BottomBounce
6 días hace
Verizon has faced multiple lawsuits, including those related to administrative fees, pension risk transfers, and data privacy, resulting in settlements and ongoing legal challenges.
Here's a breakdown of some notable Verizon lawsuits:
1. Administrative Fees Class Action Lawsuit:
What it's about: A class-action lawsuit claimed Verizon deceptively charged customers administrative fees that were not properly disclosed and were higher than advertised.
Settlement: Verizon agreed to a $100 million settlement to resolve the lawsuit, with eligible customers receiving a portion of the settlement.
Who is eligible: Customers with postpaid wireless or data services charged administrative fees between January 1, 2016, and November 8, 2023.
Claim Deadline: The deadline to submit a claim was April 15, 2024.
Settlement Details: Verizon denies any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement, which also included revised Administrative Charge disclosures in the Customer Agreement. According to Newsweek, the settlement payments have started hitting customers' bank accounts.
How to claim: Customers could file a claim online or by mail.
2. Pension Risk Transfer Lawsuit:
What it's about:
Retirees sued Verizon, claiming the company improperly transferred pension responsibilities to insurers, including a unit of Prudential Financial, potentially endangering their pensions.
Impact:
The pensions of 56,000 Verizon retirees, involving $5.7 billion in assets, were impacted by the transaction.
Legal Action:
The lawsuit alleges that Verizon failed in its fiduciary duty to the retirees by sealing the transactions with the insurers.
3. Data Privacy Lawsuit:
What it's about:
A class-action lawsuit alleged Verizon collected and sold customer data to third parties without proper consent, including browsing history, location data, and app usage.
Allegations:
The lawsuit claims the information disclosed by Verizon aided in creating detailed profiles for targeted advertising, constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
Voice ID:
Another class action lawsuit alleged Verizon collected customer voiceprints through its Voice ID feature without proper consent or notification.
4. Copyright Infringement Lawsuit:
What it's about:
Music labels sued Verizon, claiming the company encouraged customers to commit copyright infringement and ignored copyright violations for profit.
Allegations:
The lawsuit charges Verizon with contributory and vicarious copyright infringement, alleging that Verizon ignored 350,000 infringement notices sent by the record labels since 2020. $VZ
ORCA
2 semanas hace
VZ START SETTLING THE RICO ABOUT TO SERVE YOU.READ BOLD.
VoIP-Pal Announces Filing of Amended Complaint in Antitrust and RICO Lawsuit
Press Release | 12/19/2024
WACO, Texas, Dec. 19, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VoIP-Pal.com Inc. (OTCQB: VPLM) today announced the filing of an amended complaint to the original complaint filed in October 2024, in Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-03051-RDM, currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. This latest filing represents a significant escalation in the company’s legal efforts to address alleged antitrust violations, breaches of federal law, and racketeering activities that VoIP-Pal believes have caused harm to the company.
The amended complaint names Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, along with several of their directors and members of their management teams, as defendants. "Our amended complaint builds on our commitment to seeking justice for the harm VoIP-Pal has endured due to alleged antitrust violations and other unlawful practices," said Emil Malak, CEO of VoIP-Pal. "By incorporating RICO claims, we are addressing not just the alleged monopolistic and exclusionary conduct we believe the defendants engaged in, but it also alleges systemic violations and coordinated actions that have targeted our company."
VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak reassured shareholders that the strategic focus on antitrust and RICO claims is the most efficient path to address the harm caused by the defendants. “While patent litigation remains ongoing in Waco, Texas, we believe this approach offers the quickest and most effective route to justice,” Malak stated. “Our goal is to hold Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, their directors, and key management accountable through the judicial process, restore fair competition in the mobile telephone communications industry, and drive shareholder value. We are working diligently to ensure that the defendants are served soon, with the goal of doing so before the end of the year.”
Malak highlighted the importance of the filing as a step toward achieving accountability. "This legal action is not just about VoIP-Pal; it’s about holding powerful corporations accountable for practices that harm innovation, competition, and fairness in the telecommunications industry. We are confident that this expanded approach will demonstrate the strength of our case."
The amended complaint outlines detailed allegations, including:
Antitrust Violations: Claims of tying arrangements, exclusionary practices, and monopolistic control that have suppressed VoIP-Pal’s ability to compete.
RICO Claims: Allegations of coordinated racketeering activities, including fraudulent misrepresentation, deceptive practices, and systemic exclusion of VoIP-Pal from the market.
Harm to Consumers: The impact of these actions on market competition and millions of smartphone users across the United States.
"Filing this amended complaint marks a pivotal moment in our pursuit of justice," Malak added. "It reflects our commitment to protecting our shareholders, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring a level playing field in the telecommunications sector."
Additionally, a new article and interview with CEO Emil Malak has been published on CEOCFO Magazine, providing additional insights into VoIP-Pal's strategy. The article can be accessed here: https://www.ceocfointerviews.com/voippalantitrust121824.html.
About VoIP-Pal.com Inc.
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) headquartered in Waco, TX. The company owns a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology that it is currently looking to monetize.
Forward-Looking Statements
Any forecast of future financial performance is a “forward-looking statement” under securities laws. Such statements are included to allow potential investors to understand management’s beliefs and opinions with respect to the future, but patent litigation involves various risks and uncertainties that could affect the company’s ability to monetize its patents. It is impossible to predict specific outcomes of litigation.
Corporate Website: www.voip-palusa.com
IR inquiries: IR@voip-pal.com
IR Contact: Rich Inza (954) 495-4600