PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
Business
Development
First
National Energy Corporation (“Company”) was incorporated as Capstone International Corporation on November 16, 2000,
in the state of Delaware, and has a class of shares registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form SB-2 ( SEC
File No. 333-62588, filed on June 8, 2001). The Company’s name was changed to “First National Power Corporation”
on January 28, 2004, and was changed again to “First National Energy Corporation” on February 12, 2009, at which time
the Company effected a reverse stock split, adopted a holding company structure, and relocated its corporate charter from Delaware
to Nevada as part of the reorganization described in the next succeeding paragraph.
On
February 12, 2009, the Company effected a reorganization pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger to Form Holding
Company, dated as of December 10, 2009, which had the effect of (1) implementing a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding
common shares at the rate of 100 to 1, ; (2) merging the Company with and into First National Power Corporation, a Nevada corporation
and a wholly-owned indirect (second tier) subsidiary of the Company, such that First National Energy Corporation, a Nevada corporation
and a wholly-owned direct (first tier) subsidiary of the Company, succeeded the Company as a successor issuer of its registered
securities, pursuant to Rule 12g-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and continued the business of the Company for all
purposes; (3) exchanging each issued and outstanding share of the Company on the record date (and after giving effect to the reverse
stock split described above) into one new common share of the successor issuer; (4) shifting the Company’s charter from
the State of Delaware to the State of Nevada; (5) increasing the authorized capital of the Company from 100 million common shares
to 300 million common shares; (6) changing the Company’s name from “First National Power Corporation” to “First
National Energy Corporation”; and (7) changing the Company’s stock symbol from FNPR to FNEC.
The
Company has not at any time been the subject of any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceeding.
On
April 20, 2009, the Company acquired a territorial license to certain rights in alternative wind energy technology in exchange
for 98,800,000 newly issued common shares of the Company, which resulted in a change in control of the Company. 2009. As a result
of such transaction, the Company was after such date no longer deemed to be a “shell company” as defined in Rule 12b-2
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
On
February 3, 2016, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Sergey Bolotov and affiliates. Sergey Bolotov designed,
patented, developed, and manufactured the VAWT/VRTB/Bolotov Rotor wind turbine and agreed to transfer all technical and intellectual
related property related to the VAWT/VRTB/Bolotov Rotor wind turbine to the Company. In addition, Sergey Bolotov agreed to assign
all patents, designs, drawings, blueprints, plans, images, promotional material, websites, and anything else that could be useful
in marketing and distributing the VRTB technology (collectively, the “Assets”).
As
compensation for the Assets, Sergey Bolotov will be paid ten percent (10%) of the Company profits arising from the Assets and
realized by the Company, provided that Sergey Bolotov continues to consult with the Company. In addition, Sergey Bolotov will
receive a signing bonus of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) solely derived from Eleven percent (11%) of the initial profits realized
by the Company from the Assets. Further, Sergey Bolotov will be appointed as a member of the Board of Directors and will be issued
One Hundred Thousand shares of Company common stock upon such appointment. As of the date of this filing, Mr. Bolotov has not
been appointed. Subsequently, Sergey Bolotov will consult with the Company and, upon the Company receiving sufficient funding,
Sergey Bolotov will receive a consulting fee of Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000 Canadian) monthly as well research and development
facility with support staff.
On
February 5, 2016, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Company and Sergey Bolotov agreed
to accept the Memorandum of Understanding as binding and the Board of Directors of the Company ratified the Memorandum of Understanding
as binding on February 9, 2016.
4.
Business of Issuer
(i)
Principal products or services and their markets
.
Since
acquiring the technology license described above, management of the Company has expended significant time seeking sources of capital
to implement its business plan, which is primarily designed to exploit the licensed technology throughout the United States and
Canada for commercial gain by building, installing and operating its proprietary supplemental wind generation devices. The Company
is also evaluating other alternatives in order to improve the Company’s financial condition, including merger and acquisition
opportunities. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising capital or closing any such merger or acquisition
transactions.
(ii)
Distribution methods of the products or services
.
The
Company intends to market and distribute its licensed proprietary supplemental wind generation devices by achieving strategic
alliances with wind industry participants operating construction and maintenance enterprises in the licensed territories.
(iii)
Status of any publicly announced new product or service.
The
publicly announced licensed proprietary supplemental wind generation devices of the Company are the subject of intense research
and development efforts by the Company, with the object of achieving optimum performance, facilitating large scale manufacturing
at multiple locations, and protecting the Company’s unique product designs.
(iv)
Competitive business conditions and the smaller reporting company’s competitive position in the industry and methods
of competition
.
For
a discussion of competitive business conditions and the Company’s competitive position in the industry and methods of competition,
please see “Risk Factors - RISKS RELATED TO WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY” below.
(v)
Sources and availability of raw materials and the names of principal suppliers.
The
Company has identified ready sources and availability of raw materials and multiple suppliers of the materials and components
to be incorporated in its licensed proprietary supplemental wind generation devices, and does not foresee any dependence on any
sole source or supplier for such materials and components.
(vi)
Dependence on one or a few major customers
.
The
Company does not foresee any likely dependence on one or a few major customers.
(vii)
Patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, concessions, royalty agreements or labor contracts, including duration
.
On
April 21, 2009, the Company entered a Technology License and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), between the
Company and Boreas Research Corporation (“BRC”), pursuant to which BRC granted the Company a license (the “License”)
to manufacture certain alternative energy systems incorporating proprietary technology owned by BRC.
(viii)
Need for any government approval of principal products or services
.
No
government approval is required for the Company’s principal products, but certain certifications may be necessary to obtain
liability insurance for the products in order to satisfy the contractual requirements of potential customers.
(ix)
Effect of existing or probable governmental regulations on the business
.
For
a discussion of the effect of existing or probable governmental regulations on the business of the Company, please see “Risk
Factors-RISKS RELATED TO WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY” below.
(x)
Estimate of the amount spent during each of the last two fiscal years on research and development activities
.
Research
and development activities for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 and 2014 were nil.
(xi)
Costs and effects of compliance with environmental laws (federal, state and local)
.
Such
costs are unknown, but are not considered by the Company to be material.
(xii)
Number of total employees and number of full-time employees
. The Company has no paid employees nor any full-time employees,
as the directors and officers of the Company are currently performing their services without compensation.
5.
Reports to Security Holders
The
Company is a reporting entity and files annual, quarterly and special event reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
as well as proxy and information statements.
The
Company will voluntarily make available to security holders upon request a copy of this annual report on Form 10-K, including
audited financials.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We
file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available
to the public over the Internet at the website at
http://www.sec.gov
. The public may also read and copy any document we
file with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days during
the hours of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
The
risk factors required pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 503(c) are not required for smaller reporting companies. Accordingly, the
Company has determined to provide particular risk factors at this time. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the
only ones facing us. Other events that we do not currently anticipate or that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our
results of operations and financial condition. If any events described in the risk factors actually occur, our business, operating
results, prospects and financial condition could be materially harmed. In connection with the forward looking statements that
appear elsewhere in this annual report, you should also carefully review the cautionary statement referred to under “Special
Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements.”
SHOULD
ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF OUR BUSINESS PROVE INCORRECT,
ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED OR PLANNED.
FIRST
NATIONAL ENERGY CORPORATION IS A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY WITH A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY THAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO RELIABLY
PREDICT FUTURE GROWTH AND OPERATING RESULTS.
The
Company has not demonstrated that it can:
|
●
|
manufacture
products in a manner that will enable it to be profitable;
|
|
●
|
establish
many of the business functions necessary to operate, including sales, marketing, manufacturing, administrative and financial
functions;
|
|
●
|
establish
appropriate financial controls;
|
|
●
|
respond
effectively to competitive pressures; or
|
|
●
|
raise
the capital necessary to implement its business plan.
|
FIRST
NATIONAL ENERGY CORPORATION HAS INCURRED OPERATING LOSSES SINCE INCEPTION.
Since
its inception in 2000, the Company has incurred losses every quarter. The extent of the Company’s future operating losses
and the timing of profitability are highly uncertain, and it may never achieve or sustain profitability. The Company has incurred
a net loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 of ($22,612). At December 31, 2015, the Company had an accumulated deficit
of ($899,087). The Company anticipates that it will continue to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future and it is possible
that the Company will never generate substantial revenues from its products.
OUR
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM HAS EXPRESSED SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN.
Our
independent registered public accounting firm issued its report dated March 28, 2016 in connection with the audit of our financial
statements as of December 31, 2015, which included an explanatory paragraph in Note 2 describing the existence of conditions that
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, our note to our financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2015 included an explanatory paragraph describing the existence of conditions that raise substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is likely that holders
of our common stock will lose all of their investment. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.
THE
COMPANY’S FUTURE CAPITAL NEEDS ARE UNCERTAIN. THE COMPANY WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE AND
THESE FUNDS MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE ON ACCEPTABLE TERMS OR AT ALL.
The
Company believes that its current cash will not be sufficient to meet projected operating requirements for at least the next 3
months and it is therefore necessary that the Company will need to seek additional funds from public and/or private stock offerings,
borrowings under credit lines or other sources. The Company’s capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
|
●
|
the
revenues generated by products that it manufactures;
|
|
●
|
the
costs required to develop its manufacturing processes;
|
|
●
|
the
expenses it incurs in manufacturing and placing its products;
|
|
●
|
the
costs associated with any expansion of its business;
|
|
●
|
the
costs associated with capital expenditures; and
|
|
●
|
the
number and timing of any acquisitions or other strategic transactions.
|
As
a result of these factors, the Company will need to raise additional funds, and these funds may not be available on favorable
terms, or at all. Furthermore, if the Company issues equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, its existing shareholders
may experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of
its existing shareholders. If the Company cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, it may not be able to develop or enhance its
products, execute its business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated
counterparty requirements.
THE
COMPANY’S SUCCESS WILL DEPEND ON ITS ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN KEY PERSONNEL AND TECHNICAL STAFF.
The
Company believes future success will depend on its ability to manage its growth successfully, including attracting and retaining
skilled personnel for its manufacturing and site maintenance operations. Hiring qualified management and technical personnel may
be difficult. If the Company fails to attract and retain personnel, particularly management and technical personnel, it may not
be able to succeed in its planned operations.
Our
executive officers, board of directors and key employees are crucial to our business, and we may not be able to recruit, integrate
and retain the personnel we need to succeed.
Our
success will depend upon a number of key management, sales, technical and other critical personnel, including our executive officers,
our board of directors and key employees with expertise in the industry. The loss of the services of any key personnel, or our
inability to attract, integrate and retain highly skilled technical, management, sales and marketing personnel could result in
significant disruption to our operations, including our inability or limited success in locating new sites, effectiveness of sales
efforts, quality of customer service, and completion of our initiatives, including growth plans and the results of our operations.
Any failure by us to find suitable replacements for our key senior management may be disruptive to our operations. Competition
for such personnel in the technology industries is intense, and we may be unable to attract, integrate and retain such personnel
successfully.
We
may have to depend on outside advisors for some of our primary business operations.
To
supplement the business experience of our officers and directors, we may be required to employ accountants, technical experts,
appraisers and attorneys or engage other consultants or advisors. The selection of any such advisors will be made by our directors
and officers without any input from shareholders. Furthermore, it is anticipated that such persons may be engaged on an “as
needed” basis without a continuing fiduciary or other obligation to us. In the event management considers it necessary to
hire outside advisors, they may elect to hire persons who are affiliates, if they are able to provide the required services.
IF
THE COMPANY DOES NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGE ITS GROWTH, ITS BUSINESS RESOURCES MAY BECOME STRAINED AND ITS RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY
BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
The
Company expects to rapidly increase its employee base proportionate to expansion of its manufacturing capabilities. This may provide
challenges to the Company’s organization and may strain its management and operations. The Company may misjudge the amount
of time or resources that will be required to effectively manage any anticipated or unanticipated growth in its business or it
may not be able to attract, hire and retain sufficient personnel to meet its needs. If the Company cannot scale its business appropriately,
maintain control over expenses or otherwise adapt to anticipated and unanticipated growth, its business resources may become strained,
it may not be able to deliver contracted products in a timely manner and its results of operations may be adversely affected
THE
COMPANY MAY BE SUBJECT TO POTENTIAL PRODUCT LIABILITY AND OTHER CLAIMS AND IT MAY NOT HAVE THE INSURANCE OR OTHER RESOURCES TO
COVER THE COSTS OF ANY SUCCESSFUL CLAIM.
Defects
in the Company’s products could subject it to potential product liability claims for damage to property or personal injuries.
The Company’s product liability insurance, if available at reasonable cost, may not be adequate to cover future claims.
Product liability insurance is expensive and, in the future, may not be available on terms that are acceptable to the Company,
if it is available to it at all. Plaintiffs may also advance other legal theories supporting their claims that the Company’s
products or actions resulted in some harm. A successful claim brought against the Company in excess of its insurance coverage
could significantly harm its business and financial condition.
RISKS
RELATED TO CAPITAL STRUCTURE
THERE
IS NO ASSURANCE OF AN ESTABLISHED PUBLIC TRADING MARKET.
Although
the Company’s common stock trades on the OTC Markets Pink Sheets, a regular trading market for the securities may not be
sustained in the future. The OTC Markets Pink Sheets is an inter-dealer, over-the-counter market that provides significantly less
liquidity than other exchanges. Quotes for stocks included on the OTC Markets Pink Sheets are not listed in the financial sections
of newspapers as are those for other major exchanges. Therefore, prices for securities traded solely on the OTC Markets Pink Sheets
may be difficult to obtain and holders of common stock may be unable to resell their securities at or near their original offering
price or at any price. Market prices for the Company’s common stock will be influenced by a number of factors, including:
●
|
the
issuance of new equity securities pursuant to its recent issuance of shares for a technology license, or a future offering;
|
●
|
changes
in interest rates;
|
●
|
competitive
developments, including announcements by competitors of new products or services or significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic
partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
●
|
variations
in quarterly operating results;
|
●
|
changes
in financial estimates by securities analysts;
|
●
|
the
depth and liquidity of the market for the Company’s common stock;
|
●
|
investor
perceptions of the Company and the alternative energy industry generally; and
|
●
|
general
economic and other national conditions.
|
THE
COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK IS CONSIDERED A “PENNY STOCK.”
The
Company’s common stock is considered to be a “penny stock” since it meets one or more of the definitions in
Rules 15g-2 through 15g-6 promulgated under Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act. These include but are not limited to the following:
(i) the stock trades at a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) it is not traded on a “recognized” national exchange;
(iii) it is not quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market, or even if so, has a price less than $5.00 per share; or (iv) is issued by
a company with net tangible assets less than $2.0 million, if in business more than three years, or with average revenues of less
than $6.0 million for the past three years. The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is
that securities broker-dealers cannot recommend the stock but must trade in it on an unsolicited basis.
OUR
COMMON STOCK MAY BE CONSIDERED A “PENNY STOCK,” AND THEREBY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SALE AND TRADING REGULATIONS
THAT MAY MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO SELL.
Our
common stock is considered to be a “penny stock.” It does not qualify for one of the exemptions from the definition
of “penny stock” under Section 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. Our common stock is a “penny stock” because
it meets one or more of the following conditions (i) the stock trades at a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) it is not traded
on a “recognized” national exchange or (iii) it is not quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market, or has a price less than
$5.00 per share. The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers
participating in sales of our common stock are subject to the “penny stock” regulations set forth in Rules 15-2 through
15g-9 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act. For example, Rule 15g-2 requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to
provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written
receipt of the document at least two business days before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s
account. Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions
in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the
investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably
determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has
sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide
the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above;
and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s
financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult
and time consuming for holders of our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them in
the market or otherwise.
FINRA
SALES PRACTICE REQUIREMENTS MAY LIMIT A SHAREHOLDER’S ABILITY TO BUY AND SELL OUR COMMON SHARES.
In
addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an
investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that
customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make
reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other
information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced
securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend
that their customers buy our common shares, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect
on the market for our shares.
RULE
144 SALES IN THE FUTURE MAY HAVE A DEPRESSIVE EFFECT ON THE COMPANY’S STOCK PRICE AS AN INCREASE IN SUPPLY OF SHARES FOR
SALE, WITH NO CORRESPONDING INCREASE IN DEMAND WILL CAUSE PRICES TO FALL.
All
of the outstanding shares of common stock held by the present officers, directors, and affiliate stockholders are “restricted
securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As restricted shares, these shares
may be resold only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions
from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in
essence that a person who is an affiliate or officer or director who has held restricted securities for six months may, under
certain conditions, sell every three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of
1.0% of a Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. There is no limit on the amount of restricted securities that may
be sold by a non-affiliate after the owner has held the restricted securities for a period of six months if the Company is a current
reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Securities
Act of 1933, if available, or pursuant to subsequent registration of shares of common stock of present stockholders, may have
a depressive effect upon the price of the common stock in any market that may develop. In addition, if we are deemed a shell company
pursuant to Section 12(b)-2 of the Act, our “restricted securities”, whether held by affiliates or non-affiliates,
may not be re-sold for a period of 12 months following the filing of a Form 10 level disclosure or registration pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933.
FAILURE
TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL
ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.
It
is time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and maintain the internal controls, processes and reporting procedures
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and as our business develops, we may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal
auditing and other finance staff in order to remain compliant. The cost of compliance will adversely affect our financial results,
while, if we are unable to comply, we may not be able to obtain the independent accountant certifications that the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act requires of publicly traded companies.
If
we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal control
over financial reporting or to remedy any material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may identify, such failure could
result in material misstatements in our financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information
and have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Pursuant
to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and current SEC regulations, we are required to prepare assessments regarding internal
controls over financial reporting and furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. Failure
to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment or complete our Section 404 certifications could have a material
adverse effect on our stock price.
In
addition, in connection with our on-going assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we
may discover “material weaknesses” in our internal controls as defined in standards established by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies,
that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will
not be prevented or detected. The PCAOB defines “significant deficiency” as a deficiency that results in more than
a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or
detected.
In
the event that a material weakness is identified, upon receiving sufficient financing or generating sufficient revenues, we will
employ qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures to address any such material weaknesses. However, the
process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react
to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system
of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company. We cannot assure you that the
measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or that we will implement and maintain adequate
controls over our financial process and reporting in the future.
Any
failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material weaknesses that
we may identify or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our
operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements.
Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of our internal controls and,
in the case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely affect the annual auditor
attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial
information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
The
systems of internal controls and procedures that we have developed and implemented to date are adequate in a research and development
business/. The current transaction volume and limited transaction channels mean that operating management, financial management,
board members and auditor can, and do, efficiently perform a very extensive and detailed transaction review to ensure compliance
with the Company’s established procedures and controls.. If our business grows rapidly, we may not be able to keep up with
recruiting and training personnel, and enhancing our systems of internal control in line with the growth in transaction volumes
and compliance risks which could result in loss of assets, profit, and ability to manage the daily operations of our Company.
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH
CHANGING REGULATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POSE CHALLENGES FOR OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM AND RESULT IN ADDITIONAL EXPENSES AND COSTS
WHICH MAY REDUCE THE FOCUS OF MANAGEMENT AND THE PROFITABILITY OF OUR COMPANY.
Changing
laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC regulations,
have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S.
public markets. Our management team will need to devote significant time and financial resources to comply with both existing
and evolving standards for public companies, which will lead to increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion
of management time and attention from revenue generating activities to compliance activities.
THE
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS OF THE LICENSOR WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE OVER THE COMPANY.
The
officers, directors and insiders of Boreas beneficially own, in the aggregate, 86.02% of the Company’s outstanding voting
stock. As a result, the principal shareholders of Boreas Research Corporation, the Company’s technology licensor, will possess
significant influence over the Company, giving them the ability, among other things, to elect a majority of the Company’s
Board of Directors and to approve significant corporate transactions. Such stock ownership and control may also have the effect
of delaying or preventing a future change in control of the Company, impeding an acquisition, consolidation, takeover or other
business combination or discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of
the Company.
THE
COMPANY DOES NOT FORESEE PAYING CASH DIVIDENDS IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
We
currently intend to retain our future earnings to support operations and to finance expansion and, therefore, we do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The Company has not paid any dividends since its inception.
ANTICIPATED
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The
Company’s management anticipates that substantial additional capital will be required to implement its business plan. However,
there can be no assurance that management will be successful in raising such necessary additional capital. If additional funds
are raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our shareholders will be
reduced, shareholders may experience additional dilution and such securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior
to those of our common stock. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on terms favorable to us or
at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to implement our business
plan, fund expansion, take advantage of unanticipated acquisition opportunities, develop or enhance services or products or respond
to competitive pressures. Such inability could harm the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
RISKS
RELATED TO WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY
We
have a limited operating history and we have not demonstrated that we can develop, market, install and manage our licensed supplemental
energy generating systems on a large scale.
We
have a limited history of managing supplemental energy generating systems and limited data upon which you can evaluate our business.
Our prospects for success must be considered in the context of a new company in a developing industry. The risks we face include
developing and acquiring successful relationships with large scale wind farms, reliance on third parties, operating in a competitive
environment in which electricity rates will be set by the operation of market forces and regulatory constraints, uncertain performance
of our supplemental energy generating systems, financing our business and meeting the challenges of the other risk factors described
herein. If we are unable to address all of these risks, our business, results of operations and financial condition may suffer.
The
revenues generated by wind farms depend on market prices of energy in competitive wholesale energy markets. Market prices for
both energy and capacity are volatile and depend on numerous factors outside our control including economic conditions, population
growth, electrical load growth, government and regulatory policy, weather, the availability of alternate generation and transmission
facilities, balance of supply and demand, seasonality, transmission and transportation constraints and the price of natural gas
and alternative fuels or energy sources. The wholesale power markets are also subject to market regulation by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, independent system operators, and regional transmission operators which can impact market prices for energy
and capacity sold in such markets, including by imposing price caps, mechanisms to address price volatility or illiquidity in
the markets or system instability and market power mitigation measures. We cannot assure you that market prices will be at levels
that enable us to operate profitably or as anticipated. A decline in electricity or capacity market prices below anticipated levels
could have a material adverse impact on our revenues or results of operations. In markets where wind farms qualify to receive
capacity payments, it is typical that only a portion of the wind farm’s capacity is eligible to receive capacity payments.
This portion is typically based on the previous year’s average net capacity factor during peak periods. In addition, changes
to regulatory policy or market rules regarding the qualification of wind generation as a capacity resource could limit or eliminate
a wind farm’s ability to receive payments for its generating capacity.
The
governments of the United States and Canada may not extend or may decrease existing tax incentives for renewable energy, including
wind energy, which would have an adverse impact on our development strategy.
Tax
incentives applicable to the wind energy industry currently in effect include the production tax credit (“PTC”) and
accelerated tax depreciation for certain assets of wind farms. The current version of the PTC provides the owner of a wind turbine
with a credit against its federal income tax obligations based on the amount of electricity generated by the wind turbine. The
accelerated depreciation for certain assets of wind farms provides for a five-year depreciable life for these assets, rather than
the 15 to 25 year depreciable lives of many non-renewable energy assets. We also cannot assure you that the tax laws providing
for accelerated depreciation of wind farm assets will not be modified, amended or repealed in the future. If the current tax incentives
are not extended or renewed, or are extended or renewed at a lower rate, financing options for wind farms may be reduced and development
plans for additional wind farms could be adversely affected, thereby severely restricting the number of potential sites for the
Company’s products.
Tax
equity investors have limited funds, and wind energy producers compete with other renewable energy producers for tax equity financing.
In the current rapidly expanding market, the cost of tax equity financing may increase and there may not be sufficient tax equity
financing available to meet the total demand in any year. In addition, one or more current tax equity investors may decide to
withdraw from this market thereby depleting the pool of funds available for tax equity financing. Alternative financing will be
more expensive and there may not be sufficient liquidity in alternate financial markets. As a result, development of additional
wind farms and the Company’s growth potential would both be adversely affected.
The
performance of wind farms and, by extension, the Company’s products, is dependent upon meteorological and atmospheric conditions
that fluctuate over time. The production of electricity generated by our supplemental wind energy systems will be the source of
substantially all of our revenues. As a result, our results of operations will be highly dependent on meteorological and atmospheric
conditions.
Operational
factors may reduce energy production from the Company’s supplemental wind energy generation systems below projections, causing
a reduction in revenue. The amount of electricity generated depends upon many factors in addition to the quality of the wind resources,
including but not limited to turbine performance, aerodynamic losses resulting from wear on the wind turbine, degradation of other
components, icing or soiling of the blades and the number of times an individual turbine or an entire wind farm may need to be
shut down for maintenance or to avoid damage due to extreme weather conditions. In addition, conditions on the electrical transmission
network can impact the amount of energy a wind farm can deliver to the network. We cannot assure you that any of our supplemental
wind energy generation systems will meet energy production expectations in any given time period.
As
with all power generation facilities, operation of our supplemental wind energy generation systems will involve operating risks,
including:
●
|
our
possible inability to achieve the output and efficiency levels for our supplemental wind energy generation systems that we
have projected; and
|
●
|
shutdown
due to a breakdown or failure of equipment or processes, violation of permit requirements (whether through operations or change
in law), operator error or catastrophic events such as fires, explosions, floods or other similar occurrences affecting us,
our supplemental wind energy generation systems or third parties upon which our business may depend.
|
The
occurrence of one or more of these events could significantly reduce revenues expected to be produced by our supplemental wind
energy generation systems or significantly increase the expenses of our supplemental wind energy generation systems, thereby adversely
affecting our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The
Company’s financial projections assume that they will be able to operate their supplemental wind energy generation systems
nearly continually and they may have trouble meeting those obligations if they are not successful.
The
Company will need to achieve high levels of availability and dispatch for these supplemental wind energy generation systems to
operate profitably. The Company will operate under the assumption that they will achieve high levels of availability and dispatch
in developing the revenue figures included in their financial projections. However, developments could affect the dispatch rate
of their supplemental wind energy generation systems, including the following:
●
|
equipment
problems or other problems which affect the ability of our supplemental wind energy generation systems to operate;
|
●
|
implementation
of additional or more stringent environmental compliance measures; or
|
●
|
the
market introduction of new and competing products which may be more efficient and cost effective than our supplemental wind
energy generation systems.
|
Changes
in energy laws or regulations or interpretations of these laws or regulations could result in increased compliance costs or result
in additional expenditures for us. Failure by us to comply or failure to satisfy requirements could also subject us to the imposition
of penalties and fines. Governmental laws, regulations and policies applicable to alternative energy sources are currently subject
to modifications and are expected to continue to evolve. Resulting laws and policies may restrict the structuring of the sales
of the power generated by wind farms. Federal law regulates wholesale sales of electricity and the transmission of electricity
in interstate commerce by public utilities. We cannot predict whether federal or state governmental entities or regulatory authorities
will adopt new laws or regulations or modify existing laws affecting the generation and/or transmission of electricity, or the
ability of our counterparty wind farm operators to comply with them. Such new laws or regulations could have a material adverse
impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Various
state governments may not extend or may decrease incentives for renewable energy, including wind energy, which would have an adverse
impact on our development strategy.
Various
types of incentives which support the sale of electricity generated from wind energy presently exist in regions where we plan
to market, install and operate our products on existing wind farms. We cannot assure you that governmental support for alternative
energy sources will continue at current levels or that the wind farms we partner with will qualify for such incentives. Any decrease
in such state-level incentives could have an adverse impact on our development strategy.
We
depend on our ability to locate and develop new sources of wind power in a timely and consistent manner, and failure to do so
would adversely affect our operations and financial performance.
Our
success in the industry requires additional and continuing development to become and remain competitive. We expect to continue
to make substantial investments in development activities. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue
to locate additional wind power sites. This development activity will require continued investment in order to maintain and grow
our market position. We may experience unforeseen problems in our development endeavors. We may not achieve widespread market
acceptance of our supplemental wind energy generation systems. These factors could materially affect our ability to forecast operations
and negatively affect our stock price, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
The
number of desirable sites available for successful wind farms is limited, and our inability to successfully negotiate for access
with the owners and operators of such sites would limit our ability to implement our development strategy.
We
are a small company, and we will be operating in a highly competitive market, and this competition may accelerate in the future.
Potential competitors have, or may have, substantially greater financial, marketing or technical resources, and in some cases,
greater name recognition and experience than we have. Such potential competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or
emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, and may also be able to devote greater resources to the development
and promotion of supplemental wind energy generation systems than we can. Potential competitors may make strategic acquisitions
or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties that enhance their ability to address the needs
of our prospective counterparties. It is possible that new competitors or alliances among potential competitors may emerge and
rapidly gain significant market share. This would in turn reduce our market share, reduce our overall revenues and require us
to invest additional funds in new technology development. If we cannot compete successfully against competitors, this will have
a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
We
will depend on electric transmission facilities owned and operated by third parties to deliver the electricity that we sell. We
will typically connect to transmission networks through the facilities owned and controlled by our counterparty wind farm owners
and operators. The capacity of the local transmission network may be limited or constrained, and the owner of the network may
not allow us to interconnect our supplemental wind energy system without first constructing any necessary system upgrades. Many
wind farms are located in remote areas with limited transmission networks where intense competition exists for access to, and
use of capacity on, the existing transmission facilities. We cannot assure you that we will obtain sufficient network connections
for all future installations within planned timetables and budgetary constraints.
Our
counterparty wind farm owners and operators are required to meet certain technical specifications in order to be connected to
the transmission network. If any wind farm does not meet, or ceases to comply with, these specifications, we will not be able
to connect, to or remain connected, to the transmission network. We may also incur liabilities and penalties, including disconnection
from the network, if the transmission of electricity by one or more of such host wind farms does not comply with applicable technical
requirements. In the interconnection agreements between wind farms and the applicable transmission owner or operator, the transmission
owner or operator retains the right to interrupt or curtail transmission deliveries as required in order to maintain the reliability
of the transmission network. We cannot assure you that the Company will not be adversely impacted by any such interruption or
curtailment.
SHOULD
ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL
RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED OR PLANNED
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
This
Item is not applicable to us as we are not an accelerated filer, a large accelerated filer, or a well-seasoned issuer.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES.
The
Company maintains office space in Georgetown, Ontario Canada. There is no cost for the use of the office as it is provided as
a courtesy by a director. It currently does not own any equipment at that location.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The
Company is not a party to any pending or threatened legal proceedings.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not
applicable.
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market
Information
.
Market
Information
Our
common stock is listed on the OTC Markets under the symbol “FNEC”. For the periods indicated, the following table
sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of common stock, as reported by the OTC Markets. These prices represent inter-dealer
quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. . The following
table sets forth the high and low bid quotations for our common stock for each quarter during the past two fiscal years as reported
by the OTC Markets.
Year
ended December 31, 2015
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
4th quarter,
ended December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
3rd quarter, ended
September 30, 2015
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
2nd quarter, ended
June 30, 2015
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
1st quarter, ended
March 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2014
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
4th quarter,
ended December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
3rd quarter, ended
September 30, 2014
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
2nd quarter, ended
June 30, 2014
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
1st quarter, ended
March 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Holders
.
At
December 31, 2015, there were approximately 247 holders of the Registrant’s common stock.
Dividend
Policy
.
As
of December 31, 2015, the Company has not paid any dividends to its shareholders and does not intend to pay dividends to its shareholders
in the foreseeable future. However, there are no restrictions which would limit the ability of the Company to pay dividends in
the future.
Securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
.
|
(1)
|
The
Registrant maintained a stock incentive plan, entitled “2005 Stock Incentive Plan
for Employees and Consultants” and had registered 3 million of its common shares
(1 million on February 25, 2005 and 2 million on April 11, 2005) for issuance under such
stock incentive plan. Under this plan, 830,000 shares have been issued before the plan
expired in 2015. All options pursuant to this plan have expired.
|
|
(2)
|
In
February 2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. 5,000,000
shares of common stock were reserved pursuant to the Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
|
|
(3)
|
The
following information is provided in accordance with Item 201(d) (Market Price of and
Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters) of
Regulation
S-K:
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
Plan
category
|
|
Number
of securities to
be
issued upon exercise
of
outstanding options,
warrants
and rights
(a)
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(b)
|
|
Number
of securities remaining
available
for future issuance
under
equity compensation
plans
[excluding securities
reflected
in column (a)]
(c)
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
None
|
|
Equity compensation plans
not approved by security holders
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
5,000,000
Common Shares
|
|
Shares expired with the plan itself
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
5,000,000
Common Shares
|
|
Sales
of Unregistered Securities
During
the 2015 Fiscal year, there were no capital transactions.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.” There are no financial data which, if selected, would
highlight any significant trends in the registrant’s financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain
statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans,
objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section A of the Securities Act
of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the
words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,”
“intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,”
“will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such
forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions.
Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which
may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual
effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations
and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory
changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties
should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.
We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect
our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.
Plan
of Operation in the Next Twelve Months
Product
Development
Subject
to our financial constraints, we intend to continue the development and refinement of our approach to the market. Our focus is
on developing a single product line the Supplementary Wind Energy Generation Unit, and to bundle it with other services including
installation and maintenance, to make the acquisition of the bundle more attractive than just an additional source of revenue.
We
plan to hone the design of a unique supplemental new wind turbine system over the next nine to twelve months, by upgrading and
finalizing our existing designs. The resulting cost of energy should, therefore, be significantly lower than traditional wind
power systems. These design and performance features to be developed and utilized in production models of our supplemental wind
energy systems should further enhance our leadership position in technology development in the small wind power industry.
We
believe that there is currently no or limited competition in the markets we plan to pursue, and there is an increasing demand
due to the rising levels of installed wind energy capacity worldwide.
We
will strive to achieve rapid growth through strategic alliances with existing wind energy service providers, with a view to bundling
our products with products and services already being provided to existing wind energy facilities by such potential strategic
partners.
Locate
Suitable Administrative and Assembly Facilities
We
plan to move to a new facility in fiscal 2016 in order to accommodate our operations and plans for expansion. We are currently
seeking office and assembly/test space where we can perform testing and final assembly of our supplemental wind energy systems.
Our site selection criteria will include available tax credits and incentives.
We
expect to rely on outside manufacturing partners for the manufacturing of all key system components. We plan to then perform final
assembly, test, and packaging internally at our facilities. No one manufacturing partner will provide all components, thus allowing
us to better ensure our protection of our intellectual property and trade secrets. We plan to create a highly efficient assembly
facility with sufficient space to accommodate our expansion plans. We feel that our cost of manufacturing will decrease drastically
as we utilize common processes and suppliers. We also intend to implement a quality assurance program and promote communication
with design engineers to identify possible enhancements of our products as the manufacturing process evolves.
We
further believe that with higher volume, better purchasing, and improved manufacturing outsourcing, we could significantly reduce
our anticipated cost of goods. We view continuous improvement in quality and cost as a key priority for long term success.
Sales
and Distribution Strategy
Our
goal is for our supplemental wind energy systems to become leading products in the wind power marketplace in North America and
internationally. In order to achieve our goal, we intend to increase awareness of our products with potential customers, who we
anticipate will primarily be those who operate or are planning the development of significant wind energy resources. We expect,
but cannot guarantee, that large industry participants will be a significant market.
Our
goal is to retain ownership of our installed products, dividing the energy output with the host facility in return for a license
to locate our turbine assemblies on their turbine poles and sell the power produced by our assemblies through the host’s
interconnection and sale arrangements with transmission providers and power purchasers. However, we will also be seeking facilities
that will do a sale-leaseback for the SWEG unit, allowing the lender to take advantage of any government incentives for investments
in green energy products.
Our
intent is to produce and ship 25 supplemental wind energy systems during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. At present
we expect that it will take us approximately 8 weeks to build and ship a system after our design and specifications are finalized.
Our goal is to reduce this time to 3 weeks from contract to installation. No assurances can be provided that we will meet our
objectives.
North
America
North
American revenues are expected to benefit from the increasing availability of incentive programs and higher energy costs.
With a high-quality line of wind turbine assemblies and an aggressive program of industry affiliations and promotion, we plan
to establish and then expand our North American network of revenue producing locations. This strategy offers the potential for
rapid revenue growth with strategic partners which have well-established relationships with potential customers.
We
intend to promote brand name recognition for our products in the industry. Initial advertising may occur through industry publications
and attendance at targeted trade shows. We expect the message that our supplemental wind energy systems provide stable and reliable
outputs, particularly if bundled with high quality maintenance and repair services, will receive a strong response.
Strategic
partners are an important aspect in our sales and distribution strategy. Potential partners include companies that build and maintain
large-scale wind energy farms throughout North America, who provide a vital link to potential end users of renewable energy equipment
and are well placed to recommend our products, particularly if bundled with services already being provided by such partners to
such end users.
We
have identified several potential strategic partners that are interested in adding the marketing and possible bundling of our
supplemental wind energy systems to their operations.
International
- Beyond North America
We
intend to develop our international marketing beyond North America in stages. The first stage will utilize an additional license
of our proprietary technology for a specific foreign market with a vibrant and expanding wind energy market, to be followed by
establishing a joint venture relationship with a strategic partner in the foreign market. The research, planning, and relationship-building
to support the extension of our business to the first such foreign market will begin in the fiscal 2016 year. Over time, we expect
to replicate this strategy sequentially in other foreign markets, and may possibly partner with manufacturers in such foreign
markets to reduce costs.
Sales
Personnel
At
present our sales staff consists of our management. We expect to hire additional employees over the next twelve months, including
a management level operations director.
Sergey
Bolotov and affiliates
On
February 3, 2016, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Sergey Bolotov and affiliates. Sergey Bolotov designed,
patented, developed, and manufactured the VAWT/VRTB/Bolotov Rotor wind turbine and agreed to transfer all technical and intellectual
related property related to the VAWT/VRTB/Bolotov Rotor wind turbine to the Company. In addition, Sergey Bolotov agreed to assign
all patents, designs, drawings, blueprints, plans, images, promotional material, websites, and anything else that could be useful
in marketing and distributing the VRTB technology (collectively, the “Assets”).
As
compensation for the Assets, Sergey Bolotov will be paid ten percent (10%) of the Company profits arising from the Assets and
realized by the Company, provided that Sergey Bolotov continues to consult with the Company. In addition, Sergey Bolotov will
receive a signing bonus of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) solely derived from Eleven percent (11%) of the initial profits realized
by the Company from the Assets. Further, Sergey Bolotov will be appointed as a member of the Board of Directors and will be issued
One Hundred Thousand shares of Company common stock upon such appointment. As of the date of this filing, Mr. Bolotov has not
been appointed. Subsequently, Sergey Bolotov will consult with the Company and, upon the Company receiving sufficient funding,
Sergey Bolotov will receive a consulting fee of Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000 Canadian) monthly as well research and development
facility with support staff.
On
February 5, 2016, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Company and Sergey Bolotov agreed
to accept the Memorandum of Understanding as binding and the Board of Directors of the Company ratified the Memorandum of Understanding
as binding on February 9, 2016.
Expenses
We
estimate the costs to implement our business strategy over the following twelve months to be:
*
|
Product
Research and Development, primarily related to refining wind turbine assembly system designs, and establishing a supply chain
and production. We estimate product development related expenses for the next twelve months will be approximately $100,000.
|
|
|
*
|
Marketing,
including efforts to present our products to potential end users, direct marketing and attendance at trade shows as discussed
above. We estimate initial marketing expenses for the next twelve months will be approximately $200,000.
|
|
|
*
|
Research
and Development costs consist of developing and testing our company website. We estimate that research and development costs
for the next twelve months will be approximately $2,000.
|
|
|
*
|
Office,
assembly and warehouse space, to accommodate our development and production plans as discussed above. We estimate that our
facilities cost and utilities for the next twelve month will be approximately $100,000.
|
|
|
*
|
General
working capital, materials, inventory, labor and consulting costs of approximately $1,750,000.
|
Significant
Equipment
The
Company plans to purchase approximately $75,000 in capital equipment over the next twelve months, including various tenant improvements,
a forklift to support our assembly operations, materials for assembly jigs, and various electronic and mechanical testing devices.
Results
of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
|
|
Dec
31, 2015
|
|
|
Dec
31, 2014
|
|
Income
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
22,612
|
|
|
|
12,092
|
|
Administrative
Expenses
|
|
|
22,612
|
|
|
|
12,092
|
|
Development
Expenses
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
22,612
|
|
|
$
|
12,092
|
|
Development
Costs.
As
more particularly described in Note 3(c) of the accompanying financial statements, the Company is expensing development costs,
rather than capitalizing them, until the Company has a reasonable expectation of revenues.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
Dec
31, 2015
|
|
|
Dec
31, 2014
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
$
|
1,937
|
|
|
$
|
2,237
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
698,087
|
|
|
|
675,775
|
|
Resulting Working
Capital Deficit
|
|
$
|
(696,150
|
)
|
|
$
|
(673,538
|
)
|
On
May 25, 2009, the Company acquired technology license rights valued at $100 (as restated) in exchange for 98,800,000 new restricted
shares of the Company’s common stock, which were issued as more particularly described in Note 1(b) of the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
On
March 22, 2010, Pavana Power Corporation (“Pavana”), a Nevada corporation, the Company’s 99.9% owned subsidiary,
acquired an exclusive territorial 25 year license for the Republic of India (“India”), from Boreas Research Corporation
(‘Boreas”, the stockholders of whom hold controlling interests in the Company), pursuant to which the Company’s
subsidiary acquired technology rights for India in the technology of Boreas that maximizes the energy productivity of existing
wind turbines by capturing energy that flows through and underneath existing wind turbine systems. The consideration due from
the Company’s subsidiary to Boreas for the license was a deferred cash payment of $600,000, and a future royalty equal to
5% of Pavana’s “EBITDA” (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) from exploitation of
the acquired license.
On
November 8, 2010, Pavana paid Boreas $60,000 as a payment due under the India technology license agreement, leaving a cash consideration
due of $540,000. The remaining debt is non-interest bearing and are due on demand.
In
accordance with Topic ASC 850, Pavana recorded the acquisition of the Supplementary Wind Energy Generator (SWEG) technology license
for the geographical territory of India, at the carrying amount of the license technology acquired which was $100 and the balance
of the cash consideration of $599,900 was accounted for as additional paid in capital.
The
Company does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
At
present, the Company lacks sufficient capital resources to fund operations and business plan for the next twelve months. The Company
intends to obtain business capital through the use of private equity fundraising or shareholder loans. If the Company is not able
to secure additional funding, the implementation of its business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional
financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. The plan is that, in time, the primary source of capital for
our business model will be revenue from the sale of power produced by installed products.
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities and Financing Activities
|
|
Dec
31, 2015
|
|
|
Dec
31, 2014
|
|
Net
Cash used in activities
|
|
$
|
(34,259
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,908
|
|
Net
Cash from financing
|
|
|
33,959
|
|
|
|
(1,767
|
)
|
Net
Cash outflow
|
|
$
|
(300
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,141
|
|
The
Registrant has incurred net losses: ($22,612) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and ($12,092) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2015, the Registrant had an accumulated deficit of ($899,087) (2014: ($876,475). This raises
substantial doubt about the Registrant’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Risk
Factors Associated with Plan of Operation
(A)
LIMITED PRIOR OPERATIONS, HISTORY OF OPERATING LOSSES, AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT MAY AFFECT ABILITY OF REGISTRANT TO SURVIVE.
The
Registrant has had limited prior operations to date. Since the Registrant’s principal activities recently have been limited
to seeking new business ventures, it has no recent record of any revenue producing operations. Consequently, there is only a limited
operating history upon which to base an assumption that the Registrant will be able to achieve its business plans. In addition,
the Registrant has only limited assets. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Registrant will generate significant revenues
in the future; and there can be no assurance that the Registrant will operate at a profitable level.
Accordingly,
the Registrant’s prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered in
connection with the establishment of a new business.
The
Registrant has incurred net losses: ($22,612) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and ($12,092) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2015, the Registrant had an accumulated deficit of ($899,087) (2014: ($876,475). This raises
substantial doubt about the Registrant’s ability to continue as a going concern.
As
a result of the fixed nature of many of the Registrant’s expenses, the Registrant may be unable to adjust spending in a
timely manner to compensate for any unexpected delays in the development of the Registrant’s business or any capital raising
or revenue shortfall. Any such delays or shortfalls will have an immediate adverse impact on the Registrants business, operations
and financial condition.
(B)
NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING MAY AFFECT OPERATIONS AND PLAN OF BUSINESS.
The
working capital requirements associated with any adopted plan of business of the Registrant may be significant. The Registrant
anticipates, based on currently proposed assumptions relating to its operations (including with respect to costs and expenditures
and projected cash flow from operations), that it must seek financing to continue its operations (an amount which is as yet to
be determined). However, such financing, when needed, may not be available, or on terms acceptable to management. The ability
of the Registrant to continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and the success of the Registrant’s
business plan. The Registrant’s independent accountant audit reports included in this Form 10K includes a substantial doubt
paragraph regarding the Registrant’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If
funding is insufficient at any time in the future, the Registrant may not be able to take advantage of business opportunities
or respond to competitive pressures, or may be required to reduce the scope of its planned product development and marketing efforts,
any of which could have a negative impact on its business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, insufficient
funding may have a material adverse effect on the Registrant’s financial condition, which could require the Registrant to:
●
|
curtail operations significantly;
|
|
|
●
|
sell significant assets;
|
|
|
●
|
seek arrangements with strategic
partners or other parties that may require the Registrant to relinquish significant rights
|
|
|
●
|
to products, technologies or markets;
|
|
|
●
|
explore other strategic alternatives
including a merger or sale of the Registrant.
|
To
the extent that the Registrant raises capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such
securities will result in dilution to existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities,
these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could
impose restrictions on the Registrant’s operations. Regardless of whether the Registrant’s cash assets prove to be
inadequate to meet the Registrant’s operational needs, the Registrant may seek to compensate providers of services by issuance
of stock in lieu of cash, which will also result in dilution to existing shareholders.
(C)
LOSS OF ANY OF CURRENT MANAGEMENT COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON BUSINESS AND PROSPECTS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The
Registrant’s success is dependent upon the hiring and retention of key personnel. None of the officers or directors has
any employment or noncompetition agreement with the Registrant. Therefore, there can be no assurance that these personnel will
remain employed by the Registrant. Should any of these individuals cease to be affiliated with the Registrant for any reason before
qualified replacements could be found, there could be material adverse effects on the Registrant’s business and prospects.
In
addition, all decisions with respect to the management of the Registrant will be made exclusively by the officers and directors
of the Registrant. Investors will only have rights as stockholders to make decisions which affect the Registrant. The success
of the Registrant, to a large extent, will depend on the quality of the directors and officers of the Registrant. Accordingly,
no person should invest in the shares unless they are willing to entrust all aspects of the management of the Registrant to its
officers and directors.
(D)
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST MAY AFFECT ABILITY OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS TO MAKE DECISIONS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF REGISTRANT.
The
officers and directors of the Registrant have other interests to which they devote time, either individually or through partnerships
and corporations in which they have an interest, hold an office, or serve on boards of directors, and each will continue to do
so notwithstanding the fact that management time may be necessary to the business of the Registrant. As a result, certain conflicts
of interest may exist between the Registrant and its officers and/or directors which may not be susceptible to resolution.
In
addition, conflicts of interest may arise in the area of corporate opportunities which cannot be resolved through arm’s
length negotiations. All of the potential conflicts of interest will be resolved only through exercise by the directors of such
judgment as is consistent with their fiduciary duties to the Registrant. It is the intention of management, so as to minimize
any potential conflicts of interest, to present first to the board of directors of the Registrant, any proposed investments for
its evaluation.
(E)
LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY, AND INDEMNIFICATION, OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS MAY RESULT IN EXPENDITURES BY REGISTRANT.
The
Registrant’s Articles of Incorporation contain provisions authorizing the Registrant to eliminate, to the fullest extent
permitted by the Nevada Revised Statutes, as in effect from time to time, the personal liability of directors, officers and employees
of the Registrant for monetary damages arising from claims of a breach of their fiduciary duties to the Registrant. Any limitation
on the liability of any director, or indemnification of directors, officer, or employees could result in substantial expenditures
being made by the Registrant in covering any liability of such persons or in indemnifying them.
(F)
ABSENCE OF CASH DIVIDENDS MAY AFFECT INVESTMENT VALUE OF REGISTRANT’S STOCK.
The
board of directors of the Registrant does not anticipate paying cash dividends on the common stock for the foreseeable future
and intends to retain any future earnings to finance the growth of the Registrant’s business. Payment of dividends, if any,
will depend, among other factors, on earnings, capital requirements and the general operating and financial conditions of the
Registrant as well as legal limitations on the payment of dividends out of paid-in capital.
(G)
NONCUMULATIVE VOTING MAY AFFECT ABILITY OF SOME SHAREHOLDERS TO INFLUENCE MANGEMENT OF REGISTRANT.
Holders
of the shares of common stock of the Registrant are not entitled to accumulate their votes for the election of directors or otherwise.
Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares present at a meeting of shareholders will be able to elect all of the directors
of the Registrant, and the minority shareholders will not be able to elect a representative to the Registrant’s board of
directors.
(H)
NO ASSURANCE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC TRADING MARKET AND RISK OF LOW PRICED SECURITIES MAY AFFECT MARKET VALUE OF REGISTRANT’S
STOCK.
There
has been only a limited public market for the common stock of the Registrant. The common stock of the Registrant is currently
quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate
quotations as to the market value of the Registrant’s securities. In addition, the common stock is subject to the low-priced
security or so called “penny stock” rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who
sell such securities. The Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 requires additional disclosure in connection
with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock (generally, according to regulations adopted by the Securities and
Exchange Commission, any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions),
including the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the
risks associated therewith. The regulations governing low-priced or penny stocks sometimes limit the ability of broker-dealers
to sell the Registrant’s common stock and thus, ultimately, the ability of the investors to sell their securities in the
secondary market.
(I)
FAILURE TO MAINTAIN MARKET MAKERS MAY AFFECT VALUE OF REGISTRANT’S STOCK.
If
the Registrant is unable to maintain National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. member broker/dealers as market makers,
the liquidity of the common stock could be impaired, not only in the number of shares of common stock which could be bought and
sold, but also through possible delays in the timing of transactions, and lower prices for the common stock than might otherwise
prevail. Furthermore, the lack of market makers could result in persons being unable to buy or sell shares of the common stock
on any secondary market. There can be no assurance the Registrant will be able to maintain such market makers.
(J)
SALE OF SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE.
If
a substantial number of the shares of common stock of the Registrant that have been issued in reliance on Rule 144 under the Securities
Act of 1933 were sold under Rule 144 or a registered offering, the market price of the common stock could be adversely affected.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES.
The
Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Financial Reporting Release No. 60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure
About Critical Accounting Policies” (“FRR 60”), suggesting companies provide additional disclosure and commentary
on their most critical accounting policies. In FRR 60, the Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting
policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results,
and require management to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of
matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, the Company’s most critical accounting policies include
the use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements. The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses in applying
these most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its financial statements.
The
preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis,
the Company evaluates these estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and concentration of credit risk. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that is believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources that are material to investors.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not
required for smaller reporting companies.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 with comparative data for December 31, 2014 are presented in a separate
section of this report following Item 14.
ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.
None
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
As
of December 31, 2015, the Registrant carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) under the supervision and with the participation
of the Chief Financial Officer. Based on and as of the date of such evaluation, the aforementioned officers have concluded that
the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, due to a material weakness in our internal control
over financial reporting, consisting of inadequate staffing within the accounting operations by employees who are responsible
for accounting functions which prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation
of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters
or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews.
The
Registrant also maintains a system of internal accounting controls that is designed to provide assurance that assets are safeguarded
and that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and properly recorded. This system is continually
reviewed and is augmented by written policies and procedures, the careful selection and training of qualified personnel and an
internal audit program to monitor its effectiveness. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, there were no changes to
this system of internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Company
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting refers to a process designed by, or under the supervision
of our Chief Financial Officer and effected by our Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in connection with generally
accepted accounting principles, including those policies and procedures that:
|
●
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of our management and directors; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets
that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
|
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of the prevention or
detection of misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
In
connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2015, and 2014 management,
with the participation of our Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial
reporting, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. Management conducted its evaluation of the Registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework,
issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In the course of making our assessment
of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, we identified one material weakness in our internal control
over financial reporting. This material weakness consisted of inadequate staffing within the accounting operations of our company.
The small number of employees who are responsible for accounting functions (more specifically, one) prevents us from segregating
duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the untimely
identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective
reviews.
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Registrant’s independent registered public accounting
firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered
public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s
report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(b)
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2015 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART
III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Executive
Officers and Directors
Set
forth below is information regarding our executive officers and directors as of December 31, 2015
Gregory
Sheller
|
|
57
|
|
Director,
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
|
Peter
Wanner
|
|
62
|
|
Director,
Chief Financial Officer
|
Gianni
Caputo
|
|
35
|
|
Director,
Vice President, Secretary
|
GREGORY
SHELLER
- Director, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. Age 57, is and
for the past five years has been principally employed as a real estate consultant with Re/Max Alliance Group, a real estate firm
headquartered in Sarasota, Florida.
Mr.
Sheller’s education and work experience qualify him to serve as a director and officer of the Company.
PETER
WANNER
- Director, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer.
Mr.
Wanner, age 62, is a qualified accountant certified in Canada and Ontario and for the past 23 years has served as a business consultant
to start-up companies, as well as companies in refinancing and turnaround. He also has 31 years of experience in financing accounting,
including 2 years in public accounting as well as international experience working in Mexico, United Kingdom and United States.
Mr. Wanner has served as a director since May 4, 2004. The term of office for any director is for a period of one year, or until
the next annual meeting (or special meeting in lieu of an annual) of the shareholders.
Mr. Wanner has served as a director
and officer of the Company since May 4, 2004. :
Mr.
Wanner’s education and accounting and work experience qualify him to serve as a director and officer of the Company.
GIANNI
CAPUTO
- Director, Vice President and Secretary of the Company.
For
the past 8 years, Mr. Caputo, age 35, has served as Project and Kiosk Integration Manager of Aareas Interative, Inc., a developer
of technologies for real estate sales and marketing serving the building industry in the United States and Canada with annual
revenues of approximately $4 million. Mr. Caputo supervises 17 Aareas employees. Mr. Caputo has served as a director and officer
of the Company since May 25, 2009.
Mr.
Caputo’s technical skills and technology work experience qualify him to serve as a director and officer of the Company.
Significant
Employees
.
The
Registrant has no employees.
Family
Relationships
There
are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of our
outstanding Common Stock, or the Reporting Persons, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of
changes in ownership of Common Stock on Forms 4 or 5. Such persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of
all such reports they file. Based solely on a review of Forms 3 and 4 furnished to us by the Reporting Persons or prepared on
behalf of the Reporting Persons by the Company and on written representations from certain Reporting Persons that no Forms 5 were
required, the Company believes that the Reporting Persons have complied with reporting requirements applicable to them.
Conflicts
of Interest
Members
of our management are associated with other firms involved in a range of business activities. Consequently, there are potential
inherent conflicts of interest in their acting as officers and directors of our company. Although the officers and directors are
engaged in other business activities, we anticipate they will devote an important amount of time to our affairs.
Our
officers and directors are now and may in the future become shareholders, officers or directors of other companies, which may
be formed for the purpose of engaging in business activities similar to ours. Accordingly, additional direct conflicts of interest
may arise in the future with respect to such individuals acting on behalf of us or other entities. Moreover, additional conflicts
of interest may arise with respect to opportunities which come to the attention of such individuals in the performance of their
duties or otherwise. Currently, we do not have a right of first refusal pertaining to opportunities that come to their attention
and may relate to our business operations.
Our
officers and directors are, so long as they are our officers or directors, subject to the restriction that all opportunities contemplated
by our plan of operation which come to their attention, either in the performance of their duties or in any other manner, will
be considered opportunities of, and be made available to us and the companies that they are affiliated with on an equal basis.
A breach of this requirement will be a breach of the fiduciary duties of the officer or director. If we or the companies with
which the officers and directors are affiliated both desire to take advantage of an opportunity, then said officers and directors
would abstain from negotiating and voting upon the opportunity. However, all directors may still individually take advantage of
opportunities if we should decline to do so. Except as set forth above, we have not adopted any other conflict of interest policy
with respect to such transactions.
Involvement
in certain legal proceedings
.
During
the past ten years, none of the Registrant’s directors and officers have been subject to any of the following events:
1.
A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent
or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a
general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he
was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing.
2.
A conviction in a criminal proceeding or being named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and
other minor offenses).
3.
Being the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent
jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:
i.Acting
as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage
transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of
the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director
or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any
conduct or practice in connection with such activity;
ii.Engaging
in any type of business practice; or
iii.Engaging
in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal
or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;
4.
Being the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority
barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in
paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;
5.
Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State
securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended,
or vacated.
6.
Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated
any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has
not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated.
7.
Being the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not
subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:
i.
Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or
ii.Any
law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent
injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal
or prohibition order; or
iii.Any
law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity.
8.
the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory
organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in
Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization
that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
The
Board of Directors includes Greg Sheller, Peter Wanner, and Gianni Caputo. Mr. Sheller and Peter Wanner are the Registrant’s
audit committee.
Code
of Ethics
The
Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics and has attached the Code of Ethics as an Exhibit in this filing., but has resolved to
adopt a formal Code of Ethics prior to the end of the fiscal 2014 year. The delay has resulted from management’s exclusive
concentration of their efforts on business development and the inability thereby to devote the time required to get a code of
ethics drafted, approved, and posted on its website.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Executive
officers and directors of the Company do not currently receive and are not accruing any compensation:
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the aggregate compensation awarded to, earned
by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our two most highly compensated officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer),
who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2015 , or the Named Executive Officers.
Name
and principal position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock
awards
|
|
|
Option
awards
|
|
|
Nonequity
incentive
plan
compensation
|
|
|
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
|
|
|
All
other
compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gregory
Sheller,
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
President
CEO
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter
Wanner,
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gianni
Caputo,
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Vice President
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
There
were no outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2015:
Options
Exercises and Stocks Vested
There
were no options exercised and stocks vested as at December 31, 2015.
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
There
were no grants of plan-based awards as at December 31, 2015.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
As
at December 31, 2015 the Company had no formalized deferred compensation plan.
Golden
Parachute Compensation
As
at December 31, 2015, the Company had no arrangements in place relating to the termination of employees.
Compensation
of Directors
The
Company, as of December 31, 2015, did not compensate Directors.
Pension
Benefits
As
of December 31, 2015, the Company had no pension or retirement plans.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
There
were no grants under any equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2015.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The
following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Registrant’s common stock as
of December 31, 2015 (99,865,228 common shares issued and outstanding) by (i) all stockholders known to the Registrant to be beneficial
owners of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; and (ii) all officers and directors of the Registrant, individually and
as a group (each person has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to all of the shares shown as beneficially owned by
them):
Title
of Class
|
|
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount
and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Percent
of Class
|
|
Common
|
|
Lubi Investments, Inc.(2)
1551 Second Street Sarasota, Florida 34236
|
|
|
85,462,000
|
|
|
|
85.58
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Gregory Sheller
1551
Second Street, Sarasota FL 34236
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Gianni Caputo
1551
Second Street Sarasota FL 34236
|
|
|
296,400
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Peter Wanner, 44 Greystone Crescent,
Georgetown, ON Canada L7G1 G9
|
|
|
104,320
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Directors and officers as a group
|
|
|
85,902,720
|
|
|
|
86.02
|
%
|
(1)
None of these security holders has the right to acquire any amount of shares within sixty days from options, warrants, rights,
conversion privilege, or similar obligations. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally
includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of our common stock which may be acquired upon exercise
of stock options or warrants which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within 60 days after the date indicated
in the table are deemed beneficially owned by the optionees. Subject to any applicable community property laws, the persons or
entities named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares indicated as beneficially owned
by them.
(2)
Lubi Investments Inc. was incorporated and is beneficially owned and controlled by Mr. Frank Cavicchia, of the same address.
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
The
following statements relating to the capital stock set forth the material terms of our securities; however, reference is made
to the more detailed provisions of, and such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the Articles of Incorporation
and the By-laws.
Common
Stock
The
holders of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders, including the
election of directors. Our stockholders are not entitled to cumulative voting rights, and, accordingly, the holders of a majority
of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect the entire board of directors if they choose to do so and, in that
event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any person to our board of directors.
Common
Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors,
in its discretion, from funds legally available there for and subject to prior dividend rights of holders of any shares of our
Preferred Stock which may be outstanding. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, subject to prior liquidation
rights of the holders of our Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of our Common Stock are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis
our remaining assets available for distribution. Holders of the Company’s Common Stock have no preemptive or other subscription
rights, and there are no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such shares. All outstanding
shares of the Company’s Common Stock are, fully paid and not liable to further calls or assessment by the Company.
Dividends
Dividends,
if any, will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and financial conditions. The payment
of dividends, if any, will be within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We presently intend to retain all earnings, if
any, for use in its business operations and accordingly, the Board of Directors does not anticipate declaring any dividends prior
to a business combination.
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
Under
the Nevada General Corporation Law, we can indemnify our directors and officers against liabilities they may incur in such capacities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Our amended and restated
articles of incorporation provide that, pursuant to Nevada law, our directors shall not be liable for monetary damages for breach
of the directors’ fiduciary duty of care to us and our stockholders. This provision in the articles of incorporation does
not eliminate the duty of care, and in appropriate circumstances equitable remedies such as injunctive or other forms of non-monetary
relief will remain available under Nevada law. In addition, each director will continue to be subject to liability for breach
of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional
misconduct or knowing violations of law, for any transaction from which the director directly or indirectly derived an improper
personal benefit, and for payment of dividends or approval of stock repurchases or redemptions that are unlawful under Nevada
law. The provision also does not affect a director’s responsibilities under any other law, such as the federal securities
laws or state or federal environmental laws.
Our
bylaws, as amended, provide for the indemnification of our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Nevada
General Corporation Law. We are not, however, required to indemnify any director or officer in connection with any (a) willful
misconduct, (b) willful neglect, or (c) gross negligence toward or on behalf of us in the performance of his or her duties as
a director or officer. We are required to advance, prior to the final disposition of any proceeding, promptly on request, all
expenses incurred by any director or officer in connection with that proceeding on receipt of any undertaking by or on behalf
of that director or officer to repay those amounts if it should be determined ultimately that he or she is not entitled to be
indemnified under our bylaws or otherwise.
We
have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, any indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933
is against public policy, as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Amendment
of our Bylaws
Our
bylaws may be adopted, amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding shares. Subject to applicable
law, our bylaws also may be adopted, amended or repealed by our Board of Directors.
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Except
as otherwise disclosed elsewhere herein, during the last two fiscal years there have not been any transactions between the Registrant
and any of its officers, directors, and five percent or greater shareholders.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
(1)
Audit Fees: Aggregate fees billed for each of the last two (2) fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal
accountant for the audits of the annual financial statements and reviews of financial statements included on Form 10-K:
2015:
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
2014:
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
(2)
Audit-Related Fees: Aggregate fees billed in each of the last two (2) fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal
accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audits or reviews of the financial statements and are not reported
previously.
(3)
Tax Fees: Aggregate fees billed in each of the last two (2) fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant
for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
(4)
All Other Fees: Aggregate fees billed in each of the last two (2) fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal
accountant, other than the services previously reported.
(5)
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures. The Board of Directors has not, to date, appointed an Audit Committee.
(6)
Not applicable.
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
1. NATURE
OF OPERATIONS AND PURCHASE OF TECHNOLOGY
First
National Energy Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on November 16, 2000, under
the name Capstone International Corporation. On March 28, 2004, the Company changed its name to First National Power Corporation.
On February 12, 2009, the Company relocated its charter to the State of Nevada and changed its name to First National Energy Corporation.
As part of its reorganization, the Company increased its authorized capital to 300 million common shares and effected a 100 for
1 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The accompanying consolidated financial statements
reflect all share data based on the 100 for 1 reverse common stock split.
The
Company’s business purpose is the provision of wind-driven solutions for power generation. Current projects for the Company
are the completion of power generation projects from supplemental wind generation technologies.
|
b)
|
Purchase
of Technology License
|
On
April 20, 2009, the Company entered into a preliminary letter of intent with Boreas Research Corporation (“Boreas”),
a Florida corporation, pursuant to which the Company would acquire a territorial license to certain rights in alternative energy
technology of Boreas, in exchange for a quantity of newly issued common shares of the Company. The letter of intent was superseded
by a Technology License and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) between the Company and Boreas that was consummated
on May 25, 2009 (the “Closing”), at which time the Company issued to the stockholders of Boreas 98,800,000 new restricted
and unregistered common shares of the Company and agreed to pay certain future royalties to Boreas from net revenues realized
by the Company from the technology license. The consideration issued in the transaction was determined as a result of arm’s-length
negotiations between the parties.
The
preliminary letter of intent was reported by the Company on form 8-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
on April 21, 2009, and the Agreement was annexed to an information statement on form 14-C filed with the SEC in preliminary and
definitive forms on April 22, 2009 and May 4, 2009, respectively. The definitive information statement was mailed to the Stockholders
of the Company on May 4, 2009.
The
Company obtained written consent to the Agreement and the transaction from the holders of 55.82% of its issued and outstanding
shares of common stock in lieu of a meeting of stockholders.
On
May 14, 2009, the Company and Boreas amended the Agreement by making and entering into a First Amendment of Technology License
and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”), pursuant to which (1) Boreas elected, as authorized by the Agreement,
to cause the new restricted and unregistered common shares of the Company due to Boreas at the Closing to be issued to the stockholders
of Boreas, and (2) the Company and Boreas agreed to reduce the number of new restricted and unregistered common shares of the
Company to be issued at the closing of the transaction, from 98,915,000 shares to 98,800,000 shares.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND
PURCHASE OF TECHNOLOGY (cont’d)
|
b)
|
Purchase
of Technology
License (cont’d)
|
In
exchange for the Company acquiring the technology license from Boreas at the Closing pursuant to the Agreement (as amended by
the Amendment), the Stockholders of Boreas received an aggregate of 98,800,000 new restricted and unregistered common shares of
the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the Boreas Stockholders now own 98.93% of the Company’s 99,865,228 outstanding
common shares. No finder’s fees were paid or consulting agreements entered into by the Company in connection with the transaction.
Prior
to the transaction, there were no material relationships between the Company and Boreas, between Boreas and the Company’s
affiliates, directors or officers, or between any associates of Boreas and the Company’s officers or directors. All of the
Company’s transaction liabilities were settled on or immediately following the Closing.
Upon
the Closing on May 25, 2009, the Company was no longer deemed to be a “shell company” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, the Company filed an amended current report
on Form 8-K/A with the SEC on May 26, 2009, setting forth the information that would be required if the Company were filing a
general form for registration of securities on Form 10 under the Exchange Act.
On
April 18, 2011, First National Energy Corporation (the “Company”) entered into a Novation Agreement (the “Novation”)
with all of the stockholders of Boreas revising the structure of the May 25, 2009 transaction by which the Company acquired a
territorial license to certain rights in alternative energy technology of Boreas, in exchange for a quantity of newly issued common
shares of the Company. The Novation amended the Technology License and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Original Agreement”)
to substitute the stockholders of Boreas as the licensor under the Original Agreement.
|
c)
|
Further
Purchase of Technology License
|
On
March 22, 2010, Pavana Power Corporation (“Pavana”), a Nevada corporation, the Company’s 99.9% owned subsidiary,
acquired an exclusive, territorial, 25-year license for the Republic of India (“India”), from Boreas, pursuant to
which the Company’s subsidiary acquired technology rights for India in the technology of Boreas that maximizes the energy
productivity of existing wind turbines by capturing energy that flows through and underneath existing wind turbine systems. The
consideration due from the Company’s subsidiary to Boreas for the license is a deferred cash payment of $600,000, and a
future royalty equal to 5% of the subsidiary’s “EBITDA” (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)
from exploitation of the acquired license.
The
transaction between related corporations was valued at the amount of the monetary consideration that was provided to Boreas.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
2. GOING
CONCERN
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America and applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the
normal course of business. However, the Company has not generated any revenues from its planned principal operations through December
31, 2015 and has recorded losses since inception, has negative working capital, has yet to achieve profitable operations and expects
further losses in the development of its business. There can be no assurance that the Company will have adequate capital resources
to fund planned operations or that any additional funds will be available to the Company when needed, or if available, will be
available on favorable terms in the amounts required by the Company. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Management
has plans to raise cash through debt offerings once the sales of the technologies begin. The personnel, facilities and equipment
required for successfully completing the business model have been identified but until the resources are available, have not been
acquired or engaged. In the period prior to the onset of operations, the Company will undertake to raise further cash through
further capital offerings. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital.
3. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
a)
|
Basis
of Consolidation
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First National Energy Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary First
National Energy (Canada) Corporation and its 99.99% owned subsidiary Pavana Power Corporation. All material inter-company amounts
have been eliminated.
These
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
As the precise determination of assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses, depends on future events, the preparation of
financial statements for any period necessarily involves the use of estimates. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates.
Significant estimates include the recording of accruals, the useful life of intangible assets, and the determination of the valuation
of allowances for deferred tax assets.
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and loans payable. Unless otherwise
noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, or credit risks arising from
these financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values due to the relatively
short period to maturity for these instruments.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
The
Company’s financial assets and liabilities are generally classified and measured as follows:
3. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
c)
Financial Instruments (cont’d)
Assets
/ Liabilities
|
|
Classification
|
|
Measurement
|
Cash
|
|
Held
for trading
|
|
Fair
value
|
Accounts
Payable and Accrued Liabilities
|
|
Other
liability
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Loan
payable to director
|
|
Other
liability
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Loan
payable to related party
|
|
Other
liability
|
|
Amortized
cost
|
The
Company follows ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820-10), which among other things, defines
fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability
category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-tier fair value hierarchy has been
established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
●
Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
at the measurement date.
●
Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset
or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated
life.
●
Level 3—Unobservable inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk
inherent in the inputs to the model.
Assets
and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are classified below based on the three fair value hierarchy
tiers described above:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
47,853
|
|
|
|
47,853
|
|
|
|
59,500
|
|
|
|
59,500
|
|
Loan payable to director
|
|
|
110,234
|
|
|
|
110,234
|
|
|
|
76,275
|
|
|
|
76,275
|
|
Loan payable to related party
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
Cash
has been measured using Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
3.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
c)
Financial Instruments (cont’d)
Foreign
exchange risk:
The
Company’s subsidiary conducts its opening activities in Canadian dollars. The Company is therefore subject to gains or losses
due to fluctuations in Canadian currency relative to the US dollar. The Company has no exposure to this given its limited activity
and assets through the year.
Liquidity
risk:
The
Company monitors its liquidity position regularly to assess whether it has the funds necessary to fulfill planned commitments
on its alternative energy technology or viable options are available to fund such commitments from new equity issuance or alternative
sources such as debt financing. However, as a development stage company and without significant internally generated cash flow,
there are inherent liquidity risks, including the possibility that additional financing may not be available to the Company, or
that actual development expenditures may exceed those planned. The current uncertainty in global markets could have an impact
on the Company’s future ability to access capital on terms that are acceptable to the Company. The company has so far been
able to raise the required financing to meet its obligations on time. The Company has no exposure to this given its limited activity
through the year.
The
Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC 740-10-25,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred
tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets likely. The Company did not incur any material impact to
its financial condition or results of operations due to the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
tax or expected to be taken in a tax return.
Deferred
income taxes are established for all temporary differences between the book and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. In addition,
deferred tax balances must reflect tax rates expected to be in effect in years in which the temporary differences reverse. Canadian
taxes are calculated at rates expected to be in effect in Canada. U.S. deferred tax liabilities are not recognized on profits
that are expected to be permanently reinvested in Canada and thus not considered available for distribution to the parent company.
It is not practicable to determine our unrecognized deferred tax liability for temporary differences related to investments in
foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. Net operating loss carry-forwards and other deferred tax assets
are reviewed annually for recoverability, and, if necessary, are recorded net of a valuation allowance. Note 7 contains additional
discussion regarding income taxes.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
3.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
Comprehensive
loss includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. Examples of items to be included in comprehensive
loss, which are excluded from net loss, include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
securities.
Intangible
assets include the technology licenses which are amortized over the estimated useful life of 10 years on a straight line basis.
However, since these licenses were written to nominal value, no amortization was recognized during the year for accounting purposes.
|
g)
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
Long-lived
assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying
amounts may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet date whether events and circumstances have occurred
that indicate possible impairment. If there are indications of impairment, the Company uses future undiscounted cash flows of
the related asset or asset group over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable. In the event such cash
flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded asset values, the assets are written down to their estimated fair
value.
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus common stock
equivalents (if dilutive). As of December 31, 2015, there were no common stock equivalents.
|
i)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
Company accounts for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees using
the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever
is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined
on the earlier of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services. As of December 31,
2015, there was $nil of unrecognized expense related to stock-based compensation, and stock based compensation expense relating
to all employees and non-employees were $nil for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
3.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
The
parent Company maintains its books and records in U.S. dollars which is its functional and reporting currency. One of the Company’s
operating subsidiary is a foreign private company and maintains its books in Canadian dollars (the functional currency). The subsidiary’s
financial statements are converted to US dollars for consolidation purposes. The translation method used is the current rate method,
where the functional currency is the foreign currency. Under the current rate method all assets and liabilities are translated
at the current rate, stockholders’ equity are translated at historical rates and revenues and expenses are translated at
average rates for the year.
Due
to the fact that items in the financial statements are being translated at different rates according to their nature, a translation
adjustment is created. This translation adjustment has been included in Other Comprehensive Loss.
|
k)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
|
(i)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements – Adopted
|
As
of December 31, 2015, the company has evaluated and adopted the following accounting pronouncements:
In
April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic
360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”), which
includes amendments that change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and require additional disclosures about
discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented
as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial
results. Additionally, ASU 2014-08 requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement
users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations.
|
(ii)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements – Not yet effective
|
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which requires
an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services
to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The
new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted.
The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued
ASU 2015-14, the amendments in ASU 2015-14 defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business
entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier
application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods
within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
3.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
|
k)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements (cont’d)
|
In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure
of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”), which provides guidance
on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management
to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the
date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if “conditions or events raise substantial
doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.” ASU 2014-15 applies to all entities and is effective
for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company
is currently assessing the impact of this guidance.
On
January 9, 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Income Statement- Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income
Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. The ASU eliminates the concept of extraordinary items
and the uncertainty in determining when an item is both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence. Presently, an event or
transaction is presumed to be ordinary activity unless evidence supports the transaction as unusual in nature and infrequent in
occurrence. If an event or transaction is determined to be unusual and infrequent, it is deemed to be extraordinary, and is required
to be segregated from the results of ordinary operations on the face of the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing
operations, along with other financial statement disclosures. ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from the
income statement presentation. Eliminating this concept removes the uncertainty in determining when a transaction is both unusual
in nature and infrequent in occurrence. However, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature
OR occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently
occurring. This ASU aligns US GAAP with IAS 1, which prohibits presentation and disclosure of extraordinary items. This ASU is
effective for years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact
of this guidance.
In
November 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes which requires
that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The amendment takes effect
for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption available. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of the standard on the consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which requires that equity investments, except for those accounted
for under the equity method or those that result in consolidation of the investee, be measured at fair value, with subsequent
changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily
determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly
transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. ASU 2016-01 also impacts the presentation and disclosure
requirements for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only for certain provisions.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of the standard on the consolidated financial statements.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
|
l)
|
Non-controlling
Interest
|
Non-controlling
interests in the Company’s subsidiaries are recorded in accordance with the provisions of ASC 810 and are reported as a
component of equity, separate from the parent’s equity. Purchase or sale of equity interests that do not result in a change
of control are accounted for as equity transactions. Results of operations attributable to the non-controlling interest are included
in our consolidated results of operations and, upon loss of control, the interest sold, as well as interest retained, if any,
will be reported at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.
4.
LICENSES FOR TECHNOLOGY
Licenses
are recorded at carrying amount. No amortization was recorded during the year.
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Net
Book Value
|
|
|
Net
Book Value
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
North American
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology License
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indian Technology
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
License
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
5.
LOAN PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTY
On
March 22, 2010, the Company acquired an exclusive territorial 25 year Supplemental Wind Energy Generator (“SWEG”)
Technology license for the Republic of India (“India”), from Boreas. The stockholders of Boreas hold a controlling
interest in the Company through their controlling interest in First National Energy Corporation. The technology of Boreas maximizes
the energy productivity of existing wind turbines by capturing energy that flows through and underneath existing wind turbine
systems. The consideration due from the Company to Boreas for the license was a deferred cash payment of $600,000, and a future
royalty equal to 5% of the subsidiary’s “EBITDA” (revenues before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)
from exploitation of the acquired license.
On
November 8, 2010, the subsidiary paid Boreas $60,000 as a payment due under the India technology license agreement, leaving a
balance of cash consideration due of $540,000. The remaining debt is non-interest bearing and is due on demand.
6.
CAPITAL STOCK
a)
Authorized
300,000,000
Common shares, $0.001 per value
b)
Issued
99,865,228
Common shares (2014: 99,865,228 Common shares)
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
7.
INCOME TAXES
The
reconciliation of income taxes at statutory income tax rates to the income tax expense is as follows. The losses incurred by the
wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary are insignificant, hence no separate disclosure has been made:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(22,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,092
|
)
|
Applicable statutory tax rate
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Income tax recovery at statutory rate
|
|
|
(7,689
|
)
|
|
|
(4,111
|
)
|
Timing difference
|
|
|
(43,420
|
)
|
|
|
(43,420
|
)
|
Tax loss benefit
not recognized
|
|
|
51,109
|
|
|
|
47,531
|
|
Income tax -
current and deferred
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Total
income tax (expense) benefit differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. Federal statutory tax rates and estimated
state rates to pre-tax income for the years as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Statutory rate - benefit
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
State taxes,
net of federal benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Effective rate
- benefit
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
The
tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities
are as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Deferred tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating losses available
to offset future income taxes
|
|
$
|
576,463
|
|
|
$
|
525,354
|
|
Tax basis of
license in excess of accounting basis
|
|
|
363,084
|
|
|
|
406,504
|
|
|
|
|
939,547
|
|
|
|
931,858
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(939,547
|
)
|
|
|
(931,858
|
)
|
Net deferred
tax asset
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Realization
of the deferred tax asset also depend on the Company’s ability to generate taxable income within the carryforward period.
Due to uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to generate taxable income sufficient to realize all of its deferred
tax assets, the Company has recorded 100% valuation allowances.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
7.
INCOME TAXES (cont’d)
As
at December 31, 2015, the company has non-capital losses for tax purposes which can be applied against future taxable income.
These losses expire as follows:
2035
|
|
|
150,320
|
|
2034
|
|
|
139,799
|
|
2033
|
|
|
143,054
|
|
2032
|
|
|
175,273
|
|
2031
|
|
|
183,949
|
|
2030
|
|
|
187,150
|
|
2029
|
|
|
131,602
|
|
2028
|
|
|
78,145
|
|
2027
|
|
|
30,760
|
|
2026
|
|
|
32,912
|
|
2025
|
|
|
208,887
|
|
2024
|
|
|
233,627
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,695,478
|
|
8.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions
with related parties are incurred in the normal course of business and are measured at the exchange amount which is the amount
of consideration established by and agreed to by the related parties.
In
2010, the Company’s majority owned subsidiary Pavana Power Corporation, purchased the Indian license to the SWEG technology
from Boreas, which is related by virtue of common control. (see Note 1 (c)).
A
director of the Company has advanced monies to the Company to pay certain expenses. The advances have no interest rate and is
due on demand. The amount owing to the director was $110,234 ($76,275 in 2014).
9.
SEGMENT DISCLOSURE
The
Company, after reviewing its reporting systems, has determined that it has one reportable segment and geographic segment. The
Company’s operations are all related to the provision of wind-driven solutions for power generation. All assets of the business
are located the United States of America.
10.
COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCY
Pursuant
to Note 1 (c), under the Technology License purchased by Pavana, the Company has a commitment for royalties at the rate of 5%
of Pavana’s EBITDA derived using this technology.
First
National Energy Corporation
(Formerly
First National Power Corporation)
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2015 and 2014
(Amounts
expressed in US Dollars)
11.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The
Company’s capital management objective is to secure the ability to continue as a going concern and to optimize the cost
of capital in order to enhance value to shareholders. As part of this objective the Company seeks to maintain access to loan and
capital markets at all times. The Board of Directors reviews the capital structure of the Group on a regular basis.
Capital
structure and debt capacity are taken into account when deciding new investments. Practical tools to manage capital include application
of dividend policy, share buybacks and share issuances. Debt capital is managed considering the requirement to secure liquidity
and the capability to refinance maturing debt. The Group’s internal capital structure is reviewed on a regular basis with
an aim to optimize the structure e.g. by applying internal dividends and equity adjustments. Net investment in foreign entities
is monitored and the Company has the intent to hedge related translation risk.
On
December 31, 2015, the Company had no interest-bearing debt.
12. SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
2016
Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan
|
●
|
The
Registrant maintained a stock incentive plan, entitled “2005 Stock Incentive Plan for Employees and Consultants”
and had registered 3 million of its common shares (1 million on February 25, 2005 and 2 million on April 11, 2005) for issuance
under such stock incentive plan. Under this plan, 830,000 shares have been issued before the plan expired in 2015. All options
pursuant to this plan have expired.
|
In
February 2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. 5,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved pursuant
to the Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
Acquisition
of technology
|
●
|
On
February 3, 2016, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Serge Bolotov and affiliates. Serge Bolotov
designed, patented, developed, and manufactured the VAWT/VRTB/Bolotov Rotor wind turbine and agreed to transfer all technical
and intellectual related property related to the VAWT/VRTB/Bolotov Rotor wind turbine to the Company. In addition, Serge Bolotov
agreed to assign all patents, designs, drawings, blueprints, plans, images, promotional material, websites, and anything else
that could be useful in marketing and distributing the VRTB technology (collectively, the “Assets”).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
As
compensation for the Assets, Serge Bolotov will be paid ten percent (10%) of the Company profits arising from the Assets and
realized by the Company, provided that Serge Bolotov continues to consult with the Company. In addition, Serge Bolotov will
receive a signing bonus of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) solely derived from Eleven percent (11%) of the initial profits
realized by the Company from the Assets. Further, Serge Bolotov will be appointed as a member of the Board of Directors and
will be issued One Hundred Thousand shares of Company common stock upon such appointment. As of the date of this filing, Mr.
Bolotov has not been appointed. Subsequently, Serge Bolotov will consult with the Company and, upon the Company receiving
sufficient funding, Serge Bolotov will receive a consulting fee of Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000 Canadian) monthly as well
research and development facility with support staff.
|
|
|
|
|
12. SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS (cont’d)
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
February 5, 2016, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Company and Serge Bolotov agreed
to accept the Memorandum of Understanding as binding and the Board of Directors of the Company ratified the Memorandum of
Understanding as binding on February 9, 2016.
|