TIDMCLON
RNS Number : 7697L
Clontarf Energy PLC
15 September 2021
15(th) September 2021
Clontarf Energy plc
("Clontarf" or the "Company")
Interim Statement for the period ended 30 June 2021
Clontarf Energy (AIM: CLON), the energy company focused on
Africa and Bolivia, announces its unaudited financial results for
the six months ended 30 June 2021:
The principal activities during this period were ongoing
contacts with the Ghanaian authorities to resuscitate the
ratification of our signed Petroleum Agreement on Tano 2A Block,
discussions with the Chad authorities on prime sedimentary basin
close to pipeline infrastructure, leading to a signed Memorandum of
Understanding, and negotiating a exploration and development
agreement with the Bolivian authorities for lithium
evaporation.
Oil & Gas markets are cyclical, and exploration even more
so. Explorers do best when they acquire choice acreage at a modest
cost in bad times, add value prudently, and then fund or attract
partners on carried terms. This is an approach our group has used
successfully over 30 years, with circa 20 partnerships. The "junior
company" profits from agility, low cost base and a rising market.
The "major" 'farming in' later on gains time by short-circuiting
the often - for them - difficult environmental permitting and
community relations - at which Clontarf's experienced team
excels.
Where does the market stand in this cycle as of 3rd quarter
2021? Oil demand peaked at 101 million barrels of oil daily during
the 4th quarter of 2019. It crashed by 10% in mid 2020 - half of
which was due to de-stocking. But - helped by pump-priming and C-19
vaccines - a sharp recovery occurred in 2021.
Demand is generally expected to be fully restored by 2022 -
Chinese consumption is already at record levels of 14.3mmbod,
though Beijing wishes to control commodity imports by means of
import taxes and closing loopholes. Assuming continued vaccine
success, continued relaxing of lock-downs and no major breakthrough
C-19 variants, we expect strong demand growth in 2022.
What of supply? The fracking revolution was halted by the 2014
oil price fall, and has gone into reverse - though we should never
write US entrepreneurs off. They added more barrels than the entire
demand growth between 2005 and 2015.
OPEC plans to open the spigots in a controlled fashion: already
there is some relaxation of Emirates' exports. But there is no
production surge: on the contrary, sanctions-hit Venezuelan output
collapsed to 0.55mmbod, Iran's is down to 2.5mmbod, while Iraq
languishes at 4mmbod and Nigeria at 1.44mmbod. Only Libya has
recovered, and only partially to 1.17mmbod (only 70% of the
pre-2011 level).
Given recovering demand and supply constraints, one would expect
oil companies to explore for and develop new sources of competitive
oil and gas for the future. Instead, the combination of C-19,
market hostility, low prices and lower 2020 demand was a perfect
storm storing up future supply problems, as demand surges. But,
over the medium-term, China, other Asian countries, and India are
expected to grow strongly.
A supply crunch - maybe triggered by a political crisis in some
exporting country - is likely within 2 years - subject to effective
C-19 vaccines and no new pandemic.
Yet, though oil demand rebounded strongly during 2021, following
the record demand fall caused by the C-19 pandemic, exploration and
development expenditure remain depressed. At least $5 trillion of
necessary investment has been deferred. Despite much debate about
modernising tax rates and contract conditions, governments have
been slow to update contractual arrangements so as to deliver
development.
Despite a cyclical freezing of the farm-out market, and reduced
investor interest, some governments remain stuck in the contract
and fiscal terms expectations of the pre-2014 boom years. Most
frustrating for innovative juniors are the frequent requests for
bonds and bonuses. These may suit incumbent politicians and
slow-moving majors with large balance sheets, but they are not well
suited to advancing development in challenging times. Partly
balancing the revenue fall is the collapse in service costs,
especially seismic and rig rates. Partners and investors can be
persuaded to fund operating and capex costs at currently low rates
- on the cyclical argument - but they are reluctant to pay money to
host governments.
If we can resolve the outstanding issues (especially the request
for an up-front sign-on bonus, technology and training grants,
etc.,), we hope to proceed quickly with our work programmes. It
makes no sense to pay money up-front for a contract in which we
would be paying 100% of the cost and taking 100% of the risk. The
anomalous nature of such bonuses is confirmed by the fact that they
are generally not included in the "cost oil".
As of September 2021, testing, quarantine, and documentation
requirements remain onerous. Nonetheless, Clontarf Energy plc
directors and contractors were able to conduct business travel to
Africa, and America.
Ghana - developments delayed
Clontarf Energy plc, and its partners, are ready to advance the
Ghana Tano 2A work programme, subject to securing the necessary
funding in an environment complicated by prevailing circumstances,
as soon as the signed Petroleum Agreement is ratified.
Despite volatile oil prices, the carefully calibrated Ghanaian
fiscal terms help make the Tano Basin oil play feasible, given the
demonstrated source rock and Cretaceous sands which remain an
industry favourite. Indeed, the industry's exploration contraction
may assist Clontarf's focused strategy on the bigger potential
stratigraphic traps.
Ghana achieved much after 2007, ramping oil production up to 215
kbod by 2020.
Unfortunately, a slow ratification process, exacerbated by
conflicting policies, stymied efficient development: progress
stagnated after 2018, and output slipped below 200kbod.
Tano 2A Block, Tano Basin, Ghana
The Joint Venture (JV) group, which consists of Clontarf (60%),
Petrel Resources plc (30%), and local partner Abbey Oil & Gas
(10%) negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with GNPC in
2008, and signed (subject to ratification) a Petroleum Agreement in
2010.
The work programme was aggressive (by the standards of the
time), including 2D seismic and a well commitment, but it was not
bonded (other than by corporate guarantees).
Part of the Petroleum Agreement is a one-off "technology" grant
(of US$0.5mm) and "training" (of US$0.2mm yearly) payments,
together with land rentals, and standard fees.
Under previous administrations, the authorities raised periodic
objections, usually concerning bonding (though this had been agreed
to be unnecessary in the signed Petroleum Agreement) and the market
capitalisation of the original vehicle (Pan Andean Resources plc).
They have encouraged us to admit additional Ghanaian partners -
though to date these have proven to be ultimately Nigerian or other
companies lacking financial backing.
We have had initial partnership discussions with potential
partners but could not advance these without full ratification of
title. About 60% of Ghanaian Tano wells have been successful.
Fiscal terms, in spite of upward creep, and lower oil prices, are
competitive - so long as there are no bonding or bonus requirements
beyond those envisaged in the Petroleum Agreement.
Chad:
One of the great exploration stories of the 21st century will be
the unexplored interior basins of
Africa. Our group has long been interested in Chad, despite
logistical and security issues, provided we have access to export
pipeline capacity, and sedimentary basin close-by.
Despite ongoing conflict with rebels in remote areas, Clontarf
Energy plc signed, in December 2020, a Memorandum of Understanding
on available acreage close to existing pipeline infrastructure.
The subsequent death of the former president fighting jihadis in
the north, does not change this prospectivity. However, neither
should we ignore ongoing security costs and uncertainties. This
reinforces our determination to avoid onerous bonuses - at least
prior to discoveries. This is a buyers' market, and fiscal terms
should reflect current realities.
International majors continue to operate in Chad, though some
independents have relinquished ground recently.
The retrenchment of companies under restructuring opens
opportunity for juniors: super-majors such as Exxon seek to
rationalise their properties, influenced by decreasing production
from operated fields (having earlier been obliged to drop
exploration acreage), so as to concentrate on mega discoveries
elsewhere. National Oil Companies, like Petronas, concentrate their
focus on specific geographic areas.
Provided we can avoid or defer sign-on bonuses, Chad's
exploration potential is a fit with Clontarf
Energy plc. But the location of exploration blocks is crucial,
as are the terms.
Despite political and logistical challenges, Chad offers
considerable potential.
Lithium in Bolivia
Much of the world's economic lithium resource is in
south-western Bolivia and neighbouring countries. Clontarf plans to
participate in the coming lithium boom.
Clontarf and its processor companies operated in Bolivia since
1988. No other lithium player equals this record. The group's
interest in evaporites dates from 1994.
When the new State lithium company YLB, established in 2017,
opened to foreign investment in 2018, Clontarf seized the
opportunity to lever its country and industry expertise.
Though the current legal framework is not ideal, Clontarf
submitted proposals on select salt-lakes within the existing law.
We expect the legal framework to evolve to meet market needs.
A technology supply bid round is being conducted by the State
lithium company, YLB, to determine which, if any of the new Direct
Lithium Extraction (DLE) may achieve satisfactory recoveries and
impurity levels. So far, there has been no recorded breakthrough
based on pilot plant work.
Meanwhile Clontarf Energy Plc proposes exploration and
development of salt lakes in three phases: exploration, pilot plant
processing and industrialisation. Direct Lithium Extraction
technologies will be added to the process if and when they become
commercial.
A secondary objective of the sampling was to establish the
brines' chemical composition.
Results are encouraging though not yet conclusive. We propose to
conduct a 3D evaluation of several salt lakes.
To confirm how Lithium salts can be concentrated and recovered,
we are working with research laboratories, expert in bench testing
through pilot plant work. It is unlikely that there will be a
single, 'magical' membrane solution sufficient to deliver the
purities and volumes required by the high-tech battery
industry.
Since lithium extraction depends on the specific brine
composition, we analyse brines throughout the production process -
which includes traditional evaporation, as well as alternative
techniques.
Among the processes of potential are:
-- Li recovery evaporation to produce lithium carbonate (LiCO3).
-- Li recovery through ion exchange.
-- Li recovery through solvent extraction.
-- Li recovery through membrane technology.
-- Direct production of lithium hydroxide (LiOH).
The construction period for most salt lake commercial Li
production is two to three years.
The rapid growth in battery-powered electric vehicles (EVs) to
over 6.8 million vehicles worldwide by end 2020, albeit from a
small base, is generating high demand growth for scarce minerals
with which Clontarf is familiar - especially battery-grade lithium
and cobalt - as well as vanadium, zinc, and copper.
Power storage remains the key problem: existing battery
technologies are inefficient, heavy, and expensive. But faster and
more efficient charging technologies are being developed.
For the fast growth electric vehicles and electronic devices
market, 'Lithium ion technology' is the best economically feasible
solution developed so far, though it has 'only' quadrupled its
performance since 1992.
The appeal of electric vehicles is that they are emission-free
at the point of use - though the electricity must be generated and
transmitted. Any plausible demand forecast anticipates market needs
greatly in excess of current supplies. Very aggressive forecasts
may be hindered by lower oil prices after 2020 but official
support, especially in Europe, remains strong.
Lithium from salt pan deposits will be in high demand - though
processing issues remain.
Subject to likely legal framework improvements, Clontarf plans
to complete an exploration and laboratory work programme on a
select group of salares, if required by law produce an initial
precipitate product as an Engineering, Procurement and Construction
(EPC) contractor, and then produce additional, enhanced high
performance precipitated and processed salts as a joint venture
partner. This formula fits with the spirit and letter of current
Bolivian legislation, and offers a sustainable route to participate
in the coming lithium ion battery boom.
There is no quick and easy way to process brine to produce Li.
Each brine is unique, and the differences matter, as tests (such as
the new German, and American technologies) show. Additional work is
necessary to streamline evaporation, reduce costs and boost
yields.
Bolivia needs effective exploration before attracting existing
lithium producers, and battery manufacturers, in order to achieve
the stated national ambition of moving from exploration to domestic
production and value added.
Clontarf's preference is to identify potential for improvement
on the model used in similar Chilean and Argentine deposits to
define resources and reserves with a pilot plant mainly designed
for LiCO3 output. The Group has, as yet, limited expertise in
battery production, but are close to the leading Lithium metal and
battery producers. They target involvement after successful
completion of the first phase of exploration.
Clontarf plans to finalise a strategic alliance with leading
Lithium metal / Lithium-ion battery producers for the advanced
stage development, and may include a global car manufacturer to
off-take and finance Lithium-ion battery production in Bolivia. The
anticipated global demand surge is greatly in excess of current
quality, purity and volume capacity. These manufacturers are
anxious to secure a reliable supply of adequate high purity LiCO3.
Clontarf has the experience, presence and vision to help bring
these diverse needs together.
The optimal way to exploit smaller salares is to cooperate with
other potential LiCO3 producers in order to achieve world scale
LiCO3 output necessary to sustain a battery factory in the Bolivian
Altiplano.
Clontarf expects the authorities to update legislation to
encourage investment for a mega Lithium-ion battery factory, which
can be expanded with growing LiCO3 production for the benefit of
Clontarf, Bolivia, Lithium producers and battery producers.
While evaporation of LiCO3 is the primary initial goal of the
Group's exploration, Clontarf continues to investigate alternative
or supplementary lithium recovery technologies including membranes,
electrolytic processes, and solvent extraction.
In summary, Clontarf progresses its interests in Bolivia, Chad
and Ghana, maintaining cordial communications with the relevant
authorities, and continues to operate efficiently on minimal
expenditure.
Funding
Clontarf remains fully funded for near to medium term ongoing
activities.
David Horgan
Chairman
14(th) September 2021
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes
of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 596/2014.
S
For further information please visit http://clontarfenergy.com or contact:
Clontarf Energy
David Horgan, Executive Chairman
John Teeling, Non-Executive Director +353 (0) 1 833 2833
Nominated & Financial Adviser
Strand Hanson Limited
Rory Murphy
Ritchie Balmer +44 (0) 20 7409 3494
Broker
Novum Securities Limited
Colin Rowbury +44 (0) 207 399 9400
Blytheweigh - PR +44 (0) 207 138 3206
Megan Ray +44 (0) 207 138 3553
Rachael Brooks +44 (0) 207 138 3206
Said Izagaren +44 (0) 207 138 3206
Naomi Holmes +44 (0) 207 138 3206
Teneo
Luke Hogg
Alan Tyrrell
Ciara Wylie +353 (0) 1 661 4055
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Six Months Ended Year Ended
30 June 21 30 June 20 31 Dec 20
unaudited unaudited audited
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Administrative expenses ( 137 ) ( 146 ) ( 361 )
---------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
LOSS BEFORE TAXATION ( 137 ) ( 146 ) ( 361 )
Income Tax - - -
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE PERIOD (137) (146) (361)
====================== ======================= ========================
LOSS PER SHARE - basic and diluted (0.02p) (0.02p) (0.05p)
====================== ======================= ========================
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
30 June 21 30 June 20 31 Dec 20
unaudited unaudited audited
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
ASSETS:
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Intangible assets 932 869 915
932 869 915
---------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
CURRENT ASSETS
Other receivables 5 2 2
Cash and cash equivalents 470 190 89
---------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
475 192 91
TOTAL ASSETS 1,407 1,061 1,006
---------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
LIABILITIES:
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade payables ( 74 ) ( 48 ) ( 66 )
Other payables ( 1,360 ) ( 1,240 ) ( 1,300 )
---------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
( 1,434 ) ( 1,288 ) ( 1,366 )
---------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES ( 1,434 ) ( 1,288 ) ( 1,366 )
NET LIABILITES ( 27 ) ( 227 ) ( 360 )
====================== ======================= ========================
EQUITY
Called-up share capital 2,177 1,792 1,792
Share premium 10,985 10,900 10,900
Share based payment reserve 104 22 104
Retained deficit ( 13,293 ) ( 12,941 ) ( 13,156 )
---------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
TOTAL EQUITY ( 27 ) ( 227 ) ( 360 )
====================== ======================= ========================
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Called-up Share based
Share Share Payment Retained
Capital Premium Reserves Deficit Total
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
As at 1
January 2020 1,792 10,900 22 ( 12,795 ) ( 81 )
Total
comprehensive
income - - - ( 146 ) ( 146 )
-------------------- -------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ---------------------
As at 30 June
2020 1,792 10,900 22 ( 12,941 ) ( 227 )
Share options
vested - - 82 - 82
Total
comprehensive
income - ( 215 ) ( 215 )
-------------------- -------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ---------------------
As at 31
December 2020 1,792 10,900 104 ( 13,156 ) ( 360 )
Shares issued 385 115 500
Share issue
expenses - ( 30 ) - - ( 30 )
Total
comprehensive
income - - - ( 137 ) ( 137 )
----------------------
As at 30 June
2021 2,177 10,985 104 ( 13,293 ) ( 27 )
==================== ==================== ====================== ==================== =====================
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW Six Months Ended Year Ended
30 June 21 30 June 20 31 Dec 20
unaudited unaudited audited
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
CASH FLOW USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Loss for the period ( 137 ) ( 146 ) ( 361 )
Share options vested - - 51
Exchange movements - ( 1 ) -
--------------------- --------------------- ----------------------
( 137 ) ( 147 ) ( 310 )
Movements in Working Capital 49 38 101
--------------------- --------------------- ----------------------
CASH USED BY OPERATIONS ( 88 ) ( 109 ) ( 209 )
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES ( 88 ) ( 109 ) ( 209 )
--------------------- --------------------- ----------------------
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Payments for intangible assets ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 3 )
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 3 )
--------------------- --------------------- ----------------------
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issue of shares 500 - -
Share issue expenses (30) - -
--------------------- --------------------- ----------------------
NET CASH GENERATED FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES 470 - -
--------------------- --------------------- ----------------------
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS 380 ( 112 ) ( 212 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
the period 89 301 301
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
held 1 1 -
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT AT THE OF THE
PERIOD 470 190 89
===================== ===================== ======================
Notes:
1. INFORMATION
The financial information for the six months ended 30 June 2021
and the comparative amounts for the six months ended 30 June 2020
are unaudited. The financial information above does not constitute
full statutory accounts within the meaning of section 434 of the
Companies Act 2006.
The Interim Financial Report has been prepared in accordance
with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as adopted by the European
Union. The accounting policies and methods of computation used in
the preparation of the Interim Financial Report are consistent with
those used in the Group 2020 Annual Report, which is available at
www.clontarfenergy.com
The interim financial statements have not been audited or
reviewed by the auditors of the Group pursuant to the Auditing
Practices board guidance on Review of Interim Financial
Information.
2. No dividend is proposed in respect of the period.
3. LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss after
taxation for the year available to ordinary shareholders by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue and ranking for
dividend during the year. Diluted earnings per share is computed by
dividing the loss after taxation for the year by the weighted
average number of ordinary shares in issue, adjusted for the effect
of all dilutive potential ordinary shares that were outstanding
during the year.
The following table sets out the computation for basic and
diluted earnings per share (EPS):
Six months Ended Year Ended
30 June 30 June 31 Dec 20
21 20
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Numerator
For basic and diluted EPS (137) (146) (361)
============== ============== ==============
Denominator
For basic and diluted EPS 763,344,558 716,979,964 716,979,964
============== ============== ==============
Basic EPS (0.02p) (0.02p) (0.05p)
Diluted EPS (0.02p) (0.02p) (0.05p)
============== ============== ==============
Basic and diluted loss per share are the same as the effect of
the outstanding share options is anti-dilutive and is therefore
excluded.
4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
30 June 21 30 June 20 31 Dec 20
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Exploration and evaluation assets
Cost:
At 1 January 8,625 8,561 8,561
Additions 17 18 64
Closing Balance 8,642 8,579 8,625
=========== =========== ==========
Impairment:
At 1 January 7,710 7,710 7,710
Provision for impairment - - -
Closing Balance 7,710 7,710 7,710
=========== =========== ==========
Carrying value:
At 1 January 915 851 851
=========== =========== ==========
At period end 932 869 915
=========== =========== ==========
Regional Analysis 30 Jun 21 30 Jun 20 31 Dec20
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Bolivia 79 16 62
Ghana 853 853 853
---------- ---------- ---------
932 869 915
========== ========== =========
Exploration and evaluation assets relate to expenditure incurred
in prospecting and exploration for lithium, oil and gas in Bolivia
and Ghana. The directors are aware that by its nature there is an
inherent uncertainty in exploration and evaluation assets and
therefore inherent uncertainty in relation to the carrying value of
capitalised exploration and evaluation assets.
During 2018 the Group resolved the outstanding issues with the
Ghana National Petroleum Company (GNPC) regarding a contract for
the development of the Tano 2A Block. The Group has signed a
Petroleum Agreement in relation to the block and this agreement
awaits ratification by the Ghanaian government.
The Company is in negotiations with the Ministry of Electricity
Technologies and the State Lithium Company in Bolivia on
exploration and development of salt-lakes in accordance with law.
Samples have been analysed and process work is underway.
The directors believe that there were no facts or circumstances
indicating that the carrying value of intangible assets may exceed
their recoverable amount and thus no impairment review was deemed
necessary by the directors. The realisation of these intangibles
assets is dependent on the successful discovery and development of
economic deposit resources and the ability of the Group to raise
sufficient finance to develop the projects. It is subject to a
number of potential significant risks, as set out below.
The Group's activities are subject to a number of significant
potential risks including:
-- licence obligations;
-- exchange rate risks;
-- uncertainties over development and operational costs;
-- political and legal risks, including arrangements with
Governments for licences, profit sharing and taxation;
-- foreign investment risks including increases in taxes,
royalties and renegotiation of contracts;
-- title to assets;
-- financial risk management;
-- going concern;
-- ability to raise finance; and
-- operational and environmental risks.
Included in the additions for the period are GBP15,000 (2020:
GBP60,849) of directors remuneration. The remaining balance
pertains to the amounts capitalised to the respective licences held
by the entity.
5. TRADE PAYABLES
30 June 21 30 June 20 31 Dec 20
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Trade payables 64 38 40
Other accruals 10 10 26
----------- ----------- ----------
74 48 66
=========== =========== ==========
6. OTHER PAYABLES
30 June 21 30 June 20 31 Dec 20
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Amounts due to directors 1,360 1,240 1,300
1,360 1,240 1,300
=========== =========== ==========
Other payables relate to amounts due to directors' remuneration
accrued but not paid at period end.
7. SHARE CAPITAL
Allotted, called-up and fully paid:
Number Share Capital Premium
GBP'000 GBP,000
At 1 January 2020 716,979,964 1,792 10,900
Issued during the period - - -
------------ ----------------- ---------
At 30 June 2020 716,979,964 1,792 10,900
Issued during the period - - -
------------ ----------------- ---------
At 31 December 2020 716,979,964 1,792 10,900
Issued during the period 153,846,153 385 115
Share issue expenses - - (30)
At 30 June 2021 870,826,117 2,177 10,985
============ ================= =========
On 6 May 2021 the Company raised GBP500,000 via the placing of
153,846,153 ordinary shares with new and existing investors at a
price of 0.325p per placing share
8. POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
There were no material post balance sheet events affecting the
group or company.
9. The Interim Report for the six months to 30 June 2021 was
approved by the Directors on 14(th) September 2021.
10. The Interim Report will be available on the Company's
website at www.clontarfenergy.com .
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms
and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information
contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an
anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services.
For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange
use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy
Policy.
END
IR BLGDCRGBDGBS
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 15, 2021 01:59 ET (05:59 GMT)
Clontarf Energy (LSE:CLON)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Mar 2024 a Abr 2024
Clontarf Energy (LSE:CLON)
Gráfica de Acción Histórica
De Abr 2023 a Abr 2024
