ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
We are currently considered a smaller reporting company for purposes
of the SECs executive compensation and other disclosures. As such, we have opted to take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosure requirements afforded to smaller reporting companies and, as a result, have provided more limited (or,
in some cases, eliminated) disclosures that we have provided in prior years executive compensation disclosures. The executive compensation disclosures that follow comply with the SECs executive compensation disclosure rules for
smaller reporting companies and therefore are generally more narrow in scope than the executive compensation disclosures and Compensation Discussion and Analysis that we have included in prior proxy statements.
Overview
The following discussion describes the
Companys executive compensation program for those individuals we have identified as our named executive officers or NEOs for 2013 in accordance with the executive compensation disclosure rules and regulations of the SEC
for smaller reporting companies. As used below, the Committee refers to the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Companys principal executive officer, the two other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company
during 2013, who were in each case serving as executive officers on December 31, 2013 (Top 2 Officers), and two individuals (our former Senior Vice President and General Counsel and our former President of LaJobi) who would have
qualified as Top 2 Officers had they been serving as executive officers on December 31, 2013, are our NEOs for 2013.
10
Key Decisions for 2013
Although we fine-tune our compensation programs as conditions change, we believe it is important to maintain consistency in our compensation philosophy and
approach. We recognize that value-creating performance by an executive or group of executives does not always translate immediately into appreciation in our stock price, particularly in periods of economic stress. Fiscal 2013 was a challenging year
for the Company. In light of the Companys recent financial performance, continued challenging economic conditions, and in order to emphasize our pay-for-performance philosophy discussed in Compensation Philosophy and Overview
below, the following key actions were taken with respect to NEO compensation in 2013:
|
|
The Committee approved a compensation package for the CEO (effective March 14, 2013) which is weighted toward incentive compensation, in that his annual base salary was reduced from the annual base salary rate
payable to RB, Inc. for his services prior thereto (an approximate 48% reduction). He was awarded a substantial equity grant of SARs and stock options, the ultimate realizable value of which is directly tied to the value of the Companys stock
(see Employment Contracts and Arrangements below).
|
|
|
No equity grants were made to NEOs in 2013 other than grants to Mr. Benaroya and Ms. Friedman in connection with the commencement of their employment with the Company.
|
|
|
Base salaries for NEOs were not increased in 2013, other than Ms. Carr, who received a contractual base salary increase 8 months earlier than required in recognition of her performance with respect to the
implementation of various cost savings initiatives.
|
|
|
The compensation of Ms. Carr was not further increased upon her becoming CFO, in addition to her existing role as COO.
|
|
|
The Committee approved the execution of various post-termination and/or consulting agreements with departing members of management in order to assure a smooth transition.
|
CEO Compensation
Mr. Benaroya
(acting CEO through an agreement with RB, Inc. for the provision of his services from September 12, 2011 until
March 14, 2013; President and CEO thereafter)
Pursuant to an agreement between the Company and RB, Inc., a Delaware corporation
of which Mr. Benaroya is a principal shareholder, originally entered into as of September 12, 2011, and modified as of February 14, 2012, RB, Inc. provided the full-time services of Mr. Benaroya to the Company as interim
Executive Chairman and acting CEO until March 14, 2013, for a fee of $100,000 per calendar month (reduced voluntarily by RB, Inc. to $75,000 per calendar month as of September 2012). Mr. Benaroya was not paid directors fees during
the term of his engagement as interim Executive Chairman, nor did he participate in any bonus program, employee benefit plan or other compensation arrangement with the Company.
On March 14, 2013, Mr. Benaroya was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and continues to serve as
Chairman of the Board. In determining the various components of Mr. Benaroyas compensation package at the time of the commencement of his employment, the Committee reviewed a variety of factors it deemed appropriate, including, but not
limited to, Mr. Benaroyas responsibilities and prior experience, most current compensation, scope of the position, the current operational position of the Company, the desire to link a substantial portion of Mr. Benaroyas
compensation package to the Companys near and long-term future performance, comparables provided by the executive search firm retained by the Company, as well as the Companys current challenges and future plans. As a result of this
analysis and negotiations between Mr. Benaroya and the Company, on March 14, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Benaroya as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. See the section captioned
Employment Contracts and Arrangements for a description of the material provisions of Mr. Benaroyas current employment agreement, including incentive compensation, equity grants, perquisites and post-termination benefits.
11
Compensation Philosophy
We feel that the overall compensation levels of our executives (including our NEOs) should be sufficiently competitive to attract talented leaders and to
motivate those leaders to drive Company or business unit performance. At the same time, however, we believe that compensation should be set at responsible levels, reflecting our continued focus on improving sales and margins, controlling costs and
creating value for our shareholders. At the core of our compensation philosophy is our belief that compensation should be linked to performance. We believe that offering executives a total compensation package that incorporates a
reward-for-performance philosophy helps achieve these objectives. As a result, a significant portion of the potential compensation of our executive officers is based upon achievement of corporate or business unit objectives. We also believe that
total compensation and accountability should generally increase with position and responsibility. Consistent with this view, opportunities under our incentive compensation program typically represent an increasing portion of total compensation as
position and responsibility increase, as individuals with greater responsibility have greater ability to influence the Companys achievement of targeted results and strategic initiatives. Similarly, equity-based awards (when they are granted)
generally represent a higher portion of total compensation for persons with higher levels of responsibility, making a significant portion of their total compensation dependent on long-term stock appreciation.
Elements of 2013 Executive Compensation
The
material elements of our 2013 executive compensation program are: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash incentive compensation; (iii) periodic equity awards; and (iv) perquisites and other benefits.
How We Choose the Level of each Element
We
structure the size of the various elements awarded to our NEOs by balancing the interests of shareholders with the competitive need to provide an attractive overall compensation program. Although we do not have an exact formula for allocating among
the different elements of our executive compensation program, we do ensure that a significant percentage of our NEOs aggregate compensation package is contingent upon either Company or operating group results, as is more fully described below.
The particular amount of each element of an NEOs compensation for a particular year is determined by or with the approval of the Committee, which
uses the following considerations, among others, in making such determinations:
|
|
|
the performance of the Company or the relevant operational group;
|
|
|
|
the results of an annual executive assessment for each NEO for the previous year;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated difficulty of achieving stated goals and objectives in the coming year;
|
|
|
|
the value of each NEOs unique skills and capabilities to support long-term performance of the Company;
|
12
|
|
|
the contribution of each NEO as a member of the executive management team;
|
|
|
|
the scope and relative complexity of the individuals responsibilities;
|
|
|
|
competitive market and industry information, including periodic reports on performance versus a peer group of companies;
|
|
|
|
the recommendations of our compensation consultant, if any;
|
|
|
|
the contributions of such NEO beyond his or her immediate area of responsibility;
|
|
|
|
compensation at former employers, in the case of new hires; and
|
Certain of these considerations are given greater weight depending on the element of
compensation under consideration.
The Committee does not attempt to maintain target percentiles with respect to a specific list of benchmark companies,
but instead periodically uses analyses of peer group companies to determine whether the Companys compensation programs are generally competitive with that of others in similar industries.
Objectives and Operation of the 2013 Executive Compensation Program
Base Salary
The objective of base salary is to
provide current compensation that reflects job responsibilities, value to the Company and individual performance, while maintaining market competitiveness. The Committee reviews and approves the base salary and any salary adjustment for NEOs on an
annual basis, upon hiring of any NEO and at the time of any promotion or other change in responsibilities of any NEO.
The Companys agreement with
RB, Inc. (approved by the Committee and effective until March 14, 2013) provided for a specified fee for the services of Mr. Benaroya (who was an employee of RB, Inc. and not of the Company during 2013 until such date) as Executive
Chairman of the Company (Mr. Benaroyas current employment agreement, as approved by the Committee, also specifies an annual base salary which is subject to reduction only upon specified circumstances). A minimum base salary for each of
Ms. Carr and Mr. Schaub was determined by their respective Committee-approved employment agreements for 2013. There were no increases to the base salaries of the Companys NEOs in 2013 other than Ms. Carr, whose base salary was
increased from $350,000 to $375,000 as of April 1, 2013.
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
The objective of annual cash incentive compensation is to motivate and to reward the achievement of annual corporate or business unit performance objectives.
Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, incentive compensation provides our executives with the opportunity to earn more cash compensation based on the Companys or a specified business units performance.
2013 Cash Incentive Compensation
Commencing in 2012, we initiated a shareholder-approved executive Incentive Compensation Bonus Program (the ICBP), which replaced a similar
incentive compensation program in effect from 2005 through 2011.
13
Operation of the 2013 ICBP
General
All NEOs are eligible to participate in the ICBP
as members of specified participant groups based on the Companys business units (either Corporate; Sassy; Soft Home (Kids Line and CoCaLo); or LaJobi). NEOs are eligible to participate in the ICBP at a specified level (expressed as a
percentage of annual base salary). The percentage for each NEO (such NEOs IC Percentage) is assigned by the Committee (and may be determined by the Committee in the relevant individuals employment agreement). Subject to
specified restrictions set forth in the ICBP, the Committee has the sole discretion to determine, or modify at any time, the IC Percentage of any participant in the ICBP. The IC Percentages of all NEOs in 2013 ranged from 40% to 50% of base salary.
NEOs, as a result of their higher responsibility levels and greater ability to impact Company performance, generally have IC Percentages exceeding those of less senior executives.
Each NEOs IC Percentage multiplied by such NEOs annual base salary equals such NEOs Target IC, which is used to determine the
amount of incentive compensation that such NEO is eligible to earn for the relevant year in the event that applicable corporate or business unit financial objectives are achieved.
Establishing Corporate Objectives
Achievement of any
award under the ICBP is based entirely on attainment of a specified corporate or business unit financial objective for the applicable year (the Target) with respect to a specified measure of operating performance, such as operating
income or Adjusted EBITDA (the Chosen Metric). Amounts are earned by NEOs based on three separate levels of achievement with respect to the Target, as follows: (i) if the Company or relevant business unit achieves 85% of the Target
(the Minimum Target), the NEO will earn an amount equal to 20% of such NEOs Target IC; (ii) if the Company or relevant business unit achieves the Target, the NEO will earn an amount equal to 100% of such NEOs Target IC;
and (iii) if the Company or relevant business unit achieves 120% of the Target (the Maximum Target), the NEO will earn an amount equal to 200% of such NEOs Target IC. Amounts earned for achievement of results between
(i) the Minimum Target and the Target and (ii) the Target and the Maximum Target, are in each case determined by a straight-line interpolation. No payments under the ICBP will be made for performance below the Minimum Target, and no
payments in excess of 200% of a Participants Target IC will be made for performance above the Maximum Target. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no IC Payments (as defined below) will be made to any NEO (or other individual plan participant) in
any plan year in excess of $1.5 million. The Committee may adjust the Targets established for a particular calendar year to account for extraordinary events which may affect the determination of performance, in order to avoid distortions in the
operation of the ICBP. No such adjustments were made to the Targets set at the beginning of 2013 for any participant group during 2013.
Both the Chosen
Metric and the Target required are determined annually by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Chosen Metric for all participant groups during 2013 was Adjusted EBITDA (either consolidated or that of a specified business unit or units, as
applicable), which was defined for this purpose as net income before net interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization and other non-cash, special or non-recurring charges. The Committee believes Adjusted EBITDA to be an
appropriate metric by which to measure performance because it is a measure of cash flow that provides the flexibility needed to adjust for special circumstances that affect the Company from time to time and therefore provides an opportunity to
measure performance from different periods in a more consistent manner. For 2013, the Committee made no adjustments to the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA for any participant group in which any NEO was a member. The Targets for 2013 were set at
amounts that exceeded 2012 results for Corporate and each business unit. The Targets for 2013 were based on consolidated Company Adjusted EBITDA for Corporate participants. Targets for Sassy, Soft Home (Kids Line and CoCaLo), and LaJobi participants
were based on their respective Adjusted EBITDA (the combined Adjusted EBITDA of Kids Line and CoCaLo in the case of Soft Home participants).
14
Achievement of the Target generally represents a slight stretch, representing how the Company would
perform if it achieved budgeted amounts, recognizing that the budgets are generally set at slightly optimistic levels, whereas the Maximum Target is designed to be a true stretch goal for the Company or the relevant business unit[s]
thereof (typically 120% of Target). From 2005 (the first year that the Companys prior incentive compensation program was in effect) through 2013, current participant groups achieved objective corporate performance as follows (where
X signifies that the Minimum Target was not reached; and a designation of Min. Target, Target or Max. Target signifies that that such respective Target level was either reached or exceeded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant Group
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
Corporate
|
|
N/A
|
|
Target
|
|
Min. Target
|
|
X
|
|
Target
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
Sassy
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
Min. Target
|
|
Min. Target
|
|
Min. Target
|
|
Min. Target
|
Kids Line*
|
|
Target
|
|
Target
|
|
Target
|
|
X
|
|
Target
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
LaJobi
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
Target
|
|
Target
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
CoCaLo*
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
X
|
|
Target
|
|
Min. Target
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
*
|
Note that under the ICBP, first effective in 2012, Kids Line and CoCaLo participants are deemed to be members of the Soft Home participant group, and their Targets are based on the achievement of combined
Kids Line/CoCaLo Adjusted EBITDA.
|
The Maximum Target was not achieved by any participant group in any year. Generally, the Company seeks to
maintain the relative difficulty of achieving the target levels from year to year.
An NEO must be employed by the Company at the time that IC Payments
are made in order to receive any amounts otherwise payable to such participant under the ICBP for the preceding year. As a result, even if the Minimum Target had been reached by their participant groups, Messrs. Goldfarb and Schaub would not have
received any IC Payments.
15
Potential and Actual Awards under the ICBP in 2013
The following table sets forth information with respect to potential and actual awards under the ICBP for NEOs during 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO
|
|
Participant
Group
|
|
IC Percentage
%
|
|
|
Potential
Award for
Min. Target
|
|
|
Potential
Award for
Target
|
|
|
Potential Award
for Max. Target
|
|
|
Amount
Paid
|
|
|
Amount
Paid as
% of Base
Salary
|
|
Raphael Benaroya
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Kerry Carr
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
*
|
|
$
|
184,375
|
|
|
$
|
368,750
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
*
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Jodie Simon Friedman**
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
*
|
|
$
|
75,150
|
|
|
$
|
150,301
|
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
*
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Marc Goldfarb
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
34,200
|
|
|
$
|
170,800
|
|
|
$
|
341,500
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Richard Schaub
|
|
LaJobi
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
37,500
|
|
|
$
|
187,500
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
*
|
Ms. Carr and Ms. Friedman were guaranteed the bonus amounts awarded for 2013 only.
|
**
|
Pro-rated from her employment date.
|
Equity Awards
Equity awards are granted periodically to provide NEOs (and other executives) with potential upside opportunity if the Companys stock price improves and
to provide incentives for retention, as such awards vest over time. As a result of the Companys financial performance in 2013, however, other than awards made to each of Mr. Benaroya and Ms. Friedman in connection with the
commencement of their employment with the Company (discussed under Employment Contracts and Arrangements below), the Committee determined that it would be inappropriate to make grants of equity awards to NEOs.
Other Elements of Compensation and Related Benefits
Perquisites
We limit the perquisites that we make
available to our executive officers. Executives are entitled to few benefits that are not otherwise available to all of our employees. The perquisites provided to the CEO and the other NEOs in 2013 are described in footnote (6) to the Summary
Compensation Table below.
40l(k) Plan
The
Company and each of its subsidiaries offer eligible employees, including all NEOs, the opportunity to participate in a retirement plan (the 401(k) Plans) that is based on employees pretax salary deferrals pursuant to
Section 401(k) of the Code. See the section captioned Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements below for a more detailed description of the 401(k) Plans.
16
Post-Termination Benefits
Individual Employment and Post-Termination Agreements
We provide severance and other post-termination benefits to NEOs in order to help ensure a smooth transition for the Company in the event that an NEOs
position with the Company as an executive officer terminates. We have provided these benefits as we deemed them reasonable for critical members of our senior corporate staff in order to help ensure their cooperation and the continuity of management
in the event of a termination of employment for specified reasons, and to help eliminate from any decision-making process potential distractions caused by concerns over personal financial and employment security. See Employment Contracts and
Arrangements below for a description of severance arrangements for NEOs who are currently employed by the Company and post- termination agreements between the Company and specified NEOs whose employment as an executive officer of the Company
terminated during 2013.
Equity Grants
See
Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements below for a description of the acceleration of vesting and the period of exercisability of equity granted by the Company to NEOs under the 2013 EIP and predecessor plans under
various termination of employment events.
Key Decisions for 2014
With respect to 2014, no material changes have been made to the Companys overall compensation philosophy or structure discussed in this Compensation
Discussion and Analysis.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth compensation for our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)(1)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)(2)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(4)
|
|
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Comp.
($)(5)
|
|
|
All Other
Comp
($)(6)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Raphael Benaroya (A)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
682,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,167
|
|
|
|
1,539,075
|
|
Chairman, President and CEO
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
Kerry Carr (B)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
368,077
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
|
|
426,597
|
|
EVP, COO and CFO
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
169,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,709
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
510,603
|
|
Jodie Simon Friedman (C)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
178,750
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
379,202
|
|
VP and General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc. S. Goldfarb (D)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
223,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,908
|
|
|
|
429,686
|
|
Former SVP and General Counsel
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
341,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,425
|
|
|
|
53,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,261
|
|
|
|
442,229
|
|
Richard F. Schaub, Jr. (E)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,893
|
|
|
|
384,893
|
|
Former President LaJobi
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,650
|
|
|
|
45,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,751
|
|
|
|
455,835
|
|
(A)
|
From September 12, 2011 through March 14, 2013, Mr. Benaroya served as interim Executive Chairman and acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company. On March 14, 2013, Mr. Benaroya became the
Companys President and Chief Executive Officer (and remains Chairman of the Board).
|
17
(B)
|
Ms. Carr became Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company on September 12, 2012, and assumed the additional role of Chief Financial Officer of the Company (serving as principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer) effective July 1, 2013. From June 2012 until her appointment as an executive officer, Ms. Carr served as a consultant to the Company.
|
(C)
|
Ms. Friedman became Vice President and General Counsel of the Company as of August 14, 2013. From June 3, 2013 until her appointment as an executive officer, she served as Interim VP-Legal of the Company
at the same annualized base salary rate.
|
(D)
|
Mr. Goldfarb resigned as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company as of August 14, 2013, and thereafter served as a consultant to the Company pursuant to the terms of a Consulting Agreement
which expired on April 14, 2014. See Note (A) to the 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table below for a description of the disposition of all equity grants made to Mr. Goldfarb as a result of his
resignation as an officer of the Company.
|
(E)
|
Mr. Schaub resigned as President of LaJobi as of December 5, 2013, remained an employee thereafter until January 3, 2014, and as a consultant to LaJobi pursuant to the terms of a Consulting Agreement
until March 14, 2014. See Note (B) to the 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table below for a description of the disposition of all equity grants made to Mr. Schaub as a result of his resignation as an
officer of the Company.
|
(1)
|
With respect to Mr. Benaroya, the amount in the salary column for 2013 includes $182,143 paid to RB, Inc. (a company of which Mr. Benaroya is a principal shareholder) from January 1, 2013 through
March 13, 2013 pursuant to its agreement with the Company for the provision of Mr. Benaroyas services as interim Executive Chairman and acting CEO. During the term of such engagement, Mr. Benaroya did not receive directors
fees, nor did he participate in any bonus program, employee benefit plan or other compensation arrangement with the Company. See Employment Contracts and Arrangements below. All amounts in 2012 represent fees paid to RB, Inc. With
respect to Mr. Schaub, the amount in the salary column for 2013 includes $14,423 paid to him as a non-officer employee pursuant to the terms of his Consulting Agreement with the Company, described in Employment Contracts and
Arrangements below.
|
(2)
|
With respect to Ms. Carr and Ms. Friedman in 2013, the amount represents the portion of their potential incentive compensation award under the ICBP that was guaranteed pursuant to the terms of their respective
employment agreements with the Company. As these amounts were not tied to any performance measure, they were classified as bonuses.
|
(3)
|
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards for the years shown, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts reflect the Companys accounting expense and do not necessarily
correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the NEOs. Assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values for these awards can be found in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013
(the 2013 10-K), in footnote 15 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
(4)
|
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of option and/or SAR awards for the years shown, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts reflect the Companys accounting expense and do not
necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the NEOs. Assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values for these awards can be found in the 2013 10-K, in footnote 15 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. For Mr. Goldfarb in 2013, includes the incremental fair value ($11,000) of 66,250 SARs and 44,700 stock options which will be permitted to remain outstanding until July 14, 2014 (90 days following the expiration of his
Consulting Agreement with the Company), instead of their scheduled expiration date of November 14, 2013 (90 days following his resignation as an officer of the Company).
|
18
(5)
|
No NEOs earned awards under the ICBP in 2013, but see footnote (2) above for information regarding guaranteed bonus payments under the ICBP made to Ms. Carr and Ms. Friedman in 2013.
|
(6)
|
The perquisites and other personal benefits included within the All Other Compensation for each named executive officer are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Annual
Car
Allowance
|
|
|
Income
Recognized
from
Provision of Group
Term
Life Insurance
($)(a)
|
|
|
Contributions
to 401(k)
Plans ($)(b)
|
|
|
Other
($)(c)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Raphael Benaroya
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
51,167
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Kerry Carr
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
Jodie Simon Friedman
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Marc S. Goldfarb
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
8,631
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
6,709
|
|
|
|
179,072
|
|
|
|
194,908
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
13,200
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
21,261
|
|
Richard Schaub
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
9,375
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
9,893
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
12,751
|
|
(a)
|
Such group term life insurance coverage is generally provided to all employees. Amounts represent the portion of the premium paid for amounts in excess of the limits for tax purposes.
|
(b)
|
Amounts represent the relevant employers match to contributions under the 401(k) Plans on the same basis as provided to all employees. Does not include investment gains or losses under the 401(k) Plans. Because
the contributions to the 401(k) Plans are not fixed, and because it is impossible to calculate future income, it is not currently possible to calculate an individual participants retirement benefits.
|
(c)
|
With respect to Mr. Benaroya in 2013, reflects legal fees reimbursed by the Company in connection with the negotiation of his employment agreement. With respect to Mr. Goldfarb in 2013, represents a lump sum
cash payment of $45,479 in respect of accrued vacation days, and amounts earned by him under his Consulting Agreement with the Company in 2013 (consisting of $129,375 in compensation and $4,218 in reimbursement of COBRA premiums). The Company also
extended the expiration date of 66,250 SARs and 44,700 options held by Mr. Goldfarb from November 14, 2013 to July 14, 2014. See footnote (4) above and Note (A) to the 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year
End table below.
|
19
Employment Contracts and Arrangements
The following is a description of employment contracts and arrangements, and where applicable, post-termination agreements, between the Company and each NEO.
Mr. Benaroya
(acting CEO from September 12, 2011 until March 14, 2013; President and CEO thereafter)
Interim Agreement
Pursuant to an agreement between the
Company and RB, Inc., a Delaware corporation of which Mr. Benaroya is a principal shareholder, originally entered into as of September 12, 2011, and modified as of February 14, 2012, RB, Inc. provided the full-time services of Raphael
Benaroya to the Company as interim Executive Chairman and acting CEO until March 14, 2013, for a fee of $75,000 per calendar month ($100,000 per calendar month prior to September 2012). Mr. Benaroya was not paid directors fees during
the term of his engagement as interim Executive Chairman, nor did he participate in any bonus program, employee benefit plan or other compensation arrangement with the Company. The agreement with RB, Inc. was terminated in connection with the
appointment of Mr. Benaroya as President and Chief Executive Officer described below.
Current Employment Agreement
On March 14, 2013, the Company and Mr. Benaroya entered into an employment agreement (the CEO Agreement) with respect to his employment
as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, for a term of four years, subject to annual extensions unless the Company or Mr. Benaroya provides written notice of termination to the other party at least four months prior to the end
of the then-current term (and subject to earlier termination as provided in the Agreement).
Base Salary
Pursuant to the CEO Agreement, Mr. Benaroya is entitled to an annual base salary of $650,000 (prorated for the period of his service as President and CEO
in 2013). The Compensation Committee will consider annual increases in such base salary, which may only be decreased under specified limited circumstances (a Permitted Decrease). His employment is at will.
Incentive Compensation
Pursuant to the CEO Agreement,
Mr. Benaroya is eligible for an annual performance-based cash incentive compensation opportunity under the ICBP, including for the full 2013 calendar year, with an IC Percentage of 50%. The performance goals applicable to Mr. Benaroya will
be established by the Compensation Committee annually in consultation with Mr. Benaroya, and will not be established at levels that are more stringent than comparable performance goals applicable to other executive officers of the Company for
such year. Amendments to the ICBP will not apply to Mr. Benaroya without his consent.
Equity Awards
Pursuant to the CEO Agreement, on March 15, 2013, the following equity grants were made to Mr. Benaroya: (i) 200,000 Incentive Stock Options
(ISOs) under the 2008 EIP; (ii) 200,000 inducement nonqualified stock options outside of the 2008 EIP (NQSOs); and (iii) 600,000 stock appreciation rights under the 2008 EIP (the Cash SARs). Vested Cash
SARs were originally exercisable solely for cash, however, upon the approval of the Companys shareholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, all of the Cash SARs were converted into Nonqualified Stock Options (on a one-for-one basis)
under the 2008 EIP (with no change to the exercise price, deemed date of grant, vesting schedule, or other terms thereof) (referred to herein as Replacement Options).
20
The exercise price per share of each of the ISOs, NQSOs, and Replacement Options is the closing price per share
of the Companys Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The ISOs, NQSOs, and Replacement Options are referred to herein as the Equity Awards.
Twenty five percent of the ISOs vested on the date of grant, and an additional twenty-five percent will vest on each of the first, second and third
anniversaries of the date of grant. The NQSOs were immediately vested on the grant date. 15,625 of the Replacement Options vest on the last day of each month during the first consecutive 24 months of the original term of the CEO Agreement
(commencing March 31, 2013), and 9,375 of the Replacement Options will vest on the last day of each month during the subsequent consecutive 24 months. The Equity Awards generally expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. The vesting
schedule and the period of exercisability of the Equity Awards will be accelerated on the occurrence of specified events as described below.
Other
Benefits
Mr. Benaroya is entitled to participate in the Companys employee benefit plans and perquisites applicable to senior executives
generally and on a basis no less favorable than those provided to other senior executives. In addition, Mr. Benaroya is entitled to four weeks of annual paid vacation, or such greater amount provided to any other senior executive or pursuant to
Company policy (equivalent to two additional weeks based on tenure), and directors and officers liability insurance coverage during the term of his employment and for six years thereafter, providing coverage equal to at least current
levels, or if greater, the coverage provided to any other present or former senior executive or director of the Company. Mr. Benaroya was also reimbursed for his legal fees in connection with the CEO Agreement in the amount of $40,000.
Stock Purchase
Pursuant to the terms of the CEO
Agreement, Mr. Benaroya was entitled to purchase from the Company, for a period of 30 open trading window days following the execution of the Agreement, up to 200,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock at fair market value at the time of
purchase. He exercised this purchase right for all 200,000 shares on August 28, 2013.
Termination Benefits
If the employment of Mr. Benaroya is terminated by the Company for Cause or by Mr. Benaroya without Good Reason (each as defined below), he will be
entitled to receive his base salary earned through the date of termination, bonus amounts under the ICBP earned for any prior year and not yet paid, and other vested amounts and benefits, if any, provided under applicable Company programs and
policies in which he participated prior to the date of the CEO Agreement (collectively, the Accrued Benefits). In addition, the unvested portion of any Equity Award will be cancelled or immediately forfeited, as applicable. If
Mr. Benaroyas employment is terminated by the Company for Cause (defined below), any unexercised vested portion of any Equity Award will generally remain exercisable for a period of 30 open trading window days following such termination
(subject to extension to the extent the Companys insider trading policy or applicable law prohibits the exercise of the Equity Award or the sale of the underlying shares at the end of such period). If the employment of Mr. Benaroya is
terminated by Mr. Benaroya without Good Reason, the vested portion of any Equity Award will be generally exercisable for a period of 6 months following the termination date, or if later, until the 30th open trading window day following such
termination (subject to extension as described above). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event will an Equity Award be exercisable after the expiration of its term.
21
If Mr. Benaroyas employment terminates as a result of the expiration of the CEO Agreement at the end
of its term, Mr. Benaroya will be entitled to the Accrued Benefits, as well as the prorated amount of the bonus to which he would otherwise have been entitled under the ICBP had his employment continued through the end of the relevant year,
based upon actual achievement of the relevant performance goals (the Prorated Bonus Amount). In addition, the Equity Awards will remain exercisable for the remainder of their respective terms.
If Mr. Benaroyas employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or he terminates his employment for Good Reason (defined below),
Mr. Benaroya will be entitled to receive the Accrued Benefits, his base salary (without regard to any Permitted Decrease) for a period of nine months after the termination date, the Prorated Bonus Amount, the amount of COBRA premiums for
Mr. Benaroya and his family for continued coverage under the Companys medical and dental programs, if any during the nine-month period following the date of termination (the COBRA Amount), and continued coverage under the
Companys life insurance program for a period of nine months following the termination date. In order to receive such benefits (and the accelerated vesting of Equity Awards described below), Mr. Benaroya must execute a release,
substantially in the form of Release attached to the CEO Agreement. In addition, in the event of any such termination, the unvested portion of any Equity Award (as well as the unvested portion of any additional equity awards granted to
Mr. Benaroya) will become immediately vested, and will remain exercisable in accordance with their respective terms.
If Mr. Benaroyas
employment is terminated by the Company as a result of his Disability (as defined below), he will be entitled to receive the Accrued Benefits (including payments under the Companys long-term disability insurance plan to the extent provided for
therein), the Prorated Bonus Amount, the COBRA Amount, and continued coverage under the Companys life insurance program for a period of nine months following the termination date. If the employment of Mr. Benaroya is terminated as a
result of his death, his estate will be entitled to receive the Accrued Benefits and the Prorated Bonus Amount. In addition, the death benefit under the Companys life insurance program shall be paid to his designated beneficiary (or his estate
in the absence of such designation), and Mr. Benaroyas family shall be entitled to reimbursement of the COBRA Amount. In the event that the employment of Mr. Benaroya is terminated as a result of his death or Disability, the unvested
portion of any Equity Award (as well as the unvested portion of any additional equity awards granted to Mr. Benaroya) will become immediately vested to the same extent as if Mr. Benaroya had completed an additional two years of service
after the date of termination, and shall remain exercisable for the shorter of one year following the date of termination and the remainder of their term.
If Mr. Benaroyas employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Benaroya for Good Reason at any time on or after, or within
six months before the occurrence of a Change of Control, Mr. Benaroya will be entitled to the payments and benefits described above with respect to such terminations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Change of Control occurs and outstanding
Equity Awards and/or other Company equity awards issued to Mr. Benaroya are not assumed or converted into comparable awards with respect to the stock of the acquiring or successor company (or parent thereof), then immediately prior to such
Change of Control, each such award, whether or not previously vested, will be converted into the right to receive cash, or at the election of Mr. Benaroya, consideration in a form that is pari passu with the form of the consideration payable to
the Companys shareholders in exchange for their shares (less any applicable exercise price). Any award that is not assumed or converted (as described above) may be canceled at the time of the Change of Control for no consideration if its per
share exercise price is greater than such per share fair market value of the Companys Common Stock.
22
No Mitigation
In the event of the termination of Mr. Benaroyas employment for any reason, he shall be under no obligation to seek other employment or otherwise
mitigate damages, and there shall be no offset against any amounts due him under the CEO Agreement on account of any remuneration attributable to any subsequent employment that he may obtain.
Non-Compete
The CEO Agreement includes a restriction
against specified competitive activities during Mr. Benaroyas employment by the Company and for a period of nine months thereafter and a non-solicitation agreement for a period of nine months following his termination, unless the
termination of Mr. Benaroyas employment results from the expiration of the CEO Agreement at the end of its term.
Section 280G(b)(2)
The CEO Agreement includes a provision that would, under specified circumstances and at Mr. Benaroyas request, reduce the aggregate of
amounts constituting a parachute payment under Section 280G(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code to an amount that will equal three times his base amount less $1.00.
Terms used in the preceding discussion are defined in the CEO Agreement as follows:
Cause is defined generally to mean (subject to applicable cure periods set forth in the Agreement): (A) willful failure by
Mr. Benaroya to perform his material duties as an employee of the Company; (B) his conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony; (C) his theft or misuse of material Company property; or (D) willful misconduct
or an act of moral turpitude which is materially injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise; provided that Cause does not include a finding of liability in pending or future shareholder, derivative or punitive class actions or other civil
actions.
Change of Control is defined generally to mean: (a) any one person or group acquires ownership of shares of the Company
that, together with the shares of the Company held by such person or group, constitutes more than 40% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the shares of the Company; (b) any one person or group acquires, or has acquired
during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons, ownership of shares of the Company having 30% or more of the total voting power of the shares of the Company; (c) one-half or more of the
members of the Companys Board are replaced during any 18-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by at least 66 2/3% of the Companys Board prior to the date of such appointment or election (other than a
result of an election contest); or (d) any one person or group acquires, or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons, assets from the Company that have a total gross
fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions (subject to specified exceptions). A Change of Control will be deemed to have
occurred upon the consummation of a merger or consolidation of, or similar type of corporate transaction involving the Company or any subsidiary thereof with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the
voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof) more
than 60% of the combined voting power of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.
23
Disability will be deemed to have occurred if Mr. Benaroya is absent from work for at
least 135 consecutive days or for 135 days (whether or not consecutive) in any calendar year by reason of a physical or mental illness or injury.
Good Reason is defined generally to mean the occurrence of any of the following events without Mr. Benaroyas express written consent (subject to applicable cure periods set forth in the Agreement): (A) a diminution of his
base salary (subject to specified exceptions) or his annual bonus opportunity; (B) a diminution in his position, title, authority, duties, or responsibilities; (C) a relocation of the Companys headquarters office outside of a 35 mile
radius of the current office (other than a relocation to the current offices of LaJobi, Inc.); (D) a material breach of the Agreement by the Company; or (E) in connection with a Change of Control (defined below), the failure or refusal by
the successor or acquiring company (or parent thereof) to expressly assume the obligations of the Company under the Agreement.
See footnote 6 of the
Summary Compensation Table above for a description of perquisites received by Mr. Benaroya during 2013.
Ms. Carr
(EVP, COO and CFO)
Effective as of September 12, 2012, Kerry Carr was appointed to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company pursuant to the terms of an agreement between Ms. Carr and the Company, as amended (the Carr Agreement), and also serves as Chief Financial Officer (effective as of July 1, 2013).
Base Salary
Ms. Carrs current annual base
salary is $375,000. Subsequent base salary increases will be considered annually by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.
Incentive
Compensation
Ms. Carr is eligible to participate in the ICBP, with an IC Percentage of 50%, provided that for 2013 only, Ms. Carr was
guaranteed a minimum bonus payment of $50,000. The performance goals for Ms. Carr shall be established annually by the Compensation Committee, and she will have an opportunity to consult with the Compensation Committee with respect to such
goals.
Equity Awards
Pursuant to the Carr
Agreement, Ms. Carr was issued an inducement grant of 373,134 SARs (outside of the 2008 EIP, as a result of the limited number of shares remaining available for grant thereunder). The SARs may be settled in cash, Common Stock, or a combination
of both, in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and are generally exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant. The SARs will vest at a rate of 20% per year commencing on the first anniversary of the date of
grant.
Other Benefits
Ms. Carr is entitled to
participate in the Companys employee benefit plans and programs applicable to senior executives generally, and to three weeks of annual paid vacation (equivalent to one additional week based on tenure.
24
Termination Benefits
If Ms. Carrs employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by Ms. Carr without Good Reason (each as defined below), or by reason of her
death or disability, she will be entitled to receive her base salary through the date of termination, accrued vacation and any amounts required under the terms of the Companys employee benefit plans. Subject to the provisions described below,
if the Company terminates Ms. Carrs employment without Cause or she terminates such employment for Good Reason, Ms. Carr shall also be entitled to receive base salary continuation, and medical and dental coverage, for six months
following termination of employment subject to her execution of a release of claims in a form satisfactory to the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Ms. Carrs employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by
Ms. Carr for Good Reason within six months following the consummation of a Change in Control (as defined below), the foregoing benefits shall be extended by an additional period of six months. In the event of disability or death of
Ms. Carr while in the employ of the Company, all unexercised SARs will be deemed vested and may be exercised for up to one year (or the exercise period, if shorter) after such event. If Ms. Carr retires, vested unexercised SARs may be
exercised within one year of such retirement or the remaining term of the grant, if earlier. If Ms. Carrs employment is terminated for any other reason, any unexercised SARs will be cancelled and deemed terminated immediately, except that
if her employment is terminated by the Company for other than Cause, all unexercised SARs, to the extent vested, may be exercised within 90 days of the date of such event (or the exercise period, if shorter).
On March 26, 2013, the Carr Agreement was amended to specify that in the event of a specified change in control (defined for this purpose generally to
mean the acquisition of all the Companys shares or assets by an unrelated party or a merger or consolidation other than a merger or consolidation resulting in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto
representing more than 60% of the voting securities of the surviving entity immediately thereafter), if any unexercised SARs are not assumed or converted into comparable awards with respect to the stock of the acquiring or successor company (or
parent thereof), then immediately prior to such change of control, each such SAR, whether or not previously vested, will be converted into the right to receive cash, or at Ms. Carrs election, consideration in a form that is pari passu
with the form of the consideration payable to the Companys shareholders in exchange for their shares (less any applicable exercise price). Any award that is not assumed or converted as described above may be canceled at the time of such change
in control for no consideration if its per share exercise price is greater than such per share fair market value of the Companys Common Stock. In addition, if Ms. Carrs employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by
Ms. Carr for Good Reason within nine months following such a change in control, her SARs shall immediately vest, and remain exercisable for the remainder of their term.
Non-Compete
The Carr Agreement includes a restriction
against specified competitive activities as well as a non-solicitation provision during Ms. Carrs employment by the Company and for a period of one year thereafter.
Ms. Carrs employment is at will.
Terms
used in the preceding discussion of the Carr Agreement are defined as follows:
Cause means she: (i) shall have been convicted of
or entered a plea of nolo contendere with respect to any felony or any other crime (other than minor traffic offenses) involving fraud, theft, misappropriation, dishonesty, or embezzlement; (ii) shall have committed intentional acts that
materially impair the goodwill or business of the Company or cause material damage to its property, goodwill or business; (iii) shall have refused to, or willfully failed to, perform her material duties; (iv) shall have violated in any
material respect any written policies or procedures of the Company; or (v) shall have breached the representations and warranties set forth in her employment agreement (subject to a 10 day cure period, if applicable);
25
Change in Control is defined generally as when: (i) any person or group, other than
specified existing 5% beneficial owners of the Companys voting securities, becomes the beneficial owner of more than 30% of the Companys voting power (subject to specified exclusions) (ii) as a result of any proxy solicitation made
otherwise than on behalf of the Board, continuing directors cease to be a majority of the Board; (iii) the merger, consolidation, or other business combination other than one immediately following which current stockholders continue to own at
least 60% of the voting power in the Company or other resulting entity (in substantially the same proportion); (iv) the sale of all or substantially all of the Companys assets, other than one immediately following which the then-existing
stockholders are the beneficial owners of at least 60% of the voting power in the purchasing entity (in substantially the same proportions); or (v) consummation of a recapitalization or similar transaction in which any person or group, other
than specified existing 5% beneficial owners, becomes the beneficial owner in excess of 30% of the Companys voting power; and
Good
Reason means her removal from her executive officer position (without terminating her employment) or other material diminution of her duties or responsibilities without her express written consent (subject to a 30 day cure period, if
applicable).
See footnote 6 of the Summary Compensation Table above for a description of perquisites received by Ms. Carr during 2013.
The terms of outstanding options awarded to Ms. Carr are described in the 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table below.
Ms. Friedman
(VP and General Counsel)
General
On August 14, 2013, Jodie Simon Friedman
commenced her role as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company at an annual base salary of $325,000. Ms. Friedman joined the Company on June 3, 2013, at the same annualized base salary. In accordance with the terms of
her current employment arrangement with the Company, Ms. Friedman is entitled to participate in the ICBP with an IC Percentage of 40% (provided that for 2013 only, she was guaranteed a minimum bonus thereunder of $35,000). In connection with
the commencement of her employment with the Company, Ms. Friedman was awarded 150,000 stock options under the 2013 EIP, which vest ratably over a five-year period, commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date. Additional equity grants
are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Her employment is at will.
Termination Benefits
If Ms. Friedmans employment is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in the 2008 EIP), she shall be entitled to receive base salary
continuation, for a period of six months, subject to her execution of a release of claims in the Companys form. In the event of a Change in Control (the acquisition of all the Companys shares or assets by an unrelated party, or a merger
or consolidation of the Company with any other entity other than a merger or consolidation resulting in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto representing more than 60% of the voting securities of the surviving
entity immediately thereafter), if any unexercised options are not assumed or converted into comparable awards with respect to the stock of the acquiring or successor company (or parent thereof), then immediately prior to such Change of Control, any
unexercised options will be converted into the right to receive cash, or at Ms. Friedmans election, consideration in a form that is pari passu with the form of the consideration payable to the Companys shareholders in exchange for
their shares (less any applicable exercise price). Any award that is not assumed or converted as described above may be canceled at the time of the Change of Control for no consideration if its per share exercise price is greater than such per share
fair market value of the Companys Common Stock. In addition, if Ms. Friedmans employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Ms. Friedman for Good Reason (a material reduction in her authorities or
responsibilities) within nine months following a Change in Control, her options shall immediately vest, and remain exercisable for the remainder of their term.
26
Other Benefits
Pursuant to her arrangement with the Company, Ms. Simon Freidman is also entitled to participate generally in all retirement, savings, welfare and other
employee benefit plans and arrangements provided to other executive officers of the Company. Ms. Friedman is also entitled to four weeks annual paid vacation (two more than she would be entitled to based on tenure).
See footnote 6 of the Summary Compensation Table above for a description of perquisites received by Ms. Friedman during 2013. The terms of
outstanding options awarded to Ms. Friedman are described in the 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table below.
Mr. Goldfarb
(resigned as SVP and General Counsel as of August 14, 2013)
Marc S. Goldfarb was hired as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company on September 26, 2005, and served as Senior Vice President and
General Counsel of the Company from May 31, 2006 through his resignation as of August 14, 2013. During 2013, his annual base salary was $341,537. Mr. Goldfarb participated in the ICBP in 2013 with an IC Percentage of 50%. Other than
stock options awarded to Mr. Goldfarb in connection with the commencement of his employment, equity grants were at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. His employment was at will.
Pursuant to his employment arrangement with the Company prior to his resignation, Mr. Goldfarb was also entitled to participate generally in all
retirement, savings, welfare and other employee benefit plans and arrangements provided to other executive officers of the Company, including the Companys severance policy (prior to its termination) with a guaranteed minimum of 8 months of
severance, and received a monthly car allowance. Mr. Goldfarb was also entitled to three weeks annual paid vacation.
Mr. Goldfarb resigned as
Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company to pursue other opportunities as of August 14, 2013. On September 18, 2013, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (the MG Agreement), effective as of
August 15, 2013, with Mr. Goldfarb, for his retention as a legal consultant to the Company until April 14, 2014. Pursuant to the MG Agreement, Mr. Goldfarb received an aggregate: (i) $229,557 in consulting fees;
(ii) $7,499, representing the value for the benefit of COBRA reimbursements.
The MG Agreement contained a non-solicitation agreement during its
term, and also contains customary confidentiality and mutual release provisions. In addition, the MG Agreement provided that Mr. Goldfarb would not be required to provide services exceeding one half day per week. Pursuant to the MG Agreement,
the Company will indemnify Mr. Goldfarb from all losses and damages arising out of or in connection with the MG Agreement, except to the extent caused by Mr. Goldfarbs gross negligence or willful misconduct (in which case
Mr. Goldfarb shall be liable for direct damages only). Any equity awards which were vested as of August 14, 2013 will continue to be exercisable until July 14, 2014. All unvested equity was forfeited at the time of his resignation.
See footnote 6 of the Summary Compensation Table above for a description of perquisites received by Mr. Goldfarb during the period
covered by the table. The terms of outstanding equity awarded to Mr. Goldfarb are described in the 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table below.
27
Mr. Schaub
(resigned as President of LaJobi as of December 5, 2013)
Mr. Schaub became the President of Sassy in February 2010 pursuant to an employment agreement dated February 19, 2010 and amended as of
November 23, 2010, and also became the President of LaJobi in March of 2011. In June of 2011, Dean Robinson was appointed as the President of Sassy, and Mr. Schaub also became group head of Sassy (to whom Mr. Robinson reported)
through the end of 2012. Mr. Schaubs annual base salary prior to his resignation on December 5, 2013 was $375,000. Mr. Schaub participated in the ICBP during 2013 with an IC Percentage of 50%.
A grant of SARS and RSUs was made to Mr. Schaub in connection with the commencement of his employment. In addition, a grant of SARS and RSUs was made to
Mr. Schaub on January 3, 2011 in accordance with the terms of the amendment to his employment agreement as of November 23, 2010. Further equity grants were at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Prior to his resignation,
Mr. Schaub was eligible to participate in all benefit programs made generally available to executives of LaJobi, as well as the Companys severance policy prior to its termination. Mr. Schaub was entitled to three weeks annual paid
vacation (equivalent to one additional week based on tenure), and his employment was at will.
Mr. Schaubs employment agreement
contained a confidentiality, non-disparagement, non-compete for the period of employment and any period thereafter during which Mr. Schaub receives any severance payments, and one year post-employment non-solicitation provision.
On December 5, 2013, Mr. Schaub, by mutual agreement with LaJobi, resigned as LaJobis President. In connection with his departure, on
December 5, 2013, LaJobi entered into a Consulting Agreement (the RS Agreement) with Mr. Schaub. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, from December 5, 2013 until January 3, 2014 (the Transition Period),
Mr. Schaub remained employed by LaJobi as a senior business advisor and from January 4, 2014 until March 14, 2014 (the Consulting Period), Mr. Schaub became a consultant to LaJobi. Pursuant to the RS Agreement,
Mr. Schaub received $31,731, representing his base salary through the termination of the Consulting Period.
During the Transition Period,
outstanding equity awards continued to vest in accordance with their terms. Equity awards which were vested on January 3, 2014 continued to be exercisable until April 3, 2014. All unvested equity at such time were forfeited.
The RS Agreement provided that Mr. Schaub not be required to provide services during the Consulting Period exceeding 10 hours per week. The RS Agreement
contains a non-solicitation agreement during the Consulting Period and for a period of twelve months thereafter, and also contains customary confidentiality and mutual release provisions. LaJobi reimbursed Mr. Schaub for $2,000 of legal
expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation of the RS Agreement.
See footnote 6 of the Summary Compensation Table above for a
description of perquisites received by Mr. Schaub during 2013. The terms of outstanding equity awarded to Mr. Schaub are described in the 2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table below.
Material Terms of ICBP
A description of the ICBP,
including its material terms and a description of the criteria to be applied in determining amounts payable thereunder, is set forth in Operation of the 2013 ICBP above.
Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements
The following is a description of Company plans that pertain to the termination of employment of NEOs.
28
401(k) Plans
The Company offers eligible employees the opportunity to participate in a 401(k) Plan based on employees pretax salary deferrals with
discretionary Company matching contributions. Participating employees may elect to contribute from 1% to 80% (but not in excess of the amount permitted by the Code, i.e., $17,500 in 2013, and $23,000 in 2013 for employees age 50 and older who elect
to make catch-up contributions) of their compensation, on a pretax basis, to the relevant 401(k) Plan. Because the 401(k) Plans are qualified defined contribution plans, if certain highly compensated employees contributions exceed the amount
prescribed by the Code, such contributions will be reduced or limited. Employees contributions are invested in one or more of several funds (as selected by each participating employee). With respect to NEOs during 2013, the Company and LaJobi
matched a portion (one-half of any amount up to 6%, and 100% of any amount up to 3%, of salary contributed, respectively) of the compensation deferred by each NEO. Matching contributions vest ratably over four years for the Company, and over six
years for LaJobi). Under certain circumstances, the 401(k) Plans may permit participants to make withdrawals or receive loans therefrom prior to retirement age.
Equity Incentive Plans
2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2013 EIP)
The Board adopted the 2013 EIP on May 22, 2013. The 2013 EIP was approved by the Companys shareholders on July 18, 2013 at its
2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2013 EIP is a successor to the 2008 EIP (defined below), which terminated as of July 10, 2013 (although outstanding awards thereunder continue to be covered thereby). As is described below, the 2013 EIP
contains provisions which accelerate the vesting schedule and shorten the period of exercisability of outstanding awards in the event that a grantees employment is terminated under specified conditions, and permits adjustments to outstanding
awards in the event of specified corporate transactions. The following is a summary of such provisions. The 2013 EIP is described in detail in the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The 2013 EIP provides for awards in any one or a combination of: (a) stock options, (b) SARs, (c) restricted stock,
(d) stock units, (e) non-restricted Stock, and/or (f) dividend equivalent rights, any of which may constitute a Performance-Based Award (an award that qualifies for the performance-based compensation exemption of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended).
Vesting, Term and Acceleration Provisions of Awards
Subject to the following (and unless an award agreement specifies otherwise), awards under the 2013 EIP generally vest over a five year period,
and with respect to awards of stock options and SARs, generally remain exercisable for a period of 10 years from the date of grant. With respect to awards of stock options and SARs (other than such awards to outside directors, which is discussed in
the following paragraph), (i) upon Disability (as defined in the 2013 EIP) or death, all unexercised awards vest, and may be exercised for up to one year or, if shorter, for their remaining term; and (ii) if a grantees employment is
terminated for any other reason, all unexercised awards are cancelled as of the termination date; provided however, if a grantees employment is terminated for reasons other than Cause (as defined in the 2013 EIP), vested unexercised awards may
be exercised within 90 days of termination, or, if shorter, for their remaining term, and if a grantee retires (as defined in the Companys 401(k) Plan), vested unexercised awards may be exercised within one year of such retirement, or if
shorter, for their remaining term.
29
With respect to awards of awards of stock options and SARs to outside directors, unless otherwise
provided in the relevant award agreement, in the event of the death or Disability of a grantee while serving as a member of the Board, all unexercised awards vest, and may be exercised for up to one year or, if shorter, for their remaining term; if
a grantee ceases to serve as a member of the Board for any other reason, vested awards shall be exercisable for a period of 90 days following termination, or, if shorter, for their remaining term.
With respect to restricted stock or RSUs, unless otherwise provided in an agreement governing the award, upon a grantees termination of
employment for any reason (not including an authorized leave of absence) all non-vested awards are forfeited, except in the event of Disability or death, in which case all restrictions lapse as of the date of the relevant event.
Adjustments
The
committee administering the plan may adjust the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for awards thereunder, the exercise price of any awards thereunder, and any or all other matters it deems appropriate, including, without
limitation, accelerating the vesting and/or exercise period pertaining to any award thereunder, in the event of specified changes in the outstanding Common Stock or a change in the Companys capital structure as a result of specified corporate
transactions, or under other circumstances specified in the 2013 EIP. However, no reduction in the exercise price of a stock option or SAR shall be effective unless it is approved by the Companys shareholders.
2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2008 EIP)
The 2008 EIP was approved by the Companys shareholders as of July 10, 2008. The 2008 Plan is a successor to the 2004 Plan (defined
below), which terminated as of the date of such approval (although outstanding awards thereunder continue to be covered thereby). The 2008 EIP contains the same provisions which accelerate the vesting schedule and shorten the period of
exercisability of outstanding awards in the event that a grantees employment is terminated under specified conditions, and permit adjustments to outstanding awards in the event of specified corporate transactions, as are described above with
respect to the 2013 EIP.
For a more complete description of the 2008 EIP, see the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
2004 Stock Option, Restricted and Non-Restricted Stock Plan (the 2004 Plan)
The 2004 Plan provided for awards of options, restricted stock and non-restricted stock to officers, directors and key employees designated by
the Compensation Committee (however, Non-Employee Directors could be awarded options only). Awards could no longer be granted under the 2004 Plan after July 10, 2008.
30
Acceleration of Vesting/Exercise Period
Subject to the following, options and restricted stock generally vest ratably over five years, commencing on the first anniversary of the date
of grant and are generally exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant. With respect to awards of options (other than awards to Non-Employee Directors, which is discussed below), upon retirement (as defined in the Companys
401(k) plan), Disability (as defined in the 2004 Plan) or death (either while employed or within the year after retirement), all unexercised options vest, and may be exercised for up to one year (unless provided otherwise in an option agreement
evidencing the award) or the term of the unexpired option, if earlier; unless otherwise provided in an option agreement, (i) if a participants employment is terminated for reasons other than Cause (as defined in the 2004 Plan), vested
unexercised options may be exercised within either: (a) 30 days of termination (for grants issued prior to August 2007); or (b) 90 days of termination (for grants issued subsequent to August 2007), or the term of the unexpired option, if
earlier, and (ii) if a participants employment is terminated for any other reason, all options are cancelled as of the termination date.
With respect to awards of options to Non-Employee Directors, in the event of the death or Disability (as defined in the 2004 Plan) of a
participant while serving as a member of the Board, all unexercised options vest, and may be exercised for up to one year (unless provided otherwise in an agreement evidencing the award) or the term of the unexpired option, if earlier; if a
participant ceases to serve as a member of the Board for any other reason, vested options shall be exercisable for a period of 30 days following termination (unless otherwise provided in an agreement evidencing the award).
With respect to awards of restricted stock, unless otherwise provided in an agreement governing the award, all non-vested restricted stock is
forfeited (at the time of termination) if the participant has not remained in the continuous employment of the Company for the period during which the restrictions are applicable, generally five years from the date of grant, except in the event of
retirement, Disability (as defined in the 2004 Plan) or death, in which case all restrictions lapse as of the date of the relevant event.
Adjustment provisions were similar to those contained in the 2013 EIP and 2008 EIP.
For a more complete description of the 2004 Plan, see the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
31
2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding equity awards for the NEOs as of December 31, 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options/
SARs (#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options/
SARs (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
|
|
Option/SAR
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
|
Option/SAR
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
that have not
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
that
have not
Vested ($)
(12)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
have not
Vested (#)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
have not
Vested
(#)
|
Raphael Benaroya
|
|
|
5/4/2005
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.06
|
|
|
|
5/4/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/1/2006
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.05
|
|
|
|
11/1/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/27/2007
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.77
|
|
|
|
12/27/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/10/2008
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
|
|
7/10/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/22/2009
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
3,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
6.63
|
|
|
|
9/22/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2010
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
6,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
8.17
|
|
|
|
7/15/20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/19/2011
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
(7)
|
|
|
8,550
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
|
|
7/19/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/15/2013
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
150,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
3/15/23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/15/2013
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
3/15/23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/15/2013
|
|
|
|
156,250
|
(10)
|
|
|
443,750
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
3/15/23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/19/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerry Carr
|
|
|
9/14/2012
|
|
|
|
74,627
|
(13)
|
|
|
298,507
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
9/14/22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jodie Simon Friedman
|
|
|
7/18/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
7/18/23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Goldfarb (A)
|
|
|
12/26/2005
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.52
|
|
|
|
7/14/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/27/2007
|
|
|
|
24,700
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.77
|
|
|
|
7/14/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/24/2009
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
7/14/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/8/2010
|
|
|
|
21,000
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
|
|
7/14/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/9/2012
|
|
|
|
5,250
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
7/14/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Schaub (B)
|
|
|
2/24/2010
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
12,000
|
(20)
|
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
4/3/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
4/3/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/9/2012
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
(22)
|
|
|
18,000
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
4/3/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/24/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
(23)
|
|
|
4,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(24)
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/9/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
(25)
|
|
|
6,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
In accordance with the provisions of the Consulting Agreement (the MG Agreement), effective as of August 15, 2013, executed in connection with the resignation of Mr. Goldfarb as Senior Vice
President and General Counsel of the Company as of August 14, 2013, the vested portion of any outstanding equity awards made to Mr. Goldfarb as of August 14, 2013 will remain exercisable until July 14, 2014 (the 90th day
following the expiration the MG Agreement), and the unvested portion of any outstanding equity awards made to Mr. Goldfarb as of such date were forfeited. The MG Agreement expired by its terms on April 14, 2014.
|
32
(B)
|
In accordance with the provisions of the Consulting Agreement (the RS Agreement), dated as of December 5, 2013, executed among the Company, LaJobi and Mr. Schaub in connection with his resignation
as President of LaJobi as of such date, any outstanding equity awards made to Mr. Schaub as of December 5, 2013 continued to vest until January 3, 2014 (the date upon which, pursuant to the RS Agreement, Mr. Schaubs
employment terminated and his consultancy began). All vested equity awards on January 3, 2014 continued to be exercisable until April 3, 2014 (the 90
th
day following the termination of
Mr. Schaubs employment with the Company). The unvested portion of all outstanding equity awards made to Mr. Schaub as of January 3, 2014 was forfeited.
|
(1)
|
Represents an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 15,000 options issued under the 2004 Plan. All such options vested in full as of December 28, 2005.
|
(2)
|
Represents an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 15,000 options issued under the 2004 Plan. These options vested ratably over a five-year period, commencing on
November 1, 2007, and were vested in full as of November 1, 2011.
|
(3)
|
Represents an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 15,000 options issued under the 2004 Plan. These options vested ratably over a five-year period, commencing on
December 27, 2008, and were vested in full as of December 27, 2012.
|
(4)
|
Represents an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 15,000 options issued under the 2008 EIP. These options vested ratably over a five-year period, commencing on
July 10, 2009, and were vested in full as of July 10, 2013.
|
(5)
|
Represents an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 15,000 options issued under the 2008 EIP. These options vest ratably over a five-year period, commencing on
September 22, 2010.
|
(6)
|
Represents an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 15,000 SARs issued under the 2008 EIP. These SARs vest ratably over a five-year period, commencing on
July 15, 2011.
|
(7)
|
Represents an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 14,250 SARs (and 5,000 RSUs discussed in footnote 11 below) issued under the 2008 EIP. These SARs vest ratably
over a five-year period, commencing on July 19, 2012.
|
(8)
|
Represents a grant to Mr. Benaroya of 200,000 Incentive Stock Options (ISOs), issued under the 2008 EIP in connection with the commencement of his employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company. 25% of the ISOs vested upon grant, and an additional 25% will vest on each of March 15, 2014, March 15, 2015 and March 15, 2016.
|
(9)
|
Represents a grant to Mr. Benaroya of 200,000 non-qualified inducement stock options, issued outside of the 2008 EIP in connection with the commencement of his employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, all of which were vested upon grant.
|
(10)
|
Represents a grant to Mr. Benaroya of 600,000 SARs, issued under the 2008 EIP in connection with the commencement of his employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. As originally issued,
these SARs, when vested, were exercisable solely for cash. However, upon the approval of the Companys shareholders on July 18, 2013, these cash SARs were converted, on a one-for-one basis, into non-qualified stock options under the 2008
EIP (with no change to the grant date, exercise price, vesting schedule or other terms thereof). 15,625 of such options vest on the last day of each month for a consecutive 24 month period (commencing March 31, 2013), and 9,375 of such options
vest on the last day of each month for the subsequent consecutive 24 month period.
|
33
(11)
|
Represents the unvested portion of an annual grant to non-employee members of the Board, including Mr. Benaroya, consisting of 5,000 RSUs (and 14,250 SARS discussed in footnote 7 above) issued under the 2008 EIP.
The RSUs vest ratably over a five-year period, commencing on July 19, 2012.
|
(12)
|
Calculated using the closing price of the Companys Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2013, the last business day of the year ($1.02).
|
(13)
|
Represents an inducement grant of 373,134 SARs to Ms. Carr in connection with the commencement of her employment as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, which vest ratably over a
five-year period, commencing on September 14, 2013.
|
(14)
|
Represents a grant of 150,000 options to Ms. Friedman under the 2013 EIP, which vest ratably over a five-year period, commencing on July 18, 2014.
|
(15)
|
Represents the unexercised portion of an original grant of 40,000 options under the 2004 Plan, in connection with the commencement of employment of Mr. Goldfarb; all such options were deemed vested as of
December 28, 2005. See Note (A) above.
|
(16)
|
Represents 24,700 options granted to Mr. Goldfarb under the 2004 Plan, which vested ratably over a five-year period commencing December 27, 2008, and vested in full as of December 27, 2012. See Note
(A) above.
|
(17)
|
Represents the vested portion of an original grant of 50,000 SARs issued to Mr. Goldfarb under the 2008 EIP, which vested ratably over a five year period commencing February 24, 2010. The unvested portion of
this award (10,000 SARs) was forfeited on August 14, 2013. See Note (A) above.
|
(18)
|
Represents the vested portion of an original grant of 35,000 SARs issued to Mr. Goldfarb under the 2008 EIP, which vested ratably over a five year period commencing March 8, 2011. The unvested portion of this
award (14,000 SARs) was forfeited on August 14, 2013. See Note (A) above.
|
(19)
|
Represents the vested portion of an original grant of 26,250 SARs issued to Mr. Goldfarb under the 2008 EIP, which vested ratably over a five year period commencing March 9, 2013. The unvested portion of this
award (21,000 SARs) was forfeited on August 14, 2013. See Note (A) above.
|
(20)
|
Represents an original grant of 30,000 SARs to Mr. Schaub under the 2008 EIP in connection with the commencement of his employment, which vested ratably over a five-year period commencing February 24, 2011.
The vested portion of this grant remained exercisable until April 3, 2014, and the unvested portion of this grant (12,000 SARs) was forfeited as of January 3, 2014. See Note (B) above.
|
(21)
|
Represents a grant of 50,000 SARs to Mr. Schaub under the 2008 EIP, which became fully exercisable on January 3, 2014. See Note (B) above.
|
(22)
|
Represents an original grant of 22,500 SARS to Mr. Schaub under the 2008 EIP, which vested ratably over a five year period commencing March 9, 2013. The vested portion of this grant remained exercisable until
April 3, 2014, and the unvested portion of this grant (18,000 SARs) was forfeited on January 3, 2014. See Note (B) above.
|
34
(23)
|
Represents the unvested portion of an original grant of 10,000 RSUs to Mr. Schaub under the 2008 EIP, which vested ratably over a five-year period, commencing on February 24, 2011. These RSUs were forfeited on
January 3, 2014. See Note (B) above.
|
(24)
|
Represents a grant of 10,000 RSUs to Mr. Schaub under the 2008 EIP, which vested in full on January 3, 2014. See Note (B) above.
|
(25)
|
Represents the unvested portion of an original grant of 7,500 RSUs to Mr. Schaub under the 2008 EIP, which vested ratably over a five-year period, commencing on March 9, 2013. These RSUs were forfeited on
January 3, 2014. See Note (B) above.
|
The impact of specified termination events and change of control transactions on the vesting
of, and period of exercisability applicable to the awards set forth in footnotes 8, 9, 10, 13 and 14 above is described in detail under Employment Contracts and Arrangements above, under the sections captioned Mr. Benaroya,
Ms. Carr and Ms. Friedman, respectively. With respect to all other awards described above, the impact of specified termination events and change of control transactions on the vesting of, and the period of exercisability applicable to,
equity grants made under the 2004 Plan, the 2008 EIP, and/or the 2013 EIP, as applicable, are described in detail in the sections captioned
Equity Incentive Plans
above.
Additional Narrative Disclosure
See Termination of
Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements above for a description of the Companys 401(k) Plans and Equity Incentive Plans, and see Employment Contracts and Arrangements above for a description of contracts and
arrangements between the Company and its NEOs in connection with a termination of employment or change in control.
2013 Director
Compensation*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards ($)(2)(4)
|
|
|
Option/
SAR
Awards
($)(3)(4))
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Mario Ciampi
|
|
|
27,750
|
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
51,600
|
|
Fred Horowitz
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
61,850
|
|
Jan Loeb
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
7,850
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
35,350
|
|
Salvatore Salibello
|
|
|
35,250
|
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
59,100
|
|
Michael Zimmerman
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
42,600
|
|
Hugh Rovit
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
*
|
Mr. Benaroya is not included in the table because he stopped receiving compensation as a member of the Board upon his appointment as interim Executive Chairman and acting CEO of the Company effective
September 12, 2011. Mr. Hugh Rovit is included in the table because he was a director of the Company until July 18, 2013.
|
(1)
|
Reflects board retainer fees and board and committee attendance fees. Also includes an award of 9,146 shares of common stock made to each current Non-Employee Director (defined below) in lieu of (and equivalent in value
to) the February 2014 $7,500 semi-annual cash retainer.
|
35
(2)
|
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to issuances of RSUs to the directors in the table. These amounts reflect the Companys
accounting expense and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be realized by such directors. Assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values for 2013 can be found in the 2013 10-K, in footnote 15 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. Each Non-Employee Director was issued 5,000 RSUs on July 10, 2013 under the 2008 EIP.
|
(3)
|
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to issuances of SARs to the directors in the table. These amounts reflect the Companys
accounting expense and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be realized by such directors. Assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values for 2013 can be found in the 2013 10-K, in footnote 15 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. Each Non-Employee Director was issued 15,000 SARs on July 10, 2013 at an exercise price of $1.53 under the 2008 EIP.
|
(4)
|
Outstanding option/SAR awards at December 31, 2013 for each person who was a director in 2013 are as follows (the 15,000 SARs granted to each Non-Employee Director in 2013 were all unvested as of December 31,
2013):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Outstanding
Option Awards at
12/31/13
|
|
|
Vested Portion of
Outstanding
Option
Awards at
12/31/13
|
|
|
Outstanding SAR
Awards at
12/31/2013
|
|
|
Vested Portion of
Outstanding
SAR
Awards at
12/31/13
|
|
Raphael Benaroya*
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
29,250
|
|
|
|
14,700
|
|
Mario Ciampi
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
17,550
|
|
Fred Horowitz
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
17,550
|
|
Jan Loeb
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Salvatore Salibello
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
17,550
|
|
Michael Zimmerman
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
17,550
|
|
Hugh Rovit
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
*
|
This table only includes awards granted to Mr. Benaroya as a Non-Employee Director. Awards granted to Mr. Benaroya in connection with the commencement of his employment as President and CEO are described in
detail in the section captioned Employment Contracts and Arrangements Mr. Benaroya, and in the 2013 Outstanding Awards at Fiscal Year End table above.
|
Outstanding RSU awards at December 31, 2013 for each person who was a director in 2013 are as follows (the 5,000 RSUs granted to each Non-Employee
Director in 2013 were all unvested as of December 31, 2013):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Outstanding RSU Awards
at 12/31/13
|
|
|
Vested and Settled
Portion of Original RSU
Awards at 12/31/13
|
|
Raphael Benaroya*
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Mario Ciampi
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Fred Horowitz
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Jan Loeb
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Salvatore Salibello
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Michael Zimmerman
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Hugh Rovit
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
*
|
These awards were granted to Mr. Benaroya as a Non-Employee Director.
|
36
Directors who are employees of the Company (Mr. Benaroya during 2013) receive no additional compensation for
services as a director; however, all directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. In addition, the following compensation arrangements applied to each director in 2013 who was not an officer or other employee
of the Company (Non-Employee Directors): (i) an annual retainer for service as a director of $15,000; (ii) a fee for attendance at each Board meeting of $1,250, except that the Chairman of the Board, if any, receives $2,000 for
each Board meeting attended; (iii) a fee for attendance at each Audit Committee meeting of $1,500, except that the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives $2,000 for each Audit Committee meeting attended; and (iv) a fee for attendance at
each Board committee meeting, other than the Audit Committee, of $1,250, except that the Chairman of such committee receives $2,000 for each committee meeting attended. In addition, Non-Employee Directors are entitled to reimbursement of $2,000 per
day for participation in any directors retreat attended during the year (there were none during 2013). Further, it is the current intention of the Board to grant to each Non-Employee Director, on the date of each Annual Meeting of Shareholders
immediately following which such Non-Employee Director is serving on the Board, awards under the 2013 EIP (or any successor plan) with an aggregate value on the date of grant consistent with the Boards then-current policy, to the extent such
awards are available for issuance under such plan. Cash compensation to directors has not been changed to date from the arrangements approved in May of 2005, other than compensation for temporary special committees formed on an as-needed basis from
time to time (the form and value of equity awards, however, does change periodically). However, the Board determined to issue shares of our common stock to Non-Employee Directors in lieu of (and equivalent in value to) the $7,500 February 2014
semi-annual cash retainer. As a result, 9,146 shares of common stock were issued to each current Non-Employee Director on February 5, 2014 (this amount is reported in the Fees Earned section of the 2013 Directors Compensation
table above).
The Committee engaged James F. Reda and Associates, LLC, a Division of Gallagher Benefits Services, Inc. (REDA) in 2013 to
complete a director compensation study with respect to a sample of public companies based on specified selection criteria identified by the Committee, however, no changes to director compensation resulted therefrom. REDA serves at the discretion of
the Committee. In addition, during 2013, REDA was engaged on a limited basis to do an analysis of certain elements of the 2013 EIP prior to its presentation to shareholders for approval at the Companys 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to
run various Monte Carlo and Black Scholes calculations with respect to outstanding equity grants, and to review the Companys Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2012. REDA provided no other services in
2013.
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
RB,
Inc.
Pursuant to an agreement between the Company and RB, Inc., a Delaware corporation of which Mr. Benaroya is a principal shareholder,
originally entered into as of September 12, 2011, and modified as of February 14, 2012, RB, Inc. provided the full-time services of Mr. Benaroya to the Company as interim Executive Chairman and acting CEO until March 14, 2013,
for a fee of $100,000 per calendar month (reduced to $75,000 per calendar month as of September 2012). Upon termination of this agreement, the fee payable for the month of termination was prorated to reflect the actual number of days in such month
during which such agreement was in effect. Mr. Benaroya was not paid directors fees during the term of his engagement as interim Executive Chairman, nor did he participate in any bonus program, employee benefit plan or other compensation
arrangement with the Company. On March 14, 2013, the Company and Mr. Benaroya entered into an employment agreement with respect to his employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the terms of which are described in
detail in the section captioned Employment Contracts and Arrangements above. See the Summary Compensation table above for a description of all amounts paid by the Company to or for the services of Mr. Benaroya for the periods shown
therein.
Renee Pepys Lowe
Effective
September 12, 2012 (until her resignation as of January 29, 2014), Renee Pepys-Lowe was President of Kids Line and CoCaLo. CoCaLo contracts for warehousing and distribution services from a company that is managed by the spouse of
Ms. Pepys-Lowe. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, CoCaLo paid approximately $1.3 and $2.9 million, respectively, to such company for these services. This agreement terminated as of April 11, 2014.
In connection with Ms. Pepys Lowes resignation, on January 29, 2014, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (the RPL
Agreement), effective February 3, 2014, with RPL and Associates, LLC, a limited liability company of which Ms. Pepys Lowe is member and President (RPL), for up to a one-year term (subject to earlier termination), pursuant
to which RPL provided consulting services to the Company as reasonably requested by the Companys CEO, to support the Company in design and sales, for a fee of $100,000 (approximately $8,300 monthly). In addition, in the event that gross margin
dollars generated during 2014 from specified sales exceeded such dollars generated in 2013, RPL will be entitled to a bonus of up to $20,000 (pro-rated in the event of early termination), and the Company may award RPL an additional discretionary
bonus (based on overall performance) of up to $20,000 even if such milestones were not achieved. The RPL Agreement contained customary mutual releases. The RPL Agreement was terminable by either party at any time on 30-days notice, and was
terminated by the Company effective April 11, 2014.
Mr. Paglinco
On May 29, 2013, Guy Paglinco resigned as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In connection with his departure, Mr. Paglinco
and the Company executed a Transition and Release Agreement, dated May 29, 2013 (the GP Agreement), pursuant to which Mr. Paglinco remained a full-time employee of the Company through July 5, 2013 to support the
Companys succeeding CFO, and remained an employee thereafter until March 2, 2014 to provide occasional general support to the Company as needed (collectively, the Transition Period). Pursuant to the GP Agreement,
Mr. Paglinco received: (i) $206,852, representing his base salary ($281,225) through the last day of the Transition Period; (ii) $47,012, representing 45 days of accrued but unused vacation days; (and (iii) $7,500 for the
reimbursement of legal expenses in connection with the negotiation of the GP Agreement. In consideration for these benefits, the GP Agreement contains, among other things, a full irrevocable release of claims by Mr. Paglinco, a
non-disparagement agreement, and specified non-compete and non-solicitation agreements during the Transition Period and a one-year period thereafter.
Also pursuant to the GP Agreement, notwithstanding the terms of the award agreements covering such grants: (i) 1,000 RSUs and 2,000 SARs scheduled to
vest of August 14, 2013; (ii) 380 RSUs and 2,780 SARs scheduled to vest on October 6, 2013; and (iii) 2,000 RSUs and 5,600 SARs scheduled to vest on March 8, 2014 were not forfeited, and vested in accordance with their
terms, and with respect to the SARs, remained (or will remain) exercisable for a period of 90 days following such vesting (all other unvested RSUs and SARs were forfeited).
43
Messrs. Goldfarb and Schaub
See the section captioned Employment Contracts and Arrangements above for a description of a Consulting Agreement entered into between the Company
and Mr. Goldfarb effective August 14, 2013 through April 14, 2014, and a Consulting Agreement entered into between LaJobi and Mr. Schaub, effective December 5, 2013 through March 14, 2014, including all amounts payable
thereunder.
IRA
As of August 10, 2006, the
Company entered into the IRA with the Prentice Buyers and another unrelated entity (which is no longer a party to the IRA), pursuant to which the Company has, subject to specified limitations, agreed to nominate for election with respect to all
shareholders meetings or consents concerning the election of members of the Board, two Prentice Directors. The current Prentice Directors are Messrs. Ciampi and Zimmerman. Mr. Ciampi is a partner of Prentice, and a manager and member of one of
the current Prentice Buyers, and Mr. Zimmerman is the Managing Member of the general partner of Prentice, a manager of one of the current Prentice Buyers and the CEO of Prentice. The Company has also granted certain registration rights to
Prentice. See the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2006, with respect to further details regarding the IRA.
Review
and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons
The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its
oversight responsibilities by, among other things, monitoring any transactions between related persons (including, but not limited to, officers, directors, and principal shareholders) and the Company or its subsidiaries (other than normal and usual
compensation arrangements). This obligation is set forth in writing in our Audit Committee Charter. In order to fulfill this obligation, the Audit Committee reviews with the Board any such proposed transactions involving such related persons and/or
their immediate family members for the Boards consideration and ultimate approval. Related party transactions which are ongoing are subject to ongoing review by the Audit Committee to determine whether it is in our best interest and our
shareholders best interest to continue, modify or terminate the related party transaction. No director may participate in the approval of a related party transaction with respect to which he or she is a related party.
To identify related person transactions, each year, we require our directors and officers to complete Questionnaires identifying any transactions with us in
which such persons or their family members have an interest. The Audit Committee or the Board reviews all related person transactions due to the potential for a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest occurs when a persons private
interest interferes in any way (or even appears to interfere) with the interests of the Company as a whole. A conflict situation can arise when an employee, officer or director takes actions or has interests that may make it difficult to perform his
or her Company work objectively and effectively.
In considering the approval of any proposed transaction with a related person, the Board considers a
variety of factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
whether the terms of such transaction are consistent with those that could be obtained from third-parties;
|
|
|
|
whether the Company would receive a benefit from proceeding with a related person that would otherwise be unavailable (in terms of knowledge of the Company, for example);
|
|
|
|
the nature of the related persons interest in the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and the type of transaction;
|
44
|
|
|
whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in the best interests of the Company;
|
|
|
|
whether the transaction would compromise the independence of a director in accordance with independence standards applicable to the Company and such director;
|
|
|
|
the materiality of the transaction to the related person and any entity with which such related person is affiliated;
|
|
|
|
the materiality of the transaction to the Company; and
|
|
|
|
any other factors deemed appropriate by the Board.
|
The Board has reviewed and approved all of the
transactions discussed in this section. We expect our directors, officers and employees to act and make decisions that are in our best interests and encourage them to avoid situations which present a conflict between our interests and their own
personal interests. In addition, we are prohibited from extending personal loans to, or guaranteeing the personal obligations of, any director or officer. A copy of our current Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website.
Independence Determinations
The Board undertakes
periodic reviews of director independence. In such reviews, the Board considers transactions and relationships between (i) each director, entities with which such person is affiliated and/or any member of such persons immediate family,
and (ii) the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, in order to ascertain whether any such relationships or transactions are inconsistent with a determination that such person is independent in accordance with applicable rules
and regulations of the NYSE (which the Company continues to use as its independence standard although the Companys common stock is no longer listed thereon), applicable law, and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain directors have
relationships with other directors and/or shareholders of the Company and the Company from time to time has relationships with entities with which certain of such persons are affiliated. All such relationships were considered by the Board in making
its independence determinations. The Board bases its determinations primarily on a review of the responses of such persons to questions regarding employment and compensation history, affiliations and family and other relationships between the
Company, the directors, and entities with which such persons are affiliated, discussions and analyses with respect to the foregoing, and the recommendations of the Nominating/Governance Committee.
As a result of such reviews, as well as the directors responses to the Companys questionnaire with respect to independence matters, the Board has
affirmatively determined that all persons who served as directors of the Company during any part of the 2013 calendar year, and all current directors, were and are independent for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company
Manual of the NYSE, with the exception of Mr. Benaroya, the Companys current President and Chief Executive Officer (and previous Executive Chairman and acting CEO). Each member of the Companys Compensation Committee,
Nominating/Governance Committee and Audit Committee has been determined to be independent in accordance with such standards as well. In determining that each director other than Mr. Benaroya is independent, in addition to confirming that none
of the automatic disqualifications prescribed by the NYSE are applicable to such persons, the Board also affirmatively determined that each such person has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or its subsidiaries.
The Boards specific determinations with respect to material relationships for current directors, and each individual who was a director at
any time during 2013, other than Mr. Benaroya, who was not deemed to be independent, are set forth below.
As none of Messrs
Horowitz
(current
director);
Rovit
(director until July 18, 2013); or
Salibello
(current director) had any direct or indirect relationship with the Company or its subsidiaries, they were each deemed to be independent.
45
Mr. Ciampi
(current director; Prentice designee): As a partner of Prentice (which owns approximately
19.9% of the Companys outstanding stock and is a party to the IRA), and a manager and member of an affiliate of Prentice, Mr. Ciampi may be deemed to have an indirect relationship with the Company, but as the NYSE does not view ownership
of even a significant amount of stock, by itself, as a bar to an independence finding, the Board determined that Mr. Ciampi is independent.
Mr. Loeb
(current director): As Managing Member of Leap LLC (a private capital investment firm, with whom Mr. Loeb shares beneficial
ownership of approximately 8.8% of the Companys common stock), Mr. Loeb may be deemed to have an indirect relationship with the Company, but as the NYSE does not view ownership of even a significant amount of stock, by itself, as a bar to
an independence finding, the Board determined that Mr. Loebs position with Leap LLC did not affect its determination that he is independent. In addition, the Board determined that the sale of 250,000 shares of the Companys common
stock to Mr. Benaroya by Leap LLC in 2012 does not constitute a current material relationship between Mr. Loeb and the Company, and as a result, Mr. Loeb was deemed to be independent.
Mr. Zimmerman
(current director; Prentice designee): As the CEO of Prentice, the managing member of the general partner of Prentice, and a manager
and member of an affiliate of Prentice, Mr. Zimmerman may be deemed to have indirect relationships with the Company, but as the NYSE does not view ownership of even a significant amount of stock, by itself, as a bar to an independence finding,
the Board determined that Mr. Zimmermans positions with Prentice entities (including his potential deemed beneficial ownership of the Companys Common Stock held thereby) did not affect its determination that he is independent.
Board Diversity Policy
The Nominating/Governance
Committee and the Board believe that diversity along multiple dimensions, including opinions, skills, perspectives, personal and professional experiences and other differentiating characteristics, is an important element of its nomination
recommendations. As stated in our policies with respect to minimum qualifications for Board members, the Board seeks a diverse group of candidates who possess the background, skills and expertise to make a significant contribution to the Board.
Accordingly, Board candidates are considered based upon various criteria, including, but not limited to, their broad-based business and professional skills and experiences, concern for the long-term interests of the shareholders, and their
reputation, personal integrity and judgment. In addition, directors must have sufficient time available to devote to Board activities and to enhance their knowledge of the consumer goods and related industries. The Board considers each nominee in
the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of assembling a Board that can best maintain the success of our business. Although the Board does not have a formal diversity policy, the Nominating/Governance Committee periodically reviews
the Boards membership in light of our business model and strategic objectives, considers whether the directors possess the requisite skills, experience and perspectives to oversee the Company in achieving those goals, and may seek additional
directors from time to time as a result of its considerations. Qualified candidates are considered without regard to race, color, religion, sex, ancestry, national origin or disability.