Notes to the Financial Statements
1.
ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Orofino Gold Corp. ("Orofino" or the "Company") was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 12, 2005. Orofino started operations on September 1, 2007 under the "Clean 'N Shine" name operating as a full service automotive car wash, cleaning, detailing, and polishing business generating some revenues. With limited opportunities available the Company decided to look at mineral resources as an alternative business. On May 20, 2009, the Company completed a forward stock split of its common stock on a ratio of six shares for every one share of the Company. The record date of the forward stock split was May 15, 2009, the payment date of the forward split was May 19, 2009, and the ex-dividend date of the forward split was May 20, 2009. As a result of the forward split, the post forward split number off issued and outstanding shares was 60,000,000. On December 5, 2009, the Company passed a resolution to change its name from SNT Cleaning Inc. to Orofino Gold Corp.
The Company is an exploration stage gold mining company with its efforts initially focused on what it believes to be under-explored mineral concessions and larger scale development of existing high grade artisanal mining operations. The Company has achieved no operating revenues to date.
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). A summary of the significant accounting policies are as follows:
Use of estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Comprehensive income
The Company has adopted ASC Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income." Comprehensive income is comprised of net income (loss) and all changes to stockholders' equity (deficit), except those related to investments by stockholders, changes in paid-in capital and distribution to owners. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 220 "Comprehensive Income," comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting stockholder's equity that are excluded from net income, such as unrealized gains and losses on investments available for sale, foreign currency translation gains and losses and minimum pension liability. Since inception other comprehensive income has consisted of translation gains and losses.
Mineral properties
All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Costs of acquisition and option costs of mineral rights are capitalized upon acquisition. Mine development costs incurred to develop new ore deposits, to expand the capacity of mines or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of production are also capitalized once proven and probable reserves exist, and the property is determined to be a commercially mineable property. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. If the Company does not continue with exploration after the completion of the feasibility study, the cost of mineral rights will be expensed at that time. Costs of abandoned projects, including related property and equipment costs, are charged to mining costs. To determine if these costs are in excess of their recoverable amount, periodic evaluations of the carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property and equipment costs are performed. These evaluations are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.
7
Orofino Gold Corp.
Notes to the Financial Statements
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or operating results, but did expand certain disclosures. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity's own assumptions.
The Company did not have any Level 2 or Level 3 assets or liabilities as of August 31, 2012.
The Company discloses the estimated fair values for all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. As of the date of the financial statements, the fair value short-term financial instruments including prepaid, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates book value due to their short-term duration.
Basic and diluted loss per share
Basic net earnings (loss) per common share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.
Income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
The Company's functional currency is US dollars. Foreign currency balances are translated into US dollars as follows: Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary assets are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at their acquisition, unless such assets are carried at market or nominal value, in which case they are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Foreign exchange gains and losses in the period are included in operations. The assets and liabilities arising from these operations are translated at current exchange rates and related revenues and expenses at the exchange rates in effect at the time the revenue or expense is incurred. Resulting translation adjustments, if material, are accumulated as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the statement of stockholders 'deficit while foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in operations.
8
Orofino Gold Corp.
Notes to the Financial Statements
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Convertible debt
The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt and equity instruments to determine whether there are conversion features or embedded derivative instruments including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. In circumstances where the convertible instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including conversion options that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single compound instrument. Also, in connection with the sale of convertible debt and equity instruments, the Company may issue free standing warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity. When convertible debt or equity instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcated and accounted for separately, the total proceeds allocated to the convertible host instruments are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the convertible instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instruments being recorded at a discount from their face amount. When the Company issues debt securities, which bear interest at rates that are lower than market rates, the Company recognizes a discount, which is offset against the carrying value of the debt. Such discount from the face value of the debt, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to income. In addition, certain conversion features are recognized as beneficial conversion features to the extent the conversion price as defined in the convertible note is less than the closing stock price on the issuance of the convertible notes. Fees incurred in the placement of the convertible notes are deferred and recognized over the life of the debt agreement as an adjustment to interest expense using the interest method.
New Accounting Standards
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs," ("ASU 2011-04"). This standard results in a common requirement between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have any effect on our financial position and results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income." ASU 2011-05 will require companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. ASU 2011-05 does not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income, how such items are measured or when they must be reclassified to net income. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for the first interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Further, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, "Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05." The Company believes the adoption of this guidance concerns disclosure only and will not have a material impact on its financial statements.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards could have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements. As new accounting pronouncements are issued, the Company will adopt those that are applicable under the circumstances. A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard setting organizations and various regulatory agencies. Due to the tentative and preliminary nature of those proposed standards, management has not determined whether implementation of such proposed standards would be material to our financial statements.
9
Orofino Gold Corp.
Notes to the Financial Statements
3.
GOING CONCERN
In the course of the Company's exploration activities, the Company has sustained losses and expects such losses to continue unless and until the Company can achieve net operating revenues. Future issuances of the Company's equity or debt securities will be required in order for the Company to continue to finance its operations and continue as a going concern. The Company currently has no revenue from operations and has incurred cumulative net losses of $2,611,208 since its inception. The Company's financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and the Company's financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability or classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
4.
PREPAID EXPENSE
The Company's attorney received a retainer of $25,000 of which $19,387 has been expensed leaving a balance of $5,613 for future work.
5.
MINERAL PROPERTIES
On April 6, 2010, the Company counter-signed an offer for joint venture-earn-in to option several mining concessions in the Department of Bolivar, Republic of Colombia. Pursuant to various stages of due diligence it was determined that the best way of obtaining title to the various target mineral properties was to enter into new agreements. On November 15, 2010 the Company entered into four agreements. The terms of the new agreements allowed for the Company to acquire an 80% interest in four mining concessions. The agreements were amended on April 18, 2011. However the Company was unable to make the October 1, 2011 payment under the amended formula. On March 1, 2012 the Company amended the acquisition agreements again on a basis of reducing the number of properties from 4 to 2 and reducing the payment schedule. A summary of the terms and ongoing payment obligations are as follows:
Cash payments:
1. $5,000 as an initial option payment;
2. $100,000 on or before January 31, 2011 (paid);
3. $150,000 on or before March 31, 2011 (amended), (paid), (previously February 28, 2011);
4. $50,000 on April 18, 2011 (amended), (paid) (previously $800,000 on or before March 31, 2011);
5. $450,000 every six months starting on July 1, 2012 (previously $900,000 every six months starting October 1, 2011, of which the Company may pay one-half of issuing restricted common shares to the vendor at a 10-day average trading price per amendment on April 18, 2011), (previously $800,000 every six months thereafter starting on June 1, 2011).
Share issuances:
1.
24 million shares on or before March 31, 2011 (issued in March 2011)
2.
10 million shares on or before March 31, 2012, (discontinued under March 1, 2012 amendment) and
3.
10 million shares on or before December 31, 2012 (discontinued under March 1, 2012 amendment).
The Company paid a total of $350,000 to independent third parties for consulting services in relation to the signing of the option agreements. The Company incurred a cost of $100,000 paid to a person in the United States for the initial introduction of the mineral concessions and $250,000 paid to some concession holders as the initial payments to pursue an option agreement.
6.
LOANS PAYABLE
The Company has loans payable to various independent third parties on the basis of being unsecured, payable on demand and bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2012
|
|
May 31, 2012
|
|
$
|
1,149,871
|
$
|
1,438,997
|
10
Orofino Gold Corp.
Notes to the Financial Statements
7.
CONVERTIBLE LOANS
On January 18, 2011 the Company concluded agreements to convert a portion of loans payable into 10% convertible promissory notes on the basis that the principal balance and unpaid interest at the rate of 10% per annum be convertible into shares of the Company's restricted common stock at the conversion price of $0.0075 per share. The holder is limited to convert no more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding common stock at the time of conversion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
2012
|
|
May 31,
2012
|
|
Balance, at beginning of period
|
$
|
449,631
|
$
|
424,088
|
|
Convertible debt additions
|
|
325,470
|
|
-
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
12,326
|
|
49,918
|
|
|
|
787,427
|
|
474,006
|
|
Converted into shares
|
|
(101,250)
|
|
(24,375)
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
$
|
686,177
|
$
|
449,631
|
|
Conversion price
|
$
|
0.0075
|
$
|
0.0075
|
|
Number of shares issuable
|
|
91,490,267
|
|
59,950,800
|
8.
CAPITAL STOCK
Common Stock
The company issued to the founders 10,000,000 common shares of stock for $1,000. On May 20, 2009, the Company completed a 6-for-1 forward stock split (the Forward Split") of the Company's common stock in the form of a stock dividend. All share and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Forward Split. The par value of the Company's common stock was unchanged by the Forward Split.
On October 14, 2010, the Company increased its total authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 to 250,000,000, par value $0.001 per share.
On June 10, 2010 the Company issued 600,000 restricted shares to two parties for services at a value of $0.13 per share.
On August 17, 2010 the Company issued 3,600,000 restricted shares at $0.01 each pursuant to an assignment of debt dated October 31, 2009.
On August 18, 2010 the Company issued 6,000,000 restricted shares at $0.01 each pursuant to the retirement of debt as at February 17, 2010.
On March 8, 2011 the Company issued 24,000,000 restricted shares at $0.015 each pursuant to the acquisition of mineral properties.
On March 8, 2011 the Company issued 46,450,000 restricted shares at $0.0075 each to fourteen parties pursuant to the exercise of convertible debt.
On March 28, 2011 the Company issued 5,000,000 warrants at $0.10 each for cash consideration of $500,000. The warrants may be exercised to purchase 5,000,000 shares at $1.00 each until December 31, 2012 or may be surrendered for the receipt of 2,500,000 restricted shares.
On August 23, 2011 the Company issued 550,000 restricted shares at $0.0075 each to two parties pursuant to the exercise of convertible debt.
11
Orofino Gold Corp.
Notes to the Financial Statements
8.
CAPITAL STOCK continued
Warrants
(i) Warrant transactions are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
Weighted
|
year ended
|
Weighted
|
|
|
August 31,
|
average
|
May 31,
|
average
|
|
|
2012
|
exercise price
|
2012
|
exercise price
|
|
Balance
|
5,000,000
|
$ 1.00
|
5,000,000
|
$ 1.00
|
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Balance
|
5,000,000
|
$ 1.00
|
5,000,000
|
$ 1.00
|
At August 31, 2012 the Company has outstanding warrants, exercisable as follows:
|
|
|
|
Number
|
Exercise Price
|
Expiry Date
|
|
5,000,000
|
$ 1.00
|
December 31, 2012
|
The warrants may be exercised to purchase 5,000,000 shares at $1.00 each until December 31, 2012 or may be surrendered for the receipt of 2,500,000 restricted shares.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following expenses were incurred with directors and officers of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
Management fees
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
17,000
|
|
Total
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
17,000
|
As at August 31, 2012 accounts payable included $22,000 (May 31, 2011 - $40,000) owing to officers and directors.
The amounts charged to the Company for the services provided have been determined by negotiation among the parties. These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange amount which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.
12
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.
Forward Looking Statements
This section of this report includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of our report. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions. We are a development stage company and have not developed significant revenue to date to attain profitability.
Results of Operations
We are still in the development stage and have generated minimum revenues to date.
We incurred operating expenses of $99,266 for the three months ended August 31, 2012. These expenses consisted of general operating expenses and professional fees incurred in connection with the day to day operation of our business and the preparation and filing of our periodic reports and for year ends. Our net loss for the three months ending August 31, 2012 was $99,266. The main expense is mineral exploration expense of $51,137. The Company has performed due diligence on the mineral titles and is satisfied that proper ownership has been established.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash balance at August 31, 2012 was $nil with outstanding liabilities of $2,107,518. Management believes our current cash balance will be unable to sustain operations for the next 12 months. We will be forced to raise additional funds by issuing new debt or equity securities or otherwise. If we fail to raise sufficient capital when needed, we will not be able to complete our business plan. We are a developing company and our revenue has not been sufficient to attain profitability.
A total of 13,500,000 shares were issued at a fair value of $101,250 to reduce debt.
The Company has been funded by way of loans at an annual rate of interest of 10%. On January 18, 2011 the Company issued convertible debentures to debt holders to issue shares at $0.0075 per share. A total of some 100,342,933 shares are issuable at $0.0075 each to repay debt of some $752,572. As at May 31, 2011 49,950,000 shares have been issued to reduce debt of $307,125. A total of $623 010 being loans payable at July 18, 2010 was converted and the balance of $129,562 was loans payable to January 18, 2011. Pursuant to the terms of the convertible notes any shares issued will be restricted shares according to the following paragraphs included in the terms of the agreement:
“Restricted Securities. This Note is, and the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion hereof shall be, "restricted securities" within the meaning of SEC Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"). Holder acknowledges and agrees that it is acquiring this Note and, upon conversion, the shares of Common Stock, without a view to the public distribution or resale of the Note or such shares in violation of applicable federal or state securities laws.
No Registration. This Note has not been, and the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion hereof will not be, registered under the 1933 Act or under the securities laws of any other jurisdiction; and therefore, Holder must be able to hold the Note or the shares indefinitely without any transfer, sale or other disposition, unless they are subsequently registered under the 1933 Act and under the securities laws of other applicable jurisdictions or, in the opinion of counsel to the Company, registration is not required under such Act or laws as the result of an available exemption from registration.”
13
Based on our current operating plan, we do not expect to generate revenue that is sufficient to cover our expenses for at least the next year. In addition, we do not have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to execute our operations for the next year. We will need to obtain additional financing to operate our business for the next twelve months. We will raise the capital necessary to fund our business through a private placement and public offering of our common stock. Additional financing, whether through public or private equity or debt financing, arrangements with shareholders or other sources to fund operations, may not be available, or if available, may be on terms unacceptable to us. Our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital. If we issue additional equity securities to raise funds, the ownership percentage of our existing shareholders would be reduced. New investors may demand rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. Debt incurred by us would be senior to equity in the ability of debt holders to make claims on our assets. The terms of any debt issued could impose restrictions on our operations. If adequate funds are not available to satisfy either short or long-term capital requirements, our operations and liquidity could be materially adversely affected and we could be forced to cease operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
Inflation.
In the opinion of management, inflation has not had a material effect on our operations.
Consultants.
The Company currently has no stock option plan.
Research and Development Expenditures
We have not incurred any research or development expenditures since our incorporation.
Patents and Trademarks.
We do not own, either legally or beneficially, any patent or trademark.
Holders of Our Common Stock.
As of August 31, 2012, we had approximately 274 stockholder(s) of record holding 157,400,000 shares of our common stock.
Dividends.
There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:
1. We would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or
2. Our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.
We have not declared any dividends and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act"), as of August 31, 2012, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer), who concluded, that because of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting ("ICFR") described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of August 31, 2012.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is also responsible for establishing ICFR as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the 1934 Act. Our ICFR are intended to be designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our ICFR are expected to include those policies and procedures that management believes are necessary that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, and accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect of financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, effective internal control at a point in time may become ineffective in future periods because of changes in conditions or due to deterioration in the degree of compliance with our established policies and procedures.
As of August 31, 2012, management assessed the effectiveness of our ICFR based on the criteria for effective ICFR established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments by smaller reporting companies and non-accelerated filers.
Based on that assessment, management concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective as of August 31, 2012 and that material weaknesses in ICFR existed as more fully described below.
As defined by Auditing Standard No. 5, "An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements and Related Independence Rule and Conforming Amendments," established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), a material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies that results more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following control deficiencies that represent material weaknesses as of August 31, 2012:
(1) Lack of an independent audit committee. Although we have an audit committee it is not comprised solely of independent directors. We may establish an audit committee comprised solely of independent directors when we have sufficient capital resources and working capital to attract qualified independent directors and to maintain such a committee.
15
(2) Inadequate staffing and supervision within our bookkeeping operations. The relatively small number of people who are responsible for bookkeeping functions prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the ultimate identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews which may result in a failure to detect errors in spreadsheets, calculations, or assumptions used to compile the financial statements and related disclosures as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(3) Ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.
Our management determined that these deficiencies constituted material weaknesses. Due to a lack of financial and personnel resources, we are not able to, and do not intend to, immediately take any action to remediate these material weaknesses. We will not be able to do so until we acquire sufficient financing and staff to do so. We will implement further controls as circumstances, cash flow, and working capital permit. Notwithstanding the assessment that our ICFR was not effective and that there were material weaknesses as identified in this report, we believe that our consolidated financial statements contained in our Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2012, fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the years covered thereby in all material respects.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended August 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
