems
appropriate. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event of the
Grantee’s Termination of Employment for any reason, restricted stock units that
have not vested shall be forfeited and canceled. The Committee at any time may
accelerate vesting dates and otherwise waive or amend any conditions of an
Award of restricted stock units.
(c) At the time of grant, the
Committee shall specify the maturity date applicable to each grant of
restricted stock units, which may be determined at the election of the Grantee.
Such date may be later than the vesting date or dates of the Award. On the
maturity date, the Company shall transfer to the Grantee one unrestricted,
fully transferable share of Common Stock for each vested restricted stock unit
scheduled to be paid out on such date and as to which all other conditions to
the transfer have been fully satisfied. The Committee shall specify the
purchase price, if any, to be paid by the Grantee to the Company for such
shares of Common Stock.
(d) Notwithstanding anything else
provided in this Agreement, each restricted stock unit shall immediately vest
in full and all outstanding restrictions on each restricted stock unit shall
immediately be canceled in full upon and simultaneously with any “Change of
Control” of the Company unless the Board determines that the Grantee has been
offered substantially identical replacement restricted stock units and a
comparable position at any acquiring company.
5.7
Grant of Performance Shares and Share
Units.
(a) The Committee may grant performance
shares in the form of actual shares of Common Stock or share units having a
value equal to an identical number of shares of Common Stock to such Employees,
in such amounts, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee
shall determine in its discretion, subject to the provisions of the Plan. In
the event that a stock certificate is issued in respect of performance shares,
such certificates shall be registered in the name of the Grantee but shall be
held by the Company until the time the performance shares are earned. The
performance conditions and the length of the performance period shall be
determined by the Committee. The Committee shall determine in its sole
discretion whether performance shares granted in the form of share units shall
be paid in cash, Common Stock, or a combination of cash and Common Stock.
G9
(b) Notwithstanding anything else
provided in this Agreement, each performance share shall immediately vest and
be deemed earned in full upon and simultaneously with any “Change of Control”
of the Company unless the Board determines that the Grantee has been offered
substantially identical replacement performance shares and a comparable
position at any acquiring company.
5.8
Other Stock-Based Awards.
The
Committee may grant other types of stock-based Awards to such Employees, in
such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions, as the Committee shall
in its discretion determine, subject to the provisions of the Plan. Such
Awards may entail the transfer of actual shares of Common Stock, or payment in
cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of shares of Common Stock.
5.9
Grant of Dividend Equivalent Rights.
The Committee may in its discretion include in the Award Agreement with respect
to any Award a dividend equivalent right entitling the Grantee to receive
amounts equal to the ordinary dividends that would be paid, during the time
such Award is outstanding and unexercised, on the shares of Common Stock
covered by such Award if such shares were then outstanding. In the event such
a provision is included in an Award Agreement, the Committee shall determine
whether such payments shall be made in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in
another form, the time or times at which they shall be made, and such other terms
and conditions as the Committee shall deem appropriate.
ARTICLE
VI
TERMINATION
AND DEATH
6.1
Termination Other Than by Death or for
Cause.
If a Grantee’s position as an Employee of the Company or a
Subsidiary terminates for any reason other than death or for Cause (as defined
in Section 6.2) he may, unless the applicable Option Agreement provides
otherwise, exercise an Option previously granted and vested within three months
after the date of such termination, but in no event later than the date on which
the Option would have expired in accordance with its terms. To the extent the
Option is not so exercised, it shall expire at the end of such three-month
period.
6.2
Termination for Cause.
If a
Grantee’s position as an Employee of the Company or a Subsidiary is terminated
for Cause, any Option theretofore granted to him shall expire and cease to be
exercisable on the date notice of such termination is delivered to the
Grantee. “Cause” shall mean (a) the willful and continued failure by a Grantee
to substantially perform his duties with the Company (other than any such
failure resulting from his incapacity due to physical or mental illness), after
a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Grantee by the
Board, which demand specifically identifies the manner in which the Board
believes that the Grantee has not substantially performed his duties, or (b)
the willful engaging by the Grantee in conduct which is demonstrably and
materially injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise. For purposes of
this Section 6.2, no act, or failure to act, shall be deemed “willful” unless
done, or omitted to be done, not in good faith and without reasonable belief
that such action or omission was in the best interest of the Company.
6.3
Death.
If a Grantee dies (i) while
he is an Employee of the Company or a Subsidiary or (ii) during the three-month
period after the termination of his position as an Employee of the Company or a
Subsidiary, and at the time of his death the Grantee was entitled to exercise
an Option theretofore granted to him, such Option shall, unless the applicable
Option Agreement provides otherwise, expire one year after the date of his
death, but in no event later than the date on which the Option would have
expired if the Grantee had lived. During such one-year period the Option may
be exercised by the Grantee’s executor or administrator or by any person or
persons who shall have acquired the Option directly from the Grantee by bequest
or inheritance, but only to the extent that the Grantee was entitled to
exercise the Option at the date of his death and, to the extent the Option is
not so exercised, it shall expire at the end of such one-year period.
G10
6.4
Applicability
to Other Awards.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if the
Committee determines in its discretion that a Grantee’s Termination of
Employment is for Cause, then the Committee shall also have the power to
determine in its discretion that any outstanding stock options and stock
appreciation rights or other Awards, whether or not exercisable at the time of
such termination, shall be terminated as of the date of such termination and
shall be of no further force and effect. The Committee shall also have the
power to determine in its discretion the applicability of the principles in
this Article VI to Awards other than stock options.
ARTICLE VI
ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN
7.1
Administration
. The Plan shall be
administered by the Board of Directors as a whole or by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors or such other committee as may be appointed
by the Board of Directors of the Company, which Committee shall consist of not
less than two members, all of whom are members of the Board of Directors. A
majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum thereof and the actions of
a majority of the Committee at a meeting at which a quorum is present, or
actions unanimously approved in writing by all members of the Committee, shall
be the actions of the Committee. Vacancies occurring on the Committee shall be
filled by the Board. The Committee shall have full and final authority (i) to
interpret the Plan and each of the Option Agreements and other Award
Agreements, (ii) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations, if any,
relating to the Plan, (iii) to make all determinations necessary or advisable
for the administration of the Plan and (iv) to correct any defect, supply any
omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan and any Option Agreement
or any other Award Agreement. The Committee’s determination in all matters
referred to herein shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes and upon
all persons including, but without limitation, the Company, the shareholders of
the Company, the Committee, and each of the members thereof, Employees and
their respective successors in interest.
7.2
Liability.
No member of the
Committee shall be liable for anything done or omitted to be done by him or by
any other member of the Committee in connection with the Plan, except for his
own willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Committee shall have power to
engage outside consultants, auditors or other professional help to assist in
the fulfillment of the Committee’s duties under the Plan at the Company’s
expense.
7.3
Determinations.
In making its
determinations concerning the key Employees who shall receive Options or other
Awards as well as the number of shares to be covered by such Options or other
Awards and the time or times at which they shall be granted, the Committee
shall take into account the nature of the services rendered by such key
Employees, their past, present and potential contribution to the Company’s
success and such other factors as the Committee may deem relevant. The
Committee shall determine the form of Option Agreements and Award Agreement
under the Plan and the terms and conditions to be included therein, provided
such terms and conditions are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan. The
Committee may waive any provisions of any Option Agreement or any other Award
Agreement, provided such waiver is not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan
as then in effect. The Committee’s determinations under the Plan need not be
uniform and may be made by it selectively among persons who receive, or are
eligible to receive, Options or other Awards under the Plan, whether or not
such persons are similarly situated.
G11
ARTICLE VIII
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF PLAN
8.1
Amendment
of Plan.
(a) Generally. The Board of
Directors may amend the Plan at any time and from time to time. Rights and
obligations under any Option or other Award granted before amendment of the
Plan shall not be materially altered, or impaired adversely, by such amendment,
except with consent of the Grantee (or, after the Grantee’s death, the person
having the right to exercise or receive payment of the Award). For purposes of
the Plan, any action of the Board or the Committee that alters or affects the
tax treatment of any Award shall not be considered to materially impair any
rights of any Grantee. An amendment of the Plan shall be subject to the
approval of the Company’s stockholders only to the extent required by
applicable laws (including Section 422 of the Code), regulations or rules
(including applicable rules of any stock exchange).
(b) Amendments Relating to
Incentive Stock Options. To the extent applicable, the Plan is intended to
permit the issuance of Incentive Stock Options to Employees in accordance with
the provisions of Section 422 of the Code. Subject to paragraph 8.1(a) above,
the Plan, Option Agreements and other Award Agreements may be modified or
amended at any time, both prospectively and retroactively, and in a manner that
may affect Incentive Stock Options previously granted, if such amendment or
modification is necessary for the Plan and Incentive Stock Options granted
hereunder to qualify under said provisions of the Code.
8.2
Termination.
The Board may at any
time terminate the Plan as of any date specified in a resolution adopted by the
Board. If not earlier terminated, the Plan shall terminate on January 22, 2023
(but in any event not later than the day before the 10
th
anniversary
of Board approval of the Plan). No Options or other Awards may be granted
after the Plan has terminated, but the Committee shall continue to supervise
the administration of Options or other Awards previously granted.
ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1
Restrictions Upon Grant of Awards.
If the listing upon any stock exchange or the registration or qualification
under any federal or state law of any shares of Common Stock to be issued on
the exercise of Awards granted under this Plan (whether to permit the grant of
Awards or the resale or other disposition of any such shares of Common Stock by
or on behalf of Grantees receiving such shares) should be or become necessary
or desirable, the Board in its sole discretion may determine that delivery of
the certificates for such shares of Common Stock shall not be made until such
listing, registration or qualification shall have been completed. The Company
agrees that it will use its best efforts to effect any such listing,
registration or qualification, provided, however, that the Company shall not be
required to use its best efforts to effect such registration under the
Securities Act of 1933 other than on Form S-8 or such other forms as may be in
effect from time to time calling for information comparable to that presently
required to be furnished under Form S-8.
G12
9.2
Shareholder
Agreement; Restrictions Upon Resale of Unregistered Stock.
Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in this Plan, no shares of Common Stock shall be
issued to any Grantee unless and until such Grantee has executed and delivered
to the Company a copy of the then current shareholders agreement among the then
current shareholders of the Company. In addition, each Grantee shall, if the
Company deems it advisable, represent and agree in writing (i) that any shares
of Common Stock acquired by such Grantee pursuant to this Plan will not be sold
except pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act
of 1933 or pursuant to an exemption from registration under said Act, (ii) that
such Grantee is acquiring such shares of Common Stock for his own account and
not with a view to the distribution thereof, and (iii) to such other customary
matters as the Company may request. In such case, no shares of Common Stock
shall be issued to such Grantee unless such Grantee provides such
representations and agreements and the Company is reasonably satisfied that
such representations and agreements are correct.
9.3
Adjustments.
(a)
General
. In the event
of a subdivision of the outstanding Common Stock, a declaration of a dividend
payable in shares of Common Stock, a declaration of a dividend payable in a
form other than shares in an amount that has a material effect on the value of
shares of Common Stock, a combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common
Stock into a lesser number of shares of Common Stock, a recapitalization, a
reclassification or a similar occurrence, the Committee shall make appropriate
adjustments in one or more of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock
available for future grants of Options or other Awards under Section 3.2, (ii)
the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each outstanding Option or
other Award, or (iii) the exercise price of each outstanding Option or other
Award.
(b)
Reorganizations.
In the
event that the Company is a party to a merger or reorganization, outstanding
Options and other Awards shall be subject to the agreement of merger or
reorganization.
(c)
Reservation of Rights.
Except as provided in this Section 9.3, a Grantee shall have no rights by
reason of (i) any subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class,
(ii) the payment of any dividend, or (iii) any other increase or decrease in
the number of shares of stock of any class. Any issue by the Company of shares
of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any
class, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with
respect to, the number or exercise price of shares of Common Stock subject to
an Option or other Award. The grant of any Option or other Award pursuant to
the Plan shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company to make
adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations or changes of its capital or
business structure, to merge or consolidate or to dissolve, liquidate, sell or
transfer all or any part of its business or assets.
9.4
Withholding of Taxes; Tax Elections.
(a) Each Grantee who exercises a
Nonstatutory Stock Option and each Grantee who holds Restricted Stock or other
Award that has vested shall agree that no later than the date of exercise or
receipt of shares of Common Stock pursuant to such Option and no later than the
date such Restricted Stock or other Award vests (in whole or in part) he will
pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Committee
regarding payment of, any Federal, state or local taxes of any kind required by
law to be withheld with respect to the transfer to him or vesting in him of
such shares of Common Stock.
G13
(b) The
applicable Option Agreement or other Award Agreement may provide that a Grantee
may satisfy, in whole or in part, the requirements of paragraph (a):
(i) by delivery of shares of Common
Stock owned by the Grantee for at least six months (or such shorter or longer
period as the Committee may approve) having a Fair Market Value (determined as
of the date of such delivery) equal to all or part of the amount to be so
withheld, or
(ii) by electing to have the Company
withhold the requisite number of shares from shares otherwise deliverable
pursuant to the exercise of the Option or vesting of Restricted Stock or other
Award giving rise to the tax withholding obligation provided, however, that
(a) the Grantee’s election and the
withholding pursuant thereto take effect during the period beginning on the
third business day following the date of release for publication of the
quarterly and annual summary statements of the Company’s sales and earnings and
ending on the twelfth business day following such date, and six months have
elapsed since the date the Option or Restricted Stock or other Award was
granted, or
(b) such election was irrevocably
made by the Grantee and filed with the Committee in writing at least six months
in advance of the date on which such withholding occurs. The Committee may
require, as a condition of accepting any such delivery of Common Stock or any
such election by the Grantee, that the Grantee furnish to the Company an
opinion of counsel to the effect that such delivery or election will not result
in the Grantee incurring any liability under Section 16(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(c) If the Grantee, in connection
with the acquisition of shares of Common Stock under the Plan, makes an
election permitted under Section 83(b) of the Code (i.e., an election to
include in gross income in the year of transfer the amounts specified in
Section 83(b) of the Code notwithstanding the continuing transfer
restrictions), the Grantee shall submit to the Company a copy of the notice
filed by the Grantee with the Internal Revenue Service within ten (10) days of
filing such notice, and shall pay, or make arrangements satisfactory to the
Committee regarding payment of, any federal, state or local taxes of any kind
required by law to be withheld as a result of such election, all in accordance
with the provisions of clauses (a) and (b) of this section 9.4.
G14
(d) If
any Grantee shall make any disposition of shares of Common Stock issued
pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option under the circumstances
described in Section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying
dispositions), such Grantee shall notify the Company of such disposition within
ten (10) days thereof.
9.5
Use of Proceeds.
The proceeds from
the sale of Common Stock pursuant to Options or other Awards granted under the
Plan shall constitute general funds of the Company and may be used for such
corporate purposes as the Company may determine.
9.6
Substitution of Options.
Options
may be granted under this Plan in substitution for options held by individuals
who are employees of another corporation and who become Employees of the
Company or any Subsidiary of the Company eligible to receive Options pursuant
to the Plan as a result of a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar
event. The terms and conditions of any Options so granted may vary from those
set forth in the Plan to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee in
order to conform the provisions of Options granted pursuant to the Plan to the
provisions of the options in substitution for which they are granted.
9.7
Notices.
Any notice required or
permitted hereunder shall be sufficiently given only if sent by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the
Company at its principal place of business, and to the Grantee at the address
on file with the Company at the time of grant hereunder, or to such other
address as either party may hereafter designate in writing by notice similarly
given by one party to the other.
9.8
Nature of Payments.
Any and all
grants of Awards and issuances of shares of Common Stock under the Plan shall
constitute a special incentive payment to the Grantee and shall not be taken
into account in computing the amount of salary or compensation of the Grantee
for the purpose of determining any benefits under any pension, retirement,
profit-sharing, bonus, life insurance or other benefit plan of the Company or
under any agreement with the Grantee, unless such plan or agreement
specifically provides otherwise.
9.9
Non-Uniform Determinations.
The
Committee’s determinations under the Plan need not be uniform and may be
made by it selectively among persons who receive, or are eligible to receive,
Awards (whether or not such persons are similarly situated). Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall be entitled, among other
things, to make non-uniform and selective determinations, and to enter into
non-uniform and selective Award Agreements, as to the persons to receive Awards
under the Plan, and the terms and provisions of Awards under the Plan.
9.10
Waiver of Claims.
Prior to being
selected by the Committee to receive an Award, an Employee has no right to any
benefits hereunder. In consideration of a Grantee’s receipt of any Award
hereunder, the Committee may require, in its sole discretion, that each such
Grantee expressly waive any right to contest the amount of any Award, the terms
of any Award Agreement, any determination, action or omission hereunder or
under any Award Agreement by the Committee, the Company or the Board, or any
amendment to the Plan or any Award Agreement (other than an amendment to this
Plan or an Award Agreement to which his or her consent is expressly required by
the express terms of the Plan or an Award Agreement).
9.11
Governing Law.
The Plan and all
determinations made and actions taken hereunder, to the extent not otherwise
governed by the Code or the laws of the United States of America, shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Florida and construed accordingly.
G15
Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc.
WRITTEN CONSENT CARD
WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHAREHOLDERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.
THIS CONSENT IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
The undersigned, being a shareholder of record of Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) as of February 15, 2013 hereby takes the following action, pursuant to Section 607.0704 of the Florida Business Corporation Act, with respect to all shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”) held by the undersigned, in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company of written consents without a meeting, pursuant to Section 607.0704 of the Florida Business Corporation Act, to the two proposals set forth below, as the same are described in the Company’s Consent Solicitation Statement, dated February 28, 2013 (the “Consent Solicitation Statement”).
(Place an “X” in the appropriate boxes)
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders CONSENT to the following proposals:
|
Proposal 1.
|
an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock at an exchange ratio of one-for-two thousand (1:2000); and
|
|
Proposal 2.
|
approval and adoption of the Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. 2013 Stock Plan.
|
Proposal 1
RESOLVED, that the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company attached as Exhibit A to the Consent Solicitation Statement be, and it hereby is, authorized, approved and adopted in all respects.
¨
CONSENT (FOR)
|
¨
CONSENT WITHHELD (AGAINST)
|
¨
ABSTAIN
|
Proposal 2
RESOLVED, that the Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. 2013 Stock Plan attached as Exhibit F to the Consent Solicitation Statement be, and it hereby is, authorized, approved and adopted in all respects.
¨
CONSENT (FOR)
|
¨
CONSENT WITHHELD (AGAINST)
|
¨
ABSTAIN
|
INSTRUCTIONS
: TO CONSENT, WITHHOLD CONSENT OR ABSTAIN FROM CONSENTING TO THE APPROVAL OF EACH PROPOSAL, CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX ABOVE. IF NO BOX IS MARKED ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO EACH PROPOSAL, THE UNDERSIGNED WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE CONSENTED TO THE PROPOSAL.
PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS CONSENT PROMPTLY, USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
|
|
Dated: ______________, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[print name of record shareholder as set forth on stock
certificate]
|
|
[signature of record shareholder or person authorized to
sign on behalf of record shareholder]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[title or authority of authorized person, if applicable]
|
|
[signature, if held jointly]
|
If an individual, please sign exactly as the name appears on the certificate representing your shares of Common Stock. If a corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company or other entity, please identify the entity as the name appears on the certificate representing your shares of Common Stock, cause an authorized person to sign on behalf of the entity, and clearly identify the title of such authorized person. This Written Consent of Shareholders shall vote all shares to which the signatory is entitled. This Written Consent of Shareholders, together with all written consents in substantially the same form, shall be treated as a single consent of shareholders.
2
Environmental Solutions ... (CE) (USOTC:ESWW)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De May 2024 a Jun 2024
Environmental Solutions ... (CE) (USOTC:ESWW)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Jun 2023 a Jun 2024